The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saverino, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ciccone, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saverino, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ciccone, E.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 3742-3755.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

The CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 Inhibitory Receptor Is Expressed by All Human T Lymphocytes and Down-Regulates Their Functions1

Daniele Saverino*, Marina Fabbi{dagger}, Fabio Ghiotto*, Andrea Merlo*, Silvia Bruno*, Daniela Zarcone*, Claudya Tenca*, Micaela Tiso{dagger}, Giuseppe Santoro{ddagger}, Giuseppe Anastasi{ddagger}, David Cosman§, Carlo E. Grossi* and Ermanno Ciccone2,*

* Department of Experimental Medicine, Human Anatomy Section, University of Genova, {dagger} Monoclonal Antibody Unit, National Institute for Cancer Research, Genova, Italy; {ddagger} Department of Biomorphology, Human Anatomy Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; and § Immunex, Seattle, WA


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The inhibitory molecule CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 has been detected previously on the surface of a small proportion of T lymphocytes. In this study, evidence is provided that, although only a fraction of CD3+ cells are stained by mAb specific for CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 on their surface, this inhibitory receptor is present in the cytoplasm of all T lymphocytes, and that it is detectable on the surface of all T cell clones by the M402 mAb. Biochemical analyses further demonstrate that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is present in all T clones analyzed, and that the protein is tyrosine-phosphorylated. Expression of mRNA coding for CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 has been assessed by RT-PCR. Notably, in the NKL cell line and in one T cell clone, amplification of the messenger required 30 cycles only, whereas, in other T cell clones, an amplification product was detected by increasing the number of cycles. CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 inhibits CD3/TCR-mediated activation in both CD4+ and CD8+ clones, and it down-regulates Ag recognition by CD8+ cells in a clonally distributed fashion. Addition of anti-ILT2 HP-F1 mAb in the cytolytic assay enhances target cell lysis mediated by Ag-specific CTL. This could be due to interference of the mAb with receptor/ligand interactions. In contrast, HP-F1 mAb cross-linking triggers inhibitory signals that reduce cytotoxicity. CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 also controls responses to recall Ags and, in low responders, its engagement sharply increases T cell proliferation. The inhibitory function of the molecule is also confirmed by its ability to reduce CD3/TCR-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The functional outcome of T lymphocytes depends on a balance between two opposite effects, i.e., activation when appropriate peptides are presented to the TCR in the presence of an efficient costimulation, and inhibition as a consequence of the interaction of inhibitory molecules with their ligands (1). When activation prevails, an efficient immune response is mounted, whereas T cell anergy occurs when inhibitory signals are overwhelming. In addition to CTLA-4 (CD152), present in all activated T cells, other molecules that counterbalance T cell activation have been described. These inhibitory molecules belong to distinct families, such as killer cell inhibitory receptor (KIR)3 (2) and leukocyte Ig-like receptor (LIR)/Ig-like transcript (ILT) (3) that map on human chromosome 19. KIR molecules are specific for HLA-class I loci and are expressed on the surface of a small proportion (2–4%) of T lymphocytes (4). The LIR/ILT molecular family has been recently characterized in several studies (reviewed in Ref. 5) and consists of at least 10 genes coding for proteins of the Ig superfamily (3). The products of some of these genes, such as LIR-1/ILT2, are surface membrane inhibitory receptors. LIR-1/ILT2 is found on the surface of a proportion of NK cells (23–77%), on a small percentage of T lymphocytes (4–20%), and on all B cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells (6, 7, 8). LIR-1/ILT2 consists of four C2 Ig domains and exhibits a molecular mass of ~110 kDa under both reducing and nonreducing conditions (6, 7). The inhibitory function of this molecule is mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation of four immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-like sequences in its cytoplasmic tail. Tyrosine phosphorylation leads to the recruitment of Src homology protein-1, Src homology protein-2, and Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol phosphatase. Recruitment and activation of these phosphatases down-regulates the signaling mediated by activatory receptors (3, 8, 9). Inhibition has been assessed by down-regulation of NK and T lymphocyte cytolytic functions. Ligands for LIR-1/ILT2 are nonclassical class I HLA-G protein (10), some alleles of HLA-A, and -B loci and the human cytomegalovirus UL18 gene product, a viral homologue of HLA-class I (6). The first domain of LIR-1/ILT2 interacts with the relatively nonpolymorphic {alpha}3 domain of HLA-class I and the analogous region of UL18 (11). mAbs specific for LIR-1/ILT2 have been produced, namely HP-F1, M402, and M405 (8, 12). In addition, mAb VMP55 and GHI/75, defined at the Fifth Workshop on Leukocyte Ags as specific for CD85 (13, 14), have been recently shown to recognize the LIR-1/ILT2 inhibitory receptor (15), because anti-CD85 mAb react with ILT2 transfectants. In addition, peptide maps of the CD85 Ag are identical with those of ILT2.

This study demonstrates that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is present in the cytoplasm and on the surface of all T lymphocytes. The receptor is functional and regulates human T cells by inhibiting CD3/TCR-mediated activation of both CD4+ and CD8+ clones, and Ag recognition by CD8+ cells. In addition, CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 controls responses to recall Ags and, in low responders, its blocking by the HP-F1 mAb sharply increases T cell proliferation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell clones

PBL isolated from heparinized venous blood on Ficoll density gradients, were cultured with PHA (5 µg/ml) in 24-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA); hrIL-2 (Pepro Tech EC, London, U.K.) at 50 U/ml final concentration was added on culture days 2 and 4. After 7 days, cells were harvested, depleted of CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes by immunomagnetic negative selection with Dynabeads (Unipath SpA, Milan, Italy), and plated at a limiting dilution of 10 and 1 cells/well. Cells were restimulated every 7–10 days with 1 x 105 irradiated allogeneic mononuclear cells/well in medium containing 5 µg/ml PHA and 50 U/ml or 30 U/ml hrIL-2 (respectively for CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes). Phenotype and monoclonality were assessed using anti-CD4, -CD8, and -Vß mAb (see below).

Generation of EBV-specific CD8+ T cell clones

Polyclonal cell lines were produced by stimulating 2 x 106 PBL with 5 x 105 autologous irradiated (6000 rad) B-EBV cells in 24-well culture plates. Responder cells were restimulated weekly by plating 1 x 106 cells and 3 x 105 irradiated B-EBV cells/well in complete media containing 50 U/ml IL-2, on day 2 and 4 after restimulation. After the third stimulation, cell lines were enriched for CD8+ T lymphocytes by negative selection with immunomagnetic beads (Unipath SpA). Clones were produced by plating T cells at a limiting dilution of 10 and 1 cell/well, in the presence of 3 x 104 autologous irradiated B-EBV cells (16). The immunophenotype of the clones was assessed by flow cytometry.

Antibodies

The mAbs used for immunophenotypic analyses were: anti-CD2 (Leu-5b), anti-CD3 (Leu-4), anti-CD4 (Leu-3a), anti-CD8 (Leu-2a), anti-TCR-{alpha}ß (anti-WT31) (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), anti-CD85 (clone GHI/75) (13, 14), anti-CD152, (PharMingen, Hamburg, Germany), and anti-HLA-class I W6/32 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). The complete panel of anti-TCR Vß mAb from the First Human TCR Monoclonal Ab Workshop was kindly provided by Dr. Marco Londei (Imperial College, School Medicine, London, U.K.). The anti-phosphotyrosine mAb, clone PY-20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), was used for detection of phosphorylated proteins by Western blot. The anti-ILT2 HP-F1 mAb was kindly provided by Dr. Miguel Lopez-Botet (Servicio de Inmunologia, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain) (8). The anti-LIR-1 mAb M402 and M405 were kindly provided by Immunex (Seattle, WA) (6, 12).

Immunophenotyping

The surface phenotype of T cell clones was determined by flow cytometric analysis (FACScalibur; Becton Dickinson). The secondary reagent was PE- or FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse (GAM) antiserum (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL). A total of 5 x 104 T cells were incubated with specific mAb for 20 min at 4°C. Cells were washed twice with PBS, and the secondary labeled reagent was added. After incubation, cells were washed and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. Control cells were stained with the secondary reagent alone. For surface two-color immunostaining, cells were first incubated with HP-F1 or M402 mAb followed by GAM-PE, and subsequently stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD3, -CD4 or -CD8 mAb. For cytoplasmic immunostaining, both single- and two-color, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% saponin, before mAb labeling.

Cytoplasmic immunostaining

For detection of intracellular Ag, T cells were fixed for 10 min at 37°C with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cells were subsequently washed with PBS and stained with the HP-F1 mouse mAb in PBS containing 0.1% saponin. Secondary labeled reagents were tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated GAM antiserum and Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-goat antiserum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Technogenetics, Milano, Italy). After staining, T cells were washed with PBS and let adhere to polylisine-coated slides. Cells were then analyzed using a fluorescence (Leica DM/DR, Leica Microsystem, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) and a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510, Hamburg, Germany). Negative controls were provided by T cells stained with secondary reagents alone, and by unrelated cells (COS and squamous epithelial cell lines). Images were recorded as TIF files and processed (Adobe Photoshop; Adobe System, San Jose, CA).

Surface labeling and immunoprecipitation

Cell surface proteins were labeled by lactoperoxidase-catalyzed iodination as described (17). A total of 20 x 106 cells were labeled with 1 mCi 125I for 15 min at room temperature, followed by one wash with 20 mM NaI in PBS. Alternatively, surface proteins were biotin labeled (18). Cells were lysed with 1 ml RIPA lysis buffer (10 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM NaF, with 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 100 µM sodium pervanadate, 1 mM PMSF, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin), and nuclei were discarded by centrifugation at 400 x g. After three 30-min preclearing cycles with protein G-Sepharose beads (GammaBind; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, U.K.), specific absorption was performed by incubating cell extracts with 10 µg/ml HP-F1 mAb and 20 µl protein G-Sepharose beads. Incubation was conducted by overnight rotation at 4°C. Sepharose was then thoroughly washed with lysis buffer, and bound material was eluted in SDS-PAGE sample buffer.

Immunoblotting

Nuclei-free extracts (200–600 µg/lane) or immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated by SDS-electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions, and then transferred electrophoretically onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond C Extra; Amersham). Membranes were blocked by overnight incubation at 4°C with 4% low fat milk in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.005% Tween 20). The transferred Ags were then detected by incubating the membranes with 1 to 5 µg/ml mAb in 2% milk-TBST, for 2 h at room temperature. The TBST buffer was used for washes and as the diluent of secondary reagents. Biotin-conjugated GAM {kappa}-light chain and peroxidase-labeled streptavidin were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL). Peroxidase activity was revealed by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham) and autoradiography (Hyperfilm; Amersham).

mRNA analysis by RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from 5 x 106 to 107 cells using the RNA Clean solution (TIB Molbiol, Genova, Italy), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of total RNA was transcribed into cDNA by incubating it at 42°C for 1 h with 20 pmol of oligo(dT) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Basel, Switzerland), 500 µM dNTPs (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 30 U of RNase inhibitor (5 Prime -> 3 Prime, Boulder, CO), and 200 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) in a total volume of 20 µl.

To check mRNA expression of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 gene, the following primers were synthesized: ILT2 forward, 5'-ATGACCCCCATCCTCACGGTC-3' and ILT2 reverse, 5'-CTGCACCGAGAGGGAGACTC-3'. As controls, the following primers were used: G3PDH forward, 5'-ACATCGCTCAGAACACCTATGG-3', G3PDH reverse, 5'-GGGTCTACATGGCAACTGTGAG-3'.

One microliter of cDNA was amplified using 20 pmol of forward primer and 20 pmol of reverse primer, 200 µM of dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.25 U platinum Taq (Life Technologies). The reaction was amplified in a Mastercycler Personal (Eppendorf GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The following profiles were used: ILT2, one time at 95°C for 2 min; 30–40 times at 94°C for 45 s, 63°C for 30 s, or 72°C for 1 min); one time at 72°C for 5 min; G3PDH, one time at 95°C for 2 min; 30 times at 94°C for 45 s, 60°C for 30 s, or 72°C for 1 min); one time at 72°C for 5 min. Ten microliters of the product were run in a 1.2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.

Cytotoxicity assays

The ability of various mAb to trigger or to inhibit the cytolytic activity of T cell clones was measured in a conventional 4-h 51Cr release assay. Briefly, target cells (the murine mastocytoma cell line P815, or the autologous and allogeneic B-EBV cells) were labeled for 1 h with 51Cr (100 µCi/106 cells), washed twice with PBS, resuspended in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS, and plated at 5 x 103 cells per well in 96-well U-bottom plates. In the redirected killing assay, effector cells were plated in triplicate at 2:1 (E:T) ratios in the presence of one of the following mAb: anti-CD3, anti-CD4, HP-F1, and anti-CD152. To evaluate the inhibitory effect of the ILT2, effector cells were pretreated for 10 min at 4°C with the mAb; subsequently, P815 cells were added to each well together with the stimulatory mAb (anti-CD3).

HP-F1 or anti-CD152 mAb were included in the cytolytic test performed with autologous and allogeneic 51Cr-labeled B-EBV cells. In this assay, a cross-linking of HP-F1 or CD152 was obtained using HP-F1 or anti-CD152 mAb followed by GAM antiserum (Southern Biotechnology Associates).

After 4 h, 100 µl of supernatant were collected from each well and analyzed in a gamma counter for 51Cr release. Percent of specific lysis was calculated as: [(experimental release - spontaneous release)/(maximum release - spontaneous release)] x 100.

Proliferation assays

Proliferative responses were evaluated by culturing 104 CD4+ clonal T lymphocytes in the presence of 105 irradiated PBL (5000 rad) in 0.2 ml complete medium, in 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates. At the same time, the stimulatory effect of anti-CD3 mAb and the activity of HP-F1 mAb or of anti-CD152 mAb, and of their cross-linking on the proliferation rate were tested.

Cultures were pulsed with 0.5 µCi [3H]thymidine (Amersham) on day 2 and harvested 18 h later. The dry filters were counted in a gamma counter with scintillation fluid. Results are given as mean values of triplicate cultures.

PBL (4 x 105/well) were cultured in complete medium in 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates. Cell proliferation was evaluated after stimulation with recall Ags (tetanus toxoid, 5 µg/ml; Candida albicans bodies, 3 x 105/ml; purified protein derivative, 10 µg/ml), and anti-CD3 mAb (1 ng/ml) as the positive control. In the same wells, HP-F1 or anti-CD152 mAb were added in the presence or absence of GAM antiserum as cross-linker. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 days and [3H]thymidine was present during the last 18 h of culture.

Ca2+ mobilization assay

To determine cytoplasmic free intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, cells were stained with acetoxymethylester of fura-2 (1 µM final concentration) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The fluorescence of the cellular suspension (106 cells) was monitored at 37°C with an LS-5 Spectrofluorometer (Perkin-Elmer, Pomona, CA). The excitation wavelength was 345 nm and fluorescence emission was measured at 496 nm. Stimulation was performed with HP-F1, anti-CD3, and anti-CD4 mAb, followed by a GAM antiserum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) as a cross-linker. The concentration of free intracellular Ca2+ was calculated by the method of Grynkiewicz (19).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of surface ILT2 on T lymphocytes

The HP-F1 mAb has been used with the aim of identifying novel molecules that inhibit T cell functions. The expression of the Ag recognized by this mAb has been investigated in T cells in various experimental conditions. The mAb has been shown to be specific for ILT2 in a variety of leukocytes (monocytes, dendritic cells, B lymphocytes, and NK cells) (8). Two-color immunofluorescence analyses were performed in PBL from 10 normal donors. Surface HP-F1+ T lymphocytes were a fraction of all CD3+ cells (mean 19 ± 7%). Among CD8+ T lymphocytes, HP-F1+ cells were 23 ± 13%, and among CD4+ lymphocytes HP-F1+ cells were 12 ± 7%. Results from PBL of one representative donor are shown in Fig. 1GoA.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Surface expression of ILT2 on T lymphocytes using the HP-F1 mAb. A, Two-color flow cytometric analysis of surface ILT2 expression on PBL from one representative donor. The Ag recognized by the HP-F1 mAb is expressed on a proportion of T lymphocytes (on average, 19% of CD3+, 10% of CD4+, and 39% of CD8+ cells). B, ILT2 expressed on the surface of three CD8+ T cell clones displays a bimodal pattern. However, all cells express a single Vß segment to indicate their monoclonality. C, Surface expression of ILT2 detected by the HP-F1 mAb varies in the course of time. Surface ILT2 has been analyzed at three time intervals in two CD8+ CTL clones: 1 wk (T1), 2 wk (T2), and 3 wk (T3) following PHA restimulation.

 
The expression of ILT2 on CD8+ cells was next examined at the clonal level. Thirty CTL clones were produced. All of them were CD3+TCR{alpha}ß+CD8+ and the large majority displayed a bimodal expression of surface ILT2. In three clones, the expression of the Ag recognized by the HP-F1 mAb was detected in all cells (see below, and Fig. 3Go, clone BE1), and in five clones surface expression of ILT2 was undetectable by immunofluorescence. To prove that cell cultures, albeit bimodal for ILT2 expression, were monoclonal, CD8+ CTL clones were screened using a panel of mAb specific for TCR Vß segments. All cell cultures expressed a single Vß segment and were therefore monoclonal. An example is shown in Fig. 1GoB. Three CD3+8+TCR{alpha}ß+ clones are positive for three distinct Vß segments, although displaying a bimodal expression of HP-F1.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is present on the surface of all T cell clones. Four representative CD8+ clones, one HP-F1surface- (CO1), two HP-F1bimodal surface+ (PF2 and AK2), and one HP-F1surface+ on all cells (BE1), and three CD4+ T cell clones negative for surface HP-F1 expression were analyzed for surface staining of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2, using a panel of mAb, i.e., anti-CD85 mAb GHI/75, and two anti-LIR-1 mAb M402 and M405. The pattern of reactivity of HP-FI, anti-CD85, and M405 mAbs was identical, as it stained a proportion of cells only; in contrast, M402 mAb reacted with all cells of all T cell clones. This indicates that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is present on the surface of all T cell clones. A control was provided by the NKL cell line which is stained by all of the mAbs used in the totality of the cells (lower panel).

 
The membrane density of the HP-F1 Ag could change in time. Hence, the surface expression of ILT2 was evaluated in 2 CD8+ CTL clones at three time intervals after PHA restimulation: 1 wk (T1), 2 wk (T2), and 3 wk (T3) (Fig. 1GoC). In clone AK2, the percentage of HP-F1+ cells ranged between 26% and 44%, and in clone CO1 it varied from 1% to 35%.

Surface expression of ILT2 was also analyzed in CD3+CD4+ clones. Only 4 of 34 clones were positive for surface staining with the HP-F1 mAb and the percentage of positive cells ranged from 17% to 49%.

ILT2 is localized in the cytoplasm of all T lymphocytes

To assess whether or not T cells express ILT2 in their cytoplasm, seven CD8+ clones with variable surface expression of ILT2, and six CD4+ clones that were consistently negative for surface ILT2 were selected. Cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with saponin, and stained with the HP-F1 mAb followed by secondary reagents (see Materials and Methods). A cytoplasmic staining was detected in all cells of all T cell clones. Two CD4+ and two CD8+ clones are shown (Fig. 2GoA). To further support the contention that ILT2 is present in the cytoplasm of all T cells, resting T lymphocytes purified from peripheral blood were stained as above, and ILT2 was found in the cytoplasm of all cells (not shown). To reinforce the finding of a cytoplasmic localization of ILT2, FACS analyses of fixed and permeabilized cells were performed after staining with the HP-F1 mAb (Fig. 2GoB). All T cell clones analyzed, independently of their surface expression, showed the presence of ILT2 in the cytoplasm of all cells. The Ag was also detected in all resting T lymphocytes, and a negative control was provided by A431 cells (Fig. 2GoB).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. ILT2 is present in the cytoplasm of all T cell clones. A, T cell clones were fixed with paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with saponin and incubated with the HP-F1 mAb. Tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated GAM antiserum and Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-goat antiserum were the secondary reagents. T cells adherent to polylysine-coated slides were analyzed by confocal microscopy. ILT2 has been detected in all clones. Two CD8+ HP-F1surface+ and two CD4+ HP-F1surface- clones are shown in the upper and in the middle row, respectively. Different focal planes of the same cells are shown in the lower row. Arrow indicates a cell that is apparently negative in a superficial focal plane, but positive in all of the others. This shows that ILT2 is present in the cytoplasm of all cells in all clones. Negative controls were provided by T cells stained with secondary reagents alone and by irrelevant cells, such as COS and squamous epithelial cell lines (not shown). B, FACS analysis of surface expression (upper row) of ILT2 on T cell clones AK2 and CO1 and on purified resting T lymphocytes. The A431 epithelial cell line was used as a negative control. FACS analysis of cells fixed with paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with saponin and incubated with the HP-F1 mAb, anti-class I mAb w6/32 or the second reagent alone, PE-labeled GAM antiserum (lower row). ILT2 has been detected in the cytoplasm of all T cells, activated or resting, independently of surface expression.

 
The use of different mAb shows that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is present on the surface of all T cell clones.

Because LIR-1, CD85, and ILT2 are coded by the same gene, in addition to the HP-F1 mAb, three anti-CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mAb, namely the anti-CD85 mAb GHI/75, and two anti-LIR-1 mAb, M402 and M405, were used for surface staining of T cell clones (15 CD4+ and 20 CD8+). Three CD4+ T cell clones that were negative for surface expression when the HP-F1 mAb was used, and four representative CD8+ clones, two with a bimodal expression of HP-F1, one negative and one positive on all cells, are shown (Fig. 3Go). A positive control is provided by the NK cell line NKL, in which all cells are positive when the entire panel of anti-CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mAb is used. The pattern of reactivity of the HP-F1, anti-CD85 and M405 mAb with T cell clones was identical, as these Abs stained a proportion of cells only. In contrast, the M402 mAb reacted with all cells of all T cell clones. These data indicate that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is expressed on the surface of all T cell clones, although the amount of the Ag may differ among clones, as shown by differences in fluorescence intensity.

Expression of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 in resting peripheral blood T lymphocytes

To evaluate the expression of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 in resting T lymphocytes, a comparison between surface vs cytoplasmatic immunofluorescence with HP-F1 and M402 mAb was performed using PBL from eight healthy donors (Table IGo). In all donors, surface expression of the Ag recognized by the HP-F1 mAb was consistently lower than that of the Ag recognized by the M402 mAb. Different percentages of positive cells detected by M402 mAb surface staining among the different donors are due to the different mean fluorescence intensity rather than to a bimodal distribution of M402 expression. In contrast, cytoplasmic staining with both mAb showed a large proportion of positive cells in all donors. In one representative donor (i.e., BC 4), a comparison between surface vs cytoplasmatic immunofluorescence with HP-F1 and M402 mAb was performed in a two-color fluorescence assay to evaluate the distribution of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 in T lymphocytes, in CD4+, and in CD8+ cells (Fig. 4Go). Surface staining revealed that all T cells express on their surface the CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 molecule using the M402 mAb. Moreover, the CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 Ag was detected in the cytoplasm of all T lymphocytes by the HP-F1 mAb.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Surface and cytoplasmic expression of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 detected by HP-F1 and M402 mAb in PBL from healthy donors

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Two-color fluorescence analysis of PBLs. PBLs from healthy donor BC 4 were isolated and stained for surface Ags by standard procedures. HP-F1 and M402 mAb were used for indirect immunofluorescence followed by PE-labeled GAM antiserum, whereas anti-CD3, -CD4, and -CD8 mAb were directly labeled with FITC. For cytoplasmic staining, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with saponin.

 
Anti-CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mAb recognize the same Ag in T cell clones

Immunoprecipitation with HP-F1, M402, M405, and anti-CD85 mAb from a 125I surface labeled clone AK2 and from the control NKL cell line, which is consistently positive for the CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 Ag, revealed, under reducing conditions, the same band of 116 kDa with all mAb (Fig. 5GoA). In addition, eight T cell clones (five CD8+ and three CD4+) were analyzed by Western blot. A band of 116 kDa consistent with the presence of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 was detected in all clones using the M402 mAb (Fig. 5GoB) and the anti-CD85 and HP-F1 mAb (not shown). Negative controls in this experiment were provided by the epithelial cell lines A431, HeLa, and by COS cells. Occasionally, additional bands of 95 and 75 kDa were observed, which may be the products of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 proteolysis. It is of note that in CD4+ clones, relatively to the protein content, a much fainter band was observed in comparison with that yielded by the NKL cell line and by the BE1 CD8+ T cell clone (Fig. 5GoB). The intensity of the bands detected by Western blotting is thus consistent with the fluorescence intensity of surface staining yielded by the M402 mAb.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Biochemical analysis of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2. A, Lysates from I125 surface labeled NKL (left panel) and AK2 (right panel) cells were precipitated with the indicated mAb and subjected to SDS-PAGE in 8% acrylamide gel under reducing conditions. All mAb yield the same band in both cell types. Molecular mass markers are indicated on the left. An anti-CD94 isotype matched mAb was used as a control. B, Immunoblotting reactivity of mAb M402 with lysates from different cell types. In CD8+ T cell clones AK2, BE1, CO1 and in CD4+ clones AM1 and FM1, albeit expressed at greatly different levels, a protein of 116 kDa was detected in 10% acrylamide gels. The cell number charged in each well is indicated on the left and the amount of cell lysate protein charged in each well is indicated on the right. Negative controls in this experiment were represented by the epithelial cell lines A431 and HeLa, and by COS cells. C, HP-F1 Ag precipitated from different T cell clones is detected by western blot analysis using the mAb M402. Proteins were precipitated from equal numbers of cells. D, M402 mAb is unable to precipitate a 116-kDa band from BE1 T cell clone after sequential immunoprecipitation with HP-F1 mAb. Surface proteins were biotin labeled. In the same experiment M402 immunoprecipitated a 116-kDa band from BE1 cells that were not precleared with the HP-F1 mAb (right). E, In CD8+ AK2, BE1, AK3, CO1 clones and in CD4+ CP1, AM1 and FM1 clones, CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is tyrosine-phosphorylated. Western blot analysis of HP-F1 immunoprecipitates, separated in SDS-PAGE, were revealed with anti phosphotyrosine PY-20 mAb, used as a probe. The 10% acrylamide gel was run under reducing conditions. Precipitates with protein G-Sepharose beads provided negative controls (Control). An additional negative control of this experiment is represented by A431, HeLa, and COS cell lines.

 
To further support the evidence that the HP-F1 and the M402 mAb recognize the same protein, Ags immunoprecipitated with HP-F1 mAb were revealed in the Western blot assay using the M402 mAb as a probe. In all clones analyzed, a band of 116 kDa corresponding to CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 has been identified (Fig. 5GoC). To reinforce this concept, we performed sequential immunoprecipitation of surface biotin-labeled proteins. All surface CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 molecules were removed from clone BE1 by HP-F1 mAb and thus were undetectable by M402 mAb (Fig. 5GoD). In the same experiment, M402 immunoprecipitated a 116-kDa band from BE1 cells that were not precleared with HP-F1 mAb (Fig. 5GoD, right).

To determine whether or not the band of 116 kDa is phosphorylated, cells were treated with Na-pervanadate. Ags immunoprecipitated by the HP-F1 mAb were identified with an anti-phosphotyrosine mAb in the Western blot assay. In all clones, the 116-kDa band was phosphorylated (Fig. 5GoE), and in some clones it was associated with a phosphorylated band of 75 kDa, that was particularly evident in clone AK2. Negative controls in this experiment were represented by A431, HeLa, and COS cell lines.

Analysis of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA expression in T cell clones

Expression of mRNA coding for CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 was analyzed by RT-PCR using ILT2-specific primers. In 12 T cell clones, 6 CD4+ and 6 CD8+, the mRNA coding for CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 has been detected (Fig. 6Go, upper panels). It is of note that, in the NK cell line NKL and in clone BE1, the amplification required only 30 cycles; in the remaining T cell clones an amplification product was detected only after 35–40 cycles. To rule out the presence of feeder contaminants (monocytes, NK cells, B cells), the T cell clones were analyzed 2 mo after the last restimulation. In several epithelial cell lines, CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA was undetectable (Fig. 6Go, lower panels).



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA is detectable in all T cell clones. CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 gene expression analysis in six T cell clones, three CD4+, and three CD8+, and in the NKL cell line reveals the presence of mRNA. In NKL cells and in clone BE1, a PCR product was detectable after 30 cycles, in clone AK2 after 35 cycles and, in the remaining clones, 40 cycles were needed. Cells of epithelial origin, such as A431, A549, LX1, HK (i.e., normal human keratinocytes), and HeLa cell lines were used as negative controls (lower panel).

 
Cross-linking of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 inhibits CTL activation via CD3 in a redirected killing assay

To demonstrate that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 cross-linking by the HP-F1 mAb inhibits CTL activation induced via CD3, 30 cytolytic T cell clones were obtained from PBL of normal donors and tested in a redirected killing assay using the murine P815 cell target. Nineteen CTL clones were obtained following PHA stimulation, and the remaining 11 were Ag (EBV) specific.

All of the CTL clones lysed poorly P815 cells at an E:T ratio of 2:1. In contrast, addition of anti-CD3 mAb in the assay yielded a substantial lysis of the target. The HP-F1 mAb, cross-linked by P815 cells, in combination with the activatory anti-CD3 mAb, inhibited target cell lysis in the majority of the clones. According to the level of inhibition, three groups of CTL clones could be distinguished. In 17 clones, inhibition was >40%, in 10, it ranged between 40 and 20%, and, in 3 clones, it was negligible (<20%) (Table IIGo). To rule out that an inhibitory effect on P815 cell lysis could be due to competition of the HP-F1 mAb with the activatory mAb, an anti-CD4 mAb of the same isotype as that of the HP-F1 mAb (i.e., {gamma}1) was used. In these conditions, inhibition of CD3/TCR activation did not occur (Table IIGo). In addition, the inhibitory effects of anti-CD152 (CTLA-4) and of HP-F1 mAb were compared. The same levels of inhibition of CD3-mediated activation by both molecules were observed for the majority of the clones. An additive inhibition was never detected when HP-F1 and anti-CD152 mAb were used in combination (not shown). Furthermore, anti-CD85 and M402 mAb were tested to evaluate their ability to inhibit CD3/TCR-induced activation in three CD8+ clones (Fig. 7Go). Although these cross-linked mAb exerted an inhibitory function, the HP-F1 mAb was most efficient in this assay.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Different degree of inhibition of CD3-induced lysis by HP-F1 and CD152 mAb in a redirected killing assay

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. All anti-CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 inhibit activation via CD3/TCR in a redirected killing assay. Three T cell clones with the same surface phenotype (TCR{alpha}ß+CD3+8+) were used in this experiment. To obtain activation, an anti-CD3 mAb (i.e., Leu 4) was included in the assay. Addition of anti-CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mAb to the activatory mAb yields different levels of inhibition. An anti-CD4 mAb used as control does not inhibit CD3-induced activation. The target was the P815 cell line and the E:T ratio in this experiment was 2:1.

 
A role of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 for Ag-specific CTL target cell lysis

Fourteen Ag-specific CD8+ T cell clones that lyse autologous Ag presenting EBV-infected B-lymphocytes, but not allogeneic B-EBV cells, were tested in a cytolytic assay. The HP-F1 mAb that blocks interaction between the inhibitory receptor and its ligand (rather than cross-linking the receptor) was added at the onset of the assay. In all of these clones, lysis of specific targets was inhibited by addition of anti-HLA-class I mAb, or of anti-CD3 mAb. When the HP-F1 mAb was included in the assay, a >40% increase of lysis was achieved in 8 of 14 clones. A control of the cross-linking ability of HP-F1 is provided by addition of GAM antiserum. In these experimental conditions, inhibition of specific lysis occurred. Similar results were obtained using anti-CD85 and M402 mAb. CTL clones did not equally share this property. However, a proportion of them (8/14) was significantly inhibited (Fig. 8Go). This suggests that a clonal heterogeneity also exists as for the ability of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 to inhibit CD3/TCR-mediated activation.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. The HP-F1 mAb blocks receptor/ligand interactions and increases specific target cell lysis. Co1, Co4, and AK2 are CD8+ CTL clones specific for EBV-infected autologous B lymphocytes. When included in the cytolytic assay, the HP-F1 mAb enhances specific lysis. In contrast, cross-linking of the HP-F1 mAb by GAM antiserum leads to inhibition. In clones Co1 and Co4 inhibition is >40%, and in clone AK2 it is <40%. Similar results were obtained using anti-CD85 and M402 mAb. mAb to anti-CD4 ({gamma}1 isotype) and anti-DR ({gamma}2a isotype) used as controls did not affect target cell lysis. Targets were autologous B-EBV cell lines, and the E:T ratio was 5:1.

 
CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 inhibits CD3-induced proliferation of CD4+ T cell clones

To ascertain the regulatory role of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 on CD3-induced proliferation of CD4+ T cells, 30 clones were obtained from PBL of normal donors following PHA stimulation. The clones proliferated in the presence of anti-CD3 mAb. Simultaneous addition in the assay of HP-F1 mAb cross-linked by GAM antiserum resulted in >40% inhibition of proliferation in 14 of 30 clones; in 11 clones inhibition ranged between 20% and 40%, and in the remaining 5 it was <20% (Table IIIGo). At variance, addition of non cross-linked HP-F1 mAb increased CD3-induced proliferation. To rule out that the inhibitory effect was due to competition of the added mAb with the activatory Ab, we used an anti-CD4 mAb of the same isotype as that of HP-F1 (i.e., {gamma}1). Inhibition of CD3/TCR-mediated activation was not observed when the anti-CD4 mAb was cross-linked by GAM antiserum (Table IIIGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Different degree of inhibition of CD3-induced proliferation by the HP-F1 mAb in its cross-linked form

 
In conclusion, the cross-linked HP-F1 mAb inhibits proliferation triggered via the CD3/TCR pathway; however, this feature is variable among CD4+ clones. This suggests that a clonal heterogeneity again exists as for the ability of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 to inhibit CD3/TCR-mediated proliferation

CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 inhibits recall Ag-induced proliferation of PBL

To assess further the inhibitory function of the CD85/LIR-1/ILT2, PBL from 15 healthy donors were stimulated using the recall Ags tetanus toxoid, Candida albicans, and purified protein derivative. Three groups of responders could be identified. In a first group of four donors, the HP-F1 mAb did not affect significantly proliferative responses induced by recall Ags. In a second group of seven donors, the HP-F1 mAb increased proliferation by 20–40% in four individuals and by >40% in three donors. Decreased proliferation was observed when the HP-F1 mAb was cross-linked by GAM antiserum (range of decrease between 20% and 40% in three donors, and >40% in four donors). In a third group of four donors, a low response to recall Ags was detected, but this was briskly increased by addition of the HP-F1 mAb (Fig. 9Go). As a control, the HP-F1 mAb was cross-linked with GAM antiserum, and this abolished proliferation completely. The same effects were observed when an anti-CD152 mAb was used (Fig. 9Go).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 inhibits recall Ag-induced proliferation of PBL. PBL from healthy donors were stimulated using the recall Ags tetanus toxoid (TT), Candida albicans (Ca), and purified protein derivative (PPD). Addition to the cell culture of the HP-F1 mAb increased proliferation. In contrast, a decreased proliferation was observed when the HP-F1 mAb was cross-linked by GAM antiserum. An anti-CD8 mAb provided a control. In donor BC9, the HP-F1 mAb increased significantly recall Ag-induced proliferation, whereas a decreased proliferation was observed when the HP-F1 mAb was cross-linked by GAM antiserum. Donors BC2 and BC3 display a low response to recall Ags that is sharply increased by addition of the HP-F1 mAb. The same pattern of reactivity has been obtained by addition of anti-CD152 mAb.

 
In conclusion, the HP-F1 mAb increases the recall Ag-induced proliferation of PBL in the majority of the donors, and this is particularly relevant in low responders.

CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 down-regulates intracellular Ca2+ mobilization induced by CD3/TCR triggering

To provide additional experimental support to the ability of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 to inhibit activation mediated by the CD3/TCR complex, CD3/TCR-induced Ca2+ mobilization was investigated in conditions in which CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 was cross-linked by the HP-F1 mAb and GAM antiserum. Three clones which were >40% inhibited by the cross-linked HP-F1 mAb were selected and the concentration of intracellular free Ca2+ after activation via CD3/TCR in the absence or in the presence of HP-F1 mAb was evaluated. In Fig. 10Go, a representative clone is shown. A reduction of CD3/TCR-induced Ca2+ mobilization was observed in all clones when the HP-F1 mAb was simultaneously added. Altogether these data strongly support the contention that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is a molecule that strongly inhibits T cell functions.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 10. Ligation of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 reduces CD3/TCR-mediated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. The increase of intracellular Ca2+ concentration in CO1 clonal cells (CD3+CD8+CD4-) upon exposure to anti-CD3, HPF1 mAb, their combination, and subsequent cross-linking by GAM antiserum was measured. As a control, anti-CD3 exposure was also combined with anti-CD4. In the experiments where anti-CD3 was used in combination with the HP-F1 mAb or anti-CD4, the latter mAb were added 5 s before anti-CD3. Arrows indicate the time of mAb addition. Ligation of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 reduced CD3/TCR-mediated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization by ~50% (from 175 nM to 90 nM maximum concentration), whereas treatment with anti-CD4 did not affect the CD3-mediated increase of intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Ligation of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 did not per se induce Ca2+ mobilization.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the vast array of lymphocyte inhibitory molecules, only CD152 (CTLA-4) appears to play a general role for T cell function because of its presence in all activated T cells (20, 21). At variance, KIR molecules and CD94/NKG2A are found on small T cell subsets only (22). In this study, evidence is provided that, in addition to CD152, the inhibitory molecule CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is expressed by all T lymphocytes and that it is capable of down-regulating T cell function. It was previously reported that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 is expressed on a proportion of T cells, as it has been detected on the surface of 4–20% of CD3+ lymphocytes (6, 8, 13, 14, 15). Using the HP-F1 mAb to assess expression of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2, only a fraction of resting T lymphocytes was found positive. However, when resting T lymphocytes or T cell clones were analyzed for the presence of the ILT2 protein in the cytoplasm, all cells were positive. Further evidence was gathered by the use of mAb M402, specific for LIR-1 that was detected on the surface of all T cell clones tested. In addition, biochemical analyses clearly demonstrated the presence of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 in all T cell clones. It is of note that the amount of the protein detected varied in the different clones analyzed, and that a relationship between the fluorescence intensity of surface staining with mAb M402 and the intensity of the bands revealed by western blotting was apparent. Similarly, CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA was easily detected by RT-PCR in the NKL cell line and in the T cell clone BE1. At variance, to reveal CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA in other T cell clones, a higher number of amplification cycles was required. This could explain the results of a previous report in which two T cell clones were studied, one was positive and one was negative for CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA (23). Furthermore, a relationship between the high number of amplification cycles required, the low intensity of the bands detected biochemically and the low fluorescence intensity of surface staining with the M402 mAb is evident. This strongly suggests that the amounts of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA and protein differ in the various clones analyzed.

Both mRNA and protein contents are lower in CD4+ than in CD8+ clones. In clones in which all cells stain for surface HP-F1, the amount of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA and protein is comparable to that detected in the NKL cell line.

The lack of relationship between CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mRNA or protein expression and the degree of inhibition shown in a variety of experimental systems is worth of consideration. The presence of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 has been clearly demonstrated in T cell clones that display a negligible inhibitory response and, on the contrary, clones with low amounts of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 may be strongly inhibited. This observation, and a clonal heterogeneity as for the ability of the CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 to inhibit TCR-mediated activation, suggests that a control mechanism capable of modulating the level of inhibition operates. This is similar to that observed for the CD152 molecule which, again, is not equally distributed and effective among all CTL clones (16, 24, 25, 26). It is of note that the HP-F1 mAb, that in our experiments was the most efficient mAb in functional assays, was able to exert inhibition also in HP-F1surface- clones. There are two possible explanations for this finding: 1) surface immunofluorescence is less sensitive when compared with the functional assays, and thus a lower number of molecules is sufficient to determine inhibition; 2) similarly to that observed for CD152, a redistribution from the cytoplasm to the membrane may occur in the course of the functional assays (27).

The anti-CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 mAb display at least two patterns of reactivity, thus suggesting the existence of different epitopes recognized by the Abs. In particular, the HP-F1 mAb showed in some clones a bimodal distribution of surface immunofluorescence. At variance, in cytoplasmic immunofluorescence assays it stained all T lymphocytes. To explain this finding, it may be suggested that CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 molecules, to reach the lymphocyte surface, have to be linked to accessory molecules that could partially mask a epitope recognized by the HP-F1 mAb. Along this line, M402 mAb may recognize a different and unmasked epitope.

Inhibition mediated by CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 deals with relevant functions of T lymphocytes, namely Ag recognition by Ag-specific clones, T cell proliferation and the response to recall Ags. The ability of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 to inhibit cytolytic functions could render tumor-specific T lymphocytes unable to recognize tumor cells, thus providing an escape mechanism that may favor cancer development. In contrast, inefficient inhibition mechanisms could sustain the onset of autoimmune disease. Furthermore, blocking of the CD85/LIR-1/ILT2-mediated signaling could boost immune responses to Ags that, in turn, might yield a more efficient rejection of tumor cells. By the same token, it is important to emphasize that, in four subjects, we observed low responses to recall Ags that were drastically increased when the HP-F1 mAb was included in the experimental system. This observation may help establish novel strategies to improve response to vaccines.

The presence, in all T lymphocytes, of an inhibitory receptor that broadly recognizes HLA-class I molecules and is able to modulate T cell function, opens new perspectives for studies of T cell anergy. Class I molecules are ubiquitary and they may be potentially functional in all body compartments. In addition, recognition by CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 of the human CMV protein certainly provides the pathogen with a mechanism to escape recognition by the immune system (9). It is of note that the human CMV infection is common in the normal population, but that it does not lead to the development of illness. At variance, in subjects with a compromised immune system, human CMV causes disease. A question arises from these observations, and from the ability of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 to control efficiently T cell function. Does a control of the inhibition via CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 exist in vivo? Although we do not have an answer to this question, we may hypothesize the existence of a control of CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 surface expression. Alternatively, an activation receptor for HLA-class I could exist that might counterbalance the T cell inhibitory function exerted by CD85/LIR-1/ILT2.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Miguel Lopez-Botet and Francisco Navarro for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, and for providing the HP-F1 mAb.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was supported by grants from the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, from Ministero della Università e Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, and from Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (to C.E.G. and E.C.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ermanno Ciccone, Department of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Genova Via De Toni 14, 16132 Genova, Italy. Back

3 Abbreviation used in this paper: KIR, killer cell inhibitory receptor; LIR, leukocyte Ig-like receptor; ILT, Ig-like transcript; GAM, goat anti-mouse. Back

Received for publication April 17, 2000. Accepted for publication July 7, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bluestone, J. A.. 1997. Is CTLA-4 a master switch for peripheral T cell tolerance?. J. Immunol. 158:1989.[Abstract]
  2. Lanier, L. L.. 1998. NK cell receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:359.[Medline]
  3. Borges, L., M. L. Hsu, N. Fanger, M. Kubin, D. Cosman. 1997. A family of human lymphoid and myeloid Ig-like receptors, some of which bind to MHC class I molecules. J. Immunol. 159:5192.[Abstract]
  4. Ciccone, E., C. E. Grossi, A. Velardi. 1996. Opposing functions of activatory T-cell receptors and inhibitory NK-cell receptors on cytotoxic T cells. Immunol. Today 17:450.[Medline]
  5. Long, E. O.. 1999. Regulation of immune responses through inhibitory receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:875.[Medline]
  6. Cosman, D., N. Fanger, L. Borges, M. Kubin, W. Chin, L. Peterson, M. L. Hsu. 1997. A novel immunoglobulin superfamily receptor for cellular and viral MHC class I molecules. Immunity 7:273.[Medline]
  7. Lopez-Botet, M., F. Navarro, M. Llano. 1999. How do NK cells sense the expression of HLA-G class Ib molecules?. Semin. Cancer Biol. 9:19.[Medline]
  8. Colonna, M., F. Navarro, T. Bellon, M. Llano, P. Garcia, J. Samaridis, L. Angman, M. Cella, M. Lopez-Botet. 1997. A common inhibitory receptor for major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on human lymphoid and myelomonocytic cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:1809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cosman, D., N. Fanger, L. Borges. 1999. Human cytomegalovirus, MHC class I and inhibitory signalling receptors: more questions than answers. Immunol. Rev. 168:177.[Medline]
  10. Navarro, F., M. Llano, T. Bellon, M. Colonna, D. E. Geraghty, M. Lopez-Botet. 1999. The ILT2(LIR1) and CD94/NKG2A NK cell receptors respectively recognize HLA-G1 and HLA-E molecules co-expressed on target cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:277.[Medline]
  11. Chapman, T. L., A. P. Heikeman, P. J. Bjorkman. 1999. The inhibitory receptor LIR-1 uses a common binding interaction to recognize class I MHC molecules and the viral homolog UL18. Immunity 11:603.[Medline]
  12. Fanger, N. A., D. Cosman, L. Peterson, S. C. Braddy, C. R. Maliszewski, L. Borges. 1998. The MHC class I binding proteins LIR-1 and LIR-2 inhibit Fc receptor-mediated signaling in monocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:3423.[Medline]
  13. Salamone, M. D. C., G. V. Salamone, G. B. Reyes, M. Saracco, M. Kado, C. Rosselot, and L. Fainboin. 1997. CD85 workshop: CD85 antigen: an activation marker of human T cells. In Leukocyte Typing VI. T. Kishimoto, H. Kikutani, A. E. G. Kr. von dem Borne, S. M. Goyert, D. Y. Mason, M. Miyasaka, L. Moretta, K. Okumura, S. Shaw, T. A. Springer, et al., eds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 200.
  14. Engel, P., N. Wagner, T. F. Tedder. 1995. CD85 workshop report. S. F. Schlossman, and L. Boumsell, and W. Gilks, and J. M. Harlan, and T. Kishimoto, and C. Morimoto, and J. Ritz, and S. Shaw, and R. Silverstein, and T. Springer, et al eds. Leukocyte Typing V 701. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  15. Banham, A. H., M. Colonna, M. Cella, K. J. Micklem, K. Pulford, A. C. Willis, D. Y. Mason. 1999. Identification of the CD85 antigen as ILT2, an inhibitory MHC class I receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily. J. Leukocyte Biol. 65:841.[Abstract]
  16. Saverino, D., C. Tenca, D. Zarcone, A. Merlo, A. M. Megiovanni, M. T. Valle, F. Manca, C. E. Grossi, E. Ciccone. 1999. CTLA-4 (CD152) inhibits the specific lysis mediated by human cytolytic T lymphocytes in a clonally distributed fashion. J. Immunol. 162:651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hubbard, A. L., Z. A. Cohn. 1976. Specific labels for cell surfaces. A. H. Maddy, ed. Biochemical Analysis of Membranes 427. Chapman and Hall, London.
  18. De Rossi, G., D. Zarcone, F. Mauro, G. Cerruti, C. Tenca, A. Puccetti, F. Mandelli, C. E. Grossi. 1993. Adhesion molecule expression on B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells: malignant cell phenotypes define distinct disease subsets. Blood 81:2679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Grynkiewicz, G., M. Poenic, R. Y. Tsien. 1985. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J. Biol. Chem. 260:3440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chambers, C. A., J. P. Allison. 1999. Costimulatory regulation of T cell function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:203.[Medline]
  21. Scheipers, P., H. Reiser. 1998. Role of the CTLA-4 receptor in T cell activation and immunity. Physiologic function of the CTLA-4 receptor. Immunol. Res. 18:103.[Medline]
  22. Lopez-Botet, M.. 1995. CD94 cluster report: overview of the characterization of the Kp43 NK cell associated surface antigen. S. F. Schlossman, and L. Boumsell, and W. Gilks, and J. M. Harlan, and T. Kishimoto, and C. Morimoto, and J. Ritz, and S. Shaw, and R. Silverstein, and T. Springer, et al eds. Leukocyte Typing V 1437. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  23. Samaridis, J., M. Colonna. 1997. Cloning of novel immunoglobulin superfamily receptors expressed on human myeloid and lymphoid cells: structural evidence for new stimulatory and inhibitory pathways. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:660.[Medline]
  24. Linsley, P. S., P. Golstein. 1996. Lymphocyte activation: T-cell regulation by CTLA-4. Curr. Biol. 6:398.[Medline]
  25. Chuang, E., K.-M. Lee, M. D. Robbins, J. M. Duerr, M.-L. Alegre, J. E. Hambor, M. J. Neveu, J. A. Bluestone, C. B. Thompson. 1999. Regulation of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4 by Src kinases. J. Immunol. 162:1270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bradshaw, J. D., P. Lu, G. Leytze, J. Rodgers, G. L. Schieven, K. L. Bennett, P. S. Linsley, S. E. Kurtz. 1997. Interaction of the cytoplasmic tail of CTLA-4 (CD152) with a clathrin-associated protein is negatively regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation. Biochemistry 36:15975.[Medline]
  27. Linsley, P. S., J. Bradshaw, J. Greene, R. Peach, K. L. Bennet, R. S. Mittler. 1996. Intracellular trafficking of CTLA-4 and focal localization towards sites of TCR engagement. Immunity 4:535.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
Y.-H. Huang, A. L. Zozulya, C. Weidenfeller, N. Schwab, and H. Wiendl
T cell suppression by naturally occurring HLA-G-expressing regulatory CD4+ T cells is IL-10-dependent and reversible
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2009; 86(2): 273 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Mori, S. Tsuji, M. Inui, Y. Sakamoto, S. Endo, Y. Ito, S. Fujimura, T. Koga, A. Nakamura, H. Takayanagi, et al.
Inhibitory Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors LILRB and PIR-B Negatively Regulate Osteoclast Development
J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4742 - 4751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Morel and T. Bellon
HLA Class I Molecules Regulate IFN-{gamma} Production Induced in NK Cells by Target Cells, Viral Products, or Immature Dendritic Cells through the Inhibitory Receptor ILT2/CD85j
J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2368 - 2381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. van Stijn, A. T. Rowshani, S. L. Yong, F. Baas, E. Roosnek, I. J. M. ten Berge, and R. A. W. van Lier
Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Induces a Rapid and Sustained Change in the Expression of NK Cell Receptors on CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4550 - 4560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
N. Tedla, C.-W. Lee, L. Borges, C. L. Geczy, and J. P. Arm
Differential expression of leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors on cord blood-derived human mast cell progenitors and mature mast cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 334 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Maffei, F. Ghiotto, M. Occhino, M. Bono, A. De Santanna, L. Battini, G. L. Gusella, F. Fais, S. Bruno, and E. Ciccone
Human Cytomegalovirus Regulates Surface Expression of the Viral Protein UL18 by Means of Two Motifs Present in the Cytoplasmic Tail
J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 969 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
C. S. Wagner, L. Walther-Jallow, E. Buentke, H.-G. Ljunggren, A. Achour, and B. J. Chambers
Human cytomegalovirus-derived protein UL18 alters the phenotype and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2008; 83(1): 56 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. S. Wagner, H.-G. Ljunggren, and A. Achour
Immune Modulation by the Human Cytomegalovirus-Encoded Molecule UL18, a Mystery Yet to Be Solved
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 19 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. Lichterfeld, D. G. Kavanagh, K. L. Williams, B. Moza, S. K. Mui, T. Miura, R. Sivamurthy, R. Allgaier, F. Pereyra, A. Trocha, et al.
A viral CTL escape mutation leading to immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 mediated functional inhibition of myelomonocytic cells
J. Exp. Med., November 26, 2007; 204(12): 2813 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. S. Wagner, G. C. Riise, T. Bergstrom, K. Karre, E. Carbone, and L. Berg
Increased Expression of Leukocyte Ig-Like Receptor-1 and Activating Role of UL18 in the Response to Cytomegalovirus Infection
J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3536 - 3543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Bahri, F. Hirsch, A. Josse, N. Rouas-Freiss, N. Bidere, A. Vasquez, E. D. Carosella, B. Charpentier, and A. Durrbach
Soluble HLA-G Inhibits Cell Cycle Progression in Human Alloreactive T Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 176(3): 1331 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. E. Kirwan and D. N. Burshtyn
Killer Cell Ig-Like Receptor-Dependent Signaling by Ig-Like Transcript 2 (ILT2/CD85j/LILRB1/LIR-1)
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 5006 - 5015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
A. Merlo, C. Tenca, F. Fais, L. Battini, E. Ciccone, C. E. Grossi, and D. Saverino
Inhibitory Receptors CD85j, LAIR-1, and CD152 Down-Regulate Immunoglobulin and Cytokine Production by Human B Lymphocytes
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., June 1, 2005; 12(6): 705 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Tenca, A. Merlo, E. Merck, E. E. M. Bates, D. Saverino, R. Simone, D. Zarcone, G. Trinchieri, C. E. Grossi, and E. Ciccone
CD85j (Leukocyte Ig-Like Receptor-1/Ig-Like Transcript 2) Inhibits Human Osteoclast-Associated Receptor-Mediated Activation of Human Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 6757 - 6763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Vales-Gomez, M. Shiroishi, K. Maenaka, and H. T. Reyburn
Genetic Variability of the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Homologue Encoded by Human Cytomegalovirus Leads to Differential Binding to the Inhibitory Receptor ILT2
J. Virol., February 15, 2005; 79(4): 2251 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Anfossi, J.-M. Doisne, M.-A. Peyrat, S. Ugolini, O. Bonnaud, D. Bossy, V. Pitard, P. Merville, J.-F. Moreau, J.-F. Delfraissy, et al.
Coordinated Expression of Ig-Like Inhibitory MHC Class I Receptors and Acquisition of Cytotoxic Function in Human CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., December 15, 2004; 173(12): 7223 - 7229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. E. Sloane, N. Tedla, M. Awoniyi, D. W. MacGlashan Jr, L. Borges, K. F. Austen, and J. P. Arm
Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors: novel innate receptors for human basophil activation and inhibition
Blood, November 1, 2004; 104(9): 2832 - 2839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. LeMaoult, I. Krawice-Radanne, J. Dausset, and E. D. Carosella
HLA-G1-expressing antigen-presenting cells induce immunosuppressive CD4+ T cells
PNAS, May 4, 2004; 101(18): 7064 - 7069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Saverino, F. Ghiotto, A. Merlo, S. Bruno, L. Battini, M. Occhino, M. Maffei, C. Tenca, S. Pileri, L. Baldi, et al.
Specific Recognition of the Viral Protein UL18 by CD85j/LIR-1/ILT2 on CD8+ T Cells Mediates the Non-MHC-Restricted Lysis of Human Cytomegalovirus-Infected Cells
J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5629 - 5637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Urosevic, J. Kamarashev, G. Burg, and R. Dummer
Primary cutaneous CD8+ and CD56+ T-cell lymphomas express HLA-G and killer-cell inhibitory ligand, ILT2
Blood, March 1, 2004; 103(5): 1796 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
E. C. Ibrahim, Y. Allory, F. Commo, B. Gattegno, P. Callard, and P. Paul
Altered Pattern of Major Histocompatibility Complex Expression in Renal Carcinoma: Tumor-Specific Expression of the Nonclassical Human Leukocyte Antigen-G Molecule Is Restricted to Clear Cell Carcinoma While Up-Regulation of Other Major Histocompatibility Complex Antigens Is Primarily Distributed in All Subtypes of Renal Carcinoma
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2003; 162(2): 501 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Nikolova, P. Musette, M. Bagot, L. Boumsell, and A. Bensussan
Engagement of ILT2/CD85j in Sezary syndrome cells inhibits their CD3/TCR signaling
Blood, July 18, 2002; 100(3): 1019 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Bellon, F. Kitzig, J. Sayos, and M. Lopez-Botet
Mutational Analysis of Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-Based Inhibition Motifs of the Ig-Like Transcript 2 (CD85j) Leukocyte Receptor
J. Immunol., April 1, 2002; 168(7): 3351 - 3359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
N. Tedla, K. Gibson, H. P. McNeil, D. Cosman, L. Borges, and J. P. Arm
The Co-Expression of Activating and Inhibitory Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors in Rheumatoid Synovium
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2002; 160(2): 425 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Urosevic, J. Willers, B. Mueller, W. Kempf, G. Burg, and R. Dummer
HLA-G protein up-regulation in primary cutaneous lymphomas is associated with interleukin-10 expression in large cell T-cell lymphomas and indolent B-cell lymphomas
Blood, January 15, 2002; 99(2): 609 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Saverino, A. Merlo, S. Bruno, V. Pistoia, C. E. Grossi, and E. Ciccone
Dual Effect of CD85/Leukocyte Ig-Like Receptor-1/Ig-Like Transcript 2 and CD152 (CTLA-4) on Cytokine Production by Antigen-Stimulated Human T Cells
J. Immunol., January 1, 2002; 168(1): 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. Merlo, D. Saverino, C. Tenca, C. E. Grossi, S. Bruno, and E. Ciccone
CD85/LIR-1/ILT2 and CD152 (Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4) Inhibitory Molecules Down-Regulate the Cytolytic Activity of Human CD4+ T-Cell Clones Specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2001; 69(10): 6022 - 6029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Aractingi, N. Briand, C. Le Danff, M. Viguier, H. Bachelez, L. Michel, L. Dubertret, and E. D. Carosella
HLA-G and NK Receptor Are Expressed in Psoriatic Skin : A Possible Pathway for Regulating Infiltrating T Cells?
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2001; 159(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saverino, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ciccone, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saverino, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ciccone, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS