|
|
||||||||

*
Umeå Center for Molecular Pathogenesis, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; and
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-microglobulin-/-. The results show that
the total numbers of NK cells were not different among the strains. The
prior expression of a Ly49 receptor capable of binding to self MHC
class I altered the percentage of NK cells expressing endogenous Ly49A,
Ly49G2, and Ly49D even in mice in which no MHC ligand was present for
the latter receptors. The NK cells in the Ly49-transgenic mice
expressed the same level of endogenous Ly49 receptors as wild-type mice
of a similar MHC background. In contrast, the number of NK T cells was
reduced in mice in which the Ly49 transgene could bind to a MHC class I
molecule. The onset of Ly49 receptor expression on NK cells during
ontogeny was not altered in the presence of transgenic Ly49 receptors.
These data support a sequential model and argue against a selection
model for Ly49 repertoire development on NK
cells. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Ly49 family of receptors consists of both inhibitory and activating receptors. The inhibitory receptors contain an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif in the cytoplasmic tail that, upon receptor cross-linking, recruits Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase-1 and -2 (11, 12, 13, 14). Ly49A is the best characterized member and has been shown to recognize the class I molecules H-2Dd, Dk, and Dp, and binding mediates a negative signal to the NK cell, resulting in inhibition of lysis (15, 16, 17). Recent studies suggest that Ly49A may also interact weakly with H-2b molecules, but the affinity may be too low to observe inhibition of target cell lysis in vitro but sufficient to induce effects on Ly49A receptor expression in vivo (18, 19, 20, 21). Ly49C and Ly49G2 are also inhibitory members of the Ly49 family. Ly49C, which has a broad specificity, binds to class I molecules of H-2d, H-2k, H-2b, and H-2s (22, 23, 24, 25, 26) but binds most strongly to H-2Kb. Ly49G2 binds to H-2Dd and H-2Ld (27). The activating receptor, Ly49D, has a short cytoplasmic tail that lacks immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs and forms a complex with an adaptor molecule, DAP12, that contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (28, 29, 30). Upon interaction with H-2Dd, Ly49D delivers a stimulatory signal (28, 31). Inhibitory Ly49 receptors, but not activating ones, are also expressed on subsets of CD1-restricted NK T cells and accumulate on memory CD8 T cells with age (32, 33, 34, 35). Both the function and regulation of Ly49 receptors on T cells are not well understood (36).
The heterogeneous pattern of Ly49 receptors seen on NK cells suggests
that they are expressed in a stochastic way. Several inhibitory
receptors have been reported to be coexpressed at the surface of a
given NK cell. Single-cell PCR demonstrated that murine NK cells could
express up to six different inhibitory receptors and showed a highly
diverse pattern of coexpression (37). The percentage of NK
cells expressing two distinct Ly49 receptors can be predicted from the
product of their frequencies in the total NK cell population
(38). Earlier reports have shown that the repertoire of
inhibitory receptor expression by NK cells is influenced by the MHC
class I expression in the host. First, there is a higher proportion of
Ly49+ NK cells in mice deficient in
2-microblobulin
(
2m)3
compared with
2m+ mice
(39, 40). Second, introducing an
H-2Dd transgene in B6
(H-2b) mice allowed specific subsets of NK cells
to develop that were inhibited by H-2Dd but not
by H-2b and, thus, rejected bone marrow
transplants from B6 mice (41). Third, NK cells that
express multiple H-2d-specific Ly49 receptors are
significantly less frequent in H-2d mice compared
with H-2b mice (20). These results
suggest that there is a mechanism that disfavors coexpression of
multiple self class I specific receptors on NK cells and that NK cells
need to adapt to the MHC environment in which they develop. To allow NK
cells to be more sensitive to alterations in only one of the class I
alleles, NK cells may avoid expressing too many different inhibitory
receptors for self MHC. Both selection and sequential models have been
proposed to account for the development of a useful Ly49 repertoire in
mice (38). The selection model proposes that NK cells
express Ly49 receptors, and then those cells with at least one, but not
too many, receptors that bind to self MHC are selected for survival.
The sequential model proposes that NK cells sequentially express Ly49
receptors and are continuously selected for expression of receptors
that bind to self MHC.
We have studied how one or two inhibitory receptors expressed on all NK
and T cells influence the expression and regulation of the endogenous
Ly49 molecules, both inhibitory and activating types, using Ly49A-,
Ly49C-, and Ly49A/C-transgenic mice. To investigate how host MHC class
I molecules effect the NK repertoire, we introduced the transgenes onto
four different MHC class I haplotypes, H-2b,
H-2d, H-2d/b, and
2m-/-
(H-2b). We examined the numbers of NK cells and
NK T cells, the percentage of different Ly49 receptors, and the level
of receptor expression. We discuss our results in relation to the
selection and sequential models for Ly49 repertoire development.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B6 H-2b mice were purchased from
Bomholtgård Breeding and Research Center (Ry, Denmark). B10.D2
H-2d mice and
2m-/- mice (on B6
background) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor,
ME). Db-/-, Kb-/-, and
KbDb-/- mice were kindly
provided by F. Lemonnier (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) and have
been previously described (42). Mice were bred and
maintained at the animal facility at Umeå University (Umeå, Sweden),
the animal house at the Swedish Defence Research Agency (Umeå,
Sweden), or at the animal house at Microbiology and Tumor Biology
Center (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden). All animal
work was approved by the local Animal Ethical Committee (Umeå,
Sweden).
Production of transgenic mice
A 950-bp Ly49C cDNA clone was cloned into VACD2
(43) and used to produce VA49C-transgenic mice using
F1(CBA x B10.D2) as egg donors. Several
different founder lines were generated, and two of them were then
backcrossed to B10.D2 and selected for expression of
H-2d and no expression of
H-2k. B6VA49A-transgenic mice were produced onto
a B6 background directly and have been previously described
(19). Staining peripheral blood lymphocytes with
anti-Ly49A, anti-Ly49C/I Abs, or Ly49C antiserum identified
transgenic founder mice. Two different Ly49C founder lines have been
studied in this paper, numbers 20 and 25. The mice used in these
studies have been backcrossed at least four and up to eight generations
to B10.D2. We have no evidence for changes in phenotypes when comparing
animals from these different backcrossed generations or between the two
different founder lines used. To generate H-2d/b
and H-2b mice, Ly49C-transgenic mice from BC5
were bred to B6 mice. To generate
2m-/- mice, the
H-2b Ly49C-transgenic mice were bred to B6
2m-/- mice
(H-2b) and selected for
H-2b but not H-2d
expression. The presence of only H-2b was
confirmed by PCR. The Ly49C-transgenic H-2b
2m+/- mice were then
bred to B6
2m-/- mice,
and those that expressed Ly49C but not H-2Kb were
taken as
Ly49C-transgenic+
2m-/-
mice. To avoid any potential effects from not having a pure inbred
background, we have used littermates as controls in the same
experiment. Animals analyzed were between 7 and 12 wk of age with the
exception of those used in experiments that involved the analysis of
receptor expression during ontogeny, in which the ages of the mice are
indicated.
Antibodies
Antibodies used were 2.4G2 (anti-FcR
), biotin
(B)-conjugated YE1/48 (anti-Ly49A), B-5E6 (anti-Ly49C/I), and
B-4D11 (anti-Ly49G2), which were purified and biotinylated from
hybridoma supernatants. B-KT 15 (anti-CD8) was purchased from
Immunokontakt (Stockholm, Sweden). B-conjugated CTDb
(anti-H-2Db) was purchased from Caltag
(Burlingame, CA). B-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit was purchased
from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden). FITC -conjugated
HB102 (anti-H-2Dd), FITC-conjugated
anti-CD4, and FITC-conjugated Ly-5 (B220) were purchased from
Caltag. FITC-conjugated PK136 (anti-NK1.1), FITC-conjugated 5E6
(anti-Ly49C/I), and FITC-conjugated 4E5 (anti-Ly49D) were
purchased from BD PharMingen (Stockholm, Sweden). PE -conjugated
anti-CD3
and PE-conjugated anti-CD4 were also purchased from
BD PharMingen. RED670-conjugated streptavidin was purchased from Life
Technologies (Täby, Sweden). Ly49C rabbit antiserum (CTO64) was
the kind gift of Dr. M. Bennett, University of Texas South-Western
Medical Center (Dallas, TX).
Isolation of liver lymphocytes
Livers were perfused with PBS, cut into pieces, and pressed through a steel mesh. After washing with PBS, cells were resuspended in PBS plus Percoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), layered onto 80% Percoll, and centrifuged for 20 min at 2000 rpm. The interfaces were collected and washed. Remaining red cells were lysed with ammonium chloride.
Flow cytometry
To inhibit nonspecific binding of Abs to the FcR
, spleen
cells depleted of erythrocytes and liver cells were incubated with
anti-FcR
Abs for 20 min at 4°C before staining with specific
Abs. Briefly, cells (106) were incubated with
primary Abs for 30 min at 4°C. After washing with staining buffer
(PBS containing 1% FCS), cells were incubated with streptavidin
conjugates for 30 min at 4°C. When using the Ly49C rabbit antiserum
for detecting Ly49C expression, an additional incubation with B-donkey
anti-rabbit Ab was included. After a final wash, cells were
resuspended in PBS and analyzed using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences,
San Jose, CA). Viable lymphocytes are shown after gating on forward and
side scatter.
Cytotoxicity assays
Erythrocyte depleted splenocytes were cultured in
MEM (Life
Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS, 10 mM HEPES, 2 x
10-5 M 2-ME, 100 U/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml
penicillin, and 1000 U of human rIL-2 (PeproTech, Rockyhill, NJ) for 4
days in 37°C 10% CO2 and used as effector
cells in a conventional 4-h 51Cr release assay
(44). In blocking experiments, effector cells were
incubated with 10 µg/ml of F(ab')2
anti-mouse Ly49C/I (5E6) for 45 min at 37°C before targets cells
were added to the wells as described (19).
Statistics
Data were analyzed using nonparametric ANOVA methods.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ly49C is normally expressed on
3035% of NK cells and on a
few percent of NK T cells in B6 mice (34, 45). Several
different MHC class I molecules, in particular
H-2Kb, have been shown to be a ligand for Ly49C.
To test how expression of Ly49C on all NK cells influences the
endogenous Ly49 repertoire, we generated Ly49C-transgenic mice (VA49C)
by introducing a Ly49C B6 cDNA under the control
of the CD2 promoter. VA49C-transgenic mice expressed Ly49C on all NK
and T cells (Fig. 1
). The expression
level on NK cells was comparable to the endogenous levels seen on the
nontransgenic NK cells. This staining pattern resembles what was
previously observed for Ly49A in the B6VA49A-transgenic mice, generated
using the same promoter construct (19). Host expression of
an MHC class I ligand leads to reduced surface expression of the
corresponding Ly49 receptor on NK cells (46, 47). The
expression level of the Ly49C transgene was down-regulated on both T
cells and NK cells in H-2d and
H-2d/b mice, compared with
2m-/- mice, which have
very low expression levels of MHC class I. The expression level of
Ly49C was lower in the H-2d/b background than in
the H-2d, suggesting that Ly49C interacts with
both H-2b and H-2d
molecules, which is consistent with previous reports (23, 25, 26).
|
|
The sequential and selection models make different predictions for
how the Ly49 repertoire would be altered in situations in which all NK
cells express one Ly49 receptor that binds to self MHC or two Ly49
receptors that bind to self MHC. To study the formation and regulation
of the Ly49 receptor repertoire and to test the two models, we used
Ly49C- and Ly49A-transgenic mice. Transgenic mice were bred onto MHC
backgrounds so that they expressed a strong ligand for Ly49C
(H-2b, B6), a strong ligand for Ly49A
(H-2d, B10.D2), ligands for both Ly49A and Ly49C
(H-2d/b, F1), or very
little MHC class I
(
2m-/-) to generate
sixteen different Ly49-MHC combinations. These offspring allowed us to
study how one or two inhibitory receptors on all NK cells altered the
overall Ly49 repertoire in the context of the MHC haplotype of the
host. Many of the Ly49A-transgenic mice that were bred onto a
H-2d background developed a severe inflammatory
disease and died at 34 wk of age (19). In this study,
the only Ly49A- or Ly49A/C-transgenic mice that expressed
H-2d/b included in the analysis were those with
no overt signs of this inflammatory condition. No signs of inflammatory
disease have been observed in the Ly49C-transgenic mice on any of the
MHC backgrounds analyzed thus far. Our data (Fig. 3
) describe the expression of endogenous
Ly49G2, Ly49A, and Ly49D receptors in the presence of different Ly49
transgenes and MHC class I environments.
|
Table I
shows the percentage of NK
cells in the spleens of mice with the different MHC and Ly49 transgene
combinations. The total numbers and the percentages of
NK1.1+CD3- cells were not
altered in the transgenic mice compared with nontransgenic mice. These
data indicate that expression of one or two inhibitory receptors on all
NK cells did not change the size of the NK cell pool.
|
Ly49C has been shown to interact with ligands of both the
H-2b and H-2d haplotypes. A
decrease in the percentage of Ly49G2+ NK cells
was seen in the Ly49C-transgenic mice of H-2d and
H-2d/b haplotypes (Fig. 3
A). These
mice express MHC ligands for both Ly49C and Ly49G2, and the decrease in
Ly49G2+ NK cells may be explained by a need to
limit the types of inhibitory receptors that bind to self MHC on a
given NK cell. However, in Ly49C transgenic mice on an
H-2b background, there was also a decrease in the
percentage of NK cells expressing Ly49G2 (27%) compared with the
nontransgenic littermates (49%). In Ly49C-transgenic mice on a
2m-deficient background, which have very low
MHC class I levels, there was no decrease in the percentage of
Ly49G2+ NK cells. The level of Ly49G2 receptors
expressed on NK cells from each of the different MHC haplotypes was no
different from that expressed by the wild-type mice of that haplotype
(data not shown). Thus, the reduction in the percentage of
Ly49G2+ NK cells was dependent upon the
expression of an MHC ligand for the Ly49C transgene and not upon the
expression of a ligand for Ly49G2.
Ly49A expression in Ly49C-transgenic mice
Ly49A has a strong ligand in H-2d
(H-2Dd) mice and a weak ligand in
H-2b mice. The frequency of NK cells expressing
endogenous Ly49A was decreased in the Ly49C-transgenic mice on all
three class I-positive backgrounds, H-2b,
H-2d, H-2d/b, compared with
the respective nontransgenic littermates (Fig. 3
B). The drop
in the percentage of Ly49A+ NK cells in the
transgenic mice was very similar between the three different types of
class I+ mice. This was similar as seen for the
Ly49G2+ NK cells in the same mice. No significant
difference in the percentage of Ly49A+ NK cells
between Ly49C-transgenic mice expressing strong ligand for Ly49A
(H-2d) or mice expressing a weak ligand
(H-2b) was observed. Surprisingly, expression of
Ly49C on all NK cells in
2m-/- mice reduced the
percentage of NK cells expressing endogenous Ly49A. This observation
would not have been predicted from either a sequential or a selection
model for Ly49 repertoire development. Similar to the expression levels
of Ly49G2, the expression levels of Ly49A on NK cells were altered by
the host MHC haplotype but not by the expression of the Ly49C
transgene. That is, the level of Ly49A receptors expressed was similar
to the wild-type littermates for each MHC haplotype (data not
shown).
Ly49D expression in Ly49C transgenic mice
Ly49D is an activating receptor that is normally expressed on 50%
of NK cells but is not found on NK T cells. Ly49D interacts with
H-2Dd molecules. Ly49C-transgenic
H-2b mice showed a significant drop in the
percentage of NK cells expressing Ly49D (30%) compared with
nontransgenic littermates (47%) (Fig. 3
C). However, the
decrease in the percentage of NK cells that expressed Ly49D was less in
mice that expressed H-2Dd. There was no decrease
in the percentage of Ly49D+ NK cells in
Ly49C-transgenic mice in the absence of MHC class I expression
(
2m-/-). Thus, in mice
in which Ly49C can bind to an MHC class I ligand, there was a decrease
in Ly49D+ NK cells that could be somewhat
reversed in mice also carrying a ligand for Ly49D. These data suggest
that interaction of activating Ly49 receptors with their MHC ligands
during NK cell development may lead to survival or expansion of that
subset.
Ly49G2 expression in Ly49A-transgenic mice
Ly49G2 and Ly49A both bind to H-2Dd. In
Ly49A H-2d/b mice in which Ly49A has a strong
ligand, the frequency of NK cells expressing Ly49G2, which also has a
ligand in these mice, was reduced from 48 to 18% (Fig. 3
A).
A similar observation has been reported in other Ly49A-transgenic mice
(20). There was a decrease in the percentage of
Ly49G2+ NK cells in Ly49A-transgenic mice on the
H-2b background, although it was significantly
less than in the presence of H-2Dd. This may
reflect the different affinities of Ly49A for
H-2d and H-2b MHC
molecules. There was no decrease in the percentage of
Ly49G2+ NK cells in
2m-/- Ly49A-transgenic
mice. These data suggest that it is the presence of an MHC ligand for
the Ly49A transgene that leads to a reduction in
Ly49G2+ cells.
Ly49D expression in Ly49A-transgenic mice
Ly49D and Ly49A both bind to H-2Dd. A
reduction in the percentage of Ly49D+ NK cells
was seen in Ly49A-transgenic mice on an H-2b
background and on a
2m-/- background (Fig. 3
C). The decrease in
2m-/- mice was
surprising because the MHC class I ligands are expressed at a very low
level. Similar to the observation in Ly49C-transgenic mice, there was
not a significant drop in the percentage of
Ly49D+ cells in mice that expressed a ligand for
Ly49D (H-2d/b).
Ly49G2 expression in Ly49A/C double-transgenic mice
There were lower percentages of NK cells that expressed Ly49G2 in
the Ly49A/C double-transgenic mice on H-2b and
H-2d/b backgrounds compared with either Ly49A- or
Ly49C-transgenic mice (Fig. 3
A). These data suggest an
additive effect of the two transgenes. The percentage of
Ly49G2+ NK cells was lowest in
H-2d/b Ly49A/C-transgenic mice (11%) in which
both Ly49 transgenes have strong MHC ligands. There was no difference
in the percentage of NK cells that expressed Ly49G2 in mice with low
MHC class I expression
(
2m-/-).
Ly49D expression in Ly49A/C double-transgenic mice
The percentage of Ly49D+ NK cells in Ly49A/C
double-transgenic mice was similar to that observed in either
Ly49C-transgenic mice (H-2b) or Ly49A-transgenic
mice (
2m-/-) (Fig. 3
C). These data suggest that, with respect to the expression
of an activating Ly49 receptor, one of the two transgenes played a
dominant role, perhaps reflecting the need to control activating
signaling. However, there was a striking drop in the percentage of
Ly49D+ NK cells in Ly49A/C-transgenic mice of the
H-2d/b haplotype.
Ly49 expression on liver NK cells of Ly49C-transgenic mice
The reduction in percentage of NK cells expressing endogenous Ly49
receptors in the transgenic mice was not exclusive for the splenic NK
cells. A similar observation was also seen in the liver. Liver NK cells
from H-2b Ly49C-transgenic mice have a decreased
proportion of both Ly49A+ and
Ly49G2+ cells, similar to what was shown for the
spleen (Fig. 4
). Expression of one or two
transgenic Ly49 receptors altered the proportion of NK cells that
expressed the endogenous Ly49 receptors. However, the expression of
Ly49 transgenes did not effect the expression levels of endogenous
receptors. The transgenic mice on a class I+
backgrounds have fewer NK cells that acquire Ly49 molecules, but the NK
cells that did express them did so to a similar level as the
nontransgenic littermates (data not shown).
|
Table II
shows the percentage of NK
T cells in the liver of the Ly49-transgenic mice. Here, the NK T cell
numbers were effected by transgene expression. The frequency of liver
NK T cells has been shown to be significantly reduced in another
H-2d Ly49A-transgenic mice as compared with
nontransgenic littermates, whereas the H-2b
Ly49A-transgenic mice had normal numbers of NK T cells in the liver
(48). Preliminary data with our Ly49A-transgenic mice
confirm this observation. A similar decrease in the percentage of NK T
cells was also observed for the Ly49C-transgenic mice. The reduction of
NK T cells in the Ly49C-transgenic mice was largest on the
H-2b background in which Ly49C has a strong
ligand (Table II
). Although there was a decrease in the total number of
NK T cells in the liver of Ly49-transgenic mice, the percentage of NK T
cells expressing Ly49A or Ly49G2 was not altered in the transgenic mice
(Fig. 4
). Unlike the observations with NK cells, the number of NK T
cells was reduced, but the percentage of different Ly49 subsets was
unchanged.
|
The expression of Ly49 receptors on the cell surface begins around
4 or 5 days after birth and increases gradually over the next 4 wk
until the Ly49 percentage reaches the frequencies found on adult NK
cells (9, 10). To investigate whether the expression of a
Ly49 receptor on all NK cells altered the onset or time span of
acquisition of Ly49 receptors, we studied the proportion of NK cells
expressing Ly49A, Ly49G2, and Ly49D in Ly49C-transgenic
(H-2b) mice from 1022 days of age. Ly49C
transgene expression was detected at high levels on splenic NK cells
from 4-day-old mice and before endogenous Ly49 expression was detected
by flow cytometry (data not shown). The onset of endogenous receptor
expression on the NK cells did not differ between the Ly49C-transgenic
and nontransgenic littermates. This was true for both activating and
inhibitory receptors (Fig. 5
, A and B). Both the time of onset as well as the
time span necessary until adult frequencies of
Ly49+ subsets were reached was not effected by
Ly49C transgene expression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NK cell effector functions can be regulated by MHC, and the "missing self" theory proposes that this interaction via inhibitory receptors is a key mechanism that allows NK cells to distinguish between self and nonself. In order for such a system to be functional, NK cells must express at least one inhibitory receptor for self MHC. Although expression of too many inhibitory receptors for self MHC would not be obviously harmful, the observation that the MHC haplotype of the host alters Ly49 receptor expression suggests that the MHC shapes the Ly49 repertoire to produce a functional NK cell pool within the host environment. Two non-mutually exclusive models have been proposed to explain how the Ly49 repertoire is shaped by host MHC class I molecules (38). The sequential receptor expression model states that receptors are stochastically expressed and tested for recognition of self MHC class I molecules. Cells continuously express new Ly49 receptors until sufficient interaction with self MHC is achieved. Cells failing to express Ly49 receptors that interact sufficiently with self MHC do not survive. The other model is the two-step selection model stating that Ly49 receptors are stochastically expressed and cells are subsequently tested for necessary self recognition. Similar to the selection mechanism for T cells, useful NK cells that express at least one inhibitory receptor are favored, and NK cells that express multiple receptors for self are disfavored or eliminated. Hence, the final NK cell pool consists of NK cells that express a limited number of self MHC inhibitory receptors.
Data presented to date are consistent with both of these models. Recent data from two in vitro cell culture systems suggest that NK cells begin to express different Ly49 receptors at different times during their development, although the order of receptor expression differed between the two systems (49, 50). The sequential and selection models make different predictions about how expression of a single Ly49 receptor on all NK cells would alter the repertoire development. Data reported from Ly49A-transgenic mice can be predicted from both models (20). Because all of the Ly49 receptors analyzed in those experiments bound to H-2Dd, the effect of Ly49A transgene expression on the expression of other Ly49 receptors in hosts in which both transgene and endogenous Ly49 receptors bind to the same MHC molecule has been analyzed. This study shows that there were decreases in the percentages of NK cells that express endogenous Ly49 receptors that bind to H-2Dd. This could be due to several reasons, including the observations that the NK cells expressed a Ly49 receptor that bound to self MHC, so additional receptors were not necessary (sequential model), that NK cells that expressed additional receptors that bound to self MHC were disfavored (selection model), or that the endogenous receptors and transgenic receptor competed for binding on the same MHC molecules, thus somehow preventing receptor expression.
In this paper, we have presented data using Ly49C-transgenic mice. Ly49C will bind to H-2Kb, thus allowing us to examine a scenario in which only the transgenic Ly49 bound to MHC but not the endogenous Ly49 receptors (e.g., Ly49G2). In this case, we observed that there was a decrease in the expression of Ly49G2 and Ly49D even though these receptors have no ligand in H-2b mice. There was also a decrease in Ly49A expression. Data using tetramers suggest that Ly49A can bind to H-2Db but not to H-2Kb (18). Thus, our data indicate that it is the interaction of the transgene with MHC that results in a decrease in the expression of other Ly49 receptors, whether they have an MHC ligand or not. It should be noted that the percentage of NK cells that expressed a given Ly49 receptor was reduced and not the level of the receptors on those NK cells that did express them. These data are not consistent with a selection model because this model predicts that there would be no reason to select against Ly49G2 or Ly49D expression because these receptors do not interact with MHC in H-2b mice. However, a sequential model would predict that all Ly49 receptors would be reduced because all NK cells expressed one functional Ly49 receptor, so there would be no need for additional ones.
We have combined Ly49A- and Ly49C-transgenic mice and examined the Ly49 repertoire in hosts that express ligands for both receptors. The selection model predicts that the expression of multiple self receptors would lead to deletion of those NK cells. Yet in the Ly49A/C double-transgenic mice, we did not observe a decrease in the size of the NK cell pool. It is conceivable that a limited number of unusual NK cells were allowed to survive and expand to repopulate the entire NK cell pool; however, all of the NK cells expressed both Ly49 transgenes and some other Ly49 receptors. We also did not observe a delay in the development of the adult level of Ly49 subsets in Ly49C-transgenic mice. In contrast, the sequential model predicts that, as the level of self receptors is increased, there would be no effect on the total numbers of NK cells but a decrease in the percentage of endogenous receptors expressed. This is consistent with our observations. We have observed that the decrease in the percentage of Ly49G2+ NK cells in the Ly49A/C-transgenic mice is additive in comparison with Ly49A- and Ly49C-transgenic mice.
In vitro data suggest that there may be a time element that needs to be considered (49, 50). During NK cell differentiation, there may be a discrete stage in which Ly49 receptor genes can be activated. Interaction between Ly49 receptors and host MHC appears to be a necessary step that may induce further NK cell differentiation and prevents additional Ly49 receptor expression. Thus, expression of a Ly49 transgene that can interact with host MHC may induce differentiation more quickly. However, there would likely remain a period of time when additional Ly49 genes could be expressed. It has been shown that transfer of Ly49+ NK cells into irradiated hosts led to the expression of new Ly49 receptors (9). This may reflect the differentiation process or an expansion to fill a niche in an irradiated host. On top of the regulation of receptor gene expression, there is an MHC regulation of receptor expression on the cell surface (46, 51). Because the ability of an inhibitory receptor to prevent effector responses is dependent upon the receptor expression level, and these levels can change on mature NK cells (46, 52, 53), this adds a further level of complexity to the NK cell repertoire. In the experiments presented in this report, the presence of an Ly49 transgene did not alter the level of receptor expression only the percentage of cells that expressed each receptor.
Neither of the models for Ly49 repertoire development specifically discusses the expression of activating receptors. It is not clear whether Ly49 activating receptors are independent receptors capable of activating NK cells alone or coreceptors that magnify or modify activation signals via other receptors. Because these receptors provide activation signals in contrast to inhibitory signals, and cell responses are determined by the interaction between activating and inhibitory signals (54, 55), the effect of Ly49 transgenes on the development of activating receptors, such as Ly49D, is likely to be different from that for inhibitory receptors. Our observations of Ly49D expression suggest that activating receptors may interact with MHC to promote survival and/or expansion of NK cell subsets that express them. One possibility would be that it may be beneficial to maintain a balance between activating and inhibitory receptors so that those activating receptors that bind to self MHC are favored. Thus, one may expect the percentage of NK cells expressing the activating Ly49D to be increased in the Ly49A- and Ly49C-transgenic mice. However, we did not observe any increase in the percentage of NK cells expressing Ly49D in these transgenic mice. Another idea is that activating receptors are only allowed to be expressed after inhibitory receptors to ensure self-tolerance. Until further Abs become available and the MHC specificity of many activating receptors is better understood, the regulation of Ly49 activating receptors will remain unresolved.
One puzzling observation was a decrease in the percentage of NK cells
that expressed Ly49A in
2m-/- Ly49C-transgenic
mice. There were also alterations observed in Ly49D expression in
2m-/- Ly49A-transgenic
mice but not in
2m-/-
Ly49C-transgenic mice. However, Ly49G2 expression was not altered in
Ly49-transgenic
2m-/-
mice. If the regulation of Ly49 expression was only due to the
interaction of Ly49 and classical MHC class I molecules, there should
be no alterations in
2m-/- mice. As we have
discussed, there are several elements that together explain Ly49
receptor expression and regulation in addition to the direct
interaction between Ly49 receptors and MHC class I molecules. Ly49A and
Ly49D are known to be regulated by a specific transcription factor, and
in vitro data suggest that they may be expressed after Ly49C and Ly49G2
(50, 56). It is possible that Ly49 receptors can interact
with other molecules in the absence of
2m,
such as MHC class I free heavy chains or nonclassical MHC molecules,
and these interactions may alter expression of some Ly49 receptors. It
has been observed that NK cells from
2m-/- mice are
tolerant to self MHC, but they are very poor at cytotoxicity toward a
variety of tumor target cells. Until we understand more about the
molecular events involved in the development of NK cells in the absence
of
2m, the nature of the regulation of NK cell
activity in these mutant mice will remain difficult to explain.
In contrast to the observation that there were alterations in the
percentage of NK cells that expressed different Ly49 receptors in the
Ly49-transgenic mice, there were no such effects on the NK T cell
population. In the NK T cell population, there was a decrease in the
number of NK T cells in mice in which the Ly49 transgene could bind to
self MHC, but there was no change in the Ly49 repertoire of those NK T
cells that remained. MacDonald and coworkers have observed a similar
decrease in liver NK T cells in Ly49A-transgenic mice that expressed
H-2Dd (48). These NK T cells did not
express the characteristic V
or V
-chains found on CD1-restricted
NK T cells, suggesting that the NK T cells that developed did not have
the same specificity. We and others have reported that Ly49 receptor
expression can alter T cell development (19, 57). NK T
cells do not express activating Ly49 receptors, and the role of the
inhibitory Ly49 receptors is known to alter their function when
stimulated via their TCRs. However, expression of Ly49 receptors on all
NK T cells as they develop could alter the survival of cells with
certain TCR specificities with the result that many of the NK T cell
pool may fail to survive development. Furthermore, the finding that the
Ly49 repertoire on NK T cells is not altered in the Ly49-transgenic
mice may be due to the fact that NK T cell development and survival is
primarily dependent upon signals received via their TCR complex.
The formation of a properly functioning NK cell pool has important biological consequences. MHC class I molecules have been demonstrated to be able to inhibit and activate murine NK cells via Ly49 receptors. Hence, it is necessary for NK cells to adapt to the host MHC environment to function in an optimal way. One way to achieve this is for the Ly49 receptor repertoire to be shaped by host MHC. Different models have been proposed for how this occurs. Although our data cannot rule out a selection type of model, several of our observations are inconsistent with a strict interpretation of this model. Our observations on the Ly49 repertoire in Ly49A-, Ly49C-, and Ly49A/C-transgenic mice on different MHC haplotypes are consistent with a sequential model of Ly49 development.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Charles L. Sentman, Umeå Center for Molecular Pathogenesis, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. E-mail address: charles.sentman{at}ucmp.umu.se ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper:
2m,
2-microglobulin; B, biotin; LAK, lymphokine-activated killer. ![]()
Received for publication December 28, 2000. Accepted for publication March 30, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1/
2 domains. J. Immunol. 153:5482.[Abstract]
/
stimulated by nonpeptidic ligands. J. Exp. Med. 186:1769.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. W. MacFarlane IV, T. Yamazaki, M. Fang, L. J. Sigal, T. Kurosaki, and K. S. Campbell Enhanced NK-cell development and function in BCAP-deficient mice Blood, July 1, 2008; 112(1): 131 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Hansen, N. J. Bernard, C. Q. Nie, and L. Schofield NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of CXCR3+ T Cells to the Brain during Plasmodium berghei-Mediated Cerebral Malaria J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5779 - 5788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Barao, A. M. Hanash, W. Hallett, L. A. Welniak, K. Sun, D. Redelman, B. R. Blazar, R. B. Levy, and W. J. Murphy Suppression of natural killer cell-mediated bone marrow cell rejection by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells PNAS, April 4, 2006; 103(14): 5460 - 5465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yawata, N. Yawata, M. Draghi, A.-M. Little, F. Partheniou, and P. Parham Roles for HLA and KIR polymorphisms in natural killer cell repertoire selection and modulation of effector function J. Exp. Med., March 20, 2006; 203(3): 633 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, F. Rezzoug, H. Xu, P. M. Chilton, C. L. Schanie, I. Fugier-Vivier, and S. T. Ildstad NK Cells Play a Critical Role in the Regulation of Class I-Deficient Hemopoietic Stem Cell Engraftment: Evidence for NK Tolerance Correlates with Receptor Editing J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3753 - 3761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Leung, R. Iyengar, V. Turner, P. Lang, P. Bader, P. Conn, D. Niethammer, and R. Handgretinger Determinants of Antileukemia Effects of Allogeneic NK Cells J. Immunol., January 1, 2004; 172(1): 644 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Y. Koh, J. R. Ortaldo, B. R. Blazar, M. Bennett, and W. J. Murphy NK-cell purging of leukemia: superior antitumor effects of NK cells H2 allogeneic to the tumor and augmentation with inhibitory receptor blockade Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 4067 - 4075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||