|
|
||||||||
16 Couples Chemoattractant Receptors to NF-
B Activation1

*
Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612; and
Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit,
G
16, is primarily expressed in hemopoietic cells, and
interacts with a large number of seven-membrane span receptors
including chemoattractant receptors. We investigated the biological
functions resulting from G
16 coupling of chemoattractant
receptors in a transfected cell model system. HeLa cells expressing a
B-driven luciferase reporter, G
16, and the formyl
peptide receptor responded to fMLP with a
7- to 10-fold increase in
luciferase activity. This response was accompanied by phosphorylation
of I
B
and elevation of nuclear
B-DNA binding activity,
indicating activation of NF-
B. In contrast to G
16,
expression of G
q, G
13, and
G
i2 resulted in a marginal increase in
B luciferase
activity. A GTPase-deficient, constitutively active G
16
mutant (Q212L) could replace agonist stimulation for activation of
NF-
B. Furthermore, expression of G
16 (Q212L) markedly
enhanced TNF-
-induced
B reporter activity. The
G
16-mediated NF-
B activation was paralleled by an
increase in phospholipase C-
activity, and was blocked by
pharmacological inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC) and by buffering
of intracellular Ca2+. The involvement of a conventional
PKC isoform was confirmed by the finding that expression of PKC
enhanced the effect of G
16, and a dominant negative
PKC
partially blocked G
16-mediated NF-
B
activation. In addition to formyl peptide receptor, G
16
also enhanced NF-
B activation by the C5a and C3a receptors, and by
CXC chemokine receptor 2 and CCR8. These results suggest a potential
role of G
16 in transcriptional regulation downstream of
chemoattractant receptors. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunits, which possess
intrinsic GTPase activity, and tightly associated 
-subunits that
are targeted to plasma membranes. Agonist binding triggers the
activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by virtue of guanine nucleotide
exchange, converting the proteins to a GTP-bound state that activates
downstream effectors either directly or through the released G
subunits (3). Four classes of heterotrimeric G proteins
have been identified based on their primary structure (4).
In leukocytes, receptors for chemoattractants and chemokines
typically couple to the G
i proteins for various cell
responses associated with host defense. Pertussis toxin (PTX), which
catalyzes ADP ribosylation of the G
i and
G
o proteins and prevents interaction of these G proteins
with chemoattractant receptors, effectively blocks these cellular
functions (2).
Recent studies demonstrate that chemoattractant and chemokine receptors
play important roles in cell growth and differentiation.
Macrophage-inflammatory protein 1
has been found to regulate the
development of hemopoietic cells (5). Targeted deletion of
the murine IL-8 receptor homolog results in expansion of granulocytes
(6), whereas mice lacking CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)
or its ligand SDF-1 are developmentally defective (7). A
number of CXC chemokines that possess N-terminal Glu-Leu-Arg
motif have been found to stimulate angiogenesis (8). In
addition, CXC chemokines such as melanoma growth-stimulating
activity/growth-related oncogene-
stimulate the growth of
melanocytes (9). These functions of chemoattractants and
chemokines result in part from their abilities to regulate gene
transcription. Indeed, several published studies have demonstrated that
chemoattractants and chemokines stimulate the activation of NF-
B
(10, 11, 12), a transcription factor that regulates the
expression of a large number of cytokine and chemokine genes including
that for melanoma growth-stimulating activity/growth-related
oncogene-
and IL-8 (13). It is important to note that
although G
i is known for coupling chemoattractant and
chemokine receptors, its role in transcription regulation has been
unclear (14). As an example, an earlier study suggests
that the C5a receptor can use a PTX-insensitive G protein for NF-
B
activation (11). Given the established functions of
G
q and G
12 classes of G proteins in
regulating cell growth, it is possible that these G proteins couple
chemoattractant and chemokine receptors for transcription
regulation.
G
16 and its mouse equivalent G
15 are
members of the G
q family with restricted expression in
hemopoietic cells (15). A unique feature of
G
16 is that it interacts with a large number of
receptors with seven-transmembrane domain structure. In exogenous
expression systems (16, 17), receptors for IL-8, C5a, and
fMLP have been shown to use G
16 for phospholipase C-
(PLC
) activation (16, 18). A recent study demonstrated
that leukocytes from mice with targeted deletion of the
G
15 gene exhibited reduced phosphoinositide
hydrolysis in response to C5a stimulation (19). Using a
G
16 antisense approach, it has been shown that reduction
of G
16 protein level in an erythroleukemia cell line
could impair the expression of the
-globin gene (20).
However, whether G
16-mediated activation of PLC
results in gene transcription has not been established because of
technical difficulties in transfecting hemopoietic cells and the
variation of G
16 expression levels in these cells at
different developmental stages.
In this study, we sought to determine the potential involvement of
G
16 in transcriptional regulation. We examined the
ability of G
16 to stimulate NF-
B activation in a
well-characterized cell transfection system by coexpression of
G
16 with selected chemoattractant receptors and a
B-driven luciferase reporter. Our results indicate that
G
16 efficiently couples chemoattractant receptors to
NF-
B activation, suggesting a potential function of
G
16 beyond activation of PLC
.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
fMLP was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). GF 109203X,
Gö 6976, and
1,2-bis(o-amino-5-bromophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid (BAPTA) were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). The
anti-G
q Ab was purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The anti-G
i2 Ab was
prepared against a synthetic peptide with the sequences of
CAKNNLKDCGLF. The anti-G
13 Ab was a gift from Tohru
Kozasa (University of Illinois at Chicago). The
anti-G
16 Ab was obtained from Torrey Pines Biolabs
(San Diego, CA). Abs against the PLC
isoforms were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The expression vector pCMV-formyl peptide
receptor (pCMV-FPR) was constructed by subcloning of the human FPR cDNA
into the pCMV4 expression vector (21). The
G
16 expression vectors (22) were provided
by Cindy Knall and Gary Johnson (University of Colorado, Denver, CO).
Construction and characterization of the PLC
expression vectors were
described elsewhere (23). The protein kinase C (PKC)
expression constructs were provided by I. B. Weinstein (Columbia
University, New York, NY) and were described elsewhere
(24). Other plasmids used in this study were described in
a recent publication (25).
Cell culture, transfection, and luciferase reporter assay
HeLa cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/ml
penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells (
40% confluence) in
six-well plates were transfected with plasmid expression vectors coding
for a 3x
B-directed luciferase reporter (25),
G
16, FPR, and/or other expression constructs as
indicated. Where needed, pCMV
vector DNA (Promega, Madison, WI) was
added to make total DNA of 1 µg/sample. Transient transfection was
performed as described (25), using LipofectAmine Plus
reagent (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) according to manufacturer
instructions. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were
serum-starved for 1618 h, washed twice with PBS, and assayed with or
without agonist stimulation. Reporter lysis buffer (Promega) was then
added to the cells. The expressed luciferase activity was measured in a
Femtomaster FB12 luminometer (Zylux, Maryville, TN). Relative
expression level of the transfected constructs was standardized by the
use of the pRLCMV plasmid (Promega) to overcome variations between
samples. Unless otherwise indicated, all luciferase assays were
performed with duplicate samples, and 24 independent experiments were
usually conducted. Normalized data were plotted using the Prism
(version 3.0) software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Inositol phosphate (IP) production
IP production was measured as previously described (26). Briefly, 24 h after transfection, HeLa cells were labeled with myo-[3H]inositol (3 µCi/ml) (Amersham Pharmacia) in inositol-free DMEM. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were washed twice with the same medium supplemented with 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and 50 mM LiCl. Thereafter, cells were stimulated with fMLP (100 nM) at 37°C for 45 min. Reactions were stopped by removing the medium followed by addition of 1 ml ice-cold methanol. The cells were then transferred into a vial and 1.5 ml of chloroform, 0.5 ml of water were added. After vigorous vortex, the phases were separated by centrifugation. Aliquots of the upper phase (450 µl) were loaded onto packed columns containing Dowex AG1-8 (250 mg/column; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Free inositol was eluted with 10 ml of water and 10 ml of 60 mM ammonium formate. Total IPs were eluted with 1 M ammonium formate (2 ml) dissolved in 100 mM formic acid, and the associated radioactivity was measured by scintillation counting in a Beckman LS 3801 liquid scintillation counter. All measurements were performed in duplicate for a total of 23 independent experiments. Data were analyzed using the Prism software (GraphPad).
EMSA
Nuclear protein extracts were prepared as described
(27). Double-stranded NF-
B oligonucleotide, containing
the sequence 5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3' (Promega), was
end-labeled using [
-32P]ATP and T4
polynucleotide kinase. EMSA was performed according to a previously
described procedure (27), using 6% acrylamide gels and
0.5x Tris/boric acid/EDTA (TBE) buffer. The gels were dried and
autoradiograph was taken using a PhosphoImager cassette (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Analysis of the result was performed using
software from Molecular Dynamics.
Immunoblotting analysis
Proteins from whole cell extracts were separated on 610%
acrylamide SDS-PAGE gels by electrophoresis at 30 mA. Proteins were
electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membrane at 100 V for 1 h at
4°C. The membrane was pretreated with 5% nonfat milk in Tween 20 +
TBS (TTBS; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) for
12 h at room temperature. Incubation with primary Ab was performed at
4°C in TTBS with 5% BSA for 16 h. The membrane was then washed
with TTBS three times, for 10 min each, and incubated with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary Ab for 1 h at room temperature
(23°C). After three washes with TTBS, the bound Ab was detected by
enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The phosphorylated
I
B
was detected using a polyclonal Ab from Cell Signaling
Technology (Beverly, MA). The Ab recognizes phosphorylated serine-32 of
I
B
as a species with slightly higher mobility in SDS
gel.
Calcium mobilization assay
Mobilization of calcium was measured in Indo-1/AM-labeled cells. Cells were dissociated with trypsin-free buffer (Life Technologies) and washed once with HBSS. Cells were adjusted to 5 x 106/ml in HBSS and incubated with 5 µM Indo-1/AM at 37°C for 25 min. After a brief wash with HBSS, the cells were resuspended to 1 x 106/ml in HBSS. Continuous fluorescent measurements of calcium-bound and free Indo-1/AM were made using a PTI (Photon Technology International, Monmouth Junction, NJ) spectrofluorometer, detecting at 405 and 485 nm, with an excitation wavelength of 340 nm. Changes of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration was calculated as 250 · (F - Fmin)/(Fmax - F), where 250 is the Kd of Indo-1 for calcium (in nM), F is the fluorescence emission at 405 nm over that at 485 nm (A/B), Fmax is the ratio A/B when Triton X-100 is added (0.1%), and Fmin is the ratio A/B when EGTA (0.5 mM) is added to chelate the released Ca2+.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
16 for transcriptional activation, we adopted a cell
transfection system in which NF-
B activation has been extensively
characterized. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with expression
vectors for a
B-directed luciferase reporter, G
16 and
the human FPR. No significant changes in luciferase activity were
observed in unstimulated cells or in cells that expressed only the FPR
but not G
16 (Fig. 1
B activation. fMLP was found
to activate NF-
B at nanomolar concentrations. The induced luciferase
activity peaked at
100 nM of fMLP, giving a
7- to 10-fold
induction over basal level in a typical experiment (Fig. 1
q and G
13, did not
produce marked increases in NF-
B activation as seen with
G
16 (Fig. 2
i2,
believed to couple FPR to downstream signaling pathways in neutrophils,
brought only marginal increase in NF-
B activation. Except for
G
16, all G proteins tested are present in HeLa cells,
and cotransfection with the respective G
constructs under the
experimental conditions only slightly increased their cellular protein
levels (Fig. 1
2030%, there could be a greater increase in the G protein levels
in the transfected cells. Increasing the amounts of the
G
16 construct resulted in dose-dependent increases of
cellular G
16 protein levels that could be detected in
Western blot with a threshold of
80 ng of input DNA (Fig. 1
16 was present (Fig. 1
|
|
L)
impairs the intrinsic GTPase activity of G
16, resulting
in a constitutively active G protein (22). To confirm the
role of G
16 in mediating NF-
B activation, we
cotransfected a G
16QL expression construct together with
the
B luciferase reporter into HeLa cells. As shown in Fig. 2
16QL expression led to a potent activation of NF-
B
in the absence of FPR and fMLP stimulation. Maximal luciferase reporter
activity was detected in cells transfected with 510 ng of
G
16QL (Fig. 2
16QL-induced
luciferase reporter activity progressively decreased when more DNA was
used for transfection, reaching to
35% of the peak value with 200
ng of input DNA (data not shown). Using immunoblotting, we determined
that the G
16QL was expressed equally well in the
transfected cells compared with the wild-type G
16,
indicating that the high potency in activating NF-
B at lower
concentrations is an intrinsic property of this G
16
mutant. It was not clear why higher levels of G
16QL
produced less activation of NF-
B. Expression of G
16QL
at optimal concentrations dramatically enhanced TNF-
-induced
B
luciferase activity (Fig. 2
B
activation.
Activation of NF-
B results from nuclear translocation of the NF-
B
proteins and their subsequent binding to
B sequences
(28). Recent studies have revealed an additional mechanism
for NF-
B activation that involves modification of nuclear proteins,
and may not be accompanied by increased nuclear translocation of the
p65 and p50 proteins (29, 30). To determine whether
G
16 stimulates nuclear translocation of the NF-
B
proteins, a process that involves phosphorylation and degradation of
I
B
by the I
B kinases (IKKs), EMSAs were performed using a
[32P]-labeled probe containing consensus
B
binding sequence. As shown in Fig. 3
A, expression of FPR alone
(lane 3) did not stimulate
B binding activity.
fMLP induced nuclear translocation and binding of the NF-
B proteins
only in the presence of both FPR and G
16
(lane 6). The fMLP-induced response is less potent
than the TNF-
-induced response (lane 2). The
difference could be attributed in part to the small population of cells
(
2030%) that were transfected and, therefore, responsive to fMLP
stimulation, whereas all cells could respond to TNF-
. The
fMLP-induced NF-
B activation involves mostly IKK2 (IKK
) because
coexpression of a dominant negative IKK2 (IKK2DN) construct, but not
the IKK1DN (IKK
DN) construct, markedly blocked the
B binding
activity in EMSA (compare lane 8 to lane 7).
Expression of a "super repressor" of I
B
(I
B
M) devoid of
constitutive and inducible serine phosphorylation (31),
abolished fMLP-stimulated
B binding activity in EMSA
(lane 9). That fMLP-stimulated NF-
B activation
follows I
B
phosphorylation was further demonstrated by the
detection of a phosphorylated I
B
10 min after ligand addition,
using a specific polyclonal Ab against phosphorylated serine-32 of
I
B
(Fig. 3
B).
|
B activation induced by inflammatory stimuli, whereas IKK1 plays
an important role in development (32, 33, 34). Consistent with
the EMSA data, results from reporter assays indicate that coexpression
of IKK2DN almost completely blocked the luciferase activities induced
by fMLP (Fig. 3
16QL (Fig. 3
B
"super repressor"
completely abolished NF-
B activation by fMLP and
G
16QL in luciferase reporter assays (Fig. 3
B
activation by G
16 involves phosphorylation of I
B
by IKK, primarily IKK2.
To further explore the signaling mechanism by which G
16
mediates NF-
B activation, we examined involvement of PLC
, a
downstream effector of G
16 (35, 36). As
shown in Fig. 4
A, expression
of G
16QL in HeLa cells increased IP production. The
elevated IP level was further enhanced (
40%) by cotransfection of a
PLC
2 construct (Fig. 4
A). A similar increase in IP
production was observed in cells transfected with the FPR and
G
16 and stimulated with fMLP (data not shown). The
potentiation effect of the coexpressed PLC
2 on IP production
paralleled a marked increase (
100%) in
B reporter activity, but
expression of PLC
2 alone had no effect (Fig. 4
B).
Subsequently, we investigated the function of other PLC
isoforms
that are known effectors of G
16 (36). As
determined by immunoblotting using specific PLC
Abs, HeLa cells
contain both PLC
1 and PLC
3, but not PLC
2 (Fig. 4
C).
Cotransfection with plasmids for these PLC
isoforms slightly
increased their intracellular protein levels, although the actual
increase in the transfected cells may be higher. Accordingly, there was
a
40 and a
80% increase of
B luciferase activity over the
level induced by G
16QL in cells cotransfected with the
PLC
1 and PLC
3 constructs, respectively (Fig. 4
D).
|
leads to production of the second messengers
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and
diacylglycerol (37, 38). The former triggers release of
free calcium from intracellular stores, whereas the latter activates
PKC. Although NF-
B can be activated by some PKC isoforms, the
mechanism that involves G protein and PLC
has not been directly
explored. We found that in the transfected HeLa cells, fMLP-induced
NF-
B activation could be readily blocked by GF 109203X, an inhibitor
of conventional and novel PKC isoforms, and by Gö 6976, which
inhibits the conventional PKC isoforms (Fig. 5
B
activation. These results together suggest a role of conventional PKC
in G
16-mediated NF-
B activation. To further test this
possibility, expression constructs coding for representative PKC
isozymes (PKC
, PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
) were cotransfected into
HeLa cells, and
B luciferase assays were performed. Among the four
PKC isoforms, only PKC
potentiated fMLP-induced luciferase activity
(Fig. 5
(PKC
DN) with a Lys
Arg switch at position 368,
partially inhibited NF-
B activation by fMLP (Fig. 5
16QL (Fig. 5
stimulated
B luciferase activity to an
extent similar to that induced by G
16QL (Fig. 5
|
16 for PLC
activation
(16, 17, 18). Therefore, we examined whether
G
16 coupling to NF-
B activation is restricted to the
FPR, or it also applies to other receptors. Selected
chemoattractant and chemokine receptors were transiently expressed in
HeLa cells, which were then stimulated with the respective agonists
for
B luciferase assays. In the absence of cotransfected
G
16, cells expressing the receptors responded to
agonist stimulation (100 nM each) with minimally enhanced
luciferase activities (Fig. 6
16 expression construct
dramatically enhanced the agonist-stimulated luciferase activity by 18-
and 14-fold for C5aR and C3aR, and by 4.5- and 4.1-fold for CXCR2 and
CCR8, respectively (Fig. 6
16 for NF-
B activation. Therefore, we examined
whether G
16-mediated NF-
B activation could accurately
reflect signaling through the chemoattractant receptors. Using the FPR
as an example, we conducted calcium mobilization and
B luciferase
assays to test cell responsiveness to a group of synthetic peptides
derived from recently identified FPR and FPRL1 agonists
(39, 40, 41, 42). As shown in Fig. 6
B
luciferase activation are consistent with their potency in the
induction of calcium mobilization. The P2 peptide
(WKYMVm-NH2), known to bind and activate FPR and
FPRL1 (39), elicited responses similar to those induced by
fMLP in both the luciferase and calcium mobilization assays. Carboxyl-
or amino-terminal modifications of P2 resulted in peptides (P1, P3, and
P4) with markedly reduced potency in both calcium mobilization and
luciferase assays. The P5 and P6 peptides, which preferentially
activate FPRL1 over FPR (41), did not induce either
calcium mobilization or
B luciferase expression in FPR-transfected
cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
16 has been known to couple a large number of G
protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for PLC
activation. However, the
biological consequence of G
16 activation by these GPCRs
has not been determined. The lack of this information is partly due to
technical difficulties in biochemical characterization of the
G
16 protein (36) and in the transfection of
hemopoietic cells in which G
16 is expressed
(18). A number of recent studies suggest that
G
16 coupling of chemoattractant and chemokine receptors
may be important for leukocyte functions. It was shown that
transmembrane signaling of the leukotriene B4 receptor is mediated by
both G
i and G
16 (43). In
human T cells, alteration of the G
16 expression level by
cell-activating agents affects TCR-mediated functions
(44). In other hemopoietic cells, G
16 is
known to couple the P2U purinergic receptor to calcium mobilization
(20), and has been suggested to mediate some of the
functions of thromboxane A2 receptor (45).
G
16 is expressed at higher levels in early stages of
hemopoietic cells, and in poorly differentiated leukemia cells
(46). These findings suggest an association of
G
16 with hemopoietic cell growth and differentiation.
In this study, we used transiently transfected cells to assess the
potential function of G
16 in NF-
B activation. Our
results demonstrate that, among four different G proteins examined, FPR
preferentially couples to G
16 for this function.
Overexpression of G
i2, which is known to couple the FPR
for leukocyte activation, only marginally increased fMLP-induced
NF-
B activation. We have also tested the C5a and C3a receptors, as
well as two representative chemokine receptors (CXCR2 and CCR8), for
their abilities to activate NF-
B. In the absence of
G
16, C5a (100 nM) induced a
2-fold increase in the
expression of the
B luciferase reporter. A G
i
protein(s) likely mediates this activity because it could be blocked by
PTX (data not shown). Activation of G
i results in the
release of G
proteins that mediate leukocyte chemotaxis and other
functions. Thus, G
but not G
i presumably is
responsible for the induced NF-
B activation. In comparison,
expression of G
16 resulted in a potent induction of
NF-
B activation with all the five receptors tested. These findings
suggest that the chemoattractant and chemokine receptors preferentially
couple to G
16 over G
i for NF-
B
activation.
Our experimental data indicate that the activated G
16
(Q212L) is a highly potent inducer for NF-
B activation. In
comparison, maximal induction of the same
B luciferase reporter by
an activated G
q (Q209L) requires DNA input in the range
of 100200 ng per sample (data not shown). The high potency of
G
16 is likely an intrinsic property of this G
protein, and may contribute to its ability to couple the
chemoattractant receptors for NF-
B activation. We noted that
overexpression of the activated G
16 could reduce the
expression of the
B-driven luciferase reporter (Fig. 2
A
and data not shown). This may result from down-regulation of PKC
after protracted stimulation, as observed in cells treated with phorbol
ester overnight. It is also possible that G
16 (Q212L)
inhibits cell growth (22) when expressed at high
concentrations, thereby reducing the ability to activate NF-
B.
We observed that activated G
16 markedly enhanced the
TNF-
-induced NF-
B activation (Fig. 2
B), suggesting
that chemoattractants and chemokines work together with cytokines and
growth factors for transcription activation. TNF-
is known to act on
TNFR1, which couples to TNFR-associated factor for activation of the
downstream kinases responsible for IKK activation. GPCR that couples to
G
16 activates a different signaling pathway involving
PLC
and PKC
. Because both TNFR1- and G
16-mediated
NF-
B activation involve IKK, these two signaling pathways likely
converge on or before IKK activation and thereby create an additive or
synergistic effect on NF-
B activation. This possibility can be more
readily tested when stably transfected cells expressing both FPR and
G
16 become available. The synergism between TNF-
and
G
16 may also result from modification of NF-
B
coactivators, but additional experiments will be necessary to examine
this possibility. In leukocytes and other hemopoietic cells, activation
of G
16 may synergize the effect of
G
i-coupled receptors. This possibility has been
suggested by a recent study demonstrating that preactivation of PLC
by G
16 permits subsequent stimulation by G
i-coupled
receptors in transiently transfected COS-7 cells
(47). Indeed, in macrophages derived from
G
15-/- mice, C5a-stimulated
phosphoinositide accumulation and Ca2+ release
were significantly reduced (19). These findings, combined
with the regulation of G
16 expression level at various
stages of cell differentiation (15, 48), suggest the
potential of G
16 in regulating transcription and other
cellular functions in conjunction with other cytokine receptors and
GPCRs. Future studies will focus on the identification of GPCRs that
functionally couple to G
16 at early stages of
hemopoiesis, when this G protein most likely plays an important role in
cell growth and differentiation.
G
16 was first characterized for its ability to stimulate
PLC
activation (23, 36). Our results extend this
function to the activation of a transcription factor, suggesting that
other G proteins may also activate NF-
B through PLC
. Indeed,
several GPCRs that primarily couple to G
q have been
shown to stimulate NF-
B activation (27, 49, 50). We
have shown that all three PLC
isoforms found in non-neuronal cells
can function in this capacity. Although PLC
2 appears to be highly
efficient in mediating G
16-induced NF-
B activation,
cells lacking PLC
2 (such as HeLa) may use PLC
1 and PLC
3 for
NF-
B activation by this G protein. Because PLC
expression levels
vary under our experimental conditions, we cannot conclude whether
PLC
2 is more efficient than other PLC
isoforms in mediating
NF-
B activation. Our data indicate that the conventional PKC
isoform, PKC
, is largely responsible for G
16-induced
and PLC
-mediated NF-
B activation (Fig. 5
). PKC
is a downstream
effector of PLC
and can be activated by diacylglycerol, one of the
PLC
-generated second messengers. PLC
activation also produces
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which induces release of
Ca2+ from intracellular stores (37).
It is known that activation of PKC
requires
Ca2+. Consistent with this, buffering of
intracellular Ca2+ by BAPTA blocked
G
16-induced NF-
B activation. PKC
has been known to
play a role in NF-
B activation, such as in cells stimulated by
phorbol esters (51, 52). Our results provide an example of
NF-
B activation by PKC
through a pathway that involves G proteins
and PLC
. However, we noted that G
16-induced NF-
B
activation was not completely blocked by the PKC inhibitors or by the
DN PKC
. Therefore, it is possible that G
16 also
triggers other signaling pathways that contribute to NF-
B
activation.
We have tested five selected chemoattractant and chemokine receptors
and found that these G
i-coupling receptors were able to stimulate
G
16 and activate NF-
B to various degrees. Whether all
G
i-coupling receptors possess this property remains to
be investigated, but our results from the FPR study suggest that the
ability of selected peptide ligands to induce NF-
B activation
corresponds to their calcium mobilization potency. The P2 peptide
WKYMVm-NH2 (42) has been shown to
activate both FPR and a related receptor, FPRL1 (39). We
demonstrate here that modifications of the carboxyl terminus or amino
terminus (P1, P3, and P4; see Fig. 6
) severely impaired the
potency of this peptide in both calcium mobilization and NF-
B
activation assays. Our results also confirmed that peptides P5 and P6,
which are known agonists for FPRL1 (41), do not activate
FPR at the concentration used (100 nM). These findings suggest a
potential usage of G
16-mediated transcription activation
in agonist and antagonist selection (53). Reporter-based
assays provide a rapid and sensitive readout for GPCR signaling and
have been widely used in both basic research and new drug discovery
(54). With the development of cell lines that stably
express G
16 and a
B reporter, the
G
16-based assay may find its use in high-throughput
screening of drug candidates for a large number of chemoattractant and
chemokine receptors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
13 Ab, and Cindy Knall and Gary Johnson
for the G
16 constructs used in this study. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard D. Ye, Department of Pharmacology, MC868, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 South Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail address: yer{at}uic.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: G protein, guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein; FPR, formyl peptide receptor; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptors; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC
, phospholipase C-
; PTX, pertussis toxin; IKK, I
B kinase; BAPTA, 1,2-bis(o-amino-5-bromophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid; CXCR, CXC chemokine receptor; TTBS, Tween 20 + TBS; IP, inositol phosphate; DN, dominant negative. ![]()
Received for publication December 5, 2000. Accepted for publication March 23, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B by fMet-Leu-Phe in myeloid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:7995.
B activation is required for C5a-induced interleukin-8 gene expression in mononuclear cells. Blood 93:3241.
B in the immune system. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32:141.
16, a G protein
subunit specifically expressed in hematopoietic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5587.
15 and G
16 couple a wide variety of receptors to phospholipase C. J. Biol. Chem. 270:15175.
15 knockout mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:797.
16 inhibits Swiss 3T3 cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 269:17417.
q subunit gene family activate phospholipase C
isozymes. J. Biol. Chem. 267:16044.
B by bradykinin through a G
q- and G
-dependent pathway that involves phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Akt. J. Biol. Chem. 275:24907.
-1B adrenoceptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286:36.
B activation through a G protein-coupled pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 25:14928.
B and I
B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:649.[Medline]
B p65/RelA subunit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4798.
B activation in an inhibitory protein
B
-independent manner by enhancing the ability of the p65 subunit to transactivate gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 275:3114.
induced apoptosis by NF-
B. Science 274:787.
B kinase 2 gene. Science 284:321.
subunit of I
B kinase (IKK) is essential for nuclear factor
B activation and prevention of apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 189:1839.
2 by the
and 
subunits of trimeric GTP-binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5297.
16 from Sf9 cells: activation of purified phospholipase C isozymes by G-protein
subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9176.
i and
16, but not
q or
11 G-protein subunits. Biochem. J. 335:15.
16 protein expression is up- and down-regulated following T-cell activation: disruption of this regulation impairs activation-induced cell responses. FEBS Lett. 417:292.[Medline]
16, a G-protein
subunit specific for hematopoiesis in acute leukemia. Leukemia 10:1117.[Medline]
B in fibroblasts: a requirement for multiple inputs. J. Biol. Chem. 274:3828.
B activation and interleukin 1
gene expression in cultured human fibroblasts. J. Clin. Invest. 98:2042.[Medline]
B kinase
by protein kinase C isoforms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:2180.
-lactamase as reporter. Science 279:84.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Ye, F. Boulay, J. M. Wang, C. Dahlgren, C. Gerard, M. Parmentier, C. N. Serhan, and P. M. Murphy International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIII. Nomenclature for the Formyl Peptide Receptor (FPR) Family Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2009; 61(2): 119 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Allen, D. R. Moore, X. Wang, V. Casu, R. May, M. R. Lerner, C. Houchen, D. J. Brackett, and M. M. Huycke Dichotomous metabolism of Enterococcus faecalis induced by haematin starvation modulates colonic gene expression J. Med. Microbiol., October 1, 2008; 57(10): 1193 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Shi, S. Partida-Sanchez, R. S. Misra, M. Tighe, M. T. Borchers, J. J. Lee, M. I. Simon, and F. E. Lund Identification of an alternative G{alpha}q-dependent chemokine receptor signal transduction pathway in dendritic cells and granulocytes J. Exp. Med., October 29, 2007; 204(11): 2705 - 2718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lattin, D. A. Zidar, K. Schroder, S. Kellie, D. A. Hume, and M. J. Sweet G-protein-coupled receptor expression, function, and signaling in macrophages J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2007; 82(1): 16 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Thurman, A. M. Lenderink, P. A. Royer, K. E. Coleman, J. Zhou, J. D. Lambris, R. A. Nemenoff, R. J. Quigg, and V. M. Holers C3a Is Required for the Production of CXC Chemokines by Tubular Epithelial Cells after Renal Ishemia/Reperfusion J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1819 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. F. Liu and Y. H. Wong Activation of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B by Somatostatin Type 2 Receptor in Pancreatic Acinar AR42J Cells Involves G{alpha}14 and Multiple Signaling Components: A MECHANISM REQUIRING PROTEIN KINASE C, CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT KINASE II, ERK, AND c-Src J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 34617 - 34625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wettschureck and S. Offermanns Mammalian G Proteins and Their Cell Type Specific Functions Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1159 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Peavy, K. B. Hubbard, A. Lau, R. B. Fields, K. Xu, C. J. Lee, T. T. Lee, K. Gernert, T. J. Murphy, and J. R. Hepler Differential Effects of Gq{alpha}, G14{alpha}, and G15{alpha} on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Survival and Gene Expression Profiles Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 2102 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yang, W. W. Zhong, N. Srivastava, A. Slavin, J. Yang, T. Hoey, and S. An G protein-coupled lysophosphatidic acid receptors stimulate proliferation of colon cancer cells through the {beta}-catenin pathway PNAS, April 26, 2005; 102(17): 6027 - 6032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. F. Liu and Y. H. Wong G16-mediated Activation of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B by the Adenosine A1 Receptor Involves c-Src, Protein Kinase C, and ERK Signaling J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53196 - 53204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nanamori, X. Cheng, J. Mei, H. Sang, Y. Xuan, C. Zhou, M.-W. Wang, and R. D. Ye A Novel Nonpeptide Ligand for Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1 Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 66(5): 1213 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. H. Lo and Y. H. Wong Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Activation by the {delta}-Opioid Receptor via G{alpha}14 Involves Multiple Intermediates Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2004; 65(6): 1427 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Bakker, P. Casarosa, H. Timmerman, M. J. Smit, and R. Leurs Constitutively active Gq/11-coupled Receptors Enable Signaling by Co-expressed Gi/o-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5152 - 5161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. H. Lo, H. Cheung, and Y. H. Wong Constitutively Active G{alpha}16 Stimulates STAT3 via a c-Src/JAK- and ERK-dependent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 52154 - 52165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Strey, M. Markiewski, D. Mastellos, R. Tudoran, L. A. Spruce, L. E. Greenbaum, and J. D. Lambris The Proinflammatory Mediators C3a and C5a Are Essential for Liver Regeneration J. Exp. Med., September 15, 2003; 198(6): 913 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yang, H. Zhang, T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, and R. D. Ye Requirement of G{beta}{gamma} and c-Src in D2 Dopamine Receptor-Mediated Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Activation Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2003; 64(2): 447 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Marty, D. D. Browning, and R. D. Ye Identification of Tetratricopeptide Repeat 1 as an Adaptor Protein That Interacts with Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the Small GTPase Ras Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 3847 - 3858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chandrasekar, P. C. Melby, H. M. Sarau, M. Raveendran, R. P. Perla, F. M. Marelli-Berg, N. O. Dulin, and I. S. Singh Chemokine-Cytokine Cross-talk. THE ELR+ CXC CHEMOKINE LIX (CXCL5) AMPLIFIES A PROINFLAMMATORY CYTOKINE RESPONSE VIA A PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE-NF-kappa B PATHWAY J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 4675 - 4686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mo, J. Chen, Y. Han, C. Bueno-Cannizares, D. E. Misek, P. A. Lescure, S. Hanash, and R. L. Yung T Cell Chemokine Receptor Expression in Aging J. Immunol., January 15, 2003; 170(2): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Al-Mohanna, S. Saleh, R. S. Parhar, and K. Collison IL-12-dependent nuclear factor-{kappa}B activation leads to de novo synthesis and release of IL-8 and TNF-{alpha} in human neutrophils J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2002; 72(5): 995 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Ye Regulation of nuclear factor {kappa}B activation by G-protein-coupled receptors J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2001; 70(6): 839 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |