The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garside, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garside, P.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 3136-3144.
Copyright © 00 by The American Association of Immunologists

Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T Cells Provide Help for B Cell Clonal Expansion and Antibody Synthesis in a Similar Manner In Vivo1

Karen M. Smith, Lindsay Pottage, Elaine R. Thomas, Andrew J. Leishman, Tamsin N. Doig, Damo Xu, Foo Y. Liew and Paul Garside2

Department of Immunology and Bacteriology, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The relative ability of Th1 and Th2 T cells to help B cells remains controversial as do the mechanisms by which both T cell subsets provide help in vivo. Whether this help affects the clonal expansion and/or differentiation of B cells has been difficult to assess due to the low frequency of Ag-specific T and B lymphocytes. We have employed a novel technique to directly monitor the clonal expansion of Ag-specific T and B lymphocytes in vivo. OVA-specific TCR transgenic T lymphocytes were polarized toward a Th1 or Th2 phenotype in vitro. These cells were then transferred into syngeneic recipients, along with B cell receptor transgenic hen egg lysozyme-specific B lymphocytes. Our results indicate that Th1 and Th2 cells support B cell responses to a similar extent in vivo and that they achieve this in the same manner by migrating into B cell follicles to promote CD154-dependent B cell clonal expansion and Ab production.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The B cell response to protein Ags requires cognate interactions between Ag-specific B cells and activated Ag-specific Th cells within the microenvironment of secondary lymphoid tissues (1, 2, 3). T cell activation involves the presentation of Ag by professional APCs, such as dendritic cells (DC),3 to naive Ag-specific T cells. Once activated, T cells clonally expand and move to the outer edge of B cell follicles where they can interact with Ag-specific B cells, which have also encountered Ag in the lymph node and have moved to the same location (3). The B cell is then able to present Ag to the T cell, which, in turn, provides the B cell with stimulation via surface molecules, such as CD154 (4, 5, 6), and soluble cytokines. These signals drive the various components required for an effective B cell response, which include clonal expansion, differentiation, Ab production, and isotype switching (7).

Th cells can be divided into at least two subsets, Th1 and Th2, determined by which cytokines they produce upon activation (8), with Th1 cells producing IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, and TNFß, and Th2 cells producing IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13. The balance of cytokines produced by these subsets is a key factor influencing the character of an immune response (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Although a number of studies have demonstrated the ability of both Th1 and Th2 cells to support B cell responses (14, 15, 16, 17), the latter are widely believed to be particularly adept in this respect, as the cytokines they characteristically secrete have all been implicated in various stages of B cell proliferation and differentiation (11, 18, 19, 20). However, many of the studies noted above were performed in vitro, employed T cells clones or lines, relied upon different Ags to induce Th1 or Th2 responses, or could not identify the Ag-specific cells in question. Recent studies employing the adoptive transfer of TCR transgenic (tg) T cells have indicated that, in contrast to Th2 cells, CCR7 expression on Th1 cells reduces their migration to follicles and hence their ability to help B cell responses in vivo (21). However, Th2 cells may not be essential for B cell proliferation and differentiation, as IL-4 or IL-5 knockout (KO) mice, which have deficient Th2 responses, have readily detectable Ab production and germinal center formation (22, 23, 24). Furthermore, whereas Th1 cells are associated with cell-mediated immunity, and generally regarded as less important for B cell responses, IgG2a isotype switching is promoted by IFN-{gamma} (20, 25, 26), the prototypical Th1 cytokine. These results suggest that Th2 cells are not unique in their ability to induce T-dependent B cell responses and that the mechanisms by which Th1 and Th2 cells provide B cell help remain to be defined, particularly in vivo. Understanding the relative roles of Th1 and Th2 cells in providing help for B cells and the mechanisms they employ to achieve this will be important for the rational design of vaccines and therapies for immune-mediated disorders.

To study the role of Th1 and Th2 cells in providing B cell help in vivo, we have modified a recently developed system to investigate the interactions and requirements underlying T cell help for B cell responses. By polarizing Ag-specific TCR tg T cells toward a Th1 or Th2 phenotype in vitro and transferring them into naive syngeneic recipients along with Ag-specific B cell receptor (BcR) tg B cells, we have been able to examine the effect Th1 and Th2 cells have on B cell expansion, differentiation, and Ab production in vivo. Our results indicate that, following immunization, both Th1 and Th2 cells migrate into B cell follicles to support B cell clonal expansion and Ab production in a CD154-dependent manner.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

BALB/c (H-2d/d, IgMa), C57BL/6 (H-2b/b, IgMb/b), and BALB/c x C57BL/6 F1 (H-2d/b, IgMa/b) mice were purchased from Harlan Olac (Bichester, U.K.). Mice homozygous for the chicken OVA (cOVA) peptide323–339/I-Ad-specific DO11.10 TCR transgenes (detected using the clonotypic mAb KJ1.26) on the BALB/c background (27) were crossed to C57BL/6 mice to produce animals heterozygous for the DO11.10 transgenes on an F1 background. Similarly, mice heterozygous for the anti-HEL IgMa and IgDa transgenes on the C57BL/6 background (MD4) (28) were crossed to BALB/c mice, and offspring from this cross were screened for the expression of the MD4 transgenes by flow cytometry. Six-week-old, male C57BL/6 x BALB/c F1 mice were used as recipients (Harlan Olac). All animals were maintained under standard conditions at the University of Glasgow Central Research Facility in accordance with Home Office regulations.

Flow cytometry

Cell suspensions were prepared from pooled draining lymph nodes by forcing them through a nylon mesh (Cadisch Precision Meshes, London, U.K.). Aliquots of these cells were stained with PE-labeled anti-CD4 mAb CD4 (L3T4) (RM4-5) (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and biotinylated KJ1.26 mAb followed by FITC-labeled streptavidin (PharMingen) for the detection of DO11.10 T cells. Tg B cells were detected with PE-labeled anti-B220 mAb (RA3-6B2) (PharMingen) in combination with biotinylated hen egg lysozyme (HEL) (Biozyme, Blaenavon, Gwent, U.K.) or biotinylated anti-IgMa mAb (Igh-6a) (DS-1) (PharMingen) followed by FITC-labeled streptavidin. Stained cells (20,000 per sample) were then analyzed by flow cytometry using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, U.K.).

Cytokines and Abs for in vitro polarization of Th1 and Th2 cells

Recombinant murine IL-4 was kindly provided by Genzyme (Cambridge, MA) and recombinant murine IL-12 by Hoffman-LaRoche (Nutley, NJ). Anti-IL-12 polyclonal rabbit serum and anti-IFN-{gamma} polyclonal sheep serum were used at 1/500 dilution. Anti-IL-4 mAb 11B11 was used as described previously (29).

T cell purification and T cell cultures

T cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 1.25 mg/ml fungizone (complete medium) (all Life Technologies, Paisley, Scotland, U.K.). Naive CD4+ T cells were purified from pooled lymph node and spleen cells from DO11.10 BALB/c x C57BL/6 F1 mice by negative selection. B cells, monocytes, and CD8+ T cells were removed using anti-CD19, anti-CD11c, and anti-CD8 mAbs (all Serotec, Oxford, U.K.), respectively, which were then bound by anti-IgG MACS beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. APCs were obtained by irradiating BALB/c x C57BL/6 spleen cells (2000 rad). T cell differentiation was induced by culturing 2 x 105/ml CD4+ T cells with 2 x 106/ml APC and 0.3 µM OVA323–339 (Genosys, Cambridgeshire, U.K.). In addition, Th1 cell cultures included 5 ng/ml IL-12 and 10 µg/ml anti-IL-4 mAb (11B11), whereas Th2 polarizing cultures incorporated 5 ng/ml IL-4, 1/500 anti-IL-12, and 1/500 anti-IFN-{gamma} serum. After 3 days of culture, the cells were washed and harvested for transfer.

Adoptive transfer

Single cell suspensions of naive lymph node and spleen cells were prepared from DO11.10 and MD4 F1 transgenic mice. Th1 and Th2 cells were prepared as described above. The percentage of CD4+, KJ1.26+ DO11.10 T cells or HEL-binding, IgMa+ B cells in these preparations was determined by flow cytometric analysis. Cell suspensions containing 1–6 x 106 tg T and 1–6 x 106 tg B cells were mixed and injected i.v. into unirradiated, age- and sex-matched BALB/c x C57BL/6 F1 recipients at the same time.

Ags and immunizations

cOVA-HEL was prepared by coupling HEL to cOVA using glutaraldehyde as described previously (3). Animals were injected s.c. with 130 µg of coupled Ag in CFA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).

Ab treatments

Mice were injected with 250 µg anti-CD154 mAb (clone MR-1, kind gift of Dr. R. Noelle, Department of Microbiology, Dartmouth Medical College, Lebanon, NH) or 250 µg hamster IgG (ICN Biochemicals, Aurora, OH) i.p. on the day of immunization and 2 days later.

Cell cultures for cytokine analysis

Seven or fourteen days postimmunization, single cell suspensions were prepared from draining lymph nodes as described above, washed, and resuspended in complete medium at 4 x 106 cells/ml. Cells were added to 24-well plates (Costar, Corning, NY) in 1-ml aliquots and stimulated with 5 µM OVA323–339 peptide. Forty-eight hours later, supernatants were harvested and frozen to be assayed later by ELISA.

ELISAs

Abs. To detect tg B cell-derived anti-HEL IgMa in serum, Immulon 2 plates (Costar) were coated with HEL (20 µg/ml) at 4°C overnight. Plates were then washed at least three times with PBS-0.05% Tween before being blocked with PBS-10% FCS for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed and incubated with serially diluted serum samples for 3 h at 37°C before further washing. IgMa levels in serum were determined by incubation with biotinylated IgMa (Igh-6a) (DS-1) (2 µg/ml) (PharMingen) for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were then washed and incubated with Extravidin (1/1000) (Sigma) for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed again and TMB Microwell Peroxidase Substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) was added. To detect anti-cOVA IgG isotypes from endogenous B cells, a similar protocol as above was followed except that plates were coated with cOVA (2 µg/ml) (Sigma) followed by biotinylated anti-IgG2a (PharMingen) or biotinylated anti-IgG1 (Serotec), Extravidin, and TMB.

Cytokines. To detect IL-2, IL-5, and IFN-{gamma} produced from TCR tg T cells restimulated in vitro, Immulon 4 plates (Costar) were coated with anti-IL-2, anti-IL-5, or anti-IFN-{gamma} detection Abs (all PharMingen) overnight at 4°C. Plates were then washed and blocked as above. Plates were next washed and incubated with supernatants for 3 h at 37°C before being washed again and incubated with a biotinylated detection Ab, 0.5 µg/ml anti-IL-2, 2 µg/ml anti-IL-5, or 4 µg/ml anti-IFN-{gamma} (all PharMingen) for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed and incubated with Extravidin (1/1000) for 1 h at 37°C before being washed again. TMB Microwell Peroxidase substrate was then added as above. IL-5 and IFN-{gamma} standards were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). IL-4 was measured using a kit from Genzyme Diagnostics (Cambridge, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All ELISAs were read on a plate reader at 630 nm.

Immunohistochemistry

Lymph nodes were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen in OCT embedding medium (Miles, Diagnostic Division, Elkhart, IN). Tissue sections (6–10 µm) were cut on a cryostat microtome, fixed in acetone, and allowed to dry before being blocked in PBS-2% Goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, U.K.). Sections were then stained with KJ1.26 (1/400) for 30 min before being washed in PBS for 15 min. Sections were then incubated with avidin-biotin complex-labeled alkaline phosphatase (Vector) for 30 min before being washed as before. Sections were next incubated with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphatase/nitroblue tetrazolium substrate (Vector) for 45 min, and then washed. Sections were next incubated with biotinylated anti-CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2) (1/500) (PharMingen) for 30 min before washing. Avidin-biotin complex-labeled peroxidase (Vector) was then added for 30 min before washing. Sections were finally incubated in 3,3'-diaminobenzidine substrate for 10 min before a final wash, dehydration in 95% ethanol followed by 100% ethanol and clearing in Histoclear (BS & S, Edinburgh, U.K.). Sections were left to dry before mounting in ImmunoMount (Vector).

Statistics

Results are represented as the mean ± the range where groups contained two animals. If groups contained at least three animals, results are represented as the mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Phenotype of polarized T cells

CD4+ T cells were purified from DO11.10 mice by negative selection and polarized in vitro to become Th1 or Th2 cells. After 3 days of culture, these cells were harvested for adoptive transfer. Before transfer, an aliquot of each cell type was cultured in vitro with OVA323–339 peptide and their cytokine profile determined by ELISA (Fig. 1Go). Th1 cells produced high levels of IFN-{gamma} and little IL-5, whereas Th2 polarized cells produced significant amounts of IL-5 and low levels of IFN-{gamma}. Therefore, after polarization under the appropriate conditions in vitro, DO11.10 T cells adopted the expected Th1 and Th2 phenotypes.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. OVA-specific DO11.10 Th1 and Th2 cells are identified by their distinct cytokine profiles. Naive CD4+KJ1.26+ T cells were purified from DO11.10 TCR tg BALB/c x C57BL6 F1 mice and cultured with irradiated spleen cells from nontransgenic BALB/c x C57BL6 F1 mice and 5 µM OVA323–339 peptide. IL-12 and anti-IL-4 were added to cultures to promote differentiation of Th1 cells, and IL-4, anti-IFN-{gamma}, and anti-IL-12 were added to promote differentiation of Th2 cells. Induction of a Th1 or Th2 phenotype was assessed by measuring IFN-{gamma} (A) and IL-5 (B) produced by cultured cells after further in vitro stimulation. Data represent mean ± SEM for triplicate wells. Similar results were obtained in one further experiment.

 
Behavior of Ag-specific Th1 and Th2 cells in vivo

Unpolarized, Th1 and Th2 OVA-specific TCR tg T cells and HEL-specific tg B cells were transferred into naive syngeneic BALB/c x C57BL/6 F1 mice, which were then immunized with cOVA-HEL in CFA. The draining lymph nodes were removed from recipients 3, 5, and 14 days after immunization, and flow cytometric analysis performed. Th1, Th2, and unpolarized tg T cells could all be detected in vivo (Fig. 2Go). In agreement with our previous studies (3), peak clonal expansion was observed on day 3 after immunization with unpolarized TCR tg T cells and this was similar for the Th1 and Th2 groups. Unpolarized and Th1 cells expanded to similar levels, whereas Th2 cells proliferated to a lesser extent. All immunized groups displayed expansion above unimmunized control levels, indicating that in vitro polarized Th1 and Th2 TCR tg T cells can survive and respond to Ag in vivo.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Kinetics of CD4+KJ1.26+ T cell clonal expansion after immunization. Nontransgenic BALB/C x C57BL6 F1 mice were injected with 2 x 106 CD4+KJ1.26+ unpolarized ({blacksquare}), Th1 (•), or Th2 ({blacktriangleup}) T cells along with 3–6 x 106 B220+ HEL-specific B cells. On day 0, transfer recipients were injected s.c. with 130 µg cOVA-HEL in CFA. The percentage of CD4+KJ1.26+ T cells in the draining lymph nodes of adoptively transferred recipients was assessed by flow cytometry on days 3, 5, and 14 after immunization. Each time point represents the mean ± range for at least two mice per group. Unimmunized controls from each time point were averaged and represented as day 0. Similar results were obtained in two additional experiments.

 
Phenotype of polarized T cells in vivo

To confirm the phenotype of the polarized tg T cells following their adoptive transfer, we examined their effect on isotype switching of the endogenous anti-OVA Ab response of the recipients. The endogenous anti-OVA Ab responses of animals transferred with naive, Th1, or Th2 cells was assessed as the HEL-specific tg B cells are unable to switch their heavy chains. The serum level of anti-OVA IgG2a was determined 14 days postimmunization (Fig. 3GoA). OVA-specific IgG2a could be detected in immunized mice transferred with Th1 or unpolarized T cells, but not in those transferred with Th2 cells. No OVA-specific IgG2a could be detected in any unimmunized groups. There was no difference between immunized mice transferred with Th1 and Th2 cells when anti-OVA IgG1 levels were examined (data not shown); this may be explained by the recent report that this isotype is not entirely Th2-dependent (30).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Production of OVA-specific IgG2a Ab isotypes and cytokine profile of ex vivo CD4+KJ1.26+ T cells following Ag-specific restimulation in vitro. Serum from day 14 (as described in Fig. 2Go) was collected and assessed for OVA-specific IgG2a by ELISA (A). Each time point represents the mean OD ± range for at least two mice per group. Similar results were obtained in one further experiment. Lymph node cells from adoptive transfer recipients were collected 7 or 14 days postimmunization (as described in Fig. 2Go) and cultured in vitro with 5 µM OVA323–339 peptide. The peptide-specific production of IFN-{gamma} (B), IL-4 (C), or IL-5 (D) was measured by ELISA in supernatants collected after 48 h stimulation. Little or no cytokine production was apparent in the absence of peptide stimulation. Each time point represents the mean ± range for at least two mice per group. Similar results were obtained in two additional experiments.

 
Cytokine profile of OVA-specific cells ex vivo

To further confirm the functional phenotype of the transferred polarized TCR tg T cells, lymph nodes from immunized and unimmunized transferred mice were removed 7 and 14 days postimmunization, and single cell suspensions were prepared. These cells were then cultured in vitro with or without OVA323–339 peptide, and their cytokine production profile was analyzed. OVA323–339 peptide-specific T cells from animals receiving Th1 polarized cells and OVA/CFA continue to produce IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 3GoB) but little IL-4 (Fig. 3GoC) or IL-5 (Fig. 3GoD) after peptide stimulation, whereas peptide-specific T cells from animals transferred with Th2 polarized cells and immunized with OVA/CFA produce IL-4 (Fig. 3GoC) and IL-5 (Fig. 3GoD) but little IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 3GoB). Unpolarized cells produced a mixture of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines when restimulated in vitro (Fig. 3Go). Little or no cytokine production was apparent in the absence of peptide stimulation.

Effect of tg Th1 and Th2 cells on tg B cells in vivo

Clonal expansion. The relative abilities of Th1 and Th2 cells to provide B cell help could be reflected in differences in B cell clonal expansion, Ab production, or both. However, it has previously been difficult to make such comparisons due to the inability to track Ag-specific T and B cells in vivo. Therefore, we employed an adaptation of a recently described adoptive transfer system in which the response of BcR tg B cells is dependent upon cognate help from TCR tg T cells, as noted above, to directly assess Ag-specific B cell clonal expansion and Ab production in vivo in the context of help from Th1 or Th2 cells. The kinetics and magnitude of the B cell response to immunization with OVA-HEL/CFA was similar in animals receiving unpolarized, Th1 or Th2 TCR tg cells. In agreement with our previous studies (3), B cell clonal expansion peaked 5 days postimmunization before declining toward control levels by day 14 (Fig. 4GoA). Indeed, even though the Th2 cells themselves did not expand as well as unpolarized or Th1 cells (Fig. 2Go), they displayed a similar capacity to support B cell expansion (Fig. 4GoA). Thus, animals adoptively transferred with unpolarized, Th1, or Th2 cells and immunized with cOVA-HEL/CFA all appeared capable of supporting similar levels of clonal expansion of HEL-specific BcR tg B cells. As we have shown previously (3) and confirmed here (Table IGo), the BcR tg B cells do not respond in the absence of cognate help from the TCR tg T cells.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Kinetics of B220+HEL-specific B cell clonal expansion and Ab production after immunization. Nontransgenic BALB/C x C57BL6 F1 mice were injected with 2 x 106 CD4+KJ1.26+ unpolarized ({blacksquare}), Th1 (•), or Th2 ({blacktriangleup}) T cells along with 3–6 x 106 B220+HEL-specific B cells. On day 0, transfer recipients were injected s.c. with 130 µg cOVA-HEL in CFA. The percentage of B220+HEL-specific B cells in the draining lymph nodes of adoptively transferred recipients was assessed by flow cytometry on days 3, 5, and 14 after immunization (A). Each time point represents the mean ± range for at least two mice per group. The serum of nontransgenic BALB/C x C57BL6 F1 mice, which received 3–6 x 106 B220+ HEL-specific B cells and 2 x 106 CD4+ KJ1.26+ unpolarized ({blacksquare}), Th1 (•), or Th2 ({blacktriangleup}) T cells, was collected on days 3, 5, 7, and 14 postimmunization with 130 µg cOVA-HEL in CFA. HEL-specific IgMa was assessed by ELISA (B). Each time point represents the mean OD at a 1/400 dilution for at least two mice per group. Unimmunized controls from each time point were averaged and represented as day 0. Data represents the mean OD ± range for two to three mice per group. Similar results were obtained in two additional experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Th1 and Th2 cells help B cells1

 
Ab production. To give some indication of the functional status of the clonally expanded tg B cells, we assessed their Ab production (Fig. 4GoB). Serum was taken from animals transferred with unpolarized, Th1, or Th2 tg T cells together with tg B cells at 3, 5, 7, and 14 days postimmunization. All tg T cells could support Ab production by MD4 BcR tg B cells as measured by anti-HEL IgMa. Serum levels of anti-HEL IgMa peaked at 5 days postimmunization in Th1 and Th2 recipients but not until day 7 in recipients of unpolarized TCR tg T cells. By day 14 after immunization, HEL-specific IgMa Ab levels had declined to control levels in all groups. Thus, when Th1 or Th2 cells were transferred and the recipients immunized, anti-HEL IgMa was detected earlier compared with recipients receiving unpolarized tg T cells. Little or no anti-HEL IgMa was detected in serum from any unimmunized control animals.

Localization of unpolarized, Th1, and Th2 cells in vivo

It has been shown previously that T and B cells alter their anatomical location within lymph nodes in response to immunization to facilitate cognate interactions with each other (3). In the case of the T cells, adoptively transferred, unpolarized DO11.10 TCR Tg T cells disperse throughout the T cell-rich paracortex of the lymph node and do not enter B cell follicles (3) in naive animals. However, following immunization, the Ag-specific T cells undergo clonal expansion and migrate into B cell follicles, presumably to provide help to B cells. To determine whether Th1 and Th2 cells alter their localization within the lymph node in response to immunization in vivo, and if they do so in a similar manner, we transferred each cell type into naive mice and immunized with cOVA-HEL/CFA. In contrast to recent studies (21), we found that unpolarized, Th1, and Th2 TCR tg T cells all displayed paracortical localization in naive animals (Fig. 5GoA) and all displayed a similar follicular migration following immunization (Fig. 5Go, BE). There was no difference in the kinetics of the migration of unpolarized, Th1, and Th2 TCR tg T cells into B cell follicles as this occurred within 3 days of immunization and was still apparent after 5 days in all groups. These results confirmed earlier findings describing the follicular migration of unpolarized T cells in response to immunization (3) and significantly extend them by showing that both Th1 and Th2 T cells undergo similar migration with similar kinetics. Furthermore, the presence of the BcR tg B cells has no apparent effect on the response or localization of the TCR Tg T cells; no differences were detected when similar studies to those described above were performed using immunization with cOVA-HEL (targets OVA to BcR tg B cells) vs cOVA + turkey OVA-HEL (no targeting of OVA), or in µMT KO mice, or intact MD4 BcR tg mice immunized with cOVA or cOVA-HEL (targeting OVA to a large population of BcR tg B cells, (P. Garside, K. A. Pape, and M. K. Jenkins, unpublished observations).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Migration of Ag-specific Th1 and Th2 cells in vivo. Lymph nodes from transferred recipient mice were removed at days 3 and 5 postimmunization and stained as described in Materials and Methods. Unimmunized mice, which received unpolarized (data not shown), Th1 (A), or Th2 (data not shown) cells, showed paracortical localization of KJ1.26+ T cells that did not migrate into B cell follicles. Three days after immunization, KJ1.26+ T cells could be observed in the B cell follicles of unpolarized (data not shown), Th1 (B), and Th2 (data not shown) transferred groups. Treatment with anti-CD154 at day 0 and day 2 did not prevent this migration of unpolarized, Th1, or Th2 T cells at 3 (unimmunized, data not shown; Th1, data not shown; Th2, C) or 5 days (unimmunized, data not shown; Th1, D; Th2, E) after immunization. Where data are not shown, the pattern of migration is the same as that illustrated by the representative micrograph shown.

 
Effect of anti-CD154 on Th1 and Th2 cell-mediated help in vivo

T cell help for B cells is dependent on interactions between CD40 and CD154 (3, 31). Therefore, we decided to investigate whether both Th1 and Th2 cells displayed similar requirements to deliver T cell help to B cells in vivo. As we have reported previously (3), treatment with anti-CD154 affected the clonal expansion of T and B cells. The effect of anti-CD154 on T cell expansion was measured at the peak of T cell expansion 3 days after immunization. The Th1 and Th2 responses were similarly affected in the anti-CD154-treated animals as the cells only expanded to 49% and 47% of their respective untreated groups (Th1 clonal expansion = 1.03% vs 0.51% in untreated vs anti-CD154-treated groups; Th2 clonal expansion = 0.68% vs 0.32%) (representative FACS profile, Fig. 6Go, A–H; mean values ± range for two to three animals per group, Fig. 7GoA). We assessed the effect of anti-CD154 treatment at the peak of B cell clonal expansion on day 5 after immunization. B cells from Th1-transferred anti-CD154-treated and immunized mice only achieved 26% (representative FACS profile, Fig. 6Go, I–P; mean values ± SEM for two to three animals per group, Fig. 7GoB) of the clonal expansion of untreated Th1-transferred and immunized mice (1.69% vs 0.44%), whereas B cells from Th2-transferred mice only achieved 32% (Fig. 6Go, I–P) of the clonal expansion exhibited by untreated Th2-transferred and immunized mice (2.44% vs 0.79%). Ab responses were also decreased in the presence of anti-CD154. Serum anti-HEL IgMa was analyzed by ELISA 5 days after immunization. It was found that anti-CD154-treated mice transferred with Th1 cells only produced 58% of the HEL-specific serum IgMa of untreated mice and anti-CD154-treated mice transferred with Th2 cells had only produced 56% of the anti-HEL serum IgMa of untreated Th2-transferred and immunized mice (Fig. 7GoC). These results clearly demonstrate that in response to antigenic challenge in vivo previously primed Th1 and Th2 cells require interactions between CD40 and CD154 to expand fully and to mediate B cell help. Interestingly, treatment with anti-CD154 did not prevent movement of Ag-specific Th1 or Th2 (Fig. 5Go) cells into B cell follicles after immunization.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Effect of anti-CD154 on CD4+KJ1.26+ T cell and B220+HEL-specific B cell responses in vivo. Adoptive transfer recipients of Th1 (A, C, E, G, I, K, M, and O) or Th2 (B, D, F, H, J, L, N, and P) TCR tg T cells together with BcR tg B cells (A–P) cells were unimmunized (A–D, I–L) or immunized (E–H, M–P) and received 125 µg of anti-CD154 (C, D, G, H, K, L, O, and P) or hamster IgG (A, B, E, F, I, J, M, and N) on day 0 (day of immunization) and 2 days later. CD4+ KJ1.26+ T cell expansion (A–H) was assessed by flow cytometry on day 3, and B220+ HEL-specific B cell expansion (I–M) was assessed on day 5 postimmunization.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effect of anti-CD154 on CD4+KJ1.26+ T cell and B220+HEL-specific B cell responses in vivo. Double transfer recipients received 125 µg of anti-CD154 or hamster IgG on day 0 (day of immunization) and on day 2. CD4+KJ1.26+ T cell (A) was assessed by flow cytometry on day 3, and B220+HEL-specific B cell expansion (B) was assessed day 5 postimmunization. Data represent the mean ± SEM for at least two mice per group. Serum was collected on day 3 and analyzed for anti-HEL specific IgMa by ELISA (C). Data represent the mean OD ± range (A), or the mean OD ± SEM (B and C), for two to three mice per group.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have generated Th1 and Th2 cells of identical Ag specificity and observed their interactions with Ag-specific B cells in vivo. Our study has demonstrated in vivo that both Th1 and Th2 cells are capable of supporting Ag-specific B cell clonal expansion and Ab production in a CD154-dependent manner by migrating into B cell follicles.

To analyze cognate interactions between Ag-specific Th1, Th2, and B cells in vivo, it was first necessary to circumvent the obstacles presented by the extremely low frequency of Ag-specific lymphocytes present in a normal naive animal. To do this, we modified an adoptive transfer system in which we have recently shown that BcR tg B cells require cognate help from TCR tg T cells for clonal expansion and germinal center formation (3). In our current study, naive TCR tg T cells were stably polarized toward a Th1 or Th2 phenotype in vitro, as has been described previously (13, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37), before adoptive transfer. Our transferred T cells secreted the expected pattern of cytokines (IFN-{gamma} for Th1 and IL-4 and IL-5 for Th2) before adoptive transfer and maintained their phenotypes following restimulation after recovery from immunized animals. Furthermore, in contrast to TCR tg Th2 cells, the TCR tg Th1 cells supported the generation of OVA-specific IgG2a-secreting endogenous B cells, indicating that the Th1 and Th2 cells maintained their adopted phenotypes in vivo. Though there was no difference in OVA-specific serum IgG1 levels between Th1 and Th2 recipients, others (38) have observed IgG1 production in the absence of IL-4 suggesting that the absence of IgG2a, rather than the presence of IgG1, may be a better indicator of a Th2 response. Furthermore, a recent report has indicated that IgG1 may not be entirely Th2-dependent (30).

Although early in vitro studies indicated that both Th1 and Th2 cells could support B cell responses (15, 16, 17), the capacity of Th1 cells to provide cognate help for B cells is controversial, with some studies reporting that they are relatively deficient in this function (21, 39, 40). However, care must be taken when interpreting such in vitro studies, as examination of several Th1 and Th2 clones revealed considerable variation in their ability to help B cells with some Th2 clones failing to support Ab synthesis at all (15). Recent studies have also attempted to address this issue in vivo (41) and support a role for Th1 cells in helping B cell responses. However, the Th1 and Th2 cells were of differing Ag specificities and induced by different immunizing regimes as this study was more concerned with help for isotype switching than B cell clonal expansion. We have developed a physiologically more relevant system where the TCR tg Th1 and Th2 cells recognize the same Ag and can be tracked in vivo using mAbs, as can the BcR tg B cells, thus allowing analyses of Ag-specific responses.

We found that both Th1 and Th2 cells clonally expanded in response to immunization. Interestingly, whereas the kinetics of T cell clonal expansion were similar, Th2 cells expanded significantly less than Th1 cells. However, both cell types were able to support a similar degree of B cell clonal expansion and Ab production. This might imply that Th2 cells are more adept at supporting B cell responses on a per cell basis, as was suggested by earlier studies (17, 42). Although this issue will require further detailed analysis, it is clear from our studies that Th1 cells are perfectly able to support B cell clonal expansion and Ab production. Alternatively, it may be that Th1 and Th2 cells achieve optimal B cell help in different ways with Th1 cells helping less well on a per cell basis but expanding to provide more cells, whereas Th2 cells provide more help per cell but expand less, thus the net effect is the same.

We have demonstrated previously with this adoptive transfer system that Ag-specific T cells migrate into B cell follicles to provide B cell help. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of cellular localization in the induction of immune responses (43) and this issue has only begun to be directly addressed for Th1 and Th2 cells in vivo. Therefore, we determined the location of TCR tg Th1 and Th2 cells following immunization in vivo. We found that, whereas few Th1 and Th2 cells were present in B cell follicles in naive adoptive transfer recipients, considerable numbers of both types of cell could be found in this location following immunization. Our findings contrast with recent studies (21, 39), which suggested that, unlike Th2 cells, Th1 cells localize in the paracortex by virtue of their expression of CCR7 and are unable to support the differentiation of naive B cells into germinal center cells. These results do not explain the production of high-affinity IgG2a-secreting B cells that develop with the help of Th1-derived cytokines such as IFN-{gamma}. The discrepancies between the studies may be the result of the in vitro vs in vivo nature of some of the systems employed, our use of primed T cells, the use of different adjuvants, or the fact that, in contrast to the other studies, we have also tracked Ag-specific B cells directly during detailed kinetic studies in vivo. However, as noted above, it seems unlikely that the presence of the BcR tg B cells affects the behavior of the TCR tg B cells, and we have clearly shown that Th1 cells move into the B cell follicle to support B cell clonal expansion, Ab production, and class-switching to IgG2a.

A considerable number of studies have previously shown that CD40-CD154 interactions are an important component of T cell help for B cells, and we confirmed this using the adoptive transfer system (3, 31). Therefore, it was important to determine whether both Th1 and Th2 cell help for B cells were CD154-dependent. Both Th1 and Th2 cells can express CD154 (44), and membranes from each cell type can provide cognate help for B cell responses in vitro, which was shown to be CD154-dependent (31). However, more recently, it has become clear that CD154 may be involved in B cell help directly, or indirectly via effects on the differentiation of T cells or both. Thus the interaction of CD154 on T cells with CD40 on APC may result in the production of cytokines, e.g., IL-12, which polarize or activate the T cell before it interacts with the B cell. Here, we have shown that the clonal expansion of both Th1 and Th2 cells was reduced by ~50% in anti-CD154-treated animals, whereas B cell clonal expansion and Ab production were almost abolished in both situations. This is consistent with our previous findings (3) and suggests that, as reported by others, CD154 is important for the differentiation of Th1 and Th2 cells and their ability to help B cells. We cannot distinguish whether the decreased B cell responses in our anti-CD154-treated animals are a result of blocked interactions between T cells and APC leading to reduced T cell clonal expansion (3), altered T cell differentiation (45), or of a direct blockade of subsequent T cell–B cell interactions. Nevertheless, our results show clearly that Th1 and Th2 cells require CD40-CD154 interactions for maximal T and B cell responses. Interestingly, unpolarized, Th1 and Th2 cells can still enter B cell follicles after treatment with anti-CD154, suggesting that this interaction is not required for movement into the follicle and that a defect in T cell migration does not underlie the failure of T cell help in this situation, as has been demonstrated in tolerance (46).

Although our studies have provided the first direct in vivo evidence that both Th1 and Th2 cells support Ag-specific B cell expansion and Ab production in a similar manner and location, all of the molecular interactions involved remain to be elucidated. The most likely candidates would be cytokines, which have been widely implicated in T cell help for B cells. However, as we have demonstrated that Th1 and Th2 cells, which secrete very different patterns of cytokines, are both able to support B cell responses and others have been unable to find a role for a battery of the expected cytokines (39), it is clear that further studies are required to define the molecules involved in T–B cell interactions in vivo.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Randy Noelle for providing anti-CD154, Drs. M. M. Harnett and J. M. Brewer and Professors A. M. Mowat and M. K. Jenkins for critical review of the manuscript, and D. McComb and A. Eaton for invaluable assistance with graphics.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellowship awarded to P.G. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Paul Garside, Department of Immunology and Bacteriology, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, U.K. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; tg, transgenic; KO, knockout; BcR, B cell receptor; cOVA, chicken OVA; HEL, hen egg lysozyme. Back

Received for publication January 18, 2000. Accepted for publication June 23, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. MacLennan, I. C., A. Gulbranson-Judge, K. M. Toellner, M. Casamayor-Palleja, E. Chan, D. M. Sze, S. A. Luther, H. A. Orbea. 1997. The changing preference of T and B cells for partners as T-dependent antibody responses develop. Immunol. Rev. 156:53.[Medline]
  2. Kelsoe, G.. 1996. Life and death in germinal centers (redux). Immunity 4:107.[Medline]
  3. Garside, P., E. Ingulli, R. R. Merica, J. G. Johnson, R. J. Noelle, M. K. Jenkins. 1998. Visualization of specific B and T lymphocyte interactions in the lymph node. Science 281:96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Yang, Y., J. M. Wilson. 1996. CD40 ligand-dependent T cell activation: requirement of B7-CD28 signaling through CD40. Science 273:1862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kawabe, T., T. Naka, K. Yoshida, T. Tanaka, H. Fujiwara, S. Suematsu, N. Yoshida, T. Kishimoto, H. Kikutani. 1994. The immune responses in CD40-deficient mice: impaired immunoglobulin class switching and germinal center formation. Immunity 1:167.[Medline]
  6. Parker, D. C.. 1993. T cell-dependent B cell activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:331.[Medline]
  7. Vitetta, E. S., R. Fernandez-Botran, C. D. Myers, V. M. Sanders. 1989. Cellular interactions in the humoral immune response. Adv. Immunol. 45:1.[Medline]
  8. Mosmann, T. R., H. Cherwinski, M. W. Bond, M. A. Giedlin, R. L. Coffman. 1986. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J. Immunol. 136:2348.[Abstract]
  9. O’Garra, A., K. Murphy. 1994. Role of cytokines in determining T-lymphocyte function. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6:458.[Medline]
  10. O’Garra, A.. 1998. Cytokines induce the development of functionally heterogeneous T helper cell subsets. Immunity 8:275.[Medline]
  11. Paul, W. E., R. A. Seder. 1994. Lymphocyte responses and cytokines. Cell 76:241.[Medline]
  12. Romagnani, S.. 1994. Lymphokine production by human T cells in disease states. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:227.[Medline]
  13. Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, A. Sher. 1996. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787.[Medline]
  14. Lin, M. S., Y. W. Chen. 1993. B cell differentiation. II. Isotype potential of a single B cell. Cell. Immunol. 150:343.[Medline]
  15. DeKruyff, R. H., S. T. Ju, A. J. Hunt, T. R. Mosmann, D. T. Umetsu. 1989. Induction of antigen-specific antibody responses in primed and unprimed B cells. Functional heterogeneity among Th1 and Th2 T cell clones. J. Immunol. 142:2575.[Abstract]
  16. Noelle, R. J., J. McCann, L. Marshall, W. C. Bartlett. 1989. Cognate interactions between helper T cells and B cells. III. Contact-dependent, lymphokine-independent induction of B cell cycle entry by activated helper T cells. J. Immunol. 143:1807.[Abstract]
  17. Stevens, T. L., A. Bossie, V. M. Sanders, R. Fernandez-Botran, R. L. Coffman, T. R. Mosmann, E. S. Vitetta. 1988. Regulation of antibody isotype secretion by subsets of antigen-specific helper T cells. Nature 334:255.[Medline]
  18. Croft, M., S. L. Swain. 1991. B cell response to fresh and effector T helper cells. Role of cognate T- B interaction and the cytokines IL-2, IL-4, and IL-6. J. Immunol. 146:4055.[Abstract]
  19. Purkerson, J. M., P. C. Isakson. 1992. Interleukin 5 (IL-5) provides a signal that is required in addition to IL-4 for isotype switching to immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 and IgE. J. Exp. Med. 175:973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Snapper, C. M., C. Peschel, W. E. Paul. 1988. IFN-{gamma} stimulates IgG2a secretion by murine B cells stimulated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 140:2121.[Abstract]
  21. Randolph, D. A., G. Huang, C. J. Carruthers, L. E. Bromley, D. D. Chaplin. 1999. The role of CCR7 in T(H)1 and T(H)2 cell localization and delivery of B cell help in vivo. Science 286:2159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kopf, M., G. Le Gros, M. Bachmann, M. C. Lamers, H. Bluethmann, G. Kohler. 1993. Disruption of the murine IL-4 gene blocks Th2 cytokine responses. Nature 362:245.[Medline]
  23. Kopf, M., F. Brombacher, P. D. Hodgkin, A. J. Ramsay, E. A. Milbourne, W. J. Dai, K. S. Ovington, C. A. Behm, G. Kohler, I. G. Young, K. I. Matthaei. 1996. IL-5-deficient mice have a developmental defect in CD5+ B-1 cells and lack eosinophilia but have normal antibody and cytotoxic T cell responses. Immunity 4:15.[Medline]
  24. Kuhn, R., K. Rajewsky, W. Muller. 1991. Generation and analysis of interleukin-4 deficient mice. Science 254:707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Snapper, C. M., W. E. Paul. 1987. Interferon-{gamma} and B cell stimulatory factor-1 reciprocally regulate Ig isotype production. Science 236:944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Huang, S., W. Hendriks, A. Althage, S. Hemmi, H. Bluethmann, R. Kamijo, J. Vilcek, R. M. Zinkernagel, M. Aguet. 1993. Immune response in mice that lack the interferon-{gamma} receptor. Science 259:1742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Murphy, K. M., A. B. Heimberger, D. Y. Loh. 1990. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science 250:1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Goodnow, C. C., J. Crosbie, S. Adelstein, T. B. Lavoie, S. J. Smith-Gill, R. A. Brink, H. Pritchard-Briscoe, J. S. Wotherspoon, R. H. Loblay, K. Raphael, et al 1988. Altered immunoglobulin expression and functional silencing of self-reactive B lymphocytes in transgenic mice. Nature 334:676.[Medline]
  29. Openshaw, P., E. E. Murphy, N. A. Hosken, V. Maino, K. Davis, K. Murphy, A. O’Garra. 1995. Heterogeneity of intracellular cytokine synthesis at the single-cell level in polarized T helper 1 and T helper 2 populations. J. Exp. Med. 182:1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Faquim-Mauro, E. L., R. L. Coffman, I. A. Abrahamsohn, M. S. Macedo. 1999. Cutting edge: mouse IgG1 antibodies comprise two functionally distinct types that are differentially regulated by IL-4 and IL-12. J. Immunol. 163:3572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Laman, J. D., E. Claassen, R. J. Noelle. 1996. Functions of CD40 and its ligand, gp39 (CD40L). Crit. Rev. Immunol. 16:59.[Medline]
  32. Hansen, G., G. Berry, R. H. DeKruyff, D. T. Umetsu. 1999. Allergen-specific Th1 cells fail to counterbalance Th2 cell-induced airway hyperreactivity but cause severe airway inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 103:175.[Medline]
  33. Kaufmann, S. H.. 1993. Immunity to intracellular bacteria. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11:129.[Medline]
  34. Robinson, D., K. Shibuya, A. Mui, F. Zonin, E. Murphy, T. Sana, S. B. Hartley, S. Menon, R. Kastelein, F. Bazan, A. O’Garra. 1997. IGIF does not drive Th1 development but synergizes with IL-12 for interferon-{gamma} production and activates IRAK and NF{kappa}B. Immunity 7:571.[Medline]
  35. Romagnani, S.. 1991. Human TH1 and TH2 subsets: doubt no more. Immunol. Today 12:256.[Medline]
  36. Szabo, S. J., A. S. Dighe, U. Gubler, K. M. Murphy. 1997. Regulation of the interleukin (IL)-12R ß2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Xu, D., W. L. Chan, B. P. Leung, F. Huang, R. Wheeler, D. Piedrafita, J. H. Robinson, F. Y. Liew. 1998. Selective expression of a stable cell surface molecule on type 2 but not type 1 helper T cells. J. Exp. Med. 187:787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Brewer, J. M., M. Conacher, A. Satoskar, H. Bluethmann, J. Alexander. 1996. In interleukin-4-deficient mice, alum not only generates T helper 1 responses equivalent to Freund’s complete adjuvant, but continues to induce T helper 2 cytokine production. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2062.[Medline]
  39. Poudrier, J., D. van Essen, S. Morales-Alcelay, T. Leanderson, S. Bergthorsdottir, D. Gray. 1998. CD40 ligand signals optimize T helper cell cytokine production: role in Th2 development and induction of germinal centers. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:3371.[Medline]
  40. Boom, W. H., D. Liano, A. K. Abbas. 1988. Heterogeneity of helper/inducer T lymphocytes. II. Effects of interleukin 4- and interleukin 2-producing T cell clones on resting B lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 167:1350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Toellner, K. M., S. A. Luther, D. M. Sze, R. K. Choy, D. R. Taylor, I. C. M. MacLennan, H. Acha-Orbea. 1998. T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 characteristics start to develop during T cell priming and are associated with an immediate ability to induce immunoglobulin class switching. J. Exp. Med. 187:1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Noelle, R. J., J. Daum, W. C. Bartlett, J. McCann, D. M. Shepherd. 1991. Cognate interactions between helper T cells and B cells. V. Reconstitution of T helper cell function using purified plasma membranes from activated Th1 and Th2 T helper cells and lymphokines. J. Immunol. 146:1118.[Abstract]
  43. Tang, H. L., J. G. Cyster. 1999. Chemokine up-regulation and activated T cell attraction by maturing dendritic cells. Science 284:819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Roy, M., T. Waldschmidt, A. Aruffo, J. A. Ledbetter, R. J. Noelle. 1993. The regulation of the expression of gp39, the CD40 ligand, on normal and cloned CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 151:2497.[Abstract]
  45. van Essen, D., H. Kikutani, D. Gray. 1995. CD40 ligand-transduced co-stimulation of T cells in the development of helper function. Nature 378:620.[Medline]
  46. Kearney, E. R., K. A. Pape, D. Y. Loh, M. K. Jenkins. 1994. Visualization of peptide-specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo. Immunity 1:327.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. J. Johnston, A. C. Poholek, D. DiToro, I. Yusuf, D. Eto, B. Barnett, A. L. Dent, J. Craft, and S. Crotty
Bcl6 and Blimp-1 Are Reciprocal and Antagonistic Regulators of T Follicular Helper Cell Differentiation
Science, August 21, 2009; 325(5943): 1006 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M B Nickdel, P Conigliaro, G Valesini, S Hutchison, R Benson, R V Bundick, A J Leishman, I B McInnes, J M Brewer, and P Garside
Dissecting the contribution of innate and antigen-specific pathways to the breach of self-tolerance observed in a murine model of arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2009; 68(6): 1059 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
J.-H. WOO, Y.-K. SUNG, J.-S. LEE, W. T. CHUNG, J.-Y. CHOE, G. G. SONG, and D.-H. YOO
Association of Fc{gamma} Receptor Polymorphisms with Adult Onset Still's Disease in Korea
J Rheumatol, February 1, 2009; 36(2): 347 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. S. McKimmie, A. R. Fraser, C. Hansell, L. Gutierrez, S. Philipsen, L. Connell, A. Rot, M. Kurowska-Stolarska, P. Carreno, M. Pruenster, et al.
Hemopoietic Cell Expression of the Chemokine Decoy Receptor D6 Is Dynamic and Regulated by GATA1
J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3353 - 3363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. Bermudez-Fajardo, M. Yliharsila, W. H. Evans, A. C. Newby, and E. Oviedo-Orta
CD4+ T lymphocyte subsets express connexin 43 and establish gap junction channel communication with macrophages in vitro
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 608 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. P. Matson, L. Zhu, E. G. Lingenheld, C. M. Schramm, R. B. Clark, D. M. Selander, R. S. Thrall, E. Breen, and L. Puddington
Maternal Transmission of Resistance to Development of Allergic Airway Disease
J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 1282 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
S. Arce, H. F. Nawar, G. Muehlinghaus, M. W. Russell, and T. D. Connell
In Vitro Induction of Immunoglobulin A (IgA)- and IgM-Secreting Plasma Blasts by Cholera Toxin Depends on T-Cell Help and Is Mediated by CD154 Up-Regulation and Inhibition of Gamma Interferon Synthesis
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2007; 75(3): 1413 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Prickett, P. M. Gray, S. L. Colpitts, P. Scott, P. M. Kaye, and D. F. Smith
In vivo recognition of ovalbumin expressed by transgenic leishmania is determined by its subcellular localization.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4826 - 4833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
G. Hajishengallis, S. Arce, C.M. Gockel, T.D. Connell, and M.W. Russell
Immunomodulation with Enterotoxins for the Generation of Secretory Immunity or Tolerance: Applications for Oral Infections
Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 2005; 84(12): 1104 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. A. Marshall, A. M. Grierson, P. Garside, W. Harnett, and M. M. Harnett
ES-62, an Immunomodulator Secreted by Filarial Nematodes, Suppresses Clonal Expansion and Modifies Effector Function of Heterologous Antigen-Specific T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5817 - 5826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
F. A. Harding, A. D. Liu, M. Stickler, O. J. Razo, R. Chin, N. Faravashi, W. Viola, T. Graycar, V. P. Yeung, W. Aehle, et al.
A {beta}-lactamase with reduced immunogenicity for the targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics using antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1791 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. L. Fields, S. A. Nish, B. D. Hondowicz, M. H. Metzgar, G. N. Wharton, A. J. Caton, and J. Erikson
The Influence of Effector T Cells and Fas Ligand on Lupus-Associated B Cells
J. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 175(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Matsumoto, M. Matsumoto, K. Umemori, Y. Ozeki, M. Furugen, T. Tatsuo, Y. Hirayama, S. Yamamoto, T. Yamada, and K. Kobayashi
DNA Augments Antigenicity of Mycobacterial DNA-Binding Protein 1 and Confers Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Mice
J. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 175(1): 441 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Yasumi, K. Katamura, I. Okafuji, T. Yoshioka, T.-a. Meguro, R. Nishikomori, T. Kusunoki, T. Heike, and T. Nakahata
Limited Ability of Antigen-Specific Th1 Responses to Inhibit Th2 Cell Development In Vivo
J. Immunol., February 1, 2005; 174(3): 1325 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. M. Smith, J. M. Brewer, C. M. Rush, J. Riley, and P. Garside
In Vivo Generated Th1 Cells Can Migrate to B Cell Follicles to Support B Cell Responses
J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 1640 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Maffia, J. M. Brewer, J. A. Gracie, A. Ianaro, B. P. Leung, P. J. Mitchell, K. M. Smith, I. B. McInnes, and P. Garside
Inducing Experimental Arthritis and Breaking Self-Tolerance to Joint-Specific Antigens with Trackable, Ovalbumin-Specific T Cells
J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Yasumi, K. Katamura, T. Yoshioka, T.-a. Meguro, R. Nishikomori, T. Heike, M. Inobe, S. Kon, T. Uede, and T. Nakahata
Differential Requirement for the CD40-CD154 Costimulatory Pathway during Th Cell Priming by CD8{alpha}+ and CD8{alpha}− Murine Dendritic Cell Subsets
J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4826 - 4833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
A. L.-D. de Cerio, J. J. Lasarte, N. Casares, P. Sarobe, M. Ruiz, J. Prieto, and F. Borras-Cuesta
Engineering Th determinants for efficient priming of humoral and cytotoxic T cell responses
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 15(6): 691 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
H. Beacock-Sharp, A. M. Donachie, N. C. Robson, and A. M. Mowat
A role for dendritic cells in the priming of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes by immune-stimulating complexes in vivo
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 15(6): 711 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Moir, K. M. Ogwaro, A. Malaspina, J. Vasquez, E. T. Donoghue, C. W. Hallahan, S. Liu, L. A. Ehler, M. A. Planta, S. Kottilil, et al.
Perturbations in B cell responsiveness to CD4+ T cell help in HIV-infected individuals
PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 6057 - 6062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. M. Smith, J. M. Brewer, P. Webb, A. J. Coyle, C. Gutierrez-Ramos, and P. Garside
Inducible Costimulatory Molecule-B7-Related Protein 1 Interactions Are Important for the Clonal Expansion and B Cell Helper Functions of Naive, Th1, and Th2 T Cells
J. Immunol., March 1, 2003; 170(5): 2310 - 2315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R.-N. E. Dogan, C. Vasu, M. J. Holterman, and B. S. Prabhakar
Absence of IL-4, and Not Suppression of the Th2 Response, Prevents Development of Experimental Autoimmune Graves' Disease
J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2195 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Rush, T. Mitchell, and P. Garside
Efficient Priming of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells by DNA Vaccination Depends on Appropriate Targeting of Sufficient Levels of Immunologically Relevant Antigen to Appropriate Processing Pathways
J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 4951 - 4960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
B. O. Lee, L. Haynes, S. M. Eaton, S. L. Swain, and T. D. Randall
The Biological Outcome of CD40 Signaling Is Dependent on the Duration of CD40 Ligand Expression: Reciprocal Regulation by Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-12
J. Exp. Med., September 2, 2002; 196(5): 693 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
G. Muller, U. E. Hopken, H. Stein, and M. Lipp
Systemic immunoregulatory and pathogenic functions of homeostatic chemokine receptors
J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2002; 72(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. M. Smith, F. McAskill, and P. Garside
Orally Tolerized T Cells Are Only Able to Enter B Cell Follicles Following Challenge with Antigen in Adjuvant, but They Remain Unable to Provide B Cell Help
J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4318 - 4325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Johansson-Lindbom and C. A. K. Borrebaeck
Germinal Center B Cells Constitute a Predominant Physiological Source of IL-4: Implication for Th2 Development In Vivo
J. Immunol., April 1, 2002; 168(7): 3165 - 3172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. L. McQualter, R. Darwiche, C. Ewing, M. Onuki, T. W. Kay, J. A. Hamilton, H. H. Reid, and C. C.A. Bernard
Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor: A New Putative Therapeutic Target in Multiple Sclerosis
J. Exp. Med., October 1, 2001; 194(7): 873 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. R. Mackay
Follicular Homing T Helper (Th) Cells and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
J. Exp. Med., December 4, 2000; 192(11): f31 - f34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garside, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garside, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS