The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gros, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gros, P.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 1470-1477.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

The Neuronal Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein (Naip) Is Expressed in Macrophages and Is Modulated After Phagocytosis and During Intracellular Infection with Legionella pneumophila1

Eduardo Diez*, Zahra Yaraghi{dagger}, Alex MacKenzie{dagger},{ddagger} and Philippe Gros2,*

* Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; {dagger} Department of Biochemistry and Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; and {ddagger} Apoptogen, Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Legionella pneumophila is an intracellular pathogen that causes Legionnaires’ disease in humans. Inbred mouse strains are uniformly resistant to L. pneumophila infection with the notable exception of A/J, where the chromosome 13 locus Lgn1 renders A/J macrophages permissive to L. pneumophila replication. The mouse Lgn1 region is syntenic with the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) locus on human chromosome 5 and includes several copies of the neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (Naip) gene. We have analyzed a possible link among Lgn1, Naip, and macrophage function. RNA expression studies show that Naip (mostly copy 2) mRNA transcripts are expressed in macrophage-rich tissues, such as spleen, lung, and liver and are abundant in primary macrophages. Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation analyses identify Naip protein expression in mouse macrophages and in macrophage cell lines RAW 264.7 and J774A. Interestingly, macrophages from permissive A/J mice express significantly less Naip protein than their nonpermissive C57BL/6J counterpart. Naip protein expression is increased after phagocytic events. Naip protein levels during infection with either virulent or avirulent strains of L. pneumophila increase during the first 6 h postinfection and remain elevated during the 48-h observation period. This enhanced expression is also observed in macrophages infected with Salmonella typhimurium. Likewise, an increase in Naip protein levels in macrophages is observed 24 h after phagocytosis of Latex beads. The cosegregation of Lgn1 and Naip together with the detected Naip protein expression in host macrophages as well as its modulation after phagocytic events and during intracellular infection make it an attractive candidate for the Lgn1 locus.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
L;-2qegionella pneumophila is a facultative intracellular parasite that in humans can cause an acute form of pneumonia called Legionnaires’ disease (1). L. pneumophila enters macrophages through a unique coiling phagocytosis mechanism (2) and replicates within maturation-defective phagosomes (3), which do not fuse to endosomes or lysosomes (4). These replicative phagosomes are morphologically distinct and are associated with endoplasmic reticulum membranes and dotted with ribosomes (5). Although certain Legionella proteins (dot/icm) have recently been shown to play an important role in the inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion (6, 7, 8), the molecular mechanisms underlying successful intracellular survival and replication of L. pneumophila, in particular the host proteins targeted for inhibition, remain largely unknown.

In contrast to their human and guinea pig counterparts, mouse macrophages are not permissive to L. pneumophila replication even though the bacteria still rapidly inhibit phagosome-lysosome fusion soon after phagocytosis (reviewed in Ref. 9). The A/J strain is an exception, however, as A/J inflammatory peritoneal macrophages are highly permissive to L. pneumophila replication in vitro, resulting in a 1000-fold increase in viable bacteria during a 72-h infection, compared with macrophages from nonpermissive mouse strains such as C57BL/6J, C3H, and DBA/2J (10, 11). The permissiveness of A/J macrophages to L. pneumophila replication provides a unique experimental system to study the parallel human disease (9, 12). Linkage studies have indicated that a single autosomal, recessive gene, designated Lgn1 (11), determines macrophage permissiveness to intracellular replication of L. pneumophila. Lgn1 maps to the distal mouse chromosome 13 (13, 14, 15, 16, 17), within a genetic interval of 0.32 centiMorgan (95% confidence interval), defined distally by the genetic marker D13Die3 and proximally by D13Die6/D13Die26. Physical mapping studies and assembly of a cloned contig of BAC and YAC clones for the region suggest a minimal physical interval for Lgn1 of ~350 kb (15, 16, 17, 18).

The murine chromosome 13 Lgn1 region is syntenic with the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)3 locus on human chromosome 5, which includes the survival motor neuron SMN gene and the neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein NAIP gene (19, 20). There is one functional copy of NAIP in the human genome and approximately two-thirds of type I SMA cases are associated with its homozygous deletion (21). Although it was later shown that the closely linked SMN gene is the SMA-determining gene (22), NAIP remains a strong candidate as a phenotypic modifier of SMN mutations. The NAIP protein has been shown to inhibit apoptosis of neurons and other cell types both in vitro and in vivo (23, 24). In addition, NAIP has been shown to inhibit the proapoptotic cysteine proteases known as caspases; in particular, caspases 3 and 7 have been shown to interact with NAIP (A. MacKenzie, unpublished observations). The mouse Lgn1 locus includes the Smn gene as well as six copies of the Naip gene (Fig. 1Go). Analysis of mouse brain RNA and other tissues has revealed that at least three of the Naip copies (Naip1, Naip2, and Naip3) encode full-length mRNA and possibly functional proteins (25, 26). The tissue- and cell-specific expression of these Naip mRNAs and proteins remain largely unknown.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of the Lgn1 region on distal mouse chromosome 13. Genetic mapping has defined a 0.32-centiMorgan minimal interval for Lgn1 delineated proximally by Dl3Die6 (Die6) and distally by D13Die3 (Die3; 2/1270 recombinations each). Physical mapping has suggested that the size of the Lgn1 locus is between 125–350 kb and contains six copies of the Naip gene (mNaip, shown as squares). Copy 2 is the most closely linked to Smn, followed distally by copy 5 (25 ). Although a preliminary order has been proposed for five of the Naip copies by Scharf et al. in 1996 (16 ), the order of the remaining four Naip copies has not been established with certainty. Smn and M4f5 have recently been segregated from Lgn1 (17 ). The asterisk identifies the Naip2 copy most abundantly expressed in macrophages. The data shown were obtained from maps in the reports by Scharf et al. (16 ), Diez et al. (18 ), Yaraghi et al. (25 ), and Endrizzi et al. (17 ).

 
It has recently been observed that live L. pneumophila induce apoptosis in human macrophages in vitro, whereas heat-killed bacteria or avirulent mutants do not (27, 28, 29). Of particular interest, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that L. pneumophila-induced apoptosis is mediated by activation of caspase 3 (29). These studies have suggested that induction of apoptosis may be an important pathogenicity determinant of L. pneumophila for intracellular survival in host macrophages. These observations together with the genetic and physical colocalization of Naip genes within the minimal interval of Lgn1 and the demonstrated role of Naip proteins in inhibition of apoptosis in neuronal tissues have prompted us to analyze a possible link among Lgn1, Naip protein, and macrophage function.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Inbred mouse strains A/J and C57BL/6J (B6) were initially purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and subsequently maintained as breeding colonies in our laboratories. Maintenance and experimental manipulation of the animals were performed according to the guidelines and regulations of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Isolation of thioglycolate(TGC)-elicited peritoneal macrophages

TGC-elicited inflammatory macrophages were obtained from the peritoneal cavity as previously described (10). Macrophages were elicited by i.p. injection of 1 ml of sterile 3% thioglycolate broth, and peritoneal exudate cells were obtained 72 h later by washing the peritoneal cavity with 10 ml of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Burlington, Canada). The TGC-elicited macrophages (2–3 x 107 cells) were plated in 80-cm2 flasks in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Life Technologies) and incubated for 16 h at 37°C, at which point nonadherent cells were removed by washing with PBS. Cells prepared in this way were used for RNA isolation, protein determination, and bacterial infections.

RNA expression

For Northern blotting experiments, a Clontech mouse multiple tissue poly(A)+ RNA blot (~2 µg/lane) was hybridized with a partial Naip cDNA (clone ms6) (25) from which 3'-untranslated sequences had been removed. Clontech ExpressHyb solutions were used, and the hybridization conditions were as recommended by the supplier. In other experiments total cellular RNA was extracted from normal mouse tissues and cultured cells using 6 M guanidium hydrochloride, and purified by sequential ethanol precipitations and phenol-chloroform extractions. Equal amounts of RNA (10 µg/lane) were separated on a 1% agarose gel containing 0.66 M formaldehyde in MOPS buffer (40 mM morpholinopropanesulfonic acid, 10 mM sodium acetate, and 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.2) and blotted by capillarity onto a nylon membrane (GeneScreen Plus, New England Nuclear) in 10x SSC (1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl/0.015 M sodium citrate). Following transfer, the RNA was cross-linked to the blot by UV irradiation and by baking (2 h, 80°C). The blots were then prehybridized overnight at 65°C in 0.75 M NaCl, 1% SDS, 10% dextran sulfate, and denatured salmon sperm DNA (200 µg/ml). Hybridization was performed for 20 h at 65°C in the same hybridization solution without salmon sperm DNA. The probe used on total RNA blots was a Naip cDNA subfragment (1.1-kb EcoRI fragment encompassing exons 5–10 of Naip2, from {lambda} cDNA clone {lambda}8; see below). Hybridization probes were labeled with [{alpha}-32P]dATP (sp. act., 3000 Ci/mmol; DuPont-NEN, Boston, MA) by the random priming method (13). Blots were washed at a final stringency of 0.5x SSC/0.1% SDS at 65°C for 30 min followed by autoradiography (Kodak Biomax MS film, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) at -80°C with an intensifying screen for 1–8 days. Blots were stripped of probe by incubation in 0.1x SSC/0.1% SDS (90°C, three times for 15 min each time) and rehybridized to an actin cDNA control probe following the same procedure.

For RT-PCR amplification of Naip cDNA sequences, cDNA synthesis and PCR amplification conditions were as previously described (30). Reverse transcriptase-directed first-strand cDNA synthesis was conducted using 2 mg of total cellular RNA, 100 ng of random hexamers, and 200 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). The hexamer/RNA mixture was first incubated for 5 min at 65°C, followed by addition of enzyme and further incubation at 37°C for 90 min. Exon 2 sequences from all Naip transcripts were PCR-amplified using primer pairs corresponding to sequences in exon 2 that are conserved in all Naip isoforms, according to Scharf et al. (16) (exon 2F, 5'-GCTCTAGATCATGGACGCCACAGGAGATG-3'; exon 2R, 5'-CCGCTCGAGATGTCCCATGGGCATAAAATGGC-3'). Exon 4 sequences from all Naip transcripts were PCR-amplified using primer pairs corresponding to sequences in exons 3 and 5 that are conserved in all Naip isoforms (exon 3, 5'-GCTCTAGAGTAAAAGGGACACTGTGCAG-3' and a reverse primer on exon 5 5'-CCGCTCGAGTAATTCTCTTCTGACCCAGG-3'). Amplification products were gel-purified and subcloned in plasmid vector pBluescript, using restriction enzyme sites included in the oligonucleotide primers (underlined). The nucleotide sequence of 20 independent clones from each PCR amplification was determined and used to identify the Naip transcripts expressed in macrophages, using diagnostic sequence polymorphisms in exons 2 and 4 unique to each Naip copy and reported by Scharf et al. (16) and Yaraghi et al. (25).

The presence and identity of Naip mRNA transcripts expressed in macrophages were also investigated by screening a cDNA library. For this, a mouse macrophage cDNA library in bacteriophage vector {lambda}gt11 (oligo(dT)-primed; Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) was screened with a Naip cDNA (ms6 clone, without the 3'-untranslated region) (25). Positive phage clones were plaque-purified, and their inserts were characterized by restriction enzyme digestion, by hybridization to different isoform-specific and nonspecific Naip cDNA probes and ultimately by nucleotide sequencing of cDNA inserts positive for exon 2 or exon 4.

Immunoblotting

Cultured cells and primary macrophages were collected and resuspended in a buffer consisting of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM EGTA, 25% glycerol, and protease inhibitors (2 µg/ml aprotinin, 4 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 100 µg/ml PMSF) (31). Cells were then lysed by sonication (20 s, on ice), and unbroken cells and nuclei were eliminated by centrifugation (5 min, 2000 x g). The protein concentration was measured using a commercial reagent based on BCA staining (Pierce, Rockford, IL), using BSA as an internal standard. For protein extracts from tissues, organs were removed immediately after death, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground to a fine powder using mortar and pestle. The tissue powder was then resuspended in 10 ml/g of tissue of a solution consisting of 0.25 M sucrose and 0.03 M histidine (pH 7.2) supplemented with 2 mM EDTA and protease inhibitors. Tissues were homogenized using a glass potter with a tight-fitting Teflon pestle rotated at 1300 rpm. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 6000 x g for 15 min, and the supernatant corresponding to the soluble fraction was collected. Equal amounts of cellular protein were resolved on SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide gels, followed by electroblotting onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell/Xymotech, Montreal, Canada). The blots were blocked overnight at 4°C in a solution containing 5% nonfat skim milk in 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20. Membranes were then probed with the polyclonal anti-Naip antiserum 1.7 (used at a 1/2000 dilution). This rabbit polyclonal antiserum is directed against a mouse Naip/GST fusion protein containing 1.7 kb (nucleotides 2000–3660) of the Naip1 cDNA from clone ms6 (25). The isoform specificity of the 1.7 antiserum has not yet been characterized, although high sequence conservation among Naip protein isoforms suggests that this antiserum may recognize several Naip isoforms (25). Alternatively, blots were analyzed with an anti-actin polyclonal antiserum (Sigm-Aldrich, Oakville, Ontario, Canada). Specific immune complexes were detected using a second goat anti-rabbit Ab (1/5000 dilution) coupled to peroxidase and were revealed by enhanced chemiluminescence (NEN). The intensity of the luminescent signal on Western blot was quantitated using a biological imaging system (BioImage, Ann Arbor, MI) and was standardized to the same signal obtained on each blot with the anti-actin Ab.

Immunoprecipitation

The TGC-elicited peritoneal macrophages were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine, as we have previously described (31). Briefly, cells were incubated overnight in methionine-free medium (Life Technologies) containing 10% heat-inactivated dialyzed FBS, 5 mM L-glutamine, and [35S]methionine (sp. act., 1000 Ci/mmol; DuPont, Wilmington, DE) at a final concentration of 50 µCi/ml. Labeled cells were washed in cold PBS and lysed in 0.2 ml of 1% SDS/50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, followed by addition of 0.8 ml of 1% Triton X-100, 160 mM NaCl, 0.2% SDS, and 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5. For immunoprecipitation, labeled cell extracts (5–10 x 106 incorporated counts) were incubated for 16 h at 4°C in a 500-µl volume with polyclonal anti-Naip 1.7 antiserum or a rabbit preimmune serum (1/200 dilutions). Immune complexes were recovered by incubation for 2 h at 4°C with 1/1 mixture of protein A-Sepharose:protein G-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), followed by five consecutive washes in a buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.03% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 5 mg/ml BSA and two washes in 150 mM NaCl. The final pellet was incubated at room temperature in Laemmli sample buffer for 10 min. Immune complexes were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel. Fluorography was performed using a commercially available amplifier (Amplify, Amersham) as recommended by the manufacturer. The gel was dried and exposed for 2 wk at -80°C.

Infection of macrophages in vitro

L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 strain (serogroup 1, ATCC 33152, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was used and was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control (Atlanta, GA). The organism was passaged once i.p. in guinea pigs (Harley strain) before it was used in this study. Fresh isolates were obtained from the spleen on day 3 postinoculation and were grown on buffered charcoal yeast extract agar plates, which contained Legionella agar base (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with L-cysteine (0.4 g/L) and ferric pyrophosphate (0.25g/L), followed by further incubation at 37°C for 72 h. The bacteria were harvested by scraping the surface of the agar, resuspended, and stored at -80°C in tryptic soy broth (Difco) supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol until use. In other experiments, an avirulent dotA L. pneumophila mutant was used (provided by Dr. H. A. Shuman, Columbia University, New York, NY). This mutant was propagated under conditions similar to those used for wild-type L. pneumophila. The TGC-elicited peritoneal macrophages were infected with either wild-type or dotA transposon mutant of L. pneumophila at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of two bacteria per macrophage in antibiotic-free medium, according to the protocol described by Yoshida et al. (11). At predetermined times after infection, infected macrophages were washed with PBS and scraped off the tissue culture flask. Macrophages were recovered by centrifugation and lysed, and protein extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

For infection with Salmonella typhimurium, a temperature-sensitive, replication-defective S. typhimurium mutant TS{Delta}27 was used (gift from Dr. A.D. O’Brien, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 29814 U.S.A.). The protocols for propagation of this strain, preparation of the infectious inoculum, and infection of macrophages were as recently described by our group (32), with the following modifications. The inoculum was from a S. typhimurium TS{Delta}27 culture in TSB (OD600, 0.15), and the infection was with a MOI of 10. Phagocytosis was allowed to take place for 90 min at 37°C followed by extensive washing of extracellular bacteria.

For phagocytosis of inert particles, TGC-elicited peritoneal macrophages were fed a meal of latex beads (3 µm in diameter, diluted 1/50 in warm RPMI medium from stock suspension; Sigma, St. Louis MO) for 2 h at 37°C. Macrophages were then washed of nonphagocytosed beads and either harvested immediately or after a further 24 h incubation period as described above.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Naip mRNA expression in macrophages

The Lgn1 gene region on mouse chromosome 13 contains a minimum of six closely homologous copies of the Naip gene (designated copies 1–6; Fig. 1Go) (16, 25).To date, full-length cDNA sequences have been reported for copies 1, 2, and 3 (GenBank accession nos. AF007769, AF102871, and AF135492), while partial sequences of single exons have been reported for additional Naip copies (16, 17, 25, 26). Recent hybridization studies and sequencing of genomic clones suggest that only three of the six Naip gene copies (copies 1, 2, and 3) encode mRNAs that have the 5' sequences required for translation in normal tissues (25).

To examine a possible association between Naip and the Lgn1 locus, we first investigated possible Naip mRNA expression in macrophages, the cell population known to phenotypically express the genetic difference at Lgn1 (18). As isoform-specific Naip hybridization probes have not been described and as full-length sequence data are not yet available for the six Naip loci, hybridization probes that are expected to cross-react with most, if not all, Naip copies were used for this Northern blotting analysis (Fig. 2Go). The two hybridization probes used overlap the BIR domains, which are highly conserved in the sequenced Naip copies (93% identity) (25). The Naip mRNA expression was most abundant in the intestinal tract (Fig. 2GoB). Hybridization of a Northern blot containing poly(A)+ mRNA identified readily detectable Naip expression in macrophage-rich tissues (spleen, lung, and liver), with lower expression in kidney and testis, while expression was below detection levels in brain, heart, and skeletal muscle. Using Northern blots containing total cellular RNA, Naip expression was easily detected in primary, TGC-elicited macrophages (Fig. 2GoB). The Naip mRNA was expressed in macrophage cell lines J774A and RAW264.7 and was also present in two mouse fibroblast cell lines (L and LTA; Fig. 2GoB). Treatment of RAW264.7 macrophages with IFN-{gamma} did not affect Naip mRNA expression levels. Taken together, these results indicate that Naip mRNA is expressed at readily detectable levels in macrophage-rich organs, in elicited (TGC) macrophages, and in two murine macrophage cell lines. In these cells, Naip is detected as a 5- to 5.5-kb hybridizing species, a size compatible with the known full-length sequence of Naip copies 1, 2, and 3 (25, 26, 33). Interestingly, we consistently noted on independent Northern blots a lower level of Naip RNA expression in peritoneal macrophages from A/J mice (Lgns) compared with B6 (Lgnr) mice; this was by a factor of ~2.5-fold (Fig. 2GoB).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Northern blot analysis of Naip mRNA expression. A, A blot containing polyadenylated RNA (2 µg/lane) from different mouse tissues was hybridized to a 32P-labeled Naip cDNA subfragment (Naip1; see Materials and Methods) under high stringency conditions (upper panel). The same blot was rehybridized to an actin cDNA probe (bottom panel). The hybridizing Naip (5 kb) and actin species (2 kb) are identified, and the positions of molecular size markers (in kilobases) is indicated to the left of the blot. B, Total cellular RNA (10 µg/lane) from mouse fibroblast cell lines (L and LTA), from macrophage cell lines RAW 264.7 (treated or not with IFN-{gamma}), and J774 and from spleen, intestine, and TGC-elicited peritoneal macrophages from mouse strains A/J and C57BL/6J (B6) were separated on a denaturing formaldehyde gel and transferred to a hybridization membrane. The blot was then probed with a Naip2 cDNA probe overlapping exon 2 to exon 5 as described in Materials and Methods (top panel). The same blot was then rehybridized to a control actin cDNA probe (bottom panel). The position of molecular size markers (in kilobases) is indicated to the left of the blot.

 
RT-PCR was used to determine which of the Naip copy mRNAs are expressed in macrophages. The following strategy was applied. Macrophage RNA was transcribed into total cDNA using random hexamers and reverse transcriptase. Oligonucleotide primers corresponding to perfectly conserved sequences in Naip copies 1–6 flanking exon 2 and exon 4 were then used to amplify these portions of all Naip transcripts present. These products were eluted from gel as a single band and cloned, and the nucleotide sequences of 20 such clones were determined; previously published copy-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (16, 25) were then used to identify which Naip isoforms are expressed in macrophages. This analysis revealed that 10 of the clones sequenced corresponded to Naip2 (50%), five to Naip1 (25%), and two to Naip3 (10%), with additional single clones corresponding to Naip4, Naip5, and Naip6. We also screened a macrophage cDNA library with a highly conserved Naip hybridization probe and characterized the positive clones by restriction mapping and partial nucleotide sequencing. Using this approach, we also noted that the majority of clones analyzed corresponded to Naip2 (data not shown). Together, these results suggest that although multiple Naip RNA isoforms are expressed by macrophages, Naip2 appears to represent the majority of Naip transcripts produced in these cells. This is in keeping with the tissue expression results of Yaraghi et al. (33) and the cDNA cloning experiments of Huang et al. (26).

Naip protein expression in tissues and macrophages

The Naip protein expression was next analyzed in tissues and cell types positive for Naip mRNA expression. For this, we used a rabbit anti-Naip polyclonal antiserum (antiserum 1.7) directed against a fusion protein consisting of GST fused to a large central portion of the predicted Naip1 protein. The immunoblotting results in Fig. 3Go show that this antiserum detects abundant Naip protein expression in intestinal extracts prepared from either the ileum or the colon (sites of known mRNA expression; Fig. 2Go). The Naip protein is also expressed in soluble tissue extracts from spleen and is enriched in similar extracts from mature macrophages (Fig. 3Go). The immunoreactive Naip species migrates at ~150 kDa, a molecular mass compatible with that expected from the predicted amino acid sequence of Naip cDNAs (33). The relative levels of Naip protein detected in Fig. 3Go by immunoblotting are comparable to the levels of Naip mRNAs detected in the same tissues by Northern blotting (Fig. 2Go, A and B).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Naip protein expression in mouse tissues. Mouse intestinal segments corresponding to the ileum and colon as well as spleen were dissected and homogenized to isolate a total soluble protein fraction. Likewise, TGC-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages were harvested and lysed, and a total soluble protein extract was prepared. Proteins (60 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% acrylamide gel and transferred to a nylon membrane. The immunoblot was incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-Naip antiserum (1.7; used at a 1/2000 dilution) and was revealed by a secondary goat anti-rabbit antiserum. The size of the major immunoreactive band detected (150 kDa) is in agreement with the predicted size of the Naip protein (GenBank accession nos. AF007769, AF102871, and AF135492). The positions of the molecular mass markers are indicated to the left of the blot.

 
The relative expression of Naip protein was compared in peritoneal macrophages from susceptible A/J (Lgns) and resistant B6 (Lgnr) mice (Figs. 4Go-6). Results from immunoblotting experiments showed that A/J macrophages express considerably less Naip protein than their B6 counterparts (Fig. 4GoB). This difference was not due to uneven loading of proteins on the gel, as very similar immunoreactive signals were obtained in these samples with an anti-actin antiserum (Fig. 4GoB, bottom panel). Independently, immunoprecipitation using metabolically labeled macrophage extracts also showed lower Naip protein expression in A/J compared with B6 macrophages (Fig. 4GoA). Thirdly, several 2-fold dilutions of A/J and B6 macrophage extracts (10, 20, and 40 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 5GoA), and the intensity of the immunoreactive band (indexed optical density, IOD) was quantitated using an Imaging station (BioImage). The IOD of the Naip band vs the IOD of actin band was calculated for each sample (Fig. 5GoB) and was used to calculate a relative Naip expression ratio in A/J and B6 populations. A 4-fold difference in Naip protein expression was observed for B6 vs A/J macrophages (six independent experiments; p < 0.01, by Student’s t test). Finally, the reduced levels of Naip protein seen in A/J macrophages compared with B6 cells are in agreement with differences in Naip mRNA expression levels detected for these two populations by Northern blotting (Fig. 2GoB).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Naip protein expression in mouse macrophages. A, Mouse TGC-elicited peritoneal macrophages from A/J and B6 strains were metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine for 16 h in methionine-free medium supplemented with 10% dialyzed FBS, and total cell lysates were prepared in detergent-containing immunoprecipitation buffer (see Materials and Methods). Lysates were precleared by incubation with preimmune rabbit serum, followed by incubation with anti-Naip polyclonal Ab 1.7 (used at a 1/200 dilution). Immune complexes were recovered by incubation with protein A/protein G-Sepharose beads and were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% acrylamide gel, followed by autoradiography. The immunoreactive Naip protein migrates as a single band of apparent molecular mass 150 kDa. B, Total cell lysates from TGC-elicited peritoneal macrophages from A/J and B6 and from macrophage cell lines RAW 264.7 and J774A (60 µg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting as described in Fig. 3Go. The top panel shows the immunoblot probed with the anti-Naip Ab, and the bottom panel shows the same blot probed with an anti-actin Ab. The positions and sizes of protein molecular mass markers are indicated to the left of the blot.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Comparison of Naip protein expression in A/J and B6 macrophages. A, Immunoblotting of 2-fold serial dilutions of soluble protein extracts from A/J and B6 macrophages (10, 20, and 40 µg/lane), using either polyclonal anti-Naip ab (top panel) or anti-actin Ab (bottom panel). Conditions for immunoblotting were described in Fig. 3Go and Materials and Methods. B, The intensities of the immunoreactive Naip and actin signals were quantitated using a Bioimaging station. An IOD value was determined for each lane by calculating the ratios of the Naip to actin signals. Results from six independent experiments were pooled and used to calculate an average of the relative Naip expression value for B6 compared with A/J macrophages (set at 1). The mean and SE are shown for B6, indicating that Naip protein levels are significantly higher in B6 than in A/J macrophages (by Student’s t test, p < 0.01).

 
Together, these results indicate that Naip is expressed at significant levels in mouse macrophages and macrophage cell lines. Interestingly, macrophages from susceptible A/J mice express less Naip protein than their resistant B6 counterpart.

Modulation of Naip protein expression in macrophages

The level of Naip protein expression was monitored in macrophages after phagocytic events and during infection with intracellular parasites. In the first experiment, macrophages from A/J and B6 mice were infected in vitro with a wild-type strain of L. pneumophila (MOI of 2) for 2 h at 37°C. Following extensive washing, cells were harvested at predetermined time points, and soluble protein extracts were prepared and analyzed for Naip protein expression by Western blotting. A representative experiment is shown in Fig. 6Go, but similar results were obtained in four independent experiments. During L. pneumophila infection, Naip protein expression was increased, with a progressive increase during the first 6–12 h, at which point it peaked and remained constant over the 48-h observation period. A maximum induction of 4.5- to 5-fold was seen in B6 macrophages, as quantitated by imaging and comparison to control immunoreactive signals obtained for actin. The induction was specifically due to L. pneumophila infection, because this increased Naip expression was not seen in control, noninfected cultures similarly incubated for 48 h. Finally, although the absolute level of Naip expression was lower in A/J than in B6 macrophages at all time points, we noted a comparable induction of Naip expression in A/J macrophages. These results indicate that Naip protein expression in macrophages is increased following L. pneumophila infection. To determine whether this modulation of Naip expression was an active process mediated by live, intracellular, and replicating L. pneumophila cells, similar experiments were performed with an avirulent dotA L. pneumophila mutant that does not inhibit phagosome maturation and thus does not replicate intracellularly (34). The results shown in Fig. 7GoA show that Naip protein expression was also up-regulated in B6 macrophages after infection with the avirulent dotA mutant by a factor of ~4-fold. These results suggest that increased Naip expression in macrophages is not in response to active intracellular replication of L. pneumophila.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Naip protein expression in A/J and B6 macrophages during infection with L. pneumophila. Peritoneal macrophages from A/J and B6 mice were infected with L. pneumophila Philadelphia 1 with an MOI of two bacteria per cell (see Materials and Methods). At 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postinfection, protein extracts were prepared, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting for Naip protein expression (top panel). The relative Naip expression level was calculated as described in Fig. 5Go, using actin as an internal standard (bottom panel). The relative expression is further expressed as the increase above the Naip expression level (±SE) measured in A/J macrophages at the zero time point, before infection. These data represent four independent experiments. Statistically significant differences are indicated: {dagger}, p < 0.001 vs uninfected macrophages of the same strain.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Naip protein expression after infection with avirulent bacteria and after phagocytosis of inert particles. A, Peritoneal macrophages from B6 mice were infected with either a temperature-sensitive replication defective mutant of S. typhimurium (TS{Delta}27) or an avirulent dotA mutant of L. pneumophila, as described in Materials and Methods. Twenty-four hours after infection, cell extracts were prepared, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed for Naip (top panel) and actin (middle panel) protein expression by immunoblotting. The relative Naip expression was quantitated as described in Fig. 5Go, using the actin signal as an internal standard, and this is shown in the bottom panel. The Naip expression levels are expressed as a mean compiled from two independent experiments ± SE. The asterisk denotes a statistically significant increase (p < 0.001) over levels in uninfected macrophages. B, Peritoneal macrophages from B6 mice were fed a meal of Latex beads for 2 h at 37°C, and protein extracts were prepared at that point or after washing the cells and further incubation for 24 h. The results are presented as described in A.

 
Additional experiments were conducted to determine whether enhanced Naip expression during L. pneumophila infection was specific to this bacterium or was also seen with another unrelated intracellular parasite, S. typhimurium. As S. typhimurium causes a severe destructive infection in primary macrophages from B6 mice, it was not possible to assess the effect of wild-type S. typhimurium infection on protein expression at 24 or 48 h. Thus, for these experiments we used a temperature-sensitive, replication-defective mutant of S. typhimurium (TS{Delta}27) that does not replicate in primary macrophages or macrophage cell lines at 37°C (32). Twenty-four hours after infection of B6 macrophages with the TS{Delta}27 mutant, Naip induction was readily detected in these cells, and after normalizing to actin expression level, this induction was ~3-fold (Fig. 7GoA). Finally, we also tried to determine whether increased Naip expression detected during S. typhimurium and L. pneumophila infection was specific to intracellular bacteria or whether it may be part of a more general macrophage response to phagocytic events. Thus, B6 macrophages were fed a meal of inert Latex beads, and the level of Naip expression was monitored at 0 and 24 h postphagocytosis (Fig. 7GoB). We noted little if any Naip induction immediately following phagocytosis, while increased expression was detected after 24 h (Fig. 7GoB) by a factor of ~3-fold.

Together, these results indicate that Naip protein expression can be further increased in macrophages in response to ingestion of live bacteria or inert particles.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Apoptosis of phagocytes in response to intracellular infection has been described for a number of pathogens (35). Apoptosis of infected macrophages may be an advantageous strategy for a multicellular host, where this would have a net effect of limiting infection; on the other hand, from the parasite’s perspective, host cell death may be required to release intracellular organisms. Thus, a number of intracellular pathogens have developed intracellular survival strategies that are based on activation (Shigella flexneri) or inhibition (Chlamydia trachomatis, Rickettsia rickettsii) of host macrophage apoptotic responses (35, 36). Successful intracellular survival and replication of L. pneumophila also appear to involve modulation of host macrophage apoptosis. L. pneumophila induces apoptosis during infection of permissive, HL-60-derived human macrophages (27), but also in the human macrophage line U937 and the alveolar epithelial cell line WI-26 (28). L. pneumophila-induced apoptosis occurs within 1–2 h of infection, can take place in the absence of intracellular replication, and can also be induced by extracellular bacteria. Induction of apoptosis in L. pneumophila-infected macrophages is mediated by activation of the caspase pathway (28) and does not require a functional TNF-{alpha} pathway (37). Induction of apoptosis by L. pneumophila is through the activation of caspase 3, which is detectable 2 h after infection and is maximal at 3 h (9-fold increase in activity) (29). Avirulent L. pneumophila mutants cannot induce either apoptosis or caspase 3 activation. Specific inhibition of caspase 3 activity can block both L. pneumophila-induced apoptosis and cytopathogenicity (29). Whether the nonpermissive nature of mouse macrophages (vs human cells) to L. pneumophila infection is linked to resistance of murine cells to L. pneumophila-induced apoptosis is currently not known. Likewise, it remains to be determined whether the differential response of susceptible A/J and resistant B6 macrophages to L. pneumophila infection involves different macrophage apoptotic responses in these two strains.

We have used a positional cloning approach to clone the Lgn1 locus on mouse chromosome 13. Combined genetic and physical mapping studies by us (14, 18, 33) and others (15, 16, 17) have narrowed the interval for Lgn1 to a chromosome segment that includes up to six copies of the Naip gene (Fig. 1Go). Naip is a very interesting candidate for Lgn1 for the following reasons. 1) The Naip gene cluster does not recombine with Lgn1; 2) infection and replication of L. pneumophila in permissive human cells are associated with activation of caspase 3 (29) and induction of apoptosis (27, 28); 3) Naip protein expression prevents apoptosis in a number of cell types (23, 24); and 4) we have shown NAIP to be a potent inhibitor of apoptosis largely and possibly exclusively through the direct inhibition of caspase 3 with an IC50 in the range of 20 nM (A. Mackenzie et al., unpublished observations). Thus, we have studied the possible expression of Naip mRNA and protein in macrophages.

In the current study we have shown that Naip mRNA is indeed expressed in macrophage-rich tissues, in particular in primary macrophages derived from them as well as in macrophage cell lines. Screening of a macrophage cDNA library with a Naip cDNA probe suggests a frequency of 0.03% of total cellular mRNA (data not shown), suggesting that Naip mRNA is actually quite abundant in macrophages. Results from RT-PCR studies, nucleotide sequencing, and cDNA cloning from macrophages indicate that Naip2 is the most abundantly expressed Naip copy (>50%) followed by Naip1. These results are in agreement with recent tissue expression studies of the mouse Naip isoforms in normal tissues and macrophages (26, 33). Using a polyclonal anti-Naip antiserum, we show that Naip protein is expressed in macrophages ( Figs. 3–7GoGoGoGoGo), the cell population phenotypically expressing the genetic difference at Lgn1, strengthening the candidacy of Naip for Lgn1. In addition, we have observed that Naip protein expression in macrophages can be further up-regulated during a 48-h infection with L. pneumophila (Fig. 6Go) at low MOI. This induction of Naip expression does not require intracellular bacterial replication, because it still occurs when an avirulent dotA L. pneumophila mutant or an unrelated replication-defective S. typhimurium mutant is used for infection (Fig. 7Go). Interestingly, this Naip protein induction is also seen 24 h after phagocytosis of inert Latex particles by macrophages. Should Naip also act as an inhibitor of apoptosis in macrophages, then this response may increase the lifespan of macrophages, possibly enhancing their net antimicrobial activity. Thus, the genetic mapping data, the known function of Naip, and the role proposed for apoptosis in L. pneumophila infection together with the expression of Naip protein detected in cells phenotypically expressing the genetic difference at Lgn1 and the modulation of Naip protein expression observed in macrophages during phagocytosis of inert particles or live bacteria combine to make Naip an attractive candidate for Lgn1. In such a model, successful infection of macrophages by L. pneumophila is dependent on the induction of apoptosis. In mouse macrophages, constitutive or inducible Naip expression may play a protective role by preventing induction of apoptosis. This Naip-mediated inhibition of L. pneumophila replication would be lost in A/J cells by a loss-of-function mutation.

Southern blotting analyses of genomic DNA and RT-PCR analysis of Naip transcripts from A/J and B6 macrophages failed to detect a major genomic deletion of part of the Naip cluster in A/J mice that would result in the absence of expression of individual Naip copies. We did detect a small, but reproducible, 2- to 3-fold reduction in Naip mRNA levels in A/J compared with B6 macrophages. It is difficult to conclude with certainty that this difference is due to reduced expression of a specific Naip copy in A/J as opposed to lower transcription of the whole locus. The levels of constitutive and inducible Naip protein expression were also analyzed in A/J (Lgn1s) and B6 (Lgn1r) macrophages. It was consistently observed that both constitutive and inducible Naip protein expression levels were reduced by at least 4-fold in macrophages from A/J vs B6 mice (Figs. 5Go and 6Go). The reduced protein expression in A/J macrophages may be a result of decreased protein expression of a single or multiple Naip isoforms in A/J macrophages compared with B6. This reduced Naip expression may result in enhanced ability of L. pneumophila to induce apoptosis (activation of caspase 3) and thus increased permissiveness to infection. Additional experiments are required to resolve this issue.

In conclusion, the expression of Naip protein in macrophages, both at rest and after phagocytosis, reported in this study suggests that Naip may play a key role in macrophage function, possibly by contributing to the apoptotic response of these cells. The possible participation of Naip in this process opens a new window for understanding the regulation of the apoptotic response in macrophages. These results also make the Naip cluster an attractive candidate for the host resistance locus Lgn1. A formal demonstration of this point awaits the creation of mouse mutant strains bearing loss- or gain-of-function mutations at this locus.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mr. G. Govoni and Dr. F. Canonne-Hergaux for their help in RNA and protein purification from tissues, respectively. We also thank Dr. D. Malo and L. Laroche for their assistance in performing L. pneumophila infections. The dotA L. pneumophila mutant used in this study was a kind gift from Dr. H. A. Shuman (Columbia University, New York, NY).


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants (to P.G.) from the Network of Centers of Excellence (Canadian Genetic Diseases Network). P.G. is supported by a Senior Scientist award, and E.D. is supported by a studentship from the Medical Research Council of Canada. P.G. is an International Research Scholar of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philippe Gros, Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada H3G 1Y6. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: SMA, spinal muscular atrophy; BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome; BIR, baculovirus inhibition of apoptosis protein repeat; IOD, indexed optical density; MOI, multiplicity of infection; NAIP, neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein; SMN, survival motor neuron; TGC, thioglycolate; YAC, yeast artificial chromosome. Back

Received for publication August 13, 1999. Accepted for publication November 16, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. The Laboratory Investigation Team., , J. E. McDade, C. C. Shepard, D. W. Fraser, T. R. Tsai, M. A. Redus, W. R. Dowdle. 1977. Legionnaires’ disease: isolation of a bacterium and demonstration of its role in other respiratory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 297:1197.[Abstract]
  2. Horwitz, M. A.. 1984. Phagocytosis of the Legionnaires’ disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) occurs by a novel mechanism: engulfment within a pseudopod coil. Cell 36:27.[Medline]
  3. Horwitz, M. A., S. C. Silverstein. 1980. The Legionnaires’ disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila) multiplies intracellularly in human monocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 66:441.
  4. Horwitz, M. A.. 1987. Characterization of avirulent mutant Legionella pneumophila that survive but do not multiply within human monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 166:1310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Swanson, M. S., R. R. Isberg. 1995. Association of Legionella pneumophila with the macrophage endoplasmic reticulum. Infect. Immun. 65:3609.
  6. Segal, G., H. A. Shuman. 1997. Characterization of a new region required for macrophage killing by Legionella pneumophila. Infect. Immun. 65:5057.[Abstract]
  7. Segal, G., M. Purcell, H. A. Shuman. 1998. Host cell killing and bacterial conjugation require overlapping sets of genes within a 22-kb region of the Legionella pneumophila genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vogel, J. P., H. L. Andrews, S. K. Wong, R. R. Isberg. 1998. Conjugative transfer by the virulence system of Legionella pneumophila. Science 279:873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yamamoto, Y., T. W. Klein, H. Friedman. 1994. Legionella and macrophages. Immunol. Ser. 60:329.[Medline]
  10. Yamamoto, Y., T. W. Klein, C. A. Newton, R. Widen, H. Friedman. 1988. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages from A/J mice. Infect. Immun. 56:370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yoshida, S.-I., Y. Goto, Y. Mizuguchi, K. Nomoto, E. Skamene. 1991. Genetic control of natural resistance in mouse macrophages regulating intracellular Legionella pneumophila replication in vitro. Infect. Immun. 59:428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Brieland, J., P. Freeman, R. Kunkel, C. Chrisp, M. Hurley, J. Fantone, C. Engleberg. 1994. Replicative Legionella pneumophila lung infection in intratracheally inoculated A/J mice: a murine model of human Legionnaires’ disease. Am. J. Pathol. 145:1537.[Abstract]
  13. Beckers, M.-C., S.-I. Yoshida, K. Morgan, E. Skamene, P. Gros. 1995. Natural resistance to infection with Legionella pneumophila: chromosomal localization of the Lgn1 susceptibility gene. Mamm. Genome 6:540.[Medline]
  14. Beckers, M.-C., E. Ernst, E. Diez, C. Morissette, F. Gervais, K. Hunter, D. Housman, S.-I. Yoshida, E. Skamene, P. Gros. 1997. High-resolution linkage map of mouse chromosome 13 in the vicinity of the host resistance locus Lgn1. Genomics 39:254.[Medline]
  15. Dietrich, W. F., D. M. Damron, R. R. Isberg, E. S. Lander, M. S. Swanson. 1995. Lgn1, a gene that determines susceptibility to Legionella pneumophila, maps to mouse chromosome 13. Genomics 26:443.[Medline]
  16. Scharf, J. M., D. Damron, A. Frisella, S. Bruno, A. H. Beggs, L. M. Kunkel, W. F. Dietrich. 1996. The mouse region syntenic for human spinal muscular atrophy lies within the Lgn1 critical interval and contains copies of Naip exon 5. Genomics 38:405.[Medline]
  17. Endrizzi, M., S. Huang, J. M. Scharf, A.-R. Kelter, B. Wirth, L. M. Kunkel, W. Miller, W. F. Dietrich. 1999. Comparative sequence analysis of the mouse and human Lgn1/SMA interval. Genomics 60:137.[Medline]
  18. Diez, E., M.-C. Beckers, E. Ernst, C. J. DiDonato, L. R. Simard, C. Morissette, F. Gervais, S.-I. Yoshida, P. Gros. 1997. Genetic and physical mapping of the mouse host resistance locus Lgn1. Mamm. Genome 8:682.[Medline]
  19. Lefebvre, S., L. Burglen, S. Reboullet, O. Clermont, P. Burlet, L. Viollet, B. Benichou, C. Cruaud, P. Millasseau, M. Zeviani, et al 1995. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 80:155.[Medline]
  20. Roy, N., M. S. Mahadevan, M. D. McLean, G. Shutler, Z. Yaraghi, R. Farahani, S. Baird, A. Besner-Johnston, C. Lefebvre, X. Kang, et al 1995. The gene for neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein is partially deleted in individuals with spinal muscular atrophy. Cell 80:167.[Medline]
  21. Velasco, E., C. Valero, A. Valero, F. Moreno, C. Hernandez-Chico. 1996. Molecular analysis of the SMN and NAIP genes in Spanish spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) families and correlation between number of copies of cBCD541 and SMA phenotype. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5:257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lefebvre, S., P. Burlet, Q. Liu, S. Bertrandy, O. Clermont, A. Munnich, G. Dreyfuss, J. Melki. 1997. Correlation between severity and SMN protein level in spinal muscular atrophy. Nat. Genet. 16:265.[Medline]
  23. Liston, P., N. Roy, K. Tamai, C. Lefebvre, S. Baird, G. Cherton-Horvat, R. Farahani, M. McLean, J.-E. Ikeda, A. MacKenzie, et al 1996. Suppression of apoptosis in mammalian cells by Naip and a related family of IAP genes. Nature 379:349.[Medline]
  24. Xu, D. G., S. J. Crocker, J.-P. Doucet, M. St-Jean, K. Tamai, A. Hakim, J.-E. Ikeda, P. Liston, C. S. Thompson, R. G. Korneluk, et al 1997. Elevation of neuronal expression of NAIP reduces ischemic damage in the hippocampus. Nat. Med. 3:997.[Medline]
  25. Yaraghi, Z., R. G. Korneluk, A. MacKenzie. 1998. Cloning and characterization of the multiple murine homologues of NAIP (neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein). Genomics 51:l07.
  26. Huang, S., J. M. Sharf, J. D. Growney, M. G. Endrizzi, W. F. Dietrich. 1999. The mouse Naip gene cluster on chromosome 13 encodes several distinct functional transcripts. Mamm. Genome 10:1032.[Medline]
  27. Muller, A., J. Hacker, B. C. Brand. 1996. Evidence for apoptosis of human macrophage-like HL-60 cells by Legionella pneumophila infection. Infect. Immun. 64:4900.[Abstract]
  28. Gao, L. Y., Y. Abu Kwaik. 1999. Apoptosis in macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells during early stages of infection by Legionella pneumophila and its role in cytopathogenicity. Infect. Immun. 67:862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Gao, L.-Y., Y. A. Kwaik. 1999. Activation of caspase 3 during Legionella pneumophila induced apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 67:4886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Epstein, D. J., M. Vekemans, P. Gros. 1991. splotch (Sp2H), a mutation affecting development of the mouse neural tube, shows a deletion within the paired homeodomain of Pax-3. Cell 67:767.[Medline]
  31. Vidal, S., E. Pinner, S. Gauthier, P. Lepage, P. Gros. 1996. Nramp1 is an integral membrane phosphoglycoprotein absent from macrophages of inbred mouse strains susceptible to infection with intracellular parasites. J. Immunol. 157:3559.[Abstract]
  32. Govoni, G., F. Canonne-Hergaux, C. G. Pfeifer, S. L. Marcus, S. D. Mills, D. J. Hackam, S. Grinstein, D. Malo, B. Finlay, and P. Gros. 1999. Functional expression of Nramp1 in vitro in the murine macrophage line RAW264. 7 Infect. Immun. 67:2225.
  33. Yaraghi, Z., E. Diez, P. Gros, and A. MacKenzie. l999. cDNA cloning and the 5' genomic organization of Naip2, a candidate for murine Legionella resistance. Mamm. Genome 10:761.
  34. Sadosky, A. B., L. A. Wiater, H. A. Shuman. 1993. Identification of Legionella pneumophila genes required for growth within and killing of human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 61:5361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hilbi, H., A. Zychlinsky, P. J. Sansonetti. 1997. Macrophage apoptosis in microbial infections. Parasitology 115:(Suppl.):S79.
  36. Clifton, D. R., R. A. Goss, S. K. Sahni, D. van Antwerp, R. B. Baggs, V. J. Marder, D. J. Silverman, L. A. Sporn. 1998. NF-{kappa}B-dependent inhibition of apoptosis is essential for host cell survival during Rickettsia rickettsii infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Hagele, S., J. Hacker, B. C. Brand. 1998. Legionella pneumophila kills human phagocytes but not protozoan host cells by inducing apoptotic cell death. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 169:51.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
V. P. Losick, K. Stephan, I. I. Smirnova, R. R. Isberg, and A. Poltorak
A Hemidominant Naip5 Allele in Mouse Strain MOLF/Ei-Derived Macrophages Restricts Legionella pneumophila Intracellular Growth
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2009; 77(1): 196 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A. Hebb, C. Moore, V Bhan, T Campbell, J. Fisk, H. Robertson, M Thorne, E Lacasse, M Holcik, J Gillard, et al.
Expression of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family in multiple sclerosis reveals a potential immunomodulatory role during autoimmune mediated demyelination
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2008; 14(5): 577 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
J. K.X. Maier, S. Balabanian, C. R. Coffill, A. Stewart, L. Pelletier, D. J. Franks, N. H. Gendron, and A. E. MacKenzie
Distribution of Neuronal Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein in Human Tissues
J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2007; 55(9): 911 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
R. Asare, M. Santic, I. Gobin, M. Doric, J. Suttles, J. E. Graham, C. D. Price, and Y. Abu Kwaik
Genetic Susceptibility and Caspase Activation in Mouse and Human Macrophages Are Distinct for Legionella longbeachae and L. pneumophila
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2007; 75(4): 1933 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
K. A. Archer and C. R. Roy
MyD88-Dependent Responses Involving Toll-Like Receptor 2 Are Important for Protection and Clearance of Legionella pneumophila in a Mouse Model of Legionnaires' Disease.
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2006; 74(6): 3325 - 3333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
A. Fortier, G. Min-Oo, J. Forbes, S. Lam-Yuk-Tseung, and P. Gros
Single gene effects in mouse models of host: pathogen interactions
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2005; 77(6): 868 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
M. Watarai, I. Derre, J. Kirby, J. D. Growney, W. F. Dietrich, and R. R. Isberg
Legionella pneumophila Is Internalized by a Macropinocytotic Uptake Pathway Controlled by the Dot/Icm System and the Mouse Lgn1 Locus
J. Exp. Med., October 15, 2001; 194(8): 1081 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
W. F. Dietrich
Using Mouse Genetics to Understand Infectious Disease Pathogenesis
Genome Res., March 1, 2001; 11(3): 325 - 331.
[Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. Aravind, V. M. Dixit, and E. V. Koonin
Apoptotic Molecular Machinery: Vastly Increased Complexity in Vertebrates Revealed by Genome Comparisons
Science, February 16, 2001; 291(5507): 1279 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. G. Endrizzi, V. Hadinoto, J. D. Growney, W. Miller, and W. F. Dietrich
Genomic Sequence Analysis of the Mouse Naip Gene Array
Genome Res., August 1, 2000; 10(8): 1095 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
J. D. Growney and W. F. Dietrich
High-resolution Genetic and Physical Map of the Lgn1 Interval in C57BL/6J Implicates Naip2 or Naip5 in Legionella pneumophila Pathogenesis
Genome Res., August 1, 2000; 10(8): 1158 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gros, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gros, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS