The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 2048-2051.
Copyright © 00 by The American Association of Immunologists
The Cleavage of Two C1s Subunits by a Single Active C1r Reveals Substantial Flexibility of the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s Tetramer in the C1 Complex1
Zsolt Lörincz,
Péter Gál,
József Dobó,
Sándor Cseh,
Katalin Szilágyi,
Géza Ambrus and
Péter Závodszky2
Institute of Enzymology, Biological Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The activation of the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s tetramer in the C1 complex,
which involves the cleavage of an Arg-Ile bond in the catalytic domains
of the subcomponents, is a two-step process. First, the autolytic
activation of C1r takes place, then activated C1r cleaves zymogen C1s.
The Arg463Gln mutant of C1r (C1rQI) is
stabilized in the zymogen form. This mutant was used to form a
C1q-(C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s) heteropentamer to study the
relative position of the C1r and C1s subunits in the C1 complex. After
triggering the C1 by IgG-Sepharose, both C1s subunits are cleaved by
the single proteolytically active C1r subunit in the
C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s tetramer. This finding indicates that the
tetramer is flexible enough to adopt different conformations within the
C1 complex during the activation process, enabling the single active
C1r to cleave both C1s, the neighboring and the sequentially distant
one.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The
first component of the complement system,
C1,3 is a
heteropentameric complex that triggers the classical pathway of
complement activation after binding to immune complexes or nonimmune
activators (1, 2). The recognition subunit of C1 is the
C1q molecule, which binds to the activator structures through its
C-terminal globular heads while its N-terminal collagen-like arms
provide a framework for the catalytic unit. The catalytic unit itself
is a tetrameric complex of two different serine protease proenzymes,
C1r and C1s (3). Two C1r and two C1s molecules form a
calcium-dependent tetramer that associates with C1q to yield the C1
complex (4). The activation of C1 is a multistep process
involving recognition of the activator structure by C1q, transferring
the activation signal from the C1q heads to the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s zymogen
tetramer, autoactivation of C1r, and subsequent activation of zymogen
C1s by the active C1r. The protein-protein interactions between the
subcomponents, which regulate the activation of C1, have been
extensively studied. The roles of the individual domains of the
serine-protease subcomponents have been investigated by limited
proteolysis (5, 6, 7, 8, 9), recombinant protein expression
(10, 11, 12) and chemical synthesis (13, 14, 15).
These experiments provided important information about the structure
and function of C1, but our knowledge about the mechanism of the
activation process is far from complete.
Previously, we reported the construction and expression of a
recombinant mutant C1r, which was trapped in the zymogen state due to
the replacement of Arg463 by Gln
(C1rQI) (16). This stable zymogen
C1r mutant was able to form a C1r - C1rQI
heterodimer, and, after adding C1s and C1q, the C1 complex could be
reconstituted. In this way, we demonstrated that one active C1r unit in
the C1 complex is sufficient for the biological activity of the C1
complex. The aim of the present work is to reveal the details of the
activation process by means of this mutant,
C1rQI. In particular, we were interested in
finding out whether the single active C1r unit can activate both C1s
zymogen in the tetramer or only one of them.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Cells and viruses
Spodoptera frugiperda 9 cells and wild-type (wt)
Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus were
provided by Max Summers (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX).
Cells were grown at 27°C in Graces insect medium with 10% FCS
(Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), 3.3 g/L lactalbumin hydrolysate (Sigma,
St. Louis, MO), and 3.3 g/L yeastolate (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England).
Recombinant viruses were produced as described by Summers and Smith
(17).
Expression of the recombinant proteins
The expression was done essentially as described earlier
(18). A total of 2 x 107
Spodoptera frugiperda 9 cells were infected in
175-cm2 flasks at a multiplicity of infection of
10. After incubation at 27°C for 1 h the medium was changed to
50 ml Sf900 serum-free medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island,
NY). The cell culture supernatant was harvested 72 h later and was
concentrated 20-fold on a PM10 ultrafiltration membrane (Amicon,
Beverly, MA).
Reconstitution of C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s tetramer and the C1
complex
To reconstitute the C1 containing
C1r-C1rQI heterodimer, samples were prepared as
described earlier by Dobó et al. (16). Fixed amounts
of concentrated supernatant of insect cells that produce wt C1r (0.4
µg in 5 µl) were mixed with increasing amounts of concentrated
supernatant containing C1rQI (0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6,
and 2.4 µg in 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 µl, respectively) to obtain
heterodimer. One sample was prepared with 5 µl of wt C1r alone and
one with 36 µl C1rQI alone (Table I
) to serve as 100 and 0% references,
respectively. Samples were diluted to 65 µl with TBS buffer
containing 1 mM final concentration of CaCl2 and
were incubated for 3 h at 4°C. Each sample was used for the
reconstitution of C1 by adding recombinant C1s (3 µg in 20 µl
concentrated supernatant) and 8.5 µg of C1q (Calbiochem, La Jolla,
CA) in 15 µl, followed by incubation in the presence of 1 mM
Ca2+ at 4°C for 20 min. Activation of C1s
during this step was checked by immunoblotting, and no detectable
activation was observed.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I. Calculated amounts of C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s,
C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s, and
C1s-C1rQI-C1rQI-C1s tetramer variants in the
reconstituted C1 complex at equilibrium, as a function of the initial
concentration of the subcomponents1
|
|
Activation of C1 by IgG-Sepharose
IgG-Sepharose was prepared from CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B
(Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and human IgG (Humán RT,
Gödöllö, Hungary). For the coupling reaction, we
followed the procedure recommended by the manufacturer. Small columns
containing 40 µl IgG-Sepharose were equilibrated with TBS containing
10 mM CaCl2. After binding of C1 samples for 10
min, the columns were washed twice with 80 µl TBS containing 10 mM
CaCl2. The columns were incubated at 37°C for
1 h to activate C1. C1r and C1s were eluted using 100 µl TBS
containing 25 mM EDTA. Fifteen microliters of each sample was analyzed
by SDS-PAGE-Western blot under reducing conditions.
Western blot analysis
Protein samples were loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
prepared as described by Laemmli (19). For the
immunoblotting, the method of Towbin et al. (20) was
followed. Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose sheet (0.45
µm; Schleicher & Schüll, Dassel, Germany) in a semidry
apparatus (Pharmacia Biotech). Nitrocellulose strips were incubated
with goat anti-human C1s Ab (1:1000; Incstar, Stillwater, MN), then
later with alkaline phosphatase-labeled rabbit anti-goat IgG
conjugate as secondary Ab (1:3000; Sigma). Visualization was performed
by the commercially available substrates of alkaline phosphatase:
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium. For
densitometry we used the GEL DOC 1000 instrument and Molecular Analyst
Software (both obtained from Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
 |
Results and Discussion
|
|---|
The aim of this study was to assess the flexibility of the
C1r2C1s2 and to test the
accessibility of C1s by C1r in C1, a complex reconstituted with the
composition (C1s- C1rQI-C1r-C1s)-C1q and
activated on IgG-Sepharose. By adding increasing amounts of
C1rQI to fixed amounts of wt C1r, the proportion
of wt C1r2 homodimers was shifted from 100% to a
negligible value, i.e., practically all enzymatically active C1r
subunits were transferred into C1r-C1rQI
heterodimer as described earlier (16). The molar ratio of
C1rQI:C1r varied from 0:1 to 6:1 (see
Materials and Methods and Table I
). After heterodimer
formation, C1s and C1q were added at large molar excesses to consume
all C1r, and C1 was reconstituted by incubating the mixtures for 20 min
at 4°C. The C1 samples were absorbed onto IgG-Sepharose columns, and
excess C1s was washed away. Samples were then incubated at 37°C for
1 h to trigger C1 activation. After activation, C1r and C1s were
eluted using an EDTA-containing buffer and the components were
separated by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Control experiments
verified that under the conditions of elution (concentration,
temperature, time) no detectable activation of C1s by C1r occurs in the
fluid phase. The samples were blotted to nitrocellulose membranes, and
C1s was made visible using anti-C1s Abs (Fig. 1
).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. Western blot detection of C1s activation. Samples were prepared using
components as shown in Table I to reconstitute C1. After incubation at
4°C, the samples were applied to IgG-Sepharose columns. After
binding, the columns were washed extensively with buffer containing
Ca2+. IgG-Sepharose-bound C1 was activated at 37°C for
1 h. C1r and C1s were then eluted with buffer containing EDTA. The
eluates were analyzed by Western blotting using anti-C1s Abs (more
details in Materials and Methods).
|
|
The relative amounts of uncleaved and cleaved C1s were assessed by
densitometry of the membranes (see Figs. 2
and 3
).
Simple statistical considerations predict the composition of the C1
complex. A value n moles of wt C1r2
homodimers bind and activate 2n moles of C1s in the complex.
If large molar excesses of C1rQI, C1s, and C1q
are added, 2n moles of C1 containing 2n moles of
C1r- C1rQI and 4n moles of C1s are
formed; an excess of C1 containing inactive C1rQI
homodimers and C1s will also be present. The calculated amounts of the
different tetramer variants in the C1 samples as a function of the
initial concentration of the subcomponents are shown in Table I
.
Increasing total amounts of C1s are seen eluted by EDTA as the
C1rQI:C1r ratio increases due to the increase in
total amount of macromolecular C1 assembled. However, as the
C1rQI2 homodimers even in the
assembled C1 do not activate C1s, the amount of uncleaved C1s (in the
C1 bound to IgG-Sepharose) increases. The question to be answered was:
are one or two C1s subunits cleaved in the C1 complex with
C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s tetramer composition? If the
single wt C1r cleaves two C1s subunits in C1, then we expect 2 moles of
cleaved C1s per mole of wt C1r in the eluted samples, that is, the
amount of activated C1s doubles as compared with the reference signal
(sample 1 in Table I
). As seen in Fig. 2
, the signal for the uncleaved
C1s increased with an increasing C1rQI:C1r molar
ratio, while the signal of the activated C1s (the C1s A chain, Fig. 3
)
practically doubled when reaching the plateau level. This experiment
clearly demonstrates that the wt C1r in the
C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s tetramer cleaves both C1s
subunits: the one binding directly to its N-terminal
region and the
other one at the distant end of the tetramer, adjacent to the inactive
C1rQI. Two obvious explanations arise at first
glance: 1) exchange among the subunits via dissociation and
reassociation of the C1 complex or 2) conformational flexibility. Under
our experimental conditions, the dissociation and reassociation of the
C1 complex is negligible because the dissociation constant of
unactivated C1 is in the picomolar range (21). It is
plausible to assume that the Kd of the
half-activated C1 is not greater than that of the fully activated
complex (i.e., 6.5 nM) (21), reflecting a fairly tight
complex. If there were significant exchanges of subunits between the C1
complexes, the signal for activated C1s would increase continuously
instead of reaching a plateau of two activated C1s per C1r.
There are two models for the structure of C1 that are consistent with
the electron microscopic images; both models use symmetry and
functional considerations. In both models, the
C1r2 portion of the tetramer is located inside
the cone formed by the spreading C1q arms, while the protruding arms of
the tetramer (dominantly the two C1s subunits) wrap around the
collagenous arms of C1q. In the Los Angeles model (22),
the entire C1s is placed outside of the cone formed by the C1q arms,
having free access to the substrates (complement components C2, C4).
This arrangement maximizes the number of identical contact surfaces
with C1q, because the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s tetramer interacts with four
collagen-like C1q arms. The Grenoble model (4) assumes
that the C1s repenetrates the C1q cone so that the catalytic domains of
the C1s zymogen can have access to the catalytic domains of C1r. In
this model, the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s tetramer interacts with only two C1q
arms. Probing the structure of C1 with an anti-C1s mAb led to the
conclusion that these configurations are interconvertible and both can
exist in solution (23). The conversion of the two forms of
C1 requires considerable conformational flexibility of the pentameric
structure, in particular the flexibility of the tetramer inside the C1q
arms (Fig. 4
). Our results support this
view by demonstrating that the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s tetramer has indeed
significant conformational flexibility within the C1 complex. In the
case of the Grenoble model, this implies that the catalytic domains of
C1r and C1s can change their relative position to each other inside the
cone formed by the C1q arms during the activation process.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 4. Eclectic model of C1. Illustration of the cleavage of two C1s by one
active C1r in the complex, without dissociation. The flexibility of the
necklace-like C1s-C1rQI-C1r-C1s tetramer provides access to
both C1s by both C1r.
|
|
Models based on chemical cross-linking and homology modeling
(9) suggest that the second complement control protein
(CCP) module in C1r and C1s is attached to the serine protease domain
while significant flexibility is assumed at the CCP1-CCP2 domain-domain
interface. This assumption is in accord with experimentally (nuclear
magnetic resonance) observed flexibility between two contiguous CCP
modules in a related molecule, human factor H (24). The
rotation of one CCP module about the longitudinal axis could provide
sufficient conformational freedom to allow the suggested
interconversion between the two forms of C1 complex together with some
obvious flexibility (e.g., in the
region) of these extended
multidomain serine protease subunits.
The finding that the C1 molecule is flexible enough to adopt a set of
conformations allowing one of the two C1r subunits to cleave both C1s
proenzymes is in accord with independent structural observations of C1r
and C1s and points to the significance of conformational dynamics in
the mechanism of activation of the first component of complement.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Dr. András Szilágyi for his suggestions by
reading the manuscript and Júlia Balczer for her skillful
technical assistance.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Hungarian National Science Foundation (OTKA) Grant T030588 and the Foundation for the Technological Progress of Industry. Financial support from Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter is gratefully acknowledged. 
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Péter Závodszky, Institute of Enzymology, Biological Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest 1518, P.O. Box 7, Hungary. 
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: C1, the first component of complement; C1q, C1r, and C1s, subcomponents of C1; C1rQI, Arg463Gln mutant of C1r; wt, wild-type; CCP, complement control protein. 
Received for publication April 14, 2000.
Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Cooper, N. R.. 1985. The classical complement pathway: activation and regulation of the first complement component. Adv. Immunol. 37:151.[Medline]
-
Schumaker, V. N., P. Závodszky, P. H. Poon. 1987. Activation of the first component of complement. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 5:21.[Medline]
-
Volanakis, J. E., G. J. Arlaud. 1998. Complement enzymes. M. Frank, and J. E. Volanakis, eds. The Human Complement System in Health and Disease 49. Marcel Dekker, New York.
-
Arlaud, G. J., M. G. Colomb, J. Gagnon. 1987. A functional model of the human C1 complex. Immunol. Today 8:106.
-
Busby, T. F., K. C. Ingham. 1990. NH2-terminal calcium-binding domain of human complement C1s mediates the interaction of C1r with C1q. Biochemistry 29:4613.[Medline]
-
Rossi, V., C. Gaboriaud, M. Lacroix, J. Ulrich, J. C. Fontecilla-Camps, J. Gagnon, G. J. Arlaud. 1995. Structure of the catalytic region of human complement protease C1s: study by chemical cross-linking and three-dimensional homology modeling. Biochemistry 34:7311.[Medline]
-
Thielens, N. M., A. V. Dorsselaer, J. Gagnon, G. J. Arlaud. 1990. Chemical and functional characterization of a fragment of C1s containing the epidermal growth factor homology region. Biochemistry 29:3570.[Medline]
-
Arlaud, G. J., J. Gagnon, C. L. Villiers, M. G. Colomb. 1986. Molecular characterization of the catalytic domains of human complement serine protease C1r. Biochemistry 25:5177.[Medline]
-
Lacroix, M., V. Rossi, C. Gaboriaud, S. Chevallier, M. Jaquinod, N. M. Thielens, J. Gagnon, G. J. Arlaud. 1997. Structure and assembly of the catalytic region of human complement protease C1r: a three-dimensional model based on chemical cross-linking and homology modeling. Biochemistry 36:6270.[Medline]
-
Cseh, S., P. Gál, M. Sárvári, J. Dobó, Z. Lörincz, V. N. Schumaker, P. Závodszky. 1996. Functional effects of domain deletions in a multidomain serine protease, C1r. Mol. Immunol. 33:352.
-
Tsai, S.-W., P. H. Poon, V. N. Schumaker. 1997. Expression and characterization of a 159 amino acid, N-terminal fragment of human complement component C1s. Mol. Immunol. 34:1273.[Medline]
-
Rossi, V., I. Bally, N. M. Thielens, A. F. Esser, G. J. Arlaud. 1998. Baculovirus mediated expression of truncated modular fragments from the catalytic region of human complement serine protease C1s. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hernandez, J.-F., B. Bersch, Y. Pétillot, J. Gagnon, G. J. Arlaud. 1997. Chemical synthesis and characterization of the epidermal growth factor-like module of human complement protease C1r. J. Peptide Res. 49:221.[Medline]
-
Bersch, B., J.-F. Hernandez, D. Marion, G. J. Arlaud. 1998. Solution structure of the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like module of human complement protease C1r, an atypical member of the EGF family. Biochemistry 37:1204.[Medline]
-
Thielens, N. M., K. Enrie, M. Lacroix, M. Jaquinod, J.-F. Hernandez, A. F. Esser, G. J. Arlaud. 1999. The N-terminal CUB-epidermal growth factor module pair of human complement protease C1r binds Ca2+ with high affinity and mediates Ca2+-dependent interaction with C1s. J. Biol. Chem. 274:9149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dobó, J., P. Gál, K. Szilágyi, S. Cseh, Z. Lörincz, V. N. Schumaker, P. Závodszky. 1999. One active C1r subunit is sufficient for the activity of the complement C1 complex: stabilization of C1r in the zymogen form by point mutations. J. Immunol. 162:1108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Summers, M. D., G. E. Smith. 1987. Manual of Methods for Baculovirus Vectors and Insect Cell Culture Procedures Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 1555, College Station, TX.
-
Gál, P., M. Sárvári, K. Szilágyi, P. Závodszky, V. N. Schumaker. 1989. Expression of hemolytically active human complement component C1r proenzyme in insect cells using a baculovirus vector. Complement Inflamm. 6:433.[Medline]
-
Laemmli, U. K.. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T1. Nature 227:680.[Medline]
-
Towbin, H., T. Staehelin, J. Gordon. 1979. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tseng, Y., P. Závodszky, V. N. Schumaker. 1997. The human C1 complex has a picomolar dissociation constant at room temperature. J. Immunol. 158:937.[Abstract]
-
Schumaker, V. N., D. C. Hanson, E. Kilchherr, M. L. Phillips, P. K. Poon. 1986. A molecular mechanism for the activation of the first component of complement by immune complexes. Mol. Immunol. 23:557.[Medline]
-
Tseng, Y., M. L. Phillips, V. N. Schumaker. 1997. Probing the structure of C1 with an anti-C1s monoclonal antibody: the possible existence of two forms of C1 in solution. Mol. Immunol. 34:671.[Medline]
-
Barlow, P. N., A. Steinkasserer, D. G. Norman, B. Kieffer, A. P. Wiles, R. B. Sim, I. D. Campbell. 1993. Solution structure of a pair of complement control protein modules by nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Mol. Biol. 232:268.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kardos, P. Gal, L. Szilagyi, N. M. Thielens, K. Szilagyi, Z. Lorincz, P. Kulcsar, L. Graf, G. J. Arlaud, and P. Zavodszky
The Role of the Individual Domains in the Structure and Function of the Catalytic Region of a Modular Serine Protease, C1r
J. Immunol.,
November 1, 2001;
167(9):
5202 - 5208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|