|
|
||||||||


*
University Health Network, Toronto, Canada;
Departments of Surgery and Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; and
Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and Molecular Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and TNF-
compared with non-portal vein-immunized
control transplanted mice. The increased renal allograft survival and
the altered cytokine production are abolished by infusion of
anti-mouse OX2 mAb (3B6). Infusion of a soluble OX2:Fc
immunoadhesin can itself produce significant prolongation of xeno- and
allografts in mice. We have used FITC-conjugated OX2:Fc to characterize
cells expressing a ligand (OX2L) for OX2, and provide evidence that
subpopulations of LPS-stimulated splenic macrophages, Con A-activated
splenic T cells, and the majority (>80%) of 
TCR+ T
cells express this ligand. We show below that F4/80+,
OX2L+ splenic macrophages, admixed with OX2:Fc, represent a
potent immunosuppressive population capable of causing more profound
inhibition of alloreactivity in vitro or in vivo than that seen using
either OX2:Fc or OX2+ (or OX2L+) cells alone.
Immunoregulation by this OX2L+ population occurs in an
MHC-restricted fashion. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) in vitro and in vivo
(1). Because the intracellular domain of OX2 lacks
signaling motifs, or any docking sites for adapter molecules that might
engage an intracellular signaling cascade, we have suggested that these
and other data (7) are consistent with the idea that
engagement of the ligand of OX2 (OX2L) by OX2 may deliver key
immunoregulatory signals. T cells are activated after concomitant engagement of TCRs with Ag presented on APC in association with MHC molecules and the delivery of costimulatory signals resulting from the interaction of several ligand:coreceptor complexes (8, 9, 10, 11). Major positive costimulatory interactions include the following: CD40L with CD40, and CD28 with CD80/CD86; CTLA4 interactions with CD80/CD86 may deliver a negative signal (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Although positive costimulatory signals are clearly important in T cell triggering, blocking this costimulation alone, and/or facilitating signaling via CTLA4 has not reproducibly induced tolerance. This may reflect the need for other molecules (such as OX2) in active immunoregulation (4). In recent studies, we reported that DC expressing OX2 triggered an immunoregulatory function leading to increased allograft survival. Moreover, these cells were physically distinguishable from those DC with optimal allostimulatory capacity (7).
Early attempts to characterize a ligand for OX2 by Preston et al. (18) were performed by constructing a soluble chimeric protein with the extracellular domains of OX2 engineered onto domains 3 + 4 of rat CD4 Ag. The reagent was then complexed to fluorescent covaspheres to improve its ability to stain cells expressing OX2 ligand. These OX2 covaspheres were reported to bind to macrophages, but not other cell types. The specificity of the interaction was documented by inhibition studies using Fab of the OX2 mAb. Using site-directed mutagenesis, this group further reported results suggesting that the ligand-binding domain of OX2 was in the NH2-terminal domain of the extracellular region of OX2.
Using FITC-labeled OX2:Fc, we report below that a ligand for OX2 does
indeed exist on a subpopulation of LPS-stimulated splenic macrophages,
but not fresh splenic DC. Moreover, subpopulations of Con A-activated
ßTCR+ cells, and most

TCR+ cells, also bind FITC-OX2:Fc.
Admixture of OX2:Fc with the OX2L+ splenic
macrophage pool, followed either by in vivo infusion into renal
transplant recipients, or by addition in culture to freshly
allostimulated spleen responder cells produces profound inhibition of
allorecognition, greater than that seen using either OX2:Fc or
OX2+ (OX2L+) cells alone.
Cells producing this inhibition copurify with small cells expressing
the F4/80 surface marker, and inhibition occurs in an MHC-restricted
fashion. We conclude that optimal immunoregulation of transplant
rejection in vivo may depend in part upon signals delivered by receptor
cross-linking of an activated OX2L+ subpopulation
of F4/80+ splenic cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male C3H/HeJ, BALB/c, C57BL/6 and B10.Sgn, B10.BR, and B10.D2 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were housed five per cage and allowed food and water ad libitum. All mice were used at 812 wk of age.
Monoclonal Abs
The following mAbs were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego,
CA), unless stated otherwise: anti-IL-2 (S4B6; American Type
Culture Collection, Manassas, VA; biotinylated); anti-IL-4 (11B11;
American Type Culture Collection; biotinylated); anti-IFN-
(R4-6A2; American Type Culture Collection; biotinylated XMG1.2);
anti-IL-10 (JES5-2A5; biotinylated, SXC-1). PE anti-CD80, PE
anti-F4/80, FITC anti-
ßTCR, FITC anti-
TCR, L3T4
(anti-mouse CD4), anti-Thy-1.2, and anti-Ly-2.2 were
obtained from Cedarlane Labs (Hornby, Ontario, Canada). The
hybridoma-producing DEC205 (anti-mouse DC) was a kind gift from Dr.
R. Steinman (Rockefeller University), and was directly labeled with
FITC. F(ab')2 rabbit anti-rat IgG PE
conjugate (noncross-reactive with mouse IgG) was obtained from Serotec
(Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). PE rat anti-mouse OX2 (3B6) was
obtained from BioSpark (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada)
(19).
Streptavidin HRP and mouse rGM-CSF were purchased from PharMingen.
Preparation of cells
Single cell spleen and peripheral lymph node (PLN) suspensions
were prepared aseptically from individual mice in each experiment.
After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in
-MEM
supplemented with 2-ME and 10% FCS (
F10). Peyers patch (PP) cells
were used as a source of lymphocytes from which populations enriched
for 
TCR+ cells were obtained by adherence
for 90 min at 37°C to anti-
TCR Ab-coated plates
(20).
Fresh splenic DC were obtained as the nonadherent component of
overnight culture of plastic adherent spleen cells, while splenic
macrophages represented the persistently adherent pool
(21). In addition, bone marrow-derived DC were prepared in
vitro, as described elsewhere (22). Bone marrow cells were
pooled from 10 donors, treated with the mixture of Abs (L3T4,
anti-Thy-1.2, anti-Ly-2.2) and rabbit complement, and cultured
in 10 ml
F10 in tissue culture flasks, at a concentration of 2
x 106/ml with 500 U/ml murine rGM-CSF
(PharMingen). Fresh GM-CSF was added at 36-h intervals. Cells were
separated over lymphopaque on days 3.5 and 7 of culture, again
reculturing in
F10 with rGM-CSF. An aliquot of the sample stained at
10 days with FITC-conjugated DEC205 mAb showed a mean staining in the
order of 91% ± 8%. Remaining cells were washed, counted, and used as
stimulating cells in MLC (see Tables I-III), and as donor-specific
cells for pv immunization (below).
Skin transplantation
These procedures were performed essentially as described elsewhere (3, 23). When animals received donor-specific pv immunization, 10 x 106 bone marrow derived DC were infused 36 h before skin grafting. As noted in earlier publications, technical failures (due to hemorrhage) were <10%.
Cytotoxicity and cytokine assays
In cultures used to assess induction of cytotoxicity or cytokine
production, C3H responder cells were stimulated with equal numbers of
mitomycin C-treated (100 µg/ml, for 45 min at 37°C) spleen
stimulator cells in triplicate in
F10. Supernatants were pooled at
40 h from replicate wells and assayed in triplicate in ELISA for
lymphokine production, as described in detail elsewhere
(4), using cytokine capture Abs and enzyme-coupled
developing Abs, as indicated above. Recombinant cytokines for
standardization of assays were purchased from Genzyme (Cambridge, MA).
Each assay reliably quantified cytokine levels in the range 404000
pg/ml.
When cytotoxicity was measured, cells were harvested at 5 days and pooled from replicate wells, counted, and cultured at various E:T ratios with 51Cr-labeled 72-h spleen Con A blasts as target cells. Supernatants were sampled at 4 h for assessment of specific cytotoxicity.
Production and expression of an OX2:Fc fusion protein in a baculovirus expression system (1)
An immunoadhesin constructed to contain the extracellular domain of OX2, linked to a murine IgG2aFc region, was made as described elsewhere, and expressed using a Baculovirus Expression Vector System in Spodoptera frugiperda insect cells. This fusion protein inhibits type 1 cytokine production from T cells stimulated with allogeneic DC in vitro (1). One milligram of OX2:Fc was FITC labeled using conventional techniques.
Cell separation by biophysical means
Velocity sedimentation, a technique separating cells into populations of different size, was performed as described elsewhere (24), on splenic cells pretreated (24 h at 37°C) with LPS (1 µg/ml) at a concentration of 3 x 106 cells/ml. Cells were washed three times with medium before sedimentation. In some experiments, small (slow-sedimenting) cells were further fractionated, following labeling with PE anti-F4/80 mAb, using an anti-PE column. Recovery of F4/80+ and F4/80- cells was 75% and 90%, respectively (see individual experiments below).
Statistical analysis
For comparison of DC FACS staining, or cytokine production in different groups assayed in vitro, initial ANOVAs were performed, followed by pairwise comparison of relevant groups using a Student t test (see legends to figures/tables).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß
TCR+ cells
Twenty-four-hour LPS-stimulated fresh splenic macrophages and DC
were obtained from a pool of three C57BL/6 mice, while 72-h Con
A-activated PLN and PP cells were similarly prepared from a pool of
three other C57BL/6 donors. Cells were harvested, washed, preincubated
for 30 min at 4°C in PBS with 1% mouse serum, and thereafter stained
with various different fluorescent mAbs, as shown in Fig. 1
. As a control, cells were incubated
independently also with a FITC-coupled mouse MOPC173 IgG2a myeloma
(lower panels in figure). Data in Fig. 1
show the
FACS profiles from one of four such studies using these different cell
populations. In the upper panels, cells are shown stained
with FITC anti-TCR (anti-
ßTCR for PLN, anti-
TCR
for PP) or with PE anti-CD80 (splenic macrophages and DC).
|
ßTCR+ cells and splenic macrophages bound
the FITC-OX2:Fc, while no significant staining was seen with
LPS-activated splenic DC. A total of >80% of activated PP

TCR+ cells stained with FITC-OX2:Fc. When
similar studies were performed using resting cells (no LPS or Con A
activation), or in the presence of a 5-fold excess of unlabeled OX2:Fc,
no binding of FITC-OX2:Fc above control was seen for any cell
population (data not shown). In the work that follows, we have
concentrated on characterizing the population of splenic cells binding
FITC-OX2:Fc. Splenic cells binding FITC-OX2:Fc are physically distinguishable from OX2+ cells
It was intriguing to us that a DC-enriched cell population did not
bind FITC-OX2:Fc (Fig. 1
), while splenic macrophages did, because
earlier data had suggested the existence of an immunoregulatory
OX2+ DC that could modulate stimulation induced
by OX2- DC (7). Accordingly, we next asked whether
OX2+- and OX2:Fc-binding cells could be further
characterized. Forty-eight-hour LPS-stimulated, T-depleted, spleen
cells were subjected to fractionation by size using unit gravity
sedimentation techniques (24), and different cell
populations were incubated with FITC-OX2:Fc, PE (or FITC) anti-OX2,
and PE anti-CD80, again after first preincubation with mouse serum
(see above). Data shown in Fig. 2
indicate FITC-OX2:Fc+CD80+
cells, FITC-OX2:Fc-
CD80+ cells,
FITC-OX2:Fc+CD80-,
OX2+CD80+,
OX2+CD80-, and
OX2-CD80+ cells. No cells
were detected that bound both FITC-OX2:Fc and PE anti-OX2 (data not
shown).
|
Stimulation of OX2:Fc-binding cells with OX2:Fc delays graft rejection in vivo, and inhibits alloreactivity in vitro
Earlier studies have shown that along with an increase in graft
survival, infusion of OX2:Fc into grafted mice leads to a polarization
of cytokine production in lymphoid cells toward increased production of
IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-ß, with decreased production of IL-2, IFN-
,
and TNF-
. In vitro, incubation of allostimulated cells in the
presence of OX2:Fc led to inhibition of development of CTL in vitro,
decreased proliferation, and decreased production of the cytokines IL-2
and IFN-
(1). Because membrane-bound OX2 itself lacks
any significant signaling domains in the intracellular region
(25), we had earlier speculated that immunoregulation
occurred following engagement of OX2L on the receptor-bearing cell
(1, 4, 25). To investigate whether immunoregulation
induced in the presence of OX2:Fc was indeed enhanced by the presence
of OX2L+ cells, we performed the following
study.
Slow-sedimenting spleen cells (capable of binding FITC-OX2:Fc; see Fig. 2
) and fast-sedimenting (OX2+) cells were
obtained, as described above, from a pool of LPS-stimulated T-depleted
spleen cells from six C57BL/6 mice. A control population of cells
(intermediate sedimentation velocity <3% OX2+;
<4% binding of FITC-OX2:Fc) was harvested also. Groups of seven C3H
mice received C57BL/6 skin grafts, along with cells from these
different spleen pools, with or without infusion of OX2:Fc (10
µg/mouse; two doses only at 48-h intervals). Skin graft survival was
followed daily (see Fig. 3
).
|
|
). When used alone, the fast-sedimenting population of cells
(OX2+) caused some inhibition in the assays
measured. However, this was only modestly augmented by further addition
of soluble OX2:Fc (percentage of change from group with no OX2:Fc, 58%
for CTL, p < 0.05; 46% for cytokines,
p > 0.05). In contrast, cells from the
slow-sedimenting spleen pool (which bind FITC-OX2:Fc) produced little
inhibition of CTL/cytokine activity by themselves, but caused profound
inhibition in both assays in the presence of additional OX2:Fc (see
Table ISuppressive activity in splenic cells binding FITC-OX2:Fc resides in F4/80+ cells
In an earlier study, we had found that following pv immunization,
adoptive transfer of inhibition of alloresponses was possible using an
F4/80+ cell population (20).
Similarly, in a model of immune deviation following Ag inoculation to
the anterior chamber of the eye, inhibition was adoptively transferred
by F4/80+ cells (26). We speculated
that the inhibition seen using the pool of slow-sedimenting
OX2L+ cells described above might be associated
with this F4/80+ cell population. Accordingly,
T-depleted, LPS-stimulated spleen cells were fractionated as above, and
following separation into small (OX2L+: 34.5
mm/h sedimentation velocity) or large (OX2+: >6
mm/h sedimentation velocity) cells, we labeled the cell population with
PE anti-F4/80 Ab (
10% cells were stained) and used anti-PE
magnetic bead separation to recover F4/80+ and
F4/80- cells. Medium-size cells (with fewer
OX2L+ cells; see Fig. 2
) showed
18% staining
with F4/80; large cells showed negligible staining (<4%) with F4/80
Ab (data not shown). All cell populations were then tested as in Table I
for their ability to inhibit the response of C3H responder cells
stimulated with C57BL/6 stimulator cells, in the presence or absence of
additional OX2:Fc. Data for one of two such studies are shown in Table II
.
|
Suppression by OX2L+ cells follows direct allorecognition of MHC-incompatible APC
In vitro, slow-sedimenting cells from LPS-stimulated C57BL/6
T-depleted spleen cultures (OX2L+) can be used,
following engagement of OX2:Fc, to inhibit the response of C3H
responder cells stimulated to recognize C57BL/6 alloantigen. To assess
whether the inhibition reflects a suppressive function following
engagement by OX2:Fc by OX2L+ cells that leads
these cells to inhibit bystander immune responses (e.g., to third-party
Ags), we performed the following study. Inhibition of B10.BR
anti-B10, B10 anti-B10.BR, or third-party B10.BR
anti-B10.D2 alloresponses was assessed using culture systems
analogous to those shown in Table I
, in which the inhibitory population
(of OX2L+ cells) used was the slow-sedimenting
pool obtained from T-depleted, LPS-stimulated, B10.Sgn spleen cells.
Data for one of two such studies are shown in Table III
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional blockade of OX2 expression led to increased IL-2 production
(a type 1 cytokine) after allostimulation (19). Moreover,
functional blockade of OX2 expression from the time of transplantation
abolished prolongation of graft survival following pv immunization
(4, 6). In other experiments using an immunoadhesin
prepared by genetic fusion of OX2 to a murine IgG2a Fc region
(1), we reported data suggesting that a major regulatory
signal from OX2 was delivered during the initiation phase of the immune
response. Because OX2 itself lacks any signaling motifs in its
intracellular domain(s), and docking sites for adapter signaling
molecules (25), we had hypothesized that a ligand-bearing
cell (hereafter referred to as OX2L+) would be
most relevant for immunoregulation following increased OX2 expression
(1, 4). The current studies have examined this
possibility, and provide data for the existence of several
OX2L+ cell populations, one of which has potent
immunosuppressive properties after admixture with OX2:Fc itself. Note
that the OX2:Fc molecule used in our studies was derived from a
construct using a mutant IgG2a molecule, lacking both the
complement-binding domains and the Fc-binding domains. Thus, we
consider it unlikely that binding by OX2:Fc is to Fc receptors on the
cell surface. In addition, cells were preincubated with an excess of
murine Ig to saturate such sites (see text). Finally, LPS-stimulated
splenic DC, which also possess FC receptors, do not bind OX2:Fc (see
Fig. 1
).
It is important to note that there is a previous report that an OX2
ligand-bearing population was present in a macrophage cell preparation
(18). In these studies, in a fashion somewhat similar to
that described above, a soluble chimeric protein with the extracellular
domains of OX2 engineered onto domains (3 + 4) of rat CD4 Ag was used
to screen for an OX2-binding cell population. There was no evidence for
the presence of OX2-binding cells in the T cell populations studied in
this study, which is in contradistinction to the data above (see Fig. 1
). It must be acknowledged, however, that there are no data existing
concerning the identity of the ligand for OX2 on the surface of these
different cell populations, which in itself may contribute to unique
functional properties in these different cells. Moreover, the very
existence of a receptor, with an immunoregulatory role, for OX2 on such
a high percentage of activated 
TCR+ cells
is consistent with much earlier data from this laboratory concerning
the potential role for such cells in regulation of transplant rejection
following pv immunization (20).
In studies of the adoptive transfer of increased graft survival in mice
pretreated with donor-specific alloantigen infusion via the pv (a
process that leads to up-regulation of OX2 expression on DC
(4)), we reported that an F4/80+
adherent spleen cell population was associated with the suppression of
graft rejection. Similarly, Streilein et al. (26) have
reported that F4/80+ cells are implicated in
adoptive transfer of tolerance following Ag infusion into the anterior
chamber of the eye. F4/80+ cells were found in
the slow-sedimenting pool of cells found after LPS stimulation of
T-depleted spleen cells. By further purification of these
OX2L+ cells into F4/80+ and
F4/80- cells, we have been able to show that the
inhibition of alloresponses seen using OX2L+
cells mixed with OX2:Fc can be accounted for by the
F4/80+ cell pool (see Table II
).
One could envisage a model in which following OX2 engagement of OX2L on
the surface of F4/80+ cells, the latter become
nonspecifically suppressive (e.g., by release of cytokines) to T cells
activated in their vicinity. However, the data shown in Table III
argue
against such a model. In this study, we show that using a
B10-suppressive cell pool (OX2L+), the
suppression of alloimmunity seen is directed to T cells recognizing the
alloantigen expressed on those OX2L+ cells. Even
responses using responder cells, MHC compatible with the
OX2L+, F4/80+ inhibitory
cells are unaffected, as are third-party immune responses. We conclude
that T responder cells are down-regulated following direct cell:cell
MHC-restricted recognition of the inhibitory
OX2L+ cells. In the case of immunity to nominal
Ag (rather than alloantigen), we suggest that the
OX2L+ cell must itself present the Ag to the
responder lymphocyte in order for the latter to receive its tolerizing
signal. This mechanism presumably represents a necessary safeguard to
ensure that this form of immunotolerance does not cause bystander
nonspecific immunosuppression in the individual.
There has been considerable interest in the heterogeneity of DC and the significance of this to immunization/tolerance induction. DC are heterogeneous in terms of origin, cell surface phenotype, turnover in vivo, and possibly function (30, 31). It is known that the induction of immunity (vs tolerance) following Ag presentation is dependent upon the coexistence of other signaling ligands at the surface of DC (interacting with appropriate counterligands on the surface of other cells (e.g., stimulated T cells)) (32, 33, 34). Thus, CD80, CD86, and CD40 are all implicated as costimulator molecules in transplantation (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). From studies focusing on a role for the molecule OX2 in induction of unresponsiveness, we concluded that discrete populations of DC preferentially expressing OX2 were uniquely capable of inducing tolerance to mouse allograft tissue/organs (7). The data shown above add further complexity to this model. We now suggest that a distinct population of cells, expressing OX2L, are themselves ultimately engaged in the delivery of key immunoregulatory signals following engagement (by OX2) on the cell surface. Interestingly, in a recent study, Vremec et al. (35) have described a novel CD4+ DC that also expresses F4/80, as a component of a so-called lymphocyte-derived DC pool, a population previously thought to be implicated in tolerance induction. No function was described for this population in this study, and it remains to be assessed whether this F4/80+ population is the OX2L+ cell we have described in this study. The potential role manipulation of such OX2+/OX2L+ cells has for transplantation, autoimmunity, and other diseases of perturbed immunoregulation remains to be determined.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R. Gorczynski, CCRW 2-855, The Toronto Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Ontario, Canada. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: pv, portal vein; DC, dendritic cell; PLN, peripheral lymph node; PP, Peyers patch. ![]()
Received for publication May 18, 2000. Accepted for publication August 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|

+ T cells. Immunology 81:27.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Gorczynski, Z. Chen, W. He, I. Khatri, Y. Sun, K. Yu, and I. Boudakov Expression of a CD200 Transgene Is Necessary for Induction but Not Maintenance of Tolerance to Cardiac and Skin Allografts J. Immunol., August 1, 2009; 183(3): 1560 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. R. Rezaee, C. Cunningham, A. J. Davison, and D. J. Blackbourn Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus immune modulation: an overview J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2006; 87(7): 1781 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Jenmalm, H. Cherwinski, E. P. Bowman, J. H. Phillips, and J. D. Sedgwick Regulation of Myeloid Cell Function through the CD200 Receptor J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 191 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-X. Chen, H. He, and R. M. Gorczynski Synthetic peptides from the N-terminal regions of CD200 and CD200R1 modulate immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects of CD200-CD200R1 interaction Int. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 17(3): 289 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Taylor, K. McConnachie, C. Calder, R. Dawson, A. Dick, J. D. Sedgwick, and J. Liversidge Enhanced Tolerance to Autoimmune Uveitis in CD200-Deficient Mice Correlates with a Pronounced Th2 Switch in Response to Antigen Challenge J. Immunol., January 1, 2005; 174(1): 143 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gorczynski, Z. Chen, Y. Kai, L. Lee, S. Wong, and P. A. Marsden CD200 Is a Ligand for All Members of the CD200R Family of Immunoregulatory Molecules J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7744 - 7749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Messmer, B. Messmer, and N. Chiorazzi The global transcriptional maturation program and stimuli-specific gene expression profiles of human myeloid dendritic cells Int. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 15(4): 491 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Voisine, F.-X. Hubert, B. Trinite, M. Heslan, and R. Josien Two Phenotypically Distinct Subsets of Spleen Dendritic Cells in Rats Exhibit Different Cytokine Production and T Cell Stimulatory Activity J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2284 - 2291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Clark, J.-W. Ding, G. Yu, G. A. Levy, and R. M. Gorczynski Fgl2 prothrombinase expression in mouse trophoblast and decidua triggers abortion but may be countered by OX-2 Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |