The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reay, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reay, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. M.
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 5626-5634.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Determination of the Relationship Between T Cell Responsiveness and the Number of MHC-Peptide Complexes Using Specific Monoclonal Antibodies1

Philip A. Reay2,{dagger}, Kiyoshi Matsui{ddagger}, Katherine Haase*, Christoph Wulfing*, Yueh-Hsiu Chien* and Mark M. Davis*

* Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; {dagger} Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, United Kingdom; and {ddagger} Third Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We describe the generation of three mAbs that recognize the complex of the class II MHC molecule IEk bound to a peptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of moth cytochrome c (residues 95–103). Reactivities of these mAbs are sensitive to single alterations in the sequence of both helices of the MHC molecule and to the bound peptide. The epitopes of these reagents are distinct but overlap substantially. One of these mAbs specifically blocks lymphokine release by T cells responsive to this complex but not others. We have used another to examine how the number of complexes on an APC is related to its ability to stimulate T cells. We find that 200–400 complexes per cell are necessary and sufficient to induce a degree of stimulation, whereas maximum stimulation is achieved only if more than 5000 complexes are present. The analysis indicates that T cell activation is a stochastic process.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Helper T lymphocytes recognize antigenic peptide bound to class II MHC molecules (1) in an interaction involving a panoply of adhesion molecules and coreceptors, the expression of which varies between cells (2). Analysis of the relative roles of these molecules in different APCs with T cells is therefore very difficult. Complexes of class II MHC molecules and peptide are themselves generated intracellularly after endocytosis and breakdown of foreign Ag (3). Although indirect methods of peptide occupancy have been used to study this event, they can by nature only infer the way in which complexes form. To circumvent these problems, a number of efforts to generate mAbs specific for given class II MHC/peptide complexes have been made. The first such reagent was isolated by screening anti-I-Ab mAbs which revealed that one, Y-Ae, reacts only with a subset of the molecules expressed on some B cells (4). This reagent has been shown to recognize an endogenously generated peptide derived from the {alpha}-chain of IE molecules (5). A similar Ab recognizing an endogenously generated complex of I-Ab bound to a fragment of invariant chain has also been generated (6). Recently, Abs reactive with peptides derived from an exogenous Ag (hen egg lysozyme) bound to I-Ab or I-Ak have been made using cells carrying a large number of such complexes as immunogens (7, 8).

In this study, we describe the production of three Abs that recognize a peptide representing the carboxyl-terminal nine amino acids (residues 95–103) of moth cytochrome c (MCC)3 (IAYLKQATK) bound to the class II MHC molecule IEk. The recognition of this complex by specific T cells has been the subject of many studies (9, 10, 11). The Abs described here show very little recognition of empty IEk molecules but react strongly when IEk is loaded with MCC (95–103). All of these mAbs are sensitive to some changes in the sequence of the helices of IEk and of the bound peptide, demonstrating that the epitope of these reagents is very similar to that recognized by TCRs interacting with these complexes. None of these mAbs shows reactivity with free peptide, and although their epitopes overlap they appear to be different. We also find that one of these reagents (G-35) specifically inhibits lymphokine release by two T cells reactive to IEk/MCC (88–103) but has no effect on a cell recognizing a different IEk-restricted peptide.

We have used the highest affinity of these Abs (D-4) to directly investigate by Scatchard analysis the relationship between the number of specific class II MHC/peptide complexes on an APC and the ability of that cell to stimulate T cells. We find that this relationship is very similar for B cells and a transfected fibroblast, suggesting that the number of complexes generated is the key event in T cell activation. We find that 200–400 complexes per APC are necessary and sufficient to induce a minimal response, whereas maximum stimulation requires >5000 complexes. Further study shows that although each APC in the population bears sufficient complexes to stimulate, activation of only a small fraction of the T cells present occurs. This indicates that T cell stimulation is stochastic when peptide is limiting, a finding that may help to explain the observations of antagonism and partial agonism in T cell responsiveness.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cells

The T cell line 5C.C7 and hybridomas 2B4 and YO1 have been described previously (10, 12, 13). The IEk-bearing cell line (CHO-Ek) used to present peptides is a high expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) transfectant (14). The indicator cell lines for measuring IL-3 and IL-2 concentrations, R6-X and HT-2, respectively, have also been described (15, 16). All cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM L-glutamate, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 U/ml streptomycin.

Synthetic peptides

Peptides were synthesized by the Stanford University PAN facility by standard F-moc chemistry. The peptides used had the following amino acid sequences: MCC (88–103), ANERADLIAYLKQATK; MCC (102S), ANERADLIAYLKQASK; Hb (64–76), GKKVITAFNEGLK.

Generation of IEk-peptide complexes

Soluble IEk was obtained as previously described by expression as a phosphoinositide-linked protein in CHO cells (17). Solubilized purified IEk was bound to appropriate peptide at pH 5 using conditions described previously (17). Free peptide was removed by ultrafiltration, and the buffer was exchanged to PBS. Approximately 70% of such molecules are occupied with offered peptide as assessed using ELISA (18).

Generation of mAbs

Mice were primed by i.p. injection using 10 µg purified IEk/MCC (88–103) complex emulsified in CFA (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA). Mice were boosted by i.p. injection with 10 µg complex emulsified in IFA on days 15 and 42. Five weeks after the second boost, the mice were injected i.v. with 10 µg complex, and splenocytes were fused to the X63.Ag8.653 myeloma cell line at a ratio of 5. After selection in hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymine, supernatants from wells containing fused hybridomas were screened for the appropriate reactivities by ELISA as described below. Hybridomas of interest were recloned at least twice to identify stably expressing cells.

Growth and purification of mAbs

mAbs were purified from the supernatants of large scale hybridoma cultures grown in roller bottles or a hollow fiber bioreactor using affinity chromatography with a 1:1 mixture of protein A- and protein G-linked Sepharose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The purity of Ab was assessed by 12% SDS-PAGE (19).

ELISA

Reactivity of supernatants and purified Abs was assessed by coating plates (Immulon IV, Nunc, Naperville, IL) overnight at 4°C with 1 µg/ml purified IEk-peptide complexes in PBS. After blocking with PBS containing 2% BSA, Ab at the appropriate concentration, containing competitors where appropriate, was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After washing, the amount of bound Ab was detected by an incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) and color development with Sigma 104 phosphatase substrate. OD was monitored at 405 nm with a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA).

FACS analysis

Adherent cells were released by trypsinization and pulsed with peptide in solution where necessary. Cells were stained with 5 µg/ml of the appropriate Ab in PBS containing 10% FBS, and the amount of bound Ab was detected by subsequent incubation with FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma). FACS analysis was performed on a FACScan, and cell sorting was performed on a FACSvantage.

Scatchard analysis

Fab' fragments of D-4 were prepared by papain digestion (20), purified by size exclusion on a TSK 3000 SW column, and labeled with 125I (21) to a specific activity of 1 x 1013 cpm/mol. Preliminary study showed that Fab' binding to cells reached equilibrium within 1 h. Cells at a concentration of 106/ml were pulsed with different concentrations of MCC (88–103) for 6 h and were washed three times. Binding assays for Scatchard analysis were performed essentially as described (22). Briefly, serial dilutions of labeled Fab' were incubated with cells for 60 min at room temperature in a final volume of 15 µl RPMI 1640 with 5% FBS. Cell-bound radioactivity was separated from free Fab' by centrifugation through an FBS cushion. Nonspecific binding was defined as the cpm bound in the presence of a 500-fold excess of unlabeled Fab'. The data were analyzed as described (23).

T cell assays

Assays were performed essentially as described (24). Briefly, CHO-Ek cells that had been prepulsed with different concentrations of peptide were incubated with T cells at the appropriate ratio for 24 h in a volume of 200 ml at 37°C.

Lymphokine activity assays

The supernatants from activation wells were analyzed for IL-3 (5CC7) or IL-2 (hybridomas) levels using indicator cell lines R6-X and HT-2, respectively, as described (17). Briefly, 5 x 103 indicator cells were cultured in six serial dilutions of each supernatant in a volume of 100 µl for either 20 (HT-2) or 40 (R6-X) h. Cells were then pulsed with 0.5 µCi [3H]thymidine for 4 h and harvested onto glass microfiber filters. The radioactivity incorporated was determined using a Packard Matrix 96 direct beta counter, and 1 U/ml IL-2 or IL-3 was defined as the concentration of lymphokine at which half-maximal incorporation occurred. The IL-2 and IL-3 activities were calculated by simultaneously fitting the data from a standard and the test supernatants with a four-parameter logistic curve using the ARCUS RADIMM program.

BIAcore analysis

Abs were immobilized on a BIAcore flow cell by amine-targeted chemistry (25) as described previously (26). Binding of IEk-peptide complexes to the immobilized Ab was performed at room temperature in PBS using a flow rate of 15 µl/min and 15-µl injections of protein at various concentrations with a BIAcore 2000 (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ).

Calcium release

Cells were peptide loaded as in the other assays, and T cells were loaded with the calcium sensitive dye fura-2. The intracellular calcium concentration during the interaction of the cells was followed by fluorescence microscopy as described (27, 28). Briefly, fura-2-loaded T cells were added onto a patch of confluent CHO cells on the microscope stage. Intracellular calcium in T cells was determined using C-Imaging-1280 System hardware and the Simca Quantitative Fluorescence Analysis Software Package; both from Compix Imaging Systems (Mars, PA). The imaging system was coupled to a Nikon Diaphot 300 inverted microscope which was equipped with the epifluorescence attachment and a 75-W xenon arc lamp (Nikon, Melville, NY). Alternate excitation of fura-2-loaded T cells at 340 and 380 nm was achieved using a Ludl high speed dual filter wheel (Ludl Electronic Products, Hawthorne, NY) controlled by the Simca software. Images were collected with a charge-coupled device camera (Dage-MTI CCD72) in combination with a SuperGenII intensifier (Dage-MTI, Michigan City, IN) to amplify fluorescence. Analysis of intracellular calcium and the generation of figures were achieved with the Simca software package. Per run, 30–40 cells were picked at random and analyzed. Data of two sets of experiments were pooled.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Production of mAbs specific for IEk-MCC (88–103)

IEk heterodimers produced as glycophosphatidylinositol-linked chimeras (piIEk) are functionally "empty" of endogenous ligand, and >60% of these molecules can be loaded with a given peptide in vitro (18, 29). This prompted us to try to generate Abs specific for a complex of IEk and a particular peptide, using the carboxyl-terminal residues of MCC(95–103) as a model. Either syngeneic (H-2k) or allogeneic (H-2d) mice were immunized and boosted with piIEk/MCC(88–103) complexes using a standard protocol. ELISA of serum samples showed that both strains made a polyclonal Ab response that reacted with both the immunogen and with piIEk that was not prebound to any peptide. Approximately 200 hybridomas were recovered from both strains, and supernatants from these were screened by ELISA for reactivity to piIEk either unbound or associated with MCC(88–103). Twenty-six hybridomas had measurable reproducible reactivity, of which the majority (23) were BALB/c derived. Most of these hybridomas, exemplified by G-23, produce IEk-reactive Abs with peptide-independent specificity as assessed by titration of supernatant activity for IEk ± MCC (Fig. 1GoA). Three independently derived clones from the fusion of BALB/c spleen cells (D-4, G-32, and G-35) produced Abs that preferentially recognize IEk associated with MCC as assessed by ELISA (Fig. 1GoA).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Peptide sensitivity of Abs. Abs were tested for recognition of IEk molecules loaded with MCC (88–103) peptide by ELISA (A) or FACS (B). Purified Abs were used at a concentration of 5 µg/ml. For FACS analysis, the cells were loaded with peptide at 20 µM overnight.

 
To examine further the peptide requirement for reactivity of these Abs, we analyzed their binding to a CHO cell line expressing transfected native IEk (CHO-Ek) after a pulse with 20 µM MCC(88–103) peptide. Abs D-4 and G-35 show no staining of these cells above background unless the cells are treated with peptide (Fig. 1GoB). In contrast, the G-32 Ab is able to recognize the IEk molecules on these cells even if they had not been treated with peptide, although the signal does increase slightly after pulsing (Fig. 1GoB). These results are compared with those of a fourth Ab obtained in this series (G-23), which shows no indication of peptide sensitivity in the ELISA or in the FACS assay (Fig. 1GoB).

Sensitivity of Abs to peptide and MHC substitutions

To map the epitopes recognized by these Abs, we examined the effects of substitutions of either the peptide or IEk sequence on reactivity. Fig. 2Go shows the sensitivity of recognition to selected monosubstituted analogues of MCC(88–103) peptide bound to soluble IEk as assessed by ELISA. Separate peptides substituted at residues 97, 99, and 102 were used because these three positions have been shown to interact with certain TCRs (11, 30). Two analogues at each position were tested. At positions 97 and 102, the original amino acid was replaced with either a positive (lysine) or a negative (glutamate) charge to maximize potential disruption. At position 99 where the original residue was positively charged (lysine), a glutamine or glutamate was introduced. All six substituted peptides bind to IEk as effectively as the wild-type peptide (11) and are capable of stimulating specific T cell responses (31).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Sensitivity of Abs to peptide sequence substitution. The recognition of soluble IEk molecules bound to peptides of different sequence was determined by ELISA for the different Abs indicated.

 
G-23 recognizes IEk bound to all six substituted peptides as effectively as unbound or associated with the unrelated Hb peptide. In contrast, recognition by D-4, G-32, and G-35 is affected by the sequence of the bound peptide but shows different patterns of reactivity. G-35 is the most sensitive, with both substitutions at position 102 and replacement with glutamate (but not glutamine) at position 99 ablating recognition. Reactivity, however, is insensitive to the two analogues substituted at position 97 tested here. In contrast, although alteration of peptide sequence markedly reduced recognition by D-4 and G-32, none of these alterations fully ablates reactivity. Thus, D-4 reactivity is reduced by both changes at position 97 and by one of each of the alterations at positions 99 (E not Q) and 102 (K not E), whereas recognition by G-32 is only significantly reduced by alteration at position 102.

To analyze the effect of MHC sequence on Ab recognition, we used the 13 mutants of IEk described by Ehrich et al. (32), where each cell line expresses a molecule specifying a single substitution of an amino acid predicted to reside on the {alpha} helix. These cell lines were pulsed with wild-type MCC(88–103) peptide, stained with Ab, and analyzed by cytofluorography. Fig. 3Go shows a summary of the results of this analysis. Only 2 of the 13 mutants show significant alterations in staining intensity with these Abs. Cell line ß64 shows diminished staining with all three peptide-dependent Abs but is recognized effectively by G-23 and other IE-specific Abs (32). In addition, mutant ß59 affects staining by G-35 and G-32 but not by D-4 or G-23. These results demonstrate that the Abs D-4, G-32, and G-35 have similar but unique specificities, the reactivities of which are affected by changes in either component of their bipartite ligand.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Sensitivity of Abs to alterations in the sequence of IEk. The effects of mutations of the helices of IEk on the recognition of the Abs indicated were determined by FACS analysis. Cells were loaded with peptide at a concentration of 20 µM overnight before staining. The indicated numbers refer to the positions of the mutants tested in either the {alpha}- or ß-chains of IEk. •, Positions of the mutations that reduced staining to background levels.

 
To further define the epitope recognized by these reagents, we next examined their ability to cross-compete by inhibition ELISA. Each Ab was biotinylated, and the ability of different concentrations of unmodified ("cold") Abs to inhibit recognition of IEk-MCC complexes during coincubation was measured (Fig. 4Go). The peptide-independent Ab G-23 inhibits its own reactivity but does not affect recognition by D-4, G-32, or G-35. In contrast, recognition with biotinylated G-35 is inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by G-35 and more effectively by G-32 and D-4. The reactivities of biotinylated G-32 and D-4 were both inhibited in a similar dose-dependent way by unmodified G-32 and D-4 but were only marginally affected by G-35. These results suggest that D-4, G-32, and G-35 have overlapping epitopes on the IE-MCC complex but that G-35 has a lower affinity.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Overlap of Ab epitopes. The ability of unlabeled Abs to inhibit recognition of soluble IEk/MCC complexes by the biotinylated Abs indicated was determined by ELISA.

 
In a similar analysis, we found that recognition by D-4, G-32, and G-35 could be specifically inhibited by IEk complexed with appropriate peptide but was unaffected by incubation with very high concentrations of any free peptide tested (data not shown).

Affinity of Abs

To further examine the specificity of the Abs with regard to peptide occupancy, we directly assessed their affinity for IEk molecules bound to different peptides using surface plasmon resonance. Abs were immobilized on separate sections of a BIAcore (Pharmacia Sensor) chip, and increasing concentrations of IEk preloaded with either MCC(88–103) or Hb(64–76) were passed over the surface. Fig. 5Go shows representative binding curves for Abs D-4, G-35, and the anti-IEk mAb 14.4.4S (33). Both complexes bound to immobilized 14.4.4S, and the amount associated increased at higher concentrations. In contrast, whereas binding of IEk complexed with MCC to D-4 and G-35 was clearly evident, no binding of IEk preloaded with the Hb peptide was detectable. Table IGo indicates the calculated association and dissociation rate constants and the inferred dissociation equilibrium constant for these interactions. The Kd of 14.4.4S for interaction with IEk complexed with either MCC or Hb peptide is ~100 nM. This compares with values for D-4 and G-35 interacting with IEk bound to MCC of 10 and 700 nM, respectively. Both of these Abs have on rates at least as fast as 14.4.4S, but their off rates differ considerably: D-4 dissociation is 10-fold slower, whereas G-35 is 10-fold faster. The inability to measure association of D-4 and G-35 with IEk/Hb complexes using this technique indicates that their affinities must be <100 µM, because we can measure such values for interaction of the same IEk-peptide complexes with soluble TCR (26).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Surface plasmon resonance analysis of Ab reactivity. The association and dissociation phases of binding to soluble IEk/Hb (circles) or IEk/MCC complex (squares) by the Abs indicated at 10 (open symbols) or 100 µg/ml (filled symbols) were examined using a BIAcore 2000. The plots show the net binding observed ascertained by removal of the signal component due to introduction of different concentrations of protein assessed by passage over a chip surface that had been mock coupled without any Ab. RU, resonance units.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Kinetic rate constants and derived equilibrium constants for the indicated Abs as determined by surface plasmon resonance

 
Specific inhibition of T cell responses

To test whether the IEk-MCC(88–103)-specific Abs generated represented "surrogate" TCRs, we next examined their ability to specifically block T cell recognition (Fig. 6Go). The T cell clone 5C.C7 and the T cell hybridoma 2B4 both recognize MCC(88–103) restricted by IEk, and their specificities have been extensively studied (11), whereas the hybridoma YO1 recognizes Hb(64–76) in conjunction with IEk (13). Although the response of all three T cells is inhibited by Ab G-32, those to MCC are abrogated at 0.1 µg/ml, whereas equivalent inhibition of YO1 requires >10 µg/ml Ab. Recognition by all three T cells is also inhibited by the peptide-independent G-23 Ab at concentrations >1 µg/ml. In contrast to these results, although Ab G-35 inhibits the response of both 5C.C7 and 2B4 at >1 µg/ml, it has no effect on the responsiveness of YO1 at concentrations up to 200 µg/ml. Surprisingly, the Ab D-4, the epitope of which overlaps that of G-32 and G-35 (Figs. 2Go and 3Go), and which has the highest affinity (Table IGo), is very poor at inhibiting responses by the MCC(88–103)-specific T cells. Additional experiments showed that the concentration of G-35 necessary to inhibit specific recognition is dependent on the concentration of peptide used to pulse the APCs (data not shown). Additionally, high levels of D4 partially inhibit T cell responses specifically when APCs are pulsed with very low peptide concentrations (data not shown).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Specific inhibition of T cell recognition. The ability of different concentrations of the Abs indicated to inhibit the response of three different T cells was assessed. CHO-Ek cells were preloaded with 200 nM peptide for 6 h and were then washed three times. Cells (100 µl, 5 x 104) were added to 50 µl diluted Ab and incubated at 37°C for 30 min before the addition of T cells (50 µl, 5 x 104). The figure indicates the final concentration of Ab in the cultures.

 
Quantitation of stimulatory MHC-peptide numbers

We next decided to use Scatchard analysis with D-4 to directly examine the relationship between number of MHC-peptide complexes on an APC and its ability to stimulate T cells. Fab' fragments were prepared, and their affinity after iodination for IEk-MCC on peptide pulsed cells was found to be 2–5 nM (data not shown), in general agreement with the value measured using a biosensor. We next determined the number of D-4-reactive sites generated on CHO-Ek cells that had been prepulsed with different concentrations of MCC(88–103). After removal of excess peptide, the ability of these cells to stimulate different T cells at varying T:APC ratios was also established, and the same cells were analyzed by FACS after staining with D-4. Fig. 7GoA shows the response of the cell line 5C.C7 to these cells using standard assay conditions. This shows that these APCs can cause this T cell to release lymphokine only after being pulsed with >30 nM peptide. Similar results were observed for the hybridoma 2B4 and for T cells obtained from a mouse transgenic for the TCR expressed by 5C.C7 (34). Fig. 7GoA also shows the result of the Scatchard analysis for these cells, and Fig. 7GoB shows the relationship between number of complexes generated and stimulation capacity. The data presented in Fig. 7GoC indicates that there are 200 endogenous IEk-peptide complexes on the CHO-Ek cells that can interact with D-4, representing 10-4 of total IEk molecules expressed. At least a further 200–400 specific complexes per cell, corresponding to a peptide pulse of 10–30 nM, are needed for the cells to be active in T cell stimulation, whereas maximum stimulation is attained at ~5000 complexes per cell. Fig. 7GoD shows that the staining intensity of D-4 by FACS mirrors the increase in the number of complexes. In a separate experiment, we also determined the number of complexes generated after pulsing with a partial agonist for this cell line, MCC(102S), and found these to be almost identical (Fig. 7Go, A and D). In addition, we examined the relative ability of a B cell line (CH-27) compared with CHO-Ek cells to stimulate the 5C.C7 cell line (Fig. 7GoC). Although these cells load peptide more poorly, the relationship between the number of complexes formed and T cell stimulation capacity was almost identical.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Quantitation of the number of IEk-MCC complexes per cell necessary for T cell stimulation. A, Correlation between induced IL-3 release by 5C.C7 stimulated with MCC(102T) and the number of IEk-MCC complexes per APC. The results of two separate quantitative determinations of MCC(102T) are shown, alongside one for MCC(102S). B, Relationship between the number of complexes per cell and ability to stimulate T cells for the CHO-Ek transfectant and a B cell line (CH-27). C, Scatchard analysis determining the number of complexes per cell generated by limiting doses of peptide. D, Relative levels of D-4 epitopes generated on CHO-Ek cells determined by FACS after pulsing of cells with MCC(102T) or MCC(102S) at the indicated concentrations.

 
To further understand what the limited activation observed in culture represents, we analyzed the responsiveness of 5C.C7 at different ratios of T:APC. As shown in Fig. 8GoA, restricting the number of T cells present imposes a limit on the maximum IL-3 that can be released, representing maximal activation of each cell. Thus, 820 T cells produce a maximum of 2 U/ml IL-3, indicating that each cell can release 0.0025 U/ml (0.0005 U/cell). In addition, Fig. 8GoB shows that a fixed number of APCs with different numbers of complexes have only a limited capacity to stimulate. Thus, cells pulsed with the limiting concentration of peptide (30 nM) can elicit only 3 U/ml of IL-3 irrespective of the number of T cells added. This corresponds to a maximal stimulation of 1200 T cells.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Recognition by 5C.C7 of cells with different numbers of IEk/MCC complexes. A and B are plots of the same data derived from measuring the IL-3 produced when different numbers of 5C.C7 cells are incubated with a 5 x 104-cell aliquot of CHO-Ek that had been prepulsed with MCC(88–103) and the D-4 epitope expression of which was measured by Scatchard analysis. A, IL-3 production of different numbers of added T cells as a function of peptide concentration used in the prepulse; B, IL-3 produced when the T cells are exposed to CHO-Ek cells prepulsed with different concentrations of peptide as a function of the number of T cells added to the well. C, the IL-3 released by increasing numbers of 5C.C7 cells when added to 5 x 104 CHO-Ek cells that had been sorted from a population pulsed with 30 nM MCC(88–103). The two populations represent cells within the gates set for forward and side scatter which were collected without regard for the level of D-4 expressed (100%) or the 80% lowest D-4-expressing cells. D, Percentage of cells that showed full or partial activation as measured by calcium flux after exposure to CHO-Ek that had been prepulsed with MCC(88–103).

 
One possible explanation for this result is that although the average number of IEk-MCC complexes per cell is 400, there is a skewed distribution such that a small stimulatory population exists that expresses many more. If a single T cell interacts with a single APC, then to account for the observed IL-3 release it would only be necessary for 2.5% of the APCs to have sufficient complexes. To test this hypothesis directly, we used the ability to assess complex number by FACS to remove the top 20% expressing cells after a pulse with 30 nM peptide. As shown in Fig. 8GoC, this had no effect on T cell stimulation. Additionally, fitting the Scatchard data to a binomial equation, assuming that peptide loading is noncooperative, illustrates that the SD for the number of complexes per cell after a 30 nM pulse would only be ±18 (Dr. Ron Kantor, unpublished observation). This implies that none of the cells in this population would express more than 500 IEk-MCC complexes. Taken together, these findings indicate that all of the cells in the APC population have approximately equivalent stimulatory capacity.

We next examined whether the limited activation observed represented partial activation of all added T cells, or full activation of a limited subset. Previous studies in a different system using a reporter gene suggested that the latter is the case (35). In our studies, we decided to examine the Ca2+ release after stimulation with cells carrying different numbers of complexes. Accordingly, cells were pulsed with peptide as above and were incubated with T cells. Ca2+ release was assessed by fluorescence microscopy, and the results are shown in Fig. 8GoD. This indicates that when peptide is limiting, only a small number of T cells are being stimulated, even though the analysis above shows that all of the APCs have equivalent number of complexes. This strongly suggests that there is a stochastic component to T cell activation within this range. The finding that there is a maximum degree of stimulation also indicates that those cells that are not activated by such an encounter become refractory to further stimulation within the time course of the assay.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this report, we use standard hybridoma technology and soluble class II MHC-peptide complexes to generate a set of specific mAbs with reactivities that are sensitive to changes in both the helices of IEk and the sequence of bound peptide. The observed patterns of mutant sensitivity indicate that the epitopes of these mAbs partially overlap with those of TCRs for the same ligand (11, 32). Similar to the report of Porgador et al. (36), we find that these reagents show differential sensitivity to bound peptide. Thus, two of the mAbs (D-4 and G-35) show essentially no reactivity with endogenous complexes generated in transfectants or in B cell lines (data not shown), whereas G-32, with a DNA sequence that suggests it is a somatic variant of G-35 (Y. Fukui, unpublished data), seems reactive to many endogenous peptide/IEk complexes. Similar to recognition by TCRs, it appears that relatively small differences in sequence can dramatically affect sensitivity to the peptide bound to an MHC molecule. These Abs in some ways seem more sensitive to changes in peptide than T cells because they fail to react with complexes of IEk bound to the peptide (95–104) derived from pigeon cytochrome c as assessed by ELISA (data not shown). These reagents can be used in many immunochemical assays tested including FACS, Scatchard analysis, ELISA, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence (P.A.R., unpublished observations), but not Western analysis. Use of a biosensor indicates that they have an affinity for IEk bound to a correct peptide which is at least 5 orders of magnitude greater than that for empty or incorrectly occupied molecules.

The similarity between these reagents and TCRs is further suggested by the observation that one of them (G-35) specifically and efficiently inhibits the release of lymphokines by different T cells in response to IEk-MCC. Interestingly, Ab D-4, which has a higher affinity for the IEk-MCC complex (Table IGo), was extremely poor at inhibiting lymphokine release by these T cells. This differential blockade of T cell activation in vitro by G-35 and D-4 is mirrored by their relative effectiveness at blocking positive selection of developing thymocytes specific for IEk-MCC in vivo (37). Although these Abs interact with different kinetics and affinities, it seems unlikely that this is an explanation for preferential inhibition by G-35 because this has the lowest affinity and fastest off rate (Table IGo). The faster on rate for G-35 is unlikely to be exerting an effect because the APCs were preincubated with Ab in our experiments. Although partially overlapping, the epitopes for these Abs are clearly different, and it is possible that this influences efficiency of inhibition. Thus, whereas D-4 is most sensitive to substitutions throughout the MCC peptide sequence (Fig. 2Go), it may be unable to block access for TCR engagement, although this seems unlikely because a soluble TCR inhibits interaction of this Ab with IEk-MCC complexes on cells (26). Alternatively, it is possible that G-35 is more potent because it binds in a such a way that it also hinders additional interactions of IEk. Recognition by G-35 is sensitive to alterations in more of the ß helical residues of IEk tested than D-4, suggesting that it may interact more with the MHC molecule itself. The region of IEk to which G-35 appears to bind (ß59-ß64, Fig. 3Go) partially overlaps the site in HLA-DR1 (ß58–ß69) detected by Ab KL-295, which undergoes a conformational change after association with peptide (38). Such a peptide-dependent alteration may play an important role in generating arrangements of IEk-MCC complexes that are stimulatory for T cells, perhaps by altering multimerization on the surface of the APC. Supporting such a role is the observation that Ab G-32, which has an epitope similar to that of G-35 but is less sensitive to sequence of bound peptide, is particularly effective at inhibiting responses of T cells (Fig. 6Go). This area may be less occluded in class II MHC molecules than the corresponding region of class I after TCR binding as a result of the more orthogonal mode of interaction (39).

The generation of these mAbs has allowed us to directly quantitate the relationship between number of antigenic complexes per cell and lymphokine release by T cells. We find that 200–400 complexes per cell are necessary and sufficient to activate at least a small fraction of coincubated T cells. This is consistent with previous indirect studies that have estimated fractional class II MHC occupancy using either radiolabeled peptide or a functional readout (40, 41, 42). We find that the same number of limiting complexes is sufficient to stimulate two different T cells maintained in vitro as well as ex vivo T cells. The quantitation of loading of a B cell line (CH27) with MCC peptide assessed using D4 is almost identical with that previously reported by Kimachi et al. (42) using a radioiodinated peptide of related sequence. In contrast to this result, it has been reported that the number of complexes necessary to stimulate class I MHC-restricted T cells can vary greatly (43). Indeed, one report has suggested that a single complex may be sufficient (44). Although it is possible that the activation of class I MHC-restricted T cells is much more sensitive than class II MHC-restricted cells, such indirect measurements are susceptible to a number of errors (43). In particular, the need to use much higher concentrations of cells when binding radiolabeled peptide to achieve quantifiable signal compared with those used in pulsing for T cell lysis may underestimate loading necessary for stimulation because the effective concentration of receptors differs. Analysis similar to that described in this report using the recently described Abs specific for class I MHC-peptide complexes (36, 45) may resolve some of these discrepancies.

Previous quantitative studies have been unable to measure the number of complexes generated on per cell basis. We have therefore used these reagents to investigate what "minimal activation" represents. We find that a population of cells expressing minimal levels of antigenic complexes can only elicit a fractional lymphokine release, irrespective of the number of T cells added. This is not due to a skewed distribution of complexes within the population because removal of the top 20% of APCs with the highest D-4 expression had no effect on stimulation capacity. We also find that at this margin only a fraction of T cells are induced to release their intracellular stores of calcium. The direct implication of these results is that at limiting Ag dose, which is probably the level at which most real T cell responses occur, activation of T cells is stochastic even when the APC has sufficient complexes to activate. A recent report (46) indicated that very small numbers of class II MHC-peptide complexes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), although being unable to elicit lymphokine release, can induce an anergic effect on T cells. This may underpin the findings in this study, because at the margin the decision may be variable. The molecular reasons for this density-dependent effect are unclear but may be related to the rate at which complexes multimerize or otherwise interact to induce the TCR down-regulation that seems to occur (47, 48). These findings also suggest a possible explanation for the finding that the positive or negative selection of some developing class I MHC-restricted T cells can be mediated by different concentrations of the same peptide (49).


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. Elliott Ehrich and Brigitte Devaux for providing the cell lines expressing mutant IEk molecules, Nigel Rust for FACS sorting.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Research Institute and the Wellcome Trust. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philip A. Reay, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital II Headington, OX3 9DU, U.K. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MCC, moth cytochrome c; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary. Back

Received for publication November 30, 1999. Accepted for publication March 14, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Davis, M. M., J. J. Boniface, Z. Reich, D. Lyons, J. Hampl, B. Arden, Y. Chien. 1998. Ligand recognition by {alpha}ßT cell receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:523.[Medline]
  2. Collins, T. L., P. D. Kassner, B. E. Bierer, S. J. Burakoff. 1994. Adhesion receptors in lymphocyte activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6:385.[Medline]
  3. Cresswell, P.. 1994. Assembly, transport, and function of MHC class II molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:259.[Medline]
  4. Murphy, D. B., S. Rath, E. Pizzo, A. Y. Rudensky, A. George, J. K. Larson, Jr C. A. Janeway. 1992. Monoclonal antibody detection of a major self peptide. MHC class II complex. J. Immunol. 148:3483.[Abstract]
  5. Rudensky, A., S. Rath, P. Preston-Hurlburt, D. B. Murphy, Jr C. A. Janeway. 1991. On the complexity of self. Nature 353:660.[Medline]
  6. Eastman, S., M. Deftos, P. C. De Roos, D. H. Hsu, L. Teyton, N. S. Braunstein, C. J. Hackett, A. Rudensky. 1996. A study of complexes of class II invariant chain peptide: major histocompatibility complex class II molecules using a new complex-specific monoclonal antibody. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:385.[Medline]
  7. Dadaglio, G., C. A. Nelson, M. B. Deck, S. J. Petzold, E. R. Unanue. 1997. Characterization and quantitation of peptide-MHC complexes produced from hen egg lysozyme using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity 6:727.[Medline]
  8. Zhong, G., C. Reis e Sousa, R. N. Germain. 1997. Production, specificity, and functionality of monoclonal antibodies to specific peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II complexes formed by processing of exogenous protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schwartz, R. H.. 1985. T-lymphocyte recognition of antigen in association with gene products of the major histocompatibility complex. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 3:237.[Medline]
  10. Fink, P. J., L. A. Matis, D. L. McElligott, M. Bookman, S. M. Hedrick. 1986. Correlations between T-cell specificity and the structure of the antigen receptor. Nature 321:219.[Medline]
  11. Reay, P. A., R. M. Kantor, M. M. Davis. 1994. Use of global amino acid replacements to define the requirements for MHC binding and T cell recognition of moth cytochrome c (93–103). J. Immunol. 152:3946.[Abstract]
  12. Hedrick, S. M., L. A. Matis, T. T. Hecht, L. E. Samelson, D. L. Longo, E. Heber-Katz, R. H. Schwartz. 1982. The fine specificity of antigen and Ia determinant recognition by T cell hybridoma clones specific for pigeon cytochrome c. Cell 30:141.[Medline]
  13. Evavold, B. D., S. G. Williams, B. L. Hsu, S. Buus, P. M. Allen. 1992. Complete dissection of the Hb(64–76) determinant using T helper 1, T helper 2 clones, and T cell hybridomas. J. Immunol. 148:347.[Abstract]
  14. Schild, H., N. Mavaddat, C. Litzenberger, E. W. Ehrich, M. M. Davis, J. A. Bluestone, L. Matis, R. K. Draper, Y. H. Chien. 1994. The nature of major histocompatibility complex recognition by {gamma}{delta} T cells. Cell 76:29.[Medline]
  15. Schrader, J. W., I. Clark-Lewis, R. M. Crapper, G. W. Wong. 1983. P-cell stimulating factor: characterization, action on multiple lineages of bone-marrow-derived cells and role in oncogenesis. Immunol. Rev. 76:79.[Medline]
  16. Watson, J.. 1979. Continuous proliferation of murine antigen-specific helper T lymphocytes in culture. J. Exp. Med. 150:1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wettstein, D. A., J. J. Boniface, P. A. Reay, H. Schild, M. M. Davis. 1991. Expression of a class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heterodimer in a lipid-linked form with enhanced peptide/soluble MHC complex formation at low pH. J. Exp. Med. 174:219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Reay, P. A., D. A. Wettstein, M. M. Davis. 1992. pH dependence and exchange of high and low responder peptides binding to a class II MHC molecule. EMBO J. 11:2829.[Medline]
  19. Laemmli, U. K.. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680.[Medline]
  20. Parham, P. 1986. In Handbook of Experimental Immunology, Vol. 1. D. M. e. a. Weir, ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p. Ch. 14.
  21. Bolton, A. E., W. M. Hunter. 1973. The labelling of proteins to high specific radioactivities by conjugation to a 125I-containing acylating agent. Biochem. J. 133:529.[Medline]
  22. Robb, R. J., A. Munck, K. A. Smith. 1981. T cell growth factor receptors: quantitation, specificity, and biological relevance. J. Exp. Med. 154:1455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Scatchard, G.. 1949. The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 51:660.
  24. Gillis, S., M. M. Ferm, W. Ou, K. A. Smith. 1978. T cell growth factor: parameters of production and a quantitative microassay for activity. J. Immunol. 120:2027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Johnsson, B., S. Lofas, G. Lindquist. 1991. Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyldextran-modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface plasmon resonance sensors. Anal. Biochem. 198:268.[Medline]
  26. Matsui, K., J. J. Boniface, P. Steffner, P. A. Reay, M. M. Davis. 1994. Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rabinowitz, J. D., C. Beeson, C. Wulfing, K. Tate, P. M. Allen, M. M. Davis, H. M. McConnell. 1996. Altered T cell receptor ligands trigger a subset of early T cell signals. Immunity 5:125.[Medline]
  28. Wulfing, C., J. D. Rabinowitz, C. Beeson, M. D. Sjaastad, H. M. McConnell, M. M. Davis. 1997. Kinetics and extent of T cell activation as measured with the calcium signal. J. Exp. Med. 185:1815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Matsui, K., J. J. Boniface, P. A. Reay, H. Schild, B. Fazekas de St. Groth, M. M. Davis. 1991. Low affinity interaction of peptide-MHC complexes with T cell receptors. Science 254:1788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Jorgensen, J. L., P. A. Reay, E. W. Ehrich, M. M. Davis. 1992. Molecular components of T-cell recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:835.[Medline]
  31. Jorgensen, J. L., U. Esser, B. F. de St. Groth, P. A. Reay, M. M. Davis. 1992. Mapping T-cell receptor-peptide contacts by variant peptide immunization of single-chain transgenics. Nature 355:224.[Medline]
  32. Ehrich, E. W., B. Devaux, E. P. Rock, J. L. Jorgensen, M. M. Davis, Y. H. Chien. 1993. T cell receptor interaction with peptide/major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and superantigen/MHC ligands is dominated by antigen. J. Exp. Med. 178:713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ozato, K., N. Mayer, D. H. Sachs. 1980. Hybridoma cell lines secreting monoclonal antibodies to mouse H-2 and Ia antigens. J. Immunol. 124:533.[Abstract]
  34. Seder, R. A., W. E. Paul, M. M. Davis, B. Fazekas de St. Groth.. 1992. The presence of interleukin 4 during in vitro priming determines the lymphokine-producing potential of CD4+ T cells from T cell receptor transgenic mice. J. Exp. Med. 176:1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Karttunen, J., N. Shastri. 1991. Measurement of ligand-induced activation in single viable T cells using the lacZ reporter gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Porgador, A., J. W. Yewdell, Y. Deng, J. R. Bennink, R. N. Germain. 1997. Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide-MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity 6:715.[Medline]
  37. Baldwin, K. K., P. A. Reay, L. Wu, A. Farr, M. M. Davis. 1999. A T cell receptor-specific blockade of positive selection. J. Exp. Med. 189:13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zarutskie, J. A., A. K. Sato, M. M. Rushe, I. C. Chan, A. Lomakin, G. B. Benedek, L. J. Stern. 1999. A conformational change in the human major histocompatibility complex protein HLA-DR1 induced by peptide binding. Biochemistry 38:5878.[Medline]
  39. Reinherz, E. L., K. Tan, L. Tang, P. Kern, J. Liu, Y. Xiong, R. E. Hussey, A. Smolyar, B. Hare, R. Zhang, et al 1999. The crystal structure of a T cell receptor in complex with peptide and MHC class II. Science 286:1913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Harding, C. V., E. R. Unanue. 1990. Quantitation of antigen-presenting cell MHC class II/peptide complexes necessary for T-cell stimulation. Nature 346:574.[Medline]
  41. Demotz, S., H. M. Grey, A. Sette. 1990. The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. Science 249:1028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kimachi, K., M. Croft, H. M. Grey. 1997. The minimal number of antigen-major histocompatibility complex class II complexes required for activation of naive and primed T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:3310.[Medline]
  43. Kageyama, S., T. J. Tsomides, Y. Sykulev, H. N. Eisen. 1995. Variations in the number of peptide-MHC class I complexes required to activate cytotoxic T cell responses. J. Immunol. 154:567.[Abstract]
  44. Sykulev, Y., M. Joo, I. Vturina, T. J. Tsomides, H. N. Eisen. 1996. Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. Immunity 4:565.[Medline]
  45. Stryhn, A., P. S. Andersen, L. O. Pedersen, A. Svejgaard, A. Holm, C. J. Thorpe, L. Fugger, S. Buus, J. Engberg. 1996. Shared fine specificity between T-cell receptors and an antibody recognizing a peptide/major histocompatibility class I complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Korb, L. C., S. Mirshahidi, K. Ramyar, A. A. Sadighi Akha, S. Sadegh-Nasseri. 1999. Induction of T cell anergy by low numbers of agonist ligands. J. Immunol. 162:6401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Valitutti, S., S. Muller, M. Cella, E. Padovan, A. Lanzavecchia. 1995. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature 375:148.[Medline]
  48. Valitutti, S., S. Muller, M. Dessing, A. Lanzavecchia. 1996. Different responses are elicited in cytotoxic T lymphocytes by different levels of T cell receptor occupancy. J. Exp. Med. 183:1917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Ashton-Rickardt, P. G., A. Bandeira, J. R. Delaney, L. Van Kaer, H. P. Pircher, R. M. Zinkernagel, S. Tonegawa. 1994. Evidence for a differential avidity model of T cell selection in the thymus. Cell 76:651.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Mareeva, E. Martinez-Hackert, and Y. Sykulev
How a T Cell Receptor-like Antibody Recognizes Major Histocompatibility Complex-bound Peptide
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2008; 283(43): 29053 - 29059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. M. Beal, N. Anikeeva, R. Varma, T. O. Cameron, P. J. Norris, M. L. Dustin, and Y. Sykulev
Protein Kinase C{theta} Regulates Stability of the Peripheral Adhesion Ring Junction and Contributes to the Sensitivity of Target Cell Lysis by CTL
J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4815 - 4824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
R. Varma
TCR Triggering by the pMHC Complex: Valency, Affinity, and Dynamics
Sci. Signal., May 13, 2008; 1(19): pe21 - pe21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
Y. Li, D. Zhou, C. Xia, P. G. Wang, and S. B. Levery
Sensitive quantitation of isoglobotriaosylceramide in the presence of isobaric components using electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry
Glycobiology, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 166 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
G.A. Loset, E. Lunde, B. Bogen, O.H. Brekke, and I. Sandlie
Functional phage display of two murine {alpha}/{beta} T-cell receptors is strongly dependent on fusion format, mode and periplasmic folding assistance
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 9, 2007; (2007) gzm044v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S. Pastor, C. G. Vaccaro, A. Minguela, R. J. Ober, and E. S. Ward
Analyses of TCR clustering at the T cell-antigen-presenting cell interface and its impact on the activation of naive CD4+ T cells
Int. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 18(11): 1615 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. T. Joncker, J. Helft, A. Jacquet, V. Premel, and O. Lantz
Intratumor CD4 T-cell accumulation requires stronger priming than for expansion and lymphokine secretion.
Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5443 - 5451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
W. W.A. Schamel, I. Arechaga, R. M. Risueno, H. M. van Santen, P. Cabezas, C. Risco, J. M. Valpuesta, and B. Alarcon
Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response
J. Exp. Med., August 15, 2005; 202(4): 493 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. de la Fuente, M. Mittelbrunn, L. Sanchez-Martin, M. Vicente-Manzanares, A. Lamana, R. Pardi, C. Cabanas, and F. Sanchez-Madrid
Synaptic Clusters of MHC Class II Molecules Induced on DCs by Adhesion Molecule-mediated Initial T-Cell Scanning
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2005; 16(7): 3314 - 3322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
D. Dieckmann, E. S. Schultz, B. Ring, P. Chames, G. Held, H. R. Hoogenboom, and G. Schuler
Optimizing the exogenous antigen loading of monocyte-derived dendritic cells
Int. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 17(5): 621 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. Witt, S. Raychaudhuri, and A. K. Chakraborty
Movies, measurement, and modeling: the three Ms of mechanistic immunology
J. Exp. Med., February 22, 2005; 201(4): 501 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Laugel, J. M. Boulter, N. Lissin, A. Vuidepot, Y. Li, E. Gostick, L. E. Crotty, D. C. Douek, J. Hemelaar, D. A. Price, et al.
Design of Soluble Recombinant T Cell Receptors for Antigen Targeting and T Cell Inhibition
J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 1882 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Mareeva, T. Lebedeva, N. Anikeeva, T. Manser, and Y. Sykulev
Antibody Specific for the Peptide{middle dot}Major Histocompatibility Complex: IS IT T CELL RECEPTOR-LIKE?
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44243 - 44249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. J. Poloso, A. Muntasell, and P. A. Roche
MHC Class II Molecules Traffic into Lipid Rafts during Intracellular Transport
J. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 173(7): 4539 - 4546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
F. Andre, N. Chaput, N. E. C. Schartz, C. Flament, N. Aubert, J. Bernard, F. Lemonnier, G. Raposo, B. Escudier, D.-H. Hsu, et al.
Exosomes as Potent Cell-Free Peptide-Based Vaccine. I. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Transfer Functional MHC Class I/Peptide Complexes to Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2126 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. J. Dillon, V. Karpitski, S. A. Wetzel, D. C. Parker, A. S. Shaw, and P. J. S. Stork
Ectopic B-Raf Expression Enhances Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase (ERK) Signaling in T Cells and Prevents Antigen-presenting Cell-induced Anergy
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 35940 - 35949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
O. Acuto
T Cell-Dendritic Cell Interaction in Vivo: Random Encounters Favor Development of Long-Lasting Ties
Sci. Signal., July 22, 2003; 2003(192): pe28 - pe28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
V. Hurez, A. Saparov, A. Tousson, M. J. Fuller, T. Kubo, J. Oliver, B. T. Weaver, and C. T. Weaver
Restricted Clonal Expression of IL-2 By Naive T Cells Reflects Differential Dynamic Interactions with Dendritic Cells
J. Exp. Med., July 7, 2003; 198(1): 123 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. M. Hiltbold, N. J. Poloso, and P. A. Roche
MHC Class II-Peptide Complexes and APC Lipid Rafts Accumulate at the Immunological Synapse
J. Immunol., February 1, 2003; 170(3): 1329 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Q. Ge, J. D. Stone, M. T. Thompson, J. R. Cochran, M. Rushe, H. N. Eisen, J. Chen, and L. J. Stern
Soluble peptide-MHC monomers cause activation of CD8+ T cells through transfer of the peptide to T cell MHC molecules
PNAS, October 15, 2002; 99(21): 13729 - 13734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. J. DiPaolo and E. R. Unanue
Cutting Edge: Chemical Dominance Does Not Relate to Immunodominance: Studies of the CD4+ T Cell Response to a Model Antigen
J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 1 - 4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. R. Cochran, T. O. Cameron, J. D. Stone, J. B. Lubetsky, and L. J. Stern
Receptor Proximity, Not Intermolecular Orientation, Is Critical for Triggering T-cell Activation
J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 28068 - 28074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. S. Andersen, C. Geisler, S. Buus, R. A. Mariuzza, and K. Karjalainen
Role of the T Cell Receptor Ligand Affinity in T Cell Activation by Bacterial Superantigens
J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2001; 276(36): 33452 - 33457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. S. Andersen, C. Menne, R. A. Mariuzza, C. Geisler, and K. Karjalainen
A Response Calculus for Immobilized T Cell Receptor Ligands
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 49125 - 49132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reay, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reay, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS