|
|
||||||||

*
ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark; and
Lung and Allergy Clinic, Copenhagen, Denmark
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production
of Bet v 1-specific T cells. The inhibition was already noted after
39 mo of SAV and could not be solely explained by increased serum
levels of birch-specific IgG4. When IgG- and IgA/IgM-containing
fractions of long-term SAV sera were used to inhibit S-FAP, only
IgG-containing fractions were shown to inhibit S-FAP. These results
indicate that blocking IgG Abs induced by SAV inhibits the occurrence
of S-FAP at very low allergen concentrations, resulting in
significantly higher allergen threshold levels to obtain T cell
proliferation and cytokine production and thus allergen-induced
late-phase responses. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition, atopic allergic patients have been shown to have an
increased expression of CD23 on B cells and macrophages (6, 7) and Fc
RI on monocytes and dendritic cells (8, 9). The expression of IgE Fc receptors on APC suggests that they
may play a functional role in the presentation of allergens to specific
T cells. Indeed, both IgE receptors have been shown to facilitate the
presentation of allergens in the presence of specific serum-IgE,
resulting in T cell activation at 100- to 1000-fold lower allergen
concentrations than are required when control sera are used
(10, 11, 12, 13, 14). This is a crucial step in the activation of
allergen-specific Th2-like cells, because the factual exposure to
airborne allergens is extremely low, i.e., in the range of several
micrograms per year. Therefore, inhibition of this mechanism would
theoretically result in increasing the allergen concentrations required
for in vivo T cell activation and Th2 cytokine production.
Specific immunotherapy with allergen extracts, recently termed therapeutic allergy vaccines in the World Health Organization position paper on allergen immunotherapy (15), has been practiced since its introduction by Noon in 1911 (16). Specific allergy vaccination (SAV)2 is currently the only allergy treatment that not only has an antisymptomatic effects but also influences the course of the allergic disease itself (15). The clinical efficacy of SAV is well documented (reviewed in Ref. 15), and clear effects are noted with respect to symptom/medication scores, early- and late-phase skin responses, and increased allergen threshold levels in provocation tests. Most importantly, SAV has been shown to have long-term efficacy (17, 18), prevent the development of new sensitizations (19), and even inhibits the progression from rhinitis to asthma (20).
However, the precise immunological mechanisms underlying SAV are not entirely clear. Several immunological effects have been described. There is a decreased influx of activated eosinophils and activated CD4+ T cells into target tissues after topic allergen provocation, as well as during the pollen season (21, 22); a sharp rise in allergen-specific IgG4 Abs (23, 24), and a decreased number of circulating basophils (25). However, specific serum-IgE levels do not decrease after SAV but rather show a transient increase (26). In addition, a shift in the production of T cell cytokines from Th2 to a more moderate Th0 type (27, 28, 29, 30), a decreased proliferative response of peripheral T cells (28, 31), an increased production of IL-10 by T cells (32), as well as an increased production of IL-12 (33) and IL-10 (32) by APC has been reported. However, these immunological changes that SAV induces cannot completely explain the clinical observations that much higher allergen threshold levels are required to obtain a positive late-phase response (LPR). As inhibition of serum-facilitated allergen presentation (S-FAP) would offer a valid explanation of these clinical observations, the present study addresses the question whether SAV interferes with S-FAP, thereby explaining why SAV is clinically efficacious without changes in serum levels of allergen-specific IgE.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anti-CD23 mAb MHM6, anti-CD19 mAb HD37, FITC-labeled
F(ab')2 of goat anti-mouse Igs, rabbit
anti-human IgG, and rabbit anti-human IgE were obtained from
Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). Anti-Fc
RI mAb 15-1 was a kind gift of Dr.
J. P. Kinet (Boston, MA), anti-CD80 mAb BB1 and anti-CD86
mAb FUN-1 were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA), anti-CD40
mAb 89 was purchased from Immunotech (Marseille, France), and
anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 and anti-HLA-DR mAb L243 were obtained from
American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA).
Sera and IgE and IgG4 measurements
Sera from healthy controls, birch-allergic patients, birch-allergic patients undergoing SAV (birch Alutard SQ, ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark), and grass-allergic patients undergoing SAV (grass Alutard SQ) were obtained from our internal serum bank. The duration of SAV is defined as months of therapy after initial updosing. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. All sera were blinded, and clinical data were not available. Allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 were measured using the Magic Lite SQ specific IgE system (ALK-Abelló) (34).
Fractionation of long-term SAV sera
Two long-term SAV sera (1598 and 1490) were separated into IgG-
and IgM/IgA-containing fractions by separating the sera on a
Bind
Plus protein G column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The column was
washed with PBS, pH 7.2, followed by 2 ml of serum. The run through was
collected, and the IgG bound to the column was eluted using a Pierce
elution buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL). All fractions were extensively
dialized against PBS, and volumes were adjusted to the starting
volume.
The presence of IgM, IgG, and IgA was measured using a human IgG, IgA, and IgM "NL" bind a rid kit according to the manufacturers description (The Binding Site, Birmingham, U.K.).
Preparation of Bet v 1
Bet v 1 was enriched from an aqueous birch pollen extract as described by Ipsen (35, 36). In brief, size-exclusion chromatography of 150 mg (dry weight) of the pollen extract was performed on a G-75 superfine (Pharmacia) 90 cm x 2 cm2 (K15/100; Pharmacia) column, equilibrated with 0.125 NH4HCO3, pH 8.3. The fractions containing Bet v 1 (assayed by fused rocket immunoelectrophoresis and fused rocket radio-immunoelectrophoresis) were pooled and lyophilized. Typically, 1530 mg of dry weight material was obtained.
Culture conditions
T cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies), 100 IU/ml of penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies), and 5% heat-inactivated, screened human AB+ serum (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) (later referred to as complete medium). All cultures were grown under sterile conditions at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. EBV-transformed B cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU penicillin-streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Life Technologies) under the same culture conditions as for the T cells.
Bet v I-reactive T cells
Bet v 1-specific T cell line and clones were generated from the peripheral blood of birch-allergic patient AF, who is clinically allergic to birch pollen (37). The CD4+ T cell clone (TCC) AF28 reacted with aa 2133, CD4+ TCC AF19 and AF24 with aa 3751, and AF line (which contains both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells) reacted with several T cell epitopes simultaneously.
Preparation of EBV-transformed B cells for facilitated Ag presentation
Serum of birch-allergic patients and control donors was incubated for 1 h at 37°C with serial dilutions of Bet v 1. Then EBV-B cells (irradiated with 5000 rad) were added at a concentration of 3.105/ml to the allergen-complexed serum and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After incubation, the cells were washed two times in RPMI 1640 and used as APC in T cell stimulation assays.
In blocking experiments with polyclonal anti-IgG or anti-IgE, the sera were incubated with these antisera for 1 h at 37°C before adding Bet v 1. In blocking experiments with anti-CD23, EBV-B cells were incubated for 1 h at 4°C with this Ab before adding the cells to the sera. In experiments in which S-FAP induced by a patient serum was inhibited by SAV sera or fractions thereof, a mixture of the two sera (both at 40%) was preincubated for 1 h at 37°C before B cells were added.
Flow cytometric analysis
Cells were Ficoll-separated, washed twice in Cellwash (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), and labeled on ice for 30 min with mAb diluted in Cellwash. Subsequently, cells were washed three times and incubated with FITC-labeled F(ab')2 fragments of rabbit anti-mouse Ig (Dako). Cells were washed three times again, and fluorescence was analyzed on a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). For each sample, 10,000 cells were analyzed. No gates were set.
Proliferative responses of Bet v 1-specific T cell line and clones
Bet v 1-specific T cells were washed twice in RPMI 1640 medium to remove excess PHA and IL-2. Ag-specific proliferation was assessed by stimulation of the T cells, 24 x 104 cells/well, by Ag using irradiated (5000 rad) autologous EBV-transformed B cells as APC (12 x 104 cells/well). The cells were cultured for 24 h, followed by a 16-h pulse in the presence of tritiated methyl thymidine ([3H]TdR) (NEN-DuPont, Wilmington, DE), 0.5 µCi/well. Proliferation was expressed as mean cpm of [3H]TdR incorporation of triplicate cultures. All experiments shown were performed at least two times with AF line and at least one of the CD4+ Bet v 1-specific TCC.
Production of supernatants for cytokine measurements
Bet v 1-specific T cells (24 x 104/well) were activated for 24 h in the presence or absence of Bet v 1 in the presence of autologous, irradiated EBV-transformed B cells (12 x 104cells/well) as described above. Supernatants were collected for cytokine measurements after a 24-h culture period.
IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IFN-
ELISA
The presence of IL-4, IL-5, IFN-
, and IL-10 in the TCC
supernatants was measured using the Duoset (IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-
) or
Predicta (IL-10) ELISA kits according to the manufacturers
description (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To address the role of serum IgE in the presentation of Bet v 1 to
specific T cells, two CD4+ Bet v 1-specific T
cell clones and a polyclonal Bet v 1-specific T cell line from donor AF
were studied in an in vitro culture system model using autologous
EBV-transformed B cells (CD23+,
CD19+, CD20+,
HLA-DR+, CD40+,
CD80+, CD86+,
CD3-, and Fc
RI-) as
APC. This culture system has been used previously to show S-FAP of the
house dust mite allergen Der p 2 (10). Six sera containing
very high levels of birch-specific IgE and three control sera that did
not contain any detectible IgE (Table I
)
were preincubated with serial dilutions of Bet v 1 for 1 h at
37°C, AF EBV-B cells were added for 1 h at 4°C to prevent
fluid phase endocytosis, and the B cells were washed twice to remove
any free allergen not complexed with IgE and bound to CD23. T cells
were added, and proliferation was measured after a 24-h culture period.
Fig. 1
shows that the control sera could
not facilitate the presentation of Bet v 1 to the Bet v 1-specific T
cells. All sera containing high levels of birch-specific IgE could
facilitate the presentation of Bet v 1 to the T cells, and significant
proliferation could be measured at 100 and even at 10 ng/ml, indicating
that >100-fold lower allergen concentrations are sufficient to
activate Bet v 1-specific T cells in the presence of high levels of
specific serum IgE.
|
|
As allergen presentation studied at 4°C may not be relevant to
the in vivo situation, similar experiments were performed with B cell
incubation at 4°C, 37°C, and 37°C without washing away excess Bet
v 1 and serum. As shown in Fig. 2
, S-FAP
by patient serum occurred at 4°C and, more efficiently, at 37°C.
When excess allergen was not washed away after the incubation with APC
at 37°C, an even more efficient presentation of Bet v 1 was observed,
which may be explained by additional allergen presentation via
non-IgE-mediated routes. Control sera were not able to induce T cell
proliferation when the incubation with APC was performed at 4°C, but
could be detected at the highest allergen concentrations when the
incubation was performed at 37°C. This is probably the result of Ag
uptake via fluid-phase endocytosis. These results indicate that S-FAP
occurs very efficiently at physiological temperature, and therefore
additional experiments were performed at 37°C, unless stated
otherwise.
|
S-FAP of Bet v 1 occurred when sera containing high levels of
birch-specific IgE were used. To show that binding of IgE/allergen
complexes to CD23 mediated to this effect, two sets of experiments were
performed. First, patient and control sera were preincubated for 1
h at 37°C with serial dilutions of polyclonal IgE- or IgG-specific
rabbit antiserum before allergen was added. Fig. 3
clearly shows that anti-IgE Abs
completely inhibited the serum-facilitated presentation of Bet v 1,
whereas anti-IgG Abs had no effect. To evaluate the role of CD23 in
our culture model, experiments were performed by blocking CD23 or CD19
as a control B cell marker by preincubating the B cells for 1 h at
4°C with anti-CD23 or anti-CD19 mAb. Table II
shows that preicubation of AF EBV-B
cells with anti-CD23 mAb, but not anti-CD19 mAb, prevented the
occurrence of S-FAP of Bet v 1 to Bet v 1-specific T cells. These
experiments demonstrate that S-FAP of Bet v 1 is IgE dependent and is
mediated via binding to CD23.
|
|
To further study the relevance of S-FAP in birch-allergic
patients, sera were collected from a panel of patients with different
levels of birch-specific IgE (Table I
). The sera that were used
initially were sera containing >300 SU of birch-specific IgE,
representing only a small percentage of all birch-allergic patients. As
is shown in Fig. 4
, S-FAP of Bet v 1 was
observed in a serum-IgE-dependent fashion. Sera containing >100 SU
birch-specific IgE were very efficient in mediating presentation of Bet
v 1, but even sera containing 50100 SU were able to mediate the
effect. All other sera with <50 SU birch-specific IgE tested could not
facilitate the presentation of Bet v 1. This indicates that the effect
is relevant to the majority of clinically allergic patients.
|
As sera from patients undergoing SAV contained high levels of
allergen-specific IgG4 Abs, we wanted to address the question whether
sera from patients undergoing birch SAV could inhibit the observed
facilitated presentation of Bet v 1. To study this, Bet v 1 was
preincubated for 1 h at 37°C with a patient serum containing
high levels of birch-specific IgE in the presence of medium,
nonallergic control sera, long-term birch SAV sera, or long-term grass
SAV sera. Fig. 5
shows that all three
long-term birch SAV sera inhibited S-FAP of Bet v 1 to the Bet v
1-specific T cells. Similar results were obtained when the experiments
were performed at 4°C (data not shown). The effect was specific for
birch SAV, because neither control sera nor long-term grass SAV sera
could inhibit the effect. This effect was noted in all such
experiments. In addition, IgE-mediated allergen presentation of the
grass allergen Phl p 5 to a Phl p 5-specific T cell clone could be
inhibited with long-term grass SAV but not birch SAV sera, further
supporting the relevance of this finding (data not shown).
|

To address the effect of the inhibition of T cell activation with
SAV sera on cytokine production, supernatants were removed from
cultures that had been set up under S-FAP conditions with a control
serum, long-term birch SAV serum, and a long-term grass SAV serum.
Table III
shows that not only T cell
proliferation, but also the production of the cytokines IL-4, IL-5,
IL-10, and IFN-
, was inhibited by the presence of birch SAV serum,
but not by the presence of the control sera.
|
Clinical efficacy of SAV is already noticeable after short-term
SAV. To evaluate if the inhibitory effect of birch SAV sera on
presentation of Bet v 1 could be demonstrated with short-term
birch SAV sera, inhibition experiments were performed with a range of
birch SAV sera (shown in Table IV
). With
these sera, inhibition could only be demonstrated after >30 mo of
birch SAV (data not shown). However, inhibition experiments are
performed by mixing an IgE-containing serum with a SAV serum, which may
not completely represent the in vivo situation.
|
|
As serum levels of allergen-specific IgG4 have been documented to
increase after SAV, birch-specific IgG4 Ab levels were determined in
the SAV sera (Table IV
). Subjects were divided into several groups:
nonallergic controls, birch-allergic controls that did not undergo SAV,
birch-allergic patients that underwent 39 mo of SAV, 918 mo SAV,
1830 mo of SAV, and >30 mo SAV. In addition, sera from grass
allergic patients that had no sensitization to birch and had >30 mo of
grass SAV were included as control sera. The levels of birch- and
grass-specific IgE and IgG4 were measured in all these sera. Table IV
shows that nonallergic controls and allergic patients that did not
undergo SAV had very low levels of birch- or grass-specific IgG4. In
contrast, sera from patients undergoing birch- or grass-specific SAV
had high levels of specific IgG4 Abs, independent on the duration of
treatment. Only one serum long-term birch SAV (serum 1490) did not have
high serum levels of birch-specific IgG4. However, this serum was as
potent as the other SAV sera in inhibiting S-FAP (see Figs. 5
and 6
).
Another serum (809652) did have increased birch allergen-specific IgG4
but showed no inhibition of S-FAP (Table IV
, Fig. 6
A). In
addition, as stated above, we have only been able to measure the
inhibition of S-FAP in indirect assays with long-term SAV sera.
Short-term SAV sera that contained similar or even higher levels of
birch-specific IgG4 could not inhibit S-FAP (data not shown), strongly
indicating that the inhibition of S-FAP noted cannot solely be
explained by increased serum-levels of birch allergen-specific
IgG4.
The inhibition of S-FAP after SAV is mediated by blocking IgG Abs
To further investigate which type of Ab mediates the blocking of
S-FAP after SAV, we separted two long-term SAV sera on a protein G
column. As Table V
shows, all IgG Abs
were present in the eluate of the column, and all IgA and IgM Abs were
present in the run through. When the sera and the serum fractions were
tested for their ability to inhibit S-FAP, only unfractionated sera and
the fractions containing IgG inhibited S-FAP (Fig. 7
), demonstrating that blocking IgG Abs
but not IgA or IgM Abs inhibit S-FAP. This is supported by our
observation that rabbit anti-Bet v 1 antiserum, as well as murine
Bet v 1-specific monoclonal IgG Abs, also inhibit S-FAP (data not
shown).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RI. Here, we demonstrate
that this process is inhibited by blocking allergen-specific IgG Abs
that are induced by SAV. As a result of this, increased doses of
allergens are required to induce T cell proliferation and cytokine
production in vivo.
An increasing body of evidence indicates that S-FAP is a mechanism that
occurs in vivo. Atopic allergic individuals have been shown to have
increased expression of CD23 on B cells and macrophages (6, 7) and Fc
RI on monocytes and dendritic cells (8, 9). Both receptors have been shown to be involved in S-FAP in
vitro (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). In vivo Th2 responses and specific IgG1
and IgE production in mice are enhanced by allergen-IgE complexes
(38, 39) or by allergen-anti-CD23 mAb conjugates
(40), whereas CD23 knockout mice lack this ability
(41).
In addition, clinical trials with a neutralizing anti-IgE mAb have shown that anti-IgE mAb inhibits bronchial LPR and the number of eosinophils in sputum of allergic asthma patients (42), strongly suggesting that IgE is crucial for the development of LPR (43, 44) and that inhibition of this mechanism results in decreased late-phase allergic reactions. Similarly, the production of IL-4 and IL-5 and the recruitment of eosinophils to the lungs of mice sensitized with house dust mite can be inhibited by treatment with an anti-CD23 or anti-IgE mAb, and the same effect is observed in CD23 knockout mice (45).
All these findings strongly suggest that IgE, as well as IgE receptors, plays an important role in the in vivo activation of CD4+ T cells, the regulation of humoral responses, and most importantly in late-phase allergic responses.
S-FAP of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, was shown to occur
at both 4°C and 37°C and was dependent on the levels of
birch-specific IgE present in the sera. The effect was demonstrated to
occur with sera that contained >50 SU birch-specific IgE, indicating
that the effect is relevant for the majority of patients undergoing
SAV. The local production of allergen-specific IgE in the nasal mucosa
of grass pollen-allergic patients (46) indicates that
allergens entering the nasal and possibly also the bronchial mucosa may
indeed be captured in the target organ by allergen-specific IgE and be
focussed to CD23+ or
Fc
RI+ APC.
S-FAP induced by patient sera containing >300 SU birch-specific IgE
could be inhibited by sera from patients undergoing long-term birch
SAV, resulting in a strongly reduced proliferation of Bet v 1-specific
CD4+ T cells. In addition, the production of the
allergy-associated type 2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 was strongly
inhibited, as was the production of the cytokines IL-10 and
IFN-
.
The effect of this inhibition was allergen specific as it was shown that sera from patients undergoing long-term grass SAV could not inhibit the effect on Bet v 1-specific T cells.
Additional inhibition experiments showed that S-FAP of Bet v 1 could
also not be inhibited by a combination of long-term grass SAV sera with
grass extract (data not shown), thereby excluding the possibility that
IgG-allergen complexes induce an inhibitory signal in B lymphocytes
after engagement of Fc
RIIb1, as has been shown in other models
(47).
Furthermore, when sera from untreated birch-allergic patients and patients undergoing birch SAV that were matched for birch-specific IgE levels were compared in their ability to induce S-FAP, sera from the untreated patients could induce proliferation of allergen-specific T cells at low allergen concentrations, whereas this ability was inhibited in most sera from patients undergoing birch SAV. This further substantiates that SAV-treated patients may require higher allergen levels to activate allergen-specific T cells in vivo. The inhibition was not seen in all patients undergoing birch SAV. This may indicate that these patients did not have an optimal clinical response to SAV and that the effect may correlate with the clinical response to treatment. As clinical data of the patients were not available, we are currently testing sera from a placebo-controlled double blind birch SAV study to address this question.
One of the long term-birch SAV sera that inhibited S-FAP did not
contain birch-specific IgG4 (serum 1490), and only one of the two sera
that did not show a clear inhibition of S-FAP had no high
birch-specific IgG4 levels (serum 809038 and 809652). Therefore, the
inhibition of S-FAP after SAV could not completely be explained by
levels of birch-specific IgG4 induced by birch SAV, which may explain
why the rise in specific IgG4 Abs after SAV does not correlate with
clinical efficacy (15). However, our data show that serum
IgG, and not other Ab classes, mediates the inhibition of S-FAP (Table V
and Fig. 7
). This indicates that the induction of blocking
allergen-specific IgG Abs including IgG4, rather than IgG4 Abs alone,
prevent the occurrence of S-FAP. These data are supported by the
observation that rabbit anti-Bet v 1 antiserum, as well as Bet v
1-specific monoclonal IgG Abs, can also inhibit S-FAP (data not
shown).
Late-phase allergic responses have been shown to be dependent on the presence and activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes (48, 49, 50, 51, 52), eosinophils (50, 51), and factors involved in eosinophil differentiation such as IL-5 (43, 53, 54). Allergen threshold levels for immediate hypersensitivity responses and LPR are strongly increased after SAV (reviewed in Refs. 15 and 55). This may be explained by our observation that sera from patients undergoing SAV have a decreased ability to activate allergen-specific CD4+ T cells via S-FAP.
Based on these observations, we would like to propose the following working mechanism of SAV: Initially, SAV induces the production of IL-12 and IL-10 by APC (32, 33). This results in a shift in the production of cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells toward the Th0 phenotype (27, 28, 29, 30). Both the production of more Th0-like cytokines and IL-10 (32) induce the production of all subclasses of allergen-specific IgG, including IgG4 (32, 56, 57, 58).
When these Abs reach sufficiently high levels or affinities to compete
with the binding of IgE to allergens (which according to Table IV
and
Fig. 6
may already occur after 3 mo of SAV), IgE-mediated allergen
presentation to CD4+ T cells is inhibited at low
allergen concentrations, and even histamine release from mast cells and
basophils may be inhibited via a similar process (59).
Because LPR are mediated by the costimulation-dependent activation and
cytokine production by CD4+ T lymphocytes
(48, 49, 50, 51, 52), this results in a much lower LPR as the result
of a much higher allergen threshold for T cell activation in the
presence of unchanged levels of allergen-specific IgE in the serum of
patients undergoing birch SAV.
In addition, it has also been demonstrated that CD23 interacts with CD11b and CD11c on monocytes (60), which results in an increased production of proinflammatory cytokines. Binding of IgE to CD23 inhibits the production of these factors, which include Th1-biasing cytokines. An inhibition of IgE binding to CD23 by SAV as shown in this paper may therefore result in and enhanced production of Th1-biasing cytokines by APC, which results in a feedback inhibition of Th2 responses. This is accompanied by a shift in the use of B cells to the use of dendritic cells or macrophages as APC, which may also promote Th1, rather than Th2, development.
Thus, the results shown here provide evidence that links many of the previous observations on the mechanisms of SAV. Future research should be focused on the further characterization of the inhibitory allergen-specific IgG responses induced by SAV, as well as on studies that can correlate the observed inhibition of IgE-mediated allergen presentation with clinical efficacy of SAV treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
RI-specific mAb 15.1. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: SAV, specific allergy vaccination; LPR, late phase responses; S-FAP, serum-facilitated allergen presentation; TCC, T cell clone. ![]()
Received for publication February 12, 1999. Accepted for publication June 25, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RII, CD23) and IgE-BF (soluble CD23) release by lymphoblastoid B-cell line RPMI-8866 and human peripheral lymphocytes of normal and atopic donors. Immunology 66:505.[Medline]
receptor II/CD23-positive lymphocytes in atopic dermatitis. I. The proportion of Fc expression of the a-subunit of the high affinity immunoglobulin E receptor(Fc
RI-a). Clin. Exp. Allergy 26:648.
RI) on monocytes of atopic individuals. J. Exp. Med. 179:745.
RI-a). Clin. Exp. Allergy 26:648.[Medline]
RI) mediates IgE-dependent allergen presentation. J. Immunol. 154:6285.[Abstract]
. Wihl, H. Løwenstein, H. Ipsen. 1997. Immunotherapy with partially purified and standardized tree pollen extracts IV: results from long-term (6-year) follow-up. Allergy 52:914.[Medline]
. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 97:1356.[Medline]
secretion in specific allergen stimulated T cell cultures. J. Immunol. 154:4187.[Abstract]
RII by antigen-anti- Fc
RII conjugates. J. Immunol. 152:4388.[Abstract]
germ-line gene transcripts and mRNA for the
heavy chain of IgE in nasal B cells and the effects of topical corticosteroid. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:2899.[Medline]
RII-B1 regulates the presentation of B cell receptor-bound antigens. J. Immunol. 161:2079.
and IL-5 in induced sputum. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 99:693.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Braren, S. Blank, H. Seismann, S. Deckers, M. Ollert, T. Grunwald, and E. Spillner Generation of Human Monoclonal Allergen-Specific IgE and IgG Antibodies from Synthetic Antibody Libraries Clin. Chem., May 1, 2007; 53(5): 837 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pilette, K. T. Nouri-Aria, M. R. Jacobson, L. K. Wilcock, B. Detry, S. M. Walker, J. N. Francis, and S. R. Durham Grass Pollen Immunotherapy Induces an Allergen-Specific IgA2 Antibody Response Associated with Mucosal TGF-beta Expression J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4658 - 4666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Chan, S. T. Ong, S. Y. Ong, F. T. Chew, and Y. K. Mok Nuclear magnetic resonance structure-based epitope mapping and modulation of dust mite group 13 allergen as a hypoallergen. J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4852 - 4860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. M. van Oosterhout and N. Bloksma Regulatory T-lymphocytes in asthma Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 918 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Getahun, F. Hjelm, and B. Heyman IgE Enhances Antibody and T Cell Responses In Vivo via CD23+ B Cells J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1473 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Holm, M. Gajhede, M. Ferreras, A. Henriksen, H. Ipsen, J. N. Larsen, L. Lund, H. Jacobi, A. Millner, P. A. Wurtzen, et al. Allergy Vaccine Engineering: Epitope Modulation of Recombinant Bet v 1 Reduces IgE Binding but Retains Protein Folding Pattern for Induction of Protective Blocking-Antibody Responses J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5258 - 5267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Swoboda, M. Grote, P. Verdino, W. Keller, M. B. Singh, N. De Weerd, W. R. Sperr, P. Valent, N. Balic, R. Reichelt, et al. Molecular Characterization of Polygalacturonases as Grass Pollen-Specific Marker Allergens: Expulsion from Pollen via Submicronic Respirable Particles J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6490 - 6500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Westritschnig, M. Focke, P. Verdino, W. Goessler, W. Keller, A. Twardosz, A. Mari, F. Horak, U. Wiedermann, A. Hartl, et al. Generation of an Allergy Vaccine by Disruption of the Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cross-Reactive Calcium-Binding Allergen, Phl p 7 J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5684 - 5692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |