The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roeder, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roeder, R. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2000, 164: 5306-5312.
Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists

Role of OCA-B in 3'-IgH Enhancer Function1

Sean Stevens*, Jane Ong{dagger}, Unkyu Kim*, Laurel A. Eckhardt{dagger} and Robert G. Roeder2,*

* Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021; and {dagger} Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10021


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OCA-B (alternately called Bob1 and OBF-1) is a B cell-specific coactivator that interacts with the ubiquitously expressed Oct-1 and the B cell-restricted Oct-2 to activate transcription via the octamer site (5'-ATGCAAAT-3'). OCA-B-/- mice appear to undergo normal Ag-independent B cell maturation. However, Ag-dependent B cell differentiation, including germinal center formation, production of secondary Ig isotypes, and proliferation in response to surface Ig cross-linking, is greatly affected. We demonstrate that the observed reductions in expression of class-switched isotypes in OCA-B-/- mice may be due in part to deficiencies in the function of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements. Furthermore, we find that surface Ig cross-linking represses all the Ig enhancers and that this repression is absent in OCA-B-/- B cells. These results suggest an important role for OCA-B in Ig enhancer function in vivo.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A typical rearranged murine IgH locus contains a variety of transcription control elements (diagrammed in Fig. 1GoA). Immediately upstream of each variable region lies a promoter containing the conserved octamer sequence (5'-ATGCAAAT-3') that is important for B cell-specific activity of IgH promoters in vitro and in vivo (1, 2). Between the rearranged VDJ segments and the Cµ constant region gene lies the well-characterized intronic enhancer (Eµ)3 (1, 2). The intronic enhancer contributes significantly to B cell-specific activity throughout B cell differentiation and can function in the absence of other more distal enhancers. The murine intronic enhancer also possesses a functional octamer element that can contribute to B cell-specific activity in vitro and in vivo (3, 4, 5). Finally, downstream of the C{alpha} constant region gene and spread over a distance of >30 kb lie the 3'-IgH enhancer elements4: HS3A (3A, C{alpha}3'E) (6), HS1,2 (1,2, 3'{alpha}E) (7, 8), HS3B (3B, HS3), and HS4(4) (9) (reviewed in Ref. 10). Although early studies suggested that these elements could function individually as enhancers, few of the elements actually exhibit significant levels of stimulatory activity when present alone and at a more distal position from the promoter. Our previous data demonstrate, in fact, that the 3'-IgH elements must be grouped together to exhibit significant activity from a distance, indicating that the entire group, rather than individual elements, contributes normal enhancer function (11). All of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements possess matches to the octamer consensus site, but there are currently no data to indicate whether these putative octamer sites are important for the activity of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements when they are grouped together.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Map of the murine IgH locus and reporter plasmids. A, Schematic of a typical VDJ-recombined IgH locus, showing the relative positions of the various IgH transcription control elements and coding regions. B, Schematic diagram of the plasmids used in this paper. The positions of the various enhancer elements relative to one another and the promoter are identical with their positions within the murine IgH locus.

 
Transcription of the heavy chain gene is tightly regulated throughout B cell development. The IgH promoters are relatively inactive until brought into closer apposition to the intronic enhancer via VDJ recombination. The intronic enhancer itself is active at relatively constant levels throughout B cell development (4, 5, 11, 12, 13). In contrast, the level of activity of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements varies significantly during B cell development. Even when grouped together, they are inactive in pre-B cells, whereas at the B cell and plasma cell stages, the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements can activate promoters to higher levels than can the intronic enhancer (11). These results, as well as indirect evidence from cell lines lacking certain of the IgH enhancers, suggest that there may be differing levels of dependence on the intronic enhancer vs the 3'-IgH enhancer elements for Ig expression during B cell differentiation. Thus, heavy chain gene expression would be more dependent on the intronic enhancer during early B cell differentiation, whereas the 3'-IgH enhancer elements would be more crucial for heavy chain gene transcription at the B cell and plasma cell stages (10).

Whereas the factors that act through the IgH enhancers comprise a large group of ubiquitous and B cell-specific factors, the factors that act via the IgH promoters are much better characterized. As mentioned above, the octamer sequence (5'-ATGCAAAT-3') has been shown to be crucial for B cell-specific activity of the IgH promoter in vitro and in vivo. The octamer sequence is recognized by the Oct family of transcription factors, including the ubiquitous Oct-1 and B cell-restricted Oct-2, both of which interact functionally with the cofactor OCA-B to generate full IgH promoter function (14). OCA-B is a B cell-specific transcription coactivator that was originally identified in B cell nuclear extracts (15) and subsequently cloned by several laboratories (16, 17, 18). Although OCA-B has been shown to function from a promoter position, data regarding the possible function of OCA-B at more distal enhancer positions are less clear. Thus, although OCA-B is insufficient, even with Oct-2, to generate strong B cell-specific transcription activation from an enhancer position in non-B cells (19, 20), this does not preclude the possibility of a crucial role for OCA-B in a higher order complex involving Oct-1 or Oct-2 and some as yet uncharacterized cofactor in enhancer function. Gene disruption studies in mice have shown that whereas OCA-B is not necessary for early B cell differentiation, including IgM, IgD, and light chain synthesis, it is essential for germinal center formation, for normal rates of B cell proliferation in response to IgM cross-linking, and for normal expression of secondary heavy chain isotypes. The ~10-fold decrease in serum isotype levels does not appear to be due to any defect in class switch recombination, because switching occurs normally in vitro with B cells derived from knockout mice (21, 22, 23). Therefore, as suggested by mRNA analysis in OCA-B-/- B cells (21), the observed reductions in the switched heavy chain isotype levels in serum could reflect reductions in the transcription rates at the IgH locus. Given the previously demonstrated role of OCA-B in IgH promoter function in vitro (15, 16), we sought to determine whether the observed immune defects in the OCA-B knockout mice involved deficiencies in IgH promoter and/or enhancer function.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Isolation of primary B cells

Cells were isolated for transient transfection essentially as described (24). Briefly, freshly isolated murine spleens were isolated and crushed to release cells in serum-free medium. RBC were depleted with lysis buffer (0.16 M NH4Cl, 10 mM potassium bicarbonate, 0.1 mM EDTA). T cells were removed by incubation with anti-Thy1.2 antisera (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and subsequent treatment with guinea pig complement (Sigma). Macrophages and other adherent cell types were removed by overnight incubation in tissue culture flasks and subsequent decanting of suspension cells. The cells were preactivated by 50 µg/ml LPS (Sigma) for 48 h, and activated B cells were isolated via Percoll gradient centrifugation (25) and transfected using the DEAE-dextran method (Promega, Madison, WI).

Plasmid constructs

VH luc. The IgH promoter, VH, was removed from pGL2 BV (described in 11) using KpnI and BglII, and inserted into the identical sites in pGL3 Basic, a luciferase reporter construct obtained from Promega.

VH luc 3A. The 1-kb HS3A (C{alpha}3'E) element was removed from pGL2 BV HS3A (described in Ref. 11) using BamHI and SalI and inserted into the same sites in VH luc.

VH luc 1,2. The 4-kb HS1,2 (3'{alpha}E) element was removed from pGL2 BV HS1,2 (described in Ref. 11) with BamHI and SalI and inserted into the same sites in VH luc.

VH luc 3B. The 1-kb HS3B element was isolated by high fidelity PCR (26) from pGL2 BV HS3B (described in Ref. 11) and inserted into pCR 2.1 via TOPO-TA cloning according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). HS3B was then removed with BglII and SalI and inserted into the identical sites of VH luc.

VH luc 4. The 1.4-kb HS4 element was isolated by high fidelity PCR (26) from pGL2 BV HS4 (described in Ref. 11) and inserted into pCR 2.1 via TOPO-TA cloning according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). HS4 was then removed with BglII and SalI and inserted into the identical sites of VH luc.

VH luc 3B 4. HS3B and HS4 were isolated by high fidelity PCR (26) from pGL2 BV HS34 (described in Ref. 11) and inserted into pCR 2.1 via TOPO-TA cloning according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). HS3B and HS4 were then removed with BglII and SalI and inserted into the identical sites of VH luc.

3A 1,2 3B 4. HS3A was cloned by high fidelity PCR (26) and inserted into pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. pGL2 BV HS1,2 (described in Ref. 11) was digested with BamHI and SalI and inserted into the identical sites in pCR 2.1 3A. The paired elements HS3A and HS1,2 were removed by BglII and SalI digestion and inserted into VH luc 3B 4 between the BglII and XhoI sites, creating an intermediate vector possessing the group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements in proper relative order and orientation with respect to the IgH genomic locus.

VH luc 3A 1,2 3B 4. The unit of all the 3'-IgH enhancer elements was removed as a group from the intermediate '3A 1,2 3B 4' construct using BglII and SalI and inserted into VH luc digested with BamHI and SalI.

VH luc Eµ. The 1-kb Eµ enhancer was removed from pGL2 BV Eµ (described in Ref. 11) with BamHI and SalI and inserted into the same sites in VH luc.

LBK luc. The LBK minimal promoter was removed from LBK{Delta}44CAT (described in Refs. 27 and 28), using BamHI and HindIII, and inserted into the identical sites in pGL3 Basic. This construct was used as the base for the following constructs.

LBK luc Eµ. The Eµ enhancer was removed from pGL2 BV Eµ (described in Ref. 11) with BamHI and SalI and inserted into the same sites in LBK luc.

LBK luc 3A 1,2 3B 4. The entire unit was removed with BglII and SalI digestion from the intermediate '3A 1,2 3B 4' construct and inserted into the LBK luc construct digested with BamHI and SalI.

Cell lines

The pre-B cell lines 18-8 and 18-81, and the B cell line M12.4.1 have been described previously (11). The B cell lines A20, Namalwa, and Raji; the plasma cell line P3X63Ag8; and the fibroblastic cell line NIH/3T3 were obtained from American Type Cell Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The pre-B and B cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% FBS (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies), and 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies). Plasma and fibroblast cells were grown in DMEM (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Primary B cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) containing 10% FBS (JRH Biosciences), 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma), 1% nonessential amino acids (Sigma), 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME (Sigma), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies). Cells were maintained in 8% CO2 at 37°C.

Transient transfections

Cells were transiently transfected as follows: primary B, pre-B and B cells with the DEAE-dextran method (24, 29), plasma cells with Lipofectin (Life Technologies) (30), and fibroblasts with Superfect (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). In experiments in which samples were further treated, the inducer(s) was added to the medium immediately after transfection and left until harvesting of the samples. The amounts added to the medium are as follows: IL-4 (Sigma), 5 ng/ml; Ab to CD40 (anti-CD40) (PharMingen), 10 µg/ml; goat anti-mouse IgM (F(ab')2) (Sigma), 15 µg/ml.

Transfection harvesting and reporter gene assays

Cells were harvested using 1x passive lysis buffer after 48 h (Promega). Luciferase assays were conducted using the Promega dual-luciferase assay system.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Changes in 3'-IgH enhancer element function during B cell development

We cotransfected cell lines representative of various stages in B cell differentiation with newly constructed reporter vectors, diagrammed schematically in Fig. 1GoB, with a modified luciferase reporter gene (Promega) and bearing either the VH promoter alone, the VH promoter in combination with the intronic enhancer Eµ, or the VH promoter combined with the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements. In these constructs, the enhancers are positioned relative to one another such that they more accurately reflect their organization in the genome. The results from several independent transfections of each cell line are presented in Fig. 2Go. Data are presented as fold activation of the enhancer-containing constructs relative to the enhancerless construct.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Activities of the IgH transcription control elements during B cell development. Results of three to four independent transfections are presented as average fold activity relative to the promoter (prom) alone, with SDs indicated by the error bars. The cells used were: non-B cells, NIH3T3; pre-B cells,18-81; B cells, M12.4.1; plasma cells, P3X63Ag8. Amounts of each of the luciferase constructs were adjusted to account for differences in molar ratios. A total of 10 µg of each reporter + filler DNA was transfected with 0.5 µg pRL-TK control plasmid (Promega).

 
In confirmation of previously published data (1, 2), but using the newly constructed reporter plasmids described above, we found that the intronic enhancer Eµ is inactive in non-B cells and shows relatively constant activity (relative to the promoter alone) throughout B cell development. The group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements is also inactive in non-B cells but, unlike Eµ, is also inactive in pre-B cells. At the B cell and plasma cell stages, the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements become very active and show a much stronger function than Eµ. These data show that the intronic enhancer and 3'-IgH enhancer elements are regulated differentially throughout B cell development and may reflect different functional roles in IgH gene expression.

The 3'-IgH elements exhibit synergistic activity in primary B cells

Another important feature of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements is their synergistic activity when combined with one another (11). We tested whether this synergy is also observed in primary B cells using newly constructed reporter vectors with a modified luciferase reporter gene (Promega) and bearing the VH promoter alone, the VH promoter in combination with the intronic enhancer Eµ, the VH promoter combined with one or two of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements, or the VH promoter combined with the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements (Fig. 1GoB). The results of several transfections, presented as fold activation relative to the enhancerless construct, are shown in Fig. 3Go. Consistent with our previous results in transformed cell lines, the 3'-IgH enhancer elements, with the exception of HS4, show little function in primary B cells when assayed alone. However, when assayed together, the 3'-IgH enhancer elements show significant synergistic activity. Thus, pairing either HS3A (C{alpha}3'E) with HS1,2 (3'{alpha}E) or HS3B (HS3) with HS4 generates levels of activity equal to or greater than the activity of the construct bearing the intronic enhancer. A construct containing all of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements together exhibits activities much greater than the activities observed with Eµ alone or with the pairwise combinations of 3'-IgH enhancer elements. Along with our previous data, these observations indicate that the IgH enhancer elements function similarly in both primary and transformed cells, indicating the potential physiological significance of the synergistic activity of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Synergistic activation by the 3'-IgH enhancer elements in primary B cells. Results of three to four independent transfections are presented as average fold activity relative to the promoter (prom) alone, with SDs indicated by the error bars. Amounts of each of the luciferase constructs were adjusted to account for differences in molar ratios. A total of 10 µg of each reporter + filler DNA was transfected with 0.5 µg pRL-TK control plasmid (Promega).

 
IL-4 and anti-CD40 stimulation of 3'-IgH element activity is defective in OCA-B-/- primary B cells

The OCA-B knockout mice are defective in both germinal center formation and expression of class switched isotypes, despite the fact that class switch recombination itself appears to be normal (21, 22, 23). OCA-B levels can be increased in primary B cells by treatment with IL-4 and anti-CD40 (31). There is also evidence that anti-CD40 stimulation can activate HS1,2 when assayed independently of the other elements and from a proximal position (32). We therefore examined the effects of IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment on IgH enhancer function in wild-type and OCA-B-/- primary B cells.

To examine whether the effects of IL-4 and anti-CD40 stimulation are promoter dependent, we constructed a separate set of reporters using a minimal promoter (designated LBK) derived from the liver/bone/kidney alkaline phosphatase gene, and previously shown to exhibit low level constitutive function in a variety of cell types (Refs. 27 and 28 ; Fig. 1GoB). The minimal LBK promoter does not itself possess an octamer element and, as expected, does not respond to OCA-B in cotransfection experiments (data not shown).

Primary B cells of each genotype were isolated and transiently transfected in duplicate with constructs bearing either the minimal LBK or the VH promoter alone or the minimal LBK or VH promoter in combination either with Eµ or with the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements. One set of the samples was then treated with IL-4 and anti-CD40. The results from several independent experiments are found in Fig. 4Go, expressed as relative light units.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Stimulation by IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment A, Stimulation of promoter activity; B, stimulation of intronic enhancer activity; C, stimulation of 3'-IgH enhancer activity. Results of five to seven independent transfections are presented in average relative light units, normalized to control plasmid activity, with SDs indicated by error bars. Amounts of each of the luciferase constructs were adjusted to account for differences in molar ratios. A total of 10 µg of each reporter + filler DNA was transfected with 0.5 µg pRL-TK control plasmid (Promega). {square}, uninduced activity; , samples treated with IL-4 (5 ng/ml media) and anti-CD40 (10 µg/ml media).

 
The reporters containing the promoters alone show differential responses to IL-4 and {alpha}CD40 treatment (Fig. 4GoA). The activity of the VH promoter construct is up-regulated by IL-4 and anti-CD40 stimulation in wild-type primary B cells, whereas the activity of the minimal LBK promoter construct appears to be unaffected (Fig. 4GoA). In OCA-B-/- primary B cells, the minimal LBK promoter activity remains unaffected by IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment, whereas the function of the VH promoter is again induced by IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment, albeit at lower overall levels (Fig. 4GoA).

As shown in Fig. 4GoB, the intronic enhancer significantly stimulates activity of both the VH and the minimal LBK promoter constructs in both uninduced wild-type and OCA-B-/- primary B cells, indicating that intronic enhancer function itself is relatively unaffected in the absence of OCA-B (Note the change in scale from the promoter only assays in Fig. 4GoA.). Furthermore, in both wild-type and OCA-B-/- primary B cells, treatment with IL-4 and anti-CD40 moderately stimulates both the Eµ-containing VH and the Eµ-containing minimal promoter constructs.

As shown in Fig. 4GoC, the VH and the minimal LBK promoter constructs bearing the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements exhibit significantly higher activity than the reporters containing the promoters alone in uninduced primary B cells of either genotype (Fig. 4GoA), indicating that the function of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements is not impaired by the lack of OCA-B. However, although the 3'-IgH enhancer elements are significantly stimulated by IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment in wild-type primary B cells, this same treatment has no effect on function of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements in OCA-B-/- cells (Fig. 4GoC). This latter result contrasts with the results obtained with the intronic enhancer-containing constructs (Fig. 4GoB). The lack of stimulation of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements in OCA-B-/- primary B cells is independent of the nature of the promoter and thus appears to be intrinsic to the 3'-IgH enhancer elements themselves.

Surface IgM cross-linking fails to repress intronic or 3'-IgH elements in OCA-B-/- primary B cells

Another defect observed in the OCA-B-/- B cells is a reduced ability to proliferate in vitro in response to surface Ig cross-linking (21). Previous studies have indicated that surface Ig cross-linking can repress intronic enhancer function, but there are conflicting data regarding the effects on the 3'-IgH enhancer elements (33, 34, 35, 36). We examined the effects of surface Ig cross-linking on IgH enhancer activity by transiently transfecting both wild-type and OCA-B-/- primary B cells with the above-described constructs. For each group of experiments, two sets of constructs were transfected; and one set was induced by addition of anti-IgM (µ chain) to the medium. The results of several independent experiments are presented in Fig. 5Go. In wild-type cells, the promoter-only constructs are unaffected by surface Ig cross-linking (Fig. 5GoA), whereas both the Eµ and 3'-IgH enhancer element-containing constructs are significantly repressed by this treatment (Fig. 5Go, B and C). In OCA-B-/- cells, the promoters are again unaffected by surface Ig cross-linking; however, unlike the wild-type primary B cells, neither Eµ nor the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements are repressed. These data show that both Eµ and the group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements are strongly repressed by surface Ig cross-linking, in agreement with previous reports (34, 35, 36). More importantly, in these studies, the observed repression of both Eµ and the 3'-IgH enhancer elements is totally absent in the OCA-B-/- primary B cells, regardless of the promoter used.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Surface Ig cross-linking. A, Promoter activity; B, Intronic enhancer activity; C, 3'-IgH enhancer activity. Results of five to seven independent transfections are presented in average relative light units, normalized to control plasmid activity, with SDs indicated by error bars. Amounts of each of the luciferase constructs were adjusted to account for differences in molar ratios. A total of 10 µg of each reporter + filler DNA was transfected with 0.5 µg pRL-TK control plasmid (Promega). {square}, uninduced activity; , samples induced with surface Ig cross-linking (15 µg/ml).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
3'-IgH enhancer elements exhibit synergistic activity in primary B cells

Until recently, studies of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements have focused on their individual roles in activating transcription of reporter genes from promoter-proximal positions, in transfection and transgenic studies (reviewed in Ref. 10). Our previously published data, as well as the results described here, have demonstrated that these types of studies may give an incomplete view of 3'-IgH enhancer element function (11). Thus, when assayed independently in single copies positioned at a distance greater than 1 kb from a promoter, the 3'-IgH enhancer elements function weakly. In contrast, grouping the 3'-IgH enhancer elements together creates a significant synergistic activity that is both distance and orientation independent, more consistent with the definition of enhancer activity. This may be a more accurate reflection of 3'-IgH enhancer element function in vivo, because the 3'-IgH enhancer elements are all present in the IgH locus at a distance of >200 kb from the promoter after VDJ recombination. The activity of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements is shown here, and in previously published studies (11), to vary during B cell development; the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements are inactive in pre B cells but strongly active at the B cell and plasma cell stages. Consistent with these earlier data from studies with transfected cell lines, the current studies show that all of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements other than HS4 are weak in primary B cells when assayed independently (in single copies) and at a distance from the promoter. When grouped together, the 3'-IgH enhancer elements show significant synergistic activity, such that the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements stimulate promoter activity to a much greater level than the intronic enhancer, Eµ. These results demonstrate that the strong synergistic activity of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements is generated in primary B cells as well as in transformed cell lines and indicate the potential physiological relevance of the synergistic activation by the 3'-IgH enhancer elements.

IL-4 and anti-CD40 stimulation of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements is affected in OCA-B-/- cells

B cell-Th cell interactions play an important role in germinal center formation and in expression of class-switched heavy chain isotypes in vivo, and both processes are greatly affected in OCA-B-/- mice (21, 22, 23). A number of studies have suggested a preferential role for the 3'-IgH enhancer elements in the expression of IgH genes of the class-switched isotypes (37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42). These observations led us to examine whether there is a link between OCA-B and 3'-IgH enhancer element function. IL-4 and anti-CD40 stimulation of primary B cells, a treatment that mimics B cell-Th cell interactions, has previously been shown to up-regulate OCA-B expression (31).

In agreement with previous studies, treatment with IL-4 and anti-CD40 was found to enhance the function of all the IgH transcription control elements in wild-type primary B cells transfected with corresponding reporters: the VH promoter alone; the VH promoter in combination with the intronic enhancer; and the VH promoter combined with the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements (Fig. 4Go). The stimulation of enhancer function is not promoter specific because similar results were observed when these elements were assayed in combination with a minimal LBK promoter that is unresponsive to IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment in wild-type B cells. Therefore, all the IgH transcription control elements appear to be responsive to IL-4 and anti-CD40. In contrast with the results obtained with wild-type cells, in primary OCA-B-/- B cells, IL-4 and anti-CD40 failed to enhance the function of the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements when linked either to the minimal LBK promoter or the VH promoter (Fig. 4Go). These data indicate (1) that the inability of IL-4 and anti-CD40 treatment to stimulate 3'-IgH enhancer element function is not simply due to reduction of VH promoter function in the absence of OCA-B and (2) that the factor(s) responsible for the stimulation of 3'-IgH enhancer element function are missing or inactive in OCA-B-/- B cells. Although previous data have suggested that OCA-B, either with or without Oct-2, is insufficient to activate transcription from an enhancer position (19, 20), it is important to note that these experiments involved cotransfections of non-B cells and thus do not eliminate the possibility of an OCA-B requirement for another B cell-specific component(s) to activate transcription from a distal position. Therefore, the observed defects in 3'-IgH enhancer element stimulation by IL-4 and anti-CD40 in OCA-B-/- primary B cells could reflect the lack of an OCA-B-dependent activation mechanism that directly involves one or more of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements. Alternately, these data are consistent with the possibility that OCA-B plays a role in the expression and/or activation of another factor(s) necessary for IL-4 and anti-CD40 induction of enhancer activity. This could involve either increased expression of a responsive transcription factor(s), decreased expression of a repressor(s), or even an effect on intermediate factors in cell signaling. These possibilities are currently under investigation.

The observed defects in IL-4- and anti-CD40-induced enhancement of 3'-IgH enhancer element function may help explain the reduced expression of class-switched isotypes in OCA-B-/- mice. If indeed the 3'-IgH enhancer elements are more critical for expression of the class-switched isotypes, whereas Eµ is more important for IgM and IgD expression, as previously suggested (10), then defects in 3'-IgH enhancer element stimulation would preferentially affect expression of the class-switched isotypes.

Surface Ig cross-linking represses Eµ and 3'-IgH elements in wild-type but not OCA-B-/- primary B cells

Surface Ig cross-linking induces a variety of effects on B cells, one of which is an enhanced B cell proliferation that is reduced in OCA-B-/- mice (21). Several studies have demonstrated that surface Ig cross-linking reduces IgH transcription and intronic enhancer activity (34, 35, 36). We chose to examine the effects of surface Ig cross-linking on the activity of the combined IgH transcription control elements in transiently transfected primary B cells of both wild-type and OCA-B knockout mice.

Both the VH and minimal LBK promoters were unaffected by surface Ig cross-linking in wild-type B cells. Thus, all the observed effects are intrinsic to the enhancers themselves. The intronic enhancer and combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements were significantly repressed in wild-type primary B cells on surface Ig cross-linking, whether linked to the VH promoter or to the minimal LBK promoter. These results support previously published data indicating that IgH transcription is reduced by surface Ig cross-linking (34, 35, 36). Other previous data suggested that surface Ig cross-linking could induce activity of a subregion of the HS1,2 element (32, 33). The differences between these earlier observations and our present studies may be due to differences in the types of constructs used, or, more likely, the use of an isolated piece of the HS1,2 element instead of the entire group of 3'-IgH enhancer elements.

As expected, surface Ig cross-linking has no effect on either the VH promoter or the minimal LBK promoter in OCA-B-/- primary B cells. In strong contrast to the wild-type cells, neither the intronic enhancer nor the combined 3'-IgH enhancer elements are repressed in OCA-B knockout B cells. Unlike IL-4 and anti-CD40-induced activity, the defect in surface Ig-mediated repression is not specific to the 3'-IgH enhancer elements. One possibility is that OCA-B is normally a target for repression by surface Ig cross-linking, such that the signaling pathways are no longer able to reduce IgH enhancer function in cells that lack OCA-B. Another possibility is that OCA-B controls one or more of the intermediates in the signaling pathway(s) utilized by surface Ig cross-linking, and thus the signals from the B cell receptor fail to be propagated within the cell.

These results demonstrate an important role for the B cell-specific cofactor OCA-B in activation and repression of IgH enhancer activity and, therefore, IgH expression. Subsequent to the submission of this article, data published by Tang and Sharp (43) support the notion of OCA-B involvement in 3'-IgH enhancer function. Taken together, all of the data help to explain some of the immune defects observed in OCA-B knockout mice, indicating the importance of OCA-B in lymphocyte function in vivo.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Yan Luo and Cary Gunther for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant CA42567 (to R.G.R.). S.S. is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM15671-02. L.A.E. is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1AI30653. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert G. Roeder, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 166, New York, NY 10021. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Eµ, IgH intronic enhancer; 3A, HS3A (C{alpha}3'E); 1,2, HS1,2 (3'{alpha}E); 3B, HS3B (HS3); 4, HS4; luc, luciferase reporter gene; VH, IgH promoter, LBK, liver/bone/kidney alkaline phosphatase minimal promoter; anti-CD40, Ab to CD40. Back

4 For the sake of clarity and convenience, in this article we refer to the transcriptional control regions found 3' of the C{alpha} constant region gene collectively as the 3'-IgH enhancer elements. Each of the 3'-IgH enhancer elements is a complex region of DNA and consists of many putative transcription factor binding sites. Back

Received for publication December 28, 1999. Accepted for publication March 6, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Staudt, L., M. J. Lenardo. 1991. Immunoglobulin gene transcription. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9:373.[Medline]
  2. Atchison, M. L.. 1988. Enhancers: mechanisms of action and cell specificity. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 4:127.
  3. Neuberger, M. S.. 1983. Expression and regulation of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes transfected into lymphoid cells. EMBO J. 2:1373.[Medline]
  4. Tsao, B. P., X.-F. Wang, C. L. Peterson, K. Calame. 1988. In vivo functional analysis of in vitro protein binding sites in the immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:3239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jenuwein, T., R. Grosschedl. 1991. Complex pattern of immunoglobulin µ gene expression in normal and transgenic mice: nonoverlapping regulatory sequences govern distinct tissue specificity. Genes Dev. 5:932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Matthias, P., D. Baltimore. 1993. The immunoglobulin heavy chain locus contains another B cell-specific 3' enhancer close to the {alpha} constant region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lieberson, R., S. L. Giannini, B. K. Birshstein, L. A. Eckhardt. 1991. An enhancer at the 3' end of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain gene locus. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Pettersson, S., G. P. Cook, M. Bruggmann, G. T. Williams, M. S. Neuberger. 1990. A second B cell-specific enhancer 3' of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus. Nature 344:165.[Medline]
  9. Madisen, L., M. Groudine. 1994. Identification of a locus control region in the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus that deregulates c-myc expression in plasmacytoma and Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. Genes Dev. 8:2212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Arulampalam, V., L. Eckhardt, S. Pettersson. 1997. The enhancer shift: a model to explain the developmental control of IgH gene expression in B-lineage cells. Immunol. Today 18:549.[Medline]
  11. Ong, J., S. Stevens, R. G. Roeder, L. A. Eckhardt. 1998. 3'-IgH enhancer elements shift synergistic interactions during B cell development. J. Immunol. 160:4896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Banerji, J., L. Olson, W. Schaffner. 1983. A lymphocyte-specific cellular enhancer is located downstream of the joining region in immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes. Cell 33:729.[Medline]
  13. Gillies, S. D., S. L. Morrison, V. T. Oi, S. Tonegawa. 1983. A tissue-specific transcriptional enhancer element is located in the major intron of a rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Cell 33:717.[Medline]
  14. Luo, Y., H. Ge, S. Stevens, H. Xiao, R. G. Roeder. 1998. Coactivation by OCA-B: definition of critical regions and synergism with general cofactors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:3803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Luo, Y., H. Fujii, T. Gerster, R. G. Roeder. 1992. A novel B cell-derived coactivator potentiates the activation of immunoglobulin promoters by octamer-binding transcription factors. Cell 71:231.[Medline]
  16. Luo, Y., R. G. Roeder. 1995. Cloning, functional characterization and mechanism of action of the B-cell-specific coactivator OCA-B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4115.[Abstract]
  17. Strubin, M., J. W. Newell, P. Matthias. 1995. OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins. Cell 80:497.[Medline]
  18. Gstaiger, M., L. Knoepfel, O. Georgiev, W. Schaffner, C. M. Hovens. 1995. A B-cell coactivator of octamer-binding transcription factors. Nature 373:360.[Medline]
  19. Pfisterer, P., S. Zwilling, J. Hess, T. Wirth. 1995. Functional characterization of the murine homolog of the B cell-specific coactivator BOB.1/OBF.1. J. Biol. Chem. 270:29780.
  20. Schubart, D. B., P. Sauter, S. Massa, E. M. Friedl, H. Schwarzenbach, P. Matthias. 1996. Gene structure and characterization of the murine homologue of the B cell-specific transcriptional coactivator OBF-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kim, U., X.-F. Qin, S. Gong, S. Stevens, Y. Luo, M. Nussenzweig, R. G. Roeder. 1996. The B-cell-specific transcription coactivator OCA-B/OBF-1/Bob-1 is essential for normal production of immunoglobulin isotypes. Nature 383:542.[Medline]
  22. Nielsen, P. J., O. Georgiev, B. Lorenz, W. Schaffner. 1996. B lymphocytes are impaired in mice lacking the transcriptional co-activator Bob1/OCA-B/OBF1. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:321.
  23. Schubart, D. B., A. Rolink, V. M. Kosco-Vilbois, F. Botteri, P. Matthias. 1996. B-cell-specific coactivator OBF-1/OCA-B/Bob1 is required for immune response and germinal center formation. Nature 383:538.[Medline]
  24. McMahon, S. B., A. Norwell, K. J. Levine, J. G. Monroe. 1995. Transient transfection of murine B lymphocyte blasts as a method for examining gene regulation in primary B cells. J. Immunol. Methods 179:251.[Medline]
  25. Coligan, J. E., A. M. Kruisbeck, D. H. Margulies, E. M. Shevach, W. Strober. 1997. Current Protocols in Immunology Wiley, New York.
  26. Barnes, W. M.. 1994. PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from {lambda} bacteriophage templates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kiledjian, M., T. Kadesch. 1990. Analysis of the liver/bone/kidney alkaline phosphatase promoter in vivo and in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Weiss, M. J., K. Ray, P. S. Henthorn, B. Lamb, T. Kadesch, H. Harris. 1988. Structure of the liver/bone/kidney alkaline phosphatase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 263:12002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Luthman, H., G. Magnusson. 1983. High efficiency polyoma DNA transfection of chloroquine treated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 11:1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Felgner, P. L., T. R. Gadek, M. Holm, R. Roman, H. W. Chan, M. Wenz, J. P. Northrop, G. M. Ringold, M. Danielsen. 1987. Lipofectin: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Qin, X.-F., A. Reichlin, Y. Luo, R. G. Roeder, M. C. Nussenzweig. 1998. OCA-B integrates B cell antigen receptor-, CD40L- and IL-4-mediated signals for the germinal center pathway of B cell development. EMBO J. 17:5066.[Medline]
  32. Grant, P. A., T. Andersson, M. F. Neurath, V. Arulampalam, A. Bauch, R. Muller, M. Reth, S. Pettersson. 1996. A T cell controlled molecular pathway regulating the IgH locus: CD40-mediated activation of the IgH 3' enhancer. EMBO J. 15:6691.[Medline]
  33. Grant, P. A., C. B. Thompson, S. Pettersson. 1995. IgM receptor-mediated transactivation of the IgH 3' enhancer couples a novel Elf-1-AP-1 protein complex to the developmental control of enhancer function. EMBO J. 14:4501.[Medline]
  34. Johansson, K., M. Sigvardsson, T. Leanderson. 1994. Transcriptional regulation of immunoglobulin gene expression by anti-Ig. Int. Immunol. 6:41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Chen, U., R. H. Scheuermann, T. Wirth, T. Gerster, R. G. Roeder, K. Harshmann, C. Berger. 1991. Anti-IgM antibodies down modulate µ-enhancer activity and OTF-2 levels in LPS-stimulated mouse splenic B-cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:5981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Leanderson, T., E. Hsu. 1985. Anti-IgM treatment influences immunoglobulin heavy and light chain mRNA levels in mitogen-stimulated B lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 15:641.[Medline]
  37. Serwe, M., F. Sablitzky. 1993. V(D)J recombination in B cells is impaired but not blocked by targeted deletion of the immunoglobulin heavy chain intron enhancer. EMBO J. 12:2321.[Medline]
  38. Chen, J., F. Young, A. Bottaro, V. Stewart, R. K. Smith, F. W. Alt. 1993. Mutations of the intronic IgH enhancer and its flanking sequences differentially affect accessibility of the JH locus. EMBO J. 12:4635.[Medline]
  39. Aguilera, R. J., T. J. Hope, H. Sakano. 1985. Characterization of immunoglobulin enhancer deletions in murine plasmacytomas. EMBO J. 4:3689.[Medline]
  40. Eckhardt, L. A., B. Birshstein. 1985. Independent immunoglobulin class-switch events occurring in a single myeloma cell line. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Klein, S., F. Sablitzky, A. Radbruch. 1984. Deletion of the IgH enhancer does not reduce immunoglobulin heavy chain production of a IgD class switch variant. EMBO J. 3:2473.[Medline]
  42. Wabl, M. R., P. D. Burrows. 1984. Expression of immunoglobulin heavy chain at a high level in the absence of a proposed immunoglobulin enhancer element in cis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:2452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Tang, H., P. A. Sharp. 1999. Transcriptional regulation of the murine 3'-IgH enhancer by Oct-2. Immunity 11:517.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. L. Di Bartolo, E. Hyjek, S. Keller, I. Guasparri, H. Deng, R. Sun, A. Chadburn, D. M. Knowles, and E. Cesarman
Role of Defective Oct-2 and OCA-B Expression in Immunoglobulin Production and Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Lytic Reactivation in Primary Effusion Lymphoma
J. Virol., May 1, 2009; 83(9): 4308 - 4315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. I. Kuraishy, S. W. French, M. Sherman, M. Herling, D. Jones, R. Wall, and M. A. Teitell
TORC2 regulates germinal center repression of the TCL1 oncoprotein to promote B cell development and inhibit transformation
PNAS, June 12, 2007; 104(24): 10175 - 10180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Pongratz, J. W. McAlees, D. H. Conrad, R. S. Erbe, K. M. Haas, and V. M. Sanders
The Level of IgE Produced by a B Cell Is Regulated by Norepinephrine in a p38 MAPK- and CD23-Dependent Manner.
J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 2926 - 2938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. W. Kin and V. M. Sanders
CD86 Stimulation on a B Cell Activates the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt and Phospholipase C{gamma}2/Protein Kinase C{alpha}beta Signaling Pathways.
J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6727 - 6735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. M. Corcoran, J. Hasbold, W. Dietrich, E. Hawkins, A. Kallies, S. L. Nutt, D. M. Tarlinton, P. Matthias, and P. D. Hodgkin
Differential requirement for OBF-1 during antibody-secreting cell differentiation
J. Exp. Med., May 2, 2005; 201(9): 1385 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Ushmorov, O. Ritz, M. Hummel, F. Leithauser, P. Moller, H. Stein, and T. Wirth
Epigenetic silencing of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene in classical Hodgkin lymphoma-derived cell lines contributes to the loss of immunoglobulin expression
Blood, November 15, 2004; 104(10): 3326 - 3334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. R. Podojil, N. W. Kin, and V. M. Sanders
CD86 and {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Pathways, Respectively, Increase Oct-2 and OCA-B Expression and Binding to the 3'-IgH Enhancer in B Cells
J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23394 - 23404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. E. W. Sulentic, W. Zhang, Y. J. Na, and N. E. Kaminski
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, an Exogenous Modulator of the 3'{alpha} Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Enhancer in the CH12.LX Mouse Cell Line
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. A. Sepulveda, A. V. Emelyanov, and B. K. Birshtein
NF-{kappa}B and Oct-2 Synergize to Activate the Human 3' Igh hs4 Enhancer in B Cells
J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 1054 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Salas and L. A. Eckhardt
Critical Role for the Oct-2/OCA-B Partnership in Ig-Secreting Cells
J. Immunol., December 15, 2003; 171(12): 6589 - 6598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Brunner, H. Laumen, P. J. Nielsen, N. Kraut, and T. Wirth
Expression of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2-like Gene Is Controlled by BOB.1/OBF.1 in B Lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45231 - 45239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
U. Kim, R. Siegel, X. Ren, C. S. Gunther, T. Gaasterland, and R. G. Roeder
Identification of transcription coactivator OCA-B-dependent genes involved in antigen-dependent B cell differentiation by cDNA array analyses
PNAS, July 22, 2003; 100(15): 8868 - 8873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. R. Podojil and V. M. Sanders
Selective Regulation of Mature IgG1 Transcription by CD86 and {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Stimulation
J. Immunol., May 15, 2003; 170(10): 5143 - 5151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
K. Zhang
Accessibility control and machinery of immunoglobulin class switch recombination
J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2003; 73(3): 323 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. Tantin and P. A. Sharp
Mouse Lymphoid Cell Line Selected To Have High Immunoglobulin Promoter Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2002; 22(5): 1460 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Laurencikiene, V. Deveikaite, and E. Severinson
HS1,2 Enhancer Regulation of Germline {epsilon} and {gamma}2b Promoters in Murine B Lymphocytes: Evidence for Specific Promoter-Enhancer Interactions
J. Immunol., September 15, 2001; 167(6): 3257 - 3265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
X. Shi and L. A. Eckhardt
Deletional analyses reveal an essential role for the hs3b/hs4 IgH 3' enhancer pair in an Ig-secreting but not an earlier-stage B cell line
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2001; 13(8): 1003 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Hess, P. J. Nielsen, K.-D. Fischer, H. Bujard, and T. Wirth
The B Lymphocyte-Specific Coactivator BOB.1/OBF.1 Is Required at Multiple Stages of B-Cell Development
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2001; 21(5): 1531 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
U. Kim, C. S. Gunther, and R. G. Roeder
Genetic Analyses of NFKB1 and OCA-B Function: Defects in B Cells, Serum IgM Level, and Antibody Responses in Nfkb1-/-Oca-b-/- Mice
J. Immunol., December 15, 2000; 165(12): 6825 - 6832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roeder, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roeder, R. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS