The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsukawa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kunkel, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsukawa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kunkel, S. L.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 1699-1704.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Adenoviral-Mediated Overexpression of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Differentially Alters the Development of Th1 and Th2 Type Responses In Vivo1

Akihiro Matsukawa*, Nicholas W. Lukacs2,*, Theodore J. Standiford, Stephen W. Chensue{dagger} and Steven L. Kunkel*

Departments of Pathology and * Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and {dagger} Department of Pathology, Veterans Administration, Ann Arbor, MI 48109


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The expression of chemokines during an immune response may participate in determining the intensity and type of the developing immune response. In the present study, we have examined the effect of overexpressing monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 at the site of immunization during different stages of Th1- and Th2-type granulomatous responses. The overexpression of MCP-1 by MCP-1 adenovirus during the sensitization phase of the purified protein derivative Th1-type model significantly reduced the elicitation of the granulomatous response. In contrast, the overexpression of MCP-1 during the sensitization phase of the schistosome egg Ag Th2 response led to an enhanced granulomatous reaction. When cytokines were examined upon restimulation of splenocytes ex vivo, an altered cytokine profile was observed, as compared with control mice. IFN-{gamma} and IL-12 were significantly reduced in the purified protein derivative Th1-type response, whereas IL-10 and IL-13 were up-regulated in the schistosome egg Ag Th2-type response. The regulation of the immune response was further examined by using the MCP-1 adenovirus at later time points during the elicitation phase. When MCP-1 was overexpressed during the elicitation phase of the responses, neither the Th1-type nor the Th2-type granuloma was altered. Likewise, the cytokine profiles after restimulation of splenocytes ex vivo were unchanged. Thus, the function of MCP-1 may depend on the stage and type of immune response.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Historically, chemokines have been viewed as leukocyte chemoattractants that regulate cellular movement from circulation into inflamed tissue (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). However, as investigators continue to examine the function of chemokines in both disease and homeostatic circumstances, one finds a complex regulation of function and interaction with multiple cell types. Chemokines have been primarily divided into two main families based on their sequence homology and the position of the first two cysteine residues, C-X-C ({alpha}) and C-C (ß). This group of chemoattractants continues to grow at a staggering pace through broad-based searches for sequence homology in expressed sequence tag (EST) databases. However, as this effort continues, the function of all of these members must be characterized to determine their individual role in the inflamed and noninflamed environment. In addition to the continuously growing family of chemokines, their receptors are only now being identified through the cloning and characterization of numerous "orphan" receptors.

Recent data from a number of laboratories have begun to identify novel mechanisms of immune regulation by CC family chemokines. The recruitment, regulation, and activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes and their cytokine production may be the most critical issue for alteration of immune responses (1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Several studies have begun investigating whether chemokines can direct the immune system toward a specific response. In previous experiments, we have found that monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)3-1 can have a regulatory role on the immune system, both by altering an established immune response and by initiation of oral tolerance (14, 15, 16, 17, 18). In the present study, we have further examined the ability of MCP-1 to alter a purified protein derivative (PPD)-induced Th1-type and a schistosome egg Ag (SEA)-induced Th2-type granulomatous reactions (17, 19) by overexpressing the protein during the afferent vs efferent phase of the immune response. Previous studies have demonstrated that MCP-1 had no apparent effect on the developing lesion during the efferent phase of the response, whereas CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) -/- mice (the MCP-1 receptor) had a significantly altered response during the development of both Th1- and Th2-type lesions (20, 21). The results from the present study lend further evidence that MCP-1 can alter immune responses, depending on the time of MCP-1 transgene expression and the type of response, and appear to regulate or enhance the developing response.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Female CBA/J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were maintained under standard pathogen-free conditions.

Induction of Th1- and Th2-type pulmonary granuloma

Th1- and Th2-type pulmonary granulomas were generated as described elsewhere (17, 19). In brief, mice were immunized i.p. with 20 µg of Mycobacteria bovis (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for Th1-type or 5000 isolated Schistosome mansoni eggs for Th2-type responses. Immunized mice were challenged 10 days later by an i.v. infusion of 5000 Sepharose 4B beads covalently coupled to PPD or 3000 isolated S. mansoni eggs, respectively. Four days after the challenge, the mice were anesthetized and euthanized. The lungs were inflated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and 4-µm-thin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The granuloma lesions (a minimum of 20 lesions) were randomly chosen by a "blinded" observer, and captured with NIH image (a public domain image processing and analysis program for Macintosh). The area was converted from pixels (2) to µm2 by measuring a known area on a hemocytometer grid and expressed as mean granuloma area/lung.

Overxpression of MCP-1 in the development of pulmonary granuloma

To express increased quantities of MCP-1 in vivo, a recombinant adenovirus coding for murine MCP-1 (AdmMCP-1) was employed. The cDNA for murine MCP-1 was inserted into the E1 region of Ad5 containing human CMV immediate early promoter and the SV40 polyadenylation signal. Transfection of this construct in vitro resulted in the production of biologically active MCP-1 into the culture supernatant (data not shown). To determine the immunomodulating capability of MCP-1 in the development of pulmonary granuloma, the mice were treated i.p. with either 5 x 108 or 5 x 109 PFU of AdmMCP-1 at two different phases: sensitization or elicitation phase. For injecting AdmMCP-1 during the sensitization phase, AdmMCP-1 was given i.p. 1 day before sensitization with PPD or S. mansoni eggs. In case of injecting in the elicitation phase, AdmMCP-1 was given i.p. 1 day before Ag challenge. As a control, the same titer of replication-deficient, E1-deleted Ad5 construct was used.

Spleen cell cytokine production

Spleens were collected at the time of lung harvest and dispersed into single-cell suspensions. RBC were lysed with 0.1 N NH4Cl, and the spleen cells were washed three times with RPMI 1640. The cells (1 x 106/ml) were then cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 10 mM glutamine, and antibiotics at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells from PPD-immunized mice or S. mansoni egg-immunized mice were restimulated with 10 µg/ml PPD or 5 µg/ml SEA, respectively. Forty-eight hours later, the culture supernatants were collected, centrifuged, and stored at -20°C for cytokine assay.

Cytokine ELISAs

Immunoreactive murine IFN-{gamma}, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-13 were quantitated using a modification of a double ligand method as described previously (20). Flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc Immuno Plate I 96-F; Nunc, Denmark, The Netherlands) were coated with 50 µl/well of anti-murine Abs (1 µg/ml in 0.6 M NaCl, 0.26 M H3BO4, and 0.08 N NaOH, pH 9.6) for 16 h at 4°C, and then washed with PBS (pH 7.5) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (wash buffer). Plates were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS and incubated for 90 min at 37°C, and rinsed four times with wash buffer. Cell-free culture supernatants (50 µl) were diluted (undiluted and 1:10) and added in duplicate, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed four times, followed by the addition of 50 µl/well of biotinylated anti-murine Abs (3.5 µg/ml in PBS, pH 7.5, containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 2% FCS), and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Plates were washed four times, streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) was added, and the plates were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After washing, chromogen substrate (Bio-Rad) was added and the plates were incubated at room temperature to the desired extinction. The reaction was terminated with 50 µl/well of 3 M H2SO4 solution. Plates were read at 490 nm in an ELISA reader. Standards were #1/2 log dilution of murine recombinant cytokines from 1 pg/ml to 100 ng/ml. This ELISA method consistently detected cytokine levels above 30 pg/ml.

Statistics

Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA with p values <0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Exogenously produced MCP-1 alters granuloma development

In our initial studies, we attempted to alter the development of the PPD-specific immune response by giving recombinant MCP-1 and examining the granuloma response by PPD-bead embolization 10 days later. We found that the presence of exogenously injected MCP-1 (100 ng/mouse i.p.) at the time of Ag sensitization had no effect on the subsequent pulmonary granuloma formation (data not shown). Because Ag sensitization is not necessarily a transient event, we surmised that MCP-1 might need to be produced locally for an extended period of time and not given as a bolus treatment. To accomplish this, a MCP-1 adenovirus vector was utilized. Two different concentrations of the virus were used: 5 x 108 and 5 x 109 PFU. The 5 x 108 PFU treatment induced only small amounts of MCP-1 in the peritoneum by day 1 (<2 ng/ml), whereas the administration of the 5 x 109 dose induced >25 ng/ml when the peritoneal cavity was washed out (Fig. 1Go). A high level of MCP-1 was also found in the serum after the administration of 5 x 109 PFU MCP-1-adenovirus (Fig. 1Go). Increased levels of MCP-1 were only found within the first 24 h and reduced back to background by day 2 postadenovirus injection. MCP-1 or control adenovirus was injected i.p. 24 h before sensitization with PPD. The lower concentration had a small and insignificant effect on the development of subsequent lesions (data not shown), whereas the higher dose significantly decreased the response to the embolized PPD-coated beads (Fig. 2Go). These latter results with the MCP-1 adenovirus may be explained when examining the level of production of MCP-1 as described above.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. MCP-1 protein levels in peritoneum and serum of adenovirus-injected animals. Control or MCP-1 adenovirus (5 x 108 or 5 x 109 PFU) was injected into the peritoneum of normal mice. A total of 1 ml of PBS was used to wash out the peritoneum, and the cell-free supernatant was assayed for MCP-1 production. Control adenovirus-treated animals had no significant increase in MCP-1 production. Data represent means ± SE from four to five mice per group. §, Below detection level.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Overexpression of MCP-1 during antigenic sensitization differentially alters Th1- and Th2-type granulomatous formation. Control or MCP-1 adenovirus (5 x 109 PFU) was injected i.p. 24 h before sensitization with PPD (Th1) or SEA (Th2) Ags. Animals were then rechallenged with either PPD-coated beads or with schistosome eggs, respectively, into the lung via tail vein injections on day 10 of sensitization. On day 14, the lungs were harvested and the granuloma lesions were measured histologically. Two different experiments were conducted, and the data were pooled (total of eight mice per group). The results were very similar in individual experiments. Data represent means ± SE.

 
We next investigated the effect of transient overexpressing MCP-1 in a Th2-type response. In contrast to the Th1-type PPD response, the overexpression of MCP-1 had an enhancing effect on the SEA-mediated Th2 response. When 5 x 109 PFU of MCP-1 adenovirus was given 1 day before sensitization with the SEA, the developing lesions were significantly increased compared with the adenovirus controls (Fig. 2Go). Thus, MCP-1 appeared to have a differential effect on the developing immune responses depending on the type of response elicited. These results demonstrate differential effects of MCP-1 on different types of immune responses.

The morphology of the two types of granulomas were also examined. Histologically, the Th1-type PPD granulomas were noticeably smaller but major changes in the composition of the granulomas were not evident (Fig. 3Go). In contrast, the Th2-type SEA granuloma was not only larger, but also appeared to have significant increases in the number and size of multinucleated giant cells (Fig. 3Go). Thus, it appears that the overexpression of MCP-1 not only altered the magnitude of the responses, decreasing the Th1-induced lesion and increasing the Th2-induced lesion, but also in the case of the Th2 response MCP-1 may have altered the composition of the granuloma.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Histological alteration of Th1- and Th2-type granulomas. The photographs are representative of changes observed in the MCP-1 or control adenovirus-treated animals (5 x 109 PFU). Most notably, MCP-1 adenovirus treatment increased giant cell formation in the SEA lesion. Magnification, x200.

 
MCP-1 overexpression alters cytokine responses

To determine whether alteration in granuloma development was accompanied by changes in cytokine profiles, dispersed spleen cells from immunized and rechallenged mice were cultured and rechallenged with PPD or SEA in vitro, respectively. The cell-free supernatants were then assayed for critical Th1- and/or Th2-type cytokines that have previously been shown to drive the granulomatous lesion development (19). Administration of MCP-1 adenovirus (5 x 109 PFU) significantly decreased Th1-associated cytokines in the PPD-immunized mice and increased Th2-type cytokines in the SEA-immunized mice. Treatment of PPD-immunized mice with the MCP-1 adenovirus significantly lowered IFN-{gamma} as compared with control (Fig. 4Go). The IL-12 level, which was present in control, was not detected after MCP-1 adenovirus treatment (Fig. 4Go). Th2-type cytokines were not detectable in either PPD group (data not shown). In contrast, both IL-10 and IL-13 were significantly increased in the SEA-immunized mice treated with the MCP-1 adenovirus, as compared with the control adenovirus treated group, with no detectable Th1-type cytokines, IFN-{gamma} and IL-12 (Fig. 5Go). These cytokine profiles correlate well with the altered pulmonary granuloma formation observed in both groups of sensitized animals.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Alteration of Th1-associated cytokines in PPD-sensitized mice treated with MCP-1 adenovirus. Splenic lymphocytes from PPD-sensitized mice were rechallenged in vitro with specific Ag (PPD, 10 µg/ml) and 48-h cell-free supernatants were examined for cytokine profiles. Two different experiments were conducted, and the data were pooled (total of eight mice per group). The results were very similar in individual experiments. Data represent mean s± SE. U. D., undetectable.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Up-regulation of Th2-type cytokines in schistosome egg-sensitized mice treated with MCP-1 adenovirus. Splenic lymphocytes from schistosome-sensitized mice were rechallenged in vitro with specific Ag (SEA, 5 µg/ml) and 48-h cell-free supernatants were examined for cytokine profiles. Two different experiments were conducted, and the data were pooled (total of eight mice per group). The results were very similar in individual experiments. Data represent means ± SE.

 
Overexpression of MCP-1 during the efferent phase of granuloma response

We were next interested in examining the ability to alter the pulmonary granuloma responses by overexpressing MCP-1 during the elicitation phase (efferent) by administrating the adenovirus (5 x 109 PFU) i.p. on day 9 after sensitization. PPD-coated beads or schistosome eggs were then injected i.v. on day 10 and granulomas were morphometrically measured on day 14 (4 days after PPD-bead or schistosome egg embolization). The data in Fig. 6Go illustrate that overexpression of MCP-1 during the efferent phase of the Th1- or Th2-type response had no altered effect on granuloma development (Fig. 6Go). Subsequently, when spleen cells were stimulated ex vivo, no alteration of cytokine production was detected (Fig. 7Go). These data suggest that MCP-1 regulation during the efferent phase of the response had no effect on granuloma development and cytokine production. Thus, the stage of the response that MCP-1 was administered during development of the immune responses may determine its function.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Delayed administration of MCP-1 adenovirus during the elicitation phase had no effect on Th1- or Th2- type granulomas. Control or MCP-1 adenovirus (5 x 109 PFU) was injected i.p. on day 9 sensitization with PPD (Th1) or SEA (Th2) Ags. Animals were then rechallenged with either PPD-coated beads or with schistosome eggs, respectively, into the lung via tail vein injections on day 10 of sensitization. On day 14, the lungs were harvested and the granulomas lesions were measured histologically. Two different experiments were conducted, and the data were pooled (total of eight mice per group). The results were very similar in individual experiments. Data represent means ± SE.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Treatment of mice with MCP-1 adenovirus during the elicitation phase had no effect on cytokine production. Splenic lymphocytes from PPD- or SEA-sensitized mice were rechallenged in vitro with specific Ag (PPD, 10 µg/ml, or SEA, 5 µg/ml) and 48-h cell-free supernatants were examined for cytokine profiles. Two different experiments were conducted, and the data were pooled (total of eight mice per group). The results were very similar in individual experiments. Data represent means ± SE.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role of chemokines in immune responses has traditionally been viewed as recruitment factors that regulate the accumulation of cells to the site of the response. Although this function is likely the primary role of these molecules, recent evidence has suggested that these factors also have other functions. Over the past several years, a number of novel CC and CXC chemokine family members have been identified and characterized primarily by their ability to cause movement of particular cell populations during in vitro chemotactic assay. A paucity of data continues to exist for the function of these molecules during in vivo responses. However, several chemokines have been identified that can directly cause activation, degranulation, or regulation of specific cell populations. In particular, CC chemokines appear to have the ability to regulate T cell activation and function during specific immune responses. Original studies demonstrated that RANTES could directly activate T cells in vitro, specifically activating relevant signal transduction pathways (22, 23). Other evidence indicated that CC chemokine family members could enhance adjuvant activity and increase T cell activation and lymphokine production (24). More recent evidence has suggested that MCP-1 specifically enhances the developing immune responses toward a Th2-type reaction by increasing IL-4 production and possibly by decreasing Th1-type cytokines IFN-{gamma} and IL-12 (14, 15). Most convincingly, MCP-1 was found to be involved in the development of oral tolerance through the regulation of IL-12 production in the subsequent responses (16). The data in the present study help to extend these findings by demonstrating that the overexpression of MCP-1 at specific phases of the developing responses appears to differentially alter the outcome of the immune responses. When MCP-1 was introduced at the beginning of the immune response at a time when T lymphocytes would first be in contact with Ag, a decreased immune response was observed with Th1-type granuloma while increasing the Th2-type granuloma. Interestingly, Ab isotypes IgG2a and IgG1 were not altered during these T cell-mediated responses (data not shown). In contrast, when MCP-1 was overexpressed during the efferent phase of the immune response, at a time when the system was already sensitized, no effect on the developing Th1 and Th2 granulomatous response was observed.

The direct role of MCP-1 is unclear in these studies. However, MCP-1 has been shown to promote the activation of several molecules that may participate in altering the immune response. As mentioned above and in these studies, MCP-1 can alter the production of IL-12 and IFN-{gamma} in vivo (16, 17, 25, 26). The direct regulation of IL-12 by MCP-1 has previously been observed using isolated macrophages in vitro (17) and may be the primary mechanism of PPD (Th1) lesion regulation. Alternatively, MCP-1 can induce the production of suppressive cytokines that may directly impact on the production of Th1-type responses. Fibroblast-derived TGF-ß can be induced by MCP-1 activation of structural cells and may contribute to the alteration of responses observed in these studies (27). MCP-1 has also been shown to be a potent inducer of mast cell degranulation in vivo and may alter the response through the release of factors during the developing response (28). Finally, MCP-1 may alter the expression of specific costimulatory molecules during Ag presentation either directly or indirectly by induction of suppressive factors, such as IL-10, which was up-regulated in the Th2-response model. Interestingly, MCP-1-transgenic mice appear to have problems clearing bacterial infections, possibly reflecting an altered ability to generate the proper immune response (18). Likewise, MCP-1-deficient mice appear to have altered development of Th2-type granulomatous responses (29). These previous results would be reflective of the data presented in the present studies. A final possible explanation is that the overexpression of MCP-1 either altered the specific trafficking of cells into their proper compartment for activation or desensitized the cells for specific movement. We attempted to address this by examining the in vitro chemotactic responses of peripheral cells from adenoviral-treated animals and found no difference in movement of cells from MCP-1 compared with control virus-treated animals (data not shown). However, alteration of trafficking may still be a significant event in vivo during these analyses. A number of conflicting studies have suggested that MCP-1 and its receptor CCR2 may be involved in the enhancement of Th1-type responses (30, 31, 32). These data may, in fact, underscore the complexity of the chemokine regulation during development of immune responses.

Altogether, these data further support the contention that chemokines have multiple effects on a developing immune response. The fact that MCP-1, and other chemokines, can influence the direction of an immune response and aid in determining the intensity of the reaction further indicates the complexity and importance of these molecules. Future studies will examine the in vivo mechanism of MCP-1 in the differentiation of the immune response.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants P50HL60289 and HL31237. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nicholas W. Lukacs, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0602. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; PPD, purified protein derivative; SEA, schistosome egg Ag; CCR CC chemokine receptor; AdmMCP-1, adenovirus coding for murine MCP-1. Back

Received for publication September 9, 1999. Accepted for publication November 24, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Moser, B., M. Loetscher, L. Piali, P. Loetscher. 1998. Lymphocyte responses to chemokines. Int. Rev. Immunol. 16:323.[Medline]
  2. Baggiolini, M., B. Dewald, B. Moser. 1997. Human chemokines: an update. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:675.[Medline]
  3. Proost, P., A. Wuyts, J. van Damme. 1996. The role of chemokines in inflammation. Int. J. Clin. Lab. Res. 26:211.[Medline]
  4. Taub, D. D.. 1996. Chemokine-leukocyte interactions: the voodoo that they do so well. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7:355.[Medline]
  5. Wells, T. N., A. E. Proudfoot, and C. A. Power. Chemokine receptors and their role in leukocyte activation. Immunol. Lett. 65:35.
  6. Berkman, N., V. L. Krishnan, T. Gilbey, R. Newton, B. O’Connor, P. J. Barnes, K. F. Chung. 1996. Expression of RANTES mRNA and protein in airways of patients with mild asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 154:1804.[Abstract]
  7. MacLean, J. A., R. Ownbey, A. D. Luster. 1996. T cell-dependent regulation of eotaxin in antigen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia. J. Exp. Med. 184:1461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Herold, K. C., J. Lu, I. Rulifson, V. Vezys, D. Taub, M. J. Grusby, J. A. Bluestone. 1997. Regulation of C-C chemokine production by murine T cells by CD28/B7 costimulation. J. Immunol. 159:4150.[Abstract]
  9. Carr, M. W., R. Alon, T. A. Springer. 1996. The C-C chemokine MCP-1 differentially modulates the avidity of ß1 and ß2 integrins on T lymphocytes. Immunity 4:179.[Medline]
  10. Taub, D. D., P. Proost, W. J. Murphy, M. Anver, D. L. Longo, J. van Damme, J. J. Oppenheim. 1995. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), -2, and -3 are chemotactic for human T lymphocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 95:1370.
  11. Willimann, K., D. F. Legler, M. Loetscher, R. S. Roos, M. B. Delgado, I. Clark-Lewis, M. Baggiolini, B. Moser. 1998. The chemokine SLC is expressed in T cell areas of lymph nodes and mucosal lymphoid tissues and attracts activated T cells via CCR7. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:2025.[Medline]
  12. Sallusto, F., E. Kremmer, B. Palermo, A. Hoy, P. Ponath, S. Qin, R. Forster, M. Lipp, A. Lanzavecchia. 1999. Switch in chemokine receptor expression upon TCR stimulation reveals novel homing potential for recently activated T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:2037.[Medline]
  13. Hayashi, M., Y. Luo, J. Laning, R. M. Strieter, M. E. Dorf. 1995. Production and function of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and other ß-chemokines in murine glial cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 60:143.[Medline]
  14. Karpus, W. J., N. W. Lukacs, K. J. Kennedy, W. S. Smith, S. D. Hurst, T. A. Barrett. 1997. Differential CC chemokine-induced enhancement of T helper cell cytokine production. J. Immunol. 158:4129.[Abstract]
  15. Lukacs, N. W., S. W. Chensue, W. J. Karpus, P. Lincoln, C. Keefer, R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel. 1997. C-C chemokines differentially alter interleukin-4 production from lymphocytes. Am. J. Pathol. 150:1861.[Abstract]
  16. Karpus, W. J., K. J. Kennedy, S. L. Kunkel, N. W. Lukacs. 1998. Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 regulates oral tolerance induction by inhibition of T helper cell 1-related cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 187:733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chensue, S. W., K. S. Warmington, J. H. Ruth, P. S. Sanghi, P. Lincoln, S. L. Kunkel. 1996. Role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in Th1 (mycobacterial) and Th2 (schistosomal) antigen-induced granuloma formation: relationship to local inflammation, Th cell expression, and IL-12 production. J. Immunol. 157:4602.[Abstract]
  18. Rutledge, B. J., H. Rayburn, R. Rosenberg, R. J. North, R. P. Gladue, C. L. Corless, B. J. Rollins. 1995. High level monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in transgenic mice increases their susceptibility to intracellular pathogens. J. Immunol. 155:4838.[Abstract]
  19. Chensue, S. W., K. Warmington, J. H. Ruth, N. Lukacs, S. L. Kunkel. 1997. Mycobacterial and schistosomal antigen-elicited granuloma formation in IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 knockout mice: analysis of local and regional cytokine and chemokine networks. J. Immunol. 159:3565.[Abstract]
  20. Boring, L., J. Gosling, S. W. Chensue, S. L. Kunkel, Jr R. V. Farese, H. E. Broxmeyer, I. F. Charo. 1997. Impaired monocyte migration and reduced type 1 (Th1) cytokine responses in C-C chemokine receptor 2 knockout mice. J. Clin. Invest. 100:2552.[Medline]
  21. Warmington, K. S., L. Boring, J. H. Ruth, J. Sonstein, C. M. Hogaboam, J. L. Curtis, S. L. Kunkel, I. R. Charo, S. W. Chensue. 1999. Effect of C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) knockout on type-2 (schistosomal antigen-elicited) pulmonary granuloma formation: analysis of cellular recruitment and cytokine responses. Am. J. Pathol. 154:1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bacon, K. B., M. C. Szabo, H. Yssel, J. B. Bolen, T. J. Schall. 1996. RANTES induces tyrosine kinase activity of stably complexed p125FAK and ZAP-70 in human T cells. J. Exp. Med. 184:873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bacon, K. B., B. A. Premack, P. Gardner, T. J. Schall. 1995. Activation of dual T cell signaling pathways by the chemokine RANTES. Science 269:1727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Taub, D. D., S. M. Turcovski-Corrales, M. L. Key, D. L. Longo, W. J. Murphy. 1996. Chemokines and T lymphocyte activation. I. ß chemokines costimulate human T lymphocyte activation in vitro. J. Immunol. 156:2095.[Abstract]
  25. Hogaboam, C. M., S. W. Chensue, M. L. Steinhauser, G. B. Huffnagle, N. W. Lukacs, R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel. 1997. Alteration of the cytokine phenotype in an experimental lung granuloma model by inhibiting nitric oxide. J. Immunol. 159:5585.[Abstract]
  26. Zisman, D. A., S. L. Kunkel, R. M. Strieter, W. C. Tsai, K. Bucknell, J. Wilkowski, T. J. Standiford. 1997. MCP-1 protects mice in lethal endotoxemia. J. Clin. Invest. 99:2832.[Medline]
  27. Gharaee-Kermani, M., E. M. Denholm, S. H. Phan. 1996. Costimulation of fibroblast collagen and transforming growth factor ß1 gene expression by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 via specific receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 271:17779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Conti, P., W. Boucher, R. Letourneau, C. Feliciani, M. Reale, R. C. Barbacane, P. Vlagopoulos, G. Bruneau, J. Thibault, T. C. Theoharides. 1995. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 provokes mast cell aggregation and [3H]5HT release. Immunology 86:434.[Medline]
  29. Lu, B., B. J. Rutledge, L. Gu, J. Fiorillo, N. W. Lukacs, S. L. Kunkel, R. North, C. Gerard, B. J. Rollins. 1998. Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 187:601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kim, J. J., L. K. Nottingham, J. I. Sin, A. Tsai, L. Morrison, J. Oh, K. Dang, Y. Hu, K. Kazahaya, M. Bennett, et al 1998. CD8 positive T cells influence antigen-specific immune responses through the expression of chemokines. J. Clin. Invest. 102:1112.[Medline]
  31. Siveke, J. T., A. Hamann. 1998. T helper 1 and T helper 2 cells respond differentially to chemokines. J .Immunol. 160:550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Taub, D. D., T. J. Sayers, C. R. Carter, J. R. Ortaldo. 1995. {alpha} and ß chemokines induce NK cell migration and enhance NK- mediated cytolysis. J. Immunol. 155:3877.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. He, T. R. Schoeb, A. Panoskaltsis-Mortari, K. R. Zinn, R. A. Kesterson, J. Zhang, S. Samuel, M. J. Hicks, M. J. Hickey, and D. C. Bullard
Deficiency of P-Selectin or P-Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 Leads to Accelerated Development of Glomerulonephritis and Increased Expression of CC Chemokine Ligand 2 in Lupus-Prone Mice
J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8748 - 8756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. R. Young, M. T. Borchers, H. L. Allen, R. S. Gibbons, and F. X. McCormack
Lung-Restricted Macrophage Activation in the Pearl Mouse Model of Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome
J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4361 - 4368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. Jakubzick, H. Wen, A. Matsukawa, M. Keller, S. L. Kunkel, and C. M. Hogaboam
Role of CCR4 Ligands, CCL17 and CCL22, During Schistosoma mansoni Egg-Induced Pulmonary Granuloma Formation in Mice
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2004; 165(4): 1211 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
I. Inoshima, K. Kuwano, N. Hamada, N. Hagimoto, M. Yoshimi, T. Maeyama, A. Takeshita, S. Kitamoto, K. Egashira, and N. Hara
Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates pulmonary fibrosis in mice
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): L1038 - L1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. K. Akpek, D. A. Jabs, H. C. Gerard, R. A. Prendergast, A. P. Hudson, B. Lee, and J. A. Whittum-Hudson
Chemokines in Autoimmune Lacrimal Gland Disease in MRL/MpJ Mice
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. W. DePaolo, B. J. Rollins, W. Kuziel, and W. J. Karpus
CC Chemokine Ligand 2 and Its Receptor Regulate Mucosal Production of IL-12 and TGF-{beta} in High Dose Oral Tolerance
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3560 - 3567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. N. Ajuebor, C. M. Hogaboam, T. Le, and M. G. Swain
C-C Chemokine Ligand 2/Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Directly Inhibits NKT Cell IL-4 Production and Is Hepatoprotective in T Cell-Mediated Hepatitis in the Mouse
J. Immunol., May 15, 2003; 170(10): 5252 - 5259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Huang, M. Tani, J. Wang, Y. Han, T. T. He, J. Weaver, I. F. Charo, V. K. Tuohy, B. J. Rollins, and R. M. Ransohoff
Pertussis Toxin-Induced Reversible Encephalopathy Dependent on Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Overexpression in Mice
J. Neurosci., December 15, 2002; 22(24): 10633 - 10642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Lu, Z. Xing, and R. C. Brunham
GM-CSF Transgene-Based Adjuvant Allows the Establishment of Protective Mucosal Immunity Following Vaccination with Inactivated Chlamydia trachomatis
J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6324 - 6331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. Tuaillon, D. F. Shen, R. B. Berger, B. Lu, B. J. Rollins, and C.-C. Chan
MCP-1 Expression in Endotoxin-Induced Uveitis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 1493 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. R. Traynor, A. C. Herring, M. E. Dorf, W. A. Kuziel, G. B. Toews, and G. B. Huffnagle
Differential Roles of CC Chemokine Ligand 2/Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 and CCR2 in the Development of T1 Immunity
J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4659 - 4666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M Heydtmann and D H Adams
Understanding selective trafficking of lymphocyte subsets
Gut, February 1, 2002; 50(2): 150 - 152.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. Darville, C. W. Andrews Jr., J. D. Sikes, P. L. Fraley, L. Braswell, and R. G. Rank
Mouse Strain-Dependent Chemokine Regulation of the Genital Tract T Helper Cell Type 1 Immune Response
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2001; 69(12): 7419 - 7424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. A. Carnevale and M. K. Cathcart
Calcium-Independent Phospholipase A2 Is Required for Human Monocyte Chemotaxis to Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1
J. Immunol., September 15, 2001; 167(6): 3414 - 3421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
D. Huang, J. Wang, P. Kivisakk, B. J. Rollins, and R. M. Ransohoff
Absence of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 in Mice Leads to Decreased Local Macrophage Recruitment and Antigen-Specific T Helper Cell Type 1 Immune Response in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
J. Exp. Med., March 19, 2001; 193(6): 713 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Blease, B. Mehrad, N. W. Lukacs, S. L. Kunkel, T. J. Standiford, and C. M. Hogaboam
Antifungal and Airway Remodeling Roles for Murine Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1/CCL2 During Pulmonary Exposure to Asperigillus fumigatus Conidia
J. Immunol., February 1, 2001; 166(3): 1832 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsukawa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kunkel, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsukawa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kunkel, S. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS