The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudolf, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kast, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudolf, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kast, W. M.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 166: 5917-5924.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Human Dendritic Cells Are Activated by Chimeric Human Papillomavirus Type-16 Virus-Like Particles and Induce Epitope-Specific Human T Cell Responses In Vitro1

Michael P. Rudolf2, Steven C. Fausch, Diane M. Da Silva and W. Martin Kast3

Cancer Immunology Program, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-derived chimeric virus-like particles (VLPs) are the leading candidate vaccine for the treatment or prevention of cervical cancer in humans. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent inducers of immune responses and here we show for the first time evidence for binding of chimeric HPV-16 VLPs to human peripheral blood-derived DCs. Incubation of immature human DCs with VLPs for 48 h induced a significant up-regulation of the CD80 and CD83 molecules as well as secretion of IL-12. Confocal microscopy analysis revealed that cell surface-bound chimeric VLPs were taken up by DCs. Moreover, DCs loaded with chimeric HPV-16 L1L2-E7 VLPs induced an HLA-*0201-restricted human T cell response in vitro specific for E7-derived peptides. These results clearly demonstrate that immature human DCs are fully activated by chimeric HPV-16 VLPs and subsequently are capable of inducing endogenously processed epitope-specific human T cell responses in vitro. Overall, these findings could explain the high immunogenicity and efficiency of VLPs as vaccines.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Dendritc cells (DCs)4 are an unique set of highly potent APCs that are very important players in induction and maintenance of immunity against a variety of pathogens, including viruses as well as tumors. For the induction of T cell responses in vitro as well as in vivo, DCs have been shown to be the most potent APCs (1, 2, 3, 4). For example, in vitro-generated DCs loaded with either tumor Ag or peptides thereof have been shown to induce therapeutic immune responses in animal models (5, 6, 7, 8) as well as in clinical settings (9, 10). Similar results were obtained by using peptide-loaded DC in vitro with human PBL or purified CD8+ T cells for the efficient generation of peptide specific cytotoxic T cell responses (11, 12, 13, 14).

The state of activation of DCs is of utmost importance for the efficient priming of T cell responses. Immature DCs located in peripheral tissues are activated by a wide array of stimuli like bacterial endotoxins and inflammatory cytokines or receptor-mediated events like engagement of CD40 (see review, Ref. 15). Activated DCs migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, where DCs are involved in induction of Ag-specific T cells as well as B cell responses (16, 17, 18). Activation of DCs is generally characterized by up-regulation of cell surface markers like costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86, MHC class I and II molecules, and cell adhesion molecules, as well as cytokine production (15). Induction of T cell responses, in particular Th1 responses leading to activated CTL effector cells, is determined by IL-12 production of the APC (19). Furthermore, expression and secretion of IL-12 may constitute an autocrine signal to DCs, sustaining the potential of DC to maintain ongoing T cell priming (20). Therefore, the type of cytokine profile secreted by the APCs after activation by the Ag or pathogen determines the nature of the immune response induced. It has been shown that IL-12 is important in induction of immune responses against intracellular pathogens (21, 22) as well as viral infections (23, 24, 25) and against tumor cells (26, 27, 28, 29).

The association of cervical cancer with infections of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) is undisputed (30, 31). The development of an effective anti-HPV vaccine based on attenuated viral particles has been hampered so far by the fact that it is not possible to efficiently produce viral particles of high-risk types of HPV in vitro. The possibility to produce virus-like particles (VLPs) consisting of the capsid proteins L1 and L2 (32, 33) opened the possibility to use these VLPs as a preventive vaccine against HPV infections (34, 35). For example, in a clinical trial, patients with genital warts showed capsid protein-specific immune responses after one injection with HPV6-L1 VLPs, and the majority of the patients had complete regression of their genital warts within the 20-wk observation period (36). Nevertheless, capsid proteins of HPV are only expressed in mature keratinocytes during an active infection but not in cervical cancer cells. Therefore, it was necessary to produce chimeric VLPs consisting of L1 and L2 fusion proteins with transforming proteins E6 or E7, which are constitutively expressed in all cervical cancer cells and constitute for an optimal target for immunotherapy of cervical cancer. In animal experiments, chimeric VLPs have been shown to induce a protective anti-tumor immunity and proven the versatility of the system as a vaccination tool for induction of cellular immune responses (37, 38, 39). Chimeric L1L2-E7 VLPs induced strong humoral as well as protective cellular responses in tumor challenge experiments on one single injection without an adjuvant, demonstrating the strong immunogenic potential of VLPs as vaccines. Currently, several clinical trials with chimeric HPV-16 L1L2-E7 VLPs for prevention or treatment of cervical cancer are under way, investigating the efficiency of chimeric VLPs to induce peptide specific MHC class I-restricted T cell responses capable of eliminating HPV-transformed cells.

We reported earlier that HPV16 L1L2-VLPs induced MHC class I-restricted, HPV-capsid protein-specific human T cell responses in vitro (40). Still, these results did only prove the potential of the human immune system to mount a cellular immune response against capsid proteins, but could not explain the high immunogenic potential of VLPs. Therefore, we investigated the possibility of loading in vitro-generated human DCs with chimeric L1L2-E7 VLPs to use the loaded DCs as primary APCs in vitro. The results presented here show that human monocyte-derived DCs bind HPV-16 VLPs, thereby up-regulating activation-specific cell surface markers as well as secretion of IL-12 (p70). Additionally, human DCs did take up VLPs as seen by confocal microscopy with directly labeled VLPs. Furthermore, chimeric L1L2-E7 VLP-loaded DCs were able to induce HLA-A*0201-restricted, E7-specific T cell responses in vitro as determined by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT). Overall, the results show the binding to and activation of DCs by VLPs and explain the high immunogenicity of VLPs. Furthermore, the system allows the mapping of endogenously processed T cell epitopes derived from the fusion protein of chimeric VLPs.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abs and reagents

Monoclonal anti-HPV16 L1 Ab as well as Abs to human CD14-FITC, CD19-FITC, CD40, CD54-FITC, CD80-FITC, CD86-FITC, CD83, Isotype controls, streptavidin (SA)-APC, and HLA-DR, DQ, DP-FITC were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA), goat anti-mouse-FITC, goat anti-rabbit-HRP, and goat anti-mouse-IgG-biotinylated were purchased from Biosource (Camarillo, CA), HLA-A, B, C-PE was purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). Abs for FACS analysis were used at 1:50 dilutions in PBS containing 1% FCS and 0.01% NaN3. Polyclonal rabbit anti-HPV16 E7 and anti-HPV16 L2 Abs were a kind gift from Dr. J. Schiller (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The recombinant human (rhu)-IL-4 and rhu-GM-CSF were purchased from Intergen (Purchase, NY) and stored according to manufacturers instructions. TNF-{alpha} was purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ) and stored according manufacturers instructions. LPS (Escherichia coli 026:B6) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Virus-like particles

HPV-16 L1L2-VLPs were produced as described earlier (37). Each batch was tested by Western blot for presence of L1, L2, and in the case of chimeric particles, also for L2 fusion protein (E7 protein). Each batch was tested by transmission electron microscopy as described (37) for the presence of particles. For production of green fluorescence protein (GFP)-VLPs, the GFP gene was cloned from pEGFP-plasmid (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA) with the primers (GFP forward) 5'-ATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGG-3' and (GFP reverse XbaI) 5'-GCGTCTAGATTGTACAGCTCG-3' by PCR. The mutated L2 gene (lacking the stop codon) was cloned by PCR with the primers (L2 forward) 5'-CCCATGCGACACAAACGTTCTGCAAAACGC-3' and (L2 reverse no stop) 5'-ATCGGCAGCCAAAGAGACATCTG-3'. PCR products of both reactions were purified and ligated at equimolar amounts with T4-DNA-Ligase (BD PharMingen), and L2-GFP fusion product was cloned by PCR with primers GFP reverse XbaI and L2 forward. Resulting PCR product was purified and cloned into pZero (Clonetech) via EcoRV and XbaI sites, sequenced, and subsequently subcloned into pFASTBAC from where chimeric VLP particles were produced as described previously (1). Presence of L2-GFP fusion protein in purified chimeric VLPs was confirmed by Western blot analysis with anti-GFP Ab (BD PharMingen).

Crude insect cell lysates for control experiments were generated by collecting supernatant of sonicated insect cell pellets after centrifugation. Before use, the supernatants were treated with END-X B15 (Cape Cod Associates, Falmouth, MA) according to manufacturers instructions for removal of endotoxins.

Donor material

PBL from normal, healthy HLA-A*0201-positive donors were obtained by leukapheresis. Leukocytes were purified by Ficoll gradient (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) and stored in liquid nitrogen for further use.

DC generation

Frozen PBL were thawed and washed once with RPMI 1640 containing 10 mM pyruvic acid (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), 10 mM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies), 100 µg/ml kanamycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 5% human AB serum (Sigma), and plastic adherent cells were selected by plating 150 x 106 cells/ml in 175-cm2 tissue culture flasks for 2 h at 37°C. The nonadherent cells were carefully washed away with PBS, and remaining adherent cells were cultured for 4 days (for activation studies) or 7 days (for binding/uptake studies) in 1000 U/ml rhu-GM-CSF and 1200 U/ml rhu-IL-4. Every other day, one-half volume medium was replaced by fresh medium supplemented with 800 U/ml rhu-GM-CSF and 1000 U/ml rhu-IL-4.

Activation and binding assay

DCs were collected and incubated with VLPs at a concentration of 10 µg/106 cells in 1 ml of PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were subsequently incubated for 48 h in 15 ml of RPMI 1640 plus 5% human AB serum containing 1000 U/ml rhu-GM-CSF. Cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and subsequently stained for FACS analysis.

Measurement of endotoxin levels and removal of endotoxins

Endotoxin levels of serial dilutions of VLP preparations were detected and semiquantitated against an endotoxin standard (Sigma) in a Limulus assay (E-Toxate; Sigma) following manufacturers instructions.

IL-12 assay

For IL-12 assay, 1.5 x 106 DCs loaded with VLPs as described above were incubated in 1.5 ml of RPMI 1640 plus 5% human AB serum and 1.5 x 105 autologous T cells for 48 h. In control experiments, 1.5 x 106 DCs loaded with 10 µg of L2E7 protein, 10 µg of VLP heated for 10 min at 95°C, and 10 µg of LPS/106 cells was used. Supernatants were collected after spinning cells at 300 x g for 5 min. Subsequently, the amount of IL-12 was determined with a commercial IL-12 assay (human IL-12 (p70) kit; Endogen, Woburn, MA).

Confocal microscopy

For confocal microscopy, DCs were loaded with VLP-GFP particles at a concentration of 10 µg/106 DCs in PBS for 1 h at 4°C. Cells were transferred to 37°C, and aliquots were sampled at indicated time points and immediately fixed with an equal volume of 2% paraformaldehyde solution. Fixed cells were dried overnight onto microscopic slides and subsequently treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min and counterstained with anti-actin-Cy3 Ab (Sigma). Slides were analyzed with a Zeiss LSM-510 laser-scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with the Ar 458/488 and HeNe 543 lasers as well as bright-field differential interference contrast. Data was analyzed by Zeiss-LSM Image Browser, version 2.3.

In vitro immunization assay

In vitro immunization assays were performed with 1.2 x 106 DCs loaded with 10 µg of chimeric HPV16-L1L2-E7 VLPs for 1 h at room temperature, washed, and mixed with 25 x 106 nonadherent autologous cells. Cells were cultured in 48-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) at 0.5 x 106 cells per well in RPMI 1640 plus 5% human AB serum for 7 days at 37°C. Restimulation after 7 and 14 days was done with 0.5 x 106 cells per well of nonadherent, autologous PBL, loaded with 10 µg/ml chimeric HPV16-L1L2-E7 VLPs for 1 h at room temperature. PBL were subsequently washed with PBS, irradiated (25 Gy), and added to the cultures. For control experiments, 1.2 x 106 DCs either were left untreated or loaded with 10 µg of L2E7 protein and used in control experiments described as above. Restimulation of control experiments was done with autologous PBL alone or PBL loaded with L2E7 protein and subsequently treated as described above. For restimulation, the medium was supplemented with IL-2 at 40 U/ml at 2 and 4 days after restimulation. After 28 days, the effector cells were pooled, purified over Lymphoprep (Nycomed), and tested for IFN-{gamma} production by ELISPOT. Next, 96-well multiscreen HA plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA) were coated with 5 µg/ml anti-human IFN-{gamma} Ab (BD PharMingen) overnight, washed, and blocked for 4 h with RPMI 1640 plus 5% human AB serum at 37°C. Cells (250,000 per well) were incubated in the presence or absence of peptide for 40 h at 37°C. Wells were washed and plates were incubated with biotinylated anti-human IFN-{gamma} Ab (BD PharMingen) and SA-alkaline phosphatase (Sigma) and spots were counted after staining with nitroblue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate. The average of the background counts was subtracted from the average of the sample counts. Statistical analysis was performed with the Microsoft Excel program (Microsoft, Redmond, WA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Binding of VLPs to human DC

HPV-derived VLPs, either as empty particles consisting solely of capsid proteins or as chimeric particles consisting of a fusion between L2 capsid protein and either an Ag or peptides thereof, have been shown to be highly immunogenic in vivo even without the use of adjuvants. The reason for this phenomenon is not fully understood, and presumably these particles are taken up by professional APCs, which subsequently would prime immune responses. Therefore, we investigated whether human DCs generated in vitro could bind VLPs. For that purpose, we generated and purified VLPs as described (37) and found all the batches of VLPs positive for the presence of capsid proteins L1, L2 and, in the case of chimeric particles, E7 fusion protein by Western blots (data not shown). In addition, all batches of VLPs were routinely tested by transmission electron microscopy for the presence of actual particles (Fig. 1GoA). This quality control process is essential because we have shown earlier that human PBL do respond to intact particles but not to capsomers or individual capsid proteins (40), and furthermore, capsomers or capsid proteins could inhibit interaction of VLPs with cells. Therefore, we included the quality control tests for all our VLP batches used in subsequent experiments.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Binding of HPV16-L1L2-VLPs to monocyte-derived human DCs. HPV16 VLPs were generated as described previously (37 ) and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy for the presence of intact particles as shown in A. Each batch of VLPs was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy before use in subsequent binding experiments. Binding of HPV16-L1L2-VLPs to monocyte-derived human DCs is shown in B. Adherent cells from human PBL were cultured in rhu-IL-4 and rhu-GM-CSF for 7 days, harvested, and loaded with biotinylated HPV16-L1L2-VLPs. Bound VLPs were detected with SA-APC. Simultaneously, the cells were stained with CD49f-PE, CD86-FITC, or MHC class II-FITC Ab. Histograms of the gated cells (R1 in forward scatter/side scatter plot) are presented. The experiment was repeated five times and one representative experiment is shown. Top, Histograms showing binding of VLPs to human DCs (right histogram). Bottom, Expression levels of CD86 and MHC class II molecules of the VLP binding cells, indicating that these cells are DCs. Moreover, DCs expressed the {alpha}6 integrin, CD49f, which has been identified as a receptor for VLPs. The gated population was negative for CD3, CD14, CD19, and CD54 (data not shown).

 
To test for binding of intact VLP particles to human DCs, we generated, by incubating adherent cells from normal donor PBL in IL-4 and GM-CSF for 7 days. The DC population was harvested, incubated for 1 h with biotinylated HPV-L1L2-VLPs on ice, and subsequently stained with SA-APC. A distinct binding of VLPs to the DC population was observed by FACS analysis (Fig. 1GoB, top). The VLP binding cells expressed high levels of MHC class II molecules and CD86, indicating that the VLP binding cells are indeed DCs (Fig. 1Go, bottom). The VLP binding cells were negative for CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, and CD56, excluding the presence of B cells, T cells, NK cells, or macrophage/monocytes in the VLP binding cell population (data not shown). The VLP-binding DCs also expressed intermediate levels of CD49f ({alpha}6 integrin) on their surface, which has been described as a potential receptor for papillomavirus (41). Overall, these results clearly demonstrate that HPV-16 VLPs bind to the cell surface of in vitro-generated human DCs, possibly via CD49f.

IL-12 (p70) secretion of human monocyte-derived DCs induced by HPV-VLPs

Because VLPs did bind to DCs, we investigated whether the binding of VLPs to human DCs could activate DCs. For induction of effective T cell responses, in particular Th1-type T cell responses, the production and secretion of IL-12 is of crucial importance. Thus, we incubated DCs for 48 h either with medium plus GM-CSF alone or medium plus GM-CSF and LPS, L2E7 protein, VLPs, or VLPs that had been heated for 10 min at 95°C. Subsequently, the supernatants were tested for the presence of IL-12 (p70). Indeed, DCs incubated with VLPs secreted IL-12 (p70) into the supernatant, as did the DC plus LPS-positive control. In contrast, low levels of IL-12 secretion were detected in supernatantnt from untreated DCs, DCs plus L2E7 protein, and DCs plus heated VLPs (Fig. 2Go). This result indicated that VLPs actually activated human DCs, and therefore, we further investigated the observed activation by analyzing the cell surface expression of various markers known to be activation-dependent on DCs.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. IL-12 production of DCs after incubation with VLPs. Monocyte-derived DCs were incubated with either medium plus GM-CSF or with 10 µg of LPS, 10 µg of VLPs, 10 µg of heated VLPs, or 10 µg of L2E7 protein in medium plus GM-CSF for 48 h, and supernatants were analyzed in triplicate for the presence of IL-12 (p70) by ELISA (one representative experiment of three is shown). The data are expressed as the mean (SD) of the results obtained. Human DCs generated by preincubation of adherent cells in IL-4 and GM-CSF for 4 days secreted large amounts of IL-12 (p70) after activation by VLPs and in similar amounts as the positive control (LPS). DCs left untreated or stimulated with heated VLPs or L2E7 protein produced very little IL-12 (p70). *, p = 0.01 by Student’s t test assuming homoscedastic, one-tailed distribution).

 
Activation of human DCs by HPV-VLPs in comparison to LPS or TNF-{alpha}

We investigated the potential of VLPs to activate human monocyte-derived DCs in vitro and compared the activation by VLPs with the activation potential of known activating agents for human DCs. Bacterial LPS as well as rhu-TNF-{alpha} have been described to induce activation in human DCs and are commonly used in vitro. We generated human DCs as described above, harvested the DCs after 3 days, and incubated equal number of cells with either 10 µg of VLPs or excess doses of LPS (10 µg/ml) or TNF-{alpha} (100 ng/ml) for 1 h in a small volume of PBS. The VLP-loaded cells were subsequently transferred into medium containing GM-CSF. Meanwhile, the LPS or TNF-{alpha} exposed cells were transferred into medium containing GM-CSF and either 10 µg/ml LPS or 100 ng/ml TNF-{alpha}, respectively. As a control, an equal number of DCs were handled exactly the same way, but no activating agents were added. After 48 h, the cells were harvested and stained for FACS analysis as described. The results of the staining are presented in Fig. 3Go. Untreated DCs expressed already high levels of MHC class I and class II molecules as well as intermediate levels of CD83 and already high levels of CD86, but low levels of the costimulatory molecule CD80. After exposure to VLPs for 48 h we detected a significant up-regulation of CD80 as well as CD83 on the cell surface of DCs, indicating an activation and maturation of the DCs. Because levels of CD86 were already high, probably because of the manipulation during harvesting and subsequent reincubation of DCs for 48 h, no significant increase in cell surface expression of CD86 could be observed after incubation with VLPs. When DCs were generated by incubation of adherent cells for time periods shorter than 3 days in IL-4 and GM-CSF before collection and exposure to VLPs, no activation effects by VLPs were seen. The up-regulation of CD80 and CD83 was most pronounced when using DCs after 3–4 days in IL-4 and GM-CSF before incubation with VLPs (data not shown). Thus, all subsequent experiments were done with DCs harvested after 4 days of culturing in IL-4 and GM-CSF.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Activation of monocyte-derived DCs by VLPs, LPS, or TNF-{alpha}. DCs were cultured as described for 4 days, harvested, and incubated with 10 µg/ml LPS or 100 ng/ml TNF-{alpha} or loaded with 10 µg of VLPs as described previously in medium containing GM-CSF. As a control, DCs were left untreated for 1 h and subsequently incubated in medium containing GM-CSF. After a 48-h incubation period, the cells were collected and stained for FACS analysis. A representative experiment (one of three) is shown. Light lines are control Abs. Cells were gated for large cells, and gated cells are shown in the histogram plots with the staining Ab indicated below histogram plot. The FACS analysis shows that DCs loaded with VLPs significantly up-regulated expression of surface markers CD80 and CD83 as compared with DCs cultured in the absence of VLPs. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that the activation potential of VLPs is comparable to that of the known activating agents LPS and TNF-{alpha} in respect to up-regulation of activation markers CD80 and CD83 on DCs.

 
In comparison to excess amounts of LPS or TNF-{alpha}, it is obvious that VLPs are activating human DCs in vitro to the same extent as LPS or TNF-{alpha} at the concentrations used (Fig. 3Go). The up-regulation of CD80 as well as CD83 are equally efficient for all activating agents and clearly above the background expression seen on untreated cells. In contrast, CD86 expression is not changed significantly by VLPs, but LPS or TNF-{alpha} treatment induced slight up-regulation of CD86 in a part of the DCs. Therefore, the result demonstrates that VLPs have similar effectiveness in activating human DCs in vitro as high amounts of LPS and TNF-{alpha}.

The observed activation of monocyte-derived DCs on binding of VLPs was attributable to interaction of VLPs with DCs because 1) the endotoxin level in the VLP preps as determined by Limulus assay was very low (0.085 EU/10 µg ± 0.006 EU/10 µg VLPs) and we found that such low levels of endotoxin could not activate DCs in our experimental setting; 2) a sample of VLPs heated to 95°C for 5 min did not activate DCs, ruling out nonproteinaceous components as activating agents; and 3) a crude lysate of Sf9 insect cells (which are used to produce VLPs) pretreated with an endotoxin binding resin (END-X B15) did not activate DCs, ruling out any additional protein contaminants from the manufacturing process still remaining after the purification steps as activators for DCs (data not shown).

Taken together these results clearly show that VLPs interacting with DCs activate human DCs.

Uptake of chimeric GFP-VLPs by human DCs

We further investigated what happened to VLPs after binding to the cell surface of DCs. For that purpose, we constructed chimeric HPV16L1L2 VLPs containing GFP fused to the L2 protein, allowing us to directly detect the chimeric VLPs without further staining procedures. After pulsing DCs with chimeric GFP-VLPs for 1 h on ice, loaded DCs were washed and shifted to 37°C. At specific time points (t = 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min) samples were removed, fixed with paraformaldehyde, and dried onto slides. After counterstaining with an anti-actin Ab, the samples were analyzed by confocal microscopy for the localization of the GFP-VLP (see Fig. 4Go). Right after loading, the entire GFP-VLP signal was detected on the cell surface (Fig. 4GoA), whereas after 30 min at 37°C the GFP-signal was found focused into distinct spots on the cell surface (Fig. 4GoB) and after 120 min at 37°C the GFP signal was detected inside of the cell (Fig. 4GoC). Treatment of DCs with cytochalasin D, a fungal toxin that disrupts actin filaments, inhibited the focusing of the chimeric GFP-VLPs as well as the uptake of GFP-VLPs during the incubation of a 2-h incubation period at 37°C (see Fig. 4GoD). The inability of DCs to take up chimeric VLPs because of disruption of the actin cytoskeleton indicated an active uptake mechanism by DCs for VLPs.



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Confocal microscopy for uptake of VLPs by DCs. Monocyte-derived DCs were loaded for 1 h with GFP-VLPs on ice, washed, and shifted to 37°C. At indicated time points, an aliquot was removed, fixed, and dried onto slides. Cells subsequently were counterstained with anti-actin-Cy3, coverslipped, and analyzed by confocal microscopy. A, DCs loaded with GFP-VLPs at t = 0. The GFP-signal was detected exclusively on the cell surface. B, After 30 min of incubation at 37°C, the GFP-VLPs became focused in distinct areas on the cell surface of DCs. C, After 120 min at 37°C, the GFP signal was detected underneath the actin cytoskeleton, indicating uptake of the GFP-VLPs by the DCs. D, DCs pretreated with cytochalasin D did not focus or take up GFP-VLPs even after extended periods of incubation (shown at t = 120 min).

 
Induction of epitope-specific T cell responses by DCs loaded with chimeric VLPs

It has been reported that DCs are capable of channeling exogenous Ags into the MHC class I presentation pathway, and therefore we investigated whether the uptake of chimeric VLP by DCs would lead to induction of peptide-specific, MHC class I-restricted T cell responses in vitro. We chose to use chimeric HPV16-L1L2-E7 VLPs because two HPV16-E7-derived HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitopes are well characterized. The HLA-A*0201-restricted peptides 86–93 (TLGIVCPI) and 11–20 (YMLDLQPETT) are known to be exclusively recognized by human CD8+ T cells, to be immunogenic and endogenously processed (42). Therefore, the two CTL epitopes offer an excellent model system for testing the possibility of using chimeric VLPs for the mapping of endogenously processed epitopes. DC generated from PBL collected from healthy HLA-A*0201-positive donors were loaded with HPV16-L1L2-E7 chimeric VLPs, washed, and cocultured with nonadherent autologous PBL. Subsequently, the culture was restimulated twice with autologous, irradiated nonadherent PBL loaded with HPV16-L1L2-E7 chimeric VLPs. For control purposes, cultures were set up in parallel with either DCs loaded with L2E7 protein alone or unloaded DCs for priming and subsequent restimulation with PBL loaded with L2E7 protein or unloaded PBL, respectively. Seven days after the last round of restimulation, the cells from each culture were collected and tested for specific responses to HLA-A*0201-restricted E7-derived peptides by IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT. The experiments were repeated twice with different donors, and the results are presented in Fig. 5Go. The figure shows the average number of spots above background (spontaneous IFN-{gamma} release from cells not stimulated with peptide) derived from three independent experiments. The statistical analysis demonstrates that we were able to detect an E7 peptide 86–93 (TLGIVCPI)-specific response as determined by IFN-{gamma} Elispot when DCs loaded with chimeric L1L2-E7 VLPs were used for priming. There was no specific response against E7 peptide 86–93 (TLGIVCPI) detected when DCs loaded with L2E7 protein alone were used for priming in vitro. The analysis demonstrates that DCs indeed do take up and process the VLP particles for presentation, indicated by the induction of a specific CTL response in vitro against the immunodominant, HLA-A*0201-restricted E7-derived CTL epitope. Overall, these results obtained from the in vitro immunization experiments indicate the potential use of chimeric VLP-loaded DCs for in vitro immunization for the definition of T cell epitopes of endogenously processed Ags.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. IFN-{gamma}-ELISPOT analysis of in vitro immunization assays with chimeric HPV16-L1L2-E7 VLPs loaded onto DCs. Monocyte-derived DCs from HLA-A*0201-positive donor were generated as described and incubated either with medium alone, 10 µg of chimeric HPV16-L1L2-E7 VLPs, or L2E7 protein for 48 h. The loaded DCs were washed and subsequently mixed with autologous, nonadherent lymphocytes at a ratio of 1:10 and incubated for 7 days. Restimulations were done with irradiated, nonadherent PBL either unloaded or loaded with L1L2-E7 VLPs or L2E7 protein and mixed with the corresponding sample in the culture system. After the second restimulation, the responder cells were collected and tested for IFN-{gamma} production in ELISPOT against known E7-derived HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL epitopes. The number of spots in each well were counted and averaged, and background values (no peptide stimulation in the ELISPOT) were subtracted. The experiment was repeated twice and the result shown here represents the average of the three experiments with error bars representing SE. The figure clearly shows a specific response against the E7-derived CTL epitope 86–93 (TLGIVCPI), the major E7-derived CTL epitope in HLA-A*0201-positive humans (*, p = 0.01 by Student’s t test assuming homoscedastic, one-tailed distribution).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
VLPs are the lead vaccination approach for prevention of HPV infections as well as chimeric L1L2-E7 VLPs for the treatment of cervical cancer (43). VLPs have been shown to be highly immunogenic in vivo in animal models as well as in human clinical trials. Our results described here provide an explanation for the observed immunogenic potential of VLPs in vivo. Our initial observation that human DCs get activated by and rapidly take up HPV-16 VLPs demonstrates the interaction of human DCs with VLPs. Furthermore, we present evidence that the viral capsid proteins or fusion proteins thereof can be channeled into the MHC class I presentation pathway, resulting in mature DCs capable of inducing MHC class I-restricted, peptide-specific T cell responses. The experimental assays with immature human DCs is likely to reflect an in vivo situation in which VLPs bind to and activate immature DCs present at the site of injection. After migration of VLP-loaded DCs to secondary lymphoid organs, the fully activated DCs are involved in the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses against capsid proteins as well as fusion proteins.

Ag-loaded, activated DCs are the most potent APCs, and therefore only a limited number of VLP-loaded DCs needs to reach the secondary lymphoid organs to induce a strong immune response (44). For example, a clinical study reported that a single injection of HPV-6 VLPs in human patients with genital warts induced neutralizing Ab titers in most patients (36). The VLP vaccine was administered in the absence of an adjuvant and the Ab titers induced show the high immunogenic potential of VLPs in humans. These results are in line with similar results obtained in animal models, where vaccination experiments showed that VLPs not only induce Ab responses but also cytotoxic T cells capable of rejecting tumor cells. For example, in a tumor challenge model with chimeric, tumor Ag containing VLPs, a single injection of chimeric VLPs was sufficient to induce protective T cell responses against a challenge with the specific tumor Ag-expressing tumor cell line (37, 38, 39, 45). Taken together, the results derived from vaccination experiments demonstrate the potential of VLPs not only to induce protective Ab responses but also the capability to induce specific T cell-mediated cellular immune responses. In particular, the fact that a single immunization with chimeric VLPs was enough to induce protective immune responses indicates the involvement of specialized APCs like DCs. The fact that human DCs bind VLPs in vitro allows the speculation that human DCs also are involved in the induction of immune responses in vivo.

The expression of costimulatory molecules and the stage of maturation of human DCs largely determine the potential of DCs as APCs in vitro as well as in vivo (46). Activation of DCs leading to maturation of DCs by a wide range of different substances (like bacterial endotoxins, nucleic acids, cytokines or heparan sulfates, CD40L interactions, etc.) has been described, and the activation of DCs by noninfectious viral particles also was demonstrated (47). In the latter study, the authors presented data demonstrating activation of DCs by attenuated whole influenza virus. Nevertheless, viral particles consisting of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins alone did not induce up-regulation of MHC class I molecules and costimulatory molecules or cytokine production. Therefore, they concluded that the observed activation of DCs by attenuated viral particles was attributable to the presence of the viral genome; meanwhile, viral capsids alone were not able to activate immature DC. This is in contrast to our results, which show the activation of DCs by VLPs devoid of any viral genome. The observed activation of DCs by VLPs was clearly dependent on VLPs, because endotoxin levels detected in the VLP preparations are too low to activate DCs. We also ruled out that contaminating proteins derived from insect cell cultures used for production of VLPs are responsible for the observed activation of DCs, because crude insect cell lysates after removal of endotoxins were not able to induce the observed effects on DCs. Furthermore, heat denaturation of VLPs abolished the activating potential, and therefore we excluded any nonproteinaceous components in the VLP preparations as activating agents for human DCs. A comparison between different activating agents showed that VLPs were as potent activators as high doses of LPS or TNF-{alpha}, as shown in Fig. 4Go. Thus, this result allows the conclusion that the observed activation of DCs was not induced by an indirect mechanism via cytokines derived from cells other than DCs present in cultures. Overall, the evidence clearly shows that VLPs specifically activate human DCs after interacting with a potential cell surface-expressed receptor on DCs. Indeed, human DCs express CD49f, which was described previously as interacting with VLPs (41) and conferring binding of VLPs to CD49f-negative cells after transfection (48). Therefore, CD49f could serve as a binding receptor for VLPs to DCs. Taken together, our data allow the conclusion that the observed activation of DCs by VLPs resulted from specific interaction of DCs with VLPs and not from any contaminating substances in the VLP preparations or any indirect effect leading to activation of DCs.

Several viruses, such as influenza virus, herpes simplex, or measles virus (49, 50, 51) have been shown to infect DCs and lead to inhibition of activation of DCs. Therefore, such an infection could constitute an immune evasion mechanism (52, 53, 54). Because papillomaviruses are epitheliotropic viruses binding to cells in the epithelium, the majority of viral particles will infect epithelial cells after entry into the body. Shortly after infection, primarily the early genes of HPV are expressed, and only later on are the capsid proteins L1 and L2 expressed in mature keratinocytes. An immune response induced by DCs taking up viral particles at the site of infection would primarily be directed against capsid proteins rather than early gene products. In contrast, an active infection of DCs by HPV could be detrimental for the virus, because expression of early proteins in the cytoplasm would finally lead to the induction of an immune response by infected DCs specific for early gene products. Subsequently, the immune system recognizes and destroys HPV-infected epithelial cells producing new viral particles. Therefore, it seems unlikely that DCs would serve as target cells for infection by papillomaviruses. The fact that the observed uptake of VLPs by DCs in vitro was dependent on an intact actin-cytoskeleton supports the notion of an active process like endocytosis for uptake.

Our results presented here provide evidence that after uptake of chimeric L1L2-E7 VLPs by immature human DCs, the activated DCs are capable of inducing E7-derived peptide-specific T cell responses in vitro. Class I-restricted presentation is in general associated with degradation of cytoplasmic proteins, which is considered inaccessible to exogenous Ags. Nevertheless, there is evidence that DCs could channel exogenous proteins after uptake into MHC class I presentation pathway and induce specific T cell responses (18, 55). This is best seen in cross-priming effects in vivo (4), where exogenous Ags, for example, derived from tumor cells, are taken up by APCs and presented to cells of the immune system. It also has been postulated that Ag transfer between DCs might be essential for the efficient stimulation of Ag-specific immune responses (56). Furthermore, the enhancement of MHC class I presentation by exogenous particulate Ags also has been described (57). Because VLPs represent a structure similar to particulate Ags, a similar process leading to MHC class I presentation as described for particulate Ags could be envisioned for VLPs. Our results show that, indeed, loading of DCs with chimeric L1L2-E7 VLP led to E7-specific T cell responses. Chimeric VLPs are devoid of any viral genome, and no expression of E7 protein could take place in the cytoplasm of DCs exposed to VLPs. Therefore, all peptides presented in an MHC class I-restricted fashion are derived from exogenous chimeric VLPs added to the culture, demonstrating the ability of DCs to channel exogenous proteins into the MHC class I presentation pathway. The fact that chimeric VLPs lead to induction of peptide-specific T cell by an in vitro immunization system described here indicates that such a system could allow the identification of endogenously processed epitopes of any Ag delivered to immature DCs by the use of chimeric VLPs. Therefore, chimeric VLPs not only represent an efficient vaccination approach in vivo but also a tool for identification of endogenously processed T cell epitopes.

Chimeric VLPs are explored in clinical trials as vaccine for the induction of tumor Ag-specific immune responses. The induction of tumor Ag-specific cellular immune responses in vivo is critically dependent on several factors: the presentation of tumor Ag-specific peptides, the expression of costimulatory molecules by the APC, and the cytokine environment during the interaction of APCs with specific T cells. A tumor-specific CTL response is most efficiently induced by APC providing stimulatory signals via costimulatory molecules as well as a favorable cytokine environment. The importance of costimulatory molecules like CD80 is undisputed in the induction of effective anti-tumor immune responses (58, 59). Furthermore, a potent anti-tumor effect of IL-12 has been described, either by systemically administered IL-12 (60) or by vaccination with poorly immunogenic tumor cells transfected with IL-12 genes (29, 61). Furthermore, synergistic effects of expression of CD80 simultaneously with the secretion of IL-12 in inducing protective immunity against poorly immunogenic tumors in vivo have been demonstrated (62, 63). Therefore, the ability of chimeric VLPs to deliver tumor Ags to DCs and to induce CD80 expression as well as simultaneous secretion of IL-12 renders VLPs powerful tools for vaccination approaches against cancer. Several clinical trials are currently exploring the potential of chimeric L1L2-E7 VLPs to induce cellular immune responses against E7-expressing cells. Immunotherapy of cancer in general is critically dependent on the vaccine delivery system, and chimeric VLPs could, indeed, be a universal carrier for tumor Ags for the treatment of a variety of malignancies by specifically activating DCs.

The central role of DCs in controlling the induction of immune responses renders DCs a highly attractive target for immunotherapy. The evidence we present here indicates the versatility of chimeric VLPs to deliver specific Ags like E7 of HPV to immature DCs. Our data provide insight in the mechanism underlying the high immunogenic potential of VLPs in vivo and could help in the future to design better vaccination strategies for immunotherapy of cervical cancer.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Amira Elmishad and Remco Brandt for their excellent help, and in particular Patricia Simms for her input on design of FACS experiments and analysis of data.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a fellowship of the Illinois Department of Public Health, Office of Women’s Health (to M.P.R.), and National Institutes of Health Grants PO1 CA74182 and RO1 CA74397 (to W.M.K.). Back

2 Current address: IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 3010 Science Park Road, CA 92191. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. W. Martin Kast, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153. Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cells; HPV, human papillomavirus; VLP, virus-like particles; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot; SA, streptavidin; GFP, green fluorescence protein; rhu, recombinant human. Back

Received for publication November 3, 2000. Accepted for publication March 6, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hart, D. N.. 1997. Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood 90:3245.[Free Full Text]
  2. Avigan, D.. 1999. Dendritic cells: development, function and potential use for cancer immunotherapy. Blood Rev. 13:51.[Medline]
  3. Steinman, R. M., K. Inaba. 1999. Myeloid dendritic cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 66:205.[Abstract]
  4. Steinman, R. M., K. Inaba, S. Turley, P. Pierre, I. Mellman. 1999. Antigen capture, processing, and presentation by dendritic cells: recent cell biological studies. Hum. Immunol. 60:562.[Medline]
  5. Schuler, G., R. M. Steinman. 1997. Dendritic cells as adjuvants for immune-mediated resistance to tumors. J. Exp. Med. 186:1183.[Free Full Text]
  6. Mayordomo, J. I., T. Zorina, W. J. Storkus, L. Zitvogel, C. Celluzzi, L. D. Falo, C. J. M. Melief, S. T. Ildstad, W. M. Kast, A. B. Deleo. 1995. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumour peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumour immunity. Nat. Med. 1:1297.[Medline]
  7. Mayordomo, J. I., T. Zorina, W. J. Storkus, L. Zitvogel, M.D. Garcia-Prats, A. B. DeLeo, M. T. Lotze. 1997. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells serve as potent adjuvants for peptide-based antitumor vaccines. Stem Cells 15:94.[Medline]
  8. Celluzzi, C. M., J. I. Mayordomo, W. J. Storkus, M. T. Lotze, Jr L. D. Falo. 1996. Peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induce antigen-specific CTL-mediated protective tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 183:283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Thurner, B., I. Haendle, C. Roder, D. Dieckmann, P. Keikavoussi, H. Jonuleit, A. Bender, C. Maczek, D. Schreiner, P. von den Driesch, et al 1999. Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide-pulsed mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma. J. Exp. Med. 190:1669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nestle, F. O., S. Alijagic, M. Gilliet, Y. Sun, S. Grabbe, R. Dummer, G. Burg, D. Schadendorf. 1998. Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide- or tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 4:328.[Medline]
  11. Rudolf, M. P., S. Man, J. M. C. Melief, A. Sette, and W. M. Kast. 2000. Human T-cell responses to HLA-A restricted high binding affinity peptides of HPV-18 proteins E6 and E7. Clin. Cancer Res. In press.
  12. Zarling, A. L., J. G. Johnson, R. W. Hoffman, D. R. Lee. 1999. Induction of primary human CD8+ T lymphocyte responses in vitro using dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 162:5197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Macatonia, S. E., S. Patterson, S. C. Knight. 1991. Primary proliferative and cytotoxic T-cell responses to HIV induced in vitro by human dendritic cells. Immunology 74:399.[Medline]
  14. Murakami, M., K. J. Gurski, F. M. Marincola, J. Ackland, M. A. Steller. 1999. Induction of specific CD8+ T-lymphocyte responses using a human papillomavirus-16 E6/E7 fusion protein and autologous dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 59:1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Banchereau, J., F. Briere, C. Caux, J. Davoust, S. Lebecque, Y. J. Liu, B. Pulendran, K. Palucka. 2000. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:767.[Medline]
  16. Albert, M. L., B. Sauter, N. Bhardwaj. 1998. Dendritic cells acquire antigen from apoptotic cells and induce class I-restricted CTLs. Nature 392:86.[Medline]
  17. Sauter, B., M. L. Albert, L. Francisco, M. Larsson, S. Somersan, N. Bhardwaj. 2000. Consequences of cell death: exposure to necrotic tumor cells, but not primary tissue cells or apoptotic cells, induces the maturation of immunostimulatory dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Mitchell, D. A., S. K. Nair, E. Gilboa. 1998. Dendritic cell/macrophage precursors capture exogenous antigen for MHC class I presentation by dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:1923.[Medline]
  19. Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, A. Sher. 1996. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787.[Medline]
  20. Nagayama, H., K. Sato, H. Kawasaki, M. Enomoto, C. Morimoto, K. Tadokoro, T. Juji, S. Asano, T. A. Takahashi. 2000. IL-12 responsiveness and expression of IL-12 receptor in human peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 165:59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Stobie, L., S. Gurunathan, C. Prussin, D. L. Sacks, N. Glaichenhaus, C. Y. Wu, R. A. Seder. 2000. The role of antigen and IL-12 in sustaining Th1 memory cells in vivo: IL-12 is required to maintain memory/effector Th1 cells sufficient to mediate protection to an infectious parasite challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gurunathan, S., C. Prussin, D. L. Sacks, R. A. Seder. 1998. Vaccine requirements for sustained cellular immunity to an intracellular parasitic infection. Nat. Med. 4:1409.[Medline]
  23. Monteiro, J. M., C. Harvey, G. Trinchieri. 1998. Role of interleukin-12 in primary influenza virus infection. J. Virol. 72:4825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ramshaw, I. A., A. J. Ramsay, G. Karupiah, M. S. Rolph, S. Mahalingam, J. C. Ruby. 1997. Cytokines and immunity to viral infections. Immunol. Rev. 159:119.[Medline]
  25. Carr, J. A., J. Rogerson, M. J. Mulqueen, N. A. Roberts, R. F. Booth. 1997. Interleukin-12 exhibits potent antiviral activity in experimental herpesvirus infections. J. Virol. 71:7799.[Abstract]
  26. Tahara, H., H. J. Zeh 3rd, I. W. J. Storkus, S. C. Pappo, U. Watkins, S. F. Gubler, P. D. Robbins Wolf, M. T. Lotze. 1994. Fibroblasts genetically engineered to secrete interleukin 12 can suppress tumor growth and induce antitumor immunity to a murine melanoma in vivo. Cancer Res. 54:182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cavallo, F., P. Signorelli, M. Giovarelli, P. Musiani, A. Modesti, M. J. Brunda, M. P. Colombo, G. Forni. 1997. Antitumor efficacy of adenocarcinoma cells engineered to produce interleukin 12 (IL-12) or other cytokines compared with exogenous IL-12. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89:1049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Colombo, M. P., M. Vagliani, F. Spreafico, M. Parenza, C. Chiodoni, C. Melani, A. Stoppacciaro. 1996. Amount of interleukin 12 available at the tumor site is critical for tumor regression. Cancer Res. 56:2531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hallez, S., O. Detremmerie, C. Giannouli, K. Thielemans, T. F. Gajewski, A. Burny, O. Leo. 1999. Interleukin-12-secreting human papillomavirus type 16-transformed cells provide a potent cancer vaccine that generates E7-directed immunity. Int. J. Cancer 81:428.[Medline]
  30. zur Hausen, H.. 1991. Human papillomaviruses in the pathogenesis of anogenital cancer. Virology 184:9.[Medline]
  31. Walboomers, J. M., C. J. Meijer. 1997. Do HPV-negative cervical carcinomas exist?. J Pathol. 181:253.[Medline]
  32. Kirnbauer, R., F. Booy, N. Cheng, D. R. Lowy, J. T. Schiller. 1992. Papillomavirus L1 major capsid protein self-assembles into virus-like particles that are highly immunogenic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:12180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kirnbauer, R., J. Taub, H. Greenstone, R. Roden, M. Durst, L. Gissmann, D. R. Lowy, J. T. Schiller. 1993. Efficient self-assembly of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 and L1–L2 into virus-like particles. J. Virol. 67:6929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Touze, A., P. Coursaget. 1998. In vitro gene transfer using human papillomavirus-like particles. Nucleic Acid Res. 26:1317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Unckell, F., R. E. Streeck, M. Sapp. 1997. Generation and neutralization of pseudovirions of human papillomavirus type 33. J. Virol. 71:2934.[Abstract]
  36. Zhang, L. F., J. Zhou, S. Chen, L. L. Cai, Q. Y. Bao, F. Y. Zheng, J. Q. Lu, J. Padmanabha, K. Hengst, K. Malcolm, I. H. Frazer. 2000. HPV6b virus like particles are potent immunogens without adjuvant in man. Vaccine 18:1051.[Medline]
  37. Greenstone, H. L., J. D. Nieland, K. E. de Visser, M. L. De Bruijn, R. Kirnbauer, R. B. Roden, D. R. Lowy, W. M. Kast, J. T. Schiller. 1998. Chimeric papillomavirus virus-like particles elicit antitumor immunity against the E7 oncoprotein in an HPV16 tumor model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Peng, S., I. H. Frazer, G. J. Fernando, J. Zhou. 1998. Papillomavirus virus-like particles can deliver defined CTL epitopes to the MHC class I pathway. Virology 240:147.[Medline]
  39. Nieland, J. D., D. M. Da Silva, M. P. Velders, K. E. de Visser, J. T. Schiller, M. Muller, W. M. Kast. 1999. Chimeric papillomavirus virus-like particles induce a murine self-antigen-specific protective and therapeutic antitumor immune response. J. Cell Biochem. 73:145.[Medline]
  40. Rudolf, M. P., J. D. Nieland, D. M. Da Silva, M. P. Velders, M. Müller, H. L. Greenstone, J. T. Schiller, W. M. Kast. 1999. Induction of HPV16 L1/L2 virus-like particle specific human T-cell responses in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 380:355.
  41. Evander, M., I. H. Frazer, E. Payne, Y. M. Qi, K. Hengst, N. A. McMillan. 1997. Identification of the {alpha}6 integrin as a candidate receptor for papillomaviruses. J. Virol. 71:2449.[Abstract]
  42. Ressing, M. E., A. Sette, R. M. Brandt, J. Ruppert, P. A. Wentworth, M. Hartman, C. Oseroff, H. M. Grey, C. J. M. Melief, W. M. Kast. 1995. Human CTL epitopes encoded by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 identified through in vivo and in vitro immunogenicity studies of HLA-A*0201-binding peptides. J. Immunol. 154:5934.[Abstract]
  43. Da Silva, D. M., M. P. Velders, M. P. Rudolf, J. D. Schiller, W. M. Kast. 1999. Papillomavirus like particles as anticancer vaccines. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 1:82.[Medline]
  44. Ludewig, B., S. Ehl, U. Karrer, B. Odermatt, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1998. Dendritic cells efficiently induce protective antiviral immunity. J. Virol. 72:3812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. De Bruijn, M. L., H. L. Greenstone, H. Vermeulen, C. J. M. Melief, D. R. Lowy, J. T. Schiller, W. M. Kast. 1998. L1-specific protection from tumor challenge elicited by HPV16 virus-like particles. Virology 250:371.[Medline]
  46. O’Doherty, U., M. Peng, S. Gezelter, W. J. Swiggard, M. Betjes, N. Bhardwaj, R. M. Steinman. 1994. Human blood contains two subsets of dendritic cells, one immunologically mature and the other immature. Immunology 82:487.[Medline]
  47. Saurwein-Teissl, M., K. Zisterer, T. L. Schmitt, R. Gluck, S. Cryz, B. Grubeck-Loebenstein. 1998. Whole virus influenza vaccine activates dendritic cells (DC) and stimulates cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) while subunit vaccines support T cell proliferation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 114:271.[Medline]
  48. McMillan, N. A., E. Payne, I. H. Frazer, M. Evander. 1999. Expression of the {alpha}6 integrin confers papillomavirus binding upon receptor-negative B-cells. Virology 261:271.[Medline]
  49. Bender, A., M. Albert, A. Reddy, M. Feldman, B. Sauter, G. Kaplan, W. Hellman, N. Bhardwaj. 1998. The distinctive features of influenza virus infection of dendritic cells. Immunobiology 198:552.[Medline]
  50. Drake, D. R. 3rd, J. M. Moser, A. Hadley, J. D. Altman, C. Maliszewski, E. Butz, A. E. M. Lukacher. 2000. Polyomavirus-infected dendritic cells induce antiviral CD8+ T lymphocytes. J. Virol. 74:4093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Hirschowitz, E. A., J. D. Weaver, G. E. Hidalgo, D. E. Doherty. 2000. Murine dendritic cells infected with adenovirus vectors show signs of activation. Gene Ther. 7:1112.[Medline]
  52. Salio, M., M. Cella, M. Suter, A. Lanzavecchia. 1996. Inhibition of dendritic cell maturation by herpes simplex virus. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:3245.
  53. Servet-Delprat, C., P. O. Vidalain, H. Bausinger, S. Manie, F. Le Deist, O. Azocar, D. Hanau, A. Fischer, C. Rabourdin-Combe. 2000. Measles virus induces abnormal differentiation of CD40 ligand-activated human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 164:1753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Engelmayer, J., M. Larsson, M. Subklewe, A. Chahroudi, W. I. Cox, R. M. Steinman, N. Bhardwaj. 1999. Vaccinia virus inhibits the maturation of human dendritic cells: a novel mechanism of immune evasion. J. Immunol. 163:6762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Rock, K. L., L. Rothstein, S. Gamble, C. Fleischacker. 1993. Characterization of antigen-presenting cells that present exogenous antigens in association with class I MHC molecules. J. Immunol. 150:438.[Abstract]
  56. Knight, S. C., S. Iqball, M. S. Roberts, S. Macatonia, P. A. Bedford. 1998. Transfer of antigen between dendritic cells in the stimulation of primary T cell proliferation. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:1636.[Medline]
  57. Kovacsovics-Bankowski, M., K. Clark, B. Benacerraf, K. L. Rock. 1993. Efficient major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of exogenous antigen upon phagocytosis by macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Johnston, J. V., A. R. Malacko, M. T. Mizuno, P. McGowan, I. Hellstrom, K. E. Hellstrom, H. Marquardt, L. Chen. 1996. B7-CD28 costimulation unveils the hierarchy of tumor epitopes recognized by major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 183:791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Gajewski, T. F., F. Fallarino, C. Uyttenhove, T. Boon. 1996. Tumor rejection requires a CTLA4 ligand provided by the host or expressed on the tumor: superiority of B7-1 over B7-2 for active tumor immunization. J. Immunol. 156:2909.[Abstract]
  60. Nastala, C. L., H. D. Edington, T. G. McKinney, H. Tahara, M. A. Nalesnik, M. J. Brunda, M. K. Gately, S. F. Wolf, R. D. Schreiber, W. J. Storkus, M. T. Lotze. 1994. Recombinant IL-12 administration induces tumor regression in association with IFN-{gamma} production. J. Immunol. 153:1697.[Abstract]
  61. Fallarino, F., A. Ashikari, T. Boon, T. F. Gajewski. 1997. Antigen-specific regression of established tumors induced by active immunization with irradiated IL-12- but not B7-1-transfected tumor cells. Int. Immunol. 9:1259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Coughlin, C. M., M. Wysocka, H. L. Kurzawa, W. M. Lee, G. Trinchieri, S. L. Eck. 1995. B7-1 and interleukin 12 synergistically induce effective antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 55:4980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Zitvogel, L., P. D. Robbins, W. J. Storkus, M. R. Clarke, M. J. Maeurer, R. L. Campbell, C. G. Davis, H. Tahara, R. D. Schreiber, M. T. Lotze. 1996. Interleukin-12 and B7.1 co-stimulation cooperate in the induction of effective antitumor immunity and therapy of established tumors. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1335.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Didierlaurent, S. Morel, L. Lockman, S. L. Giannini, M. Bisteau, H. Carlsen, A. Kielland, O. Vosters, N. Vanderheyde, F. Schiavetti, et al.
AS04, an Aluminum Salt- and TLR4 Agonist-Based Adjuvant System, Induces a Transient Localized Innate Immune Response Leading to Enhanced Adaptive Immunity
J. Immunol., November 15, 2009; 183(10): 6186 - 6197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. M. Fahey, A. B. Raff, D. M. Da Silva, and W. M. Kast
A Major Role for the Minor Capsid Protein of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 in Immune Escape
J. Immunol., November 15, 2009; 183(10): 6151 - 6156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. Schellenbacher, R. Roden, and R. Kirnbauer
Chimeric L1-L2 Virus-Like Particles as Potential Broad-Spectrum Human Papillomavirus Vaccines
J. Virol., October 1, 2009; 83(19): 10085 - 10095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. A. Perrone, A. Ahmad, V. Veguilla, X. Lu, G. Smith, J. M. Katz, P. Pushko, and T. M. Tumpey
Intranasal Vaccination with 1918 Influenza Virus-Like Particles Protects Mice and Ferrets from Lethal 1918 and H5N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
J. Virol., June 1, 2009; 83(11): 5726 - 5734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. M. Fahey, A. B. Raff, D. M. Da Silva, and W. M. Kast
Reversal of Human Papillomavirus-Specific T Cell Immune Suppression through TLR Agonist Treatment of Langerhans Cells Exposed to Human Papillomavirus Type 16
J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2919 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. J. Garcia-Pineres, A. Hildesheim, L. Dodd, T. J. Kemp, J. Yang, B. Fullmer, C. Harro, D. R. Lowy, R. A. Lempicki, and L. A. Pinto
Gene Expression Patterns Induced by HPV-16 L1 Virus-Like Particles in Leukocytes from Vaccine Recipients
J. Immunol., February 1, 2009; 182(3): 1706 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
H. Barth, E. K. Schnober, C. Neumann-Haefelin, C. Thumann, M. B. Zeisel, H. M. Diepolder, Z. Hu, T. J. Liang, H. E. Blum, R. Thimme, et al.
Scavenger Receptor Class B Is Required for Hepatitis C Virus Uptake and Cross-Presentation by Human Dendritic Cells
J. Virol., April 1, 2008; 82(7): 3466 - 3479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
S. Mattil-Fritz, D. Scharner, K. Piuko, N. Thones, L. Gissmann, H. Muller, and M. Muller
Immunotherapy of equine sarcoid: dose-escalation trial for the use of chimeric papillomavirus-like particles
J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2008; 89(1): 138 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. M. Da Silva, S. C. Fausch, J. S. Verbeek, and W. M. Kast
Uptake of Human Papillomavirus Virus-Like Particles by Dendritic Cells Is Mediated by Fc{gamma} Receptors and Contributes to Acquisition of T Cell Immunity
J. Immunol., June 15, 2007; 178(12): 7587 - 7597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. S. Liu, J. Dyer, G. R. Leggatt, G. J. P. Fernando, J. Zhong, R. Thomas, and I. H. Frazer
Overcoming Original Antigenic Sin to Generate New CD8 T Cell IFN-{gamma} Responses in an Antigen-Experienced Host.
J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 2873 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Yang, F. M. Murillo, M. J. Delannoy, R. L. Blosser, W. H. Yutzy IV, S. Uematsu, K. Takeda, S. Akira, R. P. Viscidi, and R. B. S. Roden
B Lymphocyte Activation by Human Papillomavirus-Like Particles Directly Induces Ig Class Switch Recombination via TLR4-MyD88
J. Immunol., June 15, 2005; 174(12): 7912 - 7919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
L. Bousarghin, P. Hubert, E. Franzen, N. Jacobs, J. Boniver, and P. Delvenne
Human papillomavirus 16 virus-like particles use heparan sulfates to bind dendritic cells and colocalize with langerin in Langerhans cells
J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2005; 86(5): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Barth, A. Ulsenheimer, G. R. Pape, H. M. Diepolder, M. Hoffmann, C. Neumann-Haefelin, R. Thimme, P. Henneke, R. Klein, G. Paranhos-Baccala, et al.
Uptake and presentation of hepatitis C virus-like particles by human dendritic cells
Blood, May 1, 2005; 105(9): 3605 - 3614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Boisgerault, P. Rueda, C. M. Sun, S. Hervas-Stubbs, M. Rojas, and C. Leclerc
Cross-Priming of T Cell Responses by Synthetic Microspheres Carrying a CD8+ T Cell Epitope Requires an Adjuvant Signal
J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3432 - 3439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
H. Zhang, R. Fayad, X. Wang, D. Quinn, and L. Qiao
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag-Specific Mucosal Immunity after Oral Immunization with Papillomavirus Pseudoviruses Encoding Gag
J. Virol., October 1, 2004; 78(19): 10249 - 10257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Engelmark, A. Beskow, J. Magnusson, H. Erlich, and U. Gyllensten
Affected sib-pair analysis of the contribution of HLA class I and class II loci to development of cervical cancer
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2004; 13(17): 1951 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Yang, F. M. Murillo, K.-Y. Lin, W. H. Yutzy IV, S. Uematsu, K. Takeda, S. Akira, R. P. Viscidi, and R. B. S. Roden
Human Papillomavirus Type-16 Virus-Like Particles Activate Complementary Defense Responses in Key Dendritic Cell Subpopulations
J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2624 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Q. Yao, R. Zhang, L. Guo, M. Li, and C. Chen
Th Cell-Independent Immune Responses to Chimeric Hemagglutinin/Simian Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Like Particles Vaccine
J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 1951 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Mandic and T. Vujkov
Human papillomavirus vaccine as a new way of preventing cervical cancer: a dream or the future?
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 197 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. B. Buck, D. V. Pastrana, D. R. Lowy, and J. T. Schiller
Efficient Intracellular Assembly of Papillomaviral Vectors
J. Virol., January 15, 2004; 78(2): 751 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Y. Tsunetsugu-Yokota, Y. Morikawa, M. Isogai, A. Kawana-Tachikawa, T. Odawara, T. Nakamura, F. Grassi, B. Autran, and A. Iwamoto
Yeast-Derived Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 p55gag Virus-Like Particles Activate Dendritic Cells (DCs) and Induce Perforin Expression in Gag-Specific CD8+ T Cells by Cross-Presentation of DCs
J. Virol., October 1, 2003; 77(19): 10250 - 10259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Biemelt, U. Sonnewald, P. Galmbacher, L. Willmitzer, and M. Muller
Production of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Virus-Like Particles in Transgenic Plants
J. Virol., September 1, 2003; 77(17): 9211 - 9220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
K. Devaraj, M. L. Gillison, and T.-C. Wu
DEVELOPMENT OF HPV VACCINES FOR HPV-ASSOCIATED HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, September 1, 2003; 14(5): 345 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. G. Moron, P. Rueda, C. Sedlik, and C. Leclerc
In Vivo, Dendritic Cells Can Cross-Present Virus-Like Particles Using an Endosome-to-Cytosol Pathway
J. Immunol., September 1, 2003; 171(5): 2242 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
E. J. Davidson, P. Sehr, R. L. Faulkner, J. L. Parish, K. Gaston, R. A. Moore, M. Pawlita, H. C. Kitchener, and P. L. Stern
Human papillomavirus type 16 E2- and L1-specific serological and T-cell responses in women with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2003; 84(8): 2089 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. C. Fausch, D. M. Da Silva, and W. M. Kast
Differential Uptake and Cross-Presentation of Human Papillomavirus Virus-like Particles by Dendritic Cells and Langerhans Cells
Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 63(13): 3478 - 3482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. Ohlschlager, W. Osen, K. Dell, S. Faath, R. L. Garcea, I. Jochmus, M. Muller, M. Pawlita, K. Schafer, P. Sehr, et al.
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 L1 Capsomeres Induce L1-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes and Tumor Regression in C57BL/6 Mice
J. Virol., April 15, 2003; 77(8): 4635 - 4645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Chackerian, P. Lenz, D. R. Lowy, and J. T. Schiller
Determinants of Autoantibody Induction by Conjugated Papillomavirus Virus-Like Particles
J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6120 - 6126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Weijzen, M. P. Velders, A. G. Elmishad, P. E. Bacon, J. R. Panella, B. J. Nickoloff, L. Miele, and W. M. Kast
The Notch Ligand Jagged-1 Is Able to Induce Maturation of Monocyte-Derived Human Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4273 - 4278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. C. Fausch, D. M. Da Silva, M. P. Rudolf, and W. M. Kast
Human Papillomavirus Virus-Like Particles Do Not Activate Langerhans Cells: A Possible Immune Escape Mechanism Used by Human Papillomaviruses
J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 3242 - 3249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
P. Moingeon, C. de Taisne, and J. Almond
Delivery technologies for human vaccines
Br. Med. Bull., July 1, 2002; 62(1): 29 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
G. Moron, P. Rueda, I. Casal, and C. Leclerc
CD8{alpha}2 CD11b+ Dendritic Cells Present Exogenous Virus-like Particles to CD8+ T Cells and Subsequently Express CD8{alpha} and CD205 Molecules
J. Exp. Med., May 20, 2002; 195(10): 1233 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. Shi, J. Liu, Y. Huang, and L. Qiao
Papillomavirus Pseudovirus: a Novel Vaccine To Induce Mucosal and Systemic Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Responses
J. Virol., November 1, 2001; 75(21): 10139 - 10148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudolf, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kast, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudolf, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kast, W. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS