|
|
||||||||
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
X174 as a model pathogen. E containing
X174 (bound via an anti-CR1/anti-
X174 HP) were incubated
with P388D1 murine macrophages, and the two cell types were
separated by centrifugation through Ficoll. Both E and macrophages were
then probed and analyzed by RIA or flow cytometry. The results indicate
that all three components of the E-bound IC (
X174, HP, and CR1) were
removed from the E and internalized by the macrophages. We found that
transfer requires the Fc portion of IgG, because little transfer of
X174 occurs when it is bound to E CR1 using a HP containing only Fab
fragments. These findings, taken in the context of other studies,
suggest a general mechanism for the transfer reaction in which Fc
receptors facilitate close juxtaposition of the macrophage to the
E-bound IC which then allows a macrophage-associated protease to cleave
CR1. The released IC are then internalized and processed by the
macrophages. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Use of appropriate specific mAbs to promote immune adherence of
pathogens to primate E would appear to be a reasonable way of
developing an immunological defense against pathogens in the
bloodstream. However, the degree of binding of complement-opsonized IC
to primate E can be highly variable (
20% to >95%), depending on
the efficiency of capture of C3b by the IC (2, 5, 9, 10, 11).
To ensure a high level of binding (>90%) of virtually any target
substrate to E and to develop a potential therapy for infectious
diseases, we have produced bispecific mAb complexes (heteropolymer(s),
HP) consisting of a mAb to CR1 that is chemically cross-linked to a mAb
specific for the target pathogen (12, 13, 14). The fundamental
presumption in this approach is that the anti-CR1 mAb in the HP
will act as a surrogate for C3b; thus, the pathogen should be bound to
E via the HP and then be cleared from the circulation by the same
mechanism that operates during clearance of complement-opsonized and
E-bound IC. We have demonstrated that specific HP promote a high level
of binding of a variety of substrates to primate E. In addition, in
vivo studies in monkey models indicate that prototype pathogens (such
as the bacteriophage
X174) bound to E via the HP construct are also
cleared from the circulation and destroyed in the liver, without loss
of E (15, 16). However, the details of the mechanism by
which these E-bound IC are cleared from the circulation and transferred
to fixed tissue macrophages remain to be delineated
(17).
Therefore, we are developing in vitro systems designed to model the in
vivo IC transfer reaction. In the present studies, we used a mouse
macrophage tumor cell line (P388D1) as the
acceptor cell and E-bound IC prepared with primate E,
X174, and
specific HP. Use of the mouse cell line eliminates the potential
complication of location of primate CR1 on the surface of both the
phagocytic cell and E. Through the use of this in vitro model, we can
demonstrate a loss of
X174, HP, and CR1 from the E (in the absence
of complement) and a gain of all three components by the phagocytic
cell, suggesting that CR1 is removed from the E as a key step in the
transfer reaction. Our findings also indicate that transfer of IC from
E to macrophages requires interaction of the Fc portion of IgG
(contained within the IC) with one or more Fc receptors on the
macrophage surface. In addition, we show that inhibition of the
cytoskeletal rearrangement of the macrophage by blocking actin
polymerization partially blocks IC transfer. Finally, we observe a
similar transfer reaction in experiments in which a human cell line
(U937) (18) is used as the acceptor cell.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purified anti-CR1 mouse mAbs 7G9 (IgG2a), HB8592, and 1B4
(both IgG1) have been described (19, 20, 21, 22). Bacteriophage
X174 was kindly provided by Professor Nino Incardona, and mAbs
specific for
X174 (7B7 and
X51.1) have also been reported
(16). HP were prepared by covalently cross-linking mAb 7G9
or HB8592 with anti-
X174 mAb 7B7 (IgG2a) (anti-CR1 x
anti-
X174: 7G9 x 7B7 and HB8592 x 7B7) via a
thioether bond as described (16, 23). Fab anti-CR1
(7G9) x Fab anti-
X174 (7B7) HP was constructed by Medarex
(Annandale, NJ). MAb 2.4G2, specific for murine Fc
RII/Fc
RIII
(24), was kindly provided by Professor J. Edberg.
Fluorescein-labeled neutralite avidin (FITC-NA) and NA conjugated to
HRP (NA-HRP) were purchased from Southern Biotechnology Associates
(Birmingham, AL). RPMI 1640, FCS, and penicillin/streptomycin were
purchased from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Cytochalasin D,
Triton X-100 (TX100), o-phenylenediamine, and a general
protease inhibitor (P-2714) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Several mAbs and polyclonal Abs as well as
X174 were labeled with
125I or were covalently conjugated with biotin or
FITC as described previously (25, 26, 27).
Cells
E and serum were obtained with informed consent from a variety of human donors, and in one experiment (as noted below) E were also obtained from a cynomolgus monkey. E were stored as 25% dispersions in Alsevers solution. For several experiments, E were 51Cr-labeled with an average of 2500 cpm per 1 x 106 cells (28). The P388D1 murine macrophage cell line (TIB 63) and the U937 human monocytic cell line (CRL 1593) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). P388D1 cells were cultured as adherent monolayers and U937 cells were cultured in suspension in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and were split just before confluency. P388D1 cells were resuspended by vigorous pipetting using cold RPMI media. Preliminary experiments (not shown) confirmed that there was no specific binding of the mouse anti- human CR1 mAbs to the P388D1 cells.
Binding of ICs to E
E were washed three times with PBS containing 1% BSA (BSA-PBS)
and reconstituted to suspensions of 1040%. HP and
X174 were bound
to E by one of two methods. In the first protocol,
X174 was first
added to the E, and after mixing, HP (7G9 x 7B7 or HB8592 x
7B7) was added. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 15 min, washed
three times, and reconstituted to the initial E concentration.
Alternatively, HP were added to the E suspension, and after a 15-min
incubation the E were washed three times, reconstituted, and then mixed
with
X174 followed by an incubation and three washes. During several
experiments, a large quantity of E were opsonized in bulk with HP and
X174 and split into individual samples to minimize differences
between samples. Depending on the design of the experiment, the E were
labeled with 51Cr and/or the
X174 was labeled
with 125I, biotin, or FITC. C3b deposition on E
containing bound HP-
X174 IC was accomplished by incubating the cells
in 40% normal human serum for 15 min at 37°C (29).
IC transfer reaction
E containing bound IC were mixed with P388D1 cells or U937 cells (in RPMI-FCS) at various cellular ratios. The mixed cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1258 x g for 5 min and were then incubated for between 5 min and 2 h at 37°C. Macrophages were then separated from the E by layering the resuspended cell mixture over Ficoll-Paque Plus (P388D1) or 60% Percoll in PBS (both reagents Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) (U937) and centrifuging for 15 min at 1258 x g. After a wash with BSA-PBS, the separated cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C with a labeled Ab or with FITC-NA. During certain experiments, the macrophages were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde posttransfer and then permeabilized for 40 min at room temperature using 0.5% TX100 before the addition of labeled Ab.
Cells were analyzed for loss or gain of IC by RIA or by flow cytometry on a FACSCalibur using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). FCSC beads (Flow Cytometry Standards, San Juan, PR) were used to normalize the log fluorescence (measured by flow cytometry) to mean equivalent soluble fluorochromes (MESF). In preliminary experiments, the FCS was first heat inactivated (to destroy complement) before it was added to the RPMI. This procedure had no effect on the transfer reaction (not shown).
Demonstration of macrophage-associated CR1 by ELISA
Transfer experiments similar to those described above were
performed with the following modifications. Approximately 2 x
107 P388D1 cells were mixed
with 2 x 108 E-HP-
X174 IC or naive E.
The cell mixtures were pelleted and incubated for 1040 min at 37°C.
After separation, residual E were lysed to ensure complete removal of
the E from the macrophages (30): 1.5 ml phosphate-buffered
0.1% NaCl was added to the macrophages, and after 40 s 1.5 ml
phosphate-buffered 1.8% NaCl was added to reequilibrate the cellular
suspension. After centrifugation and one wash with BSA-PBS, the
macrophages were lysed using 0.5% TX100 for 40 min at room temperature
in the presence of a general protease inhibitor mixture. Next, 100 µl
of the lysate were placed into each of four wells of a tissue
culture-treated 96-well flat-bottom plate (Falcon; Becton Dickinson,
Franklin Lanes, NJ) containing anti-CR1 mAbs (either 1B4 or 7G9) as
capture agents. Naive macrophages and macrophages that were reacted
with naive E were also lysed as described. The cell lysates were added
to appropriate wells and incubated overnight at 4°C. After aspiration
of the macrophage lysates, the plate was washed five times with an
automated Titertek microplate washer (Titertek Instruments, Huntsville,
AL) and was subsequently blocked for 15 min at 37°C with sterile
filtered PBS-Tween containing 1% BSA. Then 100 µl of a solution
containing 0.1 µg of a different, biotinylated anti-CR1 mAb
(b-HB8592) were added to each well, and the plate was incubated for
1 h at 37°C. After a wash, 100 µl of NA-HRP/3000 were added to
each well, and the plate was incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After
another wash, the plate was developed for 15 min at room temperature
using an o-phenylenediamine developing solution, and
development was terminated by addition of 50 µl of a 1 M
H2SO4 solution. Absorbance
readings were taken at 492 nm using a Titertek Multiskan Plus
microplate reader.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transfer of the
X174 component of the IC from
51Cr-labeled E to P388D1
cells was investigated by incubating the
51Cr-labeled
E-HP-125I-
X174 IC with macrophages at a
cellular ratio of 10:1. Analysis by RIA (Fig. 1
) demonstrated that those E reacted with
macrophages lost approximately one-half of the bound
125I counts during the 15-min transfer, whereas E
subjected to a mock transfer with media alone lost only 10% of bound
125I counts. In addition, the acceptor
macrophages took up a large fraction of the counts released from the E,
whereas the media from the mock reaction contained few counts. The
absolute number of 125I counts lost from the E
during the transfer reaction were somewhat larger than the number taken
up by the macrophages, and this difference could be caused by losses
due to handling and/or processing and phagocytosis of the IC by the
macrophages (and release of digested material) following the transfer.
In fact,
4,000 counts were released into the media after transfer,
and 25% of the counts were found to be soluble in 5% trichloroacetic
acid. Analysis of 51Cr counts associated with the
E at the beginning and at the end of the reaction (after the E were
reisolated) confirmed that the E were isolated at high yield and intact
after transfer, because 51Cr counts averaged
130,000 ± 2,000 for all samples (transfer, naive E, "mock"
transfer, etc.).
|
X174 in the transfer reaction,
we were interested in determining whether this
X174 was bound
externally or was internalized by the macrophages. Therefore,
additional experiments were performed with both
125I-labeled and unlabeled
X174 in which the
P388D1 cells used in the transfer reaction were
then probed with 125I-labeled mAb
X51.1
(specific for
X174) which does not compete with mAb 7B7 (used in the
HP). The results (Table I
X174 (3537%) than did the E in
the mock samples (712%), and once again macrophages isolated after
the transfer reaction contained a substantial amount of
X174
(2326%), further confirming the findings in the previous experiment.
Moreover, the results of the second probing step (Table II
X174 mAb) bound to the permeabilized compared with the
nonpermeabilized macrophages;
X174 was only located inside those
macrophages that had participated in the transfer reaction.
|
|
X174, was also removed from the 51Cr-labeled E
during the transfer reaction and internalized by the
P388D1 macrophages. After transfer almost
one-half of the HP was removed from the E and approximately
three-fourths of the released counts were associated with the
macrophages (Table III
55% of the HP was removed
from the E, but there was no increase in fluorescent signal (above
background) of the macrophages after transfer (not shown), thus
indicating the HP was not located on the outer surface of the
macrophages.
|
X174 as
well as the HP are removed from the E during the transfer reaction.
However, none of the previous experimental protocols addressed whether
the E cell surface receptor, CR1, is also lost from the E during the
transfer process. Because of the intrinsic low level of CR1 on human E,
we used flow cytometry, which has a higher level of sensitivity
compared with the RIA, to test for CR1 loss. Specific biotinylated
probes (b-7G9, b-Rab@Ms IgG, b-
X51.1) were respectively used to
assay for CR1, HP, and
X174 located on E before and following
transfer to P388D1 cells (or to media, in
controls). The histograms indicate that both
X174 (Fig. 2
|
X174 are all transferred from E to
macrophages, but all three components are located only on the inside of
the acceptor cells.
|
X174, and an
anti-
X174 mAb were bound to human E. After a wash, the E were
either opsonized with complement (by incubation with human serum) and
washed or simply held in buffer on ice, and then both E samples were
incubated with U937 cells. We used flow cytometry to confirm that C3b
was indeed bound to the E that were opsonized with complement (not
shown). In the absence of complement, a large fraction of the
X174
was removed from the E (Fig. 4
|
We next determined whether certain properties of the IC or
macrophages, which when eliminated or blocked, would inhibit transfer
of the IC components. To address the importance of Fc receptors in the
transfer, we first tested whether HP lacking Fc regions could still
facilitate transfer. The results of flow cytometry analyses (Fig. 5
) indicate that when the
X174 was
bound to E via the F(ab')2 HP, there was
apparently no recognition by or transfer to the
P388D1 cells. However, when additional intact IgG
mAb to
X174 (7B7) was added to the E-bound
F(ab')2 HP/
X174 complex and was allowed to
bind to free sites on the
X174, >85% of the IC were stripped from
the E in the presence of macrophages (dark bar on the right side of
Fig. 5
). In the absence of macrophages, there was little, if any, loss
of
X174 for the F(ab')2 HP complex in the
presence or absence of intact mAb 7B7. These results suggest that
macrophage Fc receptors play an important role in transfer. To test
this hypothesis further, we used a mAb, 2.4G2, which is known to
specifically bind to and block mouse Fc
RII/III (24). As
seen in the RIA in Fig. 6
, when a high
input of mAb 2.4G2 was added to the P388D1 cells
(crosshatched bar), transfer was reduced nearly to background levels
(black bar). Macrophage samples that were treated with 20-fold less
blocking mAb were still partially inhibited from facilitating transfer.
These experiments were also performed with
51Cr-labeled E, and once again we found no
evidence for trapping or phagocytosis of the E by the macrophages (not
shown).
|
|
X174 to the E might
influence the transfer process, and whether macrophage membrane
reorganization might play a role in the reaction. FITC-labeled
X174
was bound to human E by two different protocols (see Materials
and Methods). In the first procedure, E were incubated with
saturating levels of HP, and after a wash,
X174 was bound to the
E-HP (Fig. 7
X174 was first mixed with the E, and
then HP was added to give solution phase binding (Fig. 7
X174 mAb (7A4) was added to the E-IC to further opsonize
"free" sites on the E-bound
X174 (Fig. 7
X174 was bound to E after the solution
phase binding protocol (MESF levels average
1300 in B and
D, compared with MESF levels of
2100 in A and
C), the P388D1 cells could remove the
X174 substrate from the E in both cases. Moreover, binding of an
additional mAb to E-bound
X174 facilitated a higher level of
transfer (compare Fig. 7
|
We designed an experiment to learn whether the amount of IC that
can be removed from the surface of the E by macrophages is limited and,
if so, which cell type is restricting. In this paradigm, both cell
types (E and P388D1 cells) were used in two
sequential transfer reactions. The first transfer reaction has already
been described (Tables I and II, RIA), and we have designated the cells
isolated after this reaction as "used." After the first transfer
reaction, an additional transfer was performed by the addition of
another aliquot of fresh E-HP-
X174 to the used macrophages;
similarly, another aliquot of fresh macrophages was added to the used
E. At the start of the experiment and after each reaction, the amount
of 125I associated with each cell type was
determined, and the percentage of transfer is reported. In addition, a
mock transfer was also performed to gauge the amount of IC lost from
the E in the absence of macrophages.
The results in Table IV
demonstrate that
the percent of
X174 removed from the E-IC in the first reaction
(42%) is approximately equal to the percent removed from a fresh set
of E-IC by the "used" macrophages during a second reaction
(3744%), and the percent uptake by the macrophages is also similar
in both reactions (an average of 29.5% compared with an average of
23.5%). These data imply that the amount of transfer that occurs is
not limited by the macrophages, because these cells were able to
facilitate approximately the same level of transfer during both
reactions.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
X174 followed by specific HP, are indeed removed from
the E and cleared to the liver (15). Studies with other
systems in monkey models suggested that loss of CR1 from the E is a key
required step in this reaction (33, 34). We chose to focus
primarily on a mouse macrophage cell line to eliminate the potential
confounding effect of human CR1 located on the acceptor macrophage. We
also conducted experiments using E-IC (±C3b) and U937 cells to
demonstrate transfer to a human cell line. Also, in other experiments
using P388D1 cells, we were able to eliminate any
contributions from complement fragments because there was an identical
amount of IC transfer (not shown) to macrophages in media containing
fresh or heat-inactivated FCS. This system has allowed us to
demonstrate that Fc receptors alone can facilitate transfer.
The experimental data (Figs. 1
and 2
and Tables I to III), which were
obtained in independent flow cytometry and RIA experiments, confirms
the basic tenets of the transfer reaction. E-bound HP and
X174 are
indeed removed from the E and taken up by the macrophages, and the
combination of permeabilization studies and flow cytometric analyses
clearly demonstrates that both of these components are internalized by
the macrophages. Moreover, we find that not only is CR1 removed from
the E during transfer (Fig. 2
C) but also CR1 can indeed be
located within the macrophage fraction (Fig. 3
). CR1 is presumably
still associated with the HP after internalization, because the cognate
mAb used to prepare the HP (7G9) is considerably less effective as
a capture mAb than mAb 1B4, which binds to CR1 at a different site
than 7G9 (Fig. 3
) (19).
Several lines of evidence suggest that Fc receptors on the macrophages
play an important role in transfer of E-bound IC. First, robust
transfer is demonstrable in the absence of complement. In addition, use
of mAb 2.4G2, specific for Fc
RII/III of the mouse (and possibly
capable of engaging Fc
RI as an intact IgG molecule
(35)) leads to almost complete inhibition of transfer
(Fig. 6
). The fact that IC prepared with HP constructed from
F(ab')2 fragments were not transferred unless
whole IgG mAb was added to the system (Fig. 5
) provides further support
for an Fc-mediated reaction. Reorganization of the macrophage membrane
(presumably mediated by cross-linked Fc receptors) appears to play a
role in transfer, because treatment of macrophages with cytochalasin D
(known to inhibit actin polymerization) (31, 32) partially
inhibits removal of IC from the E (Fig. 7
).
In a primate system, complement activation and complement receptors on
the acceptor cell may also participate in the transfer reaction
(2, 3, 5, 6). However, in experiments using U937 cells
(human), we found that opsonization of the E-IC with C3b significantly
blocked transfer of the
X174 (Fig. 4
). This blockade may have
occurred due to masking of the sites on the Fc portion of IgG (by C3b)
which are otherwise recognized by the Fc
receptors. In several in
vivo systems complement activation has been reported to slow the rate
of clearance of IgG-containing IC from the circulation (6, 36). In fact, Brown has also suggested that this effect may be
mediated by C3b blocking of Fc regions (37). Furthermore,
the C3b deposited on the IC may have enhanced binding of the IC to the
E by recruiting additional CR1. This effect would also tend to inhibit
the transfer reaction, as presumably more CR1 molecules would have to
be cleaved to allow release of the IC. In any event, we note that the
E-bound HP/
X174 IC are rapidly cleared from the circulation in
complement-replete monkey models (15, 16); however, we do
not know whether complement affects the rate of clearance. Studies with
monkeys treated with cobra venom factor could address this
question.
The results of the double transfer experiments (Table IV
) suggest that
in the present model system there may be factors that limit the amount
of IC that can be removed from the E. The limiting factors do not
appear to be associated with saturation of the processing capacity of
the acceptor macrophages, because "used" macrophages that were
incubated with fresh E-IC were able to remove as much IC (42%) from
the E-IC as did fresh macrophages. Rather, the results of this
experiment suggest that in the present experimental system not all of
the E-bound IC can be easily removed from the E. The reason for this
phenomenon remains to be elucidated but may be explained as follows.
Recognition of E-bound IC by Fc receptors appears to play a major role
in the transfer reaction, and possibly some of the
X174-IgG HP
complexes are bound to E CR1 under conditions in which the local
density of IgG is too low to allow for recognition by Fc receptors on
the macrophages. That is, the efficiency and rate of the transfer
process may depend on the number of Fc regions in the E-bound IC that
are engaged by receptors on the macrophage. Thus, only those IC with a
sufficiently high local density of IgG in the IC will be easily
transferred. The results of the experiment illustrated in Fig. 7
(C and D) support this interpretation; when
additional anti-
X174 mAb was added to the E-IC (to enhance
IgG-mediated opsonization and Fc recognition), transfer was enhanced.
We note that clearance of model IC from the circulation of animals does
depend on the size of the IC and/or the number of IgG per IC. Larger IC
are cleared more rapidly, and this finding is generally believed to be
related to the efficiency of Fc recognition (7, 38, 39, 40, 41).
The fact that we did not achieve complete transfer of the IC from the E (see above) also suggests that the Fc-mediated process is not 100% efficient in mediating transfer. However, based on our findings we suggest that the transfer reaction can occur as follows. The E-bound IC is recognized and bound by Fc receptors on the acceptor macrophage. Close juxtaposition of the two cells (perhaps partially mediated by Fc receptor movement) leads to cleavage of CR1 by a macrophage protease and results in detachment of the IC from the E. The released IC (containing CR1) would then be phagocytosed by the macrophage (a well-described reaction that requires membrane reorganization), and the E which had "lost" the IC would be spared during the reaction. Direct demonstration after transfer of a residual membrane-associated fragment of CR1 still associated with the E will be required to confirm the hypothesis. There is certainly precedence for such a proteolytic reaction. In fact, a number of membrane-associated proteases located on macrophages and other cells have been described (42, 43). Furthermore, many of these proteases are known to be able to cleave certain membrane-associated proteins, which like CR1 are composed of the short consensus repeat structural motif (44, 45, 46, 47). Finally, studies in monkey models and in humans of the processing of substrates bound to E CR1 in the circulation have suggested that loss and/or proteolysis of CR1 is a key step in the clearance reaction (5, 6, 33, 34). The present series of in vitro investigations provide strong support for this model.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
X174. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ronald P. Taylor, Box 440, Department of Biochemistry, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IC, immune complex; CR1, complement receptor 1; HP, heteropolymer;
X174, bacteriophage
X174; P388D1, mouse macrophage tumor cell line; 2.4G2, mouse mAb specific for Fc
RII/III; NA, neutralite avidin; TX100, Triton X-100; MESF, mean equivalent soluble fluorochromes; Fc
RII/III, Fc receptors. ![]()
Received for publication June 14, 1999. Accepted for publication December 6, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:923.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C. Jacobson and J. H. Weis Comparative Functional Evolution of Human and Mouse CR1 and CR2 J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 2953 - 2959. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Spitalnik Yin and yang in transfusion medicine Blood, August 1, 2005; 106(3): 771 - 772. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Craig, J. N. Waitumbi, and R. P. Taylor Processing of C3b-Opsonized Immune Complexes Bound to Non-Complement Receptor 1 (CR1) Sites on Red Cells: Phagocytosis, Transfer, and Associations with CR1 J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 3059 - 3066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Whipple, R. S. Shanahan, A. H. Ditto, R. P. Taylor, and M. A. Lindorfer Analyses of the In Vivo Trafficking of Stoichiometric Doses of an Anti-Complement Receptor 1/2 Monoclonal Antibody Infused Intravenously in Mice J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2297 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lindorfer, H. B. Jinivizian, P. L. Foley, A. D. Kennedy, M. D. Solga, and R. P. Taylor B Cell Complement Receptor 2 Transfer Reaction J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3671 - 3678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lindorfer, A. Nardin, P. L. Foley, M. D. Solga, A. J. Bankovich, E. N. Martin, A. L. Henderson, C. W. Price, E. Gyimesi, C. P. Wozencraft, et al. Targeting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Bloodstream with Bispecific Monoclonal Antibodies J. Immunol., August 15, 2001; 167(4): 2240 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Hahn, O. G. French, P. Foley, E. N. Martin, and R. P. Taylor Bispecific Monoclonal Antibodies Mediate Binding of Dengue Virus to Erythrocytes in a Monkey Model of Passive Viremia J. Immunol., January 15, 2001; 166(2): 1057 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |