The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, W.
Right arrow Articles by Charo, I. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, W.
Right arrow Articles by Charo, I. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*OMIM
*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 7072-7077.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

A Mechanism for the Impaired IFN-{gamma} Production in C-C Chemokine Receptor 2 (CCR2) Knockout Mice: Role of CCR2 in Linking the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses1

Wendy Peters*,{dagger}, Marc Dupuis{ddagger} and Israel F. Charo2,*,{dagger}

* Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, San Francisco, CA 94141; and {dagger} Cardiovascular Research Institute, {ddagger} Department of Anatomy, and § Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have recently shown that mice with a targeted disruption of CCR2, the receptor for monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, have markedly impaired recruitment of macrophages to sites of inflammation. An unexpected finding in the CCR2-/- mice was a dramatic decrease in the production of IFN-{gamma} after challenge with purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium bovis. In this study, we have investigated the mechanism of this cytokine production defect. In vitro, direct activation of splenocytes with CD3/CD28 Abs failed to reveal any differences in IFN-{gamma} production between CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- mice. However, after immunization, the number of Ag-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in the draining lymph nodes was decreased by 70% in the CCR2-/- mice, suggesting an in vivo trafficking defect. Direct measurement of cell trafficking with fluorescently labeled CFA revealed a marked decrease in the number of monocytes/macrophages migrating to the site of immunization and to the draining lymph nodes in the CCR2-/- mice. The data suggest that impaired trafficking of APCs in the CCR2-/- mice contributes to the defect in IFN-{gamma} production. These data support the idea that CCR2-positive monocytes/macrophages are critical in linking the innate and adaptive immune responses.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemokines are low m.w. chemotactic cytokines that direct the trafficking of leukocytes to areas of inflammation, aid the navigation of lymphocytes through the secondary lymphoid tissue, and modulate T cell cytokine production and proliferation (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Chemokines exert their effects through activation of seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors. Chemokine receptor 2 is the receptor for monocyte chemoattractant proteins (MCPs)3 1–5. The MCPs are potent chemoattractants for monocytes (7, 8, 9), memory T cells (10), NK cells (11, 12), and immature dendritic cells (DCs) (13). We and others have shown that deletion of CCR2 reduces the number of macrophages recruited into the peritoneum after thioglycolate administration (14, 15, 16), consistent with the possibility that CCR2 is normally present on murine monocytes/macrophages. Chemokine receptor 2 has also been found on immature murine DCs (17). Further evidence to support the idea that CCR2 plays an important role in mononuclear cell trafficking has come from recent studies showing fewer macrophages in the atherosclerotic lesions of CCR2-/- and MCP-1-/- mice than in those of wild-type mice (18, 19, 20, 21). In addition, after immunization with the purified protein derivative (PPD) of Mycobacterium bovis, granuloma formation was reduced in the CCR2-/- mice, consistent with a monocyte/macrophage trafficking defect (14). An unexpected finding in the later study was the dramatically reduced level of IFN-{gamma} in the draining lymph nodes (DLNs) of CCR2-/- mice (14). Decreased production of this cytokine in CCR2-/- mice infected with Leishmania donovani (22) or Cryptococcus neoformans (23) has subsequently been reported, suggesting that CCR2-dependent production of IFN-{gamma} is critical for host defense.

Because of the importance of IFN-{gamma} in the immune response and disease pathogenesis, we have investigated the basis of the reduced production of this cytokine in the CCR2-/- mice. We considered two possible mechanisms: first, that signaling by CCR2 acted in concert with activation of the TCR to optimize cytokine production; second, that abnormal trafficking of the T cells or APCs prevented the production of activated T cells in CCR2-/- mice. In this study, we show that the diminished IFN-{gamma} production by the CCR2-/- mice is primarily due to a defect in the trafficking of monocytes/macrophages to the site of immunization; as a result, fewer Ag-laden APCs are present in the DLNs of the CCR2-/- mice. These studies reveal a novel role for CCR2-positive monocytes/macrophages as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune responses.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents

All chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise indicated. Tissue culture reagents were from Life Technologies/BRL (Gaithersburg, MD). Cytokines and cytokine Abs were from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).

Mice

CCR2-/- mice were generated as described (14) and were backcrossed nine times with C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Littermate CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- mice were then bred to generate the mice used in the experiments. All mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions and were used between 6 and 12 wk of age.

Immunizations

For Ag-specific cytokine analysis, mice were immunized s.c. at the base of the tail with 50 µl of keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; 100 µg), emulsified with an equal volume of CFA. Inguinal DLNs were removed 4 days after immunization. For studies of cell trafficking, mice were immunized in the quadriceps with 25 µl of KLH (50 µg) emulsified with an equal volume of CFA that had been fluorescently labeled with a lipophilic tracer chloromethylbenzamido-3,3'-dioctadecylindocarbocyanine (DiI) (1 mg/5 ml CFA) (CellTracker; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) that is miscible in adjuvant, thereby rendering the adjuvant fluorescent. The epimysium covering the quadriceps and the inguinal DLNs were removed 48 h after immunization. To investigate whether the Ag and adjuvant were colocalized within the same cells, we emulsified OVA-FITC with CFA-DiI and immunized in the muscle. The cells were isolated as described below and analyzed by flow cytometery. After immunization with OVA-FITC and CFA (without DiI), ~90% of the cells were positive for FITC. After immunization with CFA-DiI and OVA (without FITC conjugation), ~90% of the cells were positive for DiI. After immunization with CFA-DiI and OVA-FITC emulsified together, less than 7% of the cells were positive for FITC and negative for DiI. Thus, the vast majority of cells isolated had taken up both adjuvant and Ag.

Cell culture and activation

Single-cell suspensions were prepared for Ag-specific cytokine analysis. Inguinal DLN cells (2.5 x 106/ml) were cultured in complete medium consisting of RPMI 1640 supplemented with FCS (10%, v/v), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), L-glutamine (2 mM), HEPES (10 mM), nonessential amino acids (100 µM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), and 2-ME (50 µM). The cells were restimulated in vitro with KLH (100 µg/ml), and supernatants were collected 48 h later and stored at -80°C until assayed. For nonspecific cell stimulation, spleens from naive mice were removed, and single-cell suspensions were prepared. Red cells were removed by hypertonic lysis at room temperature. Splenocytes (2.5 x 106 cells/ml) were cultured in complete medium and stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 (10 µg/ml; PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and anti-CD28 (10 µg/ml; PharMingen), or with Con A (5 µg/ml; Sigma). Supernatants were collected 48 h later and stored at -80°C until assayed.

APC isolation

Mononuclear cells were isolated from the epimysium of the quadriceps and from the inguinal DLNs by enzymatic digestion with 1 mg/ml collagenase D (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) in RPMI 1640 containing 2% FCS for 30 min at 37°C. After homogenization in a Dounce homogenizer, the tissue digest was centrifuged for 5 min at 900 x g, resuspended in 2 ml HBSS, and layered onto a metrizamide gradient (1.077 g/cm3; Accurate Chemical and Scientific, Westbury, NY). Mononuclear cells were isolated by collecting cells in the light density fraction after centrifugation for 20 min at 900 x g and counted with a hemocytometer. Anti-CD11b FITC (0.25 µg/ml; PharMingen) was added to stain macrophages, and anti-CD11c FITC (0.25 µg/ml; PharMingen) was added to stain DCs. A FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) was used to quantitate cells that had taken up the Ag. After flow cytometry analysis, the CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- CD11b-positive cells were both found to phagocytose the labeled adjuvant and Ag mixture equally well with ~90% of both being positive for DiI.

ELISA cytokine assays

Supernatants from stimulated cells were assayed in sandwich ELISAs, as previously described (14), except that primary and secondary Abs were from R&D Systems. All Abs were used at the dilutions recommended by the manufacturer. Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays for determination of IFN-{gamma} production by individual cells were performed as previously described (24). Briefly, 96-well Immulon IV plates (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) were coated overnight by incubation at 4°C with the IFN-{gamma} capture Ab. The following day, the plates were washed with PBS, and cells were added to the first well of a row in duplicate (2 x 106 cells). Serial dilutions were conducted across the plate, and cells were cultured overnight in complete medium plus KLH (100 µg/ml). The next day, the cells were washed away, and biotinylated anti-IFN-{gamma} secondary Ab was added for 1 h at room temperature. The plate was washed, and streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer Mannheim) was added for 30 min at room temperature. The plate was washed again, and the substrate, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (1 mg/ml; Sigma), was dissolved in 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol buffer (0.1 M; Sigma) mixed with 0.6% low-melt agarose (SeaPlaque; FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, ME). After solidification, the blue spots (each spot corresponding to an IFN-{gamma}-producing cell) were counted with an inverted microscope.

DC differentiation from bone marrow

DCs were obtained by differentiation of bone marrow precursor cells, as previously described (25), to determine whether the absence of CCR2 affected their activation efficiency. Bone marrow plugs were isolated from the femur and tibia of the hind legs, and red cells were lysed. Cells (1.2 x 107) were cultured in 25 ml of complete medium plus GM-CSF (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems). After 48 h, an additional 12.5 ml of complete medium containing GM-CSF (40 ng/ml) was added. On day 5, 19 ml of medium was removed, and nonadherent cells were collected by centrifugation. The pelleted cells were resuspended in 19 ml of fresh medium plus GM-CSF (20 ng/ml) and added back to the culture dish. On day 8, the nonadherent cells were collected and replated in fresh medium plus GM-CSF (10 ng/ml; 2 x 105 cells/ml). On day 9, the DCs were stimulated with LPS (0111:B4; Sigma; 1 µg/ml). Supernatants were removed 24 h later and stored at -80°C until assaying for IL-12 by ELISA. The cells were also labeled with CD11c-PE (0.25 µg/ml) and MHC II-CYC (0.25 µg/ml; PharMingen) to examine DC purity by flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Impairment in the production of IFN-{gamma} by CCR2-/- mice after immunization in a Th1 manner

We previously found that CCR2-/- mice challenged with PPD of M. bovis in CFA produced markedly less IFN-{gamma} than CCR2+/+ mice (14). To further investigate this finding, we immunized CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice with KLH emulsified in CFA, which also produces a Th1 response. Four days after immunization, cells from the DLNs were restimulated in vitro with KLH for 48 h, and supernatants were assayed for IFN-{gamma}. As seen in Fig. 1Go, and consistent with the previous data obtained by challenging with PPD, the KLH/CFA immunization resulted in the production of 70–90% less IFN-{gamma} by the CCR2-/- mice than by the wild-type mice. In contrast, production of IL-5, IL-10, or IL-13 was not reduced in the CCR2-/- mice (Fig. 1Go). IL-12 and IL-4 were undetectable in both CCR2 wild-type and CCR2-/- mice (data not shown). Ab isotype switching was also investigated, but no differences in IgG1 (induced by IL-4) or IgG2a (induced by IFN-{gamma}) (26, 27, 28) were found (data not shown).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Cytokine production in immunized CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- mice. Mice were immunized with KLH emulsified in CFA. After 4 days, the DLN cells were isolated and restimulated with KLH in vitro. Supernatants were collected after 48 h and assayed for cytokine levels by ELISA. Shown are the mean values for groups of eight animals. Error bars represent SEM. *, p = 0.03.

 
Activation of T cells by CD3/CD28 and Con A

To determine whether expression of CCR2 on T cells is required for normal production of IFN-{gamma}, we harvested naive splenocytes from CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice and activated them with a combination of anti-CD3 (10 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (10 µg/ml). No significant differences in the amounts of IFN-{gamma} produced were found between the CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice (Fig. 2GoA). Because the anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 were used at saturating concentrations, additional experiments were performed in which the concentration of anti-CD3 was varied between 2.5 and 0.00125 µg/ml, while anti-CD28 was kept constant at 0.1 µg/ml. Once again, at all anti-CD3 concentrations examined, we failed to detect a difference in the amount of IFN-{gamma} produced by CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ (data not shown). Splenocyte proliferation during this assay was also quantitated, and no significant differences were found between the CCR2-/- and wild-type mice (data not shown). In contrast, when splenocytes from naive mice were activated by Con A, significantly lower levels of IFN-{gamma} were produced by the CCR2-/- cells (Fig. 2GoB). These results suggest that, at least in vitro, signaling through CCR2 is not essential for T cells to produce optimal levels of IFN-{gamma} in response to direct activation by anti-CD3/anti-CD28, but that optimal activation by Con A does depend upon the presence of CCR2.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. IFN-{gamma} production by nonspecifically activated splenocytes. Splenocytes were isolated and activated with A, anti-CD3 (10 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (10 µg/ml), or B, Con A (5 µg/ml). Supernatants were collected after 48 h and assayed for IFN-{gamma} by ELISA. Shown are the mean values for groups of eight animals from one of three similar experiments. p = 0.4 (CD3/CD28); *, p = 0.01 (Con A). Error bars represent SEM.

 
Activation of DCs by LPS

Activation of T cells to produce a Th1 response requires the presence of the APC cytokine IL-12. To determine whether IL-12 function was dependent upon the presence of CCR2, DCs were derived by culturing bone marrow precursor cells of naive CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice. After differentiation, the DCs were activated in vitro with LPS to stimulate cytokine production. Flow cytometry after LPS stimulation demonstrated that the cells were 90% positive for CD11c and 90% positive for MHC II (data not shown). No differences in the production of IL-12 were found between the CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice (Fig. 3Go). Thus, as was the case for T cells, activation of CCR2 was not required for cytokine production by DCs.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. IL-12 production by DCs. DCs were differentiated from the bone marrow of CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- mice and stimulated with LPS (1 µg/ml). Supernatants were collected 24 h later and assayed by ELISA for IL-12 p70. Shown are the means of groups of six mice, in one of three similar experiments. p = 0.3. Error bars represent SEM.

 
Quantitation of Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing T cells in the DLNs

We next sought to determine whether the decrease in IFN-{gamma} production represented less cytokine being produced by each CCR2-/- T cell in the DLNs, or alternatively, whether fewer Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing T cells were present in the DLNs of the CCR2-/- mice. The ELISPOT assay was used to determine the number of Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in the DLNs, after immunization with KLH/CFA. As shown in Fig. 4Go, there were significantly fewer Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in the DLNs of CCR2-/- mice than in those of CCR2+/+ littermate controls. However, we found no differences in the total numbers of CD3-positive T cells in the DLNs after immunization. These results were consistent with a trafficking defect of either the T cell or the APC.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Determination of the number of Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing T cells in the DLNs. Inguinal DLN cells were isolated 4 days after immunization with KLH/CFA and cultured for 24 h in the presence of immobilized anti-IFN-{gamma}. Shown are the means of 12 animals per group. Error bars represent SEM. *, p = 0.05.

 
APC trafficking in CCR2-/- mice

Activation of T cells in vivo to produce IFN-{gamma} requires macrophages and/or DCs to effectively present Ag to the TCR. Because fewer T cells appeared to be activated to produce IFN-{gamma} by the ELISPOT assay and because there did not appear to be a signaling defect by the T cells lacking CCR2 (the CD3/CD28 activation experiments), we considered the possibility that APC trafficking might be abnormal in CCR2-/- mice. To test this hypothesis, the number of infiltrating monocytes/macrophages and/or DCs at the site was determined 48 h after immunization with fluorescently labeled adjuvant. Resident and infiltrating mononuclear cells were isolated from the quadriceps and quantified. As shown in Fig. 5GoA, there were significantly fewer cells at the site of immunization in CCR2-/- mice than in CCR2+/+ mice. Further analysis revealed that the vast majority of these cells were CD11b+/CD11c-, suggesting that they were macrophages (Fig. 5GoB). Peritoneal macrophages, used as control cells for Ab specificity, yielded a virtually identical staining pattern (data not shown). Using these same techniques, the number of DiI-positive cells trafficking to the DLNs after immunization was determined. Markedly fewer DiI-positive cells appeared in the DLNs of CCR2-/- mice as compared with CCR2+/+ mice (Fig. 6GoA), and the vast majority of these cells were CD11b positive (Fig. 6GoB).



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Determination of the number of APCs at the site of immunization. A, Mice were immunized in the quadriceps with KLH/CFA that was labeled with the fluorescent dye, DiI. After 48 h, the APCs were isolated and purified on a metrizamide gradient and counted. Shown are the results from pooling six mice of each genotype, in three independent experiments. B, Flow cytometry was used to identify cell types within the population of APCs that took up the labeled adjuvant. CD11b-CYC was used to stain macrophages, and CD11c-CYC to stain DCs. Shown are data for CCR2+/+ mice only, because too few APCs were present in the CCR2-/- mice. This experiment is typical of three similar experiments.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Determination of APCs in the DLNs after immunization. A, Mice were immunized as in Fig. 5Go. After 48 h, the DLN cells were dispersed by treatment with collagenase, and the APCs were purified on a metrizamide gradient. Flow cytometry was used to quantify the number of DLN cells that took up the labeled adjuvant. Shown are the results of three independent experiments. B, FACS analysis revealed that DiI-positive cells were CD11b+. Gates were set to exclude autofluorescent cells.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In our initial characterization of the CCR2-/- mice, we were surprised to find that they produced 90% less IFN-{gamma} than CCR2+/+ mice in response to immunization with PPD of M. bovis mice (14). In the current study, we have confirmed these results using an alternative means of immunization and have explored the mechanism for the selective decrease in production of the Th1 cytokine IFN-{gamma}. In this study, we report that the basis for this defect involves impaired trafficking of APCs in the CCR2-/- mice.

We initially speculated that the decreased Ag-specific production of IFN-{gamma} might be due to an inability of the CCR2-/- lymphocytes to signal in response to MCP-1 or other closely related MCP chemokines (14). Such a mechanism would imply cross-talk between CCR2 and the TCR in the production of IFN-{gamma}. Reports from a number of groups support the notion that in addition to acting as potent chemoattractants, chemokines influence proliferation and cytokine production by lymphocytes. In 1995, Bacon et al. (4) showed that the chemokine RANTES caused proliferation of T cells in the absence of exogenous Ag and up-regulated the cytokine IL-5. Further studies by this group showed that RANTES induced activation and increased expression of CD3 on T cells (29). In 1996, Taub et al. (5) showed that RANTES, macrophage-inflammatory proteins 1{alpha} and 1ß, and MCP-1 acted in concert with anti-CD3 to activate T cells, increasing proliferation. In another series of studies, Karpus et al. (6) provided evidence that different chemokines could differentially induce polarization of T cells into Th1 or Th2 cytokine-producing populations. They found that addition of MCP-1 into T cell cultures induced IL-4 production, whereas addition of macrophage-inflammatory protein 1{alpha} induced IFN-{gamma} production (6). These results were further supported by studies in which neutralizing Abs to MCP-1 were added to cultures of CD4+ T cells, and a decrease in IL-4 production was seen along with a concomitant increase in IFN-{gamma} production (30). Taken together, these in vitro studies supported the notion that signaling through CCR2 may play an important role in IFN-{gamma} production in vivo.

In the current study, we tested this hypothesis but found that CCR2-/- T cells produced as much IFN-{gamma} as CCR2+/+ T cells after direct activation of CD3/CD28. These results are in contrast to the recent report of Sato et al. (22), who found that T cells derived from CCR2-/- mice produced significantly less IFN-{gamma} than cells from CCR2+/+ mice in response to CD3/CD28 activation. Because Sato et al. used lower concentrations of the CD3/CD28 Abs, we repeated the experiments using a wide range of CD3 Ab concentrations, but again failed to detect any differences between the CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- mice. Nor did we find any difference in the proliferation of CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- splenocytes in response to CD3/CD28. The reason for the difference between our results and those of Sato et al. (22) is not apparent at this time.

Because in our hands the presence of CCR2 did not play a role in IFN-{gamma} production in response to direct activation of the TCR, we turned our attention to the other major CCR2-positive cell type, the APCs, and asked whether they were functioning abnormally in the CCR2-/- mice. Although T cells can be directly activated in vitro by the addition of anti-CD3/anti-CD28, activation by Ags requires APCs to present Ag to the TCR to provide costimulatory signals and, in the case of Th1 responses, to provide IL-12 (31). We therefore next examined the ability of LPS-activated DCs to produce IL-12, and found that the CCR2-/- cells produced as much IL-12 as wild-type cells, ruling out the possibility that the Th1 defect was due to a problem with IL-12 production. We concluded from these experiments that CCR2 was not required for cytokine production by either T cells or APCs, if these cells were directly activated in vitro.

The lack of detectable cytokine defects in isolated cells led us to suspect that impaired trafficking of leukocytes to the site of immunization and/or to the DLNs was the underlying abnormality in the CCR2-/- mice. Indeed, macrophage trafficking defects in the CCR2-/- mice have been well documented. Fewer macrophages enter the peritoneal cavity after thioglycolate administration (14, 15, 16), and fewer macrophages are recruited to the aortic wall (18, 21) in CCR2-/- than in CCR2+/+ mice. In addition, Kurihara et al. (15) found that CCR2-/- mice were susceptible to lethal infection with Listeria monocytogenes, which they attributed to a lack of macrophage trafficking into infected tissues. None of these studies, however, considered macrophage recruitment in the context of Ag presentation. In mice, CCR2 is expressed on both immature DCs (17) and monocytes/macrophages. We therefore hypothesized that trafficking of these cells to the site of immunization, and subsequently to the DLNs, might be impaired.

We began the analysis of cell trafficking by determining the number of Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in the DLNs after immunization, using the ELISPOT assay. These studies revealed that there were indeed fewer Ag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in the DLNs of the CCR2-/- mice, even though the total number of CD3+ cells was equivalent in the CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice. It was still not clear, however, whether the primary defect was at the level of the T cell or the APC, because both are required for efficient cytokine production. A clue came from a result in our earlier studies (14), and confirmed in this study, that splenocytes from CCR2-/- mice produced significantly less IFN-{gamma} than cells from CCR2+/+ mice after activation with Con A. Unlike anti-CD3/anti-CD28, optimal activation of T cells by Con A requires the presence of APCs. It is of interest in this regard that we found decreased Con A-induced IFN-{gamma} production in naive mice as well as in KLH/CFA-immunized CCR2-/- mice, implying that CCR2 may play a role in the constitutive trafficking of APCs as well as in activated APC trafficking, even though the total number of CD11b-positive cells is the same in the CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- mice (14). Consistent with this hypothesis are the reports of constitutive MCP-5 expression in naive LNs (32) and the recent findings of Gu et al. (33), who have noted the presence of MCP-1 in both the spleen and lymph nodes of naive mice. It is also possible that MCP-1 production by APCs serves to increase the efficiency of Ag presentation by attracting CCR2-positive T cells within the LN. In this regard, Sallusto et al. (34) have found that mature DCs express MCP-1 and MCP-2.

Taken together, these data implicated the APC as the culprit and suggested that a defect in monocyte/macrophage and/or DC trafficking might be the primary cause of the IFN-{gamma} production defect in CCR2-/- mice. That equivalent levels of IFN-{gamma} were produced by CCR2+/+ and CCR2-/- splenocytes in response to CD3/CD28 further suggested that T cell trafficking was not the problem. We therefore sought to directly quantitate the number of cells that entered the site of immunization and to track them to the DLNs in CCR2-/- and CCR2+/+ mice. To directly visualize cells that interacted with the Ag, we immunized mice with KLH and fluorescently labeled CFA (35). Thus, any cell that phagocytosed the Ag could be detected by fluorescence analysis. Using this technique, Dupuis et al. (35) showed that DiI-labeled APCs trafficked to the T cell areas of the DLNs, where they could present Ags. In our studies, ~70% fewer fluorescently labeled cells were found at the site of immunization in the quadriceps in the CCR2-/- mice than in the wild-type mice. Analysis of these cells for expression of CD11b and CD11c revealed that greater than 80% of the fluorescent cells were macrophages, and we failed to detect any cells that were strongly positive for CD11c, suggesting the absence of DCs. This result is also consistent with recent work by Randolph et al. (36), who found that after s.c. injection with FITC-latex beads, the majority of cells that arrived at the site were CD11b+ monocytes/macrophages. We further found a marked reduction in the number of fluorescent CD11b+ cells in the DLNs of CCR2-/- mice, as compared with the CCR2+/+ mice.

These findings suggest that impaired trafficking of the monocytes/macrophages to the site results in fewer Ag-bearing APCs in the DLNs and contributes to reduced production of IFN-{gamma} in CCR2-/- mice after immunization. However, we have not ruled out a trafficking defect in the T cells themselves, although this would have to be limited to Ag-specific T cells because we did not detect differences in the number of total CD3-positive cells in LNs from CCR2+/+ vs CCR2-/- mice. Adoptive transfer experiments will be required to address this question directly.

Our results immediately raise the question of why wild-type levels of IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 are produced in the CCR2-/- mice. One possibility is that CCR2 may be expressed on only a subpopulation of APCs that tend to induce Th1 responses. In this regard, recent reports suggest the presence of at least two populations of DCs that can differentially polarize T cells to produce either Th1 or Th2 cytokines (37, 38). There have also been reports suggesting that distinct populations of macrophages exist. Stein et al. (39) suggested the presence of two separate populations of macrophages: APC1s that promoted inflammatory responses and APC2s that were designated noninflammatory inducers. It is possible, therefore, that CCR2 is preferentially expressed on the APC1-type macrophages that predominate at sites of inflammation. This would be consistent with the presence of MCP-1 at sites of inflammation (40, 41, 42, 43) and would extend to the APC the recent paradigm that different chemokine receptors are present on Th1 vs Th2 lymphocytes. A second possibility is that we did not detect a defect in Th2 cytokines because the genetic background of the CCR2-/- mice (C57BL/6) and the immunization protocol (KLH/CFA) favored the production of Th1 cytokines. In this regard, Warmington et al. (44) found reduced levels of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines when CCR2-/- mice were immunized in a more Th2-like manner with Schistosoma mansoni egg Ags. To provide a more rigorous test of the role of the genetic background, we are crossing the CCR2 null mice onto a pure BALB/c background, and we will then test their ability to synthesize and secrete Th2 cytokines after immunization in a Th2 manner.

Gu et al. (33) have recently reported that MCP-1-/- mice have a defect in the production of Th2 cytokines, but make normal levels of IFN-{gamma}. The disparity in cytokine production between the ligand (MCP-1) and receptor (CCR2) knockouts is intriguing, and suggests several plausible explanations for reconciling the data. First, it is possible that there are additional functional receptors for MCP-1. Thus, Nibbs et al. (45) have described a murine chemokine receptor, known as D6, which binds MCPs and other chemokines, but does not signal. More recently, Schweickart et al. (46) cloned a human chemokine receptor (CCR11) that binds and signals to MCPs, although at relatively high concentrations. It is not yet known if the murine form of CCR11 is activated by murine MCPs. Second, we know that in the mouse, MCP-3 and MCP-5 are also potent CCR2 agonists (32, 47). No information is available on how these chemokines might influence the balance of Th1 vs Th2 responses, and it will be of interest to examine cytokine profiles in MCP-3- and MCP-5-deficient mice, when they become available. Finally, there are technical differences in the experimental protocols used to immunize the MCP-1-/- and CCR2-/- mice. Thus, Gu et al. (33) immunized MCP-1-/- mice in a Th2 manner, whereas we immunized CCR2-/- mice in a Th1 manner. Because both strains of mice are on the C57BL/6 background, a side-by-side comparison using identical immunization protocols should resolve many of these questions.

In summary, we have found that CCR2-/- mice have a profound and selective defect in IFN-{gamma} production when immunized in a Th1 manner and that this defect is due, at least in part, to impaired trafficking of monocytes/macrophages to the immunization site and APCs to the DLNs. These studies reveal an important function for CCR2 in the modulation of the immune response. It is interesting to speculate that the importance of CCR2 in this regard might depend upon whether or not MCP-1 (or other CCR2 agonists) are generated at the site of inflammation as part of an immune response.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. Jason Cyster, Joseph M. McCune, and Mark Goldsmith for reviewing the manuscript. We thank John Carroll and Neile Shea for preparation of the figures. We also thank Stephen Ordway and Gary Howard for editorial assistance, and Kerry Humphrey, Brian Auerbach, and Karina Fantillo for manuscript preparation.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by Grant HL52773 from the National Institutes of Health (to I.F.C.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Israel F. Charo, Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, P.O. Box 419100, San Francisco, CA 94141-9100. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; DC, dendritic cell; DiI, 3,3'dioctadecylindocarbocyanine; DLN, draining lymph node; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; PPD, purified protein derivative. Back

Received for publication March 21, 2000. Accepted for publication September 13, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rollins, B. J.. 1997. Chemokines. Blood 90:909.[Free Full Text]
  2. Schall, T. J., K. B. Bacon. 1994. Chemokines, leukocyte trafficking, and inflammation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6:865.[Medline]
  3. Baggiolini, M., B. Dewald, B. Moser. 1994. Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokines: CXC and CC chemokines. Adv. Immunol. 55:97.[Medline]
  4. Bacon, K. B., B. A. Premack, P. Gardner, T. J. Schall. 1995. Activation of dual T cell signaling pathways by the chemokine RANTES. Science 269:1727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Taub, D. D., S. M. Turcovski-Corrales, M. L. Key, D. L. Longo, W. J. Murphy. 1996. Chemokines and T lymphocyte activation: ß chemokines costimulate human T lymphocyte activation in vitro. J. Immunol. 156:2095.[Abstract]
  6. Karpus, W. J., N. W. Lukacs, K. J. Kennedy, W. S. Smith, S. D. Hurst, T. A. Barrett. 1997. Differential CC chemokine-induced enhancement of T helper cell cytokine production. J. Immunol. 158:4129.[Abstract]
  7. Valente, A. J., D. T. Graves, C. E. Vialle-Valentin, R. Delgado, C. J. Schwartz. 1988. Purification of a monocyte chemotactic factor secreted by nonhuman primate vascular cells in culture. Biochemistry 27:4162.[Medline]
  8. Yoshimura, T., E. A. Robinson, S. Tanaka, E. Appella, J.-I. Kuratsu, E. J. Leonard. 1989. Purification and amino acid analysis of two human glioma-derived monocyte chemoattractants. J. Exp. Med. 169:1449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Matsushima, K., C. G. Larsen, G. C. DuBois, J. J. Oppenheim. 1989. Purification and characterization of a novel monocyte chemotactic and activating factor produced by a human myelomonocytic cell line. J. Exp. Med. 169:1485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Carr, M. W., S. J. Roth, E. Luther, S. S. Rose, T. A. Springer. 1994. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 acts as a T-lymphocyte chemoattractant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Allavena, P., G. Bianchi, D. Zhou, J. van Damme, P. Jílek, S. Sozzani, A. Mantovani. 1994. Induction of natural killer cell migration by monocyte chemotactic protein-1, -2 and -3. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:3233.[Medline]
  12. Loetscher, P., M. Seitz, I. Clark-Lewis, M. Baggiolini, B. Moser. 1996. Activation of NK cells by CC chemokines: chemotaxis, Ca2+ mobilization, and enzyme release. J. Immunol. 156:322.[Abstract]
  13. Sallusto, F., P. Schaerli, P. Loetscher, C. Schaniel, D. Lenig, C. R. Mackay, S. Qin, A. Lanzavecchia. 1998. Rapid and coordinated switch in chemokine receptor expression during dendritic cell maturation. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:2760.[Medline]
  14. Boring, L., J. Gosling, S. W. Chensue, S. L. Kunkel, Jr R. V. Farese, H. E. Broxmeyer, I. F. Charo. 1997. Impaired monocyte migration and reduced type 1 (Th1) cytokine responses in C-C chemokine receptor 2 knockout mice. J. Clin. Invest. 100:2552.[Medline]
  15. Kurihara, T., G. Warr, J. Loy, R. Bravo. 1997. Defects in macrophage recruitment and host defense in mice lacking the CCR2 chemokine receptor. J. Exp. Med. 186:1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kuziel, W. A., S. J. Morgan, T. C. Dawson, S. Griffin, O. Smithies, K. Ley, N. Maeda. 1997. Severe reduction in leukocyte adhesion and monocyte extravasation in mice deficient in CC chemokine receptor 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:12053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vecchi, A., L. Massimiliano, S. Ramponi, W. Luini, S. Bernasconi, R. Bonecchi, P. Allavena, M. Parmentier, A. Mantovani, S. Sozzani. 1999. Differential responsiveness to constitutive vs. inducible chemokines of immature and mature mouse dendritic cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 66:489.[Abstract]
  18. Boring, L., J. Gosling, M. Cleary, I. F. Charo. 1998. Decreased lesion formation in CCR2-/- mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Nature 394:894.[Medline]
  19. Gosling, J., S. Slaymaker, L. Gu, S. Tseng, C. H. Zlot, S. G. Young, B. J. Rollins, I. F. Charo. 1999. MCP-1 deficiency reduces susceptibility to atherosclerosis in mice that overexpress human apolipoprotein B. J. Clin. Invest. 103:773.[Medline]
  20. Gu, L., Y. Okada, S. K. Clinton, C. Gerard, G. K. Sukhova, P. Libby, B. J. Rollins. 1998. Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Mol. Cell 2:275.[Medline]
  21. Dawson, T. C., W. A. Kuziel, T. A. Osahar, N. Maeda. 1999. Absence of CC chemokine receptor-2 reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 143:205.[Medline]
  22. Sato, N., W. A. Kuziel, P. C. Melby, R. L. Reddick, V. Kostecki, W. Zhao, N. Maeda, S. K. Ahuja, S. S. Ahuja. 1999. Defects in the generation of IFN-{gamma} are overcome to control infection with Leishmania donovani in CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5-, macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha}-, or CCR2-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 163:5519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Traynor, T. R., W. A. Kuziel, G. B. Toews, G. B. Huffnagle. 2000. CCR2 expression determines T1 versus T2 polarization during pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J. Immunol. 164:2021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang, Z.-E., S. L. Reiner, S. Zheng, D. K. Dalton, R. M. Locksley. 1994. CD4+ effector cells default to the Th2 pathway in interferon {gamma}-deficient mice infected with Leishmania major. J. Exp. Med. 179:1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Inaba, K., M. Inaba, N. Romani, H. Aya, M. Deguchi, S. Ikehara, S. Muramatsu, R. M. Steinman. 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176:1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Coffman, R. L., D. A. Lebman, P. Rothman. 1993. Mechanism and regulation of immunoglobulin isotype switching. Adv. Immunol. 54:229.[Medline]
  27. Galli, S. J.. 1993. New concepts about the mast cell. N. Engl. J. Med. 328:257.[Free Full Text]
  28. Robinson, D. S., Q. Hamid, S. Ying, A. Tsicopoulos, J. Barkans, A. M. Bentley, C. Corrigan, S. R. Durham, A. B. Kay. 1992. Predominant TH2-like bronchoalveolar T-lymphocyte population in atopic asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 326:298.[Abstract]
  29. Dairaghi, D. J., K. S. Soo, E. R. Oldham, B. A. Premack, T. Kitamura, K. B. Bacon, T. J. Schall. 1998. RANTES-induced T cell activation correlates with CD3 expression. J. Immunol. 160:426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hogaboam, C. M., N. W. Lukacs, S. W. Chensue, R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel. 1998. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 synthesis by murine lung fibroblasts modulates CD4+ T cell activation. J. Immunol. 160:4606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Trinchieri, G.. 1995. Interleukin-12: a proinflammatory cytokine with immunoregulatory functions that bridge innate resistance and antigen-specific adaptive immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:251.[Medline]
  32. Sarafi, M. N., E. A. Garcia-Zepeda, J. A. MacLean, I. F. Charo, A. D. Luster. 1997. Murine monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-5: a novel CC chemokine that is a structural and functional homologue of human MCP-1. J. Exp. Med. 185:99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Gu, L., S. Tseng, R. M. Horner, C. Tam, M. Loda, B. J. Rollins. 2000. Control of TH2 polarization by the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Nature 404:407.[Medline]
  34. Sallusto, F., B. Palermo, D. Lenig, M. Miettinen, S. Matikainen, I. Julkunen, R. Forster, R. Burgstahler, M. Lipp, A. Lanzavecchia. 1999. Distinct patterns and kinetics of chemokine production regulate dendritic cell function. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:1617.[Medline]
  35. Dupuis, M., T. J. Murphy, D. Higgins, M. Ugozzoli, G. van Nest, G. Ott, D. M. McDonald. 1998. Dendritic cells internalize vaccine adjuvant after intramuscular injection. Cell. Immunol. 186:18.[Medline]
  36. Randolph, G. J., K. Inaba, D. F. Robbiani, R. M. Steinman, W. A. Muller. 1999. Differentiation of phagocytic monocytes into lymph node dendritic cells in vivo. Immunity 11:753.[Medline]
  37. Rissoan, M.-C., V. Soumelis, N. Kadowaki, G. Grouard, F. Briere, R. de Waal Malefyt, Y.-J. Liu. 1999. Reciprocal control of T helper cell and dendritic cell differentiation. Science 283:1183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Maldonado-López, R., T. De Smedt, P. Michel, J. Godfroid, B. Pajak, C. Heirman, K. Thielemans, O. Leo, J. Urbain, M. Moser. 1999. CD8{alpha}+ and CD8{alpha}- subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 189:587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Stein, M., S. Keshav, N. Harris, S. Gordon. 1992. Interleukin 4 potently enhances murine macrophage mannose receptor activity: a marker of alternative immunologic macrophage activation. J. Exp. Med. 176:287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Ylä-Herttuala, S., B. A. Lipton, M. E. Rosenfeld, T. Särkioja, T. Yoshimura, E. J. Leonard, J. L. Witztum, D. Steinberg. 1991. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in macrophage-rich areas of human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Koch, A. E., S. L. Kunkel, L. A. Harlow, B. Johnson, H. L. Evanoff, G. K. Haines, M. D. Burdick, R. M. Pope, R. M. Strieter. 1992. Enhanced production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Clin. Invest. 90:772.
  42. Nelken, N. A., S. R. Coughlin, D. Gordon, J. N. Wilcox. 1991. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human atheromatous plaques. J. Clin. Invest. 88:1121.
  43. Ransohoff, R. M., T. A. Hamilton, M. Tani, M. H. Stoler, H. E. Shick, J. A. Major, M. L. Estes, D. M. Thomas, V. K. Tuohy. 1993. Astrocyte expression of mRNA encoding cytokines IP-10 and JE/MCP-1 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. FASEB J. 7:592.[Abstract]
  44. Warmington, K. S., L. Boring, J. H. Ruth, J. Sonstein, C. M. Hogaboam, J. L. Curtis, S. L. Kunkel, I. F. Charo, S. W. Chensue. 1999. Effect of C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) knockout on type-2 (schistosomal antigen-elicited) pulmonary granuloma formation: analysis of cellular recruitment and cytokine responses. Am. J. Pathol. 154:1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Nibbs, R. J. B., S. M. Wylie, I. B. Pragnell, G. J. Graham. 1997. Cloning and characterizaton of a novel murine ß chemokine receptor, D6: comparison to three other related macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} receptors, CCR-1, CCR-3, and CCR-5. J. Biol. Chem. 272:12495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Schweickart, V. L., A. Epp, C. J. Raport, P. W. Gray. 2000. CCR11 is a functional receptor for the monocyte chemoattractant protein family of chemokines. J. Biol. Chem. 275:9550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Thirion, S., G. Nys, P. Fiten, S. Masure, J. Van Damme, G. Opdenakker. 1994. Mouse macrophage derived monocyte chemotactic protein-3: cDNA cloning and identification as MARC/FIC. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201:493.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. A. Szymczak and G. S. Deepe Jr
The CCL7-CCL2-CCR2 Axis Regulates IL-4 Production in Lungs and Fungal Immunity
J. Immunol., August 1, 2009; 183(3): 1964 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. D. Loberg, C. Ying, M. Craig, L. L. Day, E. Sargent, C. Neeley, K. Wojno, L. A. Snyder, L. Yan, and K. J. Pienta
Targeting CCL2 with Systemic Delivery of Neutralizing Antibodies Induces Prostate Cancer Tumor Regression In vivo
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9417 - 9424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. A. Schneider, J. G. Meingassner, M. Lipp, H. D. Moore, and A. Rot
CCR7 is required for the in vivo function of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells
J. Exp. Med., April 16, 2007; 204(4): 735 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. K. Henke, C. G. Pearce, D. M. Moaveni, A. J. Moore, E. M. Lynch, C. Longo, M. Varma, N. A. Dewyer, K. B. Deatrick, G. R. Upchurch Jr, et al.
Targeted Deletion of CCR2 Impairs Deep Vein Thombosis Resolution in a Mouse Model.
J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3388 - 3397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. Fiorina, M. J. Ansari, M. Jurewicz, M. Barry, V. Ricchiuti, R. N. Smith, S. Shea, T. K. Means, H. Auchincloss Jr., A. D. Luster, et al.
Role of CXC Chemokine Receptor 3 Pathway in Renal Ischemic Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 716 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. P. de Lema, H. Maier, T. J. Franz, M. Escribese, S. Chilla, S. Segerer, N. Camarasa, H. Schmid, B. Banas, S. Kalaydjiev, et al.
Chemokine Receptor Ccr2 Deficiency Reduces Renal Disease and Prolongs Survival in MRL/lpr Lupus-Prone Mice
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2005; 16(12): 3592 - 3601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. H. Terwey, T. D. Kim, A. A. Kochman, V. M. Hubbard, S. Lu, J. L. Zakrzewski, T. Ramirez-Montagut, J. M. Eng, S. J. Muriglan, G. Heller, et al.
CCR2 is required for CD8-induced graft-versus-host disease
Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 3322 - 3330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. Qu, E. W. Edwards, F. Tacke, V. Angeli, J. Llodra, G. Sanchez-Schmitz, A. Garin, N. S. Haque, W. Peters, N. van Rooijen, et al.
Role of CCR8 and Other Chemokine Pathways in the Migration of Monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells to Lymph Nodes
J. Exp. Med., November 15, 2004; 200(10): 1231 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
B.-C. Chiu, C. M. Freeman, V. R. Stolberg, J. S. Hu, K. Zeibecoglou, B. Lu, C. Gerard, I. F. Charo, S. A. Lira, and S. W. Chensue
Impaired Lung Dendritic Cell Activation in CCR2 Knockout Mice
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2004; 165(4): 1199 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
B.-C. Chiu, C. M. Freeman, V. R. Stolberg, J. S. Hu, E. Komuniecki, and S. W. Chensue
The Innate Pulmonary Granuloma: Characterization and Demonstration of Dendritic Cell Recruitment and Function
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2004; 164(3): 1021 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Bruhl, J. Cihak, M. A. Schneider, J. Plachy, T. Rupp, I. Wenzel, M. Shakarami, S. Milz, J. W. Ellwart, M. Stangassinger, et al.
Dual Role of CCR2 during Initiation and Progression of Collagen-Induced Arthritis: Evidence for Regulatory Activity of CCR2+ T Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 890 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. W. DePaolo, B. J. Rollins, W. Kuziel, and W. J. Karpus
CC Chemokine Ligand 2 and Its Receptor Regulate Mucosal Production of IL-12 and TGF-{beta} in High Dose Oral Tolerance
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3560 - 3567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
A. Iwasaki
The Importance of CD11b+ Dendritic Cells in CD4+ T Cell Activation In Vivo: With Help from Interleukin 1
J. Exp. Med., July 21, 2003; 198(2): 185 - 190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. L. deSchoolmeester, M. C. Little, B. J. Rollins, and K. J. Else
Absence of CC Chemokine Ligand 2 Results in an Altered Th1/Th2 Cytokine Balance and Failure to Expel Trichuris muris Infection
J. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 170(9): 4693 - 4700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. M. Scott and J. L. Flynn
Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Chemokine Receptor 2-Deficient Mice: Influence of Dose on Disease Progression
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2002; 70(11): 5946 - 5954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Omata, M. Yasutomi, A. Yamada, H. Iwasaki, M. Mayumi, and Y. Ohshima
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Selectively Inhibits the Acquisition of CD40 Ligand-Dependent IL-12-Producing Capacity of Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells and Modulates Th1 Immune Response
J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 4861 - 4866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. M. Krackhardt, S. Harig, M. Witzens, R. Broderick, P. Barrett, and J. G. Gribben
T-cell responses against chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells: implications for immunotherapy
Blood, June 17, 2002; 100(1): 167 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. R. Traynor, A. C. Herring, M. E. Dorf, W. A. Kuziel, G. B. Toews, and G. B. Huffnagle
Differential Roles of CC Chemokine Ligand 2/Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 and CCR2 in the Development of T1 Immunity
J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4659 - 4666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
R. T. Palframan, S. Jung, G. Cheng, W. Weninger, Y. Luo, M. Dorf, D. R. Littman, B. J. Rollins, H. Zweerink, A. Rot, et al.
Inflammatory Chemokine Transport and Presentation in HEV: A Remote Control Mechanism for Monocyte Recruitment to Lymph Nodes in Inflamed Tissues
J. Exp. Med., November 5, 2001; 194(9): 1361 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. P. Chen, W. A. Kuziel, and T. E. Lane
Lack of CCR2 Results in Increased Mortality and Impaired Leukocyte Activation and Trafficking Following Infection of the Central Nervous System with a Neurotropic Coronavirus
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4585 - 4592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Peters, H. M. Scott, H. F. Chambers, J. L. Flynn, I. F. Charo, and J. D. Ernst
Chemokine receptor 2 serves an early and essential role in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis
PNAS, July 3, 2001; 98(14): 7958 - 7963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, W.
Right arrow Articles by Charo, I. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, W.
Right arrow Articles by Charo, I. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*OMIM
*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS