|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

,



,
*
Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany;
Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany;
Department of Medicine IV, Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany;
§
Milan Roche Riserche, Milan, Italy; and
¶
Naturwissenschaftliches und Medizinisches Institut, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TNF-
are crucial for the elimination of both
Chlamydia (9, 10) and Yersinia
(11). The Yersinia heat-shock protein 60 (Ye-hsp60) has attracted increasing attention as an immunodominant Ag for T cells in ReA and other diseases. First, it has recently been found to be the major bacterial component recognized by synovial Th cells in a series of ReA patients (12). Second, nonamers derived from it stimulate synovial CD8+ T cells from patients with Yersinia-ReA in a HLA-B27-restricted way (13). Third, the Ye-hsp60 could be identified in peripheral blood cells of ReA patients years after onset of the arthritis (2). And finally, Ye-hsp60 belongs to the conserved hsp60 family (14) that has repeatedly been incriminated in induction of autoimmunity (15, 16) and in modulation of established inflammatory conditions (17, 18).
The present study was performed to determine the exact specificity and function of CD4+-T cells derived from the joint of a ReA patient in response to the Ye-hsp60. We identified an immunodominant CD4 T cell epitope within the Ye-hsp60 molecule, which was not restricted by a single DR haplotype and which showed plasticity in its capacitiy to elicit cytokines. Therefore, the response to this epitope could play a dominant role in regulating the pathogenesis of ReA.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Synovial fluid from an 18-year-old male patient (HLA phenotype A2, 24; B27, 40; DR6(13), 52; DQ6; DPw1) suffering from ReA after a preceding diarrhea was obtained by arthrocentesis, performed for therapeutic reasons. The Yersinia-based etiology was confirmed by positive standard serology. Separation of synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMC) and lymphocyte proliferation assays were performed as described previously (19). SFMC were then cultured in the presence of Ye-hsp60 (10 µg/ml) for 6 days and cloned by limiting dilution in 20-µl Terasaki plates, at 1 cell/well, in the presence of 100 U/ml rIL-2 (Eurocetus, Frankfurt, Germany), 3 µg/ml PHA (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), and 104 irradiated allogeneic PBMC. Outgrowing T cell clones (TCC) were further expanded as described (12, 20) and then tested for Ag specificity in T cell proliferation assays (19) using irradiated (80 Gy) EBV-transformed autologous B lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) (104 T cells and 104 EBV-B-LCL). In some cases, irradiated (40 Gy) autologous PBMC (2 x 104) were used as APC. The HLA-restriction of the TCCs was determined using anti-DR, anti-DQ, and anti-DP mAbs (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany; each at 2.5 µg/ml).
For further specification of the HLA-DR restriction, PBMC from donors of the following DR haplotypes were used as APC: CL (DR1,-); JB (DR15 (2),-); JS (DR4,-, 53); MN (DR11 (5),-,52); IR (DR7,-, 53).
Recombinant proteins (three fragments spanning the Ye-hsp60, the whole Chlamydia-hsp60 (CT-hsp60), the Borrelia-hsp60 (Bb-hsp60), and the human-hsp60 (hu-hsp60) were tested at a final optimal concentration of 10 µg/ml as previously tested (12). Peptides were tested at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml. For investigation of DR-restricted presentation, irradiated PBMC were first preincubated with the candidate peptide (10 µg/ml) for 2 h, followed by two extensive washing steps, and TCCs were added subsequently. In addition, peptide titration experiments were performed (for details, see Results).
In addition, SFMC from seven other Yersinia-triggered ReA-patients (5 male, 2 female; mean age 25 (range, 1839)) were stimulated with the Yersinia-specific 19-kDa protein (12), the Ye-hsp60, its three recombinant fragments, and overlapping synthetic peptides spanning the complete fragment II at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml over 6 days. Lymphocyte proliferation was measured as previously described (19).
Generation of recombinant proteins
Generation of recombinant Ye-hsp60, CT-hsp60, Bb-hsp60, and hu-hsp60 were prepared as previously (12) described. For the preparation of overlapping recombinant Ye-hsp60 fragments, appropriate parts of the open reading frames were amplified by PCR using the following primers pairs: 5'-GATCG AATTC GCAGC TAAAG ACGTA-3' and 5'-GATCA AGCTT TACAG CTCGT CTTGC AG-3' for Ye-hsp60 amino acids (aa) 1187, 5'-GATCG AATTC CTGCA AGACG AGCTG-3' and 5'-GATCA AGCTT TAAGC GACAC GCTCT TG-3' for Ye-hsp60 aa 182371, and 5'- GATCG AATTC GAGCG TGTCG CTAAA C-3' and 5'-GATCT CTAGA TTACA TCATG CCGCC CATG-3' for Ye-hsp60 aa 367550. The annealing temperature was 60°C, and 30 cycles were performed. The amplified fragments were isolated from agarose gels with a Jet Sorb Kit (Genome, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany) and ligated in frame with the maltose binding protein into the pMal vector (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at the EcoRI/HindIII site or the EcoRI/XbaI site (for Ye-hsp60 aa 367550). Expression of the cloned genes was induced by 1 mM isopropyl- ß-D-thiogalactoside (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and the cells were lysed with a French press. Recombinant proteins were affinity-purified on an amylose resin column according to the suppliers instructions (New England Biolabs). The purified fragments were dialyzed against PBS and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Peptide synthesis
Peptides were synthesized by a robotic multiple peptide synthesizer (Syro; MultiSynTech, Bochum, Germany) using an F-moc/tBu solid-phase synthesis strategy (21). Wang resin (p-benzyloxybenzyl alcohol polystyrene) (Novabiochem, Bad Soden, Germany) was used as solid support. Side chain-protected F-moc amino acids were obtained from Senn Chemicals (Dielsdorf, Switzerland) and Novabiochem. Peptides were characterized by reversed-phase HPLC (M480 pump, UVD-320 S diode-array UV-detector, GINA 160 autosampler; Gynkotek, Germering/Munich, Germany) on Nucleosil C18, 100Å, 5 µm (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and electrospray mass-spectrometry (ESI-Quattro II; Micromass, Altrincham, U.K.).
HLA typing
Conventional HLA typing was performed by standard serological methods. In addition, cells from the ReA patient were HLA typed at the DRB1 loci by PCR using sequence-specific primers.
Cytokine ELISA
Culture supernatants were harvested after 48 h of T cell
stimulation for determination of Ag-induced cytokine secretion, and the
concentration of cytokines in the supernatant was measured as described
previously (5, 22). Briefly, levels of IFN-
, TNF-
,
IL-10, and IL-4 were analyzed by sandwich ELISA using purified
anti-cytokine mAb (capture) and biotinylated anti-cytokine mAbs
(detecting) (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), with a detection level of 6
pg/ml for IL-4 and 20 pg/ml for the other three cytokines.
HLA-DR-restricted T cell epitope prediction
The Ye-hsp60 protein sequence was run on a new T cell epitope prediction program, called TEPITOPE (23, 24). For prediction of HLA-DR binding-peptides derived from the Ye-hsp60 to identify "promiscuous" epitopes, the most frequent HLA-DR-alleles in the Caucasian population (DRB1*0101, DRB1*0301, DRB1*0401, DRB1*0701, DRB1*0801, DRB1*1101 DRB1*1302, and DRB1*1501) were selected, and the prediction threshold was set at 4% (23). Peptide sequences predicted to bind at least three of seven DR molecules were selected.
HLA-DR-peptide binding assays
Peptide binding to detergent-solubilized DR molecules was measured using an ELISA-based high-flux competition assay (25). HLA-DR molecules were isolated from the following human LCLs: DR1 (DRB1*0101) from HOM-2, DR3 (DRB1*0301) from WT49, DR4 (DRB1*0401) from PREISS, DR5 (DRB1*1101) from SWEIG, DR6 (DRB1*1302) from the L cell transfectant L605.2, DR7 (DRB1*0701) from EKR, and DR8 (DRB1*0801) from BM9. DR2 (DRB1*1501) was isolated from the L cell transfectant L466.1. The molecules were affinity purified using the mAb 1-1C4 (26) as described (27).
Peptide competition assays were conducted to measure the ability of unlabeled peptides to compete with a biotinylated indicator peptide for binding to purified DR molecules. The following biotinylated indicator peptides were used: GFKA7 for DR1 and DR7; GIRA2YA4 for DR2; IAYDA5 for DR3; UD4 for DR4 (28); TT830843 for DR5, and GYRA6L for DR8. An optimal concentration of purified DR molecules (30100 ng) was added to each well of a 96-well plate along with biotinylated peptide (0.15 mM) in binding buffer (25). The biotinylated indicator peptide and DR molecules were incubated with 10-fold dilutions (0.001100 mM) of the unlabeled competitor peptide (Ye-hsp60 peptide). Following incubation overnight, the peptide/class II complexes were transferred to wells coated with anti-DR L243 (HB 55; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) mAb. After 2 h incubation at room temperature, the wells were washed with an appropriate buffer (25), and the specific degree of the biotinylated peptide bound to DR molecules was revealed by the addition of alkaline phosphatase-labeled streptavidin and 4-p-nitrophenyl phosphate. The amount of substrate hydrolyzed was assessed with a MC Multiscan ELISA reader (405 nm). To determine relative peptide binding affinity, the "promiscuous" PKYVKQNTLKLAT peptide from influenza hemagglutinin (HA) 307319 (29) was included in each competition assay. The relative binding of the unlabeled competitor peptides were expressed as inhibitory concentrations (IC50).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cloning procedure yielded 61 CD4+-TCCs
specific for Ye-hsp60. All these TCCs responded also to whole
heat-killed Yersinia. Fifty of these TCCs showed specific
proliferation to Ye-hsp60 fragment II, spanning the aa residues
182371, eight were specific for fragment III, spanning the aa
residues 367550, two reacted with fragment II and fragment III, and
one was specific for fragment I, comprising the aa residues 1187
(Fig. 1
).
|
Eighty-nine 18-mer peptides, overlapping by 12 aa and covering the
whole Ye-hsp60, were employed for initial epitope characterization. The
clones responded preferentially to fragment II. Twenty-one of the 50
TCCs specific for fragment II could be grown sufficiently for epitope
analysis. Fifteen of the 21 TCCs proliferated specifically to peptide
p54319336, and the other six of the 21 TCCs
responded to the adjacent peptide p55325342
(Fig. 1
).
Next, truncated peptide variants were constructed to identify the
minimal length recognized. Five of the 15 clones specific for p54 and
one of the six TCCs specific for p55 were characterized as shown in
Table I
. The 12-mer peptide
p54-6b322333 was the minimal epitope common to
all clones responding to p54. Four types of TCCs could then be
identified on the basis of a stepwise truncation of peptide
322336 by 1 aa at the N terminus. The first type (clones 69 and
92) recognized the 10-mer p54-6g322331; the
second type (clones 83 and 85) recognized the 11-mer
p54-6h323333; the third type of clone (clone
98) could be stimulated by p55-8324337; and the
fourth type (clone 39) recognized p55-9325336.
Further truncations of the two latter peptides at the C terminus
were not tested. Stepwise truncations at the C terminus of
p54-6b322333 were of minor relevance and
influenced only proliferation of clone 98.
|
|
Effect of single alanine substitutions within peptide p54-6b322333 on T cell activation
Substitution of single positions by alanine was performed for the
12-mer peptide p54-6b to determine the aa residues that are crucial for
stimulation of the TCCs, as shown in Table I
for the three different
types of TCCs (69/92, 83/85, and 98). Different determinants were
identified. Interestingly, for the second type only two residues
(K327 and D328) of the
10-mer peptide proved essential.
Cross-recognition of other hsp60s and hsp-derived peptides by TCCs
Cross-recognition of the Bb-hsp60, CT-hsp60, and hu-hsp60 by the
TCCs was assessed using whole recombinant proteins as well as
hsp60-derived 24-mer peptides homologous to the Ye-hsp60 epitopes
(Table II
) to circumvent possible "crypticity" of these epitopes.
In the case of the Yersinia peptides p54 and p55,
cross-reactivity was observed only with the homologous Bb-hsp60-derived
24-mer peptide but not with the CT-hsp60 or the hu-hsp60.
Interestingly, the whole Bb-hsp60 was also not recognized. This
indicates that the Borrelia peptide recognized was not
generated under the experimental conditions used, i.e., it behaved as a
"cryptic" epitope. The cross-reactivity was restricted to one
clone, clone 83. Table II
shows the appropriate sequence alignments.
Clone 83 needs only K327 and
D328 for activation. Both aa are indeed shared by
the Borrelia peptide in the appropriate positions. In
contrast, clones 92 and 98 needs several other positions for
activation, which are not shared between the peptide p54-6b and the
Bb-hsp60 peptide.
Surprisingly, the hu-hsp60 peptide and the Chlamydia-hsp60
peptide were not recognized by clone 83 although they either shared the
essential aa residues KD (human peptide) or showed a highly conserved
substitution (D
E; Chlamydia peptide), which should be of
minor relevance (Table II
). This observation could be explained if
T329 was also relevant for T cell recognition but
was overlooked by the alanine substitutions, because the T
A
substitution is a conserved hydrophobic one. In both the
Chlamydia peptide and the human peptide, a nonconserved
substitution (T329
D) is present (hydrophobic
aa
negatively charged aa), whereas a relatively conserved T
N
(hydrophobic aa
small polar aa) substitution present in the
Borrelia peptide might be less important. Extension of the
substitution experiments by introducing a negatively charged amino acid
(aspartic acid (D)) instead of alanine could detect such a potentially
critical aa. In addition, several substitutions of the C-terminal
isoleucines present in the human peptide but not in the
Borrelia peptide might result in a significant decrease of
MHC binding, thus leading to a subsequent failure of T cell
recognition.
There was no cross-reactivity of the fragment III peptide
p76451468 with the corresponding peptides from
the other hsp60s. Although no essential aa residues were determined for
this peptide, the substantial differences in the sequence between the
Ye-hsp60-derived peptide and the corresponding peptide from the
hu-hsp60, the CT-hsp60, or the Bb-hsp60 could easily explain this
failure (Table II
). In contrast, clone 68 specific for the second
fragment III epitope responded both to the whole CT-hsp60 and to its
derived 24-mer peptide. The sequence alignment in Table II
shows a high
degree of homology between the putative core epitope region of the
Yersinia-p76 and the corresponding Chlamydia
peptide in comparison to the borrelial and the human ones.
HLA restriction and "promiscuous" epitope recognition by TCC
We tested the effect of anti-DR-, anti-DP-, and
anti-DQ-specific mAbs on proliferation and cytokine production on
the TCCs. These experiments revealed that HLA-DR was the restricting
class II molecule for all clones investigated. By using APC homozygous
for various DR alleles from donors, effective epitope presentation to
clone 92 could be shown for all DR alleles investigated, i.e., DR1,
DR2, DR4, and/or DR53, DR5, and/or DR52, DR7, and/or DR53. (Fig. 2
). Dose-response experiments identified
autologous APC as the best presenters, particularly in the critical
peptide concentration range between 1 µg/ml and 0.1 µg/ml (data not
shown). In contrast, clone 69 recognized the peptide epitope only in
the context of autologous DR6-positive APC, but not if presented by
DR7,53- and DR4,53-positive APC (DR1-, DR2-, and DR5- positive APC were
not tested) (Fig. 2
).
|
The TEPITOPE program confirmed that peptides from the 24-mer peptide p54/55319342 would bind to DR1, DR3, DR4, DR2b, and DR8 with a threshold of 3% and to DR6 with a 4% threshold and that the homologous peptides derived from the Bb-hsp60, the CT-hsp60, and the hu-hsp60 had no significant affinity to DR6. The same "promiscuous" DR-binding properties were predicted for the truncated epitopes, i.e., the 15-mer p54-6 (RVVINKDTTIIIDGV) and the 12-mer p54-6b (RVVINKDTTIII).
A degenerate MHC binding was also predicted for p76/77451474, with a 1% threshold to DR3, a 2% threshold to DR1 and DR4, a 3% threshold to DR5 and DR6, and a 4% threshold to DR7.
HLA-DR binding assays
The competitive binding assays employing the eight most common DR alleles and the 12-mer epitope p54-6b322333 (RVVINKDTTIII) revealed only moderate binding affinity for the DR6 molecule as well as to DR5 and DR3, compared with the promiscuous reference peptide from HA307319. The IC50 was 30 µM for DR3 and DR6 and 60 µM for DR5. DR7 showed the highest affinity for peptide p54-6b with an IC50 of 6 µM. Therefore, the overall binding affinity of the Ye-hsp60 epitope is 10-fold lower than for the strong binder HA307319. All other DR molecules bound p54-6b with even lower affinity.
There was almost no correlation between the proliferative response to the p54-6b in the context of different DR haplotypes and the peptides affinity to these MHC haplotypes. Interactions within the trimolecular complex (MHC/peptide/TCR) beyond the affinity of MHC peptide alone may be responsible for T cell recognition.
HLA binding assays with the epitopes of hsp60-fragment III (p64 and p76/77) were not performed.
Comparison of the Ye-hsp 60 epitope 322333 with other "promiscuous" epitopes
We compared the predicted HLA-DR binding frame of the
"promiscuous" Ye-hsp60 epitope p54-6b, which consists of the
nonamer VINKDTTII324332, with other microbial
epitopes "promiscuous" for HLA-DR (Table III
). Sequence alignment with these other
T cell epitopes shows that the motif required for binding several DR
molecules has similarities (30, 31, 32, 33). The residues crucial
for DR binding are position 1, 6, and 9. All the epitopes shown here
including the Ye-hsp60324332 contain a
hydrophobic residue (V324 for the Ye-hsp60) at
position 1, a small hydrophobic residue (T329 for
the Ye-hsp60) at position 6, and an aliphatic residue
(I332 for the Ye-hsp60) at position 9.
|
The cytokine profile was determined for clones 69, 92, 83, and 98,
which are all specific for p54-6b, and clone 55, being specific for
p76452468. The data for clone 69 and clone 92
are shown in Fig. 3
, and the data for
clone 55 is shown in Table IV
. IFN-
is
the prominent cytokine and closely reflects the magnitude of
proliferation in response to the particular Ag. TNF-
is frequently
secreted by all clones, except clone 55, in parallel with the level of
activation as measured by proliferation.
|
|
:IL-10 ratios ranging from 10:1 to 5:1,
depending on the stimulating peptide Ag. In contrast, clone 69,
although recognizing the same peptide (Table I
Only 1 clone (clone 55) secreted a reasonable amount of IL-4 together
with IFN-
and IL-10 (Table IV
).
Comparison of the major Ye-hsp60 Th cell epitope 322333 with the CTL epitope
When the sequence of the major CD4 T cell epitope p54-6b, RVVINKDTTIII322333, identified in the present study was compared with the sequence of the recently discovered HLA-B27-restricted CTL epitope, KRVVINKDT321329, which is also derived from the Ye-hsp60 (13), an almost complete overlap could be observed with a difference of only 1 aa at the N-terminal end. It should be emphasized that the T cells used in both investigations were derived from unrelated ReA patients.
Proliferation of other Yersinia-triggered ReA patients to Ye-hsp60-fragment II peptides
We tested SFMC derived from seven other patients for proliferation
to various Yersinia-derived Ags and Ye-hsp60-fragment
II-derived overlapping 18-mer peptides. All patients showed a good
response to whole Yersinia, to the
Yersinia-specific 19-kDa protein (data not shown), to the
complete Ye-hsp60, and to the three overlapping Ye-hsp60 fragments. As
shown in Fig. 4
, the highest stimulation
index (SI) could be seen in response to fragment II in the majority of
patients (four of seven patients). However, we could not detect a
proliferative response to any of the peptides (SI < 2), including
p54/55, except in patient 7. This patient (DR1; DR2), with the highest
SI (72.6) of all patients tested in response to fragment II, showed a
slight proliferation to peptide p41241258
(SI = 6.1).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we provide a detailed analysis of the CD4+ T cell response to the Ye-hsp60 in one patient with ReA. We were able to identify one major epitope. A small antigenic region comprising the 24-aa 319342 present on an Ag 550 aa long elicited the majority of TCCs in our study. This finding suggests that this part of the protein is central for induction of an immune response. We could also show that this peptide is presented by different HLA-DR alleles, underlining its possible importance beyond the single patient described here. This main epitope, in addition to the two others discovered in our study, differ from those identified in a mouse model of Yersinia infection (41), probably because of the interspecies MHC class II binding differences. Epitopes might also differ in acute infections from those in more chronic immune responses, such as in ReA.
In the context of ReA, an obvious question is whether the immune
response to the up-regulated hsp60 is not effective enough for the
elimination of bacteria, leading to bacterial persistence. A Th1
response is crucial for successfully fighting microbes such as
Yersinia and Chlamydia, and their elimination is
inhibited by IL-10 (9, 10, 11). We have previously reported
that a relative high amount of IL-4 and IL-10 and/or a low secretion of
IFN-
and TNF-
occurs in the joint (5, 6) or
peripheral blood (42) of ReA patients, suggesting that
such an ineffective Th1 response contributes to bacterial persistence.
Therefore, the analysis of the cytokine secretion pattern of the TCCs
upon stimulation with the immunodominant epitope was of great
interest.
Among the inhibitory cytokines, IL-10 was secreted in considerable
amount by several clones, while only one IL-4-secreting clone was
identified (Table IV
). Therefore, Ye-hsp60-specific IL-10 secretion
might permit bacterial persistence and could be an explanation for the
up-regulation of Ye-hsp60 in chronic inflammations such as ReA. We did
not find TCCs secreting only IL-10, formerly described as Tr1 clones
(43). However, it can be assumed that IL-10 produced
together with IFN-
and TNF-
acts also as an effective inhibitor
of an antibacterial immune response. One interesting observation should
be emphasized: stimulation of virtually all clones investigated with
the whole Ye-hsp60 protein fragment II182371
except clone 69 gave rise to high levels of IL-10, compared with
stimulation by the short specific peptide epitope (Fig. 3
). These
results demonstrate that Ag-specific T cells with both high and low
IL-10 production are present in the joint. The actual balance of these
two types of cells could ultimately give rise to clearance or
persistence of Yersinia. The relative contribution of these
types of T cells for the in vivo situation has to be addressed in
future studies.
In the context of the Ye-hsp60 T cell response, cross-reactivity has attracted a lot of interest in recent years. The hsp60s are highly conserved throughout evolution with an aa sequence identity of up to 50% between prokaryotic and eukaryotic species (14). The homology among enterobacteria can be as high as 90%. Cross-reactivity between Yersinia and other ReA-associated bacteria such as C. trachomatis might help to explain why such diverse bacteria induce a similar disease. However, in our study no cross-reactivity between the dominant Ye-hsp60 epitope 322333 and the corresponding epitope from the CT-hsp60 was found. The identification of the aa critical for T cell recognition within the 12-mer epitope helps to explain why some hsp60s are recognized but not others. Indeed, the critical residues were not identical on both the Ye-hsp60 and the CT-hsp60. However, these residues were shared by the homologous hsp60 peptide from Borreliaa microbe not associated with ReAwhich was readily recognized by this clone. This epitope was most probably a "cryptic" one, because no T cell activation was seen after stimulation with the whole Bb-hsp60 protein. A T cell response directed to CT-hsp60 has recently been described in a patient with Chlamydia-induced ReA (37). However, epitope analysis of one clone also revealed no cross-reactivity with either the hu-hsp60 or other enterobacterial hsp60s.
We also identified one clone (clone 55) specific for the fragment III
epitope p76451468 that produced a relatively
high amount of the Th2 cytokine IL-4 in addition to IL-10 (Table IV
), a
finding that could be confirmed by intracellular cytokine staining
(data not shown). However, compared with IL-10, IL-4-secreting cells
seemed to represent a minority. The experiments with the single
alanine-substituted peptide variants are too limited to draw final
conclusions regarding the effects of the so called "altered peptide
ligands" to the functional outcome of the clones, a concept that has
been extensively studied in recent years (44, 45).
Substitutions with the tiny hydrophobic alanine, as used in our study,
may result in effects different from those observed after substitution
with positively or negatively charged amino acids. Nonetheless,
substitution of T329 by alanine at position 8
lead to a 50% reduction of the proliferation and to a 80% reduction
in the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines IFN-
and TNF-
,
while only slightly decreasing the secretion of IL-10, resulting in an
markedly reduced IFN-
:IL-10 ratio (Fig. 3
).
A cross-reactive T cell response against bacterial and self-hsp60 has also been implicated in the induction of autoimmunity, as discussed previously (15, 16, 46, 47) and has even been described in Yersinia-induced ReA (48). It has recently been reported that an autoimmune response against self-hsp60 could be induced in mice by simultaneous immunization with both the self-hsp 60 and the CT-hsp60 but not with either of these molecules alone, suggesting that under certain circumstances autoimmunity against self-hsp60 with subsequent immunopathology can indeed occur (49). However, in contrast to animal models the evidence is less convincing in humans (17, 34). Rather, van Eden and colleagues suggest that a cross-reactive T cell response against self-hsp60 might be a relevant mechanism for down-regulating an autoimmune response by release of regulatory cytokines (17, 18, 50, 51). In our study, we could not detect a cross-reaction between human and Ye-hsp60 epitopes. However, in contrast to rheumatoid arthritis or experimental animal models such as adjuvant arthritis (46, 47), immunopathology in ReA is most likely caused by a bacteria-specific immune response and not by autoimmunity. Our results indicate that the T cell response to the hsp60 is flexible enough to react with different cytokine patterns, even without cross-reactivity with the human counterpart.
After we had identified peptide p54322333 as a relevant CD4 T cell epitope in the complete Ye-hsp60 molecule, it was a great surprise that it almost completely overlapped with the Ye-hsp60 nonamer KRVVINKDT321329, which was recently described by us to be an immunodominant HLA-B27-restricted epitope for the cytotoxic CD8+ T cell response in different patients with Yersinia-induced ReA. These findings are in accordance with earlier reports showing that CD4 T cell epitopes are often similar to CD8 epitopes, either covalently linked to or containing the CTL epitope (52, 53). In particular, this apparent overlap of epitopes for both the CD4 and the CD8 T cell responses might indicate a major immunogenic region within the Ye-hsp60 molecule that might have relevance beyond this particular patient.
Although peptide p54/55 could be presented to our T cell clones by different HLA-DR haplotypes, it is not clear whether this epitope is also seen by other patients with Yersinia-triggered ReA. Using whole SFMC instead of T cell lines and clones, lymphocyte proliferation assays were not sensitive enough for epitope mapping as described by others (33). This might be due to the relatively low peptide-specific T cell frequency among bulk SFMC and strengthens the current need for labor-intensive T cell cloning. More sensitive flow cytometric methods as a new technology for T cell epitope mapping (54) circumventing T cell cloning might be helpful in the future.
At present, there is no proof that the immunodominant peptides identified by T cell clones are relevant for the pathogenesis of ReA. Final confirmation would come from preventing or curing the disease using such peptides for vaccination or induction of Ag-specific tolerance. However, for this purpose identification of immunodominant epitopes is a first and essential step.
In summary, we could define a multiclonal and multispecific CD4+ T cell response to a single epitope derived from Ye-hsp60 with no cross-reactivity to CT-hsp60 or hu-hsp60 in a patient with Yersinia-induced ReA. The promiscuity of this peptide indicates that it might also be important for the immune response of individuals with different MHC class II types. IL-10 secretion was prominent, but differed widely, dependent on the clones and the peptides tested. Future studies applying Ag-specific cytokine expression of nonseparated T cells will clarify the relative importance of Ag-specific IL-10 secretion in ReA (55). The cytokine secretion pattern could play a role for bacterial persistence in ReA and could be a target for future T cell manipulation in patients with ReA and related diseases. It is currently a subject of debate whether inflammation in ReA is the consequence of hypersensitivity to bacterial Ag (56), which could therapeutically be down-regulated by Th2 cytokines, or alternatively, the consequence of an ineffective Th1 response necessary for effective elimination of bacteria. Our data favor the latter possibility.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Joachim Sieper, Department of Medicine IVRheumatology, University Hospital/FU Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ReA, reactive arthritis; Ye-hsp60, Yersinia enterocolitica heat shock protein 60; SFMC, synovial fluid mononuclear cells; TCC, T cell clone; LCL, lymphoblastoid cell line; CT-hsp60, Chlamydia trachomatis heat-shock protein 60; Bb-hsp60, Borrelia burgdorferi heat-shock protein 60; hu-hsp60, human heat-shock protein 60; HA, influenza hemagglutinin; SI, stimulation index. ![]()
Received for publication June 7, 1999. Accepted for publication November 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
responses correlate with clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis infection. J. Immunol. 156:4338.[Abstract]
production in NK cells and CD4+ T cells.. J. Immunol. 156:1458.[Abstract]
ß T cells in murine yersiniosis. Infect. Immun. 62:2784.
-mediated persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3998.
-secretion of peripheral blood
mononuclear cells but no other T helper 1 or 2 cytokines correlates
with chronicity in reactive arthritis. Arthritis Rheum.
42:2039.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Giraldo-Vela, R. Rudersdorf, C. Chung, Y. Qi, L. T. Wallace, B. Bimber, G. J. Borchardt, D. L. Fisk, C. E. Glidden, J. T. Loffredo, et al. The Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Alleles Mamu-DRB1*1003 and -DRB1*0306 Are Enriched in a Cohort of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Macaque Elite Controllers J. Virol., January 15, 2008; 82(2): 859 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Cole, N. J. Pumphrey, J. M. Boulter, M. Sami, J. I. Bell, E. Gostick, D. A. Price, G. F. Gao, A. K. Sewell, and B. K. Jakobsen Human TCR-Binding Affinity is Governed by MHC Class Restriction J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5727 - 5734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Bartolome Pacheco, V. M. Martinez-Taboada, R. Blanco, V. Rodriguez-Valverde, J. I. Valle, and M. Lopez-Hoyos Reactive arthritis after BCG immunotherapy: T cell analysis in peripheral blood and synovial fluid Rheumatology, October 1, 2002; 41(10): 1119 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Appel, M Rudwaleit, P Wu, M Grolms, J Sieper, and A Mertz Synovial T cell proliferation to the Yersinia enterocolitica 19 kDa antigen differentiates yersinia triggered reactive arthritis (ReA) from ReA triggered by other enterobacteria Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2002; 61(6): 566 - 567. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |