The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alam, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alam, R.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 163: 939-946.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

A Novel Lyn-Binding Peptide Inhibitor Blocks Eosinophil Differentiation, Survival, and Airway Eosinophilic Inflammation1, 2

Tetsuya Adachi, Susan Stafford, Sanjiv Sur and Rafeul Alam3

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Receptor antagonists block all receptor-coupled signaling pathways indiscriminately. We introduce a novel class of peptide inhibitors that is designed to block a specific signal from a receptor while keeping other signals intact. This concept was tested in the model of IL-5 signaling via Lyn kinase. We have previously mapped the Lyn-binding site of the IL-5/GM-CSF receptor common ß (ßc) subunit. In the present study, we designed a peptide inhibitor using the Lyn-binding sequence. The peptide was N-stearated to enable cellular internalization. The stearated peptide blocked the binding of Lyn to the ßc receptor and the activation of Lyn. The lipopeptide did not affect the activation of Janus kinase 2 or its association with ßc. The inhibitor blocked the Lyn-dependent functions of IL-5 in vitro (e.g., eosinophil differentiation from stem cells and eosinophil survival). It did not affect eosinophil degranulation. When applied in vivo, the Lyn-binding peptide significantly inhibited airway eosinophil influx in a mouse model of asthma. The lipopeptide had no effect on basophil histamine release or on the proliferation of B cells and T cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report on an inhibitor of IL-5 that blocks eosinophil differentiation, survival, and airway eosinophilic inflammation. This novel strategy to develop peptide inhibitors can be applied to other receptors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Eosinophils play a critical role in the pathogenesis of asthma, allergic diseases, and other eosinophilic disorders (1). IL-5 is the most important regulator of eosinophils. It stimulates the growth and differentiation of eosinophils (2). IL-5 also prolongs eosinophil survival by inhibiting apoptosis (3). In addition, IL-5 regulates many eosinophil functions including locomotion (4, 5), degranulation (6, 7), expression of adhesion molecules (8), cytokine synthesis (9), production of mediators such as oxygen radicals (7) and leukotrienes (10), and cytotoxicity for parasites (11). The importance of IL-5 in pathogenesis is underscored by the finding that an anti-IL-5 Ab completely blocks eosinophilic airway infiltration in a mouse model of asthma (12). Further, mice with targeted disruption of the IL-5 gene are unable to develop eosinophilic inflammation of the airways or airway hyperreactivity after allergen challenge (13). Thus, it has been well established that IL-5 regulates eosinophilic inflammation of the airways by modulating multiple functions of eosinophils.

Two tyrosine kinases, Lyn and Janus kinase 2 (Jak2),4 are known to be physically associated with the common ß (ßc) receptor of IL-3/GM-CSF/IL-5 (14, 15). These kinases are phosphorylated on tyrosine residues after stimulation of eosinophils with IL-5 (14, 15, 16, 17). They subsequently transduce signals through the Ras-Raf-1-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and the Jak-STAT pathway. A few studies that have been performed with eosinophils show that Lyn, Syk, and Jak2 tyrosine kinases are important for the antiapoptotic activity of IL-5 or GM-CSF (17, 18, 19). Lyn and Jak2 are additionally important for eosinophil differentiation from stem cells (S.S. and R.A., unpublished observations); however, they are not critical for eosinophil degranulation or for the up-regulation of adhesion molecules (18).

Receptors are the primary target for pharmacologic intervention in modern medicine, and receptor antagonists are the mainstay of therapy for many diseases. Receptors are frequently coupled to multiple signaling pathways. Receptor antagonists block all of these pathways and, as a result, are prone to develop undesired side effects. To circumvent this problem, we introduce a novel class of peptide inhibitors that is designated to block only specific signaling pathways of a receptor (Fig. 1Go). To this goal, we have developed a general strategy as follows: 1) identify a critical signaling molecule that associates with the receptor, 2) map the signaling molecule-binding site of the receptor, 3) design small peptide(s) based upon the binding site and study their in vitro binding activity, 4) N-acylate the peptide for cellular internalization and examine the specificity of signaling inhibition and biologic effects in vitro, and 5) study the biologic effects of the peptides in vivo.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Rationale for signal-specific inhibition of receptors. A, Binding of the ligand with the receptor induces multiple signaling pathways (e.g., signals 1 and 2). B, Receptor antagonists block all cytosolic signals indiscriminately. C, A signal-specific inhibitor blocks only a single signaling pathway, leaving others intact.

 
In this study, we developed a novel signaling inhibitor using the strategy described above. We previously identified the binding site of Lyn kinase on the ßc receptor of IL-3/GM-CSF/IL-5 (20). Based on the amino acid sequence of the binding site, we synthesized sequential and/or overlapping peptides. These peptides bound to Lyn kinase in vitro. Next, we N-stearated the peptides to enable cellular internalization as described previously (21, 22). This lipopeptide inhibitor blocked only the Lyn-specific signal of the IL-5R, while keeping the Jak2 signal intact. It blocked IL-5-stimulated eosinophil differentiation and survival. Furthermore, the inhibitor ameliorated allergen-induced eosinophil infiltration in the airways in a murine model of asthma.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents

A TF-1 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). RPMI medium 1640, IMDM, and antibiotic-antimycotic were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY), and FCS was supplied by Atlanta Biologicals (Norcross, GA). Percoll and an RIA kit for eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were purchased from Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ). Histopaque-1077, Con A, platelet-activating factor (PAF), propidium iodide (PI), OVA, rabbit polyclonal anti-human IgM and IgE Abs, and peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG Ab were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The mAb against antiphosphotyrosine (clone 4G10) was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Rabbit polyclonal anti-Lyn and anti-Jak2 Abs, mouse anti-IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSFRß mAb, HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG Ab, and protein A/G Plus agarose were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-CD16 immunomagnetic beads were supplied by Miltenyi Biotec (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). M-450 Pan-B and Pan-T Dynabeads were obtained from Dynal (Great Neck, NY). Human IL-5, human GM-CSF, and murine IL-3 were purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Murine IL-5 was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). An enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system, Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane, and methyl [3H]thymidine were obtained from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL).

Peptides and antisense (AS) oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs)

The synthesis of peptides and their biotinylation or stearation were performed by Quality Controlled Biochemicals (Hopkinton, MA). A peptide (ßc 450–465: YGYRLRRKWEEKIPNP-NH2) was synthesized based on the Lyn-binding sequence and modified by biotinylation or N-stearation (20). As a control N-stearated peptide, we obtained a peptide corresponding to amino acids 316–335 of IL-5{alpha} receptor (CREAGLWSEWSQPIYVGFSR-NH2). All peptides were purified to >95% by HPLC. The purity of the peptides and their modification were judged by mass spectrometry. A 15-mer Lyn AS ODN was synthesized by Operon Technologies (Alameda, CA) based on previously published sequence information (17, 18). The sequence used is as follows: Lyn AS ODN (CATATTTCCCGCTCG).

Cell culture

TF-1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS and 1 ng/ml human GM-CSF. RPMI 1640 was supplemented with antibiotic-antimycotic (100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 250 ng/ml amphotericin B).

Eosinophil purification

Peripheral blood was obtained from subjects with mild to moderate eosinophilia (6–12%). Eosinophils were isolated by sedimentation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch followed by centrifugation on a 1.088 Percoll density gradient according to the method of Hansel et al. (23). The cells were further purified by negative selection using anti-CD16 immunomagnetic beads and the magnetic cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotec). Eosinophils (>99% purity) were then suspended in RPMI 1640 in tubes coated with 3% human serum albumin.

B cell and T cell purification

The purification of B cells and T cells was done as described previously with slight modifications (24). Briefly, peripheral blood was obtained from normal subjects. PBMCs were isolated using Histopaque-1077 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the depletion of monocytes adhering to plastic petri dishes, the cells were further purified by negative selection using M-450 Pan-B Dynabeads (anti-CD19) for T cells and M-450 Pan-T Dynabeads (anti-CD2) for B cells. The purified T cells and B cells were then suspended in RPMI 1640. The purity of the B cells and T cells was >95%.

Preparation of cytosolic cell extracts and immunoprecipitation

Purified eosinophils (1–2 x 106 cells) were incubated with the N-stearated peptide for 2 h at 37°C followed by stimulation with 10 ng/ml of human IL-5 for 1–3 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 5 volumes of ice-cold 1.2x lysis buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 180 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM Na3VO4, 1.2 mM NaF, 1.2 mM EDTA, 1.2 mM EGTA, 1.2 mM PMSF, 1.2% Nonidet P-40, 0.3% sodium deoxycholate, and 1.2 µg/ml of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin). After 20 min on ice, detergent insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation at 4°C at 12,000 x g. The protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

For immunoprecipitation, the cell lysates were precleared by incubation with 20 µl of the protein A/G Plus agarose for 30 min. After removal of the beads, the lysates were incubated with the appropriate Ab (1–2 µg for each sample) for 1 h followed by incubation with 20 µl of protein A/G Plus agarose for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed three times with the cold 1x lysis buffer. Whole cell lysates or immunoprecipitates were boiled in 2-fold concentrated Laemmli reducing buffer for 2 min.

Gel electrophoresis and Western blotting

SDS-polyacrylamide gels were prepared according to the Laemmli protocol and used for Western blotting. The concentration of polyacrylamide was 8%. Gels were blotted onto Hybond membranes for Western blotting using the ECL system. Blots were incubated in a blocking buffer containing 10% BSA in TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-base, 137 mM NaCl (pH 7.6), and 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h followed by incubation in the primary Ab (0.1 µg/ml) for 1–2 h. After washing three times in TBST buffer, blots were incubated for 30 min with an HRP-conjugated secondary Ab (0.05 µg/ml) directed against the primary Ab. The blots were developed with the ECL substrate according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In some experiments, blots were reprobed with another Ab after stripping in a buffer of 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.7), 100 mM 2-ME, and 2% SDS at 50°C for 30 min.

Murine bone marrow (BM) cell culture

In vitro liquid culture was performed as described elsewhere with modifications (25). OVA-sensitized BALB/c mice were sacrificed, and femurs were removed. The BM cavity was flushed with saline to obtain cells. The BM cells (5 x 105 cells/ml) were suspended in IMDM supplemented with antibiotic-antimycotic. These cells were incubated with the N-stearated peptide for 2 h at 37°C followed by further culture in the presence of 1 ng/ml of murine IL-3 and 6 ng/ml of murine IL-5 plus 10% FCS for the indicated days. After harvesting, the total cell count was obtained; the remaining cells were used for cytospin preparations. These preparations were stained with Wright’s stain to count the number of eosinophils.

Eosinophil survival assay and measurement of ECP

Purified eosinophils (5 x 105 cells/ml) were suspended in RPMI 1640 with 5% FCS and treated with the stearated peptides at incremental concentrations for 2 h at 37°C. After the incubation, the cells were cultured with 1 ng/ml of human IL-5 for 3 days. The viability of the cultured eosinophils was assessed by counting PI-stained dead cells. For ECP release experiments, the stearated peptide-treated eosinophils were primed with GM-CSF (1 ng/ml) for 2 h and subsequently stimulated with PAF (5 x 10-8 M) for 20 min. The supernatants were separated by centrifugation, and the concentration of ECP was measured by RIA.

Allergen inhalation challenge and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)

Allergen sensitization of mice was done as described previously with slight modifications (26). Briefly, mice were sensitized by an i.p. injection of 75 µl (1 mg/ml) of chicken OVA (grade V) with 25 µl of Imject Alum (Pierce). After 1 wk, the mice received a second injection. After an additional 1 wk, mice were exposed to OVA (10 mg/ml) via inhalation for 1 h daily for 5 days. At 2 wk after the last allergen inhalation, the mice were pretreated intrabronchially with one of the peptides (2 µmol, {approx}0.5 mg) or saline and subsequently challenged with OVA inhalation 1 h later. BAL was performed after 24 h. After the total cell count of the BAL fluid had been obtained, the remaining cells were used for cytospin preparations. These preparations were stained with Wright’s stain to count the number of eosinophils.

Histamine release assay

Histamine release from basophils was studied as described previously (24). Briefly, peripheral blood leukocytes were separated from venous blood by sedimentation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch and suspended in HACM buffer (HEPES-buffered saline (pH 7.4), 0.03% human serum albumin, 2 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM MgCl2). The cells were incubated with the N-stearated peptide for 1 h at 37°C and subsequently stimulated with a 1/1000 dilution of a rabbit polyclonal anti-IgE Ab. Supernatants were collected, and the histamine content was measured with an automated fluorometric analyzer.

[3H]Thymidine incorporation

Purified T cells and B cells (5 x 106 cells/ml) were suspended in RPMI 1640 with 5% FCS and cultured with the N-stearated peptide for 2 h at 37°C followed by stimulation of T cells with 5 µg/ml of Con A and B cells with 10 µg/ml of immobilized anti-IgM Ab. The cells were cultured for 96 h, with the addition of 5 µCi/ml of [3H]thymidine (5 Ci/mmol) during the last 6 h. The cells were harvested, and the incorporation of [3H]thymidine was counted using a scintillation counter (Packard, Downers Grove, IL).

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using ANOVA, Student’s paired t test, and the Mann-Whitney U test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on the association of ßc with tyrosine kinases

The IL-5R has two subunits: the ligand-specific {alpha} subunit and the ßc subunit common to IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF (27). The ßc subunit physically associates with Lyn and Jak2 kinases (14, 15). We have previously mapped the Lyn-binding site of the ßc. Three overlapping peptides from this region (ßc 450–465, ßc 457–465, and ßc 462–481) bound Lyn kinase in vitro (20). To enable cellular internalization, the Lyn-binding peptides were modified by N-stearation. We performed many experiments with all three lipopeptides. The lipopeptides produced nearly identical results. For simplicity, we will present the data obtained with one of the peptides, ßc 450–465. To determine whether the N-stearated peptide binds Lyn in situ and competitively blocks its association with ßc, we incubated eosinophils with the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide or control peptides for 2 h. The control peptides were biotinylated ßc 450–465 peptide and N-stearated IL-5{alpha} 316–335 peptide. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-ßc Ab followed by electrophoresis and Western blotting with an anti-Lyn or anti-Jak2 Ab. The N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, but not the control peptides, abrogated the coprecipitation of Lyn with ßc (Fig. 2GoA). We also performed anti-Jak2 Western blotting using the same ßc immunoprecipitates. In contrast to the anti-Lyn blot, the coprecipitation of Jak2 with ßc was not inhibited by the peptide (Fig. 2GoB). We have observed a similar effect of the lipopeptide when the lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Lyn or anti-Jak2 Ab and immunoblotted with anti-ßc Ab (20). Our results indicate a specific binding of the lipopeptide to Lyn kinase in situ.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Effect of the N-stearated ßc 450– 465 peptide on the coimmunoprecipitation of Lyn and ßc. Eosinophils were incubated in the presence or absence of the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide for 2 h and lysed. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-ßc Ab. A, Western blotting with anti-Lyn Ab revealed that the coimmunoprecipitation of Lyn and ßc was inhibited by the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide but not by control peptides. B, In contrast, the coprecipitation of Jak2 and ßc was not affected by the peptide. These results indicate the specific binding of the peptide to Lyn kinase in situ.

 
Effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on IL-5 signaling

To study the effect of the lipopeptide on cytokine signaling, we examined the IL-5-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins in eosinophils. The cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the N-stearated peptide for 2 h and subsequently stimulated with or without IL-5 for 3 min. A stearated peptide derived from IL-5R{alpha} receptor was used as a control. After lysing the cells, the lysates were subjected to electrophoresis and Western blotting with an antiphosphotyrosine Ab. The stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, but not the stearated IL-5R{alpha} 316–335 peptide, inhibited the IL-5-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of cellular proteins in a dose-dependent manner in eosinophils (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Effect of the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide on the IL-5-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins. Eosinophils were incubated in the presence or absence of the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide and subsequently stimulated with or without IL-5 for 3 min. The stearated IL-5{alpha} 316–335 peptide was used as a control. After lysing the cells, the lysates were subjected to electrophoresis and Western blotting with an antiphosphotyrosine Ab. The N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide inhibited the IL-5-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of proteins (indicated by arrows) in eosinophils in a dose-dependent manner.

 
We investigated the activation of Lyn kinase in eosinophils. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Lyn Ab and subjected to electrophoresis followed by Western blotting with an antiphosphotyrosine Ab. The tyrosine phosphorylation of Lyn, especially the p56 isoform of Lyn (the upper band), was suppressed to the basal level by the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide but not by the biotinylated ßc 450–465 peptide or the stearated IL-5R{alpha} 316–335 peptide (Fig. 4GoA). We also examined the effect of the lipopeptide on Jak2 activation. The IL-5-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak2 kinase was not affected by pretreatment with the stearated peptide in eosinophils (Fig. 4GoB).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Effect of the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide on the IL-5-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Lyn and Jak2. Eosinophils were incubated in the presence or absence of the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide for 2 h followed by stimulation with or without IL-5 for 1 min. Biotinylated ßc 450–465 and stearated IL-5{alpha} 316–335 peptides were used as controls. The lysates of the cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Lyn or anti-Jak2 Ab. The immunocomplex was subjected to electrophoresis and Western blotting with antiphosphotyrosine Ab. A, Lyn activation after IL-5 stimulation was significantly inhibited by the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide but not by control peptides. B, The N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide did not affect Jak2 phosphorylation.

 
Effect of the Lyn AS ODN on Jak2 activation

The results of our Lyn-binding lipopeptide suggest that Lyn is not necessary for Jak2 activation. To further confirm our data, we performed similar experiments with Lyn AS ODNs using the GM-CSF-dependent cell line TF-1. As shown in Fig. 5Go, pretreating TF-1 cells with Lyn AS ODNs inhibited the GM-CSF-induced activation of Lyn but not Jak2. Taken together, these results indicate that Lyn is not essential for Jak2 activation in IL-5/GM-CSF signaling. It is possible that other src family kinases are involved in this process.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Effect of the Lyn AS ODN on the GM-CSF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Lyn and Jak2. TF-1 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the Lyn AS ODN for 6 h followed by stimulation with or without GM-CSF for 1 min. The lysates of the cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Lyn or anti-Jak2 Ab. The immunocomplex was subjected to electrophoresis and Western blotting with antiphosphotyrosine Ab. The Lyn AS ODN significantly inhibited the activation of Lyn but not Jak2.

 
Effect of the N-stearated peptide on the differentiation of murine BM cells

The differentiation of eosinophils from progenitor cells is dependent upon IL-5 (2). Previous studies have shown that a combination of IL-3 and IL-5 stimulates eosinopoiesis in vitro (25). IL-3 is required as a pluripotent stem cell growth factor. To investigate the role of Lyn kinase in eosinophil differentiation, we studied the effect of the N-stearated peptide on murine BM cells. The cells (5 x 105 cells/ml) were cultured with IL-3 and IL-5 for 1 wk. The total number of cells without peptides, with stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, with biotinylated ßc 450–465 peptide, and with stearated IL-5R{alpha} 316–335 peptide were 39 ± 1, 31 ± 6, 39 ± 6, and 38 ± 4 x 104 cells after 1 wk, respectively (n = 3). The eosinophil number was significantly reduced in the presence of the N-stearated 450–465 peptide but not in the presence of the control peptides (Fig. 6GoA). Next, we studied the kinetics of eosinophil differentiation. We obtained 5 ± 1x 104 cells of mature eosinophils and 22 ± 5 x 104 cells of eosinophilic myelocytes before culture (n = 3). As shown in Fig. 6GoB, IL-5 induced eosinophilic differentiation from stem cells within 3 days. The inhibitory effect of the stearated ßc 450–465 peptide could be observed after 3 days and lasted >=10 days.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Effect of the N-stearated ßc peptide on the eosinophil differentiation of murine BM cells. The cells were incubated with or without 20 µM of the stearated ßc 450–465 peptide for 2 h; next, IL-3 and IL-5 were added. The stearated IL-5{alpha} 316–335 peptide was used as a control. After the culture, the cells were harvested; the eosinophil count was obtained using Wright’s stain. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). A, The eosinophil count was significantly reduced in the presence of the N-stearated 450–465 peptide after 1 wk, but not in the presence of the control peptides. B, The kinetics of eosinophil differentiation were studied in the presence (•) or absence ({circ}) of the stearated ßc 450–465 peptide. The peptide significantly blocked eosinophil differentiation. *, p < 0.05 vs medium alone (Student’s paired t test).

 
Effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on eosinophil survival

We and others have shown that Lyn is important for eosinophil growth and survival (17, 18). We reasoned that the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide would have inhibitory effects on eosinophil survival. As shown in Fig. 7Go, most of the eosinophils underwent apoptosis after 3 days without IL-5 (18% viable cells). In contrast, eosinophil viability was prolonged to 82 ± 3% after stimulation with IL-5 (n = 3). When eosinophils were incubated with the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, the IL-5-induced prolongation of eosinophil survival was reduced in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7Go). The control biotinylated peptide or the stearated IL-5R{alpha} peptide did not affect IL-5-induced eosinophil survival. When eosinophils were incubated at a 10-fold higher concentration of IL-5 (10 ng/ml), the majority of the inhibitory effect of the peptide could be overcome (data not shown). Thus, the data suggest that the effect of the stearated peptides is not toxic.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Inhibition of IL-5-stimulated eosinophil survival. Eosinophils were incubated with or without the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide for 2 h. Biotinylated ßc 450–465 and stearated IL-5{alpha} 316–335 peptides were used as controls. The cells were further cultured with or without IL-5 for 72 h; next, the viability of eosinophils was assessed by PI staining. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). The N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, but not the biotinylated ßc 450–465 peptide or the stearated IL-5{alpha} 316–335 peptide, inhibited IL-5-induced eosinophil survival in a dose-dependent manner. *, p < 0.05 vs without the stearated peptides (ANOVA).

 
Effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on ECP release

We also studied the effect of the N-stearated peptide on eosinophil degranulation. Eosinophils secrete a number of granular proteins during degranulation. One of the important granular proteins is ECP. Both IL-5 and GM-CSF prime eosinophils for degranulation at low concentrations. However, GM-CSF has been shown to be a bit stronger than IL-5 in this regard. In our experiments, we primed eosinophils with a low concentration of GM-CSF (1 ng/ml) and subsequently stimulated with PAF for ECP release. ECP release without and with GM-CSF priming was 243 ± 42 and 549 ± 79 ng/106 cells, respectively (n = 4). As predicted from the function of Lyn, ECP release from eosinophils was not affected by the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide (data not shown).

Effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on airway eosinophilic inflammation

IL-5 plays a critical role in allergen-induced airway eosinophilic inflammation. In the next step, we examined the effect of the peptide on airway eosinophilic inflammation in a murine model of asthma. OVA-sensitized mice were pretreated intrabronchially with one of the peptides (2 µmol) or saline and subsequently challenged with OVA inhalation 1 h later. After an additional 24 h, BAL was performed and the number of eosinophils was counted. In the mice with saline pretreatment, 70% of the cells in the BAL fluid were eosinophils (the absolute value was 4.3 ± 0.4 x 105 eosinophils/BAL, n = 6). Administration of the stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, but not of the biotinylated ßc peptide or the stearated IL-5R{alpha} peptide, significantly inhibited the eosinophil influx in the BAL fluid (Fig. 8Go). We did not see any significant difference in the number of lymphocytes and macrophages following the stearated peptide treatment as compared with control peptides or saline.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Effect of the stearated ßc 450–465 peptide on airway eosinophil infiltration in a mouse model of asthma. OVA-sensitized mice were pretreated intrabronchially with one of the peptides (2 µmol) or saline and subsequently challenged with OVA inhalation 1 h later. BAL was performed after 24 h. After the total cell count in the BAL fluid had been obtained, the remaining cells were subjected to cytospin to count the number of eosinophils. Data are expressed as means ± SD. Pretreatment with the N-stearated ßc 450–465 peptide, but not pretreatment with the control peptides, significantly inhibited the eosinophil influx in the BAL fluid. *, p < 0.05 vs saline treatment (Mann-Whitney U test).

 
Effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on other cells

Lyn kinase is associated with Fc{epsilon}RIß and activated after a ligand binds to the receptor (28, 29). For this reason, we examined the effect of the Lyn-binding peptide on basophil histamine release. The anti-IgE-induced histamine release from leukocytes was 21 ± 7% (n = 3) of the total histamine content. The stearated peptide at a concentration of <=20 µM did not affect histamine release from basophils (data not shown).

Lyn kinase has been shown previously to be involved in B cell activation (30). For this reason, we studied the effect of the N-stearated Lyn-binding peptide on anti-IgM-stimulated B cell proliferation. The thymidine uptake of unstimulated and anti-IgM-stimulated B cells was 3806 ± 1534 cpm and 5992 ± 1485 cpm, respectively (n = 7). The N-stearated peptide showed a tendency for increased B cell proliferation, but the result was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The thymidine uptake of B cells was 9096 ± 4216 cpm at a 10 µM concentration of the peptide. The peptide induced an enhanced proliferation of B cells in four donors but had no effects on the other three donors. Therefore, the effect seems to be variable and donor-dependent.

T cells do not express Lyn kinase but do express a large number of other tyrosine kinases (e.g., Lck, Fyn, and ZAP-70). To determine the effect of the peptide on other tyrosine kinases in situ, we investigated its activity on Con A-stimulated T cell proliferation. The thymidine uptake of unstimulated and Con A-stimulated T cells was 18,934 ± 9,983 cpm and 227,191 ± 33,192 cpm, respectively (n = 3). The peptide had no effect on Con A-stimulated T cell proliferation. The thymidine uptake by T cells was 220,774 ± 11,819 cpm in the presence of a 10 µM concentration of the stearated peptide. The results suggest that the peptide does not interfere with other signaling molecules.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The objective of this study was to design a signaling inhibitor capable of blocking Lyn-coupled cellular functions. We focused on Lyn kinase for the following reasons: Lyn kinase physically associates with the ßc receptor in nonstimulated cells (14). This association is likely to confer some degree of signaling specificity. Signaling molecules that do not interact with receptors (e.g. mitogen-activated protein kinases) lack receptor specificity; therefore, their inhibition is likely to be nonspecific. Jak2 kinase also physically associates with ßc receptor (15). However, Jak kinases are involved in the signal transduction of many cytokines. In contrast, Lyn kinase mediates the signal transduction of a limited number of receptors. For this reason, we decided to generate signaling inhibitors for Lyn kinase.

Based upon the Lyn-binding sequence, we designed a novel inhibitor that blocks eosinophil differentiation and survival by interfering with IL-5-stimulated Lyn kinase signaling. The inhibitor also blocked eosinophil infiltration of the airways in a mouse model of asthma. To our knowledge, this is the first report of inhibition of eosinophil growth and differentiation by a peptide inhibitor. The peptide was N-stearated to enable cellular internalization. N-acylation of small peptides has recently been shown to cause their internalization through the lipid membranes as demonstrated by spin label electron spin resonance and 2H nuclear magnetic resonance (21). The N-myristoylation of a protein kinase C substrate analogue causes its internalization and specific inhibition of the kinase (22). Although we do not provide direct evidence of cellular internalization of our peptide, our experimental results clearly indicate that the peptide inhibits the binding of Lyn to the ßc. The binding of Jak2 to the ßc is not affected by the peptide. This type of specific inhibition is possible only if the peptide is internalized. If the peptide is to act extracellularly through the IL-5R, one would expect the inhibition of Jak2 as well as Lyn kinases. The coprecipitation of Lyn with ßc receptor is inhibited by the stearated peptide, suggesting that the inhibitor blocks the binding of Lyn to the IL-5R ßc subunit in the cytosol. Furthermore, the activation of Lyn, but not Jak2, was inhibited by the Lyn-binding peptide. In support of these findings, the results obtained with the Lyn-binding peptide are very similar to those observed with Lyn AS ODNs, which did not block Jak2 activation. The results imply that Jak2 is not a downstream molecule of Lyn in IL-5 signaling.

The selective action of our peptide can be explained by the molecular interaction of Lyn and Jak2 with the ßc receptor. Both these tyrosine kinases are physically associated with the membrane-proximal region of the ßc. However, our Lyn-binding peptide did not bind to Jak2 both in vitro and in situ (20). Thus, the difference between Lyn- and Jak2-binding sites on the ßc accounts for the specificity of our peptide. Another explanation for the specificity comes from the domain-specific interaction of Lyn kinase with receptors. Lyn has an N-terminal unique domain, followed by an Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, SH2 domain, and the tyrosine kinase domain. The N-terminal 10-aa residues of Lyn are required for binding to the Ig {alpha}-chain Ag receptor homology 1 motif of the B cell Ag receptor (31). A direct interaction of Lyn with the Fc{epsilon}RIß receptor through its unique domain has also been detected using the two-hybrid system (32). Using truncated Lyn GST fusion proteins, we have found that the unique domain is responsible for the binding of Lyn to the ßc (20). On the basis of these results, we predict that our lipopeptide competes only with the receptors that bind Lyn via the unique domain but not via the SH2 or SH3 domains.

Lyn kinase has been shown to be associated with the Ig receptor (30, 31), CD14 (33), CD19 (34), and CD22 (35) in B cells and Fc{epsilon}RIß in mast cells (28, 29). Lyn regulates B cell function both positively (36, 37) and negatively (38, 39), whereas it has an amplifying effect on mast cell degranulation (40). Our Lyn-binding peptide had variable effects on B cell proliferation and no effect on basophil histamine release. This negative result can be explained as follows: Although Lyn binds to all ßc, Ig{alpha} and Fc{epsilon}RIß via the unique domain, the binding sites on the receptors have no sequence homology. Thus, it is likely that various regions within the unique domain bind to different receptors. In this scenario, the Lyn-binding peptide from the ßc receptor will not block the binding site for other receptors.

IL-5 stimulates the growth and terminal differentiation of eosinophils from committed stem cells (2). In the present study, we found that eosinophil differentiation from stem cells was blocked by the stearated Lyn-binding peptide. These data are consistent with the results obtained with Lyn AS ODNs (S.S. and R.A., unpublished observations). We cultured murine BM cells with murine IL-3 and IL-5. In contrast to humans, the mouse has two homologous ß subunits, ßc and ßIL-3 (27). Because of the presence of ßIL-3, our peptide could block only IL-5 signaling while keeping IL-3 signaling intact. One would expect that the peptide may also block IL-3 signaling, which is essential for overall hemopoiesis in the human system, because the human has only one ß subunit, ßc. Interestingly, however, the ßc/ßIL-3 double-knockout mouse showed normal hemopoietic parameters except for a reduced number of peripheral eosinophils and impaired eosinophil function (41). This definitive study suggests that the ßc receptor is critical only for eosinopoiesis but not for other myeloid lineages. Perhaps other growth factors (e.g., G-CSF and M-CSF) compensate for the function of ßc/ßIL-3 receptors.

IL-5 is a regulatory factor not only for eosinophilopoiesis but also for the prevention of eosinophil apoptosis (3). Our results using the Lyn-binding peptide suggest that Lyn is important for eosinophil survival. We further studied the effect of Lyn signaling inhibitor on ECP release and found that Lyn is not essential for eosinophil degranulation. These results are supported by the data obtained with Lyn AS ODNs (17, 18). It has also been shown that Jak2 is critical for survival but not for degranulation.

The stearated ßc peptide blocked not only in vitro eosinophil function but also eosinophil infiltration in vivo. The influx of eosinophils into the airways is a complex process and is likely to involve not only IL-5 but also CC chemokines and other factors. The efficacy of the stearated peptide in blocking airway eosinophilic influx is thus, remarkable. IL-5 has modest direct chemotactic effects on eosinophils, but, more importantly, it primes eosinophils for chemotaxis in response to other chemoattractants. i.v. IL-5 dramatically enhances the local accumulation of eosinophils induced by intradermal eotaxin or leukotriene B4 in guinea pigs (42). In support of the above observations, an s.c. injection of eotaxin is unable to develop tissue eosinophilia in IL-5-deficient mice (43). These results suggest a critical role for IL-5 in eosinophil locomotion in vivo, and our peptide may target this function.

In summary, we have developed a novel peptide inhibitor that blocks eosinophil differentiation, survival, and airway eosinophil influx. Excessive production of eosinophils and their subsequent invasion of the airways and other target organs are characteristic features of asthma and allergic diseases. In addition, there is evidence that eosinophil survival in these diseases is prolonged due to the action of IL-5. Therefore, the Lyn-binding peptide may have therapeutic applications in asthma, allergic diseases, and other eosinophilic disorders. Furthermore, the strategy to develop novel peptide inhibitors can be applied to other receptors, broadening its implication in medicine.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI35713), the James W. McLaughlin Foundation, the University of Texas Medical Branch Technology Committee, and the Texas Allergy and Immunology Society (TAIS) Memorial Foundation. T.A. was supported by a McLaughlin Postdoctoral Fellowship and is the recipient of a TAIS Memorial Foundation Research Award. Back

2 U.S. patent pending (serial no. 60/059, 630). Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Rafeul Alam, University of Texas Medical Branch, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Clinical Sciences Building 409, Galveston, TX 77555-0762. E-mail address: Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: Jak, Janus kinase; AS, antisense; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; ßc, common ß; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein; ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; SH, Src homology; PAF, platelet-activating factor; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; PI, propidium iodide; BM, bone marrow. Back

Received for publication February 25, 1999. Accepted for publication April 30, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gleich, G. J.. 1990. The eosinophil and bronchial asthma: current understanding. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 85:422.[Medline]
  2. Yamaguchi, Y., T. Suda, J. Suda, M. Eguchi, Y. Miura, N. Harada, A. Tominaga, K. Takatsu. 1988. Purified interleukin-5 supports the terminal differentiation and proliferation of murine eosinophilic precursors. J. Exp. Med. 167:43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yamaguchi, Y., T. Sudo, S. Ohta, K. Tominaga, Y. Miura, T. Kasahara. 1991. Analysis of the survival of mature eosinophils: interleukin-5 prevents apoptosis in mature human eosinophils. Blood 78:2542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Yamaguchi, Y., Y. Hayashi, Y. Sugama, Y. Miura, T. Kasahara, S. Kitamura, M. Torisu, S. Mita, A. Tominaga, K. Takatsu. 1988. Highly purified murine interleukin 5 (IL-5) stimulates eosinophil function and prolongs in vitro survival: IL-5 as an eosinophil chemotactic factor. J. Exp. Med. 167:1732.
  5. Wang, J. M., A. Rambaldi, A. Biondi, Z. G. Chen, C. J. Sanderson, A. Mantovani. 1989. Recombinant human interleukin 5 is a selective eosinophil chemoattractant. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:701.[Medline]
  6. Fujisawa, T., R. I. Abu-Ghazaleh, H. Kita, C. J. Sanderson, G. J. Gleich. 1990. Regulatory effect of cytokines on eosinophil degranulation. J. Immunol. 144:642.[Abstract]
  7. Horie, S., G. J. Gleich, H. Kita. 1996. Cytokines directly induce degranulation and superoxide production from human eosinophils. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 98:371.[Medline]
  8. Walsh, G. M., A. Hartnell, A. J. Wardlaw, K. Kurihara, C. J. Sanderson, A. B. Kay. 1990. IL-5 enhances the in vitro adhesion of human eosinophils, but not neutrophils, in a leukocyte integrin (CD11/18)-dependent manner. Immunology 71:258.[Medline]
  9. Nakajima, H., G. J. Gleich, H. Kita. 1996. Constitutive production of IL-4 and IL-10 and stimulated production of IL-8 by normal peripheral blood eosinophils. J. Immunol. 156:4859.[Abstract]
  10. Takafuji, S., S. C. Bischoff, A. L. De Weck, C. A. Dahinden. 1991. IL-3 and IL-5 prime normal human eosinophils to produce leukotriene C4 in response to soluble agonists. J. Immunol. 147:3855.[Abstract]
  11. Rothenberg, M. E., J. Petersen, R. L. Stevens, D. S. Silberstein, D. T. McKenzie, K. F. Austen, W. F. Owen. 1989. IL-5-dependent conversion of normodense human eosinophils to the hypodense phenotype uses 3T3 fibroblasts for enhanced viability, accelerated hypodensity, and sustained antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 143:2311.[Abstract]
  12. Hamelmann, E., A. Oshiba, J. Loader, G. L. Larsen, G. Gleich, J. Lee, E. W. Gelfand. 1997. Antiinterleukin-5 antibody prevents airway hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of airway sensitization. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155:819.[Abstract]
  13. Foster, P. S., S. P. Hogan, A. J. Ramsay, K. I. Matthaei, I. G. Young. 1996. IL-5 deficiency abolishes eosinophilia, airway hyperreactivity, and lung damage in a mouse model of asthma. J. Exp. Med. 183:195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pazdrak, K., D. Schreiber, P. Forsythe, L. Justement, R. Alam. 1995. The signal transduction mechanism of IL-5 in eosinophils: the involvement of lyn tyrosine kinase and the ras-raf 1-MEK-MAP kinase pathway. J. Exp. Med. 181:1827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pazdrak, K., S. Stafford, R. Alam. 1995. The activation of the Jak-STAT1 signaling pathway by IL-5 in eosinophils. J. Immunol. 155:397.[Abstract]
  16. van der Bruggen, T., E. Caldenhoven, D. Kanters, P. Coffer, J. A. Raaijmakers, J. W. Lammers, L. Koenderman. 1995. Interleukin-5 signaling in human eosinophils involves JAK2 tyrosine kinase and STAT1a. Blood 85:1442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yousefi, S., D. C. Hoessli, K. Blaser, G. B. Mills, H. U. Simon. 1996. Requirement of Lyn and Syk tyrosine kinases for the prevention of apoptosis by cytokine in human eosinophils. J. Exp. Med. 183:1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pazdrak, K., B. Olszewska-Pazdrak, S. Stafford, R. Garofalo, R. Alam. 1998. Lyn, Jak2, and Raf-1 kinases are critical for the anti-apoptotic effect of interleukin 5, whereas only Raf-1 kinase is essential for eosinophil activation and degranulation. J. Exp. Med. 188:421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Simon, H. U., S. Yousefi, B. Dibbert, F. Levi-Schaffer, K. Blaser. 1997. Anti-apoptotic signals of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor are transduced via Jak2 tyrosine kinase in eosinophils. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:3536.[Medline]
  20. Adachi, T., K. Pazdrak, S. Stafford, R. Alam. 1999. The mapping of the Lyn kinase-binding site of the common ß (ßc) subunit of IL-3/GM-CSF/IL-5 receptor. J. Immunol. 162:1496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sankaram, M. B.. 1994. Membrane interaction of small N-myristoylated peptides: implications for membrane anchoring and protein-protein association. Biophys. J. 67:105.[Medline]
  22. Eicholtz, T., D. B. A. de Bont, J. de Widt, R. M. J. Liskamp, H. L. Ploegh. 1993. A myristoylated pseudosubstrate peptide, a novel protein kinase C inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hansel, T. T., I. J. M. de Vries, T. Iff, S. Rihs, M. Wandzilak, S. Betz, K. Blaser, C. Walker. 1991. An improved immunomagnetic procedure for the isolation of highly purified human blood eosinophils. J. Immunol. Methods. 145:105.[Medline]
  24. Alam, R., P. A. Forsythe, M. A. Lett-Brown, J. A. Grant. 1989. Cellular origin of histamine-releasing factor produced by peripheral blood. J. Immunol. 142:3951.[Abstract]
  25. Takamoto, M., K. Sugane. 1995. Synergism of IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF on eosinophil differentiation and its application for an assay of murine IL-5 as an eosinophil differentiation factor. Immunol. Lett. 45:43.[Medline]
  26. Stafford, S., H. Li, P. A. Forsythe, M. Ryan, R. Bravo, R. Alam. 1997. Monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3)/fibroblast-induced cytokine (FIC) in eosinophilic inflammation of the airways and the inhibitory effects of an anti-MCP-3/FIC antibody. J. Immunol. 158:4953.[Abstract]
  27. Miyajima, A., A. L. F. Mui, T. Ogorochi, K. Sakamaki. 1993. Receptors for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-3, and interleukin-5. Blood 82:1960.[Free Full Text]
  28. Jouvin, M. H., M. Adamczewski, R. Numerof, O. Letourneur, A. Valle, J.-P. Kinet. 1994. Differential control of the tyrosine kinases Lyn and Syk by the two signaling chains of the high affinity immunoglobulin E receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 269:5918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kihara, H., R. P. Siraganian. 1994. Src homology 2 domains of Syk and Lyn bind to tyrosine-phosphorylated subunits of the high affinity IgE receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 269:22427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yamanashi, Y., T. Kakiuchi, J. Mizuguchi, T. Yamamoto, K. Toyoshima. 1991. Association of B cell antigen receptor with protein tyrosine kinase Lyn. Science 251:192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Pleiman, C. M., C. Abrams, L. T. Gauen, W. Bedzyk, J. Jongstra, A. S. Shaw, J. C. Cambier. 1994. Distinct p53/56lyn and p59fyn domains associate with nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated Ig-{alpha}. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:4268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Vonakis, B. M., H. Chen, H. Haleem-Smith, H. Metzger. 1997. The unique domain as the site on Lyn kinase for its constitutive association with the high affinity receptor for IgE. J. Biol. Chem. 272:24072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ferrero, E., C.-L. Hsieh, U. Francke, S. M. Goyert. 1990. CD14 is a member of the family of leucine-rich proteins and is encoded by a gene syntenic with multiple receptor genes. J. Immunol. 145:331.[Abstract]
  34. Stamenkovic, I., B. Seed. 1988. CD19, the earliest differentiation antigen of the B cell lineage, bears three extracellular Ig-like domains and an Epstein-Barr virus-related cytoplasmic tail. J. Exp. Med. 168:1205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tuscano, J. M., P. Engel, T. F. Tedder, A. Agarwal, J. H. Kehrl. 1996. Involvement of p72syk kinase, p53/56lyn kinase, and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase in signal transduction via the human B lymphocyte antigen CD22. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1246.[Medline]
  36. Hibbs, M. L., D. M. Tarlinton, J. Armes, D. Grail, G. Hodgson, R. Maglitto, S. A. Stacker, A. R. Dunn. 1995. Multiple defects in the immune system of Lyn-deficient mice, culminating in autoimmune disease. Cell 83:301.[Medline]
  37. Nishizumi, H., I. Taniuchi, Y. Yamanashi, D. Kitamura, D. Ilic, S. Mori, T. Watanabe, T. Yamamoto. 1995. Impaired proliferation of peripheral B cells and identification of autoimmune disease in lyn-deficient mice. Immunity 3:549.[Medline]
  38. Wang, J., T. Koizumi, T. Watanabe. 1996. Altered antigen receptor signaling and impaired Fas-mediated apoptosis of B cells in Lyn-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 184:831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Chan, V. W. F., F. Meng, P. Soriano, A. L. DeFranco, C. A. Lowell. 1997. Characterization of the B lymphocyte populations in Lyn-deficient mice and the role of Lyn in signal initiation and down-regulation. Immunity 7:69.[Medline]
  40. Dombrowicz, D., S. Lin, V. Flamand, A. T. Brini, B. H. Koller, J. P. Kinet. 1998. Allergy-associated FcRß is a molecular amplifier of IgE- and IgG-mediated in vivo response. Immunity 8:517.[Medline]
  41. Nishinakamura, R., A. Miyajima, P. J. Mee, V. L. J. Tybulewicz, R. Murray. 1996. Hematopoiesis in mice lacking the entire granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3/interleukin-5 functions. Blood 88:2458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Collins, P. D., S. Marleau, D. A. Griffiths-Johnson, P. J. Jose, T. J. Williams. 1995. Cooperation between interleukin-5 and the chemokine eotaxin to induce eosinophil accumulation in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 182:1169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Mould, A. W., K. I. Matthaei, I. G. Young, P. S. Foster. 1997. Relationship between interleukin-5 and eotaxin in regulating blood and tissue eosinophilia in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 99:1064.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S.-J. E. Beavitt, K. W. Harder, J. M. Kemp, J. Jones, C. Quilici, F. Casagranda, E. Lam, D. Turner, S. Brennan, P. D. Sly, et al.
Lyn-Deficient Mice Develop Severe, Persistent Asthma: Lyn Is a Critical Negative Regulator of Th2 Immunity
J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1867 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Y. Niv, H. Rubin, J. Cohen, L. Tsirulnikov, T. Licht, A. Peretzman-Shemer, E. Cna'an, A. Tartakovsky, I. Stein, S. Albeck, et al.
Sequence-based Design of Kinase Inhibitors Applicable for Therapeutics and Target Identification
J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2004; 279(2): 1242 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
X. Zhu, B. Jacobs, E. Boetticher, S. Myou, A. Meliton, H. Sano, A. T. Lambertino, N. M. Munoz, and A. R. Leff
IL-5-induced integrin adhesion of human eosinophils caused by ERK1/2-mediated activation of cPLA2
J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2002; 72(5): 1046 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Z. Allakhverdi, M. Allam, and P. M. Renzi
Inhibition of Antigen-induced Eosinophilia and Airway Hyperresponsiveness by Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed against the Common beta Chain of IL-3, IL-5, GM-CSF Receptors in a Rat Model of Allergic Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 1015 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Ogura, H. Ueda, K. Hosohara, R. Tsuji, Y. Nagata, S.-i. Kashiwamura, and H. Okamura
Interleukin-18 stimulates hematopoietic cytokine and growth factor formation and augments circulating granulocytes in mice
Blood, October 1, 2001; 98(7): 2101 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J.C. Kips, K.G. Tournoy, and R.A. Pauwels
New anti-asthma therapies: suppression of the effect of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2001; 17(3): 499 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. Lach-Trifilieff, K. Menear, E. Schweighoffer, V. L. J. Tybulewicz, and C. Walker
Syk-deficient eosinophils show normal interleukin-5-mediated differentiation, maturation, and survival but no longer respond to Fcgamma R activation
Blood, October 1, 2000; 96(7): 2506 - 2510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Adachi, B. K. Choudhury, S. Stafford, S. Sur, and R. Alam
The Differential Role of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Eosinophil Functions
J. Immunol., August 15, 2000; 165(4): 2198 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Du, Y. M. Alsayed, F. Xin, S. J. Ackerman, and L. C. Platanias
Engagement of the CrkL Adapter in Interleukin-5 Signaling in Eosinophils
J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2000; 275(42): 33167 - 33175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alam, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alam, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS