|
|
||||||||
Activators Inhibit IFN-
-Induced Expression of the T Cell-Active CXC Chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC in Human Endothelial Cells1





*
Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
Infectious Disease Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129; and
Department of Neurosciences, The Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
), a member
of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily originally shown to play an
important role in adipocyte differentiation and glucose homeostasis, is
now known to regulate inflammatory responses. Given the importance of
endothelial cell (EC)-derived chemokines in regulating leukocyte
function and trafficking, we studied the effects of PPAR
ligands on
the expression of chemokines induced in ECs by the Th1 cytokine
IFN-
. Treatment of ECs with PPAR
activators significantly
inhibited IFN-
-induced mRNA and protein expression of the CXC
chemokines IFN-inducible protein of 10 kDa (IP-10), monokine induced by
IFN-
(Mig), and IFN-inducible T-cell
-chemoattractant (I-TAC),
whereas expression of the CC chemokine monocyte chemoattractant
protein-1 was not altered. PPAR
activators decreased IFN-inducible
protein of 10 kDa promoter activity and inhibited protein binding to
the two NF-
B sites but not to the IFN-stimulated response element
ISRE site. Furthermore, PPAR
ligands inhibited the release of
chemotactic activity for CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3)-transfected
lymphocytes from IFN-
-stimulated ECs. These data suggest that
anti-diabetic PPAR
activators might attenuate the recruitment of
activated T cells at sites of Th1-mediated
inflammation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a critical mediator of
Th1 immunity and is a potent activator of the endothelium. IFN-
stimulates ECs to express specific adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1)
and chemokines that regulate the trafficking of lymphocytes
and monocytes into sites of Th1-type inflammation. In particular,
IFN-
induces ECs to secrete three CXC chemokines, IFN-inducible
protein of 10 kDa (IP-10), monokine induced by IFN-
(Mig), and
IFN-inducible T-cell
-chemoattractant (I-TAC), which are active on
Th1 cells, and the CC chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
(MCP-1), which is active on monocytes (2). In addition,
immunohistochemical analysis of human atherosclerotic lesions revealed
IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC expression in ECs overlaying the plaque
(2), suggesting that these chemokines likely play an
important role in T cell recruitment to sites of inflammation.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
), as well as
PPAR
and PPAR
, belong to the superfamily of nuclear receptor
transcription factors that regulate gene expression in response to
specific ligands. PPAR
activators include naturally occurring
ligands, such as the prostaglandin D2 metabolite
15-deoxy-
12,14 prostaglandin
J2 (15d-PGJ2) (3, 4), and synthetic ligands, such as the antidiabetic
thiazolidinedione agents troglitazone and rosiglitazone (BRL49653)
(5, 6). In contrast, PPAR
ligands include natural
polyunsaturated fatty acids, eicosanoids, as well as synthetic fibric
acid derivatives, such as fenofibrate and WY 14643 (7, 8).
Although originally implicated in adipocyte differentiation and glucose
homeostasis, PPAR
has recently been shown to regulate inflammatory
responses. In monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages, activation of
PPAR
inhibits the expression of TNF-
, IL-1
, IL-6, inducible
nitric oxide synthase, gelatinase B/matrix metalloproteinase-9, and
scavenger receptor A (9, 10, 11). In a transformed colonic
epithelial cell line, PPAR
activation inhibits the expression of
IL-1-induced MCP-1 and IL-8 expression in vitro, and PPAR
ligands
reduced the severity of colonic inflammation in a mouse model of
colitis (12). PPAR
is also expressed in ECs, with data
supporting PPAR
regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor
type-1, endothelin-1, and angiogenesis (13, 14, 15).
We hypothesized that PPAR
might be involved in the regulation of
IFN-
-induced chemokine expression in human ECs, and therefore we
investigated the effect of naturally occurring and synthetic PPAR
activators on the expression of the CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and
I-TAC and the CC chemokine MCP-1.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human saphenous vein ECs were isolated from explants from unused portions of saphenous veins harvested at coronary artery bypass surgery (13). Cells were cultured in medium 199 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) containing 25 mmol/L HEPES, 1% (w/v) heparin, 50 µg/ml EC growth factor, 10 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, and 5% FCS on low-pyrogen fibronectin (1.5 mg/cm2). ECs were >99% von Willebrand factor-positive as determined by flow cytometry and were used at passages 25 for all experiments. The human bladder cancer cell line ECV304 was obtained and cultured as described by American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA), and the human CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) 300-19 transfected cell line and parental untransfected lines (gifts from B. Moser, Theodor-Kocher Institute, Bern, Switzerland) were cultured as described (16).
RNA extraction and Northern blot analysis
Human ECs were treated in standard culture media as above for
12 h with IFN-
(100 U/ml) in the absence or presence of
different PPAR
activators (10 µM 15d-PGJ2
(Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), 10 µM troglitazone (gift from
Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ), 10 µM BRL49653 (rosiglitazone; gift
from SmithKline Beecham, Philadelphia, PA)) or PPAR
activators (30
µM docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), 30 µM eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)
(both from Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 250 µM WY14643 (Biomol,
Plymouth Meeting, PA)). Total RNA from 107 cells
was isolated using RNAzol (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX). Ten micrograms
of total RNA was used for Northern blot analysis as described
(17). Blots were hybridized sequentially with the
following radiolabeled ([
-32P]deoxycytidine
5'-triphosphate) probes: a 1-kb PstI fragment from IP-10
cDNA (18), a 3-kb NotI fragment from human Mig
cDNA (19) (gift from J. Farber, National Institutes
Health, Bethesda, MD); a 300-bp BamHI/AvaI
fragment from human I-TAC cDNA (20) (gift from K. Neote,
Pfizer, Groton, CT); a 346-bp EcoRI fragment from human
MCP-1 cDNA (ATCC); and a GAPDH cDNA as a control for RNA loading.
Transient transfection assay
ECV304 cells were transiently transfected with IP-10
promotor-luciferase constructs (21) and a CMV-ß-galactosidase vector
(pCMV-ß-Gal, Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) using Lipofectamine according
to the manufacturers protocol (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD).
Transfected cells were stimulated with IFN-
(100 U/ml) in the
presence or absence of 15d-PGJ2, troglitazone, or
BRL49653 (all 10 µM). Cells were harvested after 16 h, and
luciferase and ß-galactosidase activity was measured using the
Dual-Light assay (Tropix, Bedford, MA).
EMSA
Human ECs were stimulated for 12 h with IFN-
(100 U/ml)
and 15d-PGJ2 (10 µM) before the preparation of
nuclear extracts. Standard EMSA was performed as described
(22) using oligonucleotides for the IFN-stimulated
response element (ISRE) site (5'-CGCTTTGGAAAGTGAAACCTACCTC-3'), the
B1 site (5'-GCAACATGGGACTTCCCCAGGAAC-3'), and the
B2 site
(5'-GAGCAGAGGGAAATTCCGTAACTT-3') of the human IP-10 promoter.
In vitro chemotaxis assay
Sodium butyrate-treated CXCR3-transfected and -untransfected
300-19 cells (5 x 106 cells/ml) were placed
in the top of a 48-well microchemotaxis chamber (Neuroprobe, Cabin
John, MD) separated by a polycarbonate filter with 5-µm pores from
10-fold dilutions of conditioned media collected from untreated ECs,
IFN-
-treated ECs, IFN-
- and
15d-PGJ2-treated ECs, and
15d-PGJ2-treated ECs or from IP-10 and I-TAC as
positive controls. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 90 min in a 5%
CO2 incubator, and migrated cells were stained
with Diff-Quick and counted. Chemotaxis index (CI) is defined as the
number of cells migrating in response to EC-conditioned medium divided
by the number of cells migrating in response to medium alone.
ELISA
To determine the amount of secreted CXC chemokines in supernatants used for the chemotaxis assays, sandwich ELISAs for IP-10 (17), Mig (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and I-TAC were performed. mAbs were used for the capture Ab and rabbit polycloncal Abs were used for detection. For the I-TAC ELISA, mAb 8G4 and the polyclonal Ab were generously provided by K. Neote.
Assessment of total protein synthesis
To determine the effect of 15d-PGJ2 on the
total protein synthesis in human ECs, cells were treated with IFN-
in the absence or presence of 15d-PGJ2 in media
containing radioactive-labeled methionine
([35S]-methionine, 0.2 µCi/ml). After 24
h, cells were harvested, and total protein synthesis in both lysates
and supernatants was measured by counting radioactivity after cold
trichloroacetic acid precipitation.
Statistical analysis
Differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and then by Fishers test. A p value of <0.05 was regarded as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
but not PPAR
activators inhibit IFN-
-induced CXC
chemokine mRNA expression in human ECs
To investigate the effect of PPAR activators on endothelial
chemokine mRNA expression, human ECs were stimulated for 12 h with
IFN-
(100 U/ml) in the absence or presence of different PPAR
(10
µM 15d-PGJ2, 10 µM troglitazone, 10 µM
BRL49653) or PPAR
activators (30 µM DHA, 30 µM EPA, 250 µM
WY14643), and Northern blot analysis was performed. As expected,
IFN-
induced the expression of IP-10, Mig, I-TAC, and MCP-1 mRNA in
human ECs. Treatment of ECs with three different PPAR
activators,
added at the time of IFN-
stimulation, significantly reduced IP-10,
Mig, and I-TAC mRNA levels. In contrast, none of these PPAR
activators affected IFN-
-induced MCP-1 expression (Fig. 1
A, left panel).
Densitometry analysis revealed 15d-PGJ2 as the
strongest inhibitor of CXC chemokine mRNA expression in ECs, inhibiting
IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC expression by 78, 73, and 75%, respectively
(Fig. 1
B). None of the different PPAR
activators tested
affected IFN-
-induced chemokine mRNA expression significantly (Fig. 1
A, right panel, and B). PPAR
activators alone had no effect on chemokine expression (data not
shown). Treatment of ECs with PPAR
activators did not affect cell
viability or total protein synthesis (data not shown).
|
To further investigate the effect of PPAR
activators on
IFN-
-induced CXC chemokine expression, we asked whether
15d-PGJ2, the most efficacious inhibitor tested,
blocked IP-10 mRNA accumulation and protein secretion in a
concentration-dependent manner. ECs were costimulated with IFN-
and
different concentrations of 15d-PGJ2, and IP-10
mRNA accumulation was analyzed by Northern blot at 12 h.
15d-PGJ2 inhibited IP-10 mRNA expression in
IFN-
-stimulated ECs in a concentration-dependent manner with a
maximal reduction to 24 ± 5% at 10 µM compared with
IFN-
-stimulated cells (p < 0.01;
n = 3; Fig. 2
A). Experiments in the
presence of actinomycin D revealed that 15d-PGJ2
did not significantly reduce IP-10 mRNA half-life compared with control
cells (9.9 ± 1.1 h in control cells vs 10.4 ± 1.8
h in 15d-PGJ2-stimulated cells; p
= NS; n = 4; data not shown), indicating that the
inhibitory effect of 15d-PGJ2 on IP-10 mRNA
accumulation occurs at the transcriptional level rather than as a
result of altered mRNA stability. Consistent with the data obtained by
Northern blot analysis, treatment with 15d-PGJ2
also reduced secreted IP-10 protein levels in a concentration-dependent
fashion (Fig. 2
B).
|
activators inhibit IFN-
-induced IP-10 promoter activity
To further investigate the effect of PPAR
activators on IP-10
transcription, we transiently transfected two well-characterized IP-10
promoter reporter luciferase constructs (Fig. 3
A) into the human cell line
ECV304. IFN-
stimulation (16 h) of cells transfected with a 960-bp
IP-10 promoter-reporter construct (GL-IP10) led to a 2.7 ±
0.4-fold increase in normalized promoter activity
(luciferase/ß-galactoside activity activity) similar to the effect
seen in fibrosarcoma cells (21). Treatment with
15d-PGJ2, troglitazone, or BRL49653 significantly
reduced this increase to 1.4 ± 0.1-fold
(p < 0.01), 1.6 ± 0.3-fold
(p < 0.05), and 1.6 ± 0.4-fold
(p < 0.05, compared with IFN-
-stimulated
cells; n = 3), respectively. Transfection studies with
a 435-bp IP-10 promoter-reporter deletion construct (TGL-IP10), lacking
the gamma-activated sequence (GAS) site but containing the ISRE site
and two NF-
B sites, revealed similar PPAR
activator
responsiveness. Stimulation of TGL-IP10 transfected cells with
IFN-
-enhanced relative luciferase activity 2.3 ± 0.2-fold,
similar to the effect seen in fibrosarcoma and astrocytoma cells
(21, 23). Treatment with PPAR
activators inhibited this
increase significantly: 15d-PGJ2 to 1.0 ±
0.3-fold, troglitazone to 0.9 ± 0.2-fold, and BRL49653 to
0.8 ± 0.1-fold (p < 0.01 for all,
compared with IFN-
-stimulated cells; n = 3; Fig. 3
B).
|
B activation in the IP-10
promoter
Because IFN-
induction of IP-10 transcription requires
cooperation of the ISRE site with at least one of the two NF-
B sites
in the IP-10 promoter (24), we investigated whether
PPAR
activators inhibit direct binding of transcription factors to
the ISRE site or to the NF-
B sites. Treatment of human ECs with
15d-PGJ2 did not affect the amount of
IFN-
-induced DNA-protein complexes associated with the ISRE
oligonucleotide (Fig. 3
C, left panel), suggesting
that PPAR
activators do not directly inhibit transcription factor
binding to the ISRE site. In contrast, in experiments using the
B1
or
B2 oligonucleotides, 15d-PGJ2 markedly
decreased the amount of shifted complexes induced by IFN-
(Fig. 3
C, middle panels). Therefore, PPAR
activators
may directly inhibit NF-
B activation at both
B sites in the IP-10
promoter. The specificity of the detected
B complexes was determined
by supershift analysis with anti-p50 Abs (data not shown). Protein
binding to a consensus SP-1 site served as a loading control (Fig. 3
C, right panel).
PPAR
activator 15d-PGJ2 inhibits CXCR3 chemotactic
activity released from IFN-
-stimulated ECs
To examine the potential functional relevance of inhibition by
15d-PGJ2 of IFN-
-induced CXCR3 ligand
expression in human ECs, we performed in vitro chemotaxis assay using
CXCR3-transfected lymphocytes and supernatants from cultured ECs.
Cell-free supernatants collected from IFN-
-treated ECs contained
substantial chemotactic activity for CXCR3 300-19 lymphocytes (CI
= 65 at 1:10 dilution) compared with supernatants collected from
untreated ECs (CI = 1 at all dilutions). ECs treated with
15d-PGJ2 (10 µM) and IFN-
released
significantly less CXCR3 chemotactic activity than IFN-
-stimulated
ECs. This was apparent at 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions of EC supernatant in
which 15d-PGJ2 reduced the CXCR3 chemotactic
activity found in IFN-
-stimulated EC supernatants by 58 and 72%,
respectively (p < 0.01; n = 3;
Fig. 4
). EC supernatants collected from
all groups had no chemotactic activity toward untransfected 300-19
cells (data not shown). In concordance with the ability of
15d-PGJ2 to inhibit the release of
IFN-
-induced CXCR3 chemotactic activity from ECs, ELISAs
specific for IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC revealed that
15d-PGJ2 reduced the amount of secreted CXCR3
ligands from IFN-
-stimulated ECs by 89 ± 7%
(p < 0.01; n = 5), 98 ±
2% (p < 0.05; n = 5), and
90 ± 6% (p < 0.05; n =
5), respectively (Fig. 4
B). 15d-PGJ2
stimulation alone did not release CXCR3 chemotactic activity (CI =
1) or secretion of IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC protein from ECs.
Interestingly, there was a hierarchy to the amounts of these chemokines
secreted from IFN-
-stimulated ECs: IP-10 was secreted to the highest
levels (102 ± 18 ng/ml; n = 5) followed by Mig
(10.6 ± 8.7 ng/ml; n = 5) and then I-TAC
(1.7 ± 1.6 ng/ml; n = 5).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activators inhibit
IFN-
-induced expression of the CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC
in human ECs. The mechanism for this effect is likely to be through
PPAR
activation, given prior evidence that troglitazone, BRL496553,
and 15d-PGJ2 are all PPAR
activators with
little activity for other PPAR forms. In addition, three PPAR
activators, including the
-specific agonist WY14643, had no effect
on IFN-
-induced chemokine expression. Nevertheless, we find, as
reported in other settings (9, 10), a greater biologic
effect with 15d-PGJ2 compared with that of
BRL49653, despite biochemical data demonstrating greater PPAR
receptor affinity for BRL49653 rather than
15d-PGJ2. This discrepancy has raised the
intriguing possibility that 15d-PGJ2 might also
act through other pathways (25), such as direct inhibition
and modification of I
B kinase (26).
To further characterize the underlying mechanisms for the effects of
PPAR
activators on CXC chemokine expression, we focused on the
regulation of IP-10 expression. The inhibition of IP-10 mRNA expression
occurs at a transcriptional level, because
15d-PGJ2 did not alter IP-10 mRNA half-life but
did inhibit IFN-
-induced IP-10 promoter activity. Interaction of
PPAR
with the IP-10 promoter was independent of a GAS element,
because PPAR
activators decreased the activity of both the longer
GL-IP10 reporter construct (containing the GAS element) and the
truncated TGL-IP10 construct (lacking the GAS site but containing an
ISRE and two NF-
B sites). IFN-
induction of IP-10 transcription
requires cooperation of the ISRE site with at least one of the two
NF-
B sites in the IP-10 promoter (27). Our EMSA results
indicate that the inhibition of IFN-
-induced IP-10 transcription by
PPAR
activators occurs through an inhibition of NF-
B rather than
ISRE activation. Our work extends the notion that PPAR
activators
can inhibit NF-
B (12) by demonstrating that PPAR
inhibiton of IP-10 also involves NF-
B. This effect could result from
direct interference with NF-
B binding to the IP-10 promoter, as
postulated for the interaction of NF-
B with other nuclear receptors
(e.g., the estrogen receptor (28)), or from reduced
nuclear translocation of NF-
B after PPAR
activation by inhibition
of I
B degradation as described in other settings of NF-
B
inhibition (29).
Our data also suggest differential regulation of chemokine expression
by PPAR
activators, given evidence for inhibition of the expression
in human ECs of the CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC, but no effect
on the expression of the CC chemokine MCP-1. This difference in PPAR
regulation of CXC but not CC chemokine expression might result from
their distinct transcriptional regulation by IFN-
. Activation of
IP-10 transcription by IFN-
occurs through cooperation of the ISRE
site with the NF-
B sites in the IP-10 promoter (27),
whereas transcriptional induction of MCP-1 by IFN-
occurs mainly
through the GAS site (30). Interestingly, PPAR
activators reduce IL-1ß-induced MCP-1 expression in a colon
epithelial cell line (12), a mechanism thought to be
mediated through an inhibition of NF-
B activation. It is noteworthy
that the I-TAC promoter also contains an ISRE site and an NF-
B site
(31). However, a tandem GAS-like element has been shown to
be important for IFN-
induction of Mig in some cells
(32). Although the detailed mechanism by which PPAR
activators inhibit Mig induction remains to be determined, these data
imply that there may be an unrecognized NF-
B site in the Mig
promoter or that PPAR
activators affect Mig expression in a
unique way.
Given the role of IFN-
-induced chemokines in Th1-mediated
inflammation, our study provides a novel mechanism for an
anti-inflammatory effect of PPAR
in ECs, with potentially
important implications for the treatment of diabetes given its
associated risk for vascular diseases.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 N.M. and F.M. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Andrew D. Luster, Infectious Disease Unit, AIDS Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital East, Building 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: EC, endothelial cell; IP-10, IFN-inducible protein of 10 kDa; Mig, monokine induced by IFN-
; I-TAC, IFN-inducible T cell
-chemoattractant; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; 15d-PGJ2, 15-deoxy-
12,14 prostaglandin J2; CXCR3, CXC chemokine receptor 3; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; ISRE, IFN-stimulated response element; CI, chemotaxis index; GAS, gamma-activated sequence; GL-IP10, IP-10 promoter-reporter construct; TGL-IPl0, truncated GL-IP10. ![]()
Received for publication December 30, 1999. Accepted for publication March 28, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
inducible CXC chemokines IP-10, Mig, and I-TAC are differentially expressed by human atheroma-associated cells: implications for lymphocyte recruitment in atherogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 104:1041.[Medline]
12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR
. Cell 83:803.[Medline]
and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83:813.[Medline]
(PPAR
). J. Biol. Chem. 270:12953.
agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones. J. Med. Chem. 39:665.[Medline]
and
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4312.
agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. Nature 391:82.[Medline]
is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature 391:79.[Medline]
: differentiation-dependent peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) expression and reduction of MMP-9 activity through PPAR
activation in mononuclear phagocytes in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 153:17.
ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammatory response. J. Clin. Invest. 104:383.[Medline]
activation in human endothelial cells increases plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 expression: PPAR
as a potential mediator in vascular disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19:546.
ligands are potent inhibitors of angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 274:9116.
on vascular endothelial function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254:757.[Medline]
-Interferon transcriptionally regulates an early-response gene containing homology to platelet proteins. Nature 315:672.[Medline]
chemoattractant (I-TAC): a novel non-ELR CXC chemokine with potent activity on activated T cells through selective high affinity binding to CXCR3. J. Exp. Med. 187:2009.
-containing complexes play a predominant role in induction of IFN-
-inducible protein, 10 kDa (IP-10) by IFN-
alone or in synergy with TNF-
. J. Immunol. 161:4736.
activators inhibit cytokine-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 expression in human endothelial cells. Circulation 99:3125.
B sequence motifs controls IFN
- and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated transcription from the murine IP-10 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 268:6677.
does not inhibit IL-6 or TNF-
responses of macrophages to lipopolysaccharide in vitro or in vivo. J. Immunol. 164:1046.
B kinase. Nature 403:103.[Medline]
B sequence motifs controls IFN
-and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated transcription from the murine IP-10 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 268:6677.
B by the estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett. 409:79.[Medline]
-stimulated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene transcription. J. Immunol. 161:3719.
interferon induction of Mig gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:914.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Piqueras, M. J. Sanz, M. Perretti, E. Morcillo, L. Norling, J. A. Mitchell, Y. Li, and D. Bishop-Bailey Activation of PPAR{beta}/{delta} inhibits leukocyte recruitment, cell adhesion molecule expression, and chemokine release J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2009; 86(1): 115 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Antonelli, S. M. Ferrari, P. Fallahi, S. Frascerra, E. Santini, S. S. Franceschini, and E. Ferrannini Monokine Induced by Interferon {gamma} (IFN{gamma}) (CXCL9) and IFN{gamma} Inducible T-Cell {alpha}-Chemoattractant (CXCL11) Involvement in Graves' Disease and Ophthalmopathy: Modulation by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonists J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1803 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lombardi, G. Cantini, E. Piscitelli, S. Gelmini, M. Francalanci, T. Mello, E. Ceni, G. Varano, G. Forti, M. Rotondi, et al. A New Mechanism Involving ERK Contributes to Rosiglitazone Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Interferon-{gamma} Inflammatory Effects in Human Endothelial Cells Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2008; 28(4): 718 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Duan, M. G. Usher, and R. M. Mortensen Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma}-Mediated Effects in the Vasculature Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 283 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Okamoto, E. J. Folco, M. Minami, A.K. Wara, M. W. Feinberg, G. K. Sukhova, R. A. Colvin, S. Kihara, T. Funahashi, A. D. Luster, et al. Adiponectin Inhibits the Production of CXC Receptor 3 Chemokine Ligands in Macrophages and Reduces T-Lymphocyte Recruitment in Atherogenesis Circ. Res., February 1, 2008; 102(2): 218 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. McGuire and S. E. Inzucchi New Drugs for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Part I: Thiazolidinediones and Their Evolving Cardiovascular Implications Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 440 - 449. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Poncin, A.-C. Gerard, M. Boucquey, M. Senou, P. B. Calderon, B. Knoops, B. Lengele, M.-C. Many, and I. M. Colin Oxidative Stress in the Thyroid Gland: From Harmlessness to Hazard Depending on the Iodine Content Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 424 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Antonelli, C. Ferri, P. Fallahi, S. M. Ferrari, D. Giuggioli, M. Colaci, A. Manfredi, S. Frascerra, F. Franzoni, F. Galetta, et al. CXCL10 ({alpha}) and CCL2 ( ) chemokines in systemic sclerosis a longitudinal study Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 45 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Crescioli, L Cosmi, E Borgogni, V Santarlasci, S Gelmini, M Sottili, E Sarchielli, B Mazzinghi, M Francalanci, A Pezzatini, et al. Methimazole inhibits CXC chemokine ligand 10 secretion in human thyrocytes J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 195(1): 145 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rotondi, L. Chiovato, S. Romagnani, M. Serio, and P. Romagnani Role of Chemokines in Endocrine Autoimmune Diseases Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2007; 28(5): 492 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Y. Ivashchenko, S. Z. Duan, M. G. Usher, and R. M. Mortensen PPAR-{gamma} knockout in pancreatic epithelial cells abolishes the inhibitory effect of rosiglitazone on caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): G319 - G326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Tsai, H.-J. Hsieh, F. Liao, C.-W. Ni, Y.-J. Chao, C.-Y. Hsieh, and D. L. Wang Laminar flow attenuates interferon-induced inflammatory responses in endothelial cells Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2007; 74(3): 497 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zapata-Gonzalez, F. Rueda, J. Petriz, P. Domingo, F. Villarroya, A. de Madariaga, and J. C. Domingo 9-cis-Retinoic Acid (9cRA), a Retinoid X Receptor (RXR) Ligand, Exerts Immunosuppressive Effects on Dendritic Cells by RXR-Dependent Activation: Inhibition of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Blocks Some of the 9cRA Activities, and Precludes Them to Mature Phenotype Development J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6130 - 6139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohga, K. Shikata, K. Yozai, S. Okada, D. Ogawa, H. Usui, J. Wada, Y. Shikata, and H. Makino Thiazolidinedione ameliorates renal injury in experimental diabetic rats through anti-inflammatory effects mediated by inhibition of NF-{kappa}B activation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): F1141 - F1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ptasinska, S. Wang, J. Zhang, R. A. Wesley, and R. L. Danner Nitric oxide activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma through a p38 MAPK signaling pathway FASEB J, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 950 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Brown and J. Plutzky Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors as Transcriptional Nodal Points and Therapeutic Targets Circulation, January 30, 2007; 115(4): 518 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Karalliedde, R. Buckingham, M. Starkie, D. Lorand, M. Stewart, G. Viberti, and for the Rosiglitazone Fluid Retention Study Group Effect of Various Diuretic Treatments on Rosiglitazone-Induced Fluid Retention J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3482 - 3490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B Patle, J. A De Lemos, K. L Wyne, and D. K McGuire Thiazolidinediones and risk for atherosclerosis: pleiotropic effects of PPAR{gamma} agonism Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, September 1, 2006; 3(2): 65 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Dubuquoy, C Rousseaux, X Thuru, L Peyrin-Biroulet, O Romano, P Chavatte, M Chamaillard, and P Desreumaux PPAR{gamma} as a new therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut, September 1, 2006; 55(9): 1341 - 1349. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Alfranca, M. A. Iniguez, M. Fresno, and J. M. Redondo Prostanoid signal transduction and gene expression in the endothelium: Role in cardiovascular diseases Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2006; 70(3): 446 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Racke, A. R. Gocke, M. Muir, A. Diab, P. D. Drew, and A. E. Lovett-Racke Nuclear Receptors and Autoimmune Disease: The Potential of PPAR Agonists to Treat Multiple Sclerosis J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 700 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Campia, L. A. Matuskey, and J. A. Panza Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Activation With Pioglitazone Improves Endothelium-Dependent Dilation in Nondiabetic Patients With Major Cardiovascular Risk Factors Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 867 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Antonelli, M. Rotondi, S. M. Ferrari, P. Fallahi, P. Romagnani, S. S. Franceschini, M. Serio, and E. Ferrannini Interferon-{gamma}-Inducible {alpha}-Chemokine CXCL10 Involvement in Graves' Ophthalmopathy: Modulation by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonists J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 614 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Blaschke, Y. Takata, E. Caglayan, R. E. Law, and W. A. Hsueh Obesity, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor, and Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 28 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hetzel, B. Balletshofer, K. Rittig, D. Walcher, W. Kratzer, V. Hombach, H.-U. Haring, W. Koenig, and N. Marx Rapid Effects of Rosiglitazone Treatment on Endothelial Function and Inflammatory Biomarkers Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1804 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Luna-Medina, M. Cortes-Canteli, M. Alonso, A. Santos, A. Martinez, and A. Perez-Castillo Regulation of Inflammatory Response in Neural Cells in Vitro by Thiadiazolidinones Derivatives through Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Activation J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21453 - 21462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, D. Walcher, N. Ivanova, K. Rautzenberg, A. Jung, R. Friedl, V. Hombach, R. de Caterina, G. Basta, M.-P. Wautier, et al. Thiazolidinediones Reduce Endothelial Expression of Receptors for Advanced Glycation End Products Diabetes, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 2662 - 2668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Francois, P. Richette, L. Tsagris, M. Raymondjean, M.-C. Fulchignoni-Lataud, C. Forest, J.-F. Savouret, and M.-T. Corvol Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{gamma} Down-regulates Chondrocyte Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 via a Novel Composite Element J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28411 - 28418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cunard, Y. Eto, J. T. Muljadi, C. K. Glass, C. J. Kelly, and M. Ricote Repression of IFN-{gamma} Expression by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7530 - 7536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx, H. Duez, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Atherogenesis: Regulators of Gene Expression in Vascular Cells Circ. Res., May 14, 2004; 94(9): 1168 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Lovett-Racke, R. Z. Hussain, S. Northrop, J. Choy, A. Rocchini, L. Matthes, J. A. Chavis, A. Diab, P. D. Drew, and M. K. Racke Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Agonists as Therapy for Autoimmune Disease J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5790 - 5798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Choi, R. Ray, Z. Zhang, and A. B. Mukherjee IFN-{gamma} Stimulates the Expression of a Novel Secretoglobin That Regulates Chemotactic Cell Migration and Invasion J. Immunol., April 1, 2004; 172(7): 4245 - 4252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schmidt, E. Moric, M. Schmidt, M. Sastre, D. L. Feinstein, and M. T. Heneka Anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative actions of PPAR-{gamma} agonists on T lymphocytes derived from MS patients J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2004; 75(3): 478 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, N. Pattabiraman, J. N. Zhou, M. Fu, T. Sakamaki, C. Albanese, Z. Li, K. Wu, J. Hulit, P. Neumeister, et al. Cyclin D1 Repression of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Expression and Transactivation Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2003; 23(17): 6159 - 6173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Hetzel, D Walcher, M Grub, H Bach, V Hombach, and N Marx Inhibition of MMP-9 expression by PPAR{gamma} activators in human bronchial epithelial cells Thorax, September 1, 2003; 58(9): 778 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yuan, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Kishimoto, Y. Wang, A. Ma, and Z. Liu Peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor-{gamma} ligands ameliorate experimental autoimmune myocarditis Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2003; 59(3): 685 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-W. Chen, Y.-H. Chang, C.-J. Tsi, and W.-W. Lin Inhibition of IFN-{gamma}-Mediated Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Induction by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonist, 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-Prostaglandin J2, Involves Inhibition of the Upstream Janus Kinase/STAT1 Signaling Pathway J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 979 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shanmugam, M. A. Reddy, M. Guha, and R. Natarajan High Glucose-Induced Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokine and Chemokine Genes in Monocytic Cells Diabetes, May 1, 2003; 52(5): 1256 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Koeffler Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} and Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 1 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Schlezinger, B. A. Jensen, K. K. Mann, H.-Y. Ryu, and D. H. Sherr Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Mediated NF-{kappa}B Activation and Apoptosis in Pre-B Cells J. Immunol., December 15, 2002; 169(12): 6831 - 6841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shiomi, H. Tsutsui, S. Hayashidani, N. Suematsu, M. Ikeuchi, J. Wen, M. Ishibashi, T. Kubota, K. Egashira, and A. Takeshita Pioglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist, Attenuates Left Ventricular Remodeling and Failure After Experimental Myocardial Infarction Circulation, December 10, 2002; 106(24): 3126 - 3132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wang, L. Verna, N.-G. Chen, J. Chen, H. Li, B. M. Forman, and M. B. Stemerman Constitutive Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-gamma Suppresses Pro-inflammatory Adhesion Molecules in Human Vascular Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 6, 2002; 277(37): 34176 - 34181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Zwaka, D. Manolov, C. Ozdemir, N. Marx, Z. Kaya, M. Kochs, M. Hoher, V. Hombach, and J. Torzewski Complement and Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Role of Sublytic Terminal Complement Complex-Induced Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Synthesis in Cardiac Myocytes Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2002; 161(2): 449 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dhawan and A. Richmond Role of CXCL1 in tumorigenesis of melanoma J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2002; 72(1): 9 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Elangbam, T. A. Brodie, H. Roger Brown, J. B. Nold, T. J. Raczniak, R. D. Tyler, R. M. Lightfoot, and H. G. Wall Vascular Effects of GI262570X (PPAR-{gamma} agonist) in the Brown Adipose Tissue of Han Wistar Rats: A Review of 1-month, 13-week, 27-week and 2-year Oral Toxicity Studies Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2002; 30(4): 420 - 426. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Barbier, I. P. Torra, Y. Duguay, C. Blanquart, J.-C. Fruchart, C. Glineur, and B. Staels Pleiotropic Actions of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2002; 22(5): 717 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Clark The role of PPARs in inflammation and immunity J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2002; 71(3): 388 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Diab, C. Deng, J. D. Smith, R. Z. Hussain, B. Phanavanh, A. E. Lovett-Racke, P. D. Drew, and M. K. Racke Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,1412,14-Prostaglandin J2 Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., March 1, 2002; 168(5): 2508 - 2515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Kwak, S. Myit, F. Mulhaupt, N. Veillard, N. Rufer, E. Roosnek, and F. Mach PPAR{gamma} but not PPAR{alpha} Ligands Are Potent Repressors of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Induction in Atheroma-Associated Cells Circ. Res., February 22, 2002; 90(3): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sauty, R. A. Colvin, L. Wagner, S. Rochat, F. Spertini, and A. D. Luster CXCR3 Internalization Following T Cell-Endothelial Cell Contact: Preferential Role of IFN-Inducible T Cell {alpha} Chemoattractant (CXCL11) J. Immunol., December 15, 2001; 167(12): 7084 - 7093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Hansson Immune Mechanisms in Atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2001; 21(12): 1876 - 1890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mikita, G. Porter, R. M. Lawn, and D. Shiffman Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein Exposure Alters the Transcriptional Response of Macrophages to Inflammatory Stimulus J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 45729 - 45739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Libby Current Concepts of the Pathogenesis of the Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, July 17, 2001; 104(3): 365 - 372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang, J. M. Wang, W. H. Gong, N. Mukaida, and H. A. Young Differential Regulation of Chemokine Gene Expression by 15-Deoxy-{{Delta}}12,1412,14 Prostaglandin J2 J. Immunol., June 15, 2001; 166(12): 7104 - 7111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, M. Fu, M. D'Amico, C. Albanese, J.-N. Zhou, M. Brownlee, M. P. Lisanti, V. K. K. Chatterjee, M. A. Lazar, and R. G. Pestell Inhibition of Cellular Proliferation through I{kappa}B Kinase-Independent and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}-Dependent Repression of Cyclin D1 Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 3057 - 3070. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. X. Cheng and T. Kupper A New Rexinoid for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Arch Dermatol, May 1, 2001; 137(5): 649 - 652. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Elangbam, R. D. Tyler, and R. M. Lightfoot Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptors in Atherosclerosis and Inflammation--An Update Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 2001; 29(2): 224 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Kwak, S. Myit, F. Mulhaupt, N. Veillard, N. Rufer, E. Roosnek, and F. Mach PPAR{gamma} but not PPAR{alpha} Ligands Are Potent Repressors of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Induction in Atheroma-Associated Cells Circ. Res., February 22, 2002; 90(3): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |