|
|
||||||||
2,6-Linked Sialic Acid Inhibits VCAM-1- Dependent Adhesion Under Flow Conditions1



*
Speros Martel Section of Leukocyte Biology, Department of Pediatrics,
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, and
§
Section of Atherosclerosis, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6N) mRNA was up-regulated in cultured HUVEC
by IL-1 or IL-4 alone, but that the expression was enhanced by
costimulation, whereas the level of Galß1-4GlcNAc/Galß1-3GalNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase (ST3ON) mRNA was unchanged. Removing both
2,6- and
2,3-linked sialic acids from IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC by sialidase significantly increased
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion, whereas removing
2,3-linked sialic acid
alone had no effect; adenovirus-mediated overexpression of ST6N with
costimulation almost abolished the adhesion, which was reversible by
sialidase. The same treatments of IL-1-stimulated HUVEC had no effect.
Lectin blotting showed that VCAM-1 is decorated with
2,6- but not
2,3-linked sialic acids. However, overexpression of
2,6-sialyltransferase did not increase
2,6-linked sialic acid on
VCAM-1 but did increase
2,6-linked sialic acids on other proteins
that remain to be identified. These results suggest that
2,6-linked
sialic acids on a molecule(s) inducible by costimulation with IL-1
+ IL-4 but not IL-1 alone down-regulates VCAM-1-dependent adhesion
under flow conditions. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4 integrins (i.e.,
4ß1 and
4ß7), which are constitutively expressed
on monocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and basophils but not on
neutrophils in humans (1). For leukocytes to adhere to
endothelial cells under physiological flow conditions, leukocytes must
be captured from the bloodstream. Our laboratory and others have shown
that interactions between VCAM-1 and
4 integrins are
necessary and sufficient to support primary capture of mononuclear
leukocytes under flow conditions in vitro (6, 7, 8, 9). This is
in contrast to adhesion of neutrophils under flow conditions, in which
selectins are indispensable for primary capture (1). A
major isoform of VCAM-1 that is inducible on endothelial cells consists
of seven Ig-like domains, and the binding sites for
4
integrins reside in domains 1 and 4 (10, 11, 12). For primary
capture, only domain 1 of VCAM-1 is required, whereas both
domains 1 and 4 are involved in adhesion under static conditions
(8). IL-4 is produced by Th2-type T cells, mast cells, basophils, and a subset of NK cells (13). It down-regulates endothelial cell expressions of E-selectin and ICAM-1 induced by IL-1 or TNF (14), and it enhances the expression of VCAM-1 (15, 16). However, we have previously shown that under flow conditions, adhesion of monocytes and T cells to cultured endothelial cells stimulated with IL-1 and IL-4 in combination is almost abolished (6, 8). Thus, despite enhanced VCAM-1 expression, under physiological flow conditions the net effect of the combination of IL-1 + IL-4 on endothelial cells is anti-adhesive. Although this might be partially explained by down-regulation of E-selectin or other selectin-like molecules, we have found that VCAM-1-dependent adhesion under flow conditions is markedly inhibited (8). This latter finding is of particular interest because the VCAM-1 expressed following IL-1 + IL-4 costimulation supports adhesion under static conditions as efficiently as VCAM-1 induced by IL-1 alone (8). These results strongly suggest that either the structure of VCAM-1 is somehow altered, interfering with the function of domain 1, or an antiadhesive mechanism(s) that works under flow conditions but not static conditions is up-regulated by the costimulation.
Sialic acids are 9-carbon monosaccharides that link to the terminal galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, or other sialic acids in carbohydrate chains that are attached to glycoproteins or glycolipids (17, 18). Because of their terminal location, sialic acids on the cell surface are among the first molecules encountered by other cells coming in contact with the cell (17, 18). In addition, the first carbon of sialic acids is ionized at physiological pH (17, 18). This makes sialic acid the only sugar in glycoproteins that bears a net negative charge (17, 18). Because of their location and negative charge, sialic acids have the potential to inhibit interactions between molecules (17, 18). There are several reports that document the antiadhesive nature of sialic acids (19, 20, 21).
Recently, Hanasaki et al. (22, 23) reported that
Galß1-4GlcNAc
2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6N)3 is
up-regulated in endothelial cells following stimulation with IL-1, TNF,
and IL-4 and that VCAM-1 molecules are decorated with
2,6-linked
sialic acids. These reports prompted us to examine the
following questions: 1) are sialic acids on the cell surfaces of HUVEC
required for the inhibition of VCAM-1-dependent adhesion by
costimulation with IL-1 + IL-4, 2)
does overexpression of sialic acids lead to the inhibition of
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion, and 3) if the above hypotheses are correct,
is the inhibition due to increased sialylation of VCAM-1 molecules?
In this paper we demonstrate for the first time that
2,6-linked
sialic acids on endothelial cells can inhibit VCAM-1-dependent adhesion
of leukocytes under flow conditions. However, this inhibitory effect is
neither due to increased sialylation of VCAM-1 nor related to the total
amount of sialic acids present on the cell surfaces. Rather, to exhibit
their inhibitory effect, sialic acids must be associated with a
molecule(s) that is inducible by stimulation with IL-1 and IL-4 in
combination but not IL-1 alone. We propose a novel inducible mechanism
on endothelial cells that negatively regulates leukocyte adhesion under
flow conditions.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HUVEC were harvested from 5 to 10 umbilical cords by collagenase digestion as previously described (24). Primary cultured cells were passaged with 0.05% trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and seeded onto tissue culture dishes or flasks (Corning, Cambridge, MA) coated with 1% gelatin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The cells were grown in M199 (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 10% CS (HyClone), 0.1 mg/ml heparin (Sigma), 50 µg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (Collaborative Research, Bedford, MA), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies). First-passage HUVEC were used in all experiments.
Ramos cells (CRL-1596) and 293 cells (CRL-1573) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) and Minimum Essential Medium (Life Technologies), respectively, containing 10% FCS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin.
RT-PCR and PCR cloning of
2,3-sialyltransferase cDNA
Based on conserved motifs of three published human
2,3-sialyltransferases (25, 26, 27), three pairs of
oligonucleotides were synthesized at the Childs Health Research
Center Core Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine. The sequences of
sense and antisense primers were: Galß1-3(4)GlcNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase (ST3N) (25), 5'-GCT GCC GCC GCT
GCA TCA TCG TGG GCA A (sense) and 5'-GAT GAA ATA TGG GTT GAG GAT
(antisense); Galß1-3GalNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase (ST3O)
(26), 5'-GCT GCC GGC GCT GCG CCG TTG TGG GCA A (sense) and
5'-GAT GAA GGC TGG GTG GTA GAT (antisense); and
Galß1-4GlcNAc/Galß1-3GalNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase (ST3ON)
(27), 5'-GGT GCC GCC GCT GTG TGG TCG TGG (sense) and
5'-CCG GCA ATG TGC ACC AAG TCA CAG (antisense). Total RNA was isolated
from unstimulated and IL-1-, IL-4-, and IL-1 + IL-4-stimulated
HUVEC by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction
(28). Reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction was performed by
incubating 2 µg of total RNA with 1.5 µM antisense oligonucleotides
and 1.5 mM dNTP (Promega, Madison, WI) in 10 µl of RT buffer
(Promega) at 80°C for 5 min, followed by mixing with 23 U of avian
myeloblastosis virus (AMV)-RT (Promega) and 40 U of RNase inhibitor
(Promega) in 5 µl of RT buffer, and incubating at 42°C for 2
h. Then, the RT products were diluted eight times with PCR buffer
(Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and the subsequent PCR was
performed with 0.2 µM sense oligonucleotides, 0.2 mM dNTP, 25 mM
MgCl2, and 5 U/50 µl of Taq polymerase (Fisher
Scientific) for 33 cycles. PCR product was gel purified and cloned into
pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega). Sequence analysis and database searches
were performed by using the Molecular Biology Information Resources
Center at Baylor College of Medicine.
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA was isolated from HUVEC by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction (28). Subsequently, 10 µg of total RNA was electrophoresed in a 1% agarose/formaldehyde gel. The RNA was then transferred to a charged nylon membrane (GeneScreenPlus, NEN, Boston, MA). Equal loading of lanes was assessed by photographs of the ethidium bromide-stained gels as well as by probing of the membranes with human GAPDH cDNA (29). cDNA probes for human VCAM-1 (30) and ST6N (31) were gel purified with QIAEX II (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) and were labeled with [32P]-dCTP using the random-hexamers (Prime-it II; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturers protocol. The membrane was prehybridized with QuikHyb solution (Stratagene), and hybridization was performed as previously described (29). To quantify radioactivity, ß-emissions from respective bands were measured by the Molecular Image Scanner (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and the values were normalized by those from the bands hybridized with GAPDH cDNA. Radioactivity was normalized and compared as follows: relative radioactivity compared with unstimulated HUVEC = [(counts from respective ST6N band/counts from the GAPDH of the same sample lane) ÷ (counts from the ST6N band of unstimulated HUVEC/counts from the GAPDH band of unstimulated HUVEC)].
Detection of cell surface expression of
2,3- and
2,6-linked
sialic acids
Expression of
2,3- and
2,6-linked sialic acids on
endothelial cell surfaces was detected by cell-surface ELISA using
lectins. HUVEC were seeded onto 1% gelatin-coated 96-well tissue
culture plates (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Two or 3 days after
passage, cells were stimulated with or without culture medium
containing IL-1 (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA), IL-4 (Genzyme), and IL-1
+ IL-4 at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 22.5 h. In some
wells, 0.1 U/ml of sialidase from Arthrobacter ureafaciens
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), which cleaves both
2,3-
and
2,6-linked sialic acid (32), or 20 U/ml of
recombinant sialidase L (V-LABS, Covington, LA), which specifically
cleaves
2,3-linked sialic acid (33), was added to the
culture medium and incubated for another 90 min. After washing four
times with Dulbeccos PBS (D-PBS), cells were fixed with D-PBS
containing 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde for 20 min.
After monolayers were blocked with Tris-buffered saline containing
0.5% casein (Boehringer Mannheim),
2,6- and
2,3-linked sialic
acids were detected by Sambucus nigra (SNA) and
Maackia amurensis (MAA) agglutinins labeled with digoxigenin
(Boehringer Mannheim), respectively, in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.5)
containing 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM
MnCl2 (34, 35). Bound lectins were detected by
alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-digoxigenin Ab
(Boehringer Mannheim) and p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) as
a substrate. The optical absorbance was measured at 405 nm by an
automatic microplate reader (Cambridge Technology, Watertown, MA).
Values of optical absorbance at 405 nm were subtracted with
corresponding controls (wells in which lectins were not added).
Flow adhesion assay
The adhesion of Ramos cells to HUVEC under hydrodynamic flow conditions was studied as previously described (8, 36). Briefly, cell monolayers in 35-mm tissue culture dishes were mounted in a parallel-plate flow system. Ramos cells suspended at 106 cells/ml in 37°C D-PBS containing Ca2+, Mg2+, and 11 mM glucose were passed through the parallel plate flow chamber at 1.0 dyne/cm2 under a phase contrast microscope (Diaphot TMD, Nikon, Garden City, NY) for 9 min at 37°C. At the end of the perfusion, four different fields were videotaped at 15-s intervals. Videotaped images were analyzed with Optimas image analysis software (Bioscan, Edmonds, WA). The number of stably adherent cells was quantitated as the average number of leukocytes remaining on the monolayer in the four fields.
Construction of a recombinant adenovirus carrying ST6N cDNA
A recombinant type 5 adenovirus (Ad5) vector expressing the ST6N
gene was constructed according to standard methods. Briefly, an
expression cassette containing the ST6N cDNA (a generous gift of Dr. I.
Stamenkovic, Harvard Medical School) under control of the human
elongation factor-1
promoter (EF-1
promoter) (37),
and the bovine growth hormone polyadenylation signal was subcloned into
the shuttle plasmid p
E1sp1B (Microbix Biosystems, Toronto, Canada),
which contains the 5' Ad5 sequence with a deletion in the E1 region
(38). The transformed shuttle plasmid DNA was
cotransfected into Ad5-transformed 293 cells (39) with the
circular Ad5 genome plasmid pBHGE3 (40) (Microbix
Biosystems) to generate recombinant adenovirus carrying ST6N cDNA
(Ad26st). Recombinant viruses were isolated by plaque purification and
characterized by PCR. A plaque containing the correct recombinant
vector was propagated to high titer by serial passage on 293 cells and
purified on cesium chloride gradients using standard methods (41, 42). The titer was determined by identifying the presence of
viral cytopathic effect in 293 cells infected with serial dilutions of
each preparation. The preparation used for these experiments had a
titer of 2 x 1011 infectious units/ml. The EF-1
promoter used in this construct has generated high levels of transgene
expression from other recombinant vectors produced in our laboratory
(43).
Transduction of HUVEC with adenovirus vectors
After HUVEC were grown to 8090% confluence, they were
incubated with medium containing recombinant virus at 37°C with 5%
CO2 for 24 h. For overexpression of
2,6-sialyltransferase and cytokine stimulation, cells were first
incubated with Ad26st in medium at 37°C with 5% CO2 for
17 h, and then 10 U/ml of IL-1 and 10 ng/ml of IL-4, or 10 U/ml of
IL-1 + 10 ng/ml of IL-4 was added directly to the medium and the
incubation was continued for another 24 h.
Detection of ß-galactosidase in HUVEC following transduction with adenovirus carrying ß-galactosidase cDNA
Following transduction of HUVEC with recombinant adenovirus carrying ß-galactosidase cDNA (Adgal) for 24 h, the cells were stained with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ß-D-galactoside (X-Gal) as follows. Cell monolayers were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in D-PBS for 10 min. After rinsing twice with D-PBS containing 50 mM glycine, cells were stained with 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 1 mg/ml X-Gal (Sigma), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1% deoxycholic acid, and 0.2% Nonidet P-40 in D-PBS at 37°C for 2 h.
Lectin blotting of whole cell lysates and immunoprecipitated VCAM-1
Lectin blotting of whole cell lysates and immunoprecipitated
VCAM-1 was performed as previously described (22). After
washing HUVEC monolayers four times with ice-cold D-PBS, the cells were
lysed with 1 ml of 20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl containing 1%
Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF (Sigma), 10 µg/ml aprotinin
(Boehringer Mannheim), and 2 µg/ml of leupeptin (Boehringer Mannheim)
at 4°C for 30 min. The lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 x
g at 4°C for 15 min to remove debris. For lectin blotting
of whole cell lysates, protein concentration of cell lysates was
measured by the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and 20
µg of total protein per lane was separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE under
reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes
(Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) by standard methods. For
immunoprecipitation of VCAM-1, after preclearing with protein
A-Sepharose (Pierce) at 4°C for 2 h, 400 µg of total protein
was incubated with 15 µg/ml of anti-VCAM-1 mAb, 4B9 (a generous
gift from Dr. Roy Lobb, Biogen) (44), at 4°C for 2
h. The immune complexes were then absorbed with protein A-Sepharose at
4°C for 2 h. The protein A-Sepharose beads were washed with
lysis buffer, and the beads were boiled with Laemmli sample buffer
containing 100 mM dithiothreitol (Sigma). Supernatants were separated
by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. For
detection of sialic acids, after blots were blocked with 0.5% casein,
2,6- and
2,3-linked sialic acids were detected by
digoxigenin-labeled SNA (Boehringer Mannheim) (34) and MAA
(Boehringer Mannheim) (35), respectively. Bound lectins
were detected by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep
anti-digoxigenin Ab (Boehringer Mannheim). For detection of VCAM-1,
after blots were blocked with 3% BSA in Tris-buffered saline, VCAM-1
was probed with goat anti-VCAM-1 sera (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,
MN) and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG
(Pierce). Bound alkaline phosphatase-conjugated Abs were detected by
bromochloroindoyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (Boehringer
Mannheim).
Statistics
Results are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical assessments were made using Students t test or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. The p values that exceeded 0.05 were not considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2,6-sialyltransferase and
2,3-sialyltransferase
mRNA in HUVEC
Human ST6N cDNA has been identified and cloned by three
independent groups from different cell types (31, 45, 46).
This enzyme is expressed in a wide variety of tissues, and the size of
the mRNA varies in cell types due to differences in the 5' untranslated
regions (22, 26, 46). As shown in Fig. 1
A, ST6N mRNA was detected in
unstimulated HUVEC; the size of the mRNA was
4.2 kb, which is
consistent with Hanasaki et al. (22). Because we have
previously shown that the anti-adhesive effect of IL-1 + IL-4
costimulation appears later than 8 h and remains at 24 h
after incubation (8), we were interested in the levels of
ST6N mRNA at these time points. After 22 h of incubation, ST6N
mRNA was up-regulated by either IL-1 or IL-4 alone. However,
up-regulation was further enhanced by the combination of IL-1 +
IL-4 (see Fig. 1
A). The relative radioactivities of bands
identified with ST6N cDNA compared with those of unstimulated HUVEC
were 1.25 ± 0.35 (IL-1), 1.64 ± 0.27 (IL-4), and 2.27
± 0.48 (IL-1 + IL-4).
|
2,3-sialyltransferase is expressed in human
endothelial cells, we performed RT-PCR using primers synthesized
according to three published human
2,3-sialyltransferasesST3N,
ST3O, and ST3ONwhich use glycoproteins as acceptor substrates.
Although we tried using different annealing temperatures and
Mg2+ concentrations, PCR product was only obtained with
primers made from the sequence of ST3ON. The PCR product was a single
band on gel electrophoresis, and this 493-bp PCR product was cloned
into pGEM-T Easy vector. Four clones randomly picked were sequenced and
found to be identical with the published sequence of ST3ON cDNA
(27). Northern blot analysis using this clone as a probe
demonstrated that ST3ON mRNA was constitutively expressed in HUVEC
(Fig. 1
2.0 kb, which is
consistent with a previous report (27). However, unlike
ST6N, the levels of ST3ON mRNA were not regulated by IL-1, IL-4, or
IL-1 + IL-4 (see Fig. 1
Surface expression of
2,3- and
2,6-linked sialic acids on
HUVEC
MAA and SNA lectins recognize
2,3- and
2,6-linked sialic
acids, respectively (34, 35). In spite of the increased
expression of ST6N, the binding of SNA lectin to HUVEC stimulated with
IL-1, IL-4, and IL-1 + IL-4 for 24 h was not significantly
different from unstimulated HUVEC (Fig. 2
A). After treatment of HUVEC
with sialidase from A. ureafaciens, which cleaves all three
linkages of sialic acids (32), the binding of SNA lectin
was markedly reduced (see Fig. 2
A). The reduction was
similar among different cytokine stimulations. This suggests that
up-regulation of ST6N has little effect on total amount of
2,6-linked sialic acids on cell surfaces. Similarly, MAA binding to
HUVEC was not affected by stimulation with IL-1, IL-4, or IL-1 +
IL-4 for 24 h. This binding was almost eliminated by sialidase
(Fig. 2
B).
|
Ramos cells are able to tether and adhere stably to
cytokine-stimulated HUVEC under shear stresses up to 2.0
dyne/cm2 (8). This tethering and stable
adhesion are mediated exclusively by interactions between
4 integrins on Ramos cells and VCAM-1 on HUVEC
(8). To examine the role of sialic acids on the surfaces
of HUVEC in
4/VCAM-1-dependent adhesion under flow
conditions, we studied Ramos cell adhesion at 1.0 dyne/cm2
to HUVEC that were stimulated with cytokines and then incubated with or
without sialidase. Because most Ramos cells that tethered stably
adhered, we examined only the number of stably adherent Ramos cells.
Treatment of HUVEC with sialidase after 22.5 h of cytokine
stimulation, for the last 90 min of cytokine stimulation, did not cause
any visible change in the monolayers under phase contrast microscopy.
Although incubation for 90 min at neutral pH in culture medium might
not be optimal for sialidase, this was sufficient to remove sialic
acids from surfaces of HUVEC monolayers as shown in Fig. 2
. Under flow
conditions, costimulation of HUVEC with IL-1 + IL-4 markedly
inhibited
4 integrin/VCAM-1-dependent adhesion compared
with stimulation with IL-1 alone (Fig. 3
B), although the surface
expression of VCAM-1 was higher in the costimulated HUVEC, as was seen
in our previous report (8). Treatment of IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC with sialidase significantly increased adhesion
of Ramos cells, and this increase was completely inhibited by the
anti-VCAM-1 mAb 4B9 (44) and the
anti-
4 integrin mAb HP2/1 (47) (Fig. 3
A). In contrast, the same treatment of either IL-1- or
IL-4-stimulated HUVEC failed to increase the adhesion of Ramos cells
(see Fig. 3
A). Thus, sialic acids are required for the
inhibition of VCAM-1-dependent adhesion in IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC. However, this is not related solely to the
total amount of sialic acids on cell surfaces, because removing a high
percentage of sialic acids from the surfaces of HUVEC stimulated with
either IL-1 or IL-4 had no significant effect on adhesion.
|
2,3-linkage-specific sialidase on
lectin binding and on Ramos cell adhesion under flow conditions
Because sialidase isolated from A. ureafaciens cleaves
both
2,6- and
2,3-linked sialic acids as shown in Fig. 2
, the
increased adhesion of Ramos cells following the treatment of IL-1
+ IL-4-costimulated HUVEC with the sialidase may have been due to the
removal of
2,6- or
2,3-linked sialic acids. Although to our
knowledge sialidase specific to
2,6-linked sialic acid is not known,
it has been reported that sialidase from Macrobdella decora
leech (sialidase L) specifically cleaves
2,3-linked sialic acids
(33). We examined whether this sialidase cleaves
2,3-linked sialic acids from the surfaces of HUVEC under the same
conditions used for sialidase from A. ureafaciens. Confluent
monolayers of HUVEC grown in 96-well plates were costimulated with IL-1
(10 U/ml) and IL-4 (10 ng/ml) for 24 h; in some wells, 20 U/ml of
recombinant sialidase L or 0.1 U/ml of sialidase from A.
ureafaciens was added to the culture medium and incubated for the
last 90 min.
2,6- and
2,3-linked sialic acids on the surfaces of
HUVEC were detected by the binding of SNA and MAA lectins,
respectively, as described in Materials and Methods. As
shown in Fig. 4
B,
sialidase L significantly reduced the level of
2,3-linked sialic
acid on IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC, whereas it did not change
the level of
2,6-linked sialic acid (Fig. 4
A). To
determine whether removing
2,3-linked sialic acid from IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC increases Ramos cell adhesion, HUVEC were
costimulated with IL-1 + IL-4 for 24 h and treated with
sialidases for the last 90 min, and the adhesion of Ramos cells to
HUVEC was compared under flow conditions (Fig. 4
C). Removal
of
2,3-linked sialic acids by sialidase L treatment of IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC did not show any increase in Ramos cell
adhesion, whereas treatment with sialidase from A.
ureafaciens markedly increased the adhesion. These results suggest
that
2,6-linked sialic acid is required for the inhibition of
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion by IL-1 and IL-4.
|
2,6-sialyltransferase in HUVEC by
adenovirus vector
To investigate whether overexpression of ST6N in HUVEC inhibits
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion, ST6N cDNA was introduced into HUVEC by means
of a recombinant adenovirus vector. To confirm the expression of ST6N
mRNA by the virus, HUVEC were incubated with increasing concentrations
of Ad26st for 24 h, and Northern blot analysis was performed. The
transcript length of ST6N expressed by Ad26st was 2.7 kb and was
expressed at high levels at multiplicity of infection (MOI)
100
infectious units (Fig. 5
A).
Wild-type ST6N mRNA, which has a longer untranslated region and is
4.2 kb, was not evident because of the very short exposure time of
the x-ray film (4 h).
|
2,6-linked sialic acids and
ST6N, it is difficult to distinguish the expression of ST6N induced by
gene transfer from that of wild type in each cell. Therefore, instead
of ST6N, we examined the expression of ß-galactosidase after the
cells were transduced with increasing concentrations of recombinant Ad5
carrying ß-galactosidase cDNA for 24 h. Expression was confirmed
by visual inspection of infected monolayers after exposure to X-Gal. In
this study, 100% of cells expressed the transgene following infection
at an MOI of 100 (data not shown).
To determine whether transfection of the adenovirus vector itself may
induce expression of cell adhesion molecules, Northern blot analysis of
VCAM-1 mRNA was performed (Fig. 5
B). Although VCAM-1 mRNA
was up-regulated by the virus at concentrations >500 MOI, the level of
mRNA expression was not different from controls at concentrations <250
MOI (see Fig. 5
B). Based on these results, we selected an
MOI of 100 for use in subsequent experiments, similar to that
previously published for HUVEC (48).
Effects of overexpression of human
2,6-sialyltransferase in
HUVEC on Ramos cell adhesion under flow conditions
To examine the effects of overexpression of ST6N on
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion, adhesion of Ramos cells to HUVEC stimulated
with cytokines in association with overexpression of ST6N was studied
under flow conditions. In HUVEC stimulated with either IL-1 or IL-4
alone for 24 h, overexpression of ST6N did not have a significant
effect on Ramos cell adhesion (Fig. 6
A). Although the adhesion of
Ramos cells to IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC was significantly
inhibited compared with IL-1 stimulation alone, the inhibition was not
complete and VCAM-1-dependent adhesion was still observed (see Fig. 3
)
(8). However, overexpression of ST6N in IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC led to further inhibition of Ramos cell
adhesion, and adhesion was nearly eliminated (Fig. 6
, B and
C), whereas transduction of HUVEC with Adgal at the same MOI
had no effect (Fig. 6
B). This inhibition was reversed by
removing sialic acids from HUVEC (see Fig. 6
, B and
C), and the adhesion was completely VCAM-1 dependent (see
Fig. 6
, B and C).
|
We wished to determine whether VCAM-1 induced by IL-1, IL-4, and
IL-1 + IL-4 is decorated by
2,6-linked sialic acids and whether
overexpression of ST6N up-regulates the levels of
2,6-linked sialic
acids on VCAM-1. VCAM-1 molecules immunoprecipitated from HUVEC
stimulated with IL-1 and IL-1 + IL-4 showed two distinct bands in
SDS-PAGE. The lower band and upper band correspond to the precursor and
mature forms of VCAM-1, respectively (Fig. 7
, A and
B) (49). The
amount of VCAM-1 immunoprecipitated from IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated
HUVEC was higher than from IL-1 stimulation alone, as reported
previously (see Fig. 7
B) (8). VCAM-1
immunoprecipitated from HUVEC costimulated with IL-1 + IL-4 was
decorated with
2,6- but not
2,3-linked sialic acids (see Fig. 7
A), and
2,6-linked sialic acids were also detected on
VCAM-1 molecules induced by IL-1 (see Fig. 7
B). However,
overexpression of ST6N did not increase the levels of
2,6-linked
sialic acids on VCAM-1 induced by either IL-1 or IL-1 + IL-4 (see
Fig. 7
B).
|
Because the level of
2,6-linked sialic acid on VCAM-1 was
unchanged despite the overexpression of
2,6-sialyltransferase mRNA
by adenovirus vector, we examined whether the increased
2,6-sialytransferase mRNA resulted in an increased level of
2,6-linked acid on other proteins. Detergent lysates of HUVEC
stimulated with IL-1 + IL-4 had numerous proteins that were
detected by SNA lectin (Fig. 8
). Although
we did not see any difference in
2,6-linked sialic acids on VCAM-1,
we did see an increase of
2,6-linked sialic acids on some other
proteins, which are larger than 90 kDa, following overexpression of
ST6N in IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC (see Fig. 8
). This finding
suggests that transduction of HUVEC with Ad26st not only increased ST6N
mRNA but also increased enzyme activity, which resulted in an increase
in
2,6-linked sialic acids on at least several proteins.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4 integrins and VCAM-1, in a ligand and
receptor-specific manner (1). Adhesion of leukocytes can
be regulated by the levels of expression and activation state of cell
adhesion molecules (1). In this study, we have
demonstrated a novel regulatory mechanism of leukocyte adhesion to
endothelial cells distinct from the above mechanisms. This inducible
mechanism on endothelial cells negatively regulates leukocyte adhesion
under flow conditions. For the following reasons, we concluded that at
least part of this mechanism is attributable to
2,6-linked sialic
acids that are associated with a molecule(s) inducible by costimulation
of HUVEC with IL-1 + IL-4: 1) removing both
2,3- and
2,6-linked sialic acids increased VCAM-1-dependent adhesion in
IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC but not IL-1-stimulated HUVEC; 2)
removing
2,3-linked sialic acid without removing
2,6-linked
sialic acid from IL-1 and IL-4-costimulated HUVEC did not affect
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion; 3)
2,6-sialyltransferase was highly
up-regulated in IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC, whereas
2,3-sialyltransferase was not regulated by the cytokines; and 4)
overexpression of
2,6-sialyltransferase inhibited VCAM-1-dependent
adhesion in IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC but not IL-1-stimulated
HUVEC.
Although our results and others suggest that
2,6-linked sialic acids
are common among glycoproteins expressed by HUVEC (22),
little is known about their function. A great deal of evidence suggests
that sialic acids support cell adhesion (18). Sialic acids
and their related structures bind to numerous microbial lectins that
support adhesion of microorganisms to their hosts (18).
Selectins and sialoadhesin family molecules mediate cell-cell adhesion
by binding to sialic acids and their related structures in a ligand and
receptor-specific manner (18). Several reports indicate
that
2,6-linked sialic acids may serve as a ligand for CD22, which
is expressed by mature B cells to support adhesion of these lymphocytes
(50, 51, 52). A recent study in ST6N-deficient mice suggests
that ST6N is essential in immune responses of B cells
(53). Ramos cells are a B cell line that is reported to
express CD22, although unlike mature B cells, most of the CD22 in Ramos
cells is present in the cytoplasm instead of on the cell surface
(54). However, our previous report and the current study
clearly indicate that the adhesion of Ramos cells to
cytokine-stimulated HUVEC under both static and flow conditions is
dependent exclusively on
4 integrins and VCAM-1
(8). There is no evidence that Ramos cells adhere to HUVEC
in a CD22 and
2,6-linked sialic acid-dependent manner in our system,
and in fact, overexpression of ST6N in HUVEC led to reduced Ramos cell
adhesion to costimulated HUVEC.
A few reports suggest that sialic acids may inhibit intercellular interactions as well. For instance, the rosette formation of T cells with erythrocytes can be enhanced by removing sialic acids from T cells (19). The mucin-like molecule CD43 inhibits ß2 integrin-dependent adhesion of T cells to ICAM-1, and this inhibitory effect is in part attributable to sialic acids (21). Polysialic acid, a diverse polymer of sialic acids attached to neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAM), negatively regulates NCAM-dependent cell adhesion (20).
In eukaryotic cells, sialic acids are attached to terminal galactose or
N-acetylgalactosamine with
2,3- or
2,6-linkages
(55). Transfer of sialic acids and formation of these
linkages are catalyzed by a family of sialyltransferases
(55). Sialyltransferases transfer CMP-sialic acids to
acceptor substrates, namely galactose and
N-acetylgalactosamine, on carbohydrate chains that
are attached to glycoproteins and glycolipids (55). So
far, a number of sialyltransferases have been identified, which differ
in specificities for acceptor substrates and linkages they
create (55). In N-linked
glycoproteins, sialic acids are attached to Galß1-4GlcNAc
or Galß1-3GlcNAc with
2,6 and
2,3 linkages (55).
In humans, ST6N (31, 45, 46), ST3N (25), and
ST3ON (27) have been identified. ST6N creates
2,6
linkages to Galß1-4GlcNAc, whereas ST3N and ST3ON create
2,3
linkages to Galß1-4GlcNAc in N-linked glycoproteins. ST3N
also uses Galß1-3GlcNAc as an acceptor substrate. In
O-linked glycoproteins, sialic acids are attached to
Galß1-3GalNAc and GalNAc. In humans, ST3O (26) and ST3ON
(27) have been identified. Both ST3O and ST3ON catalyze
the formation of
2,3 linkages to Galß1-3GalNAc. Although GalNAc
2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6O), which creates
2,6 linkages to
GalNAc, has been cloned in rats (56), to our knowledge the
human counterpart of this enzyme has not yet been identified.
Hanasaki et al. (22, 23) reported that the activity and
mRNA levels of ST6N, which creates
2,6 linkages of sialic acids to
N-linked and possibly O-linked glycoproteins, are
up-regulated in HUVEC by IL-1, TNF, and IL-4. We found that either IL-1
or IL-4 up-regulates ST6N mRNA in HUVEC, and the combination of the two
cytokines further enhances the expression of ST6N. Western blot
analysis of whole cell lysates using MAA lectin (data not shown) and
the binding of MAA lectin (see Fig. 2
B) to the surfaces
suggested that there are glycoproteins in HUVEC that are decorated with
2,3-linked sialic acids. Therefore, we sought to identify the
enzyme(s) responsible for the formation of
2,3 linkages to
glycoproteins in HUVEC. The only transcript identified by PCR was
ST3ON, which uses both N- and O-linked
glycoproteins as acceptor substrates (27). In contrast to
ST6N, ST3ON mRNA was constitutively expressed in HUVEC and was not
regulated by the cytokines we tested.
Sialidase isolated from A. ureafaciens cleaves all three
linkages of sialic acids from carbohydrate chains (32).
Removal of sialic acids from IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC by
sialidase increased VCAM-1-dependent adhesion under flow conditions,
whereas the same treatment of IL-1-stimulated HUVEC did not. Although
the level of ST6N in costimulated HUVEC was extremely high compared
with IL-1 stimulation alone, the levels of total
2,6-linked sialic
acids on the cell surfaces were similar. Therefore, the inhibitory
effect of sialic acids on VCAM-1-dependent adhesion under flow
conditions does not appear to be related solely to the total amount of
sialic acids on the cell surfaces. In contrast with sialidase from
A. ureafaciens, sialidase L cleaves
2,3-linked sialic
acid without changing the level of
2,6-linked sialic acid, and
removing
2,3-linked sialic acid alone from IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC by using this enzyme did not increase
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion. Therefore,
2,6-linked sialic acid is
required for the inhibition of VCAM-1-dependent adhesion by IL-1 +
IL-4 costimulation. To examine further whether increased expression of
ST6N might be mechanistically related to the inhibition of
VCAM-1-dependent adhesion, we overexpressed ST6N in HUVEC. We chose
adenovirus-mediated gene transfer for the following reasons: 1) because
HUVEC are primary cultured cells, stably transfected HUVEC cannot be
established unless cells are transformed to become immortal; and 2)
transient gene transfer by conventional methods is not efficient enough
to determine the effect in a flow adhesion assay. Overexpression of
ST6N inhibited Ramos cell adhesion only when ST6N was overexpressed in
HUVEC costimulated with IL-1 + IL-4. These results suggest that to
exhibit the inhibitory effect,
2,6-linked sialic acids must be
associated with a molecule(s) that is inducible by IL-1 + IL-4 but
not IL-1 alone.
VCAM-1 has seven potential N-linked glycosylation sites
(57), and
30% of the molecular weight of VCAM-1
expressed in HUVEC is attributed to N-linked carbohydrates
(49). Our previous report demonstrated that VCAM-1
immunoprecipitated from HUVEC after stimulation with IL-1, IL-4, or
IL-1 + IL-4 migrated similarly in SDS-PAGE (8). This
result suggests that there is no marked difference in glycosylation
among these VCAM-1 molecules, although the possibility of minor
modification of carbohydrate chains could not be excluded. Because ST6N
mRNA in IL-1 + IL-4-costimulated HUVEC was highly up-regulated and
VCAM-1 molecules were decorated with
2,6-linked sialic acids, we
examined the hypothesis that costimulation of HUVEC with IL-1 +
IL-4 increases
2,6-linked sialic acids on VCAM-1, which hampers the
ability of VCAM-1 to interact with
4 integrins under
flow conditions. This hypothesis was not supported by the experimental
results, because overexpression of ST6N in IL-1 +
IL-4-costimulated HUVEC 1) did not increase
2,6-linked sialic acids
on VCAM-1; 2) did reduce adhesion of Ramos cells to HUVEC; and 3) led
to increased
2,6-linked sialic acids on other proteins. These
results suggest that the inhibitory effect of
2,6-linked sialic acid
may be due to the expression of
2,6-linked sialic acids on some
other molecule(s) that remains to be identified.
There are reports that certain cell surface molecules are able to inhibit cell adhesion; the molecules that have so far been identified are mucins such as leukosialin (CD43) on T cells (21), episialin and epiglycanin on epithelial cells (58, 59), and polysialic acids, which are attached to NCAM on neuronal cells (20). These molecules have two features in common: 1) they are all very large, and 2) they have a high sialic acid content. One of the proposed mechanisms for sialic acid inhibition of cell adhesion is the negative charge, which generates repulsive forces (18). However, a negative charge per se does not explain the anti-adhesive effect in our experiments, because neither removing sialic acids from IL-1-stimulated HUVEC nor overexpressing them on IL-1-stimulated HUVEC had a significant effect on adhesion. In addition, most negative charges on endothelial cells are attributable to glycosaminoglycans rather than sialic acids (60). Because it is reported that the anti-adhesive effect of the mucins can be abrogated by capping these molecules with Abs (58, 59), spatial relationships between adhesion and anti-adhesion molecules appear to be critical in their anti-adhesive effects.
In summary,
2,6-linked sialic acids play an important role in the
anti-adhesive mechanism by which costimulation of HUVEC with IL-1
+ IL-4 negatively regulates leukocyte adhesion under flow conditions.
We propose a novel inducible mechanism by which
2,6-linked sialic
acids associated with an endothelial cell molecule(s) negatively
regulates leukocyte adhesion under flow conditions. Identification of
this molecule would provide new insight into the understanding of the
regulation of leukocyte and endothelial cell interactions by
cytokines.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Christie M. Ballantyne, Baylor College of Medicine, 6565 Fannin, M.S. A-601, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail address: ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ST6N, Galß1-4GlcNAc
2,6-sialyltransferase; Ad26st, adenovirus carrying ST6N cDNA; Ad5, type 5 adenovirus; Adgal, adenovirus carrying ß-galactosidase cDNA; D-PBS, Dulbeccos PBS; MAA, Maackia amurensis agglutinin; MOI, multiplicity of infection; NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecules; SNA, Sambucus nigra agglutinin; ST3N, Galß1-3(4)GlcNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase; ST3O, Galß1-3GalNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase; ST3ON, Galß1-4GlcNAc/Galß1-3GalNAc
2,3-sialyltransferase; X-Gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ß-D-galactoside. ![]()
Received for publication February 11, 1999. Accepted for publication June 14, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4 integrin-dependent adhesion under static and flow conditions are differentially regulated. J. Immunol. 157:5061.[Abstract]
4 integrin counter-receptor on stimulated endothelium. J. Exp. Med. 175:1433.
4 ß1). J. Cell Biol. 124:601.
. J. Immunol. 145:865.[Abstract]
to selectively enhance endothelial cell adhesiveness for T cells: the contribution of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-dependent and -independent binding mechanisms. J. Immunol. 146:592.[Abstract]
-2,6-sialyltransferase in human endothelial cells mediates
2,6-sialylation of adhesion molecules and CD22 ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 269:10637.
2-6-sialylation of cellular glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 270:7533.
2,3-sialyltransferase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194:375.[Medline]
2,3-sialyltransferase that sialylates glycoprotein and glycolipid carbohydrate groups. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1394.
2
3Gal-specific sialidase. J. Biol. Chem. 269:18821.
2-6)Gal/GalNAc sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 262:1596.
-2,6-sialyltransferase. Nucleic Aci