|
|
||||||||



Departments of
*
Immunobiology,
Research Administration, and
Analytical Chemistry and Formulation, Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA 98101; and
§
The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-, a greater proportion of these DC from
pGM-CSF-treated mice were 33D1+ than from FL-treated mice.
CD11blowCD11chigh DC from FL-treated mice
expressed high levels of intracellular MHC class II. DC from both
pGM-CSF- and FL-treated mice expressed high levels of surface class II,
low levels of the costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and CD86 and were
equally efficient at stimulating allogeneic and Ag-specific T cell
proliferation in vitro. The data demonstrate that treatment with
pGM-CSF in vivo preferentially expands
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC that share phenotypic and
functional characteristics with FL-generated
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC but can be distinguished
from FL-generated DC on the basis of Ag capture and surface expression
of 33D1. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although GM-CSF is an important cytokine for the generation of myeloid-related DC in vitro, the role of this cytokine in vivo has been less well defined. Examination of mice deficient in GM-CSF or in GM-CSFRß indicates that DC development in lymphoid tissue is not dramatically affected (9). Similarly, DC numbers are not increased in GM-CSF-transgenic mice, except in the peritoneal cavity (10). Additionally, in one study, systemic administration of unmodified yeast-derived murine GM-CSF into mice did not significantly increase the numbers of DC in the spleen, peripheral blood (PB), or lymph nodes (LN) (11). However, several other studies indicate that GM-CSF is capable of modulating immune responses in vivo. Transplantation of tumors transduced with GM-CSF results in the expansion of DC in vivo (12, 13) and the generation of antitumor immune responses (14, 15). Similarly, transduction of DC with GM-CSF enhances their Ag-presenting functions in vivo (16). We recently reported that treatment of mice in vivo with a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified form of yeast-derived murine GM-CSF (pGM-CSF) expands the number of CD11bhighCD11chigh but not CD11blowCD11chigh DC in murine spleen (17). PEG-modified proteins are more resistant to hepatic clearance and therefore have a more stable and prolonged biological half-life in vivo (18).
In contrast to GM-CSF, the role of the hemopoietic growth factor Flt3 ligand (FL) in the expansion of DC has been better defined in vivo than in vitro. FL increases the numbers of both CD11bhigh CD11chigh and CD11blowCD11chigh DC when administered to mice in vivo (11, 19, 20). In addition, administration of FL to humans results in transient DC expansion (51). FL-deficient mice exhibit markedly reduced numbers of both CD11bhighCD11chigh and CD11blowCD11chigh DC (52).
In this study, we have taken advantage of the increased half-life of pGM-CSF to gain further insight into the role of this cytokine in DC development and function. To this end, we have compared DC generated by daily administration of pGM-CSF or FL to mice. With regard to DC development, pGM-CSF preferentially expanded CD11bhighCD11chigh but not CD11blowCD11chigh DC. The pGM-CSF- and FL-generated, CD11bhighCD11chigh DC expressed similar levels of MHC class II, CD40, CD80, and CD86 but expression of 33D1 was more homogeneous in pGM-CSF-generated CD11bhighCD11chigh DC than in FL-generated CD11bhighCD11chigh DC. Functionally, pGM-CSF-generated DC captured and processed Ag more efficiently than FL-generated DC but were equally efficient at stimulating T cell proliferation in vitro. The data highlight the role of pGM-CSF in the development of DC that are functionally and phenotypically similar to but distinct from FL-generated DC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Female C57BL/6, DBA/2, and BALB/c mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) or Taconic (Germantown, NY). DO11.10 mice (21) were kindly provided by Dr. Mark Jenkins and GM-CSFRß-/- mice (22) were bred and maintained at Immunex and the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, respectively. All mice used were 610 wk old and were maintained in specific pathogen-free facilities. The status of the GM-CSFRß chain genes was determined by RT-PCR analysis of tail DNA. Mice (three to five per group) were injected once daily (s.c. at the nape of the neck) with 10 µg recombinant human FL (Chinese hamster ovary cell derived) for 9 consecutive days or 5 µg of either PEG-modified or unmodified murine GM-CSF for 5 consecutive days. PBS was used in control injections. FL and GM-CSF were produced at Immunex.
Preparation of pGM-CSF
Recombinant murine GM-CSF was produced in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as described (23). N-terminal PEG conjugation was conducted with 20-kDa PEG that was obtained in the activated form of succinimidylpropionic acid PEG (Shearwater Polymers, Huntsville, AL). A 6-fold molar excess of succinimidylpropionic acid PEG was added to a solution of murine GM-CSF in 20 mM NaH2PO4, 50 mM cyanoborohydride (pH 6.0), and the reaction was allowed to proceed overnight at 28°C. Mono-PEG-conjugated murine GM-CSF was purified from the reaction mixture by anion exchange chromatography with Q Sepharose high performance resin (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) using a 0150 mM NaCl elution gradient on a Perceptive Integral HPLC system. Purified protein solutions were concentrated and buffer exchanged into PBS. PEG-murine GM-CSF was then tested for endotoxin levels, by the LAL method, and total protein concentration was determined by amino acid analysis.
Pharmacokinetics of native and pGM-CSF
Pharmacokinetic parameters for native murine GM-CSF and
pGM-CSF were determined from blood concentration/time profiles
essentially as described (24). Briefly, after i.v.
injection, mice were bled at various time points ranging from 1 min to
24 h, and serum GM-CSF concentration was determined by bioassay or
radioassay. The bioassay was performed by titrating serum samples onto
the GM-CSF-responsive cell line, FDCP2.1D and measuring
[3H]thymidine incorporation.
125I iodination was used for the radioassay, and
the serum was TCA precipitated before gamma counting. The apparent
elimination rate constant (K) and the half-life
(t1/2) were calculated using a
pharmacokinetic half-life program on an RS/1 system. The log linear
portion of the concentration/time curve was used to calculate
K with t1/2 determined as
t1/2 = ln2/K. Half-life values are
presented as t1/2 SE, where SE indicates the
error in fitting the log linear line to the data points in calculating
the K value. The distribution
(t1/2
) and elimination
(t1/2ß) half-lives were calculated
using a biphasic pharmacokinetics program that related the respective
log linear concentration/time curves to specific K and
t1/2 values. The area under the blood
concentration/time curve from t = 0 to infinite time
was determined by conventional trapezoidal summation and
extrapolation.
Antibodies
All Abs were from PharMingen (San Diego, CA) except
DEC205 (NLDC-145; a gift from Dr. G. Kraal, Free University, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands) and 33D1 (hybridoma from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA), produced and biotinylated at Immunex). The
following clones were used unless otherwise noted: CD1d (1B1); CD3
(17A2); CD4 (L3T4); CD8
(53-6.7); CD11b (M1/70); CD11c (HL3); CD19
(1D3); CD40 (3/23); CD80 (16-10A1); CD86 (GL1); B220 (RA36B2); GR-1
(RB68C5); H-2Kb (AF6-88.5); I-Ab (AF6-120.1); NK1.1 (PK136); TER-119
(TER119); and Thy-1.2 (T24).
Phenotyping of DC
Phenotyping of the various populations was performed by incubating cells with either FITC-, APC-, or PE-conjugated Ab or biotinylated Ab which were detected with APC-conjugated streptavidin. Flow cytometry was performed using a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and results were analyzed with Cellquest software (Becton Dickinson).
Isolation of DC
Spleens were removed from control, FL-, or pGM-CSF-treated mice and single-cell suspensions were prepared and depleted of erythrocytes with NH4Cl. Thymus and LN (inguinal and axillary) were also harvested from GM-CSFRß-/- and GM-CSFRß+/+ mice. The various cell suspensions were incubated with Ab to Thy-1.1, B220, NK1.1, Gr-1 and Ter-119 for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were then centrifuged and resuspended. mAb-coated cells were removed using anti-Ig-coated magnetic beads (Dynabeads, Dynal, Oslo, Norway). The enriched cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-CD11c, and PE-conjugated anti-CD11b and the various cell populations were then isolated by flow cytometry using a FACStarPlus (Becton Dickinson) or a EPICS Elite (Coulter, Brea, CA) cell sorter.
Measurement of Ag uptake
Cells were harvested from spleen, PB, or bone marrow (BM) of mice treated with FL or pGM-CSF as described above. After incubation with FITC-dextran (70 kDa), FITC-OVA, or FITC-zymosan (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at 37°C, cells were washed three times in PBS-5% FBS and then incubated with PE-anti-CD11c and APC-anti-CD11b. Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b and CD11c identified DC subpopulations. FITC-dextran, FITC OVA, or FITC-zymosan uptake was quantified as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Nonspecific FITC signal was assessed by incubating cells in FITC-dextran, -OVA, or -zymosan at 0°C. For time course of uptake, cells were incubated with 2 mg/ml FITC-dextran or FITC-OVA for 090 min. For dextran or OVA titration, cells were incubated with 0.0015.0 mg/ml for 30 min at 37°C. Phagocytosis was assessed by incubating cells with 1 mg/ml FITC-zymosan for 90 min at 37°C. In some conditions, cells were pretreated with 10 µM cytochalasin D (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min at 37°C to depolymerize actin. All incubations were performed in PBS-5% FBS. To verify that the flow cytometry-based FITC signal represented internalized dextran, OVA, or zymosan, cells were analyzed by epifluorescence and phase-contrast microscopy.
Intracellular distribution of MHC class II
DC were isolated by flow cytometry as described above, except APC-conjugated CD11b and biotinylated CD11c followed by Texas Red-streptavidin (Molecular Probes) were used to identify DC populations. Sorted DC were plated onto fibronectin-like polymer (Sigma)-coated coverslips and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in DMEM, 10% FBS, 900 µM Ca2+, 500 µM Mg2+. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were permeabilized and blocked with PBS, 0.1% saponin (Sigma), 10% FBS. Intracellular and cell surface MHC class II were detected by incubation with FITC-conjugated anti-I-Ab Ab (Boeringer Ingelheim clone M5-114) in PBS, 0.1% saponin, 10% FBS. The coverslips were gently washed three times in PBS, 0.1% saponin, 10% FBS; once in PBS; and once in double-distilled H2O and were mounted in Moviol (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) containing 2.5% 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (Sigma) on glass slides. MHC class II distribution was analyzed by confocal microscopy in 0.75-µm sections on a Bio-Rad 1024 confocal head (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA; outfitted with a Zeiss axiovert microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using the 63x plan apochromat objective. Control cells that were labeled with only CD11b-APC or CD11c-TxR were used to ensure that there was no bleedthrough into the FITC-MHC class II channel from residual CD11b or CD11c after FACS sorting.
Flow cytometry-based quantification of MHC Class II distribution was determined by comparing permeabilized (total MHC class II) and nonpermeabilized (cell surface MHC class II) cells. Spleen cells isolated from FL- and pGM-CSF-treated mice were incubated with APC-CD11b and TxR-CD11c, washed, and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. The cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-I-Ab (AF6-120.1) in PBS, 5% FBS in the absence or presence of 0.1% saponin at 0°C for 30 min. The cells were washed three times in PBS, 5% FBS in the absence or presence of saponin and once in PBS and refixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. MHC class II distribution was determined by flow cytometry analysis and quantified as MFI for each population. Cell surface MHC class II was quantified using nonpermeabilized cells, and intracellular MHC class II was determined by subtracting surface MHC class II (nonpermeabilized cells) from total MHC class II (permeabilized cells).
Processing of OVA into peptide
Cells were pulsed with DQ-OVA (Molecular Probes) for 15 min at 37°C and then washed extensively with PBS, 5% FBS at 4°C. Cells were transferred to 37°C, and processing of OVA into peptide was assayed by increase in MFI over time. DC populations and DQ OVA were identified and quantified by flow cytometry as in Ag capture assays. DQ-conjugated OVA peptide was quantified using the FITC channel of a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson).
Preparation and purification of alloreactive and Ag-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
CD4+ or CD8+ allogeneic T cells (9095% pure) were isolated from the peripheral LN of 4- to 8-wk-old DBA/2 (H-2d) mice. CD4+-transgenic T cells were isolated from the inguinal LN, axillary LN and spleens of 8-wk-old OVA-TCR-transgenic DO11.10 (H-2d) mice. LN cells were incubated with Abs to MHC class II (I-Ab or I-Ad), B220, and either CD4 or CD8 and for 30 min at 4°C. Ab-coated cells were depleted with anti-Ig-coated magnetic beads (Dynabeads). Depleted LN cells were composed of at least 90% CD4+ or CD8+ T cells as determined by FACS analysis. Naive CD4+-transgenic T cells were further purified by cell sorting on the basis of CD62L expression using a FACStarPlus (Becton Dickinson).
MLR and Ag-specific T cell assay
Assays were performed in 96-well round-bottom culture plates in 0.2 ml DMEM containing 10% FCS in humidified 10% CO2 for 5 days. DC populations were isolated as above and irradiated with 2000 rad. In the MLR, purified, allogeneic CD4+ or CD8+ LN T cells (1 x 105) from DBA/2 mice (H-2d) were cultured with 2 x 1011 x 104 DC from either FL- or pGM-CSF-treated C57BL/6 mice (H-2b). To detect Ag-specific presentation, purified CD4+CD62L+LN T cells (1 x 104) from DO11.10 mice were cultured in 96-well plates with 101104 irradiated DC (2000 rad) from either FL- or pGM-CSF-treated syngeneic BALB/c mice. Cultures were conducted in the presence of a constant concentration of OVA323329 peptide (10 µg/ml) or protein (Sigma, 300 µg/ml) or with constant numbers of DC (1 x 104) in the presence of varying concentrations of OVA323329 peptide or protein in 0.2 ml culture medium for 5d. In GM-CSFRß-/- experiments, purified CD4+ or CD8+ LN T cells (2 x 104) from BALB/c (H-2d) mice were cultured with 1.25 x 1022 x 103 DC from GM-CSFRß-/- or GM-CSFRß+/+ mice (H-2b) for 6 days in 96-well V-bottom wells in HEPES-buffered RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 10-4 M 2-ME, and sodium pyruvate. The cultures were pulsed with 0.5 µCi [3H]thymidine for 8 h, and the cells were harvested onto glass fiber sheets for counting on a gas-phase beta counter. The background counts for either T cells or DC cultured alone were <100 cpm.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The in vivo pharmacokinetics of pGM-CSF was compared with that of
unmodified, recombinant murine GM-CSF. After s.c. administration to
mice, pGM-CSF was found to have a distribution half-life
(t1/2
) of 15.9 ± 1.5 min
and an elimination half-life
(t1/2ß) of 5.3 h ± 13 min.
In contrast, unmodified, recombinant murine GM-CSF had a
t1/2
of 0.92 ± 0.04 min and a
t1/2ß of 11.75 ± 3.89 min. Thus,
modification of GM-CSF by PEG increased the
t1/2
by >15-fold and the
t1/2ß by >27-fold. Splenic weight increased from
0.079 ± 0.018 g to 0.206 ± 0.037 g after s.c. injection of
0 and 5 µg pGM-CSF/mouse/day for 5 days, respectively (not shown).
These data were generated in six separate experiments using six
different batches of pGM-CSF and two to three mice per group. Thus, the
SD observed may be a reflection of batch-to-batch variation, possibly
due to variations in the extent of PEG derivitization. In contrast to
pGM-CSF, s.c. injection of unmodified GM-CSF at 5 µg/day for up to 7
days had no effect on either spleen weight or white blood cell
counts.
Treatment of mice with pGM-CSF expands CD11bhighCD11chigh but not CD11blowCD11chigh DC.
We first compared the effects of daily s.c. injection of pGM-CSF
on cells in the spleen, bone marrow (BM), LN, and PB of mice. In the
spleen, PB, and BM, we found a marked increase in the proportion of
CD11b+ cells with a concomitant decrease in the
percent of B cells
(B220+CD19+) (Table I
). Enlarged LN in pGM-CSF-treated mice
were characterized by increased numbers of T cells
(CD3+) and B cells
(B220+CD19+), although the
percentages of these populations were unaltered (Table I
). To date,
there is no clear evidence that pGM-CSF directly influences the
expansion or development of this leukocyte compartment. This suggests
that the effects in the lymph node are unlikely to be direct but may
reflect changes in trafficking and retention of lymphocytes in the LN
or a compensatory homeostatic feedback mechanism.
|
|
FL- and pGM-CSF-generated splenic DC expressed low levels of the
costimulatory molecules, CD40, CD80, CD86, and relatively high levels
of MHC class II (Fig. 2
). We previously
reported that FL-generated splenic DC express low levels of CD40 and
CD86, negligible levels of CD80 and high levels of MHC class II
(11, 20). Using a more sensitive anti-CD80 Ab (clone
16-10A1), we were able to detect low level expression of CD80 on
FL-generated DC (Fig. 2
).
|
The majority of
CD11blowCD11chigh splenic
DC from FL-treated mice expressed bright levels of CD8
and DEC205
(Fig. 2
) (20). In contrast, the majority of
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC from
FL-or pGM-CSF-treated mice did not express these markers (Fig. 2
)
(20). However, there were small proportions of
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC from
FL- or pGM-CSF-treated mice that expressed CD8
or DEC205 (Fig. 2
).
The significance of these subpopulations of DC is unknown but may
reflect DC that have been previously stimulated, because CD11b can be
up-regulated on
CD8
+DEC205+ DC in vitro
(25).
CD11blowCD11chigh DC from
FL-treated mice and
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC from
pGM-CSF-treated mice expressed somewhat higher levels of CD1d than
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC from
FL-treated mice (Fig. 2
) (20). Whereas a large
subpopulation of
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC from
FL-treated mice expressed the marginal zone marker, 33D1 (Fig. 2
)
(20), virtually all of the
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC from
pGM-CSF-treated mice expressed high levels of 33D1 (Fig. 2
). These data
demonstrate that pGM-CSF-generated
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC are
not phenotypically identical with FL-generated
CD11bhighCD11chigh
DC.
DC from pGM-CSF-treated mice capture Ag more efficiently than DC from FL-treated mice
DC capture a variety of Ags using several different mechanisms
(reviewed in Ref. 26). Particulate Ags such as microbes
and apoptotic cells can be internalized and degraded via the
actin-dependent process of phagocytosis. Soluble Ags, such as proteins,
can be internalized and degraded by actin-dependent macropinocytosis or
clathrin-dependent endocytosis (including nonselective fluid phase
endocytosis and receptor-mediated endocytosis). We therefore examined
endocytosis and phagocytosis of splenic DC generated in vivo by
treatment with FL or pGM-CSF. To assay the capture of soluble Ag,
spleen cells from pGM-CSF- and FL-treated mice were incubated with 2
mg/ml FITC-dextran for 090 min. Analysis of various DC populations by
FACS revealed that all DC populations were capable of internalizing
soluble dextran, although the initial rate of internalization for
pGM-CSF-generated DC was
4-fold faster than that of FL-generated DC
(Fig. 3
A). The
lymphocyte-enriched control population was inefficient at uptake of
soluble FITC-dextran (Fig. 3
A). Similar results were
obtained using 2 mg/ml FITC-OVA (not shown).
|
Phagocytosis was also examined in the FL- and pGM-CSF-generated splenic
DC by incubating DC with FITC-conjugated, yeast-derived zymosan
particles for 90 min in the presence or absence of cytochalasin D. DC
generated in vivo with pGM-CSF internalized
5-fold more zymosan than
DC generated in vivo with FL (Fig. 3
C). Zymosan
internalization was indeed due to actin-dependent phagocytosis because
treatment with cytochalasin D was inhibitory (Fig. 3
C). The
control, lymphocyte-enriched populations were inefficient at
phagocytosis (Fig. 3
C).
Having determined that DC from the spleens of pGM-CSF-treated mice
exhibit enhanced Ag capture efficiency, Ag capture potential was
examined in DC from PB and BM, tissues that are more clinically
accessible than the spleen. Uptake of FITC-OVA was enhanced in DC from
PB, BM, and spleens of pGM-CSF-treated mice as compared with DC from
FL-treated mice (Fig. 3
D). Interestingly, DC from BM and PB
of pGM-CSF-treated mice were more efficient at Ag capture than splenic
DC (Fig. 3
D). In contrast, FL-generated DC, including those
from the BM, were relatively poor at Ag capture (Fig. 3
D).
Similar results were obtained for FITC-dextran uptake (not shown).
Uptake was low in control lymphocyte-enriched populations from all
tissues analyzed (Fig. 3
D).
CD11blowCD11chigh DC from FL-treated mice have high levels of intracellular MHC class II
Intracellular class II can be detected in immature DC (reviewed in
Ref. 4). We therefore examined the intracellular
distribution of MHC class II. Splenic DC from mice treated with FL or
pGM-CSF were isolated by flow cytometry and processed for intracellular
MHC class II (I-Ab) localization. Confocal
microscopy revealed that FL- and pGM-CSF-generated
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC
expressed MHC class II on the cell surface and in intracellular
vesicles (Fig. 4
A).
FL-generated,
CD11blowCD11chigh DC
exhibited a much higher proportion of MHC class II-containing
intracellular vesicles compared with cell-surface MHC class II (Fig. 4
A). Freshly isolated DC generated by pGM-CSF treatment are
more adherent than those generated by FL treatment, and this results in
greater cell spreading during the 30-min incubation. Thus,
pGM-CSF-generated DC appear larger in Fig. 4
A, but forward
scatter analysis as well as cell volume comparisons using Cell-Tracker
dye (Molecular Probes) showed no difference in cell size or volume
between FL- and pGM-CSF-generated freshly isolated splenic DC in
suspension. Quantification of intracellular MHC class II confirmed that
FL-generated,
CD11blowCD11chigh DC have
higher levels of intracellular MHC class II than FL- or
pGM-CSF-generated,
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC (Fig. 4
B). FL- and pGM-CSF-generated
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC
contained approximately equal amounts of intracellular and surface MHC
Class II (Fig. 4
B).
|
Processing of protein Ag into peptide is required for efficient
presentation on MHC class II. Efficient internalization of
extracellular Ags does not necessarily lead to delivery to an
intracellular compartment where proteolysis occurs. We therefore
assessed the capacity for the DC subsets to process internalized OVA
into peptide. This was accomplished using DQ-OVA (Molecular Probes), a
self-quenching conjugate designed specifically for the study of Ag
processing. On proteolysis, highly fluorescent peptides are released
from DQ-OVA, and thus processing of OVA into peptide can be quantified
by flow cytometry. Spleen cells from pGM-CSF- and FL-treated mice were
pulsed with 2 mg/ml DQ-OVA and chased for various amounts of time to
allow protein processing. During the pulse period, pGM-CSF-generated DC
internalized the most DQ-OVA because they are more efficient at
capturing Ag (Fig. 5
). However, the rate
of OVA processing within the first 30 min (slope of the line between 0
and 30 min) was
3-fold higher by the pGM-CSF-generated than that of
FL-generated DC (Fig. 5
). Thus, FL- and pGM-CSF-generated DC are
capable of delivering internalized OVA to an intracellular compartment
where proteolysis occurs.
|
pGM-CSF-generated DC were compared with FL-generated DC for their
capacity to stimulate the in vitro proliferation of allogeneic
CD4+ or CD8+ T cells.
Purified splenic DC from FL- or pGM-CSF-treated C57BL/6 mice
(H-2b) were cultured in the presence of purified
CD4+ or CD8+ LN T cells
from DBA/2 mice (H-2d). DC from FL- or
pGM-CSF-treated mice were functionally equivalent in their capacities
to stimulate allogeneic CD4+ or
CD8+ T cell proliferation (Fig. 6
). We next assessed the capacity of the
various DC to stimulate Ag-specific T cell proliferation in vitro. We
cultured DC with LN T cells from DO11.10 transgenic mice which express
rearranged TCR
and TCRß genes encoding for a TCR specific for the
peptide fragment OVA323329 presented on
I-Ad MHC class II molecules (21). No
consistent differences were observed in the capacity of FL- or
pGM-CSF-generated DC to present soluble OVA peptide or OVA protein and
stimulate the proliferation of DO11.10 T cells (Fig. 7
).
|
|
Although administration of FL in vivo induces the generation of
both CD11bhighCD11chigh and
CD11blowCD11chigh DC, it is
unclear whether this is strictly FL-mediated or due to the combined
action of FL and endogenous cytokines. Previous studies have
demonstrated marginal changes in DC numbers in
GM-CSFRß-/- mice, the
most significant of these being a 3-fold decrease in DC in the LN
(9). To determine whether FL-mediated DC expansion in vivo
is dependent on GM-CSF, we treated
GM-CSFRß-/- mice with
FL. Spleen cellularity was increased similarly in FL-treated
GM-CSFRß-/- and
GM-CSFRß+/+ mice as was the generation of
CD11blowCD11chigh DC (Table II
). However, FL generated fewer
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC in
GM-CSFRß-/- mice than
in GM-CSFRß+/+ controls (Table II
), suggesting
that FL-mediated expansion of
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC
involves, to some extent, GM-CSF/GM-CSFR signaling. However, because
development of
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC was
not completely abrogated in
GM-CSFRß-/- mice,
GM-CSFRß chain signaling is not an absolute requirement for
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC
development. The allostimulatory capacity of splenic DC from FL-treated
GM-CSFRß-/- mice was
equivalent to FL-generated splenic DC from
GM-CSFRß+/+ mice, indicating that DC generated
with FL in GM-CSFRß-/-
mice were functionally normal (not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
First, both FL and pGM-CSF generate significant numbers of DC in vivo, but maximal DC numbers are achieved after 5 days of pGM-CSF treatment, whereas FL requires 9 days treatment to reach maximal DC numbers. Continuous treatment with pGM-CSF causes DC numbers to gradually return to normal levels after 10 days, whereas DC numbers remain elevated in response to continuous treatment with FL for >10 days. It is possible that the more rapid kinetics of DC expansion achieved with pGM-CSF may reflect differences in the differentiation time of the respective precursor cell targets. It is known that the Flt3 receptor is restricted to more primitive progenitor cells and immature myeloid and B-lymphoid precursors, whereas GM-CSF receptor is expressed on more mature myeloid cells including mature monocytes and DC (28, 29, 30). Examining DC development in mice sequentially treated with FL and pGM-CSF may shed light on the mechanism of action of these two cytokines.
Second, whereas FL induces the generation of both
CD11bhighCD11chighCD8
-,
and
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
DC, pGM-CSF primarily induces the generation
CD11bhighCD11chighCD8
-
DC (Fig. 1
A; Fig. 2
), (17). In addition,
expansion of
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
DC in FL-treated
GM-CSFRß-/- mice is
normal, whereas expansion of
CD11bhighCD11chighCD8
-
DC is reduced by 50% (Table II
). Taken together, these data suggest
that GM-CSF minimally influences the development of
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
DC. DC can be derived from both myeloid- and lymphoid-committed
precursors (5). In the mouse spleen, myeloid-related DC
are characterized as
CD11bhighCD11chighCD8
-
(20, 25, 31). Conversely, it has been proposed that the
ontogenic derivation of
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
spleen DC is related to thymic DC, which appear to be derived from a
lymphoid-committed precursor (32, 33, 34, 35).
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
spleen DC are phenotypically indistinguishable from thymic DC. The
lymphoid origin of
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
spleen DC is further supported by findings that i.v. injection of
lymphoid-committed precursors results in the exclusive generation of
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
DC in both the thymus and spleen (35). Thus, our studies
of in vivo administration of pGM-CSF and analysis of FL-treated
GM-CSFRß-/- mice
suggest that GM-CSF plays an important role in the development of
CD11bhighCD11chighCD8
-
myeloid-related DC but is not essential for the development of the
CD11blowCD11chighCD8
+
putative lymphoid-related spleen DC subset.
Third, DC generated by pGM-CSF differ in the expression of certain
surface molecules. DC generated by pGM-CSF uniformly express high
levels of the marginal zone marker, 33D1. In contrast, FL-generated,
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC can
be subdivided into 33D1+ and
33D1- subpopulations (Fig. 2
) (20).
This may indicate that pGM-CSF-generated DC represent a more
homogeneous population of
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC than
those generated with FL. The biological function of 33D1 on
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC in
the marginal zone is not clear but may reflect DC developmental origins
(e.g., macrophage/monocyte rather than Langerhans cell). Alternatively,
33D1 expression may relate to DC maturational status and functional
role in this location, given that the marginal zone is a primary entry
point for particulate Ag trafficking from the circulation (20, 36). The Ag recognition receptor DEC205 and the lymphoid-related
DC marker CD8
are not expressed on pGM-CSF-generated,
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC. This
is consistent with previous reports that CD8
and DEC205 are
coordinately expressed on
CD11blowCD11chigh DC within
the T cell areas (11, 20, 37, 38). Another difference in
surface phenotype between FL- and pGM-CSF-generated
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC is
the somewhat higher level of expression of CD1d on pGM-CSF-generated
DC. Previously, we have shown a strong correlation between CD1d,
DEC205, and CD8
on
CD11blowCD11chigh DC from
FL-treated mice (20). The presence of CD1d on the
pGM-CSF-generated,
CD11bhighCD11chigh DC
suggests that this marker may not be restricted to
CD11blowCD11chigh DC. CD1d
may play a role in unconventional Ag presentation to specific T cell
populations (reviewed in Ref. 39); therefore, the
expression of CD1d on pGM-CSF-generated DC may be functionally
significant.
Finally, pGM-CSF-generated DC are more efficient at Ag capture and
processing than FL-generated DC. The correlation between surface
phenotype and functional status of DC has become a widely accepted
means of assessing DC maturation, particularly for in vitro-generated
DC from monocyte precursors (reviewed in Refs. 4, 5).
The pGM-CSF-generated DC retain a high capacity for Ag capture and
processing, a characteristic of immature DC. In contrast, FL-generated
splenic DC are comparatively less efficient at this function and
therefore appear to represent a functionally more mature DC population
(Fig. 3
). However, the expression level of costimulatory molecules is
quite low in both FL- and pGM-CSF-generated DC, a phenotype consistent
with immature DC. Intracellular MHC Class II distribution reveals that
both FL- and pGM-CSF-generated,
CD11bhighCD11chigh contain
equivalent amounts of intracellular and surface MHC class II.
Interestingly, FL-generated,
CD11blowCD11chigh DC retain
the highest levels of intracellular MHC Class II, a phenotype
associated with immature DC. Furthermore, both FL- and
pGM-CSF-generated DC are efficient stimulators of allogeneic or
Ag-specific T cell proliferation in vitro, a hallmark of mature DC
(Figs. 6
and 7
). DC terminally differentiate when placed in culture
with T cells, and thus differences in initial maturation
phenotype/function may be obscured by the in vitro culture conditions.
Overall, none of the DC populations analyzed display all of the
characteristics expected of either mature or immature DC. This is not
due to heterogeneity in DC populations because each functional or
phenotypic characteristic is expressed homogeneously by the DC
populations analyzed. These findings are consistent with our analysis
of DC generated in FL-treated human volunteers, which exhibit low Ag
capture capacity, low expression of costimulatory molecules and
efficient stimulation of T cells (52).
There are several possible explanations for the findings that none of
the DC populations analyzed displayed all of the characteristics
expected of either mature or immature DC. These include but are not
limited to the following. 1) Functional and phenotypic transitions
observed during DC maturation may not be synchronously coupled. For
example, the down-regulation of Ag capture activity may occur at a
different rate or may be initiated at a different phase of the DC
maturation program than that of increased costimulatory molecule
expression. 2) Cytokines such as GM-CSF or FL may directly or
indirectly affect DC function and/or phenotype regardless of
maturation. This is supported by findings that GM-CSF can increase Ag
capture by DC in vitro (7, 40) and may indicate that the
GM-CSF used in these studies imparts the macrophage-like characteristic
of active phagocytosis on DC as they develop in vivo. The presence of
the high levels of FL or GM-CSF used in these studies could also induce
aberrant cell development or maturation. 3) The DC generated by FL and
pGM-CSF represent an intermediate maturation stage. It is likely that
further maturation of FL- or pGM-CSF DC will be induced by specific
maturation signals. DC maturation has been shown to be induced after
exposure to several classes of signals: proinflammatory mediators such
as IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-
, PGE2, and IFN-
(41, 42, 43, 44); T-cell derived signals such as CD40 ligand
(45, 46); and pathogen-derived signals such as LPS, viral
dsDNA, and bacterial CpG DNA (47, 48).
Due to the capacity of DC to modulate immune responses, they have been under clinical investigation as cellular vaccine adjuvants (49, 50). Given that DC represent a diverse family of leukocytes, it is as yet unclear which DC populations are the most appropriate for the generation of long lasting and clinically effective immune responses in vivo. Furthermore, the effective delivery of vaccines will also depend on matching the form of Ag (peptide, protein, and cDNA) with the functional capacity and maturation status of the DC population used. The present study provides a foundation for evaluating the use of FL and pGM-CSF in generating DC in vivo and for optimizing their clinical utility.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Baylor Institute of Immunology Research, Dallas, TX. ![]()
3 Current address: Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Australia. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cells; PB, peripheral blood; LN, lymph nodes; PEG, polyethylene glycol; pGM-CSF, PEG-modified GM-CSF; FL, Flt3 ligand; BM, bone marrow; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. ![]()
Received for publication October 8, 1999. Accepted for publication April 12, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. II. Functional analysis. Blood 90:1458.
cooperate to activate human dendritic cells: synergistic activation of interleukin 12 production. J. Exp. Med. 186:1603.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Shao, T. O. Makinde, H. S. McGee, X. Wang, and D. K. Agrawal Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand Regulates Migratory Pattern and Antigen Uptake of Lung Dendritic Cell Subsets in a Murine Model of Allergic Airway Inflammation J. Immunol., December 1, 2009; 183(11): 7531 - 7538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Ali, D. Emerich, G. Dranoff, and D. J. Mooney In Situ Regulation of DC Subsets and T Cells Mediates Tumor Regression in Mice Science Translational Medicine, November 25, 2009; 1(8): 8ra19 - 8ra19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-N. Zhu, M. Chen, J. Jongstra-Bilen, and M. I. Cybulsky GM-CSF regulates intimal cell proliferation in nascent atherosclerotic lesions J. Exp. Med., September 28, 2009; 206(10): 2141 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zarei, F. Schwenter, P. Luy, M. Aurrand-Lions, P. Morel, M. Kopf, G. Dranoff, and N. Mach Role of GM-CSF signaling in cell-based tumor immunization Blood, June 25, 2009; 113(26): 6658 - 6668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ramakrishna, N. Woller, B. Mundt, S. Knocke, E. Gurlevik, M. Saborowski, N. Malek, M. P. Manns, T. Wirth, F. Kuhnel, et al. Antitumoral Immune Response by Recruitment and Expansion of Dendritic Cells in Tumors Infected with Telomerase-Dependent Oncolytic Viruses Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 69(4): 1448 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Mott and H. Ghiasi Role of Dendritic Cells in Enhancement of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Latency and Reactivation in Vaccinated Mice Clin. Vaccine Immunol., December 1, 2008; 15(12): 1859 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Mott, D. UnderHill, S. L. Wechsler, and H. Ghiasi Lymphoid-Related CD11c+ CD8{alpha}+ Dendritic Cells Are Involved in Enhancing Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Latency J. Virol., October 15, 2008; 82(20): 9870 - 9879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Carreras, S. Turner, V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, A. Mao, C. Dascher, and S. Kovats Estradiol Acts Directly on Bone Marrow Myeloid Progenitors to Differentially Regulate GM-CSF or Flt3 Ligand-Mediated Dendritic Cell Differentiation J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 727 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Ryan, T. M. Wozniak, E. Shklovskaya, M. A. O'Donnell, B. Fazekas de St. Groth, W. J. Britton, and J. A. Triccas Improved Protection against Disseminated Tuberculosis by Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Secreting Murine GM-CSF Is Associated with Expansion and Activation of APCs J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8418 - 8424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Winter, K. Taut, F. Langer, M. Mack, D. E. Briles, J. C. Paton, R. Maus, M. Srivastava, T. Welte, and U. A. Maus FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand Aggravates the Lung Inflammatory Response to Streptococcus pneumoniae Infection in Mice: Role of Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 3099 - 3108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Bandukwala, B. S. Clay, J. Tong, P. D. Mody, J. L. Cannon, R. A. Shilling, J. S. Verbeek, J. V. Weinstock, J. Solway, and A. I. Sperling Signaling through Fc{gamma}RIII is required for optimal T helper type (Th)2 responses and Th2-mediated airway inflammation J. Exp. Med., August 6, 2007; 204(8): 1875 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Sheng, L. Li, B. B. Ganesh, C. Vasu, B. S. Prabhakar, and M. N. Meriggioli Suppression of Experimental Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Is Associated with an Expansion of FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5296 - 5306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Chavan, K. A. Marfatia, I. C. An, D. A. Garber, and M. B. Feinberg Expression of CCL20 and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, but Not Flt3-L, from Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Enhances Antiviral Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses. J. Virol., August 1, 2006; 80(15): 7676 - 7687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.W. Cutler and R. Jotwani Dendritic Cells at the Oral Mucosal Interface Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 2006; 85(8): 678 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Berhanu, J. Huang, S. M. Alber, S. C. Watkins, and W. J. Storkus Combinational FLt3 Ligand and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment Promotes Enhanced Tumor Infiltration by Dendritic Cells and Antitumor CD8+ T-Cell Cross-priming but Is Ineffective as a Therapy. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4895 - 4903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. I. Slukvin, M. A. Vodyanik, J. A. Thomson, M. E. Gumenyuk, and K.-D. Choi Directed Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Functional Dendritic Cells through the Myeloid Pathway. J. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 176(5): 2924 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wahid, M. J. Cannon, and M. Chow Dendritic Cells and Macrophages Are Productively Infected by Poliovirus J. Virol., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 401 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Driessens, M. Hamdane, V. Cool, T. Velu, and C. Bruyns Highly Successful Therapeutic Vaccinations Combining Dendritic Cells and Tumor Cells Secreting Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 64(22): 8435 - 8442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Hudson Keenihan and S. A. Robertson Diversity in Phenotype and Steroid Hormone Dependence in Dendritic Cellsand Macrophages in the Mouse Uterus Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1562 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Peng, S. F. Hussain, and Y. Paterson The Ability of Two Listeria monocytogenes Vaccines Targeting Human Papillomavirus-16 E7 to Induce an Antitumor Response Correlates with Myeloid Dendritic Cell Function J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6030 - 6038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Chklovskaia, P. Nowbakht, C. Nissen, A. Gratwohl, M. Bargetzi, and A. Wodnar-Filipowicz Reconstitution of dendritic and natural killer-cell subsets after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: effects of endogenous flt3 ligand Blood, May 15, 2004; 103(10): 3860 - 3868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Alaniz, S. Sandall, E. K. Thomas, and C. B. Wilson Increased Dendritic Cell Numbers Impair Protective Immunity to Intracellular Bacteria Despite Augmenting Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Lymphocyte Responses J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3725 - 3735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vasu, R.-N. E. Dogan, M. J. Holterman, and B. S. Prabhakar Selective Induction of Dendritic Cells Using Granulocyte Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor, But Not fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase Receptor 3-Ligand, Activates Thyroglobulin-Specific CD4+/CD25+ T Cells and Suppresses Experimental Autoimmune Thyroiditis J. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 170(11): 5511 - 5522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Granucci, S. Feau, V. Angeli, F. Trottein, and P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli Early IL-2 Production by Mouse Dendritic Cells Is the Result of Microbial-Induced Priming J. Immunol., May 15, 2003; 170(10): 5075 - 5081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Guebre-Xabier, S. A. Hammond, D. E. Epperson, J. Yu, L. Ellingsworth, and G. M. Glenn Immunostimulant Patch Containing Heat-Labile Enterotoxin from Escherichia coli Enhances Immune Responses to Injected Influenza Virus Vaccine through Activation of Skin Dendritic Cells J. Virol., May 1, 2003; 77(9): 5218 - 5225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Miller, V. G. Pillarisetty, A. B. Shah, S. Lahrs, and R. P. DeMatteo Murine Flt3 Ligand Expands Distinct Dendritic Cells with Both Tolerogenic and Immunogenic Properties J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3554 - 3564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-N. E. Dogan, C. Vasu, M. J. Holterman, and B. S. Prabhakar Absence of IL-4, and Not Suppression of the Th2 Response, Prevents Development of Experimental Autoimmune Graves' Disease J. Immunol., February 15, 2003; 170(4): 2195 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Miller, V. G. Pillarisetty, A. B. Shah, S. Lahrs, Z. Xing, and R. P. DeMatteo Endogenous Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Overexpression In Vivo Results in the Long-Term Recruitment of a Distinct Dendritic Cell Population with Enhanced Immunostimulatory Function J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 2875 - 2885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Yrlid and M. J. Wick Antigen Presentation Capacity and Cytokine Production by Murine Splenic Dendritic Cell Subsets upon Salmonella Encounter J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 108 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Basak, A. Harui, M. Stolina, S. Sharma, K. Mitani, S. M. Dubinett, and M. D. Roth Increased dendritic cell number and function following continuous in vivo infusion of granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-4 Blood, April 15, 2002; 99(8): 2869 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O'Keeffe, H. Hochrein, D. Vremec, J. Pooley, R. Evans, S. Woulfe, and K. Shortman Effects of administration of progenipoietin 1, Flt-3 ligand, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and pegylated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on dendritic cell subsets in mice Blood, March 15, 2002; 99(6): 2122 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Lipscomb and B. J. Masten Dendritic Cells: Immune Regulators in Health and Disease Physiol Rev, January 1, 2002; 82(1): 97 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Cutler, R. Jotwani, and B. Pulendran Dendritic Cells: Immune Saviors or Achilles' Heel? Infect. Immun., August 1, 2001; 69(8): 4703 - 4708. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Henri, D. Vremec, A. Kamath, J. Waithman, S. Williams, C. Benoist, K. Burnham, S. Saeland, E. Handman, and K. Shortman The Dendritic Cell Populations of Mouse Lymph Nodes J. Immunol., July 15, 2001; 167(2): 741 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.B. Toews Cytokines and the lung Eur. Respir. J., July 2, 2001; 18(34_suppl): 3S - 17s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Kirby, U. Yrlid, M. Svensson, and M. J. Wick Differential Involvement of Dendritic Cell Subsets During Acute Salmonella Infection J. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 166(11): 6802 - 6811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bronte, E. Apolloni, A. Cabrelle, R. Ronca, P. Serafini, P. Zamboni, N. P. Restifo, and P. Zanovello Identification of a CD11b+/Gr-1+/CD31+ myeloid progenitor capable of activating or suppressing CD8+ T cells Blood, December 1, 2000; 96(12): 3838 - 3846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |