The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Sasson, S. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Sasson, S. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, W. E.
The Journal of Immunology, 2001, 166: 112-120.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

Cell Division Is Not a "Clock" Measuring Acquisition of Competence to Produce IFN-{gamma} or IL-4

Shlomo Z. Ben-Sasson*,{dagger}, Regina Gerstel*, Jane Hu-Li{dagger} and William E. Paul1,{dagger}

* Lautenberg Center for General and Tumor Immunology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel; and {dagger} Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Naive CD4 T cells acquire the potential to produce IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 by culture in the presence of their cognate Ag, APC, and appropriate cytokines. In this study, we show that commitment to IFN-{gamma} production on the part of rigorously purified naive CD4 T cells can occur without cell division. Indeed, even entry into S phase is not essential. Moreover, both CD4 and CD4/CD8 thymocytes from TCR-transgenic mice (5CC7 mice) on a Rag2-/- background can acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity when stimulated by peptide, APC, and IL-12. These cells can do so without dividing and some acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing activity without entry into S phase. Not only is cell division not required for acquisition of cytokine-producing potential, cell populations that have undergone the same numbers of divisions can have quite different proportions of IFN-{gamma}- or IL-4-producing cells, depending on the duration of priming or, in the case of IL-4, on the concentration of peptide. Thus, cell division is not a clock for the expression of these cytokines. Factors associated with priming conditions including strength of stimulation, duration of priming, and number of divisions each play a role.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Naive CD4+ T cells produce little if any IL-4 or IFN-{gamma}. Upon stimulation through their TCR, preferably with ample costimulation, such cells acquire the capacity to secrete IL-4 or IFN-{gamma}. IL-4-dependent activation of Stat6 plays a major role in differentiation into IL-4-producing cells (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and is opposed by IL-12/IFN-{gamma} (6, 7, 8), whereas differentiation into IFN-{gamma}-producing cells is strikingly enhanced by IL-12-dependent Stat4 activation (9, 10) and is opposed by IL-4 (6, 8, 9, 11).

Development of cells that are capable of secreting IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} has been reported to be associated with the acquisition of DNase I hypersensitivity in the IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} genes (12, 13), respectively, and with binding of NFAT-1 to key sites in the two genes (14). Demethylation of CpGs in the second intron of the IL-4 gene occurs in association with acquisition of competence to secrete IL-4 (15). However, there is a CpG in the IFN-{gamma} promoter that is demethylated in both resting and activated CD4 T cells as well as in both Th1 and Th2 cells but which is fully methylated in B cells and other cell types (16), suggesting that some accessibility of chromatin may be established very early in the development of CD4 T cells.

It has been argued that DNA synthesis is essential for acquisition of competence to transcribe the IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} genes and that the number of cell divisions can be regarded as a "clock" through which one can evaluate the likelihood that a given cell will secrete IL-4 and/or IFN-{gamma} upon subsequent challenge (15, 17). For IFN-{gamma}, it has been suggested that there is a direct relationship between division number and competence to transcribe, whereas for IL-4, it has been proposed that a minimum number of three divisions is required before any cells can transcribe IL-4. However, others have argued that although DNA synthesis is important in IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} production, cell division is not essential and commitment to IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} production may occur quite early among cultured cells (18).

In this study, we show that although cell division plays a role in the frequency of cells that produce IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} upon challenge, it is only one of several important factors. Furthermore, among peripheral CD4 T cells highly purified for a naive phenotype that have not entered S phase or undergone cell division in response to Ag stimulation, a substantial proportion develop into IFN-{gamma} producers. Indeed, the capacity of naive CD4 T cells to acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity without entering S phase is also observed for CD4+ thymocytes. Both CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes from TCR-transgenic mice respond to peptide plus APC with priming for IFN-{gamma} production even without completion of a cell cycle.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

5CC7 TCR-transgenic mice on Rag2-/- B10.A background were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). Female B10.A mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were maintained under pathogen-free conditions at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Animal Facility and were used at 6–12 wk of age.

Cytokines and Abs

Human IL-2 was a gift from Cetus (Emeryville, CA). Mouse IL-4 was obtained from a recombinant baculovirus prepared in our laboratory. Mouse IL-6 was purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Mouse IL-12 was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Anti-CD3 (145-2C11) and anti-Thy1 (30-H12) Abs were obtained from cultured hybridoma cells. Anti-CD3 Abs were further purified by chromatography over protein A. Anti-IL-4 (11B11), anti-IFN-{gamma} (XMG1.2), anti-CD28 (37.51), and anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2) Abs were prepared by Harlan Bioproducts for Science (Indianapolis, IN). Fluorochrome-conjugated anti-CD62L (Mel14), anti-CD8 (53-6.7), anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-Iak (11-5.2), anti-IL-4 (11B11), anti-IFN-{gamma} (XMG1.2), anti-5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU)2 (3D4), anti-V{alpha}1 (RR8-1), anti-V{beta}3 (KJ25), and streptavidin were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Biotinylated 3G11 was purchased from PharMingen. The BrdU flow kit was purchased from PharMingen.

Naive CD4 cell preparation

CD4 cells were isolated from axillary, inguinal, and mesenteric lymph nodes of 5CC7 TCR-transgenic mice by negative selection, as previously described (8), using fluorescein-conjugated mAbs to B220, CD8, and I-Ak followed by incubation with magnetic beads coated with anti-FITC Abs (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA). The depleted cells were centrifuged on a discontinuous 50–70% Percoll density gradient (four layers: 50, 60, 66, and 70%). Dense cells (those at the 66–70% interface and below) were collected and used for generation of effector cells. The cell preparations were >95% CD4+. The cells were stained with FITC-anti-62L and biotinylated 3G11, followed by PE-conjugated streptavidin. Naive CD62Lhigh3G11high cells were further purified by electronic cell sorting using a FACStar Cell Sorter (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).

CFSE labeling and cell division analysis

Cells were washed twice in PBS and resuspended in PBS at a concentration of 2 x 107 cells/ml. An equal volume of freshly diluted 1.25 µM CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in PBS was added for 4 min at room temperature; staining was stopped by the addition of an equal volume of FCS. The cells were immediately washed three times in culture medium. The percentage of cells in various CFSE peaks was determined by analysis with a FACScalibur and CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson).

Stimulation of naive CD4+ cells in vitro

T-depleted splenocytes as APC were prepared from B10.A mice using anti-Thy-1 Abs plus rabbit complement (Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, Ontario, Canada). Priming was performed by culturing 1–4 x 105 CFSE-labeled or unlabeled sorted CD4+ cells with 1–4 x 106 APC in 24-well tissue culture dishes containing 1 ml of complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 5 µM 2-ME, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 10 U/ml IL-2. When indicated, IL-6 (10 ng/ml), IL-4 (1000 U/ml (~500 pg/ml)), IL-12 (10 ng/ml), neutralizing anti-IL-4 Abs (11B11; 10 µg/ml), or other cytokines and Abs, as specified, were added to the culture. The culture medium was replaced daily with fresh medium containing the appropriate cytokines and anticytokine Abs. The cytochrome c peptide (88–104; Structural Biology Section, Peptide Synthesis Laboratory, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD) was used at 0–100 µM as specified. At various times, the cells were transferred to anti-CD3- and anti-CD28-coated 24-well tissue culture dishes to assess their cytokine-producing capacity.

Intracellular staining of cytokines

Primed cells were transferred at various times after stimulation, as specified, to anti-CD3- and anti-CD28-coated 24-well plates in 1 ml of culture medium containing IL-2 (10 U ml); after 4 h of incubation, 2 µM monensin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was added and 2 h later the adherent cells were removed by pipetting in 1 ml of PBS and transferred to a tube containing 1 ml of 8% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) in PBS. After 10 min at room temperature, the fixed cells were washed once in PBS and then permeabilized by two washings in saponin buffer (0.1% saponin (Calbiochem), 0.1% BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 10 mM HEPES in PBS) and stained for intracellular cytokines by incubation for 30 min at room temperature with either 200 ng of allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} or allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-IL-4 mAbs. The stained cells were washed three times in saponin buffer and then analyzed by flow cytometry.

Cell cycle analysis

Primed cells were transferred to anti-CD3- and anti-CD28-coated 24-well plates 13–14 h or 37 h after priming initiation. After 5 h and 15 min, BrdU was added to wells to achieve a final concentration of 10 µM. Forty-five minutes later, the nonadherent cells were removed by washing with PBS containing 3% FCS. Adherent cells were removed by pipetting in 2 ml of PBS + 3% FCS, spun down, and the pellet was fixed and processed for staining with the BrdU flow kit reagents (PharMingen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

The CFSE-labeled cells were stained with PE anti-BrdU and APC anti-IFN-{gamma}. Unlabeled cells were stained with PE anti-V{beta}3 to identify transgenic cells, FITC anti-BrdU, 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) and APC anti-IFN-{gamma}. The stained cells were washed three times in saponin buffer and then analyzed for cell cycle and cytokine production on a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson). At least 50 x 103 transgenic cells were collected in each sample.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell cycle number and development of cytokine-producing potential

Naive CD4+ T cells from lymph nodes of 5CC7/Rag2-/- mice were obtained by cell sorting using high levels of expression of CD62L and 3G11 as markers for the naive state (8). These cells were labeled with CFSE and were primed with varying concentrations of cytochrome c peptide, ranging from 0 to 100 µM, in the presence of IL-2 and IL-6 with IL-12, and anti-IL-4 (Th1 conditions) or with IL-4, anti-IL-12, and anti-IFN-{gamma} (Th2 conditions). After various times of priming, they were stimulated for 6 h with immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, and the number of cells with cytosolic IFN-{gamma} or cytosolic IL-4, as well as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFN-{gamma} staining, was measured. In addition, the fluorescence intensity of CFSE was determined as a measure of cell division.

To determine the degree of CFSE fluorescence that marked cells that had not divided, we also placed such cells in culture with IL-2 alone. Since very few of such cells enter S phase or divide, the predominant peak of CFSE in this population defines those cells that had not divided. To more rigorously verify that cells in the peak chosen as the "0 division" peak had not divided, we used a BrdU-labeling approach (Fig. 1Go). Naive cells were stimulated with cytochrome c peptide (1.0 µM) in the presence of APC, IL-2, IL-12, and anti-IL-4. A total of 10 µM BrdU was added at 13 h of culture. The cells were harvested at 37 h and stained for DNA content using 7-AAD and for BrdU incorporation. Cells that were in the putative 0 division CFSE peak had few if any BrdU-labeled cells that had less than a 2x content of DNA, based on staining with 7-AAD; by contrast, among cells in the "1 division" and "2 division" CFSE peaks, a large percentage of the BrdU+ cells had less than 2x content of DNA. This argues that the latter cells had completed at least one cycle after they had been labeled with BrdU. By contrast, essentially all cells in the 0 division peak that had been in S phase during the labeling period had not yet completed a cell cycle. This strongly supports our identification of the 0 division peak as correct.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Verification of the 0 division CFSE peak. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with peptide (1 µM), APC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4. At 13 h, BrdU (10 µM) was added. Cells were washed 2 h later and cultured in medium containing the same stimulants for an additional 22 h. Cells were analyzed for uptake of BrdU, DNA content (7-AAD staining), and for the number of cell divisions (CFSE staining). The BrdU/7-AAD staining pattern of the zero, one, and two cell division CFSE peaks are illustrated.

 
Among cells primed under Th1 conditions with 0.1 µM peptide for 85 h, >90% of those that had divided three or more times produced IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 2Go). Sixty and 80% of cells that had undergone one or two divisions produced IFN-{gamma} whereas cells that had not divided had substantially fewer (15%) IFN-{gamma} producers. Plotting the amount of IFN-{gamma} produced per cell, as determined by MFI of positive cells, reveals a smooth increase with increased numbers of divisions, from 700 for cells that have not divided to 2700 for cells that have divided five times.



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among 85-h Th1-primed populations that have undergone zero to five cell divisions. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with peptide (0.1 µM), APC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4 for 85 h. Cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 6 h and stained for IFN-{gamma} content.

 
There is a clear increase in the fraction of IL-4 producers as the number of cell divisions increases from three to five in cells primed under Th2 conditions with 0.1 µM peptide for 85 h (Fig. 3Go). Cells that had not divided or divided once or twice were poorer IL-4 producers.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Frequency of IL-4-producing cells among 85-h Th2-primed populations that have undergone zero to five cell divisions. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with peptide (0.1 µM), APC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-4, anti-IL-12, and anti-IFN-{gamma} for 85 h. Cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 6 h and stained for IL-4 content.

 
These results are reminiscent of those previously published that argued that cell division is essential for the acquisition of IFN-{gamma}- or IL-4-producing potential (13, 15). Note, however, that even the cells that had not divided contain a measurable number of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells, substantially in excess of those cultured with IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4 without Ag for 85 h. The latter cell population was entirely made up of cells that had not divided; <5% produced IFN-{gamma} in response to challenge with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. The frequency of IL-4 producers among the 0 division group in response to priming with 0.1 µM peptide under Th2 conditions is only slightly greater than the frequency in cells cultured in the absence of cytochrome c peptide.

Cell division and DNA synthesis are not essential for acquiring IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity

A more striking demonstration that cells can acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing potential without cell division is shown in Fig. 4Go. Naive cells were cultured for 15 or 44 h with 0 or 1 µM cytochrome c peptide. They were incubated with IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4. Essentially, none of the cells cultured without peptide for 44 h had undergone any cell divisions and <3% produced IFN-{gamma} upon challenge. The cells cultured for 44 h with 1 µM cytochrome c peptide under Th1-inducing conditions were largely distributed into populations that had undergone zero, one, or two divisions. More than 40% of the cells that had not divided produced IFN-{gamma} upon challenge. Thus, when relatively short priming periods are employed, one can observe the appearance of cells competent to transcribe IFN-{gamma} even if no cell division has occurred. The failure of the cells to produce IFN-{gamma} if they had not been cultured with cytochrome c peptide and the fact that they had been highly enriched in cells with the markers of the naive state strongly argues that these cells acquired IFN-{gamma}-producing potential during this culture period.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among 44-h Th1-primed populations that have not divided. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with or without peptide (1 µM), APC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4 for 15 or 44 h. The frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells that have not divided (44 h, no cytochrome c peptide; 15 h, 1 µM cytochrome c peptide; and 44 h, 1 µM cytochrome c peptide) are compared with those that have divided once or twice (44 h, 1 µM cytochrome c peptide).

 
Furthermore, cells cultured for 15 h with peptide and a Th1-inducing cytokine environment showed modest IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity; only 5.7% of these cells produced IFN-{gamma}. This result supports the conclusion that the IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity of the 0 division cells at 44 h is acquired as a result of the priming culture.

Not only was cell division not required to achieve competence to produce IFN-{gamma}, it was also possible for some cells to acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing activity without entering S phase. Naive TCR-transgenic CD4 T cells from 5CC7/Rag2-/- mice were cultured for 13 or 37 h with cytochrome c peptide (1 µM), T-depleted spleen cells, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4. At the end of the culture period, they were placed in wells containing immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 for 6 h; BrdU was added for the final 45 min of the culture. In these experiments, monensin was omitted. Cells in various stages of the cycle (G0-G1, early S, late S, and G2-M) were analyzed for IFN-{gamma} content. The majority of cells primed for 14 h that had not divided were in G0-G1 (89%); only 2.5% of these cells produced IFN-{gamma}+ cells upon challenge (Fig. 5GoA). Although the percentage of IFN-{gamma}+ cells was higher in the cells that were in early and late S phase, there were extremely small numbers of cells in both of these populations.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among populations that have not divided and are in G0-G1. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with peptide (1 µM) and APC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4 for 13 h (A) or 37 h (B). In the central graph, staining for BrdU and DNA content of cells that have not divided is shown. The four peripheral graphs show the frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among G0-G1, early S phase, late S phase, and G2-M populations of the 0 division cells.

 
Among cells primed for 37 h that had not divided, 21% were still in G0-G1. Sixteen percent of these produced IFN-{gamma}+ upon challenge with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 for 6 h (Fig. 5GoB). Eighteen percent of the cells that had not divided were in early S phase (i.e., were BrdU+ and had an 7-AAD intensity of less than two times the G0-G1 level). Fifty-nine percent of these cells produced IFN-{gamma} upon challenge. Since many of these cells had less than the maximal amount of BrdU, it is likely that they had entered S phase after the beginning of the BrdU pulse and thus were in G0-G1 when they began transcribing IFN-{gamma}.

Cells in late S phase and in G2-M of the first cycle had a frequency of IFN-{gamma}+ cells of 64 and 69%, respectively, while cells that had completed one or two divisions displayed a frequency of IFN-{gamma}+ cells of 83 and 86%, respectively (latter data not shown). Thus, there is an increase in the frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells with cell division, as well an increase in MFI, but some cells that had not entered S phase had acquired IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity.

Thymocytes from 5CC7/Rag2-/- mice can be induced to produce IFN-{gamma} without cell division or DNA synthesis

In view of the capacity of naive cells to acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity without DNA synthesis, we wondered whether their predecessors might also have such potential. Thymocytes were prepared from 5CC7/Rag2-/- donors and cultured for 40 h with 1 µM cytochrome c peptide in the presence of T-depleted spleen cells and IL-2 with IL-12 and anti-IL-4 (Th1 conditions) or with IL-4, anti-IL-12, and anti-IFN-{gamma} (Th2 conditions). They were then challenged with immobilized anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 7 h and the percentage of IFN-{gamma}+ cells was determined. In addition, cells that had not been primed in vitro were tested for "acute" production of IFN-{gamma}.

Among CD4+ (single-positive) cells, 27% of those primed under Th1 conditions produced IFN-{gamma}, whereas <1% of those primed under Th2 conditions or unprimed did so (Fig. 6Go). Among CD4+/CD8+ cells, 68% of those primed under Th1 conditions produced IFN-{gamma} whereas only 13% of those primed under Th2 conditions did so and <1% of the unprimed cells made IFN-{gamma}.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among CD4 and CD4/CD8 thymocytes that have been primed in vitro. Thymocytes from 5CC7/ Rag2-/- donors were primed for 40 h in vitro with peptide (1.0 µM), APC, IL-2, and IL-12 and anti-IL-4 (Th1) or IL-4, anti-IL-12, and anti-IFN-{gamma} (Th2). These cells were then stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 7 h. Monensin was added at 3 h of culture. At the termination of culture, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD8, and for cytosolic IFN-{gamma} content. The graph at the bottom illustrates the populations whose IFN-{gamma} content is shown in the Th1 population. Cells that were freshly isolated were also challenged with immobilized anti-CD3/anti-CD28 and evaluated for IFN-{gamma} production (acute).

 
Similar results were obtained when cell populations presorted into single- and double-positive cells were primed in vitro.

Having shown that both single- and double-positive thymocytes could develop into IFN-{gamma} producers after a short period of Th1 priming, we wished to determine whether cell division or DNA synthesis was required. Thymocytes were prepared from 5CC7/Rag2-/- donors and labeled with CFSE. They were cultured for 14 or 37 h with or without 1 µM cytochrome c peptide in the presence of T-depleted spleen cells, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4. They were then challenged with immobilized anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 6 h and pulsed with BrdU for the last 45 min of the culture. Among cells that had not divided, those cultured without peptide contained very few IFN-{gamma}-producing cells (~0.5% at 14 h; ~0.3% at 37 h). Cells primed with peptide showed 3.5% IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in the undivided population at 14 h. At 37 h, the 0 division population contained 30% IFN-{gamma}+ cells (Fig. 7Go) whereas the 1 division population contained 76% IFN-{gamma}+ cells (data not shown). Indeed, in the 0 division population, 29.9% of the G0-G1 and 61.7% of the early S phase cells were IFN-{gamma}+ (Table IGo). Thus, even thymocytes from TCR-transgenic/Rag 2-/- mice have the capacity to develop into IFN-{gamma}-producing cells without dividing.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among thymocyte populations that have not divided. Thymocytes from 5CC7/Rag2-/- donors were labeled with CFSE and primed for 14 or 37 h in vitro with or without peptide (1.0 µM) and with APC, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL-4. Cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 6 h and stained for IFN-{gamma} content. The graphs illustrate the frequency of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells among those that had not divided.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. CD4+ thymocytes that had not divided nor entered S phase can be primed to produce IFN-{gamma}1

 
Duration of priming and concentration of peptide independently control cytokine-producing capacity

Not only is cell division or DNA synthesis not essential for IFN-{gamma} production, both duration of priming and concentration of Ag also play roles in determining the capacity to produce IFN-{gamma} and IL-4. Among cells primed for 85 h with peptide concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100 µM and with IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and anti-IL4 that had divided between one and five times, a similar proportion produced IFN-{gamma} upon challenge. However, the amount of IFN-{gamma}-produced per cell, as measured by the MFI of IFN-{gamma} staining in these cells, varied strikingly with the concentration of peptide used for priming. Among cells that had divided five times that had been primed for 85 h, those primed with 0.1 µM peptide had an MFI of ~4200, whereas those primed with 100 µM peptide had an MFI of 1500 (Fig. 8GoA). Among those primed to be IL-4 producers for 85 h, 40% of cells that divided five times that were primed with 0.1 µM peptide produced IL-4, whereas only 5% of comparable cells primed with 100 µM peptide produced IL-4 (Fig. 8GoB). Thus, the concentration of priming peptide is an independent variable determining the likelihood that individual cells will produce cytokine even if the cytokine environment, the duration of priming, and the number of cell divisions are kept constant.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Frequency of cytokine-producing cells and amount of cytokine per cell among populations stimulated with various concentrations of peptide. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with various concentrations of peptide and APC for 85 h under Th1 (A) or Th2 (B) conditions. At the end of culture, cells were stimulated for 6 h with immobilized anti-CD3/anti-CD28. Monensin was added at 4 h and the cells were stained for IFN-{gamma} or IL-4 content. The number of IFN-{gamma}-producing (A) or IL-4-producing (B) cells and the MFI of the IFN-{gamma}-producing cells (A) that have undergone different numbers of divisions is plotted against peptide concentration used for priming.

 
Comparing cells that had been primed under Th1 conditions with the same concentration of peptide (1 µM) and had not divided, those that were primed for 44 h had a higher percentage of IFN-{gamma} producers than those primed for 64 or 85 h (Fig. 9GoA). Among cells that had divided once or twice, those primed for 44 or 64 h had a higher percentage of IFN-{gamma} producers than did cells primed for 85 h. This presumably reflects the further division of highly stimulated cells so that the cells that had divided zero, one, or two times at 85 h may largely represent cells that responded less vigorously than cells that divided zero, one, or two times over the shorter priming periods. Nonetheless, it argues that frequency of division is not the sole determinant of cytokine-producing potential. A similar analysis of cells primed to be IL-4 producers shows that cells that divided one through five times during an 85-h priming period with 1 µM peptide had a higher frequency of IL-4 producers than cells primed under identical conditions for 64 h that had divided a similar number of times (Fig. 9GoB). Here, one would argue that priming for IL-4 production requires time, perhaps to integrate the total extent of signaling, so that very few cells can be primed to produce IL-4 during the shorter interval even though they have responded quite well as measured by cell division. Thus, cell division is not a rigid clock of commitment to cytokine production, although it does appear to be one of the critical variables.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. Frequency of cytokine-producing cells among populations primed for different lengths of time. Naive CD4 T cells were labeled with CFSE and stimulated with peptide (1 µM) and APC for 44, 64, or 85 h (A) or 64 or 85 h (B) under Th1 (A) or Th2 (B) conditions. At the end of culture, cells were stimulated for 6 h with immobilized anti-CD3/anti-CD28. Monensin was added at 4 h and the cells were stained for IFN-{gamma} or IL-4 content.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There has been considerable interest in the process through which naive CD4 T cells acquire the capacity to produce IFN-{gamma} and IL-4. It is well known that acquisition of competence to produce these cytokines requires TCR engagement and the presence of inducing cytokines.

Acquisition of such competence is associated with changes in chromatin structure as revealed by analysis of DNase I hypersensitivity, methylation state, and transcription factor binding. In cells differentiating to the Th2 phenotype, sites in the IL-4 gene and the IL-4/IL-13 intergenic region display DNase I hypersensitivity (12, 13); hypomethylation of several CpGs in the second intron of the IL-4 gene has been reported (13); and NFAT has been shown to be associated with a segment of the IL-4 gene (14). Similarly, increased accessibility of the IFN-{gamma} gene occurs during Th1 differentiation (12).

Two groups reported that the process through which competence to transcribe the IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} genes was acquired was tightly linked to cell division. Both Bird et al. (15) and Gett and Hodgkin (17) argued that cell division was required for acquiring such competence and that there was an increase in the capacity to produce IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} with each cell division, leading them to propose that there was a finite probability of opening the IL-4 or the IFN-{gamma} locus with each cell division. Effectively, cell division was regarded as a clock that could allow measurement of the acquisition by individual cells of the capacity to transcribe these cytokines. This explanation would also explain the observation that IL-4 was often monoallelically expressed in individual Th2 cells (19, 20, 21).

Richter at. al. (18) challenged the notion that acquisition of competence to produce IL-4 was strictly linked to cell division. They reported that some cells that had not divided acquired the capacity to produce IL-4 when cultured under Th2 conditions, if cell cycle inhibitors were used to block cell division. They added inhibitors from the outset of the stimulatory culture and observed that some cells acquired the capacity to produce IL-4 without dividing. However, those inhibitors that acted before or during S phase prevented acquisition of IL-4-producing capacity, leading to the conclusion that completion of S phase was required. Richter et al. (18) also showed that some cells could produce IFN-{gamma} without completing a cell division. They further argued that the concept that cell division was a clock that measured the frequency of cells capable of secreting IL-4 was incorrect. Thus, cell populations that had undergone the same number of divisions but had been primed for different periods of time contained different percentages of IL-4-producing cells, a result that we have also described in this report.

We (21)3 have argued that expression of IL-4 is not a measure of the competence of a cell to transcribe IL-4, since we have observed that early (67 h) in a Th2 culture, all cells have an equal probability of expressing IL-4, although only a small proportion do so. Thus, basing conclusions regarding acquisition of competence to transcribe IL-4 on the frequency of cells that actually transcribe this cytokine could be quite misleading.

In this study, we have investigated the requirements for cell division and DNA synthesis to acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity in more detail, taking advantage of the ability to directly analyze the number of cell divisions, entry into S phase, and cytokine-producing capacity on the individual cell level. Thus, using CFSE to count cell divisions, BrdU uptake to measure entry into, and progress through, S phase and intracellular staining for cytokines, we can directly determine the cycle status of cells and their ability to produce cytokines.

We observed that a substantial fraction of naive CD4+ T cells primed to be Th1 cells acquired the capacity to produce IFN-{gamma} by 44 h of culture. Indeed, 43% of cells that had not divided at 44 h could be stimulated to produce IFN-{gamma} by immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Even more striking was the finding that of the 0 division cells that were in G0-G1 at 44 h, 16% were capable of secreting IFN-{gamma}. Furthermore, 59% of the 0 division cells in early S phase were capable of secreting IFN-{gamma}. Since BrdU was present only for the last 45 min of the culture, it is likely that many of these cells had acquired competence to produce IFN-{gamma} while they were still in G1. Thus, in contrast to others, we provide direct evidence that acquisition of competence to produce IFN-{gamma} can be achieved without entering S phase.

Obviously the contention that cells required neither cell division nor DNA synthesis to acquire competence to produce IFN-{gamma} requires substantial confidence that the cells were actually naive and had not acquired their capacity to transcribe IFN-{gamma} previously. The cells we used were derived from TCR receptor transgenic mice on a Rag2-/- background. This ensures that all T cells only expressed receptors for the 88–104 peptide of pigeon cytochrome c and thus should markedly diminish the frequency of cells that could have been activated by environmental Ags. We further limited our analysis to lymph node cells and purified these cells both by density gradient centrifugation to obtain only the densest cells and by sorting for CD62Lbright, 3G11bright cells. We have previously reported that 3G11, an Ab recognizing a disialoceramide (22), is an excellent marker for the naive state and that CD62Lbright, 3G11bright lymph node cells produce no detectable IL-4 or IFN-{gamma} on primary stimulation (8). We emphasize these points because failure to be rigorous about purification of naive cells may have led to unreliable results due to contamination of the population with previously activated cells that had already undergone commitment to a given cytokine-producing phenotype in vivo.

We further observed that not only do naive peripheral CD4+ T cells have the capacity to differentiate into IFN-{gamma} producers under appropriate stimulatory conditions but so do both CD4 and CD4/CD8 thymocytes from the same 5CC7/Rag2-/--transgenic mice. Indeed, these cells could acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity without cell division and some of them did so without entering S phase, just as was true of peripheral CD4 T cells.

There are previous reports that mouse (23) and human (24, 25) single positive CD4 thymocytes can be stimulated to become IFN-{gamma} producers. It has generally been interpreted that the cells with this capacity are NK T cells or their progenitors (26). However, our observation of the capacity of CD4 and CD4/CD8 thymocytes to acquire IFN-{gamma}-producing capacity cannot be ascribed to NK T cells. Since we used thymocytes from 5CC7-transgenic mice on a Rag2-/- background, there should be few if any NK T cells or their progenitors, since virtually all NK T cells express V{alpha}14/J{alpha}281 (27).

It is interesting that two CpGs in the IFN-{gamma} promoter that are normally methylated in non-T cells have been shown to be hypomethylated in thymocytes (16). These CpGs are at a site that had been identified by Young et al. (28) as one to which proteins found in nuclear extracts of Th1 clones can bind. The recognition that the IFN-{gamma} gene has hypomethylated sites in its promoter in thymocytes and naive T cells, but not in liver cells, taken with our observation that a substantial proportion of thymocytes and naive CD4 T cells can produce IFN-{gamma} without entering S phase strongly suggests that transcription of the IFN-{gamma} gene in such cells may be principally limited not by the state of chromatin but rather by availability of key transcription factors, such as T-bet, which are induced by Th1 priming conditions (29). The observed differences in DNase I hypersensitivity between Th1 and Th2 lines (12) may reflect later events associated with the acquisition of "high-rate" IFN-{gamma} transcription in well-differentiated Th1 cells. This may be associated with the very large amounts of IFN-{gamma} produced per cell in such highly differentiated populations.

Regarding the issue of cell division as a clock, we argue against that both on the basis of our observations regarding the lack of concordance between competence to transcribe IL-4 and the actual expression of IL-4 (21)3 as well as our observations and those of Richter et al. (18) that cell populations primed to be Th2 cells for various times will have different frequencies of IL-4-producing cells, despite having undergone the same number of divisions. In the experiments we presented, cells that had undergone one to five divisions had a higher frequency of IL-4-producers if they had been cultured for 85 h than for 64 h. Interestingly, for IFN-{gamma}, the results were reversed. Cells that had undergone zero, one, or two divisions had a greater frequency of IFN-{gamma} producers if they were cultured for 44 h than if they were cultured for 85 h.

We would suggest that the IL-4 data can be explained by a constant proportion of cells primed under Th2 conditions (probably all) having accessible chromatin but that an increase in expression of key transcription factors, such as c-maf, occurs as time of priming proceeds. Indeed, it is known that c-maf levels tend to accumulate with duration of priming, consistent with this view (30).

A similar explanation can proposed for the discordance in expression of IFN-{gamma}. We postulate that essentially all Th1 cells have or rapidly acquire a state of accessible IFN-{gamma} chromatin and that expression depends upon the levels of key transcription factors, such as T-bet (30). Cells that respond vigorously (i.e., those that divide rapidly) may have induced higher levels of the key factor(s) than those that respond less intensely. This might account for more IFN-{gamma} expression by cells that had divided once or twice at 44 h in contrast to cells that had only completed one or two cell divisions after 85 h.

A similar argument may be adduced for the finding that different concentrations of Ag lead to differences in the frequency of IL-4-producing cells among populations that had undergone the same number of cell divisions. Thus, one would predict that differences in the levels of key transcription factors will be found in cells that had divided three, four, or five times and had been primed with 100 µM peptide vs those primed with 0.1 or 1 µM peptide. For IFN-{gamma}, similar differences are observed, although they are at the level of the amount of cytokine per cell rather than at the level of the frequency of cytokine producers within the population. Cells that had undergone three, four, or five divisions and were stimulated with 100 µM peptide had a substantially lower MFI of intracellular IFN-{gamma} than cells that had undergone the same number of divisions that had been stimulated with 0.1 µM peptide. Again, one would predict that the level of expression of key transcription factors will be higher in cells primed with 0.1 µM peptide than with 100 µM peptide, despite the fact that they had completed the same number of divisions.

Fundamentally, we argue that cell division will not be a clock for expression of cytokines in newly primed cells because it is not a clock for the opening of chromatin. Factors associated with the priming conditions, strength of stimulation, duration of priming, and number of divisions, each play a role in determining the probability that a given set of cells will actually transcribe one or both of their IFN-{gamma} or IL-4 genes; in turn, that probability will be governed not only by the degree of chromatin accessibility but also by the levels of key transcription factors.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Cynthia Watson for outstanding technical assistance and Shirley Starnes for excellent editorial support.


    Footnotes
 
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. William E. Paul, Building 10, Room 11N311, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. Back

2 Abbreviations used in this paper: BrdU, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; 7-AAD, 7-aminoactinomycin D; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Back

3 J. Hu-Li, C. Pannetier, L. Guo, M. Lohning, H. Gu, C. Watson, M. Assenmacher, A. Radbruch, and W. Pace. Rgulation of expression of IL-4 alleles: analysis using a chimeric GFP/IL-4 gene. Submitted for publication. Back

Received for publication August 18, 2000. Accepted for publication September 29, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Le Gros, G., S. Z. Ben-Sasson, R. Seder, F. D. Finkelman, W. E. Paul. 1990. Generation of interleukin 4 (IL-4)-producing cells in vivo and in vitro: IL-2 and IL-4 are required for in vitro generation of IL-4-producing cells. J. Exp. Med. 172:921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Swain, S. L., A. D. Weinberg, M. English, G. Huston. 1990. IL-4 directs the development of Th2-like helper effectors. J. Immunol. 145:3796.[Abstract]
  3. Shimoda, K., J. van Deursen, M. Y. Sangster, S. R. Sarawara, R. T. Carson, R. A. Tripp, C. Chu, F. W. Quelle, T. Nosaka, D. A. Vignali, et al 1996. Lack of IL-4-inducing Th2 response and IgE class switching in mice with disrupted Stat6 gene. Nature 380:630.[Medline]
  4. Kaplan, M. H., U. Schindler, S. T. Smiley, M. J. Grusby. 1996. Stat6 is required for mediating responses to IL-4 and for development of Th2 cells. Immunity 4:313.[Medline]
  5. Takeda, K., T. Tanaka, W. Shi, M. Matsumoto, M. Minami, S. Kashiwamura, K. Nakanishi, N. Yoshida, T. Kishimoto, S. Akira. 1996. Essential role of Stat6 in IL-4 signaling. Nature 380:627.[Medline]
  6. Seder, R., W. E. Paul, M. Davis, B. Fazekas de St. Groth.. 1992. The presence of interleukin 4 during in vitro priming determines the lymphokine-producing potential of CD4+ T cells from T cell receptor transgenic mice. J. Exp. Med. 176:1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Maggi, E., P. Parronchi, R. Manetti, C. Simonelli, M. P. Piccinni, F. S. Rugiu, M. De Carli, M. Ricci, S. Romagnani. 1992. Reciprocal regulatory effects of IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 on the in vitro development of human Th1 and Th2 clones. J. Immunol. 148:2142.[Abstract]
  8. Ben-Sasson, S. Z., K. Makedonski, J. Hu-Li, W. E. Paul. 2000. Survival and cytokine polarization of naive CD4+ T cells in vitro is largely dependent on exogenous cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:1308.[Medline]
  9. Hsieh, C, S. E. S., C. S. Macatonia, S. F. Tripp, A. Wolf, A. O’Garra, K. M. Murphy. 1993. Development of Th1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by Listeria-induced macrophages. Science 260:547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Jacobson, N. G., S. J. Szabo, R. M. Weber-Nordt, Z. Zhong, R. D. Schreiber, Jr J. E. Darnell, K. M. Murphy. 1995. Interleukin-12 signaling in T-helper type-1 (Th1) cells involves tyrosine phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription STAT3 and STAT4. J. Exp. Med. 181:1755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hsieh, C. S., A. B. Heimberger, J. S. Gold, A. O’Garra, K. M. Murphy. 1992. Differential regulation of T helper phenotype development by interleukins 4 and 10 in an {alpha}{beta} T-cell-receptor transgenic system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Agarwal, S., A. Rao. 1998. Modulation of chromatin structure regulates cytokine gene expression during T cell differentiation. Immunity 9:765.[Medline]
  13. Takemoto, N., N. Koyano-Nakagawa, T. Yokota, N. Arai, S. Miyatake, K. Arai. 1998. Th2-specific DNase I-hypersensitive sites in the murine IL-13 and IL-4 intergenic region. Int. Immunol. 10:1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Agarwal, S., O. Avni, A. Rao. 2000. Cell-type-restricted binding of the transcription factor NFAT to a distal IL-4 enhancer in vivo. Immunity 12:643.[Medline]
  15. Bird, J. J., D. R. Brown, A. C. Mullen, N. M. Moskowitz, M. A. Mahowald, J. R. Sider, T. F. Gajewski, C. R. Wang, S. L. Reiner. 1998. Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. Immunity 9:229.[Medline]
  16. Falek, P. R., S. Z. Ben-Sasson, M. Ariel. 2000. Correlation between DNA methylation and murine IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 expression. Cytokine 12:198.[Medline]
  17. Gett, A. V., P. D. Hodgkin. 1998. Cell division regulates the T cell cytokine repertoire, revealing a mechanism underlying immune class regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Richter, A., M. Lohning, A. Radbruch. 1999. Instruction for cytokine expression in T helper lymphocytes in relation to proliferation and cell cycle progression. J. Exp. Med. 190:1439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bix, M., R. M. Locksley. 1998. Independent and epigenetic regulation of the interleukin-4 alleles in CD4+ T cells. Science 281:1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Riviere, I., M. J. Sunshine, D. R. Littman. 1998. Regulation of IL-4 expression by activation of individual alleles. Immunity 9:217.[Medline]
  21. Pannetier, C., J. Hu-Li, W. E. Paul. 2000. Bias in the expression of IL-4 alleles: the use of T cells from a GFP knock-out mouse. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 64:599.
  22. Greer, J. M., T. A. Koerner, K. Hayakawa, R. R. Hardy, J. D. Kemp. 1993. The 3G11+ antigen, a marker for murine CD4+ Th1 lymphocytes, is ganglioside. Glycobiology 3:391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Fischer, M., I. MacNeil, T. Suda, J. E. Cupp, K. Shortman, A. Zlotnik. 1991. Cytokine production by mature and immature thymocytes. J. Immunol. 146:3452.[Abstract]
  24. Mingari, M. C., E. Maggi, A. Cambiaggi, F. Annunziato, F. Schiavetti, R. Manetti, L. Moretta, S. Romagnani. 1996. Development in vitro of human CD4+ thymocytes into functionally mature Th2 cells: exogenous interleukin-12 is required for priming thymocytes to produce both Th1 cytokines and interleukin-10. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1083.[Medline]
  25. Yamaguchi, E., J. De Vries, H. Yssel. 1999. Differentiation of human single-positive fetal thymocytes in vitro into IL-4- and/or IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Int. Immunol. 11:593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bendelac, A., P. Matzinger, R. A. Seder, W. E. Paul, R. H. Schwartz. 1992. Activation events during thymic selection. J. Exp. Med. 175:731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Bendelac, A., M. N. Rivera, S. H. Park, J. H. Roark. 1997. Mouse CD1-specific NK1 T cells: development, specificity, and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:535.[Medline]
  28. Young, H. A., P. Ghosh, J. Ye, J. Lederer, A. Lichtman, J. R. Gerard, L. Penix, C. B. Wilson, A. J. Melvin, M. E. McGurn, et al 1994. Differentiation of the T-helper phenotypes by analysis of the methylation state of the IFN-{gamma} gene. J. Immunol. 153:3603.[Abstract]
  29. Szabo, S. J., S. T. Kim, G. L. Costa, X. Zhang, C. G. Fathman, L. H. Glimcher. 2000. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 100:655.[Medline]
  30. Ho, I. C., M. R. Hodge, J. W. Rooney, L. H. Glimcher. 1996. The proto-oncogene c-maf is responsible for tissue-specific expression of interleukin-4. Cell 85:973.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Q. Liu, Z. Liu, C. T. Rozo, H. A. Hamed, F. Alem, J. F. Urban Jr., and W. C. Gause
The Role of B Cells in the Development of CD4 Effector T Cells during a Polarized Th2 Immune Response
J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3821 - 3830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. V. Ganusov, D. Milutinovic, and R. J. De Boer
IL-2 Regulates Expansion of CD4+ T Cell Populations by Affecting Cell Death: Insights from Modeling CFSE Data
J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 950 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
D. M. Jelley-Gibbs, J. P. Dibble, S. Filipson, L. Haynes, R. A. Kemp, and S. L. Swain
Repeated stimulation of CD4 effector T cells can limit their protective function
J. Exp. Med., April 4, 2005; 201(7): 1101 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Sehra, D. Patel, S. Kusam, Z.-Y. Wang, C.-H. Chang, and A. L. Dent
A Role for Caspases in Controlling IL-4 Expression in T Cells
J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3440 - 3446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z. Liu, Q. Liu, H. Hamed, R. M. Anthony, A. Foster, F. D. Finkelman, J. F. Urban Jr, and W. C. Gause
IL-2 and Autocrine IL-4 Drive the In Vivo Development of Antigen-Specific Th2 T Cells Elicited by Nematode Parasites
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 2242 - 2249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Quemeneur, L. Beloeil, M.-C. Michallet, G. Angelov, M. Tomkowiak, J.-P. Revillard, and J. Marvel
Restriction of De Novo Nucleotide Biosynthesis Interferes with Clonal Expansion and Differentiation into Effector and Memory CD8 T Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 4945 - 4952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. W. Lawrence and T. J. Braciale
Activation, Differentiation, and Migration of Naive Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells during Pulmonary Influenza Virus Infection
J. Immunol., July 15, 2004; 173(2): 1209 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Seki, M. Miyazaki, W. Suzuki, K. Hayashi, K. Arima, E. Myburgh, K. Izuhara, F. Brombacher, and M. Kubo
IL-4-Induced GATA-3 Expression Is a Time-Restricted Instruction Switch for Th2 Cell Differentiation
J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6158 - 6166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
B. J. Manfras, S. Reuter, T. Wendland, B. O. Boehm, and P. Kern
Impeded Th1 CD4 memory T cell generation in chronic-persisting liver infection with Echinococcus multilocularis
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2004; 16(1): 43 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. D. Roback, M. S. Hossain, L. Lezhava, J. W. Gorechlad, S. A. Alexander, D. L. Jaye, S. Mittelstaedt, S. Talib, J. E. Hearst, C. D. Hillyer, et al.
Allogeneic T Cells Treated with Amotosalen Prevent Lethal Cytomegalovirus Disease without Producing Graft-versus-Host Disease Following Bone Marrow Transplantation
J. Immunol., December 1, 2003; 171(11): 6023 - 6031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Lohning, A. Richter, T. Stamm, J. Hu-Li, M. Assenmacher, W. E. Paul, and A. Radbruch
Establishment of memory for IL-10 expression in developing T helper 2 cells requires repetitive IL-4 costimulation and does not impair proliferation
PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12307 - 12312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Adkins, T. Williamson, P. Guevara, and Y. Bu
Murine Neonatal Lymphocytes Show Rapid Early Cell Cycle Entry and Cell Division
J. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 170(9): 4548 - 4556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]