The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibisch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vié, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ibisch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vié, H.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 4924-4932.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

The T Cell Repertoire Selected In Vitro Against EBV: Diversity, Specificity, and Improved Purification Through Early IL-2 Receptor {alpha}-Chain (CD25)-Positive Selection1

Catherine Ibisch2,*, Xavier Saulquin2,*, Géraldine Gallot*, Régine Vivien*, Christophe Ferrand{dagger}, Pierre Tiberghien{dagger}, Elisabeth Houssaint* and Henri Vié3,*

* Institut de Biologie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Nantes, France; and {dagger} Etablissement de Transfusion Sanguine de Franche Comté, Besançon, France


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Polyclonal T cell lines specific for EBV proteins have proved efficient in preventing EBV-related immunoblastic lymphoma after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. To gain insight into the composition of the EBV-specific T cell repertoire that ensured patient protection, we performed for the first time an extensive characterization of eight cytotoxic T cell lines selected in vitro against EBV-transformed autologous lymphoblastoid cell lines (BLCL). These T cell lines consist of 50–100 distinct T cell clones, of which 32–96% are specific for autologous BLCL. Moreover, we demonstrate that reactivities against only five EBV proteins (BZLF1, BMLF1, EBNA-3A, EBNA-3C, and LMP2) cover 86% (32/37) of the specificities detected. In addition, we describe an improved method of T cell harvesting using a CD25 selection procedure which reduces the time required to obtain specific T cells and improves the purity of EBV-specific T cells, thus showing promise for use in adoptive transfer protocols.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epstein-Barr virus, a human {gamma} herpes virus with a marked tropism for B lymphocytes, infects >90% of individuals. Although EBV has cell growth-transforming ability in vitro and oncogenic potential in vivo, it is carried by the vast majority of individuals as a life-long asymptomatic infection. There is strong evidence to suggest that CD8+ CTLs play an important role in maintaining the long-term carrier state (1). One of the clearest indications that T cells play an important role in controlling EBV infection comes from the clinical observation that immunocompromised patients are at greatly increased risk of developing EBV-positive B cell lymphomas (2). Posttransplant B cell lymphoproliferative diseases are B cell tumors that occur frequently in T cell immunocompromised patients (3). The incidence of EBV-associated B cell lymphoproliferative disease is especially high (5–30%) among recipients of T cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA-mismatched or HLA-matched unrelated donors (2, 4). In the former case, lymphoproliferative cells are mostly of donor origin, although the viral infection itself sometimes results from reactivation of the host’s latent virus (5). These lymphoproliferations are usually rapidly progressive, leading to lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and death due to diffuse organ infiltration. The fact that these tumors are composed of EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell line (BLCL)-like cells expressing the full spectrum of virus-latent proteins (6) has led to the hypothesis that the outgrowth of EBV-transformed cells could be reversed by a restoration of CTL control. The first successful assays of adoptive cell therapy against EBV-associated lymphoma in bone marrow recipients were performed with infusions of unselected PBMC from the donor (7), leading to lymphoma regression but also to an increased risk of graft-versus-host disease because of the presence of alloreactive T cells. More recently, it was reported that an efficient and safer effect could be achieved by injecting donor-derived EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells that had been selected in vitro (8, 9). The feasibility of this selection was demonstrated by Rickinson et al. (10) in an early work showing that memory CTL in the blood of healthy carriers can be reactivated in vitro by coculture with autologous BLCL. This technique was adapted by Smith et al. (11) to produce a sufficient number of T cells for use in a clinical protocol of adoptive transfer . In a pioneering work, the same team succeeded in reversing EBV-driven lymphoproliferation in bone marrow transplant recipients after reinjection of T cells selected against autologous BLCL (12). Because of its success, this procedure is likely to become a standard approach for the protection of patients at risk or with ongoing EBV reactivation after bone marrow or solid organ transplantation. Nevertheless, the possibility of large-scale clinical protocols using specific T cell lines seems difficult to consider without precise immunological quality control of the T cell populations to be injected. In this context, efforts toward the definition of "the sufficient T cell repertoire," i.e., how many clones of how many specificities to protect or cure a patient, seems particularly crucial. In the case of EBV therapy, for example, although the T cell response against lytic Ags has recently been recognized as an important component of the anti-EBV T cell memory response (13, 14, 15), the presence of such clones cannot be easily evaluated against a latently infected BLCL (15, 16). As a first step toward a definition of the sufficient T cell repertoire in the context of EBV therapy, we performed an extensive characterization of EBV-specific T cell lines selected against autologous BLCL. In addition, we propose a new method for rapid selection of EBV-specific T cells which may be of value for clinical application.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Donors

Fifteen milliliters of heparinized blood was collected twice from eight healthy EBV-seropositive adults (D1–D8). PBMC were separated using Ficoll density centrifugation (lymphocyte separation medium; Eurobio, Paris, France). For EBV-transformed BLCL establishment, PBMC were cocultured with EBV-containing supernatant from the B95.8 EBV-producing cell line: 10 x 106 PBMC were cultured at a density of 106 cells/ml in a 24-well plate in RPMI 1640 + 10% FCS + 2 mM glutamine + gentamicin (50 µg/ml), initially supplemented with 1 µg/ml cyclosporin A and 500 µl/well of B95.8 culture supernatant.

Generation and expansion of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cell lines

For type I cell lines (D1I and D2I, see Fig. 1Go), donor PBMC were plated in 24-well culture plates in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin at 2 x 106 cells/well and stimulated with 5 x 104 35 Gy-irradiated autologous BLCL (PBMC:BLCL ratio of 40:1). After 10 days, T cells were harvested on Ficoll gradients and restimulated at a T:B ratio of 4:1 (5 x 105 T and 1.25 x 105 BLCL/well). IL-2 (150 Biological Response Modifier Program (BRMP) U/ml) was added 4 days after the second stimulation, and a third stimulation in the presence of IL-2 was performed 8 days after the second one with the same T:B ratio (4:1). Ten days after this last specific stimulation, cultures were fed with a mitogenic mixture composed of irradiated pooled allogeneic feeder cells (5 x 106 PBMC and 5 x 104 BLCL) in the presence of 1 µg/ml leukoagglutinin A (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and rIL-2 (150 BRMP U/ml). This procedure is sometimes required to reach the number of cells necessary for injection (11). Type II cell lines (D3II, D4II, D5II, D6II, D7II, and D8II) were studied after the three specific stimulation steps using the autologous BLCL. For type III cell lines (D4III, D5III, and D6III) after a 6-day coculture period of PBMC with BLCL (40:1 ratio), cells recognized by 33B3.1 mAb (an anti-CD25 mAb, kindly provided by Dr. J. Carcagne, Pasteur-Mérieux Institute, Lyon, France) were purified as follows: 1) 8–22 x 106 cells were first stained with the 33B3.1 mAb (20 µg/ml) in 500 µl PBS (0.1% BSA) for 30 min at 4°C; 2) cells were then washed twice in 10 ml sterile PBS-BSA; 3) 1 x 105 magnetic beads (Dynabeads M450; Dynal, Oslo, Norway) prepared according to the supplier’s instructions were then added to the cell suspension and rotated for 4 h at 4°C; and 4) bead-coated and uncoated cells were then separated using a magnet (six washes were performed to ensure elimination of all uncoated cells). CD25-selected T cells were then further cultured in the presence of IL-2 only.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. T cell line selection protocol.

 
Cytotoxic assay

Cytotoxic activity was tested using a standard 51Cr release assay. Briefly, target cells were labeled with 100 µCi of Na251CrO4 for 1 h at 37°C, washed four times, and then plated at E:T ratios of 3:1, 10:1, and 30:1, respectively, in a 96-well round-bottom plate. After 4 h of incubation at 37°C, 25 µl of supernatant from each well was removed and counted in a gamma scintillation counter. Each test was performed in triplicate. Results are expressed as a percentage of lysis according to the following formula: (experimental release - spontaneous release)/(maximal release - spontaneous release) x 100, where experimental release represents mean cpm released from target cells in the presence of effector cells, spontaneous release that from targets incubated without effectors, and maximum release that from targets incubated with 1% Cetavlon.

T cell line phenotype

The following TCRBV region-specific mAbs (from Immunotech, Luminy, France) were used for flow cytometry: UN7 (anti-BV1S1), E2.2E7.2 (anti-BV2S1), LE89 (anti-BV3S1), IMMU157 (anti-BV5S1), 36213 (anti-BV5S2), 3D11 (anti-BV5S3), CRI304.3 (anti-BV6S1), 3G5D15 (anti-BV7S1), 56C5.2 (anti-BV8S1/S2), FIN9 (anti-BV9S1), C21 (anti-BV11S1), VER2.32.3 (anti-BV12S2), IMMU222 (anti-BV13S1), JU74.3 (anti-BV13S6), CAS1.1.3 (anti-BV14S1), TAMAYA1.2 (anti-BV16S1), E17.5F3 (anti-BV17S1), BA62.6 (anti-BV18S1), ELL1.4 (anti-BV20S1), IG125 (anti-V21S3), and IMMU546 (anti-BV22S1) (references compiled in the 1995 T Cell Receptor Workshop, San Francisco, CA) (17). The following mAbs were also used: purified anti-V{alpha}2 and -V{alpha}12 from T-Cell Sciences (Cambridge, MA), anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 from Bioatlantic (Nantes, France), and anti-V{alpha}24 and pan {gamma}{delta} (IMMU 510) from Immunotech. Their binding was revealed by FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antiserum (green fluorescence) (rabbit anti-mouse (RAM)-FITC from Bioatlantic). Cells were stained by two-color immunofluorescence using PE-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb from Immunotech. A three-step procedure was used for staining: fresh PBMC were incubated for 30 min on ice in V-bottom microtiter plates in the presence of 25 µl of the first mAb at optimal concentration. Cells were further incubated in the presence of RAM-FITC for 30 min. After washings, cells were incubated for 30 min on ice with PE-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb. Between each step, plates were centrifuged and supernatant was discarded by flicking. Wells were washed twice with 200 µl ice-cold PBS/0.1% BSA (PBS-BSA). Labeled cells were analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).

Immunoscope analysis

RNA was extracted as described previously (18). This technique involves a combination of PCR and run-off reactions using pairs of Vß/Cß primers followed by size determination of the elongation products. Fluorescent DNA products were migrated on sequencing gels in an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and raw data were analyzed with the immunoscope software package (19).

Expression vectors

Expression vectors encoding six lytic EBV proteins (BZLF1, BMLF1, BRLF1, BCRF1, BMRF1, and BHRF1), all of the latent EBV proteins (EBNA-1, -2, -3a, -3b, -3c, and -LP, LMP1, and LMP2), and various HLA class I alleles (HLA-A*0101, HLA-A*0201, HLA-A*0301, HLA-A*2402, HLA-B*0702, HLA-B*0801, HLA-B14, HLA -B18, HLA-B*2705, HLA-B*3501, HLA-B*4402, HLA-B*4403, HLA-Cw*0102, HLA-Cw4, HLA-Cw6, HLA-Cw7, HLA-Cw8, HLA-Cw14, HLA-Cw15, and HLA-Cw16) were described previously (20, 21).

COS transfections and T cell stimulation assay

Transfection into COS cells was performed by the DEAE-dextran chloroquine method, as described (20, 21, 22). Briefly, 1.5 x 104 COS cells were cotransfected with 100 ng of an expression vector coding for an EBV protein and 100 ng of an expression vector coding for one of the HLA class I molecules. Transfected COS cells were tested 48 h after transfection in a CTL stimulation assay using either clones or polyclonal cell lines. For clonal analysis, 5 x 103 cells from the T cell clone were added to transfected COS cells. Culture supernatants were harvested 6 h later and tested for TNF-{alpha} content by measuring culture supernatant cytotoxicity to WEHI 164 clone 13 in a colorimetric assay (23). For polyclonal analysis, TNF-{alpha} secretion in culture supernatant was estimated as for T cell clones after a 6-h incubation of varying numbers of polyclonal cell lines (103, 104, and 105) along with transfected COS cells (21).

Clonal analysis of T cell lines

To generate a panel of clones, responder cells were seeded at different concentrations (3, 1, and 0.3 cells/well) in 96-microwell round-bottom culture plates along with pooled allogeneic feeder cells (5 x 104 PBL and 5 x 103 BLCL, 30 Gy irradiated) in the presence of 1 µg/ml leukoagglutinin A and rIL-2 (150 BRMP U/ml). For the D1I, D2I, D3II, D4II, and D7II lines, cells were seeded at 3, 1, and 0.3 cells/well into 96, 96, and 288 wells, respectively. For D5 and D6, cells were seeded at the same concentrations into 96, 96, and 1440 wells. A plot of the logarithm of the fraction of negative wells vs the number of titrated responders was used to provide an estimate of clonal frequency (at the density yielding 37% negative wells). For proliferation assay, resting T cell clones (2.5 x 104), taken 2–3 wk after the last stimulation, were cocultured for 48–72 h with the indicated irradiated (30 Gy) B lymphoblastoid cell line in 96-microwell flat-bottom culture plates at a 1:1 responder:stimulator ratio. Eighteen hours before harvesting, 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine was added to each well, and 3H uptake was then measured in a liquid scintillation counter.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Selection of EBV-specific T cell lines

Type I, II, and III T cell lines were obtained from eight different donors (D1–8) according to the procedures described in Fig. 1Go and in Materials and Methods. I- and II-type cell lines were obtained using the standard selection procedure described by Heslop et al. (8) and which rely on sequential stimulation of donor PBMC against autologous BLCL. In contrast, for type C cell lines, only the first stimulation against auto-BLCL was performed (at a 40:1 responder:stimulator ratio) and the CD25-positive T cells were separated at day 6 when their frequency showed at least a 10-fold increase above that observed among unstimulated PBMC (see Fig. 2Go for CD25 kinetic expression). After magnetic sorting, purified CD25+ T cells were cultured in the presence of IL-2 alone without any restimulation. The number of cells obtained at day 25 using the CD25-sorting procedure was 4- to 5-fold greater than that of the cultures selected using the standard procedure (Fig. 3Go). For example, in the case of D5, about 10% of the stimulated parental line (6 x 105 cells) were recovered by CD25 selection. This aliquot was amplified 100-fold in the presence of IL-2 without restimulation, reaching 60.106 cells at day 25, whereas in the same time, the culture obtained by the standard procedure showed no amplification. At day 30, each of the 3 CD25-selected lines was composed of at least 6 x107 cells, whereas the three corresponding lines undergoing the standard procedure always represented much less than 4 x 107 cells. As shown in Fig. 4Go, all of the 11 cell lines derived by either the standard or CD25-selection protocols were cytotoxic for autologous BLCL but not for autologous PHA blasts, suggesting EBV-specific recognition.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. CD25 expression kinetics: PBMC from D5 were stimulated in the presence of autologous BLCL at a ratio of 40:1. The percentage of CD3+CD25+ T cells was estimated at days 2, 4, and 6. Note that at day 6 some CD25+ T cells were still present among unstimulated PBMC.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Comparison of growth kinetics for D4II vs D4III, D5II vs D5III, and D6II vs D6III.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Enrichment of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells in the different T cell lines. The E:T ratio was 30:1.

 
T cell line diversity

An in-depth TCR repertoire analysis of each T cell line was performed. {alpha}ß T lymphocytes are made up of a combination of different TCR-V, -D, and -J elements (VDJ for ß-chains and VJ for {alpha}-chains). Beside this combinatorial diversity, a junctional diversity is produced by addition or removal of nucleotides at the junctions of rearranged genes. Combinatorial (TCR-V gene usage) and junctional diversity of T cell receptors are now both amenable to analysis: the former by using TCR-V region-specific mAbs and the latter by studying CDR3 length determination using the immunoscope technique (also called spectratyping). We examined TCR-V expression by two-color flow cytometry using an anti-CD3 mAb and mAbs specific for a large set of TCR-V regions. The composition of the T cell repertoire detected in the different T cell populations is shown in Table IGo. First, considerable heterogeneity was observed in the composition of the different T cell lines, even between lines D3II and D4II which shared the six HLA class I alleles (see Table IIIGo for HLA class I typing). This heterogeneity was detectable in the CD4:CD8 ratio (ranging from 0.086 for D6III to 1.177 for D5III) and also in the size of the different TCRBV subsets (see, for example, TCRBV2S1, -3S1, -5S1, -5S2, -7S1, -14S1, and -22S1). Second, no particular TCRBV subset accounted for the majority of T cells present in any of the selected culture. Taken together, these results indicated that the T cell lines selected were highly diverse and also highly heterogeneous in composition.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Repertoire analysis of the different T cell lines

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Anti-EBV T cell response in polyclonal T cell lines

 
To obtain a minimal estimation of their clonal diversity, T cell repertoires were further investigated for each cell line by analyzing TCR-CDR3 length distribution using the immunoscope technique (19). This technique, which involves a combination of PCR and run-off reactions using pairs of Vß/Cß primers followed by size determination of the elongation products, allows detection of oligoclonal expansions within each of the TCRBV subsets studied. For a normally diverse T cell repertoire, a Gaussian-like distribution of TCR-CDR3 length is usually observed for most TCRBV subsets. In the immunoscope profile, each peak corresponds to at least one clone with a characteristic CDR3 length. Consequently, the total number of distinct peaks represents the minimal number of different clones present in the culture. Immunoscope analysis of the different cell lines revealed several characteristics. First, when compared with a normal repertoire, as expected after selection of relatively rare precursors, T cell diversity was dramatically altered since almost no TCRBV subsets showed a Gaussian-like distribution. Nonetheless, more than 100 peaks were detected in most cell lines tested (i.e., D1I, D2I, D3II, D4II, D5II, and D6II), indicating the presence of at least 100 different T cell clones (see, for example, the D5II and D6II immunoscope profiles in Fig. 5Go, a and c; the same conclusions could be drawn from D1 to D4 immunoscope profiles which are not shown).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Distribution of CDR3 size (immunoscope profile) within EBV-selected T cell lines. a–d correspond to the immunoscope profiles of D5II, D5III, D6II, and D6III, respectively. Note the decrease in TCR diversity observed between the CD25-selected (D5III and D6III) and control cell lines (D5II and D6II).

 
Comparison of T cell repertoires from D5II and D5III or D6II and D6III showed that TCR-V usage, as revealed by flow cytometry, was not biased in the same way for T cell populations selected by sequential restimulation or by CD25 purification. For example, the TCRBV14S1 subset was dramatically elevated for D5II, but not for D5III, the TCRBV5S2 subset for D6III, but not for D6II, and the TCRBV21S3 subset for D5III, but not for D5II. These differences were not surprising since the selection processes for these polyclonal populations were quite different. Nevertheless, some parallel biases were observed, i.e., with the TCRBV2S1 and TCRBV3S1 subsets, both of which were elevated in the D6II and D6III cell lines (see Table IGo). Immunoscope profile analysis indicated that the number of distinct peaks within each TCRBV subset was lower for CD25-selected T cell lines than for control cultures. Nevertheless, at least 50 and 80 distinct peaks were detected for D5III and D6III, respectively. These data demonstrate a decrease in TCR diversity between CD25-selected T cell lines and control cultures, yet indicate that CD25-selected T cells are sufficiently heterogeneous to contain multiple Ag specificities.

Estimation of cell line purity in EBV-specific T cells

To estimate the proportion of EBV-specific T cells within each T cell line, T cell clones were derived from bulk cultures by limiting dilution (Table IIGo). Fifteen to 20 days after cloning, individual clones were split and tested for their ability to proliferate against autologous BLCL and each of two allogeneic BLCL. Because of the difficulty in finding fully mismatched BLCL for each donor, two control BLCL were used in each test to avoid false-positive results. In fact, this possibility seemed extremely rare since only 19 of the 640 T cell clones tested (i.e., <3%) proliferated against all 3 of the target BLCL tested. Conversely, to avoid false-negative results, 26 of the clones negative against the 3 targets were reamplified and their absence of reactivity was confirmed. Substantial variability was observed in cell line purity, ranging from 32 to 96%. To precisely compare the effect of CD25-positive selection on the resulting specific T cell purity, type II or III cell lines were prepared and cloned in parallel from the same donors (D5 and D6). Specificity determination at the clonal level showed a dramatically increased frequency of autologous BLCL-specific T cell clones in the CD25-selected lines D5III and D6III: 32 vs 96% and 61 vs 96% for D5II vs D5III and D6II vs D6III, respectively. In addition, immunoscope analysis revealed a decrease in diversity between these same populations (see above). Taken together, these results indicate that early CD25 selection eliminated non-EBV-specific T cells that persisted or were amplified in cultures prepared using the standard selection procedure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Proportion of EBV-specific T cell clones within each T cell line

 
Among the 317 clones derived from the CD25-selected cultures, only 11 (3%) were unable to recognize the autologous BLCL. Moreover, it is tempting to speculate that these 3% nonspecific T cells belonged to the few CD25+ cells already present among PBMC before stimulation that were detected among unstimulated PBMC, at least until day 6 after initiation of the culture (Fig. 2Go). To confirm that the panel of clones tested was representative of the bulk population analyzed, we compared the immunoscope profiles of the CD25-purified D5III culture and the immunoscope profile obtained from the pool of 259 clones derived from it: ~60 clones were detectable in both cases, and most of the peaks were present in both analyses (data not shown). Along with the estimated cloning efficiency, this provided further proof of the representativity of the clones tested.

Analysis of anti-EBV T cell responses in polyclonal cell lines

To identify the EBV Ags recognized by the T cell lines, we used a transient COS transfection assay allowing semiquantitative analysis of anti-EBV responses within polyclonal T cell lines (21). Decreasing numbers of responding polyclonal T cells (105, 104, and 103) were incubated with COS cells transiently transfected with DNA coding for autologous class I HLA alleles and viral proteins, and the TNF-{alpha} released by responding T cells was measured. The EBV proteins included in this analysis were the two well-characterized EBV immediate-early proteins BZLF1 and BRLF1, the three early proteins BMLF1, BMRF1, and BHRF1, the late protein BCRF1, and the eight latent proteins (EBNA-1, -2, -3A, -3B, -3C, and -LP, LMP1, and LMP2). Thirty-seven responses were observed (shown in Table IIIGo): seven against BZLF1 (in the context of HLA-B8, -B14, -B18, -B35, and -Cw6); seven against BMLF1 (in the context of HLA-A2 and HLA-B18); two responses against BRLF1 (HLA-A2 and HLA-B44), and two against BMRF1 (HLA-Cw6 and HLA-B35). No response was observed against BHRF1 and BCRF1. Notably, three of three HLA-B18 donors had a strong TNF-{alpha} response against BZLF1 and four of five HLA-A2+ donors showed a strong response against BMLF1 in this HLA context. Concerning the responses directed toward latent epitopes, five were detected against EBNA-3A, two weak responses against EBNA-3B, six against EBNA-3C, and six against LMP2. Remarkably, eight of the strongest responses detected at the bulk level were confirmed at the clonal level with a small panel of clones, consistent with a high frequency of clones having such specificity in the bulk culture (Table IVGo). Taken together, these data show that the T cell memory response reactivated against autologous BLCL is equally directed against EBV-lytic (18 responses) and EBV-latent proteins (19 responses). Finally, analysis of the D6II and D6III cell line specificities demonstrated that responses observed in the CD25-selected culture were the same as those observed in the control culture. Importantly, TNF-{alpha} production by the CD25-selected population (D6III) in response to EBV proteins was greater than that of the control population (D6II). This finding is consistent with the enrichment in specific T cells revealed by the structural analysis of T cell line diversity (see above).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. EBV specificity of 17 T cell clones derived from cell lines D1I, D2I, D3II, and D4II

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present work, we analyzed the T cell repertoire present in eight T cell lines selected in vitro against autologous BLCL. Six lines were selected using the standard protocol already used by others for clinical application (I- and II-type cell lines), and two lines were selected using a new procedure that required a singlestimulation against autologous BLCL followed by a separation at day 6 of the CD25-positive activated T cells (III-type cell lines). We found that the EBV-specific T cell lines prepared using the standard protocol were composed of about 100 distinct T cell clones. This number was decreased by 50% when the CD25 selection procedure was used. Thirty-two to 95% of the T cell clones derived from type A and B cell lines were specific for the autologous BLCL, whereas 96% of the clones from lines obtained after CD25 selection were specific for the autologous BLCL. Concerning their specificity, we demonstrated a high focusing of EBV recognition (32/37 of the specificities detected) toward 5 EBV proteins (BZLF1, BMLF1, EBNA-3A, EBNA-3C, and LMP2).

Two characteristics of the EBV-specific T cell lines seem particularly relevant for efficient and safe protection of allo-bone marrow transplantation recipients from the consequences of EBV reactivation by adoptive transfer of T lymphocytes. In terms of specificity, T cell clones directed at EBV-latent proteins are essential to cure established lymphoproliferative disease, whereas T cell clones directed at EBV-lytic proteins (e.g., capable of eliminating cells in which virus replication has been initiated) may be particularly important to prevent viral spread when reactivation of endogenous virus occurs. With respect to T cell line diversity, considering that selected T cell clones may not all be EBV specific, the risk of injecting clones with unwanted specificities would increase with the number of clones. Finally, the time required to generate such T cell lines is also a critical factor in the context of clinical application.

In terms of T cell specificity, a main concern is the relationship between the composition of the memory T cell repertoire against EBV in healthy virus carriers and the composition of the T cell repertoire after stimulation by autologous BLCL in vitro. It has recently been made clear that the memory response of healthy EBV virus carriers is composed of T cells specific for both lytic and latent protein epitopes (13, 14, 15), thus underlying the importance of both kinds of specificities to protect patients from EBV. In contrast, although several T cell clones specific for BZLF1 and BMLF1 have been described after restimulation with autologous BLCL, this strategy is usually regarded as relatively inefficient to restimulate the lytic Ag-specific response (13, 16) and the composition of the dominant anti-EBV response present within T cell lines selected in this manner was not systematically documented. Using a new protocol allowing rapid determination of the dominant epitopes recognized by bulk culture of T cell lines, we demonstrated that after stimulation with autologous BLCL, T cell specificities for lytic and latent protein epitopes were observed at similar frequencies. Redundancy among our donors for some HLA alleles such as B8 or B18 does not account for such frequent recognition of lytic proteins since BZLF1, for example, was recognized within diverse HLA contexts (HLA-B8, -B14, -B18, -B35, and -Cw6). Since CTL lines prepared by autologous BLCL stimulation have proven efficient in protecting patients against EBV reactivation, our data strongly suggest that the "sufficient repertoire" includes both lytic and latent Ags. This conclusion has direct implications in terms of clinical development. The EBV genome encodes for ~90 proteins and only 14 were tested in this study. Nevertheless, specificity could be determined for >50% (17/29) of the BLCL-responding clones tested. These clones were shown to recognize either BMLF1, BZLF1, or EBNA3C. On the one hand, since the sufficient T cell repertoire is apparently composed of T cells specific for only a few EBV proteins, one could consider protocols to select for T cells against these proteins only. On the other hand, in line with the diversity in Ags recognized by the T cell lines analyzed in this report, it would seem risky to use T cells recognizing only a single protein.

The use of TCR-V region-specific mAb demonstrated that most TCRBV subsets were present in BLCL-stimulated T cell lines, highlighting the great heterogeneity of these populations. More specifically, immunoscope analysis allowed us to demonstrate that a minimum of 50–100 distinct T cell clones was present in each culture. These findings raise the possibility that non-EBV-specific T cells may still be present after the standard selection procedure and could be amplified in the case that a mitogenic mixture were necessary to provide the number of cells required for injection. Indeed, we observed that a variable but significant proportion (3–12%) of resting T cells can survive the selection process without any stimulation (data not shown). Therefore, it is possible that in some preparations a variable proportion of non-EBV-specific T cells contaminate the selected T cell line. For example, this may have been the case for the D1I and D5II T cell lines. Consequently, a first improvement of the standard method would consist of a more stringent selection of EBV-specific T cells. The two assays performed on D5 and D6 indicate that substantial improvement was achieved through early selection of CD25+-activated T cells. Strikingly, we demonstrated autologous BLCL recognition (in a proliferation assay) for 306 of the 317 T cell clones derived from these CD25-selected populations.

In terms of culture amplification kinetics, we have observed that at day 30, without restimulation, the CD25-selection procedure allows recovery of higher T cell numbers than the doses usually recommended for injections (about 4.107/m2) (12), while, in most instances, the standard procedure does not.

Our results demonstrate that selection of the CD25+- activated T cell fraction 6 days after a single specific stimulation had fourmain effects: 1) increasing the rate at which specific T cells are selected, 2) retaining the specificities present in the culture prepared according to the conventional procedure, 3) decreasing the overall diversity of the T cell line, and 4) increasing the frequency of EBV-specific T cell clones. Thus, this approach represents an improvement to the preparation of EBV-specific T cell lines for adoptive immunotherapy and should be considered for future clinical applications.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank all blood donors included in this study, Marie-Luce Cheneau, Françoise Bonneville, Sylvie Cury, and Jean-Denis Bignon for help in HLA typing, and Ethan Grant and François Lang for critical reading of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by institutional grant from Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, by the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and by the Association pour la Recherche en Immuno-Cancérologie. Back

2 C.I. and X.S. equally contributed to this work. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Henri Vié, Institut de Biologie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U463, 9 Quai Moncousu, 44093 Nantes, Cedex 01, France. Back

Received for publication December 2, 1999. Accepted for publication February 8, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rickinson, A. B., E. Kieff. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus. , , , ed. Fields Virology 2397. Raven Press, Philadelphia.
  2. Shapiro, R. S., K. McClain, G. Frizzera, K. J. Gajl-Peczalska, J. H. Kersey, B. R. Blazar, D. C. Arthur, D. F. Patton, J. S. Greenberg, B. Burke, et al 1988. Epstein-Barr virus-associated B cell lymphoproliferative disorders following bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 71:1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zutter, M. M., P. J. Martin, G. E. Sale, H. M. Shulman, L. Fisher, E. D. Thomas, D. M. Durnam. 1988. Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferation after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 72:520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gross, T. G., M. Steinbuch, T. DeFor, R. S. Shapiro, P. McGlave, N. K. C. Ramsay, J. E. Wagner, A. H. Filipovitch. 1999. B cell lymphoproliferative disorders following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, treatment and outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 23:251.[Medline]
  5. Gratama, J. W., A. P. Oosterveer, J. M. M. Lepoutre, J. J. Van Rood, F. E. Zwaan, M. J. J. Vossen, J. G. Kapsenberg, D. Richel, G. Klein, I. Ernberg. 1990. Serological and molecular studies of EBV infection in allogeneic marrow graft recipients. Transplantation 49:725.[Medline]
  6. Murray, R. J., M. Kurilla, J. M. Brooks, W. A. Thomas, M. Rowe, E. Kieff, A. B. Rickinson. 1992. Identification of target antigens for the human cytotoxic T cell response to EBV: implications for the immune control of Epstein-Barr-virus-positive malignancies. J. Exp. Med. 176:157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Papadopoulos, E. B., M. Ladanyi, D. Emmanuel, S. Mackinnon, F. Boulad, M. H. Carabasi, H. Castro-Malaspina, B. H. Childs, A. P. Gillio, et al 1994. Infusions of donor leukocytes to treat Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disorders after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 330:1185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Heslop, H. E., M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney. 1994. Donor T cells to treat EBV-associated lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 331:679.[Free Full Text]
  9. Heslop, H. E., M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney, R. A. Krance, W. M. Roberts, R. Rochester, C. A. Smith, V. Turner, J. Sixbey, R. Moen, J. M. Boyett. 1994. Clinical protocol: administration of neomycin resistance gene marked EBV specific CTL to recipients of mismatched-related or phenotypically similar unrelated donor marrow grafts. Hum. Gene Ther. 5:381.[Medline]
  10. Rickinson, A. B., D. J. Moss, D. J. Allen, L. E. Wallace, M. Rowe, M. A. Epstein. 1981. Reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cells by in vitro stimulation with the autologous lymphoblastoid cell line. Int. J. Cancer. 27:593.[Medline]
  11. Smith, C. A., C. Y. C. Ng, H. E. Heslop, M. S. Holladay, S. Richardson, E. V. Turner, S. K. Loftin, C. Li, M. K. Brenner, C. M. Rooney. 1995. Production of genetically modified Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T cell for adoptive transfer to patients at high risk of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease. J. Hematother. 4:73.[Medline]
  12. Rooney, C. M., C. A. Smith, C. Y. C. Ng, S. K. Loftin, J. Sixbey, Y. Gan, D. Srivastava, L. C. Bowman, R. A. Krance, M. K. Brenner, H. E. Heslop. 1998. Infusion of cytotoxic T cells for the prevention and treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoma in allogeneic transplant recipients. Blood. 92:1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Steven, N. M., N. E. Annels, A. Kumar, A. M. Leese, M. G. Kurilla, A. B. Rickinson. 1997. Immediate early and early lytic cycle proteins are frequent targets of the Epstein-Barr virus-induced cytotoxic T cell response. J. Exp. Med. 185:1605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Elliott, S. L., S. J. Pye, C. Schmidt, S. M. Cross, S. L. Silins, I. S. Misko. 1997. Dominant cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to the immediate-early trans-activator protein, BZLF1, in persistent type A or B Epstein-Barr virus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1068.[Medline]
  15. Tan, L. C., N. Gudgeon, N. E. Annels, P. Hansasuta, C. A. O’Callaghan, S. Rowland-Jones, A. J. McMichael, A. B. Rickinson, M. F. C. Callan. 1999. A re-evaluation of the frequency of CD8+ T cells specific for EBV in healthy virus carriers. J. Immunol. 162:1827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Redchenko, I. V., A. B. Rickinson. 1999. Assessing Epstein-Barr virus-specific T cell memory with peptide-loaded dendritic cells. J. Virol. 73:334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Peyrat, M. A., J. Gaschet, R. Vivien, H. Vié, H., and M. Bonneville. 1996. Clustering of the TCR workshop monoclonal antibodies by flow cytometric analysis of polyclonal T cell lines. Immunologist 4:9.
  18. Pannetier, C., S. Delassus, S. Darche, C. Saucier, P. Kourilsky. 1992. Quantitative titration of nucleic acids by enzymatic amplification reactions run to saturation. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Even, J., A. Lim, I. Puisieux, L. Ferradini, P. Y. Dietrich, A. Toubert, T. Hercend, F. Triebel, C. Pannetier, P. Kourilsky. 1996. T cell repertoire in healthy and disease human tissues analyzed by T cell receptor ß-chain CDR3 size determination: evidence for clonal expansion in tumor and inflammatory diseases. Res. Immunol. 146:65.
  20. Scotet, E., J. David-Ameline, M. A. Peyrat, A. Moreau-Aubry, D. Pinczon, A. Lim, J. Even, G. Semana, J. M. Berthelot, R. Breathnach, et al. T cell response to Epstein-Barr virus transactivators in chronic rheumatoid arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 184:1791.
  21. Scotet, E., M. A. Peyrat, X. Saulquin, C. Retiere, C. Couedel, F. Davodeau, N. Dulphy, A. Toubert, J. D. Bignon, A. Lim, et al 1999. Frequent enrichment for CD8 T cells reactive against common herpes viruses in chronic inflammatory lesions: towards a reassessment of the physiopathological significance of T cell clonal expansions found in autoimmune inflammatory processes. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:973.[Medline]
  22. Brichard, V., A. van Pel, T. Wölfel, C. Wölfel, E. De Plaen, B. Lethé, P. Coulie, T. Boon. 1993. The tyrosinase gene codes for an antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas. J. Exp. Med. 178:489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Espevik, T., J. Nissen-Meyer. 1986. A highly sensitive cell line, WEHI 164 clone 13, for measuring cytotoxic factor/tumor necrosis factor from human monocytes. J. Immunol. Methods 95:99.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Clemenceau, N. Congy-Jolivet, G. Gallot, R. Vivien, J. Gaschet, G. Thibault, and H. Vie
Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is mediated by genetically modified antigen-specific human T lymphocytes
Blood, June 15, 2006; 107(12): 4669 - 4677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Bonyhadi, M. Frohlich, A. Rasmussen, C. Ferrand, L. Grosmaire, E. Robinet, J. Leis, R. T. Maziarz, P. Tiberghien, and R. J. Berenson
In Vitro Engagement of CD3 and CD28 Corrects T Cell Defects in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 2366 - 2375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
J. E. Davis, M. A. Sherritt, M. Bharadwaj, L. E. Morrison, S. L. Elliott, L. M. Kear, J. Maddicks-Law, T. Kotsimbos, D. Gill, M. Malouf, et al.
Determining virological, serological and immunological parameters of EBV infection in the development of PTLD
Int. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 16(7): 983 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Savoldo, M. L. Cubbage, A. G. Durett, J. Goss, M. H. Huls, Z. Liu, L. Teresita, A. P. Gee, P. D. Ling, M. K. Brenner, et al.
Generation of EBV-Specific CD4+ Cytotoxic T Cells from Virus Naive Individuals
J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 909 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Peggs, S. Verfuerth, A. Pizzey, J. Ainsworth, P. Moss, and S. Mackinnon
Characterization of human cytomegalovirus peptide-specific CD8+ T-cell repertoire diversity following in vitro restimulation by antigen-pulsed dendritic cells
Blood, January 1, 2002; 99(1): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Gallot, R. Vivien, C. Ibisch, J. Lule, C. Davrinche, J. Gaschet, and H. Vie
Purification of Ag-Specific T Lymphocytes After Direct Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Stimulation Followed by CD25 Selection. I. Application to CD4+ or CD8+ Cytomegalovirus Phosphoprotein pp65 Epitope Determination
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4196 - 4206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. D. Bitmansour, S. L. Waldrop, C. J. Pitcher, E. Khatamzas, F. Kern, V. C. Maino, and L. J. Picker
Clonotypic Structure of the Human CD4+ Memory T Cell Response to Cytomegalovirus
J. Immunol., August 1, 2001; 167(3): 1151 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibisch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vié, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ibisch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vié, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS