|
|
||||||||
Expression: Lamina Propria T Cells Use Different cis-Elements than Peripheral Blood T Cells to Regulate Transactivation of IFN-
Expression1



*
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048;
Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD 21702; and
Seoul Surgical Clinic, Seoul, Korea
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(IFN-
) secretion with further enhancement after
CD28 coligation. The molecular mechanisms regulating IFN-
expression
in LP T cells remain unknown. Previous studies in PBL and T cell lines
identified cis- and trans-regulatory
elements in TCR-mediated expression of IFN-
. This study examines CD2
and PMA/ionophore-responsive IFN-
promoter elements. Activation of
LPMC via CD2-induced IFN-
secretion and a parallel up-regulation of
mRNA expression. CD28 coligation enhanced mRNA stability without
up-regulating transcription as measured by nuclear run-on. Transfection
of a -2.7-kb IFN-
promoter-reporter construct into PBL and LP
mononuclear cells (LPMC) revealed significant promoter activity after
CD2 activation, with additional transactivation after CD2/CD28
costimulation in PBL, but not in LPMC. Functional analysis using
truncated promoter fragments identified distinct
cis-regulatory regions selectively transactivating
IFN-
expression in PBL compared with LPMC. In PBL, CD2 activation
elements reside within the -108- to +64-bp region. However, in LPMC
the upstream region between -204 and -108 bp was essential.
Transfection of the proximal and distal AP-1-binding elements, as well
as TRE/AP-1 constructs, revealed functional activation of AP-1
subsequent to CD2 signaling, with activation critical in PBL but
diminished in LPMC. Electromobility shift analysis using
oligonucleotides encompassing the proximal, distal, and
BED/AP-1-binding regions failed to demonstrate selective
transactivation after CD2 signaling of LPMC. This report provides
evidence that activation of LPMC results in transactivation of multiple
promoter elements regulating IFN-
expression distinct from those in
PBL. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in the mucosa is different from that in the
periphery. IFN-
transcription and mRNA synthesis closely parallel
those observed with IL-2, suggesting that differences in the capacity
of T cells to produce IFN-
are determined primarily at the
transcriptional level (3, 4). Although the IL-2 promoter
has been well characterized, the mechanisms involved in regulation of
IFN-
gene transcription are less well defined. The human IFN-
gene structure consists of four exons and three introns and is highly
conserved among mammalian species (5, 6). A number of
5'-flanking cis-regulatory promoter regions have been
identified in PMA/ionophore-activated T cell lines, including proximal
(-73 to -48) and distal (-96 to -80) regions that are conserved
between human and rodent (7). Both regions are believed to
contain binding sites for jun/fos AP-1 nucleoprotein complexes
(8). The distal region contains a GATA-regulatory motif
similar to that found in the promoter regions of GM-CSF and
macrophage-inflammatory protein-1
ß and has been shown to contain
GATA-3 as part of the nucleoprotein complex interacting with this
region (9). The proximal region displays homology with the
NFIL2A region of the human IL-2 gene and interacts with cAMP response
element-binding protein/activating transcription factor
(ATF)3 and AP-1
nuclear binding factors (9).
It has been proposed that in T cell lines the selective binding of
c-Jun or c-Jun/ATF-2 to the proximal region results in a positive
signal and activation of transcription. A diminution of transcription
results from binding of other competing factors such as cAMP response
element-binding protein/ATF-1, or after methylation of this site
(10). Additional cis-binding elements that
inhibit IFN-
expression, including a silencer repressor element
(-251 to -215 bp) that can bind Yin Yang 1 (YY-1) and an AP-2-like
protein have been reported upstream of the minimal promoter region
(-108 to +64) (11, 12). An additional YY-1 site (-211 to
-186) has been identified that overlaps with an AP-1-binding site. It
has been suggested that binding of YY-1 to this site in resting T cells
blocks constitutive transcription of IFN-
, whereas displacement of
YY-1 by AP-1 results in transactivation of the IFN-
gene. Limited
analyses of expression of this site in PMA + PHA-activated PBMC
suggests that recruitment of AP-1 to this site triggers selective
transactivation of IFN-
expression during the differentiation of
naive T-cells to memory T cells (13).
Two signals are required to achieve maximal activation of PB T cells.
The first signal is generated by engagement of the TCR, whereas a
second signal is provided by a costimulatory molecule. One major
costimulatory T cell surface molecule is CD28 (14, 15).
Previous studies have reported that costimulation of TCR activated PBL
with CD28 results in enhanced T cell proliferation, as well as cytokine
production including IFN-
(16). The molecular
mechanisms that regulate increased IFN-
production, however, remain
undefined. Initial nuclear run-on studies of TCR-activated PBL
indicated that CD28 costimulation resulted in enhanced IFN-
mRNA
stability without transcriptional up-regulation (17).
Subsequent transfection studies using PMA/ionophore activation of T
cell lines, however, suggested a modest up-regulation of IFN-
mRNA
expression after CD28 costimulation but failed to identify a CD28
response element (18). The presence of AU-rich sequences
within the 3'-untranslated region of the mRNA of many cytokines,
including IFN-
, has been demonstrated to facilitate the rapid
turnover and instability of the mRNA (19). Numerous
proteins that bind to these AUUUA motifs regulate cytokine mRNA
stability; however, the precise mechanism of posttranscriptional
regulation of IFN-
remains to be determined.
The activation pathways of LP T cells are distinct from those of PB T
cells (20, 21). LP T cells do not respond well to
activation via the TCR/CD3 receptor, yet they do exhibit increased
proliferation and cytokine production when activated via the CD2
pathway (21, 22). CD28 coligation further enhances the
activation, and LP T cells are generally thought to manifest a
heightened activation state compared with PB T cells. This activated
state can be further amplified in conditions of dysregulated
inflammation, such as Crohns disease and ulcerative colitis. Crohns
disease is characterized by widespread mucosal inflammation involving
an enhanced T cell activation state characterized by increased
production of inflammatory mediators, including IFN-
(23).
Previous studies have demonstrated that there are mucosa-specific
mechanisms for T cell cytokine gene regulation. Recent studies suggest
that regulation of IL-2 production in LPMC after CD2 activation may
involve a different mechanism from that observed in PBL and T cell
lines (24). The experiments described herein were designed
to determine 1) the regulatory mechanisms involved in enhanced IFN-
secretion in CD2/CD28-activated LP T cells, and 2) whether regulatory
elements distinct from those previously reported for PBL and T cell
lines play a role in IFN-
secretion by LP T cells. In this study,
evidence demonstrates that the IFN-
promoter possesses multiple
CD2-responsive enhancer elements located between the -204- and +64-bp
region and that transactivation of IFN-
expression in PBL and LPMC
occurs through the use of different cis-regulatory elements
and requires the recruitment of different transactivating factors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anti-CD2 mAbs (clones CB6 and GD10) were a gift from Chris Benjamin (Biogen, Cambridge, MA). Anti-CD28 ascites (clone 9.3) was obtained from Bristol-Meyers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute (Princeton, NJ). The ascites was purified over a protein G column and quantified by ELISA.
Purification of LPMC
Intestinal specimens were obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection of the colon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. Approval for the use of human subjects was granted by the Institutional Review Board at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. In this study, all tissue specimens were taken from an uninvolved area of resected colon from patients with colonic carcinoma (normal), involved areas from patients with ulcerative colitis, and uninvolved and involved areas from patients with Crohns disease.
LPMC were isolated from the resection samples by a technique modified from that described previously (25). Briefly, the intestinal specimen was washed with HBSS, and the mucosae were dissected away from the underlying layers. The mucosal layer was incubated in a shaking water bath (100 rpm) in calcium- and magnesium-deficient HBSS, containing 1 mM EDTA, 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml Fungizone, with the solution changed every 30 min until the supernatant was free of epithelial cells. The remaining LP was minced into 1- to 2-mm pieces and digested for 10 min in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 0.5 mg/ml collagenase B (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 0.1 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma), 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml Fungizone in shaker water bath (100 rpm). The supernatant was collected, filtered through 110-µm nylon mesh (Spectrum Laboratory Products, Houston, TX), and centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 15 ml and centrifuged at 30 x g for 5 min to remove epithelial and other large cells. The supernatant was removed, and lymphocytes were isolated by separation on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients. The cells were then washed three times with HBSS and resuspended in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS.
Stimulation of mononuclear cells
For stimulation through the CD2 receptor, LPMC were stimulated with 0.1 µg anti-CD2 Abs (both CB6 and GD10 clones)/106 cells at 37°C for the times indicated for each experiment. CD28 costimulation was conducted with 0.1 µg anti-CD28 Ab. Stimulation of T cells with anti-CD2 Abs did not require further cross-linking because the combination of two anti-CD2 Abs directed against different epitopes was sufficient to induce activation.
IFN-
assay
IFN-
was measured by an amplified ELISA assay
(26). Dynatech (Burlington, MA) Immulon 3 microtiter
plates were coated overnight with 100 µl 5 µg/ml monoclonal
anti-IFN-
(Endogen, Woburn, MA). Samples and standards were
added for 24 h followed by addition of 100 µl of 2.5 µg/ml
polyclonal rabbit anti-IFN-
(Endogen) for 2 h. This was
followed by addition of 100 µl 1:1000 diluted mouse anti-rabbit
alkaline phosphatase-conjugated Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove,
PA) for 2 h. Substrate, 0.2 mM NADP (Sigma), was added for 30 min
followed by addition of amplifier (3% 2-propanol, 1 mM
iodonitrotetrazolium violet, 75 µg/ml alcohol dehydrogenase, and 50
µg/ml diaphorase, Sigma) for 30 min. Plates were read at 490 nm using
an E max plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). All data
acquisition and reduction were performed with the ELISA Master program
for Macintosh computers, developed by R. L. Deem.
Northern blot analysis
Total cellular RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). RNA was separated electrophoretically on a denaturing 1% agarose gel containing 7% formaldehyde. Gels were transferred to nylon membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and hybridized to 32P-labeled DNA probe as previously described (24).
Nuclear run-on
PBL or LPMC (5 x 107) were
stimulated and nuclei were isolated as previously described
(27). In vitro transcription was conducted at 26°C for
20 min in transcription buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 100 mM KCl, 2 mM
DTT, 30 µM EDTA, 1 mM ATP, 0.5 mM GTP, 0.5 mM CTP, 2 mM
MnCl2, 35 mM
(NH4)2SO4,
8.8 mM creatine phosphate, 40 µg/ml creatine phosphokinase) and 100
µCi [
-32P]UTP. Labeled mRNA transcripts
were purified with the RNeasy kit for liquid samples and hybridized to
2 µg cDNA insert immobilized on a nylon membrane.
Preparation of nuclear protein extracts
Nuclear protein extractions were conducted with 510 x 106 LPMC. After activation, cells were centrifuged, washed in cold PBS, and kept on ice for subsequent extraction steps. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.9 ml of RSB (10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 2 µM leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF, 0.1 mM EGTA), and 0.1 ml of 5% Nonidet P-40 was added. Samples were mixed by gentle inversion and kept on ice for 10 min followed by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 2560 µl (volume is dependent on the starting number of cells) cold buffer C (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.42 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 25% v/v glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 20 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF). Samples were incubated on ice for 3040 min during which time they were pipetted twice. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation, and nuclear proteins were diluted with an equal volume of buffer D (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 20% v/v glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 20 mM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF). Protein concentrations were determined by Coomassie Plus assay (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL).
Gel (EMSA)
Double-stranded oligonucleotide was end-labeled with
[
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase.
Nuclear extract protein (36 µg) was incubated at 25°C with 0.25
mg/ml poly(dI-dC), in 20% glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2,
2.5 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM DTT, 250 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5) for 10 min.
The oligonucleotide was then added (20,000 cpm), and the binding
reactions were incubated for an additional 30 min. Specificity was
determined by the addition of 100-fold excess unlabeled oligonucleotide
as competitor. The DNA-protein complexes were separated from unbound
probe on a prerun native 5% polyacrylamide gel in low ionic strength
buffer (22.3 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 22.3 mM borate, 0.5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0)).
After 2 h, the gel was dried under vacuum and exposed to x-ray
film. The oligonucleotides used were as follows: proximal conserved
element, TTGTGAAAATACGTAATCC; distal conserved element,
GCCTATCTGTCAAACTCTCAT; BED region AP-1-binding site,
ATGGGTCTGTCTCATCGTCAAAGGA.
DNA constructs
The human IFN-
cDNA clone was obtained from American Type
Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The human IFN-
luciferase
reporter plasmids containing -2.7-kb and -204-bp fragments of the
IFN-
promoter has been described previously (9) and
were subcloned upstream to the luciferase gene. The -2.7 kb IFN-
luciferase reporter plasmid was subcloned by Dr. Masahiro Shiroo. The
IFN-
promoter-reporter constructs containing truncated promoter
fragments, -538, -108, -39 bp, and the internal deletion mutant
-214/-178, as well as the dimer of
proxIFN-
and tetramer of
distIFN-
(gifts from Laurie Penix, Yale
University, New Haven, CT) were subcloned upstream of the luciferase
gene as described previously (9, 28). The plasmid TRE2
luciferase (a gift from M. Karin, University of California, San Diego)
used to determine AP-1-dependent transactivation was generated by
subcloning two copies of the collagenase AP-1-binding sites into a
luciferase reporter plasmid (29).
Transfection
Freshly isolated LPMC were primed for transfection competence by culturing for 16 or 20 h, respectively, in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 50 mM 2-ME, and 1 µg/ml PHA-L (Sigma) as previously described (24, 30). Cells were then washed and resuspended in 250 µl fresh medium at 2 x 107 cells/ml and electroporated in the presence of 50 µg reporter construct (250 V, 2250 µF, 48 ohms) using 4-mm (gap width) cuvettes in a BTX Electro Cell Manipulator (Genetronics, San Diego, CA). After electroporation, the cells were diluted in fresh medium, allowed to rest for 1 h before plating, and then stimulated with anti-CD2 or anti-CD2 + anti-CD28 mAbs for 4 h. Luminescence was measured with a Promega (Madison, WI) luciferase assay kit and counted on a 6-detector Wallac 1450 Microbeta liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD) with coincidence counting deactivated.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression by LPMC activated via
the CD2 pathway
LP T cells represent a distinct class of lymphocytes that are
significantly more responsive than PB T cells to activation via the CD2
pathway (21). Stimulation of LP T cells through the CD2
pathway elicits proliferation as well as secretion of IFN-
and other
cytokines. In contrast to PB T cells, LP T cells do not respond well to
activation via the TCR/CD3 pathway. Costimulation of the accessory CD28
molecule synergizes with CD2, resulting in a marked increase of IFN-
secretion in LPMC (21).
To determine the molecular events involved in regulation of IFN-
secretion by LP T cells, LPMC were isolated and activated with
anti-CD2 Abs in the presence or absence of CD28 costimulation. As
seen in Fig. 1
A, a measurable
amount of IFN-
was detected in supernatants of LPMC as early as
3 h after CD2 activation and continued to rise over 24 h.
CD28 costimulation further enhanced IFN-
production levels,
particularly at early time points up to 6 h postactivation. As
shown in Fig. 1
B, Northern blot analysis of mRNA isolated
from LPMC after activation with anti-CD2 or anti-CD2 +
anti-CD28 revealed that the increase in the level of IFN-
was
paralleled by an increase in IFN-
mRNA expression. Expression of
IFN-
mRNA was detectable as early as 1 h after activation by
CD2 and continued to rise over 24 h. CD28 costimulation of the CD2
activation pathway resulted in a significant increase in the levels of
IFN-
mRNA expression by LPMC at 2 h that was sustained over
24 h.
|
mRNA
The enhanced accumulation of IFN-
mRNA observed after CD28
costimulation of LPMC could be a result of an increase in the
transcriptional rate or in posttranscriptional modification of IFN-
mRNA. To determine whether CD28 augmentation of mRNA levels in LPMC was
a result of enhanced mRNA stability, LPMC were activated with
anti-CD2 or anti-CD2 + anti-CD28 for 2 h (maximum for
mRNA expression). Actinomycin D was then added to prevent further
transcriptional initiation, and mRNA decay was monitored for the
indicated periods of time. Fig. 2
shows
that after CD2 activation, newly synthesized IFN-
mRNA exhibited
rapid decay, with a half-life of 43 min. CD28 coligation resulted in
stabilization of IFN-
mRNA and extended the half-life of IFN-
mRNA from 43 min to 228 min.
|
promoter
In tumor T cell lines, CD28 costimulation enhanced transcriptional
activation of transfected IFN-
promoter elements (18),
yet nuclear run-on studies conducted in PBL failed to detect
transcriptional activation (17). To determine whether
enhanced transcriptional activation of the IFN-
promoter was
involved after CD2 + CD28 costimulation of PBL or LPMC, nuclear run-on
assays were performed on cells utilizing the same activation protocol
as that used for transfection studies. As seen in Fig. 3
, a basal level of IFN-
gene
transcription was detectable in unstimulated PBL and LPMC and was
up-regulated after CD2 activation. However, as reported previously
(17), CD28 costimulation did not result in enhanced
transcription, as measured by run-on assays, over that observed by CD2
alone in PBL or LPMC. An equivalent level of ß-actin was detected in
both unstimulated and stimulated conditions. No signal was detected
hybridizing to the plasmid vector alone (data not shown).
|
gene appears to be complex with
numerous, partially defined regulatory elements. However, transgenic
mice generated with a full length human genomic fragment including the
-2.7-kb 5'-flanking promoter region express human IFN-
in a
tissue-specific manner (31). These studies suggest that
the key elements necessary for IFN-
gene regulation reside within
the 2.7-kb region of the IFN-
promoter. To investigate the role of
these elements in CD2 pathway activation of IFN-
production, a
-2.7-kb IFN-
promoter-luciferase construct was transfected into PBL
and LPMC. CD2 activation resulted in a marked up-regulation of reporter
gene activity in both PBL and LPMC (Fig. 4
transactivation over that observed by CD2 alone (Fig. 4
|
promoter region
To identify the CD2 response elements within the -2.7-kb region
of the IFN-
promoter, we transfected both PBL and LPMC with a
promoter-construct encompassing the entire -2.7-kb region. Expression
was then compared with a series of constructs truncated to -538 bp,
-204 bp and -108 bp immediately upstream from the IFN-
transcriptional start site, as well as the basal -39-bp construct.
Fig. 5
shows that the
cis-regulatory regions involved in the transactivation of
IFN-
gene expression in PBL are different from those in LPMC. In
CD2-activated PBL, deletion of the region between -538 and -204 bp
resulted in reduction of promoter activity to levels of the basal
-39-bp construct, although significant CD2 responsiveness was retained
within the -108-bp region (Fig. 5
A). Moreover, the -108-bp
construct consistently exhibited enhanced expression as compared with
the -204-bp construct, suggesting the presence of a CD2 response
repressor element within the -204 to -108 region. A similar pattern
of cis-regulatory regions was involved after PMA/ionophore
activation (Fig. 5
C). In LPMC, deletion of the region from
-2.7 kb down to -204 bp did not diminish CD2-directed activation of
the IFN-
promoter-reporter construct (Fig. 5
B).
Furthermore, the -204-bp reporter construct consistently exhibited
enhanced response to CD2 activation after transfection compared with
the -2.7-kb and -538-bp promoter constructs, suggesting the presence
of a CD2 response repressor element upstream of -204 region.
Truncation of the region between -204 and -108 bp resulted in a
significant reduction of promoter activity, although a basal level of
CD2 responsiveness was retained within the region from -108 to +64. A
similar pattern of cis-regulatory regions to those
identified after CD2 activation was involved in promoter
transactivation after PMA/ionophore activation of LPMC (Fig. 5
D).
|
promoter, with distinct
cis-regulatory regions of transactivation. In PBL, the
region of -108 to -39 bp is essential for promoter function, whereas
in LPMC at least two regions are involved in controlling CD2-mediated
transactivation of the IFN-
promoter: 1) a major CD2-regulatory
element contained within the region -204 to -108 bp upstream of the
transcriptional start site; and 2) a minor regulatory element residing
within -108 to -40 bp of the transcriptional start site. Up-regulation of AP-1 nuclear factors is involved in CD2 signaling
Increased binding of transcriptional AP-1 nucleoprotein has been
implicated in regulation of IFN-
promoter activity in T cell lines
(10). Furthermore, inhibition of the binding of AP-1 is
implicated in the mechanism for glucocorticoid inhibition of IFN-
expression in T cell lines (8). To determine whether
induction of functionally active jun/fos, AP-1 nucleo-factors were
involved in the regulation of IFN-
expression in PBL and LPMC,
transfection experiments were conducted using a multimeric AP-1-binding
TRE2 reporter construct. CD2 ligation resulted in transactivation of a
multimeric AP-1-binding TRE2 reporter construct in both PBL and LPMC
(Fig. 6
). The increased promoter activity
induced in PBL was 100-fold (Fig. 6
A), whereas only a
20-fold increase of AP-1 transactivation occurred in LPMC (Fig. 6
B). Although the background level in unstimulated LPMC was
high, PMA/ionophore-activated PBL and LPMC exhibited a similar level of
AP-1 transactivation. These results indicate that there is a functional
increase in AP-1 binding after CD2 pathway activation of LPMC and PBL,
with AP-1 activation appearing essential for transactivation in PBL but
probably less so for LPMC.
|
A number of AP-1-binding elements have been defined within the
region -108 bp to +64 bp of the transcriptional start site necessary
for regulation of IFN-
gene expression in T cell lines. The
conserved proximal (-73 to -48) and distal (-96 to -80) regions are
believed to be essential for regulation of IFN-
gene expression in
activated T cell lines. Activation of both the proximal and distal
conserved elements is mediated through the binding of AP-1,
jun/fos-transacting factors (8). To ascertain the role of
these elements in regulation of IFN-
expression, both LPMC and PBL
were transfected with promoter-reporter constructs containing multiple
copies of the proximal or distal element upstream of a minimal IFN-
promoter. IFN-
expression was then monitored after activation
with CD2. CD2 activation of PBL increased transactivation of the
proximal and the distal conserved regions by 200- and 100-fold,
respectively, showing that both represent CD2 response elements (Fig. 7
A). Likewise, the proximal
and distal regions responded to PMA/ionophore activation with 100- and
700-fold increases, respectively (Fig. 7
C). In contrast,
transfection of the proximal AP-1-binding elements in LPMC did not
restore loss of CD2 responsiveness above the expression of the basal
-39-bp construct (Fig. 7
C; note difference in scale range).
There was only a modest 2-fold increase over basal expression by
concatamers of four repeats of the distal AP-1 binding region
transfected into LPMC (Fig. 7
B). Similarly, after
PMA/ionophore activation, no additional transactivation was detected
with the distal region and only a modest (<2-fold) increase was
detected over the minimal promoter following transfection of the
proximal AP-1-binding elements (Fig. 7
D).
|
promoter. After CD2 activation, up-regulation of protein
complexes binding to the proximal AP-1 region of the IFN-
promoter
is marginal. A similarly marginal up-regulation of proteins binding to
the distal conserved element of the IFN-
promoter following CD2
activation was detected (data not shown). Thus, the proximal and distal
elements may be critical for activation of IFN-
expression in PBL
and T cell lines, although it is unlikely that they play a similarly
important role after CD2 activation of LPMC.
|
BED region does not appear essential for regulation of
IFN-
expression following CD2 activation of LPMC
The region -204 to -108 bp upstream of the transcriptional start
site has been defined above by functional analysis as being a major
CD2-regulatory element in LPMC. This region almost completely overlaps
with the previously defined BED region (-211 to -186 bp) in T cell
lines (12). Previous studies have shown that there is a
complex interaction between competitive binding of the YY-1 and AP-1
transcriptional factors in T cell lines. It has been hypothesized that
transactivation of the IFN-
gene occurs through the displacement of
YY-1 by AP-1 (12). Subsequent studies confirmed the
importance of this region (-196 to -183 bp) in activation of primary
memory T cells, through the recruitment of AP-1 binding to this site
(13). To assess the effect of CD2 activation on functional
regulation of the CD2 in our system, LPMC were transfected with a
promoter-reporter construct containing an internal deletion spanning
the BED region AP-1-binding site. In contrast to what has been reported
for PBL, deletion of the entire region between -214 and -178 bp did
not result in a loss of CD2 responsiveness, but rather an increase in
CD2 responsiveness was detected, probably due to the loss of the
repressor YY-1 binding site (Fig. 9
A). This finding suggests
that binding of AP-1 to a CD2 enhancer response element occurs outside
of the YY-1 site. Additionally, LPMC were activated with CD2 and
nuclear proteins were analyzed for binding to the -198- to -180-bp
AP-1-binding site by EMSA. Fig. 9
B shows that there was
constitutive binding of nuclear proteins to this site in unstimulated
LPMC, which remained unchanged after CD2 activation. Thus, functional
activation of AP-1 appears to be up-regulated after CD2 activation;
however, only modest changes, if any, were observed in binding of
trans-factors to the previously characterized AP-1-binding
sites. These results suggest that additional distinct sites, other than
those previously described in PBL and T cell line systems, are involved
in regulation of IFN-
gene expression in LPMC.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production after CD2 and CD2 +
CD28 as well as PMA/ionophore activation of LPMC. Our results identify
novel regulatory mechanisms in the mucosa that are distinct from those
in PBL and T cell lines. IFN-
gene expression in LPMC is highly
sensitive to CD2 activation. Coligation of the CD28 molecule further
enhances IFN-
secretion by mucosal T cells. Our data show that in
CD2-activated PBL and LPMC, similar to what has been reported for
TCR-activated PBL, CD28 costimulation enhances IFN-
mRNA stability
without increasing the rate of transcriptional activation. Transfection
of a -2.7-kb IFN-
promoter-reporter construct into both PBL and
LPMC reveals significant promoter activity after CD2 activation. After
CD2 + CD28 costimulation, there was a significantly greater increase of
transactivation in PBL, but not in LPMC. There are multiple CD2 and PMA
activational response elements within the IFN-
promoter with
transactivation of IFN-
involving distinct cis-regulatory
regions in PBL as compared with LPMC.
Studies performed in PBMC and tumor T cell lines activated via TCR and
CD28 costimulation demonstrated that CD28 ligation of activated T cells
results in enhanced secretion of multiple cytokines, including IFN-
(16, 17). The molecular mechanisms of this effect remain
uncertain. Initially, nuclear run-on studies performed with PBL
revealed enhanced IFN-
mRNA stability after CD28 costimulation.
Although TCR stimulation results in IFN-
mRNA expression, CD28
costimulation did not enhance transcriptional activity
(16). Subsequent transfection studies in T cell lines
suggest that a modest increase in transcriptional activation of the
IFN-
promoter occurs after CD28 costimulation. Analysis of several
cytokine promoter elements, including IFN-
, reveal a conserved
region (-161 to -153 bp) in the 5'-flanking sequence that closely
resembles a promoter motif defined as the CD28 response element in the
IL-2 promoter (16). Expression of the IL-2 gene after CD28
costimulation has been well studied and occurs through the binding of
B-like transcription factors to the CD28 response element
(32). Multiple c-Rel and NF
B binding sites have been
identified throughout the IFN-
promoter, although none of these
regions, including the conserved region -161 to -153 bp, have been
demonstrated to be selectively transactivated after CD28 costimulation
(33).
At first glance, it would seem that there is a discrepancy between the
nuclear run-on data and the results from transfection analysis.
However, several explanations could account for this discordance.
Although traditionally the transcriptional run-on assay has been
favored as the method for analyzing alterations in the rate of
transcriptional initiation, it is relatively insensitive in part, due
to measurement of transcription at a single time point outside the
context of the cell environment. Additionally, run-on assays do not
directly measure initiation, but rather, they are indicative of the
rate of transcription through the measurement of elongation and run-on
of previously initiated transcript. Likewise, run-on assays are
insensitive for measuring changes in the rate of transcriptional
elongation, splicing, and mRNA transport and are susceptible to
attenuation through DNA sequences within a gene (34).
Indeed, regulation of IL-2 expression after cycloheximide treatment
results in inconsistencies between the nuclear run-on data and enhanced
mRNA levels, due to posttranscriptional up-regulation
(35). Moreover, the steady state levels of unspliced IL-2
mRNA precursors have been shown to differ from those of IL-2-luciferase
(36) due to a posttranscriptional mechanism. In contrast,
transfection studies directly measure the accumulative kinetics of
transcriptional initiation within the intact cell. Our nuclear run-on
data are in agreement with the literature (17, 18).
Although one could argue that transfection experiments measure promoter
activity in the absence of chromatin structure, marked differences in
promoter response were displayed between PBL and LPL despite the fact
that both would be subject to identical absence of chromatin structure.
More importantly, the transfection studies emphasize that although CD2
leads to activation of the IFN-
promoter in both PBL and LPL,
different and distinct promoter elements are involved in this
augmentation.
In addition to the CD28 pathway, several additional signaling systems
affecting IFN-
mRNA stability have been described. Expression of
IFN-
mRNA in PHA-stimulated blasts or tumor T cells is stabilized
after treatment with both IL-2 and IL-12 (37). IL-7, in a
dose-dependent manner, up-regulates IFN-
secretion of
CD28-coactivated T cells by increasing the transcriptional rate as well
as enhancing IFN-
mRNA stability (38). Similarly, in a
murine system, activation of either cAMP or protein kinase C resulted
in enhanced IFN-
mRNA expression without having any effect on
transactivation of the IFN-
gene (39). Interestingly,
studies of patients with atopic dermatitis suggest that disease
pathology correlates with reduced IFN-
secretion (40).
A posttranscriptional defect has been proposed as a mediator of the
disease process because high levels of IFN-
mRNA are observed in the
absence of IFN-
protein secretion. Despite these studies, the
precise molecular mechanism regulating IFN-
mRNA stability remains
unclear.
The mRNA of IFN-
possesses multiple AUUUA motifs in the
3'-untranslated region of the mRNA (19). These sequences
are believed to function as rapid turnover elements mediating mRNA
degradation. Indeed, the addition of AUUUA motifs onto normally stable
transcripts has been shown in chimeric constructs to be sufficient to
generate rapid turnover (41). Nevertheless, CD28
costimulation enhances IFN-
and IL-2 mRNA stability in PBL; however,
no preferential enhancement in the stability of c-myc or
c-fos was detected, notwithstanding the presence of AU-rich
motifs in these mRNAs (17). Recent studies of the IL-2
gene have suggested that both 5' and 3' sequences within the
untranslated region of the IL-2 mRNA are critical for mRNA
stabilization (42). Indeed, the 5'-untranslated region
appears to be an important region, targeting the activation of
c-jun amino-terminal kinase, which leads to phosphorylation
and activation of c-jun. Thus, c-jun
amino-terminal kinase activation not only results in an increase in
binding of AP-1 and up-regulated gene transcription but now also has
been shown to directly promote mRNA stability. It is conceivable that
similar unidentified sequences are present within the IFN-
gene that
would directly link up-regulation of AP-1 activity with enhanced
IFN-
mRNA stability.
Functional studies indicate an increase in AP-1 activity after CD2
activation of PBL and LPMC; however, the effect varies between cell
types. In PBL, a 120-fold increase in AP-1 activity was detected after
transfection of an AP-1-binding construct, whereas in LPMC a more
modest 20-fold enhancement of AP-1 activity was observed. Transfection
of progressive truncations of the IFN-
promoter and constructs
encompassing the AP-1-binding sites suggest that the region between
-108 and +64 bp, which is critical for CD2 and PMA/ionophore
transactivation in PBL, is of only modest importance in transactivation
in LPMC. In LPMC, a significant CD2 response element resides between
-204 and -108 bp, a region previously reported in PBL and T cell
lines to possess an essential AP-1-binding site. CD2-mediated
transactivation of the IFN-
promoter in LPMC is not altered by
deletion of this AP-1 site. Moreover, in direct contrast to what has
been previously reported for PBMC, EMSA analysis of nucleoprotein
binding to the known AP-1-binding elements described within both the
-108- and +64-bp and -204- and -108-bp regions supports the
conclusion that CD2 activation does not appreciably alter nuclear
proteins binding to these sites in LPMC. However, a change in the
composition of these nuclear protein complexes cannot be ruled out.
These results illustrate the complexity of molecular events involved in
transcriptional regulation of IFN-
expression in LPMC and highlight
unique regulatory mechanisms distinct from those we observed in PBL and
previously noted T cell lines.
In T cell lines, the IFN-
promoter possesses multiple AP-1-binding
sites. The two promoter elements designated the proximal (-73 to -48)
and distal (-96 to -80) binding sites have been shown to be critical
for transactivation of IFN-
expression in T cell lines. The proximal
element has been shown to be a target for selective hypomethylation in
cells that express IFN-
(43) and is believed to
generate activation-specific expression in T-cell lines through binding
of jun/ATF-2 heterodimers to this element (10). These
sites are targets for selective inhibition of IFN-
gene
transactivation after glucocorticoid treatment (8), but
not following retinoid treatment (44, 45). Additionally,
whereas these sites are critical in regulation in PBL and T cell lines,
they are of modest importance in modulating CD2 response in LPMC. Thus,
it appears that both the cell type and the mode of activation play a
role in the selective transactivation of promoter elements.
Recent studies in our laboratory evaluating expression of IL-2 in LPMC
support the notion that regulation of cytokine gene expression in PBL
differs from that observed in LPMC (24, 46). Additional
studies by other groups have indicated that regulation of IFN-
gene
expression in primary T cells differs from that observed in tumor T
cell lines and likewise differs in naive compared with memory T cell
subsets. On a structural level, the IFN-
gene is virtually
completely methylated in thymocytes or CD45RAhigh
CD45ROlow neonatal or adult T cells that do not
express IFN-
(47). In contrast, the IFN-
gene is in
a hypomethylated state in adult CD45RAlow
CD45ROhigh T cells that express IFN-
. It has
been suggested that the interplay between inducible and constitutive
nucleoprotein interactions directs IFN-
gene transcription in vivo.
For example, in a transgenic murine primary T cell system, expression
of IFN-
in memory cells was under the control of both the proximal
and distal element, yet naive T cells required priming to activate
transcription from these elements (28). Furthermore, cAMP
inhibited transactivation directed by the proximal element in primed
mouse CD8+ T cells; however, transactivation of
the distal element was increased in these same cells after induction of
cAMP (28). In fact, distinct differences were seen in the
transactivation of these two elements when comparing murine
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
subsets (28).
The mononuclear cells in this study are comprised of predominantly
CD45RAlow CD45RO high
memory T cells of both CD4+ and
CD8+ T cell subsets (21). Regulation
of transcription in these cells appears distinct from that observed in
PB memory T cells. The -183- and -196-bp AP-1 binding site, located
within the BED element first identified in T cell lines, encompasses a
number of overlapping cis elements capable of binding YY-1,
AP-1 and SP-1 (12). It was hypothesized that the selective
binding of AP-1 to this region, displacing YY-1, was critical for
transcriptional activation. Studies of PBL supported this hypothesis
and suggested that the composition of DNA-protein interactions binding
to the -183- and -196-bp AP-1 site in human memory T cells differs
from that seen in naive T-cells (13). Indeed, deletion of
this site virtually eliminates expression of IFN-
in peripheral
memory T-cells (13). In direct contrast in LPMC, Fig. 6
shows that deletion of this AP-1-binding site fails to abolish CD2
activation of LPMC. Likewise, although inducible nucleoprotein binding
was detected in peripheral memory T cells binding to this site, EMSA
analysis of nucleoprotein extracted from LPMC remained unchanged after
CD2 activation.
Thus, it appears that there is a specific interplay between a complex
of factors binding to numerous cis-regulatory sequences
which may be regulated differently in LP T cells from those of PBL and
T cell lines. The selective activation of these elements might play an
important role in mediating cytokine expression in the intestine. CD2
signaling of LPMC or PBL results in functional activation of AP-1,
suggesting that regulation of AP-1 binding may be essential for IFN-
production. However, the previously identified AP-1-binding sites of
the IFN-
promoter including the proximal, distal, as well as BED
region AP-1 site, are not the targets for CD2-directed transactivation
in LPMC. In addition, these studies represent the first reports of
transcriptional activation of the IFN-
promoter in response to CD2
stimulation. The data presented in this study provide evidence
indicating that regulation of IFN-
production in LP T cells is
complex, involving regulation of multiple cis-regulatory
sequences within the IFN-
promoter region that differ from those
elements important for IFN-
activation of peripheral T cells.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Stephan R. Targan, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, D4063, Los Angeles, CA 90048. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ATF, activating transcription factor; LP, lamina propria; LPMC, lamina propria mononuclear cells; PB, peripheral blood; PHA-L, PHA-leukoagglutinin. ![]()
Received for publication May 28, 1999. Accepted for publication November 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in immune cell regulation. J. Leukocyte Biol. 58:373.[Abstract]
-Interferon: an immunoregulatory lymphokine with immunotherapeutic potential. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 9:642.[Medline]
production by neonatal T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 87:194.
. Lymphokines 13:151.
-interferon. J. Interferon Res. 6:39.[Medline]
promoter by glucocorticoids and dominant negative mutants of c-Jun. J. Biol. Chem. 270:12548.
promoter confer activation specific expression in T cells. J. Exp. Med. 178:1483.
promoter mediates selective expression in T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 271:31964.
promoter through two mechanisms: inhibition of AP1 binding and activation of a silencer element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4744.[Abstract]
promoter in in vivo CD45RA and CD45R0 T helper subsets. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:1098.[Medline]
interferon promoter elements in naive and memory (effector) CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:199.[Abstract]
genomic DNA in transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 143:2389.[Abstract]
B and NFAT with the interferon-
promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 272:30412.
induction by natural killer cell stimulatory factor (NKSF/IL-12). J. Immunol. 148:92.[Abstract]
and IL-4 in activated human T lymphocytes by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. J. Immunol. 156:1333.[Abstract]
mRNA in a cytolytic T cell clone:Ca2 +-induced transcription followed by mRNA stabilization through activation of protein kinase C or increase in cAMP. J. Immunol. 25:889.
mRNA expression in atopic dermatitis: evidence for a post-transcriptional defect. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 97:483.[Medline]
gene. J. Immunol. 153:3603.[Abstract]
promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 271:26783.
synthesis in cloned mouse Th1 lymphocytes depends on the CD28 costimulatory pathway. J. Immunol. 156:2674.[Abstract]