The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 163: 2443-2451.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Cytokine Deprivation of Naive CD8+ T Cells Promotes Minimal Cell Cycling but Maximal Cytokine Synthesis and Autonomous Proliferation Subsequently: A Mechanism of Self-Regulation1

Subash Sad2,*,{dagger} and Lakshmi Krishnan*

* Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and {dagger} Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Naive CD8+ T cells differentiate into effectors secreting various cytokines that aid their function. IL-2, but not IL-15, promoted this differentiation of naive CD8+ T cells into effectors. However, the amount of IL-2 present during differentiation had a dichotomous effect on their subsequent function. High concentrations of IL-2 enhanced proliferation and cell cycling initially, but the effectors subsequently failed to produce cytokines and proliferate autonomously, although CD28 expression was maintained. In contrast, suboptimal amounts of IL-2 during priming promoted apoptosis, little proliferation and cell cycling, yet the CD8+ effectors generated produced high levels of cytokines and proliferated autonomously. Interestingly, the effects of IL-2 on naive CD8+ T cells were totally opposite those on naive CD4+ T cells. Although IL-2 impaired cytokine synthesis by CD8+ T cells, the expression of LFA1 and CD44 as well as Fas-dependent cytotoxicity were enhanced. However, loss of cytokine synthesis was not due to increased cytotoxicity, as inhibition occurred even in the absence of perforin/FasL. Interestingly, CD8+ effectors secreting reduced amounts of cytokines exhibited enhanced IL-2R{alpha}, but reduced IL-2Rß, expression. Furthermore, sorted CD8+ IL-2R{alpha}high cells secreted less cytokines than IL-2R{alpha}low cells. These results suggest that the presence of excessive IL-2 during the activation of naive CD8+ T cells, while promoting cell cycling initially, may compromise long-term immunity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Interaction of T cells with antigenic peptides on the surface of the APC results in a series of events culminating in T cell activation. This is augmented by signals from non-Ag-specific costimulatory molecules (e.g., B7-CD28), resulting in T cell cytokine production and clonal expansion (1). Subsequent to activation, T cells segregate into dichotomous subsets (Th1/Th2 and Tc1/Tc2), synthesizing cytokines that aid their effector functions (2, 3). In contrast to CD4+ T cells, which promote B cell help and inflammatory responses, the principal function of CD8+ T cells is to kill infected targets (4). CD8+ effectors primarily kill targets by the perforin/granule exocytosis (5) and to a limited extent by Fas pathway (6). In addition to their direct cytolytic activity toward the infected target cells, effector CD8+ T cells produce cytokines (IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, TNF, and lymphotoxin) that aid their functions and activate cytotoxic functions in macrophages (7).

Cytokine production by effector T cells is regulated both positively and negatively at multiple levels during the development of an immune response. IL-10 inhibits the cytokine secretion of Th1 cells (8), whereas IFN-{gamma} inhibits the proliferation of Th2 cells (9). Similarly, IL-4 inhibits cytokine synthesis of CD8+ Tc1 cells and abrogates their ability to proliferate and curtail tumor cell proliferation (10). Besides cytokines, costimulatory molecules on the surface of APC also modulate cytokine production by T cells. Stimulation of CD4+ Th1 or CD8+ Tc1 cells in the absence of costimulators (e.g., with fixed APC) induces a state of anergy that is characterized by reduced cytokine synthesis and reduced proliferation (11, 12). Rapid killing of APC by the perforin- as well as the Fas-dependent pathway also curtails cytokine production by CD8+ T cells (13).

IL-2 is produced by T lymphocytes in response to an antigenic stimulation and is a central regulator of the immune response (14). Although IL-2 has been shown to act as a strong growth factor for T cells, it also renders activated T cells susceptible to activation-induced cell death (15). Effector CD4+ T cells cultured with high doses of IL-2 express reduced amounts of cytokines and have decreased inositol phosphate and diacylglycerol levels and impaired calcium-dependent signaling (16, 17). In the present study we present an interesting paradox between the levels of IL-2 in primary culture of naive T cells (CD8+), and subsequent functions of effectors. Although IL-2 deprivation caused apoptosis and little proliferation initially, the effectors generated under these conditions possessed optimal functions.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Female C57BL/6 mice, 6–8 wk old, were obtained form Charles River Canada (St. Constant, Canada). C57BL/6-perforin-/-, C3H/HeJ-Fas ligand-/- (FasL-/-),3 and their controls were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were maintained in the animal facility of the Institute for Biological Sciences (National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada) in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Cell lines

The mouse B cell line M12.4.1, expressing both class I and class II MHC proteins (H-2d), was obtained from Dr. L. Glimcher (Department of Cancer Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). The J774A.1 (mouse macrophage cell line expressing H-2d) cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). L1210 cells (H-2d) and L1210 cells transfected with Fas (L1210Fas, H-2d) were provided by Dr. Chris Bleackley (Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada). Cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) plus 8% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT).

T cell purification

C57BL/6 CD8+ T cells were enriched by removal of B cells, CD4+ T cells, and macrophages on mouse CD8 T cell columns (Cytovax, Edmonton, Canada) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, splenocytes (100 x 106) were incubated with a rat anti-mouse CD4 Ab, loaded onto glass bead columns coated with sheep anti-rat Ig and sheep anti-mouse Ig, and eluted. Cells that passed through the column were 80–90% CD8+ as determined by flow cytometric analysis (EPICS XL, Coulter, Hialeah, FL). CD8+, CD44low (naive) T cells were further purified (>99%) by sorting on a cell sorter (EPICS Elite ESP; Coulter) after staining the cells with PE-labeled rat anti-mouse Ly2 (YTS 169.4) and FITC-labeled rat anti-mouse CD44 (Pgp-1, IM7.8.1) obtained from Cedarlane (Hornby, Canada).

For purification of CD4+ T cells, C57BL/6 splenocytes were incubated with a rat anti-mouse CD8 Ab (YTS 169.4) and processed using Cytovax columns as described above. CD4+, CD44low T cells were further purified ( >99%) by sorting as described above for CD8+ T cells. Cells were stained with PE-labeled rat anti-mouse CD4 (YTS 191.1, Cedarlane Laboratories) and FITC-labeled rat anti-mouse CD44.

Cell cultures

C57BL/6 T cells (H-2b, 1 x 103/well) were cultured with irradiated J774A.1 or M12.4.1 cells (H-2d, 1 x 104/well) in 96-well flat-bottom plates. Cells were cultured in 200 µl of RPMI plus 8% FBS in the presence of IL-12 (1 ng/ml), anti-IL-4 Ab (50 µg/ml), and various concentrations of IL-2 or IL-15. Medium was changed every third day. This stimulation resulted in differentiation and proliferation of effector T cells that remained >99% pure throughout the length of the culture. Between days 7–9 the effectors generated were harvested, washed, counted, and analyzed in various functional assays (in the absence of any cytokines) as described.

Cytokines, Abs, and reagents

Cytokines were obtained from ID Laboratories (London, Canada). Anti-IL-4 Ab was purified on a protein G column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) from the supernatants of the 11B11 cell line (18). Con A, PMA, and calcium ionophore (A23187) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Tritiated thymidine (6.7 Ci/mmol) was obtained from ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, CA). Sodium chromate (51Cr; 250–500 mCi/mg) was obtained from Amersham (Oakville, Canada), Propidium iodide was obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), and RNase was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Laval, Canada). Lympholyte M was obtained from Cedarlane.

Purified anti-mouse CD32/CD16 (Fc{gamma}II/III receptor, 2.4G2 Fc block), biotin-labeled anti-mouse NK1.1 (PK136), biotin-labeled anti-mouse CD28 (37.51), FITC-labeled anti-mouse IL-2R{alpha} (7D4), and anti-mouse IL-2Rß (TM-ß1) were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). FITC-labeled streptavidin and anti-mouse LFA1 (CD11a, 121/7) were obtained from Cedarlane.

Cytokine assays

For cytokine synthesis, effector T cells (H-2b) were washed, layered on Lympholyte M to remove dead cells, and stimulated (1 x 105/well) with varying numbers of either irradiated allogeneic J774A.1 (H-2d) or M12.4.1 (H-2d) cells or with various amounts of Con A, plate-bound anti-CD3 Abs, or PMA and A23187. Stimulation was conducted in 96-well round-bottom plates in 200 µl of RPMI plus 8% FBS. The cytokines produced were measured in 18-h supernatants as described previously (19, 20).

Thymidine incorporation assays

Allo-specific T cells (H-2b anti-H-2d) were cultured with irradiated J774A.1 macrophage cells (H-2d) in 96-well round-bottom plates in 200 µl of RPMI plus 8% FBS in the presence or the absence of various cytokines. After 24 or 72 h, 1 µCi of tritiated thymidine was added per well. Cells were harvested 18 h after the thymidine pulse, and radioactive incorporation was determined by liquid scintillation counting.

Cytotoxicity assays

T cells were generated as described above and were used as effectors after 7–8 days of culture. M12.4.1, L1210, and L1210Fas target cells (107) were labeled with 51Cr (100 µCi) in 50 µl of RPMI plus 8% FBS medium for 45 min. Targets were washed, various ratios of effectors and targets were cocultured for 4 h in 96-well round-bottom tissue culture plates, the supernatants were collected, and radioactivity was detected by gamma counting. The percent cytotoxicity was calculated using the formula: 100 x [(cpm experimental - cpm spontaneous)/(cpm total - cpm spontaneous)].

Flow cytometric analysis

T cells were incubated on ice (106 cells in 50 µl of RPMI 1640 plus 1% FBS) with rat anti-mouse CD32/CD16 (Fc{gamma}II/III receptor). After 30 min aliquots were washed and incubated separately in 50 µl of RPMI plus 1% FBS with the following Abs: anti-mouse CD4, CD8, LFA1, IL-2R{alpha}, CD44, NK1.1, and CD28. Incubation lasted for 30 min on ice. Cells stained with biotinylated Abs were subsequently incubated with streptavidin-FITC after thorough washing. Cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde in PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry.

For cell cycle analysis, cells were stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD8 Ab for 30 min on ice in 50 µl of RPMI plus 1% FBS. Cells were washed and fixed in 70% ethanol overnight. Cells were stained with the propidium iodide in the presence of RNase A (100 U/ml) and analyzed by flow cytometry. DNA content histograms gated on CD8+ T cells were obtained using EXPO software (Coulter). The percentage of cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle was calculated.

The number of apoptotic cells was enumerated using the procedure described by Telford et al. (21). Cells were processed and acquired on the flow cytometer as described above for cell cycle analysis. The apoptotic fraction was measured by gating on CD8+ T cells and by the subdiploid population staining in the region below the large G0/G1 peak.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IL-2, but not IL-15, is required for the differentiation of naive CD8+ T cells into effectors

CD8+ CD44low T cells (1 x 103/well; >99% pure) were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic J774A.1 cells (1 x 104/well). In this differentiation culture the generation of effector CD8+ T cells can be appreciated between days 4–5, depending on the presence of cytokines in the culture. In the absence of exogenous IL-2 no detectable T cell proliferation occurred (Fig. 1Goa). This may be attributable to naive CD8+ T cells (as opposed to naive CD4+ T cells) producing minute amounts of cytokines (S. Sad, unpublished observations), not sufficient to drive their differentiation. Addition of increasing amounts of exogenous IL-2 resulted in a corresponding increase in CD8+ T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. However, IL-15, even at 10 ng/ml, failed to induce significant proliferation.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Differential effects of IL-2 vs IL-15 on naive and effector CD8+ T cells. C57BL/6 CD8+ CD44lo T cells (H-2b; 1 x 103/well) were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic J774A.1 cells (H-2d; 1 x 104/well) in the presence of IL-12, anti-IL-4, and various concentrations of IL-2 and IL-15. a, Proliferation was measured on day 5 by liquid scintillation. A parallel culture of effector cells that was derived in the presence of IL-12, anti-IL-4, and 1 ng/ml IL-2 was continued until day 7. The effector cells generated were then washed and restimulated (1 x 104/well) with irradiated allogeneic J774A.1 cells (5 x 104/well) in the absence or the presence of increasing concentrations of IL-2 or IL-15. b, Proliferation was measured at 72 h poststimulation by liquid scintillation. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
We also compared the proliferative responses of effector CD8+ T cells to IL-2 and IL-15. Effector CD8+ T cells (H-2b) were generated after stimulation with allogeneic J774A.1 cells (H-2d) in the presence of 1 ng/ml IL-2. On day 7, effectors generated were washed and restimulated with irradiated J774A.1 cells in the absence or the presence of increasing amounts of IL-2 or IL-15. Proliferation was assessed at 72 h by measuring the incorporation of tritiated thymidine. Fig. 1Gob indicates that at lower cytokine concentrations effector CD8+ T cells proliferate more strongly in response to IL-15 than to IL-2. At a cytokine concentration of 1 ng/ml, IL-2 induced 3,171 cpm, whereas IL-15 induced 24,439 cpm. However, we observed consistently that CD8+ T cell proliferation in response to IL-15 saturated around a concentration of 1 ng/ml, whereas IL-2 continued to induce proliferation even at higher cytokine levels. These results indicate that naive and effector CD8+ T cells respond differentially to IL-2 and IL-15.

IL-2-induced proliferation of CD8+ T cells impairs their subsequent cytokine synthesis ability

As experiments in Fig. 1Go clearly suggested that IL-2 plays a pivotal role in the differentiation of naive CD8+ T cells, we evaluated the optimal amounts of IL-2 required. C57BL/6 CD44low CD8+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic M12.4.1 cells (H-2d) as described in Fig. 1Go. On day 6 effector cells were harvested, washed, and analyzed directly for cell cycle and the number of apoptotic cells. Fig. 2Goa clearly indicates that addition of increasing concentrations of IL-2 enhanced the frequency of cells going into the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. On the other hand, Fig. 2Gob shows that low IL-2 concentrations (0.1 ng/ml) induced maximal apoptosis, with the number of apoptotic cells declining at IL-2 concentrations of 1 and 10 ng/ml. These results were further corroborated using the antiapoptotic cytokine, IL-15. Addition of IL-15 to CD8+ T cell cultures differentiating in the presence of 0.1 ng/ml IL-2 increased T cell yield by about 5-fold. However, IL-15 had no effect on T cell yield when 1 or 10 ng/ml IL-2 was used during the differentiation of CD8+ T cells (data not shown). Thus, the cell cycle and apoptosis data taken together indicate that low amounts of IL-2 promote apoptosis, as opposed to cell cycling, in the primary culture.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Low IL-2 concentrations favor apoptosis as opposed to cell cycling. C57BL/6 CD44low CD8+ T cells (H-2b; 1 x 103/well) were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic M12.4.1 cells (H-2d; 1 x 104/well) in the presence of IL-12, anti-IL-4, and various concentrations of IL-2. On day 6, effectors were washed, stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 Ab, fixed overnight with 70% ethanol, and subsequently stained with propidium iodide in the presence of RNase. Cell cycle analysis (a) and enumeration of the number of apoptotic cells (b) were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Values represent percentages deduced from 20,000 events acquired using a flow cytometer.

 
We then addressed the question of whether the IL-2-induced increase in proliferation also manifests in increased cytokine synthesis by the effectors generated. C57BL/6 CD44low CD8+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic M12.4.1 cells (H-2d) as described in Fig. 1Go. After 7 days the numbers of effector cells generated (>99% pure) were evaluated using a hemocytometer. Fig. 3Goa shows that the presence of increasing amounts of IL-2 enhanced the development of effectors. To evaluate the effects on cytokine synthesis, we washed the effectors, removed dead cells on Lympholyte M, and restimulated them (1 x 105/well) with Con A (5 µg/ml) for 18 h. Cytokine synthesis by CD8+ T cells in the secondary culture inversely correlated with their proliferation in the primary culture. CD8+ T cells produced maximal amounts of IL-2 in the secondary culture when they were cultured with very low levels of IL-2 in the primary culture. On the other hand, CD8+ effectors generated in the presence of high IL-2 concentrations in the primary culture produced low cytokine levels subsequently (Fig. 3Gob). Addition of IL-15 (10 ng/ml) to these cultures did not restore their cytokine synthesis defect (data not shown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. IL-2 enhances proliferation, but inhibits subsequent cytokine synthesis, by CD8+ T cells. C57BL/6 CD44low CD8+ T cells (H-2b; 1 x 103/well) were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic M12.4.1 cells (H-2d; 1 x 104/well) in the presence of IL-12, anti-IL-4, and various concentrations of IL-2. a, The number of effector cells generated on day 7 was calculated with a hemocytometer. b, For cytokine synthesis ability, effectors were layered on Lympholyte M to remove dead cells, and live cells were washed and restimulated (1 x 105/well) with 5 µg/ml Con A. Supernatants were collected after 18 h, and cytokines were measured by ELISA. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
IL-2 enhances both the proliferation as well as the subsequent cytokine synthesis of CD4+ T cells

We then addressed whether naive (CD44low) CD4+ T cells were also susceptible to the inhibitory effects of IL-2. C57BL/6 CD44low CD4+ T cells were stimulated with allogeneic M12.4.1 cells (H-2d) in the presence of anti-IL-4, IL-12 and various amounts of IL-2. After 7 days, the number of effectors generated was counted (Fig. 4Goa), and they were restimulated with either Con A (Fig. 4Gob) or M12.4.1 cells (Fig. 4Goc) to determine cytokine synthesis. Interestingly, IL-2 stimulated the proliferation of effector CD4+ Th1 cells (Fig. 4Goa) and also enhanced their subsequent ability to produce cytokines (Fig. 4Go, b and c). Thus, IL-2 enhanced the proliferation of both CD4+ and CD8+ effector cells, but it had contrasting effects on their subsequent ability to produce cytokines. Although IL-2 enhanced cytokine synthesis by CD4+ effectors, it inhibited cytokine synthesis by CD8+ effectors.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. IL-2 enhances proliferation as well as subsequent cytokine synthesis by CD4+ T cells. C57BL/6 CD44low CD4+ T cells were stimulated with irradiated allogeneic M12.4.1 in the presence of IL-12, anti-IL-4, and increasing concentrations of IL-2. On day 7 the effectors generated were counted with a hemocytometer (a), washed, and restimulated (1 x 105 cells/well) with either 5 µg/ml Con A (b) or with various numbers of irradiated M12.4.1 APCs (c). Cytokine synthesis was measured in 18-h supernatants. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
Differential restimulatory conditions reveal strong inhibition of CD8+ T cell cytokine synthesis by IL-2

We wanted to establish the extent of inhibition induced by IL-2. To this end, we addressed the possibility that restimulation of CD8+ effectors with potent APC/reagents might restore their cytokine synthesis defect. Allo-specific (H-2b anti-H-2d) effector CD8+ T cells were generated in the presence of various concentrations of IL-2. After their differentiation into effectors, CD8+ T cells were washed and restimulated (1 x 105/well) variably as described in the figure legends. Compared with Con A (Fig. 3Gob), or activated B cell lymphoma (M12.4.1; data not shown), restimulation of CD8+ effectors with an activated allo-macrophage cell line (J774A.1) resulted in quantitatively higher cytokine levels. Although this may be attributable to the potency of J774A.1 cells as APCs (10, 22), even under these potent restimulatory conditions, the pattern of IL-2-induced inhibition of cytokine synthesis continued (Fig. 5Goa). Similarly, restimulation with plate-bound anti-CD3 Abs (Fig. 5Gob) or with PMA plus Ca2+ ionophore (A23187; Fig. 5Goc) did not restore the IL-2-induced loss of cytokine synthesis. Even the use of high amounts of Ca2+ ionophore (10 µg/ml) resulted in only partial restoration of cytokine synthesis (data not shown).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Potent inhibition of CD8+ T cell cytokine synthesis by IL-2. Allo-effector CD8+ T cells (H-2b anti-H-2d) were generated as described in Materials and Methods. For cytokine synthesis, on day 7 effector cells were washed and restimulated (1 x 105 cells/well) with various numbers of activated (irradiated) macrophage cells (J774A.1; a) or with various amounts of plate-bound anti-CD3 Abs (b) or PMA in the presence of 1 µg/ml calcium ionophore, A23187 (c). Supernatants were collected after 18 h, and cytokines were measured by ELISA. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
IL-2 enhances the Fas-dependent cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells

The experiments described above indicated that the cytokine synthesis function of CD8+ T cells is lost due to exposure of cells to high concentrations of IL-2. We then determined the effects on the cytotoxic function of CD8+ T cells. Effector CD8+ T cells (H-2b anti-H-2d) were washed, and their cytolytic activity was measured by incubation with radiolabeled target cells in various proportions for 4 h. CD8+ T cells from normal mice (H-2b) showed a strong cytotoxic activity toward their specific target cells, M12.4.1 (Fig. 6Goa). The absence of such cytotoxic activity in perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells (H-2b) indicates that M12.4.1 target cells are killed by these CD8+ T cells mainly by the perforin-dependent mechanism. The presence of increasing amounts of IL-2 in the primary culture resulted in only a small increase in their ability to kill by the perforin-dependent pathway. We then addressed whether target cell killing by the alternate Fas-dependent pathway was modulated by IL-2. To test the Fas-dependent killing, we used perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells (H-2b). Cytotoxicity was tested on targets that expressed either very low levels of Fas (L1210, H-2d) or high levels of Fas (L1210Fas, H-2d). When L1210 cells were used as targets, Fas-dependent cytotoxicity was minimal as expected. On the other hand, the expression of Fas by the target cells (L1210Fas) rendered them susceptible to killing by the CD8+ T cells. The presence of increasing amounts of IL-2 in the primary culture of naive CD8+ T cells increased their subsequent ability to kill targets by the Fas-dependent mechanism (Fig. 6Gob). Thus, IL-2 has distinctly opposite effects on the two CD8+ T cell functions: enhancement of Fas-dependant cytotoxicity but impairment of cytokine synthesis.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. IL-2 enhances Fas-dependent cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells. Effector CD8+ T cells (H-2b anti-H-2d) derived in various levels of IL-2 were tested for their perforin-dependent (a) or Fas-dependent (b) cytotoxicity 7 days after initiation of culture. To measure perforin-dependent killing, normal or perforin-deficient effector CD8+ T cells were incubated with 51Cr-labeled allogeneic M12.4.1 (H-2d) cells. Fas-dependent killing was measured by testing the cytotoxicity of perforin-deficient effector CD8+ T cells on targets expressing low levels (L1210, H-2d) or high levels (L1210Fas, H-2d) of Fas. Cytotoxicity was tested in a 4-h chromium release assay. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
IL-2 induces inhibition of cytokine synthesis even in the absence of perforin- or Fas-dependent cytotoxicity

We have previously demonstrated that killing of APC by CD8+ T cells results in their reduced cytokine synthesis (13). Thus, IL-2 induced inhibition of cytokine synthesis of CD8+ T cells may be attributable to their increased cytolytic function. To address this question, we stimulated naive CD8+ T cells (normal, perforin-deficient, or FasL-deficient) with allo-APC and increasing concentrations of IL-2 and measured the cytokine synthesis of the effectors generated. Fig. 7Go confirms our previous observation that perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells produce more IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}. However, even in the absence of perforin, IL-2 exposure in primary culture impaired their ability to produce cytokines in the secondary culture. Furthermore, the amounts of IL-2 required to induce inhibition of cytokine synthesis were similar in normal and perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells. This suggests that IL-2-induced inhibition of cytokine synthesis in CD8+ T cells may not be related to perforin-dependent killing. Similar results were obtained with FasL-deficient CD8+ T cells (Fig. 8Go). FasL-deficient CD8+ T cells overall produced more cytokines than normal control cells. This was particularly evident in FasL-deficient CD8+ T cells differentiated in high IL-2 amounts, consistent with the cytotoxicity data presented in Fig. 6Gob. However, both normal and FasL-deficient CD8+ T cells showed similar sensitivity to IL-2-induced inhibition of cytokine synthesis, indicating that the IL-2-induced increase in Fas-dependent killing was not the reason for loss of cytokine synthesis.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Both normal as well as perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells are sensitive to the inhibitory effects of IL-2. Effector CD8+ T cells (H-2b anti-H-2d) from normal or perforin-deficient mice were generated in the presence of increasing concentrations of IL-2. On day 7, cells were washed and restimulated (1 x 105 cells/well) with various numbers of irradiated M12.4.1 cells (H-2d). Supernatants were collected after 18 h, and cytokines were tested by ELISA. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. IL-2 inhibits cytokine synthesis in normal as well as FasL-deficient CD8+ T cells. Effector CD8+ T cells (H-2k anti-H-2d) from normal or FasL-deficient mice were generated in the presence of increasing concentrations of IL-2. To measure cytokine production, cells were harvested on day 7, washed, and restimulated (1 x 105 cells/well) with various numbers of irradiated M12.4.1 cells (H-2d). Supernatants were collected after 18 h, and cytokines were tested by ELISA. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
IL-2 modulates the expression of cell surface molecules in CD8+ T cells

CD8+ T cells that were generated with allo-APC and increasing amounts of IL-2 in the primary culture were analyzed for the expression of various cell surface markers (Fig. 9Go). Throughout the culture period, these cells remained pure without any outgrowth of contaminant populations, and the cells did not acquire NK1.1 expression. The expression of CD28 was not altered, suggesting that costimulatory pathways may not be altered as a result of IL-2 exposure. However, IL-2 increased their expression of LFA1 and CD44 (Fig. 9Goa). To further rule out the possibility that the lack of cytokine synthesis could be due to some other contaminant cells in the culture, we resorted the CD8+ NK1.1- cells on day 7 and measured their cytokine synthesis after Con A stimulation. After resorting of the cells, the cytokine production pattern remained the same. Cells that were precultured with 0.1 ng/ml of IL-2 synthesized 1.24 ng/ml of IL-2 in the secondary culture, whereas cells that were precultured with 10 ng/ml of IL-2 synthesized <0.05 ng/ml of IL-2.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. IL-2 modulates the expression of various cell surface molecules on CD8+ T cells. Eight days after initiation of culture, effector T cells (H-2b anti-H-2d) derived in the presence of various IL-2 concentrations were washed and analyzed for their expression of CD28, LFA1, CD44, and NK1.1 (a); IL-2R {alpha}-chain (b); and IL-2R {alpha}-chain vs IL-2R ß-chain (c). Data from 20,000 events were analyzed.

 
The IL-2-induced increase in the expression of LFA1 and CD44 clearly indicated that the cells were in a highly activated state. This was further confirmed by measuring IL-2R{alpha} expression in these cells (Fig. 9Gob). At low IL-2 concentrations (0.1 ng/ml), only 47.4% CD8+ T cells expressed high levels of IL-2R{alpha}. This expression increased substantially to 99.2% at 10 ng/ml IL-2. On the other hand, CD4+ T cells exhibited substantial IL-2R{alpha}high cells (79.1%) even at low IL-2 concentrations (0.1 ng/ml), resulting in a less dramatic enhancement with increasing IL-2 (Fig. 9Gob). An interesting observation was that IL-2, while enhancing IL-2R{alpha} expression on CD8+ cells in a dose-dependent manner, down-regulated IL-2Rß (Fig. 9Goc).

Thus, IL-2 enhances CD8+ T cell activation as assessed by the expression of surface molecules and cytolytic activity, yet it inhibits IL-2Rß expression and the subsequent ability to produce cytokines.

Sorted IL-2R{alpha}low cells express more cytokines than IL-2R{alpha}high cells

We determined whether the purified IL-2R{alpha}low and IL-2R{alpha}high cells differed in their ability to produce cytokines. Allo-Ag-specific effector CD8+ T cells were derived in the presence of high concentrations (10 ng/ml) of IL-2. Effectors were sorted for IL-2R{alpha}high and IL-2R{alpha}low expression using flow cytometry and were stimulated with Con A for cytokine synthesis. Fig. 10Goa shows that on day 7, the effector CD8+ T cells derived in the presence of high levels of IL-2 were mainly IL-2R{alpha}high. Fig. 10Gob indicates that even among the cells derived in the presence of high IL-2 levels, CD8+ T cells that express low levels of IL-2R {alpha}-chain produce more IL-2 than cells that express high levels of IL-2R {alpha}-chain. This result clearly indicates that the expression of IL-2R{alpha} inversely correlates with the subsequent ability of CD8+ T cells to produce cytokines.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 10. IL-2R {alpha}-chain expression inversely correlates with the subsequent ability of CD8+ T cells to produce IL-2. Allo-specific (H-2b anti-H-2d) CD8+ T cells were generated in the presence of 10 ng/ml IL-2. On day 7 effectors were washed and stained with CD8-PE and anti-IL-2R{alpha}-FITC. a, IL-2R{alpha}low and IL-2R{alpha}high cells were sorted by flow cytometry using the gates indicated. b, Sorted cells were washed, counted, and restimulated (1 x 105 cells/well) with various amounts of Con A. Supernatants were collected after 18 h, and cytokines were tested by ELISA. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
Presence of IL-2 in primary culture impairs proliferation in secondary culture

Subsequent to the differentiation of naive T cells, effector T cells have to proliferate extensively to curtail the proliferation of the pathogens/tumors. Thus, T cells have to continuously produce cytokines to autonomously aid their proliferation and effector functions. We addressed whether the lack of cytokine production in CD8+ T cells as a result of excess IL-2 in preculture, had any effect on their autonomous proliferative ability. CD8+ T cells were generated in the presence of allo-APC and increasing concentrations of IL-2. On day 7 cells were washed and restimulated with allo-APC in the absence of any exogenous growth factors. Proliferation was measured after 24 h. Fig. 11Goa clearly indicates that the presence of high IL-2 in primary culture induced a proliferative defect in CD8+ T cells in the secondary culture, whereas exposure to lesser amounts of IL-2 resulted in stronger autonomous proliferation. Similar results were obtained at 72 h after culture (data not shown).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 11. IL-2 impairs autonomous as well as cytokine-dependent proliferation of CD8+ T cells. Allospecific (H-2b anti-H-2d) CD8+ T cells were generated in the presence of various concentrations of IL-2. a, To measure autonomous Ag-dependent proliferation, effector cells (day 7) were restimulated (1 x 104/well) with irradiated allogeneic J774A.1 cells (5 x 104/well) in the absence of any exogenous cytokines. Proliferation was measured at 24 h poststimulation. To measure apoptosis after restimulation, live effector cells (day 7) were stimulated with allo-APC as described above. b, At 24 h cells were harvested, and the number of apoptotic cells was enumerated as described in Materials and Methods. Values represent percentages deduced from 20,000 events acquired using a flow cytometer. Cytokine-dependent proliferation of effector cells was measured after restimulation with allo-APC in the presence of various concentrations of IL-2 (c) or IL-15 (d). Proliferation was measured at 72 h after stimulation. The mean ± SD of triplicate cultures are shown.

 
We also tested whether the IL-2-induced loss of cytokine synthesis in CD8+ T cells was due to apoptosis of effector cells in the secondary culture. CD8+ effectors derived in the presence of varying amounts of IL-2 were washed, and dead cells were removed by layering over Lympholyte M. Cells were restimulated with allo-APC for 24 h and tested for the number of apoptotic cells. In the secondary culture also, effectors derived with low (0.1 ng/ml) levels of IL-2 (in the primary culture) had higher numbers of apoptotic cells than effectors generated in higher amounts of IL-2 (1 and 10 ng/ml; Fig. 11Gob).

To determine whether the effectors derived in high levels of IL-2 maintained their proliferation in response to exogenous cytokines, we measured the proliferation of CD8+ effectors in response to allo-APC and increasing concentrations of IL-2 or IL-15 in secondary culture (Fig. 11Go, c and d). CD8+ effectors generated in high concentrations of IL-2 retained their proliferative ability to exogenous cytokines in vitro, although at a reduced level.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The production of cytokines (IL-2, IFN-{gamma}, TNF, and lymphotoxin) by CD8+ T cells correlates with their cytotoxic function. For an effective CD8+ T cell response, in addition to killing infected cells CD8+ T cells must proliferate sufficiently through the duration of infection to overpower the pathogen. IL-2 drives the autonomous proliferation of CD8+ T cells (23, 24). At the same time, the presence of IL-2 is required to promote T cell differentiation. We, therefore, analyzed the consequences of differential IL-2 levels during the priming of naive CD8+ T cells.

Previously, it has been shown that mature effector CD4+ T cell clones lose their ability to produce cytokines upon preculture with high levels of IL-2 (16). This abrogation of cytokine production was associated with decreased inositol phosphate and diacylglycerol production and impaired calcium-dependent signaling (16, 17). Our observations are different from these studies, as we have addressed the effects of IL-2 during the priming of naive CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, our studies highlight the finding that IL-2 differentially affects naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells; increasing IL-2 inhibits cytokine synthesis by CD8+ cells, whereas it enhances cytokine production by CD4+ cells.

Because cytokine production modulates T cell effector functions, we addressed the consequences of impaired cytokine synthesis by CD8+ T cells. We observed that while IL-2 impairs subsequent cytokine synthesis by CD8+ T cells, it enhances their cytotoxic activity, particularly by the Fas-dependent pathway (Fig. 6Go). Other investigators have also reported that IL-2 enhances Fas-dependent cytotoxicity of T cells (25). Furthermore, we observed that enhancement of cytotoxic function of CD8+ T cells with IL-2 correlates with the increased expression of IL-2R{alpha}, CD44, and LFA1, indicating the activated state of these cells (Fig. 9Go). McKisic et al. (26) have shown that IL-2 inhibits the cytolytic activity and cytokine synthesis of IL-2-producing T cell clones. However, we (20, 27, 28) and others (12, 29) have shown that exogenous cytokines do not impair the cytotoxic function of CD8+ T cells. Effector CD8+ T cells that are treated with IL-4 lose their cytokine synthesis ability, but maintain their short term cytotoxicity (20). Similarly, anergic cells that fail to produce IL-2, remain highly cytolytic (12, 29). Cytokines affect the cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells only over the long term, when T cells have to undergo autonomous proliferation to curtail the proliferation of tumor cells (10).

Rapid killing of APC by effector CD8+ T cells compromises their stimulation and consequent cytokine synthesis (13). As high levels of IL-2 enhanced the cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells, we addressed whether the loss of cytokine synthesis was due to their increased cytotoxicity toward APC. However, FasL-deficient and perforin-deficient CD8+ T cells were equally susceptible to IL-2-induced loss of cytokine synthesis.

IL-2, IL-4, and IL-15 all stimulate CD8+ T cell proliferation. These overlapping activities may be attributed to their sharing multiple components of the receptors used for binding and signal transduction. All three cytokines use the same IL-2R{gamma}c chain, but their receptor {alpha}-chain usage is specific for each cytokine. Furthermore, IL-2 and IL-15 share the usage of IL-2R ß-chain. Interestingly, addition of IL-15 to naive CD8+ cells evoked no T cell proliferation or differentiation (Fig. 1Go). More importantly, IL-15 could not overcome the inhibitory effects of IL-2 (data not shown). This could be partly due to an IL-2-induced reduction in IL-2Rß expression by CD8+ T cells (Fig. 9Goc) and consequent impairment of IL-15 signal transduction. Furthermore, reduced IL-2Rß expression in CD8+ effectors may compromise their long term proliferation and consequent memory development.

One of the differences in the proliferative response of effector CD8+ T cells to IL-2 vs IL-15, is the observation that IL-15-induced proliferation saturates around a concentration of 1 ng/ml, whereas IL-2 continues to induce stronger proliferation even beyond 10 ng/ml. It may be that this unabated proliferation induced by IL-2 renders the cells nonresponsive. Moreover, CD8+ T cells that express higher levels of IL-2R{alpha} produce lesser amounts of IL-2 on subsequent stimulation than cells that express lower levels of IL-2R{alpha} (Fig. 10Go). However, CD4+ effectors that are generated with high amounts of IL-2 have enhanced IL-2R{alpha} expression but produce elevated levels of cytokines. Thus, IL-2R{alpha} expression correlates both positively (in the case of CD4+ T cells) and negatively (in the case of CD8+ T cells) with subsequent T cell functions.

Although high expression of IL-2R{alpha} may result in increased usage of IL-2 and, consequently, decreased further production, the effector CD8+ cells also produced lower amounts of IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 5Go) and TNF (data not shown), suggesting that a different mechanism may be at play. Furthermore, inhibition of cytokine synthesis occurred even when effectors were restimulated with agents (Con A/plate-bound anti-CD3 Abs, in the absence of APC) that induce T cell activation but not proliferation. Additionally, impairment of autonomous proliferation of CD8+ effectors (Fig. 11Go) clearly indicates a functional loss of IL-2 synthesis. To further confirm that the inhibition of cytokine synthesis was not due to increased uptake by CD8+ T cells, we irradiated CD8+ effectors (2500 rad) and restimulated them with allo-APC for 18 h. Even under these conditions, CD8+ T cells that were generated in low IL-2 (0.1 ng/ml) produced 1.95 ± 0.32 ng/ml of IL-2, whereas cells generated in high IL-2 (10 ng/ml) produced <0.05 ng/ml of IL-2.

Various investigators have also shown that effector CD4+ T cell clones when cultured with high levels of IL-2 undergo activation-induced cell death upon subsequent stimulation with anti-CD3 Abs (15, 30). Interestingly, IL-2-dependent activation-induced cell death occurs only in effector, but not in naive, CD4+ T cells (30). Our results indicate that during the differentiation of naive CD8+ T cells into effectors, the presence of low amounts of IL-2 results in increased numbers of apoptotic cells both during the primary culture as well as in the secondary culture (after restimulation with APC for 24 h). As cytokine production and apoptosis in the secondary culture were measured within the same time frame (18–24 h), the loss of cytokine synthesis by CD8+ T cells appears to be due to defects in signal transduction rather than to the cells undergoing rapid death due to activation. It is, however, conceivable that the failure of effectors to proliferate autonomously due to loss of cytokine production may increase the propensity for apoptosis over the long term.

The lack of ability to produce cytokines and proliferate autonomously has often been referred to as anergy. Stimulation of T cells with Ag on fixed APCs results in an anergic state, although the cells maintain their short term effector function (11, 12, 29). We have previously shown that IL-4 also induces a similar state in CD8+ T cells that is characterized by impaired cytokine synthesis, proliferation, and compromised ability to curtail the proliferation of tumor cells (10, 20). IL-10 has also been shown to induce a long term anergy-like state in human CD4+ T cells (31). CD8+ T cells proliferate more strongly and produce more cytokines in the absence of IFN-{gamma} (S. Sad, unpublished observations). These results indicate that the induction of an anergy-like state in T cells may be a phenomenon that occurs with high levels of various cytokines.

Cytolytic effector CD8+ T cells specific for a variety of Ags, including viruses, tumors, and exogenous proteins, persist in the absence of the cognate Ag in vivo and in vitro (32, 33). The nature of stimulus that drives the proliferation of memory T cells in the absence of Ag and the role of IL-2 in the maintenance of memory CD8+ T cells remain unclear. Although IL-2-deficient mice have normal CTL responses (34), OVA-specific memory CTLs decline strongly in the absence of IL-2, (32), suggesting that cell cycling is important for the maintenance of CD8+ T cell memory. Our data indicate that IL-2 compromises subsequent cytokine synthesis in CD8+ T cells, raising questions about the role of IL-2 in the maintenance of memory cells. It is possible that the production of IL-2 is precisely regulated in vivo so that its level is always maintained at low concentrations, sufficient to drive low level proliferation of cells. Alternatively, IL-2 production by CD8+ T cells may not be important for maintenance of memory CD8+ T cells, as CD4+ T cells can produce copious amounts of IL-2 and are less susceptible to IL-2-induced inhibition of cytokine synthesis. This would mean that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells have to coexist in vivo to sustain memory CD8+ T cells. IL-15 has been shown to be more potent than IL-2 in selectively stimulating the proliferation of memory CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells in vivo (35). Our results also demonstrate that effector, but not naive, CD8+ T cells respond more strongly to IL-15 than to IL-2 (Fig. 1Go). Thus, it is possible that IL-2 might play a more important role during the initiation of an immune response, whereas at later stages IL-15 might sustain the circulation of memory CD8+ T cells.

Several observations indicate that CD8+ T cells are often dependent on cytokines produced by CD4+ helper cells (36, 37, 38, 39). CD8+ T cells may be capable of effectively curtailing an acute phase immune response, as effects of IL-2 are less discernable over the short term. However, the chronic course of infection may lead to more CD4+ dependence for sustenance of CD8+ cells.

As opposed to MHC class II, which is selectively expressed on cells, MHC class I is expressed on almost all cells. Because CD8+ T cells are MHC class I restricted, they can be stimulated more readily, and severe CD8+ T cell responses can cause pathology (40, 41). Thus, multiple mechanisms must maintain the regulation of CD8+ T cell responses. As IL-2 is a potent proliferation-promoting cytokine, it is reasonable that its production needs to be precisely regulated. Other mechanisms mediated by IL-4-, perforin-, and Fas-dependent killing also help to regulate CD8+ T cell function (13, 20). The lack of production of cytokines may be a self-regulating mechanism for turning off immune responses. Thus, besides the expression of cytokine patterns, the amounts of individual cytokines in the local microenvironment can have totally different temporal effects.


    Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge technical assistance provided by Renu Dudani and Margaret-Anne Gidney.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by funds from the Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada. This is publication 42394 from the National Research Council of Canada. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Subash Sad, Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, 100 Sussex Drive, Room 4105, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0R6. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviation used in this paper: FasL, Fas ligand. Back

Received for publication February 22, 1999. Accepted for publication June 10, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Allison, J. P.. 1994. CD28–B7 interactions in T-cell activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6:414.[Medline]
  2. Mosmann, T. R., R. L. Coffman. 1989. TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:145.[Medline]
  3. Mosmann, T. R., S. Sad. 1996. The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more. Immunol. Today 17:138.[Medline]
  4. Henkart, P. A.. 1994. Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity: two pathways and multiple effector molecules. Immunity 1:343.[Medline]
  5. Kagi, D., B. Ledermann, K. Burki, P. Seiler, B. Odermatt, K. J. Olsen, E. R. Podack, R. M. Zinkernagel, H. Hengartner. 1994. Cytotoxicity mediated by T cells and natural killer cells is greatly impaired in perforin-deficient mice. Nature 369:31.[Medline]
  6. Nagata, S., P. Golstein. 1995. The Fas death factor. Science 267:1449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Belosevic, M., C. E. Davis, M. S. Meltzer, C. A. Nacy. 1988. Regulation of activated macrophage antimicrobial activities: identification of lymphokines that cooperate with IFN-{gamma} for induction of resistance to infection. J. Immunol. 141:890.[Abstract]
  8. Fiorentino, D. F., A. Zlotnik, P. Vieira, T. R. Mosmann, M. Howard, K. W. Moore, A. O’Garra. 1991. IL-10 acts on the antigen-presenting cell to inhibit cytokine production by Th1 cells. J. Immunol. 146:3444.[Abstract]
  9. Gajewski, T. F., F. W. Fitch. 1988. Anti-proliferative effect of IFN-{gamma} in immune regulation. I. IFN-{gamma} inhibits the proliferation of Th2 but not Th1 murine helper T lymphocyte clones. J. Immunol. 140:4245.[Abstract]
  10. Sad, S., L. Li, T. R. Mosmann. 1997. Cytokine-deficient CD8+ Tc1 cells induced by IL-4: retained inflammation and perforin and Fas cytotoxicity but compromised long term killing of tumor cells. J. Immunol. 159:606.[Abstract]
  11. Jenkins, M. K., R. H. Schwartz. 1987. Antigen presentation by chemically modified splenocytes induces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 165:302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Otten, G. R., R. N. Germain. 1991. Split anergy in a CD8+ T cell: receptor-dependent cytolysis in the absence of interleukin-2 production. Science 251:1228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sad, S., D. Kagi, T. R. Mosmann. 1996. Perforin and Fas killing by CD8+ T cells limits their cytokine synthesis and proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 184:1543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Swain, S. L.. 1991. Lymphokines and the immune response: the central role of interleukin-2. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 3:304.[Medline]
  15. Lenardo, M. J.. 1991. Interleukin-2 programs mouse {alpha}ß T lymphocytes for apoptosis. Nature 353:858.[Medline]
  16. Schell, S. R., F. W. Fitch. 1989. Pretreatment of cloned helper T lymphocytes with IL-2 induces unresponsiveness to antigen and concanavalin A, associated with decreased inositol phosphate and diacylglycerol production. J. Immunol. 143:1499.[Abstract]
  17. Otten, G., K. C. Herold, F. W. Fitch. 1987. Interleukin 2 inhibits antigen-stimulated lymphokine synthesis in helper T cells by inhibiting calcium-dependent signalling. J. Immunol. 139:1348.[Abstract]
  18. Ohara, J., W. E. Paul. 1985. Production of a monoclonal antibody to and molecular characterization of B-cell stimulatory factor-1. Nature 315:333.[Medline]
  19. Mosmann, T. R., T. A. Fong. 1989. Specific assays for cytokine production by T cells. J. Immunol. Methods 116:151.[Medline]
  20. Sad, S., T. R. Mosmann. 1995. Interleukin (IL) 4, in the absence of antigen stimulation, induces an anergy-like state in differentiated CD8+ TC1 cells: loss of IL-2 synthesis and autonomous proliferation but retention of cytotoxicity and synthesis of other cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 182:1505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Telford, W. G., L. E. King, P. J. Fraker. 1994. Rapid quantitation of apoptosis in pure and heterogeneous cell populations using flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods 172:1.[Medline]
  22. Williams, I. R., E. R. Unanue. 1991. Characterization of accessory cell costimulation of Th1 cytokine synthesis. J. Immunol. 147:3752.[Abstract]
  23. Widmer, M. B., F. H. Bach. 1981. Antigen-driven helper cell-independent cloned cytolytic T lymphocytes. Nature 294:750.[Medline]
  24. von, B. H., K. Turton. 1983. Autonomously proliferating K/D-restricted cytolytic T cell clones. Eur. J. Immunol. 13:176.[Medline]
  25. Esser, M. T., R. D. Dinglasan, B. Krishnamurthy, C. A. Gullo, M. B. Graham, V. L. Braciale. 1997. IL-2 induces Fas ligand/Fas (CD95L/CD95) cytotoxicity in CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocyte clones. J. Immunol. 158:5612.[Abstract]
  26. McKisic, M. D., D. W. Lancki, D. C. Cronin, F. W. Fitch. 1993. Cytolytic activity of murine IL-2-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clones cycles in response to IL-2. J. Immunol. 151:4055.[Abstract]
  27. Sad, S., L. Krishnan, R. C. Bleackley, D. Kagi, H. Hengartner, T. R. Mosmann. 1997. Cytotoxicity and weak CD40 ligand expression of CD8+ type 2 cytotoxic T cells restricts their potential B cell helper activity. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:914.[Medline]
  28. Sad, S., R. Marcotte, T. R. Mosmann. 1995. Cytokine-induced differentiation of precursor mouse CD8+ T cells into cytotoxic CD8+ T cells secreting Th1 or Th2 cytokines. Immunity 2:271.[Medline]
  29. Go, C., D. W. Lancki, F. W. Fitch, J. Miller. 1993. Anergized T cell clones retain their cytolytic ability. J. Immunol. 150:367.[Abstract]
  30. Refaeli, Y., P. L. Van, C. A. London, J. Tschopp, A. K. Abbas. 1998. Biochemical mechanisms of IL-2-regulated Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis. Immunity 8:615.[Medline]
  31. Groux, H., M. Bigler, V. J. de, M. G. Roncarolo. 1996. Interleukin-10 induces a long-term antigen-specific anergic state in human CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 184:19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ke, Y., H. Ma, J. A. Kapp. 1998. Antigen is required for the activation of effector activities, whereas interleukin 2 is required for the maintenance of memory in ovalbumin-specific, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 187:49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lau, L. L., B. D. Jamieson, T. Somasundaram, R. Ahmed. 1994. Cytotoxic T-cell memory without antigen. Nature 369:648.[Medline]
  34. Kundig, T. M., H. Schorle, M. F. Bachmann, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel, I. Horak. 1993. Immune responses in interleukin-2-deficient mice. Science 262:1059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Zhang, X., S. Sun, I. Hwang, D. F. Tough, J. Sprent. 1998. Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. Immunity 8:591.[Medline]
  36. von, B. H., P. Kisielow, W. Leiserson, W. Haas. 1984. Lyt-2- T cell-independent functions of Lyt-2+ cells stimulated with antigen or concanavalin A. J. Immunol. 133:59.[Abstract]
  37. Keene, J. A., J. Forman. 1982. Helper activity is required for the in vivo generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 155:768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Williamson, J. S., S. A. Stohlman. 1990. Effective clearance of mouse hepatitis virus from the central nervous system requires both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J. Virol. 64:4589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Matloubian, M., R. J. Concepcion, R. Ahmed. 1994. CD4+ T cells are required to sustain CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell responses during chronic viral infection. J. Virol. 68:8056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Zinkernagel, R. M., H. Hengartner. 1994. T-cell-mediated immunopathology versus direct cytolysis by virus: implications for HIV and AIDS. Immunol. Today 15:262.[Medline]
  41. Zinkernagel, R. M.. 1996. Immunology taught by viruses. Science 271:173.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
R. Dudani, Y. Chapdelaine, H. van Faassen, D. K. Smith, H. Shen, L. Krishnan, and S. Sad
Preexisting Inflammation Due to Mycobacterium bovis BCG Infection Differentially Modulates T-Cell Priming against a Replicating or Nonreplicating Immunogen
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2002; 70(4): 1957 - 1964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. A. Piccirillo and E. M. Shevach
Cutting Edge: Control of CD8+ T Cell Activation by CD4+CD25+ Immunoregulatory Cells
J. Immunol., August 1, 2001; 167(3): 1137 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
K. Masuko-Hongo, M. Kurokawa, T. Kobata, K. Nishioka, and T. Kato
Effect of IL15 on T cell clonality in vitro and in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2000; 59(9): 688 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sad, S.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnan, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS