|
|
||||||||
-Induced Janus Kinase-1-STAT1 Activation in Macrophages by Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide and Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide

*
Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102; and
Departamento Biologia Celular, Facultad de Biologia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-stimulated macrophages. We showed previously that VIP/PACAP
inhibit NF-
B nuclear translocation through the stabilization of
I
B and reduce IFN regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) binding to the
regulatory elements found in the IL-12 p40 and inducible NO synthase
promoters. In this paper we studied the molecular mechanisms involved
in the VIP/PACAP regulation of IRF-1 transactivating activity. Our
studies indicate that the inhibition in IRF-1 binding correlates with a
reduction in IRF-1 protein and mRNA in IFN-
-treated Raw 264.7
macrophages. In agreement with the described Janus kinase
(Jak)1/Jak2/STAT1/IRF-1 activation pathway, VIP/PACAP inhibit
Jak1/Jak2, STAT1 phosphorylation, and the binding of STAT1 to the GAS
sequence motif in the IRF-1 promoter. The effects of VIP/PACAP are
mediated through the specific VIP/PACAP receptor-1 and the cAMP/protein
kinase A (PKA) transduction pathway, but not through the induction of
suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 or suppressor of cytokine
signaling-3. Because IFN-
is a major stimulator of innate immune
responses in vivo, the down-regulation of IFN-
-induced gene
expression by VIP and PACAP could represent a significant element in
the regulation of the inflammatory response by endogenous
neuropeptides. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-12, and immunomodulatory cytokines such as
TGFß1 and IL-10 (1).
IFN-
constitutes one of the most potent macrophage-activating
factors. Binding of IFN-
to its receptor induces the assembly of an
active receptor complex and consequent transphosphorylation of the
receptor-associated Janus tyrosine kinases
(Jak)3 Jak1 and Jak2
(2, 3). The activation of these kinases induces
phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail of the receptor itself, which
lacks intrinsic kinase activity. The cytosolic protein STAT1 is then
recruited to the activated IFN-
-receptor complex and phosphorylated
(2). Upon phosphorylation, STAT1 form homodimers and
translocate to the nucleus where they bind to the IFN-
-activated
site (GAS), also termed STAT binding element, found in the promoter of
many IFN-
-induced genes including the IFN regulatory factor-1
(IRF-1) and ICAM-1 genes (4, 5, 6, 7). Many of the regulatory
effects of IFN-
in macrophages appear to be mediated by IRF-1, which
transactivates multiple effector genes including IL-12 and the
inducible NO synthase (iNOS; Ref. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15).
Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and the pituitary adenylate
cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) are two neuropeptides that
perform a broad spectrum of biological functions affecting both natural
and acquired immunity (reviewed in Refs. 16, 17, 18),
primarily as anti-inflammatory agents. VIP and PACAP have been
shown to inhibit T cell proliferation and cytokine production (reviewed
in Ref. 19), and to modulate several macrophage functions,
including phagocytosis, respiratory burst, and chemotaxis (reviewed in
Ref. 17). In agreement with their anti-inflammatory
role, VIP and PACAP were recently reported to inhibit the in vitro and
in vivo production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and
TNF-
(20, 21, 22), to reduce the secretion of NO
(23), to enhance the production of the
anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (24), to protect mice
from endotoxic shock presumably through the inhibition of endogenous
TNF-
and of other inflammatory mediators (25), and to
act as survival factors against tissue injury of lung and neuronal
cells (26, 27, 28). Furthermore, we and others have recently
demonstrated that VIP and PACAP inhibit IL-12 production in
endotoxin-stimulated peritoneal macrophages (29, 30, 31), with
a subsequent inhibitory effect on IFN-
synthesis by T cells
(31). Both the inhibitory and the stimulatory effects are
exerted at a transcriptional level, and involve regulation of several
transcription factors, such as NF-
B, cAMP response element binding
protein, c-Jun, and IRF-1 (23, 24, 32, 33). In particular,
VIP and PACAP inhibit IL-12 and iNOS gene expression stimulated by LPS
and IFN-
partly through the inhibition of IRF-1 synthesis (23, 33). To further understand the molecular mechanisms through
which VIP and PACAP attenuate the inflammatory responses, we examined
the effects of VIP/PACAP on IFN-
-induced Jak/STAT1 activation and
IRF-1 synthesis in Raw 264.7 macrophages. Our results indicate that
VIP/PACAP inhibit Jak1/Jak2/STAT1 phosphorylation, binding of STAT1 to
the GAS motif in the IRF-1 promoter, and subsequently, IRF-1
transcription and synthesis. These effects are mediated through the
VIP/PACAP receptor (VPAC)1 and the cAMP/PKA transduction pathway.
VIP/PACAP do not induce suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)1/3 in
nonstimulated macrophages or in LPS- and LPS/IFN-
-activated
macrophages.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Synthetic VIP and PACAP38 were purchased from Novabiochem
(Laufelfingen, Switzerland). The VPAC1 antagonist
(Ac-His1,
D-Phe2, K15,
R16, L27) VIP
(3, 4, 5, 6, 7)-GRF (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) was kindly donated by Dr.
Patrick Robberecht (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium).
Oligonucleotides were synthesized by the Oligonucleotide Synthesis
Service from Rutgers University (Newark, NJ). Murine recombinant
IFN-
was purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Forskolin,
protease inhibitors, PMSF, EDTA, glycine, protein G-Sepharose,
glycerol, EGTA, and DTT were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and
N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide
(H89) was obtained from ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, CA). Abs
against IRF-1, phospho-Tyr (PY20), phosphorylated-STAT1
(Tyr701), Jak1, Jak2, STAT1
p91, and NF-
B
p65 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz,
CA).
Cell cultures
Raw 264.7 mouse macrophage cells (American Type Culture
Collection, Rockville, MD) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2 mM
L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 10 µg/ml
streptomycin, and 10% FCS (complete culture medium; Life Technologies,
Rockville, MD). The cells were plated in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter
plates (Corning Glass, Corning, NY) for 24 h. Nonadherent cells
were removed by aspiration and two washings with DMEM medium.
Peritoneal macrophages were obtained from male BALB/c mice (6 to
10-wk-old) previously injected i.p. with 4% Brewers thioglycolate
medium (Difco, Detroit, MI). Peritoneal cells were collected 4 days
later by peritoneal lavage with ice-cold DMEM. The peritoneal cells
were washed twice with ice-cold DMEM and incubated for 2 h at
37°C. The nonadherent cells were removed by washing. At least 96% of
the adherent cells were macrophages as judged by morphologic and
phagocytic criteria, and FACS analysis (>96%
Mac1+). Macrophage monolayers were incubated with
complete medium and stimulated with 100 U/ml IFN-
in the presence or
absence of VIP or PACAP38 (from 10-12 to
10-7 M) for various times at 37°C in a
humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
RNA extraction and Northern blot analysis
Northern blot analysis was performed according to standard
methods. Macrophage monolayers (2 x 106
cells/ml) were stimulated with 100 U/ml IFN-
in the absence or
presence of 10-8 M VIP and PACAP for different
time periods at 37°C. Total RNA was extracted by the acid
guanidinium-phenol-chloroform method, electrophoresed on 1.2%
agarose-formaldehyde gels, transferred to Schleicher & Schuell Nytran
membranes (Keene, NJ), and cross-linked to the nylon membrane using UV
light.
The probes for murine IRF-1 and GAPDH were generated by RT-PCR as
previously described (34). The probes for SOCS1 and SOCS3
were generated by RT-PCR as previously described (35).
Oligonucleotides were end-labeled with 3000 Ci/mmol
[
-32P]ATP (Amersham, Arlington, IL) by using
T4 polynucleotide kinase. The RNA-containing membranes were
prehybridized for 16 h at 42°C, and hybridized at 42°C for
16 h with the appropriate probes. The membranes were washed twice
in 2x SSC containing 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 20 min each
time, once at 37°C for 20 min, and once in 0.1x SSC containing 0.1%
SDS at 50°C for 20 min. The prehybridization and hybridization
buffers were purchased from 5 Prime
3 Prime (Boulder, CO). The
membranes were exposed to x-ray films (Kodak, Rochester, NY).
EMSA
Nuclear extracts were prepared by the mini-extraction procedure of Schreiber et al. (36) with slight modifications. Raw 264.7 cells were plated at a density of 107 cells in six-well plates, stimulated, washed twice with ice-cold PBS/0.1% BSA, and scraped off the dishes. The cell pellets were homogenized with 0.4 ml of buffer A (10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM NaN3). After 15 min on ice, Nonidet P-40 was added to a final 0.5% concentration, the tubes were gently vortexed for 15 s and nuclei were sedimented and separated from cytosol by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 40 s. Pelleted nuclei were washed once with 0.2 ml of ice-cold buffer A, and the soluble nuclear proteins were released by adding 0.1 ml of buffer C (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.4 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 25% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM NaN3). After incubation for 30 min on ice, followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C, the supernatants containing the nuclear proteins were harvested, the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method, and aliquots were stored at -80°C for later use in EMSAs.
Oligonucleotides corresponding to the IRF-1 (nucleotides -933 to
-906) motif of the iNOS promoter and GAS site of IRF-1 promoter were
synthesized as follows (nucleotides -131 to -105; Ref. 4, 12): 5'-CACTGTCAATATTTCACTTTCATAATG-3' (IRF-1) and
5'-GCCTGATTTCCCCGAAATGACGGC-3' (GAS). The oligonucleotides were
annealed after incubation for 5 min at 85°C in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.0), 5 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM DTT.
Aliquots of 50 ng of the double-stranded oligonucleotides were
end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP by using T4
polynucleotide kinase. For EMSA we used 20,00050,000 cpm of
double-stranded oligonucleotides, corresponding to
0.5 ng per
reaction. The 15 µl binding reaction mixtures were set up containing
the following: 0.51 ng DNA probe, 5 µg nuclear extract, 2 µg
poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) and binding buffer (50 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA,
0.5 mM DTT, 5% glycerol, and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5)). The mixtures
were incubated on ice for 15 min before adding the probe, followed by
another incubation for 20 min at room temperature. Samples were loaded
onto 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed in TGE
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 0.38 M glycine, and 2 mM EDTA) at 100
V, followed by transfer to Whatman paper, drying under vacuum at
80°C, and autoradiography. In competition and Ab supershift
experiments, the nuclear extracts were incubated for 15 min at room
temperature with the specific Ab (1 µg) or competing cold
oligonucleotide (50-fold excess) before the addition of the labeled
probe.
Western blot analysis of IRF-1
Thirty micrograms of nuclear extract protein was separated by SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide). After electrophoresis, the gel was electroblotted in Tris-glycine buffer (48 mM Tris, 39 mM glycine; pH 9.2) containing 40% methanol onto a reinforced nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). The membrane was blocked with TBST buffer (10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) containing 5% milk powder for 1 h at room temperature, then incubated for an additional 6 h at 4°C with a rabbit polyclonal Ab against IRF-1 (1:500) in 5% nonfat milk/TBST solution. After washing three times in TBST, membranes were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG at 1:5000 dilution. After washing three times in TBST for 5 min each, and once in TBS for 5 min, the membrane was drained briefly and subjected to the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham). The x-ray films were exposed for 520 min.
Analysis of STAT1 and Jak1/2 phosphorylation
The phosphorylation status of Jak1/Jak2 and STAT1 was assessed by immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblot analysis as previously described (37). Cells (3 x 107 cells) were lysed in ice-cold immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.4), 1 mM Na3VO4, 20 mM ß-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS). STAT1 and Jak1/Jak2 molecules were immunoprecipitated by incubation of lysates with polyclonal Abs to 10 µg/ml STAT1 or 10 µg/ml Jak1 and Jak2, respectively. Ab-Ag complexes were captured on protein G-Sepharose beads for 1 h at 4°C. Precipitated proteins were released from the beads by washing in immunoprecipitation buffer (three times) and boiling in SDS sample buffer, and then were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% acrylamide-resolving gel. Immunoblot analysis using an anti-phosphorylated-STAT1 Ab (0.5 µg/ml, for STAT1 analysis) or an Ab specific for phophotyrosine residues (1 µg/ml, for Jak1 and Jak2 analysis) was completed essentially as described above. Following analysis of phosphorylated-STAT1, phosphorylated-Jak1, and phosphorylated-Jak2, the blots were stripped and reprobed with Abs directed to STAT1, Jak1, or Jak2, respectively, as described above.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced IRF-1 expression and its
subsequent binding to the iNOS promoter
To investigate whether VIP/PACAP affect IRF-1 nuclear
translocation and binding in macrophages stimulated with IFN-
, we
assessed IRF-1 binding to the iNOS promoter by EMSA. Stimulation of Raw
264.7 cells with IFN-
led to an increase in IRF-1 binding and
treatment with VIP or PACAP significantly inhibited this binding (Fig. 1
A). The specificity of the
IRF-1 binding was evident by the complete displacement of the
IRF-1/DNA binding complexes in the presence of a 50-fold excess of
unlabeled homologous oligonucleotide (IRF-1) but not of nonhomologous
oligonucleotide (cAMP response element; Fig. 1
A).
Furthermore, the IRF-1/DNA complexes were supershifted by an
anti-IRF-1 Ab in IFN-
-stimulated macrophages (Fig. 1
B). Both neuropeptides reduced the IFN-
-induced
presence of IRF-1 protein in the nucleus (Fig. 2
A). Next, we investigated
whether these effects are due to the regulation of IRF-1 expression and
synthesis. Northern blots indicated that, although IRF-1 mRNA was not
detectable in unstimulated cells, it was strongly induced in the
IFN-
-stimulated Raw 264.7 cells (Fig. 2
B), and treatment
with VIP and PACAP significantly reduced the levels of specific IRF-1
mRNA (Fig. 2
B). Therefore, these results indicate that VIP
and PACAP inhibit IFN-
-induced IRF-1 expression and its subsequent
binding to the promoter of IFN-
-activated genes in macrophages.
|
|
Although the IRF-1 promoter contains a complex array of
transactivating binding sites, GAS/STAT binding element appears to be
essential for maximal IRF-1 gene transcription following IFN-
stimulation (2). To investigate whether VIP/PACAP affect
STAT1 binding to the GAS motif, nuclear extracts from Raw 264.7
macrophages stimulated with IFN-
in the presence or absence of VIP
or PACAP were used in gel shift assays. IFN-
treatment led to
increased binding to an oligonucleotide containing the GAS motif, and
treatment with VIP and PACAP inhibited this binding (Fig. 3
A). The GAS binding was
competed by an excess of unlabeled homologous oligonucleotide (GAS) but
not by a nonhomologous oligonucleotide (NF-
B; Fig. 3
A).
Ab supershift experiments indicate that the GAS-binding complexes in
IFN-
-stimulated macrophages contain STAT1 (Fig. 3
B).
|
protein
(2, 38, 39). To determine whether VIP and PACAP
affect the activation of STAT1, Raw 264.7 cells were stimulated with
IFN-
for different times in the presence or absence of VIP or PACAP.
Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-STAT1 Ab, and the
levels of phosphorylated STAT1 were assessed by Western blot using a
specific Ab against Tyr701-phosphorylated
STAT1
. IFN-
stimulated in a time-dependent manner the
phosphorylation of STAT1 (Fig. 4
-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 and its subsequent binding to
the GAS site in the IRF-1 gene.
|
-induced Jak1 and Jak2 phosphorylation
in Raw 264.7 cells and peritoneal macrophages
STAT1 phosphorylation depends on the activity of the
IFN-
-receptor-associated PTK Jak1/2. Binding of IFN-
to its
receptor results in the activation of Jak1/2 by transphosphorylation
(2, 38). To investigate whether VIP and PACAP regulate
Jak1 and Jak2 activation, cell extracts of IFN-
-stimulated Raw 264.7
cells or peritoneal macrophages treated with or without VIP or PACAP
were immunoprecipitated with anti-Jak1 or anti-Jak2 Ab,
followed by Western blotting with an anti-phosphotyrosine Ab. Both
Jak1 and Jak2 were weakly phosphorylated in unstimulated controls; the
Jak1/Jak2 phosphorylation level increased within 5 min following
IFN-
stimulation in both Raw 264.7 cells and peritoneal macrophages
(Fig. 5
). Treatment with VIP or PACAP
reduced Jak1 and Jak2 phosphorylation at all time points (Fig. 5
).
|
-induced Jak1-STAT1 activation in macrophages
The majority of the effects of VIP and PACAP in macrophages are
exerted through the VIP/PACAP-receptor VPAC1, and the subsequent
activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33).
Therefore, we next investigated whether the inhibitory effect of VIP on
the Jak/STAT/IRF signaling pathway could be related to occupancy of
this specific receptor and to activation of PKA. We investigated the
ability of a specific VPAC1-antagonist (40) and of H89, a
potent and selective PKA inhibitor, to reverse the effects of VIP. Both
the VPAC1 antagonist and the PKA inhibitor reversed the inhibitory
effects of VIP on IRF-1 expression (Fig. 6
A), on the binding of STAT1
to GAS/IRF-1 (Fig. 6
B), and on STAT1 and Jak1
phosphorylation (Fig. 6
C). In contrast,
PACAP638, an antagonist specific for the
VIP/PACAP-receptors PAC1 and VPAC2 (41), or calphostin C,
a PKC-inhibitor, did not affect the inhibitory effects of VIP (data not
shown). These results suggest that the inhibition of the Jak/STAT/IRF
signaling pathway by VIP is mediated through VPAC1 and the cAMP/PKA
pathway. This is supported by the fact that forskolin (a cAMP-inducing
agent) exerts an effect similar to VIP (Fig. 6
).
|
Because both SOCS1 and 3 inhibit STAT1 activation in response to
IFN-
(42), we investigated the possibility that the
effect of VIP/PACAP on Jak/STAT activation is mediated through the
induction of SOCS1 and/or SOCS3. Raw 264.7 cells stimulated with LPS or
IFN-
in the presence or absence of VIP/PACAP were analyzed for SOCS1
and SOCS3 expression by Northern blots. As previously reported
(43), LPS induces SOCS3 but not SOCS1 expression, whereas
IFN-
induces both (Fig. 7
). VIP and
PACAP do not induce SOCS1/3 in unstimulated macrophages, and do not
alter the expression of SOCS1 or SOCS3 in stimulated macrophages at any
time point (from 30 min to 20 h; Fig. 7
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-6, IL-12, and NO
(20, 21, 22, 24, 25). This might be of clinical relevance,
because these cytokines are involved in the detrimental effects of
ischemia-reperfusion and septic shock (1, 45, 46, 47, 48). In
fact, VIP and PACAP protect mice from lethal endotoxemia, presumably by
reducing the levels of endogenous TNF-
and other macrophage-derived
factors (25). VIP/PACAP regulation of proinflammatory
cytokines and iNOS occurs at the transcriptional level, and involves
several transcriptional factors, such as NF-
B, cAMP response element
binding protein, c-Jun, and IRF-1 (23, 24, 32, 33). In two
recent studies, we demonstrated that VIP and PACAP inhibit IL-12 p40
and iNOS mRNA expression in macrophages stimulated with LPS and IFN-
through two different intracellular pathways; a cAMP-independent
pathway that preferentially blocks the LPS-induced NF-
B nuclear
translocation, and a cAMP-dependent pathway that inhibits
IFN-
-induced IRF-1 transactivation (23, 33). NF-
B
activation is prevented through the inhibition of I
B phosphorylation
and degradation, which results in the retention of NF-
B in the
cytoplasm (33). The intracellular mechanisms by which VIP
and PACAP inhibit IRF-1 transactivation are not elucidated yet. In the
present study we investigated the molecular mechanisms for the
suppression of IFN-
-induced gene expression by VIP/PACAP, with
particular emphasis on the role of the Jak12/STAT1/IRF-1 signaling
pathway. The results demonstrate that VIP and PACAP sequentially
inhibit IFN-
-induced Jak1 and Jak2 activation, and the
subsequent activation of STAT1, in terms of phosphorylation, nuclear
translocation, and binding to the GAS motif in the IRF-1 promoter. The
VIP/PACAP inhibition of IRF-1 synthesis explains in part the inhibitory
effect of these neuropeptides on IL-12 and NO production, and suggests
a possible role in the regulation of other IFN-
-stimulated genes.
Whether VIP/PACAP affect the response of macrophages to cytokines other
than IFN-
remains to be established. Most cytokine receptors signal
through the Jak/STAT family (43) and, therefore,
inhibition of Jak1/2 and STAT1 by VIP/PACAP might affect other
responses as well. However, although different receptors activate Jak1
and/or Jak2, the ultimate biological response may depend on other
factors as well. For example, although both IL-4 and IFN-
activate
Jak1, IL-4 does not affect IRF-1 and actually antagonizes the induction
of NO by IFN-
(50).
The immunological actions of VIP and PACAP are exerted through a family
of receptors consisting of VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 (51).
Peritoneal macrophages express VPAC1 and PAC1 mRNA constitutively, with
VPAC2 mRNA being induced upon LPS stimulation (31, 52, 53). Similar results were obtained for the Raw 264.7 cells
(23). Our results demonstrate that VIP exerts its
inhibitory effect on the Jak/STAT/IRF signaling pathway through VPAC1.
This finding is in agreement with previous reports that VPAC1 mediates
VIP inhibition of LPS/IFN-
-induced IL-12 and iNOS expression
(23, 31, 33).
VPAC1 is coupled primarily to the adenylate cyclase system
(51), and Jak1-STAT1 activation is indeed inhibited by
agents that increase intracellular cAMP (54, 55, 56, 57). In the
present study, forskolin, a cAMP-inducing agent, inhibited Jak1
activation, STAT1 phosphorylation and binding to the GAS motif, and
IRF-1 synthesis. In addition, H89, a potent and selective PKA
inhibitor, reversed the inhibitory effect of VIP on Jak1/STAT1 and
IRF-1 synthesis, supporting the involvement of the cAMP/PKA pathway.
Similar observations were made for the inhibitory effect of NO and
IL-12 production by VIP in LPS/IFN-
-stimulated macrophages
(23, 33). The link between the cAMP pathway and the Jak1/2
activation has not been elucidated. One of the possibilities is the
induction of SOCS1 and/or SOCS3 by VIP/PACAP. The members of the SOCS
family act as inhibitors of cytokine signaling (58, 59, 60),
and SOCS1 and SOCS3 inhibit STAT1 activation by IFN-
(42). However, VIP and PACAP did not induce the expression
of SOCS1 and SOCS3 in unstimulated macrophages, and did not alter SOCS1
and/or SOCS3 expression in cells treated with either LPS or
IFN-
.
Several neurohormones activate specific members of the Jak/STAT family.
Prolactin activates Jak2, STAT1 and STAT5 (61, 62); the
growth hormone activates Jak1 and Jak2, followed by STAT1, STAT3, and
STAT5 (63); and
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone
activates Jak2 and STAT1 (64). However, no neuropeptides
or hormones have been previously reported to inhibit the Jak/STAT
pathway. To our knowledge, VIP and PACAP are the first example of
neuropeptides that negatively regulate the expression of IRF-1 through
the inhibition of Jak1/STAT1 activation.
IFN-
is one of the most important macrophage stimulators in vivo,
and STAT1 and IRF-1 play central roles in the expression of several
genes essential for both innate and specific immunity. Therefore, the
regulation of Jak/STAT1/IRF activation by VIP and PACAP could represent
an important regulatory element in the complex machinery by which these
endogenous neuropeptides regulate the inflammatory response.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Doina Ganea, Rutgers University, Department of Biological Sciences, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07102. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Jak, Janus kinase; GAS, IFN-
-activated site; IRF-1, IFN regulatory factor-1; iNOS, inducible NO synthase; PAC1, PACAP-preferring receptor; PACAP, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide, VPAC, VIP/PACAP receptor; PKA, protein kinase A. ![]()
Received for publication February 14, 2000. Accepted for publication June 29, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IFN-
, and is likely to autoregulate the p91 gene. EMBO J. 13:158.[Medline]
involves binding of distinct factors to a palindromic response element. J. Biol. Chem. 269:21146.
response element-binding proteins with the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) gene promoter controls the pattern of expression on epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 269:8952.
in monocytic cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:147.
and lipopolysaccharide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9730.
and bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Exp. Med. 177:1779.
production by whole blood cells from healthy young and old subjects. J. Neuroimmunol. 75:25.
production by macrophages: in vitro and in vivo studies. J. Immunol. 162:2358.
B and interferon regulatory factor 1 activation. J. Immunol. 162:4685.
and IL-6. J. Immunol. 162:1200.
synthesis by T cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 96:167.[Medline]
transcriptional activation by regulating NF-
B and CREB/c-Jun. J. Biol. Chem. 273:31427.
B and Ets activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:31930.
-signaling pathway in macrophages at different stages of maturation. J. Immunol. 160:4337.
. J. Immunol. 163:2640.
-treated and virus-infected macrophages. Scand. J. Immunol. 49:169.[Medline]
-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Janus kinases and latent cytoplasmic transcription factors in human monocytes by Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Infect. Immun. 66:2514.
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone to its G-protein coupled receptor on B lymphocytes activates the Jak/STAT pathway. Biochem. J. 331:211.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Foster, K. Andreadou, L. Jamieson, P.M. Preshaw, and J.J. Taylor VIP Inhibits P. gingivalis LPS-induced IL-18 and IL-18BPa in Monocytes Journal of Dental Research, September 1, 2007; 86(9): 883 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Spensieri, G. Fedele, C. Fazio, M. Nasso, P. Stefanelli, P. Mastrantonio, and C. M. Ausiello Bordetella pertussis Inhibition of Interleukin-12 (IL-12) p70 in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Blocks IL-12 p35 through Adenylate Cyclase Toxin-Dependent Cyclic AMP Induction. Infect. Immun., May 1, 2006; 74(5): 2831 - 2838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Foster, J. Cheetham, J.J. Taylor, and P.M. Preshaw VIP Inhibits Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced Immune Responses in Human Monocytes Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2005; 84(11): 999 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Galgani, V. De Rosa, S. De Simone, A. Leonardi, U. D'Oro, G. Napolitani, A. M. Masci, S. Zappacosta, and L. Racioppi Cyclic AMP Modulates the Functional Plasticity of Immature Dendritic Cells by Inhibiting Src-like Kinases through Protein Kinase A-mediated Signaling J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32507 - 32514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lukashev, A. Ohta, S. Apasov, J.-F. Chen, and M. Sitkovsky Cutting Edge: Physiologic Attenuation of Proinflammatory Transcription by the Gs Protein-Coupled A2A Adenosine Receptor In Vivo J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 21 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Voice, S. Donnelly, G. Dorsam, G. Dolganov, S. Paul, and E. J. Goetzl c-Maf and JunB Mediation of Th2 Differentiation Induced by the Type 2 G Protein-Coupled Receptor (VPAC2) for Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7289 - 7296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Delgado, D. Pozo, and D. Ganea The Significance of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide in Immunomodulation Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2004; 56(2): 249 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Delgado Inhibition of Interferon (IFN) {gamma}-induced Jak-STAT1 Activation in Microglia by Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide: INHIBITORY EFFECT ON CD40, IFN-INDUCED PROTEIN-10, AND INDUCIBLE NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE EXPRESSION J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 27620 - 27629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-W. Chen, Y.-H. Chang, C.-J. Tsi, and W.-W. Lin Inhibition of IFN-{gamma}-Mediated Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Induction by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonist, 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-Prostaglandin J2, Involves Inhibition of the Upstream Janus Kinase/STAT1 Signaling Pathway J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 979 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Ahmed, A. Mayer, J.-D. Ji, and L. B. Ivashkiv Inhibition of IL-6 signaling by a p38-dependent pathway occurs in the absence of new protein synthesis J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2002; 72(1): 154 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ganea and M. Delgado VASOACTIVE INTESTINAL PEPTIDE (VIP) AND PITUITARY ADENYLATE CYCLASE-ACTIVATING POLYPEPTIDE (PACAP) AS MODULATORS OF BOTH INNATE AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 229 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bousquet, V. Chesnokova, A. Kariagina, A. Ferrand, and S. Melmed cAMP Neuropeptide Agonists Induce Pituitary Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-3: Novel Negative Feedback Mechanism for Corticotroph Cytokine Action Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2001; 15(11): 1880 - 1890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |