The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 201999, 163: 1449-1456.
Copyright © 201999 by The American Association of Immunologists

Th1 T Cell Responses to HIV-1 Gag Protein Delivered by a Listeria monocytogenes Vaccine Are Similar to Those Induced by Endogenous Listerial Antigens1

Marielena Mata and Yvonne Paterson2

Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia, PA 19104


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular bacterium that lives and grows in the cytoplasm of the host cell. The hallmark of a listerial infection is a cell-mediated immune response to its own secreted virulence factors. Thus, L. monocytogenes vaccines engineered to secrete HIV proteins may be ideal vectors for boosting cellular immune responses against HIV. Using strains of L. monocytogenes that stably express and secrete HIV Gag (Lm-Gag) to deliver this Ag to the immune system, we have previously shown strong MHC class I-restricted cytotoxic T cell responses to this protein. In this study, we examine MHC class II-restricted T cell responses to HIV-Gag delivered by Lm-Gag. We demonstrate the induction of CD4+ T cells that are HIV-Gag specific and identify three epitopes in two strains of mice, BALB/c (H-2d) and C57BL/6 (H-2b), two of which are both H-2d and H-2b restricted, but are not immunodominant for both haplotypes. In addition, we show that the CD4+ T cells induced are of the Th1 phenotype that produce IFN-{gamma} at levels similar to CD4+ T cells induced to endogenous listerial Ags. These studies suggest that chromosomally modified strains of L. monocytogenes may be useful as vaccine vectors for the induction of Th1 T cell responses against HIV.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A major hallmark of HIV infection is the selective depletion of CD4+ T cells, leading to an impaired immune system that leaves the host susceptible to opportunistic infections (1). Although antiviral Abs are produced, they appear unable to control infection (2, 3). However, studies done in primates have shown that passive immunization with serum from HIV-infected patients as well as with mAbs could prevent infection, although breakthrough infections could occur (4). On the other hand, a number of studies have indicated a correlation between the presence of HIV-specific CTLs and nonprogression of HIV-positive individuals to AIDS (5). Thus, attempts to develop HIV vaccines, in recent years, have focused on approaches that induce strong cell-mediated immunity (6). CD4+ T cells play a key role in regulating the balance between humoral and cellular immunity. Hence, it has been suggested that in response to HIV-1 infection, Th1 type cells, which induce cell-mediated immunity, are protective, whereas Th2 type cells, which result in humoral immunity, may be detrimental to the induction of protective responses (7).

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive facultative intracellular bacterium that enters the macrophage upon phagocytosis. Its unusual ability to escape from the phagolysosome and live in the cytoplasm of the cell (8), thus inducing both CD8+ CTL and CD4+ T cells (9, 10), has resulted in close investigation of this organism as a vaccine vector to induce cell-mediated immunity (11, 12). In addition to the production of a strong CTL response to Ags delivered by L. monocytogenes (13, 14, 15, 16), there is evidence that the CD4+ T cell response to listerial Ags is of the Th1 phenotype. Macrophages infected with L. monocytogenes have been shown to produce IL-12 in vitro and to direct Th1 development through the induction of IFN-{gamma} (17, 18). In addition, IL-12 has been shown to be produced in vivo after immunization with live L. monocytogenes (19), and neutralization of this cytokine results in exacerbated infection (20, 21). This effect can be reversed by treatment with IFN-{gamma} (21). Moreover, IFN-{gamma} has been shown to be a critical parameter of protection against L. monocytogenes in mice with disrupted IFN-{gamma} or IFN-{gamma} receptor genes (22, 23). On the other hand, neutralization of Th2 cytokines such as IL-10 and IL-4 has been shown to increase resistance to L. monocytogenes (24, 25). The concept that L. monocytogenes-induced CD4+ T cells are restricted to the Th1 phenotype may prove to be of importance in vaccine development if the balance of Th1/Th2 CD4+ subsets is shown to be relevant to disease progression in AIDS. In this study, therefore, we have investigated the strength and phenotype of the CD4+ T cell response to a foreign HIV gene product delivered by this potential vaccine vector.

We have previously described a genetic method to permanently modify the chromosome of L. monocytogenes so that HIV gene products can be expressed as secreted proteins under the control of a copy of the strong promoter of the hemolysin (hly) gene, which encodes listeriolysin-O (26). Furthermore, we demonstrated that mice immunized with one of these constructs, Lm-Gag, mount a strong, specific, long-lasting CTL response against the HIV-1 Gag protein, and that the response is directed predominantly against an epitope present in the p24 portion of the protein (26, 27). In the present work, we show the production in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice of CD4+ T cells of a Th1 phenotype that peaks at day 7 after infection. Levels of IFN-{gamma} produced by Gag-specific cells are similar between the two strains. We also compared the production of IFN-{gamma} by Gag-specific CD4+ T cells induced by Lm-Gag3 with that produced by CD4+ T cells specific for all endogenous soluble secreted listerial Ags (SLA), induced by both Lm-Gag and wild-type L. monocytogenes. Levels of IFN-{gamma} against the foreign HIV gene product were equivalent to levels produced in response to the endogenous Ags delivered by Lm-Gag and wild-type L. monocytogenes. Finally,3 we have identified epitopes present in the p24 portion of the protein in both strains of mice and found that two of these epitopes are common to the H-2b and H-2d MHC class II molecules. We discuss the relevance of these findings with respect to the development of L. monocytogenes as a vaccine against HIV-1.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Female BALB/c (H-2d) and C57BL/6 (H-2b) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Raleigh, NC) and maintained in a pathogen-free microisolator environment. Mice used in this study were 6–12 wk old.

Bacterial strains

L. monocytogenes (Lm-wt) strain 10403S (10) was the wild-type organism used in these studies. It has an LD50 of ~5 x 104 when injected i.v. or i.p. into BALB/c mice. Lm-Gag refers to either one of two recombinant strains of L. monocytogenes, each of which carries a copy of the HIV-1 strain HXB gag gene stably integrated into the listerial chromosome and both of which secrete the gag gene product as determined by Western blotting of secreted proteins (26) (M. Mata, A. Zubair, Z.-J. Yao, K. Syres, and Y. Paterson, manuscript in preparation). The two strains have an LD50 of ~5 x 106 and 5 x 107. All strains were grown in brain/heart infusion (BHI) medium (Difco, Detroit, MI).

Antigens

SLA is a mixture of secreted products of L. monocytogenes grown in vitro in BHI and may include such virulence factors as hemolysin, p60, phospholipase C, metalloprotease, and others. It was prepared by growing 10403S in BHI until it reached stationary phase. The bacteria were spun out and the supernatant was filtered. Ammonium sulfate was added to 80% saturation, and precipitated protein was sedimented by high-speed centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in PBS and dialyzed against PBS to eliminate remaining ammonium sulfate.

Gag p24 was purified from an Escherichia coli heat-induced expression system, as previously described (28). In brief, E. coli was grown to log phase at 32°C in LB broth (Difco), and the temperature was raised to 42°C to induce production of p24. After 90 min of shaking, E. coli was pelleted and lysed, and inclusion bodies were purified. Inclusion bodies were then washed to eliminate any detergents remaining and suspended in 8 M urea. This preparation was further purified by anion-exchange purification (Gradifrac, Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) using SP and Q columns. Purity of p24 was then verified by Coomassie blue staining of SDS-PAGE gels as well as by Western blot (data not shown).

SIV-Nef was purified from an E. coli isopropyl {beta}-D-thiogalactoside induction system (kind gift of Dr. Casey Morrow, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL). In brief, E. coli was grown to log phase in LB broth (Difco) with carbenicillin and kanamycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 37°C. Isopropyl {beta}-D-thiogalactoside was added at a final concentration of 0.5 µM, and cells were incubated an additional 2 h at 30°C. After overnight storage at room temperature, E. coli was pelleted and sonicated. The resulting protein solution was mixed with 50% slurry of glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Pharmacia Biotech) and rocked for 30 min at 4°C. After washing the matrix with thrombin cleavage buffer (Novagen, Madison, WI), the protein was cleaved using thrombin protease (Novagen), collected, and dialyzed against PBS buffer. Purity of Nef was verified by Coomassie blue staining of SDS-PAGE gels as well as by Western blot (data not shown).

Twenty-two overlapping 20-mer peptides (Table IGo) with 10-aa overlaps, spanning residues 133–362 of the HIV-1SF2 Gag protein encompassing the p24 region, were provided by the MRC AIDS reagent project, London, U.K. (Repository reference: ADP 788.1–22).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Overlapping peptides spanning the HIV-1 SF2 Gag p24 sequence peptides are 20-mers with 10-aa overlap1

 
The identification and synthesis of the Kd-restricted CTL peptide epitope, Gag197–205, called AMQM in this study, have been previously described (27).

Proliferation assays

Six- to twelve-week-old female mice were immunized i.p. with 106 or 107 live Lm-Gag, or with 104 live 10403S (Lm-wt). Splenocytes were obtained from mice 1 wk after immunization, and T cells were purified by nylon wool purification, as previously described (29). Briefly, splenocytes were added to a nylon wool column to eliminate adherent cells and were incubated at 37°C for 45 min, eluted, and washed. This step was performed twice for higher purity. A total of 5 x 105 nylon wool purified splenocytes was cultured in triplicate in 96-well microplates with Ag in 200 µl of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 µM 2-ME (RP-10). An equal number of irradiated (3000 rad) splenocytes from naive mice were added as APCs. T cells and APCs were cocultured for 3 days at 37°C. After 48 h, [3H]thymidine at 50 µCi/ml was added to the cultures for 16–24 h. Plates were harvested on day 3 using a Tomtec harvester 96 (Hamden, CT), and [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured with a MicroBeta Trilux scintillation counter (Wallac, EG&G, Gaithersburg, MD).

Complement-mediated depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

Nylon wool-purified splenocytes were resuspended in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 5% FCS at a concentration of 1 x 107 cells/ml. Supernatants from hybridoma 2.43 (anti-CD8) or hybridoma GK1.5 (anti-CD4) containing the respective Abs were added to the cells at a 1/2 dilution. Cells and Abs were incubated for 30 min at 4°C. After this time, cells were spun and resuspended at the same concentration, and rabbit complement H-2 (PelFreez Clinical Systems, Brown Deer, WI) was added at a 1/5 dilution. Cells and complement were incubated for 45 min at 37°C. After this time, cells were washed, counted, and resuspended in RP-10 and used in a proliferation assay, as described above.

ELISA cultures

Six- to eight-week-old female mice were immunized by i.p. inoculation with 106 or 107 live Lm-Gag, or with 104 live Lm-wt. Splenocytes (5 x 105 cells/ml), obtained from mice at several different time points after immunization, were cultured in 24-well plates with Ag at 37°C in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 50 µM 2-ME. After 3 days, supernatants of duplicate cultures were collected and stored at -20°C until samples were tested for cytokines by ELISA.

Cytokine ELISAs

IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 were measured using a specific sandwich ELISA, as described previously (30, 31, 32). IFN-{gamma} was detected using the mAb R46-A2 at 5 µg/ml and polyclonal rabbit anti-IFN-{gamma} used at an optimal dilution (kindly provided by Dr. Phillip Scott, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). The levels of IFN-{gamma} were calculated by comparison with a standard curve using murine rIFN-{gamma} (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). IL-4 was detected using mAb 11B11 at 1 µg/ml and biotinylated mAb BVD-6 used at an optimal dilution. The levels of IL-4 were calculated by comparison with a standard curve using supernatants from the IL-4-secreting X-4 cell line (33). Plates were developed using a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG Ab (IFN-{gamma}) or peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (IL-4) (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and ABTS (2.2'-azino-di[3-ethyl-benzthiazoline sulfonate(6)] as a peroxidase substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). Plates were then read at 405 nm. The lower limit of detection for the assays was as follows: ~30 pg/ml for IFN-{gamma} and 0.2 U/ml for IL-4.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Immunization of BALB/c mice with Lm-Gag results in proliferative responses to recombinant p24

To study the CD4+ T cell response to HIV-Gag, we first measured the ability of Lm-Gag immune splenocytes to proliferate in response to exogenous HIV-Gag Ag. We used splenocytes from BALB/c mice immunized with Lm-wt or the Lm-Gag recombinant strains and stimulated them with Ag for 3 days before pulsing with [3H]thymidine. Whereas splenocytes from both groups of mice were able to proliferate equally well in response to SLA (total secreted proteins from L. monocytogenes), only splenocytes from mice immunized with Lm-Gag proliferated in response to the in vitro addition of purified p24, a proteolytic product of the Gag protein (Fig. 1Go). The response to Gag p24 was specific because splenocytes from Lm-Gag-immunized mice were not stimulated by rSIV239-Nef produced and purified by a similar protocol (data not shown). Not unexpectedly, proliferation of Lm-Gag splenocytes to p24 was not as great as to SLA, which includes numerous Ags secreted by L. monocytogenes, including a number of known virulence factors (34).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. T cells from Lm-Gag-immunized mice proliferate in response to Gag p24. Female BALB/c mice were immunized i.p. with 0.2 LD50 Lm-Gag or Lm-wt. After 1 wk, splenocytes were isolated and T cells enriched by nylon wool purification. In vitro cultures were set up with either SLA or p24. On day 2 of the incubation, [3H]thymidine was added to the cultures. On day 3, cells were harvested and [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured using a scintillation counter. The error bars represent the SD between triplicate assays for each measurement.

 
CD4+ T cells mediate proliferative responses against Gag, in two strains of mice

To further characterize the proliferative response to p24 Gag, we wished to identify epitopes in two different strains of mice, BALB/c (H-2d) and C57BL/6 (H-2b). Twenty-two overlapping peptides (Table IGo) that span the entire p24 region of the Gag protein were used as Ags in proliferation assays with splenocytes from mice immunized with Lm-Gag. We were able to identify two and three epitopes for the H-2d and H-2b haplotypes, respectively (Fig. 2Go, A and B). In addition, none of the peptides induced proliferative responses in splenocytes from mice immunized with the wild-type strain of L. monocytogenes (data not shown). Interestingly, two of these epitopes were common for both strains of mice. Promiscuous epitopes that bind to more than one haplotype have previously been identified for HIV-Env (35, 36). Indeed, such epitopes are considered advantageous for peptide-based vaccine approaches because they can be used to induce immunity in outbred populations (37, 38). To determine whether the common epitopes were immunodominant for both haplotypes, proliferation assays were performed at limiting dilutions (Fig. 3Go, A and B). The data show that although two peptides are recognized by both strains of mice, namely MRC-2 (Gag143–162) and MRC-17 (Gag193–212), only MRC-2 is immunodominant and solely for the H-2b haplotype (Fig. 3GoB). In BALB/c mice, MRC-13 (Gag253–272) is immunodominant for H-2d (Fig. 3GoA).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Identification of H-2d- and H-2b-restricted epitopes recognized by T cells from Lm-Gag-immunized mice. BALB/c (A) or C57BL/6 (B) female mice were immunized i.p. with 0.2 LD50 Lm-Gag. After 1 wk, splenocytes were isolated and T cells enriched by nylon wool purification. In vitro cultures were set up with peptides at 1 µM. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured as in Fig. 1Go.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Different epitopes are immunodominant in H-2d and H-2b Lm-Gag-immunized mice. Female BALB/c (A) or C57BL/6 (B) mice were immunized i.p. with 0.2 LD50 Lm-Gag. After 1 wk, splenocytes were isolated and T cells enriched by nylon wool purification. In vitro cultures were set up with peptides at varying concentrations. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured as in Fig. 1Go.

 
Proliferation assays are considered standard methods to measure CD4+ T cell activation. Furthermore, our data are consistent with the identified epitopes being recognized by CD4+ T cells because of the absence of CD8+ T cell epitopes in the immunodominant MRC-2 and -13 peptides (27). Nevertheless, to verify that the proliferation observed was restricted to the CD4+ T cell pool, we performed proliferation assays using the newly identified epitopes as sources of Ag and splenocytes from Lm-Gag-immunized mice that had been depleted of either the CD8+ or CD4+ T cell populations. As shown in Fig. 4Go, depletion of the CD4+ population, but not the CD8+ population, resulted in total abrogation of the proliferative response, confirming that this is, indeed, a measure of the CD4+ T cell response. Depletion of CD8+ T cells did result in diminished stimulation index values, suggesting a possible contribution by this T cell subset. This difference may be due to an increased background proliferative response of the CD4+ T cell population remaining after CD8+ T cell depletion, which was observed. It is also possible that activated CD8+ T cells may be playing a role by producing cytokines that could enhance the CD4+ T cell proliferative response.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Proliferative responses against Gag are mediated by CD4+ T cells, but not by CD8+ T cells. Female BALB/c (A) or C57BL/6 (B) mice were immunized i.p. with 0.2 LD50 Lm-Gag. After 1 wk, splenocytes were isolated, T cells enriched by nylon wool purification, and subsets depleted by complement-mediated depletion methods. In vitro cultures were set up with peptides at 1 µM. AMQM refers to the 9-mer peptide that is the CTL epitope. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured as in Fig. 1Go.

 
CD4+ T cell responses to Gag delivered by L. monocytogenes present a Th1 phenotype

A major incentive for using L. monocytogenes as a vaccine vector for HIV is its ability to induce a strong Th1 phenotype response. Although it seems likely that the CD4+ T cell response to a foreign protein secreted by L. monocytogenes would have a similar phenotype to that specific for endogenous listerial Ags, this has not previously been investigated. To verify that the Gag-specific response is also of the Th1 phenotype, we examined the cytokine profile of Gag-specific T cells in vitro. Splenocytes from mice immunized with Lm-Gag were cultured with Ag for 3 days. Supernatants from these cultures were then tested for IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 using specific two-site or sandwich ELISAs. As shown in Fig. 5Go, while splenocytes from both Lm-wt- and Lm-Gag-immunized mice produced IFN-{gamma} in response to SLA, only splenocytes from Lm-Gag-immunized mice responded to p24 by producing IFN-{gamma}. IL-4 production was below the level of detection of this assay (0.2 U/ml) (data not shown).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. T cells from Lm-Gag-immunized mice produce IFN-{gamma} but not IL-4 in response to Gag p24. Female BALB/c (A, B, and C) or C57BL/6 (D, E, and F) mice were immunized i.p. with 0.2 LD50 Lm-Gag or Lm-wt or were not treated. After 4, 7, 10, or 13 days, splenocytes were isolated. In vitro cultures were set up with no Ag (A and D), SLA at 5 µg/ml (B and E), or p24 at 5 µg/ml (C and F) for 3 days. On day 3, supernatants were collected and tested for IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 production using ELISA assays. Results for IL-4 were below the limit of detection of the assay. The error bars represent the SD of the average of three individual mice per group.

 
Ag-specific production of IFN-{gamma} peaked at day 7 for both p24 and SLA responses consistent with adaptive immune cells as the source of cytokine secretion. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are known to produce IFN-{gamma} in an Ag-specific manner in listeriosis as well as in viral diseases (39, 40). The exogenous p24 used as a source of Ag in these assays is unlikely to stimulate CD8+ T cells. However, to determine the role played by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in Ag-specific production of IFN-{gamma}, we took advantage of the previous identification of T cell epitopes. In the H-2b haplotype, we could confirm that CD4+ T cells that recognize the two epitopes identified (MRC-2 and MRC-17) produce IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 6GoB), and that the level of production correlates with the antigenicity of the epitope, as determined by proliferation assays (Fig. 3GoB). The levels of IFN-{gamma} production in this particular experiment were lower than in other experiments presented in this work and are a good example of the variability observed in these types of assays and the difficulty of working with fresh splenocytes and in vivo systems instead of cell lines and clones. Nonetheless, the patterns of secretion are reproducible from one experiment to another. For T cells of the H-2d haplotype, we were able to test the role of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells using the MHC class II epitopes identified above as well as a MHC class I epitope previously described (27), Gag197–205. Although some T cells clearly respond to the MHC class I epitope with production of IFN-{gamma}, the level of production by T cells recognizing MRC-13, the MHC class II epitope, is substantially higher (Fig. 6GoA). Again, a comparison of the different CD4+ epitopes corroborates immunogenicity of the epitopes determined by proliferation assays (Fig. 3GoA).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Gag p24-specific IFN-{gamma} production is mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Female BALB/c (A) or C57BL/6 (B) mice were immunized i.p. with 0.2 LD50 Lm-Gag. After 7 days, splenocytes were isolated. In vitro cultures were set up with SLA at 5 µg/ml or peptides at 1 µM for 3 days. On day 3, supernatants were collected and tested for IFN-{gamma} production using ELISA assays. Each symbol represents results for an individual animal. The horizontal bar is the average of four mice.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During the early stages of HIV and AIDS immunology research, the emphasis was placed on the role of Abs in controlling infection, as reviewed (4). It was not until recent years that the focus shifted to the role of cytokines and cell-mediated immune responses with the conclusion, by many, that perhaps vaccines that induce strong CTL responses might be more effective (5). Numerous studies had shown the presence of CTLs specific to HIV Ags in HIV+ individuals, but more interesting was the finding of the presence of such CTLs in HIV-seronegative individuals that had been exposed to the virus (41, 42), suggesting that the CTL responses cleared the virus during the very early stages of infection. Indeed, an inverse correlation between the presence of CTLs specific for several Ags and rapid progression to AIDS has been shown (43, 44). In addition, Clerici and Shearer (7) showed an inverse correlation between IL-2 secretion by PBL and progression to disease, such that during the early stages of infection, patients had strong IL-2 responses while, as they progressed to AIDS, IL-2 could not be detected. Concomitant with the waning of IL-2 secretion, there appeared to be an increase in the production of IL-4 and a decrease in CTL responses. Furthermore, IL-12, a cytokine involved in the early differentiation of the Th1 phenotype has been shown to be important in resistance to HIV (45, 46), but its production is impaired in HIV-1-infected patients (47, 48). Taken together, these studies strongly suggest that a shift from Th1 to Th2 responses exacerbates disease, implying that the induction of Th1 responses against HIV would be a desirable approach for vaccine development.

Although differences in resistance to L. monocytogenes have been reported among different strains of mice (49, 50), these do not appear to be related to a predisposition by susceptible strains to a Th2 CD4+ T cell phenotype, as is the case in leishmaniasis (51). The immune response to L. monocytogenes, in both susceptible and resistant strains, is characterized by a strong Th1 cell-mediated response with the production of high levels of IL-12, TNF-{alpha}, and IFN-{gamma} and strong CTL responses to several Listerial Ags (52). mRNA levels of several cytokines, including IL-1{beta}, IL-6, GM-CSF, and TNF-{alpha}, can be detected in vivo, in a variety of strains of mice, as early as 30 min after infection in the liver and spleen (53, 54, 55, 56). IFN-{gamma} mRNA can be detected as early as 30 min in the liver, but a significant increase is seen after 16 h in the spleen (55, 56). These data correlated with cytokine secretion by splenocytes harvested 6 h after infection and cultured for 48 h in the presence of Ag (56). Furthermore, using in vivo Ab depletion or cytokine knockout mice, some of these cytokines, namely IL-6 (57), TNF-{alpha} (19, 58), IL-12 (20, 21), and IFN-{gamma} (22, 23), have been shown to be indispensable for protection against listerial infection. Although control of the infection appears to be mediated by neutrophils (59) and activated macrophages (60, 61, 62), the presence of T cells, in particular CTLs, is necessary to obtain sterilizing immunity (52). In addition, memory responses are clearly mediated by CD8 T cells in the mouse model (63, 64).

Clearly, the outcome of HIV and listerial infections is very different in that the immune response to listerial Ags results in sterilizing immunity and protection from further challenge in mice, whereas the immune response to HIV infection is not always successful in controlling viral replication. There is, therefore, an urgent need to develop anti-HIV vaccines to induce immune responses that can control infection. To determine what the requirements are for these vaccines, studies have focused on the immune parameters of those individuals that have mounted effective immune responses against the virus, which were discussed above. Because the immune response to listerial Ags and the immune parameters thought to be required for effective HIV vaccine approaches have critical elements in common, we have been developing L. monocytogenes constructs expressing HIV Ags as possible AIDS vaccines (11, 26, 27) (M. Mata, A. Zubair, Z.-J. Yao, K. Syres, and Y. Paterson, manuscript in preparation). Using one of these constructs that expresses the gag gene, we were able to show the induction of strong CTL responses (26) and identified an epitope in the H-2d haplotype (27). In this study, we have examined the CD4+ T cell compartment in anti-HIV Gag immunity induced by Lm-Gag in two strains of mice that differ in both MHC haplotype and genetic background.

The first question we asked was whether we could detect proliferative responses in vitro to recombinant p24, a proteolytic product of the Gag protein that had been shown to contain the class I-restricted epitope in BALB/c mice (26). A proliferative response to a large protein in vitro is usually indicative of the presence of Ag-specific CD4+ T cell responses. Our data, then, suggested that the proliferative response seen in mice immunized with Lm-Gag, but not with the wild-type strain of L. monocytogenes, was CD4+ specific (Fig. 1Go). Furthermore, utilizing a series of overlapping peptides that spanned the whole sequence of p24 (Table IGo), we were able to identify several epitopes in two different haplotypes, namely H-2d and H-2b (Fig. 2Go, A and B). More interestingly, two of these epitopes were common to both strains of mice.

A potential problem in vaccine approaches that focus on isolated Ags or T cell peptide epitopes is the diversity of the MHC molecules in an outbred population that could result in Ags being presented by some but not other MHC haplotypes, leaving a segment of the population unprotected (37, 38). Therefore, the identification of epitopes that can bind to more than one haplotype was interesting. However, the immunodominance patterns observed for the two strains of mice indicated that although Gag293–312 (MRC-17) and Gag143–162 (MRC-2) are recognized by both strains, they are weak Ags for H-2d-restricted T cells (Fig. 3Go).

A major objective in using L. monocytogenes as a vaccine approach for HIV is to exploit its characteristic induction of a Th1 response. In this study, we have confirmed that the response to a recombinant Ag delivered by L. monocytogenes showed this particular cytokine pattern. Although splenocytes from mice immunized with either the Lm-Gag or the wild-type strain responded to listerial Ags (SLA), only mice immunized with Lm-Gag responded to the recombinant p24 Ag in vitro by secreting IFN-{gamma}, whereas IL-4 production was not detectable in any of the groups. The IFN-{gamma} response peaked at day 7, correlating with the activation of T cells shown to peak at this time point in a primary infection with L. monocytogenes (65, 66). Other, non-T cell sources of IFN-{gamma} such as NK cells or {gamma}{delta} T cells would be expected to feature more prominently early in infection, nor are they known to be specific for conventional protein Ags. In addition, using MHC-specific epitopes (Fig. 6Go), we were able to verify that the major cellular source of this cytokine was, indeed, a CD4+, MHC class II-restricted T cell.

In this study, we have shown the induction of Gag-specific CD4+ T cells with a Th1 phenotype in response to HIV-Gag delivered by L. monocytogenes and demonstrated that such response is comparable with the response mounted to the endogenous listerial Ags. This response, in combination with the CD8+ T cell response reported in previous work (26, 27), encourages the further exploration of L. monocytogenes as a vaccine vector for HIV, including a comparison with other live vectors such as vaccinia virus, Salmonella sp., and bacillus Calmette-Guérin, as well as other approaches such as peptide vaccines, recombinant proteins, and DNA vaccines. In addition, the ability to use L. monocytogenes to deliver recombinant Ags with the consequent induction of both CD4+- and CD8+-specific responses may be useful for the prevention of other viral infections (11, 12, 14, 15, 16) and treatment of other diseases such as cancer (11).


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Phillip Scott (University of Pennsylvania) and Dr. Leslie King (University of Pennsylvania) for helpful discussions and the sharing of techniques and reagents. We also thank Dr. Nita Salzman and Kimberly Syres for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI-36657. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Yvonne Paterson, Department of Microbiology, 323 Johnson Pavilion, 3610 Hamilton Walk, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6076. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Lm-Gag, L. monocytogenes strain expressing HIVgag; BHI, brain/heart infusion; Lm-wt, L. monocytogenes wild-type strain; SLA, secreted listerial Ags. Back

Received for publication March 12, 1999. Accepted for publication May 13, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Fauci, A. S.. 1993. Multifactorial nature of human immunodeficiency virus disease: implications for therapy. Science 262:1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hahn, B. H., G. M. Shaw, M. E. Taylor, R. R. Redfield, P. D. Markham, S. Z. Salahuddin, F. Wong-Stall, R. C. Gallo, E. S. Parks, W. P. Parks. 1986. Genetic variation in HTLV-III/LAV over time in patients with AIDS or at risk for AIDS. Science 232:1548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Saag, M., B. H. Hahn, J. Gibbons, Y. X. Li, E. S. Parks, W. P. Parks, G. M. Shaw. 1988. Extensive variation of HIV type-1 in vivo. Nature 334:440.[Medline]
  4. Haigwood, N. L., S. Zolla-Pazner. 1998. Humoral immunity to HIV, SIV, and SHIV. AIDS 12:(Suppl. A):S121.
  5. Kalams, S. A., B. D. Walker. 1994. The cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response in HIV-1 infection. Clin. Lab. Med. 14:271.[Medline]
  6. Salk, A., P. A. Bretscher, P. L. Salk, M. Clerici, G. Shearer. 1993. A strategy for prophylactic vaccination against HIV. Science 260:1270.[Free Full Text]
  7. Clerici, M., G. M. Shearer. 1993. A Th1->Th2 switch is a critical step in the etiology of HIV infection. Immunol. Today 14:107.[Medline]
  8. Falkow, S., R. R. Isberg, D. A. Portnoy. 1992. The interaction of bacteria with mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8:333.
  9. De Libero, G., S. H. E. Kaufmann. 1986. Antigen-specific Lyt-2+ lymphocytes from mice infected with the intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. J. Immunol. 137:2688.[Abstract]
  10. Bishop, D. K., D. J. Hinrichs. 1987. Adoptive transfer of immunity to Listeria monocytogenes: the influence of in vitro stimulation on lymphocyte subset requirements. J. Immunol. 139:2005.[Abstract]
  11. Weiskirch, L. M., Y. Paterson. 1997. Listeria monocytogenes: a potent vaccine vector for neoplastic and infectious disease. Immunol. Rev. 158:159.[Medline]
  12. Jensen, E. R., H. Shen, F. O. Wettstein, R. Ahmed, J. F. Miller. 1997. Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes as a live vaccine vehicle and a probe for studying cell-mediated immunity. Immunol. Rev. 158:147.[Medline]
  13. Schafer, R., D. A. Portnoy, S. A. Brassell, Y. Paterson. 1992. Induction of a cellular immune response to a foreign antigen by a recombinant Listeria monocytogenes vaccine. J. Immunol. 149:53.[Abstract]
  14. Ikonomidis, G., Y. Paterson, F. Kos, D. Portnoy. 1994. Delivery of a viral antigen to the class I processing and presentation pathway by L. monocytogenes. J. Exp. Med. 180:2209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Goossens, P. L., G. Milon, P. Cossart, M.-F. Saron. 1995. Attenuated Listeria monocytogenes as a live vector for induction of CD8+ T cells in vivo: a study with the nucleoprotein of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Int. Immunol. 7:797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Slifka, M. K., H. Shen, M. Matloubian, E. R. Jensen, J. F. Miller, R. Ahmed. 1996. Antiviral cytotoxic T-cell memory by vaccination with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes. J. Virol. 70:2902.[Abstract]
  17. Hsieh, C.-S., S. E. Macatonia, C. S. Tripp, S. F. Wolf, A. O’Garra, K. M. Murphy. 1993. Development of TH1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by Listeria-induced macrophages. Science 260:547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hsieh, C.-S., S. E. Macatonia, A. O’Garra, K. M. Murphy. 1993. Pathogen-induced Th1 phenotype development in CD4+ {alpha}{beta}-TCR transgenic T cells is macrophage dependent. Int. Immunol. 5:371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Zhan, Y., C. Cheers. 1998. Control of IL-12 and IFN-{gamma} production in response to live or dead bacteria by TNF and other factors. J. Immunol. 161:1447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wagner, R. D., H. Steinberg, J. F. Brown, C. J. Czuprynski. 1994. Recombinant interleukin-12 enhances resistance of mice to Listeria monocytogenes infection. Microb. Pathog. 17:175.[Medline]
  21. Tripp, C. S., M. K. Gately, J. Hakimi, P. Ling, E. R. Unanue. 1994. Neutralization of IL-12 decreases resistance to Listeria in SCID and C. B-17 mice: reversal by IFN-{gamma}. J. Immunol. 152:1883.[Abstract]
  22. Dalton, D. K., S. Pitts-Meek, S. Keshav, I. S. Figari, A. Bradley, T. A. Stewart. 1993. Multiple defects of immune cell function in mice with disrupted interferon-{gamma} genes. Science 259:1739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Huang, S., W. Hendriks, A. Althage, S. Hemmi, H. Bluethmann, R. Kamijo, J. Vilcek, R. M. Zinkernagel, M. Aguet. 1993. Immune responses in mice that lack the interferon-{gamma} receptor. Science 259:1742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Dai, W. J., G. Kohler, F. Brombacher. 1997. Both innate and acquired immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection are increased in IL-10-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 158:2259.[Abstract]
  25. Haak-Frendscho, M., J. F. Brown, Y. Iizawa, R. D. Wagner, C. J. Czuprynski. 1992. Administration of anti-IL-4 monoclonal antibody 11B11 increases the resistance of mice to Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Immunol. 148:3978.[Abstract]
  26. Frankel, F. R., S. Hegde, J. Lieberman, Y. Paterson. 1995. Induction of cell-mediated immune responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein by using Listeria monocytogenes as a live vaccine vector. J. Immunol. 155:4775.[Abstract]
  27. Mata, M., P. J. Travers, Q. Liu, F. R. Frankel, Y. Paterson. 1998. The MHC class I-restricted immune response to HIV-gag in BALB/c mice selects a single epitope that does not have a predictable MHC-binding motif and binds to Kd through interactions between a glutamine at P3 and pocket D. J. Immunol. 161:2985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Debouck, C., J. G. Gorniak, J. E. Strickler, T. D. Meek, B. W. Metcalf, M. Rosenberg. 1987. Human immunodeficiency virus protease expressed in Escherichia coli exhibits autoprocessing and specific maturation of the gag precursor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:8903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Julius, M. H., E. Simpson, L. A. Herzenberg. 1973. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 3:645.[Medline]
  30. Curry, R. C., P. A. Keiner, G. L. Spitalny. 1987. A sensitive immunochemical assay for biologically active µIFN-{gamma}. J. Immunol. Methods 104:137.[Medline]
  31. Mossman, T. R., T. A. T. Fong. 1989. Specific assays for cytokine production by T cells. J. Immunol. Methods 116:151.[Medline]
  32. Chatelain, R., K. Varkila, R. L. Coffman. 1992. IL-4 induces a Th2 response in Leishmania major-infected mice. J. Immunol. 148:1182.[Abstract]
  33. Karasuyama, H., F. Melchers. 1988. Establishment of mouse cell lines which constitutively secrete large quantities of interleukin 2, 3, 4 or 5, using modified cDNA expression vectors. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:97.[Medline]
  34. Brehm, K., J. Kreft, M. T. Ripio, J. A. Vazquez-Boland. 1996. Regulation of virulence gene expression in pathogenic Listeria. Microbiologia 12:219.[Medline]
  35. Palker, T. J., T. J. Matthews, A. Langlois, M. E. Tanner, M. E. Martin, R. M. Scearce, J. E. Kim, J. A. Berzofsky, D. P. Bolognesi, B. F. Haynes. 1989. Polyvalent human immunodeficiency virus synthetic immunogen comprised of envelope gp120 T helper cell sites and B cell neutralization epitopes. J. Immunol. 142:3612.[Abstract]
  36. Shirai, M., C. D. Pendleton, J. A. Berzofsky. 1992. Broad recognition of cytotoxic T cell epitopes from the HIV-1 envelope protein with multiple class I histocompatibility molecules. J. Immunol. 148:1657.[Abstract]
  37. Berzofsky, J. A.. 1988. Features of T-cell recognition and antigen structure useful in the design of vaccines to elicit T-cell immunity. Vaccine 6:89.[Medline]
  38. Alexander, J., J. Sidney, S. Southwood, J. Ruppert, C. Oseroff, A. Maewal, K. Snoke, H. M. Serra, R. T. Kubo, A. Sette, et al 1994. Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. Immunity 1:751.[Medline]
  39. Nakane, A., T. Minagawa, M. Kohanawa, Y. Chen, H. Sato, M. Moriyama, N. Tsuruoka. 1989. Interactions between endogenous {gamma} interferon and tumor necrosis factor in host resistance against primary and secondary Listeria monocytogenes infections. Infect. Immun. 57:3331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Su, H. C., L. P. Cousens, L. D. Fast, M. K. Slifka, R. D. Bungiro, R. Ahmed, C. A. Biron. 1998. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell interactions in IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 responses to viral infections: requirements for IL-2. J. Immunol. 160:5007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Clerici, M., J. V. Giorgi, C. C. Chou, V. K. Gudeman, J. A. Zack, P. Gupta, H. N. Ho, P. G. Nishanian, J. A. Berzofsky, G. M. Shearer. 1992. Cell-mediated immune response to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 in seronegative homosexual men with recent sexual exposure to HIV-1. J. Infect. Dis. 165:1012.[Medline]
  42. Rowland-Jones, S. L., T. Dong, K. R. Fowke, J. Kimani, P. Krausa, H. Newell, T. Blanchard, K. Ariyoshi, J. Oyugi, E. Ngugi, et al 1998. Cytotoxic T cell responses to multiple conserved HIV epitopes in HIV-resistant prostitutes in Nairobi. J. Clin. Invest. 102:1758.[Medline]
  43. Zanussi, S., C. Simonelli, M. D’Andrea, C. Caffau, M. Clerici, U. Tirelli, P. DePaoli. 1996. CD8+ lymphocyte phenotype and cytokine production in long-term non-progressor and in progressor patients with HIV-1 infection. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 105:220.[Medline]
  44. Dyer, W. B., G. S. Ogg, M. A. Demoitie, X. Jin, A. F. Geczy, S. L. Rowland-Jones, A. J. McMichael, D. F. Nixon, J. S. Sullivan. 1999. Strong human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity in Sydney Blood Bank Cohort patients infected with nef-defective HIV type 1. J. Virol. 73:436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Clerici, M., D. R. Lucey, J. A. Berzofsky, L. A. Pinto, T. A. Wynn, S. P. Blatt, M. J. Dolan, C. W. Hendrix, S. F. Wolf, G. Shearer. 1993. Restoration of HIV-specific cell-mediated immune responses by interleukin-12 in vitro. Science 262:1721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Salgame, P., M. X. Guan, A. Agahtehrani, E. E. Henderson. 1998. Infection of T cell subsets by HIV-1 and the effects of interleukin-12. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 18:521.[Medline]
  47. Chehimi, J., S. E. Starr, I. Frank, A. D’Andrea, X. Ma, R. R. MacGregor, J. Sennelier, G. Trinchieri. 1994. Impaired interleukin 12 production in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J. Exp. Med. 179:1361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Taoufik, Y., O. Lantz, C. Wallon, A. Charles, E. Dussaix, J. F. Delfraissy. 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus gp120 inhibits interleukin-12 secretion by human monocytes: an indirect interleukin-10-mediated effect. Blood 89:2842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Cheers, C., I. F. C. McKenzie, H. Pavlov, C. Waid, J. York. 1978. Resistance and susceptibility of mice to bacterial infection: course of listeriosis in resistant and susceptible mice. Infect. Immun. 19:763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Cheers, C., I. F. C. McKenzie. 1978. Resistance and susceptibility of mice to bacterial infection: genetics of listeriosis. Infect. Immun. 19:755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Jones, D. E., M. M. Elloso, P. Scott. 1998. Host susceptibility factors to cutaneous leishmaniasis. Front. Biosci. 3:D1171.[Medline]
  52. Pamer, E. G., A. J. A. M. Sijits, M. S. Villanueva, D. H. Busch, S. Vijh. 1997. MHC class I antigen processing of Listeria monocytogenes proteins: implications for dominant and subdominant CTL responses. Immunol. Rev. 158:129.[Medline]
  53. Wagner, R. D., C. J. Czuprynski. 1993. Cytokine mRNA expression in livers of mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 53:525.[Abstract]
  54. Poston, R. M., R. J. Kurlander. 1992. Cytokine expression in vivo during murine listeriosis: infection with live, virulent bacteria is required for monokine and lymphokine messenger RNA accumulation in the spleen. J. Immunol. 149:3040.[Abstract]
  55. Iizawa, Y., J. F. Brown, C. J. Czuprynski. 1992. Early expression of cytokine mRNA in mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 60:4068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Ehlers, S., M. E. Mielke, T. Blankenstein, H. Hahn. 1992. Kinetic analysis of cytokine gene expression in the livers of naive and immune mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes: the immediate early phase in innate resistance and acquired immunity. J. Immunol. 149:3016.[Abstract]
  57. Liu, Z., R. J. Simpson, C. Cheers. 1994. Role of IL-6 in activation of T cells for acquired cellular resistance to Listeria monocytogenes. J. Immunol. 152:5375.[Abstract]
  58. Hauser, T., K. Frei, R. M. Zinkernagel, T. P. Leist. 1990. Role of tumor necrosis factor in Listeria resistance of nude mice. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 179:95.[Medline]
  59. Rakhmilevich, A. L.. 1995. Neutrophils are essential for resolution of primary and secondary infection with Listeria monocytogenes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 57:827.[Abstract]
  60. Dai, W. J., W. Bartens, G. Kohler, M. Hufnagel, M. Kopf, F. Brombacher. 1997. Impaired macrophage listericidal and cytokine activities are responsible for the rapid death of Listeria monocytogenes-infected IFN-{gamma} receptor-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 158:5297.[Abstract]
  61. Mackaness, G. B.. 1969. The influence of immunologically committed lymphoid cells on macrophage activity in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 129:973.[Abstract]
  62. Samsom, J. N., A. Annema, P. H. Groeneveld, N. van Rooijen, J. A. Langermans, R. van Furth. 1997. Elimination of resident macrophages from the livers and spleens of immune mice impairs acquired resistance against a secondary Listeria monocytogenes infection. Infect. Immun. 65:986.[Abstract]
  63. Czuprynski, C. J., J. F. Brown. 1990. Effects of purified anti-Lyt-2 mAb treatment on murine listeriosis: comparative roles of Lyt-2+ and L3T4+ cells in resistance to primary and secondary infection, delayed-type hypersensitivity and adoptive transfer of resistance. Immunology 71:107.[Medline]
  64. Orme, I. M.. 1989. Active and memory immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection in mice is mediated by phenotypically distinct T-cell populations. Immunology 68:93.[Medline]
  65. North, R. J.. 1973. Cellular mediators of anti-Listeria immunity as an enlarged population of short-lived replicating T cells: kinetics of their production. J. Exp. Med. 138:342.[Abstract]
  66. Busch, D. H., I. Pilip, E. G. Pamer. 1998. Evolution of a complex T cell receptor repertoire during primary and recall bacterial infection. J. Exp. Med. 188:61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
M. G. Cottingham, A. van Maurik, M. Zago, A. T. Newton, R. J. Anderson, M. K. Howard, J. Schneider, and M. A. Skinner
Different Levels of Immunogenicity of Two Strains of Fowlpox Virus as Recombinant Vaccine Vectors Eliciting T-Cell Responses in Heterologous Prime-Boost Vaccination Strategies.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2006; 13(7): 747 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
C. N. Kotton and E. L. Hohmann
Enteric Pathogens as Vaccine Vectors for Foreign Antigen Delivery
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 5535 - 5547.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
R. Stevens, K. E. Howard, S. Nordone, M. Burkhard, and G. A. Dean
Oral Immunization with Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes Controls Virus Load after Vaginal Challenge with Feline Immunodeficiency Virus
J. Virol., August 1, 2004; 78(15): 8210 - 8218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
M. Giri, K. E. Ugen, and D. B. Weiner
DNA Vaccines against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in the Past Decade
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2004; 17(2): 370 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
D. A. Sewell, D. Douven, Z.-K. Pan, A. Rodriguez, and Y. Paterson
Regression of HPV-Positive Tumors Treated With a New Listeria monocytogenes Vaccine
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2004; 130(1): 92 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. Saklani-Jusforgues, E. Fontan, N. Soussi, G. Milon, and P. L. Goossens
Enteral Immunization with Attenuated Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes as a Live Vaccine Vector: Organ-Dependent Dynamics of CD4 T Lymphocytes Reactive to a Leishmania major Tracer Epitope
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2003; 71(3): 1083 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
V. Novitsky, H. Cao, N. Rybak, P. Gilbert, M. F. McLane, S. Gaolekwe, T. Peter, I. Thior, T. Ndung'u, R. Marlink, et al.
Magnitude and Frequency of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Responses: Identification of Immunodominant Regions of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C
J. Virol., September 11, 2002; 76(20): 10155 - 10168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. Angelakopoulos, K. Loock, D. M. Sisul, E. R. Jensen, J. F. Miller, and E. L. Hohmann
Safety and Shedding of an Attenuated Strain of Listeria monocytogenes with a Deletion of actA/plcB in Adult Volunteers: a Dose Escalation Study of Oral Inoculation
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2002; 70(7): 3592 - 3601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. L. Marzo, V. Vezys, K. Williams, D. F. Tough, and L. Lefrancois
Tissue-Level Regulation of Th1 and Th2 Primary and Memory CD4 T Cells in Response to Listeria Infection
J. Immunol., May 1, 2002; 168(9): 4504 - 4510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. R. Gunn, A. Zubair, C. Peters, Z.-K. Pan, T.-C. Wu, and Y. Paterson
Two Listeria monocytogenes Vaccine Vectors That Express Different Molecular Forms of Human Papilloma Virus-16 (HPV-16) E7 Induce Qualitatively Different T Cell Immunity That Correlates with Their Ability to Induce Regression of Established Tumors Immortalized by HPV-16
J. Immunol., December 1, 2001; 167(11): 6471 - 6479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Hiroi, H. Goto, K. Someya, M. Yanagita, M. Honda, N. Yamanaka, and H. Kiyono
HIV Mucosal Vaccine: Nasal Immunization with rBCG-V3J1 Induces a Long Term V3J1 Peptide-Specific Neutralizing Immunity in Th1- and Th2-Deficient Conditions
J. Immunol., November 15, 2001; 167(10): 5862 - 5867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
J. A. Vazquez-Boland, M. Kuhn, P. Berche, T. Chakraborty, G. Dominguez-Bernal, W. Goebel, B. Gonzalez-Zorn, J. Wehland, and J. Kreft
Listeria Pathogenesis and Molecular Virulence Determinants
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2001; 14(3): 584 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. V. Rayevskaya and F. R. Frankel
Systemic Immunity and Mucosal Immunity Are Induced against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Gag Protein in Mice by a New Hyperattenuated Strain of Listeria monocytogenes
J. Virol., March 15, 2001; 75(6): 2786 - 2791.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Weissman, H. Ni, D. Scales, A. Dude, J. Capodici, K. McGibney, A. Abdool, S. N. Isaacs, G. Cannon, and K. Kariko
HIV Gag mRNA Transfection of Dendritic Cells (DC) Delivers Encoded Antigen to MHC Class I and II Molecules, Causes DC Maturation, and Induces a Potent Human In Vitro Primary Immune Response
J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4710 - 4717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. E. Touloukian, W. W. Leitner, S. L. Topalian, Y. F. Li, P. F. Robbins, S. A. Rosenberg, and N. P. Restifo
Identification of a MHC Class II-Restricted Human gp100 Epitope Using DR4-IE Transgenic Mice
J. Immunol., April 1, 2000; 164(7): 3535 - 3542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
N. Soussi, G. Milon, J.-H. Colle, E. Mougneau, N. Glaichenhaus, and P. L. Goossens
Listeria monocytogenes as a Short-Lived Delivery System for the Induction of Type 1 Cell-Mediated Immunity against the p36/LACK Antigen of Leishmania major
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2000; 68(3): 1498 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mata, M.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS