|
|
||||||||


*
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Immunology, University of Freiburg, and
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany;
Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
§
Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The accessibility of peripheral organs for T cells may play a crucial role in tolerance induction. Blood vessels in most organs are surrounded by a basement membrane, restricting tissue access of T cells. The liver is an exception in this respect, as it lacks a basement membrane around hepatic sinusoides. Therefore, hepatocytes are readily accessible for T cells (15). Thus, it is likely that active mechanisms of tolerance induction, such as peripheral deletion or anergy, are operating in the liver. Several earlier studies have examined CD8 T cell tolerance induction by expression of specific Ags in the liver (16, 17, 18). However, the tolerance mechanisms were not well defined, since the fate of self-reactive T cells could not be directly followed. Surprisingly, tolerance mechanisms of CD8 T cells toward liver Ags using a transgene-encoded neo-self Ag together with the corresponding TCR-transgenic (tg)3 models have to date only been studied with the allo-MHC Ag Kb (19, 20, 21, 22). These studies have defined peripheral deletion and anergy as the key mechanisms of tolerance induction of CD8 T cells in the liver.
To examine the tolerance mechanism of CD8 T cells toward a classical MHC-restricted peptide Ag in the liver, we have generated tg mice expressing the GP33 CD8 T cell epitope of LCMV glycoprotein in hepatocytes. These mice together with TCR-tg mice specific for the GP33 epitope were used to study peripheral tolerance of CD8 T cells toward an MHC-restricted peptide Ag in the liver.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The DNA construct used to generate ALB1 mice was based on the
pWEKB plasmid containing the genomic Kb gene in
which the 5' part of exon 1 was replaced by a cDNA fragment encoding aa
160 of the LCMV glycoprotein (23). The
NruI/EcoRI fragment of pWEKB containing the
GP33-modified Kb gene without the promoter region
was cloned into the EcoRI/SmaI site of pUC-19.
The 3.8-kb fragment of the 5' noncoding region of the mouse albumin
gene containing promoter and enhancer elements (24) was
cloned in front of the GP33-modified Kb gene. The
hybrid construct was released from the plasmid by a SphI and
PvuI digest, leaving 100 bp of vector sequence at the 5' end
of the regulatory elements. DNA was injected into mouse zygotes of
(C57BL/6 x DBA/2)F2 mice. Six founder mice
were obtained, and one line (ALB1) was selected for further analysis.
The mice used in this study were back-crossed to C57BL/6 (B6) eight or
nine times. B6 mice were obtained from our own breeding colony or from
Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). TCR-tg mice (line 318) expressing
the P14 TCR (V
2/Vß8.1) (25) specific for LCMV GP33
plus H-2Db on about 50% of their
CD8+ T cells have been described previously
(26). To generate TCR-tg Thy-1.1 mice, 318 mice were
back-crossed to B6.PL-Thy-1a mice, which were a
gift from Dr. H. Mossmann (Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology,
Freiburg, Germany).
107.5 tg mice (official designation Tg[Alb-1.HBV]Bri66) expressing hepatitis B virus large surface Ag (HBsAg) in the liver have been described (27). They were back-crossed three times to B6 and MHC typed before use. The tg mice were typed by PCR using 5'gPTY (5'-CCAGTAAAAGGATGGGTCAG-3') and 3'gPTY (5'-GGGTCTGAGTCGGAGCCAGG-3') primers for ALB1 mice and HBS 93 (5'-TGTTCTGACTACTGCCTCTC-3') and HBS 539 (5'-GCAGTAGTCATGCAGGTCCG-3') primers for 107.5 tg mice.
Virus
LCMV-WE was originally obtained from Rolf Zinkernagel (University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland) and was propagated on L929 fibroblast cells. Mice were infected by injection of 200 PFU into the lateral tail vein.
Adoptive transfer experiments
To activate TCR-tg cells in vivo, spleen cells containing 105 naive TCR-tg CD8 T cells were adoptively transferred (i.v.) into B6 mice, which were infected with 200 PFU of LCMV-WE 13 days after transfer. Eight days after infection, TCR-tg effector cells were isolated from the spleen and were transferred (i.v.) into nonirradiated ALB1 or B6 mice. In the transfer experiments using naive TCR-tg cells, spleen cells containing 105 naive TCR-tg CD8 T cells were adoptively transferred (i.v.) into the various recipient mice and subsequently infected with 200 PFU of LCMV-WE. In the adoptive transfer experiments using a high number of TCR-tg cells (107), spleen cells were first depleted of B cells using sheep-anti-mouse IgG Dynabeads (Dynal, Hamburg, Germany). Cells were labeled with 5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) as previously described (28).
In vitro stimulation of TCR-tg cells
Spleen cells from TCR and TCR x ALB1 mice containing 2 x 104 TCR-tg cells were stimulated in vitro for 4 days with GP33-coated B6 spleen cells (2 x 106) in 24-well plates in 1.1 ml of IMDM supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.001 M 2-ME. Cells harvested after 4 days were used in a CTL assay at the indicated dilution of culture.
CTL assay
The cytolytic activity of T cells from LCMV-infected ALB1 mice was determined in a standard 5-h 51Cr release assay using EL-4 target cells (H-2b) loaded with LCMV glycoprotein 3341 (KAVYNFATM), LCMV nucleoprotein 396408 (FQPQNGQPI), or adenovirus E1A 234243 (SGPSNTPPEI) peptide (Neosystem Laboratoire, Strasbourg, France) as previously described (29).
Serum transaminase activity
Blood (200 µl) taken from the tail vein was collected in serum separator tubes (Microtainer brand serum separator tube, Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) and centrifuged for 20 min at 3300 x g, and sera were analyzed for alanine amino transferase activity (sALT; units per liter).
Flow cytometry
Cells were stained with the following Abs according to
standard procedures: Cy-Chrome-labeled anti-mouse-CD8
,
biotinylated anti-mouse-CD4, PE-labeled anti-mouse-V
2,
FITC-labeled anti-mouse-Vß8.1,8.2, and APC-labeled streptavidin
(all from PharMingen, San Diego, CA). PBL were analyzed after lysis of
RBC (FACS-Lysing Solution, Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). Flow
cytometry was performed on a FACSort flow cytometer using CellQuest II
software (Becton Dickinson).
Immunohistology
Tissue sections (5 µm) were cut on a cryostat microtome, air-dried, fixed in acetone for 10 min, and blocked with Tris-buffered saline containing 5% mouse serum and with Dako Biotin Blocking System (Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Anti-Thy-1.1-biotin (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was used as primary mAb followed by streptavidin-conjugated alkaline phosphatase (StreptAB Complex/AP, Dako, Hamburg, Germany) and Fast Red TR/naphthol AS-MX substrate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Sections were counterstained with Mayerss hemalum.
Molecular biology
Total RNA was isolated using an RNA isolation kit (Fluka BioChemika, Buchs, Switzerland). For cDNA synthesis 2 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). RT-PCR was performed by amplification of cDNA with GP33 transgene-specific primers 5'gPTY (5'-CCAGTAAAAGGATGGGTCAG-3') and 3'Ex2 (5'-CGAGGCCGGGCCGGGACACGGCGG-3') and ß-actin-specific primers 5' (5'-ATGGATGACGATATCGCT-3') and 3' (5'-ATGAGGTAGTCTGTCAGGT-3'). Transgene-specific primers were located in two different exons to prevent PCR amplification of contaminating genomic DNA. PCR conditions were 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 62°C, and 45 s at 72°C followed by a final elongation for 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel and transferred by alkaline capillar blotting to a nylon membrane (Gene Screen, NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). Membranes were hybridized overnight at 42°C with 32P-labeled GP33- or ß-actin-specific probes and exposed to a BIOMAX MS film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To study T cell tolerance toward an Ag expressed in hepatocytes,
tg mice expressing the GP33 CD8 T cell epitope of LCMV glycoprotein in
the liver were generated. Our first attempts to express the GP33 Ag in
hepatocytes using the entire LCMV glycoprotein cDNA under the control
of the mouse albumin promoter failed (data not shown). For a second
approach, a chimeric albumin-GP33-Kb construct
was designed. In this construct the Kb-promoter
region of the genomic Kb gene was replaced by the
mouse albumin promoter, and the signal sequence of the
Kb molecule, encoded in the first exon, was
exchanged by the leader sequence of the LCMV glycoprotein (aa 160)
containing the GP33 epitope (Fig. 1
A). Six tg lines were
obtained that showed similar phenotypes, and one line (ALB1 mice) was
selected for further analysis. RT-PCR analysis of this line revealed
GP33 transgene expression in the liver and the thymus (Fig. 1
B), but not in other organs, including heart, kidney, lung,
and spleen (data not shown). Importantly, as illustrated in Fig. 1
B, expression of the GP33 transgene in the liver was 100-
to 1000-fold higher than that in the thymus.
|
Incomplete thymic deletion of GP33-specific T cells in ALB1 mice
To examine the effect of the GP33 transgene on the T cell
repertoire, ALB1 mice were infected with LCMV, and the Ag specificity
of the induced CTL response was tested. As shown in Fig. 2
A, spleen cells from
LCMV-infected ALB1 mice exhibited significant CTL activity against GP33
peptide-loaded EL-4 target cells, indicating that the GP33 transgene
did not lead to complete tolerance induction. However, the
GP33-specific CTL activity of ALB1 mice was reduced about 10-fold on an
effector cell-to-cell basis compared with that of C57BL/6 (B6) control
mice. This partial tolerance was GP33 Ag specific, since LCMV-infected
ALB1 mice showed the same CTL activity against LCMV NP396
peptide-coated target cells as B6 mice (Fig. 2
B). Titration
experiments further revealed a more pronounced decrease in specific
lysis at low GP33 peptide concentration by ALB1 effector cells compared
with B6 mice, suggesting that GP33-specific T cells expressing high
affinity TCRs are predominantly negatively selected out in ALB1 mice
(Fig. 2
D).
|
2+/Vß8+) in
the thymus and the periphery were analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 3
|
2+/Vß8+ T cells in
these mice was still significantly higher than the number of T cells
expressing only endogenous TCR V
2 and Vß8 chains in control mice
(2%). This clearly showed that TCR-tg cells were present in the
periphery of TCR x ALB1 double-tg mice. To test whether the
remaining TCR-tg cells in TCR x ALB1 mice were functional, TCR-tg
cells from TCR and TCR x ALB1 mice were stimulated for 4 days
with GP33-coated APC in vitro in the absence of exogenous IL-2, and the
cytolytic activity was assessed. To generate identical conditions for
the stimulation, normal B6 spleen cells were added to the responder
spleen cells from TCR mice to ensure the same percentage (
0.5%) of
TCR-tg cells in the culture. As shown in Fig. 4
|
To determine whether TCR-tg cells proliferate in response to the
GP33 Ag in the liver of ALB1 mice, we made use of the CFSE labeling
technique (28). Naive CFSE-labeled TCR-tg
Thy-1.1+ T cells (107) were
adoptively transferred into nonirradiated ALB1 mice (Thy-1.2), and 4
days later TCR-tg cells isolated from the liver were analyzed. The data
in Fig. 5
demonstrate that TCR-tg
Thy-1.1+ cells isolated from liver homogenate of
ALB1 mice did not undergo cell division, whereas the same TCR-tg cells
transfused into LCMV-infected hosts cycled rapidly.
|
|
2+)
cells in the donor cell population (Thy-1.1+
CD8+) remained constant in both types of mice
(Fig. 7
|
The data presented above indicate that the GP33 Ag expressed on
hepatocytes in ALB1 mice was ignored by adoptively transferred naive
GP33-specific TCR-tg cells. To test whether these cells could be
activated in vivo by LCMV infection and whether the induced T cells
recognize the GP33 Ag on hepatocytes and induce hepatitis, transaminase
(sALT) levels in the sera were monitored. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 8
A, LCMV infection of ALB1
mice containing 105 naive TCR-tg cells led to a
significant increase in sALT levels (200300 U/L). Without transfer of
TCR-tg cells or without LCMV infection sALT levels were <50 U/L in
these mice (data not shown).
|
Surprisingly, TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 triple-transgenic mice
showed only weak signs of hepatitis (<100 U/L) after LCMV infection
(Fig. 8
D). This result, however, can be explained by the
limited clonal expansion of TCR-tg T cells in these mice after LCMV
infection compared with the extent of expansion in the adoptive
transfer experiments (Fig. 8
, D vs AC). The
weak proliferative response of the TCR-tg cells in TCR x
ALB1 x 107.5 triple-tg mice was due to rapid LCMV clearance
(<103 PFU/g spleen vs 107
in control mice on day 4 after infection) by TCR-tg cells. To provide
further support for this explanation, high numbers
(107) of naive TCR-tg cells were transferred into
ALB1 x 107.5 mice followed by LCMV infection. This cell transfer
resulted in a frequency of TCR-tg T cells in the recipient mice similar
to that seen in TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 triple-tg mice. LCMV
infection of these ALB1 x 107.5 double tg mice also induced only
moderate clonal expansion of TCR-tg cells and mild hepatitis (<150
U/L; Fig. 8
E).
Finally, we investigated whether TCR-tg cells isolated from TCR x
ALB1 double-tg or TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 triple-tg mice were
able to proliferate and to induce hepatitis after in vivo activation.
TCR-tg cells (105) from these mice were
transferred into ALB1 x 107.5 double-tg mice. After cell
transfer, mice were infected with LCMV, and clonal expansion of the
transferred TCR-tg cells and sALT levels was monitored. The same degree
of expansion and hepatitis was observed with TCR-tg cells from TCR
x ALB1 (Fig. 8
F) or TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 mice
(Fig. 8
G) as seen with transfers of T cells from single-tg
TCR mice (Fig. 8
C). This result demonstrates that TCR-tg
cells in TCR x ALB1 or TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 mice were
not anergized by the presence of the GP33 Ag on hepatocytes.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The albumin promoter has been used previously to achieve liver-specific expression of a transgene (31, 32). In six tg lines analyzed here, expression of the GP33 transgene was not strictly liver specific, and thymic expression was observed in all founder lines. Thymic expression of tg neo-self Ags under the control of putative tissue-specific promoters has been commonly found. In addition, ectopic expression of various endogenous genes normally expressed in the periphery has been frequently observed in the thymus (1, 2, 3). These observations suggest that thymic expression of peripheral self Ags may serve a physiological purpose in establishment of self tolerance to nonthymic proteins.
Analysis of TCR x ALB1 double-tg mice revealed that GP33 transgene expression in the thymus led to an 8- to 10-fold reduced number of TCR-tg cells in the thymus and the periphery. Importantly, the density of the tg TCR and of CD8 coreceptors on the remaining TCR-tg cells in TCR x ALB1 double-tg mice was similar to that seen on T cells from single-tg TCR mice. Furthermore, TCR-tg cells from TCR x ALB1 double-tg or TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 triple-tg mice exhibited the same capacity for clonal expansion and induction of hepatitis after adoptive transfer and LCMV infection as tg cells from single-tg TCR mice. In this respect, our system differs from other tolerance models in which the neo-self Ag was expressed in the thymus. Intrathymic expression of the allo-MHC Ag Kb driven by the rat insulin promoter led to deletion of those Kb-specific T cells that expressed the tg TCR at a high density (33). In the same TCR-tg system, induction of anergy was also reported when the Kb transgene was expressed in the thymus under the control of the keratin IV promoter (34).
How can the escape of about 10% of GP33-specific T cells in ALB1 mice from thymic negative selection be explained? The type and the location of the cells that ectopically express the GP33 transgene in the thymus of these mice are unknown. However, ectopic expression of various peripheral self Ags in the thymus has been shown to be restricted to a few medullary epithelial cells (1, 3). It is therefore possible that due to low expression of the GP33 transgene in the thymus of ALB1 mice, a fraction of thymocytes may never get into contact with GP33 Ag-expressing cells. Due to the high frequency of GP33-specific precursor T cells in TCR-tg mice, GP33-specific T cells were found in the periphery of TCR x ALB1 double-tg mice in appreciable numbers.
Without transfer of GP33-specific T cells, ALB1 single-tg mice did not
develop disease after LCMV infection, probably because a large
proportion (
90%) of GP33-specific T cells were deleted in the
thymus. The finding that transfer of a small number
(105) of naive GP33-specific TCR-tg cells
restored responsiveness and was sufficient to induce autoimmune
hepatitis after LCMV infection supports this hypothesis. Furthermore,
it indicates that significant transaminase levels were only observed in
this system when a massive GP33-specific CTL response was induced.
Interestingly, transaminase levels were increased only transiently
despite the persistence of TCR-tg effector/memory cells at a high
frequency at later time points. This phenomenon requires further
study.
Surprisingly, LCMV infection of TCR x ALB1 x 107.5
triple-tg (Fig. 8
D) or ALB1 x 107.5 double-tg mice
(Fig. 8
E) adoptively transferred with a high number of
TCR-tg cells did not induce a significant increase in transaminase
levels. How can this result be explained? Due to the high frequency of
LCMV GP33-specific TCR-tg cells, LCMV is rapidly cleared under these
conditions. Therefore, Ag-induced expansion of TCR-tg cells is
very limited, and thus, transaminase levels are not significantly
increased.
Once they had left the thymus, TCR-tg cells ignored the GP33 Ag expressed on hepatocytes. This conclusion is based on the adoptive transfer experiments, which revealed that TCR-tg cells did not undergo cell division or peripheral deletion in ALB1 mice. It is important to stress that TCR-tg cells isolated from TCR x ALB1 double-tg or TCR x ALB1 x 107.5 triple-tg mice were able to proliferate and to induce disease after in vivo stimulation with Ag. In this respect, our experiments show parallels to models using tg mice expressing OVA (35) or LCMV glycoprotein/nucleoprotein (13, 14, 36) in the ß-cells of the endocrine pancreas.
The mechanism of CD8 T cell tolerance to Ags in the liver has been previously addressed by Bertolino et al., who reported activation followed by peripheral deletion of Kb-specific TCR-tg cells in irradiation chimeras generated with tg mice expressing Kb in the liver and lymph node cells from TCR-tg mice (22). In contrast, Schönrich et al. observed tolerance induction by down-regulation of the TCR on self-reactive CD8 T cells in tg mice expressing Kb in the liver under control of the albumin promoter (19). Hepatitis could be induced in this model when TCR-tg cells were activated by strong antigenic stimuli (Ag plus IL-2) and when inflammatory signals induced by infectious agents (Listeria monocytogenes) were provided (37). Ferber et al. further demonstrated that the extent of down-regulation of the tg Kb-reactive TCR correlated with the amount of Kb expression on liver cells (20).
How can the differing results in the Kb and LCMV GP33 models be explained? In the system described here, a MHC class I-restricted peptide Ag (GP33) was employed as a model Ag, whereas in the studies referred to above, an allo-MHC class I Ag (Kb) was used. Allo-reactive T cells recognize foreign MHC class I molecules in both peptide-dependent and -independent manners (38). It is therefore difficult to compare the number of target molecules on the cell surface of hepatocytes in the two tg models. In addition, the Ag affinities of the tg TCRs used may differ. Despite these limitations, we favor the explanation that expression of a neo-self Ag at high levels in the liver leads to active tolerance mechanisms (i.e., TCR down-regulation, anergy, peripheral deletion), whereas expression at a lower level, as shown here, leads to ignorance. A similar conclusion has recently been reached from studies using tg mice expressing OVA under the control of the rat insulin promotor in the endocrine pancreas (35). However, the liver differs from the pancreas not only in size, but also in its architecture. The microvasculature of the liver is distinct from that seen in most other tissues, due to the discontinuous endothelial cell layer and the lack of a basal membrane, which may render hepatocytes particularly susceptible to recognition by CD8 T cells (15).
It is well established that the migration of T cells through lymphoid
and nonlymphoid organs is crucially influenced by their activation
state (39). We observed a dramatically increased
infiltration of activated TCR-tg into the liver of ALB1 mice compared
with naive TCR-tg cells (Fig. 6
). This result is very much in line with
several previous studies reporting accumulation and selective retention
of activated T cells by the liver (40, 41). The poor
infiltration of naive TCR-tg cells into the liver tissue of ALB1 mice
may help to explain how tolerance by ignorance is established in this
tg model. After LCMV infection, TCR-tg cells are activated and
gain the ability to efficiently infiltrate the liver to cause disease.
The question, however, of what proportion of TCR-tg cells present in
adult TCR x ALB1 double-tg mice has been in contact with
GP33-expressing hepatocytes once in their lifespan remains
open.
Infection of normal mice with a high dose (105 PFU) of LCMV induces CD8 T cell-mediated acute hepatitis (42). It must be emphasized that the tg model described here is distinct from this latter experimental system. In our model, recipient mice of TCR-tg cells are infected with a low dose of LCMV (200 PFU), and this infection induces hepatitis only in ALB1 or ALB1 x 107.5 tg mice, but not in normal or 107.5 single-tg mice. Thus, the increased transaminase levels in the mice examined here are due to an autoimmune response directed against the tg neo-self Ag. In the former system the increased transaminase levels at high dose infection are due to a CTL response against LCMV-infected hepatocytes.
T cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of virus-induced liver diseases. However, only a few murine models of virus-induced autoimmune hepatitis have been described to date. In the HBsAg tg model, adoptively transferred activated T cells from HBsAg-primed donor mice cause transient hepatitis in tg mice expressing HBV envelope proteins in hepatocytes (43, 44, 45). In contrast to the model described here, active immunization of these mice fails to induce autoimmune hepatitis (18, 46) due to tolerance induction by as yet undefined mechanisms.
Hepatocytes in 107.5 tg mice store the tg HBsAg in the endoplasmic
reticulum, which has been shown to render these cells sensitive to cell
death induced by several inflammatory stimuli (LPS, IFN-
, or
TNF-
) (30). The question, however, of to what extent
the increased sensitivity of HBsAg tg hepatocytes contributes to the T
cell-mediated hepatitis could not yet be directly addressed. We were
able to dissect this process by using either ALB1 (specific Ag), 107.5
(sensitive hepatocytes), or ALB1 x 107.5 (specific Ag and
sensitive hepatocytes) double-tg mice as recipients for TCR-tg cells.
Importantly, 107.5 single-tg mice did not exhibit significantly
increased transaminase levels (<50 U/L), indicating that the
inflammatory cytokines (IFN-
and TNF-
) produced during LCMV
infection were not sufficient to induce hepatitis by bystander effects.
However, serum transaminase levels in LCMV-infected ALB1 x 107.5
double-tg recipient mice (600700 U/L) were considerably higher than
those in ALB1 single-tg mice (200300 U/L), indicating that HBsAg
storage disease ("ground glass" hepatocytes) plays an important
role in the pathophysiology of HBV infection.
In conclusion, we describe here a new model of CD8 T cell-mediated autoimmune hepatitis induced by a viral infection. This tg mouse model may serve as a valuable tool to examine the immunopathologic processes of T cell-mediated hepatitis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hanspeter Pircher, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Immunology, University of Freiburg, Hermann Herderstrasse 11, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: tg, transgenic; B6, C57BL/6; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; HBsAg, hepatitis B virus large surface Ag; CFSE, 5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester; sALT, serum alanine aminotransferase; SP, single positive. ![]()
Received for publication February 15, 2000. Accepted for publication June 14, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
b in the liver. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1932.[Medline]
-fetoprotein locus during development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:5254.
. Hepatology 16:655.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Holdener, E. Hintermann, M. Bayer, A. Rhode, E. Rodrigo, G. Hintereder, E. F. Johnson, F. J. Gonzalez, J. Pfeilschifter, M. P. Manns, et al. Breaking tolerance to the natural human liver autoantigen cytochrome P450 2D6 by virus infection J. Exp. Med., June 9, 2008; 205(6): 1409 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Weinhold, D. Sommermeyer, W. Uckert, and T. Blankenstein Dual T Cell Receptor Expressing CD8+ T Cells with Tumor- and Self-Specificity Can Inhibit Tumor Growth without Causing Severe Autoimmunity J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5534 - 5542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Morimoto, X. Tan, R. M. Teague, C. Ohlen, and P. D. Greenberg Induction of Tolerance in CD8+ T Cells to a Transgenic Autoantigen Expressed in the Liver Does Not Require Cross-Presentation J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 6849 - 6860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Berardi, F Lodato, A Gramenzi, A D'Errico, M Lenzi, A Bontadini, M C Morelli, M R Tame, F Piscaglia, M Biselli, et al. High incidence of allograft dysfunction in liver transplanted patients treated with pegylated-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for hepatitis C recurrence: possible de novo autoimmune hepatitis? Gut, February 1, 2007; 56(2): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Riedl, A. Bertoletti, R. Lopes, F. Lemonnier, J. Reimann, and R. Schirmbeck Distinct, Cross-Reactive Epitope Specificities of CD8 T Cell Responses Are Induced by Natural Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Variants of Different Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4003 - 4011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Tesar, G. Chalasani, L. Smith-Diggs, F. K. Baddoura, F. G. Lakkis, and D. R. Goldstein Direct Antigen Presentation by a Xenograft Induces Immunity Independently of Secondary Lymphoid Organs J. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 173(7): 4377 - 4386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Djilali-Saiah, P. Lapierre, S. Vittozi, and F. Alvarez DNA Vaccination Breaks Tolerance for a Neo-Self Antigen in Liver: A Transgenic Murine Model of Autoimmune Hepatitis J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 4889 - 4896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Satoi, K. Murata, M. Lechmann, E. Manickan, Z. Zhang, H. Wedemeyer, B. Rehermann, and T. J. Liang Genetic Immunization of Wild-Type and Hepatitis C Virus Transgenic Mice Reveals a Hierarchy of Cellular Immune Response and Tolerance Induction against Hepatitis C Virus Structural Proteins J. Virol., December 15, 2001; 75(24): 12121 - 12127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Reignat, G. J.M. Webster, D. Brown, G. S. Ogg, A. King, S. L. Seneviratne, G. Dusheiko, R. Williams, M. K. Maini, and A. Bertoletti Escaping High Viral Load Exhaustion: CD8 Cells with Altered Tetramer Binding in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection J. Exp. Med., May 6, 2002; 195(9): 1089 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||