|
|
||||||||
Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
+, F4/80+ and
CD11c+ cells. The expression of MHC class II on the surface
of peritoneal cells was also enhanced. Furthermore, peritoneal cells
from archaeosome-injected mice strongly enhanced allo-T cell
proliferation and cytokine production. The ability of
archaeosome-treated APCs to stimulate T cells was restricted to
Mac1
high, B220- cells in the peritoneum.
These Mac1
high cells in the presence of GM-CSF gave rise
to both F4/80+ (macrophage) and CD11c+
(dendritic) populations. Overall, the activation of APCs correlated to
the ability of archaeosomes to induce strong humoral, T helper, and CTL
responses to entrapped Ag. Thus, the recruitment and activation of
professional APCs by archaeosomes constitutes an efficient
self-adjuvanting process for induction of Ag-specific responses to
encapsulated Ags. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Efficient immune stimulation occurs when Ags are presented by potent APC populations. Primarily dendritic cells (DCs)3 and macrophages serve this function (3, 4, 5). These professional APCs effectively take up foreign Ags, and process and present antigenic peptides in the context of MHC molecules. Recognition of the MHC-Ag complex by the TCR triggers T cell activation. However, besides recognition of foreign Ags, T cells require additional signals to become fully active (6). These key signals are augmented by non-Ag-specific costimulatory molecules on APC surfaces interacting with their receptors on T cells (e.g., B7 with CD28). T cell activation results in cytokine production and subsequent clonal expansion of Ag-specific effectors. Thus, to induce strong adaptive T cell responses, adjuvants that effectively activate professional APCs may be most suitable for vaccines.
Liposomes primarily composed of natural or synthetic ester phospholipids (conventional liposomes) have been explored as possible Ag carriers, and a liposome-based vaccine against hepatitis A has been licensed for human use (7). Although liposomes are phagocytosed by macrophages and are used as carrier systems for targeting Ags to APCs (8), codelivery of other immunostimulating agents such as lipid A, cholera toxin, or cytokines is required for potentiation of strong adjuvant activity (9, 10, 11).
Archaea consist of organisms distinct from eubacterial and eukaryotic cells due in part to their unique, polar lipid structures (12, 13). The distinct structures of archaeal lipids confer considerable stability to liposomes (archaeosomes) formulated from the total polar lipids (TPL) of the different archaea (14) or from purified lipid subfractions (15). In earlier studies we reported archaeosomes to be superior adjuvants, capable of facilitating strong, long-lasting Ab, CD4+ T helper and CD8+ CTL responses to entrapped proteins (16, 17, 18). In this study we elucidate the mechanism(s) for the strong adjuvant activity of archaeosomes by evaluating their immunostimulating effects on APCs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methanobrevibacter smithii ALI (DSM 2375), was
cultivated in a 75-l fermenter as described previously
(19). Total lipids were extracted from frozen cell pastes,
and the TPL were collected as the acetone-insoluble fraction
(19). Archaeosomes were prepared from the TPL obtained
from the human gut archaeon isolate, M. smithii.
L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine,
L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol, and
cholesterol were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) for the
preparation of conventional liposomes, defined herein as
L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine:L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol:cholesterol
(1.8/0.2/1.5 molar ratio) vesicles. Vesicles (archaeosomes and
conventional liposomes) were prepared by pressure extrusion at 23°C
(20). Briefly, 20 mg of dried lipid was hydrated in 1 ml
of PBS (10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.14, containing 160 mM NaCl) in
either the presence or the absence of the protein Ag (10 mg/ml). After
18-h hydration, the multilamellar vesicles obtained were pressure
extruded several times using a Liposofast apparatus containing two
stacked 400-nm polycarbonate filters (Avestin, Ottawa, Canada). Ag that
was not associated with the vesicles was removed by ultracentrifugation
(200,000 x gmax for 30 min,
three times) from 7-ml volumes of PBS, followed by washing pellets
twice. Mean vesicle diameters were determined by number-weighted
Gaussian size distributions using a particle sizer (model 370; Nicomp,
Santa Barbara, CA). The vesicle sizes ranged from 96263 nm. The
amount of protein incorporated into the vesicles was estimated by the
SDS Lowry method, after lipid removal (21) and comparison
with standard curves constructed for the relevant protein. The ratio of
protein to lipid (micrograms per milligram) is based on the salt-free
dry weights of the vesicles.
Cell lines
The J774A.1 (macrophage) cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 8% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT) and 10 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies). EG.7, a subclone of EL-4 stably transfected with the gene encoding OVA (22), was also obtained from American Type Culture Collection and maintained in RPMI plus 8% FBS additionally containing 400 µg/ml G418 (Rose Scientific, Edmonton, Canada). Wehi 16413 cells were obtained from Dr. Tim Mosmann (University of Rochester, Rochester, NY) and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 8% FBS. All cells were cultured at 37°C under 8% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.
Generation of bone marrow-derived DCs
Bone marrow was flushed from the femurs and tibias of one to three naive BALB/c mice, and single-cell suspensions were made by passing them through Falcon 2360 cell strainers (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) using a sterile 1-ml syringe plunger. Cells were counted, resuspended at 1 x 106 cells/ml in RMPI medium supplemented with 8% FBS and 5 ng/ml of recombinant murine GM-CSF (ID Laboratories, London, Canada) in a Falcon tissue culture flask (Becton Dickinson), and cultured for 68 days at 37°C in 8% CO2. Nonadherent cells were removed on days 2 and 4 of culture, and fresh RPMI plus 8% FBS containing GM-CSF was added. On the day of the experiment (days 68), nonadherent cells were harvested, washed, counted, and used. The DC preparations were consistently >80% CD11c+ by flow cytometry.
In vitro activation of APCs
J774A.1 macrophage cells or bone marrow-derived DCs were incubated in vitro with 25 µg/ml of empty archaeosomes or conventional liposomes in 24-well tissue culture plates (Falcon) at the appropriate cell densities stated in the figure legends. Alternatively, cells were activated with 10 µg/ml LPS (Escherichia coli). After 24 h at 37°C in 8% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere, the cells were recovered and stained for various cell surface markers or were used as APCs (after irradiation at 2500 rad) in T cell proliferation assays.
For measurement of cytokine production by APCs, J774A.1 or bone marrow-derived DCs (1 x 105) were cultured in vitro with empty archaeosomes or conventional liposomes, in 96-well tissue culture plates. Supernatants were collected at 48 h, and TNF production was measured by a bioassay using Wehi 16413 cells (23).
Mice
Inbred, pathogen-free, 6- to 8-wk-old female BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (St. Constant, Canada). C3H/HeJ mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were maintained in the animal facility of the Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council, in accordance with guidelines from the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
Archaeosome injections and peritoneal exudate preparations
BALB/c or C3H/HeJ mice were injected i.p. with empty archaeosomes (1 mg of lipid/injection). At various time points after injection, mice were euthanized, and peritoneal exudate cells were recovered by performing peritoneal lavage with 10 ml of warm RPMI plus 8% FBS medium. Erythrocytes were then selectively lysed with Tris-buffered ammonium chloride, pH 7.2 (Sigma). The cells were washed, resuspended in RPMI plus 8% FBS, counted, and analyzed for cell surface marker expression, used for cell sorting, or used as APCs for T cell proliferation assays.
Flow cytometric analysis and sorting
For flow cytometric analysis, cells were incubated on ice
(106 cells in 50 µl of RPMI plus 1% FBS) with
anti-mouse CD32/CD16 (Fc
II/III receptor). After 30 min, aliquots
were washed and incubated in 50 µl of RPMI plus 1% FBS with the
different FITC, PE, or biotinylated anti-mouse Abs as stated in the
figure legends. The Abs used for the various experiments included
Mac1
, F4/80, CD80 (B7.1), CD86 (B7.2), H-2Kd
(MHC class I), Iad (MHC class II), B220, CD4, and
CD8. All Abs were obtained from PharMingen Canada (Mississauga,
Canada), except for F4/80, which was obtained from Cedarlane (Hornby,
Canada). Ab incubation was performed for 30 min on ice. Cells stained
with biotinylated Abs were subsequently incubated with
streptavidin-FITC after thorough washing. Cells were fixed in 1%
formaldehyde in PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry (EPICS XL; Beckman
Coulter, Hialeah, FL) using EXPO software.
For flow cytometric cell sorting, peritoneal exudate cells (10 x
106/ml) were stained (for 30 min on ice) with 5
µl of the anti-mouse CD32/CD16 Ab, followed by 5 µl of
PE-labeled, anti-mouse Mac1
, or B220 Ab. Cells were then washed
and resuspended in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1% FBS. Cells
were sorted on an EPICS Elite ESP (Beckman Coulter) and collected in
RPMI plus 8% FBS medium. Subsequently an aliquot of the sorted cells
was analyzed on an EPICS XL to confirm purity.
T cell stimulation assays
C57BL/6 (H-2Kb) splenocytes obtained from naive control mice were enriched for CD4+ or CD8+ T cells by passing through appropriate T cell columns (Cytovax, Edmonton, Canada) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, splenocytes (100 x 106) were incubated with a rat anti-mouse CD4 or CD8 Ab, loaded onto glass-bead columns coated with goat anti-rat Ig and sheep anti-mouse Ig, and eluted. After passage through the column, cells were 8090% enriched for the appropriate T cell type, as determined by flow cytometric analysis. T cells thus obtained were cultured with irradiated (2500 rad) allo-APCs (H-2Kd) at various APC/T cell concentrations in triplicate in RPMI plus 8% FBS medium in 96-well microtiter plates (Falcon). After 72 h (37°C, 8% CO2 in humidified air), an aliquot of the culture supernatant was collected for cytokine analysis. To determine T cell proliferation, the cultures were pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine (ICN Pharmaceuticals Canada, Montreal, Canada) for 18 h and harvested onto glass-fiber filters, and the radioactivity incorporated was determined by liquid scintillation counting.
Ag-specific immune responses
BALB/c mice were immunized i.p. on days 0 and 21, with OVA
(grade V, Sigma) entrapped in archaeosomes or conventional liposomes
(15 µg of Ag entrapped in vesicles consisting of
1 mg lipid). Mice
were euthanized on day 28 for evaluation of Ag-specific immune
responses. For evaluation of humoral responses, mice were bled by
cardiac puncture before euthanizing, the blood was collected in serum
separator tubes (Becton Dickinson), and serum was separated and stored
at -20°C until assayed. The Ab levels in serum were determined by
indirect Ag-specific ELISA (17). Ab titers are represented
as endpoint dilutions exhibiting 0.3 OD unit above background. For
evaluation of Ag-specific proliferation, splenocytes were selectively
lysed for erythrocytes using Tris-buffered ammonium chloride and then
were cultured for 72 h in triplicate with varying Ag
concentrations, and IFN-
production in the supernatant was
determined by cytokine specific ELISA (24). For CTL
assays, 30 x 106 spleen cells were cultured
with 5 x 105 irradiated (10,000 rad) EG.7
cells in 10 ml of RPMI plus 8% FBS containing 0.1 ng/ml IL-2, in
25-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Falcon), kept
upright. After 5 days (37°C, 8% CO2), the
cells recovered from the flask were used as effectors in a standard
51Cr release CTL assay, and the percent specific
lysis against EG.7 targets was determined (18).
Statistical analyses
Students t test and ANOVA were performed to determine statistical significance between different groups. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
J774A.1 macrophages or bone marrow-derived DCs were incubated with
M. smithii archaeosomes for 24 h, and the expression of
cell surface molecules was analyzed by flow cytometry. Nonactivated
J774A.1 cells constitutively show strong expression of MHC class I
molecules and moderate expression of costimulatory marker CD86 (B7.2),
but fail to express MHC class II and CD80 (B7.1). Exposure of J774A.1
cells to archaeosomes (Fig. 1
) led to
strong up-regulation of MHC class II, CD80 (B7.1), and CD86 (B7.2). An
increase in the expression of various markers also occurred after
treating cells with LPS, a known activator of macrophages. In contrast,
comparable amounts of conventional liposomes failed to enhance the
expression of these activation markers on J774A.1 cells. Similar
results were obtained when bone marrow-derived DCs were exposed to
archaeosomes for 24 h. Nonactivated DCs constitutively expressed
high levels of MHC class II molecules. However, incubation of these DCs
with archaeosomes led to an even further up-regulation of MHC class II
expression (Fig. 2
). Furthermore, there
was also a strong up-regulation of B7.2 expression after archaeosome
treatment. Thus, archaeosomes induced a rapid and potent up-regulation
of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules on APCs.
|
|
Activated APCs often exhibit an enhanced capacity to secrete
inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF. Therefore, we tested whether
treatment of APCs with archaeosomes led to enhanced secretion of
cytokines. Macrophages (J774A.1) or DCs incubated with M.
smithii archaeosomes for 48 h produced substantial amounts of
TNF (Fig. 3
) relative to nonactivated
APCs. TNF production showed a dose-dependent correlation to increasing
archaeosome concentrations. In contrast, incubation of APCs with
conventional liposomes failed to invoke significant increases in TNF
production.
|
As experiments in
Figs. 13![]()
![]()
suggest that archaeosomes activate
APCs, we tested whether this translated into an increased functional
ability of the APCs to stimulate T cell proliferation. Macrophages
(J774A.1, H-2Kd) pre-exposed to archaeosomes
strongly stimulated the proliferation of purified allo-specific
(H-2Kb) CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4
a). This proliferation was
comparable to that achieved with LPS-activated macrophages. In the
absence of any activation, J774A.1 APCs induced only modest
CD8+ T cell proliferation. Similarly,
nonactivated bone marrow-derived DCs (H-2Kd)
showed low ability to induce the proliferation of purified naive
allo-specific (H-2Kb) CD4+
T cells. However, prior activation of DCs with archaeosomes led to
strong proliferation of the T cells (Fig. 4
b). In contrast,
DCs exposed to conventional liposomes failed to enhance T cell
stimulation.
|
-positive cells
in vivo
To decipher the effects of archaeosomes on cell populations in
vivo, we analyzed the recruitment of APC populations into the
peritoneal cavities of mice after i.p. injection of a dose of 1 mg of
empty archaeosomes. Representative data in Fig. 5
a show the Mac1
expression
profile of peritoneal exudate cells from control (PBS-treated) and
archaeosome-treated mice. Three distinct populations can be identified
based on Mac1
staining, Mac1
-,
Mac1
low, and
Mac1
high, particularly in the
archaeosome-treated mice. Fig. 5
b summarizes the percentage
of these three populations in the peritoneum at various time points
after archaeosome injection (as deduced from several experiments for
each time point). From these two figures it is evident that in control
mice (injected with PBS alone), the primary cell population is
Mac1
-. In contrast, archaeosome-treated mice
show a decrease in Mac1
- cells as early as
day 2 and a concomitant increase in Mac1
+
cells. By day 14 of archaeosome treatment,
Mac1
high cells become the predominant
population, accounting for >60% of the cells in the peritoneum. As
Mac1
expression is primarily seen on cells of the monocytic
lineage (macrophages and DCs), these results suggest that archaeosomes
facilitate the sustained recruitment of these cell populations into the
injection site.
|
DCs are known to be potent APCs and express high levels of CD11c
(25, 26). Therefore, we evaluated the expression of CD11c
on peritoneal exudate cells after archaeosome treatment. On day 5 after
archaeosome treatment there was a substantial increase in the
percentage of CD11c-expressing cells, from 1.7% in the control mice
(injected with PBS) to 5.2% in the archaeosome-treated group (Fig. 6
). Similarly, there was a significant
enhancement of F4/80+ cells in the peritoneum of
archaeosome-treated mice (from 35% in the controls to 58% with
archaeosome treatment). F4/80 is a myeloid Ag expressed mainly by
macrophages (26). The peritoneum is normally rich in
macrophages, and this number appears to further increase with
archaeosome treatment (Fig. 6
).
|
Next we wanted to determine whether the increased numbers of APCs
in the peritoneum of archaeosome-injected mice were also in an
activated state. Therefore, the peritoneal exudate cells were stained
for MHC class II molecules as a representative activation marker. The
profile in Fig. 7
indicates the MHC class
II expression of cells in the peritoneum 5 days after archaeosome
treatment. It highlights the strong up-regulation of MHC class II
expression by archaeosomes compared with controls (peritoneal exudate
cells from PBS-treated mice).
|
Having demonstrated the ability of archaeosomes to recruit potent
APCs in vivo, we evaluated the ability of these APCs to stimulate T
cells. Peritoneal exudate cells were recovered from archaeosome-treated
mice and used as APCs to stimulate allo-specific purified
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
Peritoneal APCs from archaeosome-treated mice induced strong
proliferation of both CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells (Fig. 8
a). Furthermore, the T cells
stimulated by archaeosome-activated APCs produced substantial IFN-
(Fig. 8
b). In contrast, peritoneal exudate cells from
control mice (treated with PBS alone) were unable to induce T cell
proliferation or cytokine production.
|
high
Next we focussed on identifying the specific APC population that
was being activated in vivo by archaeosomes and was capable of T cell
activation. For this purpose peritoneal exudate cells recovered from
archaeosome-treated mice were sorted by flow cytometry for various cell
populations based on cell surface marker expression and then used as
APCs for stimulating T cells. T cell proliferation was monitored as a
measure of APC activation. In the first set of experiments, peritoneal
cells obtained on day 5 after archaeosome treatment were sorted based
on B220 expression. Peritoneal cells from both control and
archaeosome-treated mice had
40% B220+ cells.
After sorting, the purity of B220+ and
B220- populations obtained from peritoneal
exudate of archaeosome-injected mice was > 90% (data not shown).
Fig. 9
a indicates that the
sorted B220+ cells were unable to stimulate the
proliferation of T cells. In contrast, B220-
cells stimulated the proliferation of T cells to a similar extent as
unsorted cells. As B220 is primarily expressed on B cells, these
results suggest that the APC population activated by archaeosomes in
vivo excluded B cells.
|
. As described above, archaeosomes injected into the peritoneum
of mice result in three distinct populations,
Mac1
-, Mac1
low, and
Mac1
high. Because the best separation of these
populations was evident between days 45 after archaeosome injection,
this time point was chosen for cell sorting experiments.
Mac1
low and Mac1
high
cells accounted for 34 and 26% of the peritoneal cells, respectively.
On sorting, the purity of the two populations was >80% (data not
shown). Fig. 9
high
cells. Mac1
is strongly expressed on cells of the monocytic lineage,
including macrophages and DCs (26). Thus, the T cell
proliferation results also suggest that these APC populations are being
specifically activated by archaeosomes in vivo.
Mac1
high cells induced by archaeosomes in vivo
include both macrophage and DC populations
To further characterize the Mac1
high cell
population that was recruited and activated by archaeosomes in vivo,
Mac1
low and Mac1
high
cells were sorted and cultured with GM-CSF in vitro for 48 h, and
the characteristics of the cell population were analyzed. In Fig. 10
a, the data indicate
Mac1
staining of peritoneal exudate cells from archaeosome-treated
mice. The cells were then sorted for Mac1
low
and Mac1
high expression. The data in Fig. 10
b show the profile of the purified populations. These
cells were then incubated with GM-CSF for 48 h, and the
expressions of F4/80, CD11c, and B220 were analyzed (Fig. 10
c). Interestingly, the Mac1
high
cells gave rise to two populations expressing F4/80 or CD11c. As strong
CD11c expression is often associated with mature DCs, and F4/80
expression with macrophages (26), it appears that the
Mac1
high cells recruited and activated by
archaeosomes in vivo included precursors of both these potent APC
populations. Mac1
low cells, in contrast,
stained negatively for F4/80, and CD11c and were primarily
B220+ cells.
|
The potential of archaeosomes to evoke Ag-specific immune
responses was tested after immunization of mice with OVA entrapped in
these vesicles. The data in Fig. 11
demonstrate the potent adjuvant action of archaeosomes to entrapped
soluble Ag and its superiority to conventional liposomes. Entrapment of
OVA in archaeosomes facilitated strong Ag-specific Ab responses (Fig. 11
a). Furthermore, the spleen cells of OVA-archaeosome
immunized mice responded strongly to soluble OVA stimulation in vitro
by producing IFN-
, indicating induction of
CD4+ T helper responses as well (Fig. 11
b). More interestingly, archaeosomes induced a strong
CD8+ CTL response to the entrapped exogenous Ag
(Fig. 11
c). Thus, the ability of archaeosomes to activate
professional APCs in vivo translates into their potent ability to evoke
humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to entrapped Ag.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is noteworthy that archaeosomes enhanced the expression of MHC class II on J774A.1 cells, as these cells constitutively fail to express MHC class II. In contrast, mature DCs constitutively express high levels of MHC class II (4), and archaeosome treatment leads to an even further up-regulation of expression. Some studies suggest that costimulation through either B7.1 or B7.2 differentially allows the development of Th1 or Th2 cells, respectively (27). Indeed, adjuvants such as cholera toxin that prime predominantly Th2 cells have been shown to preferentially activate B7.2 (28). In comparison, the ability of archaeosomes to up-regulate the expression of both B7.1 and B7.2 on J774A.1 macrophages conforms to their ability to prime both Th1 and Th2 responses to entrapped Ag (17). However, archaeosomes up-regulated the expression of B7.2, but not B7.1, on the surface of DCs. Recent evidence suggests that following bacterial ingestion, up-regulation of costimulatory molecules on DCs may occur in a sequential manner, with B7.1 being up-regulated much later than B7.2 (29). Thus, it is possible that the lack of B7.1 up-regulation observed on DCs relates to the kinetics of expression. Overall, the functionality of archaeosome activation of APCs is demonstrated by the potent ability of archaeosome-treated macrophages and DCs to efficiently stimulate T cells.
To correlate the ability of archaeosomes to activate APCs with the ability to adjuvant immune responses to entrapped Ag, we elucidated the effects of archaeosomes on various cell populations in vivo after an i.p. injection of empty archaeosomes. This approach was chosen because, firstly, the peritoneum offers an anatomically defined site that is readily accessible to most cell types. Secondly, in our earlier studies we had observed that i.p. injection of Ag entrapped in archaeosomes evoked a strong systemic immune response (16, 17). We also chose to use empty archaeosomes to address the immunostimulatory effects of archaeosomes independently of Ag-mediated stimulation.
Several microbial products are known to stimulate B cells, including LPS and bacterial porins (30, 31). Many of these microbial products also function as potent adjuvants for coadministered Ag (30). Although a typical Gram-negative, outer membrane structure containing LPS- and porin-like components is not encountered among archaeobacteria, we examined whether archaeobacterial lipids affected the Ag-presenting ability of B cells in the peritoneum. Firstly, we observed that the overall numbers of B220+ cells (B cells) in the peritoneum of archaeosome-injected mice were not significantly different from those in controls. Furthermore, the inability of sorted B220+ cells from peritoneal exudates of archaeosome-treated mice to induce T cell stimulation clearly ruled out direct effects of archaeosomes on Ag presentation by B cells.
The most dramatic effects of archaeosome injection were a sustained
increase in Mac1
high cells in the peritoneum,
the up-regulation of MHC class II, and the ability of APCs to enhance T
cell proliferation. One point of interest is that although there was an
increase in CD11c+ and
F4/80+ cells in the peritoneum of
archaeosome-treated mice, these increases were less dramatic than that
observed for Mac1
high cells. CD11c and F4/80
are prominently expressed on mature DCs and macrophages, respectively
(26). In contrast, Mac1
appears to be more ubiquitously
expressed on all cells of the monocytic lineage. Furthermore,
macrophages and DCs are considered to arise from a common precursor
(32). Thus, one may speculate that the
Mac1
high precursors recruited by archaeosomes
to the site of injection, upon acquiring expression of CD11c and F4/80,
migrate to other lymphoid organs for Ag presentation.
Macrophages and DCs are potent APCs for induction of Ag-specific immune responses. More interestingly, they appear to possess abilities to cross-prime exogenous Ag for MHC class I presentation and CTL induction (33, 34). Furthermore, effective costimulation provided by DCs has been shown to bypass CD4+ T cell help for CTL induction (35, 36, 37). Archaeosomes are efficiently phagocytosed by macrophages (38), and we have also previously demonstrated the ability of archaeosomes to facilitate strong CTL responses to entrapped exogenous Ag even in the absence of CD4+ T cell help (18). The data of this study indicate that archaeosomes not only effectively target Ag to DCs and/or macrophages, but also sufficiently enhance costimulatory activity of these APCs for potentiation of strong cell-mediated immunity. In contrast, conventional liposomes that are also phagocytosed by macrophages, albeit to a lesser extent than archaeosomes (38), appear incompetent to sufficiently activate APCs. Consequently, they fail to induce a strong T cell response to entrapped Ag in vivo (17, 18), a conclusion consistent with our previous data demonstrating that conventional liposomes per se do not facilitate MHC class I processing of entrapped soluble Ags (18).
Many adjuvants appear to potentiate different components of the innate immune system. ISCOMs have been shown to promote neutrophil, macrophage, and DC recruitment after i.p. injection into mice (39). CpG-DNA motifs are potent activators of NK and DCs (40). Adjuvants such as cholera toxin and porins modulate the expression of costimulatory molecules on APCs (28, 31, 41). Our observations indicating that the activation of APCs by archaeosomes conform to this general scheme of innate immune activation promoting subsequent adaptive T cell responses. Indeed, our recent studies indicate that protection in mice against infection by Listeria monocytogenes develops rapidly within 7 days of immunization with archaeosomes and requires that a protective Ag be entrapped.4 Whether generalized inflammatory responses involving other cell types, such as neutrophils, also ensues with archaeosome injection needs further study. However, we have not observed increases in the overall numbers of peritoneal exudate cells after archaeosome injection (data not shown). Furthermore, archaeosomes do not exhibit direct mitogenic effects on spleen cells in vitro (L. Krishnan et al., unpublished observations). Thus, it appears probable that archaeosome effects are restricted to the APC component of the innate immune system.
Bacterial products are a major source of adjuvants. Peptidoglycans, monophosphoryl lipid A or lipid A components of LPS, and mycobacterial lipoproteins are examples of such products (30). Bacterial products may be immunomodulatory because they mimic the microbial structures that provide the danger signal of infection to the host. The presence of CD14, the LPS receptor on macrophages and neutrophils, is one such example (42). More recently, the induction of host immunity through interactions between bacterial lipoproteins and Toll-like receptors on monocytes has become evident (43). Archaeal polar lipids are composed of fully saturated, branched phytanyl chains of defined length that are attached via ether bonds to the sn-2,3 glycerol backbone carbon atoms. In contrast, conventional phospholipids found in other bacteria and eukarya have fatty acyl chains, often unsaturated and of variable length, that are attached via ester bonds to the sn-1,2 glycerol backbone carbon atoms (12, 13). The interaction of the unique ether lipid structures of archaea with specific receptors on APCs leading to immune activation may be a possibility. Furthermore, unique head-group structures are also seen among archaeal lipids. These may, again, facilitate specific interactions with cells. Interestingly, M. smithii lipids (from which archaeosomes were prepared) exhibit an abundance of archaetidylserine and caldarchaetidylserine (44) that are analogues of phosphatidylserine present in eubacteria that is recognized by CD36 on macrophages (45).
Many of the approaches for induction of strong vaccine-specific immunity aim to mimic the ability of pathogens to activate APCs and evoke strong immunity. Indeed, the use of Ag-pulsed DCs is extremely effective for induction of cell-mediated immunity (46). The use of archaeosomes represents a relatively simple approach for activating DCs and adjuvanting immune responses. Furthermore, archaeosomes facilitate Ag-specific protective immunity4 even in the long term (17, 18). Additionally, M. smithii is a natural nonpathogenic habitant of the human colon (47), suggesting that lipids from such archaea may be more readily acceptable from a regulatory perspective in vaccine formulations. It has yet to be determined whether any of the lipids from the archaea normally resident in the human gut enter the systemic sites of the host. However, from our currently ongoing toxicology evaluations (A. Omri et al., unpublished observations) as well as from our animal studies (16, 17, 18), we can conclude that archaeosome vaccine formulations are safe. Elucidating the mechanism(s) by which archaeosomes signal APC activation may further aid the optimization and development of archaeosomes for vaccines.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Lakshmi Krishnan, National Research Council, Institute for Biological Sciences, 100 Sussex Drive, Room 3016, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0R6. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DCs, dendritic cells; TPL, total polar lipids. ![]()
4 W. J. Conlan, L. Krishnan, G. E. Willick, G. B. Patel, and G. D. Sprott. Immunization of mice with lipopeptide Ags encapsulated in novel liposomes prepared from the total polar lipids of various archaeobacteria elicits rapid and prolonged specific protective immunity against infection with the facultative intracellular pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication September 11, 2000. Accepted for publication November 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v
3). J. Immunol. 161:6250.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G D. Sprott, C. J Dicaire, J.-P. Cote, and D. M Whitfield Adjuvant potential of archaeal synthetic glycolipid mimetics critically depends on the glyco head group structure Glycobiology, July 1, 2008; 18(7): 559 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Krishnan, K. Gurnani, C. J. Dicaire, H. van Faassen, A. Zafer, C. J. Kirschning, S. Sad, and G. D. Sprott Rapid Clonal Expansion and Prolonged Maintenance of Memory CD8+ T Cells of the Effector (CD44highCD62Llow) and Central (CD44highCD62Lhigh) Phenotype by an Archaeosome Adjuvant Independent of TLR2 J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2396 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Decker, H. Singh-Jasuja, S. Haager, I. Kotter, and H.-G. Rammensee Nucleosome, the Main Autoantigen in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Induces Direct Dendritic Cell Activation via a MyD88-Independent Pathway: Consequences on Inflammation J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3326 - 3334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Sprott, C. J. Dicaire, K. Gurnani, S. Sad, and L. Krishnan Activation of Dendritic Cells by Liposomes Prepared from Phosphatidylinositol Mannosides from Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin and Adjuvant Activity In Vivo Infect. Immun., September 1, 2004; 72(9): 5235 - 5246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Gurnani, J. Kennedy, S. Sad, G. D. Sprott, and L. Krishnan Phosphatidylserine Receptor-Mediated Recognition of Archaeosome Adjuvant Promotes Endocytosis and MHC Class I Cross-Presentation of the Entrapped Antigen by Phagosome-to-Cytosol Transport and Classical Processing J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Krishnan, S. Sad, G. B. Patel, and G. D. Sprott Archaeosomes Induce Enhanced Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses to Entrapped Soluble Protein in the Absence of Interleukin 12 and Protect against Tumor Challenge Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2526 - 2534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Eckburg, P. W. Lepp, and D. A. Relman Archaea and Their Potential Role in Human Disease Infect. Immun., February 1, 2003; 71(2): 591 - 596. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |