|
|
||||||||

*
Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021; and
Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, NY 10029
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(50300
enzyme-linked immunospots/200,000 T cells) and proliferated.
Macrophages were much less efficient in expanding HIV-1-responsive T
cells, and bulk mononuclear cells responded weakly to VSV/HIV-1.
CD4+ T cells from at least half of the donors showed strong
responses to VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs. Presentation to CD8+ T
cells, but not to CD4+, was primarily through an endogenous
pathway, because the responses were markedly reduced if
envelope-defective virus particles or reverse transcriptase inhibitors
were added. Therefore, nonreplicating vaccines can be targeted to
immature DCs, which upon further maturation induce combined and robust
CD4+ and CD8+ immunity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dendritic cells (DCs)3 are efficient APCs for initiating immunity (see refs. 9 and 10 for review). Immature DCs take up Ag in the periphery, as illustrated by the capacity of skin DCs to capture and express DNA vaccines (11, 12, 13). The DCs then migrate via afferent lymphatics to lymphoid organs, where processed Ags are presented to T cells. Following maturation, DCs prime Ag-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, including T cell memory (14). Given the many specializations that DCs exhibit to initiate T cell immunity, such as the expression of abundant MHC-peptide complexes and T cell costimulators (15, 16), it would seem important for HIV-1 vaccine design to target this physiologic pathway.
It is well documented that envelope-defective HIV-1, when pseudotyped with another viral envelope encoded by a distinct plasmid in the virus-producer cells, undergo only one cycle of replication. These pseudotyped vectors are easy to prepare and provide a safe way to deliver all HIV-1 genes other than env into cells. Page (17) and Landau (18) were the first to describe replication-defective HIV-1 vectors containing deletions in the HIV-1 envelope gene. Several subsequent studies used vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G protein (VSV-G)-pseudotyped vectors to transduce dividing and nondividing cells (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Recently, we used VSV-pseudotyped HIV-1 to infect mature DCs and found that a small fraction of the cells undergo a single full round of viral infection and protein synthesis (24).
Here, we infected monocyte-derived DCs with VSV-pseudotyped HIV-1
to assess Ag presentation to CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells from infected individuals. To mimic
the delivery of vaccines in vivo, we delivered the nonreplicating
vector to an immature stage of DC development. When the infected DCs
were matured to maximize T cell stimulatory activity, the DCs presented
HIV-1 Ags as efficiently as pox vectors to CD4+
and CD8+ T cells from HIV-1-infected individuals.
The mature DCs greatly expanded CD4+ and
CD8+ IFN-
-secreting cells and induced
proliferative responses in enriched CD8+ T cells.
Therefore, VSV-pseudotyped virus is a readily available, safe approach
for transducing DCs and obtaining strong presentation of HIV-1 to
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients from two different institutions were all on HAART therapy that was initiated after their CD4+ T cell counts began to fall. Blood from individual patients was studied at least twice, and comparable results were obtained.
Cell preparation
DCs were generated from the monocytes of normal donors and HIV-1-infected individuals. CD14+ monocytes were positively selected from PBMCs using CD14 magnetic beads, as suggested by the vendor (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). A total of 1 x 106 CD14+ cells were plated in six-well trays in 3 ml consisting of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% human serum, recombinant human GM-CSF (100 IU/ml, Leukine; Immunex, Seattle, WA) and recombinant human IL-4 (1000 U/ml; Genzyme, Cambridge, MA). The cells were fed on day 2 and 4 with 1 ml fresh medium containing the same concentration of cytokines. At day 6, most of the nonadherent cells were immature DCs, showing little or no expression of the CD83, p55, DC-LAMP, and CD25 markers expressed by mature, more stimulatory DCs. To promote maturation, we replated the nonadherent DCs at 106 cells/well for 4 days in 3 ml medium, supplemented with cytokines as above and either LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 20 ng/ml) or irradiated (3000 rad) CD40 ligand (CD40L)-transfected fibroblasts (a kind gift of Dr. J. Banchereau, Baylor Institute for Immunology Research, Dallas, TX) at a ratio of 1 fibroblast to 7 DCs. In some experiments, soluble CD40L was used. The CD14- population was the source of T cells and was kept frozen until use. In many experiments, CD14- cells were separated by nylon wool columns to obtain bulk T cells or by positive and negative selection with CD4 and CD8 magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec).
Viruses and infection of cells
We were kindly provided with two envelope plasmids to pseudotype HIV-1: a VSV-G expression construct pHCMV-G from J. Burns (University of California, San Diego, CA) and a murine leukemia virus env plasmid from D. Landau (Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, NY). An env-defective HIV-1, expressing the green fluorescent protein, was provided by D. Gabuzda (Dana-Farber, Boston, MA). VSV wild-type virus was a gift of J. K. Rose (Yale University, New Haven, CT). Recombinant vaccinia and avipox were obtained from Virogenetics Corporation (Troy, NY) Vaccinia vectors were NYVAC parental vector and vP989:NYVAC-HIV-1 gag/pol (IIIB). Avipox vectors were ALVAC parental and vCP300:ALVAC-HIV-1 gp 160; gag/pro; nef/pol CTL. Complementation of env-defective HIV-1 plasmid with the VSV-G plasmid yielded pseudotyped virus that could only undergo a single round of infection. To produce virus, 3 x 106 293T cells were cotransfected with 20 µg/ml of the env-defective and 5 µg/ml VSV-G plasmids using the calcium phosphate method. Virus particles lacking envelope were produced by transfection of 293T cells with env-defective HIV-1 plasmid only. Virus stocks were prepared by collecting the culture supernatants after 72 h, filtering through 0.45-µm Millipore filters (Bedford, MA), and storing in aliquots at -80°C. Virus stocks were spun down through a 3-ml 25% sucrose cushion at 25,000 rpm for 2 h in SW41 rotor. Viral titers (infectious units) were quantified in HeLa Magi cells as described by Vodicka et al. (25) and also by p24 ELISA. Immature DCs were infected for 2 h in cytokine medium with VSV/HIV-1 at a multiplicity of infection of 220 ng p24 Ag, or 103104 infectious units, per 105 cells. AZT or 3TC (1 µM, from the National Institutes of Health AIDS Reagent Program) were added 1 h before infection and maintained throughout the course of the experiments. The infected DCs were matured with CD40L-expressing cells or soluble CD40L and cultured for an additional 4 days to allow the expression of HIV-1 Ags. As noted previously (24), a fraction of these CD40L-matured DCs expressed HIV-1 proteins but only after 34 days of culture. A total of 10 PFU of avipox/cell or 2 PFU of vaccinia/cell were used to infect the different APCs. Proviral DNA in infected DCs was analyzed as described (26).
Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay for IFN-
release
Ninety-six-well plates (Milliliter, Millipore, Bedford, MA) were
coated overnight at 4°C with 10 µg/ml of anti-IFN-
mAb
(Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden). The plates were washed and blocked with
RPMI 1640/5% human serum. PBMCs, or mixtures of DCs and T cells,
infected or not with viral vectors, were added to the coated plates for
36 h. The cells were lysed with PBS/0.05% Tween 20, and the wells
were incubated for 2 h with 1 µg/ml of biotin-conjugated,
anti-IFN-
mAb (Mabtech). To visualize the spot-forming foci
(IFN-
-secreting cells), the wells were washed and treated with
avidin HRP (Vectastain Elite kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA)
followed by stable diaminobenzidine (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL)
as substrate. The ELISPOT assay was also used to assess the expansion
of Ag-specific T cells over time. DCs infected or not with VSV/HIV-1
were cocultured for 7 days with T cells. Then CD4 and CD8 cells were
purified and restimulated in the ELISPOT assay with monocytes infected
with vaccinia or avipox vectors or pulsed with 5 µg/ml of either
HIV-1 p24 or control protein (Protein Science, Meriden, CT) and a
monocyte:T cell ratio of 1:3.
Proliferation assay
Infected and uninfected mature DCs were cultured with syngeneic T cells in round-bottom wells in 200 µl of medium. Generally we added DCs to 105 T cells at a ratio of 1:10 or 1:20 as specified in the figure legends. Triplicate cultures were seeded in parallel. After 5 days, the wells were pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]TdR for 8 h.
Detection of HIV-1 p24 protein
For FACS assays, infected DCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min on ice. Cells were permeabilized for 15 min in 1% saponin on ice, stained with anti p24 (clone 183, AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) followed by FITC-labeled anti-mouse Ig (Tago Scientific, Burlingame, CA), and double stained with anti-CD86 PE (PharMingen, San Diego, CA). For Western blotting, cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and equivalent cell numbers were loaded in 9% acrylamide gels. After transfer, the nitrocellulose was probed with anti-VSV-G (1.5 µg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) or anti-p24 Abs and revealed with enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously shown that replication-incompetent VSV/HIV-1 undergoes a single cycle of viral protein synthesis in a small fraction of mature DCs (24). To model the immature stage of DC that exists in peripheral tissues, we examined cells that were generated by culturing blood monocytes with GM-CSF and IL-4 (27, 28, 29). These cells are competent in Ag capture and support infection with wild-type M-tropic HIV-1 (30), but lack the full costimulatory activities of mature DCs (28, 29).
We used viruses complemented with VSV-G after finding that these were
more infectious then those complemented with murine leukemia virus
envelope (data not shown). Following infection with VSV/HIV-1, a
consistent but small percentage (<10%) of the immature DCs expressed
a green fluorescence protein reporter in our HIV-1 plasmid (not shown).
HIV-1 infection was monitored by the production of reverse transcripts
containing HIV-1 long-terminal repeat and gag sequences; this
production was sensitive to pretreatment with AZT or 3TC (Fig. 1
A). A vigorous infection with
VSV/HIV-1 was evident by the very high number of full-length
transcripts, >104 for 2 x
104 cells (Fig. 1
A). When analyzed by
Western blot, the infected DCs expressed HIV-1 gag (Fig. 1
B). As expected, VSV-G envelope expression was minimal
because the pseudotyped virus should lack an envelope gene, whereas DCs
infected with wild-type VSV had readily detectable G protein (Fig. 1
C). When the infection of DCs was studied with replicating,
wild-type VSV, most of the cells were infected as detected by
immunofluorescence with anti-VSV-G Ab (not shown), again showing
that most DCs were competent for entry via the VSV envelope. These
results show that VSV/HIV-1 efficiently infects immature DCs.
|
Mature DCs are more effective in HIV-1 Ag presentation than immature DCs
We first tested the presentation of HIV-1 Ags by DCs that were
infected with nonreplicating virus and either kept in an immature state
or allowed to mature. To study Ag presentation, DCs were prepared from
several HIV-1-infected individuals being followed in two medical
centers (Table I
).
CD14+ blood cells were cultured in GM-CSF and
IL-4 for 6 days and then infected with VSV/HIV-1 or left noninfected.
Then parallel aliquots were either kept in cytokines (immature) or
stimulated 4 days with CD40L to mature and express HIV-1 Ags. The DCs
were added to autologous T cells, and the response was measured in an
IFN-
ELISPOT assay. Mature infected DCs were much better stimulators
of patient T cells then immature infected DCs (Fig. 2
; top, DCp and Tp).
Noninfected DCs did not stimulate ELISPOT-producing T cells. Also, the
VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs from normal donors did not stimulate IFN-
release from autologous T cells (Fig. 2
, DCn + Tn). When patient DCs
were infected with VSV/SIV, they failed to stimulate T cells (not
shown), indicating that the T cell response was HIV-1 specific. In all
four experiments of this kind, mature DCs were better stimulators for
autologous T cells than immature DCs.
|
|
and IL-1
, LPS, monocyte-conditioned
medium (MCM), and CD40L. Infected DCs matured with CD40L were best able
to present Ags to Ag-specific autologous T cells relative to DCs
matured with LPS (Fig. 3
|
To identify subsets of T cells that could respond to the infected
DCs, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
were enriched either by positive or negative selection using magnetic
beads. T cell selections were verified by FACS, and positively selected
cells were found to be 98% enriched for the specific subset. The T
cell subsets were then stimulated for 36 h with autologous
uninfected and VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs in an IFN-
ELISPOT assay. As
shown in Fig. 4
A, the
CD8+ T cells were more active in the production
of IFN-
, but in some patients the infected DCs could also stimulate
IFN-
secretion from CD4+ cells (Fig. 4
A). The number of T cells that responded to DCs expressing
HIV-1 Ags was high, 50200 cells secreting IFN-
per 2 x
105 CD8+ cells. Comparable
responses were obtained when positively or negatively selected
(CD8+ or CD4-) populations
were studied, ruling out an involvement of NK cells in the IFN-
production. Nonetheless, in some cases we also removed the
CD56+ NK cells, which represented 15% of the
CD4- cells, with CD56 beads, and this did not
change the results (data not shown). We conclude that VSV/HIV-1, a
vector that is reliably prepared to a high viral titer in a
straightforward manner, can be used to identify
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in
HIV-1-infected individuals on HAART (summarized in Table I
).
|
We next tested whether infected DCs could expand Ag-specific T
cells in 5-day cultures. As in the case of the ELISPOT assay above
(Fig. 2
), T cells from uninfected donors did not show proliferative
responses to autologous, VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs. In contrast,
CD8+ T cells from all patients proliferated in
response to VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs and did not show a significant
syngeneic MLR to uninfected DCs (Fig. 4
B and Table I
). At
the DC:T ratios that we used (1:101:20), uninfected DCs did stimulate
CD4+ T cell proliferation, as a result of the
syngeneic MLR, but in at least half the patients studied, the infected
DCs were further stimulatory for CD4+ T cells
(Fig. 4
B and Table I
). Therefore, VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs can
stimulate growth in CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells from HIV-1-primed donors.
To assess expansion of cytokine-producing effectors, we cocultured
VSV/HIV-1-infected DCs for 7 days with autologous T cells. The ELISPOT
assay was then carried out using restimulation with autologous
monocytes pulsed with p24 or recombinant HIV-1 vectors. Fig. 5
shows a typical experiment in which T
cells from an individual donor were evaluated for IFN-
secretion in
fresh bulk PBMCs (Fig. 5
A), in T cells stimulated with
autologous DCs infected with various vectors (Fig. 5
B), and
with T cells expanded for 7 days with DCs (Fig. 5
C). It is
evident that 1) VSV/HIV-1 is not effective in fresh PBMCs (Fig. 5
A), 2) VSV/HIV-1 is comparably effective to recombinant pox
viral vectors when DCs are used as APCs with fresh T cells (Fig. 5
B), and 3) DCs infected with VSV/HIV-1 clearly expand
IFN-
-secreting T cells, both CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5
C).
|
We then set up dose response curves to compare the efficacy with
which DCs and macrophages, infected with pseudotyped HIV-1, expand
effector T cells. Mature DCs proved to be markedly more potent. At a
DC:T cell ratio of 1:30, the response was much greater than macrophages
at a ratio of 1:5, and at 1:30, macrophages had no activity (Fig. 6
). Taken together, the data on APC
requirements indicate that mature DCs should be targeted with
nonreplicating viral vectors to expand HIV-1 Ag-reactive T cells.
|
We have shown above (Fig. 1
A) that inhibitors of
reverse transcription block the infection of DCs with VSV/HIV-1. To
evaluate the relative contributions of the endogenous (AZT-sensitive)
and exogenous (AZT-resistant) pathways of HIV-1 Ag presentation, we
conducted ELISPOT assays in which CD4+ and
CD8+ cells were stimulated with DCs that were
treated with AZT. To block endogenous presentation, we also studied
envelope-deficient HIV-1 particles produced by 293 cells in the absence
of an env plasmid. Fig. 7
shows that pretreatment of DCs with AZT substantially reduced IFN-
secretion by the CD8+ cells without affecting
cytokine release by the CD4+ T cells. Similar
results were obtained when DCs were pretreated with 3TC, another
reverse transcriptase inhibitor (not shown). DCs infected with virus
particles devoid of envelope also did not stimulate
CD8+ T cells (Fig. 7
). As in the case of DCs
infected in the presence of AZT, DCs pulsed with envelope-deficient
virus were able to stimulate CD4+ T cells.
Therefore, we conclude that VSV/HIV-1 charges MHC class I molecules in
DCs primarily by the endogenous pathway and MHC II by an exogenous
route.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At this time, many nonreplicating forms of HIV-1 are being considered as vaccine vectors, particularly avipox and modified vaccine Ankara (see Ref. 31 for review). Our current studies are an initial exploration of the use of VSV-pseudotyped virus to charge DCs with HIV-1 Ags. We want to assess the hypothesis that targeting of a nonreplicating vaccine to mature DCs will enhance T cell-mediated immunity and thereby provide an opportunity to study the resistance that a well-primed T cell system can provide to challenge with immunodeficiency viruses, HIV-1 and SIV. Strong T cell immunity, comparable to that seen with immunogenic viruses, is not being observed when humans or monkeys are vaccinated with current pox virus vectors.
Because mature DCs are not typically found in the periphery, we
assessed whether VSV/HIV-1 can be captured by immature DCs. Whereas pox
viruses have toxicity to immature DCs (32, 33) or block
their maturation (34), immature DCs allow nontoxic entry
of pseudotyped virus through the acid-sensitive VSV envelope.
Interestingly, the level of full-length reverse transcripts is very
high (at least 104 copies in 2 x
104 DC in Fig. 1
A), yet the percentage
of DCs expressing HIV-1 gag is relatively low (Fig. 1
D),
suggesting a block in the HIV-1 life cycle beyond reverse
transcription. Although our current studies exploit the VSV-G as the
entry mechanism, additional uptake receptors are known to be expressed
by DCs. These include the macrophage mannose receptor (35)
and DEC-205 (36), both multilectin receptors for
adsorptive endocytosis. Other newly recognized C-type lectins, Langerin
(37) and DC-SIGN (38), are not yet known to
lead to Ag presentation.
Following uptake into immature DCs, the cells could be induced to
mature and became more potent in presenting HIV-1 Ags (Figs. 2
and 3
).
We tested several maturation stimuli and found CD40L to be superior to
LPS and MCM. Together, our data indicate that a nonreplicating vaccine
can be captured by immature DCs, and then maturation harnesses the T
cell stimulatory potential of these APCs.
There are interesting advantages to the use of pseudotyped virus for
delivering HIV-1 Ags to the immune system in vivo. The first is safety.
The virus is not pathogenic, because it is genetically unable to
undergo more than a single cycle of replication. We have verified this
previously by showing that pseudotyped virus is not transmitted from
DCs to T cells, as occurs with wild-type HIV-1 (24), nor
does the virus replicate in DCs cultured for up to 7 days. A second
advantage is the ease of preparation. High titer virus (10
6107 infectious units/ml
in the Magi assay) is produced by simple cotransfection of the 293 T
producer line with the VSV-G and env-deficient HIV-1
plasmids. Third, as discussed above, VSV-pseudotyped virus gains access
to immature DCs, which are rich in acidic, endocytic compartments and
represent the most logical sites for capture of vaccines in vivo
(9, 10). Fourth, anti-envelope Abs should not be
induced when pseudotyped viruses are targeted to DCs. VSV-G is poorly
expressed in the infected DCs, so B cells should not be selected to
produce anti-envelope Abs. Moreover, most humans do not have
preexisting neutralizing Abs to VSV. A fifth advantage, and the
emphasis of this paper, is that VSV/HIV-1 is efficiently presented to
both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
by DCs. Both CD4+ and CD8+
subsets are probably required for strong T cell memory and protection
against HIV-1 (39, 40, 41). In fact, DCs charged with
VSV/HIV-1 induce robust T cell responses from primed T cells, both in
terms of the absolute number of IFN-
-secreting cells and the high
levels of DNA synthesis, especially in CD8+
cells.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Angela Granelli-Piperno, Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021-6399. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; VSV-G, VSV G protein; CD40L, CD40 ligand; ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospot; MCM, monocyte-conditioned medium. ![]()
Received for publication February 12, 2000. Accepted for publication September 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and MIP-1
as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8-T cells. Science 270:1811.
. J. Exp. Med. 179:1109.
secretion. J.
Virol. In press.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Stahl-Hennig, S. Kuate, M. Franz, Y. S. Suh, H. Stoiber, U. Sauermann, K. Tenner-Racz, S. Norley, K. S. Park, Y. C. Sung, et al. Atraumatic Oral Spray Immunization with Replication-Deficient Viral Vector Vaccines J. Virol., December 1, 2007; 81(23): 13180 - 13190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Peng, F.-c. Lin, P. H. Verardi, L. A. Jones, M. B. McChesney, and T. D. Yilma Pseudotyped Single-Cycle Simian Immunodeficiency Viruses Expressing Gamma Interferon Augment T-Cell Priming Responses In Vitro J. Virol., March 1, 2007; 81(5): 2187 - 2195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moris, A. Pajot, F. Blanchet, F. Guivel-Benhassine, M. Salcedo, and O. Schwartz Dendritic cells and HIV-specific CD4+ T cells: HIV antigen presentation, T-cell activation, and viral transfer Blood, September 1, 2006; 108(5): 1643 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Narvaez, J. Angel, and M. A. Franco Interaction of Rotavirus with Human Myeloid Dendritic Cells J. Virol., December 1, 2005; 79(23): 14526 - 14535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tenner-Racz, C. S. Hennig, K. Uberla, H. Stoiber, R. Ignatius, J. Heeney, R. M. Steinman, and P. Racz Early protection against pathogenic virus infection at a mucosal challenge site after vaccination with attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 3017 - 3022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Palmowski, L. Lopes, Y. Ikeda, M. Salio, V. Cerundolo, and M. K. Collins Intravenous Injection of a Lentiviral Vector Encoding NY-ESO-1 Induces an Effective CTL Response J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1582 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, M. Messerle, R. Sapinoro, K. Santos, P. K. Hocknell, X. Jin, and S. Dewhurst Murine Cytomegalovirus Abortively Infects Human Dendritic Cells, Leading to Expression and Presentation of Virally Vectored Genes J. Virol., July 1, 2003; 77(13): 7182 - 7192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Marsac, D. Loirat, C. Petit, O. Schwartz, and M.-L. Michel Enhanced Presentation of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-Restricted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Gag-Specific Epitopes after DNA Immunization with Vectors Coding for Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Glycoprotein- Pseudotyped HIV-1 Gag Particles J. Virol., June 27, 2002; 76(15): 7544 - 7553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gruber, J. C. Wheat, K. L. Kuhen, D. J. Looney, and F. Wong-Staal Differential Effects of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors on Dendritic Cell Immunophenotype and Function J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2001; 276(51): 47840 - 47843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |