The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radoja, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radoja, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, A. B.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 2619-2628.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Mice Bearing Late-Stage Tumors Have Normal Functional Systemic T Cell Responses In Vitro and In Vivo1

Sasa Radoja*,{dagger}, T. Dharma Rao*, Deborah Hillman* and Alan B. Frey2,*

* Department of Cell Biology and Kaplan Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; and {dagger} The Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, Belgrade, Yugoslavia


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immune suppression in tumor-bearing hosts is considered to be one factor causally associated with the growth of antigenic tumors. Support for this hypothesis has come from reports that spleen T cells in tumor-bearing mice are deficient in either priming or effector phase functions. We have reexamined this hypothesis in detail using multiple murine tumor models, including transplantable adenocarcinoma, melanoma, sarcoma, and thymoma, and also a transgenic model of spontaneous breast carcinoma. In both in vitro and in vivo assays of T cell function (proliferation, cytokine production, induction of CD8+ alloreactive CTL, and development of anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin CD4+ T cells, rejection of allogeneic or syngeneic regressor tumors, respectively) we show that mice bearing sizable tumor burdens are not systemically suppressed and do not have diminished T cell functions. Therefore, if immune suppression is a causal function in the growth of antigenic tumor, the basis for escape from immune destruction is likely to be dependent upon tumor-induced T cell dysfunction at the site of tumor growth.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tcells of tumor-bearing mice have been described as having defects in various molecules important in the TCR- and IL-2R-mediated signal transduction pathways (1, 2, 3). For example, diminished levels or activation status of TCR-proximal protein tyrosine kinase molecules (p56lck, TCR{zeta} chain, or p59fyn) in spleen T cells have been described in murine tumor models that were postulated to be responsible for an altered pattern of cellular protein tyrosine phosphorylation thought to reflect defective T cell function (4, 5, 6). Such defects in the T cell signal transduction machinery are considered to be the biochemical basis of suppression of immune response that is postulated to be causally associated with tumor escape from immune destruction (1, 2, 3).

Although interest in the area of tumor-induced immune suppression has increased recently, the mechanism(s) by which tumor growth induces the biochemical changes in T cells that are postulated to underlie T cell dysfunction are largely unknown. Some possibilities include production by tumor (or host cells that infiltrate the tumor microenvironment) of soluble factors that inhibit cell cycle progression, tumor-induced defects in proximal TCR-mediated signal transduction molecules, tumor-induced defects in intracellular signaling molecules, and activation of tumor-infiltrating macrophages that may express immunosuppressive factors such as IL-10, PGE, hydrogen peroxide, or nitric oxide.

The physiological consequences of the tumor-induced T cell defects are variable. In some murine tumor models TCR-mediated proliferation is reduced in T cells obtained from spleens (7); in other models cytokine expression from spleen T cells or induction of CTL activity in MLR established in vitro is diminished (5, 8). In several studies the reported diminished function of spleen T cells in mice bearing late-stage tumors is postulated to correlate with the development of a particular deficit in one of several molecules associated with proximal TCR-mediated cell signaling (5, 6, 7, 9). However, two reports persuasively argue that these biochemical changes in T cells of tumor-bearing mice represent normal fluctuation not attributable to the effects of tumor growth (8, 10). In addition, several reports argue that, owing to its unusual sensitivity to proteolysis, the apparent reduction of the TCR{zeta} levels in spleen T cells from tumor-bearing mice may be an experimental artifact resulting from contamination of T cell preparations with neutrophils and/or macrophages (8, 10, 11). These observations, considered together with an analysis of T cell function in cancer patients in whom the loss of proteins involved in proximal TCR-mediated signal transduction was not observed (12), prompted us to carefully evaluate the function of T cells in spleens of tumor-bearing mice. Our data demonstrate that tumor-bearing mice do not have systemic T cell dysfunction.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

C3H/HeN, C57BL/6, male, and FvBN female mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were housed four per cage in a barrier facility and maintained on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle (0700–1900 h) with ad libitum access to food and water. A sentinel program revealed that the mice were murine hepatitis virus negative. Experiments involving animals were conducted with the approval of the New York University Medical School committee on animal research.

Tumors

6-1 tumor was created by expression of plasmids encoding activated Ha-Ras plus p53 genes in primary murine C3H/HeN embryonic fibroblasts. The properties of this tumor have been described previously (13). Lp53 was created by transfection of L929 cells with a plasmid expressing activated murine p53 (13). MEFSV40TAg was created by transfection of primary C3H/HeN MEF with a plasmid expressing SV40 large T Ag (14). MCA-38 cells and MC57G cells were gifts from S. Vukmanovic (New York University Medical School, New York, NY). EL-4 cells were gifts from A. Menoret (University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT). UV6138, 6139b, K1735, and K5222 were gifts from H. Schreiber (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL). L929 (C3H/HeN) was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). A-20 (BALB/c) was a gift from Y. Liu (Ohio State University, Columbus, OH). Most adherent tumor cell lines were removed from tissue culture plastic by incubation in HBSS containing 2 mM EDTA and were washed three times in HBSS. A-20 cells were grown in suspension culture, and 6139b were passaged in vivo in syngeneic nude mice by trocar injection of small tumor fragments (~2 mm3). The viability of the cell lines was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion, and 2 x 105 cells were injected i.p. in a volume of 0.2 ml of HBSS. Regressor tumor 6139b was injected as small tumor fragments using a trocar. Control mice received injections of HBSS only.

Transgenic FvBN mice expressing activated ß-catenin under the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)3 promoter (an amino-terminal deletion of 89 residues termed "{Delta}BCM") were created and provided by Alexandra Imbert and Pam Cowin (New York University Medical School). These mice develop multifocal breast carcinoma at 4–5 mo of age.

Tissue culture

RPMI 1640 medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) was used for isolation and culture of T cells and was supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 0.002 mM L-glutamine, and 10% FBS (Intergen, Purchase, NY). DMEM was used for culture of tumor cell lines. All tissue culture supplements were supplied by Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY).

Isolation of T cells

T cells were purified using immunomagnetic separation using type MS+ or VS+ columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergish-Gladbach, Germany). In each experiment aliquots of isolated cells were analyzed for cell surface expression of various markers by flow cytometry and were routinely >95% CD3{epsilon}+. T cells purified thusly from splenocytes of control mice do not express activation Ags (CD25 and CD69), do not transcribe IL-2 mRNA, and do not incorporate tritiated thymidine in proliferation assay unless stimulated in vitro (15).

Cytofluorometry

For single-color analysis, splenocytes (106) from control or tumor-bearing mice were once washed with FACS buffer (HBSS without phenol red (BioWhittaker), 1% BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 0.1% sodium azide (Sigma)) and analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) as previously described (16).

Proliferation assay

Single-cell splenocyte suspensions were prepared and analyzed by measurement of incorporation of tritiated thymidine after stimulation with plate-bound purified anti-TCRß mAb (H57-597, 0.01 mg/ml for 60 min at 37°C) as previously described (17).

Generation of primary CTL in vitro

Responder spleen cells (5 x 106) from C3H/HeN or transgenic {Delta}BCM FvBN mice were cultured with the same number of irradiated stimulator splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice in 2 ml of complete RPMI 1640 medium. Responder cells from C57BL/6 mice were similarly stimulated with irradiated C3H/HeN cells. After 5 days cells were harvested, the viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion, the percentage of CD8+ T cells was determined by flow cytometry of an aliquot (or in some cases, as indicated in the figure legend, CD8+ T cells purified by magnetic immunobeading), and CTL activity was determined.

Chromium release assay

CTL activity of splenocytes was determined in standard 51Cr release assays. In brief, 106 target cells (EL-4 or P815 for redirected assays) were incubated with 0.2 mCi of Na[51Cr]04 in RPMI 1640 medium for 60 min at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with complete medium and transferred to round-bottom 96-well plates at 5 x 103 cells/well. Effector cells were added at varying numbers as indicated in the figure legends in a final volume of 0.2 ml. After a 4-h incubation at 37°C, 0.1 ml of supernatants were harvested, and released radiolabel was determined by scintillation counting. Redirected cytolysis assays using anti-CD3{epsilon} Ab 145-2C11 (at 0.001 mg/ml final concentration) were used to determine the CTL function of splenocytes from animals bearing MCA-38 tumors (because of lack of a suitable target cell) exactly as previously described (18). Purified hamster IgG was used as control Ab for redirected assay, and lysis of labeled targets in the presence of effector cells plus control IgG was equivalent to spontaneous release. Maximal release from target cells was determined by treatment of cells with 1% Triton X-100, spontaneous release was determined from cultures of labeled target cells incubated with medium only, and the formula used for determination of specific lysis was: [(experimental release - spontaneous release)/(maximal release - spontaneous release)] x 100.

RNA isolation, RT, and PCR amplification

Total cellular RNA was isolated from T cells without in vitro stimulation, used to prepare cDNA, and used to program PCR amplification as described previously (16). Actin was amplified for 30 cycles; IL-2, IL-10, TNF-{alpha}, and IFN-{gamma} were amplified for 33 cycles; and IL-4 was amplified for 38 cycles. The sizes of the PCR fragments generated were 450 (actin), 247 (IL-2), 383 (IL-4), 354 (TNF-{alpha}), 186 (IL-10), and 237 (IFN-{gamma}). The sequences of the PCR primers used are: actin: sense, 5'-GTG GGG CGC CCC AGG CAC CA; and antisense, 5'-CTC CTT ATT GTC ACG CAC GAT TTC; IL-2: sense, 5'-GAG TCA AAT CCA GAA CAT GCC; and antisense, 5'-TCC ACT TCA AGC TCT ACA G; IL-4: sense, 5'-GAA TGT ACC AGG AGC CAT ATC; and antisense, 5'-CTC AGT ACT ACG AGT AAT CCA; IL-10: sense, 5'-CAT TTC CGA TAA GGC TTG G; and antisense, 5'-CGG GAA GAC AAT AAC TG; TNF-{alpha}: sense, 5'-TTC TGT CTA CTG AAC TTC GGG GTG ATC GGT CC; and antisense, 5'- GTA TGA GAT AGC AAA TCG GCT GAC GGT GTG GG; and IFN-{gamma}: sense, 5'-AAC GCT ACA CAC TGC ATC TTG G; and antisense, 5'-GAC TTC AAA GAG TCT GAG G. There were no cytokine PCR products in control reactions in which polymerase was omitted, as detected by Southern blot analyses.

End labeling, agarose gel electrophoresis, and Southern blotting

Oligonucleotide probes for all cytokine PCR products are internal to the PCR primers used for amplification (IL-2, 5'-CTC CCC AGG ATG CTC ACC TTC; IL-4, 5'-AGG GCT TCC GTG CTT CGC A; IL-10, 5'-GGA CTG CCT TCA GCC AGG TGA AGA CTT; TNF-{alpha}, 5'-AG CGC GCC AAC GCC CTC CTG GCC AAC GGC; and IFN-{gamma}, 5'-GGA GGA ACT GGC AAA AGG A; actin was visualized by ethidium bromide staining only). Probes were labeled with [{gamma}-32P]ATP (7000 mCi/mM; NEN/DuPont, Boston, MA) and used to analyze PCR-amplified DNA fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis followed by Southern blotting as previously described (16).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor growth causes splenomegaly and accumulation of macrophages and neutrophils

As a prelude to characterization of systemic T cell function in tumor-bearing mice we analyzed the effect of progressive tumor growth on spleen size and cellularity. Naive mice were seeded with tumor cells, and spleens were isolated and characterized by flow cytometry at increasing times of tumor growth. An innocula of ~2 x 106 6-1 cells, a dose that caused progressive tumor growth and death after about 8 wk, resulted in tumors of ~3 g after about 30–35 days. The total number of splenocytes increased progressively in tumor-bearing mice, such that by wk 2 of growth spleens had about 3-fold more cells than controls (Fig. 1Go). The increase was not due to metastasis of tumor, because spleens of mice bearing 6-1 tumor expressing neomycin resistance did not contain cells able to grow in the presence of G-418 in vitro (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Tumor-bearing mice have increased numbers of splenocytes. Age-matched littermate C3H/HeN mice were injected with 6-1 tumor cells (or HBSS as control) as described in Materials and Methods. At the indicated number of days of tumor growth splenocytes were isolated, RBCs were lysed in hypotonic medium, and viable cells were enumerated. The percentage of dead cells did not increase as a function of tumor growth. At each time point of analysis the number of splenocytes obtained from five individual mice were counted to determine the average number of cells. Error bars show the SD.

 
Spleens from a series of different murine transplantable tumors and a transgenic line that develop breast carcinoma spontaneously at about age 4–5 mo (termed {Delta}BCM) were analyzed for splenomegaly. In all 10 tumor models tested, encompassing four strains of mice and five tumor types (6-1, MCA-38, K1735, K5222, Lp53, UV6138, MEFSV40TAg, EL4, MC57G, and {Delta}BCM), splenomegaly was an inevitable consequence of tumor growth (data not shown).

The cellular composition of tumor-bearing mouse spleens as a function of tumor burden was analyzed by flow cytometry. For 6-1 sarcoma, at early times of tumor growth (1–2 wk) the percentages of Mac1+ and Gr-1+ were notably increased, whereas the abundance of other major cell types (CD4+ or CD8+ T cells and B cells) was not dramatically affected (data not shown). There was a progressive accumulation of Mac1+ and Gr-1+ cells, such that in mice with large tumor burdens (>~4 wk of growth) macrophages and neutrophils together accumulated to 50–60% of the total splenocytes. At early times of tumor growth there was only a modest effect on the percent abundance of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but by 3–4 wk CD3{epsilon}+ T cells were reduced from 25–30% to about 10% (Fig. 2Go). There was a similar reduction in abundance of B cells from ~50 to 10% by wk 4 of tumor growth. The mean fluorescence intensity of staining of T cell subsets did not diminish, but for B cells, as the abundance decreased, so did the mean fluorescence intensity (from ~750 to ~340).



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Spleens of mice bearing tumors accumulate macrophages and neutrophils. Splenocytes from mice bearing 35-day-old 6-1 tumors were analyzed by flow cytometry using fluorochrome-conjugated Abs to cell types as indicated. The percentage of each cell type analyzed is shown in the histograms. The decline in the percentage of T and B cells and the reduction in the mean fluorescence index of B cell staining in late-stage tumor-bearing mice (from ~750 to ~540) were been consistently observed. In a similar manner splenocytes from mice bearing different tumor types were analyzed as indicated. Multiple mice bearing each tumor have been analyzed, and representative histograms are presented. These analyses (which have been repeated five times with equivalent results) demonstrate that macrophages and neutrophils accumulate in spleens of tumor-bearing mice coincident with a decline in CD4+ T cells and B cells.

 
Similarly we analyzed by flow cytometry splenocytes of animals bearing other tumor types. Although the relative abundance of different immune cells varied depending upon the individual tumor type (Fig. 2Go and data not shown), in all models it can be generalized that with increasing time of tumor growth spleens accumulate macrophages and neutrophils simultaneously, with a decrease in T cells and in most cases also in B cells.

Spleen cells of tumor-bearing mice are deficient in proliferative response to TCR ligation in vitro

To determine whether the altered cellular composition of spleens reflected T cell function, the proliferative responsiveness of splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice was tested compared with that of cells from control mice (Fig. 3Go). Proliferation assay of 105 splenocytes from mice bearing 6-1 tumor showed a progressive decrease in the incorporation of tritiated thymidine as a function of time of tumor growth. At early times after tumor seeding the proliferative deficit was modest (~25% that in control spleen cells at 2 wk), but in all mice analyzed (>40 individual 6-1 tumor-bearing mice) proliferation was reduced by about 40% by about 3 wk of tumor growth. At later times the deficit was even greater, approaching 90% at 5 wk. The proliferative deficit was not a function of the method of T cell activation in vitro (plate-bound anti-TCR Ab), because the deficit was also noted when soluble anti-TCR Ab (or anti-CD3{epsilon}) plus anti-CD28 Ab, plate-bound anti-TCR plus anti-CD28 Abs, or Con A were used to stimulate cells (data not shown). A similar proliferative deficit was noted in other tumor models.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Splenocytes from mice bearing tumors are defective in proliferative response in vitro. Splenocytes (105) from mice bearing tumors for increasing time (as indicated on the y-axis) or from age-matched control mice were prepared and used for assay of proliferation in response to stimulation with soluble anti-TCR Ab as described in Materials and Methods. The numbers of mice in each group were: day 6, three; day 7, three; day 12, two; day 14, four; day 21, four; day 24, four; day 28, six; and day 35, four. The average incorporation of radiolabel into splenocytes from 26 individual control mice was 41.5 x 103 ± 2.5 x 103 cpm. Error bars show the SD for each group of mice.

 
Tumor-bearing mice prime anti-KLH T cells in vivo

The apparent proliferative deficit in tumor-bearing mice was anticipated to reflect some phenotypic abnormality in T cell function, possibly related to escape of tumor from antitumor immune response. To address this point we asked whether tumor-bearing mice can prime a T cell immune response in vivo. Tumor-bearing or control mice were injected with an antigenic protein, KLH, and the development of anti-KLH T cell immune response was measured by proliferation assay of splenocytes in vitro. We found that mice bearing tumors for 2 or 3 wk produced anti-KLH T cell immune response equivalent to that of non-tumor-bearing control mice (Fig. 4Go). This finding suggests that the dramatic change in spleen cellular composition and deficit in spleen T cell proliferation do not inhibit development of CD4+ T cells reactive with a soluble antigenic protein after injection.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Tumor growth does not inhibit in vivo priming. Mice (n = 9/group) were seeded with 6-1 tumor cells (or injected with HBSS) and after 2 or 3 wk of tumor growth were injected s.c. with 0.1 mg of KLH. Two weeks following KLH injection splenocytes were prepared and analyzed by flow cytometry for expression of CD3{epsilon}. Cells were tested for proliferation (2 x 105 CD3+ T cells/well) in response to KLH stimulation in vitro (0.05 mg/ml). The error bars show the SD for the combined data from tumor-bearing and control mice (three individual experiments, each with three mice per group).

 
Tumor-bearing mice reject allogeneic tumor challenge

We performed experiments designed to test the physiologically relevant function of T cell immune response in tumor-bearing mice by asking whether tumor-bearing mice could reject allogeneic tumor challenge. Mice were seeded with 6-1 tumor cells and after 3 wk of tumor growth were injected with tumors originating in the H-2B (Fig. 5Goa) or H-2D (data not shown) background. Mice syngeneic with the secondary tumors injected at the same time as mice bearing 6-1 tumor developed tumors with kinetics typical of the individual tumor. One hundred percent of both non-tumor-bearing control and tumor-bearing H-2K mice rejected allogeneic tumor challenges. This finding shows that tumor-bearing mice are competent to reject allogeneic tumor challenge.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. 6-1 tumor-bearing mice reject allogeneic and syngeneic regressor tumor. Mice were seeded with 106 6-1 tumor cells (n = 20; four separate experiments, with five mice per experiment) and after 3 wk of tumor growth were injected s.c. with either allogeneic tumor cells (MCA-38) or syngeneic regressor tumor cells (6139b). Mice were monitored for 7 wk after growth of 6-1 tumor, and perpendicular measurements of tumor size were made. For assay of allogeneic tumor growth control mice syngeneic with the secondary tumor cells that were injected at the same time as in tumor-bearing mice developed tumors at the expected frequency for the challenge dose used (syngeneic control). For assay of syngeneic regressor tumor cells, athymic C3H/HeN were used as controls to prove tumor growth (athymic controls). The growth of each tumor is shown by an individual line.

 
Tumor-bearing mice reject challenge of syngeneic regressor tumor

Because allogeneic tumor is a very strong antigenic stimulus, rejection of allogeneic tumor may not be sufficiently sensitive to evaluate immune dysfunction in tumor-bearing mice in which immune dysfunction may be subtle. Therefore, to evaluate the immune function of tumor-bearing mice using a milder antigenic stimulus we also tested whether mice bearing 3-wk-old 6-1 tumor could reject challenge of syngeneic and non-cross-reactive tumors, which are rejected by mice with functional immune systems. The goal of this experiment was to test whether mice bearing tumors can mount a successful antitumor immune response to antigenically unrelated tumors. The choice of the specific second tumors, so-called regressor tumors (19), was made because they are known to require T cells for their rejection in intact (non-tumor-bearing) mice (20). If mice bearing tumors can reject secondary tumors, then it can be inferred that the T cells in the tumor-bearing mouse are not defective in the ability to recognize and reject antigenic tumors. The growth of regressor tumors was authenticated by seeding tumors in athymic syngeneic mice simultaneously with injection into tumor-bearing mice. As was found for the rejection of allogeneic tumors, mice bearing 6-1 tumors could reject challenge of three different syngeneic regressor tumors (Fig. 5Gob) and L929 and 1402RE tumors (data not shown). These results show that the immune function in tumor-bearing mice is sufficient to permit rejection of syngeneic, but not cross-reactive, tumors.

Splenocytes of tumor-bearing mice can develop CD8+ CTL after in vitro priming

The ability to develop spleen-derived CD8+ CTL response after in vitro priming has been found by others to be defective in tumor-bearing mice (4, 8). Because rejection of allogeneic and syngeneic tumor in vivo is dependent upon CD8+ T cells, this assay of systemic immune competency was tested in various tumor models. After 3 wk of 6-1 tumor growth (a point at which spleen cellularity is dramatically altered; Fig. 2Go) spleens were isolated from mice and primed in vitro with irradiated allogeneic H-2B splenocytes. After 5 days of coculture viable cells were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry. Viable cells present after in vitro priming were 15% CD8+ using splenocytes from control mice and were 8% using splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice (day 21). Cells were used as effector cells in a standard cytolysis assay and were equal to or more active than control T cells in CTL activity (Fig. 6Goa). Target lysis was inhibited by inclusion of anti-CD8 Ab, but not by irrelevant Ig (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Tumor-bearing mice can generate CD8+allogeneic effector cells after in vitro priming. Mice were injected with either 6-1 tumor cells (n = 3; a) or MCA-38 tumor (n = 4; b). After 3 wk of tumor growth splenocytes were isolated and used as effector cells in in vitro priming MLR reactions using C57BL/6 stimulator cells (a) or C3H/HeN stimulator splenocytes (b) as described in Materials and Methods. For the data shown in c, splenocytes from three mice bearing 5-mo-old {Delta}BCM tumors were used to establish MLR (using C57BL/6 stimulator cells). After 5 days of stimulation in vitro, cells were recovered, analyzed for the percentage of CD8+ T cells, and used as effector cells in chromium release assays. Spontaneous lysis ranged from 4–19%. For the data shown in a, after the 5-day coculture the percentage CD8+ T cells in cultures obtained from control splenocytes was 15% (day 21), and for splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice it was 8% (day 21). For the data shown in b and c, after 5 days CD8+ T cells were isolated by magnetic immunobeading and used as effector cells in a chromium release assay. Control mice were injected with HBSS (a and b) or were age-matched nontransgenic FvBN. The error bars show the SD for the combined data from separate tumor-bearing or control mice.

 
In a similar manner in vitro priming of CD8+ CTL was tested for four other tumor models (MCA-38 and {Delta}BCM, Fig. 6Go, b and c; K1735 and EL4 tumors, data not shown). Splenocytes from mice bearing MCA-38 tumors were stimulated in vitro with C3H/HeN spleen cells; the others were primed with C57BL/6 spleen cells. Cytolytic activity induced in spleen cells obtained from MCA-38 tumor-bearing mice was analyzed by redirected CTL assay (using P815 tumor as target), and assay of the other tumor models used direct lysis of labeled EL4 targets (H-2B as were cells used for in vitro priming). In all tumor models tested efficient CTL activity was elicited from spleen cells of tumor-bearing mice. Alloreactivity induced in splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice was potent; when CD8+ T cells were purified after priming for use in CTL assay, significant killing was seen at E:T cell ratios as low as 2.5:1. These experiments demonstrate that although the cellular composition of spleens in tumor-bearing mice is changed compared with that in control mice (Fig. 2Go), the presence of abundant macrophages and neutrophils and the reduced levels of CD8+ T cells (even during priming in vitro) does not diminish functional priming of T cell-mediated cytolytic immune response.

Purified spleen CD3+ T cells from tumor-bearing mice are not defective in proliferative response in vitro

The results of the functional analyses of spleen T cell immune responses (shown above) motivated us to re-examine the proliferative deficit previously noted in Fig. 3Go. We reasoned that the presence of macrophages and neutrophils that accumulate in spleens may have artifactually influenced T cell proliferation assays, perhaps due to elaboration of immunosuppressive chemokines and/or cytokines produced during in vitro culture. Alternatively, because of the progressive decrease in abundance of T cells as a function of tumor growth, the absolute number of T cells in spleen preparations of tumor-bearing mice may have been reduced below a minimum number required to reveal anti-TCR Ab-induced T cell proliferation in vitro. Therefore, we modified the proliferation assay to include analysis of the percentage of CD3{epsilon}+ T cells in splenocyte preparations, which permitted plating of known numbers of T cells from spleens of both control and tumor-bearing mice. When proliferation was assessed in this manner, spleen T cells from tumor-bearing mice were not diminished in incorporation of tritiated thymidine compared with control T cells (Fig. 7Go, A and B).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Purified Thy1+ splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice proliferate better than T cells purified from control mice. Mice were injected with 6-1 tumor cells (n = 4) or HBSS as a control (n = 4). After 26 days spleens were isolated, and Thy1+ cells were obtained by incubation with anti-Thy1 Ab-conjugated magnetic beads before isolation by magnetic capture (as described in Materials and Methods). An aliquot of purified cells was analyzed by flow cytometry using FITC-conjugated anti-Mac1 and anti-CD3{epsilon} Abs as indicated (A). This analysis shows that splenocytes purified by anti-Thy1 capture are about 95% CD3{epsilon}+ T cells and are uncontaminated by Mac1+ cells. Proliferation assays were established using purified spleen T cells with graded numbers of cells isolated from control or tumor-bearing mice (B). Proliferation is dependent upon stimulation in vitro, as T cells plated on non-anti-TCR Ab coated wells did not incorporate tritiated thymidine.

 
Confirmatory experiments were also performed in which spleen T cells were purified by magnetic immunobead isolation using anti-Thy1 Ab before proliferation assay. T cells purified in this manner were >95% CD3{epsilon}+ and were not contaminated with Mac1+ cells (Fig. 7GoA) or Gr-1+ cells (15). In addition, incorporation of thymidine in vitro was dependent upon mitogen activation, demonstrating that isolation does not activate the T cells (15). Purified T cells obtained from tumor-bearing mice reproducibly proliferated better than T cells purified from control mice (Fig. 7GoB). In another confirmatory experiment CD3{epsilon}+ T cells purified from spleens of tumor-bearing mice by FACS also proliferated better than the equivalent cell population purified from control mice (data not shown).

To generalize this finding we performed proliferation assays using spleen cells from mice bearing 3-wk tumors of the following types: K1735, EL4, UV6138, L929/p53 (21), K5222, B16, SV40 large T Ag-transformed primary murine embryonic fibroblasts (21), MCA-38, and MC57G. In addition, we tested a transgenic murine line in which mutant ß-catenin is expressed under the MMTV promoter and mice develop spontaneous multifocal breast carcinoma at 4–5 mo of age, {Delta}BCM. For all tumor models proliferation of spleen T cells from mice bearing tumors was equivalent to or greater than that of splenocytes from syngeneic control mice (Table IGo). Collectively, our analyses do not indicate a proliferative deficit in spleen T cells of mice bearing tumors up to 15–20% of body weight.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Comparison of spleen T cell proliferation in different tumor models1

 
Cytokine analyses of Thy1+ spleen T cells from 6-1 tumor-bearing or control mice

The accumulation of cytokine RNA in spleen T cells of tumor-bearing mice RNA was isolated from purified Thy1+ cells and analyzed for the expression of mRNAs encoding various cytokines. Cells were purified by magnetic immunobeading from tumor-bearing or control spleens as described above, and an aliquot taken for flow cytometric confirmation of purity (cells were >95% CD3{epsilon}+; data not shown). The remainder of the cells were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen before RNA isolation. We found that T cells obtained from spleens of tumor-bearing mice expressed a variety of cytokine RNAs, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 8Go). Cytokine RNAs were strongly expressed without stimulation in vitro, but not in T cells of control mice, indicating that the T cells were transcribing these genes in situ. Importantly, cells from control mice did not express these RNAs, indicating that the isolation procedure does not induce transcription of these cytokine RNAs, which is indicative of activation.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Cytokine RNA analysis of purified T cells isolated from tumor-bearing or control spleens. Purified T cells from control or 6-1 tumor-bearing mice were isolated by magnetic immunobeading using anti-Thy1 conjugated beads (as described in Materials and Methods) and snap-frozen, RNA was isolated, and RT-PCR analysis was performed using ß-actin primers. After normalization of cDNA inputs (by scanning densitometry of actin PCR products) reactions using cytokine-specific primers were conducted. RNA was also prepared from activated splenocytes or peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) as positive controls. PCR products were then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, and blots were hybridized with 32P-labeled probes internal to the primers used for PCR. Autoradiographs were developed after 1 or 3 days of exposure and were converted to digital images using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). This experiment, which has been repeated twice with identical results, shows that T cells from spleens of tumor-bearing mice are activated compared with control T cells, because RNA encoding various cytokines is expressed immediately upon isolation (i.e., without activation in vitro).

 
Spleen T cells from tumor-bearing mice secrete bioactive IL-2

The cytokine RT-PCR analyses showed that several cytokine mRNAs were transcribed in T cells of tumor-bearing, but not control, mice without activation in vitro (Fig. 8Go). Because spleen T cells are apparently activated in situ, we considered the possibility that cytokine production upon further activation may be dampened, perhaps due to overstimulation in response to tumor growth. To make this determination T cells from MCA-38 tumor-bearing and control mice were purified before collection of culture supernatants either with or without activation in vitro by incubation on anti-TCR-coated plasticware and analysis of tissue culture supernatants for IL-2 content by CTLL-2 bioassay (22) (Fig. 9GoA). We found that highly purified CD4+ T cells of MCA-38 tumor-bearing mice secreted IL-2 without in vitro activation. The amount of IL-2 secreted ranged from 2 pg to 500 fg/ml/2 x 106 cells/24 h. CD4+ spleen T cells from the other tumor models did not secrete IL-2 unless activated.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. IL-2 secretion from spleen T cells of tumor-bearing or control mice. A and B, IL-2 bioassay of splenocytes from mice bearing MCA-38 and {Delta}BCM tumors. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated by magnetic immunobeading from splenocyte preparations of individual tumor-bearing or control mice, and aliquots were plated in the presence of plate-bound anti-TCR (MCA-38) or anti-TCR plus anti-CD28 Abs for 48 h (2 x 106 cells/ml) as described in Materials and Methods. Serial dilution of supernatants were analyzed in triplicate by CTLL-2 bioassay after 24 or 48 h of incubation as indicated using rIL-2 as standard (22 ). Anti-IL-2 Ab was added to some reactions as indicated in the form of S4B6 hybridoma-conditioned medium diluted 1/8 (which was titrated to inhibit 50–100 pg/ml of rIL-2).

 
Because T cells are, for unknown reasons, activated in situ, we considered that the ability to respond to further activation stimuli may be altered relative to that of naive cells activated under similar conditions. To evaluate this we purified CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from spleens of mice bearing {Delta}BCM tumors (and 6-1, K1735, and EL-4; data not shown) and stimulated them with plate-bound anti-TCR plus anti-CD28 Abs before IL-2 analysis by bioassay (Fig. 9GoB). CD4+ spleen T cells in three of five tumor models tested produced IL-2 upon activation in vitro at levels close to those of control cells. For MCA-38 and 6-1 tumor models the production of IL-2 from CD4+ T cells was slightly less than that for controls.

IL-2 secretion from T cells from mice bearing {Delta}BCM tumors required stimulation in vitro. However, although T cells from the {Delta}BCM model (and EL-4; data not shown) did not secrete IL-2 without in vitro activation, upon stimulation these T cells secreted greater levels of IL-2 than did syngeneic control cells. Collectively, these analyses demonstrate that IL-2 production from spleen T cells of tumor-bearing mice is not diminished compared with that in control animals. Furthermore, in several models systemic T cells of tumor-bearing mice secrete IL-2 without deliberate activation in vitro, implying a heightened activation status in vivo, an idea in concert with our other findings and which implies functional integrity in situ.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immune suppression in the tumor-bearing host is postulated to be the basis for growth of antigenic tumor despite antitumor immune response (2, 3). This hypothesis is based upon a variety of data showing that the antitumor immune response is demonstrable in the early phase of tumor growth but is down-regulated upon continuous growth (23, 24, 25, 26). In recent years a number of reports have attempted to describe the phenomenon of tumor-induced immune suppression in biochemical terms. Mizoguichi et al. (5) reported that systemic peripheral T cells in tumor-bearing mice, isolated from spleens of mice bearing large burdens of the MCA-38 colon carcinoma, showed an altered pattern of protein tyrosine phosphorylation coincident with reduced expression of signal-transducing molecules p56lck and p59fyn. A key observation was that spleen T cells from tumor-bearing mice had also lost expression of TCR{zeta}, which, due to its fundamental position in the cascade of cytosolic signaling events, was postulated to be the basis for defective immune response, permitting antigenic tumor to grow. Subsequently, several independent reports described similar results (6, 9). These findings renewed enthusiasm into the search for a mechanistic understanding of tumor-induced escape from immune response.

However, it has been proposed that the apparent loss of TCR-proximal signal-transducing proteins may not accurately reflect expression in T cells of tumor-bearing mice or be truly tumor-induced functional immune suppression (8, 10, 26). The possibility of artifactual proteolysis of TCR-associated signaling proteins generated during T cell isolation and analysis was considered because of the observation that when splenic T cells are rigorously purified before detergent solubilization and immune precipitation analysis there is no loss of these proteins (8, 10). In support of this contention is the report that the inclusion of high levels of protease inhibitors during cell lysis resulted in enhanced recovery of TCR{zeta} (11). This issue is particularly acute if the contaminating cell types are macrophages or neutrophils, both of which are abundant in the spleen and primary tumors of tumor-bearing mice and which elaborate powerful protease activities or reactive oxygen intermediates difficult to inhibit (11). Our data substantiate the idea of inadvertent cell contamination as the basis for the conflicting data concerning putative systemic T cell dysfunction in tumor-bearing mice and extend the conclusions to include analysis of several T cell functions both in vivo and in vitro to prove this important point.

Functional impairment of murine systemic T cells resulting from tumor growth has not been observed in our hands. We analyzed several different tumor types, including colon carcinoma, fibrosarcoma, thymoma, melanoma, and spontaneous breast cancer, and found, contrary to our expectation, that purified spleen T cells proliferate better than control T cells. In addition, instead of a functional deficit, T cells are activated in situ as evidenced by the expression of cytokine genes, which is observed at the time of cell isolation without activation in vitro. Furthermore, spleen T cells from tumor-bearing mice can be activated in vitro to produce IL-2 and are therefore not inhibited in cytokine production by tumor growth. Mice that have a modest systemic T cell proliferative deficit (10–20% lower than controls) were observed, but only when tumors were extremely large, so the relevancy to putative tumor-induced down-regulation of antitumor immune response or an analogous situation in human patients is doubtful.

Previous analyses of putative systemic T cell dysfunction were limited to in vitro biochemical experiments and did not address the in vivo function of T cells of tumor-bearing mice as we have (4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 27). Assessment of T cell function in our experiments was made by in vivo assays, including T cell priming to exogenous protein Ag and rejection of allogeneic and syngeneic tumors. These physiological relevant characteristics, considered together with the in vitro analyses (including CD8+ CTL induction), clearly demonstrate that mice bearing sizable tumor burden have normal systemic T cell function in vivo. We have used at least one tumor model used by others (MCA-38) as well as nine other tumors of different histological origin to demonstrate that there is no systemic T cell dysfunction in tumor-bearing mice.

TIL from cancer patients have been reported to have decreased expression of TCR{zeta}, which is suggested to correlate with decreased proliferation and effector phase functions of TIL (28, 29, 30, 31). If decreased TCR{zeta} renders TIL unable to effectively eliminate human tumors because of decreased CTL function, then understanding the biochemical basis for this phenomenon becomes important to develop effective immunotherapeutic strategies for the management of cancer that are dependent upon activation of antitumor T cell immune response (2). TCR{zeta} has been recently shown to be a substrate for cleavage by caspase 3 resultant from activation of Fas, implying a mechanism by which TIL could be rendered dysfunctional by cell-to-cell contact in the tumor microenvironment (32). In this regard, there have been several reports that PBL T cells of patients with certain cancers also have decreased TCR{zeta} levels, implying that systemic T cells are dysfunctional in cancer patients (33, 34, 35). If TCR{zeta} is degraded in TIL by a Fas-dependent mechanism requiring contact with tumor, as suggested by the data presented by Rabinowich et al. (31), how TCR{zeta} in PBL T cells could be degraded is hard to envisage, because this would mean that the whole body complement of T cells would have to have contact with the Fas-activating environment of the tumor. In addition, loss of TCR{zeta} presumably reflects diminished T cell function, but cancer patients do not have loss of T cell functions in vivo (except in very late stages), which would be reflected in enhanced opportunistic infection, which is not seen. Therefore, the issue of biochemical defects in PBL T cells of cancer patients and the relevancy to tumor escape from immune destruction are at present unresolved.

Despite the concerns that our data illustrate in consideration of the influence of tumor growth on systemic T cell function, tumor-induced defective immune response is probably common in the early phase of immune response and is causally related to tumor escape from immune response because of tumor-induced defective T cell function in tumor-specific T cells (2, 3). For example, in recent reports studying human TIL derived from late-stage renal cell carcinoma patients, the Finke laboratory has shown that diminished T cell function in vitro is correlated with defective activation of NF-{kappa}B, which is postulated as the likely basis for diminished antitumor T cell function (36). Those data illustrate a potentially important difference between cancer patients and tumor-bearing mice in terms of tumor-induced effects on systemic T cell function.

In a variety of additional experiments that assessed the function of anti-tumor T cells in murine tumor models in which hosts expressed transgenic TCR specific for tumor Ags, T cells were found to be ineffective in killing tumors, albeit for different reasons depending upon the specific model employed. For example, using adoptive transfer of T cells obtained from a transgenic TCR mouse model, Staveley-O’Carroll et al. (37) showed that systemic Ag-specific T cell anergy is induced in CD4+ T cells in mice bearing early-stage A20 lymphoma modified to express influenza hemagglutinin as tumor Ag, although the biochemical basis underlying the anergic phenotype is still unknown. Ag nonspecific T cell responses were not defective in early-stage tumor-bearing mice. In a different transgenic TCR murine tumor model Prevost-Blondel and colleagues recently showed that B-16 melanoma (modified to express an MHC class I-restricted tumor Ag) grew in mice expressing a transgenic TCR reactive with the tumor Ag. TIL that accumulated in primary tumors were highly lytic for tumor in vitro in 18-h lysis assays, strongly implying that CTL function was inhibited in situ (38). Assessment of perforin-mediated cytolysis was not demonstrated, implying that cytolysis was Fas mediated. Finally, Wick and colleagues showed, using a transgenic TCR mouse model, that antitumor T cells do not accumulate at the site of tumor growth, implying that the tumor microenvironment impedes T cell recruitment, perhaps due to down-regulated inflammatory response at the tumor site (39). Collectively, these data highlight the important influence of the tumor microenvironment in both recruitment of T cells to the site of primary tumor and T cell activation (of both priming and effector phase antitumor T cell functions) and serve to focus our attention on the mechanism(s) by which Ag-specific T cell anergy may be induced in situ.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank John Hirst for performing the flow cytometry analysis and FACS; Dan Levey for critical editorial comments; Alexandra Imbert and Pam Cowin for {Delta}BCM mice; Hans Schreiber, Antoine Menoret, Yang Liu, and Stanislav Vukmanovic for providing several tumor cell lines; and S. Vukmanovic for advice on the redirected CTL assay.


    Footnotes
 
1 Flow cytometric facilities were supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant CA16087 to the Kaplan Cancer Center. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alan B. Frey, Department of Cell Biology, Room MSB 690, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; MEF, murine embryonic fibroblasts; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Back

Received for publication July 30, 1999. Accepted for publication December 13, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Pawelec, G., J. Zeuthen, R. Kiessling. 1997. Escape from host-antitumor immunity. Crit. Rev. Oncogen 8:111.[Medline]
  2. Sogn, J.. 1999. Tumor immunology: the glass is half full. Immunity 9:757.
  3. Finke, J., S. Ferrone, A. B. Frey, A. Mufson, A. Ochoa. 1999. Where have all the T cells gone? Mechanisms of immune evasion by tumors. Immunol. Today 20:158.[Medline]
  4. Loeffler, C. M., M. J. Smyth, D. L. Longo, W. C. Kopp, L. K. Harvey, H. R. Tribble, J. E. Tase, W. J. Urba, A. S. Leonard, H. A. Young, et al 1992. Immunoregulation in cancer-bearing hosts: down-regulation of gene expression and cytotoxic function in CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 149:949.[Abstract]
  5. Mizoguchi, H., J. J. O’Shea, D. L. Longo, C. M. Loeffler, D. W. McVicar, A. C. Ochoa. 1992. Alterations in signal transduction molecules in T lymphocytes from tumor-bearing mice. Science 258:1795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Salvadori, S., B. Gansbacher, K. Zier. 1994. Functional defects are associated with abnormal signal transduction in T cells of mice inoculated with parental but not IL-2 secreting tumor cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 1:165.[Medline]
  7. Otsjui, M., Y. Kimura, T. Aoe, Y. Okamoto, T. Saito. 1996. Oxidative stress by tumor-derived macrophages suppresses the expression of CD3{zeta} chain of TCR complex and antigen specific T-cell responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Levey, D., P. Srivastava. 1995. T cells from late tumor-bearing mice express normal levels of p56lck, p59fyn, ZAP-70 and CD3{zeta} despite suppressed cytolytic activity. J. Exp. Med. 182:1029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Salvadori, S., B. Gansbacher, A. M. Pizzimenti, K. S. Zier. 1994. Abnormal signal transduction by T cells of mice with parental tumors is not seen in mice bearing IL-2-secreting tumors. J Immunol. 153:5176.[Abstract]
  10. Noda, S., T. Narumiya, A. Kosugi, S. Narumiya, C. Ra, H. Fujiwara, T. Hamaoka. 1995. Do structural changes of T cell receptor complex occur in tumor-bearing state?. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 86:383.[Medline]
  11. Franco, J., P. Ghosh, R. Wiltrout, C. Carter, A. Zea, N. Momozaki, A. Ochoa, D. Longo, T. Sayers, K. Komschlies. 1995. Partial degradation of T cell signal transduction molecules by contaminating granulocytes during protein extraction of splenic T cells from tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Res. 55:3840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wang, Q., J. Stanley, S. Kudoh, J. Myles, V. Kolenko, T. Yi, R. Tubbs, R. Bukowski, J. Finke. 1995. T cells infiltrating non-Hodgkin’s B cell lymphomas show altered tyrosine phosphorylation pattern even though T cell receptor/CD3-associated kinases are present. J. Immunol. 155:1382.[Abstract]
  13. Appleman, L., J. Uyeki, A. Frey. 1995. Mouse embryo fibroblasts transformed by activated Ras or dominant-negative p53 express cross-reactive tumor rejection antigens. Int. J. Cancer. 61:887.[Medline]
  14. Appleman, L., 1994. Immune response against embryo fibroblasts transformed by activated Ha-Ras and dominant-negative p53. Doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York, NY.
  15. Radoja, S., and A. B. Frey. 2000. Isolation of T cells from murine tumors by magnetic immunobeading. In Methods in Molecular Medicine. L. M. a. K. Motmans, ed. Humana Press, New York, In press.
  16. Frey, A. B., T. D. Rao. 1999. NKT cell cytokine imbalance in murine diabetes mellitus. Autoimmunity 29:201.[Medline]
  17. Wood, S. C., T. D. Rao, A. B. Frey. 1999. Multidose streptozotocin induction of diabetes in BALB/cBy mice induces a T cell proliferation defect in thymocytes which is reversible by interleukin-4. Cell. Immunol. 192:1.[Medline]
  18. Arsov, I., S. Vukmanovic. 1997. Altered effector responses of H-Y transgenic CD8+ cells. Int. Immunol. 9:1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Mullen, C. A., J. L. Urban, C. Van Waes, D. A. Rowley, H. Schreiber. 1985. Multiple cancers: tumor burden permits the outgrowth of other cancers. J. Exp. Med. 162:1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ward, P. L., H. K. Koeppen, T. Hurteau, D. A. Rowley, H. Schreiber. 1990. Major histocompatibility complex class I and unique antigen expression by murine tumors that escaped from CD8+ T-cell-dependent surveillance. Cancer Res. 50:3851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Appleman, L., A. Frey. 1995. Dominant-negative p53 can restore tumorigenicity of L-929 cells in immunocompetent mice. Int. J. Cancer 63:576.[Medline]
  22. Lopez, C., T. D. Rao, H. Feiner, R. Shapiro, J. Marks, A. B. Frey. 1998. Repression of interleukin-2 mRNA translation in primary human breast carcinoma tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Cell. Immunol. 190:141.[Medline]
  23. North, R.. 1985. Down-regulation of the antitumor immune response. Adv. Cancer Res. 45:1.[Medline]
  24. North, R., A. Digiacom, and E. Dye. 1987. In Tumor Immunology: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, Therapy, Suppression of Antitumor Immunity. Vol. 8. W. Den Otter and E. Ruitenberg, eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 125.
  25. North, R., M. Awwad, P. Dunn. 1989. The immune response to tumors. Transplant. Proc. 21:575.[Medline]
  26. Levey, D., P. Srivastava. 1996. Alterations in T cells of cancer-bearers: whence specificity?. Immunol. Today 17:365.[Medline]
  27. Correa, M. R., A. C. Ochoa, P. Ghosh, H. Mizoguchi, L. Harvey, D. L. Longo. 1997. Sequential development of structural and functional alterations in T cells from tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol. 158:5292.[Abstract]
  28. Finke, J., A. Zea, J. Stanley, D. Longo, H. Mizoguchi, R. Tubbs, R. Wiltrout, J. O’Shea, S. Kudoh, E. Klein, R. Bukowski, et al 1993. Loss of T cell receptor zeta chain and p56lck in T cells infiltrating human renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 53:5613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nakagomi, H., M. Petersson, I. Magnusson, C. Juhlin, M. Matsuda, H. Mellstedt, J. Taupin, E. Vivier, P. Anderson, R. Kiesling. 1993. Decreased expression of the signal-transducing {zeta} chains in tumor-infiltrating t cell and NK cells of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 53:5610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lai, P., H. Rabinowich, P. A. Crowley-Nowick, M. C. Bell, G. Mantovani, T. L. Whiteside. 1996. Alterations in expression and function of signal-transducing proteins in tumor-associated T and natural killer cells in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2:161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rabinowitch, H., M. Banks, T. Reichert, T. Logan, J. Kirkwood, T. Whiteside. 1996. Expression and activity of signaling molecules in T lymphocytes obtained from patients with metastatic melanoma before and after IL-2 therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2:1263.[Abstract]
  32. Gastman, B. R., D. E. Johnson, T. L. Whiteside, H. Rabinowich. 1999. Caspase-mediated degradation of T-cell receptor {zeta}-chain. Cancer Res. 59:1422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Gunji, Y., S. Hori, T. Aoe, T. Asano, T. Ochiai, K. Isono, T. Saito. 1994. High frequency of cancer patients with abnormal assembly of the T cell receptor-CD3 complex in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 85:1189.[Medline]
  34. Matsuda, M., M. Peterssin, R. Lenkei, J.-L. Taupin, I. Magnusson, H. Mellstedt, P. Anderson, R. Kiesling. 1995. Alterations in the signal-transduction molecules of T cells and NK cells in colorectal tumor infiltrating, gut mucosal and peripheral lymphocytes: correlation with the stage of the disease. Cancer Res. 61:767.
  35. Healy, C., J. Simmons, M. Carducci, T. DeWeese, M. Bartowski, K. Tong, W. Bolton. 1998. Impaired expression and function of signal-transducing zeta chains in peripheral T cells and natural killer cells in patients with prostate cancer. Cytometry 32:109.[Medline]
  36. Ling, W., P. Rayman, R. Uzzo, P. Clark, H. J. Kim, R. Tubbs, A. Novick, R. Bukowski, T. Hamilton, J. Finke. 1998. Impaired activation of NF{kappa}B in T cells from a subset of renal cell carcinoma patients is mediated by inhibition of phosphorylation and degradation of the inhibitor, I{kappa}B{alpha}. Blood 92:1334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Staveley-O’Carroll, K., E. Sotomayor, J. Montgomery, I. Borrello, L. Hwang, S. Fein, D. Pardoll, H. Levitsky. 1998. Induction of antigen-specific T cell anergy: an early event in the course of tumor progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Prevost-Blondel, A., C. Zimmermann, C. Stemmer, P. Kulmburg, F. M. Rosenthal, H. Pircher. 1998. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes exhibiting high ex vivo cytolytic activity fail to prevent murine melanoma tumor growth in vivo. J. Immunol. 161:2187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Wick, M., P. Dubey, H. Koeppen, C. Siegel, P. Fields, L. Chen, J. Bluestone. 1997. Antigenic cancer cells grow progressively in immune hosts without evidence for T cell exhaustion or systemic anergy. J. Exp. Med. 186:229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Monu and A. B. Frey
Suppression of Proximal T Cell Receptor Signaling and Lytic Function in CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells
Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11447 - 11454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. J. Stewart and S. I. Abrams
Altered Immune Function during Long-Term Host-Tumor Interactions Can Be Modulated to Retard Autochthonous Neoplastic Growth
J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2851 - 2859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Koneru, N. Monu, D. Schaer, J. Barletta, and A. B. Frey
Defective Adhesion in Tumor Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., May 15, 2006; 176(10): 6103 - 6111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. B. Frey and N. Monu
Effector-phase tolerance: another mechanism of how cancer escapes antitumor immune response
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 79(4): 652 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Kusmartsev and D. I. Gabrilovich
STAT1 Signaling Regulates Tumor-Associated Macrophage-Mediated T Cell Deletion
J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4880 - 4891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Koneru, D. Schaer, N. Monu, A. Ayala, and A. B. Frey
Defective Proximal TCR Signaling Inhibits CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Lytic Function
J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 1830 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Danna, P. Sinha, M. Gilbert, V. K. Clements, B. A. Pulaski, and S. Ostrand-Rosenberg
Surgical Removal of Primary Tumor Reverses Tumor-Induced Immunosuppression Despite the Presence of Metastatic Disease
Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2205 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. M. Prins, F. Incardona, R. Lau, P. Lee, S. Claus, W. Zhang, K. L. Black, and C. J. Wheeler
Characterization of Defective CD4-CD8- T Cells in Murine Tumors Generated Independent of Antigen Specificity
J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1602 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. S. Yang, C. E. Monken, and E. C. Lattime
Intratumoral Vaccination with Vaccinia-Expressed Tumor Antigen and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Overcomes Immunological Ignorance to Tumor Antigen
Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6956 - 6961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Saio, S. Radoja, M. Marino, and A. B. Frey
Tumor-Infiltrating Macrophages Induce Apoptosis in Activated CD8+ T Cells by a Mechanism Requiring Cell Contact and Mediated by Both the Cell-Associated Form of TNF and Nitric Oxide
J. Immunol., November 15, 2001; 167(10): 5583 - 5593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Radoja, M. Saio, and A. B. Frey
CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Are Primed for Fas-Mediated Activation-Induced Cell Death But Are Not Apoptotic In Situ
J. Immunol., May 15, 2001; 166(10): 6074 - 6083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page

Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2000; 37(5): 517 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radoja, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radoja, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, A. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS