|
|
||||||||
2-Microglobulin Subunit1
Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1,
2,
3, and
2-microglobulin
(
2m) domains of the MHC class I complex. The
data from the structure, together with discrepancies in earlier studies
using MHC class I tetramers, prompted us to study the role of the
2m subunit in MHC class I-Ly49 interactions.
Here we provide, to our knowledge, the first direct evidence that
residues in the
2m subunit affect binding of
MHC class I molecules to Ly49 receptors. A change from murine
2m to human
2m in
three different MHC class I molecules, H-2Db,
H-2Kb, and H-2Dd,
resulted in a loss of binding to the receptors Ly49A and Ly49C.
Analysis of the amino acids involved in the binding of Ly49A to
H-2Dd in the published crystal structure, and
differing between the mouse and the human
2m, suggests the cluster formed by residues
Lys3, Thr4,
Thr28, and Gln29, as a
potentially important domain for the
Ly49A-H-2Dd interaction. Another possibility is
that the change of
2m indirectly affects the
conformation of distal parts of the MHC class I molecule, including the
1 and
2 domains
of the heavy chain. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I MHC molecules are expressed on virtually all nucleated cells
and present peptides derived from intracellular proteins to T cells
(7). As noted above, MHC class I molecules also have a
strong influence on the regulation of NK cell activity, mainly by
providing inhibitory signals after initial triggering by activating
receptors (8, 9, 10, 11). The MHC class I molecule is a
trimolecular complex consisting of heavy chain, light chain
(
2-microglobulin,
2m),3
and peptide.
2m is a soluble 12 kDa globular
protein noncovalently associated with the MHC class I heavy chain. It
is a relatively conserved protein, and displays 69% homology at the
amino acid level between mouse and human (see Fig. 5
)
(12). This allows for cross-species association of
2m with the heavy chain. This was first
demonstrated by culturing human and murine cells in FBS, which led to
an exchange of their endogenous
2m for
exogenous bovine
2m
(b
2m) (13, 14). The degree of
2m exchange in MHC class I in mouse cell lines
incubated with exogenous human
2m
(h
2m) can be up to 90% (15).
Furthermore, changes in the
2m subunit, e.g.,
by an exchange from murine
2m
(m
2m) to h
2m, have
been demonstrated to affect the conformation of the
1 and
2 domains in
the heavy chain in several earlier studies (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23).
|
1 domain and the C terminus of the
2 domain of the heavy chain. It is located at
the end side of the MHC class I peptide-binding platform, away from the
peptide and adjacent to the glycosylation site at position 176 in
2 of the heavy chain (24). This
site was proposed to be responsible for trans-interactions
between Ly49A and H-2Dd, i.e., when Ly49A and
H-2Dd are present on different cells
(24). Site 1 contains several polymorphic amino acids in
H-2Dd, matched by a region in Ly49A with high
variability between different Ly49 receptors, which could in part
explain the allelic differences in specificity of Ly49A. The larger
site 2 overlaps with the CD8 binding site, and spans a nonpolymorphic
region lined by the
2m subunit and the
1,
2, and
3 domains of the heavy chain
(24). The
2m-subunit contributes
to 25% of this interface. Site 2 was suggested to be an interface
responsible for cis-interactions between Ly49A and
H-2Dd on the same cell surface, without excluding
a possibility for trans-interactions (24). This
is in line with earlier reports where cis-interactions have
been proposed to be a mechanism responsible for modulation of the level
of Ly49 receptors expressed on the cell surface (25, 26).
Several studies have probed the impact of changes in
2m on the stability, as well as on the
structure and function, of MHC class I molecules in the context of
recognition by Abs and T cells (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29). To date
no one has addressed the role of
2m in MHC
class I recognition by Ly49 receptors. Our interest in this problem was
in part attracted by a discrepancy between two earlier studies using
MHC class I tetramers to study Ly49 receptor specificity. Both studies
demonstrated that Ly49A binds to H-2Dd, whereas
Ly49C had a broader specificity and bound to, e.g.,
H-2Kb and H-2Db (30, 31). However, H-2Db tetramers were
reported to bind Ly49A in one study (31) but not in the
other (30). One difference, of several, between
the studies was that the former used m
2m and
the latter h
2m in the
H-2Db tetramers. This, together with the
available structural data, prompted us to test the role of
2m in the interaction with Ly49 receptors. In
addition, a mouse expressing a transgene single-chain
H-2Dd, with m
2m and
peptide covalently linked to the heavy chain, failed to educate NK
cells in vivo, and soluble Ly49A did not bind to the single chain
H-2Dd expressed on cells derived from the lymph
node. The covalent modification close to
2m
was proposed as one potential reason for the lack of Ly49A reactivity,
either by steric hindrance or by a conformational change
(32).
Here we describe how the change from m
2m to
h
2m in three different MHC class I tetramers,
H-2Db, H-2Dd, and
H-2Kb, reduces the binding to the receptors Ly49A
and Ly49C. This has implications for understanding Ly49-MHC class I
interactions, as well as for technical aspects of in vitro NK cell
assays.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ly49A-transgenic (tg) B6 mice (B6VA49A; founder 26) and BALB/c mice were bred and maintained at the Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institutet (Stockholm, Sweden). Animal care was in accordance with institutional guidelines. The Ly49A-tg B6 mice have been described elsewhere (33). RNK16 is a spontaneous leukemic rat NK cell line, and C1R is a human B cell lymphoblastoid cell line. Ly49A-RNK16 transfectants have been described elsewhere (34), as have Ly49C-C1R transfectants (35). The hybridomas HB-76, HB-87, HB-102, (anti-H-2Dd), HB-158, HB-41 (anti-H-2Kb), B22.249 (anti-H-2Db), and HB-120 (anti-HLA A, B, and C) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 µg/ml penicillin, and 2 mM L-glutamine at 37°C with 7.5% CO2. Hybridomas were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% FCS, hypoxanthine/aminopterin/thymidine, sodium pyruvate, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 µg/ml penicillin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. The preparation of nylon wool-nonadherent (NWNA) spleen cells were prepared as described earlier (36).
Generation of MHC class I tetramers
Production of soluble MHC class I heavy chain fused with a BirA
substrate peptide (H-2KbBsp,
H-2DbBsp,
H-2DdBsp),
m
2m, and h
2m, and the
in vitro refolding of the
MHCBsp/
2m/peptide
complexes have been described previously (37, 38). The
generation of the H-2DdBsp cDNA
construct has also been described (31). The
H-2DdBsp construct encodes aa
1280 of H-2Dd, ending with a proline, followed
by a glycine, serine, and Bsp 41/50 (described by P. Schatz et al.)
(39). The H-2KbBsp
(40) and the
H-2DbBsp (41)
constructs were gifts from J. D. Altman (Emery University,
Atlanta, GA) and T. N. Schumacher (The Netherlands Cancer
Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), respectively. The
H-2KbBsp construct encodes aa
1279, ending with a serine, followed by a glycine, serine, and Bsp
41/50 (39). The
H-2DbBsp construct encodes aa
1280, ending with a threonine, followed by a glycine-serine linker
(12 aa) and Bsp 85 (39). The
HLA-EBsp cDNA construct was a gift from V. Braud
(Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford,
U.K.). The m
2m cDNA was a gift from P. J.
Travers (Birkbeck College, London, U.K.), and the
h
2m cDNA was provided by E. Y. Jones
(Oxford Center for Molecular Science, Oxford, U.K.). Both
m
2m and h
2m cDNA
encode aa 199, plus an additional methionine at position one in
h
2m, and a methionine and a glycine at
position 1 and 2 in m
2m. Synthetic peptides
(HIV-1-derived P18-I10 (RGPGRAFVTI), OVA257264
(SIINFEKL), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) gp33 (KAVYNFATM),
and B7L (VMAPRTVLL) were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville,
AL). Briefly, the MHCBsp,
2m, and peptide were refolded by dilution in
the presence of protease inhibitors (2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml
pepstatin A, and 0.2 mM PMSF) for 48 h. The same batch of heavy
chain and peptide was used for the refoldings of each MHC. The refolded
complexes were purified by size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex
200 10/30 column (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and
biotinylated by incubation with BirA enzyme and biotin (Avidity,
Denver, CO) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Free
biotin was removed by gel filtration using NAP-5 desalting columns
(Pharmacia Biotech). The MHC complexes were then quickly frozen in
liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C. Tetramers were produced in
parallel by stepwise mixing biotinylated
MHC/
2m/peptide complexes with neutravidin-PE
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at a 4:1 molar ratio. The MHC class I
tetramers generated were
H-2DbBsp refolded with
m
2m and LCMV gp33
(H-2Db/m
2m),
H-2DbBsp refolded with
h
2m and LCMV gp33
(H-2Db/h
2m),
H-2DdBsp refolded with
m
2m and P18-I10
(H-2Dd/m
2m),
H-2DdBsp refolded with
h
2m and P18-I10
(H-2Dd/h
2m),
H-2KbBsp refolded with
m
2m and OVA257264
(H-2Kb/m
2m),
H-2KbBsp refolded with
h
2m and OVA257264
(H-2Kb/h
2m), and
HLA-EBsp refolded with
h
2m and B7L (HLA-E). Equal quality of the
paired MHC class I tetramers (with either m
2m
or h
2m) was controlled by a gel-shift assay
(data not shown), as well as by staining hybridomas expressing an Ab
specific for the MHC class I molecule used (see Results).
Furthermore, the quality of the H-2Db tetramers
was controlled by additional staining of T cell clones specific for
H-2Db/LCMV gp33.
Abs and flow cytometry
FITC-labeled DX5 mAb was purchased from PharMingen (Stockholm,
Sweden). A1 (anti-Ly49A) and SW5E6 (anti-Ly49C/I) were purified
from hybridoma supernatants over a protein G column (Pharmacia
Biotech). All stainings were made in 50 µl on ice for 60 min,
followed by three washes in PBS supplemented with 2% FCS. Stainings
performed in PBS alone were similar to stainings in PBS supplemented
with 2% FCS. NWNA spleen cells were incubated with an
anti-Fc
RIII mAb (2G4) before staining with mAbs and MHC
tetramers. MHC tetramers were used at concentrations ranging from 2 to
40 µg/ml. All stainings with control tetramers were performed at 40
µg/ml. Dead cells were excluded on the basis of forward and side
scatter. Cells were analyzed on a FACScan or a FACSort cytometer (BD
Biosciences, Mountain View, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2m was involved in the
recognition of MHC class I by Ly49 receptors, we produced MHC class I
tetramers refolded with either h
2m or
m
2m and measured their binding to
Ly49-expressing cells by FACS. Murine MHC class I is stabilized by
h
2m at least as well as by
m
2m, and h
2m has been used in
murine MHC class I tetramers earlier (27, 30, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45).
Binding of H-2Db to both Ly49A and Ly49C is markedly
reduced when m
2m is replaced with h
2m
A discrepancy in studies of Ly49 receptor binding specificity of
H-2Db suggested to us that the binding of
H-2Db to Ly49A, but not to Ly49C, was influenced
by the
2m subunit (30, 31). To
test this hypothesis it was necessary to investigate whether a change
from m
2m to h
2m in
H-2Db would affect binding to both receptors or
only to Ly49A. Consequently,
H-2Db/m
2m and
H-2Db/h
2m tetramers were
produced and tested for binding to Ly49 receptor-expressing cells in
parallel experiments. The same batch of MHC class I heavy chain and the
same peptide were used in each refolding, leaving
2m as the variable
parameter.
As hypothesized,
H-2Db/h
2m tetramers
failed to bind the Ly49A-RNK16 transfectant (Fig. 1
A), whereas the
binding of H-2Db/m
2m
tetramers, although weak, was reproducible in a number of experiments
(Fig. 1
A). No staining of nontransfected RNK16 cells was
observed (data not shown). Ly49A-RNK16 transfectants incubated with a
control tetramer
(H-2Kb/m
2m) were also
negative (shown as 0 µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 1
A). Because MHC class I
tetramer binding is sensitive to the level of receptor expression, we
also stained cells with a higher expression level of Ly49A to see
whether the H-2Db/h
2m
tetramer would then bind Ly49A. Ly49A-tg B6 mice express Ly49A at a
high level on CD2+ cells, including T and NK
cells (33). DX5+ NWNA spleen cells
from Ly49A-tg B6 mice were not stained by
H-2Db/h
2m tetramers
(Fig. 1
B). However, the
H-2Db/m
2m tetramers did
clearly bind to Ly49A on the DX5+ NWNA Ly49A-tg
B6 spleen cells (Fig. 1
B). This binding was not observed
with a control tetramer (HLA-E; shown as 0 µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 1
B), and it could be completely blocked by an anti-Ly49A
mAb (A1) (data not shown).
|
2m readily
stained Ly49C-C1R transfectants (Fig. 1
2m, were also
negative (shown as 0 µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 1
2m, albeit weakly
(Fig. 1
2m to Ly49C-C1R
transfectants (Fig. 1
2m
tetramer, because both H-2Db tetramers stained
B22.249, a hybridoma expressing an anti-H-2Db
mAb, to the same extent (Fig. 1
2m influences
the binding of H-2Db to both Ly49A and Ly49C.
Binding of H-2Dd refolded with h
2m to
Ly49A is impaired
We further investigated whether the observed influence of the
2m subunit on H-2Db
binding to Ly49A and Ly49C applied also to other Ly49-MHC class I
interactions. The involvement of the
2m
subunit in site 2 in the structure of Ly49A in complex with
H-2Dd (24) suggested to us that a
change from m
2m to
h
2m could also affect the interaction between
H-2Dd and Ly49A. Ly49A-RNK16 transfectants were
stained by H-2Dd/m
2m
tetramers (Fig. 2
A), but not
by a control tetramer
(H-2Kb/m
2m) (shown as 0
µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 2
A). Moreover, no staining by
H-2Dd/m
2m of
nontransfected RNK16 cells was observed (data not shown). This was
expected, as similar observations were made earlier (30, 31). In contrast,
H-2Dd/h
2m tetramers
failed to stain the same Ly49A-transfected cell line (Fig. 2
A).
H-2Dd/h
2m tetramers
stained HB-102, hybridoma cells expressing Ig molecules specific for
H-2Dd, to a similar extent as the
H-2Dd/m
2m tetramers
(Fig. 2
C). No binding was observed when incubating HB-102
with a control tetramer (HLA-E; shown as 0 µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 2
C) or when we incubated an
H-2Db-specific hybridoma (B22.249) with the
H-2Dd tetramers (data not shown). Incubation of
NWNA spleen cells from Ly49A-tg B6 mice with
H-2Dd/h
2m tetramer
failed to stain the DX5+ cells, whereas there was
still a strong binding of
H-2Dd/m
2m tetramer (Fig. 2
B). A control tetramer (HLA-E) did not stain the
Ly49A-positive cells (shown as 0 µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 2
B), and the binding of
H-2Dd/m
2m tetramers
could be completely blocked by an anti-Ly49A mAb (A1) (data not
shown). Importantly, we observed a weak, but reproducible, staining of
Ly49A-positive T cells by the
H-2Dd/h
2m tetramer (data
not shown). The expression level of Ly49A on these cells is even higher
than on the DX5+ cells. This binding was not
observed when staining with a control tetramer (HLA-E), and could be
blocked by the addition of A1 mAb (data not shown). In conclusion,
2m also influences the binding of
H-2Dd to Ly49A.
|
2m
Franksson et al. (35) reported that
H-2Kb/OVA (SIINFEKL) conferred better protection
against Ly49C+ NK cells than
H-2Kb/SEV (FAPGNYPAL). In contrast, Su et al.
(46) reported that "empty" (peptide-receptive)
H-2Kb molecules conferred better protection than
H-2Kb presenting the OVA peptide. Although the
picture is not complete, these studies clearly show that the
interaction between Ly49C and H-2Kb is influenced
by the content of the MHC class I peptide binding groove. There is no
evidence for such a specific peptide influence on the interaction
between Ly49A and H-2Dd. This implies that the
H-2Kb-Ly49C interaction differs in some aspects
from that of Ly49A and H-2Dd. To test the role of
the
2m subunit in this interaction, we
refolded H-2Kb tetramers with either
h
2m or m
2m and
compared their binding to Ly49C-expressing cells. We chose to refold
the H-2Kb complexes with an OVA-derived peptide,
known to permit strong binding of H-2Kb to Ly49C
(31).
H-2Kb/m
2m tetramers
clearly stained Ly49C-C1R transfectants (Fig. 3
A), as published earlier
(31). Interestingly,
H-2Kb/h
2m tetramers
displayed a severely reduced binding to the Ly49C-C1R transfectants
(Fig. 3
A). The binding of
H-2Kb/h
2m was close to
the negative control, although we observed, in one of four experiments,
a slight binding at higher
H-2Kb/h
2m tetramer
concentrations (data not shown). Similar results were obtained when
staining NWNA spleen cells from BALB/c mice.
H-2Kb/m
2m tetramers
clearly stained DX5+ spleen cells, whereas
H-2Kb/h
2m tetramers did
not stain the DX5+ population above background
levels (Fig. 3
B). To test the integrity and quality of both
tetramers we stained HB-41 hybridoma cells expressing an
anti-H-2Kb mAb. Both
H-2Kb tetramers stained HB-41 cells to a similar
level, but no staining was observed with a control HLA-E tetramer
(shown as 0 µg/ml tetramer in Fig. 3
C) or when staining a
control hybridoma (B22.249) (data not shown). The hybridoma HB-158,
producing the mAb AF6-88.5, has been demonstrated by Kuhns and Pease to
be specific for an epitope dependent partially on the
2m subunit (23). The staining of
HB-158 by H-2Kb/h
2m
tetramers was severely reduced, but not completely abolished, in
comparison to staining by
H-2Kb/m
2m tetramers
(Fig. 3
D), confirming the results of Kuhns and Pease
(23) using a direct binding assay.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2m subunit strongly affects binding of MHC
class I molecules to Ly49 receptors. A change from
m
2m to h
2m in three
different MHC class I molecules, H-2Dd,
H-2Kb, and H-2Db, resulted
in a markedly reduced binding to the receptors Ly49A and Ly49C,
suggesting that this is a general feature of Ly49-MHC class I
interactions. These results illustrate that the source of
2m can have a strong influence on the outcome
of MHC class I tetramer-based assays for NK receptor specificity.
Moreover, as further discussed below, the results have practical
implications with respect to experiments based on cell lines grown in
medium supplemented with xenogeneic serum. Finally, and most
importantly, these findings can be interpreted within the context of
the structural data available.
Tormo et al. (24) reported two sites of interaction
between receptor and ligand in the cocrystal of Ly49A and
H-2Dd.
2m contributes to
25% of the second site of interaction, site 2 (Fig. 4
A). Here, one of the subunits
of the Ly49A dimer lies against the surfaces of the
-sheets (65% of
the interface) that form the bottom of the peptide binding platform,
3 (15% of the interface) and
2m. Interactions at this site have been
described as primarily polar, with 26 direct hydrogen bonds
(24). Many other contacts between
2m and Ly49A are bridged by numerous water
molecules trapped at the interface. There is 30% difference in the
amino acid sequence between m
2m and
h
2m (Fig. 5
).
Four residues of the m
2m subunit
(Lys3, Thr4,
Gln29, and Lys58) are
involved in seven direct hydrogen bond interactions with five residues
(Asp193, Arg157,
Val248, and Asp229, and
Asn242) in Ly49A at site 2 (Fig. 4
B)
(24). Three of these residues (Lys3,
Thr4, and Gln29) form a
cluster with other amino acids (Gln6,
Thr28, and residue 85; Ala in BALB/c, and Asp in
C57BL/6). All of the amino acids in this cluster, except residue 4,
differ between m
2m and
h
2m. Thus there is an important difference
between the mouse and the human, in this region of
2m (Figs. 4
and 5
). The most striking
difference is residue 29, where glutamine in the mouse, involved in
three hydrogen bonds with Ly49A, is substituted by a glycine in the
human. It is tempting to speculate that these residues in
2m influence the binding of Ly49 receptors to
MHC class I molecules. Note that residues Arg157,
Asp193, Asp229, and
Val248 in Ly49A, which interact with this
cluster, also are involved in the contact at site 1. There are
additional residues contributing to the molecular contacts between
Ly49A and H-2Dd at both sites, e.g.,
Asp241, Asn226,
Arg228, Asn242,
Asn244, Asp246,
Gln247, and Phe249
(24).
|
2m.
However, there is an alternative interpretation: previous studies of
the
2m-MHC class I interaction have also
demonstrated that a change from m
2m to
h
2m can result in conformational changes
of the
1 and
2
domains of the MHC class I heavy chain (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). This
opens the possibility that substitution of m
2m
with h
2m causes conformational changes that
could affect binding at site 1. Apart from Ser2 in the MHC
class I heavy chain, the site 2 interaction contains no polymorphic
residues involved in hydrogen bonding between the MHC complexes studied
here (H-2Dd, H-2Db, and
H-2Kb). This leaves little room to explain the
different MHC class I specificities displayed by Ly49 receptors. If
site 2 is involved in the MHC class I specificity of Ly49 receptors, it
has to be affected by changes of amino acids in parts of the molecule
directly around or more distal to site 2, to distinguish between
different MHC class I molecules. Earlier studies of Ly49-MHC class I
interactions, focused on effects of mutations in the
1 and
2 domains of
MHC class I, support the notion that changes distal to sites 1 and 2
can affect the interaction between MHC class I and Ly49 receptors. Most
of the mutations investigated earlier have targeted amino acids outside
sites 1 and 2, yet some of them have marked effects on the interaction
with Ly49A+ NK cells. Mutation in
H-2Dd of Ser73 and
Asp156 located in the Ag-binding cleft of
H-2Dd, substituting them with their counterparts
in H-2Db, partially impaired recognition of
H-2Dd by Ly49A in functional assays
(47). Furthermore, mutation of
Trp97, Ala99, and
Trp114 in H-2Dd resulted in
near total loss of protection from Ly49A-expressing effector cells
(48). Mutation of residues 103, 104, and 107 from
H-2Dd to their counterparts in
H-2Db severely impaired the recognition of
H-2Dd by
Ly49A.4
In summary, the replacement of m
2m with
h
2m could have a direct effect on the Ly49A
interaction at site 2, or an indirect effect at site 1. Therefore, our
result can not be interpreted in favor of one of the two contact sites
as the physiologically important one. It is not excluded that both are
important, i.e., that the same H-2Dd molecule can
be recognized, at the same time, by two different Ly49A receptors,
either in trans (between NK and target cell), in
cis (between molecules on the NK cell surface itself), or in
both cis and trans.
MHC class I tetramers are excellent tools to investigate the
specificity of various MHC class I binding receptors, but the analysis
is not without pitfalls; tetramer binding is highly dependent on the
level of receptor expression, with sharp threshold effects. There is
always a risk of false negative results due to too low expression of
the receptor of interest. An earlier study of MHC class I-Ly49 receptor
interaction based on MHC class I tetramer binding reported seemingly
controversial results to ours (30). In the study by
Hanke et al. (30), both
H-2Db/h
2m and
H-2Kb/h
2m tetramers were
found to bind to Ly49C. In our study we could observe virtually no
binding of MHC class I refolded with h
2m to
the above receptors. However, we could observe some binding of
H-2Dd/h
2m to T cells in
a Ly49A-tg mouse with high expression of Ly49A. Differences in the
level of receptor expression in the two systems is one possible
explanation for the differing results, demonstrating that the effect of
the change of the
2m subunit is not absolute
when it comes to Ly49-MHC class I interactions. However, it is clear
from our study that changing the
2m subunit
clearly can decrease the binding between MHC class I tetramers and Ly49
receptors.
The valency of the MHC tetramer can vary between batches, affecting the
binding to the receptors expressed on the cells. Therefore, it is
important to produce the compared MHC tetramers under the same
conditions, including usage of the same batch of heavy chain and
peptide, measuring the concentrations and doing the tetramerizations in
parallel. Furthermore, it is important to verify that production under
these stringent conditions results in MHC tetramers of comparable
quality. In this study, we have primarily used staining of specific B
cell hybridomas as a control. The affinity between the MHC and
the Ig molecules produced by the B cell hybridoma is higher than the
one between, e.g., Ly49 receptors and MHC class I; thus, the former
interaction may be less sensitive to possible differences in MHC class
I valency between tetramer batches. Therefore, we have also stained T
cell clones specific for H-2Db complexed with a
peptide from LCMV gp33. Considering the stringency of the production,
the staining of the B cell hybridomas, and the control staining of the
specific T cell clones, it is unlikely that our results depend on a
systematic difference in quality between tetramer batches based on
h
2m vs m
2m.
Considering the high homology (76%) between
h
2m and b
2m, and the
similar affinity for murine MHC class I molecules, our results
implicate that precaution should be taken when interpreting results
from assays based on cells grown in bovine serum. Up to 90% of the MHC
class I molecules have been demonstrated to exchange
m
2m to h
2m when
incubating murine tumor cells with fluorescent
h
2m (15). This is likely to be
true also for b
2m, which can be present in
large amounts in FCS. Given the effect on MHC class I tetramer binding
to Ly49 receptors, the exchange from m
2m to
b
2m or h
2m could
reduce the protective capacity by MHC class I molecules and, thereby,
lead to false results also in functional assays. For example, this
effect could potentially explain why MHC class I specificity is more
distinct in in vivo rejection assays than in in vitro assays of NK cell
cytotoxicity when tumor targets are used (49).
In summary, the influence of the
2m subunit on
Ly49-MHC class I interactions can be mediated by direct interference
within a contact site that involves
2m, such
as site 2 in the Ly49A-H-2Dd interaction, by
structural alterations distal to
2m, or both.
Additional structural investigations will be needed to elucidate the
effect of h
2m on murine MHC class I
structures, and the effect on Ly49 receptor binding. Today there are no
available structures for comparison of the same MHC class I/peptide
combination refolded with m
2m and
h
2m, respectively. Such studies are required
to pinpoint the motifs responsible for the difference in binding of MHC
class I tetramers to Ly49 receptors, imposed by the
2m subunit. They would also enlighten other
conformational aspects of the MHC class I structure, important for
recognition by NK cells, Abs, and T cells.
Note added in proof.
During the revision of this manuscript, Matsumoto et al.
(50) published data demonstrating a role of
2m in recognition of H-2Dd by Ly49A. They
show that Ly49A tetramers do not bind significantly to cells expressing
H-2Dd complexed with h
2m. Furthermore, they
demonstrate that the interaction between H-2Dd and Ly49A
can be blocked by an anti-m
2m mAb, both in binding
assays and functional assays. The data by Matsumoto et al. support the
notion that
2m is important for Ly49-MHC interactions,
and we can in this study confirm and extend the importance of
2m in recognition by Ly49 receptors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jakob Michaëlsson, Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institutet, Box 280, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail address: jakob.michaelsson{at}mtc.ki.se ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper:
2m,
2-microglobulin; m
2m, murine
2m; h
2m, human
2m; b
2m, bovine
2m; NWNA, nylon wool-nonadherent; tg, transgenic; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. ![]()
4 Waldenström, M., A. Achour, J. Michaëlsson, A. Rölle, and K. Kärre. The role of an exposed loop in the
2 domain in the mouse MHC class I H-2Dd molecule for recognition by the monoclonal antibody 34-5-8S and the NK cell receptor Ly49A. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication November 20, 2000. Accepted for publication April 3, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-microglobulin: structural evidence for strain-related polymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:554.
2-microglobulin from serum associates with MHC class I antigens on the surface of cultured cells. Nature 308:642.[Medline]
2-microglobulin with H-2 class I heavy chains on the surface of mouse cells in culture. J. Immunol. 133:3203.[Abstract]
2-microglobulin with cell surfaces: the affinity of different H-2 and HLA antigens for
2-microglobulin. J. Immunol. 140:2322.[Abstract]
2-microglobulin and HLA class I heavy chains results in serologically detectable conformational changes of both chains. J. Immunol. 135:1281.[Abstract]
2-microglobulin. [Published erratum appears in 1988 Immunogenetics 27:158.]. Immunogenetics 26:351.[Medline]
2-microglobulin induces localized conformational changes in the
-1 and -2 superdomain. Immunogenetics 30:361.[Medline]
2-microglobulin. Immunogenetics 28:385.[Medline]
2-microglobulin "bound" and "free" H- 2Kb heavy chains. Mol. Immunol. 27:169.[Medline]
1 helix upon association with human
2-microglobulin. Immunol. Cell Biol. 71:145.
2-microglobulin mutations on the
1 helical region of H-2Ld. Immunogenetics 48:273.[Medline]
2-microglobulin: interactions with murine MHC I molecules. Mol. Immunol. 35:919.[Medline]
2-microglobulin on major histocompatibility complex I peptide loading and the engineering of a high affinity variant: implications for peptide-based vaccines. J. Biol. Chem. 273:28010.
2-microglobulin. J. Immunol. 160:2297.
-herpesvirus reactivation in CD4-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15565.
2-microglobulin (
2m) with mouse class I major histocompatibility antigens and its ability to support peptide binding: a comparison of human and mouse
2m. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1609.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|