The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Harty, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Harty, J. T.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 165: 5-9.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists


CUTTING EDGE

Cutting Edge: Antilisterial Activity of CD8+ T Cells Derived from TNF-Deficient and TNF/Perforin Double-Deficient Mice1

Douglas W. White2,*, Vladimir P. Badovinac2,{dagger}, George Kollias{ddagger} and John T. Harty3,*,{dagger}

* Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Immunology and {dagger} Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; and {ddagger} Department of Molecular Genetics, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens, Greece


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
The mechanisms by which CD8+ T cells mediate immunity against bacterial pathogens remain largely unknown. Perforin-dependent cytolysis plays a role, but is not required for CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity against Listeria monocytogenes. TNF is essential for CD8+ T cell immunity to L. monocytogenes, but the cellular source of TNF is undefined. TNF-deficient and TNF/perforin double-deficient mice were used to generate CD8+ T cells specific for an L. monocytogenes-derived Ag. Wild-type and TNF-deficient CD8+ T cells mediated antilisterial immunity in wild-type but not TNF-deficient host mice, revealing that CD8+ T cell-derived TNF is not required for CD8+ T cell-mediated antilisterial immunity, but demonstrating a role for TNF derived from other cell types. TNF/perforin double-deficient CD8+ T cells mediated antilisterial immunity in the liver, but not in the spleen, of wild-type recipient mice, suggesting that perforin-independent immunity in the spleen requires CD8+ T cell-derived TNF.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
CD8+ T cells are potent mediators of immunity against the intracellular bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes (LM)4 (1). In vitro, Ag-stimulated CD8+ T cells express an array of effector functions including cytolysis and elaboration of cytokines such as IFN-{gamma} and TNF. However, the mechanisms by which CD8+ T cells provide antilisterial immunity in vivo remain poorly understood. Studies by Kagi et al. indicated that a perforin-dependent pathway, presumably cytolytic, participates in optimal CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity against LM, especially in the spleen (2). However, while studies with LM Ag-specific CD8+ T cell lines derived from perforin-deficient (P0) mice confirmed a role for perforin in the spleen, they also revealed a perforin-independent pathway for antilisterial immunity (3, 4).

Numerous studies have demonstrated a role for TNF in resistance to primary listeriosis (5, 6, 7, 8). Neutralization of TNF with mAbs in WT mice also inhibited secondary responses against LM, while neutralization of IFN-{gamma} did not (9). Additionally, antilisterial immunity mediated by P0-derived CD8+ T cell lines is inhibited by pretreatment of host animals with anti-TNF mAbs (3). Because mAb-mediated neutralization cannot identify the cellular source of the required TNF, it has not been clear whether TNF derived from LM Ag-specific CD8+ T cells, or some other cell type, is required for effective CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity in vivo. To address this issue, we analyzed the capacity of TNF-deficient (T0) and TNF/perforin double-deficient (T0P0) CD8+ T cells to provide immunity against LM.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Mice

C57BL/6 (B6) (H-2b MHC) mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). T0 (H-2b MHC) mice on the B6/129 background and B6/129 controls have been described (10). T0P0 (H-2b MHC) mice were generated by appropriate cross and backcross of T0 mice with P0 (H-2b MHC) mice (11).

Bacteria and cell lines

LM strain 10403s (12) and attenuated LM strain DP-L1942 (ActA-) (13) were maintained and used for animal injection as described (14). Recombinant LM XFL204 was kindly provided by Dr. H. Shen (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). XFL204 is derived from 10403s and was engineered using previously described strategies (15) to secrete a fusion protein consisting of dihydrofolate reductase and amino acids 396–404 of the nucleoprotein (NP) of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). NP396–404 is a well characterized H-2Db-restricted CD8+ T cell epitope from LCMV (16). EL4, a B6-derived thymoma cell line, and EL4 expressing the LM listeriolysin O (LLO) gene (EL4-LLO) were maintained as described (17).

Generation of CD8+ T cell lines

CD8+ T cell lines specific for LLO were derived from LM immune B6 (wild type; WT), P0, T0, and T0P0 mice by in vitro restimulation with EL4-LLO cells as described (17). WT and P0 mice were immunized by i.v. injection with 103 to 104 CFU of virulent LM strain 10403s, while T0 and T0P0 mice were immunized with 104 to 106 attenuated LM DP-L1942. In the case of T cell lines specific for NP396–404, T0 mice were immunized with XFL204 and EL4 cells supplemented with 100 nM synthetic NP396–404 peptide were used as stimulators as described (18).

Intracellular cytokine staining and 51Cr release assays

Intracellular cytokine staining was performed as described (19). Briefly, CD8+ T cells specific for LLO were incubated for 4 h in the presence of EL4 or EL4-LLO cells and stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD8 (53-6.7; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). The cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with PE-conjugated anti-TNF (MP6-XT22; PharMingen) or PE-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} (XMG1.2; PharMingen). List mode data was acquired on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) using Cyclops software (Cytomation, Fort Collins, CO) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA). 51Cr release assays were performed as described (3).

Adoptive transfer and survival assays

LLO- or NP396–404-specific CD8+ T cells were washed in antibiotic-free buffer and resuspended in pyrogen-free normal saline. Cells were delivered i.v. in 0.2- to 0.5-ml volumes into naive host mice. Within 2 h, host mice were challenged i.v. with the indicated dose of bacteria. CFU per spleen and liver were determined 3 days postchallenge as described (14). Data are presented as mean log10 CFU ± SD per spleen or per gram of liver. Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis; values of p are shown for each group compared with the control group that did not receive T cells. The susceptibility of B6, B6/129, T0, and T0P0 mice to infection with LM was estimated as described (14).


    Results and Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Resistance of T0 and T0P0 mice to primary infection with virulent and ActA- LM

While P0 and WT mice exhibit similar resistance to primary infection with virulent LM (2, 3, 4), T0 (8) and TNF receptor type I (p55)-deficient (20, 21, 22) mice are extremely susceptible to infection. Consistent with these studies, the estimated LD50 of virulent LM 10403s in WT, T0, and T0P0 mice was 104.7, 101.9, and 102.3, respectively. This result confirms the critical role played by TNF in resistance to primary infection with virulent LM (8). Furthermore, this result indicates that a lack of perforin does not increase the susceptibility of mice already profoundly immunocompromised due to a lack of TNF.

We have previously elicited potent CD8+ T cell responses in immunocompromised mice (18, 23) by immunizing with attenuated LM DP-L1942 (13). Both T0 and T0P0 mice survived at least 4 wk following high-dose challenges with ActA- LM (>106 CFU), suggesting that this strategy might be used to generate CD8+ T cell responses in the absence of TNF.

Generation and characterization of CD8+ T cells from T0 and T0P0 mice

Adaptive immunity to LM in WT mice involves CD8+ T cells (24). To address the effector functions involved in CD8+ T cell immunity to LM, we analyzed the protective capacity of CD8+ T cell lines, specific for known LM Ags, from WT and various gene knockout mice (25). To this end, we immunized T0 and T0P0 mice with DP-L1942 and generated CD8+ T cell lines by in vitro restimulation with EL4 cells that express the LM Ag LLO (3, 17). LLO-specific CD8+ T cell lines from WT and P0 mice were analyzed as controls. T cell lines derived from all mice were >93% CD8+ (Fig. 1Go). Restimulation in vitro followed by intracellular staining for IFN-{gamma} and TNF revealed that all CD8+ T cell lines produced IFN-{gamma} in an Ag-specific fashion, but that only CD8+ T cells derived from WT and P0 mice produced TNF (Fig. 1Go). These results demonstrate that the antilisterial response in T0 and T0P0 mice involves the activation of LLO-specific CD8+ T cells that produce IFN-{gamma}, but not TNF, when restimulated in vitro.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Ag-specific cytokine production by P0, T0, and T0P°CD8+ T cell lines. LLO-specific CD8+ T cells derived from WT and knockout mice were incubated in the presence of brefeldin A with EL4 or EL4-LLO cells for 4 h at the indicated E:T ratio and then stained for surface CD8 and intracellular TNF or IFN-{gamma}. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

 
Interestingly, perforin deficiency resulted in faster (not shown) and more uniform production of cytokines. Similar results were obtained when cytokine secretion by P0 CD8+ T cells was measured, suggesting that the presence of a perforin-dependent mechanism of cytolysis slows the production of cytokines by CD8+ T cells in vitro (4, 26).

T0 CD8+ T cell lines mediated Ag-specific cytolysis of EL4-LLO cells that was comparable to WT CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2Go). CD8+ T cells from T0P0 mice mediated Ag-specific cytolysis of LLO-expressing target cells, which was delayed compared with WT and T0-derived CD8+ T cells. Consistent with previous in vitro studies of P0 CD8+ T cells (3, 4), this cytolysis was inhibited by anti-CD95 mAbs (Fig. 2Go). These results demonstrate Ag-specific, CD95-dependent cytolysis in vitro by CD8+ T cells derived from LM-immune T0P0 mice.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Ag-specific cytolysis by T0 and T0P0 CD8+ T cell lines. LLO-specific CD8+ T cells derived from WT, T0, or T0P0 mice were incubated for the indicated time at various E:T ratios with 51Cr-labeled EL4 ({square}) or EL4-LLO target cells in the absence ({blacksquare}) or presence of control IgG ({circ}) or anti-CD95 mAb (•). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments.

 
T0 CD8+ T cells mediate immunity against LM in WT, but not T0, host mice

WT and P0 LLO-specific CD8+ T cells mediate antilisterial immunity in adoptive transfer assays (3, 17). Immunity mediated by P0 CD8+ T cells is abrogated by treatment of host mice with neutralizing anti-TNF mAbs (3). Although this approach does not identify the cellular source of the biologically relevant TNF, these experiments suggest that TNF is required for CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity against LM. To address this hypothesis, we transferred T0-derived LLO-specific CD8+ T cells into WT host mice, which were subsequently challenged with virulent LM. LLO-specific CD8+ T cells from T0 mice provided antilisterial immunity as measured by a >=100-fold decrease in LM CFUs in the spleen (Fig. 3GoA) and liver (Fig. 3GoB). These results demonstrate that CD8+ T cell-derived TNF is not required for antilisterial immunity.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. T0-derived LLO-specific CD8+ T cells transfer antilisterial immunity to WT, but not T0, host mice. Naive B6 (A and B) and T0 (C and D) mice were injected i.v. with 1–1.6 x 107 LLO-specific CD8+ T cells derived from WT or T0 mice and then challenged with 0.8–1.7 x 105 (A and B) or 0.8–1.7 x 103 (C and D) virulent LM 10403s. CFU from the spleen (A and C) and liver (B and D) were quantitated 3 days postchallenge. Data are presented as mean log10 CFU ± SD for six animals per group pooled from two independent experiments. Student’s t test was used in statistical analysis; values of p are shown for each group compared with the control group in the same experiment that did not receive T cells.

 
In the same experiment, LLO-specific CD8+ T cells from T0 donors were transferred into T0 hosts. Due to the importance of TNF in the innate response to LM, the dose of LM administered to T0 hosts was reduced by 100-fold. This challenge resulted in comparable levels of infection in control T0 and WT hosts (3). However, even with these lower challenge doses, T0 hosts were not significantly protected by T0 CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3Go, C and D). This suggests that antilisterial immunity mediated by LLO-specific T°CD8+ T cells requires host cell-derived TNF.

To determine whether host cell-derived TNF is also required for immunity mediated by WT CD8+ T cells, T0 or WT hosts were injected with WT CD8+ T cells and then challenged with the low dose or high dose, respectively, of virulent LM. WT CD8+ T cells mediated dramatic reductions in bacterial numbers in the spleen (>100-fold) and liver (>1000-fold) of WT hosts (Fig. 4Go, A and B) but were unable to provide significant protection in T0 hosts (Fig. 4Go, C and D).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. B6-derived LLO-specific CD8+ T cells transfer antilisterial immunity to WT, but not T0, host mice. Naive B6 (A and B) and T0 (C and D) mice were injected i.v. with 1.4 x 107 LLO-specific CD8+ T cells derived from WT mice and then challenged with 1.6 x 105 (A and B) or 1.6 x 103 (C and D) virulent LM 10403s. Data from four mice/group are presented as described in Fig. 3Go. The asterisk indicates that one animal died before the CFU assay and is therefore not included.

 
While both strains of mice are H-2b, the possibility exists that minor Ag differences between B6 and T0 (B6/129 background) strains could stimulate host responses that nonspecifically decrease the in vivo bacterial counts. This is unlikely because the degree of antilisterial immunity provided by T0 LLO-specific CD8+ T cells in adoptive transfer experiments was indistinguishable in B6 and B6/129 host mice (data not shown). Second, a T0-derived CD8+ T cell line specific for a non-LM Ag (LCMV NP396–404) did not protect when transferred into B6 mice that were subsequently challenged with virulent LM. B6 mice that received 8 x 106 NP396–404-specific T0-derived CD8+ T cells had similar levels of infection in their spleen (104.7±0.5 CFU) as mice that received no T cells (104.8±0.5 CFU). Similar results were obtained in the liver (not shown). These results are also consistent with the absence of nonspecific immunity observed in similar experiments with B6/129-derived P0 CD8+ T cell lines (3). Thus, minor Ag differences cannot account for the antilisterial immunity provided by T0 CD8+ T cell lines in these adoptive transfer experiments.

These results demonstrate that CD8+ T cell-derived TNF is not required for antilisterial immunity in WT hosts. However, consistent with the TNF neutralization experiments, CD8+ T cells from both WT and T0 mice fail to transfer significant antilisterial immunity to T0 hosts. This finding suggests a requisite role for TNF produced by host cells in antilisterial immunity mediated by LLO-specific CD8+ T cells in adoptive transfer assays. The underpinnings of such a requirement are not clear, but could involve deficient homing of CD8+ T cells to the spleen and liver in T0 hosts, or a failure in the activation of CD8+ T cells at the site of infection.

T0P0 CD8+ T cells mediate antilisterial immunity in the liver, but not the spleen, of WT host mice

Previous experiments have demonstrated that P0 CD8+ T cells mediate significant antilisterial immunity in the livers, but reduced immunity in the spleen, of WT hosts (3, 4). To address the influence of TNF on perforin-independent antilisterial immunity, LLO-specific CD8+ T cells from T0P0 mice were transferred into WT hosts that were subsequently challenged with virulent LM. T0P0-derived CD8+ T cells provided significant antilisterial immunity in the liver, but not in the spleen (Fig. 5Go, E and F). These results suggest that CD8+ T cells provide immunity in the liver by a pathway that is independent of both CD8+ T cell-derived perforin and TNF. This result also indicates that perforin-independent CD8+ T cell immunity in the spleen requires CD8+ T cell- derived TNF.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. T0P0-derived LLO-specific CD8+ T cells mediate antilisterial immunity in the liver, but not the spleen, of WT host mice. Naive B6 mice were injected i.v. with 107 LLO-specific CD8+ T cells derived from T0P0 mice and then challenged with 105 virulent LM 10403s. CFU from the spleen (A) and liver (B) were quantitated 3 days postchallenge. Data from two independent experiments, six mice/group, are presented as described in Fig. 3Go.

 
Together, these studies demonstrate an in vivo pathway of CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity against LM that is independent of CD8+ T cell-derived TNF. This result underscores the apparent versatility of activated CD8+ T cells in terms of their ability to fight listeriosis. TNF joins the arsenal of perforin, CD95, and IFN-{gamma} (3, 4, 23) as the fourth effector function that is individually expendable for effective CD8+ T cell immunity to LM. However, CD8+ T cell immunity is severely hampered when two effector functions (perforin and TNF) are simultaneously deactivated. The relevance of CD8+ T cell-derived TNF in this process is underscored by our recent results demonstrating that deletion of IFN-{gamma} and perforin does not additionally compromise CD8+ T cell-mediated antilisterial immunity compared with perforin deficiency alone (27). The present results also uncover a pathway of CD8+ T cell-mediated antilisterial immunity in the liver that is independent of both perforin and CD8+ T cell-derived TNF. While it is well appreciated that the molecular mechanisms of effective CD8+ T cell responses are pathogen specific (1), the present results emphasize that effective CD8+ T cell responses may be expressed in a tissue- or organ-specific fashion as well. Finally, while the role of a number of CD8+ T cell effector functions have been examined, the importance of as yet untested (28) or unknown effector functions should not be overlooked.


    Acknowledgments
 
The expert technical assistance of Lori Gorton is greatly appreciated.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI36864 and AI42767. D.W.W. is a trainee in the Medical Scientist Training Program. Back

2 D.W.W. and V.P.B. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John T. Harty, 3-512 Bowen Science Building, Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: LM, Listeria monocytogenes; T0, TNF-deficient; T0P0, TNF/perforin double-deficient; P0, perforin deficient; LLO, listeriolysin O; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; NP, nucleoprotein; B6, C57BL/6; WT, wild type. Back

Received for publication March 3, 2000. Accepted for publication April 24, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 

  1. Harty, J. T., A. Tvinnereim, D. W. White. 2000. CD8+ T cell effector mechanisms in resistance to infection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:275.[Medline]
  2. Kagi, D., B. Ledermann, K. Burki, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1994. CD8+ T cell-mediated protection against an intracellular bacterium by perforin-dependent cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:3068.[Medline]
  3. White, D. W., J. T. Harty. 1998. Perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells provide immunity to Listeria monocytogenes by a mechanism that is independent of CD95 and IFN-{gamma} but requires TNF-{alpha}. J. Immunol. 160:898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. White, D. W., A. MacNeil, D. H. Busch, I. M. Philip, E. G. Pamer, J. T. Harty. 1999. Perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells: in vivo priming and antigen-specific immunity against Listeria monocytogenes. J. Immunol. 162:980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Havell, E. A.. 1987. Production of tumor necrosis factor during murine listeriosis. J. Immunol. 139:4225.[Abstract]
  6. Nakane, A., T. Minagawa, K. Kato. 1988. Endogenous tumor necrosis factor (cachectin) is essential to host resistance against Listeria monocytogenes infection. Infect. Immun. 56:2563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Havell, E. A.. 1989. Evidence that tumor necrosis factor has an important role in antibacterial resistance. J. Immunol. 143:2894.[Abstract]
  8. Pasparakis, M., L. Alexopoulou, V. Episkopou, G. Kollias. 1996. Immune and inflammatory responses in TNF-{alpha}-deficient mice—a critical requirement for TNF-{alpha} in the formation of primary B cell follicles, follicular dendritic cell networks and germinal centers, and in the maturation of the humoral immune response. J. Exp. Med. 184:1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Samsom, J. N., J. A. Langermans, H. F. Savelkoul, R. van Furth. 1995. Tumor necrosis factor, but not interferon-{gamma}, is essential for acquired resistance to Listeria monocytogenes during a secondary infection in mice. Immunology 86:256.[Medline]
  10. Pasparakis, M., L. Alexopoulou, M. Grell, K. Pfizenmaier, H. Bluethmann, G. Kollias. 1997. Peyer’s patch organogenesis is intact yet formation of B lymphocyte follicles is defective in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice deficient for tumor necrosis factor and its 55-kDa receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:6319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Walsh, C. M., M. Matloubian, C. C. Liu, R. Ueda, C. G. Kurahara, J. L. Christensen, M. T. Huang, J. D. Young, R. Ahmed, W. R. Clark. 1994. Immune function in mice lacking the perforin gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Bishop, D. K., D. J. Hinrichs. 1987. Adoptive transfer of immunity to Listeria monocytogenes: the influence of in vitro stimulation on lymphocyte subset requirements. J. Immunol. 139:2005.[Abstract]
  13. Brundage, R. A., G. A. Smith, A. Camilli, J. A. Theriot, D. A. Portnoy. 1993. Expression and phosphorylation of the Listeria monocytogenes ActA protein in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:11890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Harty, J. T., E. G. Pamer. 1995. CD8 T lymphocytes specific for the secreted p60 antigen protect against Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Immunol. 154:4642.[Abstract]
  15. Shen, H., J. F. Miller, X. Fan, D. Kolwyck, R. Ahmed, J. T. Harty. 1998. Compartmentalization of bacterial antigens: differential effects on priming of CD8 T cells and protective immunity. Cell 92:535.[Medline]
  16. van der Most, R., A. Sette, C. Oseroff, J. Alexander, K. K. Murali, L. L. Lau, S. Southwood, J. Sidney, R. W. Chesnut, M. Matloubian, R. Ahmed. 1996. Analysis of cytotoxic T cell responses to dominant and subdominant epitopes during acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J. Immunol. 157:5543.[Abstract]
  17. Harty, J. T., M. J. Bevan. 1996. CD8 T-cell recognition of macrophages and hepatocytes results in immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 64:3632.[Abstract]
  18. White, D. W., V. P. Badovinac, X. Fan, and J. T. Harty. 2000. Adaptive immunity against Listeria monocytogenes in the absence of the p55 TNF receptor type I. Infect. Immun. In press.
  19. Badovinac, V. P., J. T. Harty. 2000. Intracellular staining for TNF and IFN-{gamma} detects different frequencies of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. Methods 238:107.[Medline]
  20. Pfeffer, K., T. Matsuyama, T. M. Kundig, A. Wakeham, K. Kishihara, A. Shahinian, K. Wiegmann, P. S. Ohashi, M. Kronke, T. W. Mak. 1993. Mice deficient for the 55 kd tumor necrosis factor receptor are resistant to endotoxic shock, yet succumb to L. monocytogenes infection. Cell 73:457.[Medline]
  21. Rothe, J., W. Lesslauer, H. Lotscher, Y. Lang, P. Koebel, F. Kontgen, A. Althage, R. Zinkernagel, M. Steinmetz, H. Bluethmann. 1993. Mice lacking the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 are resistant to TNF-mediated toxicity but highly susceptible to infection by Listeria monocytogenes. Nature 364:798.[Medline]
  22. Endres, R., A. Luz, H. Schulze, H. Neubauer, A. Futterer, S. M. Holland, H. Wagner, K. Pfeffer. 1997. Listeriosis in p47phox-/- and Trp55-/- mice: protection despite absence of ROI and susceptibility despite presence of RNI. Immunity 7:419.[Medline]
  23. Harty, J. T., M. J. Bevan. 1995. Specific immunity to Listeria monocytogenes in the absence of IFN-{gamma}. Immunity 3:109.[Medline]
  24. Mielke, M. E., G. Niedobitek, H. Stein, H. Hahn. 1989. Acquired resistance to Listeria monocytogenes is mediated by Lyt-2+ T cells independently of the influx of monocytes into granulomatous lesions. J. Exp. Med. 170:589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Harty, J. T., D. White. 1999. A knockout approach to understanding CD8+ cell effector mechanisms in adaptive immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Immunobiology 201:196.[Medline]
  26. Sad, S., D. Kagi, T. R. Mosmann. 1996. Perforin and Fas killing by CD8+ T cells limits their cytokine synthesis and proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 184:1543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Badovinac, V. P., and J. T. Harty. 2000. Adaptive immunity and enhancedCD8+ T cell response to Listeria monocytogenes in the absence of perforin and IFN{gamma}. J. Immunol. In press.
  28. Stenger, S., D. A. Hanson, R. Teitelbaum, P. Dewan, K. R. Niazi, C. J. Froelich, T. Ganz, S. Thoma-Uszynski, A. Melian, C. Bogdan, et al 1998. An antimicrobial activity of cytolytic T cells mediated by granulysin. Science 282:121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JEMHome page
E. Narni-Mancinelli, L. Campisi, D. Bassand, J. Cazareth, P. Gounon, N. Glaichenhaus, and G. Lauvau
Memory CD8+ T cells mediate antibacterial immunity via CCL3 activation of TNF/ROI+ phagocytes
J. Exp. Med., September 3, 2007; 204(9): 2075 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. Deckert, S. Virna, M. Sakowicz-Burkiewicz, S. Lutjen, S. Soltek, H. Bluethmann, and D. Schluter
Interleukin-1 Receptor Type 1 Is Essential for Control of Cerebral but Not Systemic Listeriosis
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2007; 170(3): 990 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Virna, M. Deckert, S. Lutjen, S. Soltek, K. E. Foulds, H. Shen, H. Korner, J. D. Sedgwick, and D. Schluter
TNF Is Important for Pathogen Control and Limits Brain Damage in Murine Cerebral Listeriosis
J. Immunol., September 15, 2006; 177(6): 3972 - 3982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. P. Badovinac, K. A. N. Messingham, T. S. Griffith, and J. T. Harty
TRAIL Deficiency Delays, but Does Not Prevent, Erosion in the Quality of "Helpless" Memory CD8 T Cells
J. Immunol., July 15, 2006; 177(2): 999 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
N. Ismail, H. L. Stevenson, and D. H. Walker
Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-{alpha}) and Interleukin-10 in the Pathogenesis of Severe Murine Monocytotropic Ehrlichiosis: Increased Resistance of TNF Receptor p55- and p75-Deficient Mice to Fatal Ehrlichial Infection
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2006; 74(3): 1846 - 1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
D. Torres, L. Janot, V. F.J. Quesniaux, S. I. Grivennikov, I. Maillet, J. D. Sedgwick, B. Ryffel, and F. Erard
Membrane Tumor Necrosis Factor Confers Partial Protection to Listeria Infection
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2005; 167(6): 1677 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. A. Brehm, K. A. Daniels, and R. M. Welsh
Rapid Production of TNF-{alpha} following TCR Engagement of Naive CD8 T Cells
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 5043 - 5049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
D. R. Roach, H. Briscoe, B. M. Saunders, and W. J. Britton
Independent Protective Effects for Tumor Necrosis Factor and Lymphotoxin Alpha in the Host Response to Listeria monocytogenes Infection
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2005; 73(8): 4787 - 4792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
H. Minagawa, K. Hashimoto, and Y. Yanagi
Absence of tumour necrosis factor facilitates primary and recurrent herpes simplex virus-1 infections
J. Gen. Virol., February 1, 2004; 85(2): 343 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. A. N. Messingham, V. P. Badovinac, and J. T. Harty
Deficient Anti-Listerial Immunity in the Absence of Perforin Can Be Restored by Increasing Memory CD8+ T Cell Numbers
J. Immunol., October 15, 2003; 171(8): 4254 - 4262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
S. C. Cowley and K. L. Elkins
Multiple T Cell Subsets Control Francisella tularensis LVS Intracellular Growth Without Stimulation Through Macrophage Interferon {gamma} Receptors
J. Exp. Med., August 4, 2003; 198(3): 379 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. R. San Mateo, M. M. Chua, S. R. Weiss, and H. Shen
Perforin-Mediated CTL Cytolysis Counteracts Direct Cell-Cell Spread of Listeria monocytogenes
J. Immunol., November 1, 2002; 169(9): 5202 - 5208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L.-Y. Kwok, H. Miletic, S. Lutjen, S. Soltek, M. Deckert, and D. Schluter
Protective Immunosurveillance of the Central Nervous System by Listeria-Specific CD4 and CD8 T Cells in Systemic Listeriosis in the Absence of Intracerebral Listeria
J. Immunol., August 15, 2002; 169(4): 2010 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Rayevskaya, N. Kushnir, and F. R. Frankel
Safety and Immunogenicity in Neonatal Mice of a Hyperattenuated Listeria Vaccine Directed against Human Immunodeficiency Virus
J. Virol., January 15, 2002; 76(2): 918 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. Miura, T. Kudo, A. Matsuki, K. Sekikawa, Y.-I. Tagawa, Y. Iwakura, and A. Nakane
Effect of 6-Hydroxydopamine on Host Resistance against Listeria monocytogenes Infection
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2001; 69(12): 7234 - 7241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. J. Smyth, J. M. Kelly, V. R. Sutton, J. E. Davis, K. A. Browne, T. J. Sayers, and J. A. Trapani
Unlocking the secrets of cytotoxic granule proteins
J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2001; 70(1): 18 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Zhou, B. L. Freidag, C. C. Caldwell, and R. A. Seder
Perforin Is Required for Primary Immunity to Histoplasma capsulatum
J. Immunol., February 1, 2001; 166(3): 1968 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Harty, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Harty, J. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS