|
|
||||||||
1


*
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205;
Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; and
Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
secretion induced by this virus
has been of particular interest because it has been associated with the
development of HIV-1 dementia and because TNF-
increases viral
replication by enhancing NF-
B interaction with the viral promoter,
the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Thus, an autocrine pathway is
potentially created in which HIV-1 stimulates its own replication.
Conflicting reports exist, however, on the ability of HIV-1 to induce
TNF-
secretion in vitro or in vivo. Using experimental protocols
that controlled for potential bacterial endotoxin-induced TNF-
secretion, the current study demonstrates significant differences in
TNF-
-eliciting properties among primary and laboratory obtained
HIV-1. The relative TNF-
-inducing ability of different variants is
conserved when tested using PBMC from different individuals.
Elicitation of TNF-
secretion was not blocked by exposure of cells
to zidovudine, indicating that viral integration was not required to
induce secretion. Rather, the interaction between the virus and cell
surface is critical for TNF-
induction, as Abs against CD4 or CCR5
blocked the induction of TNF-
synthesis by PBMC when added before
virus exposure. Furthermore, the ability to induce TNF-
secretion
mapped to a region of the HIV-1 env gene that includes
the third hypervariable domain. Differences in the ability of different
HIV-1 variants to elicit TNF-
may account for individual differences
in HIV-1 disease course. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among cytokines elicited by HIV-1, TNF-
, in particular, has assumed
a prominent role in the effort to understand host-virus interactions
(1, 3, 8, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). Binding of TNF-
to one of its two
receptors triggers a phospholipase activation pathway that promotes the
dissociation in the cytosol of the nuclear transcription factor NF-
B
from its inhibitor, I-
B (inhibitory protein that dissociates from
NF-
B), thereby permitting NF-
B to move to the nucleus of the
cell. In the nucleus, NF-
B is capable of binding to the HIV-1 long
terminal repeat, thereby enhancing viral transcription (8, 24, 30).
It has also been demonstrated, however, that HIV-1 infection can
enhance secretion of TNF-
by T cells (31), B cells
(32), and monocytes or macrophages (25, 33, 34, 35, 36). Thus, TNF-
can participate in an autocrine or
paracrine pathway in which HIV-1 enhances its own replication. Because
TNF-
secretion can be elicited from a variety of immune cells, it is
likely that it is not elicited by HIV-1 binding to the same receptor on
all of these cells. It has been demonstrated, for example, that
cross-linking of CD4 on monocyte/macrophages results in TNF-
secretion (33), but such binding could not account for the
high level of TNF-
mRNA expression observed in B cells
(32).
Because of the variability in both HIV-1 proteins and the cellular
proteins with which HIV-1 might interact, we hypothesized that
different variants of HIV-1 might differ in their ability to elicit
TNF-
secretion. We therefore explored the ability of different
clinical and laboratory HIV-1 isolates to elicit TNF-
secretion from
human PBMC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
assay
Freshly obtained unstimulated PBMC from healthy HIV-seronegative
volunteers were placed in a 96-well plate (Corning Glass, Cambridge,
MA) at 4 x 105/well in 100 µl of RPMI
1640 tissue culture medium (Life Sciences, Grand Island, NY) containing
10% human AB serum. Different HIV-1 variants (500 pg of p24 Ag/well)
or bacterial LPS (6.0 endotoxin units Salmonella typhimurium
LPS; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were added to the cultures in 100 µl of
the same medium. Each virus was tested with and without 10 µg/ml
bactericidal permeability-increasing protein (37, 38)
(BPI;3 Xoma
Pharmaceuticals, Berkeley, CA) present in the media to ensure that
observed TNF-
production was not attributable to contaminating
bacterial endotoxin (39, 40). Sixteen hours later, 100
µl of the cell-free culture supernatant was assayed by ELISA
(PerSeptive Diagnostics, Framingham, MA) for the presence of TNF-
.
Each test condition was assayed in either duplicate or triplicate.
Viruses and virus preparation
PBMC from HIV-1-seropositive individuals were cocultured with
PBMC from healthy seronegative donors that had been placed in RPMI 1640
medium containing 10% human AB serum and stimulated with PHA (5
µg/ml; Life Sciences) for 2 days. Cocultures were subsequently
maintained in media supplemented with IL-2 (2 U/ml; Boehringer
Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Growth of virus from the cultures was
determined by assay for viral p24 Ag (DuPont/NEN, Cambridge, MA) 10
days after the initiation of cultures. Culture supernatant fluids and
control supernatant fluids from cultures containing no virus (referred
to in the figures as "media controls") were centrifuged at 800
x g for 10 min to remove cellular debris and then
centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 2 h over a 20%
sucrose cushion. The sedimented material was resuspended in RPMI 1640
medium and passed through a 0.22-µm filter, tested for p24
concentration, and used at an appropriate dilution in the TNF-
assay.
The HIV-1 molecular clone p120 was originally derived from HIVNL4-3, but contains an envelope derived from the molecular clone HIVHXB2, which was inserted between the SalI and BamHI sites, corresponding to positions 57858474 based on the nucleotide sequence of the prototype HIV-1 clone HXB2. The molecular clone p125 is identical to p120, but contains an insert from HIVADA extending from positions 70397619 (based on HXB2), which includes the third hypervariable region of the virus envelope. This region is defined by two BglII sites at either end of the insert. The molecular clone p125MNenv contains the envelope gene from HIVMN, amplified by nested PCR reactions, inserted between the SalI and BamHI sites of p125, extending between bases 57858474 of the HIV-1 envelope (based on HXB2). The external primers used for this amplification were 5'-AAACTGACAGGATCCATGGAACAGCC-3' and 5'-TAAGTCATTGGTCTAGAAGGTACCTGAGGT-3'. The internal primers used were 5'-CAGAATTGGGTGTCGACATAGCAGAATAGGCATTATTCGACAGAG-3' and 5'-TTGCTAAGGATCCATGCACTAATCGACCGGATGTGTCTCTGTCTC-3'. The underlined portions of the primers contain the SalI and BamHI sites used for insertion into p125.
Conditions used for amplification for both first- and second-round PCR were 95°C for 2 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min, followed by 20 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min (including an additional 20 s for each cycle) and one final cycle at 72°C for 7 min.
To create the chimeric viruses, the amplified fragment from
HIVMN was cloned into the cloning vector pGEM11
(Promega, Madison, WI) by ligating each amplified
SalI-BamHI fragment with T4 DNA ligase (Life
Sciences) to the plasmid digested with the corresponding restriction
enzymes. The DNA was transformed into Escherichia coli
DH5
cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and then purified using
standard procedures (41). The pGEM11 construct was then
digested with SalI and BamHI; p125 was also
digested with the same enzymes independently. Upon agarose gel
electrophoresis and purification), the complementary fragments were
ligated and transformed as described above. Transfection of virus into
COS-7 cells was performed using the DEAE-dextran method, as previously
described (42), with virus amplified through replication
on PHA and IL-2-stimulated PBMC, which were added to the transfected
COS-7 cells.
Cells and cell culture conditions
PBMC were obtained by centrifugation of leukopheresed blood from healthy HIV-seronegative donors on Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturers instructions. The RPMI 1640 medium, human AB serum, and all other culture supplements were purchased as minimal endotoxin reagents.
Abs
Human anti-CCR5 Abs were obtained from hybridoma 242.21.6 supernatant fluid and were used either without dilution or at 10-fold dilutions in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% human AB serum. Anti-CD4 Abs (RPA-T4; PharMingen, San Diego, CA) were used at a concentration of 20 µg/ml. Isotype controls for the respective Abs were used at 20 µg/ml (murine IgG and murine IgG1; PharMingen).
Statistical analysis
The significance of differences in TNF-
secretion between and
among different groups was determined by a one-way ANOVA using the
Stata statistical package (Stata, College Station, TX).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|

PBMC from three subjects were stimulated with low passage HIV-1
isolates, LPS, or tissue culture media, and TNF-
secretion was
measured 16 h later (Fig. 1
).
Adherent cells, predominantly monocytes, secreted between 80 and 90%
of the total TNF-
produced in response to LPS or viral stimuli (data
not shown). Both LPS and virus 9 stimulated secretion of TNF-
,
achieving concentrations of this cytokine that were significantly above
those elicited by media alone (p < 0.001 for
all subjects). None of the other viral isolates stimulated levels of
TNF-
that were significantly greater than their respective media
controls. The response of subject 1 to virus 11 compared with that
subjects response to tissue culture media approached, but did not
achieve, significance (p = 0.054). Individual
subjects differed in their TNF-
response to either LPS or virus 9,
but the relative relationship of the responsiveness pattern to the
different viruses was maintained among the subjects independent of the
stimulus. This finding suggests that some subjects tend to secrete more
TNF-
in response to an appropriate stimulus than others.
|
secretion, as did many of the primary
isolates that initially elicited TNF-
secretion (data not
shown).
The ability of LPS to stimulate TNF-
secretion is well
established (39, 40) and endotoxin contamination must be
considered when evaluating the ability of any agent to elicit TNF-
secretion. Therefore, the effect of BPI, an inhibitor of endotoxin
activity, on the response to LPS and to all viral isolates was
evaluated in each experiment and is shown for subject 2 from Fig. 1
(Fig. 2
). As shown in Fig. 1
, BPI
effectively abrogated the ability of LPS to elicit TNF-
secretion
(p < 0.001). It had, however, no significant
effect on the ability of virus 9 to elicit TNF-
secretion
(p = 1.0) from subject 2, indicating that
contaminating LPS does not account for the ability of virus 9 to elicit
this cytokine. For all subjects, the LPS response was significantly
reduced by treatment with BPI (p < 0.001 for
LPS response compared with LPS plus BPI response for all subjects,
shown only for subject 2). However, none of the responses of the
subjects to virus 9 was reduced by BPI treatment.
|
Because of the demonstrated ability of HIV-1 to incorporate host
cellular Ags into the virus particle during the budding process
(43, 44, 45, 46, 47), the possibility was considered that the
differential TNF-
response was attributable to reactivity against
HLA or other host Ags which might stimulate a MLR. To evaluate this
possibility, TNF-
responsiveness was assayed against virus 8, a
primary clinical isolate, grown on either autologous or heterologous
PBMC (Fig. 3
). The mean response to virus
grown on autologous cells was 3120 pg/ml of TNF-
compared with 2060
pg/ml of TNF-
produced in response to the same virus grown on
heterologous cells. This difference was not statistically significant
(p > 0.5).
|
PBMC from a single subject were challenged with the same panel of
viruses at two points separated by 5 wk (Fig. 4
). The virus that elicited the greatest
responses in the first experiment with the cells of this subject (virus
8) also did so in the second experiment. None of the responses to the
same virus differed significantly (p > 0.05)
at the two time points.
|
secretion
To determine whether viral integration and/or protein synthesis
were required for TNF-
secretion, TNF-
levels were measured in
cultures to which a primary viral isolate and zidovudine (AZT, 50
µg/ml; Burroughs-Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC), an inhibitor
of RT, were added. The TNF-
secreted in response to viral isolate
8203 was significantly greater than that secreted by PBMC alone
(p = 0.008, Fig. 5
). A dose of AZT which completely
inhibited replication of this virus, as measured by p24 levels in
culture supernatant fluid over a period of 2 wk (data not shown),
had no significant effect on the ability of this virus to elicit
TNF-
secretion (p = 1.0 when compared with
virus alone, p = 0.03 when compared with cells and AZT
alone). In the absence of virus, AZT also had no significant effect on
TNF-
secretion (p = 1.0) compared with the
level observed in cultures not exposed to virus.
|

Because unintegrated HIV-1 was able to elicit TNF-
secretion,
we hypothesized that secretion was stimulated by viral interactions at
the cell surface. Binding of HIV-1 to the cell surface requires the
interaction of the viral envelope with the host cell receptors CD4 and
CCR5 or CXCR4 (48). To determine whether this binding
event is critical for subsequent TNF-
secretion, PBMC from
several subjects were cultured with anti-CD4 or anti-CCR5 Abs
before the addition of p125, a CCR5-utilizing molecular clone of HIV-1
that routinely elicited high levels of TNF-
secretion. Both
anti-CD4 and anti-CCR5 Abs significantly inhibited TNF-
induction by p125 (Fig. 6
). Neither
anti-CD4 nor anti-CCR5 Abs inhibited TNF-
synthesis induced
by LPS. Isotype controls for the respective Abs also did not
significantly alter TNF-
secretion.
|
-eliciting genes of HIV-1
Since binding of HIV-1 with the coreceptors was necessary to
elicit TNF-
from PBMC, we sought to further define the interaction
of HIV-1 envelope with the cell surface that resulted in TNF-
secretion. We therefore examined the ability to elicit TNF-
secretion of chimeric viruses created by substituting parts of the
envelope from different viruses into a molecular clone, p125.
HIVMN failed to elicit TNF-
secretion (Fig. 7
). A viral clone,
p125MNenv, which contains the env
region of HIVMN also failed to elicit TNF-
secretion. Clone p120, which is identical to p125, but contains the V3
loop region from the HIV-1 clone HXB2, also failed to elicit TNF-
secretion. Only p125 from this group of chimeric viruses was able to
elicit TNF-
secretion at levels that were significantly above those
observed with the PBL controls (p < 0.001).
Levels of TNF-
secreted after cultivation with
p125MNenv were not significantly different from
those observed with HIVMN
(p > 0.5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. The ability to
elicit TNF-
appears to be intrinsic to certain viral variants and is
maintained when those viruses are exposed to cells from different
normal individuals. The response pattern of a given individual to a
panel of viral variants is generally conserved when observations are
made at different time points. Although different individuals show
variation in the amount of TNF-
they produce in response to the same
virus, the relative stimulatory ability of different viral variants is
maintained among different individuals.
Since secretion of TNF-
was observed even when viruses were exposed
to PBMC in the presence of inhibitory concentrations of AZT, secretion
was not dependent on viral integration.
In fact, the differences among viral variants in their ability to
elicit TNF-
mapped in these studies to the viral envelope,
specifically to the area around and including the V3 region. Previous
studies eliciting TNF-
with purified HIV-1 envelope demonstrated
that secretion could be elicited with truncated envelope proteins from
many different regions within the viral envelope (49). In
the current studies with intact virus, analysis of the ability of
chimeric viruses to elicit TNF-
suggested that the region around the
V3 loop of the envelope was a critical determinant of the
TNF-
-eliciting ability. These studies do not exclude the possibility
that other regions of the virus may also influence its ability to
elicit TNF-
secretion.
The critical role of envelope in eliciting TNF-
secretion renders it
likely that secretion results from interactions of virus and receptors
on the cell surface. The current studies demonstrate that TNF-
induction is blocked by both anti-CD4 and anti-CCR5 Abs, which
suggests that interactions with these receptors may influence the
ability of different viral variants to elicit TNF-
secretion. That
being the case, the induction of TNF-
by HIV-1 is not simply due to
its interaction with CCR5 because not all viruses that bind CCR5 induce
TNF-
. Previous studies have shown that binding of virus to CD4
results in TNF-
secretion (33). Because induction of
TNF-
secretion in our studies mapped to the V3 envelope region,
binding to the second HIV-1 receptor likely plays a role in this
cytokine induction (13, 50), which it may do simply by
altering the affinity with which the virus binds to CD4 (51, 52). Although large numbers of syncytia-inducing (SI) viruses
were not studied in these experiments, no clinical or laboratory
isolates known to contain only SI variants were able to elicit TNF-
secretion. Furthermore, the chimeric viruses p120 and
p125MNenv that lost TNF-
-eliciting ability had
been switched from nonsyncytia inducing (NSI) to the SI phenotype in
creating the chimera. Apart from the envelope change, the viruses were
identical to the parental p125.
The role of TNF-
in the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection has been
controversial. The early demonstration that TNF-
could promote
expression of virus from T cell lines carrying integrated proviral DNA
(8) first suggested that virally induced inflammatory
processes could indirectly accelerate the disease course by promoting
increased viral expression.
A central role of TNF-
in AIDS pathogenesis has been proposed by
others as well (53, 54). Careful analysis of the
relationship between viral load and TNF-
levels in asymptomatic
HIV-1-infected individuals showed a direct relationship between plasma
TNF-
levels and viral load, although, in the same study, levels of
TNF-
mRNA in PBMC did not correlate with viral load. These studies
suggested that TNF-
in serum originated from other sites within the
body, such as lymph nodes, where virus was actively replicating.
Other studies have called into question the role that TNF-
plays in disease progression. Li et al. (55) found no
difference in TNF-
mRNA levels in tonsilar tissue from five normal
individuals and similar tissue obtained from seven asymptomatic
HIV-1-infected individuals. Furthermore, no correlation was found
between the level of HIV-1 gene expression in these tissues and the
level of TNF-
gene expression. These authors concluded that TNF-
is not critical for HIV-1 replication in lymph nodes. Recently, Lane et
al. (56) reported that nanogram concentrations of TNF-
suppressed HIV-1 replication by inducing the CCR5 agonist RANTES.
Macrophage inflammatory protein-1
and macrophage inflammatory
protein-1ß were also induced by TNF-
, but did not inhibit HIV-1
replication.
Foli et al. (57) challenged the entire notion that HIV-1
is capable of eliciting TNF-
secretion. Although acknowledging that
TNF-
levels are elevated in HIV-1-infected individuals, these
investigators demonstrated that high concentrations of two HIV-1
strains, HIVBa-L and
HIVLAI, did not elicit TNF-
secretion when
care was taken to ensure that the virus preparations had minimal
concentrations of contaminating endotoxin. These investigators
concluded that the elevated levels of TNF-
observed in
HIV-1-infected individuals was elicited by pathogens or processes other
than HIV-1.
In the current studies, effects of potential endotoxin contamination
were abrogated by inclusion of BPI, which inhibits LPS-induced TNF-
secretion (38). Most HIV-1 variants were incapable of
eliciting TNF-
secretion. Neither HIVBa-L nor
HIVIIIB, which is closely related to
HIVLAI, could elicit TNF-
secretion (data not
shown), as found by Foli et al. (57). However, several
clinical isolates were capable of eliciting this cytokine, even in the
presence of an LPS inhibitor.
The differences among HIV-1 strains in their ability to elicit TNF-
secretion introduce one more variable that might be associated with
differences in disease course. These differences may be particularly
relevant to understanding why some individuals with AIDS develop
dementia whereas others with advanced disease do not. In a postmortem
analysis of cytokine expression in the brains of demented and
nondemented AIDS patients, Wesselingh et al. (58, 59)
demonstrated significantly increased levels of TNF-
mRNA produced by
cells of the macrophage lineage in demented patients compared with
nondemented controls. With the exception of IL-4 mRNA levels, which
were diminished in demented individuals, TNF-
was the only cytokine
for which levels differed significantly from nondemented control
subjects. Since the development of dementia does not correlate simply
with viral load (60), explaining differences among
infected individuals in the development of the dementia syndrome may
require phenotypic characterization of the dementia-associated viruses,
particularly in terms of their TNF-
-eliciting ability.
Whether the appearance of TNF-
-eliciting HIV-1 variants affects
other aspects of disease pathogenesis, including the rate of disease
progression, remains to be determined. The knowledge that TNF-
secretion is viral-variant dependent should permit a more systematic
approach to this question, with efforts to correlate disease
progression with the TNF-
secretion associated with the viral
variants present at a given point in the disease course.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard B. Markham, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BPI, bactericidal permeability-increasing protein; AZT, zidovudine; SI, syncytia inducing. ![]()
Received for publication October 5, 1998. Accepted for publication November 16, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induces the expression of the human immunodeficiency virus from a chronically infected T cell clone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2365.
to activate HIV-1 from latently and acutely infected cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage. J. Immunol. 156:841.[Abstract]
and interleukin 6 induction of virus. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:1199.[Medline]
inhibits entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 into primary human macrophages: a selective role for the 75-kilodalton receptor. J. Virol. 70:7388.[Abstract]
/cachectin enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in primary macrophages. J. Infect. Dis. 163:78.[Medline]
B potently up-regulates the promoter activity of RANTES, a chemokine that blocks HIV infection. J. Immunol. 158:3483.[Abstract]
functions in an autocrine manner in the induction of human immunodeficiency virus expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:782.
in activation and replication of the tat-defective human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 67:1094.
B activation induced by tumor necrosis factor-
in stably tat-transfected cells is associated with the presence of cell-surface-bound Tat protein. AIDS 10:455.[Medline]
and immune activation products in HIV infection. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 84:36.[Medline]
B activation in Jurkat cells. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 12:1209.[Medline]
production and Ig secretion in B lymphocytes from HIV-infected individuals but not from seronegative donors. J. Immunol. 147:2922.[Abstract]
can be induced from mononuclear phagocytes by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 binding to the CD4 receptor. J. Virol. 63:4404.
and IL-6 production. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 75:131.[Medline]
production in glial cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 57:179.[Medline]
. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 5:131.[Medline]
inhibits HIV-1 replication in peripheral blood monocytes and alveolar macrophages by inducing the production of RANTES and decreasing C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) expression. J. Immunol. 163:3653.
by monocyte/macrophages. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 13:829.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Rostasy, L Monti, S A Lipton, J C Hedreen, R G Gonzalez, and B A Navia HIV leucoencephalopathy and TNF{alpha} expression in neurones J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2005; 76(7): 960 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Peterson, S. Hughes, D. E. Dimcheff, K. Wehrly, and B. Chesebro Separate Sequences in a Murine Retroviral Envelope Protein Mediate Neuropathogenesis by Complementary Mechanisms with Differing Requirements for Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha J. Virol., December 1, 2004; 78(23): 13104 - 13112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-F. Fortin, C. Barat, Y. Beausejour, B. Barbeau, and M. J. Tremblay Hyper-responsiveness to Stimulation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected CD4+ T Cells Requires Nef and Tat Virus Gene Products and Results from Higher NFAT, NF-{kappa}B, and AP-1 Induction J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 2004; 279(38): 39520 - 39531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xu, J. Kulkosky, E. Acheampong, G. Nunnari, J. Sullivan, and R. J. Pomerantz HIV-1-mediated apoptosis of neuronal cells: Proximal molecular mechanisms of HIV-1-induced encephalopathy PNAS, May 4, 2004; 101(18): 7070 - 7075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zhang, F. Rana, C. Silva, J. Ethier, K. Wehrly, B. Chesebro, and C. Power Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope-Mediated Neuronal Death: Uncoupling of Viral Replication and Neurotoxicity J. Virol., June 15, 2003; 77(12): 6899 - 6912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. De, K. Devadas, and A. L. Notkins Elevated Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-{alpha}) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Transgenic Mice: Prevention of Death by Antibody to TNF-{alpha} J. Virol., October 11, 2002; 76(22): 11710 - 11714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Johnston, C. Silva, and C. Power Envelope Gene-Mediated Neurovirulence in Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Neuronal Injury J. Virol., February 22, 2002; 76(6): 2622 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Choe, D. J. Volsky, and M. J. Potash Induction of Rapid and Extensive beta -Chemokine Synthesis in Macrophages by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and gp120, Independently of Their Coreceptor Phenotype J. Virol., November 15, 2001; 75(22): 10738 - 10745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Lawn, S. T. Butera, and T. M. Folks Contribution of Immune Activation to the Pathogenesis and Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2001; 14(4): 753 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Johnston, Y. Jiang, G. van Marle, M. B. Mayne, W. Ni, J. Holden, J. C. McArthur, and C. Power Lentivirus Infection in the Brain Induces Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression: Role of Envelope Diversity J. Virol., August 15, 2000; 74(16): 7211 - 7220. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |