|
|
||||||||


*
Department of Cellular Injury, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910; and
Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
900
nucleotides, which together were responsible for inducible promoter
activity. Mutagenesis of single promoter elements demonstrated a
functional upstream stimulatory factor/E box in the TATA box-proximal
region and three equally important, closely spaced, CREB/AP-1
half-sites in the upstream promoter region. The cAMP response
element-binding protein (CREB)/AP-1 half-sites bound in vitro Jun and
CREB that are induced by protein kinases A and/or C. The 900-nucleotide
segment stretching between the above two regions had no functional
impact on the induced transcription, and its deletion increased the
promoter activity. Finally, a region upstream of the distal site had a
repressor activity on CR2 transcription. Moreover, IL-4 induced binding
of CREB and AP-1 to the upstream promoter elements and resulted in
increased CR2 surface protein expression. These studies have
characterized regions of the CR2 promoter and the transcription factors
that bind to them and are crucial to induced CR2 expression. Our
studies may provide insights to novel approaches to modulate B cell
function by regulating CR2 gene
transcription. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CR2 is expressed on mature B lymphocytes and B cell lines but not on
early (pre-B cell) and late (plasma cell) developmental stages
(10). Human splenic marginal zone B cells express higher
levels of CR2 than other B cell subpopulations; thus, they may
facilitate the primary immune response (11). Several
studies indicate that the level of CR2 expression affects the intensity
of the B cell response. In vitro, human spleen B cells with high levels
of CR2 expression respond better to Ag (12), and B cells
from knockout mice heterozygous for the inactivated Cr2
locus express
50% of the normal levels of CR2 and respond to a
T-dependent Ag less efficiently than B cells from wild-type animals
(8, 9).
The 5'-promoter region of the human CR2 gene is essential for CR2 expression (13, 14). Moreover, a silencing element located in the first intron regulates cell-specific expression of CR2 in humans (15) and mice (16). Transcription of the murine CD21 gene is positively regulated by histone acetylation, suggesting an important role for the accessibility of DNA by transcription factors (17). However, the exact transcriptional mechanisms that are responsible for the regulation of CR2 expression on mature B cells are unknown. Recent studies in a B cell line have shown that expression of the CR2 gene can be induced by a cell-permeable cAMP analogue, and a protein kinase A (PKA)- and a protein kinase C (PKC)-responsive heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP D) was shown to bind to a novel element in the promoter region of the CR2 gene (18, 19, 20).
We undertook this study to dissect systematically the transcriptional regulation of the CR2 promoter by truncation and mutation analysis, and EMSA. We have identified two regions at -57/+75 and -1017/-955, which bind a number of proteins, to be involved in enhancing CR2 promoter activity. In addition, we show that the region -954/-58, which binds a number of well-established transcription factors, is not involved in induced CR2 promoter activity, whereas the -1252/-1018 upstream region is involved in the suppression of the transcriptional process.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IM-9 B lymphoblastoid cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) containing 10% FBS (Life Technologies), 2 µM L-glutamine (Life Technologies), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies) and supplemented with 25 mM HEPES buffer.
Construction of truncated and mutated CR2 promoter constructs
The SP65 chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) plasmid
containing the human CR2 promoter from -1252 to +75 was the gift of
Dr. Michael Holers, Denver, CO. Truncated CR2 promoter constructs were
generated by using PCR. The PCR fragments flanked with NotI
and ApaI termini were inserted into the SP65 CAT vector
plasmid, which had been predigested with NotI and
ApaI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Deletion constructs
-951/-65 and
-951/-71 were generated using PCR primers to
introduce two NdeI restriction sites into the CR2 promoter
at -953 and -66 or -72, followed by digestion with NdeI
(New England Biolabs), removal of the insert, and religation.
The Quick-Change Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and PCR
primers containing 37 mutated nucleotides were used to introduce
mutations in potential transcription factor-binding sites (Table I
). All plasmids were purified using the
Qiagen Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The sequences of the
clones were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.
|
Plasmid DNA (5 µg/107 cells) was introduced into IM-9 cells by the DEAE-dextran method as described (21). After transfection, 5 x 106 cells/sample were cultured for 1824 h in 5 ml RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS medium. Cells were treated with 1 mM dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and/or 100 ng/ml PMA (Sigma) for the next 1823 h or as indicated and harvested, and freeze-thaw lysates were assayed for CAT activity by separating the acetylated forms of [14C]chloramphenicol on TLC plates, as described (22). Data were analyzed using a Molecular Imager FX System and Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
EMSA
Five million IM-9 cells in 5 ml RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS were
incubated overnight, then stimulated with 1 mM dbcAMP and 100 ng/ml PMA
for 10 min or with 200 U/ml IL-4 (Sigma) and/or 0.1 µg/ml
anti-CD40 mAb (Oxford Biotechnology, Raleigh, NC) for 1030 min,
or left untreated. After stimulation, the nuclear proteins were
prepared as described (23). The protein concentrations of
all nuclear extracts were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay.
Complementary single-stranded oligonucleotides were annealed, then
end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP using a kit from
Life Technologies, purified on Centri-Sep columns (Princeton
Separations, Adelphia, NJ), and used as probes in EMSA.
EMSAs were performed as described (18). In supershift experiments, 1.53 µg purified anti-Jun/AP-1 (recognizes c-Jun, Jun B, Jun D) and anti-activating transcription factor (ATF)-1 (recognizes ATF-1, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-1, cAMP response element modulator (CREM)-1) Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or anti-RFX5 Ab (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA) were added to nuclear extracts just before the addition of labeled oligonucleotide and then incubated for 40 min at 25°C. Anti-hnRNP D Ab (gift of Dr. Gary Brewer, Winston-Salem, NC) was added after preincubation of the nuclear extracts with labeled oligonucleotide, samples were then incubated for 10 min on ice. Data were analyzed using a Molecular Imager FX System and Quantity One software.
Flow cytometry
IM-9 cells were either unstimulated or stimulated with 200 U/ml IL-4 (Sigma) and/or 0.1 µg/ml anti-CD40 mAb (Oxford Biotechnology) for 48 h. Expression of CR2 on the IM-9 cell surface was evaluated after staining with the PE-labeled anti-human mCD21 Ab (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) or the PE-labeled mouse IgG1 (Sigma) that we used as an isotypic control. Samples were analyzed using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACScan) flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). We acquired 10,000 cell-gated events and analyzed them with CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). The number of surface CR2 was estimated by quantitative calibration using a QuantiBRITE PE Fluorescence Quantitation Kit (Becton Dickinson).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine potential transcription factors that may be involved
in transcriptional regulation of the CR2 gene expression, we examined
its promoter region for consensus transcription factor binding sites
using MatInspector software (24). The analysis revealed
several sites that could bind known transcription factors (Fig. 1
). Many of these factors are
up-regulated by PKA and/or PKC. We have reported previously that hnRNP
D binds specifically to the CR2 promoter 490471 nucleotides
upstream of the transcriptional initiation site and is optimally
induced by cAMP and PMA cotreatment of the cells (18, 19).
To determine whether PKA and PKC-mediated signaling pathways are
involved in the transcriptional regulation of the CR2 promoter, we
treated B cells with dbcAMP and PMA and evaluated the expression of a
CAT reporter gene driven by the -1252/+75 CR2 promoter in
IM-9 B lymphoblastoid cells. We chose IM-9 cells, after testing several
mature B cell lines (data not shown), because the promoter is less
active in these cells and its expression can be further induced.
Treatment of cells with dbcAMP or PMA alone for 23 h increased the
expression of the CAT gene by <2-fold in IM-9 cells (Fig. 2
A), whereas treatment with
both of them induced CAT gene expression by 10-fold,
indicating that the PKA and PKC signaling pathways act synergistically
to induce expression of the CR2 promoter. The empty CAT vector could
not be stimulated (data not shown). To study the kinetics of induced
expression, we performed time-response experiments (Fig. 2
B). We detected significantly increased CAT expression
after 7 h stimulation. The expression levels at later time points
did not significantly differ from that at 7 h.
|
|
To determine the regions of the CR2 promoter that are responsible
for its dbcAMP and PMA-induced transcriptional activation, we generated
sequential truncated versions of the CR2 promoter, transfected them
into IM-9 cells and determined their ability to drive the transcription
of a CAT reporter gene. We calculated the degree of
inducibility of the truncated promoter constructs by setting the
activity of the empty CAT vector at zero and the activity of the
full-length (-1252/+75) CR2 promoter at 100%. Deletion of the
-1252/-1018 region of the CR2 promoter (construct -1017/+75)
increased the dbcAMP- and PMA-induced transcriptional activity to
220%, indicating that a repressor element is present in this region
(Fig. 3
A). However, deletion
of additional 63 nucleotides (construct -954/+75) decreased the
dbcAMP- and PMA-induced transcriptional activity of the CR2 promoter to
10%. This finding clearly indicates that critical positive
regulatory transcription factors bind to the -1017/-955 region. This
region contains potential CREB/AP-1-binding half-sites. Deletion
of additional sequences up to -57 did not decrease further the
induced transcriptional activity. However, regulatory elements that
bind to the -57/+75 region of the CR2 promoter (potential
CREB/AP-1-binding half-site, X box, and upstream stimulatory factor
(USF)/E box regulatory elements) were sufficient to provide 30%
transcriptional activity after stimulation with dbcAMP and
PMA.
|
-951/-65) or the -951/-71 region (construct
-951/-71) of the CR2 promoter increased the dbcAMP and PMA-induced
transcriptional activity by 12- or 8-fold, respectively, as compared
with the intact promoter (Fig. 3
-951/-65 and
-951/-71 constructs, suggesting that proper
phasing of DNA-binding proteins is important. These data further
support our finding that the -1017/-955 and -57/+75 regions are
responsible for inducibility of the CR2 promoter and demonstrate that
the long stretch between them is dispensable. Identification of the regulatory elements controlling inducibility of the human CR2 promoter by mutagenesis
To define which specific regulatory elements in the -1017/-955
and -57/+75 regions are responsible for the dbcAMP- and PMA-induced
transcriptional activation of the CR2 promoter, we performed site
directed mutagenesis of these two regions. Mutation of any of three
potential CREB/AP-1 half-sites at -1017/-1014, -987/-983, and
-970/-964 (MUT 13, Table I
) reduced the inducible promoter activity
to
30% (Fig. 3
C).
In the -57/+75 region, mutation of a potential CREB/AP-1 half-site at
-56/-53 (MUT 8) had no effect on induced transcriptional activity of
the promoter. Mutation of the potential overlapping X box and USF/E box
regulatory elements at -45/-41 (MUT 9) reduced activity to
45%.
To assess potential interaction of the CREB/AP-1 and X box/USF/E box
regulatory elements, we tested a construct with both elements mutated
(MUT 10). We did not observe any change in the decreased
transcriptional activity that was already observed with MUT 9,
indicating that the CREB/AP-1 half-site at -56/-53 does not play a
role in induced promoter activity.
The above promoter truncation experiments showed that the -954/-58
region does not participate in the induced transcriptional regulation
of the CR2 promoter (Fig. 3
A). To verify these results, we
mutated the consensus NF-
B, AP-2, and hnRNP D sites that had been
predicted to exist in this region of the promoter (Fig. 1
). Mutations
of these sites alone or in combination (MUT 47) did not have any
effect on induced transcriptional activity of the promoter (Fig. 3
C). It should be mentioned that oligonucleotides, defining
these binding sites and surrounding sequences, bound the predicted
transcription factors in a specific manner (not shown).
Identification of transcription factors that bind to functionally relevant motifs of the promoter
We performed EMSA using synthetic oligonucleotides to identify
proteins that bind to promoter elements that we found to be
functionally important in the above mutagenesis experiments. For each
binding site, we performed experiments using either wild-type or
mutated oligonucleotides with flanking sequences defined by the CR2
promoter (Table II
) and nuclear proteins
extracted from dbcAMP and PMA costimulated or unstimulated IM-9
cells. Abs were also used in shift assays to detect the presence
of possible protein candidates. The mutations were similar to those
used in the reporter experiments.
|
|
Incubation of nuclear extracts with the -975/-953 oligonucleotide
produced one strong shifted band (band 1) (Fig. 4
C). dbcAMP
and PMA treatment for 10 min increased protein-DNA binding. Mutation of
nucleotides -970/-964 inhibited the formation of band 1, indicating
that the protein present in band 1 may be functionally important. A
different complex was formed in the presence of the mutated
oligonucleotide (band 2). Addition of either anti-Jun/AP-1 or
anti-CREB Ab decreased intensity of band 1, indicating that Jun and
CREB/ATF family members are both present in the complex.
Incubation of nuclear extracts with the -54/-32 oligonucleotide
produced two shifted bands (Fig. 4
D). dbcAMP and PMA
treatment for 10 min significantly increased the DNA binding of the
protein present in band 1. Mutation of nucleotides -45/-41 inhibited
the formation of band 1, but not band 2, indicating that the protein
present in band 1 may be functionally relevant. Addition of an Ab
specific for RFX5, which was shown to bind X-boxes in promoters of MHC
class II genes (25), had no effect on the intensity of the
bands. Finally, Abs against Jun/AP-1 or CREB did not alter the
appearance of the bands.
Stimulation of IM-9 cells with IL-4 and anti-CD40 mAb increases binding of nuclear proteins to the CR2 promoter and enhances the expression of surface CR2
To verify the physiological importance of identified transcription
factor-binding sites we performed EMSA using oligonucleotides with
flanking sequences defined by the CR2 promoter (Table II
) and nuclear
proteins extracted from IL-4 and/or anti-CD40 mAb stimulated or
unstimulated IM-9 cells. Abs were also used in shift assays to detect
the presence of possible protein candidates. Activation of the IL-4 and
CD40 signaling pathways has been shown to induce cAMP and inositol
trisphosphate second messenger pathways in human B lymphocytes and to
increase the cell surface density of CD21 on human B cells (26, 27).
Incubation of nuclear extracts from IM-9 cells with the -996/-976
oligonucleotide produced three shifted bands (Fig. 5
, A and C).
Treatment for 30 min with anti-CD40 mAb alone slightly increased
protein-DNA binding, whereas treatment with IL-4 caused a very strong
increase in protein-DNA binding (Fig. 5
A). Simultaneous
treatment of cells with IL-4 and anti-CD40 mAb for 30 min did not
further increase the intensity of the bands over that already observed
after treatment with IL-4 alone; therefore, for supershift experiments
with specific Abs, we used nuclear extracts from cells treated with
IL-4 alone for 30 min. Similarly to our observations shown in Fig. 4
B, addition of anti-Jun/AP-1 Ab inhibited the formation
of bands 1 and 2 indicating that Jun is present in the complex.
Addition of anti-CREB Ab induced a supershifted band and
simultaneously caused the disappearance of band 1 and reduced the
intensity of band 2, indicating that bands 1 and 2 contain CREB/ATF
proteins. Addition of anti-hnRNP D Ab decreased the intensity of
all shifted bands, indicating that the protein complex contains
hnRNP D.
|
In addition, we performed flow cytometry analysis of the CR2 expression
on the surface of IL-4 and/or anti-CD40 mAb-stimulated or
unstimulated IM-9 cells to determine the physiological relevance of the
identified functional promoter elements in the up-regulation of the
surface CR2. All stimuli caused an increase of 2030% in the surface
CR2 expression (Table III
). We have also
observed similar increase after IL-4 and/or anti-CD40 mAb
stimulation of human peripheral blood B lymphocytes (data not
shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
First, we defined functionally relevant regions of the promoter by
gradually deleting segments from the 5'-end. By using this approach, we
found that two short segments of the promoter at -1017/-955 and
-57/+75 were responsible for induced promoter activity. We do not know
whether there is any cross-talk between proteins binding to these two
distantly positioned regions. However, deletion of the nearly 900
nucleotides between the two regions dramatically (8- to 12-fold)
increased the dbcAMP- and PMA-induced transcriptional activity. The
greatly increased inducibility of the deletion construct could be due
to the closer proximity of the -1017/-955 region to the TATA box and
the more efficient interaction with proteins binding at -57/+75.
Indeed, our data suggest that proper spatial arrangement of DNA-binding
proteins is important, because positioning motifs onto the opposite
side of the DNA helix by introducing a half-turn of helix (6
nucleotides) significantly affected promoter activity. These data also
indicate that the 900 nucleotides between the two critical regions are
not required for dbcAMP- and PMA-induced transcriptional activation.
Moreover, we detected a >2-fold increase in inducibility by removing
the -1252/-1018 region, suggesting binding of transcriptional
repressors to elements defined by this region. A possible
repressor-binding site at -1223/-1217 may bind the transcription
factor YY1, which can interact with AP-1/Jun and CREB/ATF proteins and
act as a repressor (31). No other region of the
promoter influenced the induced promoter activity, although the binding
of transcription factors to these regions may regulate the basal
promoter activity. The -954/-58 region contains consensus NF-
B,
hnRNP D and AP-2 sites, which interact with the corresponding proteins
in EMSA in an inducible manner (data not shown), yet removal or
mutagenesis of these elements does not affect promoter inducibility.
These findings underscore the importance of performing assays that
monitor the promoter activity in the context of the entire promoter
rather than relying on EMSA findings.
Next, we analyzed the -1017/-955 and -57/+75 regions in detail by mutagenizing 4- to 7-nucleotide-long segments corresponding to core elements of predicted transcription factor-binding sites. It is important that the functional effect of these mutations was evaluated in the context of the entire 1.3-kb CR2 promoter without affecting potentially critical phasing of interacting transcription factors. The TATA box proximal -57/+75 region contains a predicted CREB/AP-1 half-site at -56/-53 and a site at -45/-41 homologous to an overlapping X box and USF/E box. Mutagenesis of the X box/USF/E box resulted in a 55% reduction in the inducible activity of the promoter, suggesting the functional importance of this site. We have found by EMSA that an inducible protein binds specifically to this site. In supershift experiments using a specific Ab, we excluded that this protein is RFX5, one of several proteins that were shown to bind X boxes in promoters of MHC class II genes (25). The -45/-41 site is identical with a consensus E box and may serve as a binding site for the USF (32). USF proteins interact with the TATA-binding protein (33) and CREB/AP-1 (34, 35). Mutagenesis of the CREB/AP-1 half-site did not affect the inducibility of the promoter activity, suggesting that this site is not involved in the expression of the CR2 promoter.
By analyzing the upstream -1017/-955 segment, we have identified
three functional CREB/AP-1 half-sites in close proximity to each other
at -1017/-1014, -987/-983, and -970/-964. Mutation of either of
these sites in the context of the entire promoter reduced inducibility
of the promoter to
30% of that of the wild type promoter. In EMSA
using short synthetic oligonucleotides, members of the CREB/ATF family,
hnRNP D and an unidentified protein recognized the central site in
addition to Jun. Stimulation of IM-9 cells with dbcAMP and PMA or IL-4
led to strongly increased DNA binding of all identified transcription
factors, supporting their role in the induced expression of the CR2
promoter. A CREB/Jun heterodimer seems to bind the two flanking sites
and is moderately induced by dbcAMP and PMA treatment. It is well
documented that CREB/ATF proteins and AP-1/Jun proteins bind as homo-
or heterodimers to very similar promoter elements (36).
Binding of hnRNP D to the central site is not surprising because of
extensive sequence similarity to the only previously characterized site
at -490/-471 (18). There is a shared TNGNGNNTNCNTCAAAAT
motif (67% identity) between these two sites that should help in
identifying hnRNP D-binding sites in other promoters. Our observation
that mutation of any of the three promoter elements reduced
inducibility to the same degree suggests that proteins binding to
different elements are likely to cooperate with each other and function
as a multiprotein unit where each element is indispensable. The size of
the entire unit is one-half of that of a nucleosome hinting that it may
indeed be regulated as a unit. It is tempting to speculate that
the three closely spaced CREB/AP-1 half-sites are bridged by CREB/Jun
dimers in a complex fashion with both Jun (37, 38) and
hnRNP D (19) facilitating alignment of interacting
proteins. hnRNP D interacts with the TATA-binding protein
(19), whereas CREB and AP1 recruit CREB-binding protein
(CBP)/p300 proteins (39, 40) with histone
acetyltransferase activity (41), thus providing multiple
links to the transcription initiation complex. PKA-dependent
phosphorylation of CREB is required for its interaction with CBP/p300
(39, 41), whereas AP-1/Jun is regulated by PKC
(42) and hnRNP D is regulated by both PKA and PKC
(18, 20). In lymphocytes, CREB was regulated by PKC
(43). Furthermore, CREB/ATF sites are targets of the IL-4-
and anti-CD40-initiated signaling pathways in primary B cells
(44).
The present study demonstrates that the human CR2 promoter is subject to regulation by PKA and PKC signaling pathways in a mature B cell line. In addition, we show that the IL-4 and anti-CD40 Ab-initiated signaling pathways participate in the regulation of the CR2 promoter and enhance the number of CR2 molecules on the cell surface (26, 44). We have delineated the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the induced promoter activity and have uncovered a novel and complex interplay of several transcription factors. We conclude that the endogenous CR2 gene is under stricter regulatory control than the upstream promoter is; thus, we suspect additional layers of complexity in the regulation of the CR2 gene. Nevertheless, various physiological stimuli of B cells activate the PKA and PKC signaling pathways (43, 45, 46, 47); thus, they may be involved in the regulation of CR2 expression, in addition to IL-4 and CD40L. Because CR2 is crucial in determining the magnitude and duration of the B cell response, transcriptional fine-tuning of its expression is important.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. George C. Tsokos, Department of Cellular Injury, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Road, Building 503, Room 1A32, Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CR2, complement receptor type 2; ATF, activating transcription factor; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; CBP, CREB binding protein; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein; CREM, cAMP response element-modulator; dbcAMP, dibutyryl cAMP; hnRNP, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; USF, upstream stimulatory factor. ![]()
Received for publication August 3, 2000. Accepted for publication March 7, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A-crystallin gene: involvement of Pax-6, USF, CREB and/or CREM, and AP-1 proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:7363.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Liu, J.-Y. Zhu, and Z.-X. Niu Molecular Structure and Expression of Anthropic, Ovine, and Murine Forms of Complement Receptor Type 2 Clin. Vaccine Immunol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 901 - 910. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Debnath, K. M. Roundy, J. J. Weis, and J. H. Weis Defining In Vivo Transcription Factor Complexes of the Murine CD21 and CD23 Genes J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7139 - 7150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wu, S. A. Boackle, P. Hanvivadhanakul, D. Ulgiati, J. M. Grossman, Y. Lee, N. Shen, L. J. Abraham, T. R. Mercer, E. Park, et al. Association of a common complement receptor 2 haplotype with increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3961 - 3966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-g. Hu, H. Illges, C. Gruss, and R. Knippers Distribution of the chromatin protein DEK distinguishes active and inactive CD21/CR2 gene in pre- and mature B lymphocytes Int. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 17(6): 789 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tolnay, L. A. Vereshchagina, and G. C. Tsokos NF-{kappa}B Regulates the Expression of the Human Complement Receptor 2 Gene J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6236 - 6243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ulgiati, C. Pham, and V. M. Holers Functional Analysis of the Human Complement Receptor 2 (CR2/CD21) Promoter: Characterization of Basal Transcriptional Mechanisms J. Immunol., June 15, 2002; 168(12): 6279 - 6285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |