The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, H. R.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 166: 51-57.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Biased V{beta} Usage in Immature Thymocytes Is Independent of DJ{beta} Proximity and pT{alpha} Pairing1

Anne Wilson, Céline Maréchal and H. Robson MacDonald2

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne Branch, University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During thymus development, the TCR {beta} locus rearranges before the TCR {alpha} locus. Pairing of productively rearranged TCR {beta}-chains with an invariant pT{alpha} chain leads to the formation of a pre-TCR and subsequent expansion of immature pre-T cells. Essentially nothing is known about the TCR V{beta} repertoire in pre-T cells before or after the expression of a pre-TCR. Using intracellular staining, we show here that the TCR V{beta} repertoire is significantly biased at the earliest developmental stage in which VDJ{beta} rearrangement has occurred. Moreover (and in contrast to the VH repertoire in immature B cells), V{beta} repertoire biases in immature T cells do not reflect proximity of V{beta} gene segments to the DJ{beta} cluster, nor do they depend upon preferential V{beta} pairing with the pT{alpha} chain. We conclude that V gene repertoires in developing T and B cells are controlled by partially distinct mechanisms.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mature B and T lymphocytes express highly variable heterodimeric Ag receptors at the cell surface. Whereas the B cell receptor (BCR)3 is composed of Ig H chains and L chains along with the Ig{alpha} and Ig{beta} signaling complex (1), the TCR is a heterodimer of {alpha}- and {beta}-chains in association with the CD3 complex (CD3{epsilon}, {gamma}, {delta}, and {zeta}) (1). During development the BCR and TCR are assembled from independent rearranging gene segments at the Ig and TCR loci, respectively. In both instances variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments are recombined in a combinatorial fashion to produce a diverse BCR or TCR repertoire (2, 3, 4).

There are many striking parallels in B and T cell development. In both cases, one Ag receptor chain (IgH for the BCR and TCR {beta} for the TCR) rearranges early in development. Productive rearrangement of this chain leads to the formation of a pre-BCR or a pre-TCR complex in which IgH or TCR {beta} is paired with an invariant surrogate L chain or pT{alpha} chain, respectively (5, 6). Signaling through the pre-BCR or pre-TCR leads to clonal expansion of immature B or T cells (7, 8), ultimately resulting in rearrangement of the IgL or TCR {alpha} locus and subsequently expression of a BCR or TCR. Maturing B and T cells are then positively and negatively selected on the basis of their Ag receptor specificity to yield the peripheral BCR and TCR repertoires (9, 10, 11, 12, 13).

Based on these developmental parallels, there are several different ways in which biases in the BCR or TCR repertoires can arise. At early developmental stages, nonrandom VDJ recombination at the IgH or TCR {beta} locus may lead to intrinsic biases in VH or V{beta} gene usage in immature B or T cells. Moreover, the obligate formation of a pre-BCR or pre-TCR for subsequent developmental progression may further select for IgH or TCR {beta}-chains that can pair effectively with the corresponding surrogate L or pT{alpha} chains. Finally, positive and negative selection events would be expected to select for mature BCR and TCR based on the appropriate pairing and specificity of the IgH/IgL and TCR {beta}/TCR {alpha} heterodimers.

Although considerable data are available concerning the mature BCR and TCR repertoires, less is known about the factors that shape the pre-BCR and pre-TCR repertoires before positive and negative selection events. Nevertheless, it has been shown that the pre-BCR repertoire is subject to bias in at least two respects (7). First, a preference for rearrangement of VH gene segments that are proximal to the DJH locus results in a nonrandom use of IgH chains in immature B cells. Second, the failure of a large proportion (~50%) of IgH chains to pair effectively with the surrogate L chain introduces further bias in the VH repertoire that can successfully undergo pre-BCR-mediated selection.

In contrast to B cells, essentially nothing is known about factors that may influence the pre-TCR repertoire during early T cell development. In particular, it is not clear whether the recombination machinery that directs VDJ{beta} rearrangements acts at random or alternatively introduces an intrinsic V{beta} repertoire bias. Moreover, the possible influence of preferential TCR {beta}/pT{alpha} pairing on the pre-TCR-selected V{beta} repertoire has not been directly evaluated.

In this report, we have developed a novel two-color intracellular (ic) immunofluorescence protocol that, when combined with two-color surface staining, allows accurate determination of the TCR V{beta} repertoire in immature thymocyte subsets. Our data indicate that significant biases in the V{beta} repertoire are already apparent at the earliest developmental stage in which VDJ{beta} rearrangement has occurred. However, in contrast to the VH repertoire in immature B cells, V{beta} repertoire biases in immature T cells do not reflect proximity of V{beta} gene segments to the DJ{beta} cluster, nor do they depend upon preferential pairing with pT{alpha}.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice and cell suspensions

C57BL/6 female mice (V{beta}b allotype) were purchased from Harlan Olac (Bicester, U.K.). Congenic V{beta}a allotype mice (backcrossed 15 generations to the C57BL/6 background) were a kind gift from Alexandra Livingstone (Basel Institute for Immunology, Basel, Switzerland). They were bred and maintained at the Institut Suisse de Recherche Experimentale sur le Cancer animal facility and have been described in more detail elsewhere (14). pT{alpha}-deficient mice on a C57BL/6 background (15) were a kind gift from Hans Jorg Fehling (Basel Institute for Immunology). All mice were used at 6–8 wk of age. CD4-CD8- (double-negative (DN)) thymocytes were prepared as previously described (16, 17). Contaminating mature {alpha}{beta} or {gamma}{delta} T cells and immature CD44+ thymocytes were eliminated during subsequent FACS analysis by gating out all cells stained with a mixture of FITC-conjugated Abs to CD4, CD8, CD44, CD3{epsilon}, TCR {alpha}{beta}, and TCR {gamma}{delta}(either prepared in this laboratory or purchased from PharMingen, San Diego, CA). For the analysis of immature single positive (ISP) (CD4-CD8+CD3-) thymocytes, depletion was performed using mAbs to CD4, CD25, and CD44.

ic staining, FACS analysis, and Abs

Thymocyte subsets were analyzed by four-color simultaneous surface and ic flow cytometry on a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) as previously described (17, 18, 19). Briefly, purified DN thymocytes were surface stained with the FITC mixture described above and CD25-Cy5 (prepared in this laboratory) and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde before permeabilization with 0.5% saponin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Two-color ic staining of TCR V{beta} vs TCR C{beta} was performed by staining with PE-conjugated anti-V{beta} mAbs followed by anti-TCR C{beta}-CyChrome (PharMingen). mAbs to TCR V{beta}s 2, 6, 8.2, 8 total (8.1/8.2/8.3), 9, and 17a were prepared in this laboratory by conjugation of the purified proteins with the Phycolink PE conjugation kit (Prozyme, San Leandro, CA); mAbs to TCR V{beta}s 4, 8.3, 10b, 11, and 12 were purchased from Caltag (Burlingame, CA); and those to TCR V{beta}s 3, 5.1/5.2, 7, 8.1/8.2, and 13 were purchased from PharMingen. The percentage ic TCR V{beta}+ of total ic TCR C{beta}+ for DN3 (CD25+CD44-) or DN4 (CD25-CD44-) thymocytes was calculated using the CellQuest (Becton Dickinson) program. For ISP thymocytes, three-color surface staining with anti-CD8-CyChrome, anti-TCR {beta}-PE (PharMingen), and anti-CD24-FITC (prepared in this laboratory) was followed by fixation and ic staining with anti-TCR V{beta}-PE conjugates. ISP thymocytes were defined as CD8+CD24+TCR {beta}low. Since ISP thymocytes have been previously shown to be 100% ic TCR C{beta}+ (17), the percentage of ic V{beta}+ ISP was calculated directly.

Statistical analysis

The percentages of ic V{beta}+ DN3 thymocytes as well as the ratios of ic V{beta}+ DN4:DN3 or ISP:DN3 thymocytes were compared pairwise for all V{beta} domains using the Student t test. Values of p < 0.001 were considered to be significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ic TCR V{beta} staining in immature thymocytes

Although several groups have identified immature fetal or adult thymocytes expressing TCR {beta} protein based on ic staining with anti-TCR C{beta} mAb (17, 20, 21, 22, 23), very little is known about the relative expression of TCR V{beta} domains before positive and negative selection. To address this issue, we prepared a panel of PE-conjugated anti-V{beta} mAbs and used them in conjunction with CyChrome-conjugated anti-C{beta} mAb in two-color ic staining of immature CD4-CD8- (DN) adult thymocytes. Surface staining with a Cy5-conjugated mAb to CD25 and a FITC-conjugated mAb mixture to CD44 and a panel of mature thymocyte markers (see Materials and Methods) was used in the other two colors to define CD44-CD25+ (DN3) and CD44-CD25- (DN4) subsets (Fig. 1Go). As reported previously (17), a clearly defined subset of ic TCR {beta}+ cells was distinguishable in both DN3 and DN4 subsets (25 and 75%, respectively). In addition, a small proportion of double-staining ic TCR V{beta}5+ ic C{beta}+ cells (corresponding to 11 ± 2% of ic TCR C{beta}+ cells) was detectable in both the DN3 and DN4 subsets (Fig. 1Go). This staining was shown to be specific, since immature thymocytes from C57BL/6 (V{beta}b) mice stained positively for V{beta}8.2 but negatively for V{beta}17a (Fig. 2Go). In contrast, immature thymocytes from congenic C57BL/6 mice of the V{beta}a haplotype stained positively for V{beta}17a but negatively for V{beta}8.2 (Fig. 2Go). These results are compatible with the V{beta}a genotype, which harbors a large deletion including V{beta}8.2, as well as a polymorphism that allows expression of V{beta}17a (24, 25).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. ic TCR V{beta} proteins are expressed in immature thymocytes. Purified DN thymocytes were surface stained with a mixture of FITC-conjugated mAbs including CD4, CD8, CD3, TCR {beta}, TCR {gamma}{delta}, and CD44 along with CD25-Cy5. After fixation and permeabilization, ic staining was performed with mAb to C{beta} (CyChrome) to distinguish all ic C{beta}+ cells, followed by anti-V{beta}5 (PE). Cytograms of ic V{beta}5 vs ic C{beta} staining are gated on CD44-CD25+ (DN3) or CD44-CD25- (DN4) thymocytes.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. ic V{beta} staining is specific; ic C{beta} vs ic V{beta} staining on immature DN3 and DN4 subsets (purified, stained, and gated as described in Fig. 1Go) in C57BL/6 mice of the V{beta}b and V{beta}a allotypes. In V{beta}a mice, a large portion of the V{beta} locus including the V{beta}8.2 gene segment is deleted, while the polymorphic V{beta}17a gene segment is expressed.

 
Biased V{beta} repertoire in DN3 thymocytes

The DN3 subset is the earliest stage at which full-length VDJ{beta} transcripts and TCR C{beta} protein are expressed (16, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). It was therefore of interest to determine whether biases in V{beta} usage, which are pronounced after positive and negative thymic selection (32, 33, 34, 35, 36), could already be detected at the DN3 stage. Fig. 3Go represents a summary of ic V{beta} staining in DN3 thymocytes of C57BL/6 mice for the 16 V{beta} domains analyzed in this study. With the exception of V{beta}5.1/5.2 (which cannot be distinguished by the mAb used) and V{beta}17a (which is not expressed in the V{beta}b haplotype), the other 13 individual V{beta} domains were used at frequencies varying between 2.9% (for V{beta}12) and 8.6% (for V{beta}8.2) in the DN3 subset. A pairwise statistical comparison of these 13 V{beta} domains indicated that they could be subdivided into four groups based on their level of utilization in the DN3 subset: V{beta}8.2 > V{beta}4, V{beta}6, V{beta}8.3 > V{beta}2, V{beta}3, V{beta}8.1, V{beta}10, V{beta}11 > V{beta}7, V{beta}9, V{beta}12, V{beta}13. Thus there is a considerable (up to 3-fold) variation in the probability of utilization of a particular V{beta} domain at this early developmental stage.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Biased V{beta} repertoire in DN3 thymocytes; a summary of ic V{beta} staining in DN3 thymocytes of C57BL/6 mice. Results are the mean ± SD of 5–10 separate experiments. Staining and gating were as described in Fig. 1Go. The different V{beta} segments are arranged in the same order as found on the chromosome with the most 5' segments at the bottom and the most 3' segments at the top.

 
Biased V{beta} repertoire in DN3 thymocytes is independent of proximity to DJ{beta} segments

At the IgH locus, there is a large body of evidence indicating that proximal VH segments rearrange preferentially to DJH segments during ontogeny (37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44). Thus it is possible that the variations observed in V{beta} usage among DN3 thymocytes reflect proximity to the DJ{beta} segments. However, as shown in Fig. 3Go (in which the V{beta} segments are ordered according to their positions on the chromosome), there is no correlation between frequency of V{beta} usage and chromosomal localization. Indeed, the most DJ{beta}-proximal V{beta} segments (V{beta}7 and V{beta}3) are used at a relatively low frequency, whereas the most frequently used segment (V{beta}8.2) is relatively distal to DJ{beta}. Moreover, within each group of V{beta} domains defined by statistically similar usage in DN3 thymocytes (see above), the individual members appear to be located randomly within the V{beta} locus.

V{beta} repertoire in DN3 thymocytes is independent of {beta}-selection

As mentioned previously, VDJ{beta} rearrangement and TCR {beta} protein expression first occur at the DN3 stage of adult thymus development. Since DN3 thymocytes also express pT{alpha} and CD3 components (45, 46), de novo synthesized TCR {beta} protein can presumably be rapidly incorporated into a pre-TCR complex. Formation of a pre-TCR will in turn signal the cell to enter cell cycle. As a result, DN3 thymocytes are heterogeneous in size (as measured by forward light scatter), with ~70% small (i.e., resting) and 30% large (i.e., cycling) cells (Fig. 4GoA). As expected, the majority of large DN3 cells (65 ± 7%) but very few small DN3 cells (12 ± 2%) express ic TCR {beta} protein (Fig. 4GoA). Most large DN3 cells are thus "{beta} -selected," while the minor subset of small ic TCR {beta}+ DN3 cells presumably represents cells that either have failed to assemble a pre-TCR complex (due to the inability of their TCR {beta}-chains to pair with pT{alpha}) or have not yet entered the cell cycle despite the presence of a functional pre-TCR (47). In either case, these small DN3 cells would be considered to be not {beta} selected.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. The V{beta} repertoire is not affected by {beta} selection. A, ic C{beta} staining of DN3 thymocytes gated on small (70%) and large (30%) cells by forward light scatter. Percentages of ic C{beta}+ cells are the means ± SD of eight independent experiments. B, Percentage of ic V{beta}+ among ic C{beta}+ cells in small (open bars) and large (filled bars) DN3 thymocytes. Data are the means ± SD of four to eight independent experiments.

 
To determine whether {beta} selection significantly alters the V{beta} repertoire of DN3 thymocytes, we compared ic V{beta} staining in ic C{beta}+ DN3 cells gated according to size. As shown in Fig. 4GoB, the hierarchy of ic V{beta} usage observed previously in total ic C{beta}+ DN3 thymocytes was preserved in the small and large DN3 subsets. Moreover, analysis of the TCR V{beta} repertoire of DN3 thymocytes from pT{alpha}-deficient mice (15), which are genetically incapable of forming a pre-TCR, indicated no significant differences in ic V{beta} usage as compared with wild-type mice (Table IGo). Taken together, these data demonstrate that the biased V{beta} repertoire of DN3 thymocytes does not result from the preferential ability of certain V{beta} domains to form a functional pre-TCR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. TCR V{beta} repertoire in DN3 thymocytes of pT{alpha}-deficient mice1

 
V{beta} repertoire is not significantly affected by pre-TCR-mediated expansion of immature thymocytes

Following productive VDJ{beta} rearrangements at the DN3 stage, the TCR {beta}-chain pairs with the invariant pT{alpha}-chain and CD3 components to form the pre-TCR complex (8). As a consequence of pre-TCR signaling, DN3 thymocytes shut off further VDJ{beta} recombination, down-regulate the expression of CD25, and enter a phase of rapid proliferation (DN4). Proliferating DN4 thymocytes subsequently express CD8 at the ISP stage before becoming CD4+CD8+ cells and initiating VJ{alpha} rearrangement. To determine whether the V{beta} repertoire is selected during this pre-TCR-mediated expansion phase of thymocyte development, we measured ic V{beta} expression in DN4 and ISP thymocyte subsets and compared these values with those obtained in the preexpansion (DN3) stage. As shown in Fig. 5Go, only very slight changes in the V{beta} repertoire were observed in DN4 and ISP subsets, since the ratio of DN4:DN3 or ISP:DN3 ic TCR V{beta}+ cells was not significantly different from 1 in virtually all cases. These data indicate that the dramatic expansion of immature thymocytes that occurs between the DN3 and ISP stages of development does not depend upon the V{beta} domain utilized by the pre-TCR.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. The V{beta} repertoire is unaffected by pre-TCR-mediated expansion of immature thymocytes. Data are a summary of the ratios between DN4 and DN3 (left) or ISP and DN3 (right) of the percentage of ic C{beta}+ cells expressing a particular ic V{beta} protein. Ratios are the means ± SD calculated from four to eight individual experiments in which DN3 and DN4 or DN3 and ISP subsets were compared in the same sample. The vertical lines correspond to a ratio of 1.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The data presented here represent (to our knowledge) the first attempt to analyze the TCR V{beta} repertoire early in development before positive and negative selection events. Although it is known that the expressed TCR V{beta} repertoire is modified during both positive (32, 35) and negative (33, 34, 36) thymic selection, the contribution of other factors (such as rearrangement frequency and probability of pairing with pT{alpha}) to TCR V{beta} repertoire formation has not been previously evaluated. Our data indicate that the TCR V{beta} repertoire is already significantly skewed at the earliest stage of adult thymus development in which VDJ{beta} rearrangements can be detected. Moreover, and in marked contrast to the VH repertoire in immature B cells, the bias in V{beta} repertoire observed in immature T cells does not reflect any obvious preference for rearrangement of proximal V{beta} segments or for pairing with the pT{alpha}-chain. Thus, although the general parallels in B and T cell development are striking, the mechanisms responsible for controlling V{beta} and VH usage at early developmental stages are quite distinct.

Technical considerations

Previous studies of VH repertoire formation in immature B cells have mainly relied upon PCR amplification and sequencing at the population level. Such techniques have the advantage of detecting both nonproductive and productive IgH rearrangements. However, they are subject to biases due to the variable efficiency of amplification by different PCR primers and do not evaluate rearrangements at the single-cell level. The latter problem can be overcome using single-cell PCR (42, 48), but this method introduces sampling errors due to the relatively small number of cells that can be analyzed.

To assess the TCR V{beta} repertoire in immature thymocytes, we have developed a two-color ic staining procedure using a panel of PE-conjugated anti-V{beta} mAbs in conjunction with CyChrome-conjugated anti-C{beta} mAb. Anti-V{beta} mAbs represent a powerful tool to analyze the TCR V{beta} repertoire, since (at least in the mouse) mAbs are available for the majority of V{beta}-chains. Indeed, the panel of anti-V{beta} mAbs used here detected ~70% of the total V{beta} repertoire in both DN3 and DN4 subsets as assessed by ic staining. ic staining is, however, necessary to reliably detect TCR {beta} protein expression at early stages of thymus development, since the pre-TCR is expressed at very low levels on the cell surface and can only be detected using elaborate multistage staining protocols (49). Moreover, simultaneous assessment of ic V{beta} and ic C{beta} protein expression in individual cells allows the proportion of ic V{beta}+ cells to be measured with greater precision, particularly in immature subsets (such as DN3) where only a minority of cells express TCR {beta} protein.

Intracellular V{beta} staining detects only productive VDJ{beta} rearrangements

Imprecise joining of V, D, and J gene segments during VDJ{beta} recombination leads to premature stop codons and/or an incorrect translational reading frame for the C{beta} domain in two of three cases. Nevertheless, the V{beta} domain could still in theory be translated correctly in cases of nonproductive rearrangement, leading to a truncated TCR {beta} protein. Two-color ic staining for V{beta} and C{beta} domains argues against the presence of stable truncated TCR {beta} proteins, since (for all 16 V{beta} domains analyzed) ic V{beta} staining was only detected in cells that stained positively for ic C{beta}. Moreover, the clear quantitative correlation between ic V{beta} and ic C{beta} staining in individual cells (manifested as a diagonal staining pattern in two-color plots) demonstrates that the two mAbs are binding to the same molecule and hence (by implication) that there are no detectable truncated TCR {beta} proteins expressing V{beta} but not C{beta}.

There are several possible explanations for the absence of detectable truncated ic TCR {beta} proteins arising from nonproductive VDJ{beta} rearrangements. First, although out-of-frame TCR and BCR rearrangements are clearly transcribed, several studies indicate that the resulting mRNAs are considerably less stable than mRNAs arising from in-frame rearrangements (50, 51, 52). Second, even if they are translated, truncated ic TCR {beta} proteins may be degraded much more rapidly than full-length proteins. Finally, truncated ic TCR {beta} proteins (even if relatively stable) may not fold correctly and thus may not be recognized by anti-V{beta} mAbs. Whatever the explanation, the fact that none of the 15 independent anti-V{beta} mAbs used in our study recognizes truncated ic TCR {beta} proteins rules out the possibility that the ic V{beta} staining technique itself introduces a repertoire bias by selectively detecting certain nonproductive VDJ{beta} rearrangements.

Biases in VDJ{beta} rearrangement at the TCR {beta} locus

VDJ{beta} rearrangements and subsequent expression of a TCR {beta} protein first occur during the DN3 stage of adult thymus development. Thus DN3 thymocytes would be expected to express a TCR V{beta} repertoire representative of the frequency at which individual V{beta} gene segments recombine during development. As shown here by ic V{beta} staining, the frequency of expressed V{beta} segments varies by a factor of 3 among DN3 thymocytes (8.6% for V{beta}8.2 vs 2.9% for V{beta}12). This variation in V{beta} usage is not due to preferential association of certain V{beta}-chains into a pre-TCR complex, since similar V{beta} repertoires were observed in small and large DN3 thymocyte subsets, which represent stages before and after pre-TCR selection events (47). Moreover, V{beta} repertoires were not significantly different among DN3 thymocytes from pT{alpha}-deficient and wild-type mice, formally ruling out any major influence of pre-TCR-mediated selection on the observed V{beta} bias. Subject to the caveat that ic V{beta} staining measures only the frequency of productively rearranged VDJ{beta} alleles (see above), we conclude that there is a significant developmental bias inherent in VDJ{beta} recombination in adult thymocytes before pre-TCR- or TCR-mediated selection. Whether a similar bias also applies to fetal VDJ{beta} rearrangement remains to be investigated.

Possible origin of biased VDJ{beta} recombination in immature T cells

There are a number of factors that could influence the frequency of rearrangement of individual V{beta} gene segments in DN3 thymocytes. By analogy with studies of VDJH recombination in immature B cells, one of the most obvious possibilities would be the relative proximity of a given V{beta} segment to the DJ{beta} cluster. Indeed, in both fetal and adult mouse pre-B cells, it has been shown that DJH-proximal VH segments (such as VH 81X) are preferentially rearranged (37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44). In marked contrast to pre-B cells, the most DJ{beta}-proximal V{beta} segments in DN3 thymocytes (V{beta}7 and V{beta}3) are apparently rearranged at relatively low frequency, whereas the relatively distal V{beta}8.2 segment is rearranged most frequently. These data indicate that physical proximity on the chromosome does not play an equivalent role in directing VDJ rearrangement in immature mouse T and B cells.

Several other molecular mechanisms could influence the frequency of rearrangement of individual V{beta} gene segments. For example, subtle differences in the conserved heptamer/nonamer recombination signal sequences (RSS) or slightly differing lengths of the conserved 23-aa spacers could favor recognition or cleavage of certain V{beta} segments by the recombinase machinery (53, 54, 55, 56). In this respect, the recent availability of the complete nucleotide sequence of the TCR {beta} locus has allowed us to compare RSS and spacer lengths for all V{beta} genes examined in this study (see GenBank data sequences under AE000663, AE000664, and AE000665). This analysis indicates that there is no obvious difference in either parameter that correlates with the observed frequency of V{beta} recombination in DN3 thymocytes (A. Wilson and C. V. Jongeneel, data not shown). Clearly, quantitative functional analysis of the efficiency of cleavage of these V{beta} recombination substrates in vitro will be required to formally address this issue.

Finally, it is possible that differences in the frequency of rearrangement of particular V{beta} genes simply reflect differences in their accessibility to recombinase (53, 56, 57). In this regard, recent studies have demonstrated that the efficiency of VDJ recombination is influenced by nucleosomal structure, histone acetylation, methylation status, and transcriptional activity (58, 59, 60, 61). Obviously any (or all) of these factors may contribute to the biased V{beta} repertoire of immature T cells.

No evidence for pre-TCR-mediated V{beta}-selection

Another factor influencing the VH repertoire in immature B cells is the differential ability of individual IgH chains to form a functional pre-BCR (62, 63). It has been estimated that only 50% of IgH chains in pre-B cells have the capacity to pair with the surrogate L chain and hence to form a pre-BCR (7, 42). This failure to form a functional pre-BCR is at least in part due to structural constraints imposed by the VH domain, since certain VH families (such as VH 7183 and VH Q52) are significantly less represented in the expressed VH repertoire following pre-BCR-mediated selection (42).

In contrast to these findings for immature B cells, we find no evidence for a role of the V{beta} domain in pre-TCR-mediated selection. In particular, large DN3 thymocytes (which are already cycling as a consequence of pre-TCR signaling) expressed a V{beta} repertoire similar to that of their small, noncycling DN3 counterparts. Moreover, the V{beta} repertoire in DN3 thymocytes of pT{alpha}-deficient mice, which are genetically incapable of assembling a pre-TCR, was not significantly different from that observed in wild-type mice. Even more strikingly, the V{beta} repertoire in DN4 and ISP thymocyte subsets, which have undergone extensive proliferation as a consequence of pre-TCR signaling, could not be distinguished from the DN3 V{beta} repertoire. Clearly, these data do not formally exclude the possibility that the pre-TCR may exert a selective role in forming the TCR {beta}-chain repertoire, perhaps by favoring certain CDR3{beta} lengths or sequence motifs. Nevertheless, they argue strongly that V{beta} domains (unlike VH domains) do not play an important structural role in the assembly of the pre-TCR complex. This result might have been anticipated in view of the fact that a genetically engineered pre-TCR complex lacking most of the extracellular portion of the TCR {beta}-chain (including the V{beta} domain) appears to signal normally in transgenic mice (64, 65).

Differing requirements for the VH and V{beta} domains in pre-BCR vs pre-TCR selection may have structural implications. Whereas the pre-BCR contains (in addition to the surrogate L chain and signaling components) a VpreB component, the existence of a comparable VpreT element in the pre-TCR has not been demonstrated. Based on our data, one could speculate that the hypothetical VpreT chain does not exist and consequently that fewer molecular constraints are imposed upon V{beta} (as opposed to VH) pairing during pre-TCR and pre-BCR assembly.

Concluding remarks

In conclusion, we have shown that the overall striking parallels in T and B cell development extend to biases in V gene segment recombination at the TCR {beta} and IgH loci. However, in contrast to VH gene biases in immature B cells, V{beta} gene biases in immature T cells do not reflect proximity to D segments and are not significantly influenced by pairing with the surrogate (pT{alpha}) chain. Thus, inherent developmental biases in V{beta} gene rearrangement represent one of the major elements shaping the mature TCR V{beta} repertoire.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Alexandra Livingstone and Hans Jorg Fehling for providing the C57BL/6 V{beta}a-congenic and pT{alpha}-deficient mice and Victor Jongeneel (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics) for help in alignment of RSS.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by a grant (to A.W.) from the Human Frontiers Science Program. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. H. Robson MacDonald, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Chemin des Boveresses 155, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BCR, B cell receptor; RSS, recombination signal sequence; ic, intracellular; DN, double negative; ISP, immature single positive. Back

Received for publication July 19, 2000. Accepted for publication September 27, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Clevers, H. B., T. Wileman Alarcon, C. Terhorst. 1988. The T cell receptor/CD3 complex: a dynamic protein ensemble. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 6:629.[Medline]
  2. Gellert, M.. 1997. Recent advances in understanding V(D)J recombination. Adv. Immunol. 64:39.[Medline]
  3. Schatz, D. G., M. A. Oettinger, M. S. Schlissel. 1992. V(D)J recombination: molecular biology and regulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:359.[Medline]
  4. Tonegawa, S.. 1983. Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302:575.[Medline]
  5. Borst, J., G. S. Brouns, E. de Vries, M. C. Verschuren, D. Y. Mason, J. J. van Dongen. 1993. Antigen receptors on T and B lymphocytes: parallels in organization and function. Immunol. Rev. 132:49.[Medline]
  6. Borst, J., H. Jacobs, G. Brouns. 1996. Composition and function of T-cell receptor and B-cell receptor complexes on precursor lymphocytes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8:181.[Medline]
  7. Melchers, F., E. ten Boekel, T. Yamagami, J. Andersson, A. Rolink. 1999. The roles of preB and B cell receptors in the stepwise allelic exclusion of mouse IgH and L chain gene loci. Semin. Immunol. 11:307.[Medline]
  8. von Boehmer, H., H. J. Fehling. 1997. Structure and function of the pre-T cell receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:433.[Medline]
  9. Healy, J. I., C. C. Goodnow. 1998. Positive vs negative signaling by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:645.[Medline]
  10. Nossal, G. J.. 1994. Negative selection of lymphocytes. Cell 76:229.[Medline]
  11. Rajewsky, K.. 1996. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system. Nature 381:751.[Medline]
  12. Sebzda, E., S. Mariathasan, T. Ohteki, R. Jones, M. F. Bachmann, P. S. Ohashi. 1999. Selection of the T cell repertoire. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:829.[Medline]
  13. von Boehmer, H.. 1994. Positive selection of lymphocytes. Cell 76:219.[Medline]
  14. Ohteki, T., H. R. MacDonald. 1996. Stringent V {beta} requirement for the development of NK1.1+ T cell receptor-{alpha}/{beta}+ cells in mouse liver. J. Exp. Med. 183:1277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fehling, H. J., A. Krotokova, C. Saint-Ruf, H. von Boehmer. 1995. Crucial role of the pre-T-cell receptor {alpha} gene in development of {alpha}{beta} but not {gamma}{delta} T cells. Nature 375:795.[Medline]
  16. Wilson, A., W. Held, H. R. MacDonald. 1994. Two waves of recombinase gene expression in developing thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 179:1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wilson, A., M. Capone, H. R. MacDonald. 1999. Unexpectedly late expression of intracellular CD3{epsilon} and TCR {gamma}{delta} proteins during adult thymus development. Int. Immunol. 11:1641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wilson, A., H. R. MacDonald. 1998. A limited role for {beta}-selection during {gamma}{delta} T cell development. J. Immunol. 161:5851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. MacDonald, H. R., A. Wilson. 1998. The role of the T-cell receptor (TCR) in {alpha}{beta}/{gamma}{delta} lineage commitment: clues from intracellular TCR staining. Immunol. Rev. 165:87.[Medline]
  20. Bischof, A., J.-H. Park, and T. Hunig. 2000. Expression of T-cell receptor {beta} chain mRNA and protein in {gamma}/{delta} T cells from euthymic and athymic rats: implications for T cell lineage divergence. Dev. Immunol. In press.
  21. Buer, J., I. Aifantis, J. P. DiSanto, H. J. Fehling, H. von Boehmer. 1997. Role of different T cell receptors in the development of pre-T cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:1541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Falk, I., C. N. Levelt, K. Eichmann. 1993. Lineage relationships of the fetal thymocyte subset that expresses the {beta} chain of the interleukin-2 receptor. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:3373.[Medline]
  23. Falk, I., J. Bior, H. Kohler, K. Eichmann. 1996. Proliferation kinetics associated with T cell receptor-{beta} chain selection of fetal murine thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 184:2327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Behlke, M. A., H. S. Chou, K. Huppi, D. Y. Loh. 1986. Murine T-cell receptor mutants with deletions of {beta}-chain variable region genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kappler, J. W., E. Kushnir, P. Marrack. 1989. Analysis of V {beta} 17a expression in new mouse strains bearing the V {beta} a haplotype. J. Exp. Med. 169:1533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dudley, E. C., H. T. Petrie, L. M. Shah, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1994. T cell receptor {beta} chain gene rearrangement and selection during thymocyte development in adult mice. Immunity 1:83.[Medline]
  27. Godfrey, D. I., J. Kennedy, P. Mombaerts, S. Tonegawa, A. Zlotnik. 1994. Onset of TCR-{beta} rearrangement and role of TCR-{beta} expression during CD3-CD4-CD8- thymocyte differentiation. J. Immunol. 152:4783.[Abstract]
  28. Pearse, M., P. Gallagher, A. Wilson, L. Wu, N. Fisicaro, J. F. Miller, R. Scollay, K. Shortman. 1988. Molecular characterization of T-cell antigen receptor expression by subsets of CD4-CD8- murine thymocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Petrie, H. T., R. Scollay, K. Shortman. 1992. Commitment to the T cell receptor-{alpha}{beta} or -{gamma}{delta} lineages can occur just prior to the onset of CD4 and CD8 expression among immature thymocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:2185.[Medline]
  30. Tourigny, M. R., S. Mazel, D. B. Burtrum, H. T. Petrie. 1997. T cell receptor (TCR)-{beta} gene recombination: dissociation from cell cycle regulation and developmental progression during T cell ontogeny. J. Exp. Med. 185:1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wilson, A., J.-P. de Villartay, H. R. MacDonald. 1996. T cell receptor {delta} gene rearrangement and T early {alpha} (TEA) expression in immature {alpha}{beta} lineage thymocytes: implications for {alpha}{beta}/{gamma}{delta} lineage commitment. Immunity 4:37.[Medline]
  32. Blackman, M. A., P. Marrack, J. Kappler. 1989. Influence of the major histocompatibility complex on positive thymic selection of V {beta} 17a+ T cells. Science 244:214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kappler, J. W., N. Roehm, P. Marrack. 1987. T cell tolerance by clonal elimination in the thymus. Cell 49:273.[Medline]
  34. Kappler, J. W., U. Staerz, J. White, P. C. Marrack. 1988. Self-tolerance eliminates T cells specific for Mls-modified products of the major histocompatibility complex. Nature 332:35.[Medline]
  35. MacDonald, H. R., R. K. Lees, R. Schneider, R. M. Zinkernagel, H. Hengartner. 1988. Positive selection of CD4+ thymocytes controlled by MHC class II gene products. Nature 336:471.[Medline]
  36. MacDonald, H. R., R. Schneider, R. K. Lees, R. C. Howe, H. Acha-Orbea, H. Festenstein, R. M. Zinkernagel, H. Hengartner. 1988. T-cell receptor V {beta} use predicts reactivity and tolerance to Mlsa-encoded antigens. Nature 332:40.[Medline]
  37. Alt, F. W., G. D. Yancopoulos, T. K. Blackwell, C. Wood, E. Thomas, M. Boss, R. Coffman, N. Rosenberg, S. Tonegawa, D. Baltimore. 1984. Ordered rearrangement of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region segments. EMBO J. 3:1209.[Medline]
  38. Malynn, B. A., G. D. Yancopoulos, J. E. Barth, C. A. Bona, F. W. Alt. 1990. Biased expression of JH-proximal VH genes occurs in the newly generated repertoire of neonatal and adult mice. J. Exp. Med. 171:843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Marshall, A., G. E. Wu, C. Paige. 1996. Frequency of VH81X usage during B cell development: initial decline in usage is independent of Ig heavy chain cell surface expression. J. Immunol. 156:2077.[Abstract]
  40. Perlmutter, R. M., J. F. Kearney, S. P. Chang, L. E. Hood. 1985. Developmentally controlled expression of immunoglobulin VH genes. Science 227:1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Rao, S. P., J. M. Riggs, D. F. Friedman, M. S. Scully, T. W. LeBien, L. E. Silberstein. 1999. Biased VH gene usage in early lineage human B cells: evidence for preferential Ig gene rearrangement in the absence of selection. J. Immunol. 163:2732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. ten Boekel, E., F. Melchers, A. G. Rolink. 1997. Changes in the V(H) gene repertoire of developing precursor B lymphocytes in mouse bone marrow mediated by the pre-B cell receptor. Immunity 7:357.[Medline]
  43. Wu, G. E., C. J. Paige. 1986. VH gene family utilization in colonies derived from B and pre-B cells detected by the RNA colony blot assay. EMBO J. 5:3475.[Medline]
  44. Yancopoulos, G. D., B. A. Malynn, F. W. Alt. 1988. Developmentally regulated and strain-specific expression of murine VH gene families. J. Exp. Med. 168:417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Aifantis, I., O. Azogui, J. Feinberg, C. Saint-Ruf, J. Buer, H. von Boehmer. 1998. On the role of the pre-T cell receptor in {alpha}{beta} vs {gamma}{delta} T lineage commitment. Immunity 9:649.[Medline]
  46. Wilson, A., H. R. MacDonald. 1995. Expression of genes encoding the pre-TCR and CD3 complex during thymus development. Int. Immunol. 7:1659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Hoffman, E. S., L. Passoni, T. Crompton, T. M. J. Leu, D. G. Schatz, A. Koff, M. J. Owen, A. C. Hayday. 1996. Productive T-cell receptor {beta} gene rearrangement: coincident regulation of cell cycle and clonality during development in vivo. Genes Dev. 10:948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. ten Boekel, E., F. Melchers, A. Rolink. 1995. The status of Ig loci rearrangements in single cells from different stages of B cell development. Int. Immunol. 7:1013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Bruno, L., A. Scheffold, A. Radbruch, M. J. Owen. 1999. Threshold of pre-T-cell-receptor surface expression is associated with {alpha}{beta} T-cell lineage commitment. Curr. Biol. 9:559.[Medline]
  50. Li, S., D. Leonard, M. F. Wilkinson. 1997. T cell receptor (TCR) mini-gene mRNA expression regulated by nonsense codons: a nuclear-associated translation-like mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 185:985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Jr Schroeder, H. W., J. Y. Wang. 1990. Preferential utilization of conserved immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene segments during human fetal life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:6146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Wilbert, O. M., J. Weber-Arden, D. Kabelitz, B. Arden. 1997. TCR-{delta} gene rearrangement and selection during fetal thymocyte development. J. Immunol. 159:3338.[Abstract]
  53. Hempel, W. M., I. Leduc, N. Mathieu, R. K. Tripathi, P. Ferrier. 1998. Accessibility control of V(D)J recombination: lessons from gene targeting. Adv. Immunol. 69:309.[Medline]
  54. Hesse, J. E., M. R. Lieber, K. Mizuuchi, M. Gellert. 1989. V(D)J recombination: a functional definition of the joining signals. Genes Dev. 3:1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Ramsden, D. A., K. Baetz, G. E. Wu. 1994. Conservation of sequence in recombination signal sequence spacers. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Sleckman, B. P., J. R. Gorman, F. W. Alt. 1996. Accessibility control of antigen-receptor variable-region gene assembly. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:459.[Medline]
  57. Whitehurst, C. E., S. Chattopadhyay, J. Chen. 1999. Control of V(D)J recombinational accessibility of the D {beta} 1 gene segment at the TCR {beta} locus by a germline promoter. Immunity 10:313.[Medline]
  58. Cherry, S. R., D. Baltimore. 1999. Chromatin remodeling directly activates V(D)J recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. McBlane, F., J. Boyes. 2000. Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation. Curr. Biol. 10:483.[Medline]
  60. Kwon, J., A. N. Imbalzano, A. Matthews, M. A. Oettinger. 1998. Accessibility of nucleosomal DNA to V(D)J cleavage is modulated by RSS positioning and HMG1. Mol. Cell 2:829.[Medline]
  61. Golding, A., S. Chandler, E. Ballestar, A. P. Wolffe, M. S. Schlissel. 1999. Nucleosome structure completely inhibits in vitro cleavage by the V(D)J recombinase. EMBO J. 18:3712.[Medline]
  62. Decker, D. J., G. H. Kline, T. A. Hayden, S. N. Zaharevitz, N. R. Klinman. 1995. Heavy chain V gene-specific elimination of B cells during the pre-B cell to B cell transition. J. Immunol. 154:4924.[Abstract]
  63. Keyna, U., G. B. Beck-Engeser, J. Jongstra, S. E. Applequist, H. M. Jack. 1995. Surrogate light chain-dependent selection of Ig heavy chain V regions. J. Immunol. 155:5536.[Abstract]
  64. Jacobs, H., J. Iacomini, M. van de Ven, S. Tonegawa, A. Berns. 1996. Domains of the TCR {beta}-chain required for early thymocyte development. J. Exp. Med. 184:1833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Irving, B. A., F. W. Alt, N. Killeen. 1998. Thymocyte development in the absence of pre-T cell receptor extracellular immunoglobulin domains. Science 280:905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. J. Melenhorst, M. D. H. Lay, D. A. Price, S. D. Adams, J. Zeilah, E. Sosa, N. F. Hensel, D. Follmann, D. C. Douek, M. P. Davenport, et al.
Contribution of TCR-{beta} Locus and HLA to the Shape of the Mature Human V{beta} Repertoire
J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6484 - 6489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Wojciechowski, A. Lai, M. Kondo, and Y. Zhuang
E2A and HEB Are Required to Block Thymocyte Proliferation Prior to Pre-TCR Expression
J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5717 - 5726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Wu, S. Ranganath, M. Gleason, B. B. Woodman, T. M. Borjeson, F. W. Alt, and C. H. Bassing
Restriction of endogenous T cell antigen receptor beta rearrangements to Vbeta14 through selective recombination signal sequence modifications
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 4002 - 4007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Aublin, M. Ciofani, N. Willkomm, A. Hamrouni, A. L. Szymczak-Workman, T. Takahashi, Y. Sandjeu, P. Guillaume, D. A. A. Vignali, O. Michielin, et al.
A Natural Structural Variant of the Mouse TCR beta-Chain Displays Intrinsic Receptor Function and Antigen Specificity
J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8587 - 8594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Senoo, L. Wang, D. Suzuki, N. Takeda, Y. Shinkai, and S. Habu
Increase of TCR V{beta} Accessibility within E{beta} Regulatory Region Influences its Recombination Frequency But Not Allelic Exclusion
J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Pacholczyk, P. Kraj, and L. Ignatowicz
Peptide Specificity of Thymic Selection of CD4+CD25+ T Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 613 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
D. Gibbons, N. C. Douglas, D. F. Barber, Q. Liu, R. Sullo, L. Geng, H.-J. Fehling, H. von Boehmer, and A. C. Hayday
The Biological Activity of Natural and Mutant pT{alpha} Alleles
J. Exp. Med., September 4, 2001; 194(5): 695 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)