|
|
||||||||






*
Unité de Biologie Moléculaire du Gène, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 277, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France;
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 463, Institut de Biologie, Nantes, France; and
Immunotech SA, Marseilles, France
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-chains comprised the same TCRAV region,
thus suggesting hierarchical contribution of TCR
-chain vs TCR
ß-chain CDR to recognition of this particular MHC/peptide complex.
The common occurrence of T cell clonotypes with public TCR features
within GLC/A2-specific T cells allowed their direct detection within
unsorted PBL using ad hoc clonotypic primers. These results, which
suggest an unexpectedly high contribution of public clonotypes to the
TCR repertoire against a dominant epitope, have several implications
for the follow-up and modulation of T cell-mediated
immunity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ßs, whose structural diversity is
generated by somatic recombination of V, D, and J gene segments
(1). TCR V
and Vß regions comprise three major
hypervariable regions that are homologous to the Ig
complementarity-determining regions
(CDR).3 While CDR1 and
CDR2 are exclusively encoded by germline parts of the V segment, CDR3
comprise both germline residues derived from the V(D)J segments and
nongermline residues contributed by N nucleotides, which are added in a
template-independent fashion at the V(D)J joints during the
recombination process (1). Early models based upon the
crystal structure of MHC and Ig molecules proposed that CDR1 and CDR2
primarily contact residues of the MHC
-helices, whereas CDR3 contact
the antigenic peptide in the MHC groove (1, 2). The key
role of CDR3 in recognition of the antigenic peptide was then confirmed
experimentally through several approaches, such as peptide immunization
of single-chain TCR transgenic mice (3, 4) and
site-directed mutagenesis (5). More recently,
crystallographic analyses of several TCR/MHC/peptide complexes have
revealed a conserved diagonal orientation of the TCR over the
MHC/peptide complex and identified several contact points between,
respectively, the N-terminal and C-terminal halves of the peptide and
the CDR3 loops of the TCR
-chain and TCR ß-chain
(6, 7, 8). These structural studies also suggested a greater
contribution of TCR
than TCRß CDR in contacting the MHC/peptide
complex (6, 8). Although resolution of the three-dimensional structure of TCR/MHC/peptide complexes has brought important insights into the structural basis of Ag recognition, the amount of data recovered to date from these studies is still too limited to give a general understanding of the molecular mechanisms of TCR repertoire central and peripheral selection. This issue has been more specifically addressed through two other approaches. On the one hand, analyses of the TCR repertoire of cells selected by defined MHC/peptide complexes in vitro and in vivo have clearly shown TCR repertoire restriction within Ag-selected T cells (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20) and have led in some systems to the identification of highly recurrent CDR motifs associated with response to particular Ags (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). On the other hand studies of T cell development in in vivo situations where either the specificity of the selected TCR and/or the quality of the selecting MHC/peptide complexes could be controlled by transgenesis have recently demonstrated the key role played by self-MHC/peptide complexes in shaping the mature T cell repertoire (21, 22, 23, 24). However, several questions remain open. For instance, in systems where TCR restrictions have been identified, it has been difficult to assess the respective contributions of combinatorial/enzymatic constraints, thymic selection by self-MHC/peptide complexes, and peripheral selection by environmental Ags to the emergence of cells with public TCR features (i.e., with restricted TCR motifs shared by clonotypes from distinct individuals) (12). Moreover, since in several studies the repertoire diversity of cells selected by a given Ag was extensive and showed no evidence for selection of clonotypes with recurrent TCR motifs (25, 26), it is still unclear whether these public T cell responses are the exception or the rule. This is an important point, since identification of public TCR motifs could have major implications in immunodiagnosis (i.e., by permitting follow-up of immune responses with serological or molecular probes specific to public clonotypes) and immunotherapy (i.e., by permitting specific selection or elimination of public clonotypes with wanted or unwanted specificities, respectively).
In the present study we took advantage of several recent technical
breakthroughs permitting 1) efficient isolation of Ag-specific T cells
by means of multimeric MHC/peptide complexes (27) and 2)
global qualitative and semiquantitative analysis of their TCR features
using a combination of flow cytometric and molecular approaches
(28) to study in detail the TCR structural constraints
imposed by a given selecting Ag. As a model Ag, we chose the
HLA-A2-restricted epitope GLCTLVAML derived from the EBV lytic protein
BMLF1 (hereafter referred to as GLC/A2) because 1) this Ag is derived
from a common infectious agent that infects a large fraction of the
adult population (29), and 2) this particular epitope
triggers strong peripheral T cell responses in infected individuals and
is recognized by a relatively large fraction of EBV-specific T cells in
HLA-A2 donors in various physiopathologic situations
(30, 31, 32, 33). Our results indicate that several T cell
clonotypes with recurrent TCR motifs (and in some cases with fully
conserved TCR
ß-chains) are shared by
GLC/A2+ T cell lines derived from several
individuals and together account for about half of the reactive T
cells. Hence, this suggests frequent selection of public clonotypes by
dominant Ags, at least in the course of chronic stimulation as is
presently the case. Our observations also suggest tighter interactions
between this particular MHC/peptide complex and the CDR from the TCR
-chain than the TCR ß-chain, since several clonotypes bearing TCR
ß-chains with weak CDR1, -2, and -3 homology shared the same TCRAV
region.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following mAbs, whose specificity is indicated in parentheses, were used for flow cytometry and immunomagnetic sorting: E2.2E7.2 (Vß2), LE89 (Vß3), IMMU157 (Vß5.1), 3D11 (Vß5.3), CRI304.3 (Vß6.2), 3G5D15 (Vß7), 56C5.2 (Vß8.1/8.2), FIN9 (Vß9), C21 (Vß11), S511 (Vß12), IMMU1222 (Vß13.1), JU74 (Vß13.6), CAS1.1.13 (Vß14), Tamaya1.2 (Vß16), E17.5F3 (Vß17), BA62.6 (Vß18), ELL1.4 (Vß20), IG125 (Vß21.3), IMMU546 (Vß22), and HUT78.1 (Vß23). Synthetic peptides were obtained from either Chiron Mimotopes Corp. (Victoria, Australia) or Genosys (Cambridgeshire, U.K.). For functional assays, lyophilized peptides were dissolved at 20 mg/ml in DMSO, diluted at 2 mg/ml in 10 mM acetic acid, and stored as stock solutions at -80°C.
Generation of recombinant MHC/peptide complexes
Soluble MHC/peptide tetramers were produced using a method similar to that described by Altman et al. (27). ß2-Microglobulin and HLA-A2 heavy chain extracellular part fused at the COOH-terminus to a 13-aa target sequence for the biotin ligase BirA enzyme were produced in Escherichia coli as inclusion bodies. HLA-A2 complexes (2 µM HLA-A2 and 2 µM ß2-microglobulin) were folded in vitro by dilution in the presence of either 10 µM of the synthetic EBV BMLF1 peptide (GLCTLVAML) (30, 31, 32, 33) or the CMV pp65 peptide (NLVPMVATV; as a control) essentially as previously described. The folded MHC complexes were diafiltrated and concentrated to 1 mg/ml in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.00, on a prep scale 3-kDa concentration cassette (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The MHC complexes were biotinylated using purified BirA enzyme at a concentration of 10 µg/ml of enzyme, 40 µM biotin, 2 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgOAc. Biotinylated complexes were then purified by anion exchange (MonoQ, Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) with a 0 to 0.5 M NaCl gradient and were checked by SDS-PAGE and analytical gel filtration. Biotinylated complexes were then tetramerized with PE-streptavidin (Immunotech, Westbrook, ME) at a 4/1 molar ratio and stored at 4°C at 200 µg of MHC in 10 mM Tris (pH 8.00), 50 mM NaCl, and 0.5 mM EDTA until use. Titration curves by flow cytometry on specific T cell lines were stable for at least 3 mo for the two tetramers.
Generation of T cell lines and culture
T cell lines were derived from either fresh PBL of HLA-A2 EBV-seropositive healthy donors or from synovial fluid lymphocytes (SFL) of HLA-A2 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with previously documented reactivity against EBV (32, 33). T cells were cultured and cloned as previously described (34, 35) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with human serum (8%) and recombinant IL2 (150 IU/ml) and were stimulated once a month with purified PHA (Sigma) and irradiated PBL and B lymphoblastoid cells. Sorting of T cells with TCR Vß-specific mAb was performed as previously described (35) using sheep anti-mouse Ig-coated immunomagnetic beads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). The purity of TCR Vß-sorted cells was checked by flow cytometry and was always >98% (data not shown). Sorting of Ag-specific T cells using recombinant MHC/peptide complexes was performed as follows. Avidin-coated beads (Dynal) were incubated for 15 min with biotinylated MHC/peptide monomers (50 µl at 10 µg/ml for 2 x 107 beads) and then added to CD8+ synovial T cells or fresh PBL. Cells were rotated for 2 h at 4°C, immunomagnetically sorted, and washed extensively as previously described (35). Bead-coated cells were then expanded as described above.
Flow cytometric analysis
Cells were phenotyped by indirect immunofluorescence as previously described (34). In brief, cells were incubated first with unconjugated mAb for 30 min at room temperature, washed, and then incubated with FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse Ig antiserum (BioAtlantic, Nantes, France) for 30 min on ice. After washing, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACScan apparatus (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) using the LYSYS II software package on a FACstation.
CD25 induction assay
HLA-A2+ stimulator cells (B lymphoblastoid cell lines) were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 10 µM peptide and washed three times before use. Responder T cells were incubated at a 1/1 ratio with peptide-loaded stimulator cells for 18 h, stained with a CD25-specific mAb, and analyzed by flow cytometry as described above.
Immunoscope analysis
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) as recommended by the manufacturer. RT-PCR amplification and run-off steps were performed as previously described (36). TCR ß-chain-specific primers were described previously (37). Fluorescent DNA products were loaded on a sequencing gel and analyzed with Immunoscope software (38).
Sequence analysis of TCR transcripts
PCR were performed as described above with 5 U of Pfu polymerase for 25 cycles. PCR products were then cloned in pCR-blunt II-TOPO vector using the Blunt TOPO PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For sequencing purposes, PCR was conducted directly on E. coli- colonies with Taq polymerase as previously described (39). Sequencing reactions were conducted directly on these products using M13(-20) primer and with the ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit or the ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). CDR3 region corresponding sequences were extracted and analyzed using a software designed for this purpose.
Clonotypic analysis
cDNA made from total RNA were extracted from unsorted PBL of HLA-A2 EBV-seropositive healthy donors and from a control thymus. Each sample was amplified (28 cycles) with TCR BV-specific sense primers and fluorescent antisense public clonotypic primers specific for consensus junctional sequences. The fluorescent products were migrated in a 373A DNA sequencer, and the raw data were analyzed with the Immunoscope software package.
The fluorescent clonotypic primers were 5'-6-Fam-CGA AGG TGT AGC CAT TCC CTG T-3' for BV2, 5'-6-Fam-CAA AAT ACT GCG TNC CNC CNG G-3' for BV16BJ2S3, and 5'-6-Fam-CGA AGT ACT GAA TNC CNC CNG G-3' for BV16BJ2S4.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GLC/A2-reactive T cell lines were generated following
immunomagnetic sorting of specific T cells using streptavidin-coated
beads coated with biotinylated recombinant HLA-A2/GLC complexes. Sorted
cells were then expanded using polyclonal stimulators before
specificity and repertoire analyses. The Ag specificity of T cell lines
was documented first by flow cytometry using fluorescent HLA-A2
tetramers bound to relevant or irrelevant peptides (see representative
staining profiles of unsorted vs GLC/A2-sorted lines from two donors in
Fig. 1
A). T cell line
specificity was then confirmed by analyzing their cytotoxic activity
and CD25 up-regulation after short term incubation with HLA-A2 target
cells loaded with the relevant peptide (Fig. 1
B and data not
shown).
|
Detection by flow cytometry of several recurrent TCR Vß subsets within GLC/A2-reactive T cells derived from healthy and RA individuals
TCR Vß expression by GLC-A2+ T cells was
studied by flow cytometry using a panel of 23 Vß-specific mAb. As
shown in Table I
, the frequency of T
cells recognized by a given Vß-specific Ab greatly varied from one
cell line to another. For instance, while the majority of
GLC/A2-reactive T cells derived from donors RA1 and RA14 were stained
by the Vß4-specific mAb, a large fraction of cells from, e.g., donors
RA4, PBL2, RA15, RA3, and PBL6 reacted with the Vß1-, Vß2-,
Vß12-, Vß14-, and Vß16-specific mAb, respectively (Table I
).
Despite this heterogeneity, there was a significant skewing of the TCR
repertoire in favor of few highly recurrent Vß subsets in most cell
lines regardless of their donor origin and physiopathologic context. In
particular, Vß1+, -2+,
-4+, -16+, and
-22+ subsets were each found in at least
one-third of the GLC/A2+ T cell lines and
together accounted for at least 70% of the cells in 10 of 14
lines.
|
V(D)J composition and junctional features of TCR ß-chains
expressed by GLC/A2+ T cells were further studied
by the Immunoscope approach in four PBL- and seven SL-derived T cell
lines. This technique, which consists of amplifying TCR transcripts
with appropriate pairs of BVBC or BVBJ primers followed by a run-off
labeling of the amplified products with fluorescent internal primers,
permits global analysis of BVBJ region usage and distribution of TCRB
junctional length within complex mixtures of T cells (28, 36, 37, 38). In agreement with flow cytometric analysis, junctional
transcripts were frequently amplified from
GLC/A2+ T cell lines using BV1-, BV2-, BV4-,
BV16-, and BV22-specific primers (Fig. 2
). TCRBV transcripts were recurrently
amplified in several cell lines using other BV primers specific for,
e.g., BV3, BV9, BV13A, and BV23, but their frequency remained <1% in
most cases, as suggested by semiquantitative PCR estimations (data not
shown).
|
|
The TCR ß-chain junctional features of the GLC/A2-reactive TCR
Vß subsets with conserved CDR3 length were analyzed in more detail by
semiquantitative BVBJ Immunoscope analyses (in the case of the
Vß2+ and Vß4+ subsets)
and by extensive sequencing of TCRB junctional transcripts (in the case
of Vß2+, Vß4+,
Vß16+, and Vß22+
subsets). As shown in Fig. 4
, BJ usage
was highly restricted within both the Vß2+ and
Vß4+ GLC/A2-reactive T cells. In almost all
donors the 8-aa-long BV2 junctional transcripts comprised either the
BJ1S2 or the highly related BJ1S3 element. Likewise, the dominant
9-aa-long BV4 transcripts comprised almost exclusively the BJ1S4
element. Sequence analysis of BV2 and BV4 transcripts amplified with
primers specific to the recurrent BJ elements demonstrated extensive
conservation of the CDR3 junctional sequences in most donors. For
instance, the 8-aa-long BV2BJ1S3 transcripts, which were by far the
predominant ones in several donors (i.e., RA3, RA5, RA11, and RA15; see
Fig. 4
), showed full amino acid sequence conservation at all but one
CDR3 position (Table II
). The same held
true for BV2BJ1S2 transcripts (Table II
), which predominated in donors
RA1, PBL1, and PBL2 (Fig. 4
). More sequence variability was observed
within BV4BJ1S4 transcripts, although identical CDR3 sequences were
isolated from several individuals (i.e., RA1, RA5, RA11, RA14, and
PBL1; Table III
).
|
|
|
|
|
The above results indicated that T cell clonotypes bearing public
TCR Vß2, Vß4, and Vß16 chains (i.e., showing extensive CDR3
sequence homology in distinct individuals) significantly contributed to
the response against the GLC/A2 Ag. To assess the extent of TCR
structural conservation within these public T cell subsets, we then
analyzed TCRA chain transcripts derived from
Vß2+, Vß4+, and
Vß16+ T cells obtained from several
GLC/A2+ cell lines. Strikingly, sequencing of
TCRA transcripts derived from T cell clones expressing Vß2, Vß4,
and Vß16 TCR chains with the consensus junctional motifs described in
Tables II
, III
, and IV
revealed predominant usage of the AV15
region by all T cell clones regardless of the BV region used (Table VI
). Accordingly, AV15 transcripts were
amplified from all GLC/A2+ T cell lines sorted
with Vß2-, Vß4-, and Vß16-specific mAbs (Fig. 3
). AV15
transcripts showed a highly conserved CDR3 length within a given Vß
subset, which differed from one Vß subset to another (Fig. 3
).
Despite CDR3 length restriction, AV15 transcripts derived from Vß2
and Vß4 subsets showed significant junctional diversity in terms of
both AJ usage and CDR3 sequence (Tables II
and III
). By contrast,
Vß16 populations derived from three of four
GLC/A2+ cell lines studied (RA2, RA4, and PBL3)
expressed AV15 TCR chains with identical CDR3 sequence (Table IV
). None
of the clones bearing other Vß regions (i.e., Vß1, Vß14, and
Vß22 from donors RA5 and PB1) expressed AV15 transcripts, thus
strongly suggesting that expression of this particular V
region was
mainly restricted to the Vß2, Vß4, and Vß16 subsets.
Interestingly, most (four of five) of these V
15-negative clones used
the same V
region (AV2S3) despite expression of highly heterogeneous
Vß regions, thus suggesting here again a hierarchical contribution of
V
vs Vß regions to recognition of the GLC/A2 complex.
|
The existence of a significant fraction of T cells with highly
conserved CDR3 sequences in most GLC/A2-sorted T cell lines
should lead to TCR repertoire alterations readily detectable within
unsorted PBL using appropriate clonotypic primers. To test this, we
synthesized primers specific for three consensus junctional sequences
that predominated in GLC/A2+ cell lines derived
from PBL1 (BV16BJ2S4), PBL2 (BV2BJ1S2), and PBL3 (BV16BJ2S3; see Tables II
and IV
). We then performed successive nested PCR amplifications
on total PBL or control thymus samples using firstly BV and
BC primers, secondly BV and internal BJ primers, and thirdly BV and
clonotypic primers. As shown in Fig. 5
, peaks with the expected size were amplified using the relevant
clonotypic primers in the three PBL samples studied, but were absent in
the control sample. In parallel, we could directly estimate the
frequency of the corresponding clonotypes by multiplying the percentage
of GLC/A2+ T cells assessed by flow cytometry
using the relevant fluorescent HLA/peptide tetrameric complexes (data
not shown) by the frequency of T cells bearing the appropriate
junctional sequence within GLC/A2+ T cells
deduced from flow cytometry and junctional sequence analyses of
GLC/A2-sorted T cells (Tables I
, II
, and IV
and Fig. 4
). While the
frequency of these clonotypes was
5 x
10-4 in two-thirds of the samples studied, it
was in the range of 10-5 or less in one sample
(PBL3), thus demonstrating the high sensitivity of the present approach
for detecting TCR repertoire biases associated with responses to
dominant peripheral Ags.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and CDR2
(derived from the TCR AV15 gene segment) seemed to
be shared by the largest fraction of reactive T cells, restriction of
CDR1ß and CDR2ß usage was also obvious, although less pronounced,
with seven Vß covering most of the GLC/A2 repertoire. Finally within
several recurrent Vß subsets (Vß2, -4, -16, and -22) we identified
conserved junctional motifs on either the CDR3ß and/or the CDR3
loops. The extent of CDR3 homology greatly varied from one subset to
another, ranging from the presence of a conserved amino acid at a
single position on the CDR3 loop (e.g., Gly at
Cys+6 within BV22 sequences; Table V
and/or -ß sequences. Interestingly,
clonotypes expressing strictly identical TCR were identified in several
cell lines (see, e.g., the BV4AV15 sequences from RA1, RA11 and RA5,
RA14 donors (Table IIIGiven the rather frequent occurrence of these public clonotypes within GLC/A2-reactive cells, these results raise the possibility that cells with similarly conserved features will be found in other antigenic responses. How, then, could we reconcile this assumption with the relatively seldom occurrence of public clonotypes suggested by previous analyses of Ag-specific T cells in many other models (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)? A possible explanation may rely on differences between the Ag selection conditions of the T cell populations studied. The extent of TCR repertoire restriction within Ag-selected T cells may be greatly affected by the avidity of the TCR/MHC/peptide interactions (which depends itself on the number of MHC/peptide complexes displayed by the presenting cell and the affinity of the TCR for these ligands). In particular, several groups have shown a more pronounced TCR repertoire restriction within cells stimulated at low Ag density and/or subjected to several rounds of antigenic stimulation, which should favor in both cases preferential expansion of subsets showing the highest affinity for the selecting Ag (40, 41, 42). In this regard, since EBV has been shown to be frequently reactivated through the lifetime of the individual (29), it is likely that GLC/A2-reactive cells, which were derived in most cases from old donors, have been chronically exposed to their Ag. Such a chronic stimulation could then explain the relatively common occurrence of public clonotypes within cells reactive against this particular Ag. Along this line, clonotypes with similarly highly conserved TCR features were previously identified in another EBV-specific T cell response (15). However, the chronic nature of the antigenic stimulus cannot alone explain the common occurrence of T cell with recurrent TCR features, as suggested by a recent study identifying public T cell clonotypes even during the acute phase of the GLC/A2-specific T cell response.4
These observations naturally raise several questions about the nature
of the combinatorial and/or selective constraints that could favor the
expansion of clonotypes with public TCR features. Comparison of the
nucleotide sequences of TCR rearrangements coding for identical TCR
chains in distinct individuals indicated rather limited "N"
additions within most public V(D)J junctions (Table VII
). In particular, several public BV4,
BV16, and AV15 transcripts comprised VD, DJ, or VJ joints devoid of
nongermline nucleotides; among them, one BV4BD2BJ1S4 transcript shared
by three donors was totally devoid of N nucleotides at both VD and DJ
joints, and one AV15S1AJ37 joint shared by two donors was generated by
so-called homologous region guided recombination (43)
(Table VII
). Therefore, enzymatic constraints linked to the
recombination machinery may favor the generation of some public
rearrangements before Ag exposure, as suggested by several previous
studies (12, 13, 14, 15). However, several public sequences also
comprised highly conserved residues that were mainly N encoded; this
was typically the case for public BV16 sequences, which showed highly
diverse nucleotide sequences due to extensive N addition at the VD
joints despite full conservation of their amino acid sequence (Table VII
). Hence, this indicates the occurrence of an Ag-driven selection of
these public sequences, either intrathymically in the course of
positive selection of the naive T cell repertoire or in the periphery,
following exposure to one or several related environmental Ags. In this
regard it has been previously proposed that public clonotypes might
correspond to T cells that have been selected by self-MHC peptides
highly related to the selecting peripheral Ags (44).
According to this hypothesis, which is consistent with recent evidence
for a key role played by self peptides in the positive selection
process (21, 22, 23, 24), it is assumed that the public clonotypes
will correspond to subsets establishing tight interactions with the
selecting peptide, thus limiting the peptide degeneracy of the positive
selection process. Another nonexclusive possibility is that the extent
of TCR repertoire restriction of T cells reactive against a given Ag
may be affected by peripheral selection driven by related peripheral
Ags, and thus may depend on the immunological history of each
individual (45). Either hypothesis could explain the
occurrence of specific junctional motifs that were highly recurrent
within BV22 sequences derived from donor PBL1, but were absent in other
individuals (Table V
).
|
region by several GLC/A2-reactive T cells that expressed TCR ß-chains
with rather weak CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3 homology (i.e., V
15 by Vß2
or Vß4 vs Vß16 subsets and V
2.3 by Vß1, Vß2, Vß14, and
Vß22 subsets; Table VI
dominance within I-E/Cytc-reactive
murine T cells (9, 10, 41) and with a recent analysis of
the GLC/A2-specific T cell repertoire, which showed the use of a much
more restricted set of V
than Vß regions by reactive T cell
clones.4 Whether this observation can be
generalized to other systems is unclear. Both the limited number of
available V
-specific mAb and the lack of genotypic allelic exclusion
of TCRA gene rearrangements have hampered detailed analysis of the
TCR
repertoire by classical flow cytometric and molecular
approaches. It is therefore possible that V
dominance may have been
missed in many systems because of these mere technical limitations. On
a structural basis, the dominant V
usage by
GLC/A2+ T cells would be fully consistent with
data drawn from recent crystallographic studies of several
TCR/MHC/peptide complexes suggesting greater contribution of CDR
that CDRß in contacting the MHC/peptide (7, 8). Another aim of the present study was to compare the TCR repertoire of EBV-reactive T cells expanded in an immunopathologic situation (in the present case, in patients with RA) to that of cells directed against the same viral epitope but derived from healthy donors. There is still a controversy regarding the physiopathologic significance of the dramatic enrichment for EBV-reactive T cells found within inflamed joints of most RA patients (26, 28). The strong similarities between the TCR repertoire of RA-derived synovial lymphocytes and PBL from healthy donors suggest that the massive infiltration of inflamed joints by EBV-reactive T cells is an epiphenomenon linked to the inflammatory process rather than the consequence of a local expansion of T cells cross-reacting with joint-derived Ags. Such a hypothesis, which was recently corroborated by an analysis of EBV reactivity of cells infiltrating inflammatory lesions with or without autoimmune features (28, 46), would rule out a primary etiological role for EBV-specific T cells in RA. However, given the high frequency of cells with such a reactivity (46) and the presence of the EBV genome within joint tissues of most RA patients (47), EBV-reactive cells may still contribute to perpetuation of joint erosion through local release of proinflammatory cytokines upon recognition of EBV+ targets.
The frequent expansion of T cell clonotypes with public TCR features
during antigenic responses could have important implications in both
immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy. In the former case, identification
of a large number of public junctional motifs selected by defined Ags
may permit a direct molecular follow-up of T cell responses from DNA or
RNA samples, with no need for in vitro T cell manipulation and
functional studies. This is illustrated by the Immunoscope analysis
performed on PBL cDNA using primers specific for public clonotypic
junctions, which allowed detection of public GLC/A2-reactive cells at
frequencies as low as 10-5 (Fig. 5
). It is
likely that with the development of more sensitive molecular techniques
permitting screening of a large number of DNA sequences (e.g., through
DNA chips), such an approach could be applied for routine detection of
T cell responses directed against a broad set of common infectious or
tumor Ags. On an immunotherapeutic point of view, the frequent
occurrence of T cell subsets bearing recurrent V
/Vß combinations
should allow selective expansion or depletion of cells with
respectively protective or pathogenic properties.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Marc Bonneville, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 463, Institut de Biologie, 9 quai Moncousu, 44035 Nantes Cedex 01, France. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CDR, complementarity-determining region; SFL, synovial fluid lymphocytes; RA, rheumatoid arthritis. ![]()
4 N. E. Annels, M. F. C. Callan, L. Tan, and A. B. Rickinson. Changing patterns of dominant T cell receptor usage with maturation of an Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cell response. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication February 17, 2000. Accepted for publication May 30, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß receptor. EMBO J. 7:3745.[Medline]
ß T cell receptor at 2.5 A and its orientation in the TCR-MHC complex. Science 274:209.
gene segment in mouse T cell receptors for cytochrome C. Nature 324:679.[Medline]
and ß chains of the human T cell antigen receptor recognizing HLA-A2 and influenza A matrix peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8987.
and ß chains determine T cell specificity for myoglobin peptides. J. Exp. Med. 172:27.
-repressor: identification of residues critical for antigen recognition. J. Immunol. 144:4851.[Abstract]
/
receptor in a patient with a large granular lymphocyte disorder. Blood 74:285.
T cell subset. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:804.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Venturi, H. Y. Chin, T. E. Asher, K. Ladell, P. Scheinberg, E. Bornstein, D. van Bockel, A. D. Kelleher, D. C. Douek, D. A. Price, et al. TCR {beta}-Chain Sharing in Human CD8+ T Cell Responses to Cytomegalovirus and EBV J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7853 - 7862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Venturi, H. Y. Chin, D. A. Price, D. C. Douek, and M. P. Davenport The Role of Production Frequency in the Sharing of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ TCRs between Macaques J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2597 - 2609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Venturi, K. Kedzierska, D. A. Price, P. C. Doherty, D. C. Douek, S. J. Turner, and M. P. Davenport Sharing of T cell receptors in antigen-specific responses is driven by convergent recombination PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18691 - 18696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Speiser, P. Baumgaertner, C. Barbey, V. Rubio-Godoy, A. Moulin, P. Corthesy, E. Devevre, P.-Y. Dietrich, D. Rimoldi, D. Lienard, et al. A Novel Approach to Characterize Clonality and Differentiation of Human Melanoma-Specific T Cell Responses: Spontaneous Priming and Efficient Boosting by Vaccination J. Immunol., July 15, 2006; 177(2): 1338 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schaft, B. Lankiewicz, J. Drexhage, C. Berrevoets, D. J. Moss, V. Levitsky, M. Bonneville, S. P. Lee, A. J. McMichael, J.-W. Gratama, et al. T cell re-targeting to EBV antigens following TCR gene transfer: CD28-containing receptors mediate enhanced antigen-specific IFN{gamma} production Int. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 18(4): 591 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Price, J. M. Brenchley, L. E. Ruff, M. R. Betts, B. J. Hill, M. Roederer, R. A. Koup, S. A. Migueles, E. Gostick, L. Wooldridge, et al. Avidity for antigen shapes clonal dominance in CD8+ T cell populations specific for persistent DNA viruses J. Exp. Med., November 21, 2005; 202(10): 1349 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Trautmann, M. Rimbert, K. Echasserieau, X. Saulquin, B. Neveu, J. Dechanet, V. Cerundolo, and M. Bonneville Selection of T Cell Clones Expressing High-Affinity Public TCRs within Human Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD8 T Cell Responses J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 6123 - 6132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Miles, D. Elhassen, N. A. Borg, S. L. Silins, F. E. Tynan, J. M. Burrows, A. W. Purcell, |