The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelfrey, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pelfrey, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, P. V.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 1641-1651.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Quantification of Self-Recognition in Multiple Sclerosis by Single-Cell Analysis of Cytokine Production1

Clara M. Pelfrey2,*, Richard A. Rudick*,{dagger}, Anne C. Cotleur*, Jar-Chi Lee{ddagger}, Magdalena Tary-Lehmann§ and Paul V. Lehmann§

* Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, {dagger} Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research, and {ddagger} Department of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195; and § Institute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Identifying and quantifying autoaggressive responses in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been difficult in the past due to the low frequency of autoantigen-specific T cells, the high number of putative determinants on the autoantigens, and the different cytokine signatures of the autoreactive T cells. We used single-cell resolution enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays to study, directly ex vivo, proteolipid protein (PLP)-specific memory cell reactivity from MS patients and controls. Overlapping 9-aa-long peptides, spanning the entire PLP molecule in single amino acid steps, were used to determine the frequency and fine specificity of PLP-specific lymphocytes as measured by their IFN-{gamma} and IL-5 production. MS patients (n = 22) responded to 4 times as many PLP peptides as did healthy controls (n = 22). The epitopes recognized in individual patients, up to 22 peptides, were scattered throughout the PLP molecule, showing considerable heterogeneity among MS patients. Frequency measurements showed that the number of PLP peptide-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells averaged 11 times higher in MS patients than in controls. PLP peptide-induced IL-5-producing T cells occurred in very low frequencies in both MS patients and controls. This first comprehensive assessment of the anti-PLP-Th1/Th2 response in MS shows a greatly increased Th1 effector cell mass in MS patients. Moreover, the highly IFN-{gamma}-polarized, IL-5-negative cytokine profile of the PLP-reactive T cells suggests that these cells are committed Th1 cells. The essential absence of uncommitted Th0 cells producing both cytokines may explain why therapeutic strategies that aim at the induction of immune deviation show little efficacy in the established disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Multiple sclerosis (MS)3 is a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS postulated to be a T cell-mediated autoimmune disease (1). Many studies have shown correlations between disease progression in MS and the Th1 cytokines IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-12 (reviewed in Ref. 2). Proinflammatory cytokines are thought to be crucial for the initiation and amplification of inflammatory brain lesions and direct myelin damage in MS (3, 4, 5). The role of Th2-like cytokines in MS is less clear. Regulatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 may play a role in the resolution of relapses (2), but in some situations they are associated with exacerbation of autoimmune disease (6). It is likely that both inflammatory and regulatory processes occur simultaneously in MS. This may explain why proinflammatory and regulatory cytokines are often up-regulated simultaneously in MS (7, 8, 9).

Although the pathogenesis of MS is thought to involve autoreactivity directed against myelin Ags, such as MBP and PLP, the poor aqueous solubility and strong hydrophobicity of PLP have impeded studies with this molecule. Using intact PLP as an Ag, proliferation assays have not shown convincing or consistent responses in PBMC or cerebral spinal fluid of MS patients (10, 11). Even the detection of vaccine Ag-specific memory cells in immunized individuals is frequently a technical challenge due to the very low frequency of cells. New technological developments that are permitting better insights are the use of MHC tetramers and a new generation of computer-assisted ELISPOT assay optimized for single-cell resolution. Although highly sensitive, comprehensive tetramer analysis requires knowing both the Ag and the MHC restriction element and does not lend itself to systematic testing of peptide libraries. With increasing evidence for diverse autoimmune repertoires in MS resulting from determinant spreading (12, 13), such studies might be required for comprehensive assessment of the autoimmune T cell repertoire. An alternative method is by a pepscan approach in conjunction with ELISPOT analysis. The ELISPOT assay can be performed without knowing the MHC restriction element and is ideally suited for comprehensive peptide mapping and determinations of very low frequency Ag-specific T cells (range of 1:10,000 to 1:1,000,000) that are undetectable by other cytokine detection methods, such as intracytoplasmic staining (14). We reasoned that with the extensive MHC heterogeneity in humans, a comprehensive study is required in which all possible determinants are examined regardless of whether the peptide is dominant or cryptic following natural processing. To accomplish this goal, we used a PLP peptide library consisting of single-amino acid overlapping 9-mer peptides. Peptides of this length can bind directly on the cell surface to MHC class I and class II molecules of APC where they can stimulate peptide specific T cells. This systematic approach should reveal the total PLP-specific T cell pool, its fine specificity, and the overall clonal sizes of the PLP peptide reactive repertoire.

The ELISPOT assay demonstrates very high sensitivity and specificity (14) and has been used for detection of anti-PLP responses in mononuclear cells from cerebral spinal fluid and blood of MS patients (15, 16). Findings from studies using a select number of synthetic PLP peptide Ags in proliferation assays indicate that T cell responses to a heterogeneous array of PLP determinants occur in MS patients (12, 13, 17, 18). Similarly, longitudinal analysis of selected PLP peptide responses in MS suggest that chronic immune sensitization to myelin determinants leads to acquired immunity to new self-Ags, known as determinant spreading (12, 13, 19, 20). Whereas previous studies focused on the response to whole PLP, using only IFN-{gamma} as a readout (15, 16), we have examined reactivity using peptides spanning the entire PLP molecule and we have expanded our analysis to include both type 1 and type 2 cytokines.

In MS and EAE, the autoimmune disease state has been associated with enhanced Th1 responses to self. Controversy still exists over the degree of Th1 polarization in autoimmune disease as well as the contribution of Th2 or Th0 responses to pathogenesis. To fully understand the diversity of the autoimmune response, however, a systematic study covering all possible determinants on the molecule is still missing. The delineation of PLP-reactive memory cells as proinflammatory Th1 or anti-inflammatory Th2 is essential to the understanding of the role these cells play in the autoimmune process. We sought to provide this missing information at single-cell resolution, performing ELISPOT assays for the detection of PLP peptide-reactive memory cells that produce the Th1 cytokine IFN-{gamma} and the Th2 cytokine IL-5.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ELISPOT protocol

The ELISPOT protocol used in this study was developed in our laboratory (21, 22). ELISPOT plates (UNIFILTER, low volume catalogue no. 7770-0052, Whatman, Clifton, NJ) were precoated with cytokine capture Abs (specified below) in PBS (50 µl/well) and placed at 4°C overnight. Study subject PBMC were isolated from heparinized blood by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, washed three times, and set up in a preactivation culture with PLP peptides in 96-well V-bottom tissue culture plates (Costar, Corning, NY) at 1.5 x 105 cells/well in 200 µl of complete medium. PLP peptides were added to the wells at a final concentration of 7 µM. The cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a 7% CO2 incubator. Ab-coated ELISPOT plates were washed three times with 100 µl/well sterile PBS. Plates were blocked to prevent nonspecific binding of proteins using 100 µl/well sterile PBS containing 1% BSA (fraction V) for 2 h at room temperature and then washed again three times with 100 µl/well sterile PBS. Cells from the preactivation cultures were carefully resuspended, and half the cells (100 µl, 7.5 x 104 cells) were transferred to ELISPOT plates that were precoated with IFN-{gamma} capture Ab; the remaining cells were transferred to plates coated with IL-5 capture Ab. The cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 7% CO2. Cells were then washed away using three washes with 100 µl/well PBS followed by three washes with 100 µl/well PBS/0.05% Tween. Secondary biotinylated anti-cytokine Ab was diluted in PBS/0.05% Tween/1% BSA, added at 50 µl/well, and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were then washed three times with 100 µl/well PBS/Tween, and a 1/2000 dilution of streptavidin-HRP in PBS/Tween/BSA was added at 100 µl/well for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were washed three times in 100 µl/well PBS, and spot color was developed by adding 100 µl/well AEC substrate diluted 1/30 in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) containing a 1/2000 dilution of 30% H2O2. Plates were observed for spot development for a maximum of 1 h at room temperature and then were washed three times with dH2O (200 µl/well) to stop the reaction. Plates were dried overnight at room temperature, images of the wells were acquired and saved on compact disc using an automated ImmunoSpot Series 1, and the spots were enumerated on an ImmunoSpot Satellite analyzer (Cellular Technology Ltd., Cleveland, OH) using software specifically designed for the ELISPOT assay. Briefly, digitized images were analyzed for the presence of areas in which color density exceeds background by a factor calculated from comparing control wells to experimental wells. After separating spots that touch or partially overlap, additional criteria of spot size and circularity were applied to gate out noise caused by spontaneous substrate precipitation and nonspecific Ab binding. Objects that did not meet these criteria were ignored, and areas that met them were recognized as spots, counted, and highlighted. Positive responses were defined as two or more adjacent peptide-stimulated wells giving responses greater than the mean ± 3 SD of unstimulated wells.

Abs and reagents

Primary or capture Abs were anti-IFN-{gamma} (M-700A, Endogen, Cambridge, MA) at a concentration of 4 µg/ml or anti-IL-5 (18551D, PharMingen, San Diego, CA) at a concentration of 5 µg/ml. Secondary or detecting Abs were anti-IFN-{gamma} (M-701, Endogen; biotinylated according to the manufacturer’s directions) at a concentration of 4 µg/ml or anti-IL-5 (18522D, PharMingen) at a concentration of 1 µg/ml. We purchased streptavidin-HRP from Dako (D0397, Carpenteria, CA) and 30% H2O2 from Sigma (H-1009, St. Louis, MO). The AEC substrate (A-5754, Sigma) stock solution was prepared with 100 mg of AEC in 10 ml of dimethylformamide (Sigma), then diluted 1/30 in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0). The AEC/acetate buffer solution was filtered through a 0.45-µm pore size filter before use to remove colored precipitates. Tween-20 (polyoxyetylene 20-sorbitan monolaurate) was purchased from Fisher (BP337–100, Pittsburgh, PA). BSA (fraction V) was obtained from Sigma (A-1933). Ficoll-Paque plus was purchased from Pharmacia (M-1440-03, Piscataway, NJ). Complete medium consisted of RPMI 1640, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10% newborn bovine serum (all from Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD).

Study subjects

Patients at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation were invited to participate in this study. Healthy controls consisted of volunteer researchers from both Case Western Reserve University and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Research subjects signed an institutional review board-approved informed consent document to donate blood for this study. Patients (n = 22) were categorized as relapsing-remitting (n = 9), secondary progressive (n = 8), or primary progressive (n = 5). Patients had not received steroid treatment for a period of at least 3 mo before blood drawing. Some patients were using IFN-ß or glatiramer acetate as therapy. Patient and control groups were equally divided between males and females. Up to 40 ml of blood was obtained from study subjects by phlebotomy.

Peptides and Ags

Systematic mapping of determinants involving hundreds of peptides was performed as previously described (23, 24). The PLP peptides were synthesized in a fully automated fashion using the pin method and have >96% purity; they were obtained from Chiron Mimetopes (San Diego, CA). Nine-amino acid-long PLP peptides that span the PLP molecule in single amino acid steps were used to stimulate PBMC at a final concentration of 7 µM, which is optimal for pulsing of APC (23, 24). Because the MHC class I groove is closed on both ends (25), we chose to use nonamer peptides, which can bind extracellularly to class I molecules, in addition to class II molecules, bypassing intracellular processing (26). Although class II molecules preferentially bind longer peptides, nonamer peptides are also capable of binding MHC class II molecules and stimulating CD4 T cells (22, 24). Recall Ags consisted of tetanus toxoid (1/20 dilution), diphtheria toxoid (100 µg/ml), both from Connaught Laboratories (Swiftwater, PA) as well as Candida albicans extract (1/20 dilution; Bayer, Spokane, WA). As a positive control we used the mitogen PHA (PHA-P; 2.5 µg/ml for IFN-{gamma} assays and 10 µg/ml for IL-5 assays; Sigma). We also tested purified human MBP (10 and 100 µg/ml; provided by Dr. Henry McFarland, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) as well as an MBP-PLP fusion protein known as MP4, which consists of the 21.5-kDa isoform of MBP fused to a genetically engineered form of PLP ({Delta}PLP4) containing the four major hydrophilic regions of the PLP molecule (10 and 100 µg/ml; provided by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT) (27).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed in collaboration with the Cleveland Clinic Biostatistics Department. Analysis of the number and magnitude of the PLP peptide response was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, comparing MS patients to healthy controls. Age was compared between the study groups using Student’s t test. The average age for MS patients in the study was significantly older than that in the controls, so we performed an analysis of covariance with rank data to adjust for possible age effects in the group comparisons. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant, and all tests were two-sided. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT assays demonstrate a significantly elevated number of stimulatory PLP peptides and a highly increased frequency of PLP-peptide reactive cells in MS patients compared with controls

We tested PBL obtained from 22 MS patients and 22 healthy controls for PLP-peptide-induced production of IFN-{gamma} and IL-5 in ex vivo ELISPOT assays. The mean age of MS patients was 49 ± 9 years (age range, 32–70 years), and the mean age of controls was 40 ± 11 years (range, 24–67 years). The average Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) of MS patients was 5.0 ± 2.4, with a range from 1 to 8.5. Mean disease duration was 12 ± 7 years (range, 2–30 years; Table IGo). The peptides used spanned the entire PLP sequence in steps of single amino acids, as illustrated in Fig. 1GoA. IFN-{gamma} and IL-5 ELISPOT measurements were selected because in our previous work (14) we showed, first, that such ELISPOT assays detect Ag-specific memory T cells (naive T cells do not produce these cytokines, and recall responses are not detected in unsensitized individuals); and second, they measure the true frequency of Ag-specific T cells in the low frequency range in the absence of bystander reactions. We selected IL-5 over IL-4 and IL-10 for measurement of Th2 memory/effector cells because IL-5 production is confined to T cells, while IL-4 and IL-10 can be produced by APC, and subsequently can give high backgrounds and bystander activity (M. Tary-Lehmann, unpublished observations).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Study subject characteristics

 


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Determinant mapping of PLP with 9-aa-long overlapping peptides using the ELISPOT assay. A, Schematic representation of determinant mapping with overlapping peptides. The amino acid sequence of the protein (PLP) is shown on the top. The 9-mer peptides progress along the molecule 1 aa at a time. Thereby, all conceivable determinants are used for class I or class II binding, and any peptides that bind can activate T cells. Therefore, the complete in vivo primed T cell repertoire specific for an Ag can be assessed. B, IFN-{gamma} response to multiple adjacent PLP peptides in patient MS17. Each bar represents the number of spots (i.e., IFN-{gamma}-positive cells) obtained per PLP peptide-stimulated well. Numbers at the top of each bar are stimulation indexes above the medium control value. The horizontal line represents the mean ± 3 SD of the medium control well to demonstrate which wells gave significant responses (marked with asterisks). Thus, three adjacent PLP peptides constitute this positive epitope: PLP43–51, PLP44–52, and PLP45–53. C, Close-up view of individual ELISPOT wells from the analysis in B. The medium well is shown on the left, and the highest IFN-{gamma}-positive well, PLP45–53, is on the right.

 
A representative example of an IFN-{gamma}-positive response, involving three adjacent PLP peptides, is shown in Fig. 1GoB. The positive PLP 9-mer peptides demonstrated stimulation indexes above the medium control value of 3.9, 10.6, and 17.6, respectively. Examples of the actual ELISPOT wells from the medium control and the highest stimulating peptide are shown (Fig. 1GoC).

Table IIGo shows comparisons of PLP 9-mer peptide-induced responses for each individual MS patient and healthy control. For IFN-{gamma} responses, 13 of the 22 MS patients (59%) responded to PLP peptide clusters consisting of minimally two adjacent peptides. In these patients the number of positive determinants varied between two and 22, with seven of the patients responding to >10 determinants. In contrast, eight of the 22 controls (36%) showed IFN-{gamma} responses to PLP determinants. Of these, five responded to only two determinants, and another three healthy donors responded to six to nine peptide clusters. Thus, many more MS patients responded to PLP than controls, and MS patients reacted to a significantly higher number of determinants (Tables II and III).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Comparison of PLP 9-mer-induced responses for each individual MS patient and control

 
To assess the magnitude of the PLP peptide-specific response in MS patients and controls, regardless of what determinant they responded to, we calculated the cumulative number of spot-forming units (e.g., cytokine-secreting cells) for all positive peptides. Control donors showed total spot numbers not exceeding 150 PLP peptide-induced IFN-{gamma} spots, and only two donors exhibited >100 total spots (Table IIGo). In contrast, the maximal cumulative spot number reached in a single MS patients was 2110, and seven of the patients generated >100 spots. The overall frequency of PLP peptide-specific T cells, therefore, was very strongly increased in MS patients.

A summary of the combined group data comparing MS patients to controls is shown in Table IIIGo. The total number of IFN-{gamma}-positive PLP peptides was >4 times higher in MS patients than in healthy controls. MS patients showed a significantly higher mean number of IFN-{gamma}-positive PLP peptides compared with controls (6.5 ± 1.7 vs 1.5 ± 0.6; p = 0.022). The magnitude of the IFN-{gamma} response (i.e., the average number of single-cell spots in each peptide-stimulated well) was >11 times higher in MS patients than in controls (MS mean, 232.0 ± 105.3; control mean, 21.8 ± 9.7). Because the number of spots was extremely variable from one person to another, with one patient having a total of 2110 IFN-{gamma}-positive cells and another having none, the magnitude of the IFN-{gamma} response approached, but did not reach, significance (p = 0.06). Age-adjusted results indicate similar findings.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Comparison of combined PLP 9-mer peptide-induced responses between MS patients and healthy controls

 
Compared with IFN-{gamma}, PLP peptide-induced IL-5-secreting cells occurred in very low frequencies. Although the total number of IL-5-positive peptides and the magnitude of the IL-5 response were both >3 times higher in MS patients than in controls, the comparison of individual mean values showed that neither category was significantly different between MS patients and healthy controls (p = 0.58 and 0.52, respectively; Table IIIGo). Thus, after stimulation with PLP peptides, only IFN-{gamma}, and not IL-5, responses showed a significant increase in MS patients, but not in controls.

MS patients responded to many more PLP epitopes and they do not demonstrate a skewed response to a limited set of peptides compared with healthy controls

We wanted to examine which regions of the PLP molecule gave positive responses and to compare those epitopes between MS patients and controls to see whether there were regions unique to either group or if there were "hot spots" within PLP. To facilitate this comparison, the sum of IFN-{gamma}-positive cells for all MS patients and controls is plotted in Fig. 2Go. There were many more epitopes of PLP recognized uniquely by MS patients. The recognition spanned the entire PLP molecule from N-terminus to C-terminus in an extremely heterogeneous pattern. Healthy controls did not demonstrate recognition of unique PLP determinants, because virtually every PLP epitope recognized by a control was also recognized by one or more MS patients. Fig. 3Go shows a similar histogram of the sum of IL-5-positive cells for MS patients and controls. There are many fewer PLP determinants that elicited any IL-5 response in either group. The magnitude of the IL-5 responses was extremely low compared with that of IFN-{gamma} and generally did not show common epitopes between MS patients and controls.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Comparison of IFN-{gamma}-positive PLP peptide responses between MS patients and controls. IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells for each positive PLP peptide (defined in Materials and Methods) were counted for each MS patient (n = 22) and control subject (n = 22) and then combined to get a sum of IFN-{gamma}-positive cells for every peptide. PLP nonamers are numbered by the first amino acid in each peptide.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Comparison of IL-5-positive PLP peptide responses between MS patients and controls. IL-5-secreting cells for each positive PLP peptide were counted for each MS patient (n = 17) and control subject (n = 11) and then combined to get a sum of IL-5-positive cells for every peptide. PLP nonamers are numbered by the first amino acid in each peptide.

 
Fine specificity of the anti-PLP response shows highly diverse determinant recognition patterns for individual MS patients with minimal determinant overlap

Next, we studied the exact determinant regions recognized by the PLP-specific T cells, because this information pertains to therapeutic strategies designed to selectively inactivate autoreactive T cells, and it is relevant for selecting the "right peptide(s)" for tetramer-based immunodiagnostic approaches. Figs. 4Go and 5 show the localization of the PLP determinants targeted in the individual MS patients and controls. The plots are lined up vertically to allow a more detailed comparison of common or unique PLP determinants between MS patients and controls. The data show that the stimulatory peptides were scattered over the entire PLP molecule, and the patterns of peptide recognition were highly unique for the individual patients. Overall, the IFN-{gamma} responses (Fig. 4Go) were not skewed to any set of peptides, but two regions appeared to be partially shared: PLP133–152 (five patients reacted) and PLP161–178 (seven patients reacted). Most other shared determinants were observed in no more than four patients at a time. This diversity of determinant recognition is consistent with the multitude of different allelic MHC molecules expressed in the patients, each having different peptide binding motifs. With regard to determinant recognition (either the numbers of determinants or the magnitude of the response), we did not observe any correlation with disease state, amount of disability (EDSS), or disease duration.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. IFN-{gamma}-positive PLP peptide responses by individual. Each horizontal line represents the responses of one individual within the PLP sequence (shown across the x-axis). Each positive 9-mer peptide is plotted with a diamond symbol at the position of the first amino acid. The number of diamonds plotted on each line equals the number of peptides that were positive for that individual (see also Table IIGo). Since the first amino acid of each 9-mer peptide defines that peptide number, the gray bars (controls) and the black bars (MS patients) represent the remaining 8 aa of the last positive peptide in any epitope to allow comparison of epitope overlap.

 
There were many fewer regions of the PLP molecule that elicited an IL-5 response in patients or in controls (Fig. 5Go); only two healthy controls and five MS patients gave positive IL-5 responses to PLP peptides. IL-5 responses in both groups were observed primarily in the N- and C-terminal regions, with almost no reactivity in the center of the molecule. The peptides showed no conservation between MS patients or controls. We also observed that the frequency of IL-5-producing cells in positive wells was very low compared with that in positive IFN-{gamma} wells (Fig. 3Go and Tables II and III).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. IL-5-positive PLP peptide responses by individual. The first amino acid in each positive nonamer is represented by a diamond to show the number of positive PLP peptides that make up that epitope. The gray bars (controls) and the black bars (MS patients) represent the remaining 8 aa of the last positive peptide in any epitope to allow comparison of epitope overlap.

 
T cell responses to third-party recall Ags and mitogens are comparable between MS patients and healthy controls

Because the PLP peptide responses in MS patients were biased toward Th1 recognition, we wanted to make sure that the overall immune responsiveness in the patients did not reflect general Th1 hyper-responsiveness. Using the same IFN-{gamma} and IL-5 ELISPOT approach as a readout, we asked whether the MS patients and the controls respond differently to recall Ags, mitogen, or myelin proteins. The recall Ags consisted of vaccine Ags, environmental Ags, or mitogen. While these third party responses were quite variable from subject to subject, they did not show significant differences between patients and controls (Fig. 6Go). IFN-{gamma} responses to PHA were too numerous to count and are not shown on the IFN-{gamma} plot. The IFN-{gamma} responses to the MBP-PLP fusion protein, MP4, showed a strong increase in MS patients compared with controls at the higher dose of 100 µg/ml (p = 0.045). Although we tested responses to MBP, we did not observe significant IFN-{gamma} or IL-5 differences between patients and controls (data not shown), suggesting that the positive MP4 responses were due to recognition of the PLP component of that fusion protein. Importantly, the MS patients showed IL-5 responses to these recall Ags and to the mitogen with similar frequencies as those in healthy controls, suggesting that there is no overall Th1 bias in the patients.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. IFN-{gamma} and IL-5 responses to mitogen and recall Ags do not show significant differences between MS patients and controls. The average number of IFN-{gamma} or IL-5 spots ± SEM from triplicate wells is shown. Cells were stimulated with PHA (10 µg/ml for IFN-{gamma}, too numerous to count; 2.5 µ/ml for IL-5), tetanus toxoid (1/20 dilution), diphtheria toxoid (100 µg/ml), Candida albicans extract (1/20 dilution), recombinant MBP-PLP fusion protein (MP4; 10 and 100 µg/ml). Controls (C; ) and MS patients (MS; {blacksquare}) were tested simultaneously with PLP peptides. The numbers tested are in parentheses.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study we examined Th1 and Th2 autoreactivity at the single-cell level against PLP, a potential target Ag in multiple sclerosis. We wanted to determine whether cytokine responses to self peptides showed quantifiable differences between MS patients and healthy controls. Here we demonstrate that MS patients exhibit a significantly stronger IFN-{gamma} immune response to PLP compared with healthy controls. This autoimmune response in MS involves recognition of a greater diversity of PLP peptides as well as a >11-fold higher number of cells responding to those PLP peptides. IL-5 responses were not different between MS patients and controls. These differences were not due to a generally increased capacity to produce IFN-{gamma} in MS, because the numbers of cells responding to recall Ags or mitogen did not differ significantly between patients and controls. For IFN-{gamma}-positive responses, epitopes recognized by controls were also recognized by MS patients, but there were many more epitopes of PLP recognized uniquely by MS patients, and the recognition spanned the entire PLP molecule from N-terminus to C-terminus in an extremely heterogeneous pattern. Although we cannot tell whether these PLP-specific cells are the primary cells or whether they have been secondarily engaged after determinant spreading, once they are primed it is likely that they participate in the autoimmune process. This idea was introduced by Mor and Cohen (28) in rodent experimental allergic encephalomyelitis; while only one determinant of MBP was immunodominant, 11 of 16 peptides were capable of causing histological or clinical EAE. After processing and presentation of native Ag, determinant display may not be a reliable measure of the pathogenic T cell repertoire. This might explain why recall responses with the MBP-PLP fusion protein were much weaker than those induced by the peptides. By providing every conceivable PLP determinant for the T cells to recognize, our single-amino acid pepscan strategy aimed to monitor the entire PLP-specific repertoire. With analogy to the study by Mor and Cohen (28), while not all of the primed PLP-peptide specific T cells will contribute to the disease process, one can predict that many of these T cells do contribute to the disease. Due to the multitude of determinants targeted in most patients, our data suggest that the autoimmune repertoire shows an unexpectedly highly diversity with respect to determinant specificity and, by analogy, TCR usage.

Multiple studies have examined lymphocyte responses to PLP with varying degrees of success due in part to the poor aqueous solubility and strong hydrophobicity of the PLP molecule and to the techniques used to measure reactivity. Studies that failed to find reactivity used whole PLP and measured reactivity in proliferation assays (10, 11). Limiting dilution analysis and proliferation assays now are thought to be less sensitive methods for the detection of clonally expanded memory cell populations than more recent techniques, such as single-cell cytokine ELISPOT assays and tetramer analysis. Studies that found significantly increased PLP responses in MS compared with controls used single-cell techniques and IFN-{gamma} output as a measure of reactivity (15, 16). Many researchers have examined T cell lines and clones specific for PLP; however, there is always the potential for in vitro skewing of the cytokine responses by virtue of the culture methods used to obtain lines and clones. Additional studies have found a very strong association with whole PLP stimulation and IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 mRNA expression in MS (29, 30, 31). An increasing number of researchers have taken to using synthetic peptides of PLP and have had much more success in detecting PLP-specific responses in both cerebral spinal fluid and peripheral blood (17, 18, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). This study confirms the previously observed increased PLP responses in MS compared with controls, but, in addition, we performed the first comprehensive epitope mapping using PLP 9 mers spanning the entire PLP molecule examining both type 1 and type 2 cytokine responses in MS patients and healthy controls.

While the data presented here show a clear difference in the IFN-{gamma} response to PLP peptides in MS patients, it is worth noting that the role of IFN-{gamma} in EAE and MS remains controversial. Relapses in EAE initially were shown to correlate with increased expression of IFN-{gamma} (37, 38). Intrathecal injections of IFN-{gamma} induced inflammation in Lewis rats (39), and in transgenic mouse models, organ-specific expression of IFN-{gamma} led to autoimmune diseases resembling diabetes, myasthenia gravis, and uveitis (40, 41, 42). Likewise, the potentially damaging role of IFN-{gamma} in MS has been demonstrated in several studies. IFN-{gamma} was shown to induce oligodendrocyte death by apoptosis (5). Systemic administration of IFN-{gamma} to MS patients was shown to worsen the disease (43). Beck et al. reported increased IFN-{gamma} production preceding MS exacerbations (44), and IFN-{gamma}-expressing cells were found to be present in MS lesions (45). However, several conflicting observations about the role of IFN-{gamma} have appeared. Administering anti-IFN-{gamma} mAb to genetically EAE-resistant mice induced an EAE-susceptible phenotype (46, 47). Intraventricular injection of IFN-{gamma} prevented EAE in rats (48), and IFN-{gamma} was not necessary for the induction of EAE using IFN-{gamma} knockout mice back-crossed to an EAE-susceptible strain (49). Similarly, in knockout animals, lack of IFN-{gamma} converted an otherwise EAE-resistant mouse to become susceptible to disease (50). In MS, the ELISPOT assay has been used to demonstrate that MS patients have increased numbers of mononuclear cells in blood and cerebral spinal fluid, secreting IFN-{gamma} in response to stimulation with myelin proteins and viral Ags (15, 16, 51). Paradoxically, regulatory cytokines such as IL-4 and TGF-ß were shown to be simultaneously up-regulated with IFN-{gamma} in MS (29, 30, 31). Thus, in both EAE and MS, cytokine interactions are much more complex than originally proposed and, as such, do not support a rigid classification of MS into the Th1/Th2 model. Instead, certain cytokines, such as IFN-{gamma}, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10, may play an important role in the pathogenesis of disease, and their relative roles may change over the course of T cell-mediated disease.

In the current study we observed that the number and distribution of IFN-{gamma}-positive PLP epitopes was quite heterogeneous even though there were two common regions recognized by both MS patients and controls: PLP133–152 and PLP161–178. These common regions appear different from most other published immunodominant regions (17, 18, 32, 52, 53). There are several possible explanations for this difference. First, the HLA type of the study subjects determines which peptides are able to bind and stimulate T cells. Without HLA typing of our study subjects, it is impossible to compare the commonly recognized regions of PLP between our own patients and controls or between subjects in our study and those in other published studies. Second, by using the ELISPOT technique to detect these PLP epitopes, it is possible that the sensitivity of the assay technique may allow us to observe more or different regions of PLP recognition than proliferation assays or techniques that rely on growing out T cell clones. Third, our epitope-mapping technique using overlapping 9-mer peptides may skew the responses we observed compared with studies that have used longer peptides. Because the MHC class I groove is closed on both ends (25), we chose to use nonamer peptides, which can bind extracellularly to class I molecules, bypassing intracellular processing (26). These nonamer peptides are also capable of binding MHC class II molecules (22, 24), but might stimulate primarily high affinity CD4 cells only. Recent evidence in a humanized MHC model of EAE demonstrated equivalent T cell responses between 9-mer and 20-mer peptides derived from an encephalitogenic myelin protein (T. Forsthuber, Cleveland, OH, personal communication). As mentioned previously, the techniques that were used in the past favored the detection of CD4 cells in MS patients, while our detection system might have a CD8 bias. We did not want to limit ourselves to only one class of response; however, a rigorous analysis of the HLA restriction elements for each study subject and for every positive peptide that was recognized in this analysis (208 peptides) was beyond the scope of the present study.

Several points have emerged that highlight PLP as a unique, potential autoimmune target in MS. In contrast to the relatively restricted reactivity to MBP in MS patients, which appears to be directed primarily to PLP83–106 and PLP142–170 (reviewed in Ref. 1), reactivity to PLP can be observed for virtually the entire molecule, as we show here and others have shown previously (12, 19, 54). Also, for PLP, the determinants recognized vary considerably between patients, and many patients respond to more than one peptide. Unlike MBP, no single immunodominant region of PLP has been identified. Add to this the compelling evidence for epitope spreading within PLP in MS with progression of disease (12, 54), and it becomes very difficult to determine whether immunodominant epitopes exist. Perhaps, as Tuohy et al. (54) suggest, they exist only in the temporal context of an "epitope du jour." This argues that a cross-sectional analysis such as the present study, performed at one moment in time, may not accurately represent PLP reactivity in MS. We have examined patients with different types of MS, and each of them is at a potentially different stage of disease compared with the others. Consequently, the PLP peptide reactivity we observed may be highly specific for that particular patient, for that moment in time. In addition, other myelin proteins implicated in MS autoreactivity, such as MBP and MOG, may also play a role in progression; however, the current epitope-mapping technique we have used here did not permit simultaneous analysis of all other potential autoantigens. Experiments designed to address longitudinal cytokine responses to myelin determinants in a more narrowly defined MS population are currently in progress.

When studied at single-cell resolution, it is striking how purely Th1 (IFN-{gamma}+ and IL-5-) the anti-PLP peptide responses are. Although it is still controversial whether Th2 cells are pathogenic, there are virtually no PLP-specific IL-5-producing Th2 cells in these patients. The PLP-specific cells also do not appear to be Th0, which should coexpress IFN-{gamma} and IL-5 at comparable frequencies. This observation might be important for therapeutic considerations. The cytokine differentiation of Th0 cells can be redirected toward a putatively nonpathogenic class (Th2/Th3), while the Th1 cells are committed. This might help explain why oral and other Ag therapies work well for prevention, but less well for the treatment of established disease.

As we observed, PLP-reactive T cells could be detected in healthy controls; however, those frequencies were much lower than those in MS patients. While some controls gave strong responses to individual peptides, MS patients showed reactivity to more determinants, consistent with a role for epitope spreading, which has been implicated in disease progression (12, 13, 22, 54, 55). Thus, the clinical presentation of MS may not represent loss of self tolerance, so much as the strength of the autoimmune response that is engaged. These data may suggest the existence of a pathogenic threshold, as has been observed in EAE, where a minimum number of neuroantigen-reactive cells is required to achieve disease. The processes that lead to violation of self tolerance, such as the priming of autoreactive T cells by cross-reactive infections, might occur in patients and healthy controls alike. Thus, quantitative differences in clonal sizes may influence the development of clinical MS.

Here we show the feasibility of quantification of the full PLP-specific T cell repertoire at single-cell resolution, overcoming the limitations of MHC diversity and determinant diversity that are inherent for humans and for the autoimmune process. The data affirm the autoimmune hypothesis by suggesting that disease vs health is a quantitative and not necessarily qualitative matter and show strong Th1 polarization, which suggests that therapies designed at redirecting cytokine expression might be difficult. The ability to comprehensively measure the overall effector cell mass to an autoantigen, that is, directly measuring the frequency of cells specific for hundreds of determinants, should be valuable for clinical trials that are aimed at modifying this effector cell pool. Thus, it should be possible to determine the effect of therapy on the magnitude, fine specificity, and effector cell class as measured by cytokine expression. The ability to perform such measurements, using a high throughput technique with automated analysis, may revolutionize clinical trials that to date have been unable to obtain direct information on how the autoantigen-specific effector cells are affected by autoantigen treatment.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Richard Trezza for valuable help with the computer-assisted ELISPOT image analysis, and Dr. Vincent Tuohy for critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Multiple Sclerosis Society Grant RG-3005-A-2. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Clara Pelfrey, Department of Neurosciences, NC30, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Lerner Research Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MS, multiple sclerosis; AEC, 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot assay; MBP, myelin basic protein; MP4, MBP-PLP fusion protein; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; PLP, proteolipid protein; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Score. Back

Received for publication March 15, 2000. Accepted for publication May 16, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Martin, R., H. F. McFarland. 1995. Immunological aspects of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 32:121.[Medline]
  2. Navikas, V., H. Link. 1996. Review: cytokines and the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurosci. Res. 45:322.[Medline]
  3. Bever, C. T., H. S. Jr, H. B. Panitch, D. E. Levy, D. E. McFarlin, K. P. Johnson. 1991. {gamma}-Interferon induction in patients with chronic progressive MS. Neurology 41:1124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hofman, F. M., D. R. Hinton, K. Johnson, J. E. Merrill. 1989. Tumor necrosis factor identified in multiple sclerosis brain. J. Exp. Med. 170:607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Vartanian, T., Y. Li, M. Zhao, K. Stefansson. 1995. Interferon-{gamma}-induced oligodendrocyte cell death: implications for the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Mol. Med. 1:732.[Medline]
  6. Genain, C. P., K. Abel, N. Belmar, F. Villinger, D. P. Rosenberg, C. Linington, C. S. Raine, S. L. Hauser. 1996. Late complications of immune deviation therapy in a nonhuman primate. Science 274:2054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rieckmann, P., M. Albrecht, B. Kitze, T. Weber, H. Tumani, A. Broocks, W. Luer, S. Poser. 1994. Cytokine mRNA levels in mononuclear blood cells from patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 44:1523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Link, J., M. Soderstrom, T. Olsson, B. Hojeberg, A. Ljungdahl, H. Link. 1994. Increased transforming growth factor-ß, interleukin-4, and interferon-{gamma} in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 36:379.[Medline]
  9. Rieckmann, P., M. Albrecht, B. Kitze, T. Weber, H. Tumani, A. Broocks, W. Luer, A. Helwig, S. Poser. 1995. Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} messenger RNA expression in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is associated with disease activity. Ann. Neurol. 37:82.[Medline]
  10. Hafler, D. A., D. S. Benjamin, J. Burks, H. L. Weiner. 1987. Myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein reactivity of brain- and cerebrospinal fluid-derived T cell clones in multiple sclerosis and postinfectious encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 139:68.[Abstract]
  11. Johnson, D., D. A. Hafler, R. J. Fallis, M. B. Lees, R. O. Brady, R. H. Quarles, H. L. Weiner. 1986. Cell-mediated immunity to myelin-associated glycoprotein, proteolipid protein, and myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 13:99.[Medline]
  12. Tuohy, V. K., M. Yu, B. Weinstock-Guttman, R. P. Kinkel. 1997. Diversity and plasticity of self recognition during the development of multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Invest. 99:1682.[Medline]
  13. Tuohy, V. K., M. Yu, L. Yin, J. A. Kawczak, R. P. Kinkel. 1999. Spontaneous regression of primary autoreactivity during chronic progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J. Exp. Med. 189:1033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Helms, T., B. O. Boehm, R. J. Asaad, R. P. Trezza, P. V. Lehmann, M. Tary-Lehmann. 2000. Direct visualization of cytokine-producing recall antigen-specific CD4 memory T cells in healthy individuals and HIV patients. J. Immunol. 164:3723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sun, J. B., T. Olsson, W. Z. Wang, B. G. Xiao, V. Kostulas, S. Fredrikson, H. P. Ekre, H. Link. 1991. Autoreactive T and B cells responding to myelin proteolipid protein in multiple sclerosis and controls. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:1461.[Medline]
  16. Olsson, T., W. W. Zhi, B. Hojeberg, V. Kostulas, Y. P. Jiang, G. Anderson, H. P. Ekre, H. Link. 1990. Autoreactive T lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis determined by antigen-induced secretion of interferon-{gamma}. J. Clin. Invest. 86:981.
  17. Pelfrey, C. M., J. L. Trotter, L. R. Tranquill, H. F. McFarland. 1993. Identification of a novel T cell epitope of human proteolipid protein (residues 40–60) recognized by proliferative and cytolytic CD4+ T cells from multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 46:33.[Medline]
  18. Pelfrey, C. M., J. L. Trotter, L. R. Tranquill, H. F. McFarland. 1994. Identification of a second T cell epitope of human proteolipid protein (residues 89–106) recognized by proliferative and cytolytic CD4+ T cells from multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 53:153.[Medline]
  19. Tuohy, V. K.. 1994. Peptide determinants of myelin proteolipid protein (PLP) in autoimmune demyelinating disease: a review. Neurochem. Res. 19:935.[Medline]
  20. Lehmann, P. V., T. Forsthuber, A. Miller, E. E. Sercarz. 1992. Spreading of T-cell autoimmunity to cryptic determinants of an autoantigen. Nature 358:155.[Medline]
  21. Forsthuber, T., H. C. Yip, P. V. Lehmann. 1996. Induction of TH1 and TH2 immunity in neonatal mice. Science 271:1728.[Abstract]
  22. Targoni, O. S., P. V. Lehmann. 1998. Endogenous myelin basic protein inactivates the high avidity T cell repertoire. J. Exp. Med. 187:2055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Geysen, H. M., S. J. Rodda, T. J. Mason, G. Tribbick, P. G. Schoofs. 1987. Strategies for epitope analysis using peptide synthesis. J. Immunol. Methods 102:259.[Medline]
  24. Gammon, G., H. M. Geysen, R. J. Apple, E. Pickett, M. Palmer, A. Ametani, E. E. Sercarz. 1991. T cell determinant structure: cores and determinant envelopes in three mouse major histocompatibility complex haplotypes. J. Exp. Med. 173:609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bjorkman, P. J., M. A. Saper, B. Samraoui, W. S. Bennett, J. L. Strominger, D. C. Wiley. 1987. Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2. Nature 329:506.[Medline]
  26. Adorini, L., S. Muller, F. Cardinaux, P. V. Lehmann, F. Falcioni, Z. A. Nagy. 1988. In vivo competition between self peptides and foreign antigens in T-cell activation. Nature 334:623.[Medline]
  27. Elliott, E. A., H. I. McFarland, S. H. Nye, R. Cofiell, T. M. Wilson, J. A. Wilkins, S. P. Squinto, L. A. Matis, J. P. Mueller. 1996. Treatment of experimental encephalomyelitis with a novel chimeric fusion protein of myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein. J. Clin. Invest. 98:1602.[Medline]
  28. Mor, F., I. R. Cohen. 1993. Shifts in the epitopes of myelin basic protein recognized by Lewis rat T cells before, during, and after the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Clin. Invest. 92:2199.
  29. Link, J., M. Soderstrom, A. Ljungdahl, B. Hojeberg, T. Olsson, Z. Xu, S. Fredrikson, Z. Y. Wang, H. Link. 1994. Organ-specific autoantigens induce interferon-{gamma} and interleukin-4 mRNA expression in mononuclear cells in multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis. Neurology 44:728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Link, J., M. Soderstrom, V. Kostulas, T. Olsson, B. Hojeberg, A. Ljungdahl, H. Link. 1994. Optic neuritis is associated with myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein reactive cells producing interferon-{gamma}, interleukin-4 and transforming growth factor-ß. J. Neuroimmunol. 49:9.[Medline]
  31. Link, J.. 1994. Interferon-{gamma}, interleukin-4 and transforming growth factor-ß mRNA expression in multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 158:(Suppl.):1.
  32. Trotter, J. L., W. F. Hickey, R. C. van der Veen, L. Sulze. 1991. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from multiple sclerosis patients recognize myelin proteolipid protein and selected peptides. J. Neuroimmunol. 33:55.[Medline]
  33. Chou, Y. K., D. N. Bourdette, H. Offner, R. Whitham, R. Y. Wang, G. A. Hashim, A. A. Vandenbark. 1992. Frequency of T cells specific for myelin basic protein and myelin proteolipid protein in blood and cerebrospinal fluid in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 38:105.[Medline]
  34. Trotter, J. L., C. M. Pelfrey, A. L. Trotter, J. A. Selvidge, K. C. Gushleff, T. Mohanakumar, H. F. McFarland. 1998. T cell recognition of myelin proteolipid protein and myelin proteolipid protein peptides in the peripheral blood of multiple sclerosis and control subjects. J. Neuroimmunol. 84:172.[Medline]
  35. Trotter, J. L., C. A. Damico, A. H. Cross, C. M. Pelfrey, R. W. Karr, X. T. Fu, H. F. McFarland. 1997. HPRT mutant T-cell lines from multiple sclerosis patients recognize myelin proteolipid protein peptides. J. Neuroimmunol. 75:95.[Medline]
  36. Pelfrey, C. M., L. R. Tranquill, A. B. Vogt, H. F. McFarland. 1996. T cell response to two immunodominant proteolipid protein (PLP) peptides in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Mult. Scler. 1:270.[Medline]
  37. Renno, T., M. Krakowski, C. Piccirillo, J. Y. Lin, T. Owens. 1995. TNF-{alpha} expression by resident microglia and infiltrating leukocytes in the central nervous system of mice with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: regulation by Th1 cytokines. J. Immunol. 154:944.[Abstract]
  38. Owens, T., T. Renno, V. Taupin, M. Krakowski. 1994. Inflammatory cytokines in the brain: does the CNS shape immune responses?. Immunol. Today 15:566.[Medline]
  39. Simmons, R. D., D. O. Willenborg. 1990. Direct injection of cytokines into the spinal cord causes autoimmune encephalomyelitis-like inflammation. J. Neurol. Sci. 100:37.[Medline]
  40. Sarvetnick, N., D. Liggitt, S. L. Pitts, S. E. Hansen, T. A. Stewart. 1988. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus induced in transgenic mice by ectopic expression of class II MHC and interferon-{gamma}. Cell 52:773.[Medline]
  41. Geiger, K., E. Howes, M. Gallina, X. J. Huang, G. H. Travis, N. Sarvetnick. 1994. Transgenic mice expressing IFN-{gamma} in the retina develop inflammation of the eye and photoreceptor loss. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35:2667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Gu, D., L. Wogensen, N. A. Calcutt, C. Xia, S. Zhu, J. P. Merlie, H. S. Fox, J. Lindstrom, H. C. Powell, N. Sarvetnick. 1995. Myasthenia gravis-like syndrome induced by expression of interferon {gamma} in the neuromuscular junction. J. Exp. Med. 181:547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Panitch, H. S., R. L. Hirsch, J. Schindler, K. P. Johnson. 1987. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with {gamma} interferon: exacerbations associated with activation of the immune system. Neurology 37:1097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Beck, J., P. Rondot, L. Catinot, E. Falcoff, H. Kirchner, J. Wietzerbin. 1988. Increased production of interferon {gamma} and tumor necrosis factor precedes clinical manifestation in multiple sclerosis: do cytokines trigger off exacerbations?. Acta Neurol. Scand. 78:318.[Medline]
  45. Traugott, U., P. Lebon. 1988. Multiple sclerosis: involvement of interferons in lesion pathogenesis. Ann. Neurol. 24:243.[Medline]
  46. Billiau, A., H. Heremans, F. Vandekerckhove, R. Dijkmans, H. Sobis, E. Meulepas, H. Carton. 1988. Enhancement of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in mice by antibodies against IFN-{gamma}. J. Immunol. 140:1506.[Abstract]
  47. Duong, T. T., F. D. Finkelman, B. Singh, G. H. Strejan. 1994. Effect of anti-interferon-{gamma} monoclonal antibody treatment on the development of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in resistant mouse strains. J. Neuroimmunol. 53:101.[Medline]
  48. Voorthuis, J. A., B. M. Uitdehaag, C. J. De Groot, P. H. Goede, P. H. van der Meide, C. D. Dijkstra. 1990. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by intraventricular administration of interferon-{gamma} in Lewis rats. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 81:183.[Medline]
  49. Dalton, D. K., S. Pitts-Meek, S. Keshav, I. S. Figari, A. Bradley, T. A. Stewart. 1993. Multiple defects of immune cell function in mice with disrupted interferon-{gamma} genes. Science 259:1739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Krakowski, M., T. Owens. 1996. Interferon-{gamma} confers resistance to experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1641.[Medline]
  51. Link, H., J. B. Sun, Z. Wang, Z. Xu, A. Love, S. Fredrikson, T. Olsson. 1992. Virus-reactive and autoreactive T cells are accumulated in cerebrospinal fluid in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 38:63.[Medline]
  52. Markovic-Plese, S., H. Fukaura, J. Zhang, A. al-Sabbagh, S. Southwood, A. Sette, V. K. Kuchroo, D. A. Hafler. 1995. T cell recognition of immunodominant and cryptic proteolipid protein epitopes in humans. J. Immunol. 155:982.[Abstract]
  53. Greer, J. M., P. A. Csurhes, K. D. Cameron, P. A. McCombe, M. F. Good, M. P. Pender. 1997. Increased immunoreactivity to two overlapping peptides of myelin proteolipid protein in multiple sclerosis. Brain 120:1447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Tuohy, V. K., M. Yu, L. Yin, J. A. Kawczak, P. R. Kinkel. 1999. Regression and spreading of self-recognition during the development of autoimmune demyelinating disease. J. Autoimmun. 13:11.[Medline]
  55. Kaufman, D. L., M. Clare-Salzler, J. Tian, T. Forsthuber, G. S. Ting, P. Robinson, M. A. Atkinson, E. E. Sercarz, A. J. Tobin, P. V. Lehmann. 1993. Spontaneous loss of T-cell tolerance to glutamic acid decarboxylase in murine insulin-dependent diabetes. Nature 366:69.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
I R Moldovan, R A Rudick, A C Cotleur, S E Born, J-C Lee, M T Karafa, and C M Pelfrey
Longitudinal single-cell cytokine responses reveal recurrent autoimmune myelin reactivity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2005; 11(3): 251 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D.-A. Laplaud, C. Ruiz, S. Wiertlewski, S. Brouard, L. Berthelot, M. Guillet, B. Melchior, N. Degauque, G. Edan, P. Brachet, et al.
Blood T-cell receptor {beta} chain transcriptome in multiple sclerosis. Characterization of the T cells with altered CDR3 length distribution
Brain, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 981 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
D. Sewell, Z. Qing, E. Reinke, D. Elliot, J. Weinstock, M. Sandor, and Z. Fabry
Immunomodulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by helminth ova immunization
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2003; 15(1): 59 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. D. Huhn, P. F. Fogarty, R. Nakamura, E. J. Read, S. F. Leitman, M. E. Rick, J. Kimball, A. Greene, K. Hansmann, A. Gratwohl, et al.
High-dose cyclophosphamide with autologous lymphocyte-depleted peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support for treatment of refractory chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenia
Blood, January 1, 2003; 101(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
G Riemekasten, C Weiss, S Schneider, A Thiel, A Bruns, F Schumann, S Blass, G-R Burmester, and F Hiepe
T cell reactivity against the SmD183-119 C terminal peptide in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2002; 61(9): 779 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
K. Nicolson, S. Freland, C. Weir, B. Delahunt, R. A. Flavell, and B. T. Backstrom
Induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the absence of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 2
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 14(8): 849 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
H. Reijonen, E. J. Novak, S. Kochik, A. Heninger, A. W. Liu, W. W. Kwok, and G. T. Nepom
Detection of GAD65-Specific T-Cells by Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Tetramers in Type 1 Diabetic Patients and At-Risk Subjects
Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1375 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Tian, S. Gregori, L. Adorini, and D. L. Kaufman
The Frequency of High Avidity T Cells Determines the Hierarchy of Determinant Spreading
J. Immunol., June 15, 2001; 166(12): 7144 - 7150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Greer, B. Denis, R. A. Sobel, and E. Trifilieff
Thiopalmitoylation of Myelin Proteolipid Protein Epitopes Enhances Immunogenicity and Encephalitogenicity
J. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 166(11): 6907 - 6913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. I. McFarland, A. A. Lobito, M. M. Johnson, G. R. Palardy, C. S. K. Yee, E. K. Jordan, J. A. Frank, N. Tresser, C. P. Genain, J. P. Mueller, et al.
Effective Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy in the Marmoset Model of Multiple Sclerosis
J. Immunol., February 1, 2001; 166(3): 2116 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelfrey, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pelfrey, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS