|
|
||||||||
CUTTING EDGE |
Department of Biology, Inflammation Division, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA 02139
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production, whereas IL-2
secretion is modulated by CTLA4-Ig, but not ICOS-Ig. In contrast, both
ICOS and CD28 are required for complete attenuation of IL-4 production.
Our data suggest that ICOS and CD28 regulate T cell expansion and that
ligation of either CD28 or ICOS can either uniquely regulate cytokine
production (IL-2/TNF-
) or synergize for optimal cytokine production
(IL-4) after SAg administration. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, but not IL-2 (9, 11). Interestingly, ICOS has been reported to deliver a signal
independent of CD28 for cytokine production and proliferation in vitro
(10). However, the relative role of ICOS and CD28 in the
regulation of T cell function in vivo remains largely unexplored.
Superantigens (SAgs) are toxins secreted by infectious microorganisms
that bind to MHC class II molecules on APC and interact with both
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
bearing the appropriate TCR V
-chain (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). This
interaction causes a strong activation of all T lymphocytes expressing
SAg-specific V
elements. In mice, the bacterial SAg
Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) elicits an initial
cytokine secretion and clonal expansion of spleen and lymph node
V
8+ T cells followed by a partial clonal
deletion of this leukocyte type via apoptosis. The remaining
reactive V
8+ T cells reach a state of anergy
or unresponsiveness that can persist for several weeks
(18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27). A series of studies in recent years using the
chimeric soluble CTLA4-Ig constant region fusion protein (CTLA4-Ig),
anti-CD28 mAb Fab, or mice genetically deficient for CD28
(28, 29) have shown that costimulation through CD28 is
critical for clonal expansion and cytokine production after SEB
administration. In the present series of experiments, we have used this
well characterized system to investigate the contribution of ICOS and
the relative importance of this new pathway vs the series of events
elicited by the interaction of CD28 and B7 molecules using either the
competitive inhibitor of CD28/CTLA4 signaling, CTLA4-Ig, or the soluble
ICOS Ig.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six-week-old BALB/c mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained in a specific pathogen-free mouse facility (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA). Mice received one dose of 50 µg/mouse of SEB (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in a single i.v. injection on day 0. Control littermates were injected with an identical volume (200 µl) of PBS. For the blocking experiments, mice also received 100 µg/mouse of ICOS-Ig or CTLA4-Ig. Fusion proteins were administered i.p. 90 min before SAg administration on days 0 and 2 for the experimental group of mice sacrificed on day 3; and on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the experimental group of mice sacrificed on day 10. Human Ig (100 µg/mouse) was used as an appropriate control.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Spleen and lymph node monocellular suspensions were subjected to
hypotonic erythrocyte lysis, washed, and then stained using mAb
directed against CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), V
6 (RR4-7), and V
8
(F23.1) obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). The Abs anti-CD4
and anti-CD8 were PE labeled, and anti-V
6 and anti-V
8
were FITC labeled. Quantitative fluorometric analysis was performed on
a FACScaliber instrument (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View,
CA).
To obtain the absolute number of spleen or lymph node
CD4+V
8+ and
CD8+V
8+ T lymphocytes,
the percentages of these cell types determined by flow cytometry were
multiplied by the total number of cells recovered from the spleen or
lymph node, respectively.
ICOS-Ig and CTLA4-Ig generation
ICOS-Ig was generated as described previously (11). CTLA4-Ig was obtained from Chimerigen (Allston, MA).
Culture conditions
Triplicates of 1.5 x 105 or 3 x 105 spleen cells were cultured for 3 days in medium (200 µl/well of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 50 µM 2-ME, 10 nM HEPES, 200 mM L-glutamine, 10 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) supplemented with 20 µg/ml SEB or 3 µg/ml Con A. For blocking experiments in vitro, cells were preincubated for 2 h with different concentrations (0, 5, 50, or 100 µg/ml) of either ICOS-Ig, CTLA4-Ig, or human Ig and then stimulated with SEB (20 µg/ml) for 72 h. For assessment of proliferation, cells were harvested after an 8-h pulse labeled with 1 µCi [3H]thymidine (Amersham, Little Chalfont, U.K.).
Cytokine measurement
Blood was collected at 1, 1.5, or 2 h after enterotoxin
challenge. Serial dilutions of serum samples were assayed using
commercial ELISA kits for TNF-
, IFN-
, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10
(Endogen, Boston, MA).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
8+ and
CD8+V
8+ T cells,
which reaches a maximum level at 34 days following SEB
treatment; and 3) a deletion phase of mature
V
8+ lymphocytes via apoptosis, which
is clearly present 10 days after SEB injection and lasts over 30 days
(16, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 30, 31, 32). The surviving SEB-specific
V
8+ cells in vivo are anergic as assessed by
their low proliferative response to a second enterotoxin stimulation in
vitro (16, 19, 20, 22, 24).
Effect of ICOS on SEB-induced V
8+ T cell
proliferation
On day 3, SEB treatment resulted in 2-fold and 5-fold increases in
the total number of peripheral
CD4+V
8+ and
CD8+V
8+ T cells,
respectively, when compared with that observed in PBS-treated controls
(Fig. 1
, A and B).
The size of the peripheral V
8+ T cell
population from PBS-treated mice is not different from that of
PBS+hIg-, PBS+ICOS-Ig-, or PBS+CTLA4-Ig-treated littermates, indicating
that the administration of the fusion proteins alone does not have any
detectable effect on cell numbers (data not shown). However,
administration of ICOS-Ig (100 µg/mouse) reduces the expansion of
both CD4+ and CD8+
V
8+ T cells in response to SEB by 70% in both
secondary lymphoid tissues (Fig. 1
, A and B). The
suppression of T cell expansion was comparable in magnitude to that
observed using CTLA4-Ig. These data support recent work in
CD28-deficient mice or using CD28 mAbs that T cell expansion requires
CD28 engagement (29, 33). Administration of both CTLA4-Ig
together with ICOS-Ig failed to further suppress T cell expansion (data
not shown). No significant responses of V
6+ T
cells to SEB in control mice or experimental littermates were detected
(data not shown) indicating the specificity of SEB for
V
8+ T lymphocytes.
|
8+ T
cell proliferation (Fig. 1
8+ T cells can be suppressed by either CD28
or ICOS blockade. The precise mechanisms whereby these two molecules
regulate T cell expansion are unclear. However, we have observed that
mice treated with CTLA4-Ig or mice genetically deficient in CD28 show a
reduced ICOS expression after SEB administration (J.-A. G.,
unpublished observations). This suggests that CD28/B7 interactions are
in part required for ICOS induction, which then can interact with its
ligand B7RP-1, which is constitutively expressed on B cells and
macrophages, to regulate T cell clonal expansion. These data differ
from our previous observation with soluble Ags, whereby CTLA4-Ig, but
not ICOS-Ig, inhibits proliferation of resting
CD4+ T cells (11). The precise
reasons for this difference remains to be further elucidated. However,
after SAgs, both B7RP-1-positive B cells and macrophages, are involved
in Ag presentation to V
8+ specific T cell,
whereas murine dendritic cells, which do not express the ICOS ligand
(10), are likely the principle cell population that most
effectively presents processed peptides from soluble proteins to
Ag-specific CD4+ T cells.
Effect of ICOS on SEB-induced V
8+ T cell clonal
deletion
Clonal size can be regulated either by depletion of Ag-stimulated
cells or by anergy induction. CD28 has been demonstrated to provide an
anti-apoptotic signal via the up-regulation of BCL-xL (34, 35) and at least in part, through the stabilization of IL-2
mRNA, to support T cell expansion (36). However, despite
the suboptimal proliferation of peripheral
CD4+V
8+ and
CD8+V
8+ T cells detected
in SEB-treated mice following either ICOS-Ig or CTLA4-Ig
administration, these lymphocytic populations were reduced during the
enterotoxin-driven deletion phase as much as the same populations in
the SEB-treated control littermates (data not shown). This indicates
that neither ICOS- nor CD28-mediated signals regulate clonal deletion
in response to SEB and supports the observation that responsive cells
undergo depletion in CD28-deficient mice (29).
Effect of ICOS on SEB-induced V
8+ T cell anergy
The V
8+ T lymphocytes that have not been
eliminated by apoptosis in vivo 10 days after the single i.v.
administration of SEB are anergic. Subsequently, these cells show a
very low proliferative response in vitro to a second restimulation with
the enterotoxin (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27). To determine whether
costimulatory signals mediated by ICOS are required for the induction
of V
8+ T cell anergy in response to SEB, the
proliferative response to SEB in vitro of splenocytes from
ICOS-Ig-treated mice after SEB priming in vivo was evaluated. As
expected, spleen V
8+ T cells from SEB-treated
mice failed to proliferate to the enterotoxin in vitro (Fig. 2
A). Whereas CTLA4-Ig
administration in vivo was able to significantly reduce SEB-induced
V
8+ T cell anergy, ICOS-Ig did not show any
effect on the impairment of these cells to mount a proliferative
response upon SEB restimulation (Fig. 2
A). An increase in
the dose of SEB (25 or 50 µg/ml) did not modify the suboptimal T cell
activation observed with lower doses (data not shown). Splenocytes from
mice treated with either CTLA-4Ig or ICOS-Ig show a normal response to
Con A, indicating the specificity of the V
8+ T
cell anergic response to SEB (Fig. 2
B). These data contrast
to that observed in CD28-deficient mice, which rapidly undergo anergy
induction that can be in part reversed by IL-2 administration
(29). However, mice transgenic for CTLA4-Ig are also
protected from anergy induction. Thus it is likely that this is a
consequence of blockade of CTLA4/B7 signaling, rather than an
extinction of a CD28-driven response. Indeed, in recent years it has
been shown that tolerance induction is an active process of signaling
through CTLA4, rather than a process that occurs as a lack of
CD28-mediated costimulation (37). These data also
illustrate an important confounding issue in using CTLA4-Ig, which
inhibits both a positive and a negative signal; additional experiments
are required using neutralizing CD28, CTLA4, and ICOS mAbs to further
delineate the precise contribution of these three related family
members to anergy induction.
|
Cytokine production after SAg administration is a consequence of T
cell-derived stimulation (25, 38). We next investigated
whether CD28 and ICOS would also deliver comparable signals required
for cytokine production. CD28-mediated costimulation is critical for
SEB-induced early secretion of IL-2 (Fig. 3
); however, by 2 h post SEB
administration, IL-2 production is comparable in both control Ig- and
CTLA4-Ig-treated mice (Fig. 3
). Administration of ICOS-Ig had no
significant effect on IL-2 production and did not synergize with
CTLA4-Ig for additional suppression of IL-2 secretion (Fig. 3
). In
contrast, ICOS, but not CD28, delivered an important signal for TNF-
secretion (Fig. 3
). Similar to IL-2, no synergistic effects between
ICOS and CD28 were observable (Fig. 3
). These results differ from data
using CD28-deficient mice, which exhibit a marked protection from
repeated peritoneal administrations of Toxin Shock Syndrome toxin-1
(TSST-1), which is a consequence of abrogated TNF-
production
(39). Likewise, SEB-induced TNF-
production was
partially protected by anti-B7-2, but not B7-1 blockade
(40). The precise reasons for these differences are at
present unknown, although different toxins and routes of administration
might use different signals. IFN-
production was completely
inhibited by CTLA4-Ig, although ICOS-Ig alone reduced IFN-
levels by
50% 2 h post SEB administration (Fig. 3
). Finally, CD28 signaling
was important for IL-4 production, whereas ICOS-Ig administration alone
was ineffective (Fig. 3
). However, unlike IL-2, IFN-
, and TNF-
,
the combination of CD28 and ICOS blockade completely inhibited IL-4
production (Fig. 3
). Thus CD28 delivers signals preferential for IL-2
and IFN-
, ICOS signals for TNF-
, whereas CD28 and ICOS synergize
for complete inhibition of IL-4 production in response to SEB. These
data support our recent findings after infection with the nematode
Nippostrongylus brazileneis, where ICOS regulates T cell
expansion and effector cytokine production (41).
|
production (strictly ICOS dependent), IFN-
(CD28
dependent and in part ICOS dependent). For other cytokines such as
IL-4, signaling through both ICOS and CD28 are required for IL-4
production. We suggest that ICOS is an important costimulatory molecule
involved in optimal T cell expansion, but not in either peripheral
deletion or anergy and can deliver both unique and complementary
signals to CD28 for cytokine secretion.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: ICOS, inducible costimulator; SAg, superantigen; SEB, Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B. ![]()
Received for publication September 5, 2000. Accepted for publication October 12, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-specific stimulation of human T cells by staphylococcal toxins. Science 244:84.
1, V
3, V
11 and V
12 by staphylococcal enterotoxin A. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:617.[Medline]
-specific superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B: stimulation of mature T cells and clonal deletion in neonatal mice. Cell 56:27.[Medline]
8+CD4+ T cells in Staphylococcus enterotoxin B-primed mice. J. Exp. Med. 172:1065.
8+CD4+ T cells in mice tolerant to Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B. Nature 349:245.[Medline]
8+ T cells from tolerance induction by the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:858.[Medline]
8+ peripheral T cells responding to staphylococcal enterotoxin B in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:1963.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. M. Hubbard, J. M. Eng, T. Ramirez-Montagut, K. H. Tjoe, S. J. Muriglan, A. A. Kochman, T. H. Terwey, L. M. Willis, R. Schiro, G. Heller, et al. Absence of inducible costimulator on alloreactive T cells reduces graft versus host disease and induces Th2 deviation Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 3285 - 3292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sacre, G. Carcelain, N. Cassoux, A.-M. Fillet, D. Costagliola, D. Vittecoq, D. Salmon, Z. Amoura, C. Katlama, and B. Autran Repertoire, diversity, and differentiation of specific CD8 T cells are associated with immune protection against human cytomegalovirus disease J. Exp. Med., June 20, 2005; 201(12): 1999 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Taylor, A. Panoskaltsis-Mortari, G. J. Freeman, A. H. Sharpe, R. J. Noelle, A. Y. Rudensky, T. W. Mak, J. S. Serody, and B. R. Blazar Targeting of inducible costimulator (ICOS) expressed on alloreactive T cells down-regulates graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and facilitates engraftment of allogeneic bone marrow (BM) Blood, April 15, 2005; 105(8): 3372 - 3380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. S. Huang, P. Borszcz, S. Sidobre, M. Kronenberg, and K. P. Kane CD1d1 Displayed on Cell Size Beads Identifies and Enriches an NK Cell Population Negatively Regulated by CD1d1 J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5304 - 5312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Lavender, B. J. Ma, E. T. Silver, and K. P. Kane The Rat RT1-A1c MHC Molecule Is a Xenogeneic Ligand Recognized by the Mouse Activating Ly-49W and Inhibitory Ly-49G Receptors J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3518 - 3526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Wiley, S. Goncharova, T. Shea, J. R. Johnson, A. J. Coyle, and M. Jordana Evaluation of Inducible Costimulator/B7-Related Protein-1 as a Therapeutic Target in a Murine Model of Allergic Airway Inflammation Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2003; 28(6): 722 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Annenkov, G. M. Daly, T. Brocker, and Y. Chernajovsky Clustering of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-containing signalling subunits in CD4+ T cells is an optimal signal for IFN-{gamma} production, but not for the production of IL-4 Int. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 15(5): 665 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Phillips, T. G. Markees, J. P. Mordes, D. L. Greiner, and A. A. Rossini Blockade of CD40-Mediated Signaling Is Sufficient for Inducing Islet But Not Skin Transplantation Tolerance J. Immunol., March 15, 2003; 170(6): 3015 - 3023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lohning, A. Hutloff, T. Kallinich, H. W. Mages, K. Bonhagen, A. Radbruch, E. Hamelmann, and R. A. Kroczek Expression of ICOS In Vivo Defines CD4+ Effector T Cells with High Inflammatory Potential and a Strong Bias for Secretion of Interleukin 10 J. Exp. Med., January 20, 2003; 197(2): 181 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Mittrucker, M. Kursar, A. Kohler, D. Yanagihara, S. K. Yoshinaga, and S. H. E. Kaufmann Inducible Costimulator Protein Controls the Protective T Cell Response Against Listeria monocytogenes J. Immunol., November 15, 2002; 169(10): 5813 - 5817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Iwai, Y. Kozono, S. Hirose, H. Akiba, H. Yagita, K. Okumura, H. Kohsaka, N. Miyasaka, and M. Azuma Amelioration of Collagen-Induced Arthritis by Blockade of Inducible Costimulator-B7 Homologous Protein Costimulation J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4332 - 4339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rajagopalan, M. K. Smart, E. V. Marietta, and C. S. David Staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced activation and concomitant resistance to cell death in CD28-deficient HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice Int. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 14(7): 801 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-h. Ogawa, G. Nagamatsu, M. Watanabe, S. Watanabe, T. Hayashi, S. Horita, K. Nitta, H. Nihei, K. Tezuka, and R. Abe Opposing Effects of Anti-Activation-Inducible Lymphocyte- Immunomodulatory Molecule/Inducible Costimulator Antibody on the Development of Acute Versus Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease J. Immunol., November 15, 2001; 167(10): 5741 - 5748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |