|
|
||||||||
Department of Biochemistry, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH), Aachen, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor and the signaling receptor
subunit gp130. After ligand binding, constitutively gp130-associated
tyrosine kinases of the Janus family, Jak1, Jak2, and Tyk2, become
activated by phosphorylation (7, 8). Gp130, subsequently
tyrosine phosphorylated on its cytoplasmic tail, recruits the protein
tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 and transcription factors of the STAT family
via specific phosphotyrosine/SH2 domain interactions
(9, 10, 11). STAT3 associates with the four cytoplasmic
membrane-distal tyrosine motifs of gp130, whereas SHP2 binds to Y759
(12, 13). Subsequently, SHP2 and the STAT factors also
become tyrosine phosphorylated. Activated STAT homo- and/or
heterodimers (14) translocate to the nucleus where they
bind to enhancer elements of IL-6-inducible genes (15).
SHP2 activation is involved in the attenuation of the signal
transduction (16, 17, 18) and the induction of the MAPK
pathway after IL-6 stimulation (19). Prevention of SHP2
phosphorylation by mutation of the SHP2 recruitment site in gp130 leads
to enhanced and prolonged STAT activation, APP gene promoter induction
(16, 17, 18), and impaired MAPK activation upon stimulation
with IL-6 (19). SHP2 is a ubiquitously expressed and highly conserved enzyme also known as syp, SH-PTP2, SH-PTP3, PTP-1D, PTP-2C, PTP-N11, and SAP2 (20). The protein contains two N-terminal SH2 domains and a C-terminal protein tyrosine phosphatase domain. Association of SHP2 with activated receptor complexes and its subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation have been described for many cytokines, growth factors, and cell adhesion proteins. The consensus sequence VXY(T/V/I)X(V/L/I) for SHP2 binding was deduced from the phosphotyrosine motifs in the receptor complexes analyzed (21). Activated SHP2 plays a bivalent role: on the one hand, SHP2 down-regulates signal transduction by dephosphorylating signaling components, and on the other hand, tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP2 acts as an adaptor protein to recruit further adaptor molecules (e.g., grb2, gab1, and gab2) to the respective receptor molecules, thereby activating different signal transduction pathways (22, 23). A regulatory function of the SHP2-SH2 domains for the phosphatase activity of SHP2 has been suggested by several in vitro studies (24, 25) and has recently been corroborated by the solution of the three-dimensional structure of SHP2 (26). The structure implicates an inhibitory function of the N-terminal SH2 domain on the phosphatase activity that can be overcome by the binding of phosphotyrosine peptides to the SH2 domain(s) of SHP2.
In this study we analyzed the requirements for the tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2 at the gp130 signal transducing subunit of the IL-6R complex. We found that apart from Y759 of gp130, no further cytoplasmic tyrosine residues are involved in SHP2 phosphorylation. Since SHP2 contains two SH2 domains, we investigated whether both Y759 motifs in the gp130 homodimer are needed for SHP2 to exert its action on IL-6 signal transduction and acute phase protein promoter activation. We extended our studies to the heterodimeric gp130/LIF-R and gp130/OSM-R complexes. Finally, it has been studied whether the SHP2 and the STAT recruitment sites on gp130 are required to be present on the same chain of a receptor complex and whether there is cross-talk between different receptor complexes.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Restriction enzymes were purchased from Roche (Mannheim,
Germany). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by MWG-Biotech (Ebersberg,
Germany). Vent polymerase was obtained from New England BioLabs
(Schwalbach/Ts, Germany), and rIL-5 was purchased from Cell Concepts
(Umkirch, Germany). Abs to the extracellular domain of the IL-5R
-chain were gifts from Jan Tavernier (Gent, Belgium). Abs to the
extracellular domains of the IL-5R ß-chain and to SHP2 were obtained
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Phosphotyrosine Abs
(4G10) were purchased from Upstate Laboratories (Lake Placid, NY). Abs
to gp130 were gifts from Dr. J. Wijdenes (Besançon, France).
Recombinant IL-6 and sIL-6R were prepared as described previously
(27, 28). The sp. act. of IL-6 was 2 x
106 B cell stimulatory factor-2 U/mg of
protein.
Construction of expression vectors
Plasmid constructions were conducted by standard procedures
(29). pGL3
2M-215Luc contains the promoter
region -215 to +8 of the rat
2-macroglobulin
(
2M) gene fused to the luciferase-encoding
sequence and was described previously (15).
pSVL-gp130 (YYYYYY) is an expression vector for wild-type gp130 (gp130(YYYYYY)) and was described previously (17). This expression vector was modified by PCR mutagenesis to encode a gp130 mutant with all cytoplasmic tyrosine residues of gp130 replaced by phenylalanine (pSVL-gp130(FFFFFF)) (mutated residues are bold) (30). The vector coding for the add-back mutant gp130(FYFFFF) is identical with pSVL-gp130(FFFFFF), but contains a tyrosine codon at position 759. All these constructs contain a C-terminal Myc tag. These vectors were used for stable transfection of murine pre-B cells (Ba/F3 cells).
Vectors encoding IL-5R/gp130 fusion proteins of the extracellular
IL-5R
or IL-5Rß region and the transmembrane and intracellular
parts of gp130 (IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY) and IL5-Rß/gp130(YYYYYY)) were
previously described (pSVL-
130; pSVL-ß130) (31).
pSVL-based expression vectors for IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY) and
IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY) were generated by exchange of the
sequence encoding the intracellular and transmembrane parts of
wild-type gp130 in pSVL-
130 and pSVL-ß130 (31) by the
corresponding sequence of pSVL-gp130(YFYYYY). These vectors
were used for transient transfection of COS-7 cells. IL-5R/gp130
chimeric receptor constructs were generated by fusing the extracellular
domain of the IL-5R
or the IL-5Rß with the appropriate mutated
cytoplasmic part of chimeric EpoR/gp130 receptors (30). To
allow expression in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2, these
constructs were inserted into the pRcCMV expression vector (Invitrogen,
Groningen, The Netherlands) to give pRcCMV-IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY),
pRcCMV-IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY),
pRcCMV-IL5-R
/gp130(YFFFFF),
pRcCMV-IL5-R
/gp130(YYFFFF),pRcCMV-IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY),pRcCMV-IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY),
pRcCMV-IL-5Rß/gp130(YFFFFFF), and
pRcCMV-IL-5Rß/gp130(YYFFFFF).
pRcCMV-EpoR/gp130(YYYYYY), pRcCMV-EpoR/gp130(YFYYYY),
pRcCMV-EpoR/gp130(YFFFFF), and
pRcCMV-EpoR/gp130(YYFFFF) are expression vectors for
EpoR/gp130 chimeric receptor constructs and were described previously
(30). Expression vectors for fusion proteins of the
extracellular domain of the IL-5Rß and the transmembrane and
cytoplasmic parts of the LIF-R or the OSM-R were used previously by
Hermanns et al. (pRcCMV-IL-5Rß/OSM-R and pRcCMV-IL-5Rß/LIF-R)
(32). The sequences of all constructs were verified by
fluorescence sequencing.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis
For immunoprecipitation 2 x 107 cells were lysed in 500 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 1% Brij 96 (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany; 0.5% Brij 96 in coimmunoprecipitation assays); and 10 µg/ml of each aprotinin, pepstatin, leupeptin). Equal amounts of cellular protein were incubated with the appropriate Abs at 4°C overnight and immunoprecipitated with 2.5 mg of protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Immune complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Eschborn, Germany). Ags were detected by incubation with the appropriate primary Ab (4G10, 1/1000 dilution; anti-SHP2 and anti-IL-5Rß, 1/1000 dilution) and HRP-coupled secondary Abs (1/2000; Dako, Hamburg, Germany). The membranes were developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham-Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). To verify application of equal amounts of protein, blots were stripped in 10 mM 2-ME, 2% SDS, and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7, for 30 min at 70°C and reprobed.
Transfection and reporter gene analysis
Human hepatoma cells HepG2 were grown and transiently
transfected using the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method as
described previously (33). Transfections were adjusted
with control vectors to equal amounts of DNA. Cell lysis and luciferase
assays were conducted using the luciferase kit (Promega, Madison, WI)
according to the manufacturer. All transient expression experiments
were performed at least in triplicate. Luciferase activity values were
normalized to transfection efficiency monitored by the cotransfected
ß-galactosidase expression vector (pCR3lacZ; Pharmacia;
1.5 µg). COS-7 cells were grown in DMEM with 10% FCS, 100 mg/l
streptomycin, and 60 mg/l penicillin. Approximately 1.5 x
107 COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with
25 µg of DNA using the DEAE-dextran method. Briefly, cells were
incubated in medium containing DNA, 80 µM chloroquine, and 0.4 mg/ml
DEAE-dextran for 80 min, avoiding gas exchange. Afterward, cells were
incubated for 1 min in PBS containing 10% DMSO. After 24 h cells
were split 1/2, and after an additional 24 h in culture
medium cells were stimulated. Chimeric receptor surface expression in
COS-7 cells was verified by FACS analysis with Abs to the extracellular
domains of the IL5-R
-chain or IL-5R ß-chain. Ba/F3 cells were
grown and stably transfected as described previously (34).
Surface expression of gp130 was verified by FACS analysis with B-P4 Ab
specific for the extracellular domain of gp130.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tyrosine 759 in gp130 is essential for IL-6-induced SHP2
activation. Substitution of tyrosine 759 to phenylalanine leads to loss
of SHP2 phosphorylation, enhanced and prolonged STAT activation, and
acute phase protein gene induction (16, 17, 18). We examined
whether any other tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of gp130
apart from Y759 are required for SHP2 activation. Therefore, a gp130
receptor mutant with a Y
F exchange of all cytoplasmic tyrosine
residues except Y759 was generated
(gp130(FYFFFF)). This mutant as well as the
wild-type gp130 receptor (gp130(YYYYYY)) and a mutant with all six
tyrosines mutated to phenylalanine (gp130(FFFFFF)) were
stably expressed in Ba/F3 pro-B cells that lack endogenous gp130. As
determined by FACS analysis the surface expressions of these various
receptor mutants were similar (Fig. 1
B). Stimulation of cells
expressing wild-type gp130 (gp130(YYYYYY); lanes 1 and
2) or the gp130(FYFFFF) mutant
(lanes 3 and 4) with IL-6/sIL-6R complexes
led to a similar extent of SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1
A). In contrast, elimination of all cytoplasmic tyrosine
residues of gp130 abolished SHP2 phosphorylation (lanes
5 and 6). Thus, the presence of Y759 is sufficient for
SHP2 phosphorylation, and none of the other five cytoplasmic tyrosines
in gp130 is required for SHP2 activation.
|
The phosphorylation of SHP2 after activation of the IL-6R/gp130
complex requires the recruitment of SHP2 to phosphotyrosine 759 of
gp130 (12). To examine whether the tyrosine residues Y759
in both subunits of the activated gp130 dimer are required for SHP2
phosphorylation, we used a heterodimeric chimeric receptor system that
enabled us to induce the dimerization of two different cytoplasmic
tails (31). These chimeric receptors containing the
IL-5R
or IL-5Rß extracellular domains fused to the transmembrane
and cytoplasmic domains of gp130 were transiently expressed in COS-7
cells. Thus, by stimulation with IL-5 we were able to induce receptor
complex formation where only one receptor chain in the dimer contains a
Y
F substitution at position Y759 (i.e.,
(IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY) or
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY)). The
expression levels of all these chimeric receptor constructs were
monitored by FACS analysis and were found to be similar (data not
shown). Mutation of Y759 to F in both chimeric receptor chains led to
the total loss of SHP2 phosphorylation (Fig. 2
, lanes 7 and 8).
Restoration of one Y759 in the receptor complex was sufficient to
sustain SHP2 phosphorylation regardless of whether the Y759 is present
in the IL-5R
(lanes 3 and 4) or
IL-5Rß chimeric protein (lanes 5 and 6).
Thus, for SHP2 phosphorylation, Y759 is required in only one of the
chimeric receptor chains in the activated receptor complex.
|
/gp130 chimera is
not required for binding of SHP2 to the IL-5Rß/gp130 chimeric
receptor chain.
|
A further downstream effect of SHP2 activation is the attenuation
of IL-6-induced acute phase protein expression in liver cells
(17, 18). To examine whether a single Y759 in the gp130
dimer is sufficient for the repression of acute phase protein induction
we analyzed whether a single Y759
F substitution in the cytoplasmic
part of the gp130 dimeric receptor complex is sufficient to abolish the
negative effect of SHP2 on acute phase protein promoter induction
in human hepatoma cells. The IL-5R/gp130 chimeric receptors were
expressed in HepG2 cells transfected with an
2M-promoter luciferase construct (Fig. 4
). Stimulation of cells expressing the
IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY) and IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY) chimeric receptors
led to a 20-fold induction of the luciferase reporter gene
(lanes 1 and 2). Elimination of Y759 in
both chimeric receptor chains
(IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY);
lanes 7 and 8) further enhanced the reporter
activity (>2-fold), whereas only moderate increases in reporter
activity were measured in cells expressing the
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY)
(lanes 3 and 4) or
IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
(lanes 5 and 6) heterodimeric receptor
chimeras, demonstrating that in these cells a single tyrosine 759 is
able to down-regulate acute phase gene induction.
|
LIF and OSM signal through gp130/LIF-R or gp130/OSM-R heteromeric
receptor complexes. In human cells, OSM also uses gp130/LIF-R complexes
(36). We analyzed whether tyrosine 759 in the gp130
receptor chain of these receptor complexes also affects gene induction.
The transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of wild-type LIF-R and OSM-R
were fused to the extracellular part of IL-5Rß. These IL-5Rß/OSM-R
and IL-5Rß/LIF-R chimeric proteins were coexpressed with the chimeric
IL-5R
/gp130 constructs IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY) (Fig. 5
, lanes 5 and 6
and lanes 9 and 10) or
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY) (lanes 7 and
8 and lanes 11 and 12) in HepG2 cells
and analyzed for
2M-promoter-luciferase
construct gene activation after IL-5 stimulation. Activation of the
IL-5R
/IL-5Rß chimeric receptor pairs containing the cytoplasmic
wild-type receptor domains
(IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY) (lanes
1 and 2), IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/LIF-R
(lanes 5 and 6), or
IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/OSM-R (lanes 9 and
10)) led to the induction of the luciferase reporter gene.
Elimination of Y759 in the cytoplasmic part of gp130
(IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
(lanes 3 and 4),
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/LIF-R (lanes
7 and 8), or
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/OSM-R (lanes
11 and 12)) resulted in a further increase in reporter
gene activity. These observations demonstrate that LIF and OSM
signaling can also be down-regulated by the presence of tyrosine 759 of
gp130 within the receptor complex.
|
One central function of gp130 is the recruitment and activation of
STAT factors at the four distal tyrosine motifs. We investigated
whether repression of gene induction via the tyrosine 759 motif of
gp130 also occurs in receptor complexes in which the SHP2 and STAT
recruitment sites are located not on the same but on different receptor
chains (Fig. 6
A). Therefore,
we measured the reporter gene induction mediated by an
IL-5R
/gp130(YYFFFF)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
receptor complex (lanes 9 and 10) in which
SHP2 can only be recruited to the IL-5R
/gp130 chimera and STATs can
only be activated at the IL-5Rß/gp130 receptor chain.
Interestingly, this receptor combination was as potent as the
IL-5R
/gp130(YFFFFF)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY) complex
(lanes 5 and 6), where SHP2 and STAT are
activated at the same chain. For comparison, the
IL-5R
/gp130(YFFFFF)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
complex (lanes 7 and 8), in which
both Y759 motifs are lacking, was again much more potent to mediate
reporter gene activation after stimulation of the cells with IL-5. The
receptor combinations with mutated STAT binding sites in the
IL-5R
/gp130 chain show less efficient gene induction than the
corresponding unmutated receptor chain, most likely because of the
lower number of STAT activation sites in the receptor complex (compare
IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY) (lanes
1 and 2) with
IL-5R
/gp130(YFFFFF)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY)
(lanes 5 and 6) and
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
(lanes 3 and 4) with
IL-5R
/gp130(YFFFFF)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
(lanes 7 and 8)). Thus, to attenuate
gp130-mediated gene induction, the SHP2 recruitment site does not have
to be located on the same receptor chain as the STAT activation
sites.
|
/gp130(YFFFFF)·IL-5Rß/LIF-R (lanes
3 and 4) and
IL-5R
/gp130(YFFFFF)·IL-5Rß/OSM-R (lanes
7 and 8) led to an enhanced reporter gene induction
compared with the complexes containing Y759
(IL-5R
/gp130(YYFFFF)·IL-5Rß/LIF-R (lanes
1 and 2) and
IL-5R
/gp130(YYFFFF)·IL-5Rß/OSM-R (lanes
5 and 6)). Thus, tyrosine 759 in gp130 is able to
affect signal transduction even when STAT activation occurs exclusively
at the LIF-R or OSM-R. The tyrosine motif 759 of one receptor complex does not repress signaling of another receptor complex
SHP2 is bound to and activated at many cytokine and growth factor
receptors. To examine the possibility of a receptor cross-talk we asked
whether the presence of an SHP2 recruitment site in one receptor
complex affects the signaling of another receptor complex. We therefore
coexpressed chimeric Epo-R/gp130 constructs together with IL-5R/gp130
receptors and again analyzed the effect of the presence of Y759 on
receptor-dependent reporter gene induction (Fig. 7
A). Activation of
Epo-R/gp130(YYFFFF) (lanes 9 and
10, upper part) with Epo was performed to allow
specific SHP2 activation at one receptor complex, whereas the
IL-5R/gp130(YFYYYY) chimera was stimulated with IL-5 to
activate the STATs at another receptor complex (lanes
9 and 10, lower part) (17, 30).
|
,ß/gp130(YYYYYY) led to a significant reporter gene induction
(lanes 1 and 2). As expected, mutation of
Y759 in both receptor complexes resulted in an enhanced inducibility
(lanes 3 and 4). Stimulation of cells
expressing Epo-R/gp130(YFFFFF) and
IL-5-R
,ß/gp130(YYYYYY) (lanes 5 and
6) was less effective, most likely due to the activation of
STATs only at the IL-5R/gp130 complex. However, as expected, mutation
of Y759 in the IL-5R
,ß/gp130 (IL-5R/gp130(YFYYYY);
lanes 7 and 8) led to enhanced reporter gene
induction. Interestingly, this enhanced gene induction was not affected
by the absence (lanes 7 and 8) or the
presence (lanes 9 and 10) of SHP2
recruitment sites in the coactivated Epo-R/gp130 chimeric receptor
complexes (compare Epo-R/gp130(YFFFFF) and
IL-5R/gp130(YFYYYY) (lanes 7 and
8) with Epo-R/gp130(YYFFFF) and
IL-5R/gp130(YFYYYY) (lanes 9 and
10)). We had to exclude that the lack of signal attenuation
in lanes 9 and 10 is not simply due to the choice
for the extracellular domain and thus due to different activities of
the chimeric receptor complexes. Therefore, the experiment was also
performed after replacing the extracellular domains of the chimeric
receptors by each other (Fig. 7
We conclude from the results presented in Figs. 6
and 7
that the SHP2
and STAT recruitment sites in gp130 do not have to be located on the
same receptor chain for the Y759-dependent attenuation of gene
induction (Fig. 6
), but it is necessary that they be located in the
same receptor complex (Fig. 7
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 two neighboring phosphotyrosine motifs (Y663 and Y686) are required for SHP2/platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 interaction (40, 41). Similarly, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs comprise two tyrosine modules of a conserved sequence separated by six to eight residues (42). Thus, the presence of two SH2 domains in SHP2 could be a hint that SHP2 binds to two cytoplasmic phosphotyrosine residues in the signal transducer gp130. This idea is supported by in vitro studies revealing a regulatory potential of the SH2 domains for the catalytic activity of SHP2; SHP2 mutants lacking the SH2 domains are constitutively active (24, 25). Recently, the three-dimensional structure of SHP2 has been solved by Hof et al. (26). The structure demonstrates that the N-terminal SH2 domain interacts with the catalytic domain of SHP2. Binding of a phosphopeptide to this SH2 domain opens the catalytic cleft for substrate binding. Therefore, SHP2 phosphatase activity can be induced in vitro by phosphotyrosine peptides corresponding to the SHP2 binding site of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (21, 43). Furthermore, simultaneous occupancy of both SH2 domains in SHP2 by a tethered peptide with two insulin receptor substrate 1-derived phosphorylation sites led to strong stimulation of its phosphatase activity. In contrast, binding of monophosphorylated peptides led to weaker activation of SHP2 (25).
In the present study we report that no other tyrosine residue apart
from Y759 in the cytoplasmic domain of gp130 is required for SHP2
phosphorylation after receptor activation. Mutation of all cytoplasmic
tyrosine residues except Y759 to phenylalanine in gp130 did not abolish
SHP2 phosphorylation, indicating that Y759 in gp130 is sufficient for
the recruitment of SHP2 (Fig. 1
).
As an alternative to association with two phosphotyrosine modules in
one gp130 receptor chain, one could envisage that one SHP2 molecule
binds to two Y759 motifs in the gp130 homodimer, thereby embracing the
two gp130 molecules within a receptor complex. Using IL-5R/gp130
chimeric receptor mutants, we have shown that chimeric receptor
complexes containing only a single Y759 motif are able to recruit SHP2
and mediate its phosphorylation upon receptor activation (Figs. 2
and 3
). From these data we suggest that receptor dimerization is mainly
required for Jak activation leading to STAT and SHP2
phosphorylation.
The role of the second SH2 domain of SHP2 in IL-6 signaling remains to
be elucidated. To date, none of the IL-6 signal transduction components
has been identified as a direct substrate for SHP2. An attenuation of
STAT activation and a reduction of acute phase protein induction by
SHP2 have been reported by several investigators (16, 17, 18).
We tested whether a unique SHP2 binding site in gp130 is sufficient for
repressing acute phase protein gene induction. As expected from our
previous work (17), stimulation of the
2M promoter through the chimeric wild-type
receptor combination (IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY)
led to a weaker promoter activation than that obtained with the
IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)
receptor complex (Fig. 4
), which lacks the SHP2 recruitment sites, and
leads to impaired SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation (Figs. 2
and 3
).
Activation of SHP2 through only a single Y759 module in the
heterodimeric receptor chimeras
(IL-5R
/gp130(YFYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YYYYYY) or
IL-5R
/gp130(YYYYYY)·IL-5Rß/gp130(YFYYYY)) correlates
with reduced reporter gene activation. Thus, our results indicate that
only one tyrosine 759 motif of a gp130 dimer is required for SHP2
phosphorylation and its inhibitory function on acute phase protein gene
induction. Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate that for the
attenuation of receptor-mediated gene induction the SHP2 recruitment
site does not have to be located within the same chain of the receptor
complex as the STAT binding sites (Fig. 6
A).
The two IL-6-type cytokines LIF and OSM signal through gp130/LIF-R or
gp130/OSM-R heteromeric receptor complexes. These receptor complexes
contain only a single gp130-SHP2 recruitment site. Schiemann et al.
(44) have proposed an additional SHP2 binding site at the
LIF-R. Analysis of the SHP2 binding site of gp130 within the
gp130/LIF-R and gp130/OSM-R complexes shows that the Y759 motif in
gp130 is also functional in attenuating LIF and OSM signaling (Fig. 5
).
Within these heterodimeric receptor complexes the Y759 of gp130 could
act specifically on the gp130 receptor chain or might also affect
LIF-R- or OSM-R-originated gene activation. Interestingly, APP promoter
activation was also impaired when gp130-mediated STAT activation was
prevented by mutation of the STAT recruitment sites in the IL-5R/gp130
receptor chain (Fig. 6
B). Thus, similar to the gp130
homodimer, the inhibitory activity of Y759 of gp130 in the gp130/OSM-R
and gp130/LIF-R heterodimeric complexes is evident even when the STATs
are activated only at the OSM-R or LIF-R chain. The putative SHP2
binding site in the LIF-R might also affect gp130/LIF-R-mediated gene
induction. However, to date this site was only examined in homodimeric
receptor chimeras, containing the LIF-R cytoplasmic tail, with regard
to MAPK activation (44).
After stimulation of cells with a variety of cytokines and growth
factors, SHP2 is recruited at the tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors and
becomes activated. Thus, it is possible that SHP2 activated at one
receptor complex could inhibit the signaling through another receptor.
If such receptor cross-talk could occur, the SHP2 activation at one
receptor complex should influence signal transduction events elicited
by another receptor. From our experiments (Fig. 7
) no evidence for
"trans-inhibition" between two different receptor
complexes was obtained. This indicates that the downstream activities
that mediate Y759-dependent attenuation of APP gene induction act only
on signals derived from the receptor complex from which they originate
and therefore are unlikely to be mobile
(trans-acting) proteins.
SHP2 becomes activated by binding to the tyrosine 759 motif of gp130
and tyrosine phosphorylated by the Jaks with transient and rapid
kinetics similar to those of receptor phosphorylation (17, 18, 39). In turn, the activated receptor-bound phosphatase may
dephosphorylate the tyrosine-phosphorylated Janus kinases, the
receptor, and/or the STATs, leading to an attenuation of signaling. The
release of SHP2 from the receptor chain would result in the inhibition
of SHP2 activity due to binding of the SHP2-SH2 domains to the
catalytic domain of SHP2 (26). Regarding SHP2 as the
mediator of Y759-dependent attenuation of
2M
gene induction, this mechanism would explain why no
trans-inhibition of other receptor complexes can be
observed.
Another mechanism of feedback inhibition for cytokine signaling has
become obvious by the discovery of the cytokine-induced SOCS
(suppressors of cytokine signaling) proteins (45, 46, 47). The
SOCSs bind to the Janus kinases to inhibit signal transduction.
Recently, we found that the IL-6-induced SOCS3 also requires tyrosine
759 of gp130 to exert its negative action on IL-6 signaling.
Furthermore, we have shown that SOCS3 interacts with a peptide
corresponding to the phosphorylated tyrosine 759 motif of gp130. This
interaction did not depend on the presence of SHP2 (48).
Thus, SOCS3 has to be recruited to phosphotyrosine 759 of gp130 to
inhibit the receptor-associated Jaks and cannot act in trans on other
receptor complexes. This requirement of SOCS3 to bind gp130 is in
agreement with the observed lack of trans-inhibition
(Fig. 7
).
In previous work from our group it was demonstrated that IL-6 signaling
was inhibited by TNF-
pretreatment of macrophages. This effect is
very likely due to TNF-
-induced SOCS3 gene induction
(49). Thus, SOCS3 has been suggested to be a mediator of
receptor cross-talk. Nevertheless, the inhibitory function of
SOCS3 on IL-6 signal transduction depends on the presence of tyrosine
759 of the activated signal transducer gp130 (48).
Therefore, cross-talk with TNF-
signaling has to occur at the level
of SOCS3 gene induction (upstream of binding to the Y759 motif) and not
at the level of SOCS3 function (downstream of binding to the Y759
motif). In conclusion, the two differently activated receptor complexes
do not influence each other directly but, rather, through the induction
of proteins that, in turn, affect receptor activities.
The activation of the Ras/Raf/MAPK cascade has been described to inhibit IL-6 signal transduction (50, 51). Tyrosine 759 in gp130 is essential for IL-6-dependent activation of the MAPK cascade (19). Since the activated MAPK is a trans-acting protein, it has been concluded that activation of the Ras/Raf/MAPK cascade is unlikely to be directly responsible for the Y759-dependent reduction of APP gene induction. Nevertheless, MAPK could contribute indirectly to the mechanism of attenuation investigated in this work. For example we found that MAPK activation by PMA increases the level of SOCS3 mRNA, which, in turn, results in the tyrosine 759-dependent repression of IL-6 signal transduction (52).
Further efforts are required to elaborate whether SOCS3 and/or SHP2 are the mediators of Y759-dependent attenuation of IL-6-, OSM-, and LIF-induced gene induction. Work on the role and the mode of action of SOCS3 and SHP2 in IL-6-type cytokine-induced inhibition of gene expression is in progress.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 D.A. and M.W. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Current address: Institute of Molecular Biology, Jagiellonian University, 3 Mickiewicza Avenue, Krakow, 31-120, Poland. ![]()
4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Peter C. Heinrich, Medical School, Aachen, Department of Biochemistry, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. ![]()
5 Abbreviations used in this paper: OSM, oncostatin M; APP, acute phase protein;
2M,
2-macroglobulin; CNTF, ciliary neurotrophic factor; Epo, erythropoietin; gp130, glycoprotein 130; Jak, Janus kinase; LIF, leukemia-inhibitory factor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; sIL, soluble IL; SH2, Scr homology domain 2; SHP2, Scr homology domain 2-containing phosphatase 2; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; -R, receptor; Tyk2, tyrosine kinase 2. ![]()
Received for publication April 11, 2000. Accepted for publication June 15, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and gp130-mediated stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase: evidence for participation of multiple signaling pathways which converge at Ras. J. Biol. Chem. 272:16631.
induce SOCS3 mRNA and inhibit IL-6-induced activation of STAT3 in macrophages. FEBS Lett. 463:365.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Eulenfeld and F. Schaper A new mechanism for the regulation of Gab1 recruitment to the plasma membrane J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2009; 122(1): 55 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Clahsen and F. Schaper Interleukin-6 acts in the fashion of a classical chemokine on monocytic cells by inducing integrin activation, cell adhesion, actin polymerization, chemotaxis, and transmigration J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 84(6): 1521 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stross, S. Radtke, T. Clahsen, C. Gerlach, R. Volkmer-Engert, F. Schaper, P. C. Heinrich, and H. M. Hermanns Oncostatin M Receptor-mediated Signal Transduction Is Negatively Regulated by SOCS3 through a Receptor Tyrosine-independent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2006; 281(13): 8458 - 8468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Qing, A. P. Costa-Pereira, D. Watling, and G. R. Stark Role of Tyrosine 441 of Interferon-{gamma} Receptor Subunit 1 in SOCS-1-mediated Attenuation of STAT1 Activation J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 1849 - 1853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-P. Yang, U. Albrecht, V. Zakowski, R. M. Sobota, D. Haussinger, P. C. Heinrich, S. Ludwig, J. G. Bode, and F. Schaper Dual Function of Interleukin-1{beta} for the Regulation of Interleukin-6-induced Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 Expression J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 45279 - 45289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mahboubi, N. C. Kirkiles-Smith, J. Karras, and J. S. Pober Desensitization of Signaling by Oncostatin M in Human Vascular Cells Involves Cytoplasmic Tyr Residue 759 in gp130 but Is Not Mediated by Either Src Homology 2 Domain-containing Tyrosine Phosphatase 2 or Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 25014 - 25023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Niemand, A. Nimmesgern, S. Haan, P. Fischer, F. Schaper, R. Rossaint, P. C. Heinrich, and G. Muller-Newen Activation of STAT3 by IL-6 and IL-10 in Primary Human Macrophages Is Differentially Modulated by Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 J. Immunol., March 15, 2003; 170(6): 3263 - 3272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lehmann, J. Schmitz, M. Weissenbach, R. M. Sobota, M. Hortner, K. Friederichs, I. Behrmann, W. Tsiaris, A. Sasaki, J. Schneider-Mergener, et al. SHP2 and SOCS3 Contribute to Tyr-759-dependent Attenuation of Interleukin-6 Signaling through gp130 J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 661 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cebo, V. Durier, P. Lagant, E. Maes, D. Florea, T. Lefebvre, G. Strecker, G. Vergoten, and J.-P. Zanetta Function and Molecular Modeling of the Interaction between Human Interleukin 6 and Its HNK-1 Oligosaccharide Ligands J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12246 - 12252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mahboubi and J. S. Pober Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (STAT1) Is Not Sufficient for the Induction of STAT1-dependent Genes in Endothelial Cells. COMPARISON OF INTERFERON-gamma AND ONCOSTATIN M J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8012 - 8021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Schuringa, L. V. Dekker, E. Vellenga, and W. Kruijer Sequential Activation of Rac-1, SEK-1/MKK-4, and Protein Kinase Cdelta Is Required for Interleukin-6-induced STAT3 Ser-727 Phosphorylation and Transactivation J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2001; 276(29): 27709 - 27715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |