The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorczynski, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gorczynski, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 4854-4860.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Receptor Engagement on Cells Expressing a Ligand for the Tolerance-Inducing Molecule OX2 Induces an Immunoregulatory Population That Inhibits Alloreactivity In Vitro and In Vivo1

Reginald M. Gorczynski2,*,{dagger}, Kai Yu* and David Clark*,{ddagger}

* University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; {dagger} Departments of Surgery and Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and {ddagger} Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and Molecular Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Increased survival of C57BL/6 renal allografts following portal vein donor-specific pretransplant immunization of C3H mice is associated with increased expression of the molecule OX2 seen on host dendritic cells, along with a marked polarization in cytokine production from lymphocytes harvested from the transplanted animals, with preferential production of IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-ß on donor-specific restimulation in vitro, and decreased production of IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha} compared with non-portal vein-immunized control transplanted mice. The increased renal allograft survival and the altered cytokine production are abolished by infusion of anti-mouse OX2 mAb (3B6). Infusion of a soluble OX2:Fc immunoadhesin can itself produce significant prolongation of xeno- and allografts in mice. We have used FITC-conjugated OX2:Fc to characterize cells expressing a ligand (OX2L) for OX2, and provide evidence that subpopulations of LPS-stimulated splenic macrophages, Con A-activated splenic T cells, and the majority (>80%) of {gamma}{delta}TCR+ T cells express this ligand. We show below that F4/80+, OX2L+ splenic macrophages, admixed with OX2:Fc, represent a potent immunosuppressive population capable of causing more profound inhibition of alloreactivity in vitro or in vivo than that seen using either OX2:Fc or OX2+ (or OX2L+) cells alone. Immunoregulation by this OX2L+ population occurs in an MHC-restricted fashion.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Renal and skin allograft survival is increased following donor-specific portal vein (pv)3 immunization (1, 2, 3), and is in turn associated with increased expression of a number of distinct mRNAs (4), one of which encodes OX2, a molecule expressed on the surface of dendritic cells (DC) (5). We showed subsequently that infusion of anti-OX2 mAbs from the time of transplantation blocks the protective effect of pv immunization in mice receiving renal allografts (4) and rats receiving small intestinal transplantation (6), and the polarization to type 2 cytokine production seen in these models (4, 6). A soluble immunoadhesin, in which the extracellular domain of OX2 was linked to a murine IgG2aFc region, inhibited T cell allostimulation and type 1 cytokine production (IL-2, IFN-{gamma}) in vitro and in vivo (1). Because the intracellular domain of OX2 lacks signaling motifs, or any docking sites for adapter molecules that might engage an intracellular signaling cascade, we have suggested that these and other data (7) are consistent with the idea that engagement of the ligand of OX2 (OX2L) by OX2 may deliver key immunoregulatory signals.

T cells are activated after concomitant engagement of TCRs with Ag presented on APC in association with MHC molecules and the delivery of costimulatory signals resulting from the interaction of several ligand:coreceptor complexes (8, 9, 10, 11). Major positive costimulatory interactions include the following: CD40L with CD40, and CD28 with CD80/CD86; CTLA4 interactions with CD80/CD86 may deliver a negative signal (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Although positive costimulatory signals are clearly important in T cell triggering, blocking this costimulation alone, and/or facilitating signaling via CTLA4 has not reproducibly induced tolerance. This may reflect the need for other molecules (such as OX2) in active immunoregulation (4). In recent studies, we reported that DC expressing OX2 triggered an immunoregulatory function leading to increased allograft survival. Moreover, these cells were physically distinguishable from those DC with optimal allostimulatory capacity (7).

Early attempts to characterize a ligand for OX2 by Preston et al. (18) were performed by constructing a soluble chimeric protein with the extracellular domains of OX2 engineered onto domains 3 + 4 of rat CD4 Ag. The reagent was then complexed to fluorescent covaspheres to improve its ability to stain cells expressing OX2 ligand. These OX2 covaspheres were reported to bind to macrophages, but not other cell types. The specificity of the interaction was documented by inhibition studies using Fab of the OX2 mAb. Using site-directed mutagenesis, this group further reported results suggesting that the ligand-binding domain of OX2 was in the NH2-terminal domain of the extracellular region of OX2.

Using FITC-labeled OX2:Fc, we report below that a ligand for OX2 does indeed exist on a subpopulation of LPS-stimulated splenic macrophages, but not fresh splenic DC. Moreover, subpopulations of Con A-activated {alpha}ßTCR+ cells, and most {gamma}{delta}TCR+ cells, also bind FITC-OX2:Fc. Admixture of OX2:Fc with the OX2L+ splenic macrophage pool, followed either by in vivo infusion into renal transplant recipients, or by addition in culture to freshly allostimulated spleen responder cells produces profound inhibition of allorecognition, greater than that seen using either OX2:Fc or OX2+ (OX2L+) cells alone. Cells producing this inhibition copurify with small cells expressing the F4/80 surface marker, and inhibition occurs in an MHC-restricted fashion. We conclude that optimal immunoregulation of transplant rejection in vivo may depend in part upon signals delivered by receptor cross-linking of an activated OX2L+ subpopulation of F4/80+ splenic cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Male C3H/HeJ, BALB/c, C57BL/6 and B10.Sgn, B10.BR, and B10.D2 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were housed five per cage and allowed food and water ad libitum. All mice were used at 8–12 wk of age.

Monoclonal Abs

The following mAbs were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA), unless stated otherwise: anti-IL-2 (S4B6; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA; biotinylated); anti-IL-4 (11B11; American Type Culture Collection; biotinylated); anti-IFN-{gamma} (R4-6A2; American Type Culture Collection; biotinylated XMG1.2); anti-IL-10 (JES5-2A5; biotinylated, SXC-1). PE anti-CD80, PE anti-F4/80, FITC anti-{alpha}ßTCR, FITC anti-{gamma}{delta}TCR, L3T4 (anti-mouse CD4), anti-Thy-1.2, and anti-Ly-2.2 were obtained from Cedarlane Labs (Hornby, Ontario, Canada). The hybridoma-producing DEC205 (anti-mouse DC) was a kind gift from Dr. R. Steinman (Rockefeller University), and was directly labeled with FITC. F(ab')2 rabbit anti-rat IgG PE conjugate (noncross-reactive with mouse IgG) was obtained from Serotec (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). PE rat anti-mouse OX2 (3B6) was obtained from BioSpark (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) (19).

Streptavidin HRP and mouse rGM-CSF were purchased from PharMingen.

Preparation of cells

Single cell spleen and peripheral lymph node (PLN) suspensions were prepared aseptically from individual mice in each experiment. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in {alpha}-MEM supplemented with 2-ME and 10% FCS ({alpha}F10). Peyer’s patch (PP) cells were used as a source of lymphocytes from which populations enriched for {gamma}{delta}TCR+ cells were obtained by adherence for 90 min at 37°C to anti-{gamma}{delta}TCR Ab-coated plates (20).

Fresh splenic DC were obtained as the nonadherent component of overnight culture of plastic adherent spleen cells, while splenic macrophages represented the persistently adherent pool (21). In addition, bone marrow-derived DC were prepared in vitro, as described elsewhere (22). Bone marrow cells were pooled from 10 donors, treated with the mixture of Abs (L3T4, anti-Thy-1.2, anti-Ly-2.2) and rabbit complement, and cultured in 10 ml {alpha}F10 in tissue culture flasks, at a concentration of 2 x 106/ml with 500 U/ml murine rGM-CSF (PharMingen). Fresh GM-CSF was added at 36-h intervals. Cells were separated over lymphopaque on days 3.5 and 7 of culture, again reculturing in {alpha}F10 with rGM-CSF. An aliquot of the sample stained at 10 days with FITC-conjugated DEC205 mAb showed a mean staining in the order of 91% ± 8%. Remaining cells were washed, counted, and used as stimulating cells in MLC (see Tables I-III), and as donor-specific cells for pv immunization (below).

Skin transplantation

These procedures were performed essentially as described elsewhere (3, 23). When animals received donor-specific pv immunization, 10 x 106 bone marrow derived DC were infused 36 h before skin grafting. As noted in earlier publications, technical failures (due to hemorrhage) were <10%.

Cytotoxicity and cytokine assays

In cultures used to assess induction of cytotoxicity or cytokine production, C3H responder cells were stimulated with equal numbers of mitomycin C-treated (100 µg/ml, for 45 min at 37°C) spleen stimulator cells in triplicate in {alpha}F10. Supernatants were pooled at 40 h from replicate wells and assayed in triplicate in ELISA for lymphokine production, as described in detail elsewhere (4), using cytokine capture Abs and enzyme-coupled developing Abs, as indicated above. Recombinant cytokines for standardization of assays were purchased from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA). Each assay reliably quantified cytokine levels in the range 40–4000 pg/ml.

When cytotoxicity was measured, cells were harvested at 5 days and pooled from replicate wells, counted, and cultured at various E:T ratios with 51Cr-labeled 72-h spleen Con A blasts as target cells. Supernatants were sampled at 4 h for assessment of specific cytotoxicity.

Production and expression of an OX2:Fc fusion protein in a baculovirus expression system (1)

An immunoadhesin constructed to contain the extracellular domain of OX2, linked to a murine IgG2aFc region, was made as described elsewhere, and expressed using a Baculovirus Expression Vector System in Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells. This fusion protein inhibits type 1 cytokine production from T cells stimulated with allogeneic DC in vitro (1). One milligram of OX2:Fc was FITC labeled using conventional techniques.

Cell separation by biophysical means

Velocity sedimentation, a technique separating cells into populations of different size, was performed as described elsewhere (24), on splenic cells pretreated (24 h at 37°C) with LPS (1 µg/ml) at a concentration of 3 x 106 cells/ml. Cells were washed three times with medium before sedimentation. In some experiments, small (slow-sedimenting) cells were further fractionated, following labeling with PE anti-F4/80 mAb, using an anti-PE column. Recovery of F4/80+ and F4/80- cells was 75% and 90%, respectively (see individual experiments below).

Statistical analysis

For comparison of DC FACS staining, or cytokine production in different groups assayed in vitro, initial ANOVAs were performed, followed by pairwise comparison of relevant groups using a Student t test (see legends to figures/tables).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Binding of FITC-OX2:Fc to LPS-stimulated splenic cells, but not DC, and to {alpha}ß{gamma}{delta}TCR+ cells

Twenty-four-hour LPS-stimulated fresh splenic macrophages and DC were obtained from a pool of three C57BL/6 mice, while 72-h Con A-activated PLN and PP cells were similarly prepared from a pool of three other C57BL/6 donors. Cells were harvested, washed, preincubated for 30 min at 4°C in PBS with 1% mouse serum, and thereafter stained with various different fluorescent mAbs, as shown in Fig. 1Go. As a control, cells were incubated independently also with a FITC-coupled mouse MOPC173 IgG2a myeloma (lower panels in figure). Data in Fig. 1Go show the FACS profiles from one of four such studies using these different cell populations. In the upper panels, cells are shown stained with FITC anti-TCR (anti-{alpha}ßTCR for PLN, anti-{gamma}{delta}TCR for PP) or with PE anti-CD80 (splenic macrophages and DC).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. FACS analysis of 24-h LPS-stimulated fresh splenic macrophages and DC, or 72-h Con A-activated PLN and PP cells. Cells were preincubated for 30 min at 4°C in PBS with 1% mouse serum before staining with the FITC anti-TCR or PE anti-CD40 (upper panels); FITC-OX2:Fc (middle panels); or, as control, FITC-coupled mouse MOPC173 myeloma (Ig2a). Upper panels, Cells stained with control Igs are shown in the unshaded area. Middle panels, The unshaded area represents a FACS profile for cells in the absence of addition of FITC-OX2:Fc.

 
It is clear that subpopulations of activated {alpha}ßTCR+ cells and splenic macrophages bound the FITC-OX2:Fc, while no significant staining was seen with LPS-activated splenic DC. A total of >80% of activated PP {gamma}{delta}TCR+ cells stained with FITC-OX2:Fc. When similar studies were performed using resting cells (no LPS or Con A activation), or in the presence of a 5-fold excess of unlabeled OX2:Fc, no binding of FITC-OX2:Fc above control was seen for any cell population (data not shown). In the work that follows, we have concentrated on characterizing the population of splenic cells binding FITC-OX2:Fc.

Splenic cells binding FITC-OX2:Fc are physically distinguishable from OX2+ cells

It was intriguing to us that a DC-enriched cell population did not bind FITC-OX2:Fc (Fig. 1Go), while splenic macrophages did, because earlier data had suggested the existence of an immunoregulatory OX2+ DC that could modulate stimulation induced by OX2- DC (7). Accordingly, we next asked whether OX2+- and OX2:Fc-binding cells could be further characterized. Forty-eight-hour LPS-stimulated, T-depleted, spleen cells were subjected to fractionation by size using unit gravity sedimentation techniques (24), and different cell populations were incubated with FITC-OX2:Fc, PE (or FITC) anti-OX2, and PE anti-CD80, again after first preincubation with mouse serum (see above). Data shown in Fig. 2Go indicate FITC-OX2:Fc+CD80+ cells, FITC-OX2:Fc- CD80+ cells, FITC-OX2:Fc+CD80-, OX2+CD80+, OX2+CD80-, and OX2-CD80+ cells. No cells were detected that bound both FITC-OX2:Fc and PE anti-OX2 (data not shown).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Characterization of OX2+- and OX2:Fc-binding cells in 48-h LPS-stimulated, T-depleted, spleen cells after fractionation of the cells by size using unit gravity sedimentation techniques (24 ). The different cell populations shown were incubated with FITC-OX2:Fc, PE (or FITC) anti-OX2, and PE anti-CD80, again after first preincubation with mouse serum (see Fig. 1Go). a, Data show staining of cells with FITC-OX2:Fc. b, Data show staining with FITC anti-OX2. No cells were detected that bound both FITC-OX2:Fc and PE anti-OX2 (data not shown).

 
It is clear from these data that CD80+ and CD80- FITC-OX2:Fc-binding cells exist, and that these are found predominantly in a slow-sedimenting splenic population that contains some 50% of this splenic pool. In addition, both CD80+ and CD80- OX2+ cells exist, but in contrast to the OX2:Fc-binding cells, these are found in the faster-sedimenting cell population, making up <10% of this splenic pool.

Stimulation of OX2:Fc-binding cells with OX2:Fc delays graft rejection in vivo, and inhibits alloreactivity in vitro

Earlier studies have shown that along with an increase in graft survival, infusion of OX2:Fc into grafted mice leads to a polarization of cytokine production in lymphoid cells toward increased production of IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-ß, with decreased production of IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha}. In vitro, incubation of allostimulated cells in the presence of OX2:Fc led to inhibition of development of CTL in vitro, decreased proliferation, and decreased production of the cytokines IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} (1). Because membrane-bound OX2 itself lacks any significant signaling domains in the intracellular region (25), we had earlier speculated that immunoregulation occurred following engagement of OX2L on the receptor-bearing cell (1, 4, 25). To investigate whether immunoregulation induced in the presence of OX2:Fc was indeed enhanced by the presence of OX2L+ cells, we performed the following study.

Slow-sedimenting spleen cells (capable of binding FITC-OX2:Fc; see Fig. 2Go) and fast-sedimenting (OX2+) cells were obtained, as described above, from a pool of LPS-stimulated T-depleted spleen cells from six C57BL/6 mice. A control population of cells (intermediate sedimentation velocity <3% OX2+; <4% binding of FITC-OX2:Fc) was harvested also. Groups of seven C3H mice received C57BL/6 skin grafts, along with cells from these different spleen pools, with or without infusion of OX2:Fc (10 µg/mouse; two doses only at 48-h intervals). Skin graft survival was followed daily (see Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Skin allograft survival after infusing slow-sedimenting spleen cells (capable of binding FITC-OX2:Fc; see Fig. 2Go) along with soluble OX2:Fc. Various populations of spleen cells were obtained from a pool of LPS-stimulated T-depleted spleen cells from six C57BL/6 mice (see Fig. 2Go). Groups of seven C3H mice received C57BL/6 skin grafts, along with cells from these different spleen pools, with or without infusion of OX2:Fc (10 µg/mouse; two doses only at 48-h intervals). Skin graft survival was followed daily. a, Data show survival for groups receiving LPS-spleen cell subpopulations alone; *, p < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test), compared with control (no additional cells or OX2:Fc). b, Data show results for groups receiving cells + OX2:Fc; *, p < 0.05, compared with other groups.

 
In a separate study, C3H spleen cells were cultured with mitomycin C-treated C57BL/6 DC, again in the presence/absence of pools of the same splenic cells, with/without additional OX2:Fc protein. CTL (day 5) and cytokines (in the culture supernatant at 40 h) were measured in standard fashion. Data from one of three such studies are shown in Table IGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. A slow-sedimenting (3–4.5 mm/h) LPS-stimulated spleen cell population is stimulated in the presence of OX2:Fc to inhibit CTL and type 1 cytokine production in vitro

 
As described in our earlier report, infusion of OX2:Fc alone led to increased skin allograft survival. Only the OX2+ large cell pool (sedimenting at >6 mm/h) produced any prolongation of survival following infusion of the pools of splenic cells tested alone (see Fig. 3Goa). As predicted from data using anti-OX2 mAbs in pv immunized mice, infusion of anti-OX2 into mice receiving these cells abolished the increase in graft survival seen (R. M. G., unpublished data). However, infusion of OX2:Fc, in association with cells capable of binding FITC-OX2:Fc (OX2L+), the small cells (slow-sedimenting pool), led to the most pronounced increased survival seen. These data were recapitulated by in vitro studies. Addition of OX2:Fc alone to the culture medium inhibited production of CTL and type 1 cytokines (IL-2, IFN-{gamma}). When used alone, the fast-sedimenting population of cells (OX2+) caused some inhibition in the assays measured. However, this was only modestly augmented by further addition of soluble OX2:Fc (percentage of change from group with no OX2:Fc, 58% for CTL, p < 0.05; 46% for cytokines, p > 0.05). In contrast, cells from the slow-sedimenting spleen pool (which bind FITC-OX2:Fc) produced little inhibition of CTL/cytokine activity by themselves, but caused profound inhibition in both assays in the presence of additional OX2:Fc (see Table IGo: percentage of change from group with no OX2:Fc was 93% for CTL, p < 0.01; 88% for cytokines, p < 0.01).

Suppressive activity in splenic cells binding FITC-OX2:Fc resides in F4/80+ cells

In an earlier study, we had found that following pv immunization, adoptive transfer of inhibition of alloresponses was possible using an F4/80+ cell population (20). Similarly, in a model of immune deviation following Ag inoculation to the anterior chamber of the eye, inhibition was adoptively transferred by F4/80+ cells (26). We speculated that the inhibition seen using the pool of slow-sedimenting OX2L+ cells described above might be associated with this F4/80+ cell population. Accordingly, T-depleted, LPS-stimulated spleen cells were fractionated as above, and following separation into small (OX2L+: 3–4.5 mm/h sedimentation velocity) or large (OX2+: >6 mm/h sedimentation velocity) cells, we labeled the cell population with PE anti-F4/80 Ab (~10% cells were stained) and used anti-PE magnetic bead separation to recover F4/80+ and F4/80- cells. Medium-size cells (with fewer OX2L+ cells; see Fig. 2Go) showed ~18% staining with F4/80; large cells showed negligible staining (<4%) with F4/80 Ab (data not shown). All cell populations were then tested as in Table IGo for their ability to inhibit the response of C3H responder cells stimulated with C57BL/6 stimulator cells, in the presence or absence of additional OX2:Fc. Data for one of two such studies are shown in Table IIGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. F4/80+, slow-sedimenting (3–4.5 mm/h), LPS-stimulated spleen cells stimulated in the presence of OX2:Fc provide optimal inhibition of CTL and type 1 cytokine production in vitro1

 
As already shown in Table IGo, inhibition from large (OX2+) cells is independent of exogenous addition of OX2:Fc. In contrast, no inhibition was seen using small cells until OX2:Fc was added, when this population (containing OX2L+ cells) was the optimally inhibitory pool. More important, the F4/80+ in this OX2L+ small cell population was the most active for suppression in the context of exogenous OX2:Fc, with little such activity present in the small cell, F4/80- population.

Suppression by OX2L+ cells follows direct allorecognition of MHC-incompatible APC

In vitro, slow-sedimenting cells from LPS-stimulated C57BL/6 T-depleted spleen cultures (OX2L+) can be used, following engagement of OX2:Fc, to inhibit the response of C3H responder cells stimulated to recognize C57BL/6 alloantigen. To assess whether the inhibition reflects a suppressive function following engagement by OX2:Fc by OX2L+ cells that leads these cells to inhibit bystander immune responses (e.g., to third-party Ags), we performed the following study. Inhibition of B10.BR anti-B10, B10 anti-B10.BR, or third-party B10.BR anti-B10.D2 alloresponses was assessed using culture systems analogous to those shown in Table IGo, in which the inhibitory population (of OX2L+ cells) used was the slow-sedimenting pool obtained from T-depleted, LPS-stimulated, B10.Sgn spleen cells. Data for one of two such studies are shown in Table IIIGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Inhibition of CTL induction by slow-sedimenting (3–4.5 mm/h) LPS-stimulated spleen cells in the presence of OX2:Fc depends upon their being MHC-matched with allo-stimulatory DC

 
It is clear from these data that while exogenous OX2:Fc inhibits CTL and cytokine production in all the allorecognition combinations used, addition of slow-sedimenting B10 (OX2L+) cells increased this inhibition only when responder T cells simultaneously recognized the same (B10) cells. Bystander inhibition of a third-party (B10.BR anti-B10.D2) response by OX2L+ cells did not occur, nor indeed was inhibition seen when OX2L+ cells were MHC compatible with the responder cell pool (B10 anti-B10.BR combination). Thus, it seems the inhibitory signal delivered by OX2L+ cells follows from their direct recognition, by responder T cells, in this case by MHC-directed TCRs on responder cells.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Unresponsiveness to donor renal allografts following Ag-specific pv pre- or peritransplant immunization is associated with the preferential activation of type 2 rather than type 1 cytokine-producing cells (23, 27). T cell activation depends not just upon the delivery of signals via the TCR (generally in the form of Ag-MHC), but also on the appropriate delivery of costimulatory signals from APCs (28), along with the cytokine milieu in which stimulation occurs. We (4, 6, 7) and others (29) have also reported evidence that implicated another molecule, OX2, in the regulation of alloresponsiveness, and more particularly in the regulation of graft rejection following pv immunization (4). More recently, we confirmed, using species-specific mAbs to human, rat, or mouse OX2, that mAbs to OX2 detected on the surface of host DC may play a role in regulating cytokine production after allostimulation in vitro (19); this activity was seen using F(ab')2 anti-OX2 reagents (R. M. G., in preparation).

Functional blockade of OX2 expression led to increased IL-2 production (a type 1 cytokine) after allostimulation (19). Moreover, functional blockade of OX2 expression from the time of transplantation abolished prolongation of graft survival following pv immunization (4, 6). In other experiments using an immunoadhesin prepared by genetic fusion of OX2 to a murine IgG2a Fc region (1), we reported data suggesting that a major regulatory signal from OX2 was delivered during the initiation phase of the immune response. Because OX2 itself lacks any signaling motifs in its intracellular domain(s), and docking sites for adapter signaling molecules (25), we had hypothesized that a ligand-bearing cell (hereafter referred to as OX2L+) would be most relevant for immunoregulation following increased OX2 expression (1, 4). The current studies have examined this possibility, and provide data for the existence of several OX2L+ cell populations, one of which has potent immunosuppressive properties after admixture with OX2:Fc itself. Note that the OX2:Fc molecule used in our studies was derived from a construct using a mutant IgG2a molecule, lacking both the complement-binding domains and the Fc-binding domains. Thus, we consider it unlikely that binding by OX2:Fc is to Fc receptors on the cell surface. In addition, cells were preincubated with an excess of murine Ig to saturate such sites (see text). Finally, LPS-stimulated splenic DC, which also possess FC receptors, do not bind OX2:Fc (see Fig. 1Go).

It is important to note that there is a previous report that an OX2 ligand-bearing population was present in a macrophage cell preparation (18). In these studies, in a fashion somewhat similar to that described above, a soluble chimeric protein with the extracellular domains of OX2 engineered onto domains (3 + 4) of rat CD4 Ag was used to screen for an OX2-binding cell population. There was no evidence for the presence of OX2-binding cells in the T cell populations studied in this study, which is in contradistinction to the data above (see Fig. 1Go). It must be acknowledged, however, that there are no data existing concerning the identity of the ligand for OX2 on the surface of these different cell populations, which in itself may contribute to unique functional properties in these different cells. Moreover, the very existence of a receptor, with an immunoregulatory role, for OX2 on such a high percentage of activated {gamma}{delta}TCR+ cells is consistent with much earlier data from this laboratory concerning the potential role for such cells in regulation of transplant rejection following pv immunization (20).

In studies of the adoptive transfer of increased graft survival in mice pretreated with donor-specific alloantigen infusion via the pv (a process that leads to up-regulation of OX2 expression on DC (4)), we reported that an F4/80+ adherent spleen cell population was associated with the suppression of graft rejection. Similarly, Streilein et al. (26) have reported that F4/80+ cells are implicated in adoptive transfer of tolerance following Ag infusion into the anterior chamber of the eye. F4/80+ cells were found in the slow-sedimenting pool of cells found after LPS stimulation of T-depleted spleen cells. By further purification of these OX2L+ cells into F4/80+ and F4/80- cells, we have been able to show that the inhibition of alloresponses seen using OX2L+ cells mixed with OX2:Fc can be accounted for by the F4/80+ cell pool (see Table IIGo).

One could envisage a model in which following OX2 engagement of OX2L on the surface of F4/80+ cells, the latter become nonspecifically suppressive (e.g., by release of cytokines) to T cells activated in their vicinity. However, the data shown in Table IIIGo argue against such a model. In this study, we show that using a B10-suppressive cell pool (OX2L+), the suppression of alloimmunity seen is directed to T cells recognizing the alloantigen expressed on those OX2L+ cells. Even responses using responder cells, MHC compatible with the OX2L+, F4/80+ inhibitory cells are unaffected, as are third-party immune responses. We conclude that T responder cells are down-regulated following direct cell:cell MHC-restricted recognition of the inhibitory OX2L+ cells. In the case of immunity to nominal Ag (rather than alloantigen), we suggest that the OX2L+ cell must itself present the Ag to the responder lymphocyte in order for the latter to receive its tolerizing signal. This mechanism presumably represents a necessary safeguard to ensure that this form of immunotolerance does not cause bystander nonspecific immunosuppression in the individual.

There has been considerable interest in the heterogeneity of DC and the significance of this to immunization/tolerance induction. DC are heterogeneous in terms of origin, cell surface phenotype, turnover in vivo, and possibly function (30, 31). It is known that the induction of immunity (vs tolerance) following Ag presentation is dependent upon the coexistence of other signaling ligands at the surface of DC (interacting with appropriate counterligands on the surface of other cells (e.g., stimulated T cells)) (32, 33, 34). Thus, CD80, CD86, and CD40 are all implicated as costimulator molecules in transplantation (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). From studies focusing on a role for the molecule OX2 in induction of unresponsiveness, we concluded that discrete populations of DC preferentially expressing OX2 were uniquely capable of inducing tolerance to mouse allograft tissue/organs (7). The data shown above add further complexity to this model. We now suggest that a distinct population of cells, expressing OX2L, are themselves ultimately engaged in the delivery of key immunoregulatory signals following engagement (by OX2) on the cell surface. Interestingly, in a recent study, Vremec et al. (35) have described a novel CD4+ DC that also expresses F4/80, as a component of a so-called lymphocyte-derived DC pool, a population previously thought to be implicated in tolerance induction. No function was described for this population in this study, and it remains to be assessed whether this F4/80+ population is the OX2L+ cell we have described in this study. The potential role manipulation of such OX2+/OX2L+ cells has for transplantation, autoimmunity, and other diseases of perturbed immunoregulation remains to be determined.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by Medical Research Council grant to R.M.G. (MT-14678). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R. Gorczynski, CCRW 2-855, The Toronto Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Ontario, Canada. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: pv, portal vein; DC, dendritic cell; PLN, peripheral lymph node; PP, Peyer’s patch. Back

Received for publication May 18, 2000. Accepted for publication August 1, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gorczynski, R. M., M. S. Cattral, Z. G. Chen, J. A. Hu, J. Lei, W. P. Min, G. Yu, J. Ni. 1999. An immunoadhesin incorporating the molecule OX-2 is a potent immunosuppressant that prolongs allo- and xenograft survival. J. Immunol. 163:1654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gorczynski, R. M., W. Holmes. 1991. Specific manipulation of immunity to skin grafts bearing multiple minor histocompatibility differences. Immunol. Lett. 27:163.[Medline]
  3. Gorczynski, R. M., Z. Chen, S. Chung, Z. Cohen, G. Levy, B. Sullivan, X.-M. Fu. 1994. Prolongation of rat small bowel or renal allograft survival by pretransplant transfusion and/or by varying the route of allograft venous drainage. Transplantation 58:816.[Medline]
  4. Gorczynski, R. M., Z. Chen, X. M. Fu, H. Zeng. 1998. Increased expression of the novel molecule Ox-2 is involved in prolongation of murine renal allograft survival. Transplantation 65:1106.[Medline]
  5. Barclay, A. N.. 1981. Different reticular elements in rat lymphoid tissue identified by localization of Ia, Thy-1 and MRC OX-2 antigens. Immunology 44:727.[Medline]
  6. Gorczynski, R. M., Z. Cohen, X. M. Fu, J. Lei. 1999. Anti-rat OX-2 blocks increased small intestinal transplant survival after portal vein immunization. Transplant. Proc. 31:577.[Medline]
  7. Gorczynski, L., Z. Chen, J. Hu, G. Kai, V. Ramakrishna, R. M. Gorczynski. 1999. Evidence that an OX-2 positive cell can inhibit the stimulation of type-1 cytokine production by bone-marrow-derived B7-1 (and B7-2) positive dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 162:774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Forster, E., W. Krenger, J. Joergensen, R. Hof, R. S. Geha, G. A. Hollander. 1999. Contribution of CD40-CD154-mediated costimulation to an alloresponse in vivo. Transplantation 67:1284.[Medline]
  9. Lespagnard, L., P. Mettens, T. DeSmedt, H. Bazin, J. Urbain, O. Leo, M. Moser. 1998. The immune response induced in vivo by dendritic cells is dependent on B7-1 or B7-2, but the inhibition of both signals does not lead to tolerance. Int. Immunol. 10:295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Walunas, T. L., J. A. Bluestone. 1998. CTLA-4 regulates tolerance induction and T cell differentiation in vivo. J. Immunol. 160:3855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Walunas, T. L., A. I. Sperling, R. Khattri, C. B. Thompson, J. A. Bluestone. 1996. CD28 expression is not essential for positive and negative selection of thymocytes or peripheral T cell tolerance. J. Immunol. 156:1006.[Abstract]
  12. Hancock, W. W., M. H. Sayegh, X. G. Zheng, R. Peach, P. S. Linsley, L. A. Turka. 1996. Costimulatory function and expression of CD40 ligand, CD80, and CD86 in vascularized murine cardiac allograft rejection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Freeman, G. J., V. A. Boussiotis, A. Anumanthan, G. M. Bernstein, X. Y. Ke, P. D. Rennert, G. S. Gray, J. G. Gribben, L. M. Nadler. 1995. B7-1 and B7-2 do not deliver identical costimulatory signals, since B7-2 but not B7-1 preferentially costimulates the initial production of IL-4. Immunity 2:523.[Medline]
  14. Kuchroo, V. K., M. P. Das, J. A. Brown, A. M. Ranger, S. S. Zamvil, A. Sobel, H. L. Weiner, N. Nabavi, L. H. Glimcher. 1995. B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecules activate differentially the Th1/Th2 developmental pathways: application to autoimmune disease therapy. Cell 80:707.[Medline]
  15. Emtage, P. C. R., Y. H. Wan, J. L. Bramson, F. L. Graham, J. Gauldie. 1998. A double recombinant adenovirus expressing the costimulatory molecule B7-1 (murine) and human IL-2 induces complete tumor regression in a murine breast adenocarcinoma model. J. Immunol. 160:2531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Imro, M. A., P. Dellabona, S. Manici, S. Heltai, G. Consogno, M. Bellone, C. Rugarli, M. P. Protti. 1998. Human melanoma cells transfected with the B7-2 co-stimulatory molecule induce tumor-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro. Hum. Gene Ther. 9:1335.[Medline]
  17. Osman, G. E., S. Cheunsuk, S. E. Allen, E. M. Chi, H. D. Liggitt, L. E. Hood, W. C. Ladiges. 1998. Expression of a type II collagen-specific TCR transgene accelerates the onset of arthritis in mice. Int. Immunol. 10:1613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Preston, S., G. J. Wright, K. Starr, A. N. Barclay, M. H. Brown. 1997. The leukocyte/neuron cell surface antigen OX2 binds to a ligand on macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:1911.[Medline]
  19. Ragheb, R., S. Abrahams, R. Beecroft, J. Hu, J. Ni, V. Ramakrishna, G. Yu, R. M. Gorczynski. 1999. Preparation and functional properties of monoclonal antibodies to human, mouse and rat OX-2. Immunol. Lett. 68:311.[Medline]
  20. Gorczynski, R. M.. 1994. Adoptive transfer of unresponsiveness to allogeneic skin grafts with hepatic {gamma}{delta}+ T cells. Immunology 81:27.[Medline]
  21. McLaren, A. J., S. E. Marshall, N. A. Haldar, C. G. Mullighan, S. V. Fuggle, P. J. Morris, K. I. Welsh. 1999. Adhesion molecule polymorphisms in chronic renal allograft failure. Kidney Int. 55:1977.[Medline]
  22. Fabrega, E., J. Crespo, F. Casafont, J. Delapena, G. Delasheras, J. A. Amado, F. Ponsromero. 1995. Endothelin-1 and vascular complications in liver transplantation. Transplantation 59:1748.[Medline]
  23. Gorczynski, R. M.. 1992. Immunosuppression induced by hepatic portal venous immunization spares reactivity in IL-4 producing T lymphocytes. Immunol. Lett. 33:67.[Medline]
  24. Miller, R. G., R. A. Phillips. 1969. The separation of cells by velocity sedimentation. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 73:191.
  25. Chen, Z., H. Zeng, R. M. Gorczynski. 1997. Cloning and characterization of the murine homologue of the rat/human MRC OX-2 gene. BBA Mol. Basis Dis. 1362:6.
  26. Streilein, J. W., M. Takeuchi, A. W. Taylor. 1997. Immune privilege, T-cell tolerance, and tissue-restricted autoimmunity. Hum. Immunol. 52:138.[Medline]
  27. Gorczynski, R. M., N. Hozumi, S. W. Wolfe, Z. Chen. 1995. Interleukin-12, in combination with anti-interleukin-10, reverses graft prolongation after portal venous immunization. Transplantation 60:1337.[Medline]
  28. Schwartz, R. H.. 1996. Models of T cell anergy: is there a common molecular mechanism?. J. Exp. Med. 184:1.[Free Full Text]
  29. Borriello, F., J. Lederer, S. Scott, A. H. Sharpe. 1997. MRC OX-2 defines a novel T cell costimulatory pathway. J. Immunol. 158:4549.
  30. Salomon, B., J. L. Cohen, C. Masurier, D. Klatzmann. 1998. Three populations of mouse lymph node dendritic cells with different origins and dynamics. J. Immunol. 160:708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Leenen, P. J. M., K. Radosevic, J. S. A. Voerman, B. Salomon, N. vanRooijen, D. Klatzmann, W. vanEwijk. 1998. Heterogeneity of mouse spleen dendritic cells: in vivo phagocytic activity, expression of macrophage markers, and subpopulation turnover. J. Immunol. 160:2166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Larsen, C. P., S. C. Ritchie, R. Hendrix, P. S. Linsley, K. S. Hathcock, R. J. Hodes, R. P. Lowry, T. C. Pearson. 1994. Regulation of immunostimulatory function and costimulatory molecule (B7-1 and B7-2) expression on murine dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 152:5208.[Abstract]
  33. Lenschow, D. J., T. L. Walunas, J. A. Bluestone. 1996. CD28/B7 system of T cell costimulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:233.[Medline]
  34. Larsen, C. P., T. C. Pearson. 1997. The CD40 pathway in allograft rejection, acceptance, and tolerance. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:641.[Medline]
  35. Vremec, D., J. Pooley, H. Hochrein, L. Wu, K. Shortman. 2000. CD4 and CD8 expression by dendritic cell subtypes in mouse thymus and spleen. J. Immunol. 164:2978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. M. Gorczynski, Z. Chen, W. He, I. Khatri, Y. Sun, K. Yu, and I. Boudakov
Expression of a CD200 Transgene Is Necessary for Induction but Not Maintenance of Tolerance to Cardiac and Skin Allografts
J. Immunol., August 1, 2009; 183(3): 1560 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
S. A. R. Rezaee, C. Cunningham, A. J. Davison, and D. J. Blackbourn
Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus immune modulation: an overview
J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2006; 87(7): 1781 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. C. Jenmalm, H. Cherwinski, E. P. Bowman, J. H. Phillips, and J. D. Sedgwick
Regulation of Myeloid Cell Function through the CD200 Receptor
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 191 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
D.-X. Chen, H. He, and R. M. Gorczynski
Synthetic peptides from the N-terminal regions of CD200 and CD200R1 modulate immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects of CD200-CD200R1 interaction
Int. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 17(3): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Taylor, K. McConnachie, C. Calder, R. Dawson, A. Dick, J. D. Sedgwick, and J. Liversidge
Enhanced Tolerance to Autoimmune Uveitis in CD200-Deficient Mice Correlates with a Pronounced Th2 Switch in Response to Antigen Challenge
J. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 174(1): 143 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Gorczynski, Z. Chen, Y. Kai, L. Lee, S. Wong, and P. A. Marsden
CD200 Is a Ligand for All Members of the CD200R Family of Immunoregulatory Molecules
J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7744 - 7749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
D. Messmer, B. Messmer, and N. Chiorazzi
The global transcriptional maturation program and stimuli-specific gene expression profiles of human myeloid dendritic cells
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 15(4): 491 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Voisine, F.-X. Hubert, B. Trinite, M. Heslan, and R. Josien
Two Phenotypically Distinct Subsets of Spleen Dendritic Cells in Rats Exhibit Different Cytokine Production and T Cell Stimulatory Activity
J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2284 - 2291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. A. Clark, J.-W. Ding, G. Yu, G. A. Levy, and R. M. Gorczynski
Fgl2 prothrombinase expression in mouse trophoblast and decidua triggers abortion but may be countered by OX-2
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorczynski, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gorczynski, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS