The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nabholz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nabholz, M.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 5659-5667.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Constitutive Expression of a Chimeric Receptor That Delivers IL-2/IL-15 Signals Allows Antigen-Independent Proliferation of CD8+CD44high But Not Other T Cells1

Stephan Gasser*, Patricia Corthésy*, Friedrich Beerman*, H. Robson MacDonald{dagger} and Markus Nabholz2,*

* Lymphocyte Biology Unit, Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research; and {dagger} Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne Branch, University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have prepared transgenic mice whose T cells constitutively express a chimeric receptor combining extracellular human IL-4R and intracellular IL-2Rß segments. This receptor can transmit IL-2/IL-15-like signals in response to human, but not mouse, IL-4. We used these animals to explore to what extent functional IL-2R/IL-15R expression controls the capacity of T cells to proliferate in response to IL-2/IL-15-like signals. After activation with Con A, naive transgenic CD8+ and CD4+ T cells respond to human IL-4 as well as to IL-2. Without prior activation, they failed to proliferate in response to human IL-4, although human IL-4 did prolong their survival. Thus, IL-2-induced proliferation of activated T cells requires at least one other Ag-induced change apart from the induction of a functional IL-2R. However, a fraction of CD8+CD44high T cells proliferate in human IL-4 without antigenic stimulation or syngeneic feeder cells. In contrast, CD4+CD44high T cells are not constitutively responsive to human IL-4. We conclude that although all transgenic T cells express a functional chimeric receptor, only some CD8+CD44high T cells contain all molecules required for entry into the cell cycle in response to human IL-4 or IL-15.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Induction of T lymphocyte proliferation is a two-step process. Resting T cells do not enter the cell cycle when exposed to IL-2 until they are made responsive by signals from the TCR. The IL-2R that transmits signals required for the proliferation of activated T lymphocytes is formed by the association of the IL-2R{alpha} (CD25),3 IL-2Rß, and the common {gamma}-chain ({gamma}c). Resting, naive T cells express low levels of IL-2Rß, but no CD25 chain. Upon antigenic stimulation, IL-2Rß expression increases, and the CD25 chain appears on the cell surface. Together with the {gamma}c these molecules can form a high affinity IL-2R. The IL-2R ß-chain is shared by the IL-15R (1). The {gamma}c also participates in the formation of the receptors for IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15 (2), and it is constitutively expressed on most blood cells. In the absence of CD25, the IL-2R ß-chain and the {gamma}c can form, at least in man, an intermediate affinity IL-2R, stimulation of which enhances the survival of human peripheral blood T cells (3, 4, 5).

Thus, in T cells high levels of IL-2Rß and expression of CD25 correlate with the capability to proliferate in response to IL-2. This raises the question of whether expression of a high affinity IL-2R is not only necessary but also sufficient to render T cells IL-2 responsive. Early experiments with transgenic mice constitutively expressing CD25 and/or IL-2R ß-chains indicated that a fraction of CD8+ T cells from these animals were constitutively IL-2 responsive (6, 7, 28). Recently, Zhang et al. (8) showed that a fraction of CD8+ T cells from normal mice can proliferate in response to IL-15 without antigenic stimulation. They observed that CD8+CD44high T cells express higher levels of IL-2R ß-chain than other peripheral T cells and interpreted their findings to suggest that the expression of a functional IL-2R or IL-15R on the cell surface is sufficient to render cells competent to enter the cell cycle in response to IL-2 or IL-15.

We have used transgenic mice that express a receptor chimera consisting of the intracellular domain of the IL-2R ß-chain and the extracellular part of the human IL-4R (hIL-4R/IL-2Rß) to address this question directly. The hIL-4R/IL-2R ß-chain requires the constitutively expressed endogenous {gamma}c, but not the CD25, IL-15R {alpha}-chain, or IL-2R ß-chain, to transmit signals in response to human IL-4 (hIL-4). These signals are expected to be identical with those induced by IL-2 or IL-15 via their natural high affinity receptors. The affinity of the chimeric receptor for hIL-4 is expected to be similar (Kd = 25 pM) (9) to the affinity of the high affinity IL-2R (Kd = 10 pM). Preliminary experiments showed that in IL-2-dependent mouse cell lines the receptor chimera could deliver IL-2 signals when stimulated with hIL-4 (Ref. 9 and our unpublished results). To constitutively express the chimeric receptor on T cells, we constructed a vector that expresses the receptor chimera from the promoter of the human CD2 gene under the control of the CD2 locus control region. Analogous constructs have been shown to be expressed homogeneously on peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (10). Because the hIL-4R does not bind mouse IL-4 (mIL-4), we did not expect any in vivo stimulation of the transgenic T cells by endogenous mIL-4. Any effect of hIL-4 on these cells must be due to the signal transducing competence of the receptor chimera.

We show that a fraction of CD8+ T cells that overlaps with memory cells, but not CD4+ or naive CD8+ T cells, is competent to proliferate in response to hIL-4 without any requirement for antigenic stimulation. However, our experiments demonstrate that expression of a functional receptor is not sufficient to make most T cells IL-2 responsive. Our results provide an explanation for the early observations with mice constitutively expressing CD25 and/or IL-2R ß-chains (6, 7) as well as for the results of Zhang et al. (8).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

C57BL/6(H-2b) and CBA-J (H-2k) mice were purchased from Harlan (Zeist, The Netherlands). Mice were maintained on standard laboratory chow and water ad libitum in a temperature- and light-controlled environment.

hIL-4R/IL-2Rß construction

For construction of the hIL-4R/hIL-2Rß chimera, a full-length hIL-4R cDNA fragment was excised from plasmid phIL-4REP5AB (11) with Asp718 and BglII, and ends were filled in with T4 DNA polymerase. A full-length hIL-2Rß cDNA was excised from phIL-2RßCDM8 (12) with HindIII and NotI, and the cleavage sites were filled in. Both receptor cDNAs were inserted into EcoRV-cleaved pBluescript SK+/-. An exact fusion between the extracellular region of hIL-4R and the transmembrane region of hIL-2Rß was made by overlap extension PCR (13) using the fusion primer GCCCTTCGAGCAGCACCTCATTCCGTGGCTCGGC, in which the underlined bases are complementary to the IL-2Rß and the T7 primer (Life Technologies, Basel, Switzerland) to amplify the transmembrane domain and the intracellular domain of the IL-2R ß-chain. The fusion primer GCCGAGCCACGGAATGAGGTGCTGCTCGAAGGG, in which the underlined bases are complementary to the hIL-4R, and the T3 primer were used to amplify the extracellular part of the IL-4R. An EcoRI-HindIII fragment of the fusion receptor was inserted into pBluescript SK+/-. The sequence of the receptor was checked by DNA sequencing. The receptor was excised from pBluescript SK+/- by BssH II/HindIII cleavage and was inserted into the SmaI-cleaved hCD2 minigene vector. The hIL-4R/hIL-2Rß-CD2 cDNA was isolated from the hCD2 minigene vector containing the fusion receptor as described previously (10).

Transgenic animals

Transgenic DBA/2 x C57BL/6 F1 mice were generated according to published procedures (14, 15). The presence of the transgene in the offspring was assessed by Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA isolated from mouse tails (14) and was digested to completion with EcoRI and BamHI. A fragment of 2.6 kb indicated the presence of the transgene. Comparison of the intensity of the bands with a control digestion of the construct used for injections, evaluated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA), allowed estimation of transgene copy number. Transgenic founders were backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice.

Flow cytometric analysis and FACS

Spleen or peripheral blood lymphocytes or Con A-activated blast cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation. The following Abs were used for cell surface staining: FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 (H35-17.2) and anti-CD4 (GK1.5; both conjugated by A.-L. Peitrequin, Ludwig Institute, Epalinges, Switzerland) for flow cytometric analysis; anti-CD8 (53.6.7.) or anti-CD4 (RM4-5) conjugated to PE (both from PharMingen, San Diego, CA) for FACS sorting; anti-CD44 conjugated to Cy-Chrome (1 M7, PharMingen); anti-hIL-4R (MAB230, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); anti-mIgG2A-PE (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL); anti-CD25-PE (PC61, conjugated by A.-L. Peitrequin) or anti-CD25-Cy5 (PC61, conjugated by A. Wilson, Ludwig Institute) (16); and anti-IL-2R ß-chain-PE (TM-ß1, PharMingen); anti-{gamma}c-biotin (4G3, PharMingen). Biotinylated Abs were detected with streptavidin-PE (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA). Purified lymphocytes were stained with excess concentrations of Abs at 4°C for 30 min. Flow cytometry was performed with a FACScalibur for three-color analysis involving Cy5 staining or with a FACScan (both from Becton Dickinson, Sunnyvale, CA) using CellQuest and WinMDI 2.8 software. FACS sorting was performed with a FACS II, B-D system (Becton Dickinson).

CD8+CD44high T cells included 10–20% of the most strongly CD44-positive CD8+ cells; CD8+CD44low T cells included 50–60% of the CD8+ T cells with the lowest CD44 expression. The remaining 20–40% of CD8+CD44intermediate CD8+ T cells were rejected.

For counting of living CD4+ T cells, cells were resuspended in 200 µl of PBS containing 10 µg/ml propidium iodide and 200,000 microsphere particles (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), clearly distinguishable from the cells in forward/side scatter plots. The ratio of microsphere particles to living cells per culture was determined on day 0. On consecutive days the number of surviving cells was estimated from the ratio of microsphere particles to cells excluding propidium iodide.

Cell culture

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from spleens from transgenic or control mice and passed over Ficoll-Hypaque to remove erythrocytes and dead cells. Cells were cultured in DMEM-Glutamax (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 50 µM 2-ME, 10 mM HEPES, 100 µg/ml gentamicin (Life Technologies), and 50 µg/ml penicillin-gentamicin sulfate (Life Technologies). For 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate-succinimidyl ester (CFSE) staining, 5 x 107 cells/ml were suspended in PBS. CFSE was added to a final concentration of 5 µM, and the suspension was incubated at 37°C for 10 min. To remove free CFSE, cells were immediately washed three times in cold medium (17). Con A (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) blasts were prepared by culturing 105/ml spleen cells for 24 h in the presence of 2.5 µg/ml Con A, anti-mIL2 mAb S4B6.1 (18), and anti-mCD25 mAb 5A2 (19). Cells were then washed once with 10 mM {alpha}-methyl-D-mannosidase (Sigma) to remove bound Con A and were passed over Ficoll-Hypaque. Subsequently, cells were cultured in medium containing IL-2-blocking Abs, IL-2 (200 U/ml), or hIL-4 (400 U/ml) together with IL-2-blocking Abs. Blocking Abs and ILs were added daily. After culture for 48 h, living cells were recovered by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation and stained for flow cytometric analysis.

To compare responsiveness to hIL-15 and hIL-4, transgenic and normal spleen cells were passed over Ficoll-Hypaque and sorted by FACS. The sorted cells were labeled with CFSE (5 µM), washed, and cultured in medium alone or in the presence of IL-2 (200 U/ml), hIL-4 (200 U/ml), hIL-15 (200 ng/ml), or hIL-4 (200 U/ml) plus hIL-15 (200 ng/ml). ILs were replenished after 48 h. The CFSE intensity of living cells (excluding propidium iodide) was analyzed by flow cytometry before culture and after 24, 48, and 72 h of culture in the presence of a constant number of added microsphere particles to estimate the recovery of living cells (see above).

Cytokines

Recombinant hIL-2 was provided by Glaxo (Geneva, Switzerland), and hIL-4, in the form of culture supernatants, was supplied by Christoph Heusser (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland). The ED50 values of hIL-4 and IL-2 were determined by the dose-dependent proliferation of the IL-4-dependent CT.4S cell line and the IL-2-dependent proliferation of CTLL-2 cells. Supernatant containing 10 µg/ml hIL-15 was provided by Immunex (Seattle, WA).

Limiting dilutions of mixed lymphocyte cultures

FACS-sorted cells were seeded at various concentrations (1–1000 cells/well) in round-bottom microplates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) containing 0.5–1 x 106 irradiated (5000 rad) allogeneic (CBA-J, H-2k), syngeneic (derived from the T cell donor animal, H-2b/d), or histocompatible (C57BL/6, H-2b) spleen cells in a final volume of 0.2 ml of medium, supplemented with IL-2 (200 U/ml) or hIL-4 (200 U/ml). IL-2 and hIL-4 were replenished weekly. Plates were wrapped in aluminum foil and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Between weeks 2 and 4 after setting up the cultures, wells were periodically scored for proliferation by microscopic examination. The frequency of proliferating T cells was estimated by taking the percentages of nonresponding cultures as the zero terms of Poisson distributions. The raw data were processed according to Taswell (20).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of hIL-4R/IL-2R ß-chain transgenic mice

The chimeric receptor construct (Fig. 1GoA) codes for a protein in which the extracellular part of the hIL-4R is fused to the transmembrane stretch and the cytoplasmic portion of the hIL-2R ß-chain. To limit expression of the chimeric receptor to lymphocytes, we inserted the chimera into a vector containing the promoter and the 3'-locus control region of the human CD2 gene (Fig. 1GoB). CD2 minigenes are expressed in both early and late stages of T cell development as well as in B and NK cells (10). We obtained two founder mice carrying an estimated six and nine copies of the transgene (Fig. 1GoC), which were transmitted through the germline with normal Mendelian ratios. As expected, the transgenic mice appeared normal with regard to behavior, life span, and physiology. Lymphocyte numbers and T cell subset distribution were normal in both lines (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. A, Schematic drawing of the chimeric receptor undergoing hIL-4-induced dimerization. On the left is a representation of the high affinity IL-2R undergoing IL-2 induced trimerization. B, Diagrammatic representation of the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß transgene. cDNA of the chimeric receptor was inserted into the human CD2 minigene vector. This vector contains 5 kb of the CD2 promoter and 5.5 kb of the 3' locus control region of CD2. C, Genotypic analysis of offspring of injected C57BL/6xDBA mice. Tail DNA was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and analyzed by Southern blot using the probe shown in B. 753 and 901 represent independent transgenic founders. Normal, digested genomic DNA of C57BL/6 mice; Vector, EcoRI/BamHI-digested hIL4R/IL-2Rß minigene shown in B.

 
Expression of hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera on transgenic T cells

Expression of the transgene in T cells was monitored by flow cytometry using an Ab directed against the hIL-4R (Fig. 2Go). The chimeric receptor was expressed on all peripheral T lymphocytes. There was no difference between expression levels on CD44low and CD44high subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. B cells also expressed the chimera, but at lower levels (data not shown).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Expression of hIL-4R/IL-2Rß transgene and IL-2R subunits on T cell subsets. Using three-color staining, hIL-4R, CD25, IL-2Rß, or {gamma}c levels were analyzed on CD4+ and CD8+ splenocytes from normal and transgenic mice gated according to levels of CD44 expression.

 
Comparison of the expression of the endogenous IL-2R chains by T cells of normal and transgenic animals showed that the transgene did not affect their expression levels. As expected, we could not detect any CD25 chain on resting T cells, whereas the {gamma}c, which is required for the formation of a functional chimeric receptor, was expressed at equivalent levels on all T cells. IL-2Rß expression was barely detectable on CD44low subsets. As reported by Zhang et al. (8), both CD4+CD44high and CD8+CD44high T cells clearly expressed IL-2Rß, and levels in the latter subset were considerably higher. In contrast to Zhang et al., we did not observe any detectable CD25 expression on the CD44high subsets of transgenic mice or their nontransgenic littermates. Because CD25 expression is the transient consequence of T cell activation, this difference raises the possibility that the CD44high T cells of the mice described by these workers had recently been exposed to Ag, whereas this was apparently not the case in the animals used in our study.

The chimeric receptor can substitute for the endogenous high affinity IL-2R

Preliminary experiments with an IL-2-dependent mouse CTL line transduced with the chimeric receptor construct showed that hIL-4 could substitute for IL-2 as a growth factor for these cells. This cell line allowed us to titer the hIL-2 and hIL-4 preparations used subsequently and to make sure that equivalent concentrations of these cytokines were added in the experiments with cells from transgenic mice described below.

To test whether the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera can induce a similar proliferative response as the endogenous high affinity IL-2R in normal T cells we primed freshly isolated control or transgenic T cells to become IL-2 responsive by culturing them for 24 h in Con A. To prevent auto- and paracrine stimulation by IL-2, a combination of neutralizing anti-mouse IL-2 and IL-2R Abs was added. The primed cells were cultured for an additional 48 h either in IL-2 without Abs or with hIL-4 in the presence of the Abs that block the effects of IL-2. To follow cell division, cells were labeled with CFSE before priming. Comparison of the CFSE fluorescence histogram of Con A-primed cells cultured in the absence of IL-2 or hIL-4 with that of unstimulated cells showed that Con A priming did not induce any cell division (Fig. 3GoA). This shows that the blocking effect of the Abs against IL-2 and the IL-2R is complete. Human IL-4 has no effect on nontransgenic cells, whereas it drives primed transgenic T cells through exactly the same number of divisions as IL-2. Growth of CD8+ T cells stimulated with either IL-2 or hIL-4 was faster than that of CD4+ T cells. The average doubling time of CD8+ T cells was 12 h, compared with 17.3 h for CD4+ T cells. This is consistent with the previously observed difference between the proliferation rates of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 Abs and cultured in IL-2 (21).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Human IL-4 stimulates the proliferation and CD25 expression of Con A-activated T cells expressing the chimeric receptor. Normal or transgenic splenocytes were stained with CFSE and cultured in 2.5 µg/ml Con A in the presence of mAbs against mIL-2 (S4B6.1) and IL-2R (5A2) to block IL-2 stimulation. After 24 h cells were resuspended in medium containing blocking mAbs, IL-2 (200 U/ml), or hIL-4 (200 U/ml) plus blocking mAbs. ILs and Abs were replenished daily. Forty-eight hours later cells were stained with mAbs specific for CD4 or CD8 and were analyzed for CFSE fluorescence (A) or CD25 expression (B).

 
Work from our laboratory has shown that IL-2 enhances and prolongs Ag-triggered CD25 expression of T cells, by stimulating CD25 gene transcription (22). We tested whether hIL-4 has a similar effect on CD25 expression by transgenic T cells. Using the same protocol for Con A priming, we observed that IL-2 and hIL-4 (in the presence of Abs that block the effects of IL-2) increased CD25 expression in primed transgenic CD8+ or CD4+ T cells by exactly the same amount compared with that in primed cells cultured in the absence of either cytokine (Fig. 3GoB). Human IL-4 had no effect on nontransgenic control cells. Thus, by two criteria hIL-4 has the same effect on hIL-4R/IL-2Rß-expressing T cells as IL-2.

Most transgenic T cells need Ag stimulation to proliferate in response to hIL-4

IL-2 does not stimulate proliferation of naive T cells unless they have been activated with Ag or reagents that mimic antigenic triggering (anti-CD3, Con A). Ag activation results in the appearance of the CD25 chain and increased expression of the IL-2R ß-chain. Together with the constitutively expressed {gamma}c, these subunits can form a high affinity IL-2R. Having shown that the hIL-4R/IL-2R ß-chain can form a receptor competent to induce T cell proliferation, we tested whether the constitutive expression of the chimera on freshly isolated T cells would render these cells capable of proliferating without any requirement for antigenic triggering. To address this question, CFSE-labeled spleen cells were cultured in medium containing IL-2 or hIL-4 and blocking Abs. Analysis of CFSE fluorescence after 72 h showed that neither CD4+ nor most CD8+ T cells had undergone any cell division (Fig. 8Go and data not shown). Furthermore, the cytokines did not induce detectable CD25 expression.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Comparison of the effects of hIL-15 and hIL-4 on nonactivated CD8+CD44high T cells. FACS-sorted transgenic T cells expressing the chimeric receptor were labeled with CFSE and cultured in medium containing hIL-15 (200 ng/ml), hIL-4 (200 U/ml), or both at the same concentrations. Before culture (0 h) and after 24, 48, and 72 h of culture, cell size and shape (forward (FSC) vs side (SSC) scatter) and CFSE intensity of living cells (excluding propidium iodide) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Only the FSC/SSC plots of cells stimulated with hIL-4 plus hIL-15 are shown in the left panels. Stimulation with either cytokine alone gave indistinguishable distributions. The fractions of blasts present in the cultures after 24, 48, and 72 h in hIL-4 were 2.6, 11.4, and 16.6%, respectively. In hIL-15 there were 3.3, 12.5, and 17.1% blasts, and in hIL-4 and hIL-15 there were 3.1, 11.5, and 16.8% blasts at the same time points. The recoveries of living cells cultured in the presence of hIL-4, hIL-15, or hIL-4 plus hIL-15 were similar, as determined from the ratio of microsphere particles to living cells (see Materials and Methods; data not shown). CFSE staining was monitored in the entire population (total) or in the blast cells. Note that the CFSE histograms for the three culture conditions shown are virtually identical, and therefore difficult to distinguish. Cells did not respond to IL-2. Nontransgenic cells failed to respond to hIL-4, but their response to hIL-15 was identical with that of transgenic cells (data not shown).

 
In the course of these experiments we noticed that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells survived better in the presence of hIL-4 than without cytokines. This effect was quantified for CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4Go). FACS-sorted normal and transgenic CD4+ T cells were labeled with CFSE and cultured in medium alone or in medium containing hIL-4. Using propidium iodide to exclude dead cells and a standard consisting of microsphere particles (see Materials and Methods), living T cells were counted on the following days by FACS. Without ILs or in the presence of 200 U/ml IL-2 (data not shown), <5% of the cells survived until day 6, whereas 50% of the transgenic T cells cultured in hIL-4 were still alive. Monitoring CFSE fluorescence confirmed that the survivors had not undergone any cell division (data not shown). A similar effect of high doses of IL-2 on survival has been described for human T cells (3, 4, 5). This result shows that the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera is able to form a functional receptor on resting T cells, but cannot transmit all signals required for entry into the cell cycle. At least one Ag induced change, apart from the induction of the IL-2R chains, is required to allow a T cell to proliferate in response to IL-2.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Effect of hIL-4 on the survival of normal and transgenic CD4+ T cells. CD4+ T cells were positively selected by FACS sorting, and replicate cultures were set up in medium alone or in medium containing hIL-4 (200 U/ml). At the indicated times cells from individual cultures were mixed with a constant number of microsphere particles, and the number of propidium iodide-excluding T cells was determined by flow cytometry.

 
A CD44high subpopulation of transgenic CD8+ T cells proliferates in hIL-4 without activation by Ag

The results described above show that the chimeric receptor can transmit the same signals as IL-2 in Con A-activated T cells. To compare the efficiency of the chimeric receptor with the endogenous IL-2R more quantitatively, we resorted to a limiting dilution microculture system described previously (23). Graded numbers of FACS-sorted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (>99% pure) were cultured in 96-well plates with irradiated allogeneic spleen cells in the presence of IL-2 or hIL-4. As previously described, in this system proliferation of alloresponsive normal T cells is strictly dependent on the addition of IL-2. After 14–21 days, microcultures were scored for proliferation by microscopic examination. The frequency of responding, colony-forming T cells (plating efficiency) was calculated according to the method of Taswell (20). In all experiments presented in this paper the results obtained with the two transgenic lines fell within the same 95% confidence limits. The results from one such experiment are shown in Fig. 5GoA, and the results of three independent experiments are summarized in Fig. 5GoB. The frequency of alloresponsive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells growing in the presence of IL-2 falls into the normal range (24). Human IL-4 did not support the proliferation of nontransgenic T cells, while the frequency of transgenic CD4+ T cells growing in hIL-4 was comparable to that of IL-2-responsive nontransgenic T cells. Surprisingly, the frequency of IL-2-responsive transgenic CD4+ T cells was 2 times lower. Similarly, we observed a slightly lower (1.2-fold) plating efficiency of transgenic CD8+ T cells in IL-2. The same differences were found with both transgenic lines. Strikingly, the plating efficiency of transgenic CD8+ T cells in hIL-4 was 3 times higher than that of normal CD8+ T cells in IL-2.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Limiting dilution (LD) analysis of normal and transgenic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells proliferating in the presence of allogeneic spleen cells. Groups of 24 replicate cultures containing, on the average, 37, 111, 333, or 1000 CD8+ or CD4+ T cells (H-2b/b or H-2b/d), positively selected by flow cytometry, were set up in 96-well plates containing 5 x 105 irradiated CBA/J (H-2k) spleen cells/well. Medium alone or medium containing IL-2 (200 U/ml) or hIL-4 (200 U/ml) was added at the beginning of the cultures and replenished weekly. Between days 14 and 21 wells were inspected microscopically for growth. The frequency of proliferating cells and 95% confidence limits were calculated according to the method of Taswell (20 ). A, Representative limiting dilution analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells cultured in the presence of IL-2 or hIL-4. No growth was observed in the absence of exogenous IL-2 or hIL-4. B, Plating efficiency (mean ± range) of at least three experiments.

 
We repeated the limiting dilution analysis using histocompatible, instead of allogeneic, stimulator cells. For these experiments we used C57BL/6 backcrossed transgenic mice with an H-2b/b background. Stimulator cells were derived from C57BL/6 mice (H-2b). As expected, in this situation no cells grew in IL-2 (data not shown). However, the plating efficiency of transgenic CD8+ T cells in hIL-4 was similar to that in the presence of allogeneic stimulators (compare Figs. 5GoA and 6A). These results indicate that about 1% of transgenic CD8+ T can proliferate in hIL-4 without any antigenic stimulus. Similar plating efficiencies were obtained with CD8+ T cells from transgenic mice of H-2b/d background that were cultured together with autologous stimulator cells (data not shown). Because the same cells failed to respond to IL-2, it is unlikely that they were recently activated T cells. Statistical analysis showed that the data could be fitted to a single-hit Poisson distribution (Fig. 6Go), indicating that single T cells gave rise to colonies and that plating efficiency was not affected by interactions between T cells.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Limiting dilution analysis of CD8+ T cells and their CD44 high and low subsets proliferating on irradiated histocompatible spleen cells. Transgenic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (H-2b/b) and their CD44high or CD44low subsets were positively sorted (>99% pure) and serially diluted into wells containing 5 x 105 irradiated spleen cells of C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice (see Fig. 5Go). Human IL-4 or IL-2 did not trigger the proliferation of CD4+CD44high or CD44low T cells. A, Representative limiting dilution analysis of total CD8+, CD8+CD44low, and CD8+CD44high T cells in the presence of hIL-4. B, Plating efficiency of total CD8+, CD8+CD44low, and CD44high T cells in the presence of hIL-4. Data represent the mean ± range of at least three experiments. CD8+ T cells did not proliferate in the presence of IL-2 or in medium alone.

 
To determine whether the CD8+ transgenic T cells that grow in hIL-4 without antigenic stimulation belong to a defined subpopulation, we fractionated responder cells using surface markers that correlate with functional characteristics. Because it appeared plausible that the Ag-independent, hIL-4-responsive cells might be cells that had experienced Ag triggering in the past, such as memory cells, we separated cells according to their level of CD44 expression. In C57BL/6 mice this surface marker is up-regulated rapidly after antigenic stimulation of T cells, and its expression remains elevated for long periods (25, 26).

Limiting dilution analysis of transgenic CD8+CD44low and CD8+CD44high T cells in the presence of hIL-4 and syngeneic feeder cells showed that CD44high T cells had a 7-fold higher plating efficiency (1/280:1/38; Fig. 6Go). No colonies could be detected when cells were cultured in medium alone or in medium containing IL-2.

Neither CD4+CD44low nor CD4+CD44high T cells gave rise to detectable colonies when plated on syngeneic irradiated spleen cells in hIL-4 (data not shown). Thus, the ability to proliferate in hIL-4 without antigenic stimulation is restricted to CD8+ T cells the majority of which belong to the CD44high subset.

Ag-independent hIL-4-stimulated proliferation of transgenic CD8+CD44high T cells does not require feeder cells

To test whether feeder cells are needed to support proliferation of transgenic hIL-4-responsive CD8+ T cells, we set up a limiting dilution analysis in which total CD8+, CD8+CD44low, and CD8+CD44high T cells were cultured in hIL-4 without any feeder cells. The plating efficiencies thus determined for the different populations were comparable to those observed in the limiting dilutions with syngeneic feeder cells (compare Figs. 6Go and 7Go). No growth was observed in medium with or without IL-2.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Frequency of CD8+ T cells proliferating in hIL-4 in the absence of other cells. CD8+ T cells and the CD44high and CD44low subsets were positively sorted (>99% pure) and inoculated at an average concentration of 12, 37, 111, or 333 cells/well. A, Representative limiting dilution analysis of total CD8+, CD8+CD44low, and CD8+CD44high T cells in the presence of hIL-4. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells did not proliferate in the presence of IL-2 or in medium alone. Human IL-4 failed to trigger the proliferation of CD4+ T cells. B, Plating efficiency of total CD8+, CD8+CD44low, and CD8+CD44high T cells in the presence of hIL-4. The mean ± range of at least three limiting dilution experiments are plotted.

 
In a separate experiment we sorted single cells into wells. In presence of hIL-4, 3–4% of CD8+CD44high T cells divided at least six times (data not shown), confirming the frequencies found in the serial dilution experiments. However, we found that 51% of CD8+CD44high T cells underwent at least one division. At present we are comparing the proliferative capacities of different CD8+CD44high subsets.

Human IL-4-responsive CD8+CD44high T cells belong to the same population that responds to hIL-15 without Ag stimulation

A recent report showed that a subset of CD8+ T cells responds to IL-15 without prior Ag activation (8). The authors hypothesized that the responsive cells belonged to the CD44+ subset of CD8+ cells, but they did not verify this by sorting the subset before stimulation. Nevertheless, it appeared plausible that the constitutively hIL-4-responsive transgenic T cells might be the same as the constitutively IL-15-responsive cells detected by Zhang and co-workers. To test this conjecture we compared the proliferative responses of CFSE-stained transgenic, FACS-sorted CD8+CD44high T cells to hIL-4, hIL-15, and a combination of both. As shown in Fig. 8Go, the combination of hIL-15 and hIL-4 induced the appearance of a population of larger cells (blasts), as measured by forward scatter. Stimulation with either cytokine alone resulted in the same size shift in a virtually identical fraction of cells. IL-2 did not induce the appearance of blasts. The histograms in the middle and right columns of Fig. 8Go show that the blasts cultured in hIL-15 or hIL-4 underwent exactly the same number of divisions. Combined addition of the two ILs did not change the response; no additive effect was observed. IL-2 or medium alone did not induce proliferation of the same cells (data not shown). A similar CFSE profile was obtained when nontransgenic CD8+CD44high T cells were cultured in hIL-15 or hIL-4 plus hIL-15, but hIL-4 did not lead to proliferation (data not shown). FACS-sorted CD8+CD44low cells did not proliferate under any of the conditions described here (data not shown). Taken together these data show that, as postulated by Zhang et al. (8), constitutively IL-15-responsive CD8+ T cells are already CD44high before culture. In addition, our results indicate that in hIL-4R/IL-2Rß transgenic mice these cells are identical with the constitutively hIL-4-responsive cells.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have used transgenic mice to study what controls IL-2 responsiveness in normal T lymphocytes. These mice constitutively express a hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimeric receptor on their lymphocytes in which the extracellular part of the hIL-4R is fused to the transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail of the IL-2R ß-chain. The chimera was expected to bind hIL-4 and to deliver the same signals as the high affinity IL-2R and IL-15R, by associating with the {gamma}c that is constitutively expressed on all T cells. Because of the species specificity of the IL-4R the chimera does not respond to mIL-4, and cells from nontransgenic mice do not respond to hIL-4 in any of the assays used.

We have found that the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera can fully substitute for the IL-2R in two assays: 1) hIL-4, in the presence of Abs preventing auto- or paracrine stimulation by IL-2, drives Con A-primed CD4+, and CD8+ T cells through the same number of cell divisions as IL-2; and 2) hIL-4 stimulates CD25 expression on Con A-primed transgenic T cells to exactly the same degree as IL-2.

Because both the chimera and the {gamma}c are constitutively expressed on all T cells, naive transgenic T cells should express a functional receptor that can transmit the same signals as the high affinity IL-2R present on activated, but not naive, T cells. However, in bulk cultures freshly isolated CD4+ or CD8+ transgenic T cells do not proliferate when cultured in hIL-4 without Con A, nor did hIL-4 induce the expression of the CD25 chain. Nevertheless, the chimeric receptor was not only expressed but was also functional on resting T cells, because hIL-4 strongly enhanced the survival of transgenic T cells cultured in the absence of Con A or Ag. This effect is similar to that which high doses of IL-2 exert on human peripheral T cells (3, 4, 5), presumably through intermediate affinity IL-2R formed by the IL-2R ß-chain and the {gamma}c in the absence of CD25. Con A priming does not affect the levels of expression of the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera (data not shown) or the {gamma}c (Ref. 27 and our unpublished results). Although we have not tested this directly, it is unlikely that the affinity of the receptor formed by the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera is different on resting and activated cells. Thus, our results are consistent with earlier observations of T cells from transgenic mice expressing the hCD25 and/or IL-2R ß-chains (6, 7, 28). They indicate that expression of a functional receptor with the same cytoplasmic domains as the IL-2R is not sufficient to make a T cell competent to proliferate in response to signals transduced by this receptor. IL-2-induced proliferation of normal T cells requires, apart from the expression of CD25 and an increase in IL-2Rß, at least one other Con A- or Ag-activated change, such as the expression of a cytoplasmic signaling component. A likely candidate is JAK3, the JAK family member that associates specifically with the {gamma}c. In IL-2-dependent T cell lines JAK3 is essential for IL-2-driven cell proliferation (29). There is no detectable JAK3 in naive T cells, but its appearance is induced by Ag (4). Other molecules, such as c-Myc, c-Fos, and c-Jun, that are barely expressed in resting T cells and become up-regulated in response to antigenic stimulation (30, 31) may also be required to make T cells capable of entering the cell cycle in response to IL-2. The hIL-4R/IL-2Rß-expressing mice described here provide a useful tool to investigate the roles of these components in IL-2 signal transduction.

We have quantified the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that respond to IL-2 or hIL-4 using limiting dilution analysis. Transgenic CD4+ T cells stimulated with MHC-incompatible splenocytes respond to both IL-2 and hIL-4. The frequency of hIL-4-responsive T cells was the same as that of IL-2-responsive nontransgenic CD4+ T cells, whereas the frequency of IL-2-responsive transgenic cells was 2 times lower. A similar difference was not observed between normal and transgenic CD8+ T cells. Because the association of the {gamma}c with the IL-2R ß-chain is expected to be ligand dependent (32), it is unlikely that the lower IL-2 responsiveness of transgenic CD4+ T cells is due to competition between endogenous IL-2Rß and transgenic hIL-4R/IL-2R ß-chain for the {gamma}c. It is, however, possible that hIL-4R/IL-2R ß-chain competes with the endogenous IL-2R ß-chain for receptor-associated signal transducers that are limiting in CD4+, but not in CD8+, T cells.

There are about 3 times as many transgenic CD8+ T cells responding to hIL-4 as to IL-2. Frequency analysis shows that most of the transgenic CD8+ T cells that proliferate in response to hIL-4 require neither allogeneic stimulators nor syngeneic feeder cells. The observation that they fail to proliferate in IL-2 indicates that they are not recently activated T cells. By separating transgenic CD8+ T cells according to CD44 expression we could show that there were about 7 times more cells proliferating in hIL-4, independently of Ag activation, in the CD44high subset than among the CD8+CD44low T cells. CD44 is up-regulated rapidly after antigenic stimulation of T cells, and the expression level remains elevated, in contrast to other activation markers such as CD69 or CD25 (25, 26, 33). These results indicate that signaling through the hIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera can induce the proliferation of Ag-experienced CD8+ T cells that are no longer IL-2 responsive. The low plating efficiency of the hIL-4-responsive CD8+ T cells suggests that they belong to a particular subset of the CD44high population, but further cell fractionation experiments are required to confirm this hypothesis.

Zhang et al. (8) have recently postulated that CD8+CD44high T cells respond to IL-15 without Ag activation. By sorting CD8+CD44high T cells before cultivation we showed that this is indeed true, and that among hIL-4R/IL-2Rß+ transgenic T cells the hIL-15-responsive cells are most likely identical with the ones that constitutively respond to hIL-4. CD8+CD44high T cells express higher levels of IL-2Rß than other T cell subsets, and because the IL-2R ß-chain forms part of the IL-15R, Zhang and co-workers have speculated (8) that the constitutive IL-15 responsiveness of some CD8+ T cells is simply the result of an increased level of functional receptors. Our results strongly argue against the hypothesis that the ability of IL-2 or IL-15 to drive cells through the cell cycle depends only on the expression level of their receptors. All T cell subsets express similar levels of hIL-4R/IL-2Rß-chain and {gamma}c, and the chimeric receptor drives proliferation of all CD4+ and CD8+ T cells once they are activated by Con A. However, only cells belonging to the CD8+CD44high subset proliferate in response to signals from this receptor without antigenic stimulation. These cells apparently express all the components required for the transduction of IL-2 signals that induce cell proliferation, whereas most naive T cells and CD4+CD44high T cells lack at least one of the components.

We found, however, that a low frequency of CD8+CD44low T cells could grow in response to hIL-4 without antigenic stimulus. Additional experiments are required to determine whether these cells are indeed naive cells or, e.g., express isoforms of CD44 (34, 35) that react poorly with the anti-CD44 Ab used.

If our observation that the chimeric receptor is able to trigger the proliferation of a fraction of CD8+ T cells with memory phenotype independently of Ag and feeder cells holds true for human T cells expressing an analogous chimeric receptor (mIL-4R/IL-2Rß), this would have very useful clinical applications. Ex vivo analysis has shown that human tumor-specific CTL express cell surface markers of Ag-experienced cells (36). Thus, transduction of human tumor-specific T cell with such a chimera would presumably render in vitro expansion of such cells much simpler and cheaper, because they are expected to grow in mIL-4 without any requirement for periodic reactivation via the TCR. Furthermore, it should be possible to stimulate adoptively transferred T cells expressing the mIL-4R/IL-2Rß chimera in the patient by administration of mIL-4, which is not expected to have the severe toxic effects of hIL-2.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Pierre Brawand, Werner Held, Veronique Imbert, Patrick Reichenbach, Corinne Rusterholz, and Jean-Charles Cerottini for useful and stimulating discussions; GLAXO and Christoph Heusser for cytokines; Clothilde Horvath for help with the limiting dilution assays; Pierre Zaech for carrying out the FACS sortings; and Vincent Mottier for technical assistance. We also acknowledge the invaluable assistance of the staff of the Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research animal facility.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the Swiss Cancer League and the Copley-May Foundation in Geneva. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Markus Nabholz, Lymphocyte Biology Unit, Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CD25, IL-2R {alpha}-chain; {gamma}c, common {gamma}-chain; hIL-4, human IL-4; mIL-4, mouse IL-4; CFSE, 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate-succinimidyl ester. Back

Received for publication December 27, 1999. Accepted for publication March 20, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. DiSanto, J. P.. 1997. Cytokines: shared receptors, distinct functions. Curr. Biol. 7:R424.[Medline]
  2. Leonard, W. J.. 1996. The molecular basis of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency: defective cytokine receptor signaling. Annu. Rev. Med. 47:229.[Medline]
  3. Boise, L. H., A. J. Minn, C. H. June, T. Lindsten, C. B. Thompson. 1995. Growth factors can enhance lymphocyte survival without committing the cell to undergo cell division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gonzalez-Garcia, A., I. Merida, A. C. Martinez, A. C. Carrera. 1997. Intermediate affinity interleukin-2 receptor mediates survival via a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 272:10220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Unutmaz, D., F. Baldoni, S. Abrignani. 1995. Human naive T cells activated by cytokines differentiate into a split phenotype with functional features intermediate between naive and memory T cells. Int. Immunol. 7:1417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hattori, M., H. Okazaki, Y. Ishida, M. Onuma, S. Kano, T. Honjo, N. Minato. 1990. Expression of murine IL-2 receptor ß-chain on thymic and splenic lymphocyte subpopulations as revealed by the IL-2-induced proliferative response in human IL-2 receptor {alpha}-chain transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 144:3809.[Abstract]
  7. Nishi, M., Y. Ishida, T. Honjo. 1988. Expression of functional interleukin-2 receptors in human light chain/Tac transgenic mice. Nature 331:267.[Medline]
  8. Zhang, X., S. Sun, I. Hwang, D. F. Tough, J. Sprent. 1998. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 8:591.[Medline]
  9. Izuhara, K., A. Miyajima, N. Harada. 1993. The chimeric receptor between interleukin-2 receptor ß chain and interleukin-4 receptor transduces interleukin-2 signal. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190:992.[Medline]
  10. Zhumabekov, T., P. Corbella, M. Tolaini, D. Kioussis. 1995. Improved version of a human CD2 minigene based vector for T cell-specific expression in transgenic mice. J. Immunol. Methods 185:133.[Medline]
  11. Ryan, J. J., L. J. McReynolds, A. Keegan, L. H. Wang, E. Garfein, P. Rothman, K. Nelms, W. E. Paul. 1996. Growth and gene expression are predominantly controlled by distinct regions of the human IL-4 receptor. Immunity 4:123.[Medline]
  12. Hatakeyama, M., M. Tsudo, S. Minamoto, T. Kono, T. Doi, T. Miyata, M. Miyasaka, T. Taniguchi. 1989. Interleukin-2 receptor ß chain gene: generation of three receptor forms by cloned human {alpha} and ß chain cDNA’s. Science 244:551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ho, S. N., H. D. Hunt, R. M. Horton, J. K. Pullen, L. R. Pease. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51.[Medline]
  14. Beermann, F., E. Hummler, E. Schmid, G. Schutz. 1993. Perinatal activation of a tyrosine aminotransferase fusion gene does not occur in albino lethal mice. Mech. Dev. 42:59.[Medline]
  15. Hogan, B., F. Costantini, E. Lacy. 1986. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
  16. Lowenthal, J. W., P. Corthesy, C. Tougne, R. Lees, H. R. MacDonald, M. Nabholz. 1985. High and low affinity IL 2 receptors: analysis by IL 2 dissociation rate and reactivity with monoclonal anti-receptor antibody PC61. J. Immunol. 135:3988.[Abstract]
  17. Lyons, A. B., C. R. Parish. 1994. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 171:131.[Medline]
  18. Zurawski, S. M., T. R. Mosmann, M. Benedik, G. Zurawski. 1986. Alterations in the amino-terminal third of mouse interleukin 2: effects on biological activity and immunoreactivity. J. Immunol. 137:3354.[Abstract]
  19. Moreau, J. L., M. Nabholz, T. Diamantstein, T. Malek, E. Shevach, J. Theze. 1987. Monoclonal antibodies identify three epitope clusters on the mouse p55 subunit of the interleukin 2 receptor: relationship to the interleukin 2-binding site. Eur. J. Immunol. 17:929.[Medline]
  20. Taswell, C.. 1981. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I. Data analysis. J. Immunol. 126:1614.[Abstract]
  21. Soldaini, E., H. R. MacDonald, M. Nabholz. 1992. Minimal growth requirements of mature T lymphocytes: interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 increase growth rate but not plating efficiency of CD4 cells stimulated with anti-CD3 and IL-2. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:1707.[Medline]
  22. Soldaini, E., M. Pla, F. Beermann, E. Espel, P. Corthesy, S. Barange, G. A. Waanders, H. R. MacDonald, M. Nabholz. 1995. Mouse interleukin-2 receptor alpha gene expression: delimitation of cis-acting regulatory elements in transgenic mice and by mapping of DNase-I hypersensitive sites. J. Biol. Chem. 270:10733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Cerottini, J. C., H. R. MacDonald. 1981. Limiting dilution analysis of alloantigen-reactive T lymphocytes. V. Lyt phenotype of cytolytic T lymphocyte precursors reactive against normal and mutant H-2 antigens. J. Immunol. 126:490.[Medline]
  24. Ryser, J. E., H. R. MacDonald. 1979. Limiting dilution analysis of alloantigen-reactive T lymphocytes. III. Effect of priming on precursor frequencies. J. Immunol. 123:128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Budd, R. C., J. C. Cerottini, C. Horvath, C. Bron, T. Pedrazzini, R. C. Howe, H. R. MacDonald. 1987. Distinction of virgin and memory T lymphocytes: stable acquisition of the Pgp-1 glycoprotein concomitant with antigenic stimulation. J. Immunol. 138:3120.[Abstract]
  26. Oehen, S., K. Brduscha-Riem. 1998. Differentiation of naive CTL to effector and memory CTL: correlation of effector function with phenotype and cell division. J. Immunol. 161:5338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kondo, M., Y. Ohashi, K. Tada, M. Nakamura, K. Sugamura. 1994. Expression of the mouse interleukin-2 receptor {gamma} chain in various cell populations of the thymus and spleen. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:2026.[Medline]
  28. Asano, M., Y. Ishida, H. Sabe, M. Kondo, K. Sugamura, T. Honjo. 1994. IL-2 can support growth of CD8+ T cells but not CD4+ T cells of human IL-2 receptor ß-chain transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 153:5373.[Abstract]
  29. Asao, H., N. Tanaka, N. Ishii, M. Higuchi, T. Takeshita, M. Nakamura, T. Shirasawa, K. Sugamura. 1994. Interleukin 2-induced activation of JAK3: possible involvement in signal transduction for c-Myc induction and cell proliferation. FEBS Lett. 351:201.[Medline]
  30. Crabtree, G. R.. 1989. Contingent genetic regulatory events in T lymphocyte activation. Science 243:355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kawamura, M., D. W. McVicar, J. A. Johnston, T. B. Blake, Y. Q. Chen, B. K. Lal, A. R. Lloyd, D. J. Kelvin, J. E. Staples, J. R. Ortaldo, et al 1994. Molecular cloning of L-JAK, a Janus family protein-tyrosine kinase expressed in natural killer cells and activated leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Takeshita, T., K. Ohtani, H. Asao, S. Kumaki, M. Nakamura, K. Sugamura. 1992. An associated molecule, p64, with IL-2 receptor ß chain: its possible involvement in the formation of the functional intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptor complex. J. Immunol. 148:2154.[Abstract]
  33. Swain, S. L., L. M. Bradley. 1992. Helper T cell memory: more questions than answers. Semin. Immunol. 4:59.[Medline]
  34. Tolg, C., M. Hofmann, P. Herrlich, H. Ponta. 1993. Splicing choice from ten variant exons establishes CD44 variability. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Trowbridge, I. S., J. Lesley, R. Schulte, R. Hyman, J. Trotter. 1982. Biochemical characterization and cellular distribution of a polymorphic, murine cell-surface glycoprotein expressed on lymphoid tissues. Immunogenetics 15:299.[Medline]
  36. Romero, P., P. R. Dunbar, D. Valmori, M. Pittet, G. S. Ogg, D. Rimoldi, J. L. Chen, D. Lienard, J. C. Cerottini, V. Cerundolo. 1998. Ex vivo staining of metastatic lymph nodes by class I major histocompatibility complex tetramers reveals high numbers of antigen-experienced tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 188:1641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Dhanji, M. T. Chow, and H.-S. Teh
Self-Antigen Maintains the Innate Antibacterial Function of Self-Specific CD8 T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 138 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
F. Gesbert, J.-L. Moreau, and J. Theze
IL-2 Responsiveness of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes: further investigations with human IL-2R{beta} transgenic mice
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 17(8): 1093 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Dhanji and H.-S. Teh
IL-2-Activated CD8+CD44high Cells Express Both Adaptive and Innate Immune System Receptors and Demonstrate Specificity for Syngeneic Tumor Cells
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3442 - 3450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Ilangumaran, S. Ramanathan, J. La Rose, P. Poussier, and R. Rottapel
Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 Regulates IL-15 Receptor Signaling in CD8+CD44high Memory T Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., September 1, 2003; 171(5): 2435 - 2445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Berard, K. Brandt, S. B. Paus, and D. F. Tough
IL-15 Promotes the Survival of Naive and Memory Phenotype CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., May 15, 2003; 170(10): 5018 - 5026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Oh, J. A. Berzofsky, D. S. Burke, T. A. Waldmann, and L. P. Perera
Coadministration of HIV vaccine vectors with vaccinia viruses expressing IL-15 but not IL-2 induces long-lasting cellular immunity
PNAS, March 18, 2003; 100(6): 3392 - 3397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
L. Vivien, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis
T lymphocytes need IL-7 but not IL-4 or IL-6 to survive in vivo
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2001; 13(6): 763 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
T. A. Fehniger, K. Suzuki, A. Ponnappan, J. B. VanDeusen, M. A. Cooper, S. M. Florea, A. G. Freud, M. L. Robinson, J. Durbin, and M. A. Caligiuri
Fatal Leukemia in Interleukin 15 Transgenic Mice Follows Early Expansions in Natural Killer and Memory Phenotype Cd8+ T Cells
J. Exp. Med., January 15, 2001; 193(2): 219 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nabholz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gasser, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nabholz, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS