|
|
||||||||



*
Department of Medical Microbiology, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland;
Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021; and
North Shore Hospital System, Manhassett, NY 11030
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and 1ß (MIP-1
and
MIP-1ß) by PBMCs from HTLV-II-infected and HTLV-II/HIV-1-coinfected
individuals. We observed spontaneous production of significant levels
of MIP-1
and -1ß and, to a lesser extent, RANTES, from individuals
infected with HTLV-II alone or with concomitant HIV-1 infection.
Spontaneous C-C chemokine production was not observed in PBMCs from
uninfected or HIV-1-infected individuals. Although HTLV-II is known to
preferentially infect CD8+ lymphocytes in vivo, we observed
that whereas RANTES was produced exclusively by the
CD8+-enriched fraction, MIP-1
and -1ß were produced by
both the CD8+-enriched and CD8+-depleted
fractions of HTLV-II-infected PBMCs. RT-PCR demonstrated active
expression of the HTLV-II regulatory protein Tax in the infected
CD8+ T lymphocyte population, and it was further shown that
Tax transactivates the promoters of MIP-1ß and RANTES. Therefore, it
appears that HTLV-II stimulates the production of C-C chemokines both
directly at a transcriptional level via the viral transactivator Tax
and also indirectly. Although the HTLV-II-infected individuals in this
study are all virtually asymptomatic, they certainly display an
abnormal immune phenotype. Moreover, our findings suggest that HTLV-II,
via chemokine production, would be expected to alter the progression of
HIV-1 infection in coinfected individuals. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and
MIP-1ß (5, 6, 7). These chemokines are the natural ligands
for receptors that are necessary for HIV-1 entry, and a number of
independent studies have clearly demonstrated that they can both
suppress infection by macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) HIV-1 strains and
enhance infection by T cell-tropic strains (6, 8, 9, 10, 11).
Moreover, it has been suggested that overproduction of the C-C
chemokines may actually protect individuals from infection by M-tropic
strains of HIV-1. Specifically, it has been shown that certain
individuals who have been clearly exposed to HIV-1, yet who have
remained uninfected, produce high levels of the C-C chemokines
(8, 10, 12). Although the majority of in vitro studies have attempted to investigate the relationship between HTLV-I and HIV-1 coinfections, concomitant infections with HIV-1 and HTLV-II are of much greater clinical significance as it has been shown that as many as 30% of all IVDUs in urban areas of North America are coinfected (13, 14, 15, 16). The influence of HTLV-II infection on HIV-1 has not been extensively evaluated, and epidemiological studies have failed to agree upon what, if any, influence HTLV-II might have on HIV-1 disease progression (17, 18, 19, 20). In this report we describe the results of studies to investigate the immunological features of HTLV-II infection and to analyze mechanisms whereby HTLV-II could potentially influence infection with and the progression of HIV-1 in vivo. Specifically, we have analyzed spontaneous C-C chemokine production by unstimulated PBMCs from HTLV-II-infected individuals and have investigated possible molecular mechanisms involved.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patient population examined in this study included the
following: nine individuals with HTLV-II infection, three with HIV-1
infection, four with HTLV-II and HIV-1 coinfection, and seven normal
donors. All of the HIV-1 singly infected individuals, all of the
HTLV-II-infected individuals, and two of the dually infected
individuals were from the New York City Metropolitan area. Two of the
dually infected individuals were from Sao Paolo, Brazil. Further
details of the patient population are seen in Table I
. Venous blood samples were obtained
from each individual after proper informed consent was obtained.
|
PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll-Hypaque and cultured at a density of 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS in the absence of any additional stimulation. PBMCs from uninfected individuals were also cultured in the presence of PHA (0.005 mg/ml). Cultures were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 36 h. Viable cells were counted again and then collected by centrifugation.
Chemokine ELISAs and statistical testing
Cell-free culture medium was collected at 36 h and assayed
for MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, and RANTES. Assays were performed using
Quantinkine Immunoassays (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) following the
manufacturers instructions. Each sample was assayed in triplicate.
Data were analyzed for statistical significance using Students
t test.
CD8+ cell population separations and culture
CD8+ T lymphocytes were separated from PBMCs using magnetic beads coated with anti-CD8+ Abs (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). Cells were bound to the beads at 4°C for 60 min and then washed five times according to the manufacturers instructions. Selected CD8+ cells were cultured in the presence of the beads. All cells were cultured at a density of 106 cells/ml using the same conditions as for PBMC cultures.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from 23 x 106 cells using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), a typical guanidine isothiocyanate RNA isolation reagent, according to the manufacturers instructions. Total RNA was treated with 1 U of DNase I (amplification grade; Life Technologies) before cDNA synthesis. First strand cDNA was reverse transcribed using an oligo dT primer and the SuperScript Preamplification System (Life Technologies). Two microliters of the resultant RT product were used as template for Tax and ß-actin PCRs. Primers for the amplification of Tax were as follows, TR101 5'-TTCCYAGGRTTTGGACAGAG-3' and TR102 5'-GGGTAAGGACCTTGAGGGTC-3'. Primers for the ß-actin PCR were as follows, ß-actin forward 5'-TTGCTGATCCACATCTGCTG-3' and ß-actin reverse 5'-GCATCCACGAAACTACCTTC-3'. All PCRs were 25-µl reactions containing 800 pM each primer, 200 mM each dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.3, and 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Emeryville, CA). The PCR cycles were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 amplification cycles of 40 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 40 s at 72°C, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.
Transactivation assays
Luciferase reporter assays were performed by transiently transfecting COS-7 cells with an HTLV-II subtype B Tax construct and a chemokine promoter-luciferase reporter construct. The RANTES promoter was cloned into pGL2-Basic Vector (Promega, Madison, WI) (provided by A. Krensky, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA). The MIP-1ß promoter (provided by W.J. Leonard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) was subcloned into pGL3-Basic Vector (Promega). HTLV-II subtype B Tax was cloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pCAGGS. Six-centimeter dishes of cells were transfected with 3 µg of the Tax2B plasmid or control vector and 2 µg of the luciferase reporter plasmid with 10 µl Lipofectamine (Life Technologies). Cells were lysed after 48 h and assayed for luciferase activity using Promegas Luciferase Assay System. Each transfection experiment was repeated three times.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, MIP-1ß, and RANTES. Results are summarized in
Table II
than normal donor
PBMCs (p < 0.025 and p <
0.05, respectively) (Fig. 1
and -1ß (Fig. 1
|
|
and -1ß were produced at relatively equal levels by both
lymphocyte fractions (Fig. 2
and RANTES primarily in the CD8+-depleted
fraction, whereas MIP-1ß is only present in slightly higher levels in
the depleted fraction relative to the
CD8+-enriched fraction. The observation that
chemokine production in HTLV-II infection differs from that in
stimulated normal lymphocytes suggests that the production of C-C
chemokines at least in the CD8+ T lymphocyte
population is a direct result of HTLV-II infection as opposed to a
physiological response to chronic viral infection. In fact, in one of
the HTLV-II-infected individuals examined, production of all three
chemokines occurred exclusively in the
CD8+-enriched fraction.
|
|
promoter
as this promoter has not been cloned. However, it seems likely that the
MIP-1
promoter may also be directly responsive to Tax based on the
observations of Baba et al. (5), who reported that
MIP-1
mRNA is detectable in as little as 2 h after induction of
HTLV-I Tax expression in the JPX-9 Tax-inducible cell line.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, MIP-1ß, and RANTES. Previous studies on C-C chemokine
production as a consequence of HTLV infection have been conducted on
transformed T lymphocyte cell lines or in IL-2-stimulated cultures
(5, 6, 7, 25), and it had not been established whether this
abnormal chemokine production also occurs in unstimulated lymphocytes
from infected individuals. It seems likely that spontaneous production
of chemokines also occurs in vivo as MIP-1
, MIP-1ß, and RANTES are
present at higher levels in the serum of HTLV-II-infected individuals
compared with uninfected controls (M. J. Lewis, unpublished
observations). Additionally, we have also observed that unstimulated
PBMCs from HTLV-1-infected individuals can also spontaneously produce
C-C chemokines (M. H. Kaplan, unpublished data).
The results of our study also suggest that, in part, the C-C chemokine
production, particularly that observed in CD8+
lymphocytes, could be a direct result of HTLV-II infection mediated
through the activity of the transactivating protein Tax on the
chemokine promoters. RT-PCR demonstrated that there was active
transcription of Tax mRNA in the CD8+ T
lymphocyte population, and it was further shown that Tax could
transactivate the promoters of MIP-1ß and RANTES. The RANTES promoter
has been reported to be responsive to NF-
B (21), and it
seems likely that the stimulatory effect of Tax on the NF-
B
signaling pathway could be responsible for transactivation of the
RANTES promoter. The Tax-responsive elements in the MIP-1
and -1ß
promoters have yet to be determined (26), but they are
likely to be different from those of the RANTES promoter. Baba et al.
(10) reported that the MIP-1
and -1ß mRNAs could be
detected within 26 h after induction of HTLV-1 Tax expression,
whereas RANTES mRNA was not detectable even after 24 h. Thus,
although it would appear that Tax can induce the expression of several
C-C chemokines at the level of transcription, it is probable that this
induction is mediated via different pathways. This could explain why we
do not observe significant differences in the amount of RANTES produced
by PBMCs from HTLV-II-infected individuals.
Although our results suggest a direct role for Tax, it is likely that
other indirect effects of HTLV-2 infection are contributing to
increased levels of chemokines. It is especially important when
we consider that both the CD8+-enriched
and CD8+-depleted lymphocyte fractions
produce both MIP-1
and -1ß, whereas RANTES is produced
only by the CD8+-enriched fraction. The pattern
of chemokine production by lymphocyte subpopulations, together with the
level of Tax expression and transactivity on the chemokine promoters,
indicates that indirect mechanisms are also contributing to the overall
increases of MIP-1
and -1ß in the PBMC cultures, particularly in
the CD8+-depleted cell population.
It is uncertain to what extent the quantities of C-C chemokines
produced by HTLV-II-infected individuals are able to influence the
progression of HIV-1 infection in vivo. At present there is no
consensus among available epidemiological studies as to whether HTLV-II
infection has a positive or negative effect on HIV-1 disease
progression (17, 18, 19, 20). Unfortunately, interpretation of
these studies is limited due to the inability to definitively determine
the temporal relationship of infection by the two viruses. However, the
observed spontaneous production of C-C chemokines in HTLV-II and HIV-1
coinfected individuals certainly suggests the possibility of unique
virus-mediated immunological interactions. Several independent studies
have now clearly established that C-C chemokines inhibit infection by
M-tropic strains of HIV-1 and enhance the pathogenicity of T
cell-tropic strains (6, 9, 10, 11). Therefore, it could be
anticipated that, depending on the time course and dynamics of
coinfection, HTLV-II infection could have the potential to either
inhibit or enhance the progression of HIV-1 infection. Specifically, it
might be expected that if HTLV-II infection preceded that of HIV-1,
inhibition of M-tropic HIV-1 by C-C chemokines early in infection could
delay or prevent the progression of HIV-1 infection. Overproduction of
C-C chemokines has also been suggested as a mechanism whereby several
hemophiliacs have remained HIV-1 uninfected despite multiple,
documented exposures (12). More recently, Garzino-Demo et
al. (27) evaluated a cohort of homosexual males at risk
for HIV-1 infection but who remained uninfected and demonstrated that
these individuals also spontaneously produce high levels of MIP-1
(27). This study did not evaluate or consider the
possibility that some of these individuals may have had HTLV-I or -II
infection, but it is possible that this may have been the case in some
instances. In this regard we have also observed that a number
HTLV-II-infected IVDUs remain uninfected by HIV-1 despite certain
repeated exposures (M. H. Kaplan and W. W. Hall, unpublished
data), and it is possible that chemokine production could have played a
role in the prevention of infection. It would be useful to investigate
whether HTLV-1, HTLV-II, or possibly other chronic viral infections
could play a role in the observed chemokine overproduction in these and
other exposed-uninfected individuals (10, 12). Detailed
prospective studies on populations with extraordinarily high rates of
HTLV-II infection, such as that occurring in IVDUs in South Vietnam
(28), where the risk of HIV-1 infection is also high, may
help resolve some of these issues.
More direct evidence that HTLV-II has the potential to down-regulate
HIV-1 via a chemokine-mediated pathway has been provided recently by
Casoli et al. (25), who demonstrated an anti-HIV
activity produced by HTLV-II-infected PBMCs or purified
CD8+ T cells that is neutralized by Abs against
RANTES, MIP-1ß, and, particularly, MIP-1
. Additionally, they
demonstrated that the levels of these chemokines produced by
IL-2-stimulated PBMCs from HTLV-II-infected individuals were inversely
related to the levels of HIV-1 replication.
It is clear from these results that PBMCs from HTLV-II-infected
individuals display an abnormal immune phenotype although almost all of
these individuals are grossly asymptomatic. A number of studies have
demonstrated that PBMCs from HTLV-II-infected individuals undergo
spontaneous proliferation in short-term culture, and that this is
associated with a range of cytokine production that included TNF-
,
IL-6, IFN-
, IL-4, and IL-5 (5, 29, 30). It is unclear
whether the spontaneous chemokine production we have observed in our
cultures is associated with spontaneous proliferation, but it is very
likely this is the case and may share the same underlying mechanism(s).
It is also likely that the range of chemokines and cytokines produced
by HTLV-infected lymphocytes may be greater than those observed by this
and other studies. Moreover, it is possible that they could play a role
in the pathogenesis of the wide variety of HTLV-related diseases, in
particular, the neurological and inflammatory disorders associated with
infection. On a more basic level, these results suggests that
constitutive chemokine or cytokine production by unstimulated
lymphocytes from asymptomatic individuals can be used as a marker for
abnormal, although clinically silent, immune activation, whether it be
caused by HTLV infection, another chronic or latent viral infection, or
an autoimmune disease.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. William W. Hall, Department of Medical Microbiology, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HTLV-I, human T lymphotropic virus type I; HTLV-II, human T lymphotropic virus type II; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; IVDUs, i.v. drug users; M-tropic, macrophage-tropic. ![]()
Received for publication May 5, 2000. Accepted for publication July 14, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and MIP-1ß as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells. Science 270:1811.
B DNA binding activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220:120.[Medline]
. Blood 95:2760.
from spontaneously proliferating T cells in patients with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-I/II. Blood 78:571.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. W. Wlodarski, Z. Nearman, A. Jankowska, N. Babel, J. Powers, P. Leahy, H.-D. Volk, and J. P. Maciejewski Phenotypic differences between healthy effector CTL and leukemic LGL cells support the notion of antigen-triggered clonal transformation in T-LGL leukemia J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 83(3): 589 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zella HTLV-IIb reduces HIV infection Blood, March 1, 2007; 109(5): 1792 - 1792. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pilotti, L. Elviri, E. Vicenzi, U. Bertazzoni, M. C. Re, S. Allibardi, G. Poli, and C. Casoli Postgenomic up-regulation of CCL3L1 expression in HTLV-2-infected persons curtails HIV-1 replication Blood, March 1, 2007; 109(5): 1850 - 1856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bovolenta, E. Pilotti, M. Mauri, B. Panzeri, M. Sassi, P. Dall'Aglio, U. Bertazzoni, G. Poli, and C. Casoli Retroviral Interference on STAT Activation in Individuals Coinfected with Human T Cell Leukemia Virus Type 2 and HIV-1 J. Immunol., October 15, 2002; 169(8): 4443 - 4449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. King, R. Anderson, and J. S. Marshall Dengue Virus Selectively Induces Human Mast Cell Chemokine Production J. Virol., July 17, 2002; 76(16): 8408 - 8419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |