The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loyer, V.
Right arrow Articles by Perreault, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loyer, V.
Right arrow Articles by Perreault, C.
The Journal of Immunology, 1999, 163: 6462-6467.
Copyright © 1999 by The American Association of Immunologists

The In Vivo Fate of APCs Displaying Minor H Antigen and/or MHC Differences Is Regulated by CTLs Specific for Immunodominant Class I-Associated Epitopes1

Véronique Loyer, Pierre Fontaine, Stéphane Pion, Francis Hétu, Denis-Claude Roy and Claude Perreault2

Guy-Bernier Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The goal of this work was to evaluate the fate of APCs following interactions with T cells in unprimed mice with a normal T cell repertoire. We elaborated a model in which male adherent peritoneal mononuclear cells were injected into the foreleg footpads of naive female recipients mismatched for either minor or major histocompatibility Ags. At various times after injection, APC numbers in the draining (axillary and brachial) lymph nodes were assessed using a Ube1y gene-specific PCR assay. Our experimental model was designed so that the number of APCs expressing the priming epitope was similar to what is observed under real life conditions. Thus, early after injection, the frequency of afferent lymph-derived APCs expressing the priming epitope was in the range of 101–102/106 lymph node cells. We found that APCs presenting some, but not all, nonself epitopes were killed rapidly after entrance into the lymph nodes. Rapid elimination of APCs occurred following interactions with MHC class I-restricted, but not class II-restricted, T cells and was observed when APCs presented an immunodominant (B6dom1/H7a), but not a nondominant (HY), epitope. Killing of APCs was mediated partly, but not exclusively, by perforin-dependent process. We propose that killing of APCs by CTLs specific for immunodominant MHC class I-restricted epitopes may be instrumental in regulating the intensity, duration, and diversity of T cell responses.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The process of T cell activation by Ag is initiated by the formation of conjugates between T cells and APCs. Professional APC subsets are of hemopoietic origin and encompass dendritic cells, macrophages, and B lymphocytes (1, 2, 3). The duration of Ag availability together with Ag dose and localization determine whether an immune response will be elicited and, eventually, what will be its intensity and consequences (4). Indeed, the duration of interaction between T cells and APCs is critical in determining whether this interaction will entail T cell activation, deletion, or negligence. Thus, by precisely controlling the duration of exposure to Ag, Iezzi et al. (5) have shown that naive T cells require a sustained antigenic stimulation for ~20 h to be committed to proliferation. Conversely, effector T cells become committed in only 1 h, but undergo activation-induced cell death if stimulation is prolonged (5). Therefore, considering how critical time limitations are for T cells to mediate early control of infection, it is of crucial importance that the duration of cognate interactions between T cells and APCs be neither too short nor too long (4, 6, 7). Premature termination of T cell/APC interaction may hinder the generation of a protective immune response, while failure to terminate this interaction can lead to T cell exhaustion (5, 8, 9, 10, 11).

It is generally considered that the duration of Ag presentation is limited to a large extent by the finite half-life of APCs. However, following in vivo interactions with T cells, it is not clear whether the demise of professional APCs is due to their basal turnover rate or to killing by Ag-specific T cells. It has been clearly demonstrated that under in vitro culture conditions, both CD4+ and CD8+ Ag-primed T cells kill dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells in an Ag-specific manner (8, 9, 12, 13, 14). In vitro, killing of APCs by CD8+ CTLs is mediated primarily by the perforin pathway and to a lesser extent via FasL/Fas interactions, whereas CD4+ T cell cytotoxicity is conducted essentially by the Fas pathway (8, 9, 12, 13, 14). However, these studies have been performed with T cell lines or clones. Thus, although they show that Ag-primed T cells can rapidly eliminate APCs, they do not allow inferences regarding interactions of APCs with naive T cells. Furthermore, one caveat of in vitro studies is that they are performed under conditions quite distinct from those found in vivo, i.e., culturing a large excess of T cells in close proximity to APCs. Nevertheless, a few studies have addressed the fate of APCs following in vivo encounter with T cells. Thus, it has recently been reported that by 48 h after injection, OVA peptide-pulsed (but not unpulsed) DCs disappeared from the lymph nodes of mice bearing high numbers of TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells specific for an OVA peptide-I-Ad complex (15). Similarly, it has been shown that anti-HY TCR CD8+ transgenic T cells could eliminate HY+ B lymphocytes in vivo (16). These observations provide direct evidence that when present in relatively large numbers, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from transgenic animals can kill APCs in vivo. However, the occurrence of this process in real life conditions and the tempo of APC demise have yet to be evaluated. Therefore, the goal of this work was to analyze the in vivo fate of hemopoietic APCs following the presentation of different T cell epitopes to naive nontransgenic animals with a normal T cell repertoire. These studies enabled evaluation of the half-life of APCs presenting specific class I- and/or class II-associated epitopes and additionally provided insights into the effector pathways responsible for the elimination of APCs.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

B10.C-H7b(47N)/Sn (B10.H7b)3 mice were a gift from Dr. D. C. Roopenian (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). The following strains of mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory: BALB/c, B6.C-H2bm1/By (bm1), B6.C-H2bm12/KhEg (bm12), B6.MRL-Faslpr (B6lpr), B6Smn.C3H-Faslgld (gld), C3H.SW, C57BL/6J (B6), C57BL/6-Pfptm1Arp (PKO), and C57BL/10J (B10). Mice were used between 6 and 16 wk of age and were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions according to the standards of the Canadian committee for animal protection.

Preparation of cell suspensions and DNA extraction

Resident peritoneal mononuclear cells were harvested from euthanized male mice following injection of 10 ml of DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 5% FCS into the peritoneal cavity (17). These cell suspensions were enriched in mononuclear phagocytes by adherence to 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Sarstedt, Newton, NC) as previously described (18). Adherent peritoneal cells from male donors were gamma-irradiated (12.5 Gy), then 5 x 105 cells resuspended in 50 µl of DMEM were injected bilaterally into foreleg footpads of female recipients. Recipients were sacrificed at different times after injection, and their axillary and brachial lymph nodes were carefully dissected. DNA was extracted from lymph node cells using the Qiamp Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Canada), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration and purity of the DNA samples were evaluated by spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm wavelengths.

Nested semiquantitative PCR amplification

Ube1y, a gene that maps to a region of the mouse Y chromosome required for normal spermatogonial proliferation (19, 20), was used as a marker gene to differentiate male from female cells. Conditions for PCR amplification were optimized using serial dilutions of B6 male cells admixed with B6 female cells so that one male cell in 1 x 106 female cells was reproducibly detectable. For each sample, PCR amplification was performed on six aliquots of 1 µg of purified DNA. For the first amplification, each DNA aliquot was amplified in a 50-µl reaction volume containing 25 pmol of each oligonucleotide primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Life Technologies), 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, and 1.5 mM MgCl2. Oligonucleotides for this first amplification of the DNA samples were 5'-TTGTGGTGCCTGTGCAGCTAGACT-3' and 5'-TCAACAAAGGCGTCCTTCTC-3', and generated a 525-bp fragment. DNA was subjected to amplification in a Gene Amp PCR system 9600 (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Cycle conditions included an initial 94°C denaturation step of 4.5 min followed by 25 cycles consisting of a 94°C denaturation step (30 s), a 55°C annealing step (15 s), and a 72°C extension step (15 s). The final extension time was prolonged to 5 min.

Upon completion of the first amplification round, 5 µl of the amplified mixture was reamplified for another 25 cycles using the same parameters as those described above, except for the use of nested oligonucleotide primers. For this second amplification, oligonucleotide primers were internal to the original primers (5'-GACATTTTCCCTGGAGAAAG-3' and 5'-CATGTCTAGACAGAGGACAG-3' and generated a smaller 377-bp fragment.

Aliquots of 10 µl from the second PCR amplification were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer containing 0.5 µg/ml of ethidium bromide and were visualized under UV light. The first PCR amplification product of positive samples was then serially diluted and reamplified under the same conditions as those described above for the second PCR amplification. The number of dilutions generating a UV-detectable signal permitted quantification of the samples (21). In each experiment, a positive control consisted of B6 male cells, and a negative control consisted of B6 female cells. PCR procedures included strict measures to avoid contamination (22, 23).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental protocol

We developed our experimental protocol in an effort to mimic real life conditions. Thus, we elected to measure the survival of realistic numbers of APCs carried by the afferent lymph into peripheral lymph nodes. Careful studies during the course of respiratory Sendai virus infection in mice have shown that frequencies of APCs presenting MHC class I- and MHC class II-restricted viral epitopes reached a peak of ~102/106 lymph node cells (24). Detection of such low cell frequencies is best accomplished by PCR methodology. Therefore, we elaborated a model in which male APCs are injected into the foreleg footpads of female recipients and, at various times after injection, the numbers of male APCs in the draining axillary and brachial lymph nodes were measured using a previously validated sensitive semiquantitative nested PCR assay (21). We used Ube1y, a Y-linked gene, as a marker gene. To estimate the frequency of male APCs, DNA extracted from recipient’s axillary and brachial lymph nodes was amplified, and the product of this first amplification reaction was serially diluted 10-fold from 100 to 105. Each fraction was PCR amplified with nested oligonucleotide primers, then aliquots of the second amplification were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The results depicted in Fig. 1GoA show that this assay was reproducible (cf., concordance between samples), specific (female cells always gave negative results), and sensitive, as it could detect DNA from one male cell in 106 female cells. Furthermore, within the range tested, there was a log-linear relationship between the number of PCR-positive bands and the number of male cells in the sample. Thus, this methodology provided a good estimate of the proportion of male cells over the range of cell frequencies of interest for this study.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Development of a semiquantitative nested PCR assay for the detection of male cells using Ube1y as a marker gene. A, DNA extracted from C57BL/6 lymph node cell preparations containing various ratios of male and female cells was PCR amplified. The product of the first amplification was serially diluted 10-fold from 100 to 10-5 and PCR amplified with nested oligonucleotide primers. Aliquots of the second amplification products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Note that a positive 10-2 dilution (of the product of the first PCR amplification) is obtained when the male cell frequency in the sample is >=10/106 cells. B, Recovery of B6 and BALB/c male APCs 96 h following s.c. injection of 5 x 105 APCs into each foreleg footpad of syngeneic female recipients. Similar results were obtained 24 h following injection of APCs (data not shown). In A and B each bar represents one mouse.

 
We used adherent peritoneal mononuclear cells as a source of APCs. Such preparations contain ~66% monocytes/macrophages, 33% B lymphocytes, and 1% DCs (17, 18, 25, 26). Peritoneal cells were irradiated (12.5 Gy) to preclude proliferation into allogeneic recipients. In dose-finding experiments, we observed that 2–24 h after injection of 5 x 105 male APCs into each foreleg footpad of female B6 recipients, we reproducibly obtained the desired APC frequency in axillary and brachial lymph nodes, i. e., 101–102 APCs/106 lymph node cells (Fig. 1GoB). When assessed at various time points, no male cells could be detected outside the draining lymph nodes, i.e., in spleen or in inguinal lymph nodes (data not shown). Female mice with the H2b haplotype, such as B6, can generate T cell responses toward HY epitopes encoded by the Y chromosome. Conversely, other strains of mice, such as BALB/c, are totally unresponsive to HY epitopes (27). To verify whether HY-specific responses could influence APC recovery under our assay conditions, we compared the recoveries of male B6 and BALB/c APCs 24 and 96 h after injection into syngeneic female recipients. No difference was observed between B6 and BALB/c mice (Fig. 1GoB), showing that the presence of HY epitopes does not influence the short term recovery of injected APCs.

The in vivo fate of APCs presenting various nonself epitopes

Mice were sacrificed between days 1 and 21 after s.c. injection of APCs, and the frequency of (male) APCs in their axillary and brachial lymph nodes was assessed by PCR assay. The survival of injected cells was estimated in a variety of mouse strain combinations to elucidate how MHC class I- and/or class II-restricted interactions with T cells would influence the fate of APCs (Fig. 2Go). Donor/recipient combinations used in these experiments were incompatible for either minor (MiHA) or major histocompatibility Ags and are presented in Table IGo.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. The in vivo fate of APCs presenting mismatched minor and/or major histocompatibility Ags. A–G depict the PCR-positive dilutions of male APCs recovered in the lymph nodes (axillary and brachial) of female recipients in seven donor/recipient combinations from 1 to 21 days following injection. Correlation between the number of positive PCR dilutions and the frequencies of male APCs is shown in Fig. 1GoA. Each bar represents one mouse.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Donor/recipient mouse strain combinations used in Figs. 2Go and 3Go

 
The time required for the number of APCs to decrease below a threshold of 10 APCs/106 lymph node cells (i.e., PCR negative at a 10-2 fold dilution) was taken as a useful criterion to compare APC survival in selected donor/recipient combinations. As shown in Fig. 2Go, the nature of nonself Ag expressed by APCs had a dramatic influence on their survival. Thus, at one end of the scale, HY had little, if any, influence on the persistence of APC, because only on day 21 did the frequency of APCs drop below the threshold of 10 cells/million in one of two mice tested (Fig. 2GoA). In contrast, APCs incompatible for a full MHC haplotype (H2b or H2k) were rapidly eliminated as their frequency dropped below this threshold 2–3 days after injection (Fig. 2Go, B and C).

MHC class I (bm1) and class II (bm12) mutants differ by only a few amino acids from the wild-type molecules, and they elicit pure CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses, respectively (28, 29, 30). Therefore, they represent a most useful paradigm to study MHC class I- and class II-restricted responses. Interestingly, MHC class I and class II incompatibilities had quite divergent effects on the persistence of APCs. Class I incompatibility (bm1->B6; Fig. 2GoF) was sufficient to induce APC disappearance as rapidly as that seen in the case of a full MHC mismatch. In contrast, class II incompatibility (bm12->B6; Fig. 2GoG) had no apparent influence on APC survival. Similar results were observed in the reciprocal combinations, i.e., B6->bm1 and B6->bm12 (data not shown). These results indicate that induction of class I-restricted, but not class II-restricted, T cell responses can lead to rapid clearance of APCs.

Interpretation of the above results must take into account the fact that, like their wild-type homologs, MHC mutant molecules are expressed at ~105 copies/APC, so that their cell surface abundance is superior to that of most conventional epitopes, which are usually expressed at <=103 copies/cell (31, 32). Thus, the question arises as to whether more typical class I-restricted T cell epitopes, with a cell surface density on the order of 101–103 copies/cell, can cause rapid demise of APCs. We have shown above that a single HY disparity had little or no effect on APC clearance (Fig. 2GoA). However, the single class I-restricted HY peptide presented by H2b mice is expressed at only 10 copies/cell and is a nondominant epitope, i.e., it can elicit a T cell response when presented alone, but is neglected when presented together with other epitopes on the same APCs (33, 34). Conversely, the B6dom1 MiHA, a nonapeptide presented by the H2-Db molecule, is expressed at 103 copies/cell and is immunodominant when presented with numerous other MiHAs (33, 34, 35). It has recently been found that B6dom1 is encoded by the H7 MiHA locus originally discovered by Snell 35 years ago (36, 37). Thus, by injecting B10 APCs into H7b congeneic recipients, we could evaluate the impact of the immunodominant B6dom1 epitope (encoded by the H7a allele) on APC clearance. In this strain combination, APC frequency decreased below 10 cells/million by day 8 (Fig. 2GoE). Similar results with regard to the kinetics of APC clearance were observed in the B6->C3H.SW strain combination (Fig. 2GoD) as well as in the reciprocal combination C3H.SW->B6 (data not shown), in which APCs present multiple incompatible MiHAs. These observations demonstrate that presentation of immunodominant epitopes such as B6dom1 (H7a), either alone (B10->B10.C-H7b) or together with other Ags (B6->C3H.SW), leads to a rapid clearance of APCs. Considering that bm1 mutants probably elicit more vigorous CD8+ T cell responses than most conventional microbial epitopes, the clearance of B6dom1-incompatible APCs may be more representative of what can be expected with conventional Ags under real life conditions.

Clearance of APCs is mediated partly, but not solely, by the perforin pathway

In an effort to gain some insight into the mechanisms responsible for the clearance of APCs, we studied the fate of APCs in strain combinations in which the perforin- or Fas-dependent cytotoxic pathway was defective (Fig. 3Go). Taking into account the finding that clearance of APCs was regulated essentially by MHC class I-restricted effectors (Fig. 2Go), we followed the fate of bm1 APCs after injection into perforin- or FasL-deficient B6 recipients. Whereas bm1 APCs dropped below the threshold of 10 cells/million by day 2 following injection into normal (Fig. 2GoF) or FasL-deficient hosts (Fig. 3GoA), they persisted for 4–14 days when injected into perforin-deficient hosts (Fig. 3GoB). These observations provide evidence for a role of perforin, but not Fas, in the clearance of APCs. It is notable, however, that the APC clearance rate was substantially more variable (4–14 days) in perforin-deficient recipients than in other hosts. This suggests that although they may be less effective, perforin-independent pathways can contribute to the clearance of APCs.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Clearance of APCs in FasL- and perforin-deficient hosts. PCR-positive dilutions of male cells found in the lymph nodes of female recipients following injection of bm1 APCs into gld (FasL-deficient; A) or PKO (perforin-deficient; B) recipients. Each bar represents one mouse.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Three conclusions can be drawn from this study. First, APCs presenting some, but not all, nonself epitopes can be killed rapidly after entrance into the lymph nodes of normal mice with a normal naive (preimmune) T cell repertoire. Second, elimination of APCs requires MHC class I-restricted interactions with T cells and is observed when APCs present an immunodominant (B6dom1/H7a), but not a nondominant (HY), epitope. Finally, clearance of APCs is mediated partly, but not exclusively, by the perforin pathway. Naturally, as our studies were limited to the first 3 wk following APC injection, we cannot discard the possibility that class II and/or nondominant epitopes could have more subtle effects on APC clearance detectable only at later time points. Furthermore, as this work was based on evaluation of peritoneal APCs, i.e., essentially a mixture of monocytes/macrophages and B lymphocytes, it will be worthwhile in future studies to evaluate whether purified preparations of macrophages, B cells, and DCs share the same behavior.

Our conclusions regarding the differential effects of class I- vs class II-restricted interactions are based on the study of bm1 and bm12 mutants. Studies regarding in vitro and in vivo T cell proliferation as well as induction of graft-vs-host disease and skin graft rejection have shown that responses of B6 T cells to bm1 and bm12 Ags have similar kinetics (time of onset and expansion rate) and intensity (29, 38, 39); responses against bm1 are neither more rapid nor more vigorous. Thus, the rapid clearance of bm1, but not bm12, APCs reported herein (Fig. 2Go) cannot be ascribed to a superior immunogenicity of bm1 relative to bm12. Rather, under the conditions we employed, this finding provides strong evidence that interactions with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells have qualitatively different consequences for the APC, and that only class I-restricted interactions are lethal for the APC. Therefore, it appears logical to infer that one important function of class I-restricted CTLs may be to control the duration of Ag presentation. Furthermore, selective killing of APCs by CD8+ T cells could explain previous documentation that, at least in vitro, expansion of anti-bm1 CD8+ T cells is of shorter duration than that of anti-bm12 CD4+ T cells (29).

The delayed clearance of APCs in perforin-deficient hosts indicates that the perforin pathway is one, but not the sole, pathway that regulates the fate of APCs. The influence of perforin is consistent with observations showing that under most circumstances, MHC class I-restricted CTLs lyse target cells preferentially via the perforin pathway (40, 41). However, the results presented in Fig. 3Go also indicate that APC demise can be induced by perforin-independent mechanisms, and that Fas has a minor influence, if any, on the fate of APCs. It has been shown that effector CTLs harbor potent killing mechanisms in addition to those provided by the Fas and perforin/granzyme B pathways (42). These alternative pathways involve members of the TNF family, ATP, IFN-{gamma}, as well as some undefined signal elicited by TCR binding of the {alpha}2 domain of MHC class I molecules on the target cell (43, 44, 45, 46, 47). A plausible rationale for this redundancy of lethal mechanisms is to deal with the array of antiapoptotic molecules elaborated by intracellular pathogens to extend the life of infected cells (48). Clearly, further studies will be required to decipher the mechanisms responsible for the perforin-independent clearance of APCs shortly after productive interactions with CTL precursors. It is noteworthy that the persistence of APCs in PKO recipients (4–14 days; see Fig. 3GoB) was substantially more variable than that in other mice. This suggests that the efficiency of the other mechanisms may be less predictable than that of the perforin pathway.

The differential influence of dominant vs nondominant epitopes on APC survival impinges on our understanding of the mechanisms of immunodominance. MHC class I-restricted immunodominant epitopes differ from nondominant epitopes in two ways (49). First, when both types of Ag are presented separately, dominant epitopes evoke more powerful T cell responses (34, 50, 51, 52). Second, when dominant and nondominant epitopes are presented together, recognition of the dominant epitopes suppresses responses to nondominant epitopes, and thereby restricts the diversity of the repertoire of CTL responses (33, 53). This inhibitory effect of dominant epitopes on recognition of nondominant epitopes has been referred to as the immunodominance effect or immunodomination and is a central feature of all CTL responses that follow confrontation with numerous epitopes (54, 55). Interestingly, immunodomination is observed only when both the dominant and nondominant epitopes are presented at the same time on the same APC (33, 49). Suppression of CTL responses to nondominant epitopes does not take place when the dominant and nondominant epitopes are presented at different time points or if they are presented concomitantly but on separate APCs. The present demonstration that APC survival is curtailed following presentation of an immunodominant (B6dom1), but not a nondominant (HY), class I-restricted epitope could provide a plausible basis for immunodomination. Accordingly, we propose that by killing APCs, CTLs specific for immunodominant determinants reduce the duration of Ag presentation and consequently impede the generation of CTL responses toward nondominant Ags. It is notable that, like APC killing, immunodomination seems to be primarily a characteristic of CD8+ as opposed to CD4+ T cell responses (49, 56).

Conceptually, it is tempting to speculate that killing of APCs by CTLs specific for immunodominant epitopes may represent a sensible way to regulate T cell responses. 1) It would terminate Ag presentation only when CTLs specific for the best (immunodominant) epitopes have been primed (49). 2) In the case of infection with many intracellular micro-organisms, killing of monocyte-macrophage APCs would lead to elimination of an important reservoir of pathogens. 3) Limiting the duration of Ag presentation may reduce the risk of T cell exhaustion, and thus of tolerance. 4) Restricting the diversity of the T cell repertoire could lessen the risk of collateral autoimmune damage by cross-reactive CTLs (54, 57). Finally, it makes good sense that in a system where regulation of immune responses involves killing APCs, Ag presentation be conducted primarily by disposable cells with a rapid renewal rate, such as professional hemopoietic APCs.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. P. Eden and D. C. Roopenian for their thoughtful review of the manuscript. We are indebted to Ms. Nathalie Beaudoin and the animal caretakers of the Guy-Bernier Research Center for their invaluable help during the course of these studies.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (Grant 8079). D.C.R. is a scholar of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Claude Perreault, Guy-Bernier Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415 de l’Assomption Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1T 2 M4. E-mail address: Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: B6, C57BL/6J; B10, C57BL/10J; B10.H7b, B10.C-H7b(47N)/Sn; bm1, B6.C-H2bm1/By; bm12, B6.C-H2bm12/KhEg; B6lpr, B6.MRL-Faslpr; C3Hlpr, C3H.MRL-Faslpr; gld, B6Smn.C3H-Faslgld; PKO, C57BL/6-Pfptm1Arp; FasL, Fas ligand. Back

Received for publication June 11, 1999. Accepted for publication October 5, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Banchereau, J., R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392:245.[Medline]
  2. Gordon, S.. 1999. Macrophages and the immune response. ed. Fundamental Immunology 4th Ed.533. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
  3. Constant, S. L.. 1999. B lymphocytes as antigen-presenting cells for CD4+ T cell priming in vivo. J. Immunol. 162:5695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Zinkernagel, R. M., S. Ehl, P. Aichele, S. Oehen, T. Kundig, H. Hengartner. 1997. Antigen localisation regulates immune responses in a dose- and time-dependent fashion: a geographical view of immune reactivity. Immunol. Rev. 156:199.[Medline]
  5. Iezzi, G., K. Karjalainen, A. Lanzavecchia. 1998. The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. Immunity 8:89.[Medline]
  6. Ehl, S., P. Klenerman, P. Aichele, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1997. A functional and kinetic comparison of antiviral effector and memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte populations in vivo and in vitro. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:3404.[Medline]
  7. Flynn, K. J., G. T. Belz, J. D. Altman, R. Ahmed, D. L. Woodland, P. C. Doherty. 1998. Virus-specific CD8+ T cells in primary and secondary influenza pneumonia. Immunity 8:683.[Medline]
  8. Stenger, S., R. J. Mazzaccaro, K. Uyemura, S. Cho, P. F. Barnes, J. P. Rosat, A. Sette, M. B. Brenner, S. A. Porcelli, B. R. Bloom, et al 1997. Differential effects of cytolytic T cell subsets on intracellular infection. Science 276:1684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Oddo, M., T. Renno, A. Attinger, T. Bakker, H. R. MacDonald, P. R. A. Meylan. 1998. Fas ligand-induced apoptosis of infected human macrophages reduces the viability of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 160:5448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moskophidis, D., E. Laine, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1993. Peripheral clonal deletion of antiviral memory CD8+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:3306.[Medline]
  11. Rocha, B., A. Grandien, A. A. Freitas. 1995. Anergy and exhaustion are independent mechanisms of peripheral T cell tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 181:993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sad, S., D. Kagi, T. R. Mosmann. 1996. Perforin and Fas killing by CD8+ T cells limits their cytokine synthesis and proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 184:1543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ashany, D., X. Song, E. Lacy, J. Nikolic-Zugic, S. M. Friedman, K. B. Elkon. 1995. Th1 CD4+ lymphocytes delete activated macrophages through the Fas/APO-1 antigen pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Matsue, H., D. Edelbaum, A. C. Hartmann, A. Morita, P. R. Bergstresser, H. Yagita, K. Okumura, A. Takashima. 1999. Dendritic cells undergo rapid apoptosis in vitro during antigen-specific interaction with CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 162:5287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ingulli, E., A. Mondino, A. Khoruts, M. K. Jenkins. 1997. In vivo detection of dendritic cell antigen presentation to CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:2133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Tanchot, C., F. A. Lemonnier, B. Perarnau, A. A. Freitas, B. Rocha. 1997. Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naive or memory T cells. Science 276:2057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fortier, A. H., L. A. Falk. 1994. Isolation of murine macrophages. ed. Current Protocols in Immunology 1411. Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  18. Wahl, L. M., P. D. Smith. 1995. Isolation of monocyte/macrophage populations. ed. Current Protocols in Immunology 761. Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York.
  19. Kay, G. F., A. Ashworth, G. D. Penny, M. Dunlop, S. Swift, N. Brockdorff, S. Rastan. 1991. A candidate spermatogenesis gene on the mouse Y chromosome is homologous to ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1. Nature 354:486.[Medline]
  20. Mitchell, M. J., D. R. Woods, P. K. Tucker, J. S. Opp, C. E. Bishop. 1991. Homology of a candidate spermatogenic gene from the mouse Y chromosome to the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1. Nature 354:483.[Medline]
  21. Hétu, F., F. Coutlee, D. C. Roy. 1994. A non-isotopic nested polymerase chain reaction method to quantitate minimal residual disease in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Mol. Cell Probes 8:449.[Medline]
  22. Kwok, S., R. Higuchi. 1989. Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 339:237.[Medline]
  23. Léonard, B. M., F. Hétu, L. Busque, M. Gyger, R. Bélanger, C. Perreault, D. C. Roy. 1998. Lymphoma cell burden in progenitor cell grafts measured by competitive polymerase chain reaction: less than one log difference between bone marrow and peripheral blood sources. Blood 91:331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Usherwood, E. J., T. L. Hogg, D. L. Woodland. 1999. Enumeration of antigen-presenting cells in mice infected with Sendai virus. J. Immunol. 162:3350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. van Vugt, E., M. A. Verdaasdonk, R. H. Beelen, E. W. Kamperdijk. 1992. Induction of an increased number of dendritic cells in the peritoneal cavity of rats by intraperitoneal administration of bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Immunobiology 186:230.[Medline]
  26. Correa, S. G., C. M. Riera, P. Iribarren. 1997. Involvement of peritoneal dendritic cells in the induction of autoimmune prostatitis. J. Autoimmun. 10:107.[Medline]
  27. Simpson, E.. 1982. The role of H-Y as a minor transplantation antigen. Immunol. Today 3:97.
  28. Hansen, T. H., D. G. Spinella, D. R. Lee, D. C. Shreffler. 1984. The immunogenetics of the mouse major histocompatibility gene complex. Annu. Rev. Genet. 18:99.[Medline]
  29. Sprent, J., M. Schaefer, D. Lo, R. Korngold. 1986. Functions of purified L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ cells in vitro and in vivo. Immunol. Rev. 91:195.[Medline]
  30. Wise, M., D. Zelenika, F. Bemelman, D. Latinne, H. Bazin, S. Cobbold, H. Waldmann. 1999. CD4 T cells can reject major histocompatibility complex class I-incompatible skin grafts. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:156.[Medline]
  31. Levitsky, V., Q. J. Zhang, J. Levitskaya, M. G. Masucci. 1996. The life span of major histocompatibility complex-peptide complexes influences the efficiency of presentation and immunogenicity of two class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes in the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 4. J. Exp. Med. 183:915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wang, W., P. H. Gulden, R. A. Pierce, J. A. Shabanowitz, S. T. Man, D. F. Hunt, V. H. Engelhard. 1997. A naturally processed peptide presented by HLA-A*0201 is expressed at low abundance and recognized by an alloreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T cell with apparent high affinity. J. Immunol. 158:5797.[Abstract]
  33. Pion, S., P. Fontaine, M. Desaulniers, J. Jutras, J. G. Filep, C. Perreault. 1997. On the mechanisms of immunodominance in cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to minor histocompatibility antigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:421.[Medline]
  34. Pion, S., G. J. Christianson, P. Fontaine, D. C. Roopenian, C. Perreault. 1999. Shaping the repertoire of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses: explanation for the immunodominance effect whereby cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for immunodominant antigens prevent recognition of nondominant antigens. Blood 93:952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Perreault, C., J. Jutras, D. C. Roy, J. G. Filep, S. Brochu. 1996. Identification of an immunodominant mouse minor histocompatibility antigen (MiHA): T cell response to a single dominant MiHA causes graft-versus-host disease. J. Clin. Invest. 98:622.[Medline]
  36. Snell, G. D., H. P. Bunker. 1965. Histocompatibility genes of the mouse. V. Five new histocompatibility loci identified by congenic resistant lines on a C57BL/10 background. Transplantation 3:235.
  37. Eden, P. A., G. J. Christianson, P. Fontaine, P. J. Wettstein, C. Perreault, D. C. Roopenian. 1999. Biochemical and immunogenetic analysis of an immunodominant peptide (B6dom1) encoded by the classical H7 minor histocompatibility locus. J. Immunol. 162:4502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sprent, J., M. Schaefer, D. Lo, R. Korngold. 1986. Properties of purified T cell subsets. II. In vivo responses to class I vs. class II H-2 differences. J. Exp. Med. 163:998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Selvaggi, G., C. Ricordi, E. R. Podack, L. Inverardi. 1996. The role of the perforin and Fas pathways of cytotoxicity in skin graft rejection. Transplantation 62:1912.[Medline]
  40. Kagi, D., B. Ledermann, K. Burki, P. Seiler, B. Odermatt, K. J. Olsen, E. R. Podack, R. M. Zinkernagel, H. Hengartner. 1994. Cytotoxicity mediated by T cells and natural killer cells is greatly impaired in perforin-deficient mice. Nature 369:31.[Medline]
  41. Bachmann, M. F., T. Ohteki, K. McKall-Faienza, A. Zakarian, D. Kagi, D. E. Speiser, P. S. Ohashi. 1997. Altered peptide ligands trigger perforin- rather than Fas-dependent cell lysis. J. Immunol. 159:4165.[Abstract]
  42. Sutton, V. R., D. L. Vaux, J. A. Trapani. 1997. Bcl-2 prevents apoptosis induced by perforin and granzyme B, but not that mediated by whole cytotoxic lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 158:5783.[Abstract]
  43. Armitage, R. J.. 1994. Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily members and their ligands. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6:407.[Medline]
  44. Blanchard, D. K., S. Wei, C. Duan, F. Pericle, J. I. Diaz, J. Y. Djeu. 1995. Role of extracellular adenosine triphosphate in the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated lysis of antigen presenting cells. Blood 85:3173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ando, K., K. Hiroishi, T. Kaneko, T. Moriyama, Y. Muto, N. Kayagaki, H. Yagita, K. Okumura, M. Imawari. 1997. Perforin, Fas/Fas ligand, and TNF-{alpha} pathways as specific and bystander killing mechanisms of hepatitis C virus-specific human CTL. J. Immunol. 158:5283.[Abstract]
  46. Nakamoto, Y., L. G. Guidotti, V. Pasquetto, R. D. Schreiber, F. V. Chisari. 1997. Differential target cell sensitivity to CTL-activated death pathways in hepatitis B virus transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 158:5692.[Abstract]
  47. Pettersen, R. D., G. Gaudernack, M. K. Olafsen, S. O. Lie, K. Hestdal. 1998. The TCR-binding region of the HLA class I {alpha}2 domain signals rapid Fas-independent cell death: a direct pathway for T cell-mediated killing of target cells?. J. Immunol. 160:4343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Edwards, K. M., J. E. Davis, K. A. Browne, V. R. Sutton, J. A. Trapani. 1999. Anti-viral strategies of cytotoxic T lymphocytes are manifested through a variety of granule-bound pathways of apoptosis induction. Immunol. Cell Biol. 77:76.[Medline]
  49. Perreault, C., D. C. Roy, C. Fortin. 1998. Immunodominant minor histocompatibility antigens: the major ones. Immunol. Today 19:69.[Medline]
  50. Pion, S., P. Fontaine, C. Baron, M. Gyger, C. Perreault. 1995. Immunodominant minor histocompatibility antigens expressed by mouse leukemic cells can serve as effective targets for T cell immunotherapy. J. Clin. Invest. 95:1561.
  51. Oukka, M., J. C. Manuguerra, N. Livaditis, S. Tourdot, N. Riche, I. Vergnon, P. Cordopatis, K. Kosmatopoulos. 1996. Protection against lethal viral infection by vaccination with nonimmunodominant peptides. J. Immunol. 157:3039.[Abstract]
  52. Pewe, L., G. F. Wu, E. M. Barnett, R. F. Castro, S. Perlman. 1996. Cytotoxic T cell-resistant variants are selected in a virus-induced demyelinating disease. Immunity. 5:253.[Medline]
  53. Wolpert, E. Z., P. Grufman, J. K. Sandberg, A. Tegnesjö, K. Kärre. 1998. Immunodominance in the CTL response against minor histocompatibility antigens: interference between responding T cells, rather than with presentation of epitopes. J. Immunol. 161:4499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Deng, Y., J. W. Yewdell, L. C. Eisenlohr, J. R. Bennink. 1997. MHC affinity, peptide liberation, T cell repertoire, and immunodominance all contribute to the paucity of MHC class I-restricted peptides recognized by antiviral CTL. J. Immunol. 158:1507.[Abstract]
  55. Yewdell, J. W., J. R. Bennink. 1999. Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:51.[Medline]
  56. Wettstein, P. J.. 1995. Murine minor histocompatibility antigens detected by helper T cells: recognition of an endogenous peptide. J. Immunol. 154:2134.[Abstract]
  57. Mason, D.. 1998. A very high level of crossreactivity is an essential feature of the T-cell receptor. Immunol. Today 19:395.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Matsunaga, D. Fukuma, S. Hirata, S. Fukushima, M. Haruta, T. Ikeda, I. Negishi, Y. Nishimura, and S. Senju
Activation of Antigen-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes by {beta}2-Microglobulin or TAP1 Gene Disruption and the Introduction of Recipient-Matched MHC Class I Gene in Allogeneic Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6635 - 6643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Luketic, J. Delanghe, P. T. Sobol, P. Yang, E. Frotten, K. L. Mossman, J. Gauldie, J. Bramson, and Y. Wan
Antigen Presentation by Exosomes Released from Peptide-Pulsed Dendritic Cells Is not Suppressed by the Presence of Active CTL
J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5024 - 5032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Baron, M.-C. Meunier, E. Caron, C. Cote, M. J. Cameron, D. J. Kelvin, R. LeBlanc, V. Rineau, and C. Perreault
Asynchronous Differentiation of CD8 T Cells That Recognize Dominant and Cryptic Antigens
J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8466 - 8475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Laffont, J. D. Coudert, L. Garidou, L. Delpy, A. Wiedemann, C. Demur, C. Coureau, and J.-C. Guery
CD8+ T-cell-mediated killing of donor dendritic cells prevents alloreactive T helper type-2 responses in vivo
Blood, October 1, 2006; 108(7): 2257 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. N. Mueller, C. M. Jones, A. T. Stock, M. Suter, W. R. Heath, and F. R. Carbone
CD4+ T Cells Can Protect APC from CTL-Mediated Elimination.
J. Immunol., June 15, 2006; 176(12): 7379 - 7384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Mayerova, L. Wang, L. S. Bursch, and K. A. Hogquist
Conditioning of langerhans cells induced by a primary CD8 T cell response to self-antigen in vivo.
J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 4658 - 4665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Yang, S. P. Huck, R. S. McHugh, I. F. Hermans, and F. Ronchese
Perforin-dependent elimination of dendritic cells regulates the expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo
PNAS, January 3, 2006; 103(1): 147 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. H. Newberg, K. J. McEvers, D. A. Gorgone, M. A. Lifton, S. H. C. Baumeister, R. S. Veazey, J. E. Schmitz, and N. L. Letvin
Immunodomination in the Evolution of Dominant Epitope-Specific CD8+ T Lymphocyte Responses in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Monkeys
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 319 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Yamaoka, B. Min, Y.-J. Zhou, W. E. Paul, and J. J. O'Shea
Jak3 negatively regulates dendritic-cell cytokine production and survival
Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 3227 - 3233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
R. Obst, H.-M. van Santen, D. Mathis, and C. Benoist
Antigen persistence is required throughout the expansion phase of a CD4+ T cell response
J. Exp. Med., May 16, 2005; 201(10): 1555 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
D. M. Jelley-Gibbs, J. P. Dibble, S. Filipson, L. Haynes, R. A. Kemp, and S. L. Swain
Repeated stimulation of CD4 effector T cells can limit their protective function
J. Exp. Med., April 4, 2005; 201(7): 1101 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. V. Gorbachev and R. L. Fairchild
CD4+ T Cells Regulate CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Cutaneous Immune Responses by Restricting Effector T Cell Development through a Fas Ligand-Dependent Mechanism
J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2286 - 2295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. E. Hirst, M. S. Buzza, C. H. Bird, H. S. Warren, P. U. Cameron, M. Zhang, P. G. Ashton-Rickardt, and P. I. Bird
The Intracellular Granzyme B Inhibitor, Proteinase Inhibitor 9, Is Up-Regulated During Accessory Cell Maturation and Effector Cell Degranulation, and Its Overexpression Enhances CTL Potency
J. Immunol., January 15, 2003; 170(2): 805 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. Chen, J. R. Bennink, P. A. Morton, and J. W. Yewdell
Mice Deficient in Perforin, CD4+ T Cells, or CD28-Mediated Signaling Maintain the Typical Immunodominance Hierarchies of CD8+ T-Cell Responses to Influenza Virus
J. Virol., September 11, 2002; 76(20): 10332 - 10337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. C. Probst, T. Dumrese, and M. F. van den Broek
Cutting Edge: Competition for APC by CTLs of Different Specificities Is Not Functionally Important During Induction of Antiviral Responses
J. Immunol., June 1, 2002; 168(11): 5387 - 5391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. P. Medema, D. H. Schuurhuis, D. Rea, J. van Tongeren, J. de Jong, S. A. Bres, S. Laban, R. E.M. Toes, M. Toebes, T. N.M. Schumacher, et al.
Expression of the Serpin Serine Protease Inhibitor 6 Protects Dendritic Cells from Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-induced Apoptosis: Differential Modulation by T Helper Type 1 and Type 2 Cells
J. Exp. Med., September 4, 2001; 194(5): 657 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
F. Ronchese and I. F. Hermans
Killing of Dendritic Cells: A Life Cut Short or a Purposeful Death?
J. Exp. Med., September 4, 2001; 194(5): F23 - F26.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Y. Choi, Y. Yoshimura, G. J. Christianson, T. J. Sproule, S. Malarkannan, N. Shastri, S. Joyce, and D. C. Roopenian
Quantitative Analysis of the Immune Response to Mouse Non-MHC Transplantation Antigens In Vivo: The H60 Histocompatibility Antigen Dominates Over All Others
J. Immunol., April 1, 2001; 166(7): 4370 - 4379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loyer, V.
Right arrow Articles by Perreault, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loyer, V.
Right arrow Articles by Perreault, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS