|
|
||||||||

*
Nexstar Pharmaceuticals, Boulder, CO 80301; and
Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
100,000 peptides and identified
three novel peptides stimulatory for the HA1.7 TCR. While there is some
convergence at residues known to be important for T cell recognition,
all three peptides differ markedly from each other and bear little
resemblance to wild-type hemagglutinin 307319. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene has thus far required
the establishment of at least short-term T cell clones. Techniques such
as single-cell PCR (5) could eliminate this requirement.
Although it is difficult to culture T cells without knowing the Ag to
which they respond, nonspecific stimulation has sometimes been
successful. We have recently used cell sorting, brute force sequencing
of TCR Vß genes, and nonspecific stimulation to identify T cell
clones potentially involved in rheumatoid arthritis
(6). Identifying the Ags that expanded T cell clones recognize and proving that these clones are indeed pathogenic remain difficult and interrelated tasks. Once an Ag is identified, multimeric MHC-peptide reagents may be useful to quantitate the level of these T cells at sites of pathology and to follow their levels over the course of disease (7, 8). Several methodologies are currently available for identifying T cell-recognized Ags. If a stimulatory tissue is known and available, biochemical strategies have been successful (9). An elegant biochemical/biophysical approach has been developed using HPLC and tandem mass spectrometry to elute, identify, and sequence stimulatory peptides (10, 11). This technique requires that the T cell clone be extremely sensitive, and for this reason has been most successful with class I-restricted CTL. Molecular biologic approaches have also been developed. cDNA libraries derived from the stimulatory tissue have been constructed in phage, plasmid, or retroviral vectors, and expressed libraries have been successfully screened for class I and class II T cell Ags (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). When a stimulatory tissue is not known or available, it has sometimes been possible to identify an Ag from a peptide library. Synthetic positional scanning soluble peptide combinatorial libraries (18) that hold one position fixed while the others are free to be any amino acid quickly become quite large and thus have been most useful for the identification of MHC class I-presented Ags, which are shorter (89 aa vs 1315 aa for class II) and which can typically be recognized at lower concentrations (19). However, the approach has worked for one class II-restricted myelin basic protein-specific clone that recognizes highly degenerate peptides (20). Synthetic peptide libraries that incorporate binding motifs for specific MHC molecules and are random at other positions have been developed and screened with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, GAD, and islet ß cell-reactive T cell clones (21, 22, 23). Escherichia coli expressed peptide libraries have likewise been constructed and successfully screened with class I-restricted T cell clones (24).
A major gap in the technology developed so far is in the ability to
identify peptides recognized by MHC class II-restricted T cells when no
source of stimulatory material is available and when the T cells likely
do not recognize nanomolar concentrations of peptides. We developed a
novel method that uses T cell hybridomas transfected with the TCR of
interest to screen a library of peptides expressed on the surface of
fibroblasts as covalent amino-terminal extensions of the DRß-chain.
The use of T cell hybridomas obviates the need to establish and
maintain functional T cell clones, and the covalent linkage of the
peptide to the MHC molecule guarantees high Ag density. We screened a
library of
100,000 covalent peptides with a murine T cell hybridoma
expressing the HA1.7 TCR specific for influenza hemaglutinin
(HA)3 307319
presented by DR4 (25). Using this approach, we have
identified three novel stimulatory peptide mimetics of
HA307319. The three peptides are markedly
divergent, and searches based on these peptides, individually or
collectively, do not identify the wild-type HA peptide.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peptides were purchased from Macromolecular Resources (Ft. Collins, CO), the Molecular Resource Center at the National Jewish Center (Denver, CO), or Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). They were purified to >70% homogeneity before use. Peptide stocks were prepared at 1020 mg/ml in water or 0.1 M acetic acid. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Macromolecular Resources or Operon Technologies (Alameda, CA).
DNA sequencing
DNA sequencing was performed using Sequenase (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH) according to the manufactures instructions or using rhodamine dye terminators and an Applied Biosystems automated system (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA)
Plasmid construction
Standard molecular biologic techniques (26) were used to generate the following constructs.
HA1.7 TCR V
and Vß constructs.
The HA1.7 TCR V
-chain (gb X63455) was constructed by sewing the
HA1.7 J
onto human V
1.2 by PCR. PBL from a normal donor were
purified over Ficol, and total cellular RNA was extracted using RNAsol
B (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturers
directions. Human V
cDNA, primed with a C
antisense oligo
(5'-GGGCACAGAGGTGGTAGCAGC-3'), was made using a reverse transcriptase
system (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturers
directions and used as template in a first PCR to clone human V
1.2
and add a portion of the HA1.7 J
. The sense oligo was
5'-GCCTCGAGATGCTCCTGCTGCTCGTC-3', and the anti-sense V-J oligo was
5'-AGTCCCAAAGGTTAATTTCTCATTTCCAAATGGAGACTCACTCACAGCACAGAAGTA-3'.
PCR was conducted for 30 cycles of 96°C for 1 min, 37°C for 30
s, ramp to 72°C 1°/2 s, 72°C for 1 min, followed by 10 min at
72°C. The PCR product was purified using Promega Wizzard PCR and used
as template in a second PCR using the same sense oligo and an antisense
oligo
(5'-GGTCCGGATTCTGGATATTGGGTATGATGGTGAGTCTTGTTCCAGTCCCAAAGGTTAA-3')
that added the rest of J
and the beginning of C
including a
BspEI cloning site. Twenty cycles of PCR were performed
using the same conditions. The PCR product was again purified using the
Promega Wizzard PCR system, digested with BspEI and
partially with XhoI (as there is another XhoI
site in the V
1.2 leader), gel purified, and ligated into the
XhoI/BspEI prepared expression vector
pSFFMC
.
The HA1.7 TCR Vß-chain (gb X63456) was constructed by sewing the
HA1.7 D-Jß on to a previously cloned human Vß 3.1 gene using
pB
DOßhVß3 as template. An initial PCR added part of the HA1.7
D-Jß, and the second PCR completed Jß and added part of
human Cß with a BglII cloning site. The sense oligo was
the same in both rounds and included a 5' EcoRI site. The
sequence was 5'-GTGAGAATTCCACCATGGG-3'. The antisense oligo in the
first PCR was
5'-ACCGAAGGTGTAGCCATAGGGCAACCCTGTCGAACTGCTAGCACAGAG-3' and in the
second PCR was
5'-TCAGATCTTCTACAACGGTTAACCTGGTCCCCGAACCGAAGGTGTAGCC-3'. PCR
conditions were as for the HA1.7 TCR
-chain except that only 20
cycles were done in the first round. As for the
-chain,
the resultant PCR product was digested and ligated in to the
EcoRI/BglII digested expression vector
pHßAcPrMCß2. The sequences of the HA1.7 V
- and Vß-chain
constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
TCR expression vectors.
pSFFMC
was constructed by destroying an XhoI site
upstream of the SFFV-LTR in pSFFpJS
1, which itself consists of the
EcoRI-flanked DO-11.10 TCR V
-chain (27)
cloned into pSFFVSVneo (28).
pHßAcPrMCß2 was constructed by destroying the BglII and EcoRI sites in pHßAcPr-1-neo (29) and inserting a PCR-amplified mouse Cß2 fragment (30) between the BamHI and SalI cloning sites. The PCR used oligonucleotide primers (sense 5'-GCGTCGACAGAAGATCTGAGAAAT GTGACT-3' and antisense 5'-GCGGATCCTATGGCAGGGTGAAGAACGGC-3'), which introduced a BglII site at the 5' end of Cß by changing one codon from GAG to GAA. Finally, a SalI-EcoRI-SalI adapter was inserted. Both vectors contain the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene that confers resistance to G418.
CD4-lsrc vector.
To make the plasmid, pBABE-CD4lsrc, encoding the extracellular and
transmembrane domains of human CD4 fused to the unique domain of murine
lck and the Src homology (SH) 3 and SH2 domains of c-src, we modified
the plasmid pMV7 (L3T4ctmlsrc) by swapping human for murine CD4. The
sequence across the junction of these fragments is shown in Scheme 1
.
|
2 or GP+E retroviral packaging lines to obtain viral
stock. Hybridomas expressing this construct were shown to respond to
10-fold less peptide Ag (A. Korman, data not shown).
Covalent HLA-DRB1*0401-peptide constructs.
The vector pBABE-puro (31) was modified by
destroying the two XmaI and the single SpeI sites
before insertion of the covalent peptide-DRB1*0401 cassette. The
SpeI site was removed by digestion, Klenow fill-in, and
blunt ligation. The XmaI site in the 5' long terminal repeat
was destroyed by blunt-end ligating the calf intestinal alkaline
phosphatase-treated SmaI-digested bacterial
portion of the vector to the T4 DNA polymerase blunt-ended
KpnI-flanked retroviral portion of the vector. The remaining
XmaI site in the 3' long terminal repeat was then destroyed
by blunt-end ligation following a SmaI/KpnI
digest and T4 DNA polymerase treatment. This plasmid is designated
pBABE
XS-puro.
pBABE
XS-DR4FLU was modeled on published constructs
(32). It consists of the described
I-Ek leader and signal sequence, the
HA307319 peptide, a 14-aa linker containing a
thrombin site, and DRB1*0401. DRB1*0401 was cloned by RT-PCR from the
consanguineous cell line SAVC (IMGT/HLA Cell Database ID 11368). Total
cellular RNA was prepared using RNAsol B (Tel-Test) and
converted to cDNA using a Promega reverse transcriptase system with a
random hexamer primer. The PCR primers were sense
5'-TGAAAGCTTGGGGACACCCGACCACGTTTC-3' and antisense
5'-TCAGTCGACTCAGCTCAGGAATCCTGTTGG-3'. The sense primer added a
HindIII cloning site, while the antisense primer added a
SalI cloning site. The final construct is shown
diagrammatically in Scheme 2
.
|
XS DR4. The ligated plasmid was used to transform
electrocompetent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the
accompanying instructions using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser with pulse
controller (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Two independent transformations
were performed, each resulting in >106
penicillin colonies. Plasmid DNA (pBABE
XSDR4-SSL9) was amplified in
E. coli and purified for transfection using a
maxiprep system (Qiagen, Studio City, CA). Gene transfer
The HA1.7 TCR was introduced into 54
by electroporation.
Briefly, 107 54
cells were washed twice in
HBSS, resuspended in 0.5 ml Optimem medium (Life Technologies,
Rockville, MD) and placed on ice for 10 min following the addition of
10 µg each of pSFFMC
-V
HA and pHßAcPrMCß2-VßHA. The cells
were transferred to an electroporation cuvette with a 0.4-cm gap and
pulsed at 250V, 960 µF using a Bio-Rad electorporator with a
capacitance extender (Bio-Rad). The cells were incubated for 10 min at
room temperature, and then diluted in 10 ml IMDM with 10% FCS and
incubated overnight at 37°C. The following day, active G418 was added
at 1 mg/ml. Fourteen days later, the transfected cells were stained
with biotinylated anti-TCR and positive cells were enriched using
streptavidin-coated Dynabeads (M-280; Dynal, Lake Success, NY) before
cloning by limiting dilution. These cells were later found to express
very low levels of human CD4 and were then infected with retrovirally
encoded pBABE-CD4lsrc. This was done by coculturing the HA1.7 hybridoma
with
2 cells stably transfected with pBABE-CD4lsrc for 3 days. The
hybridoma cells were then removed and placed in puromycin at 2.5
µg/ml. Resistant cells were then cloned by limiting dilution.
Murine ICAM-1 was introduced into 75IP by coculture with
2 cells
stably transfected with CRIP-ICAM as described above. As no selection
was available, the coculture was stained with biotinylated anti-DR
mAb, enriched using Dynabeads, and cloned by limiting dilution. The
resultant cell is designated 75IP-ICAM.
Covalent peptide-DRB1*0401 constructs were introduced into 75IP or
75IP-ICAM by CaPO4-mediated gene transfer
(33). Briefly, 1.6 x 106
75IP-ICAM cells were plated at 5 x 104 per
ml in T75 flasks on day 0. On day 1, 3.2 ml of precipitated
pBABE
XSDR4-SSL9 DNA (32.2 µg) was added for 4 h, at which
time glycerol shock was performed and the cells were washed and placed
in fresh medium. On day 2, fresh medium containing 2.5 µg/ml
puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added. Each flask yielded
1400 puromycin-resistant transfectants. Two multiflask transfections
were performed yielding 33,000 and 27,000 puromycin-resistant
transfectants, respectively.
Cell culture
All cells were cultured in IMDM (Life Technologies) with 10% FCS (Summit, Ft. Collins, CO) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Stimulation assay
IL-2 production by HA1.7CD4lsrc in response to coculture with APCs expressing DR4 plus covalent or exogenous peptide was measured by the ability of culture supernatants to support the growth of the IL-2-dependent cell line HT-2 as described (34). In some cases, the results were quantitated by measuring the incorporation of [3H]thymidine by HT-2 cells during the final 4 h of the culture. Briefly, 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) was added to each assay well for 4 h. Incorporated label was transferred to glass fiber filters using a MachIII cell harvester (Tomtech, Hamden, CT) and counted on a 1450 MicroBeta scintillation counter (Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland).
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry was performed using a FACScan cytometer (Becton
Dickinson, San Jose, CA). The following mAbs were used: anti-murine
TCR Vß, H57-597 (35); anti-human CD4, Leu-3A-PE
(Becton Dickinson); anti-DR, L243 (HB-55; American Type Culture
Collection, Manassas, VA); anti-DR
, 20-2C3.4; biotinylated
anti-murine ICAM-1, 3E2 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA); and biotinylated
anti-murine LFA-1, 2D7 (PharMingen). H57-597and 20-2C3.4 culture
supernatants were purified on protein A or G, respectively, and
biotinylated using biotin hydroxy succinimide (36).
Culture supernatant from L243 was purified over protein G and used with
a secondary goat anti-mouse Ig(H&L) (Southern Biotechnology
Associates, Birmingham, AL). PE-conjugated streptavidin was used as a
secondary reagent for biotinylated Abs (Rockland Immunochemicals,
Gilbertsville, PA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The goal of this work was to develop a model system whereby
libraries of random peptides covalently attached to HLA-DR4 could be
created, expressed on the surface of fibroblasts, and screened for the
ability to stimulate a particular T cell clone. In this way,
stimulatory peptides, presumably mimetics of the peptides recognized in
vivo, can be identified. This schema is shown in Fig. 1
. To obviate the need to derive and
maintain functional T cell clones from a site of pathology, we
generated a T cell hybridoma expressing the TCR of interest. To
increase the sensitivity of the system, this cell coexpresses human CD4
as a chimeric molecule comprised of the extracellular and transmembrane
domains of human CD4 fused to the unique amino-terminal domain of
murine Lck and to the SH3, SH2, and kinase domains of c-src (CD4lsrc).
This construct is analogous to the construct described by Xu et al.
(37), which increased sensitivity 10- to 100-fold.
Furthermore, we introduced murine ICAM-1 into the fibroblast APC to
permit interaction with the murine LFA-1 expressed by the responding T
cell hybridoma.
|
For the current study, we expressed the variable portion of the
human TCR HA1.7, which is specific for HA307319
presented by HLA-DR4 (DRA1*0101, DRB*0401) (25). Using
synthetic oligonucleotides and PCR, we grafted the published TCR V
and Vß CDR3 regions onto previously cloned human variable and mouse
constant region genes and expressed the resultant constructs in the
TCR-negative murine thymoma, 54
(38). In addition, we
introduced CD4lsrc by retroviral infection to enable interaction with
human MHC class II on the APC and to increase the sensitivity. Fig. 2
A shows the expression of
endogenous (murine) LFA-1, chimeric TCR, and of CD4lsrc by HA1.7. TCR
staining is 127 times background, while staining for the extracellular
portion of human CD4 is 106 times background. Fig. 2
B shows
the ability of the HA1.7 hybridoma to secrete IL-2 in response to
µg/ml concentrations of HA307319 presented by
SAVC, a homozygous HLA-DRB1*0401-expressing EBV-transformed cell
line.
|
Experiments by other investigators have shown that peptides
covalently attached to the amino terminus of the ß-chain of murine
I-A and I-E molecules function well in T cell stimulation assays
(39). To confirm that this was also the case for peptides
bound to HLA-DR4, we expressed HA307319
covalently bound to DR4 in 75IP, a DR
-expressing 3T3 murine
fibroblast (40). We then introduced murine ICAM-1 using a
retroviral vector to yield 75IP-DR4-FLU-ICAM. Fig. 3
A shows the expression of DR
and ICAM-1 by this fibroblast. Both are >300-fold over background
staining. Fig. 3
B demonstrates the ability of
75IP-DR4-FLU-ICAM to stimulate the HA1.7 TCR hybridoma to produce IL-2.
Significant stimulation is seen with as few as 100 stimulator
cells.
|
We performed a reconstruction experiment to determine 1) the
average number of peptides expressed following transfection of the
fibroblast APCs with a pool of plasmids encoding a library of covalent
peptides covalently attached to DR4, and 2) the number of APCs
necessary for stimulation. We mixed plasmids encoding DR4-FLU and
DR4-OP at a ratio of 1:1000 and used this mixture to transfect 75IP. OP
("other peptide", AAYAIASTAQAAA) had been identified in previous
experiments and was chosen as an unrelated, nonstimulatory peptide that
permits equivalent expression of DR4 (data not shown). We then screened
the resultant 3500 independent puromycin-resistant transfectants, in
pools of 10 cells, for their ability to stimulate HA1.7. If each
fibroblast expressed only one peptide, we would have expected 3.5
stimulatory transfectants. Fig. 4
shows
the distribution of [3H]thymidine
incorporationas a measure of IL-2 produced by HA1.7 in response to
the pools of 10 fibroblast APCsby each of the pools. Using a cutoff
of 1000 cpm, 19 of 384 wells were stimulatory. This extrapolates to 5.4
peptides expressed per puromycin-resistant transfectant. The fact that
13 of the 19 positive wells had incorporation of >10,000 cpm indicates
that pools of at least 10 cells can be screened. However, the finding
of six positive wells with cpm between 1000 and 2000 cautions that some
weak positives might be missed if the pool size were increased too
much. Subsequent screening of the peptide library was performed on
pools of 20 transfectants each expressing different random
peptides.
|
Fig. 5
shows the design of the
peptide portion of the library compared with the wild-type
HA307319 peptide. To enrich for peptides
capable of binding DR4, we fixed positions 1, 6, and 9 of the library
to phenylalanine, threonine, and leucine, respectively. Phenylalanine
in place of tyrosine was chosen for position 1 based on the work of
Hammer et al. (41), which demonstrated that some of the
alleles of HLA-DR with increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis are
unable to accommodate a bulky tyrosine at this position. Positions -1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 were randomized, and positions -2, 10, and 11
were fixed as glycine or alanine on the presumption that these terminal
residues would be less important to T cell stimulation. With seven
variable positions, the possible number of unique peptides is 1.3
x 109. This is a larger library than we could
hope to generate or screen. Considerable degeneracy at some if not all
of the variable positions will be required for us to find stimulatory
peptides. However, by allowing seven positions to vary, we minimize the
risk that the choice of fixed residues will preclude all possibility of
finding a peptide with stimulatory activity. To minimize stop codons,
the third position of the randomized codons was limited to G or C. Stop
codons will still occur one in 32 times, resulting in 20% of the
peptides being nonexpressible.
|
Identification of stimulatory peptides
In all, we screened 60,000 puromycin-resistant 75IP/ICAM-1
transfectants, expressing
324,000 unique covalent peptides, for the
ability to stimulate HA1.7 to produce IL-2. Because the
puromycin-resistant transfectants were grown up in bulk, replated, and
then tested, 4-fold oversampling would have been required to cover 99%
of the peptides. As performed, we screened 78% of the total. Allowing
for stop codons, improper insert ligation, and incomplete sampling, we
estimate that we screened at least 100,000 peptides. Of the 3,840 pools
of 20 transfected APCs each, three were identified as positive by
visual inspection of HT-2 viability.
[3H]Thymidine was added to the 96-well plates
containing the stimulatory wells to quantitate the production of IL-2.
In this way, we determined that pools 1A9, 7G5, and 20E12 were 40x,
130x, and 60x background, respectively.
All three pools were cloned at limiting dilution to obtain a
stimulatory clone from among the 20 seeded in the original pool. To
identify the stimulatory peptides expressed by each of these three
clones, two methods were employed. Superinfection of 1A9 and 7G5 with
wild-type Moloney leukemia virus allowed us to rescue virus capable of
conferring puromycin resistance following infection of 75IP. These
puromycin-resistant cells were then cloned and tested for the ability
to stimulate HA1.7. For 1A9, one of 38 rescued clones was stimulatory,
while one in 21 clones rescued from 7G5 was stimulatory. RT-PCR and
sequencing of the peptides from these rescued clones yielded, in each
case, a single sequence. This approach did not work for 20E12, as 128
rescued clones were all unable to stimulate HA1.7. In an attempt to
reduce the complexity of the transfected DNA, we obtained a secondary
transfectant of the 20E12 clone. RT-PCR was used to recover the
transfected peptide-encoding sequences, which were then recloned into
pBABE
XS-DR4. Pools of 410 plasmids, each encoding a single
peptide, were retransfected into 75IP. In this way, a stimulatory
transfectant was obtained, and sib selection identified the individual
peptide responsible for stimulation.
Fig. 6
shows the three peptides
identified compared with wild-type HA307319.
Peptides 1A9 and 7G5 conform to the overall structure imposed by the
library design, that is, they have the F, T, and L anchors at positions
1, 6, and 9. However, peptide 20E12 has drastically changed two of the
anchor positions, T6 to P and L9 to R. In both cases, this resulted
from a single base change from the template. Sequencing of 29
additional, nonstimulatory peptides from 20E12 revealed that about half
had altered anchor residues at positions 6 and 9. Such changes were not
found in 16 sequences from plasmid library DNA, in the 13 unique
sequences identified in the 1A9 transfectant, nor in the nine unique
sequences identified in the 7G5 transfectant. Tandem peptide-encoding
inserts comprised five of the 51 sequences identified in the three
stimulatory fibroblasts and were limited to 1A9. In all, 5/13, 6/9, and
22/30 sequences identified in the stimulatory transfectants 1A9, 7G5,
and 20E12, respectively, encoded expressible peptides. Fig. 7
shows the stimulation of HA1.7 by
synthetic peptides, corresponding to the sequences identified in 1A9,
7G5, and 20E12, presented by the DRB1*0401 homozygous, EBV-transformed
cell line, SAVC.
|
|
All three stimulatory peptides have a positively charged amino
acid at position HA311. To investigate the
significance of this finding, we examined the ability of
alanine-substituted peptides to stimulate HA1.7. Fig. 8
shows that peptides 20E12 R311A and 7G5
K311A are unable to stimulate HA1.7 and that
HA307319 K311A is dramatically less stimlatory
than wild type. Thus, the finding of a Lys or Arg as the fifth amino
acid in all three peptides correctly predicts the importance of a
positive charge at this position for peptide recognition by HA1.7. The
HA307319 K311A peptide could not be tested at 1
mg/ml due to toxicity. The 1A9 R311A peptide was synthesized but could
not be tested as removal of its sole charged residue rendered it
insoluble.
|
Each peptide was used to search the nonredundant database using National Center for Biotechnology Information BLAST and EMBL Biocelerator Smith-Waterman programs. In addition, a profile was built from the three peptides using EMBL Profile Weight and a "profilesearch" was performed. None of the searches identified influenza HA as a possible source protein.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We chose to clone and express the TCR of interest as a chimeric protein
in a murine TCR-negative T cell hybridoma for several reasons. First,
it provided an immortal cell line that could be easily grown to the
large number of cells required by our assay. Second, regardless of the
consequences of TCR ligation in the primary T cell, we knew that we
could expect the transfected hybridoma to produce IL-2 if its TCR was
engaged by Ag. Thus, we could limit our screen to production of a
single cytokine. Furthermore, such hybridomas have been shown to be
less dependent on costimulation. In addition, particularly when the
target Ag is unknown, T cell clones can be difficult to establish and
those that can be maintained using nonspecific stimuli may be highly
selected. Indeed, some of the pathogenic T cells in disease may be
anergic or may die in response to in vitro stimulation. In our model
system, we have shown that transfection of the HA1.7 TCR into the
murine TCR-negative T cell hybridoma 54
provides a highly sensitive
indicator cell, responding to 0.1 µg/ml of peptide. This response is
comparable to that reported for the T cell clone (42) but
less sensitive than the reported response of a similar transfectant of
the HA TCR into the Jurkat cell line (43). Although we
chose a T cell clone for our model system, similar indicator cells can
be made using any TCR for which the TCR V
and Vß sequences are
available.
Our method of creating libraries of peptides covalently linked to the DR ß-chain and expressed on the surface of fibroblasts differs from other methods in several ways, which may be advantageous for some T cells. Because the amino acids are encoded genetically, we do not need to avoid or substitute cysteine residues, and because the peptides are expressed as fusion proteins, solubility is not a concern. Indeed, the covalent linkage guarantees exceptionally high Ag density. Although we did not take advantage of it in these studies, the fact that each fibroblast expresses only a few MHC bound peptides may permit direct screening of the library with multimeric, fluorescently labeled soluble TCRs, thus obviating the need for a functional assay at the screening stage. Furthermore, the library, once expressed in fibroblasts, provides a permanent resource for future studies. Conversely, the genetic approach has inherent limitations. Although we permitted only G or C in the third position of each random codon, one of 32 random codons will yield a translation stop. In addition, deconvolution of the stimulatory fibroblasts to identify the one responsible peptide required considerable additional effort.
We have fixed three anchor residues to bias our library for peptides capable of binding DRB1*0401, and we have selected seven central residues to randomize. This strategy provides a possible library of 207 (1.3 x 109) peptides. Reconstruction experiments indicate that, on average, each of the 60,000 transfected fibroblasts express 5.4 peptides for a total possible library of 3.2 x 105 peptides. This number should be regarded cautiously for several reasons. Stop codons, improper insert ligation, and partial library sampling would all reduce the number of expressible peptides screened. However, the three stimulatory transfectants were found to encode 5, 6, and 22 peptides. This suggests an average of 11 expressible peptides each and would extrapolate to 6.6 x 105 total peptides in the library. Thus our estimate of at least 100,000 peptides screened is conservative.
We identified three peptides capable of stimulating the HA1.7 TCR transfectant specific for HA307319 presented by DRB1*0401. All three peptides have Arg or Lys at their fifth position (HA311), suggesting that a positive charge at this position is essential for stimulation of HA1.7. Alanine substitutions at this position confirmed the requirement for such a residue in the peptides identified from the library as well as in wild-type HA307319. Two of the three peptides have lysine at position 7 (HA316). This contrasts slightly with the findings of Wedderburn et al. (42) that even a Lys to Arg change at HA316 resulted in loss of activity when presented to the HA1.7 TCR by DRB1*0101 APCs. It is more consistent with the finding of Van Bergen and Koning (44), who showed that an altered peptide ligand with a Lys to His substitution at this position was still stimulatory for the HA1.7 clone, though about 100 times more peptide was required and the response became CD4 dependent. Our finding that peptide 1A9 with a Lys to Gly change at HA316 is stimulatory may be a consequence of compensatory changes at other positions or may be due to presentation by DRB1*0401. Interestingly, the 1A9 peptide is not stimulatory when presented by a DRB1*0101 APC (data not shown). Position -1 (HA316) is also a lysine in the wild-type peptide and is serine, threonine, and methionine in the three library peptides, indicating that this position is not important for HA1.7 stimulation.
The finding of mutated "anchor" residues in peptide 20E12 was unexpected. Although each mutation resulted from a single base change, it is unlikely that these changes were accidental, as a synthetic peptide with the mutations reverted to the templated "anchor" residues was unable to stimulate HA1.7 (data not shown). This raises the possibility that the actual binding frame of 20E12 has shifted. While we cannot definitively rule this out, our finding that a positive charge is important at position HA311 makes it unlikely that the binding register of the 20E12 peptide has changed.
All three of the peptides are significantly less stimulatory than wild-type HA307319. This is perhaps just due to chance and if we had screened more peptides we would have found superagonists. It may also result from our decision to fix position HA307 to glycine or HA318 and HA319 to alanine. Alternatively, the linker that guarantees extremely high peptide density and that likely facilitates peptide binding may interfere with T cell recognition of some otherwise stimulatory peptides. Theoretically, it is also possible that HA307319 is the optimal peptide.
Finally, database searches against the three library peptides individually or collectively failed to identify influenza HA as the source protein. Thus, peptides found in this way cannot guarantee identification of the actual peptide ligand or source protein. This is perhaps not surprising as it has been shown in several systems that different T cells specific for the same peptide MHC molecule cannot tolerate the same amino acid substitutions. Thus it is unlikely that peptide mimetics identified for one T cell can be used to study other T cells with the same reactivity. This is certainly true in our study as none of the three peptides could stimulate a T cell hybridoma expressing the 3BC6.6 TCR (45), which is also specific for HA307319 presented by DR4 (data not shown). Perhaps peptides stimulatory for independent T cells, either found randomly or by further mutagenesis of initial hits, would be more generally stimulatory of all specific T cells. Alternatively, the discernable convergence of some residues among the three peptide mimetics we identified hints that a more extensive array of stimulatory peptides would be more informative.
In summary, we identified three peptide mimetics for influenza
HA307319 by screening a library of
100,000
random peptides expressed in fibroblasts as amino-terminal extensions
of the DRB1*0401 molecule. None of these mimetics were able to
implicate a peptide of HA as the original Ag, and none could stimulate
a second TCR with the same specificity. These findings suggest that the
identification of a single peptide stimulatory for a T cell is unlikely
to uncover the actual Ag seen in vivo.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
, Susan Radka for SAVC and 20-2C3.4, John Kappler and Philippa
Marrack for pSFFpJS
1, pB
DOßhVß3, and pBEk-MCC, Glenn Dranoff
for CRIP-ICAM, Gordon Keller for pBABE-puro, Steve Hedrick for
pHßAcPr-neo, and Pat Concannon for cloned TCR genes from 3BC6.6. We
also thank John Kappler and Masazumi Matsumura for helpful discussions,
Amy Riter, Kristin Enny, Mark Karlok, and Jill Elliott for excellent
technical assistance, and Brian Kotzin for critical reading of the
manuscript. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jerry Bill, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Mail Stop B-164, Denver, CO 80262. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HA, hemagglutinin; SH, Src homology. ![]()
Received for publication November 12, 1999. Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II+ peptide recognition. J. Exp. Med. 185:1919.
ß T cell receptors. J. Immunol. 142:2736.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Zavala-Ruiz, E. J. Sundberg, J. D. Stone, D. B. DeOliveira, I. C. Chan, J. Svendsen, R. A. Mariuzza, and L. J. Stern Exploration of the P6/P7 Region of the Peptide-binding Site of the Human Class II Major Histocompatability Complex Protein HLA-DR1 J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2003; 278(45): 44904 - 44912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |