|
|
||||||||

*
Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany; and
AmCell Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA 94089
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From analyses of freshly isolated lin- BDC it
became evident that BDC do not represent a homogeneous cell population,
but, rather, a mixture of at least two populations (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14): 1) CD123bright
CD11c- BDC, which possess a plasmacytoid
morphology, express CD45RA, and depend on IL-3 for their survival and
differentiation into mature DC with typical dendritic morphology and
potent T cell stimulatory function; and 2)
CD123dim CD11cbright BDC,
which are rather monocytoid in appearance, express CD45RO, and
spontaneously develop into typical mature DC even when cultured without
any exogenous cytokines. Plasmacytoid CD123bright
CD11c- BDC display some features, such as the
expression of the pre-TCR
-chain, that indicate that they may arise
from lymphoid precursors (4, 14, 15), whereas
CD123dim CD11cbright BDC
display all the criteria of myeloid DC (3, 4, 5, 6, 7). DC
resembling plasmacytoid CD123bright
CD11c- BDC have been detected in the T cell-rich
areas of lymphoid tissue (16) and were initially
erroneously designated plasmacytoid T cells or plasmacytoid monocytes
due to their morphology and phenotype (17, 18). DC
resembling CD123dim
CD11cbright BDC have been found in the dark and
light zones of germinal centers (19).
Here we describe a panel of new mAb raised against immunomagnetically purified CD4+ lin- BDC that identify three presumably novel BDC Ags: BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4. In fresh human blood, expression of BDCA-2 and BDCA-4 is strictly confined to plasmacytoid CD123bright CD11c- BDC, whereas expression of BDCA-3 is restricted to a small population of CD123- CD11c+ BDC. This small population of BDCA-3+ BDC shares many immunophenotypic features with classical CD123dim CD11cbright BDC, but unlike CD123dim CD11cbright BDC, BDCA-3+ BDC lack expression of CD1c (BDCA-1), CD2, and several of the Fc receptors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Five 6- to 8-wk-old female BALB/c mice (Simonsen, Gilroy, CA)
were inoculated with
5 x 105 to 1
x 106 purified HLA-DR+
lin- BDC under anesthesia on days 0, 4, 7, 11,
and 14 in the right hind footpad and with
1 x
106 HLA-A2+ Bristol-8 B
lymphoblastoma cells in the left hind footpad on days -3, 0, 4, 7, 11,
and 14 (30). Both cell types were incubated with 1/100 PHA
(Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) for 10 min at room temperature
and washed with PBS before injection.
On day 15 the cells of the mouse right hind popliteal lymph nodes were fused to SP2/0 Ag14 myeloma cells. Fused cells were plated on 96-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 20% FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 15 mmol/L HEPES, 10-4 mmol/L hypoxanthine (Life Technologies), and 2 µg/ml azaserine (O-diazoacetyl-L-serine; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and placed in a 37°C incubator with 9% CO2.
When visible hybridoma colonies were apparent, flow cytometric analysis
was used to screen supernatants from these wells for Ab secretion and
for nonreactivity (
1% positive cells) to PBMC. Briefly, a mixture of
rat anti-mouse
mAb-conjugated polystyrene beads (2.5 µm in
diameter; Interfacial Dynamics, Portland, OR) and PBMC was incubated
with 50 µl of hybridoma supernatant for 20 min at room temperature.
The bead/cell mixture was then washed twice with PBS, pH 7.4,
containing 5 mmol/L EDTA and 0.5% BSA (PBS/EDTA/BSA), and binding of
mouse IgM, IgG1, Ig2a, and Ig2b from the supernatants to the beads and
the test cells was detected by staining with PE-conjugated rat
anti-mouse IgM mAb (clone X54; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), rat
anti-mouse IgG1 mAb (clone X56; BD Biosciences), and rat
anti-mouse IgG2 mAb (clone X57; BD Biosciences).
Culture supernatants that fulfilled the screening criteria of the first
round were then flow cytometrically screened for reactivity to a
significant proportion of BDC. Briefly, a mixture of rat anti-mouse
mAb-conjugated polystyrene beads and enriched BDC (PBMC depleted of
B cells, T cells, and monocytes) was incubated with 50 µl of
hybridoma culture supernatant for 20 min at room temperature. The
mixture was then washed twice with PBS/EDTA/BSA and stained with
PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgM mAb, rat anti-mouse IgG1 mAb,
and rat anti-mouse IgG2 mAb to detect binding of mouse IgM, IgG1,
Ig2a, and Ig2b from the supernatants to the beads and the enriched BDC.
For discrimination of HLA-DR+ BDC from
HLA-DR- cells, the bead/cell mixture was then
washed once, free binding sites of the PE-conjugated rat anti-mouse
IgG2 mAb and the bead-conjugated rat anti-mouse
mAb were
saturated by incubation with 100 µg/ml mouse IgG2a, and the mixture
was counterstained with anti HLA-DR-FITC (clone AC122, IgG2a).
Selected hybridoma cells were expanded, subclones were established, and the isotype of the mAb was determined by the ISOTYPE Ab-STAT Kit (SangStat Medical, Palo Alto, CA).
Cell preparations
Buffy coats from normal healthy volunteers were obtained form the Institute for Transfusionmedicine, Hospital Merheim (Cologne, Germany). PBMC were prepared from buffy coats by standard Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation. Peripheral blood leukocytes were prepared from buffy coats by lysis of erythrocytes in isotonic ammonium chloride buffer.
CD4+ lin- BDC were isolated from PBMC by two-step immunomagnetic cell sorting (MACS) as described in detail previously (13, 20). Briefly, monocytes, T cells, B cells, and NK cells were depleted using mAb against CD3 (clone BW264/56), CD11b (clone M1/70.15.11.5), CD16 (clone VEP-13), and in a few experiments a poorly defined Ag expressed on B cells and monocytes (clone L179; BD Biosciences). From the depleted cell fraction, BDC were then enriched using an mAb against CD4 (clone M-T321). To screen hybridoma culture supernatants (see above), BDC were merely partially enriched by immunomagnetic depletion of T cells, B cells, and monocytes based on CD3 and L179 Ag expression.
CD1c-, BDCA-2-, and BDCA-3-expressing cells were isolated from PBMC by indirect magnetic labeling with PE- or FITC-conjugated mAb (AD5-8E7, AC144, and AD5-5E8, respectively) and anti-PE or anti-FITC mAb-conjugated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and enrichment of labeled cells by MACS. In some experiments BDCA-3+ cells were isolated based on direct magnetic labeling with anti-BDCA-3 mAb (AD5-5E8)-conjugated microbeads. Highly pure CD1c+ BDC without contaminating CD1c+ B cells were obtained by immunomagnetic depletion of CD19+ B cells using CD19 mAb-conjugated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) followed by immunomagnetic enrichment of CD1c+ cells.
Basophils were purified from PBMC by immunomagnetic depletion of nonbasophils based on indirect magnetic labeling of CD3-, CD7-, CD14-, CD15-, CD36-, CD45RA-, and HLA-DR-expressing cells with a magnetic labeling kit (Miltenyi Biotec). CD14+ monocytes, CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cells, and CD3+ T cells were immunomagnetically purified based on direct magnetic labeling with CD14, CD34, and CD3 mAb-conjugated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec), respectively.
Cell culturing
For generation of immature monocyte-derived DC (Mo-DC), purified
CD14+ monocytes were cultured at a cell density
of 5 x 105 to 1 x
106 cells/ml in medium (RPMI 1640 (Life
Technologies) supplemented with 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 10%
FCS (Sigma), 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies), 100 U/ml
penicillin (Life Technologies), and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life
Technologies)) at 37°C in a humidified 5%
CO2-containing atmosphere in the presence of
500-1000 U/ml rIL-4 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and 100 ng/ml rGM-CSF
(PeproTech) for 7 days. For generation of mature Mo-DC, immature Mo-DC
were washed once and cultured in medium in the presence of 20 ng/ml
TNF-
(PeproTech) for another 3 days. For generation of
CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cell-derived DC
(CD34-derived DC), purified CD34+ cells were
cultured at a cell density of 5 x 104
cells/ml in medium in the presence of 100 ng/ml rFlt3 ligand
(PeproTech), 0.5 ng/ml rTGF-
1 (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml rTNF-
, 20
ng/ml recombinant stem cell factor (PeproTech), and 100 ng/ml rGM-CSF
for 11 days. Freshly isolated CD4+
lin- BDC were cultured at a cell density of
5 x 105 to 1 x
106 cells/ml in medium in the presence of 10
ng/ml rIL-3 (PeproTech) for up to 48 h. Isolated
CD1c-, BDCA-2-, and BDCA-3-expressing BDC were cultured at a
cell density of 5 x 105 to 1 x
106 cells/ml in medium without any cytokines or
in the presence of 10 ng/ml rIL-3, 20 ng/ml IL-4 (PeproTech), and 100
ng/ml GM-CSF for up to 48 h.
Flow cytometric analysis
A FACScalibur (BD Biosciences) was used for one-, two-, three-, or four-color flow cytometry. Data for 5 x 103 to 2 x 105 cells/sample were acquired in list mode and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
The following mAb (clone names) were used in this study for flow
cytometry: CD1a (HI149), CD10 (HI10a), CD11a (G43-25B), CD11c (B-ly6),
CD25 (M-A261), CD27 (M-T271), CD32 (FL18.26), CD38 (HIT2), CD40 (5C3),
CD43 (1G10), CD54 (HA58), CD62L (Dreg 56), CD64 (10.1), CD69 (FN50),
CD98 (HIM6), anti-HLA-DQ (Tü169), and anti-TCR
(T10B9.1A-31) from PharMingen (San Diego, CA); CD2 (S5.2), CD8 (SK1),
CD13 (L138), CD14 (MFP9), CD19 (SJ25-C1), CD33 (P67.6), CD34 (8G12),
CD45RO (UCHL-1), CD56 (NCAM16.2), CD62L (SK11), CD71 (L01.1), CD123
(9F5), anti-IgD (TA4.1), anti-mouse IgG1 (X56), anti-mouse
IgG2 (X57), and anti-mouse IgM (X54) from BD Biosciences; CD5
(CLB-T11/1, 6G4), CD7 (CLB-T-3A1/1, 7F3), CD16 (CLB-FcR Gran1, 5D2),
CD45RA (F8-11-13), and CD80 (CLB-DAL1) from CLB (Amsterdam, The
Netherlands); CD18 (7E4), CD23 (9P25), CD58 (AICD58), CD77 (38.13),
CD83 (HB15A), CD86 (HA5.2B7), and CD116 (SC06) from Coulter-Immunotech
(Marseilles, France); CD3 (BW264/56), CD4 (M-T321), CD11b
(M1/70.15.11.5), CD14 (TUK4), CD15 (VIMC6), CD16 (VEP-13),
anti-HLA-DR (910/D7), anti-AC133 (AC133/1), and anti-TCR
(BW242/412) from Miltenyi Biotec; CD36 (AC106), CD123 (AC145),
anti-HLA-DR (AC122 and AC123), and anti-glycophorin A (AC107)
from Amcell (Sunnyvale, CA); CD1c (M241) from Ancell (Bayport, MN);
polyclonal anti-IgG, anti-IgM (SA-DA4), polyclonal anti-
,
and polyclonal anti-
from Southern Biotechnology Associates
(Birmingham, AL); CD61 (VIPL2) from W. Knapp (Institute of Immunology,
University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria); CD44 (IM7) from J. Moll
(Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany); CD20 (HI47) from
Caltag (Burlingame, CA); anti-CLA (HECA-452) from E. Butcher
(Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA);
anti-Fc
RI (15-1) from J. P. Kinet (Molecular Allergy and
Immunology Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD); CD11c (Ki-M1)
from M. R. Parwaresch (Department of Pathology, Christian
Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany); CMRF-44 and CMRF-56 from D.
N. Hart (Mater Medical Research Institute, Mater Misericordiae
Hospitals, South Brisbane, Australia); and anti HLA-A,B,C (W6/32) from
Sigma.
All Abs were used as FITC-, PE-, biotin-, or Cy5-conjugated mAb. For indirect immunofluorescent staining with biotinylated mAb, streptavidin-APC (BD Biosciences) was used. For exclusion of dead cells in the flow cytomeric analysis, cells were stained with propidium iodide. To minimize FcR-mediated mAb binding, cells were stained in most experiments in the presence of FcR-blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec) containing human IgG.
Microscopic analysis
Cells were spun down on slides in a cytocentrifuge (Cytospin 3; Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA). A Zeiss Axioscope microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used for analysis. Digital pictures were made using the Xillix MicroImager MI1400-12X (Xillix, Vancouver, Canada).
Endocytosis assay
To assess endocytosis of BDC subsets, purified CD1c+, BDCA-2+, and BDCA-3+ BDC, and (as controls) purified CD3+ T cells and immature Mo-DC were incubated at 37°C in medium with 1 mg/ml Lucifer Yellow (LY) for 0, 15, 45, and 75 min. Afterward, cells were washed three times in ice-cold PBS/EDTA/BSA and analyzed by flow cytometry.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mAb listed in Table I
fulfilled
the initial screening criteria for BDC-specific mAb (see
Materials and Methods) and were further characterized.
According to their reactivity with blood cells, the mAb could be
divided into four groups: 1) AC144, AD5-13A11, and AD5-4B8; 2)
AD5-17F6; 3) AD5-5E8 and AD5-14H12; and 4) AD5-8E7.
|

, CD14, CD19, and CD56 (Fig. 1
-,
CD14-, CD19-, and
CD56-) with CD123-PE vs CD11c-FITC reveals three
BDC subsets (Fig. 2
|
|
|
|

, CD14, CD19, and CD56 (Fig. 1
The fourth group mAb AD5-8E7 reacts with 2.39 ± 0.76%
(n = 10) of unfractionated PBMC (Fig. 1
A).
Light scatter analysis (Fig. 1
B) and counterstaining of the
lineage markers TCR
, CD14, and CD19 revealed that the mAb is not
reactive to T cells and monocytes, but is reactive to a major subset of
small resting CD19+ B cells. Staining of purified
BDC shows that AD5-8E7, in addition to B cells, stains a third subset
of BDC distinct from those subsets recognized by the mAb of the first
and second groups, namely CD11cbright
CD123dim BDC. A significant proportion of the
CD11cbright CD123dim BDC
expresses CD56 (see below). For this reason, some AD5-8E7-reactive PBMC
stain for CD56 (Fig. 1
A). AD5-8E7 is not reactive to
purified NK cells (data not shown). The Ag recognized by AD5-8E7 was
initially named BDCA-1, as it appeared to be a new Ag. However, it
later transpired that AD5-8E7 completely blocked binding of the CD1c
mAb M241 to MOLT-4 cells (Fig. 5
). Thus,
the Ag recognized by AD5-8E7 is CD1c.
|
Expression of BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4 on cultured BDC
Expression of BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4 on
CD11c- and CD11c+ BDC was
analyzed after various periods of culturing total BDC in the presence
of rIL-3. The results are shown in Fig. 4
. Expression of
BDCA-2 is completely down-regulated within 48 h on
CD11c- BDC. In contrast, BDCA-4 is even further
up-regulated on CD11c- BDC and, unlike BDCA-2,
is also expressed to a high level on most, if not all,
CD11c+ BDC. Expression of BDCA-3 is rapidly
induced on CD11c- BDC, reaching the highest
expression level after 24 h. Thereafter, BDCA-3 expression appears
to be down-regulated again. Analyzing the expression of BDCA-3 on
CD11c+ BDC is complicated by the fact that
BDCA-3- CD11cbright and
BDCA-3+ CD11c+ subsets are
present at the onset of the culture. Expression of BDCA-3 appears to
remain unchanged at least until 6 h of culture on the
BDCA-3+ CD11c+ BDC
population and is induced within 3 h on at least some cells of the
BDCA-3- CD11cbright BDC
subset.
Expression of BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4 on Mo-DC and CD34-derived DC
Functional CD1a+ DC can be generated ex vivo
from monocytes (21, 22, 23) and CD34+
hemopoietic progenitor cells (24). Fig. 6
shows that immature Mo-DC (25, 26) and CD34-derived DC express CD1a, CD1c, and BDCA-4, but not
BDCA-2 or BDCA-3.
|
The possibility that 37°C incubation of anti-BDCA-2 mAb-labeled
BDCA-2+ cells results in mAb internalization was
addressed by staining of PBMC with FITC-conjugated AC144 mAb (IgG1).
Then, following incubation at 37°C, the remaining cell
surface-associated mAb was detected by staining with PE-conjugated rat
anti-mouse IgG1 mAb. As shown in Fig. 7
, when cells were incubated at 37°C,
the intensity of the rat anti-mouse IgG1-PE staining decreased
extremely rapidly to background levels. In contrast, the intensity of
the AC144-FITC staining decreased only temporarily to a level of
50%, but thereafter nearly returned to the preincubation level.
This demonstrates that BDCA-2 is internalized upon anti-BDCA-2 mAb
labeling, with kinetics similar to those of receptor-mediated
endocytosis. The transient decrease in AC144-FITC staining intensity is
probably due to patching and capping of the BDCA-2/anti-BDCA-2 mAb
complex before endocytosis.
|
CD1c+, BDCA-2+, and
BDCA-3+ cells were isolated from PBMC by MACS
(Fig. 8
). On May-Grünwald Giemsa
staining of cytocentrifuge slides (Fig. 8
), freshly isolated
BDCA-2-expressing cells displayed the typical lymphoplasmacytoid
morphology of CD11c- CD4+
lin- DC from blood and tonsils: that is,
medium-sized round cells with oval or indented nuclei (3, 6, 16). In contrast, both freshly isolated
CD1c+ BDC as well as freshly isolated
BDCA-3+ BDC displayed the typical morphological
characteristics of CD11c+
CD4+ lin- DC from blood or
tonsils: that is, less rounded cells with short cell processes and more
hyperlobulated nuclei (3, 19). In addition to
CD1c+ BDC, CD1c+ B cells
with the typical morphology of small resting lymphocytes can be seen on
the cytocentrifuge slides of isolated CD1c+ PBMC.
Highly pure CD1c+ BDC were obtained if, before
the enrichment of CD1c+ cells,
CD19+ B cells were magnetically depleted from
PBMC (data not shown).
|
The phenotypes of fresh CD1c+,
BDCA-2+, and BDCA-3+ BDC
were analyzed by two-color (BDCA-2+ and
BDCA-3+ BDC) or three-color
(CD1c+ BDC) immunofluorescence, respectively. The
results of the phenotypic analysis are shown in Table II
and can be summarized as follows. None
of the BDC subsets expressed CD1a, CD8, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD23,
CD25, CD27, CD34, CD61, CD69, CD71, CD77, CD80, CD83, glycophorin A,
TCR
, AC133, IgD, IgM, or the CMRF-56 Ag. All BDC subsets
expressed CD43, CD44, CD54, and MHC class I molecules at similar
levels. BDCA-2+ BDC differed from the other two
subsets in that they did not express CD13, CD40, CD45RO, and CD56, but
did express CD45RA and small amounts of CD10, and in that they
expressed lower levels of CD18, CD38, CD58, CD98, CD116, and CLA, but
higher levels of CD4. Minor proportions of
BDCA-2+ BDC are CD2 and CD7 positive,
respectively. CD1c+ BDC differ from the other two
subsets in that they express higher levels of MHC class II molecules,
but lower levels of CD62L, and in that they are all positive for CD2
and the Fc receptors CD32, CD64, and Fc
RI. Probably due to the Fc
receptor expression, CD1c+ BDC are also positive
for IgG,
and
. Furthermore, some CD1c+ BDC
are positive for CD14 and CD11b, whereby the level of expression
inversely correlates with the level of both CD1c and CD2 expression
(data not shown). BDCA-3+ BDC differ from the
other two subsets in that they express CD36 at a much lower level, and
they appear to express low levels of CD5. Finally, apart from CD11c and
CD123, at least one additional Ag, CD33, is useful for discrimination
of all three subsets: CD33 is expressed at low levels on
BDCA-2+ BDC, at intermediate levels on
BDCA-3+ BDC, and at high levels on
CD1c+ BDC.
|
Freshly isolated CD1c+ BDC and
BDCA-3+ BDC were cultured for 2 days in medium
without any supplemented cytokines, and freshly isolated
BDCA-2+ BDC were cultured for 1 day in medium
supplemented with IL-3 and CD40 mAb on CD32-transfected fibroblasts.
After the culture period, cells were analyzed for the expression of
CD1a, CD80, CD83, CD86, and HLA-DR. For the purpose of comparison,
immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC were also included (25, 26). As shown in Fig. 9
, in
contrast to immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC, none of the BDC subsets
expressed CD1a after the culture period. However, the costimulatory
molecules CD80 and CD86, the dendritic cell activation Ag CD83
(27), and HLA-DR molecules were up-regulated upon
culturing all three BDC subsets to a similar level compared with mature
Mo-DC. The results were not significantly different in another
experiment in which all three BDC subsets were cultured for 2 days in
medium supplemented with IL-3, IL-4, and GM-CSF (data not shown).
|
The endocytic capacity of purified CD1c+,
BDCA-2+ and BDCA-3+ BDC,
and, as controls, purified CD3+ T cells and
immature Mo-DC was examined by culturing the cells at 37°C in the
presence of LY and analyzing the uptake of LY after various periods by
flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 10
, unlike purified CD3+ T cells, purified
CD1c+ BDC, BDCA-3+ BDC, and
to some extent BDCA-2+ BDC have the ability to
endocytose LY. Similar results were obtained using FITC-dextran (data
not shown). The endocytic capacities of all BDC populations are much
lower if compared with immature Mo-DC.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This immunization technique combined with a powerful procedure for rapid isolation of large numbers of BDC has permitted us to produce a panel of mAb that recognize three presumably novel BDC Ags: BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4. We found that in noncultured human blood BDCA-2 and BDCA-4 are exclusively expressed by a CD123bright CD11c- DC population. This DC population is now commonly referred to as plasmacytoid BDC (4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14, 16). Using BDCA-2 or BDCA-4 as a surface marker for immunomagnetic isolation and/or flow cytometric identification of plasmacytoid BDC, our results on frequency, immunophenotype, morphology, endocytic capacity, and maturation of these cells were consistent with most previous reports where a large panel of leukocyte Ags was used (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14). This clearly illustrates that both Ags are useful markers for plasmacytoid BDC in noncultured human blood. Preliminary results from stainings of tonsilar cells indicate that the T cell zone-associated plasmacytoid DC in peripheral lymphoid organs can also be discriminated from other lymphoid tissue-associated DC populations, such as germinal center DC, interdigitating DC, and follicular DC based on the expression of BDCA-2 and BDCA-4 (data not shown).
Concerning this point it is interesting that, unlike BDCA-2, BDCA-4 is also expressed on several in vitro differentiated DC populations: 1) in contrast to BDCA-2, BDCA-4 is expressed on both Mo-DC and CD34-derived DC; 2) whereas expression of BDCA-2 is completely down-regulated on plasmacytoid BDC once they have undergone IL-3-mediated maturation in culture, expression of BDCA-4 is, in fact, up-regulated on cultured plasmacytoid BDC; and 3) in contrast to BDCA-2, BDCA-4 is expressed within 12 h by a majority of cultured CD11c+ BDC, although it is unclear whether this is only true for the larger CD1c+ CD11cbright population or is also true for the smaller CD1c- CD11c+ CD123- population. The finding that no other BDCA-4+ cells than plasmacytoid BDC appear to be present in noncultured human blood, in fact, indicates that no counterparts of the in vitro differentiated BDCA-4+ DC populations are present in blood.
Labeling of BDCA-2 by anti-BDCA-2 mAb and incubation at 37°C induce rapid internalization of the Ag-mAb complex. In analogy to other endocytic receptors on DC that are down-regulated upon maturation, such as langerin (39), it is tempting to speculate that BDCA-2 may be a receptor with Ag capture function.
Expression of BDCA-3 was found to be restricted to a small population
of CD1c- CD11c+
CD123- BDC in noncultured human blood. With
respect to phenotype, morphology, endocytic capacity, and maturation
requirements, this BDC population is quite similar to the
CD1c+ CD11cbright
CD123dim BDC population. However, apart from
BDCA-3 and CD1c expression, our immunophenotypic analysis has revealed
some striking differences: in contrast to CD1c+
BDC, BDCA-3+ BDC do not express the Fc receptors
CD32, CD64, and Fc
RI, and they do not express CD2. The lack of Fc
receptor expression indicates that BDCA-3+ BDC,
unlike CD1c+ BDC (40, 41), do not
have the capability of Ig-mediated Ag uptake.
In principle, BDCA-3+ BDC and CD1c+ BDC may represent maturational stages of the same cell type or unrelated DC types. The fact that BDCA-3 expression is induced on a reasonable proportion of CD1c+ BDC after culture-induced maturation may be considered an argument in favor of the former concept, but because the same observation was also made for IL-3-stimulated plasmacytoid BDC, such data could also be taken as an argument in favor of a similar relationship between BDCA-3+ BDC and plasmacytoid BDC.
A recent study by Ito et al. (7) has provided evidence
that CD1c+ CD11cbright BDC,
in contrast to CD1c-
CD11c+ BDC, have the capacity to acquire
Langerhans cell characteristics (expression of Lag Ag, E-cadherin, and
langerin, and presence of Birbeck granules) when cultured with GM-CSF,
IL-4, and TGF-
1. If BDCA-3+ BDC and
CD1c+ BDC represent maturational stages of the
same cell type, this would indicate that BDCA-3+
BDC have either already lost or not yet acquired the capacity to
differentiate into Langerhans cells.
In contradiction to our results, Ito et al. (7) have reported that CD1c+ CD11cbright BDC, unlike CD1c- CD11c+ BDC, express CD1a. This is, in fact, more than doubtful. The authors stated that they have used the two mAb, BL-6 and B-B5, for staining of CD1a and that a difference in staining intensity was actually observed when the two mAb were compared (staining with B-B5 was probably brighter). We found that staining of BDC was clearly negative using optimal titers of the CD1a mAb BL-6 and HI149, but positive using B-B5. Moreover, it turned out that B-B5, unlike BL-6 and HI149, stained a high proportion of CD19+ B cells in blood. Thus, the staining pattern of B-B5 was quite reminiscent of a CD1c mAb rather than a CD1a mAb, and, in fact, we could show that our CD1c mAb AD5-8E7 inhibits binding of B-B5 to MOLT-4 cells (data not shown). Therefore, we conclude that B-B5 recognizes CD1c and that CD1c+ BDC do not express CD1a.
Staining of CD1c+ BDC for CD1c, CD2, and CD14 revealed that a minor proportion of BDC expresses CD14 to a variable degree and that the level of CD1c as well as CD2 expression on these cells is inversely proportional to the level of CD14 expression (data not shown). This observation is in accordance with a linear differentiation model, in which CD1c+ CD2+ CD11cbright CD14- BDC are the progeny of CD14+ CD1c- CD2- monocytes rather than the progeny of a common precursor of both cell types. This concept finds further support in the observation of Crawford et al. (42) that a considerable proportion of CD14+ monocytes already expresses very low levels of CD2 and has the capacity to rapidly differentiate into mature DC with typical dendritic morphology and potent T cell stimulatory function when cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4.
In summary, the results of this study identify three presumably novel markers of BDC in human blood: 1) BDCA-2, 2) BDCA-4 for CD11c- CD123bright plasmacytoid BDC, and 3) BDCA-3 for CD11c+ CD123- BDC. A third population of CD11cbright CD123dim BDC can be identified based on the expression of CD1c and the lack of B cell lineage Ags. It is noteworthy that the expression profile of BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4 is virtually indistinguishable on all three subsets after maturation in culture. The use of CD1c (BDCA-1), BDCA-2, BDCA-3, and BDCA-4 mAb provides a convenient and efficient way to rapidly detect, enumerate, and isolate BDC populations from PBMC, leukapheresis material, or whole blood without apparent functional perturbation. This will be a valuable aid for their further functional and molecular characterization and may prove useful in elucidating their interrelationships. Furthermore, the ability to easily isolate BDC populations to homogeneity will greatly facilitate their clinical use.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: BDC, blood dendritic cell; DC, dendritic cell; lin, lineage; MACS, magnetic cell sorting; Mo-DC, monocyte-derived DC; CD34-derived DC, CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cell-derived DC; LY, Lucifer Yellow. ![]()
Received for publication April 21, 2000. Accepted for publication August 29, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in response to in vitro HIV-1 infection. J. Immunol. 152:4649.[Abstract]
production by T helper 1 cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:659.[Medline]
cooperate in the generation of dendritic Langerhans cells. Nature 360:258.[Medline]
receptor-mediated phagocytosis by human blood dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 157:541.[Abstract]
RI as a complex composed of Fc
RI
- and Fc
RI
-chains and can use this receptor for IgE-mediated allergen presentation. J. Immunol. 157:607.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Jin, S. Kavikondala, L. Sun, R. Fu, M.-Y. Mok, A. Chan, J. Yeung, and C.-S. Lau Systemic lupus erythematosus patients have increased number of circulating plasmacytoid dendritic cells, but decreased myeloid dendritic cells with deficient CD83 expression Lupus, July 1, 2008; 17(7): 654 - 662. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Huysamen, J. A. Willment, K. M. Dennehy, and G. D. Brown CLEC9A Is a Novel Activation C-type Lectin-like Receptor Expressed on BDCA3+ Dendritic Cells and a Subset of Monocytes J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2008; 283(24): 16693 - 16701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. J. van der Vliet, R. Wang, S. C. Yue, H. B. Koon, S. P. Balk, and M. A. Exley Circulating Myeloid Dendritic Cells of Advanced Cancer Patients Result in Reduced Activation and a Biased Cytokine Profile in Invariant NKT Cells J. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 180(11): 7287 - 7293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Smolewska, J Stanczyk, H Brozik, M Biernacka-Zielinska, B Cebula, T Robak, and P Smolewski Distribution and clinical significance of blood dendritic cells in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2008; 67(6): 762 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Smed-Sorensen, M. Moll, T.-Y. Cheng, K. Lore, A.-C. Norlin, L. Perbeck, D. B. Moody, A.-L. Spetz, and J. K. Sandberg IgG regulates the CD1 expression profile and lipid antigen-presenting function in human dendritic cells via Fc{gamma}RIIa Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 5037 - 5046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Cicinnati, J. Kang, G. C. Sotiropoulos, P. Hilgard, A. Frilling, C. E. Broelsch, G. Gerken, and S. Beckebaum Altered chemotactic response of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells from patients with chronic hepatitis C: role of alpha interferon J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2008; 89(5): 1243 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Meyer-Wentrup, D. Benitez-Ribas, P. J. Tacken, C. J. A. Punt, C. G. Figdor, I. J. M. de Vries, and G. J. Adema Targeting DCIR on human plasmacytoid dendritic cells results in antigen presentation and inhibits IFN-{alpha} production Blood, April 15, 2008; 111(8): 4245 - 4253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Lebre, S. L. Jongbloed, S. W. Tas, T. J.M. Smeets, I. B. McInnes, and P. P. Tak Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovium Contains Two Subsets of CD83-DC-LAMP- Dendritic Cells with Distinct Cytokine Profiles Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 172(4): 940 - 950. [Abstract] |