|
|
||||||||
CUTTING EDGE |
B1


*
Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202; and
Department of Immunology, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-1, and
IL-6 (7, 8). Inasmuch as CD14 lacks transmembrane and
intracellular domains, the mechanism(s) of CD14-mediated transmembrane
signaling has remained elusive. CD14 physically associates with the
leukocyte integrin CR3 (9) and may thus promote cell
adherence, binding, and phagocytosis (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12).
Recently, Toll-like receptor 4
(TLR4)3 has been
identified as another LPS signaling partner. Hyporesponsiveness and
hyperresponsiveness to LPS have been traced to TLR4
(13, 14, 15). Because LPS and CD14 complexes transiently come
into the proximity of CR3 before cell adherence (9), we
hypothesized that LPS/CD14 complexes physically associate with TLR4
before the nuclear translocation of NF-
B. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LPS (Escherichia coli serotype 026:B6), lipid A
(F583), PMA, polymyxin B, and A23187 were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Company (St. Louis, MO). FITC and tetramethylrhodamineisothiocyanate
(TRITC) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Anti-NF-
B
mAbs were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
mAbs directed against Mo-5 and CD87 (urokinase receptor) were the
generous gifts of Dr. Robert Todd (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
MI).
Preparation of monocytes
Monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood using Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma) density gradient centrifugation at 300 x g for 45 min at room temperature. Cells were suspended in pyrogen-free and sterile HBSS containing Ca2+/Mg2+ (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and 50 ng/ml polymyxin B. Cells were allowed to adhere to glass coverslips at 37°C for 15 min then washed with HBSS.
Preparation of FITC- and TRITC-conjugated Abs
F(ab')2 of anti-CD14 (clone 26ic) and mAb for hTLR4 (clone HTA125) were used (16, 17). Abs were dialyzed against 0.15 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer at pH 9.3 overnight at 4°C. Samples were incubated with dyes at a fluorophore-protein ratio of 40 µg rhodamine or 30 µg FITC per milligram protein at room temperature for 4 h. The fluorescent conjugates were separated from unreacted fluorochromes by Sephadex G-25 (Sigma) column chromatography. Purified conjugates were dialyzed against PBS at pH 7.4 overnight at 4°C.
NF-
B nuclear staining
Monocytes were allowed to adhere to glass coverslips for 15 min
at 37°C, then treated with LPS as described below. After fixation
with methanol at -20°C and being made permeable with 2% Nonidet
P-40, cells were blocked with 20% normal goat serum at room
temperature for 20 min. Cells were incubated with 1 µg/ml rabbit
anti-human NF-
B Ab at room temperature for 60 min, rinsed with
PBS, labeled with 1 µg/ml fluorescein-conjugated secondary Ab in the
dark at 4°C for 4560 min, and then washed with buffer.
Fluorescence microscopy
An axiovert-inverted fluorescence microscope with HBO-100 mercury illumination (Carl Zeiss, New York, NY) interfaced to a Dell 410 workstation via Scion SG-7 video card (Vay Tek, Fairfield, IA) was used. The fluorescence images were collected by an intensified charge-coupled device camera, model XC-77 (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) and processed with ScionImage Software. A narrow bandpass-discriminating filter set was used with excitation at 485DF20 nm and emission of 530DF30 nm for FITC. For rhodamine, an excitation of 540DF20 nm and an emission of 590DF30 nm were used (Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT). Long-pass dichroic mirrors at 510 and 560 nm were used for FITC and rhodamine, respectively. For energy transfer imaging, the 485DF22, 510LP, and 590DF30 filter combination was used (18).
Single-cell imaging spectrophotometry
Single-cell spectra were obtained using a microscope/imaging spectrophotometer system (18, 19). Labeled cells were illuminated with an excitation filter at 485DF22 nm and a 510LP dichroic mirror for FITC and resonance energy transfer (RET) experiments. For rhodamine emission spectra, excitation was provided with a 540DF20-nm filter and a 560LP dichroic mirror. The emission spectra were obtained with an Acton-150 (Acton, MA) imaging spectrophotometer. The input side of the spectrophotometer was fiberoptically coupled to the microscope. The exit port of the spectrophotometer was attached to a Gen-II intensifier that was coupled with an I-MAX-512 camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ). Spectra collection was controlled by a high-speed Princeton ST-133 interface and a Stanford Research Systems (Sunnyvale, CA) DG-535 delay-gate generator. The systems were interfaced to a Dell 410 workstation running Winspec software (Princeton Instruments) to manage and analyze the data.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To study the physical proximity of CD14 and TLR4, RET microscopy was
used. RET microscopy, in both imaging and spectroscopic formats, can be
used to detect lateral proximity of membrane proteins. This is
accomplished by detecting the migration of excitation energy from donor
(FITC) to acceptor (TRITC) chromophores attached to different proteins
(22). Monocytes were allowed to adhere to endotoxin-free
glass coverslips. Cells were incubated with either 200 ng/ml LPS or
medium alone for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were fixed and stained with
FITC-conjugated anti-CD14, rhodamine-conjugated anti-TLR4, or
both at 4°C in the dark. The fluorescence images showed that
anti-CD14 and anti-TLR4 were expressed on monocytes, and that
the fluorescence of both receptors was enhanced after LPS stimulation
(Fig. 1
). Moreover, RET emission images
were only observed on cells treated with LPS, suggesting a role for LPS
in promoting the physical proximity between these two molecules.
|
560 nm. In contrast, when cells were incubated with 200 ng/ml LPS,
the spectrum showed two peaks at
560 and
590 nm, indicating the
presence of RET. Moreover, RET was not observed between anti-CD14
and anti-Mo5, anti-Mo1 (CD11b/CD18), or anti-CD87 in the
presence and absence of LPS (data not shown). Thus, RET is specific for
anti-CD14 and anti-TLR4 in the presence of LPS.
|
Although these data support an LPS-dependent physical association of
CD14 and TLR4, they do not discriminate between the possibilities that
LPS binding triggers 1) a lateral association of CD14 and TLR4 in the
plasma membrane, and 2) the delivery of preassociated CD14 and TLR4
from an intracellular pool to the plasma membrane. To address this
issue, we sought to up-regulate CD14 and TLR4 expression in the absence
of LPS. Therefore, we treated cells with the calcium ionophore A23187
(2 µM, 20 min, 37°C) in HBSS containing 5 mM
Ca2+. This procedure up-regulated CD14 and TLR4
expression to the same extent as LPS (Fig. 3
, A and B).
However, CD14-to-TLR4 RET was not observed in these cells (Fig. 3
C, A23187 control). Thus, CD14 and TLR4 are not delivered
to the plasma membrane in a preassociated form. When LPS (200 ng/ml) is
incubated with A23187-treated cells, RET is again observed (Fig. 3
C). Hence, the physical proximity of CD14 and TLR4 is
induced at the plasma membrane.
|
To correlate the physical association of CD14 and TLR4 with downstream
elements of signal transduction, we examined NF-
B translocation to
the nucleus. In these experiments, monocytes were incubated with 200
ng/ml LPS or culture medium alone for 60 min at 37°C. Cells were
fixed as described in Materials and Methods. After blocking
with 10% normal goat serum, cells were stained with FITC-conjugated
anti-NF-
B mAb. As expected, LPS induced NF-
B staining inside
the nucleus (Fig. 1
H). In contrast, there was no nuclear
staining for cells exposed to HBSS alone (Fig. 1
G). RET was
observed at the earliest time points tested, whereas roughly 1 h
was required to obtain nuclear staining for NF-
B. Thus, physical
proximity of CD14 and TLR4 precedes NF-
B nuclear translocation.
In this study we have shown that LPS triggers close physical proximity
between CD14 and TLR4. TLR4 is one member of the Toll-like receptor
family. TLR4 requires CD14 to participate in the process of LPS-induced
signaling, including NF-
B activation (21, 24). The
positive RET signal between TLR4 and CD14 indicates that the donor and
acceptor chromophores are
7 nm apart; on a molecular level, this
would roughly correspond to CD14 and TLR4 being nearest protein
neighbors. A CD14/LPS/TLR4 complex is consistent with other reports
suggesting that LPS is in close physical proximity with TLR4 during
signaling, although the binding affinity of LPS for TLR4 might be low
(25). We suggest a model wherein LPS induces physical
proximity between CD14 and TLR4. LPS is delivered from the serum
protein LPS-binding protein to membrane-bound CD14. LPS-charged CD14
has been previously shown to interact with the leukocyte integrin
CD11b/CD18 before cell adherence (9); this may contribute
to certain immediate responses of leukocytes to LPS. The close physical
proximity of CD14 and CD11b/CD18 is lost after adherence. It now
appears that LPS-charged CD14 may then promote changes in gene
expression by physically interacting with TLR4. We suggest that the
LPS/CD14 complex can associate with various membrane partners to elicit
different aspects of the inflammatory response. The ability of CD14 to
shuttle between CR3 and TLR4 is analogous to urokinase receptor
(another GPI-linked protein) shuttling between CR3 and CR4 during
neutrophil polarization (26, 27).
We have also shown that the up-regulation of CD14 and TLR4 are very early events in LPS stimulation of human monocytes. Although the up-regulation of CD14 has been previously reported (20, 21), the up-regulation of human TLR4 has not. However, TLR4 expression declines after LPS stimulation in murine peritoneal macrophages (28, 29). It is possible that this difference could be accounted for by species or cell type; differences in human and murine TLR4 responses have been reported (e.g., 25). However, this difference could also be accounted for by the fact that we are studying changes that take place over several minutes, whereas the down-regulation of TLR4 expression occurs over a period of hours and is temporally associated with LPS internalization and changes in TLR4 gene expression.
Although these studies have established a molecular proximity between CD14 and TLR4, they have not established the supramolecular composition of these signaling complexes. That is, there may be other components of the signaling complex. One possibility is CD11b/CD18. However, attempts to measure RET between TLR4 and CD11b/CD18 have not been successful (our unpublished data). It may be that these proteins are part of the same membrane domain or present in an array on a membrane, but too far apart to be detected with RET. However, other microscopic methods, such as fluctuation correlation spectroscopy, might contribute to further dissecting these signaling complexes within the membranes of intact living cells.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Howard R. Petty, Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; RET, resonance energy transfer; TRITC, tetramethylrhodamineisothiocyanate. ![]()
Received for publication June 27, 2000. Accepted for publication July 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RIIIb to CR3 proximity on neutrophils. J. Immunol. 164:953.
Mß2) during neutrophil polarization. J. Immunol. 156:297.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Jackson, W. Abate, J. Parton, S. Jones, and J. L. Harwood Lysophospholipid metabolism facilitates Toll-like receptor 4 membrane translocation to regulate the inflammatory response J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2008; 84(1): 86 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Henning, A. K. Azad, K. V. L. Parsa, J. E. Crowther, S. Tridandapani, and L. S. Schlesinger Pulmonary Surfactant Protein A Regulates TLR Expression and Activity in Human Macrophages J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 7847 - 7858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Meng, P. Parroche, D. T. Golenbock, and C. J. McKnight The Differential Impact of Disulfide Bonds and N-Linked Glycosylation on the Stability and Function of CD14 J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3376 - 3384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Krogh-Madsen, P. Plomgaard, T. Akerstrom, K. Moller, O. Schmitz, and B. K. Pedersen Effect of short-term intralipid infusion on the immune response during low-dose endotoxemia in humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2008; 294(2): E371 - E379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Khan, S. Ghousunnissa, S. M. Jegadeeswaran, D. Thiagarajan, S. E. Hasnain, and S. Mukhopadhyay Anti-B7-1/B7-2 antibody elicits innate-effector responses in macrophages through NF-{kappa}B-dependent pathway Int. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 477 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Satta, S. Dunoyer-Geindre, G. Reber, R. J. Fish, F. Boehlen, E. K. O. Kruithof, and P. de Moerloose The role of TLR2 in the inflammatory activation of mouse fibroblasts by human antiphospholipid antibodies Blood, February 15, 2007; 109(4): 1507 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. BOSSHART and M. HEINZELMANN Targeting Bacterial Endotoxin: Two Sides of a Coin Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., January 1, 2007; 1096(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nishitani, H. Mitsuzawa, H. Sano, T. Shimizu, N. Matsushima, and Y. Kuroki Toll-like Receptor 4 Region Glu24-Lys47 Is a Site for MD-2 Binding: IMPORTANCE OF CYS29 AND CYS40 J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38322 - 38329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cuschieri, J. Billigren, and R. V. Maier Endotoxin tolerance attenuates LPS-induced TLR4 mobilization to lipid rafts: a condition reversed by PKC activation J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 80(6): 1289 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Powers, K. Szaszi, R. G. Khadaroo, P. S. Tawadros, J. C. Marshall, A. Kapus, and O. D. Rotstein Oxidative stress generated by hemorrhagic shock recruits Toll-like receptor 4 to the plasma membrane in macrophages J. Exp. Med., August 7, 2006; 203(8): 1951 - 1961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. BRAAT, M. P PEPPELENBOSCH, and D. W HOMMES Immunology of Crohn's disease. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., August 1, 2006; 1072: 135 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Romics Jr, G. Szabo, J. C. Coffey, J. H. Wang, and H. P. Redmond The Emerging Role of Toll-Like Receptor Pathways in Surgical Diseases Arch Surg, June 1, 2006; 141(6): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. McNamara, M. Gallup, A. Sucher, I. Maltseva, D. McKemy, and C. Basbaum AsialoGM1 and TLR5 Cooperate in Flagellin-Induced Nucleotide Signaling to Activate Erk1/2 Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 653 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Motegi, M. Kinoshita, K. Sato, N. Shinomiya, S. Ono, S. Nonoyama, H. Hiraide, and S. Seki An in vitro Shwartzman reaction-like response is augmented age-dependently in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Park, F. Gamboni-Robertson, Q. He, D. Svetkauskaite, J.-Y. Kim, D. Strassheim, J.-W. Sohn, S. Yamada, I. Maruyama, A. Banerjee, et al. High mobility group box 1 protein interacts with multiple Toll-like receptors Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): C917 - C924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Harada, K Isse, and Y Nakanuma Interferon {gamma} accelerates NF-{kappa}B activation of biliary epithelial cells induced by Toll-like receptor and ligand interaction J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 59(2): 184 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Rosenfeld, N. Papo, and Y. Shai Endotoxin (Lipopolysaccharide) Neutralization by Innate Immunity Host-Defense Peptides: PEPTIDE PROPERTIES AND PLAUSIBLE MODES OF ACTION J. Biol. Chem., January 20, 2006; 281(3): 1636 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Elner, H. R. Petty, V. M. Elner, A. Yoshida, Z.-M. Bian, D. Yang, and A. L. Kindzelskii TLR4 Mediates Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Endotoxin Binding and Cytokine Expression Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 4627 - 4633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Hadley, J. E. Wang, S. J. Foster, C. Thiemermann, and C. J. Hinds Peptidoglycan of Staphylococcus aureus Upregulates Monocyte Expression of CD14, Toll-Like Receptor 2 (TLR2), and TLR4 in Human Blood: Possible Implications for Priming of Lipopolysaccharide Signaling Infect. Immun., November 1, 2005; 73(11): 7613 - 7619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Lanzarotto, A Akbar, and S Ghosh Does innate immune response defect underlie inflammatory bowel disease in the Asian population? Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2005; 81(958): 483 - 485. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Choe, M. S. Kelker, and I. A. Wilson Crystal Structure of Human Toll-Like Receptor 3 (TLR3) Ectodomain Science, July 22, 2005; 309(5734): 581 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lentschat, H. Karahashi, K. S. Michelsen, L. S. Thomas, W. Zhang, S. N. Vogel, and M. Arditi Mastoparan, a G Protein Agonist Peptide, Differentially Modulates TLR4- and TLR2-Mediated Signaling in Human Endothelial Cells and Murine Macrophages J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 4252 - 4261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Whitsett, C. J. Bachurski, K. C. Barnes, P. A. Bunn Jr., L. M. Case, D. N. Cook, D. Crooks, M. W. Duncan, L. Dwyer-Nield, R. C. Elston, et al. Functional Genomics of Lung Disease Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2004; 31(2/S1): S1 - S81. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Epelman, D. Stack, C. Bell, E. Wong, G. G. Neely, S. Krutzik, K. Miyake, P. Kubes, L. D. Zbytnuik, L. L. Ma, et al. Different Domains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exoenzyme S Activate Distinct TLRs J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 2031 - 2040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Komai-Koma, L. Jones, G. S. Ogg, D. Xu, and F. Y. Liew TLR2 is expressed on activated T cells as a costimulatory receptor PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 3029 - 3034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Branger, S. Knapp, S. Weijer, J. C. Leemans, J. M. Pater, P. Speelman, S. Florquin, and T. van der Poll Role of Toll-Like Receptor 4 in Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pneumonia in Mice Infect. Immun., February 1, 2004; 72(2): 788 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Campos, G. M. S. Rosinha, I. C. Almeida, X. S. Salgueiro, B. W. Jarvis, G. A. Splitter, N. Qureshi, O. Bruna-Romero, R. T. Gazzinelli, and S. C. Oliveira Role of Toll-Like Receptor 4 in Induction of Cell-Mediated Immunity and Resistance to Brucella abortus Infection in Mice Infect. Immun., January 1, 2004; 72(1): 176 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Lee, J. Ye, Z. Gao, H. S. Youn, W. H. Lee, L. Zhao, N. Sizemore, and D. H. Hwang Reciprocal Modulation of Toll-like Receptor-4 Signaling Pathways Involving MyD88 and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT by Saturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37041 - 37051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Van Amersfoort, T. J. C. Van Berkel, and J. Kuiper Receptors, Mediators, and Mechanisms Involved in Bacterial Sepsis and Septic Shock Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2003; 16(3): 379 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Mizel, A. P. West, and R. R. Hantgan Identification of a Sequence in Human Toll-like Receptor 5 Required for the Binding of Gram-negative Flagellin J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23624 - 23629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Su, P. J. M. Ceponis, S. Lebel, H. Huynh, and P. M. Sherman Helicobacter pylori Activates Toll-Like Receptor 4 Expression in Gastrointestinal Epithelial Cells Infect. Immun., June 1, 2003; 71(6): 3496 - 3502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A J Kvalsvig and D J Unsworth The immunopathogenesis of meningococcal disease J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2003; 56(6): 417 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Vega and A. De Maio Geldanamycin Treatment Ameliorates the Response to LPS in Murine Macrophages by Decreasing CD14 Surface Expression Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2003; 14(2): 764 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. I. Miller, S. Viriyakosol, C. J. Binder, J. R. Feramisco, T. N. Kirkland, and J. L. Witztum Minimally Modified LDL Binds to CD14, Induces Macrophage Spreading via TLR4/MD-2, and Inhibits Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 10, 2003; 278(3): 1561 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Cooke, K. Olkiewicz, N. Erickson, and J. L.M. Ferrara The role of endotoxin and the innate immune response in the pathophysiology of acute graft versus host disease Innate Immunity, December 1, 2002; 8(6): 441 - 448. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bosshart and M. Heinzelmann Arginine-Rich Cationic Polypeptides Amplify Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Monocyte Activation Infe |