The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reijonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nepom, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reijonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nepom, G.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 163: 1674-1681.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Differential Presentation of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) T Cell Epitopes Among HLA-DRB1*0401-Positive Individuals1

Helena Reijonen2,*, John F. Elliott{dagger}, Peter van Endert{ddagger} and Gerald Nepom*

* Virginia Mason Research Center, Seattle, WA 98101; {dagger} Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; and {ddagger} Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Hopital Necker, Paris, France


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) is one of the major autoantigens in type 1 diabetes. We investigated whether there is variation in the processing of GAD65 epitopes between individuals with similar HLA backgrounds and whether the processing characteristics of certain immunogenic epitopes are different in distinct APC subpopulations. Using DR401-restricted T cell hybridomas specific for two immunogenic GAD65 epitopes (115–127 and 274–286), we demonstrate an epitope-specific presentation pattern in human B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL). When pulsed with the GAD protein, some DRB1*0401-positive B-LCL, which presented GAD65 274–286 epitope efficiently, were unable to present the GAD65 115–127 epitope. However, all B-LCL presented synthetic peptides corresponding to either GAD epitope. In addition, when pulsed with human serum albumin, all cell lines gave equal stimulation of a DR4-restricted human serum albumin-specific T hybridoma. GAD65-transfected cell lines displayed the same presentation phenotype, showing that lack of the presentation of the 115–127 epitope was not due to inefficient uptake of the protein. Blood mononuclear adherent cells, B cells, or dendritic cells derived from the same individual displayed the same presentation pattern as observed in B cell lines, suggesting that the defect most likely is genetically determined. Therefore, individual differences in Ag processing may result in the presentation of distinct set of peptides derived from an autoantigen such as GAD65. This may be an important mechanism for the deviation of the immune response either into a regulatory pathway or into an inflammatory autoimmune reactivity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tcell responses directed against various islet cell Ags, particularly glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65),3 have frequently been demonstrated in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Studies using peptide Ags derived from the GAD65 sequence show that the T cell-proliferative response is very heterogeneous: multiple different peptide epitopes have been described, and responses occur in about 50% of patients and also occur in some unaffected relatives of diabetic patients. The link between T cell reactivity to GAD65 and pathogenic events in IDDM is not clear. It is likely that T cell responses to islet Ags such as GAD65 represent amplification events in a cumulative immune response; whether a specific T cell determinant from GAD65 is presented by risk-associated HLA class II molecules, which might skew the T cell response into a disease-accelerating direction in some individuals, is not known. The limited set of peptides processed from GAD65 that are immunogenic and the selection of epitopes determined by binding to MHC class II molecules are primary determinants of potential immunogenicity that vary between different individuals. Differences in Ag processing may result in the presentation of certain epitopes at the expense of the others, and by that mechanism influence the specificity and magnitude of Ag-specific T cell response.

T cell reactivity to several GAD65 epitopes mediated by various DR molecules has been demonstrated both in IDDM patients and normal subjects (6, 7, 8, 9) as well as DR401-transgenic mice (10, 11). In the nonobese diabetes mouse model, T cell responses have been described initially confined to a limited region of the GAD molecule, followed by intramolecular spreading of the T cell response to additional GAD peptides (12). Whether a similar epitope spreading plays a role in the progression of human IDDM is not known. The islet inflammation may be initiated by one APC population, but further diversified and amplified by another. The efficiency of HLA class II-restricted presentation has been demonstrated to vary depending upon the APC type (13). Molecular mechanisms behind these differences are the ability to internalize the Ag and as well as distinct Ag processing regulated by proteases and chaperones. Changes in Ag processing may lead to a shift in the peptide repertoire generated, such that a novel peptide becomes a dominant epitope presented by HLA class II. Therefore, during disease progression new APCs with different processing characteristics may be recruited into the inflammation site and T cell responses to additional epitopes may be generated.

Our aim was to identify first whether there is interindividual variation, presumably on a genetic basis, in the capacity to process and present epitopes generated from intact GAD65 protein, and second, whether such differences would be present in all cell lineages used as APCs. Both of these issues may arise from variation in the specific types of proteases and chaperones used during Ag processing and presentation. We analyzed processing and presentation of two immunogenic epitopes of GAD65 using DR401-restricted murine T cell hybridomas specific for peptides 274–286 and 115–127, respectively. In a previous study, these peptides were shown to be immunogenic in the context of HLA-DR401 in B10.M/DR4 transgenic mice (11). It is interesting to note that epitopes overlapping with the ones in this study have been shown to be recognized also by human T cells. Endl et al. (6) described reactivity for GAD65 peptide 266–285, with T cells from a newly diagnosed DR401-positive IDDM patient. Another group demonstrated a cytotoxic HLA-A*0201-restricted T cell response for GAD 114–123 epitope naturally processed in target cells in one prediabetic and two IDDM subjects (14). In this study, we report a differential Ag presentation pattern for these two epitopes among APCs derived from DRB1*0401-positive individuals.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cells

B-LCL were the following: BPh (DRB1*0401, 0301), BrDe (DRB1*0401,0701), EmWi (DRB1*0401, 0301), JeBa (DRB1*0401, 0801), RePo (DRB1*0401, 0301), Bsm (DRB1*0401 homozygous), and Priess (DRB1*0401 homozygous). The cells were obtained from diabetic patients (Bph, BrDe, JeBa), subjects positive for autoantibodies against multiple {beta} cell Ags (EmWi, RePo), and normal subjects (Bsm, Priess). The first two groups were also positive for GAD65 autoantibodies. Three of these individuals (EmWi, JeBa, RePo) were available for subsequent blood drawing at the Department of Endocrinology at Virginia Mason, and from one subject frozen PBMC had been collected earlier (BrDe). Fresh PBMC used in APC subpopulation experiments were obtained from the volunteers mentioned above as well as one healthy subject (SAM, DRB1*0401, 0101). DR401-restricted GAD65-specific murine T cell hybridomas were generated in DRB1*0401 transgenic mice by Linda Wicker (Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ), as described previously (11). Hybridomas T33.1 and T35 were specific for immunogenic GAD 274–286 (IAFTSEHSHFSLK) and 115–127 (MNILLQYVVKSFD) peptides, respectively. DR401-restricted hybridoma 17.9 was specific for HSA p64–76 (a gift from Dennis Zaller, Merck Research Laboratories).

Enrichment of APC populations from peripheral mononuclear cells

Mononuclear cells were separated by standard Ficoll-Hypaque method and were subsequently incubated with anti-CD19-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). CD19+ cells were removed by applying a magnetic field and detached by DETACHaBEAD solution (Dynal). Purity of B cells obtained was ~95% estimated by FACScan. CD19-negative unbound cells were allowed to adhere to a plastic plate for 2 h at 37°C, after which the attached cells were released by trypsinization. Average 75% of recovered adherent cells were CD14+. To generate dendritic cells, the adherent fraction of PBMC was cultured for 7 days in the presence of GM-CSF (600 U/ml) and IL-4 (400 U/ml).

Antigens

Two different rGAD65 protein preparations were used in most experiments. One was produced in Escherichia coli expression system, as described earlier (12), and the other one was obtained from Sf9 insect cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses; this preparation had a purity of ~95% (8). HSA protein was purchased commercially (Sigma, St Louis, MO). GAD peptides 115–127 (MNILLQYVVKSFD) and 274–286 (IAFTSEHSHFSLK) were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems 432 Peptide Synthesizer (Foster City, CA), and the purity of each peptide was determined by mass spectrometry, performed by the Carbohydrate Structure Facility at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI).

Flow-cytometric analysis

mAb binding to live cells was detected by flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). The following affinity-purified, isotype-specific mouse mAbs were used to stain cell surface molecules: L243 (anti-DR, hybridoma purchased from American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD), SPLV3 (anti-DQ, obtained from DNAX Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Palo Alto, CA), NFLD.D1 (anti-DR04, Dr. Sheila Drover, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada), anti-CD83 (Dr. Thomas Tedder, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC), anti-CD40, anti-CD86, anti-CD1a, anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD14-FITC (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), anti-CD25 FITC, and anti-CD19 PE (Becton Dickinson). Isotype-matched control Abs were used to detect background staining. Binding of unlabeled Abs was detected using FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig.

Binding assays with paraformaldehyde-fixed cells

Peptide-binding assays were performed as described earlier (15). Briefly, HLA class II homozygous EBV-transformed human B cell lines (1 x 106) or transfected type 1 bare lymphocyte syndrome cell line (a gift from Janet Lee (16)) expressing a single HLA class II allele were fixed with 0.5% paraformaldehyde before incubation with 10µM biotinylated peptide in 150 mM citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.4), 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM iodoacetamide, 1 mM benzamidine, and 1 mM pefabloc for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were washed twice in PBS before lysis in 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.15 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 1 mM pefabloc, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin A. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation 15 min, 20,000 x g, and supernatants were transferred to 96-well plates precoated with either 10 µg/ml of SPVL3 mAb (anti-DQ) or L243 mAb (anti-DR) and blocked with 5% FCS in PBS. The samples were diluted 1:1 on the plate in 0.02% n-dodecyl-{beta}-D-maltoside (for HLA-DQ) or 0.75% n-octyl-{beta}-D-glucopyranoside (for HLA-DR) in 50 mM Tris, pH 8, for neutralization, and complexes were captured overnight at 4°C. The wells were then washed five times with PBS containing 0.2% Tween-20 and europium-labeled streptavidin (Wallac, Turku, Finland) diluted 1/1000 in assay buffer (Wallac) and incubated at 25°C for 30 min. Plates were washed five times as before, and enhancement buffer (Wallac) was added. Plate was incubated 15 min at 25°C, and fluorescence was measured using a DELFIA 1232 fluorometer (Wallac). The sp. act. of the europium-streptavidin was calibrated to be 1466 fluorescence units per femtomole of biotin bound.

GAD65 recombinant retrovirus-producing cell lines and infection of B-lymphoblastoid cells

GAD65-expressing B cell lines were generated by retroviral-mediated gene transfer, as previously described (17). Briefly, GAD65-cDNA fragment was cloned into the parental retroviral construct pLNCL6. GAD protein-producing cell lines were generated by introduction of the retroviral constructs into the amphotropic packaging line PE501. Next day supernatants from transfected PE501 cells were used to infect PG13 fibroblasts in the presence of polybrene (4 µg/ml) in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS. Infected PG13 fibroblasts were selected under a selective medium containing G418 (1 mg/ml), isolated, expanded, and determined for a viral titer. Virus-producing cells (5 x 105) were plated and cocultivated with B-lymphoblastoid cells (2 x 106) in 60-mm plates in the presence of polybrene (4 µg/ml). The nonadherent B cells were harvested after 24 h of coculture and were grown for another 24 h before placing them in a selective medium containing G418 (1 mg/ml). GAD65 expression was detected on a Western blot and RIA (18).

T cell proliferation assay

In some experiments, B-LCLs were first fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature, and washed three times with PBS with 1% FCS. In the protease inhibitor assay, APCs were pretreated with leupeptin (40–200 µg/ml) or pepstatin A (10–50 µg/ml) overnight at 37°C. Otherwise, B-LCL or primary APCs were pulsed with human rGAD65 (3–25 µg/ml), HSA protein (0.375–6 mg/ml), or peptides GAD65 p115–127 or p274–286 (0.01–10 µM) for 4–12 h. APCs were washed after prepulsing with Ag to avoid possible degradation or toxicity of the protein during a long incubation period, after which the cells were irradiated and plated onto 96-well microtiter plate at density of 5 x 105/well. Dendritic cells were used at a density of 5000/well. T cell hybridoma cells were added at 104/well, and incubated for 24 h. IL-2 production of T hybridomas was determined by a proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the presence of culture supernatants, measured by thymidine incorporation. A standard curve for IL-2 (U/ml) was established in each HT-2 cell proliferation assay. The proliferation of HT-2 cells reached a plateau at 2–2.5 U/ml corresponding to 3.5–4 x 105 cpm of thymidine incorporation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Differential presentation of GAD65 epitopes by DRB1*0401-positive B-LCLs

Three DR401-positive B-LCLs pulsed with intact rGAD65 protein efficiently processed and presented both GAD 115–127 and 274–286 epitopes, but four other DR401 B-LCLs displayed an epitope-specific presentation pattern: the GAD 274–286 epitope was efficiently presented to the T33.1 hybridoma, whereas no stimulation of the T cell hybridoma T35 specific for GAD 115–127 was detected (Fig. 1Go, A and B). The level of proliferation of the hybridomas was dependent on the GAD65 concentration. When 25 µg/ml GAD65 was used to pulse the APCs, both hybridomas were efficiently stimulated. HLA-DRB1*0401 homozygous cell lines (Priess and Bsm) presented GAD65 274–286 epitope well at lower concentration than the heterozygous cell lines. Similarly, GAD65 115–127 was most efficiently presented by Priess, in contrast to Bsm, which displayed the presentation-deficient phenotype at all concentrations tested.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Presentation of human rGAD65 protein by DR401-positive B-LCLs to mouse T hybridoma T33.1 specific for GAD65 274–286 epitope (A) and T hybridoma T35 specific for GAD65 115–127 (B), and presentation of HSA protein to T hybridoma 17.9 specific for HSA 64–76 (C). In B and C, the legend symbols for the cell lines are the same as in A. T cell responses were tested at the following concentrations: 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 µg/ml of GAD65, and 375, 750, 1500, 3000, and 6000 µg/ml of HSA protein. IL-2 production of the hybridomas was measured by the proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the culture supernatant. Each bar represents a mean of cpm [3H]thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures. Error bars represent SEM. Data are representative of the results of three or more experiments.

 
One possible explanation for the deficient presentation phenotype might have been a lack of essential factors in the processing machinery. This was investigated by testing the capacity of these cell lines to present another protein Ag, exogenously added HSA (Fig. 1GoC). All cell lines presented the HSA Ag equally well at several concentrations between 1–6 mg/ml, excluding the possibility of a general inability of processing exogenous Ags. Fixed cells did not present GAD protein to both T-35 and T-33.1 hybridomas, indicating that the presentation of epitopes from GAD65 protein required intracellular processing (data not shown).

GAD65 peptides are presented by all B-LCLs

All B cell lines (fixed and unfixed) efficiently presented peptides corresponding to the particular epitopes, demonstrating that the peptide-DR401 complex can interact with the specific hybridoma and induce stimulation (Fig. 2Go). DR401 homozygous cell lines (Priess and Bsm) presented the peptides most efficiently at low peptide concentration: <10 µM for the GAD 274–286 peptide and <1 µM for the GAD 115–127 peptide. This result also demonstrated that T cell hybridoma T-35 specific for the epitope 115–127 produced more IL-2 when stimulated by its cognate peptide at low concentration than did T cell hybridoma T-33.1 with peptide 274–286 under identical conditions, indicating that the deficiency to present the 115–127 epitope is not due to a lower sensitivity of the T35 hybridoma. The lower stimulation of T cell hybridomas by the heterozygous cell lines was not due to peptide stealing, because the other class II molecules present on those cells were not good binders for the given peptides (data not shown); differences may be a result of a higher density of the equivalent class II molecules on the cell surface of the homozygous cells.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Presentation of GAD65 peptide p274–286 to T33.1 hybridoma (A) and p115–127 to T35 hybridoma by B-LCLs (B). IL-2 production of the hybridomas is measured by the proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the culture supernatant. Each symbol represents a mean of cpm [3H]thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures. Error bars represent SEM. Data are representative of the results of three or more experiments.

 
Same presentation pattern occurs in the GAD65-transfected cell lines

To investigate the processing pattern in a quantitative manner, we stably transfected the APCs (Priess, Bsm) with rGAD65 cDNA. The intracellular expression of GAD65 was equivalent in both cell lines, as detected by RIA and Western blot (data not shown). However, the processing failure in terms of the GAD115–127 epitope was observed in Bsm, whereas Priess-transfected cells could present the relevant endogenous epitope (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. B cell lines were stably transfected with GAD65 cDNA, and the presentation of endogenously synthesized GAD65 was detected by the stimulation of T33.1 hybridoma (specific for GAD65 274–286) and T35 hybridoma (specific for GAD65 115–127). IL-2 production of the hybridomas is measured by the proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the culture supernatant. Each bar represents a mean of cpm [3H]thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures. Error bars represent SEM. Data are representative of the results of three or more experiments.

 
Presentation of at least one epitope in each of these transfected cells demonstrated that the HLA class II pathway is intact, even though GAD65 is now an endogenous Ag. The presentation of the 274–286 epitope via class II endogenous pathway is similar in both transfected cell lines, whereas the presentation of the 115–127 peptide is not, indicating that the processing-deficient phenotype of the Bsm cells, shown in Fig. 1Go, was not due to more inefficient uptake of exogenously added GAD65.

Differential presentation of GAD65 epitopes is not dependent on APC lineage

To address the question of whether lack of processing of the GAD65 115–127 epitope would be displayed in primary APCs and different APC lineages, Ag presentation was tested in distinct cell populations. PBL were obtained from the same four subjects from whom we had B cell lines (BrDe, EmWi, JeBa, and Repo used in the experiments presented above) and one healthy new subject as a control (Sam). This group represents both presentation phenotypes. When GAD65 protein was presented by these primary peripheral lymphocytes, the epitope-specific presentation phenotype was not altered (Fig. 4Go). To determine whether a distinct APC subpopulation would be capable of presenting the subdominant epitope 115–127, B cells and adherent cells were differentially separated from fresh peripheral blood. One-half of the adherent cells were subjected to GM-CSF and IL-4 in culture for 7–10 days to generate a population of dendritic cells. A population positive for CD40, DR, DQ, CD86, and CD1a; low for CD83; and negative for CD14, CD4/8, CD25, and CD19 was obtained. Once again, the epitope-specific presentation pattern did not change in any of these APC types, nor in dendritic cells, which have the greatest capacity to present Ag (Fig. 5Go). Most of the experiments were performed using two concentrations of GAD65 at optimal dose-response range. An example of GAD65 dose response in all APC lineages derived from Repo is shown in Fig. 5GoD. Both hybridomas, T33.1 and T35, were highly stimulated by all APCs when pulsed with GAD65 p274–286 and p115–127 peptides, respectively (data not shown).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Presentation of human rGAD65 protein (15 µg/ml) by PBL. IL-2 production of the hybridomas is measured by the proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the culture supernatant. Each bar represents a mean of cpm [3H]thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures. Error bars represent SEM. Data are representative of the results of two or more experiments.

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Presentation of human rGAD65 protein by distinct APC subpopulations: mononuclear adherent cells (A), primary CD19-positive B cells (B), and dendritic cells (C). GAD65 was used at 15 µg/ml (A and B) or 25 µg/ml (C). IL-2 production of the hybridomas is measured by the proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the culture supernatant. Peptide control was included in each experiment (not shown); both GAD65 p274–286 and p115–127 were efficiently presented to given hybridomas (level of stimulation 173–295,000 cpm). A dose-response curve for different APC lineages derived from RePo (D) shows that dendritic cells present the Ag most efficiently. Each bar represents a mean of cpm [3H]thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures. Error bars represent SEM. Data are representative of the results of two or more experiments.

 
The effects of protease inhibitors on the presentation of GAD65 epitopes

To explore the mechanism behind the presentation-deficient phenotype, B cell lines were incubated in the presence of protease inhibitors, leupeptin and pepstatin A, for 20–24 h before the subsequent pulsing with GAD65 protein. The effect of the protease treatment on GAD65 epitopes was similar in all cell lines: leupeptin inhibited the responses, whereas pepstatin A augmented the response. However, the presentation of GAD65 115–127 was not rescued by either of the protease inhibitors (Fig. 6Go). A submaximal concentration of GAD65 (5–15 µg/ml) was used in these assays for each cell line and both T cell hybridomas, allowing the detection of either augmentation or inhibition of the epitope processing. To evaluate potential nonspecific toxicity of protease inhibitors at high concentrations, three concentrations of leupeptin (40, 100, and 200 µg/ml) and pepstatin A (10, 25, and 50 µg/ml) were used to define a dose-response effect. The highest concentration that gave complete inhibition or the strongest augmentation was tested for toxicity on the APCs pulsed with a synthetic peptide. Protease inhibitor treatment had no effect on peptide presentation (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. The effect of protease inhibitors on the processing of GAD65 274–286 epitope to T33.1 hybridoma (A) and GAD65 115–127 epitope to T35 hybridoma (B). APCs were pulsed at the concentrations of GAD65, which gave a submaximal stimulation of T cell hybridomas (shown in Fig. 1Go). In A, Priess and Bsm were pulsed at 5 µg/ml GAD65, and all of the other cell lines at 12.5 µg/ml. In B, all B cell lines were pulsed at 25 µg/ml GAD65. IL-2 production of the hybridomas is measured by the proliferation of IL-2-dependent HT-2 cells in the culture supernatant. Each bar represents a mean of cpm [3H]thymidine incorporation in triplicate cultures. Error bars represent SEM. Data are representative of the results of two or more experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We report differences between DRB1*0401-positive individuals in the processing of epitope 115–127 from human rGAD65, showing an epitope-specific deficiency in the processing of an important IDDM autoantigen.

Epitope GAD65 115–127 was not processed and presented by four of seven B-LCLs derived from different DR401-positive individuals. The differences in the presentation cannot be due to differences in the ability to internalize an Ag, first, because the other GAD65 epitope 274–286 was presented equally well by all APCs, and second, because the same processing pattern was observed in GAD65-transfected cell lines. The expression level of GAD65 in transfected cell lines was quantitated showing a comparable high level of expression in both APC phenotypes. We also tested the presentation of HSA to see whether the cell lines with defective processing of GAD65 epitope also displayed an inefficient processing of epitopes from other Ags. This was not the case, because all APCs induced similar stimulation of an HSA-specific T hybridoma, ruling out the possibility of a global defect in the processing machinery. Fixed cells efficiently presented peptides, but did not present the whole GAD65 Ag, which shows that the inability to present GAD65 115–127 epitope is at the processing level. Titration of the synthetic peptides corresponding to the T cell epitopes is also a good indication of the sensitivity of T hybridomas. Both T hybridomas were stimulated in a dose-dependent manner, and at low peptide concentration T-35 hybridoma specific for GAD65 115–127 was induced to produce more IL-2 than T-33.1 hybridoma, demonstrating that the processing difference was not due to a lower sensitivity of the T-35 hybridoma.

One hypothesis for the processing deficiency in the distinct cell lines is an inefficient loading of peptide onto a particular MHC class II, if in the peptide-loading compartment the other class II and possibly class I molecule(s) have a higher binding affinity to a given peptide (19, 20, 21). In our study, some of the cell lines were HLA identical, but to exclude the possibility of epitope stealing, peptide binding was measured for all of the other HLA-DR or DQ molecules present on the B-LCLs. None of the other HLA class II molecules displayed a higher affinity for the p115–127 or p274–286 than DR401 molecule. Because HLA-A*0201 has been shown to bind and present an almost completely overlapping naturally processed GAD peptide 114–123 (14), all of the cell lines were tested for the positivity of HLA-A*02. Four of them were positive for HLA-A*02 (Bsm, BrDe, JeBa, Priess), but no correlation between the processing phenotype and genotype was observed. The processing phenotype did not associate with IDDM in our study, but this small number of subjects tested does not exclude a possible relationship with disease progression. Five subjects in our study were positive for GAD65 autoantibodies. Ag-specific Igs on the surface of B cells facilitate Ag uptake and may modulate the transportation and processing of Ag. However, in our study, GAD65 autoantibody positivity did not correlate with the epitope-specific presentation phenotype.

Another possible explanation for the lack of presentation of the 115–127 epitope is an inefficiency in the generation of that particular peptide in the processing compartment, or loading of the peptide onto MHC class II molecules. In an earlier study (11) when GAD-transfected Priess was used as a source of APC, more IL-2 was secreted by the T cells recognizing GAD65 274–286 compared with those recognizing GAD65 115–127. This might have been due to a lower expression level of GAD65 in these particular Priess-transfected cells than in our GAD65 transfectants. In a long-term culture without the G418 selection, the number of cells expressing high levels of GAD65 decreases. In this study, the level of GAD65 expression was quantitated from the cell pellets by RIA. However, consistent with the previous observation, a lower stimulation of T-35 than T-33.1 hybridoma was seen in response to a low concentration of exogenously added protein, as shown in Fig. 1Go. Therefore, in all experiments, a high enough concentration of exogenous GAD65 protein (15–25 µg/ml, depending on the APC) was added to ensure maximal presentation of the 115–127 epitope. At this concentration, the cells capable of presenting both epitopes induced a high IL-2 production in both T-35 and T-33.1 hybridomas.

We wanted to investigate whether the differential processing was characteristic only in one APC population, B cells, or whether it could be seen across the APC lineages. Cell proteases play a key role in Ag processing, and it has been shown that distinct APC lineages differ in their ability to process T cell epitopes from a single Ag (22, 23). Distinct APCs also internalize Ag by different mechanisms, and some chaperones are found only in certain APC populations, such as the recently described DO molecule in B cells (24). To test this hypothesis, we separated distinct APC populations, monocytes, and primary B cells, from peripheral blood from the same four subjects and one healthy control representing both processing phenotypes observed in B-LCL. In addition, we generated dendritic cells from adherent mononuclear cells, which allowed us to investigate the presentation of the GAD65 protein in this most efficient APC population. The dendritic cells generated from monocytes using GM-CSF and IL-4 have properties of immature dendritic cells (high expression of CD1a), and they have maximal capacity to capture and process an Ag (25, 26, 27). Upon maturation, the population of dendritic cells, characterized by CD83 expression (28), loses their Ag-processing capacity, but becomes efficient stimulators of T cells. Our results showed that all APC populations derived from the same individual displayed the same epitope-specific presentation pattern as observed in B-LCL. Although our results do not define the precise molecular basis for the defect in the processing of the GAD65 115–127 epitope in some individuals, the consistent presentation pattern through the APC lineages strongly suggests that the defect is most likely genetically determined.

One hypothesis for the differential processing is a lack of a chaperone essential for the presentation of the given epitope. Dependence of chaperones in terms of T cell epitope generation, class II intracellular trafficking, and peptide loading can vary in distinct processing compartments (29, 30, 31, 32), where different epitopes can be generated from a single Ag (25, 26, 27, 28). It is also possible that other competing peptides with higher affinity are generated. Different epitopes within one Ag may vary in their sensitivity to proteases and processing requirements. Certain epitopes may be processed in early endosomes, while others may require processing in a more acidic late endocytic compartment. Some studies have implicated distinct processing mechanisms for different epitopes (29, 30, 31). Walker et al. (33) tested a number of B-LCL for their ability to present keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The observation was that three cell lines presented KLH to only one particular KLH-specific T cell hybridoma, but not to the others. A differential ability to process various distinct Ags has been observed also in Ia-transfected fibroblasts (34, 35, 36). Michalek et al. (37) provided evidence that genetically identical APC clones processed differently the same immunodominant T cell determinant from native OVA. These findings all suggest that different epitopes, even from a single protein Ag, may vary in their dependence on particular processing compartments or chaperones, such as DM or DO, that contribute to Ag-processing mechanisms.

Distinct APCs may vary in their protease content, resulting in the destruction of a GAD65 T cell epitope or alternatively generation of a competing epitope hindering the binding of GAD 115–127 onto the DRB401 molecule. Different proteases may be involved in the processing of GAD epitopes, and their relative deficiency or excess could result in a skewing of the T cell determinants generated in the endosomes. Vidard et al. (38) showed that poor presentation of some epitopes from OVA to specific T cell hybridomas was augmented by leupeptin treatment, whereas other determinants from the same Ag were inhibited. Other protease inhibitors had a complex pattern of inhibition/augmentation of presentation of these epitopes. In one recent study using experimental leishmaniasis as a model, treatment with a specific cathepsin B inhibitor modulated the polarity of Th differentiation from Th2 into Th1 by altering the Ag processing (39). In our study, leupeptin inhibited the processing of both GAD 274–286 and GAD 115–127 epitopes, whereas pepstatin A augmented the presentation, suggesting that same type proteases are involved in at least part of the processing of both epitopes. On the other hand, leupeptin inhibits serine and thiol proteases, and pepstatin A inhibits several acid proteases, in particular aspartate proteases; therefore, the proteases involved in the processing of the distinct GAD65 epitopes may be different, but still affected by the same inhibitors. More specific protease inhibitor studies are needed to answer this question.

Leupeptin inhibits cathepsin B protease, which appears to cut preferentially after two contiguous basic amino acid residues. Interestingly, the GAD274–286 region is preceded by a Arg-Lys dibasic sequence providing a possible cut site for cathepsin B. A similar dibasic proteolytic site is located three amino acid residues downstream of the 115–127 region in GAD65. The positioning of dibasic motifs within a protein Ag could be of crucial significance in determining the length of the processed peptide. The flanking residues have been shown to modulate binding to MHC class II molecule as well as T cell interaction (40). In addition, cathepsin B mediates Ii degradation in APCs (41). Because in our study both epitopes were sensitive to leupeptin, it is unlikely that cathepsin B provides a mechanism for the differential presentation pattern of GAD65 epitopes, and consistent with this interpretation, we observed no correlation in the processing of the invariant chain in the distinct B cell lines (data not shown).

We have described an epitope-specific difference in the presentation of two distinct immunogenic epitopes from GAD65. The difference suggests either quantitative or qualitative variation in the intrinsic ability of APCs from different individuals to process and present epitopes from this important diabetes autoantigen. This pathway of immunomodulation may be crucial for the promotion of autoimmunity mediated by determinant spreading or the selection of dominant epitope reactivity in the process leading to clinical IDDM.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Terri Daniels, Susan Masewicz, Sharon Kochik, and Ben Falk for their expert assistance, and Dr. Åke Lernmark for advice and reagents. T33.1 and T35 hybridomas were a generous gift from Linda Wicker, and 17.9 HSA hybridoma was kindly provided by Dennis Zaller (Merck Research Laboratories). We thank Dr. Claes Öhlen for critically reading the manuscript, and Nicky Ducommun for the help in the preparation of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 The work was supported by Grants DK49841 and AI 38913 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Helena Reijonen, Virginia Mason Research Center, Benaroya Research Institute, 1201 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-2795. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: GAD65, glutamic acid decarboxylase 65; B-LCL, B-lymphoblastoid cell line; HSA, human serum albumin; IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes. Back

Received for publication January 19, 1999. Accepted for publication May 14, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Atkinson, M. A., D. L. Kaufman, L. Campbell, K. A. Gibbs, S. C. Shah, D.-F. Bu, M. G. Erlander, A. J. Tobin, N. K. Maclaren. 1992. Response of peripheral-blood mononuclear cells to glutamate decarboxylase in insulin-dependent diabetes. Lancet 339:458.[Medline]
  2. Harrison, L. C., M. C. Honeyman, H. J. DeAizpurua, R. S. Schmidli, P. G. Colman, B. D. Tait, D. S. Cram. 1993. Inverse relation between humoral and cellular immunity to glutamic acid decarboxylase in subjects at risk of insulin-dependent diabetes. Lancet 341:1365.[Medline]
  3. Atkinson, M. A., M. A. Bowman, L. Campbell, B. L. Darrow, D. L. Kaufman, N. K. Maclaren. 1994. Cellular immunity to a determinant common to glutamate decarboxylase and Coxsackie virus in insulin-dependent diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 94:2125.
  4. Lohmann, T., R. D. G. Leslie, M. Hawa, M. Geysen, S. Rodda, M. Londei. 1994. Immunodominant epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 and 67 in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 343:1607.[Medline]
  5. Geluk, A., K. E. van Meijgaarden, N. C. Schloot, J. Wouter Drijfhout, T. H. M. Ottenhoff, B. O. Roep. 1998. HLA-DR binding analysis of peptides from islet antigens in IDDM. Diabetes 47:1594.[Abstract]
  6. Endl, J., H. Otto, G. Jung, B. Dreisbusch, F. Donie, P. Stahl, R. Elbracht, G. Schmitz, E. Meinl, M. Hummel, et al 1997. Identification of naturally processed T cell epitopes from glutamic acid decarboxylase presented in the context of HLA-DR alleles by T lymphocytes of recent onset IDDM patients. J. Clin. Invest. 99:2405.[Medline]
  7. Bach, J. M., H. Otto, G. T. Nepom, G. Jung, H. Cohen, J. Timsit, C. Boitard, P. M. van Endert. 1997. High affinity presentation of an autoantigenic peptide in type I diabetes by an HLA class II protein encoded in a haplotype protecting from disease. J. Autoimmun. 10:375.[Medline]
  8. Lohmann, T., M. Londei. 1996. T cell clones to epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 raised from normal subjects and patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. J. Autoimmun. 9:385.[Medline]
  9. Vreugdenhil, G. R., A. Geluk, T. H. Ottenhoff, W. J. Melchers, B. O. Roep, J. M. Galama. 1998. Molecular mimicry in diabetes mellitus: the homologous domain in coxsackie B virus protein 2C and islet autoantigen GAD65 is highly conserved in the coxsackie B-like enteroviruses and binds to the diabetes associated HLA-DR3 molecule. Diabetologia 41:40.[Medline]
  10. Patel, S. D., A. P. Cope, M. Congia, T. T. Chen, E. Kim, L. Fugger, D. Wherrett, G. Sonderstrup-McDevitt. 1997. Identification of immunodominant T cell epitopes of human glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 by using HLA-DR({alpha}1*0101, {beta}a1*0401) transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wicker, L. S., S.-L. Chen, G. T. Nepom, J. F. Elliott, D. C. Freed, A. Bansal, S. Zheng, A. Herman, Å. Lernmark, D. M. Zaller, et al 1996. Naturally processed T cell epitopes from human glutamic acid decarboxylase identified using mice transgenic for the type 1 diabetes-associated human MHC class II allele, DRB1*0401. J. Clin. Invest. 98:2597.[Medline]
  12. Kaufman, D. L., M. Clare-Salzler, J. Tian, T. Forsthuber, G. S. P. Ting, P. Robinson, M. A. Atkinson, E. E. Sercarz, A. J. Tobin, P. V. Lehmann. 1993. Spontaneous loss of T-cell tolerance to glutamic acid decarboxylase in murine insulin-dependent diabetes. Nature 366:69.[Medline]
  13. Schneider, S. C., E. E. Sercarz. 1997. Antigen processing differences among APC. Hum. Immunol. 54:148.[Medline]
  14. Panina-Bordignon, P., R. Lang, P. M. van Endert, E. Benazzi, A. M. Felix, R. M. Pastore, G. A. Spinas, F. Sinigaglia. 1995. Cytotoxic T cells specific for glutamic acid decarboxylase in autoimmune diabetes. J. Exp. Med. 181:1923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kwok, W. W., G. T. Nepom, F. C. Raymond. 1995. HLA-DQ polymorphisms are highly selective for peptide binding interactions. J. Immunol. 155:2468.[Abstract]
  16. Hume, C. R., L. A. Shookster, N. Collins, R. O’Reilly, J. S. Lee. 1989. Bare lymphocyte syndrome: altered HLA class II expression in B cell lines derived from two patients. Hum. Immunol. 25:1.[Medline]
  17. Kwok, W. W., D. Schwarz, B. S. Nepom, P. S. Thurtle, R. A. Hock, G. T. Nepom. 1988. HLA-DQ molecules form {alpha}-{beta} heterodimers of mixed allotype. J. Immunol. 141:3123.[Abstract]
  18. Hao, W., T. Daniels, D. G. Pipeleers, A. Smismans, H. Reijonen, G. T. Nepom, Å. Lernmark. 1999. Radioimmunoassay for glutamic acid decarboxylase-65. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 1:13.[Medline]
  19. Adorini, L., Z. A. Nagy. 1990. Peptide competition for antigen presentation. Immunol. Today 11:21.[Medline]
  20. Nepom, G. T.. 1990. HLA and type I diabetes. Immunol. Today 11:314.[Medline]
  21. Tussey, L. G., S. Rowland-Jones, T. S. Zheng, M. J. Androlewicz, P. Cresswell, J. A. Frelinger, A. J. McMichael. 1995. Different MHC class I alleles compete for presentation of overlapping viral epitopes. Immunity 3:65.[Medline]
  22. Vidard, L., K. L. Rock, B. Benacerraf. 1992. Heterogeneity in antigen processing by different types of antigen-presenting cells: effect of cell culture on antigen processing ability. J. Immunol. 149:1905.[Abstract]
  23. Michaelsson, E., M. Holmdahl, A. Engstrom, H. Burkhardt, A. Scheynius, R. Holmdahl. 1995. Macrophages, but not dendritic cells, present collagen to T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2234.[Medline]
  24. Liljedahl, M., T. Kuwana, W.-P. Fung-Leung, M. R. Jackson, P. A. Peterson, L. Karlsson. 1997. HLA-DO is a lysosomal resident which requires association with HLA-DM for efficient intracellular transport. EMBO J. 15:4817.[Medline]
  25. Cella, M., A. Engering, V. Pinet, J. Pieters, A. Lanzavecchia. 1997. Inflammatory stimuli induce accumulation of MHC class II complexes on dendritic cells. Nature 388:782.[Medline]
  26. Cella, M., F. Sallusto, A. Lanzavecchia. 1997. Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:10.[Medline]
  27. Banchereau, J., R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392:245.[Medline]
  28. Zhou, L. J., T. F. Tedder. 1995. Human blood dendritic cells selectively express CD83, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. J. Immunol. 154:3821.[Abstract]
  29. Griffin, J. P., R. Chu, C. V. Harding. 1997. Early endosomes and a late endocytic compartment generate different peptide-class II MHC complexes via distinct processing mechanisms. J. Immunol. 158:1523.[Abstract]
  30. Pinet, V., M. S. Malnati, E. O. Long. 1994. Two processing pathways for the MHC class II-restricted presentation of exogenous influenza virus antigen. J. Immunol. 152:4852.[Abstract]
  31. Pinet, V., M. Vergelli, R. Martin, O. Bakke, E. O. Long. 1995. Antigen presentation mediated by recycling of surface HLA-DR molecules. Nature 375:603.[Medline]
  32. Zhong, G., P. Romagnoli, R. N. Germain. 1997. Related leucine-based cytoplasmic targeting signals in invariant chain and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules control endocytic presentation of distinct determinants in a single protein. J. Exp. Med. 185:429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Walker, E., N. L. Warner, R. Chesnut, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 1982. Antigen-specific I region-restricted interactions in vitro between tumor cell lines and T cell hybridomas. J. Immunol. 128:2164.[Abstract]
  34. Norcross, M. A., D. M. Bentley, D. H. Margulies, R. N. Germain. 1984. Membrane Ia expression and antigen-presenting accessory cell function of L cells transfected with class II major histocompatibility complex genes. J. Exp. Med. 160:1316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Malissen, B., M. P. Price, J. M. Goverman, M. McMillan, J. White, J. Kappler, P. Marrack, A. Pierres, M. Pierres, L. Hood. 1984. Gene transfer of H-2 class II genes: antigen presentation by mouse fibroblast and hamster B-cell lines. Cell 36:319.[Medline]
  36. Shastri, N., B. Malissen, L. Hood. 1985. Ia-transfected L-cell fibroblasts present a lysozyme peptide but not the native protein to lysozyme-specific T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Michalek, M. T., B. Benacerraf, K. L. Rock. 1989. Two genetically identical antigen-presenting cell clones display heterogeneity in antigen processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Vidard, L., K. L. Rock, B. Benacerraf. 1991. The generation of immunogenic peptides can be selectively increased or decreased by proteolytic enzyme inhibitors. J. Immunol. 147:1786.[Abstract]
  39. Maekawa, Y., K. Himeno, H. Ishikawa, H. Hisaeda, T. Sakai, T. Dainichi, T. Asao, R. A. Good, N. Katunuma. 1998. Switch of CD4+ T cell differentiation from Th2 to Th1 by treatment with cathepsin B inhibitor in experimental leishmaniasis. J. Immunol. 161:2120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Moudgil, K. D., E. E. Sercarz, I. S. Grewal. 1998. Modulation of the immunogenicity of antigenic determinants by their flanking residues. Immunol. Today 19:217.[Medline]
  41. Reyes, V. E., S. Lu, R. E. Humphreys. 1991. Cathepsin B cleavage of Ii from class II MHC {alpha}- and {beta}-chains. J. Immunol. 146:3877.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
X. Feng, T. Chuhjo, C. Sugimori, T. Kotani, X. Lu, A. Takami, H. Takamatsu, H. Yamazaki, and S. Nakao
Diazepam-binding inhibitor-related protein 1: a candidate autoantigen in acquired aplastic anemia patients harboring a minor population of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria-type cells
Blood, October 15, 2004; 104(8): 2425 - 2431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. D. Lich, J. A. Jayne, D. Zhou, J. F. Elliott, and J. S. Blum
Editing of an Immunodominant Epitope of Glutamate Decarboxylase by HLA-DM
J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. C. Jaume, S. L. Parry, A.-M. Madec, G. Sonderstrup, and S. Baekkeskov
Suppressive Effect of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65-Specific Autoimmune B Lymphocytes on Processing of T Cell Determinants Located Within the Antibody Epitope
J. Immunol., July 15, 2002; 169(2): 665 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
H. Reijonen, E. J. Novak, S. Kochik, A. Heninger, A. W. Liu, W. W. Kwok, and G. T. Nepom
Detection of GAD65-Specific T-Cells by Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Tetramers in Type 1 Diabetic Patients and At-Risk Subjects
Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1375 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
H. Kita, Z.-X. Lian, J. Van de Water, X.-S. He, S. Matsumura, M. Kaplan, V. Luketic, R. L. Coppel, A. A. Ansari, and M. E. Gershwin
Identification of HLA-A2-restricted CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cell Responses in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis: T Cell Activation Is Augmented by Immune Complexes Cross-Presented by Dendritic Cells
J. Exp. Med., January 7, 2002; 195(1): 113 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reijonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nepom, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reijonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nepom, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS