|
|
||||||||



*
Department of Cytokine Biology, The Forsyth Institute, Boston, MA 02115;
Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in the murine model. The
production and activity of IL-1
is modulated by a network of
regulatory cytokines, including those produced by Th1
(pro-inflammatory) and Th2 (anti-inflammatory) subset T cells. This
study was designed to assess the functional role of the Th2-type
cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 in infection-stimulated bone resorption in
vivo. The dental pulps of the first molars were exposed and infected
with a mixture of four common endodontic pathogens, and bone
destruction was determined by micro-computed tomography at sacrifice on
day 21. The results demonstrate that IL-10-/- mice had
significantly greater infection-stimulated bone resorption in vivo
compared with wild-type mice (p < 0.001), whereas
IL-4-/- exhibited no increased resorption.
IL-10-/- had markedly elevated IL-1
production within
periapical inflammatory tissues (>10-fold) compared with wild type
(p < 0.01), whereas IL-4-/-
exhibited decreased IL-1
production (p < 0.05).
IL-10 also suppressed IL-1
production by macrophages in a
dose-dependent fashion in vitro, whereas IL-4 had weak and variable
effects. We conclude that IL-10, but not IL-4, is an important
endogenous suppressor of infection-stimulated bone resorption in vivo,
likely acting via inhibition of IL-1
expression. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several cytokines, including IL-1, TNF, IL-6, and IL-11, have been
reported to stimulate bone resorption (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In previous
studies in the periapical model, the expression of IL-1
mRNA and
protein was markedly increased in infiltrating macrophages and
polymorphonuclear leukocytes in inflammatory lesions. In functional
studies, most bone resorptive activity was attributable to the activity
of IL-1
(6, 7, 8).
IL-1
production and activity are potentially regulated by T
cell-derived cytokines (9). Mediators produced by Th1
cells up-regulate inflammation and IL-1 expression, whereas Th2
cell-derived cytokines are generally inhibitory. The Th2-type cytokines
IL-4 and IL-10 have been reported to down-regulate the production both
of IL-1 (10, 11, 12, 13, 14) and Th1-type cytokines (15, 16). IL-4 and IL-10 also suppress bone resorption in vitro
(17, 18, 19, 20). In murine periapical lesions, both IL-4 and
IL-10 expression was increased up to 2 wk after infection, declining
thereafter (21). There was a positive correlation between
Th1 cytokines IFN-
and IL-12 and bone resorptive cytokine expression
and a lack of correlation with IL-4 and IL-10 (21).
However, the intrinsic role of these cytokines in vivo is not
known.
In this study, the effect of IL-4 and IL-10 on infection-stimulated
bone destruction was examined in IL-4-deficient
(IL-4-/-), IL-10-deficient
(IL-10-/-), and wild-type mice using an in vivo
model of periapical inflammation. The regulation of endodontic
pathogen-stimulated IL-1
production by IL-4 and IL-10 in macrophages
was also assessed in vitro.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetically engineered 7-wk-old male IL-4-/- and IL-10-/- mice on backgrounds of BALB/c (for IL-4-/-) and C57BL/10J (IL-10-/-) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Animals were maintained in the Forsyth Institute Animal Facility (Boston, MA) under pathogen-free conditions. Age-matched wild-type BALB/c and C57BL/10J mice were used as controls.
Periapical lesion induction
Infection-stimulated periapical bone destruction was induced as
previously described (22). In brief, mice were
anesthetized with 62.5 mg/kg ketamine HCl and 12.5 mg/kg xylazine in
sterile PBS by intraperitoneal injection. All four first molar pulps
were exposed using a no. 1/4 dental round bur and a variable speed
electric handpiece (Osada Electric, Los Angeles, CA) under a surgical
microscope (MC-M92; Seiler, St. Louis. MO). The exposure site was
1.5-fold the diameter of the bur.
Exposed pulps were infected with a mixture of four common endodontic
pathogens, including Prevotella intermedia (American Type
Culture Collection
(ATCC)3 25611; ATCC,
Manassas, VA), Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC 25586),
Peptostreptococcus micros (ATCC 33270), and
Streptococcus intermedius (ATCC 27335). Organisms were grown
on tryptic soy broth with yeast agar plates, and subsequently in
mycoplasma liquid medium under anaerobic conditions (80%
N2, 10% H2, and 10%
C02). The cells were harvested by centrifugation
at 7000 x g for 15 min and resuspended in prereduced
anaerobically sterilized Ringers solution under nitrogen influx. The
final concentration of each organism was determined
spectrophotometrically, and the four species of microorganism were
mixed to yield
1010 cells of each bacterial
species/ml in 10 µg/ml methylcellulose. At the time of pulp exposure
(day 0), animals were infected with 10 µl of the bacterial mixture
inoculated directly into the exposed pulp. This regimen results in
reproducible infection of the root canal with pathogens in this model
(23). Mice without pulp exposure and infection were
established as negative controls in each strain.
Macrophage cultures
Resident peritoneal cells were isolated from IL-10-/- mice. A total of 5 ml of cold culture medium, consisting of RPMI 1640 (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), and 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), was injected into the peritoneal cavity and collected with the cells under sterile conditions. After washing three times with cold medium, the cells were resuspended at 106 cells/ml. Aliquots (160 µl) were dispensed into 96-well culture plates (Corning, Corning, NY), and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Nonadherent cells were removed by washing three times with warm medium, and the number of adherent cells was determined. Adherent cells comprised 67 ± 7% (n = 3) of the total cells plated.
For in vitro experiments, isolated macrophages were preincubated with or without regulatory cytokines for 1 h, following which they were stimulated with the four pathogens for 24 h in 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Pathogens were grown as described above, fixed with 0.5% formal saline for 24 h, washed three times in sterile PBS, resuspended in culture medium, and used to stimulate macrophages at 1.6 x 106 cells/well. Escherichia coli LPS (serotype 026:B6, Sigma) was used as a positive control (160 ng/well). Mouse rIL-4 and mouse rIL-10 (both from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were used at 0 (control), 0.1, 1, and 10 U/ml. After 24 h, the culture supernatants were collected and stored at -70°C until assay.
Tissue sample preparation
Animals were killed on day 21 after pulp exposure. After removal of soft tissue, one hemi-mandible was fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. For the other hemi-mandible and maxillae, the periapical tissues surrounding the mesial and distal root apices were carefully extracted, together with surrounding bone in a block specimen under a surgical microscope. Periapical tissues were rinsed in PBS, freed of clots, weighed, and immediately frozen at -70°C.
Micro-computed tomography analysis
Hemi-mandibles were scanned as previously described (24) using a compact fan-beam-type tomograph (µCT 20, Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) providing a 17-µm nominal resolution. The most centrally located section, which included the crown and distal root of the mandibular first molar and that exhibited a patent root canal apex was selected for quantitation. The cross-sectional area of periapical lesions was selected with Adobe Photoshop 4.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) and measured with NIH Image 1.61 (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Protein preparations and ELISA
For protein extraction, frozen periapical tissue samples were ground using a precooled sterile mortar and pestle, and the tissue fragments were dispersed in 800 µl lysis buffer consisting of 100 µg/ml BSA (fraction V, Sigma), 100 µg/ml Zwittergent-12 (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies), 10 mM HEPES buffer (Life Technologies), 1 µg/ml aprotinin (Sigma), 1 µg/ml leupeptin (Sigma), and 0.1 µM EDTA (Sigma) in RPMI 1640 (Mediatech) as previously described (6). The mixture was placed on ice and was subjected to a 20-s sonication. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation and stored at -70°C until assay.
Assays for cytokines in extracts employed commercially available ELISA
kits obtained from the following sources: IL-1
(Endogen, Cambridge,
MA; sensitivity 6 pg/ml), IL-6 (8 pg/ml), IL-12 (2 pg/ml), IFN-
(1
pg/ml) and TNF-
(3 pg/ml; all from BioSource International,
Camarillo, CA). All assays were conducted in accordance with the
manufacturers instructions. The concentration of each cytokine was
calculated from a standard curve that was constructed using recombinant
cytokines provided with each kit. Results were expressed as pg
cytokine/mg periapical tissue.
Statistical analysis
Differences in bone resorption and cytokine expression in
periapical lesions were analyzed by the nonpaired Students
t test. Differences in IL-1
production stimulated by
pathogens in vitro were analyzed by Dunnetts two-tailed t
test and Duncuns multiple range test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Th2-type cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-10, suppress
inflammatory responses, including the expression of IL-1, and have been
shown to inhibit bone resorption in vitro (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20). Therefore, we determined the effect of deficiencies of
these cytokines on infection-stimulated bone destruction in vivo. The
mandibular first molars of groups of IL-4-/-
(n = 8),
IL-10-/-(n = 10), and wild-type
mice (n = 8 for IL-4-/-
background strain BALB/c, n = 10 for
IL-10-/- background strain C57BL/10J) were
subjected to pulp exposure and were infected with a mixture of four
bacterial pathogens. The teeth of negative controls of all strains
remained unexposed and uninfected (n = 3 each). After
21 days, the extent of periapical bone destruction was determined by
micro-computed tomography analysis. As shown in Fig. 1
, unexposed and uninfected controls
exhibited no resorption; the indicated radiolucent area represents the
normal periodontal ligament that anchors teeth to the bone. In
contrast, all exposed and infected animals showed increased bone
resorption. Of importance, IL-10-/- mice
exhibited
5-fold increased periapical bone resorption, compared with
wild-type controls (p < 0.001), and often even
involved the neighboring uninfected second molar (Fig. 2
). Somewhat surprisingly,
IL-4-/- mice exhibited no increased resorption
compared with wild type. These data suggest that endogenously expressed
IL-10, but not IL-4, is an important inhibitor of infection-stimulated
bone destruction in vivo.
|
|
IL-1
has previously been shown to be the primary mediator of
bone resorption in this model, whereas TNF-
has no significant
resorptive effect (6). Therefore, the levels of IL-1
and other regulatory cytokines in inflammatory periapical tissues were
assessed by ELISA. As shown in Fig. 3
, the levels of IL-1
were markedly increased (>10-fold) in response
to infection in the periapical tissues of
IL-10-/- mice compared with wild-type
(p < 0.01). IL-6 was also increased
(p < 0.05), whereas the levels of TNF-
and
IL-12 (data not shown) were similar to wild type. Only IFN-
was
higher in wild-type mice (p < 0.05, data not
shown). In contrast, for IL-4-/- mice, a
significant decrease (p < 0.01) in IL-1
was
noted. There were also no differences in the other mediators tested.
Therefore, these data demonstrate a direct correlation between the
local expression of IL-1 in inflammatory tissue, and the extent of bone
resorption.
|
responses to pathogens
Macrophages are prominent in inflammatory periapical tissues, and
produce large quantities of IL-1 (7, 8). Therefore, we
tested the ability of the four infecting pathogens to induce IL-1
by
macrophages in vitro. Resident peritoneal macrophages were harvested,
and were stimulated with pathogens. After 24 h, culture
supernatants were harvested and analyzed for IL-1
content by ELISA.
As shown in Fig. 4
, stimulation of
macrophages with all pathogens induced substantial IL-1
expression,
compared with control cultures. The levels of IL-1
induced by
Gram-negative bacteria or LPS were higher than those induced by
Gram-positive bacteria. F. nucleatum especially induced
significantly greater amounts of IL-1
than were induced by other
pathogens (p < 0.05).
|
production by IL-4 and IL-10
The ability of IL-4 and IL-10 to modulate IL-1
production by
macrophages in vitro was determined. As shown in Fig. 5
, rIL-10 suppressed IL-1
production
by macrophages in response to all pathogens, in a dose-dependent
fashion (p < 0.05). In contrast, rIL-4 did not
show a significant suppressive effect on pathogen-stimulated IL-1
production. Therefore, these findings confirm and extend the in vivo
findings above with respect to the suppressive effect of IL-10.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, previously
reported to be the primary mediator of bone resorption in the murine
model (6, 25). In contrast,
IL-4-/- mice had decreased local IL-1
expression compared with wild-type controls. Taken together, these
findings demonstrate that endogenous IL-10, but not IL-4, suppresses
infection-stimulated inflammatory responses, including bone resorption,
and suggests that there is functional heterogeneity among the Th2-type
cytokines with regard to their regulation of osseous inflammation
in vivo. Similar functional discordance between IL-4 and IL-10 has been reported previously in other systems. For example, IL-10, but not IL-4, plays a critical role in the suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (26). IL-10 attenuates excessive inflammation and weight loss in Pseudomonas lung infections, and improves survival without affecting bacterial burden (27). In contrast, IL-4-deficient mice exhibit enhanced bacterial clearance, reduced inflammation, and improved survival in Staphylococcus aureus-induced septic arthritis (28).
The elevated IL-1
expression in IL-10-/-
mice was not unexpected, given previous reports that IL-1 production in
vitro (29, 30) and serum monokine levels in vivo are
increased by IL-10 neutralization (31). Therefore, we
confirmed the suppressive effect of both cytokines on
pathogen-stimulated IL-1
production by resident peritoneal
macrophages in vitro. The IL-10-/- strain was
used as a source of peritoneal macrophages to circumvent the effect of
endogenous IL-10 on modulating recombinant cytokines. IL-10 was found
to strongly suppress the levels of IL-1
in a dose-dependent fashion,
whereas IL-4 had only weak and variable inhibitory effects. These data
are consistent with findings that IL-10 is a more potent suppressor of
inflammatory cytokines than IL-4 in vitro (10, 11, 12, 13).
Whereas both IL-4 and IL-10 reduce steady-state levels of IL-1 mRNA,
there are reported differences in their suppressive mechanisms
(14, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38). IL-10 inhibits IL-1 at the transcriptional
level (39), likely by preventing LPS-stimulated activation
of NF-
B in monocytes (14), which is involved in the
induction of many inflammatory cytokine genes. In contrast, IL-4 has
weak effects on transcription (35, 36), but shows little
modulation of NF-
B (14). Both cytokines may also
inhibit IL-1 via posttranscriptional mechanisms (14, 33, 35, 38). IL-4 enhances LPS-stimulated IL-1 mRNA degradation
(14, 35), a process dependent on de novo protein synthesis
(33). IL-10 also decreases mRNA stability through an
AU-rich cluster present in the 3' untranslated region of a number of
inflammatory cytokine genes (38). The destabilizing effect
of IL-10 was relatively selective, because the stability of mRNAs was
not modulated by IL-4. In the present study, rIL-4 showed a modest
suppressive effect on LPS and S. intermedius-stimulated
IL-1
production, but did not inhibit IL-1
stimulated by
Gram-negative bacteria. In contrast, IL-10 showed a more potent
suppressive effect for all pathogens except S. intermedius.
Finally, IL-4 and IL-10 also increase IL-1R antagonist (34, 40, 41). Taken together, these data suggest that the
anti-inflammatory suppressive mechanisms induced by IL-10 on bone
are more effective than those mediated by IL-4.
The interaction of IL-10 with its receptor leads to the activation of
STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 (42). STAT3 activation by IL-10 is
an important factor in the deactivation of LPS-stimulated macrophages,
because LPS-induced inflammatory cytokine production was augmented in
mutant mice with a cell type-specific disruption of the STAT3 gene in
macrophages and neutrophils (43). In the present study,
strong IL-10 suppression was preferentially exerted on IL-1
production induced by LPS and Gram-negative bacteria in vitro,
consistent with a STAT3-mediated effect. However, there was also
obvious inhibition by rIL-10 of Gram-positive bacterial stimulation of
IL-1
. The dramatic (10-fold) increase in IL-1
levels in
IL-10-/- mice suggests that Gram-negative
bacteria were likely the most important pathogens in the mixed
anaerobic innoculum in vivo.
Both IL-4 and IL-10 have been reported to inhibit IL-1- and
TNF-
-stimulated bone resorption in vitro (17, 18, 19, 20). IL-1
stimulates resorption both directly and indirectly via expression of
cyclooxygenease-2 by osteoblasts (44, 45). Both mediators
inhibit bone resorption by suppressing cyclooxygenease-2-dependent
prostaglandin E2 synthesis (45, 46). Both IL-4
(17, 18, 19, 47, 48) and IL-10 (20, 49) also
inhibit recruitment of osteoclast precursors and their differentiation
to mature multinucleated osteoclasts. There was little difference
reported in the potency of resorption inhibition between IL-4 and IL-10
(46, 50), suggesting that the differential effects of
these mediators on infection-stimulated resorption in the present study
is not exerted on bone cells.
In IL-10-/- mice, IL-6 levels were also
significantly increased in local inflammatory tissues (Fig. 3
), whereas
the levels of IL-4 were unchanged. Although often considered to be a
proinflammatory mediator, recent data suggests that the predominant
effects of IL-6 may in fact be Th2-like and anti-inflammatory
(51). IL-6 is induced by IL-1 (52, 53, 54), but
can act as a feedback inhibitor by suppressing IL-1 transcription
(55, 56), and inducing IL-1R antagonist (57, 58). IL-6-/- also exhibit periapical
bone destruction that is increased, but less dramatically than we
observed in IL-10-/- mice (K. Balto and P.
Stashenko, unpublished observations). Therefore, increased expression
of IL-6 may represent a compensatory mechanism that is incompletely
effective in reducing inflammation in the absence of IL-10.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philip Stashenko, Department of Cytokine Biology, Forsyth Institute, 140 Fenway, Boston, MA 02115. ![]()
3 Abbreviation used in this paper: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection. ![]()
Received for publication May 30, 2000. Accepted for publication July 12, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in the pathogenesis of periapical bone destruction in a rat model system. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 8:50.[Medline]
B (NF-
B) activation in human monocytes: IL-10 and IL-4 suppress cytokine synthesis by different mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 270:9558.
and -ß, interleukins-1ß and -6 and interferon-
. Immunol. Cell Biol. 73:57.[Medline]
-induced prostaglandin E2 production by the antiinflammatory cytokines interleukin-4, interleukin-10, and interleukin-13 in osteoarthritic synovial fibroblasts: distinct targeting in the signaling pathways. Arthritis Rheum. 42:710.[Medline]
and IL-1ß mRNAs are suppressed, in the CNS. Cytokine 8:227.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Sasaki, N. Suzuki, R. Kent Jr., N. Kawashima, J. Takeda, and P. Stashenko T Cell Response Mediated by Myeloid Cell-Derived IL-12 Is Responsible for Porphyromonas gingivalis-Induced Periodontitis in IL-10-Deficient Mice J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 6193 - 6198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.A. Silva, G.P. Garlet, S.Y. Fukada, J.S. Silva, and F.Q. Cunha Chemokines in Oral Inflammatory Diseases: Apical Periodontitis and Periodontal Disease J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2007; 86(4): 306 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Stashenko, R. B. Goncalves, B. Lipkin, A. Ficarelli, H. Sasaki, and A. Campos-Neto Th1 Immune Response Promotes Severe Bone Resorption Caused by Porphyromonas gingivalis Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 203 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Goncalves, O. Leshem, K. Bernards, J. R. Webb, P. P. Stashenko, and A. Campos-Neto T-Cell Expression Cloning of Porphyromonas gingivalis Genes Coding for T Helper-Biased Immune Responses during Infection Infect. Immun., July 1, 2006; 74(7): 3958 - 3966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sasaki, K. Balto, N. Kawashima, J. Eastcott, K. Hoshino, S. Akira, and P. Stashenko Gamma Interferon (IFN-{gamma}) and IFN-{gamma}-Inducing Cytokines Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-18 Do Not Augment Infection-Stimulated Bone Resorption In Vivo Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2004; 11(1): 106 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Al-Rasheed, H. Scheerens, D.M. Rennick, H.M. Fletcher, and D.N. Tatakis Accelerated Alveolar Bone Loss in Mice Lacking Interleukin-10 J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2003; 82(8): 632 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-T. A. Teng THE ROLE OF ACQUIRED IMMUNITY AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE PROGRESSION Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 237 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Balto, H. Sasaki, and P. Stashenko Interleukin-6 Deficiency Increases Inflammatory Bone Destruction Infect. Immun., February 1, 2001; 69(2): 744 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |