The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKallip, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ladisch, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKallip, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ladisch, S.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 163: 3718-3726.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Tumor Gangliosides Inhibit the Tumor-Specific Immune Response1

Robert McKallip, Ruixiang Li and Stephan Ladisch2

Glycobiology Program, Center for Cancer and Transplantation Biology, Children’s National Medical Center, and Departments of Pediatrics and Biochemistry/Molecular Biology, George Washington University School of Medicine,Washington, DC 20010


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor gangliosides are highly immunosuppressive membrane glycosphingolipids that are shed into the tumor cell microenvironment. We directly tested the impact of shed gangliosides on the in vivo antitumor immune response in a syngeneic fully autochthonous system (FBL-3 erythroleukemia cells, C57BL/6 mice, and highly purified FBL-3 cell gangliosides). The major FBL-3 ganglioside was identified as GM1b by mass spectrometry. Substantial ganglioside shedding (90 pmol/108 cells/h), a requisite for their inhibition of the immune function of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, was detected. Immunosuppression by FBL-3 gangliosides was potent; 5–20 µM inhibited the tumor-specific secondary proliferative response (80–100%) and suppressed the generation of tumor-specific CTLs (97% reduction of FBL-3 cell lysis at an E:T ratio of 100:1). In vivo, coinjection of 10 nmol of FBL-3 gangliosides with a primary FBL-3 cell immunization led to a reduced response to a secondary challenge (the increase in the draining popliteal lymph node mass, cell number, and lymphocyte thymidine incorporation were lowered by 70, 69, and 72%, respectively). Coinjection of gangliosides with a secondary tumor challenge led to a 61, 74, and 42% reduction of the increase in lymph node mass, cell number, and thymidine uptake and a 63–74% inhibition of the increase of draining lymph node T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD19+), and dendritic cells/macrophages (Mac-3+). Overall, the clear conclusion that tumor-derived gangliosides inhibit syngeneic antitumor immune responses implicates these molecules as a potent factor in promoting tumor formation and progression.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The ability of the immune system to recognize and eliminate spontaneously arising tumor cells is considered important in the prevention of tumor formation (1). The immune response to tumors is complex and in many cases is directed against tumor-specific Ags or tumor-specific transplantation Ags (TSTA)3 expressed by the tumor cells (2, 3, 4). However, many tumor cells expressing these immunogenic TSTA or tumor-specific Ags are able to escape host responses and survive to form tumors. These enigmatic observations suggest that tumor cells possess mechanisms that allow them to escape initial immune recognition and destruction.

One proposed mechanism of tumor escape is the release, by tumor cells, of soluble factors into their microenvironment, leading to the suppression of the immune response (5, 6, 7). We have hypothesized that gangliosides, a class of biologically active cell surface molecules, may function as soluble modulators of the immune response (8). Evidence that gangliosides may be active in the suppression of the antitumor immune response include studies demonstrating that tumor cells synthesize and shed gangliosides into their microenvironment (5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), coupled with studies showing that gangliosides are highly immunosuppressive in vitro. Gangliosides inhibit multiple steps in the cellular immune response, including, for example, Ag processing and presentation (13, 14), lymphocyte proliferation (13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), and the generation of a cytotoxic response (20, 21, 22). A gap in our knowledge, however, is the fact that modulation of the immune response by gangliosides in a syngeneic tumor system in vivo has not been shown, leaving us with only indirect proof of this concept. Here we have addressed this issue.

The immune response to tumors is distinct from the responses to other stimuli such as polyclonal mitogens, soluble bacterial Ags, and allogeneic stimuli (23). Thus, although the effects of gangliosides on the response to several non-tumor-associated Ags have been well documented (16, 17, 18), the effects of gangliosides on the antitumor immune response have not been completely elucidated. To overcome these pitfalls, we performed a comprehensive examination of the critical aspects of ganglioside involvement in tumor cell escape from the immune system. This includes evaluating ganglioside synthesis, shedding, and immunosuppressive activity, in a physiologically relevant in vivo tumor model.

This study has taken advantage of the well-documented and fully characterized antitumor immune response developed in the FBL-3 tumor model (23). FBL-3, an erythroleukemia of B6 origin, expresses unique TSTA that can be recognized by the immune system. Priming syngeneic mice with irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells leads to the subsequent rejection of future live tumor challenges (23). Although FBL-3 is immunogenic, injection of live FBL-3 tumor cells into naive syngeneic mice results in tumor growth, suggesting that the FBL-3 tumor cells possess mechanisms of escaping immune recognition and destruction.

Using this model, we have specifically and comprehensively examined the impact of tumor gangliosides on the antitumor immune response. We were able to directly assess, in a single system, all aspects of the hypothesis (8) that tumor cells actively shed high concentrations of gangliosides into their microenvironment and that these shed gangliosides serve as a protective barrier, binding to host lymphocytes and preventing the host from mounting an efficient antitumor immune response. With an autochthonous system (C57BL/6 mice, syngeneic FBL-3 cells, and highly purified FBL-3 gangliosides), the metabolism (synthesis and shedding) and tumor-specific inhibition of the immune response in vitro and in vivo by the tumor gangliosides was demonstrated. This is the crux of the concept that gangliosides enhance tumor formation by an immunological mechanism. These results provide direct evidence that tumor gangliosides are highly effective inhibitors of the syngeneic antitumor immune response, thereby establishing ganglioside metabolism as an active factor in the process of tumor formation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor cells

FBL-3, a Friend virus-induced erythroleukemia of B6 origin, was kindly provided by Dr. Philip Greenberg. B78H1 melanoma, a variant of B16 melanoma, was kindly provided by Dr. Hyam Levitsky. Both cell lines were maintained in vitro by serial passage in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, penicillin 50 U/ml, streptomycin 50 µg/ml, and 10 mM HEPES buffer (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD).

Mice

Female 5–7 wk old C57BL/6 mice (H-2b Thy-1.2), to which the FBL-3 and B78H1 tumor cell lines are syngeneic, were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley.

Ganglioside isolation

The cellular gangliosides were isolated from FBL-3 tumor cells which were pelleted, lyophilized, and extracted twice with chloroform-methanol (1:1). The total lipid extract was taken to dryness. Gangliosides were purified by partitioning the dried total lipids in diisopropylether/1-butanol/0.1% aqueous NaCl (24). The lyophilized final aqueous phase was dissolved in a small volume of water, after which Sephadex G-50 gel exclusion chromatography was used to remove salt and low m.w. impurities from the ganglioside fraction. Gangliosides were quantified as nanomols of lipid-bound sialic acid by a modified colorimetric resorcinol assay (25). Analysis of gangliosides was performed using 10- x 20-cm precoated Silica Gel 60 high performance TLC plates. The plates were developed in chloroform-methanol, 0.25% aqueous CaCl2·2H2O (60:40:9). Gangliosides were visualized as purple bands with resorcinol-HCl (26).

High performance liquid chromatographic purification of gangliosides

To obtain highly purified tumor cell gangliosides for the immunological studies, in a final step the gangliosides were purified by normal phase HPLC. Briefly, ~800 nmol lipid-bound sialic acid (LBSA) of FBL-3 cell gangliosides in 100 µl HPLC water were chromatographed with a Perkin-Elmer (Norwalk, CT) HPLC system, on a LiChrosorb-NH2 column (250 mm long, 10 mm inside diameter, Merck, Germany). The separation was conducted at ambient temperature with a solvent gradient program described by Gazzotti et al. (27). The eluting solvent system was composed of acetonitrile-5 mM Sorensen’s phosphate buffer (83:17), pH 5.6 (solvent A), and acetonitrile-20 mM Sorensen’s phosphate buffer (1:1), pH 5.6 (solvent B). The gradient elution program of 80 min, at a flow rate of 6.25 ml/min, was as follows: 100% of solvent A for 7 min, then a linear gradient from 100% solvent A to solvent A-solvent B (66:34) over 53 min, and then a linear gradient from solvent A-solvent B (66:34) to solvent A-solvent B (36:64) over 20 min. The elution profile was monitored by flow-through detection of UV absorbance at 215 nm. The isolated gangliosides were lyophilized, dissolved in a small volume of distilled water, desalted by Sephadex G-50 gel exclusion chromatography, and lyophilized.

Mass spectrometric analysis

The carbohydrate structure of gangliosides was characterized by negative-ion fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (FAB-MS). Ceramide structures were elucidated by negative ion FAB collisionally activated dissociation tandem MS (FAB CAD-MS/MS) without prior derivatization using linked scans. Approximately 1 µl of ganglioside-methanol solution was mixed with 2 µl of triethanolamine (matrix) on the FAB probe tip. Ions were formed by bombardment with a 6-keV beam of xenon atoms in a JEOL HX-110 double-focusing mass spectrometer. For analysis of the ceramide structure by FAB CAD-MS/MS, the [CerO]- fragment ion was selected as the precursor ion. Helium was used as the collision gas, and the helium pressure was adjusted to reduce the abundance of the precursor by 75%. A JEOL DA-500 data system generated the linked scans (28).

Ganglioside shedding

FBL-3 tumor cells were metabolically labeled by culture for 48 h in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10 µCi each of D-[1-14C]glucosamine hydrochloride and D-[1-14C]galactose, after which the cells were washed three times in RPMI medium and resuspended at 2.0 x 106 cells/ml in three 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks. The supernatant and the cells from the same flask were harvested 24 h after the cells were resuspended. The gangliosides present in the cells and in the supernatant were then purified by previously described methods (24). The radiolabeled gangliosides were quantified by ß-scintillation counting of the ganglioside-associated radioactivity, and equal aliquots of radiolabeled gangliosides were qualitatively analyzed by high performance TLC (HPTLC) autoradiography (29) with radiolabeled rat brain gangliosides as standards.

Proliferative responses

Mice were immunized by injecting 107 {gamma}-irradiated (10,000 rad) FBL-3 tumor cells in 100 µl PBS i.p. twice at 2-wk intervals (23). The spleens were removed from these mice for use in the immunological studies 2 wk after the second injection. Single-cell suspensions of splenocytes were prepared with a laboratory homogenizer (Stomacher, Tekmar, Cincinnati, OH). Contaminating erythrocytes were lysed by resuspending the splenocytes in 5 ml lysing buffer, ACK (BioWhittaker) for 1 min and then washing three times in HB104 medium. After the third wash, the splenocytes were adjusted to 4 x 106 cells/ml in HB104 medium containing 2% FCS and 1% HEPES buffer. This suspension was aliquoted (25 µl) into 96-well A/2 flat-bottom plates. FBL-3 cell gangliosides in 10 µl HB104 medium were added to each well to achieve a final concentration of 0–20 µM. Finally, the cultures were stimulated by addition of 104 irradiated (10,000 rad) syngeneic FBL-3 tumor cells per well. The splenocyte proliferative response was determined 4 days later by adding 0.5 µCi [3H]thymidine (DuPont NEN, Wilmington, DE) to each well for 4 h. [3H]Thymidine uptake was determined by ß-scintillation counting. The possibility that the gangliosides were directly toxic to the cells was addressed by determining the number and viability of the splenocytes present at the end of the culture period by trypan blue dye exclusion.

CTL response

Splenocytes (4 x 106 cells/well) from mice preimmunized against FBL-3 tumor cells were prepared as described above and then cultured in the presence or absence of 20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides in 24-well plates in a final volume of 2 ml for 4 h before restimulation with 4 x 105 {gamma}-irradiated (10,000 rad) FBL-3 tumor cells. The splenocytes were harvested 4 days later and washed three times in HB104 medium to remove unbound gangliosides. The number of splenocytes added was adjusted to achieve the desired E:T ratios and aliquoted (100 µl) to 96 round-bottom plates. Tumor targets were labeled by incubating 106 tumor cells with 100 µCi sodium [51Cr]chromate (DuPont NEN) for 1 h in RPMI medium containing 10% FCS. The tumor target cells were then washed three times in HB104 medium, adjusted to 105 cells/ml, and added (5 x 103 cells/50 µl/well) to 96-well round-bottom plates. Lysis of the 51Cr-labeled tumor cells was assessed in a standard 4-h chromium release assay (22). 51Cr-labeled EL-4 tumor cells were used as nonspecific control targets. Supernatants were harvested via the Skatron supernatant collection system (Skatron, Sterling, VA). Spontaneous release of label was measured in parallel wells containing target but not effector cells. Maximum release of label was quantified by addition of 50 µl of 1% Triton X-100 to wells containing target cells alone. Samples were counted in a gamma counter (Cobra II, Hewlett Packard, Meriden, CT). Percent lysis was determined by the formula lysis (%) = [(experimental release - spontaneous release) (total release - spontaneous release)] x 100.

In vivo primary immune response

To assess the effects of gangliosides on the primary antitumor immune response, naïve C57BL/6 mice were immunized by injecting 103 irradiated (10,000 rad) FBL-3 tumor cells in the presence or absence of 10 nmol FBL-3 gangliosides s.c. into their left rear footpads. Two weeks later, the effect of gangliosides on the primary immunization was assessed by determining the response to a secondary tumor challenge, measured with a modified version of the popliteal lymph node (PLN) assay (30, 31). Here, mice were rechallenged by injecting them in their left rear footpad with 105 irradiated (10,000 rad) FBL-3 tumor cells in 50 µl PBS. The immune response was measured 5 days later by determining the changes in PLN mass, cell number, and [3H]thymidine incorporation, and comparing them with those of unstimulated lymph nodes isolated from the right rear footpad. The cell number was determined after preparing a single-cell suspension of the lymph nodes with a laboratory homogenizer. The lymph node cell suspensions were adjusted to 106/ml in RPMI medium containing 10% FCS, and 100 µl were added to triplicate wells in a 96-well flat-bottom plate, pulsed for 18 h with 0.5 µCi [3H]thymidine, and harvested, and [3H]thymidine uptake was determined by ß-scintillation counting.

In vivo secondary immune response

Mice were immunized by injecting 107 {gamma}-irradiated (10,000 rad) FBL-3 tumor cells in 100 µl PBS i.p. twice at 2-wk intervals (23) and were used for the immunological studies 2 wk after the second injection. The immunized mice received a secondary challenge by injecting them in their left rear footpad with 2.5 x 106 irradiated (10,000 rad) FBL-3 tumor cells in 50 µl PBS, admixed with or without 10 nmol of purified FBL-3 tumor cell gangliosides. As a positive control of inhibition, immunized mice were injected into their left footpad with irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells and concomitantly received cyclosporin, 24 mg/kg i.p. daily) (32). As a control for specificity of the response, other mice received 2.5 x 106 irradiated unrelated (B78H1) tumor cells. Five days after the secondary challenge, the immune response was determined by aseptically removing the draining lymph nodes and quantifying the increase in lymph node mass, cell number, and lymphocyte DNA synthesis compared with those of unstimulated lymph nodes isolated from the right rear footpad, as described above.

Flow cytometric analysis

Cells (5 x 105) isolated from the PLNs of C57BL/6 mice were resuspended in cold PBS-0.5% BSA and incubated with fluorescently labeled mAb. The following mAb (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) were used: PE-conjugated hamster IgG isotype standard (anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin); PE-conjugated anti-CD8; PE-conjugated anti-CD69; PE-conjugated anti-CD25; PE-conjugated anti-CD69; FITC-conjugated anti-CD3; FITC-conjugated anti-CD4; FITC-conjugated anti-CD19; and FITC-conjugated anti-Mac-3. The cells were stained with the mAbs for 30 min on ice, washed twice in PBS-0.5% BSA, and analyzed with a FACStarPlus flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).

Statistical analysis

Student’s unpaired t test (two-tailed) was used to determine the significance of differences between experimental and control data.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Identification of the major FBL-3 ganglioside as GM1b

FBL-3 gangliosides were isolated (24), quantified (25), and initially analyzed by HPTLC (27). FBL-3 tumor cells contained ~12 nmol gangliosides/108 cells. HPTLC analysis of the FBL-3 ganglioside migration pattern (Fig. 1Go) revealed the FBL-3 ganglioside fraction to contain one major ganglioside doublet. It migrated with HPTLC mobility between that of the human brain ganglioside standards GM1 and GD1a, similar to the migration of a ganglioside observed previously in several other mouse tumors and identified as GM1b (28, 29).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. HPTLC pattern of FBL-3 tumor cell gangliosides. Total cellular gangliosides were isolated and purified from FBL-3 tumor cells. Gangliosides were visualized as purple bands on the HPTLC plate with resorcinol-HCl reagent. The major FBL-3 ganglioside migrated with HPTLC mobility between that of standard human brain gangliosides (HBG) GM1 and GD1a.

 
To determine the molecular structure, the HPLC-purified FBL-3 gangliosides were characterized by negative ion FAB-MS analysis. The ganglioside preparation contained two species corresponding to the two bands of the doublet seen by HPTLC and represented by [M - H] - ions at m/z 1516 and 1626 (Table IGo). They correspond to two molecular species of the ganglioside GM1b. Fig. 2Go shows the negative-ion mass spectrum of one of the molecular species of GM1b. The peak at m/z 1626 represents the molecular ion, [M - H]-. In addition, there are peaks in the mass spectrum that resulted from the loss of N-acetylneuraminic acid, galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine and a second galactose. Specifically, the molecular ion [M - H ]- at m/z 1626 yielded the peak at m/z 1335.6 by the loss of N-acetylneuraminic acid, and the peak at m/z 1173.6 by the loss of N-acetylneuraminic acid and galactose. The loss of N-acetylneuraminic acid, galactose, and N-acetylgalactosamine gave the peak at m/z 970.8, whereas the loss of N-acetylneuraminic acid, galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, and a second galactose resulted in the peak at m/z 808.7. The corresponding [CerO]- was also detected, at m/z 646.6.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Structural characterization of molecular species of FBL-3 cell gangliosides1

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Negative-ion FAB mass spectrum of GM1b isolated by normal-phase HPLC. The peak at m/z 1626.9 represents the molecular ion. Four additional fragment ions for this molecular species were observed. They resulted from the loss of N-acetylneuraminic acid (-NeuAc, galactose (-Gal), N-acetylgalactosamine (-GalNAc), and a second galactose (-Gal). Inset, FAB CAD-MS/MS of the precursor ion [CerO]- at m/z 646. The product ions, S (m/z 390) and T (m/z 406), indicate the ceramide structure is d18:1-C24:1.

 
The ceramide structures of the FBL-3 ganglioside were further examined by FAB CAD-MS/MS. In the case of the species of GM1b which has a m/z 1626, the parent ion [CerO]- at m/z 646.6 was used to produce secondary fragmentation S and T ions. The presence of an S ion at m/z 390 and a T ion at m/z 406 indicates that the long chain base is d18:1 and the fatty acid is C24:1. Therefore, the ceramide structure of this molecule was d18:1-C24:1 (Fig. 2Go). With this same approach, the ceramide structure of the second molecular species of GM1b was identified. Thus, the analysis revealed that the GM1b ganglioside had two ceramide structures, d18:1-C16:0 and d18:1-C24:1 (Table IGo) and led to the conclusion that two molecular species of GM1b, differing in their ceramide structures, are the major gangliosides of FBL-3 tumor cells. This latter finding is consistent with the general concept, shown in a number of other studies, that tumor-derived gangliosides frequently express heterogeneous ceramide structures (28, 33, 34, 35).

FBL-3 cells shed gangliosides

Significant shedding of gangliosides by tumor cells into the cellular microenvironment is thought to be a critical element in satisfying the hypothesis that tumor gangliosides interfere with the antitumor immune response, because to interact with host leukocytes, these molecules should be released by the tumor cells. We quantified ganglioside shedding by the FBL-3 tumor cells and found that ~17% of cellular gangliosides were shed into the microenvironment in a 24-h period. This translates into a shedding rate of 90 pmol/108 cells/h, indicating that FBL-3 tumor cells shed gangliosides at a substantial rate. Qualitative analysis of the shed gangliosides by TLC/autoradiography revealed that GM1b is both the major cellular and the major shed ganglioside (Fig. 3Go). This is consistent with previous observations and with the generally accepted concept that the major ganglioside species present on the cell membrane are also the species most prominent as shed molecules in the cell culture supernatant (8, 12, 28).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Autoradiographic analysis of ganglioside synthesis and shedding by FBL-3 cells. FBL-3 cells were metabolically radiolabeled for 24 h, washed, and cultured in fresh medium for 24 h. Radiolabeled cellular gangliosides (Cell) and shed supernatant gangliosides (SN) were isolated and analyzed by HPTLC autoradiography. RBG, 14C-labeled rat brain standard gangliosides.

 
FBL-3 gangliosides suppress the in vitro secondary proliferative response to syngeneic tumor cell challenge

As a first step in determining the effects of tumor-derived gangliosides on the antitumor immune response, the effect of FBL-3 gangliosides on the secondary proliferative response of splenocytes to syngeneic tumor cells was examined. In these experiments, splenocytes from preimmunized mice were cultured in the presence or absence of FBL-3 gangliosides and restimulated with irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells. Ganglioside concentrations as low as 5 µM caused an 80% decrease in the proliferative response, in comparison with the secondary proliferative response of control splenocytes cultured in the absence of added gangliosides. Splenocytes exposed to 20 µM gangliosides showed almost 100% inhibition of proliferation (Fig. 4GoA). These results demonstrate that tumor-derived gangliosides can inhibit the tumor-specific secondary proliferative response.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Tumor-derived gangliosides inhibit the secondary proliferative response to syngeneic tumor challenge. A, Splenocytes (4 x 105) from previously immunized mice were rechallenged with irradiated FBL-3 tumor (4 x 104) cells in the presence (•) or absence (hatched area of 2.5–20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides. The cells were pulsed with 0.5 µCi [3H]thymidine for 4 h, 4 days after stimulation. B, The kinetics of the proliferative response was examined by stimulating splenocytes from preimmunized mice (4 x 105) with irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells (4 x 104) in the presence (•) or absence ({circ}) of 20 µM FBL-3 cell gangliosides and determining the proliferative response on days 3–7 by ß-scintillation counting. Data are means ± SE of triplicate determinations. The proliferative responses of splenocytes treated with 5–20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides were significantly different from that of control splenocytes, p <= 0.01.

 
The possibility that gangliosides could inhibit the immune response by merely altering the kinetics of the response was examined. [3H]Thymidine incorporation of ganglioside-exposed and control splenocytes from preimmunized mice was assessed at times before and after the maximal control response was observed (days 3–7). In this experiment, the maximal control response was observed on day 4 (Fig. 4GoB); whereas in the presence of 20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides, the proliferative response never achieved a level greater than 15% of the control response on any day. Thus, the addition of tumor-derived gangliosides completely inhibited the proliferative response without altering the kinetics of the response.

We excluded the possibility that the immunosuppressive activity of the FBL-3 gangliosides was the result of a nonspecific direct cytotoxic effect on the splenocytes. We exposed splenocytes from preimmunized mice to FBL-3 gangliosides for 4 days and then determined the viable cell counts. The cell counts of splenocytes incubated in 20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides were nearly equal to those of control cells (2.28 and 2.40 x 106/ml, respectively, representing a cell recovery of 57 and 60% of the initial 4 x 106 cells/ml plated). Therefore, the inhibition of the proliferative response caused by exposure of splenocytes to FBL-3 gangliosides was not the result of a direct effect on cell viability. Further supporting this conclusion is the fact that mitogen-induced lymphoproliferative responses are relatively unaffected even at ganglioside concentrations which cause marked inhibition of Ag-induced responses (36).

FBL-3 gangliosides inhibit the generation of CTL specific for syngeneic FBL-3 tumor cells

The ability of the immune system to develop T cells capable of recognizing and lysing specific tumor targets is critical for tumor elimination in vivo (37). To examine the effects of FBL-3 gangliosides on the CTL response, splenocytes (4 x 106/well) from preimmunized mice were cultured in the presence or absence (control) of 20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides and restimulated with 4 x 105 irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells. After 4 days of culture, the nonadherent cells were harvested and redirected against 51Cr-labeled FBL-3 tumor targets at E:T ratios ranging from 100:1 to 3:1. A vigorous specific CTL response was observed; at an E:T ratio of 100:1, there was 72% specific lysis of FBL-3 targets and no significant lysis of the unrelated target, EL-4. FBL-3 gangliosides (20 µM) had a significant inhibitory effect on the CTL response, as shown in Fig. 5Go. At an E:T ratio of 100:1, for example, target cell lysis was reduced by 97%. These results clearly show that FBL-3 gangliosides inhibit the generation of tumor-specific CTLs.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Tumor-derived gangliosides inhibit the CTL response to FBL-3 tumor challenge. The effects of added FBL-3 gangliosides on the generation phase of the antitumor CTL response were determined by restimulating splenocytes from previously immunized mice with irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells for 5 days in the presence (•) or absence ({circ}) of 20 µM gangliosides, washing them, and measuring cytotoxicity against 51Cr-labeled FBL-3 tumor targets in a standard chromium release assay. To determine the effect of tumor-derived gangliosides on the effector phase, CTLs were generated in the absence of gangliosides and then directed against 51Cr-labeled FBL-3 tumor cells in the presence of 20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides in a standard 4-h chromium release assay ({blacksquare}). The SE of the triplicates was routinely <10% of the total release.

 
The effect of tumor gangliosides on the effector function of tumor-specific CTLs was also examined. In this case, splenocytes from preimmunized mice were stimulated with irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells for 4 days to allow generation and expansion of the tumor-specific CTL population. The CTLs were harvested and cytotoxicity directed against 51Cr-labeled FBL-3 tumor targets in the presence or absence of 20 µM FBL-3 gangliosides was assessed in a standard chromium release assay. Lytic activity of the ganglioside-exposed splenocytes at an E:T ratio of 100:1 (59% lysis of tumor targets) was only slightly lower than the 72% lysis by splenocytes not exposed to gangliosides (Fig. 5Go). Thus, the inhibitory effect of the tumor gangliosides on the antitumor CTL response reflects a significant inhibitory effect on the generation phase combined with only a minimal effect on the effector phase of the response.

C57BL/6 mice develop a measurable and specific antitumor immune response to FBL-3 cells

The first step in the establishment of an in vivo tumor system in which the antitumor immune response could be measured was to develop a mouse model that is capable of recognizing and lysing the specific tumor cell, FBL-3. To accomplish this, C57BL/6 mice were immunized with FBL-3 tumor cells as described by Kern et al. (23). Two weeks after the second immunization, we determined whether or not the immunization was successful by injecting immunized as well as naive mice (i.e., not immunized with FBL-3 cells) with a live tumor cell challenge (5 x 106 FBL-3 cells) and observing them for survival. All three of three immunized mice rejected the tumor challenge, whereas all naive mice rapidly developed tumors.

To determine whether an immune response to the FBL-3 tumor cells could be detected in vivo, we used a modified PLN assay (30, 31). Previously immunized mice were challenged in their left rear footpads with 2.5 x 106 irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells or B78H1 tumor cells. Five days after the injection, the immune response was quantified by harvesting the stimulated draining PLNs and comparing their mass and cell number to those of unstimulated PLNs. FBL-3-stimulated lymph nodes showed an increase in mass of 1.9 mg and an increase in cell number of 1.7 x 106/node, compared with unstimulated lymph nodes, demonstrating that there was a vigorous and quantifiable immune response to the syngeneic FBL-3 tumor cells. In contrast, mice preimmunized with irradiated FBL-3 and challenged with unrelated tumor cells (B78H1) did not produce a significant response (0.3 ± 0.2 mg increase in mass and no detectable increase in cell number), demonstrating that the immune response was specific for the FBL-3 tumor cells. These results confirm previous studies (38) showing that C57BL/6 mice immunized with FBL-3 cells can develop an effective and specific immune response to an FBL-3 tumor challenge and demonstrate that this model can be used to directly measure the effects of tumor gangliosides on the antitumor immune response to syngeneic tumor cells.

FBL-3 tumor gangliosides inhibit the in vivo primary antitumor immune response to FBL-3 tumor cells

The primary immune response to a tumor challenge most closely mirrors the likely initial interaction between the tumor cell and the immune system. Unsuccessful attempts to directly assess this response suggest that the FBL-3 tumor cells are not sufficiently immunogenic to produce a measurable primary immune response in the PLN assay. Therefore, to measure the effects of tumor gangliosides on the primary antitumor immune response in vivo, 10 nmol of FBL-3 gangliosides were coinjected with the primary FBL-3 cell immunization into naive mice. The modulatory effects of the tumor gangliosides on the primary immune response were assessed by determining how this influenced the response to a subsequent (secondary) challenge with 105 irradiated FBL-3 cells alone. This challenge was administered 2 wk later, and the response was quantified 5 days after the challenge by determining the changes in PLN mass, cell number, and [3H]thymidine uptake, compared with unstimulated control nodes. Mice given a primary FBL-3 immunization in the absence of gangliosides had a significant secondary anti-FBL-3 immune response; the PLN mass increased by 2.8 ± 0.3 mg (Fig. 6GoA), the cell number increased by 2.7 x 106 cells/node (Fig. 6GoB), and the thymidine uptake increased by 6.8 x 103 dpm (Fig. 6GoC), compared with unstimulated control lymph nodes. However, when the immunizing FBL-3 tumor cells were admixed with 10 nmol FBL-3 gangliosides, there was a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in the secondary immune response (70, 69, and 72% reduction of the FBL-3 cell-induced increase in PLN mass, cell number, and thymidine incorporation, respectively), which directly reflects a reduction of the efficiency of the primary immune response. These results demonstrate that tumor gangliosides significantly inhibit the primary antitumor immune response in vivo.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Tumor-derived gangliosides inhibit the in vivo primary immune response to FBL-3 tumor cells. Naive mice were injected s.c. (footpad) with a primary FBL-3 cell (103 irradiated cells) immunization together with (gan) or without (med) 10 nmols of FBL-3 gangliosides. Two weeks later, the effects of the gangliosides on the primary immune response were assessed by determining the response to a subsequent (secondary) challenge with 105 irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells. The response was quantified by determining changes in PLN mass (A), cell number (B), and [3H]thymidine uptake (C), 5 days after the challenge, compared with unstimulated control nodes.

 
FBL-3 tumor gangliosides inhibit the increase in lymph node mass in response to secondary syngeneic tumor cell challenge in vivo

In addition to examining the effects of tumor gangliosides on the primary antitumor immune response, using the same assay system, the modified PLN assay, we quantified the effects of FBL-3 gangliosides on the in vivo secondary antitumor immune response. The first parameter measured was the increase in PLN mass in response to syngeneic FBL-3 tumor cell challenge. When previously immunized mice were stimulated with FBL-3 tumor cells admixed with FBL-3 gangliosides (10 nmol), there was a marked reduction in the increase in PLN mass. Whereas the mean increase in lymph node mass in mice stimulated with FBL-3 tumor cells was 1.85 mg, the coinjection of purified FBL-3 gangliosides with FBL-3 tumor cells resulted in only a 0.72-mg increase in lymph node mass. This 61% inhibition of the response demonstrates that FBL-3 gangliosides significantly (p <= 0.02) suppress the increase in lymph node mass caused by syngeneic tumor challenge in vivo (Fig. 7GoA), and in fact to a degree similar to that caused by treatment of mice with cyclosporin (24 mg/kg i.p. daily for 4 days), a standard system for suppression of the cellular immune response (32).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Tumor-derived gangliosides inhibit the draining lymph node response to syngeneic tumor cell challenge in vivo. In a modified PLN assay, preimmunized mice were injected s.c. (footpad) with 2.5 x 106 irradiated FBL-3 tumor cells together with (gan) or without (med) 10 nmol FBL-3 gangliosides. Mice treated with cyclosporin (CsA) served as positive controls for immunosuppression. The immune response was determined 5 days later as the net increase in the PLN mass (A), cell number (B), and [3H]thymidine uptake (C).

 
FBL-3 gangliosides inhibit the secondary lymphoproliferative response in vivo

The effect of FBL-3 gangliosides on the in vivo secondary lymphoproliferative response to syngeneic tumor challenge was directly examined in two ways: by determination of the increase in PLN cell number; and by quantification of the spontaneous proliferative response. Unstimulated lymph nodes contained 0.19 x 106 cells/node. Lymph nodes stimulated with {gamma}-irradiated FBL-3 cells contained 1.83 x 106 cells/node, which represents an almost 10-fold increase in cell number. However, when the FBL-3 cell challenge was injected together with FBL-3 gangliosides, the draining lymph nodes harvested 5 days later contained only 0.73 x 106 cells, indicating a marked inhibition by gangliosides of the increase in cell number (Fig. 7GoB). FBL-3 gangliosides also significantly (p = 0.006) reduced the spontaneous proliferative response, as measured by [3H]thymidine uptake, by 41%, from 1.06 x 103 dpm/105 cells to 0.63 x 103 dpm/105 cells (Fig. 7GoC). Once again these results indicated a similar effect to that achieved by the repeated injection of cyclosporin (Fig. 7Go, B and C). These in vivo studies provide strong evidence that FBL-3 gangliosides significantly suppress the antitumor immune response in vivo.

FBL-3 gangliosides inhibit the tumor-induced activation and expansion of lymph node cell populations in vivo

Changes in the PLN populations induced by gangliosides were further delineated by determining the expression of cell surface markers specific for cell lineage and activation status. Lymph node cells from mice injected in the footpad with irradiated FBL-3 cells admixed with FBL-3 gangliosides (10 nmol) or injected with irradiated FBL-3 cells alone (control) were stained with fluorescence-conjugated mAbs for lineage-specific markers including CD3 (T cells), CD4 (Th cell), CD8 (CTL), CD19 (B cells), and Mac-3 (dendritic cells/macrophage) as well as activation markers CD69 (early activation marker), and CD25 (IL-2 receptor) and analyzed by FACS. This allowed us to determine changes in both the total number and activation status of cells from the various cell populations involved in the antitumor immune response in vivo. Comparing the cell populations of lymph nodes draining the site of FBL-3 cell injection with the cell populations of unstimulated lymph nodes, it was apparent that s.c. injection of the FBL-3 cells caused a significant increase in all cell populations examined (Fig. 8GoA). This increase was suppressed in the lymph nodes of mice also receiving the FBL-3 gangliosides. For example, the T cell population (CD3+) increased from 2.2 x 105 cells/node in the unstimulated lymph node to 11.1 x 105 cells/node in the stimulated, control lymph nodes, but to only 5.5 x 105 cells/node in the stimulated lymph nodes of ganglioside-treated mice (63% decrease). These ganglioside-induced changes were evident in the T cell subpopulations, in which there was 57 and 65% inhibition of the CTL and T helper cell populations, as well as in the B cell and dendritic cell/macrophage populations, which were decreased by 74 and 69%, respectively. The expression of activation markers was also affected; coinjection of FBL-3 tumor gangliosides with FBL-3 cells led to a significantly reduced number of lymph node cells expressing CD69 and CD25 (60 and 71%, respectively). Overall, ganglioside-induced inhibition of each lymph node cell subpopulation studied was statistically significant (p <= 0.04), whereas the distribution of the cell populations showed that the inhibition was not specific for any single population examined (Fig. 8GoB). Thus, the in vivo administration of the tumor gangliosides caused a generalized suppression of the observed increase of cell populations associated with in the antitumor immune response in vivo.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. FACS analysis of the effect of in vivo tumor ganglioside administration upon draining lymph node cell subpopulations. Lymph node cells isolated from mice 5 days after receiving either a tumor cell challenge, alone ({blacksquare}) or together with 10 nmol FBL-3 gangliosides (), were compared with control unstimulated lymph node cell populations ({square}). A, Absolute number of cells expressing the indicated markers. B, percent of the total lymph node cell population expressing the same markers. Data represent the mean ± SE of the results of three separate experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The hypothesis that gangliosides shed by tumors bind to host leukocytes and suppress the antitumor immune response is supported by a number of observations. It has been shown that tumor cells synthesize and shed gangliosides (5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) and that these shed molecules directly bind to target cells in vitro (39, 40). Other work has demonstrated the immunosuppressive activity of gangliosides. Gangliosides inhibit the in vitro proliferative response of lymphocytes to both nonspecific mitogens (16, 17, 18) and soluble Ags (e.g., tetanus toxoid) (8, 41) and have been shown to be inhibitors of the cytotoxic response in vitro (20, 21, 22). Initial in vivo studies demonstrated that gangliosides are highly effective in suppressing the allogeneic immune response (31, 42), providing one possible explanation for the earlier observation that addition of gangliosides to poorly tumorigenic cells significantly increased their tumorigenic potential in vivo (29). Together, these findings all point to a possible role of gangliosides in modulating the ability of tumor cells to escape host immune destruction. However, before the present work, there has been no direct evidence, either in vitro or in vivo, of inhibition of the specific antitumor immune response by tumor-derived gangliosides.

The present study has taken advantage of the well documented antitumor immune response developed in the FBL-3 tumor model, allowing us to comprehensively examine the impact of tumor gangliosides on the antitumor immune response. Here we directly tested the hypothesis that tumor cells actively shed biologically active gangliosides into their microenvironment, where they serve as a protective barrier, binding to host lymphocytes and preventing them from developing an efficient antitumor immune response. We found that FBL-3 tumor cells shed gangliosides at a high rate, creating a tumor microenvironment rich in tumor-derived gangliosides. Using the highly purified FBL-3 gangliosides, we showed in vitro inhibition of the tumor-specific secondary proliferative response and of the generation of tumor-specific CTLs. In vivo, we observed inhibition of both the primary and secondary antitumor immune responses. These studies provide the first direct evidence that tumor gangliosides are highly effective inhibitors of the syngeneic antitumor immune response and thereby establish tumor cell ganglioside metabolism as an active factor in the process of tumor formation.

Immunosuppressive activity is a general biological property of gangliosides that is not specifically limited by the source of the gangliosides but that is influenced by their molecular structure. In fact, gangliosides other than the disialoganglioside GM1b studied here, such as those isolated from LAN-5 neuroblastoma cells (which are mainly GD2 and GM2) (43), also are effective inhibitors of the immune response to FBL-3 tumor cells (unpublished data). Variations in either the carbohydrate or the ceramide structure can lead to differing degrees of activity. For example, in comparing a series of highly purified normal human brain gangliosides, those with a terminal sialic acid linked to a compact neutral oligosaccharide had the greatest immunosuppressive activity (36). Other studies examining the relationship between structure and activity revealed that tumor gangliosides were frequently more immunosuppressive than corresponding normal human brain gangliosides of identical carbohydrate structure. These differences were inversely related to the length of the ceramide fatty acyl chain (34). Thus, immunosuppressive activity is quantitatively affected by ganglioside structure.

Another factor influencing activity is presence of these molecules in the tumor microenvironment. Because tumor cells shed gangliosides at a high rate, it was predicted that the concentration of gangliosides in the tumor microenvironment would be very high. This was supported by recent findings in an in vitro system in which the shedding rate and microenvironmental ganglioside concentrations could be estimated (39, 40). Therefore, in contrast to lower concentrations in the peripheral circulation, the tumor cell microenvironment may contain high concentrations of highly active gangliosides, leading to maximal inhibition of the antitumor immune response at the site of tumor formation and progression.

The mechanisms of ganglioside-induced immunosuppression are most likely multiple and remain to be fully elucidated. However, it is clear that both APC and T cells are affected by tumor gangliosides. Some of the known mechanisms are reversible inhibition of APC function (13, 14), inhibition of IL-2-induced T cell proliferation (44), and down-regulation of CD4 expression (45, 46, 47). Most recently, it has been shown that exposure of mouse splenocytes to gangliosides results in reduced gene transcription of the Th1-associated cytokines, IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}, while leaving gene transcription of the Th2-associated cytokines, IL-4 and IL-10, unaffected (48). Others have reported a ganglioside-induced increase in T cell IL-10 production (49). Together, these findings suggest that shed tumor gangliosides may shift the balance of the antitumor immune response from the normally predominant Th1 response toward the Th2 response, possibly leading to a reduction in the cellular antitumor immune response critical for tumor elimination. Because the earliest stage of the cellular immune response known to be affected by exposure to gangliosides is Ag presentation (13, 14), it is tempting to speculate that the initial step in tumor ganglioside-induced immunosuppression in vivo is interference with the functions of APC, which in the FBL-3 tumor model would predominantly be dendritic cells.

Notwithstanding gaps in knowledge regarding the mechanism of immunosuppression by tumor gangliosides, the conclusion supported by the present work, that gangliosides shed by tumor cells can suppress the ability of the immune system to recognize and eliminate tumor cells, may have direct relevance to human cancer. Corroborating evidence includes the observations that aggressive neuroblastomas shed significant quantities of gangliosides in vivo and that the level of shed gangliosides was directly related to the incidence of tumor recurrence and the rapidity of progression (50). It has been proposed that clinically it may be possible to boost the immune response, specifically or nonspecifically, to enhance tumor cell recognition and elimination (51, 52, 53). However, to date such attempts have had only limited success. This may stem in part from the ability of tumor cells to escape immune recognition by various mechanisms, one being the shedding of tumor gangliosides into the microenvironment. Thus, a potentially therapeutic enhancement of the immune response could be negated by the particular immunosuppressive activity of the tumor. Approaches designed to inhibit such tumor cell escape mechanisms would be desirable. Recently, it was shown that metabolic depletion of tumor gangliosides is possible by treating cells with inhibitors of the synthesis of glucosylceramide, a metabolic precursor of gangliosides (40, 43, 54, 55). With the recognition of a causative role of gangliosides in tumor-associated immunosuppression and a facilitative role in tumor progression, the use of such inhibitors of ganglioside synthesis might enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapeutic approaches to cancer.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Phillip Greenberg for providing the FBL-3 cell line, Dr. Hyam Levitsky for providing the B78H1 cell line, Dr. Douglas Gage for performing the mass spectrometric analysis of the FBL-3 tumor gangliosides, and Barbara Taylor for her assistance with the flow cytometric analysis.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA42361. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stephan Ladisch, MD, Center for Cancer and Transplantation Biology, Children’s Research Institute, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20010. Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TSTA, tumor-specific transplantation Ags; FAB-MS; fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry; FAB CAD-MS/MS, FAB collisionally activated dissociation tandem MS; HPTLC, high performance TLC; PLN, popliteal lymph node. Back

Received for publication February 1, 1999. Accepted for publication July 22, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Burnet, F. M.. 1970. The concept of immunological surveillance. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 13:1.[Medline]
  2. Bocchia, M., T. Korontsvit, Q. Xu, S. Mackinnon, S. Y. Yang, A. Sette, D. A. Scheinberg. 1996. Specific human cellular immunity to bcr-abl oncogene-derived peptides. Blood 87:3587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cheever, M. A., M. L. Disis, H. Bernhard, J. R. Gralow, S. L. Hand, E. S. Huseby, H. L. Qin, M. Takahashi, W. Chen. 1995. Immunity to oncogenic proteins. Immunol. Rev. 145:33.[Medline]
  4. Boon, T., P. van der Bruggen. 1996. Human tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 183:725.[Free Full Text]
  5. Black, P. H.. 1980. Shedding from the cell surface of normal and cancer cells. Adv. Cancer Res. 32:75.[Medline]
  6. Chen, Q., V. Daniel, D. W. Maher, P. Hersey. 1994. Production of IL-10 by melanoma cells: examination of its role in immunosuppression mediated by melanoma. Int. J. Cancer 56:755.[Medline]
  7. Tada, T., S. Ohzeki, K. Utsumi, H. Takiuchi, M. Muramatsu, X. F. Li, J. Shimizu, H. Fujiwara, T. Hamaoka. 1991. Transforming growth factor-ß-induced inhibition of T cell function: susceptibility difference in T cells of various phenotypes and functions and its relevance to immunosuppression in the tumor-bearing state. J. Immunol. 146:1077.[Abstract]
  8. Ladisch, S., B. Gillard, C. Wong. 1983. Shedding and immunoregulatory activity of YAC-1 lymphoma cell gangliosides. Cancer Res. 43:3808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Skipksi, V. P., N. Katopodis, J. S. Prendergast, C. C. Stock. 1975. Gangliosides in blood serum of normal rats and Morris hepatoma 5123tc-bearing rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 67:1122.[Medline]
  10. Kloppel, T. M., T. W. Keenan, M. J. Freeman, D. J. Morre. 1977. Glycolipid-bound sialic acid in serum: increased levels in mice and humans bearing mammary carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:3011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ladisch, S., Z.-L. Wu. 1985. Detection of a tumor-associated ganglioside in plasma of patients with neuroblastoma. Lancet 1:136.[Medline]
  12. Li, R., S. Ladisch. 1991. Shedding of human neuroblastoma gangliosides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1083:57.[Medline]
  13. Ladisch, S., L. Ulsh, B. Gillard, C. Wong. 1984. Modulation of the immune response by gangliosides: inhibition of adherent monocyte accessory function in vitro. J. Clin. Invest. 74:2074.
  14. Heitger, A., S. Ladisch. 1996. Gangliosides block antigen presentation by human monocytes. Biochim. Biophy. Acta 1303:161.[Medline]
  15. Miller, H. C., W. J. Esselman. 1975. Modulation of the immune response by antigen reactive lymphocytes after cultivation with gangliosides. J. Immunol. 115:839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lengle, E. E., R. Krishnaraj, R. G. Kemp. 1979. Inhibition of the lectin-induced mitogenic response of thymocytes by. Cancer Res. 39:817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ryan, J., M. Shinitzky. 1979. Possible role of glycosphingolipids in the control of immune responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 9:171.[Medline]
  18. Whisler, R., A. Yates. 1980. Regulation of lymphocyte responses by human gangliosides. I. Characteristics of inhibitory effects and the induction of impaired activation. J. Immunol. 125:2106.[Abstract]
  19. Lu, P., F. J. Sharom. 1996. Immunosuppression by YAC-1 lymphoma: role of shed gangliosides. Cell. Immunol. 173:22.[Medline]
  20. Bergelson, L. D., E. V. Dyatlovitskaya, T. E. Klyuchareva, E. V. Kryukova, A. F. Lemenovskaya, V. A. Matveeva, E. V. Sinitsyna. 1989. The role of glycosphingolipids in natural immunity: gangliosides modulate the cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:1979.[Medline]
  21. Ando, I., D. Hoon, Y. Suzuki, R. Saxton, S. Golub, R. Irie. 1987. Ganglioside GM2 on the K562 cell line is recognized as a target structure by human natural killer cells. Int. J. Cancer 40:12.[Medline]
  22. Grayson, G., S. Ladisch. 1992. Immunosuppression by human gangliosides. II. Carbohydrate structure and inhibition of human NK activity. Cell. Immunol. 139:18.[Medline]
  23. Kern, D. E., J. P. Klarnet, M. C. Jensen, P. D. Greenberg. 1986. Requirement for recognition of class II molecules and processed tumor antigens for optimal generation of syngeneic tumor-specific class I-restricted CTL. J. Immunol. 136:4303.[Abstract]
  24. Ladisch, S., B. Gillard. 1985. A solvent partition method for microscale ganglioside purification. Anal. Biochem. 146:220.[Medline]
  25. Svennerholm, L.. 1957. A colorimetric resorcinol-hydrochloric acid method. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 24:604.[Medline]
  26. Ledeen, R., R. Yu. 1982. Gangliosides: structures, isolation and analysis. Methods Enzymol. 83:139.[Medline]
  27. Gazzotti, G., S. Sonnino, R. Ghidoni. 1985. Normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of non-derivatized ganglioside mixtures. J. Chromatogr. 348:371.[Medline]
  28. Li, R., D. Gage, S. Ladisch. 1993. Biosynthesis and shedding of murine lymphoma gangliosides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1170:283.[Medline]
  29. Ladisch, S., S. Kitada, E. F. Hays. 1987. Gangliosides shed by tumor cells enhance tumor formation in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 79:1879.
  30. Kroczek, R. A., C. D. Black, J. Barbet, L. J. Edison, E. M. Shevach. 1987. Induction of IL-2 receptor in vivo: response to allogeneic cells. Transplantation 44:547.[Medline]
  31. Li, R., N. Villacreses, S. Ladisch. 1995. Human tumor gangliosides inhibit murine immune responses in vivo. Cancer Res. 55:211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Morris, R. E., J. Wu, R. Shorthouse. 1990. A study of the contrasting effects of cyclosporine, FK 506, and rapamycin on the suppression of allograft rejection. Transplant. Proc. 22:1638.[Medline]
  33. Ladisch, S., C. Sweeley, H. Becker, D. Gage. 1989. Aberrant fatty acyl {alpha}-hydroxylation in human neuroblastoma tumor gangliosides. J. Biol. Chem. 264:12097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ladisch, S., R. Li, E. Olson. 1994. Ceramide structure predicts tumor ganglioside immunosuppressive activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Chang, F., R. Li, K. Noon, D. Gage, S. Ladisch. 1997. Human medulloblastoma gangliosides. Glycobiology 7:523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ladisch, S., H. Becker, L. Ulsh. 1992. Immunosuppression by human gangliosides. I. Relationship of carbohydrate structure to the inhibition of T cell responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1125:180.[Medline]
  37. Tanaka, K., T. Yoshioka, C. Bieberich, G. Jay. 1988. Role of the major histocompatibility complex class I antigens in tumor growth and metastasis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 6:359.[Medline]
  38. Rogers, M. J., L. W. Law, E. Appella, S. Oroszlan, C. C. Ting. 1977. Solubilized TSTA and the major viral structural proteins, gp70 and p30, in the immune response to murine leukemias induced by Friend and Rauscher virus. Int. J. Cancer 20:303.[Medline]
  39. Olshefski, R., S. Ladisch. 1996. Intercellular transfer of shed tumor cell gangliosides. FEBS Lett. 386:11.[Medline]
  40. Olshefski, R., S. Ladisch. 1998. Synthesis, shedding, and intercellular transfer of human medulloblastoma gangliosides: abrogation by a new inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase. J. Neurochem. 70:467.[Medline]
  41. Floutsis, G., L. Ulsh, S. Ladisch. 1989. Immunosuppressive activity of human neuroblastoma tumor gangliosides. Int. J. Cancer 43:6.[Medline]
  42. Li, R., D. Gage, R. McKallip, S. Ladisch. 1996. Structural characterization and in vivo immunosuppressive activity of neuroblastoma GD2. Glycoconj. J. 13:385.[Medline]
  43. Li, R., S. Ladisch. 1996. Abrogation of shedding of immunosuppressive neuroblastoma gangliosides. Cancer Res. 56:4602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Sharom, F. J., A. L. Chiu, J. W. Chu. 1991. Membrane gangliosides modulate interleukin-2-stimulated T-lymphocyte proliferation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1094:35.[Medline]
  45. Offner, H., T. Thieme, A. A. Vandenbark. 1987. Gangliosides induce selective modulation of CD4 from helper T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 139:3295.[Abstract]
  46. Garofalo, T., M. Sorice, R. Misasi, B. Cinque, M. Giammatteo, G. M. Pontieri, M. G. Cifone, A. Pavan. 1998. A novel mechanism of CD4 down-modulation induced by monosialoganglioside GM3: involvement of serine phosphorylation and protein kinase C{delta} translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 273:35153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Krifuks, O., L. D. Bergelson, M. Schlesinger. 1998. The down-modulation of CD4 induced by the GM1 ganglioside is regulated by phosphatases and kinases: evidence from enzyme inhibitors and anti-CD45 antibodies. Cell. Immunol. 187:45.[Medline]
  48. Irani, D. N.. 1998. Brain-derived gangliosides induce cell cycle arrest in a murine T cell line. J. Neuroimmunol. 87:11.[Medline]
  49. Kanda, N.. 1999. Gangliosides GD1a and GM3 induce interleukin-10 production by human T cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 256:41.[Medline]
  50. Valentino, L., T. Moss, E. Olson, H. J. Wang, R. Elashoff, S. Ladisch. 1990. Shed tumor gangliosides and progression of human neuroblastoma. Blood 75:1564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Velders, M. P., H. Schreiber, W. M. Kast. 1998. Active immunization against cancer cells: impediments and advances. Semin. Oncol. 25:697.[Medline]
  52. Dranoff, G.. 1998. The use of gene transfer in cancer immunotherapy. Forum 8:357.[Medline]
  53. Simons, J. W., B. Mikhak. 1998. Ex-vivo gene therapy using cytokine-transduced tumor vaccines: molecular and clinical pharmacology. Semin. Oncol. 25:661.[Medline]
  54. Inokuchi, J., K. Momosaki, H. Shimeno, A. Nagamatsu, N. S. Radin. 1989. Effects of D-threo-PDMP, an inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthetase, on expression of cell surface glycolipid antigen and binding to adhesive proteins by B16 melanoma cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 141:573.[Medline]
  55. Abe, A., J. Inokuchi, M. Jimbo, H. Shimeno, A. Nagamatsu, J. A. Shayman, G. S. Shukla, N. S. Radin. 1992. Improved inhibitors of glucosylceramide synthase. J. Biochem. 111:191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Biswas, K. Biswas, A. Richmond, J. Ko, S. Ghosh, M. Simmons, P. Rayman, B. Rini, I. Gill, C. S. Tannenbaum, et al.
Elevated Levels of Select Gangliosides in T Cells from Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Is Associated with T Cell Dysfunction
J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 5050 - 5058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
K. Bennaceur, I. Popa, J. A. Chapman, C. Migdal, J. Peguet-Navarro, J.-L. Touraine, and J. Portoukalian
Different mechanisms are involved in apoptosis induced by melanoma gangliosides on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells
Glycobiology, June 1, 2009; 19(6): 576 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
J. de Leon, A. Fernandez, M. Clavell, M. Labrada, Y. Bebelagua, C. Mesa, and L. E. Fernandez
Differential influence of the tumour-specific non-human sialic acid containing GM3 ganglioside on CD4+CD25- effector and naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells function
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 591 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Shen, K. Stone, A. Jales, D. Leitenberg, and S. Ladisch
Inhibition of TLR Activation and Up-Regulation of IL-1R-Associated Kinase-M Expression by Exogenous Gangliosides
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4425 - 4432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Das, G. Sa, C. Hilston, D. Kudo, P. Rayman, K. Biswas, L. Molto, R. Bukowski, B. Rini, J. H. Finke, et al.
GM1 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}, Overexpressed in Renal Cell Carcinoma, Synergize to Induce T-Cell Apoptosis
Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 68(6): 2014 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Raval, S. Biswas, P. Rayman, K. Biswas, G. Sa, S. Ghosh, M. Thornton, C. Hilston, T. Das, R. Bukowski, et al.
TNF-{alpha} Induction of GM2 Expression on Renal Cell Carcinomas Promotes T Cell Dysfunction
J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6642 - 6652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Hamada, M. K. Kim, A. Iwakura, M. Ii, T. Thorne, G. Qin, J. Asai, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Sekiguchi, M. Silver, et al.
Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} Mediate Contribution of Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Functional Recovery After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, November 21, 2006; 114(21): 2261 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Biswas, A. Richmond, P. Rayman, S. Biswas, M. Thornton, G. Sa, T. Das, R. Zhang, A. Chahlavi, C. S. Tannenbaum, et al.
GM2 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Potential Role in Tumor-Induced T-Cell Dysfunction.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6816 - 6825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
K. Bennaceur, I. Popa, J. Portoukalian, O. Berthier-Vergnes, and J. Peguet-Navarro
Melanoma-derived gangliosides impair migratory and antigen-presenting function of human epidermal Langerhans cells and induce their apoptosis
Int. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 18(6): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
F. A. Crespo, X. Sun, J. G. Cripps, and R. Fernandez-Botran
The immunoregulatory effects of gangliosides involve immune deviation favoring type-2 T cell responses
J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 586 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. Shen, R. Falahati, R. Stark, D. Leitenberg, and S. Ladisch
Modulation of CD4 Th Cell Differentiation by Ganglioside GD1a In Vitro
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 4927 - 4934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
I. L. Tourkova, G. V. Shurin, G. S. Chatta, L. Perez, J. Finke, T. L. Whiteside, S. Ferrone, and M. R. Shurin
Restoration by IL-15 of MHC Class I Antigen-Processing Machinery in Human Dendritic Cells Inhibited by Tumor-Derived Gangliosides
J. Immunol., September 1, 2005; 175(5): 3045 - 3052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Kotlan, P. Simsa, J.-L. Teillaud, W. H. Fridman, J. Toth, M. McKnight, and M. C. Glassy
Novel Ganglioside Antigen Identified by B Cells in Human Medullary Breast Carcinomas: The Proof of Principle Concerning the Tumor-Infiltrating B Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2278 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Chahlavi, P. Rayman, A. L. Richmond, K. Biswas, R. Zhang, M. Vogelbaum, C. Tannenbaum, G. Barnett, and J. H. Finke
Glioblastomas Induce T-Lymphocyte Death by Two Distinct Pathways Involving Gangliosides and CD70
Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 65(12): 5428 - 5438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Rayman, A. K. Wesa, A. L. Richmond, T. Das, K. Biswas, G. Raval, W. J. Storkus, C. Tannenbaum, A. Novick, R. Bukowski, et al.
Effect of Renal Cell Carcinomas on the Development of Type 1 T-Cell Responses
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6360S - 6366S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y.-Y. Liu, T. Y. Han, J. Y. Yu, A. Bitterman, A. Le, A. E. Giuliano, and M. C. Cabot
Oligonucleotides blocking glucosylceramide synthase expression selectively reverse drug resistance in cancer cells
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 933 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. V. Thornton, D. Kudo, P. Rayman, C. Horton, L. Molto, M. K. Cathcart, C. Ng, E. Paszkiewicz-Kozik, R. Bukowski, I. Derweesh, et al.
Degradation of NF-{kappa}B in T Cells by Gangliosides Expressed on Renal Cell Carcinomas
J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3480 - 3490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
X. Zhang and F. L. Kiechle
Glycosphingolipids in Health and Disease
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2004; 34(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Kishore, C. Luedemann, E. Bord, D. Goukassian, and D. W. Losordo
Tumor Necrosis Factor-Mediated E2F1 Suppression in Endothelial Cells: Differential Requirement of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signal Transduction Pathways
Circ. Res., November 14, 2003; 93(10): 932 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Draberova, L. Dudkova, M. Boubelik, H. Tolarova, F. Smid, and P. Draber
Exogenous Administration of Gangliosides Inhibits Fc{epsilon}RI-Mediated Mast Cell Degranulation by Decreasing the Activity of Phospholipase C{gamma}
J. Immunol., October 1, 2003; 171(7): 3585 - 3593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Caldwell, A. Heitger, W. Shen, Y. Liu, B. Taylor, and S. Ladisch
Mechanisms of Ganglioside Inhibition of APC Function
J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 1676 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Saito, H. Aoki, A. Ito, S. Ueno, T. Wada, K. Mitsuzuka, M. Satoh, Y. Arai, and T. Miyagi
Human {alpha}2,3-Sialyltransferase (ST3Gal II) Is a Stage-specific Embryonic Antigen-4 Synthase
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 26474 - 26479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Kudo, P. Rayman, C. Horton, M. K. Cathcart, R. M. Bukowski, M. Thornton, C. Tannenbaum, and J. H. Finke
Gangliosides Expressed by the Renal Cell Carcinoma Cell Line SK-RC-45 Are Involved in Tumor-induced Apoptosis of T Cells
Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 63(7): 1676 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Peguet-Navarro, M. Sportouch, I. Popa, O. Berthier, D. Schmitt, and J. Portoukalian
Gangliosides from Human Melanoma Tumors Impair Dendritic Cell Differentiation from Monocytes and Induce Their Apoptosis
J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3488 - 3494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. Sriram, S. Cho, P. Li, P. W. O'Donnell, C. Dunn, K. Hayakawa, J. S. Blum, and R. R. Brutkiewicz
Inhibition of glycolipid shedding rescues recognition of a CD1+ T cell lymphoma by natural killer T (NKT) cells
PNAS, June 11, 2002; 99(12): 8197 - 8202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
F. H. Igney and P. H. Krammer
Immune escape of tumors: apoptosis resistance and tumor counterattack
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2002; 71(6): 907 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
W. Deng, R. Li, M. Guerrera, Y. Liu, and S. Ladisch
Transfection of glucosylceramide synthase antisense inhibits mouse melanoma formation
Glycobiology, March 1, 2002; 12(3): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. Deng, R. Li, and S. Ladisch
Influence of Cellular Ganglioside Depletion on Tumor Formation
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 7, 2000; 92(11): 912 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKallip, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ladisch, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKallip, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ladisch, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS