The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Texier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Maillère, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Texier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Maillère, B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 3177-3184.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

HLA-DR Restricted Peptide Candidates for Bee Venom Immunotherapy

Catherine Texier*, Sandra Pouvelle*, Marc Busson{dagger}, Mireille Hervé*, Dominique Charron{dagger}, André Ménez* and Bernard Maillère1,*

* Département d’Ingénierie et d’Etudes des Protéines, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique-Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France; and {dagger} Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U396, Hôpital St Louis, Paris, France


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
T cell epitopes containing peptides have been recently proposed as an alternative to conventional immunotherapy of allergic diseases because they are expected to be better tolerated than allergen extracts. A principal limitation to their clinical use is that they present an important diversity, which primarily results from the polymorphism of HLA class II molecules. In Caucasian populations, however, seven alleles of the most expressed molecules (namely DRB1*0101, DRB1*0301, DRB1*0401, DRB1*0701, DRB1*1101, DRB1*1301, and DRB1*1501) predominate. Peptides from allergens that would efficiently bind to them should be potential candidates for specific immunotherapy. In this paper, we have determined the peptides present in the major bee venom allergen by investigating the capacity of synthetic peptides that encompass its whole sequence to bind to each allele. Several efficient binders have been identified and are either allele-specific or common to several HLA-DR molecules. Interestingly enough, the 81–97 sequence is universal in the sense that it binds to all studied molecules. This sequence is surrounded by several active regions, which make the 76–106 sequence particularly rich of binding determinants and a good candidate for specific immunotherapy. Statistical analyses of the binding data also provide an overview of the preponderant HLA-DR alleles specificity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy is preferentially treated by specific immunotherapy. This treatment consists of repeated injections of minute quantities of allergens preparations and hence may induce undesirable IgE mediated anaphylactic side effects. The mechanism of this specific immunotherapy is not yet entirely known. However, recent observations have suggested that it operates by decreasing T cell proliferation or IL-4 secretion (1, 2). Molecules containing T cell determinants but devoid of IgE reactivity are therefore predicted to constitute safe alternatives to conventional immunotherapy. These approaches have been previously applied to insect, pollen, and animal allergens (3, 4, 5) and have been successfully used to desensitize some patients (6, 7). The corresponding preparations are obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of recombinant allergens (3, 4, 5) or by using linear peptide fragments that are generally barely antigenic for native proteins specific Abs (7, 8). Their T cell stimulating potency is assessed by submitting them to T cell stimulation assays, using PBMC from a panel of allergic patients (7, 8, 9). However, T cell response to allergens generally involve multiple epitopes that may vary from one patient to another (9, 10). Therefore, such assays do not entirely ensure that the tested molecules contain T cell epitopes for most individuals. They require complementary assays taking into account the interindividual diversity and hence the HLA polymorphism.

T cell epitopes are indeed carried by peptides that are derived from proteins of the allergenic extracts, and which complex to the molecules of the MHC of class II (MHC II or HLA II in humans). These molecules bind a large array of peptides by using few peptide residues as anchors (11) and by interacting with the peptide backbone (12, 13). Most of the polymorphic residues reside in the peptide binding groove and evidently are responsible for MHC II binding specificity (14). As a result, allergens as well as other Ags are recognized by specific T lymphocytes through various regions, depending on the expressed MHC II molecules (15). In particular, these regions depend on the HLA-DRB1 molecules that are the most abundant ones at the surface of APC. More than 200 different alleles have been described for the HLA-DRB1 locus (16), suggesting an impressive number of potential T cell epitopes within a single allergen. This elevated number of alleles does not allow an exhaustive description of the T cell epitopes diversity. However, alleles are not equally distributed worldwide. In defined populations, a limited number of alleles are preponderant and are present in the majority of individuals. In Caucasian populations, seven alleles (DRB1*0101, DRB1*0301, DRB1*0401, DRB1*0701, DRB1*1101, DRB1*1301, and DRB1*1501) cover ~60% of the HLA-DRB1 allele frequency. Moreover, peptides common to several HLA-DR alleles exist (17, 18, 19) and illustrate similarities in the peptide binding modes (20, 21, 22). By using binding assays specific to these HLA-DR alleles, we may thus expect to delineate a reasonable number of peptide binders from an allergen and to combine them in minimal peptide sequences, suitable for immunotherapy of most of the patients.

In this paper, we have tentatively developed this approach to a major allergen, the bee venom phospholipase A2 (API m1).2 Bee venom immunotherapy is a well-suited treatment for patients suffering from severe reactions to bee stings, but it causes undesirable side effects for ~15% of them (23). A number of T cell epitopes from API m1 have already been delineated by proliferative cellular assays, performed with PBMC from allergic patients (9). Three peptides, namely 45–62, 81–92, and 113–124, have been selected and successfully used to desensitize some patients (7). However, other studies have also revealed that human T cell response to API m1 involves multiple epitopes (10, 24), thus addressing the question of the peptide sequences to be used. We have adapted peptide binding assays to the seven preponderant HLA-DRB1 alleles found in Caucasian populations and investigated the capacity of overlapping peptides encompassing the whole API m1 sequence to bind to each of them. We have delineated allele-specific and promiscuous binding regions that are interesting candidates for specific immunotherapy and illustrate the functional similarities between HLA-DRB1 alleles.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Peptides

Peptides were synthesized on an Advanced ChemTech model 357 MPS synthesizer (Advanced Chemtech Europe, Brussels, Belgium) as previously described (15). API m1 peptides sequences were based on the amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA (25). HA306–318 (PKYVKQNTLKLAT), A3152–166 (EAEQLRAYLDGTGVE), MT2–16 (AKTIAYDEEARRGLE), YKL (AAYAAAKAAALAA), and B121–36 (TERVRLVTRHIYNREE) were biotinylated with biotinyl-6-aminocaproic acid (Fluka Chimie, St Quentin Fallavier, France) on the N terminus. Peptides were cleaved from the resin by 95% trifluoroacetic acid and purified by reversed-phase HPLC on a C18 Vydac (Interchim, Montluçon, France) column. Their quality was assessed by electrospray mass spectroscopy.

Purification of HLA-DR molecules

EBV homozygous cell lines were used as sources of human HLA class II molecules. HOM2 (DRB1*0101), SCHU (DRB1*1501, DRB5*0101), STEILIN (DRB1*0301, DRB3*0101), PITOUT (DRB1*0701, DRB4*0101), and SWEIG (DRB1*1101, DRB3*0202) were from Prof. H. Grosse-Wilde (European Collection for Biomedical Research, Essen, Germany). BOLETH (DRB1*0401, DRB4*0103) and 0206AD (DRB1*1301, DRB3*0101) were kindly provided by Dr. J. Choppin (Hôpital Cochin, Paris) and Prof. J. Dausset (Centre d’Étude du Polymorphisme Humain, Paris), respectively. HLA-DR molecules were purified by affinity chromatography using the monomorphic mAb L243 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) coupled to protein A-Sepharose CL 4B gel (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Orsay, France) (26). Briefly, cells were lysed on ice at 5 x 108 cells/ml in 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3) buffer containing 1% Nonidet P40, 10 mg/L aprotinin, 5 mM EDTA, and 10 µM PMSF. After centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 1 h, the supernatant was applied to Sepharose 4B and protein A-Sepharose 4B columns and then to the specific affinity column. HLA-DR molecules were eluted with 1.1 mM n-dodecyl ß-D-maltoside (DM), 500 mM NaCl and 500 mM Na2CO3 (pH 11.5). Fractions were immediately neutralized to pH 7 with 2 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) buffer and extensively dialyzed against 1 mM DM, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM phosphate (pH 7) buffer.

HLA DR peptide binding assays

HLA-DR molecules were diluted in 10 mM phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DM, 10 mM citrate, and 0.003% thimerosal buffer with an appropriate biotinylated peptide and serial dilutions of competitor peptides. More precisely, HA306–318 was used at pH 6 for the 101 and 401 alleles at 10 nM and 30 nM concentration, respectively, and at pH 5 for the 1101 allele at 20 nM concentration. YKL (10 nM) was used for the 701 allele at pH 5. Incubation was done at pH 4.5 for the 1501, 1301, and 301 alleles in the presence of A3152–166 (10 nM), B121–36 (200 nM), and MT2–16 (50 nM), respectively. Samples (100 µl per well) were incubated in 96-well polypropylene plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at 37°C for 24 h, except for the 1301 and 301 alleles which were incubated 72 h. After neutralization with 50 µl of 450 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.003% thimerosal, 0.3% BSA, and 1 mM DM buffer, samples were applied to 96-well Maxisorp ELISA plates (Nunc) previously coated with 10 µg/ml L243 mAb and saturated with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.3% BSA, and 0.003% thimerosal buffer. They were allowed to bind to the Ab-coated plates for 2 h at room temperature. Bound biotinylated peptide was detected by incubating streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Amersham, Little Chalfont, U.K.), and after washings, by adding 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate substrate (Sigma, St Quentin-Fallavier, France). Emitted fluorescence was measured at 450 nm upon excitation at 365 nm on a Fluorolite 1000 fluorometer (Dynex, Issy les moulineaux, France). Maximal binding was determined by incubating the biotinylated peptide with the MHC II molecule in the absence of competitor. Binding specificity was assessed by adding an excess of nonbiotinylated peptide. Background did not significantly differ from that obtained by incubating the biotinylated peptide without MHC II molecules. Data were expressed as the peptide concentration that prevented binding of 50% of the labeled peptide (IC50). Average and SE values were deduced from at least three independent experiments. Validity of each experiment was assessed by reference peptides. Their IC50 variation did not exceed a factor of three.

Statistical analysis

The factor analysis was performed using SPSS 8.0 software (SPSS France, Paris). Maximum likelihood method was applied to extract the principal components. The varimax method of rotation was used to facilitate the three-dimensional graph interpretation. Validity of the model was assessed by Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) (KMO = 0.76) and Barlett’s tests (p = 10-6). Variance analyses (ANOVA) were performed using STATVIEW 5.0 software (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Peptide binding assays with preponderant Caucasian HLA-DRB1 alleles

To delineate interesting peptides for specific immunotherapy, we established peptide binding conditions for seven HLA-DRB1 preponderant alleles (Table IGo). Each allele was present in >5% of the HLA-DRB1 allele frequency in the French population and altogether reach the HLA-DRB1 allele frequency of 63% and 58% in France and in the United States, respectively (27). Since we immunopurified these alleles from homozygous EBV cell lines using the monomorphic L243 mAb, the HLA-DR preparations also contained the second gene product (see Materials and Methods). To overcome this contaminating activity, we cautiously selected biotinylated peptides for each assay. These peptides derived from the most efficient binders to the first gene product and did not bind at low concentration to the second one. HA306–318 was used for the 101, 401, and 1101 alleles in agreement with previous data (20, 28, 29) and in particular with those obtained with transfected cells (28, 30). However, it was not suited to perform binding assays with the 1501 allele because it efficiently bound to the DRB5*0101 molecule (28, 30, 31). We thus used the naturally eluted A3152–166 peptide, which was unambiguously restricted to the 1501 allele (31). Because of the moderate affinity of the HA306–318 peptide, we used other biotinylated peptides for investigating the 701, 1301, and 301 alleles. These are, respectively, the synthetic YKL peptide (28), the naturally eluted B121–36 peptide (32), and the MT2–16 T cell epitope (33). Competitive experiments with YKL on DRB4*0101 and with B121–36 and MT2–16 on DRB3*0101 alleles confirmed their weak reactivity for these molecules (data not shown). The binding assays were therefore specific to the HLA-DRB1 products. They were also sensitive because the IC50 values of the nonbiotinylated peptides ranged between 14 and 330 nM (Table IGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. List of HLA-DR molecules and biotinylated peptides used in this paper1

 
A unique binding pattern of API m1 peptides is observed for each allele

The competitive ELISA allowed us to evaluate the relative binding affinities of an extensive number of peptides from the major bee venom allergen (API m1) to each allele. We first tested a set of 30 peptides that encompassed the whole API m1 sequence (25) and that we previously used for characterizing the T cell response to API m1 in BALB/c mice (15). These peptides of 18 aa contained all possible peptides of 15 residues present in API m1 sequence. They were expected to cover most, if not all, binding determinants because 15 aa was the length most frequently found in naturally processed peptides (34). As proposed by others (22, 35), we discriminated the active and inactive peptides on the basis of an upper 1000 nM threshold. As shown in Table IIGo, the 101, 401, and 1101 alleles displayed a similar binding pattern. In particular, four peptides (P81–98, P85–102, P89–106, and P93–110) bound to them with good efficiency. One peptide (P105–122) exhibited a good binding activity to the 401 allele only, whereas two others (P77–94 and P117–134) bound to the 1101 allele. The 701 allele was characterized by seven peptides with a substantial binding ability (P13–30, P17–34, P21–38, P45–62, P77–94, P81–98, and P85–102), whereas four peptides (P53–70, P57–74, P81–98, and P85–102) were active toward the 301 allele. The P81–98 and P85–102 peptides also bound efficiently to the 1301 allele as did the P117–134 peptide. Finally, two regions of high affinity were found for the 1501 allele and comprised on one side the P65–82, P69–86, P73–90, P77–94, P81–98, and P85–102 peptides and on the other one the P113–130 and P117–134 peptides. Clearly, each allele displayed a unique binding pattern of API m1 peptides, but interestingly a number of peptides were common to several alleles. In particular, the P81–98 peptide bound efficiently to all the alleles, whereas the P85–102 peptide bound to six of them. The common peptides defined three distinct regions: a N-terminal region (P13–30 to P21–38 peptides, most of them being of moderate activity), a central one (P77–90 to P93–110 peptides), and a C-terminal one (P105–122 to P117–134 peptides). We also observed that 13 peptides of the 30 ones tested displayed few, if any, binding activity irrespective of the allele used in the assay.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Binding capacities to immunopurified HLA-DR molecules of the API m1 18-mer peptides1

 
Fine delineation of HLA-DR binding regions revealed multiple determinants

To compare the binding areas of API m1 determinants, we used three sets of 13-aa-long peptides that encompassed the three identified common regions in an exhaustive manner. The length of 13 residues was expected to be small enough to discriminate between two HLA-DR contact areas in an 18-mer peptide, as we previously did with MHC II molecules from BALB/c mice (15). The N-terminal part of API m1 was analyzed with 11 peptides for the 101, 401, 701, and 1101 alleles (Fig. 1Go). The P18–30 to P22–34 peptides bound efficiently to the 701 allele; in particular, the P18–30 peptide was almost as active as the corresponding 18-mer peptide. The 101, 401, and 1101 alleles bound approximately the same peptides as the 701 allele, but the binding activities were weaker in agreement with the IC50 values of the corresponding 18-mer peptides. The central part of API m1 was investigated for the seven alleles using 24 peptides of 13 residues (Table IIIGo). For the 101 allele, the active peptides (P85–97 and P91–103 to P95–107) defined two distinct binding regions. These regions were also found for the 401 and 1101 alleles, but presented slight variations. The first region also extended to the P82–94 and P83–95 peptides for the 401 allele and to the P83–95 peptide for the 1101 allele. The second region was reduced to only one peptide for the 1101 allele whereas it was strictly identical between the 101 and 401 alleles. None of the 13-mer peptides reproduced the activity level of the P77–94 peptide for both the 1101 and 0701 alleles. The latter was characterized by three active peptides (P85–97 to P87–99) in agreement with the IC50 values of the P81–98 and P85–102 18-mer peptides. The P85–97 peptide efficiently bound to both the 301 and 1301 alleles, whereas the P86–98 peptide was active toward the 1301 allele only. Seven peptides (P73–85 to P78–90 peptides and P81–93 peptide) were as efficient binding to the 1501 allele as the corresponding 18-mer peptides (P73–90, P77–94, and P81–98). Finally, the C-terminal part of API m1 was analyzed for the 401, 1501, 1101, and 1301 alleles using sixteen 13-mer peptides (Fig. 2Go). The 401 allele was the only one for which the six P109–121 to P114–126 peptides were active. Seven other peptides (P116–128 to P122–124) bound to the 1501 allele, whereas the P121–133 and P122–134 peptides exhibited a high binding activity to the 1101 and 1301 alleles.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Binding capacities of 13-mer peptides from the N-terminal part of API m1. Inverse IC50 values (M-1) were calculated from at least three independent experiments. The P21–38 18-mer peptide was included in the experiments (on the left of each graph) in addition to reference peptides (not shown). Lack of vertical bars indicates an IC50 value superior to 10-4 M.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Binding capacities to immunopurified HLA-DR molecules of 13-mer peptides from the central part of API ml1

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Binding capacities of 13-mer peptides covering the C-terminal extremity of API m1. Inverse IC50 values (M-1) were calculated from at least three independent experiments. The 18-mer peptides were included in the experiments (on the left of each graph) in addition to reference peptides (not shown). Lack of vertical bars indicates an IC50 value superior to 10-4 M. n.d., Not defined and concerns 13-mer peptides whose corresponding 18-mer peptides were weakly active.

 
The different API m1 regions interacting with the HLA-DRB1 alleles are summarized in a list of representative peptides presented Table IVGo. This list is predominantly composed of 13-mer peptides; however, 18-mer peptides have been sometimes introduced if the 13-mer peptides did not display a correct activity. Note that the peptide P85–97 binds to the 101, 401, 1101, 701, 301, and 1301 alleles and reaches an impact level in Caucasian populations of 55% (Table IVGo). This sequence is surrounded by various determinants, namely P76–88, P77–94, P81–93, and P94–106 peptides. Even though they have a moderate frequency, their combination with the P85–97 peptide provides at least one determinant to each allele. Then, the recognition level of the 76–106 region reaches the maximal frequency of about 63%. In particular, the sequence 81–97, which is a combination of the P81–93 and P85–97 peptides, is active for all the alleles tested. In the C-terminal extremity of API m1, the P122–134 peptide has a nonnegligible frequency of 23%. Other peptides (P18–30, P45–62, P57–74, P65–82, and P111–123) are allele-specific and have lower importance in the Caucasian populations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Representative peptides of the HLA-DRB1 restricted determinants of API m1

 
The HLA binding pattern of API m1 peptides is primarily governed by the dimorphism at the HLA position ß86

Taking advantage of our extensive binding data, we applied statistical analyses that could account for functional similarities and differences of these representative HLA-DR molecules toward the API m1 peptides. We first applied a factorial analysis and then represented graphically the functional similarity of the HLA-DRB1 alleles (Fig. 3Go). In this approach, we only used data from 18-mer peptides because they entirely cover the API m1 sequence. By this method, the 101 and 401 alleles were nearly indistinguishable and in proximity to the 701 and 1101 alleles. The 301, 1301, and 1501 alleles constituted an heterogeneous group in which the 301 allele was clearly apart from the others. The seven HLA-DRB1 alleles display 14 polymorphic residues in the peptide binding groove, which are responsible for their binding specificity (14). It is likely that some of them only affect the peptide activities. We therefore evaluated the influence of each HLA-DRB1 polymorphic position on the API m1 binding pattern by a variance analysis (Table VGo). More precisely, for each position, we measured the interaction effect between the two factors that contributed to the IC50, namely, amino acid at that position and peptides. By this method, we found that the well-known ß86 position of HLA-DR molecules exerted a very significant effect in complete agreement with the factor analysis (Fig. 3Go). The main component separated the 0301, 1301, and 1501 alleles from the other ones (101, 401, 1101 and 701), which precisely differed from the former ones by position ß86 (Table VGo). The other positions have lower influence, except perhaps the position ß71 (p = 0.07). We could not exclude that the lack of apparent influence is hidden by the effect of the position ß86.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Factor analysis of binding data to HLA-DR alleles. IC50 values obtained with 18-mer peptides that encompass the API m1 sequences are considered as characteristics of the tested HLA-DR molecules. Each molecule is therefore represented by a single point with 30 coordinates in the theoretical space defined by the 30 "peptide" variables. Factorial analysis allows us to project the cloud of HLA-DR molecules into a space of smaller dimensions, while preserving as much as possible the information provided by the crude data. The axis of the reduced space are given by the principal components, which are formed by a linear combination of peptide variables. The first principal component accounts for the largest amount of variation in the sample. The second one accounts for the next largest amount of variance in a dimension independent of the first one, and so on. In our model, the cloud of HLA-DR points is described by three components that account for 49%, 17%, and 11% of the variance, respectively. The model explains 77% of the total variance and is validated by Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin and Bartlett’s tests (see Materials and Methods). In the figureGo, HLA molecules were discriminated by residue ß86, which was either a glycine ({square}) or a valine ({blacksquare}).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Influence of polymorphic residues on the binding pattern of the API m1 18-mer peptides1

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Peptide fragments have the advantage to be barely antigenic for allergen-specific IgE (10) and weakly reactive when they are used at high concentrations in the skin prick tests (7). Therefore, peptides are not expected to induce undesirable side effects such as anaphylactic shock. However, for peptides to be efficient, they need to involve specific T cell epitopes. This is difficult to obtain for the human population because T cell epitopes vary from one patient to another, depending on HLA II allelic forms. With the ultimate goal of delineating peptides sequences that may have the largest possible binding ability profile, we have investigated the binding capacities of overlapping peptides from the major bee venom allergen (API m1). HLA-DRB1 gene products are the most abundant HLA II molecules at the surface of APC, and there are only seven HLA-DRB1 alleles among the most frequently encountered ones in the Caucasian populations. The peptides listed in Table IVGo illustrate the main different regions of API m1 interacting with these preponderant alleles. The 13-mer P85–97 peptide of API m1 binds to six of the seven alleles, and when it is combined with the peptide P81–93, all alleles are bound. Therefore, the 81–97 region appears as a minimal sequence for binding all these alleles. Universal HLA-DR-restricted peptides have been previously reported for other proteins (17, 18). However, few of them, especially from natural sequences (19), also bind to the 301 allele (36). In addition, we found that elongation of the N- and C-terminal parts of the P81–97 peptide to the P76–106 peptide advantageously encompasses other active regions. Thus, the P76–106 peptide contains one determinant of the 0301 and 1301 alleles; two of the 101, 401, 701, and 1501 alleles; and three of the 1101 allele. Addition of the P57–74 and P122–134 peptides also increases the number of determinants for the 0301, 1101, 1301, and 1501 alleles. Other peptides described here are of lower incidence. As demonstrated previously (15), peptides that bind to MHC II molecules are not necessarily T cell stimulating, but previous papers confirmed the in vivo potency of some of them. Three of 10 patients respond to the P81–99 peptide (10), whereas the P81–98 peptide elicits a significant T cell proliferation for 46% of the allergic patients (9). Both peptides encompass the 81–97 sequence that we identified and that is contained in the 76–106 sequence. Other fragments such as the P45–62, P72–90, and P113–124 peptides have also been reported to stimulate T cells (9) and may also correspond to particular HLA-DRB1 alleles such as 701, 1501, and 401, respectively. As inferred from T cell clone investigations (9, 24), we cannot exclude that these T cell epitopes are restricted to other MHC II molecules such as DQ (9, 24) and DP (24). Nevertheless, HLA-DR-restricted T cells have been also isolated but their peptide specificity remains unknown (9, 37). Further investigations are required to tackle this question, and they may be facilitated by our binding data. Our results are also in agreement with previous observations (10), showing that T cell response to API m1 involves multiple epitopes. It was even suggested that long fragments might be more appropriate than short peptides for immunotherapy to encompass the maximum of T cell determinants. We propose that such a sequence contains the 76–106 fragment at least.

By these data, we document the capacities of the Caucasian preponderant HLA-DRB1 alleles to recognize a natural protein, i.e., API m1. To appreciate the differences of binding patterns, we applied statistical analyses on values obtained with the peptides encompassing the whole API m1 sequence. Clearly, each HLA-DR molecule possesses its own binding profile, but two main subsets emerge as a result of a dimorphism at position ß86 of HLA-DR molecules. Obviously, this position is not the only one important polymorphic positions contributing to binding data. Several peptide differences exist between HLA-DR molecules that share identical amino acid at position ß86 (Table IIGo). This position is occupied by either a glycine for alleles 101, 401, 701, and 1101 or a valine for the alleles 301, 1301, and 1501. This dimorphism valine/glycine is known to control the P1 anchor residue (11, 28, 32, 38) and to contribute to the dimer stability of HLA II molecules (39). Our binding data suggest that position ß86 segregates the preponderant alleles upon different binding modes. The alleles 101, 401, 701, and 1101 have in common the use of the P1 position as primary anchor and hence have an overlapping peptide repertoire (21, 22). For example, both 101 and 401 binding motifs of the alleles 101 and 401 accept Y96 as a potential P1 anchor in the P94–106 peptide and Y87 and F88 in the P85–97 peptide (11, 40, 41). Differences are also observed in Fig. 3Go between these alleles and the alleles 701 and 1101. They may result from the size of the P6 pocket that is large enough in the latter to accommodate bulky side chains (21). In sharp contrast, the P1 position may not necessarily constitute the main anchor residue in valine-possessing alleles. Interactions are also ensured by other anchoring positions and in a different way as compared with that of glycine-possessing alleles. For instance, the P85–97 peptide is likely to bind to the 0301 allele by using D94 and K96 as P4 and P6 anchors and thus are different from the 101 and 401 alleles (36, 42). L59 in P1 and D62 in P4 may participate to the binding of the P57–74 peptide to the 301 allele only (36, 42). In the P122–134 peptide, a 1501 motif exists with amino acids V125 at P1, W128 at P4, and L131 at P7 (31), and it does not fit with the binding specificity of the 1101 allele, to which this peptide also binds (11). Suitable 1501 anchors (31) are also found in the P76–88 peptide (Y68 in P4 and L71 in P7) and in the P81–93 peptide (Y87 in P4 and L90 in P7); both of which exclusively bind to the 1501 allele. Therefore, our results provide an overview on the functionality of HLA-DR molecules, which is consistent with their known specificity. This view may be useful to address the basis of genetic linkage between disease and HLA typing. In bee allergic patients, HLA-DR7 was found in higher frequency than in control population (43), while it was the opposite for DR4 (44). Interestingly, we found that peptides P13–30, P17–34, P21–38, and P45–62 bind with good efficiency exclusively to the 701 allele. Only one peptide (P105–122) is exclusive to the 401 allele. Such differences may support previously described genetic association. However, we have to also mention that nonassociated HLA-DR, as exemplified by alleles 1501 and 301, also display their own peptides. Particularities in the binding pattern could not therefore furnish sufficient arguments to account for the genetic link between bee venom allergy and HLA II molecules.

In this paper, we describe the regions from the major bee venom allergen that efficiently bind to the predominant HLA-DRB1 molecules of Caucasian populations. Considering the potentiality of T cell epitopes as therapeutic leads for specific immunotherapy, our results provide a sound molecular basis for developing this approach to bee venom allergy. They also give information on functional similarities and differences within the main Caucasian HLA-DRB1 alleles.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Pr. J. Dausset, Pr. Grosse-Wilde and Dr. J. Choppin for the kind gift of EBV cell lines. We also thank Dr. D. Gillet for critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr B. Maillère, Département d’Ingénierie et d’Etudes des Protéines, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique-Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France. E-mail address: Back

2 Abbreviations used in this paper: API m1, bee venom phospholipase A2; DM, n-dodecyl ß-D-maltoside Back

Received for publication August 24, 1999. Accepted for publication January 6, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jutel, M., W. J. Pichler, D. Skrbic, A. Urwyler, C. Dahinden, U. R. Muller. 1995. Bee venom immunotherapy results in decrease of IL-4 and IL-5 and increase of IFN-{gamma} secretion in specific allergen-stimulated T cell cultures. J. Immunol. 154:4187.[Abstract]
  2. Akdis, C. A., M. Akdis, T. Blesken, D. Wymann, S. S. Alkan, U. Muller, K. Blaser. 1996. Epitope-specific T cell tolerance to phospholipase A2 in bee venom immunotherapy and recovery by IL-2 and IL-15 in vitro. J. Clin. Invest. 98:1676.[Medline]
  3. Ferreira, F., C. Ebner, B. Kramer, G. Casari, P. Briza, A. J. Kungl, R. Grimm, B. Jahn-Schmid, H. Breiteneder, D. Kraft, et al 1998. Modulation of IgE reactivity of allergens by site-directed mutagenesis: potential use of hypoallergenic variants for immunotherapy. FASEB J. 12:231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takai, T., T. Yokota, M. Yasue, C. Nishiyama, T. Yuuki, A. Mori, H. Okudaira, Y. Okumura. 1997. Engineering of the major house dust mite allergen Der f 2 for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 15:754.[Medline]
  5. Smith, A. M., M. D. Chapman, E. A. Taketomi, T. A. Platts-Mills, S. S. Sung. 1998. Recombinant allergens for immunotherapy: a Der p 2 variant with reduced IgE reactivity retains T-cell epitopes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 101:423.[Medline]
  6. Norman, P. S., Jr J. L. Ohman, A. A. Long, P. S. Creticos, M. A. Gefter, Z. Shaked, R. A. Wood, P. A. Eggleston, K. B. Hafner, P. Rao, et al 1996. Treatment of cat allergy with T-cell reactive peptides. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 154:1623.[Abstract]
  7. Muller, U., C. A. Akdis, M. Fricker, M. Akdis, T. Blesken, F. Bettens, K. Blaser. 1998. Successful immunotherapy with T-cell epitope peptides of bee venom phospholipase A2 induces specific T-cell anergy in patients allergic to bee venom. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 101:747.[Medline]
  8. Counsell, C. M., J. F. Bond, Jr J. L. Ohman, J. L. Greenstein, R. D. Garman. 1996. Definition of the human T-cell epitopes of Fel d 1, the major allergen of the domestic cat. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 98:884.[Medline]
  9. Carballido, J. M., N. Carballido-Perrig, M. K. Kagi, R. H. Meloen, B. Wuthrich, C. H. Heusser, K. Blaser. 1993. T cell epitope specificity in human allergic and nonallergic subjects to bee venom phospholipase A2. J. Immunol. 150:3582.[Abstract]
  10. Kammerer, R., A. Kettner, Y. Chvatchko, N. Dufour, J. M. Tiercy, G. Corradin, F. Spertini. 1997. delineation of PLA2 epitopes using short or long overlapping synthetic peptides: interest for specific immunotherapy. Clin. Exp. Allergy 27:1016.[Medline]
  11. Rammensee, H. G., T. Friede, S. Stevanoviic. 1995. MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first listing. Immunogenetics 41:178.[Medline]
  12. Jardetzky, T. S., J. C. Gorga, R. Busch, J. Rothbard, J. L. Strominger, D. C. Wiley. 1990. Peptide binding to HLA-DR1: a peptide with most residues substituted to alanine retains MHC binding. EMBO J. 9:1797.[Medline]
  13. Herve, M., B. Maillere, G. Mourier, C. Texier, S. Leroy, A. Menez. 1997. On the immunogenic properties of retro-inverso peptides. Total retro-inversion of T-cell epitopes causes a loss of binding to MHC II molecules. Mol. Immunol. 34:157.[Medline]
  14. Stern, L. J., J. H. Brown, T. S. Jardetzky, J. C. Gorga, R. G. Urban, J. L. Strominger, D. C. Wiley. 1994. Crystal structure of the human class II MHC protein HLA-DR1 complexed with an influenza virus peptide. Nature 368:215.[Medline]
  15. Texier, C., M. Hervé, S. Pouvelle, A. Ménez, B. Maillere. 1999. On the diversity and heterogeneity of H-2d restricted determinants and T cell epitopes from the major bee venom allergen. Int. Immunol. 11:1313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Charron, D., R. Fauchet, E. Albert, J. Bodmer, A. Cambon-Thomsen, L. Degos, J. Hors, A. Piazza, I. Schreuder. 1997. Genetic diversity of HLA, functional and medical Implication. , ed. XIIth International Histocompatibility Workshop and conference 669. EDK, Paris, France.
  17. Sinigaglia, F., M. Guttinger, J. Kilgus, D. M. Doran, H. Matile, H. Etlinger, A. Trzeciak, D. Gillessen, J. R. Pink. 1988. A malaria T-cell epitope recognized in association with most mouse and human MHC class II molecules. Nature 336:778.[Medline]
  18. Panina-Bordignon, P., A. Tan, A. Termijtelen, S. Demotz, G. Corradin, A. Lanzavecchia. 1989. Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:2237.[Medline]
  19. Alexander, J., J. Sidney, S. Southwood, J. Ruppert, C. Oseroff, A. Maewal, K. Snoke, H. M. Serra, R. T. Kubo, A. Sette, et al 1994. Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. Immunity 1:751.[Medline]
  20. O’Sullivan, D., T. Arrhenius, J. Sidney, M. F. Del Guercio, M. Albertson, M. Wall, C. Oseroff, S. Southwood, S. M. Colon, F. C. Gaeta, et al 1991. On the interaction of promiscuous antigenic peptides with different DR alleles. Identification of common structural motifs. J. Immunol. 147:2663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hammer, J., P. Valsasnini, K. Tolba, D. Bolin, J. Higelin, B. Takacs, F. Sinigaglia. 1993. Promiscuous and allele-specific anchors in HLA-DR-binding peptides. Cell 74:197.[Medline]
  22. Southwood, S., J. Sidney, A. Kondo, M. F. del Guercio, E. Appella, S. Hoffman, R. T. Kubo, R. W. Chesnut, H. M. Grey, A. Sette. 1998. Several common HLA-DR types share largely overlapping peptide binding repertoires. J. Immunol. 160:3363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Muller, U., A. Helbling, E. Berchtold. 1992. Immunotherapy with honeybee venom and yellow jacket venom is different regarding efficacy and safety. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 89:529.[Medline]
  24. Dhillon, M., C. Roberts, T. Nunn, M. Kuo. 1992. Mapping human T cell epitopes on phospholipase A2: the major bee-venom allergen. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 90:42.[Medline]
  25. Kuchler, K., M. Gmachl, M. J. Sippl, G. Kreil. 1989. Analysis of the cDNA for phospholipase A2 from honeybee venom glands: the deduced amino acid sequence reveals homology to the corresponding vertebrate enzymes. Eur. J. Biochem. 184:249.[Medline]
  26. Gorga, J. C., V. Horejsi, D. R. Johnson, R. Raghupathy, J. L. Strominger. 1987. Purification and characterization of class II histocompatibility antigens from a homozygous human B cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 262:16087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Colombani, J.. 1993. HLA: Fonctions Immunitaires at Applications Médicales John Libbey Eurotext, Montrouge, France.
  28. Marshall, K. W., A. F. Liu, J. Canales, B. Perahia, B. Jorgensen, R. D. Gantzos, B. Aguilar, B. Devaux, J. B. Rothbard. 1994. Role of the polymorphic residues in HLA-DR molecules in allele-specific binding of peptide ligands. J. Immunol. 152:4946.[Abstract]
  29. Roche, P. A., P. Cresswell. 1990. High-affinity binding of an influenza hemagglutinin-derived peptide to purified HLA-DR. J. Immunol. 144:1849.[Abstract]
  30. Posch, P. E., A. E. Hastings, S. Rosen-Bronson, J. R. Richert, C. K. Hurley. 1996. The relative importance of individual DR binding motif positions as defined by peptide anchor analysis of influenza hemagglutinin peptide 306–318 and human myelin basic protein peptide 152–165 binding to several DR molecules: definition of a common extended DR binding motif. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1884.[Medline]
  31. Vogt, A. B., H. Kropshofer, H. Kalbacher, M. Kalbus, H. G. Rammensee, J. E. Coligan, R. Martin. 1994. Ligand motifs of HLA-DRB5*0101 and DRB1*1501 molecules delineated from self-peptides. J. Immunol. 153:1665.[Abstract]
  32. Davenport, M. P., C. L. Quinn, R. M. Chicz, B. N. Green, A. C. Willis, W. S. Lane, J. I. Bell, A. V. Hill. 1995. Naturally processed peptides from two disease-resistance-associated HLA-DR13 alleles show related sequence motifs and the effects of the dimorphism at position 86 of the HLA-DR beta chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Geluk, A., W. Bloemhoff, R. R. De Vries, T. H. Ottenhoff. 1992. Binding of a major T cell epitope of mycobacteria to a specific pocket within HLA-DRw17(DR3) molecules. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:107.[Medline]
  34. Chicz, R. M., R. G. Urban, W. S. Lane, J. C. Gorga, L. J. Stern, D. A. Vignali, J. L. Strominger. 1992. Predominant naturally processed peptides bound to HLA-DR1 are derived from MHC-related molecules and are heterogeneous in size. Nature 358:764.[Medline]
  35. Geluk, A., V. Taneja, K. E. van Meijgaarden, E. Zanelli, C. Abou-Zeid, J. E. R. Thole, R. R. de Vries, C. S. David, T. H. Ottenhoff. 1998. Identification of HLA class II-restricted determinants of mycobacterium tuberculosis-derived proteins by using HLA-transgenic, class II-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Malcherek, G., V. Gnau, S. Stevanovic, H. G. Rammensee, G. Jung, A. Melms. 1994. Analysis of allele-specific contact sites of natural HLA-DR17 ligands. J. Immunol. 153:1141.[Abstract]
  37. Carballido, J. M., N. Carballido-Perrig, G. Terres, C. H. Heusser, K. Blaser. 1992. Bee venom phospholipase A2-specific T cell clones from human allergic and non-allergic individuals: cytokine patterns change in response to the antigen concentration. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:1357.[Medline]
  38. Newton-Nash, D. K., D. D. Eckels. 1993. Differential effect of polymorphism at HLA-DR1 ß-chain positions 85 and 86 on binding and recognition of DR1-restricted antigenic peptides. J. Immunol. 150:1813.[Abstract]
  39. Verreck, F. A., A. Termijtelen, F. Koning. 1993. HLA-DR beta chain residue 86 controls DR {alpha}ß dimer stability. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:1346.[Medline]
  40. Hammer, J., E. Bono, F. Gallazzi, C. Belunis, Z. Nagy, F. Sinigaglia. 1994. Precise prediction of major histocompatibility complex class II-peptide interaction based on peptide side chain scanning. J. Exp. Med. 180:2353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Marshall, K. W., K. J. Wilson, J. Liang, A. Woods, D. Zaller, J. B. Rothbard. 1995. Prediction of peptide affinity to HLA DRB1*0401. J. Immunol. 154:5927.[Abstract]
  42. Geluk, A., K. E. van Meijgaarden, S. Southwood, C. Oseroff, J. W. Drijfhout, R. R. de Vries, T. H. Ottenhoff, A. Sette. 1994. HLA-DR3 molecules can bind peptides carrying two alternative specific submotifs. J. Immunol. 152:5742.[Abstract]
  43. Faux, J. A., M. F. Moffatt, A. Lalvani, J. Dekker, D. A. Warrell, W. O. Cookson. 1997. Sensitivity to bee and wasp venoms: association with specific IgE responses to the bee and wasp venom and HLA DRB1 and DPB1. Clin. Exp. Allergy 27:578.[Medline]
  44. Lympany, P., D. M. Kemeny, K. I. Welsh, T. H. Lee. 1990. An HLA-associated nonresponsiveness to mellitin: a component of bee venom. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 86:160.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Jahn-Schmid, P. Sirven, V. Leb, W. F. Pickl, G. F. Fischer, G. Gadermaier, M. Egger, C. Ebner, F. Ferreira, B. Maillere, et al.
Characterization of HLA Class II/Peptide-TCR Interactions of the Immunodominant T Cell Epitope in Art v 1, the Major Mugwort Pollen Allergen
J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3636 - 3642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X.-F. Wang, J. Kerzerho, O. Adotevi, H. Nuyttens, C. Badoual, G. Munier, S. Oudard, S. Tu, E. Tartour, and B. Maillere
Comprehensive Analysis of HLA-DR- and HLA-DP4-Restricted CD4+ T Cell Response Specific for the Tumor-Shared Antigen Survivin in Healthy Donors and Cancer Patients
J. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 181(1): 431 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Van Overtvelt, E. Wambre, B. Maillere, E. von Hofe, A. Louise, A. M. Balazuc, B. Bohle, D. Ebo, C. Leboulaire, G. Garcia, et al.
Assessment of Bet v 1-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses in Allergic and Nonallergic Individuals Using MHC Class II Peptide Tetramers
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4514 - 4522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Kudela, B. Janjic, J. Fourcade, F. Castelli, P. Andrade, J. M. Kirkwood, T. El-Hefnawy, M. Amicosante, B. Maillere, and H. M. Zarour
Cross-Reactive CD4+ T Cells against One Immunodominant Tumor-Derived Epitope in Melanoma Patients
J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7932 - 7940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Mouquet, S. Farci, P. Joly, B. Maillere, J. Leblond, L. Drouot, J. Leprince, M. C. Tonon, P. Loiseau, D. Charron, et al.
A Truncated Alternative Spliced Isoform of Human Desmoglein 1 Contains a Specific T Cell Epitope Binding to the Pemphigus Foliaceus-Associated HLA Class II DRbeta1*0102 Molecule
J. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 177(9): 6517 - 6526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Janjic, P. Andrade, X.-F. Wang, J. Fourcade, C. Almunia, P. Kudela, A. Brufsky, S. Jacobs, D. Friedland, R. Stoller, et al.
Spontaneous CD4+ T Cell Responses against TRAG-3 in Patients with Melanoma and Breast Cancers
J. Immunol., August 15, 2006; 177(4): 2717 - 2727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. M. Cohen, S. Pouvelle-Moratille, X.-F. Wang, S. Farci, G. Munier, D. Charron, A. Menez, M. Busson, and B. Maillere
Scanning the HIV Genome for CD4+ T Cell Epitopes Restricted to HLA-DP4, the Most Prevalent HLA Class II Molecule
J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5401 - 5408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Monneaux, J. Hoebeke, C. Sordet, C. Nonn, J.-P. Briand, B. Maillere, J. Sibillia, and S. Muller
Selective Modulation of CD4+ T Cells from Lupus Patients by a Promiscuous, Protective Peptide Analog
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5839 - 5847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Immonen, S. Farci, A. Taivainen, J. Partanen, S. Pouvelle-Moratille, A. Narvanen, T. Kinnunen, S. Saarelainen, M. Rytkonen-Nissinen, B. Maillere, et al.
T Cell Epitope-Containing Peptides of the Major Dog Allergen Can f 1 as Candidates for Allergen Immunotherapy
J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3614 - 3620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Immunotherapy
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6_suppl): S46 - S50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Mandic, F. Castelli, B. Janjic, C. Almunia, P. Andrade, D. Gillet, V. Brusic, J. M. Kirkwood, B. Maillere, and H. M. Zarour
One NY-ESO-1-Derived Epitope That Promiscuously Binds to Multiple HLA-DR and HLA-DP4 Molecules and Stimulates Autologous CD4+ T Cells from Patients with NY-ESO-1-Expressing Melanoma
J. Immunol., February 1, 2005; 174(3): 1751 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
C. Buhot, A. Chenal, A. Sanson, S. Pouvelle-Moratille, M. H. Gelb, A. Menez, D. Gillet, and B. Maillere
Alteration of the tertiary structure of the major bee venom allergen Api m 1 by multiple mutations is concomitant with low IgE reactivity
Protein Sci., November 1, 2004; 13(11): 2970 - 2978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Mandic, C. Almunia, S. Vicel, D. Gillet, B. Janjic, K. Coval, B. Maillere, J. M. Kirkwood, and H. M. Zarour
The Alternative Open Reading Frame of LAGE-1 Gives Rise to Multiple Promiscuous HLA-DR-restricted Epitopes Recognized by T-helper 1-type Tumor-reactive CD4+ T Cells
Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6506 - 6515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
M. J. Holtzman
Drug Development for Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2003; 29(2): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Fournel, S. Neichel, H. Dali, S. Farci, B. Maillere, J.-P. Briand, and S. Muller
CD4+ T Cells from (New Zealand Black x New Zealand White)F1 Lupus Mice and Normal Mice Immunized Against Apoptotic Nucleosomes Recognize Similar Th Cell Epitopes in the C Terminus of Histone H3
J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 636 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Zhang, P. Chaux, V. Stroobant, A. M. M. Eggermont, J. Corthals, B. Maillere, K. Thielemans, M. Marchand, T. Boon, and P. van der Bruggen
A MAGE-3 Peptide Presented by HLA-DR1 to CD4+ T Cells That Were Isolated from a Melanoma Patient Vaccinated with a MAGE-3 Protein
J. Immunol., July 1, 2003; 171(1): 219 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Jacquemin, V. Vantomme, C. Buhot, R. Lavend'homme, W. Burny, N. Demotte, P. Chaux, K. Peerlinck, J. Vermylen, B. Maillere, et al.
CD4+ T-cell clones specific for wild-type factor VIII: a molecular mechanism responsible for a higher incidence of inhibitor formation in mild/moderate hemophilia A
Blood, February 15, 2003; 101(4): 1351 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. A. Castelli, C. Buhot, A. Sanson, H. Zarour, S. Pouvelle-Moratille, C. Nonn, H. Gahery-Segard, J.-G. Guillet, A. Menez, B.