|
|
||||||||

*
Centro Nacional de Biología Fundamental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; and
Departments of Neurology and Microbiology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90033
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The envelope gp160 glycoprotein of HIV-1, ENV, represents an interesting Ag for the identification of alternative processing pathways, as some of its epitopes can be presented in a TAP-independent fashion by human MHC class I molecules, while others follow the classical TAP-dependent pathway (10). Of special interest is the gp160-derived HIV IIIB ENV epitope 318RGPGRAFVTI327 (p18),4 which is presented by various human (HLA-A2 (11), -A11 (12), -A3 (13), and -B27 (14)) and murine (Ld (15), Dd (16), H-2q, H-2u, H-2p (17)) MHC class I molecules. It was defined as an immunodominant epitope in the H-2Dd-restricted CTL response against the HIV-1 strain IIIB in BALB/c mice (H-2d) (16, 18, 19), and its crystal structure in association with Dd has recently been determined (20). There are some suggestions that high processing efficiency of this ENV epitope leads to impaired presentation of other coexpressed epitopes in infected cells,5 but the proteases involved remain to be characterized. Metallopeptidases, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), have been implicated in the extracellular cleavage in vitro of a 15-mer synthetic peptide encompassing this epitope (21, 22). However, little is known about the proteases involved in the endogenous ENV p18 processing pathway in living cells.
In this report, we studied processing and presentation of the p18 epitope in cells infected with recombinant vaccinia viruses (rVV) that express either the native gp160 protein or the immunodominant 10-mer peptide inserted at the carboxyl-end of the hepatitis B virus secretory core protein (HBe). By using different protease inhibitors, we demonstrate that, in addition to proteasomes, metallo-endopeptidases distinct from those that can be defined with the available specific inhibitors are involved in the TAP-dependent generation of the p18 10-mer epitope from both native gp160 and HBe-chimeric proteins in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrate that HBe chimeric proteins can be processed by a novel TAP-dependent pathway involving metallopeptidases, which is different from the previously described TAP-independent furin pathway (9).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c mice (H-2d haplotype) were bred in the institutional colony.
Cell lines
Dr. H.-G. Rammensee (Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany) provided the P13.1 cell line, a derivative from mouse mastocytoma P815 cells (H-2d) by transfection with the lacZ gene encoding ß-galactosidase. Dr. P. Cresswell (Yale University, New Haven, CT) provided the TAP-deficient human lymphoblastoid T2 cells transfected with Dd. Both cell lines were cultured in IMDM supplemented with 10% FCS and 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME.
Peptides
ENV-derived peptides 10ENV (RGPGRAFVTI) and 9ENV (GPGRAFVTI), as well as the CMV 9pp89 peptide (YPHFMPTNL) were synthesized in an Applied Biosystems peptide synthesizer model 431A (Foster City, CA), purified, and found homogeneous by HPLC analysis.
Inhibitors
Brefeldin A (BFA) and all protease inhibitors were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) except leupeptin (Amersham-UBS, Arlington Heights, IL), pepstatin (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), Z-VAD.fmk (Enzyme System Products, Livermore, CA), and lactacystin (Dr. E. J. Corey, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA). For control of activity of the protease inhibitors, P13.1 cells (1 x 108) were disrupted by sonication for 15 min at 4°C and centrifuged. A supernatant aliquot corresponding to 1 x 107 cells was directly frozen (nondegraded control). Equivalent aliquots were incubated in the presence of individual inhibitors at 200 µM, and digestion by cellular proteases was allowed for 5 days at 37°C in PBS. Inhibitors were renewed daily. A sample incubated without inhibitors was taken as the degraded control. After SDS-PAGE separation and Coomassie Blue staining of these samples, the overall protein content of each lane was quantitated by densitometry with the PCBAS 2.08e program (Isotopenmeßgeräte, Straubenhardt, Germany). Percent inhibition of protein degradation caused by each inhibitor was calculated as follows: 100 x (sample with inhibitor - degraded)/(nondegraded - degraded).
Recombinant vaccinia viruses
Generation of rVV-eC-10env with the H-2Dd-restricted HIV-1 ENV protein p18 10-mer 318RGPGRAFVTI327 epitope inserted into the carboxyl terminus of HBe has been described previously.5 rVV-ENV virus (vSC25) encoding full-length gp160 from HIV-1 strain IIIB was a kind gift of Dr. B. Moss (23). rVV-sA encodes a secreted, glycosylated 86-aa-long protein construct containing 18 aa comprising an Ld-restricted murine hepatitis virus nucleocapsid epitope, which are linked to a stretch of 67 residues of the HIV gp160 IIIB V3 loop comprising the p18 epitope. It is similar to the published A recombinant (24), except that it is preceded by the adenovirus E19 signal sequence (5). Two other recombinants used as controls were those encoding HBe, rVV-HBe (25), and murine CMV 9pp89 immunodominant epitope biterminally flanked by alanines and inserted into the amino terminus of HBe, rVV-eN-A9pp89A (26). All rVV-encoded proteins relevant to this study contain their respective signal sequences for endoplasmic reticulum translocation. All foreign genes cloned into the rVV used in this study are under the control of the vaccinia early-late promoter 7.5k.
T cell lines and cytolytic assays
Polyclonal pp89-monospecific CTL were generated by immunization
of mice with murine CMV and cultured as described previously
(7). BALB/c mice were immunized by i.p. injection of
5 x 107 PFU of rVV-ENV. Polyclonal
ENV-specific CTL were generated from splenocytes obtained 3 wk
postimmunization that were stimulated in vitro in the presence of
10-6 M 9ENV peptide in
-MEM supplemented with
10% FCS and 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME. Recombinant human IL-2,
generously provided by Hoffmann-LaRoche (Nutley, NJ), was added 5 days
later at 15 U/ml. Long-term cultures were restimulated weekly with
mitomycin C-treated spleen cells pulsed with
10-4 M 9ENV peptide and cultured in medium
supplemented with 60 U/ml IL-2 and 10-6 M 9ENV.
Following this protocol, no vaccinia-specific CTL were selected.
Polyclonal CTL were used as effector cells in standard 4-h cytolytic
assays (27). Over a period of several years, CTL thus
prepared recognized peptide-pulsed cells with half-maximal lysis at
10ENV or 9ENV peptide concentrations between 4 x
10-10 and 8 x 10-9
M. Infected cells were used as target cells after a 3- to 5-h infection
with rVV as described (9). All inhibitors were added
together with the virus and kept at a 5-fold higher concentration
during the 1-h adsorption period than throughout the infection. After
washing the virus inoculum, the inhibitors were kept at the
concentrations indicated for individual experiments throughout
infection and 51Cr labeling. BFA was then added
to stop further endogenous presentation and kept until the end of the
CTL assay. Inhibitors were not toxic at the indicated concentrations.
The data are mean values of at least two experiments.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endogenous expression of the gp160 protein of the HIV-1 IIIB
strain results in efficient presentation of the p18 epitope by the MHC
class I molecule Dd to gp160-specific CTL
(18, 19). The 10-mer sequence
318RGPGRAFVTI327, as well
as shorter sequences, are recognized by ENV-specific CTL when used as
synthetic peptides and thus represent the epitope core
(16). Processing and presentation of gp160 by
H-2Dd-positive P13.1 target cells following
infection with rVV-ENV was confirmed by specific lysis using
p18-specific CTL lines (Fig. 1
A, lines). The level of
recognition was similar to that obtained with exogenously added 10ENV
peptide (75% specific lysis vs 0% without peptide at an E:T ratio of
5:1). These CTL lines recognized peptide-pulsed cells with high
sensitivity (half-maximal lysis was at 5 x
10-9 M 10ENV). A multiplicity of infection was
used that does not have any measurable effect on P13.1 host cell
macromolecular synthesis (28). In addition, no Ag
presentation to CTL could be detected when the cells were solely loaded
with the input virus, without allowing the infection to proceed (data
not shown).
|
To demonstrate that the HIV ENV epitope requires endogenous processing,
presentation was analyzed in the presence of BFA. This drug blocks
class I export beyond the cis-Golgi compartment
(29), thus preventing surface expression of newly
assembled class I-peptide complexes from endogenous origin. Exogenously
added peptides are not affected by BFA, and thus no inhibition was
found when rVV-HBe-infected cells pulsed with
10-4 M 9ENV peptide were treated with BFA (data
not shown). By contrast, the full block of specific lysis caused by the
addition of BFA during infection (open bars in Fig. 1
) demonstrated
that the epitope in both ENV constructs was indeed generated from
proteins endogenously processed in infected cells.
The involvement of proteasomes in the presentation of p18 was tested by
treatment of P13.1 target cells with the proteasome-specific inhibitor
lactacystin, a Streptomyces metabolite (30, 31)
(Table I
), and infection with either rVV
encoding the epitope. Although an inhibitory effect of lactacystin was
clearly evident in either infected target, it was not complete (Fig. 1
, open bars, LC). Specific inhibition was 48 ± 8%
(n = 6) in rVV-ENV-infected targets and 40 ± 9%
(n = 6) in rVV-eC-10env-infected cells. No further
inhibition was observed when a higher concentration of lactacystin was
used, 100 µM, while its effect was lost if it was lowered to 10 µM.
A further control of the inhibitory potential of lactacystin was
revealed by similar experiments with target cells infected with
rVV-eN-A9pp89A (26) and treated with identical
concentration of lactacystin, 50 µM, which completely failed to
present the CMV-derived 9pp89 epitope to its specific CTL (inhibition
of 83 ± 17%, n = 4, see Fig. 3
B). We
also have the experience that this range of lactacystin concentrations
can reveal selective effects on Ag presentation (7). Thus,
the marked, but only partial inhibition of Ag presentation revealed by
these data implicates a role for proteasomes in MHC class I processing
of the p18 10-mer epitope in vivo, but also suggests the contribution
of other proteases in this endogenous Ag processing.
|
|
To characterize proteases distinct from proteasomes that
contribute to HIV epitope Ag processing, experiments with several
specific protease inhibitors were conducted. They were chosen to cover
a wide range of protease classes. The inhibitors leupeptin, pepstatin,
and 1,10-phenanthroline specific for different families of proteases
(Table I
) were initially tested. Open bars in Fig. 2
show that both leupeptin and pepstatin
had no effect on the specific recognition of target cells infected with
either rVV-ENV (Fig. 2
A), or rVV-eC-10env (Fig. 2
B). In contrast, in the same experiments, target cells
treated with the inhibitor 1,10-phenanthroline failed to present the
p18 epitope to specific CTL. Whereas specific inhibition of
rVV-ENV-infected cells was 70 ± 8% (n = 5) (Fig. 2
A), it reached 96 ± 4% (n = 4) using
rVV-eC-10env-infected targets. (Fig. 2
B). These results
clearly demonstrate that p18 10-mer epitope presentation is
predominantly metalloproteinase dependent in vivo.
|
Endopeptidases are involved in p18 10-mer Ag processing
Although most metallopeptidases are located at the cell membrane and in the extracellular matrix, previous studies have identified about half a dozen different functional metallopeptidases in the cytosol and a similar number in other compartments related to the MHC class I presentation pathway, such as the ER and the trans-Golgi network (39). Any of these enzymes may play a role in the endogenous pathway of Ag processing.
On the basis of cleavage mechanism, metallopeptidases comprise
aminopeptidases, carboxypeptidases, carboxy-dipeptidases, and
endopeptidases, among others (reviewed in Ref. 40). Some
of these groups can be distinguished by the action of different
specific inhibitors (summarized in Table I
). To more precisely identify
the metallopeptidase group involved in p18 Ag processing,
H-2Dd-positive target cells were infected with
either rVV-ENV (Fig. 4
A) or
rVV-eC-10env (Fig. 4
B) and treated with different individual
group-specific inhibitors (Table I
). All these compounds were found to
be active in partially preventing protein degradation in cell extracts,
with the exception of bestatin (Table I
). The caspase-1-specific
inhibitor z-VAD.fmk was also included in view of the sensitivity of
this cystein protease to 1,10-phenanthroline. Remarkably, none of the
different inhibitory compounds used prevented Ag presentation of any
construct to specific CTL (Fig. 4
). As phosphoramidon is more active in
inhibiting bacterial endopeptidases, but does not block all
metallo-endopeptidases of mammalian origin, the most likely explanation
to our results is that mammalian metallo-endopeptidases that
are not blocked by phosphoramidon are involved in p18 processing. This
points at enzymes of the matrixins and astacin families of
metallo-endopeptidases as candidates for processing the ENV epitope,
because these are the only two families among the some fifty families
of metallopeptidases that are not sensitive to phosphoramidon
(39). Proteases in these families are sensitive to neither
of the other inhibitors used. Unfortunately, drugs that collectively
and specifically block the endoproteolytic activity of these groups of
enzymes have not been described. Because over 15 different
well-characterized higher vertebrate proteases belong to these two
families, positive identification of the peptidase involved awaits
further molecular and cellular biology work.
|
Processing of p18 epitope in a HBe chimeric protein context proceeds via both a TAP-independent and a classical TAP-dependent pathway
Previous studies have reported Ag presentation by a
TAP1/2-independent pathway of some HLA-restricted gp160 epitopes, in
addition to the general TAP-dependent Ag processing pathway
(10). However, it is not known whether such a
TAP-independent pathway also occurs in mouse cells, particularly for
presentation of the p18 epitope by murine MHC. Therefore, TAP
dependency of p18 presentation from the secreted precursor proteins was
tested in TAP-deficient T2/Dd target cells. Fig. 5
demonstrates that rVV-ENV-infected
cells are not recognized by ENV-specific CTL. Thus, the p18 10-mer
epitope generated from the native protein is only presented by the
TAP-dependent pathway.
|
We next explored the TAP-dependency of the novel pathway defined by the
metallo-endopeptidases. To this end, inhibition assays with
1,10-phenanthroline were conducted in T2/Dd
target cells infected with rVV-eC-10env. Fig. 6
shows no inhibition of specific lysis
in the presence of the metallopeptidase inhibitor. Thus,
metalloproteinases are not involved in the TAP-independent processing
pathway of the HBe chimeric protein. TAP-independent presentation of a
similar chimeric recombinant virus comprising a CMV epitope was
previously reported in our laboratory (9). That study
demonstrated that the trans-Golgi network protease furin is involved in
Ag processing of CMV 9pp89 epitope. However, because we show here that
the metalloproteinases that process the HIV epitope are not part of the
TAP-independent processing pathway, they represent a different route
not linked to the furin Ag processing pathway previously described
(9).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A third construct containing the same ENV epitope, the sA recombinant protein, appears to have a different fate. Its processing remains to be characterized, because it was resistant to both lactacystin and 1,10-phenanthroline, unlike the other two ENV constructs. Although unlikely, we cannot exclude a contribution of proteasomes and metallopeptidases in processing the sA construct. But if these enzymes were involved, there must still be an important parallel pathway that still can provide enough peptide for target cell formation even if the putative metallopeptidase-proteasome route is blocked by inhibitors. It may seem surprising to invoke an additional pathway for processing of this 86-residue-long sA recombinant, which shares some 60 aa with the over 500-residue-long full-length ENV. However, it has been reported that less drastic differences in ENV primary sequence, such as deletion of the native signal sequence, produce rapid degradation and more efficient intracellular processing and presentation to ENV-specific CTL (41). Also, generation of presented peptides from an oligopeptide precursor can be different than from a protein (42). In addition, a precedent for more than one processing pathway operating for a given protein Ag has been reported previously even for a 19-aa-long minigene product (7). The demonstration of a TAP-independent route for the HBe chimera involving heterologous proteases confirms the existence of additional parallel processing pathways. Multiple proteolytic mechanisms, albeit all TAP dependent, are also implicated in processing of native ENV, because neither inhibitor completely blocked presentation. This adds to the idea that multiple processing pathways can coexist, and for given Ags some may prevail in the final aim of providing a peptide that can be presented and recognized as foreign by the immune system.
In contrast, it may seem puzzling that two essentially diverse constructs, which only share the ENV epitope, appear to be processed by the same pathway. This should be no problem with proteasomes, because they are multicatalytic enzymes and thus can deal with a multitude of different protein substrates. The metallopeptidases involved in ENV Ag processing may similarly have broad sequence specificity. Alternatively, low efficacy cleavage of any of these constructs by enzymes with preference for other substrates might well be enough for optimal Ag presentation. The possibility is also open that different specific enzymes that share the same drug sensitivity are involved in processing either ENV construct. It is probable that this first analysis using inhibitors only unveils the possibility that full processing of any given protein can profit from the concerted action of several proteases. Further characterization of these activities in this and other systems may reveal other critical parameters, such as the effect of ubiquitination, unfolding, and protein context.
The two proteins studied here cotranslationally enter the secretory pathway, but the sensitivity of their processing to lactacystin indicates that at least a part of the pathway occurs in the cytosol. The results with BFA and TAP-deficient cells further reinforce the endogenous nature of the sequential pathway involving proteasomes and metallo-endopeptidases. The subcellular localization of the metallopeptidases, a point that might shed some light on the issue of which protease acts first on the protein substrates, remains an open question. Surprisingly, many epitopes derived from proteins targeted to the secretory pathway are TAP dependent. Both direct proteolysis of newly translated protein products and proteolysis involving retrograde transport of proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum back to the cytoplasm have been implicated in this process (43, 44, 45, 46). Processing in vesicular compartments combined with retrograde movement of proteins or their proteolytic fragments to the cytoplasm (47) may enhance further degradation and provide an explanation for the apparent multiple processing pathways. A final processing step at the plasma membrane performed by ACE-like metallopeptidases, similar to what was described in vitro (22, 48), seems unlikely, because we did not find any inhibition by captopril. It is likely that the HBe chimeric protein does not assemble into capsids (49), so that a pathway involving its secretion and exposure to the numerous membrane metalloproteinases followed by capsid phagocytosis and delivery to the cytosol (47) can probably be excluded. This route would also not apply to the membrane-anchored native ENV, which too should follow a conventional endogenous pathway.
We have described several proteolytic enzymes involved in processing of this epitope located in the V3 variable loop of HIV ENV protein. Our work concentrated on the processing pathway in mouse cells for presentation by murine MHC class I molecules. One can expect that most of these proteolytic systems be conserved between mouse and human cells. Thus, it is well possible that equivalent pathways also exist in human cells, where they may contribute to the previously described presentation of this epitope by a number of HLA molecules (11, 12, 13, 14). It is possible that the promiscuous presentation of this epitope by almost a dozen different class I molecules may be related to the diversity of processing pathways that the cell can use to generate this antigenic peptide.
In conclusion, our work demonstrates that for some epitopes the
proteasome is not the only source of antigenic peptides bound to MHC
class I molecules. Rather, it profits from the activity of other
proteases in the same sequential pathway. The possibility of taking
advantage of the many cellular proteolytic systems should help enlarge
the repertoire of possible epitopes T lymphocytes can see, particularly
in those instances where proteasomal degradation leads to epitope
destruction (50, 51, 52). The reverse face of the picture
would be that alternative proteolytic systems might in some cases
destroy potential epitopes generated by proteasomes. Similar positive
and negative outcomes have been reported for the action of IFN-
(53, 54, 55). Our previous results (7, 9) and
those reported here highlight the diversity of proteases involved in Ag
recognition. Further studies are needed to delineate the increasingly
complex Ag processing pathways.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Institut Curie, Paris, France. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Margarita Del Val, Centro Nacional de Biología Fundamental, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ctra. Pozuelo, km 2, E-28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: p18, HIV IIIB ENV epitope 318RGPGRAFVTI327; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; BFA, brefeldin A; HBe, hepatitis B virus secretory core protein; rVV, recombinant vaccinia virus. ![]()
5 D. López, Y. Samino, U. H. Koszinowski, and M. Del Val. HIV ENV protein expression inhibits cytomegalovirus MHC class I peptide presentation in vitro and in vivo. Submitted for publication. ![]()
6 B. C. Gil-Torregrosa, A. R. Castaño, D. López, and M. Del Val. Furin-mediated proteolytic maturation of antigenic proteins in the secretory pathway as a general MHC class I Ag presentation pathway. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication April 12, 1999. Accepted for publication March 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
can stimulate post-proteasomal trimming of the N terminus of an antigenic peptide by inducing leucine aminopeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18734.
-inducible 11S regulator (PA28) and the LMP2/LMP7 subunits govern the peptide production by the 20S proteasome in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23808.
-induced subunits LMP2 and LMP7. J. Biol. Chem. 271:17275.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Guil, M. Rodriguez-Castro, F. Aguilar, E. M. Villasevil, L. C. Anton, and M. Del Val Need for Tripeptidyl-peptidase II in Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Viral Antigen Processing when Proteasomes are Detrimental J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 39925 - 39934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Samino, D. Lopez, S. Guil, L. Saveanu, P. M. van Endert, and M. Del Val A Long N-terminal-extended Nested Set of Abundant and Antigenic Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Natural Ligands from HIV Envelope Protein J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6358 - 6365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Samino, D. Lopez, S. Guil, P. de Leon, and M. Del Val An Endogenous HIV Envelope-derived Peptide without the Terminal NH3+ Group Anchor Is Physiologically Presented by Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 1151 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Admon, E. Barnea, and T. Ziv Tumor Antigens and Proteomics from the Point of View of the Major Histocompatibility Complex Peptides Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2003; 2(6): 388 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Monini, C. Sgadari, G. Barillari, and B. Ensoli HIV protease inhibitors: antiretroviral agents with anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic and anti-tumour activity J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2003; 51(2): 207 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. N. Golovina, E. J. Wherry, T. N. J. Bullock, and L. C. Eisenlohr Efficient and Qualitatively Distinct MHC Class I-Restricted Presentation of Antigen Targeted to the Endoplasmic Reticulum J. Immunol., March 15, 2002; 168(6): 2667 - 2675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lopez, Y. Samino, U. H. Koszinowski, and M. Del Val HIV Envelope Protein Inhibits MHC Class I Presentation of a Cytomegalovirus Protective Epitope J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4238 - 4244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lautscham, S. Mayrhofer, G. Taylor, T. Haigh, A. Leese, A. Rickinson, and N. Blake Processing of a Multiple Membrane Spanning Epstein-Barr Virus Protein for CD8+ T Cell Recognition Reveals a Proteasome-dependent, Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing-independent Pathway J. Exp. Med., October 8, 2001; 194(8): 1053 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Koelle, H. B. Chen, M. A. Gavin, A. Wald, W. W. Kwok, and L. Corey CD8 CTL from Genital Herpes Simplex Lesions: Recognition of Viral Tegument and Immediate Early Proteins and Lysis of Infected Cutaneous Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2001; 166(6): 4049 - 4058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Komlosh, F. Momburg, T. Weinschenk, N. Emmerich, H. Schild, E. Nadav, I. Shaked, and Y. Reiss A Role for a Novel Luminal Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase in Final Trimming of 26 S Proteasome-generated Major Histocompatability Complex Class I Antigenic Peptides J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2001; 276(32): 30050 - 30056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |