The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, T. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 2052-2058.
Copyright © 00 by The American Association of Immunologists

Human Lymphocyte-Specific Protein 1, the Protein Overexpressed in Neutrophil Actin Dysfunction with 47-kDa and 89-kDa Protein Abnormalities (NAD 47/89), Has Multiple F-Actin Binding Domains1

Qihong Zhang, Yao Li and Thomas H. Howard2

Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35295


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1) is an F-actin binding protein, which has an acidic N-terminal half and a basic C-terminal half. In the basic C-terminal half, there are amino acid sequences highly homologous to the actin-binding domains of two known F-actin binding proteins: caldesmon and the villin headpieces (CI, CII, VI, VII). However, the exact numbers and locations of the F-actin binding domains within LSP1 are not clearly defined. In this report, we utilized 125I-labeled F-actin ligand blotting and high-speed F-actin cosedimentation assays to analyze the F-actin binding properties of truncated LSP1 peptides and to define the F-actin binding domains. Results show that LSP1 has at least three and potentially a fourth F-actin binding domain. All F-actin binding domains are located in the basic C-terminal half and correspond to the caldesmon and villin headpiece homologous regions. LSP1 181–245 and LSP1 246–295, containing sequences homologous to caldesmon F-actin binding site I and II, respectively (CI, CII), binds F-actin; similarly, LSP1 306–339 can bind F-actin and contains two inseparable villin headpiece-like F-actin binding domains (VI, VII). Although LSP1 1–305, which does not contain VI and VII regions, retains F-actin binding activity, its binding affinity for F-actin is much weaker than that of full-length LSP1. Site-directed mutagenesis of the basic amino acids in the KRYK (VI) or KYEK (VII) sequences to acidic amino acids create mutants that bind F-actin with lower affinity than full-length wild-type LSP1. High KCl concentrations decrease full-length LSP1 binding to F-actin, suggesting the affinity between LSP1 and F-actin is mainly through electrostatic interaction.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The microfilamentous cytoskeleton is a three-dimensional, dynamic network that regulates several types of cell motility, including pseudopodial extension, cell crawling, cell shape change, cell locomotion, chemotaxis, and phagocytosis in variety of cells including polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs).3 The actin-rich PMNs require actin-based motility for their functions in the human immune response and are therefore an excellent model system in which to study cell motility and cytoskeletal dynamics.

Direct evidence which links PMN motility and cytoskeletal dynamics are derived in part from studies with pharmacological agents such as cytochalasins and phalloidins and studies of human cell motility disorders auch as the neutrophil actin dysfunction (NAD) (1, 2). In 1991, Coates and colleagues (3) described a unique PMN disorder, NAD with abnormal 47-kDa and 89-kDa proteins (NAD 47/89). The NAD 47/89 PMNs could not move and contained increased amounts of a 47-kDa and decreased amounts of an 89-kDa protein. In addition, the NAD 47/89 PMNs have a unique morphology and abnormal microfilamentous structure, resulting from defective actin polymerization in response to chemotactic factor stimulation, and this leads to a decreased ability of the cells to spread on glass (3, 4).

Cloning and sequencing of the 47-kDa-protein cDNA revealed a nucleotide sequence nearly identical to that of the lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1), a mouse cDNA sequence reported in GenBank (5) and subsequently identified as an F-actin binding protein (6). Human LSP1 is a phosphoprotein composed of 339 aa (7). The gene for this protein was cloned from mouse lymphocyte library using a subtractive hybridization technique (8), and studies showed that this gene is expressed in normal murine B and T lymphocytes and in transformed B cells but not in T lymphoma cell lines (5). Subsequent studies showed LSP1 is not limited to lymphocytes but is a pan-leukocyte protein (9, 10). Human LSP1 has an acidic N-terminal half which is 53% homologous to its mouse counterpart and a basic C-terminal half which is 85% homologous to its mouse counterpart (6). The basic C-terminal domain contains amino acid sequences homologous to two known F-actin binding protein caldesmon and the villin headpiece. Although it is known that LSP1 is an F-actin binding protein and is a very important regulator of microfilamentous cytoskeleton dynamics, it is not known which regions of the molecule are required for the F-actin binding activity. In the studies reported here, two methods were used to define the F-actin binding domains of this molecule. The results show that human LSP1 has at least three F-actin binding domains, all located in the basic C-terminal half, corresponding to the homologous regions of F-actin binding domains in two known actin-binding proteins: caldesmon and the villin headpiece.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents

Restriction enzymes BamHI and HindIII, T4 DNA ligase, and in vitro mutagenesis kit were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). QIAEX II gel extract kit was from Qiagen (Santa Clarita, CA). Proband resin was obtained from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA). PCR primers were synthesized at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics at the University of Alabama (Birmingham, AL), 125I-labeled G-actin was prepared in the University of Alabama cancer center. Prokaryotic expression plasmid pET21C was from Novagen (Madison, WI). Isopropyl ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), ampicillin, gelsolin and phalloidin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Taq DNA polymerase was purchased from Perkin-Elmer (Norwalk, CT). Bovine brain tubulin was purchased from Cytoskeleton (Denver, CO).

Rabbit skeletal muscle G-actin preparation

Rabbit skeletal muscle G-actin was prepared according to the method of Spudich and Watt (11). G-actin dialyzed against G-buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 mM ATP, 0.2 mM DTT, 0.2 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM NaN3) was further purified by passage over a Sephadex G-75 column. Before use, the G-actin was centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min in the Beckman (Palo Alto, CA) Optima TL Ultracentrifuge.

Construction of truncated LSP1 peptides

The strategy for creating truncated LSP1 peptides involved preparing PCR primers which place a BamHI restriction site in front of the 5' primer, a stop codon, and a HindIII restriction site behind the 3' primer (the LSP1 cDNA contains neither BamHI nor HindIII restriction sites). The PCR products were excised using BamHI and HindIII and purified by QIAEX II gel extract kit. The purified PCR products were ligated into prokaryotic expression vector pET21C, which had been cut with BamHI and HindIII and purified. When correctly ligated, this vector added six histidine residues to the C terminus of the peptide, which was then used to purify the peptides by nickel affinity chromatography.

Expression of truncated protein and protein purification

The constructed plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3), the bacteria were induced with 1 mM IPTG for 3 h to express the proteins, the bacteria were lysed by three freeze-thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen and a 37°C water bath. After centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 1 h, the supernatants were passed through a nickel affinity column and the bound proteins were subsequently purified.

High-speed F-actin cosedimentation assay

Truncated and mutated LSP1 proteins in P-buffer (10 mM imidazole (pH 7.0), 75 mM KCl, 0.2 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EGTA, and 0.01% Nonidet P-40) were first spun at 100,000 x g at Beckman centrifuge for 45 min to remove aggregates. Assays of F-actin cosedimentation were performed by mixing actin with LSP1 in P-buffer containing 2 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM ATP. After incubation for 60 min at room temperature, the samples were spun at 100,000 x g for 45 min. The pellets were washed twice with P-buffer. Both supernatants and pellets were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and then the bands were visualized by Coomassie blue staining and quantified by a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) densitometric scanner.

125I-labeled G-actin labeling

Column-purified G-actin was labeled with 125I-Bolton Hunter reagent (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). The labeled G-actin was separated from the free 125I by passing over G-75 gel filtration column. The concentration of the G-actin was measured by BCA method.

F-actin ligand blotting

125I-labeled G-actin at 1 mg/ml was polymerized to F-actin in the presence of 0.2 µM gelsolin (100:1 mol actin to gelsolin) in polymerizing buffer (20 mM PIPES (pH 7.0), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM CaCl2) for 10 min on ice, then phalloidin was added to a final concentration of 40 µM and polymerization was continued at room temperature for an additional 15 min. 125I-labeled F-actin (125I-F-actin) was diluted to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml with blocking buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 90 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20, 5% nonfat milk, 1% BSA, and 0.25% gelatin). Truncated LSP1 peptides were expressed in E. coli, and equal OD600 total cells were lysed with Laemmli buffer and E. coli proteins separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose (NC) membrane. The NC membrane was first treated with blocking buffer at room temperature for 2 h. After incubation with 50 µg/ml 125I-F-actin at room temperature for 6 h during constant agitation, the blots were then washed extensively with TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20, and 90 mM NaCl) five times (15–30 min/wash). Blots were air-dried, and F-actin binding proteins were identified by autoradiography (12, 13). For cold probe competition assays, the blots were incubated with either cold F-actin or microtubule at room temperature for 2 h before the blots were air-dried.

In vitro site-directed mutagenesis

In vitro site-directed mutagenesis was done according to the protocol described for the Promega GeneEditor in vitro site-directed mutagenesis system. Synthesized oligonucleotides containing the mutated bases were phosphorylated by T4 polynucleotide kinase, then the phosphorylated oligonucleotides were annealed with the plasmid which contained the LSP1 cDNA. The primers were extended by T4 DNA polymerase, and the gap was ligated by T4 DNA ligase, the mutants were selected by DNA sequencing. The mutated proteins were purified by inserting the mutated gene into prokaryotic expression vector pET21C and subsequently induced with IPTG. The expressed proteins were purified.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sequence comparison to known proteins reveals four potential actin-binding sequences in LSP1

Database searches of the LSP1 amino acid sequences to define regions homologous to the actin-binding domains of known actin-binding proteins revealed four regions of interest in the C-terminal half of the protein. Two sequences separated by 23 aa were more than 60% homologous to the F-actin binding sites of caldesmon (CI and CII, Fig. 1Go) (14, 15, 16, 17). The CI region contains a 33-aa sequence (aa 205–237), where 18 of 33 aa are similar; the second region of homology, CII, spans 17 aa (aa 260–276), where 9 of 17 aa are similar. In addition, near the extreme C-terminal end of LSP1, there are also two short stretches of amino acids (VI and VII) that are almost identical to the KKEK sequences identified in the headpiece of villin as an F-actin binding domain. This headpiece is essential for the bundling activity and its morphologic effect(s) of the villin molecule on cells (18, 19, 20) (see Fig. 1Go). Furthermore, computer-based secondary structure analysis reveals a series of {alpha}-helices positioned between and following CI and CII. Also three ß-pleated sheets that include the VI and VII domains follow the helical structure and are similar to those found in other F-actin binding proteins including spectrin and ABP280.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Diagram of human LSP1 molecule. Computer analysis of LSP1 identifies two caldesmon-like (CI and CII) ({blacksquare}) and two villin headpiece-like (VI and VII) () amino acid sequences in the C-terminal half of the molecule. These sequences are homologous to the actin-binding domains of caldesmon and the villin headpiece. Shown in single letter amino acid code are the location and sequences of the CI, CII, VI, and VII homologous regions. Numbers reveal the amino acids in N- to C-terminal direction for LSP1 (1–339), caldemon (597–667), and villin (805–826). The boundary of truncated peptides are labeled.

 
Truncated peptide analysis shows LSP1 has at least three F-actin binding domains

Our initial results showed human LSP1 purified from Sf9 cells infected with LSP1 cDNA recombinant baculovirus, similar to mouse LSP1, can bind to F-actin. In addition, human LSP1 colocalizes with F-actin in A7 melanoma cells that stably express LSP1 protein from the pCEP4 vector (21). Because the basic C-terminal half of LSP1 contains regions highly homologous to the F-actin binding proteins caldesmon and villin headpiece, PCR was utilized to create an array of truncated LSP1 peptide constructs and were analyzed for F-actin binding activity. The constructs, designated LSP1 x-y where x is N-terminal and y is C-terminal amino acid, were designed to include and exclude the V and C homologous sequences in combinations and alone within unique peptides. Truncated LSP1 cDNA was cloned into the prokaryotic expression vector pET21C and transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) and induced to express truncated peptides by IPTG. Initially, the LSP1 truncates expressed in bacteria were screened for F-actin binding domains by 125I-F-actin ligand blot. Results of the 125I-F-actin ligand blot screen for F-actin binding domains are shown in Fig. 2Go. In whole bacterial lysates of E. coli expressing LSP1 peptides induced by IPTG, 125I-F-actin binds to several, but not all, LSP1 peptides, suggesting that LSP1 contain more than one F-actin domain. No actin-binding peptides are present in control IPTG induced bacterial lysates, and no binding was observed with the nonspecific control, purified BSA protein. Gelsolin, a known F-actin binding protein on ligand blots (4), is included as a positive control (Fig. 2GoC). Specific screening results show that the full-length and C-terminal LSP1 (LSP1 181–339), but not the N-terminal LSP1 (LSP1 1–180), peptides bind F-actin in the ligand blot. Also, both the LSP1 1–305, which contains both CI and CII, and the LSP1 306–339, which contains both VI and VII regions, bind to F-actin on ligand blots (Fig. 2GoA). F-actin binding by ligand blot via CI and CII independently is also demonstrated with LSP1 181–245 and LSP1 246–295 peptides (Fig. 2GoB). The screening results suggest that LSP1 has at least three F-actin binding domains and that these binding domains may differ in their apparent affinity for F-actin.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. 125I-F-actin ligand blotting screens of the LSP1 peptides for F-actin binding domains. Shown are autoradiographs of F-actin ligand blot assays which screen for F-actin binding domains by assaying 125I-F-actin bound to the indicated LSP1 peptides expressed in whole bacterial lysates. Note the ligand blot results suggest there are three F-actin binding domains. Proteins were separated on 10% (A and C) and 15% (B) SDS-PAGE before transfer to nitrocellulose membrane for blotting. Control in A refers to total bacterial protein of IPTG induced without the expression of LSP1 peptides, and while LSP1 1–180 expressed visible evidence of LSP1 peptide in IPTG induced bacterial cells (not shown), there is no binding on 125I-F-actin ligand blot. In C, purified BSA (10 µg) is included as a negative control and purified gelsolin (1 µg) is included as a positive control.

 
To specifically define the F-actin binding domains in human LSP1, truncated LSP1 peptides purified from E. coli were analyzed for F-actin binding domains by cosedimentation with F-actin at high speeds (100,000 x g for 45 min). Results with the high-speed F-actin cosedimentation assay show that full-length LSP1 and the C-terminal half of LSP1 (LSP1 181–339) (Fig. 3GoA) but not the N-terminal half (LSP1 1–180) (Fig. 3GoB) cosediment with F-actin. None of these peptides alone sediment under these assay conditions. These results are consistent with the overlay data that F-actin binding domain(s) reside within the C-terminal half of the molecule.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Recombinant LSP1 peptide cosedimentation with F-actin defines three F-actin binding domains. Shown are SDS-PAGE of supernants (S) and pellets (P) from solutions of purified LSP1 peptides alone or LSP1 peptides mixed with F-actin sedimented at 100,000 x g for 45 min. Cosedimentation with F-actin of full-length LSP1 (LSP1 1–339), C-terminal one-half of LSP1 (LSP1 181–339), LSP1 181–295, LSP1 296–339, LSP1 306–339, LSP1 181–245, and LSP1 246–295 peptides but not N-terminal half of LSP1 (LSP1 1–180) indicate there are at least three F-actin binding domains in the C-terminal half of the LSP1 molecule.

 
To define more precisely the location and the number of F-actin binding domains, additional truncated peptides that include or exclude the CI, CII, and VI, VII domains were created and analyzed. Both LSP1 181–295 that contains both CI and CII and LSP1 306–339 that contains both VI and VII can bind F-actin independently (Fig. 3GoC). Thus, LSP1 has at least two F-actin binding domains. Because the VI and VII domains are separated by only 7 aa, it was technically difficult to express and purify VI and VII and analyze them as independent peptides. In contrast, truncated peptides including CI or CII (LSP1 181–245 and LSP1 246–295) were sufficiently large and sufficiently spaced to allow independent analysis of CI and CII to further define F-actin binding domains of LSP1. The results show these peptides each retain an F-actin binding domain (Fig. 3GoD). In summary, these results show LSP1 has at least three, and possibly four, F-actin binding domains, CI, CII, and VI/VII. Given the sequence homologies, it is possible that VI and VII can also independently bind F-actin. These results, summarized in Fig. 4Go, support the contention that LSP1 has at least three F-actin binding domains. Two LSP1 peptides, LSP1 1–275 and LSP1 181–275, yielded unexpected results. Although both contain the defined CI and CII sequences, neither binds F-actin. Inclusion of 20 additional C-terminal amino acids in these peptides (LSP1 1–295) restores F-actin binding, suggesting that the 20 additional amino acids contribute important secondary structure.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Summary of F-actin binding sites within LSP1 molecule. At least three F-actin binding fragments were identified within LSP1 molecule: one that includes the CI region, the second contains the CII region, and at least one additional binding fragment is retained in the VI and VII region.

 
Comparison of affinity of the F-actin binding domains in LSP1 truncates and LSP1 mutants

Quantative analysis by Scatchard plot of murine LSP1 binding to F-actin by Jongstra-Bilen et al. (6) suggested that murine LSP1 might contain high- and low-affinity F-actin binding domain. However, these domains were not clearly characterized. Our quantitative analysis of F-actin binding by cosedimentation shows that LSP1 1–305 binding to F-actin is lower affinity than the binding of full-length LSP1 (Fig. 5GoA). This finding also suggests that LSP1 306–339 indeed contain another F-actin binding domain. It should be noted that at equal molar ratio of both LSP1 peptides, the quantity of LSP1 1–305 which cosediments with F-actin is quantitatively less (<20% by cosedimentation) than that of LSP1 1–339. The result indicates the CI, CII binding to F-actin is weaker than full length and suggests the V regions may represent strong binding domains while C regions may represent relatively weaker binding domains. It is also possible that VI and VII domains may cooperate with each other and with CI and CII to strengthen F-actin binding.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Both the deletion mutation and point mutation in the villin headpiece-like regions weaken LSP1 binding to F-actin. Shown are the results of F-actin cosedimentation assay of LSP1 1–305 truncate (A) and LSP1 K326E mutant (B). Compared with full-length wild-type LSP1 protein, both LSP1 1–305 and LF K326E bind to F-actin weakly, though the amount of proteins and actin is similar in each assay. C, Saturation binding curves and Kd of wild-type and mutated LSP1 to F-actin.

 
To exclude the possibility that the weaker binding of LSP1 1–305 to F-actin was due to the conformational change accompanying peptide truncation and to determine whether VI and VII can bind F-actin independently, full-length LSP1 mutants were created by site-directed mutagenesis to assay the contribution of VI and VII to F-actin binding independently. The results show both the VI and VII sequences are independently important for F-actin binding of LSP1 (Fig. 5GoB). VI and VII respectively contain the sequences KYEK and KRYK that are similar to the villin headpiece sequence KKEK, the F-actin binding domain of villin. Mutation of a single positively charged amino acid to glutamic acid (E) in the VII domain (KYEK to KYEE) weakens full-length LSP1 binding to F-actin (see Fig. 5GoB). Similar results were obtained with point mutations in the VI region. Furthermore, quantitative assay of LSP1 wild-type and VI or VII mutant binding to F-actin over a range of molar ratios of LSP1 to F-actin (Fig. 5GoC) shows LSP1 affinity for and saturation binding to F-actin is dramatically altered by basic amino acid to acidic amino acid changes in either VI or VII sequences. Similar results are obtained on 125I-F-actin ligand blot (data not shown). The results show both the VI and VII sequences are independently important for F-actin binding. In combination with analysis of LSP1 truncates these results demonstrate that LSP1 contains at least three, and likely four, independent F-actin binding domains in its C-terminal half.

LSP1 binds to F-actin through electrostatic interaction

The actin-binding domains of many actin-binding proteins contain clustered basic amino acids. This observation seems to be a repeating theme in actin-binding proteins, which may reflect their evolutionary origin. Actin-binding domains at clustered basic amino acids in proteins include the KKGGKKKG sequence of myosin, DAIKKK sequence in actin depolymerizing factor, cofilin and tropomyosin, and KSKLKKT sequence in thymosin ß4 (22). Vandekerckhove (22) has suggested that the extreme N-terminal peptide Ac-DEDE of actin molecule is the binding site on actin that is the ligand for these positively charged sequences on actin-binding proteins. Several lines of evidences including chemical cross-linking are consistent with this suggestion (22, 23). Such a situation will inevitably lead to competition between different actin-binding proteins for actin in cells. Because the F-actin binding domains of LSP1 localize in the basic C-terminal half of the molecule, we reasoned that the interaction of LSP1 with F-actin may also be through electrostatic interaction and therefore that LSP1 may compete with other actin-binding proteins. To test the possibility that the LSP1 to actin interaction is controlled electrostatically, we increased the concentration of KCl in the F-actin cosedimentation assay to determine whether increased ionic strength would dissociate LSP1 from F-actin. The increase in KCl concentration did not affect the solubility of LSP1 protein (data not shown). Increasing KCl concentration did not affect the polymerization of actin, as shown in Fig. 6Go, which was consistent with the fact that actin-actin interaction is mainly hydrophobic (24). However, when the concentration of KCl was increased, the binding of LSP1 to F-actin decreased. This observation suggests that at least one of the three F-actin binding domains associate with F-actin through electrostatic interaction. Such electrostatic interactions may be nonspecific. However several lines of evidence show the LSP1 interaction with actin is specific. As shown in Fig. 7Go, 125I-F-actin ligand blot demonstrate cold F-actin at >20-fold excess significantly dissociates 125I-F-actin from binding. This effect is specific to F-actin polymer since 50- to 100-fold excess cold taxol stabilized microtubule does not compete away F-actin binding.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. LSP1 binds to F-actin through electrostatic interaction. LSP1 has greatly decreased binding to F-actin with increasing KCl concentration, whereas KCl concentration does not affect the polymerization of actin. A, SDS-PAGE analysis of LSP1 in the presence of increasing KCl concentrations (100–500 mM). B, The amount of actin and LSP1 in the pellet determined by scanning of Coomassie blue stained gels.

 


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. LSP1 binds to F-actin specifically. Shown are autoradiography of 125I-F-actin binding to wild-type LSP1. Note that 125I-F-actin bound to LSP1 is displaced by 50- to 100-fold excess of cold F-actin, but not by excess cold taxol stabilized microtubules. Therefore, F-actin binding to LSP1 is specific for that polymer.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The polymerization and depolymerization between monomeric G-actin and filamentous F-actin is regulated by a number of actin-binding proteins. According to their mode of interaction with actin in vitro, these actin-binding proteins are classified into several groups: 1) monomer binding proteins, such as profilin, that bind to G-actin and sequester G-actin to limit actin polymerization; 2) F-actin capping proteins such as gelsolin, that cap the rapidly growing plus-end of F-actin filaments, so F-actin cannot grow from the barbed end; 3) F-actin severing proteins, such as severin, that cut longer F-actin filaments into shorter F-actin filaments; and 4) F-actin bundling proteins like villin, fimbrin, that cross-link actin filament into a parallel array (25, 26, 27). The ability of these proteins to bind actin is regulated by receptor-activated signaling events including [Ca2+], phospholipid, and protein phosphorylation (28, 29, 30, 31) and thereby links receptor signaling to cytoskeletal dynamics. Each actin-binding protein has its own unique binding affinity for actin, some of them may bind to the same region of the actin molecule, and therefore they may compete with each other. The competition, cooperation, and regulatory interactions among these actin-binding proteins modulate microfilamentous cytoskeleton dynamics in nonmuscle cells. To understand how these actin-binding proteins regulate microfilamentous cytoskeleton dynamics, it is essential to define the actin-binding domains in each actin-binding protein. Domain mapping is still the major approach to explore the functional domains of actin-binding proteins.

In this study, we have mapped the F-actin binding domains of human LSP1, an F-actin binding protein. Overexpression of LSP1 modifies the cytoskeletal structure and motility of PMNs. The F-actin binding domains of LSP1 were mapped to three regions of the molecule: aa 181–245, aa 246–295, and aa 306–339. Each domain contains amino acid sequences homologous to those in the F-actin binding proteins caldesmon or the villin headpiece. Two complementary methods were utilized to define the F-actin binding domains. The high-speed F-actin cosedimentation assay utilizes purified native proteins and excludes specific or nonspecific interference from other proteins. The F-actin ligand blotting utilizes 125I-radioactive labeled F-actin. This method is more useful in screening for potential F-actin binding domains including those peptides that have weak binding to F-actin and those peptides which might form homologous aggregates or easily precipitate under the conditions of F-actin cosedimentation assay condition. With the F-actin cosedimentation assay, it is difficult to determine whether homologous aggregates might explain cosedimentation with F-actin. In contrast, 125I-F-actin ligand blot screens independent of peptide aggregates. One limitation of the F-actin ligand blotting is that this method uses denatured and renatured proteins, resulting in the uncertainty that some proteins may not be properly renatured. Combining these two methods provides the most accurate and easily interpreted results.

Although domain mapping through creation of actin-binding protein truncates is a standard method for defining the functional domains of actin-binding proteins, it has its limitation. For example, truncates may have a significantly altered conformation resulting from deleting adjunct sequences, and therefore may provide little insight into the function of full-length actin-binding proteins. An example is the microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2) and tau molecules binding to microtubule. It was shown that the extreme C-terminal hydrophobic {alpha}-helix in these proteins is responsible for the microtubule bundling activity of MAP2 and tau by domain mapping (32). However, in subsequent experiments exploiting site-directed mutagenesis and deletion mutation experiments, it was shown that the regions identified by truncation are not directly responsible for microtubule bundling activity of these proteins (33). Therefore, caution should be taken in interpreting data from truncated peptides alone to map the functional domains of a molecule as the sole method for defining actin-binding domains. The same situation has been encountered in this study with analysis of LSP1 actin-binding domains. Clearly, the results show the truncated peptide LSP1 181–245 and peptide LSP1 246–295, which respectively contain CI and CII alone, can each bind to F-actin independently, and LSP1 1–295, which include these two fragments, can also bind to F-actin. However, LSP1 1–275, which include LSP1 181–245 and part of LSP1 246–295, does not bind to F-actin either in the F-actin cosedimentation assay or the F-actin ligand-blotting assay. This result suggests aa 275–295 may modify the conformation of the truncates and therefore affect the F-actin binding. Thus the three-dimensional structure of the molecule is as important as the primary amino acid sequences. To fully confirm the findings reported here, the crystal structure of the LSP1 would be required.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. William Nauseef for the completing initial screen for binding sites with the 125I-F-actin ligand blot assay.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 HL56144 (to T.H.H.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Thomas H. Howard, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, 1600 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35233. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PMN, polymorphonuclear neutrophil; NAD, neutrophil actin dysfunction; LSP1, lymphocyte-specific protein 1; IPTG, isopropyl ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside; 125I-F-actin, 125I-labeled F-actin. Back

Received for publication May 26, 1999. Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Boxer, L. A., E. T. Hedley-Whyte, T. P. Stossel. 1974. Neutrophil actin dysfunction and abnormal neutrophil behavior. N. Engl. J. Med. 291:1093.
  2. Southwick, F. S., G. A. Dabiri, T. P. Stosse. 1988. Neutrophil actin dysfunction is a genetic disorder associated with partial impairment of neutrophil actin assembly in three family members. J. Clin. Invest. 82:1525.
  3. Coates, T. D., J. C. Torkildson, M. Torres, J. A. Church, T. H. Howard. 1991. An inherited defect of neutrophil motility and microfilamentous cytoskeleton associated with abnormalities in 47-kD and 89-kD proteins. Blood 78:1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Howard, T., Y. Li, M. Torres, A. Guerrero, T. Coates. 1994. The 47-kD protein increased in neutrophil actin dysfunction with 47- and 89-kD protein abnormalities is lymphocyte specific protein. Blood 83:231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jongstra, J., G. F. Tidmarsh, J. Jongstra-Bilen, M. M. Davis. 1988. A new lymphocyte-specific gene which encodes a putative Ca2+-binding protein is not expressed in transformed T lymphocyte lines. J. Immunol. 141:3999.[Abstract]
  6. Jongstra-Bilen, J., P. A. Janmey, J. H. Hartwig, S. Galea, J. Jongstra. 1992. The lymphocyte-specific protein LSP1 binds to F-actin and to the cytoskeleton through its COOH-terminal basic domain. J. Cell Biol. 118:1443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jongstra-Bilen, J., A. J. Young, R. Chong, J. Jongstra. 1990. Human and mouse LSP1 genes code for high1y conserved phosphoproteins. J. Immunol. 144:1104.[Abstract]
  8. Jongstra, J., M. M. Davis. 1988. Molecular genetic analysis of mouse B lymphocyte differentiation. UCLA Symp. Mol. Cell. Biol. (New Ser.) 56:261.
  9. Jongstra, J., M. E. Ittel, N. N. Iscove, G. Brady. 1994. The LSP1 gene is expressed in cultured normal and transformed mouse macrophages. Mol. Immunol. 31:1125.[Medline]
  10. Li, Y., A. Guerrero, T. H. Howard. 1995. The actin-binding protein, lymphocyte-specific protein 1, is expressed in human leukocytes and human myeloid and lymphoid cell lines. J. Immunol. 155:3563.[Abstract]
  11. Spudich, J. A., S. Watt. 1971. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction: biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 246:4866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chia, C. P., A. L. L. Hitt, E. J. Luna. 1991. Direct binding of F-actin to ponticulin, an integral plasma membrane glycoprotein. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 18:164.[Medline]
  13. Andrews, R. K., J. E. B. Fox. 1992. Identification of a region in the cytoplasmic domain of the platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib-IX complex that binds to purified actin-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 267:18605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bryan, J., M. Imai, R. Lee, P. Moore, R. G. Cook, W.-G. Lin. 1989. Cloning and expression of a smooth muscle caldesmon. J. Biol. Chem. 264:13873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hayashi, K., Y. Fujio, I. Kato, K. Sobue. 1991. Structural and functional relationships between h- and l-caldesmons. J. Biol. Chem. 266:355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wang, C.-L. A., S. Xu, R. C. Lu, V. Saavedra-Alanis, J. Bryan. 1991. Localization of the calmodulin and the actin-binding sites of caldesmon. J. Biol. Chem. 266:9166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zhan, Q., S. S. Wong, C.-L. A. Wang. 1991. A calmodulin-binding peptide of caldesmon. J. Biol. Chem. 266:21810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Friederich, E., C. Huet, M. Arpin, D. Louvard. 1989. Villin induces microvilli growth and actin redistribution in transfected fibroblasts. Cell 59:461.[Medline]
  19. Friederich, E., E. Pringault, M. Arpin, D. Louvard. 1990. From the structure to the function of villin, an actin-binding protein of brush border. BioEssays 12:403.[Medline]
  20. Friederich, E., K. Vancompernolle, C. Huet, M. Goethals, J. Finidori, J. Vandekerckhove, D. Louvard. 1992. An actin-binding site containing a conserved motif of charged amino acid residues is essential for the morphogenic effect of villin. Cell 70:81.[Medline]
  21. Howard, T. H., J. Hartwig, C. Cunningham. 1998. Lymphocyte-specific protein 1 expression in eukaryotic cells reproduces the morphologic and motile abnormality of NAD 47/89 neutrophils. Blood 91:4786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Vandekerckhove, J.. 1990. Actin-binding proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2:41.[Medline]
  23. Highsmith, S.. 1990. Electrostatic contributions to the binding of myosin and myosin-MgADP to F-actin in solution. Biochemistry 29:10690.[Medline]
  24. Erickson, H. P.. 1989. Co-operativity in protein-protein association. J. Mol. Biol. 206:465.[Medline]
  25. Hartwig, J. H., D. J. Kwiatkowski. 1991. Actin-binding proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3:87.[Medline]
  26. Matsudaira, P.. 1991. Modular organization of actin crosslinking proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 16:87.[Medline]
  27. Otto, J. J.. 1994. Actin-bundling proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:105.[Medline]
  28. Yamashiro, S., Y. Yamakita, R. Ishikawa, F. Matsumura. 1990. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation causes 83K nonmuscle caldesmon to dissociate from microfilaments. Nature 344:675.[Medline]
  29. Yin, H. L., K. Iida, P. A. Janmey. 1988. Identification of a polyphosphoinositide-modulated domain in gelsolin which binds to the sides of actin filaments. J. Cell Biol. 106:805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yu, F.-X., P. A. Johnston, T. C. Sudhof, H. L. Yin. 1990. GCap39, a calcium ion- and polyphosphoinositide-regulated actin capping protein. Science 250:1413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Janmey, P., T. Stossel. 1987. Modulation of gelsolin function by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Nature 325:362.[Medline]
  32. Lewis, S. A., I. E. Ivanov, G. H. Lee, N. J. Cowan. 1989. Organization of microtubules in dendrites and axons is determined by hydrophobic zipper in microtubule-associated proteins MAP2 and tau. Nature 342:498.[Medline]
  33. Lewis, S. A., N. Cowan. 1990. Microtubule bundling. Nature 345:674.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JEMHome page
A. L. Smith, L. Ganesh, K. Leung, J. Jongstra-Bilen, J. Jongstra, and G. J. Nabel
Leukocyte-specific protein 1 interacts with DC-SIGN and mediates transport of HIV to the proteasome in dendritic cells
J. Exp. Med., February 19, 2007; 204(2): 421 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. J. D. McLaughlin, A. Banerjee, M. R. Kelher, F. Gamboni-Robertson, C. Hamiel, F. R. Sheppard, E. E. Moore, and C. C. Silliman
Platelet-Activating Factor-Induced Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Requires beta-Arrestin-1 Recruitment and Activation of the p38 MAPK Signalosome at the Plasma Membrane for Actin Bundle Formation.
J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 7039 - 7050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. Liu, D. C. Cara, J. Kaur, E. Raharjo, S. C. Mullaly, J. Jongstra-Bilen, J. Jongstra, and P. Kubes
LSP1 is an endothelial gatekeeper of leukocyte transendothelial migration
J. Exp. Med., February 7, 2005; 201(3): 409 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Ohira, G. Bannenberg, M. Arita, M. Takahashi, Q. Ge, T. E. Van Dyke, G. L. Stahl, C. N. Serhan, and J. A. Badwey
A Stable Aspirin-Triggered Lipoxin A4 Analog Blocks Phosphorylation of Leukocyte-Specific Protein 1 in Human Neutrophils
J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 2091 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Wang, H. Hayashi, R. Harrison, B. Chiu, J. R. Chan, H. L. Ostergaard, R. D. Inman, J. Jongstra, M. I. Cybulsky, and J. Jongstra-Bilen
Modulation of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18)-Mediated Adhesion by the Leukocyte-Specific Protein 1 Is Key to Its Role in Neutrophil Polarization and Chemotaxis
J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
G. Cicchetti, P. G. Allen, and M. Glogauer
CHEMOTACTIC SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN NEUTROPHILS: FROM RECEPTOR TO ACTIN ASSEMBLY
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, May 1, 2002; 13(3): 220 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, T. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS